260070_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
F II N b• 260070 ITII S Active AW5460070 ❑ 1 A
ac ity um er.
ac Ity tatur
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
03/22/2017 Entry Time: 08:00 am
Farm Name:
242 Farm
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Parmlt. Den ed ccess
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Cumberland Region: Fayetteville
Exit Time: 8:30 am Incldent 0
Owner Emall:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5111 NC Hwy 242 N Garland NC 28441
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Form: Latitude: 34' 51' 07" Longitude: 78° 33' 01"
From intersection of NC 210 and NC 242, travel south on NC 242 1.0 miles to farm entrance on the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert T Young Operator Certification Number: 18461
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Tide Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Robert Marble
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Y
Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 03/22/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
FffSwine - Farrow to Wean 1,350 �a
Total Design Capacity: 1,350
Total SSLW: 584,550
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon #1
agoon 1 19.00 30.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 03/22/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
Elm
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Elm
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
11
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
[]
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
, ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

1
Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 03/22/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
260070
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
- Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑
❑
20. Does the -facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need .improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
'Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
3
page: 4

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 03/22/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
'23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
' ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32: Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
260070 Facility status:
Active Permit: AWS260070
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
Count • Cumberland Rea ion•
Fayetteville
y. _
Date of Visit: 09/2312015 Entry Time: 11:00 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm
Farm Name: 242 Farm
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Incident ft
Owner Email:
Phone:
910-296-1800
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5111 NC Hwy 242 N Garland NC 28441
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 51' 07" Longitude: 78° 33' 01"
From intersection of NC 210 and NC 242, travel south on NC 242 1.0 miles to farm entrance on the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert T Young Operator Certification Number: 18461
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspoctor Signature: Dete:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

e ^l
Permit: AWS260070
Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number:
260070
Inspection Date: 09/23/15
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
1,350
Total Design Capacity:
1,350
Total SSLW:
584,550
Waste Structures
Disignated
observed
Type
Identifier Closed Data Start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Lagoon #1
Lagoon 1 19.00 32.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 09/23/15. Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharnies & Stream Impacts
Yes No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
N ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
N ❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
N ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storaae & Treatment
Yes No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

S
Permit: AWS260070 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown Lt_C Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Nay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14• Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17• Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18• Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS260070 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

s N
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
260070 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Rea son for visit:
Routine
Dalo of visit:
08/19/2014 Entry Time: 10:30 am
Farm Name:
242 Farm
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Melling Address:
PO Box 487
Active Permit: AWS260070
❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Cumberland Region: Fayetteville
Exit Time: 11:30 am
Incident p
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5111 NC Hwy 242 N Garland NC 28441
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: ' Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 51' 07" Longitude: 78' 33' 01"
From intersection of NC 210 and NC 242, travel south on NC 242 1.0 miles to farm entrance on the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Teddy E Wade Operator Certification Number: 22588
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rep rosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Ammons Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector($):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 06/19/14 Inpseclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Wast2 Structures Observed
Dlsignaled
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon #t
Lagoon 1 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 08/19/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yoe No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
'❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storaae & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the 'structures observed (Le./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑0
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na N,g
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ C]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit AWS260070 Owner - Facility ; Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
260070
Inspection Date: 08/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Appllcatlon
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
Q
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
s ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
Nola_ No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS260070 Owner- Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
260070
Inspection Date: 08/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
-Yv-s_No_Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yea No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or +
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?'
❑
❑
Q
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

■ Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 260070 Facility Status: Active
Inppectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Date of Visit: 10/17/2013 Entry Time: 10:45 am Exit Time: 11::
Farm Name: 242 Farm
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address: 5111 NC Hwy 242 N Garland NC 28441
Facility Statue: 0 Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brawn LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 51' 07" Longitude: 78° 33' 01"
From intersection of NC 210 and NC 242, travel south on NC 242 1.0 miles to farm entrance on the left.
Permit: AWS260070
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Cumberland Region:
Im Incident #
Owner„EQail:
Phone:
Warsaw NC 28398
❑ Denied Access
Fayetteville
910-296-1800
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William Victor Sutton Operator Certification Number: 26076
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Ammons Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

1 �
r
Permit: AWS260070 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 10/17/13 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start pate Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon #1
Lagoon 1 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 260070
Inspection Date: 10/17/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im acts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if'yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
log
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
Q
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
MEI
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes Na Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0110
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

