430018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

C
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 43 18
.[3 Permitted [] Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 3-30-21100
10 Not O erational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ln3.1:99_........
Farm Name: Cools..F.airm....................... County. alatilctt..................................... ......... JFRQ ............
Owner Name:JQW10t ................................... 1 AY4...........-............................................... Phone No: C 9
...........................................................
Facility Contact: lPxner........................................................... ...... Title: ......................................... ........ .............. Phone No:
Mailing Address: PQ.flP.x..48.l................................... ..... ...... Finc.Lcyd.M.
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator: .............. .....-:...........
Location of Farm:
........ 2756.11 ..............
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse '~
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Canacitv Panulation Poultry - ,= Ca acity Population Cattle -Caiiai-itv Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder 250 0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity F 250
Total SSLW 130,500
Nutmber of Lagoons 1 _ Holding Ponds / Solid Traps. -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharLe is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
-
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scoff Faucloth'r;.; Trent Allen M }ro4' _. x r
��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

FacilitXNumber 43— 18 Lagoon Number Q j.,,..,,,. Lagoon Identifier isna.Q.wto.,isag.44r�..Q1......____ _
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 35 25 23
5-1
Waste Last Added 1.-. j,- ............................. Longitude 78 40 57
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): .J Q .......................
Embankment Height (feet): ........................
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: 033016a----]
Distance to Stream: 0 X250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 X1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O• Yes O No
Intervening Stream? O Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): (0<5 05-10 O>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes 0• No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes ONO Adequate Marker O Yes ONO
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 3-30-2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O• Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 6
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O• No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
•0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes
unavailable
comments
O NO Unknown fail to make contact O Yes OO No
• with representative
1 -VI

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless- of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. if you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Harnett County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File
)r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Dwight Mayo
PO Box 481
Pine Level NC 27568
4 0IT •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT" OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCF-5
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Coats Farm
Facility Number 43-18
Harnett County
Dear Dwight Mayo;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 1.1 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive Iagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Catalina 28301 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

U Division of Soil and Water Conservation Q Other Agency
MDivision of Water Quality
* Routine O Complaint O Follow-uttcif DAVO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
L s-�{
Facility Number Date of inspection
Time of Inspection ©p 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�( Registered (3 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Coun! ,lI
y..................lin- ..............................
Farm Name:.................`-'�:5........... ......... 3, ......................................................
j-� �.�-
Ow=ner Name: .......................c!!.. ...... ¢ ................ Phone Na:...............�..................................
Facility
Facility Contact: .............. LW.1b. ......
A ........ ! !'14. O........ Title: ..........................
�J J GG
Mailing Address: ...............'.. I........... }.... y........._P. t7:xa�
Onsite Representative:.... --.,t-,. 11 ' (.rza
Certified Operator; ............ ................
Location of Farm:.
.................................... Phone No: ...................................................
.......eine....... � �.�....... A)c.....................�?���...
Integrator: ........................ -
Operator Certification Number, ................................... ....
Latitude 00 & " Longitude 0. 0' r��49
w
M, tgq uerent
- Design �" urrent esegn „ arrant b�
Somme;: Capacity° Population', + Potilfrj+' .. Capacity vooulation Cattle Capacffy,WPapulation '
�•
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
" El Non -Layer EE3.'1,1[_1Non-Dairy1
❑ Farrow to Wean
x a zstr'"R"
Farrow to Feeder 01WC>
❑c:pastaa
Other K k
❑Farrow to Finish
-Total Design--Capaciy .57
❑ Gilts
G ❑Soars
M,
- T0taL5SIW aM
N''umber of Lagoonsl�Holdtag Ponds `
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ LagoonArea 10 Spray Field Are a
.:
S�
. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System k
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Dd No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes X No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? NIA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ;K No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Cl Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes KNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

•
Facility Number: ftg—&
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? El Yes P(No
Structures (Lagoons,flolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Yes 19 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
ia. Lir 6an ii-eed -� be n+ ,O 5~ Kjj an
Oli4cls�- -5,4rfacr vxdev- dj',rcrsj',,,j d,,liee)s
Freeboard (ft): ............ale
. a ... ......... .................................... ................. ............ ...........................................................
6e sfoazi 4,v� im
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
Im No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
XYes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
A No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .................. &ezli, . . . ........ .......... ....... .....................................
........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
C3 Yes
[I No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Wf No
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
XYes
E]No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0 Yes
XNo
22. Does record ke-eping need improvement?
ZYes
0 No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Of Yes
0 No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
[I No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit')
C1 Yes
0 No
No viola'tionsor'de'fl'cie'nc'ie's were noted during this.'viiit. Yo'u.w'ill re'cei've no ftirther'
0 -this visit., ......
coerespi iiden�6 abort
Cominents question, I 2in any !IS an=swers and/or any re'co'nJimendaizons or anyother .om�nents
p 'A .......... .... W',
te pl! situations.- (us� addition=al pages 4s.n essarv)-,
Use'drawnlgs�,qif falcilit'Y'4o:6�t ai� L
ia. Lir 6an ii-eed -� be n+ ,O 5~ Kjj an
Oli4cls�- -5,4rfacr vxdev- dj',rcrsj',,,j d,,liee)s
6e sfoazi 4,v� im
q5pon j ty not iuir an
a) tv- 6 Avd- ovvd -TAR - 9
L;W
-40 Pie+t Oco, ci Awn ie4i 447
Reviewer/Inspector Name *,LW
ReviewerA nspector Signature: & � � 1 n Date:
// // 1-11

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
e0�
1DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 30, 19.97
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Coats Farm
Harnett County
Dear Mr. Mayo:
On 4/27/97 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted a compliance inspection of your
swine facility. Please find enclosed a copy of the Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part
.0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly
performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to
contact me at [phone].
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville y_ FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N%q
f C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number t g Date of Inspection
Time of Inspecdou n I Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: --i --- - Total Tirane (in hours} Spent onRevlew . o
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: L:c :s &CAM- - - County: - LiaSpelL
Owner Name: { J t 11- _ Phone No: _ .f g 0.ti 2 (E - 22 9r _
Mailing Address: V o . & k- . `-i a L- — - -- P:,.4 Lev d , J c_ 2 7 Ste.
Onsite Representative: I�w ,
.r
Certified Operator: wi PA uk.Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
Latitude " Longitude ' 44
rU Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
s .. F _a�s�sYx�Pa 2� 'rz;h§ ��u A a h r ''?'rs«s , r s� �u"Y�ik a' `• r.s�'A s
oultry
Wean to Feeder z qs Q r<
Feeder to Finish° N 10Hai i
Farrow to Weana ;
Farrow to Eeede
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Lvestock
a kr'�.:sz`;n:s-'YYk` 'p" �Y- '3";;S?:x;•::�'"a�':.�::g Y''^`' E""•x'
R=N
- xu�'�_ - yn' x ? +,,.» a r �;. -- v. . +: �'=-2; .,it ^ : � y ,.�"�3- .�.e.•Rt.
Niiinber.
'x' r of ViLs!; azm .rSubsurface Drains Present
',
. ;:• 'T3. xsara
'r�"��..'.' QQ� A ,4 Spray Field
I. Are tbere any buffers that need maintenancerunprovemtit? Q Yes GJo
2 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yam, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mainteflance/mVmvement?
❑ Yes
)9 No
❑ Yes
Wo '
13 -Yes
JoNo
❑ Yes
BNo
13 Yes
69 No
© Yes
f3 No
13 Yes
b No
CondAmed on back

6. Is pity not is conipliimc a with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to hrn►e a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection aft M/M?
8. Are these lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly Closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Hokllat Ponds
9. Is strwftW fied=rd less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): • ..Lagoon 1 LagooD 2 lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or my other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structin" need .
(If any of gaesdons 9-12 was answered yes, and the dtattion poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify part and stop pumping levels?
waste Aoalication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
.((fin excess of WMP, orrunoff
fentering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Cop type �sw.wdD� - "'� " -j N 2a- ---
16.
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated is the Animal Waste Management Plea?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
En Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? .
21. Does the facility fad to comply with the Animal Waste Management Pian in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewerllaspeaw fail to discuss reviewhnspection with owner or operator in Charge?
Us�dra�vin
.. UL It ,'�s" s,t� b sA-t s(, LQjer- O rtj4lon s j s tu-,
W�rk�'.,,,b w� 4�-��,�t� G. N� �•• G�-�;�e� PIAK
— ►James `� � tis{ to -Zoos. l� ��� 1 le.vs� ,r�w.rk¢r
El Yes 12140
❑ Yes CF No
C1 Yes MO
O Yes ffN0
Lagoon 4
0 Yes Wo
13 Yes QtNo
13 Yes J&No
EMes 1] No
1] Yes EWo-
M(4 �
E3 Yes 18 No
❑ Yes J§ No
❑ Yes PNo
N/hriv OTC ON
tJIA-
%V rA �Eea$No
❑ Yes ado
❑ Yes ERNo
Revkwer/inspeetor Name
ReviwerAnspector Signature: ���- w Dins:Z'7 9
cc: Division of Opater Quality, Water QualitySecdog, F&dLgAssmsiment Unit 11/14/96