1
Permit: AWS260070 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number, 260070
Inspection Date: 10/17/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No N
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hey)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Aycock loam, 1 to 4%
slopes
Soil Type 2
Candor send, 1 to 8%
slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 []
[]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
ftcoma_gnd Documents i
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
[]
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
El
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS260070 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
260070
Inspection Date: 10/17/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No No No
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
a List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
� ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other R
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[]
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

• Division of Water Quality
11 Facility Number ®- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 5-2 Z Arrival Time: Z' Departure Time: t2_25 M County: 0&1_11�&*egion:
Farm Name 4Owner Email:
Owner Name: i,t.t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t k Mon Title:
Onsite Representative: t,f{
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
(jilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone: f�
Certification Number: A(_y__5 S 1>
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
ury rounry
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
I 'a y.41
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes /] Na [3 NA [3 NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
�NA
❑NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑NA
❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
VNo ❑NA ❑NE
[:]No Pg NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes P9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes TO
❑ NA [3 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA F]NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): t A - d .
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No [DNA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes M No [DNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? []Yes X" No ❑ NA F]NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

' Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: ?b 7--
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate.box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments.(refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other, comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary);
� s re - I-
S. 0 V ,4-- opt 2- r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 910 `t-f 3 3 - 3 34a
Date:
21412011

C.
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ®- ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 49 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ot72 _ Departure Time: County: i.Um L"Region:
Farm Name: HVd 2q2 F�Wrn Owner Email:
Owner Name: t.1/r r l i�+ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: i'Y I t ry 011S Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
T
Certified Operator: gd i.VQ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Ow+1Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I I E I I Layer
Non -La er
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream_ Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
DaLa Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
�NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
[] No
® NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No [P NA ❑ NE
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continuer!

e
Facill Number: IDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Ij
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No P9 NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types}: Q90S i^LN
13. Soil Type(s): 414 U 0A9
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 1P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 7p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP [—]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes `A No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes P No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E4 No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

1 '
Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 No
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes P No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes §j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments sa
Use dr
swings offacility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary),
St
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: %!4
Date: -1 j%ju
21412011

i✓
Type of Visit IF Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0�Otther ❑l D1e�nied Access
Date of Visit: 5- 7- 1a Arrival,rime: Departure Time: i1d County: C�
0115UITMl/Region:
A49—
Farm Name: lM Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: INK4_1 yl�mtokly_ Title: I Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �w �
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: aa�
Back-up Operator: Qdl Back-up Certification Number: / v
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0 I = Ii Longitude: ❑ ° 0 " =
Design
Swine Capacity
Current
Population
Design
Wet Poultry C+apacity
Current
Population
Design Current
l
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑Dai
Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑Dai
Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -La ers❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turke Pouets
❑ Other
❑Dai
❑
ElNon-Dai
❑
Heifer
arrow to Wean
D Cow
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Gilts
PCBoars
❑
Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
rNA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
RNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
I�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
!" No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Z+1A
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: f
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ 9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes $a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
`� ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift'' D ApApplicatio/n,�Outsid of Area
12. Crop type(s) aQ,y/Ii' 4t 6 644,71 r '5M • cLtit, DK "'id j ""ln+Q�.�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
�D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
pa No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any.other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Firk A b. Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: p
Page 2 of 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 2 t?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soi] Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
rwNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
41 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �'Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes]
No
El NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
r
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I bl Arrival Time: r� � Departure Time: �� County: �2egion:
Farm Name: .._rl °2T °firr FVm Owner Email:
OwnerName: �u"I.s'�1 ram` ['�'�s -_ . Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I Y , iR t?m Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: /
lau
Back-up Operator: C d,44
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: �O b
y6 ,
Latitude: 0 0 = Longitude: 0 ° 0 ` = "
\f
Tn@urrent,
Capapulatio
Design CSwine
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
El Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
El Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
Dry Poultry
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullet
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other.
❑ Turks e s
❑ Turke Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
- d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 'pNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
�NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1PNo
:1 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Q
Date of Inspection 2�
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structre I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes 1PNo
❑ Yes r❑ No
Structure 5
❑NA El NE
ANA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [2 Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1�lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) - in - g gat, f � t arn7 Y l ,LgR1_ —
13.
Soil type(s) 1"'fL t Cog
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
(� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
i .,�: ��.$� �k A.x�4E.�1:a1 � .�. P
Contments':(refer to questlun`#) Ezplam;any YES answersFaniilor uny r commendations or�any otherxq�cimm,ents 1 2f
'Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (tise�Addihonal pages as
a♦
7
Reviewer/Inspector Name T ;' ;; „t wl Phone:rl'l0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents jjj 111
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 16No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 63)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
%io
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q�NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
JqNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
tONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�MNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
ElNE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
eb No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
,,.pp��
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
bNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
b No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
J&N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

1
ivis€on of Water Quality J , S _>
Faciltty Nutrtber d7 Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation1.
M — O'.Other Agency
Type of Visit {Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for VisitVRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time: Departure Time: ® Count • .
' ndtgion: r— -O
�a r Owner Email:
Owner Name: Q2i }
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: I /, I t!1_.i+ YJ1, /l�'Jf_1
Certified Operator: '�`-�
Back-up Operator: !4— 1
Location of Farm:
rnO Phone:
Phone No: (O27
Integrator: 01 __16
Operator Certification Number: %2
Back-up Certification Number:
= c = ` Longitude: = ° = 1
Design Current Design,,: Current "
Swine: 'Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity ` Papulatian Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
El Wean to Feeder ❑Nan -La er
❑ Feeder to Finish
arrow to Wean / I Dry Poultry
>: ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
:} ILJ Boars_._. _._I._._ ._ _ I_.._..._ —J
;,.::Other
❑ Other
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Des€gn 0irre'ntY:
Catjacityi Population`
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Daia Calf
❑
Daia Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: Dj'
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ N E
El Yes
❑No
NNA
❑NE
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes Iallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

t Facility Number: --0"7 a Date of Inspection b
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
ElNE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
ElYes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes )D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window] ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) &M � & " o` I S—in G,- 015 f ✓)l1 6.ki
13. Soil type(s) 4t
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes CQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes )0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes P9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[--]Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
LAd, � r u-n1c) j Atg
Reviewer/Inspector Name (� ,S F 0 CA NTQAJ Phone: I iV ,J_:3 .2 XA'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: b
Page 2 of 3 121240 Condi d

1
`', Facility Number ��](] Date of Inspection (o
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �IKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2!r-NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
15 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
k�NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 l .
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
kjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
El NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

,. y 'Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other agency cQ ffi .:. 1 N,
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit woutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: a� _ Departure Time: Coun Region:
FkY
Farm Name: F;a-v- ram' Owner Email:
Owner Name: lA OLVYYI S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: rA � n.7 %S Title: �—M Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: + ��
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Nu er:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = S= Longitude: 0 ° = 4
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
^; ❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
��' ❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry, Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[I Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
CR)qA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
�r
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes
❑ No
t NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
&PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

FacilityfNumber L, —Cn
Date of Inspection i O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ;q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes PDNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes i�No El NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes )tNo [I NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ""�VVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind
{{Drift
s El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 0.4 f 1ll.f
13. Soil type(s)
�--r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes "M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes .99 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Q Phone—WOPhone-WOV23 3
Reviewer/inspector Signature: L&Aab=c Date: CJ
12/%261U4 Continued

Facility Number: — d~]O Date of Inspection F
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
IM No
XNA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
�'NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
W] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
t No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
V1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
,,
t� f� U. �� h GI Lo I t ca—EEA I 0 Z Tt uCVti"
b
'vQ 1ur,e_ Y tvr<a'
1 e�Ylo,� � r S �'lCSl�-k � � -ir. i�l W � `C � • rl 1 l�� V
S V r VCX>
+
T
12128104

Facility No. Time In Time Out
Faun Name Integrator
Owner Site Rep
Operator ��No.
Back-up No. 1
COC ircle: CGe7neral))or NPDES
Date
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean =Feed
Farrow —Feed
Wean — Finish
Farrow — Finish
Feed, Finish
Gilts 1 Boars
Farrow — Wean
Others
BOAR . esign n�
3ludge'Surve f Z
rop ield
Rain Gau�g%
Soil Testy m�
PLAT
Weekly Freeboard ✓ Daily Rainfall
Spray/Freeboard Drop u rLlot,
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Observed
CalibratianlGPM L,� 1
Waste Transfers r�
Rain Breaker ---
Wettable Acres
1-in Inspections L---
Date Nitrogen (N) Date Nitrogen (N)
°t Lp f
MIM., ..
�•�._ fie��L1�1 '