" ` [, Division of Soil and Water Conservation13 Other Agency
~� s
® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DIVO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
3
Time of Inspection l•' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�( Registered 13 Certified 13 Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: _
Farm Name: �^ County
• - - ..... ......3 .................! -......_.... _ ............. !Z.... ...........W ...... ........
Owner Name: ....... .............. i. - �' Phone No: �/✓�— �7....�......................._....._.
'�r,rt1T ...(`t i}C ......... Title: _.._ Phone No•Facility Contact:.............. L......... .... �................:...................._.__....__......._.......... ...... ......................... _..... _..
Mailing Address: ............. 1C.................. f.........?"..0.... .....!C . �M . fine ....... ......./. .0 ...............
J I /f
Onsite Representative: ......._bwtr�!._ ............ !..«............................_........... Integrator:.................... "�' �? • . ... - ..... .
Certified Operator;.............l.io.ic u.......... .... ,(...f..:.14(. LC)....................... ... Operator Certification Number;.................
Luwtinn of Farm:
Latitude • t 66 Longitude 0• ° 44
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present E] Lagoon Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Design Current
General
Design Current _ Design_-- Current
Swine
Capacity Population
PoultryCapacity
Population Cattle ?' ' "Capacity Population
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
❑ Wean to Feeder
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Layer
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notifv DWQ)
❑ Yes M No
JE1 Dairy
NIA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Feeder to Finish
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ iron -Layer
JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Q,5t
10 Other
4
❑Farrow to FinishTotal
Design Capacity '
csc;�
❑ Gilts
❑ soars
.: ,
„Total_ SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present E] Lagoon Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
10 Spray Field Area ;
n C kJ
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes J[ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes Dd No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notifv DWQ)
❑ Yes M No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
NIA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes P(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes &K No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes KNo
7/25197
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoon0folding Fonds, -Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes A No
Structure 5 Structure h
Identifier:
01
Freeboard(ft): . ........... ........................... .................................... ............. ....................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? X Yes ❑ No
❑ No.violations or deficiencies were noted daring this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ax r
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): xr
. n
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
+ be ,�rc� lM 1ICL , 5�
d Y il,
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
,- 1 .gym- r
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
$(Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
A No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ..................4.O .........
fi' S[ t t ....-.........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)"
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Z No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
X Yes
❑ No
21,
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative"
❑ Yes
OgNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
VfYes
IF ­
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities_ Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No.violations or deficiencies were noted daring this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ax r
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): xr
. n
ra 6 -As nc--to be lwt), nuz Strn�a
lr�� 5�r-5 a -C t '' �r Su rf c '�C?.r dirtrSt'en c[i�iln_
+ be ,�rc� lM 1ICL , 5�
d Y il,
l* acf< 7 *4 Rn curll e-
. >+ 6o - Pike
,- 1 .gym- r
3 /� r
Reviewer/Inspector lame
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
n

�Stat4 of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Governor p E H N F 1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 10, 1995
Mr. Dwight Mayo
Mayo Farms
P. O. 481
Pine Level, NC 27568
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Harnett County
Dear Sirs:
On August 9, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find
enclosed -a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your
information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility
is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal
Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. T. Jones
Chemist
DTJ/sc
Enclosure
CC: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

l,1
�kya
x 91 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
County
Dear : Mft, A4#1O
On , , an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
�T/
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Sincerely,
E 6mAr4w�WT-E-n�—i nee r
rU
CIt4 : sY

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. !}�'
DIVISION OF ENVIRON TMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: AU11 2,1995
Time: U; 07
Farm Name/Owner:_ .-Jt- 014tJ C-- "A'C5 _ J/ 9 r / 6 , -7P�
Mailing Address: P G + 13o -x �& L P_ ���E� SEL � 7
County: _ _ �� e 4— _ �-
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Ff#- e /} tl/' 0/r5 Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
R"T.rm
rt
Type of Operation: Swiney Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: So(FkK 11tc f �1e)
DE,N, 4 Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: „ Longitude: „
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 0 or No Actual Freeboard: _Ft. ° Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lag n(s)? Yes or G was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? 'e or No Is the cover crop adequate?0 or No
Crop(s) being utilized:Argly-UPA
Does the facility millet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? a or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a iJSGS Map Blue Line.) Yes 03N
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by mart -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes olo If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or® 4e-'4-
Additional Comments: 4_ha l 144116' M o� 44 -IFA, Do,'� S6AI /� -45
� NG - 6 u f lite 11 S f,4d. +
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
"Www