L '
Type of Visit
ompliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
outine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit-
,p Arrival Time: �ra'D Departure Time: , �� County: Region: � C�
Farm Name: ry ��'°j/ Owner Email:
Owner Name•�'+�2.'6. 5I�"Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: gD_ kjdD0 w Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _ integrator:
Certified Operator: n Q WL e S Operator Certification Number: 2,5 3
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude: = e =
Design Current Design
wourrent Design C►urrent
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle C►apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
JEI Layer I
I ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Daia Heifer
Farrow to Wean fl Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
El Stocker
❑ Gilts El Non-Layers
ElBeef Feeder
El
❑ Boars El Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Othe 10 Turkey Poults
❑ Other 10 Other I
L
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes CgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
0,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[?NNo
❑ Yes
[&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: " � —
Date of Inspection �to
Waste Collection & Treatment "{
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 361
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or t 0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) .?fir-/`rn ac�t� /S.s�.t ,Gr.ii•.�
13. Soil type(s) zju ,4 .�G
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 5&'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes rQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fait to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 5Q No
❑ Yes ,QNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: CR
Page 2 of 3 112128104 Continued

t"
Facility Number: -? Date of Inspection 4—
' Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes UdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? []Yes f [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 5q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
®,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
5& No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
C&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
5iLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional'Comments and/or. Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

io,
Type of Visit J&<o-mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Bate of Visit: Arrival Time: D O Departure Time: I 2.30--1 County: f /'+ Region: R�
Farm Name: 49 4,;2, Owner Email:
Owner Name:A��� :4y �X'0- 3 Phone:
/01
Mailing Address: Z 1:9 , a u^ 2 S !
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,T of enrt yOV J1 Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No: 6
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e =' = Longitude: 0 ° =' 0 "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
! PE01
LaerNon-Layet '
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullcts
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a di'seharge?
❑ Yes 12�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ISLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

e
Facility Number:,_;?(— Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
54 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _-P9
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�&No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
g No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
,�[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
,�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ,r y j - -1,
13. Soil type(s) t1 Z
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
JqNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
U(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReviewerlInspector Name Phone:"—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: &— 3-0 Sr
12128104 Continued

Facility Number-24, Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes W,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�9[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�guNo
ElNA
ElNE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VI No
yaj
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
f7 No
❑ NA
ElNE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
CK No
❑ NA
❑ NE
t -F - Y v -'idi� ,e,� y I# ,,��, - y ' + i �r ,.w'4. �+
Additlongl+,Commenfs andlo'r�Drawings "¢
12128104
12128104

Type of Visit T Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit �b Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number ► j� late or visit:
Permitted 10 Certified ©Conditionally Certified D Registered
Farm Name: am ] t—
Owner Name: i l.cfA�u "J 6 rAIM S
Mailing Address:
3 27 O- Time:
10 t O cr tin 1 0 BelowThr eshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:m�tr'►d( iC�O
Phone No: 910 Wak? ' 011 !
Facility Contact: e) 6r i� i c .p Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: *P164 Y � Integrator: %� ".rQ +
Certified Operator: __ OCLU= _— k(10 J (e_S _ Operator Certification Number: c2�620
Location of Farm:
NSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' �•J6 6 Longitude 0' Of K
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feede
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
ign '`Current _' Deslgf Current Design - Current
tci Population Poultry Capneltv Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I on -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity;.
i
Total SSLW
of Lagoons
klSglid Traps 0
Discharges _ Strearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Fieid ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection &r Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
El Yes
0No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes l No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 3 a'% c2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes dNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type nermu A (6 tc,"Et
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
['� No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes [� No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes � No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes %No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes W No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes tp No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
-- .:i n.: .S 4.;.i'k.. TL .P .a .aye4T� ,. +�.., 4,�.•., _
- �ffientil
Com(refer to questlUn #)xp�laln any.:YrESgswers And/orlany recornmendatlons;or any�otber comments
X"a $r.'`Yah :9S' tsi�j,{l�"dt`
lJ a gs of facillty to better eaplaln'situationS. (tree addltional pegus ag necessary) °; [] Field Cony ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name h %�u . errYl'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 70 bate of Inspection 2? n
Odor kwas
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes M No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [pt No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes M No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes P No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: a
AL
05103101

Facility lumber p Date of Visit: .f="�3 Time: L=
Not O er tional 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _ iya County: C14., ker��/oQ
Owner Name: w � cN�s �C' Phone No: 91O .?p9 —.2N
]Hailing Address:
Facility Contact: .J ohrr 13 i t iVt 'title:
Onsite Representative: bar 4-
Certified Operator: _ 4,r. _ _T o'e &AR
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: -2.2 -T-,P-P
19 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 0 " Longitude • 1 0 if
Design
Swine Capacity
Current
Pa ulatiol
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
S
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
D Subsurface Drair
❑ No Liquid Waste
Discharges 8 Stream Imnacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �3 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? #4
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
W_ aste �,ge p S TreatIllgUl
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
OM3101 Continued

Facility Number: �6 — 7d Date of Inspection I s= ^03
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [Vl No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes W No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) r�-,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ElYes M No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvemcnt?
❑ Yes
(] No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
[] No
Waste Auplicat€on
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes]
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload
El Yes
jig No
N
12. Crop type l��rM ucQ�.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Reguired Regords & 12ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes jK] No
t
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes (,�] No
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ] No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [g] No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
JIM No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to yuestioift#) Explain any YES answer"s,and/or any recommendations or any tfther;comments.
Ilse drawings of, facility, to bettei''cxplain sltuatlons(use-additional pagesas necc`ssary) ®Field Conv ❑ Final Notes
0,0Oof )D D kin?
Reviewer/Inspector Name i.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
M � I��co,e�P> G✓G `r jY1A � rt �4r ! ►7� sC .
Date:
05103101 l / / Continued

Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other [7 Denied Access
Date or visit: 4 'lime:
Facility Number
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted B Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ........... .r.�.. 2......///'t"¢!L................................................................... County:.......t..............................
Owner Name:.........k'`y`'�r.. Phone No: �1..�...es.. ................... .......................
'rs//...1.Title: Phone No:....................................................
Facility Contact: ....../
/ FI a �� i1 P
Mailing Address:... .................................... .rl'.......... f.........o �� �(..��,1 ...f.Y...�r .......r..zip ,....................................................
Onsite Representative:..... � ...,1Q..,�N".. .. Integrator: .............................
............... ...... ..... ..................................................................................................
Certified Operator:......,,.rJ,�lY, k ........�!c✓ . „. , Operator Certification Number:..........
.. ........................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 t. Longitude ' 1 44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Poultry on Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
[IR Farrow to Wean [}
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity,
❑ Gilts
❑Boars ,; . Total SSLW '
Number of La oohs' ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
g
Holding Ponds / SohdfTraps ` F ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 1& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes RNo
c. li' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JjNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number„ 5' — d
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .......... .........................................................
❑ Yes A"No
Structure 5 Structure 6
......................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes X No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ,�No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JkNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes A No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Croptype
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes A No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes WNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes W No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9 No
17. Are rock outcrops present? /e/%4
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
❑ Unknown -E�No AI&
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
KNo
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WU � ec ts, design, maps, etc.) ✓ f_
❑Yes
�-No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
&No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
XNo
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PNo
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
XNo
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
'Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
W?No
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: 70
Date of Inspection 0 D
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ Yes FS No
❑ Yes ®.No
AYes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
jur4wH�Igs vi Inuuay w ue{u{UrJCXPJaIAK'atun uvna: kusc auuiuunau pages ns ucgrnary): ❑ Fie Id Copy [I Final Notes
R, €?.h$tr"'iFi.f'Yr3(.#P*rr�h?a�E?r!
,9.r ,4z ,ter/.�e�r�/.w �.• '0a
01/01/01

7 Facility Number L 7v Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified p Registered JEJ Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ................. ...�04
....................................................................... County: ...........
.............................
Owner Name: ............. %r•¢y� � Phone No: �lla� , geZ.-O... ,/ /..............................
Facility Contact: .......... '`............................... Title Phone No:
MailingAddress: .............. p. � ................................. `i..�s�.f.. ��... .G ...rZ. y c....................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:.......`' ...,:...,....................
Certified Operator: ................. a:`........1 .......... ................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
qr
Latitude
='f
Longitude = • =, ='L
Current7t
'ulation
Design l'iCurre it�.i,iti, �i� ,� �BI�a j,iit' #*� DesignE I.,41 eCuxrent
'Poultry '
;$wine
Ca' aci Po .
Ca aci . Po ulahon • . ,CaEtle a
+ �,Capactty '' Populgtion
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
jjri9
j,7 r0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑Layer 1_4
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
` T
Non -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed'from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes [!R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M'No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) : ............... `36............................................................. ....................................................... ... ..:.............................. ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes a No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number:2 Date of Inspection r�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes W No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Annlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes
N No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
)KNo
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
R No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IM No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Q-No
15,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[;Yes
r❑`Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
MNo
Rcuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )(No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes )RNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes kNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes XNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes. �jNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) KYes ❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes P�No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ YesNo
�4 •.0 lat�tgn;s'olr• detjcjeenctes w� re �qte¢ dlrt°ing • ijs;vjslt; Yo€� :w.iil tecwe t Q fu>;-titer
• C'OWriSbO' tid6& abhut' this :visit::: • . • . • ..........:................ .
.. _..... a 39,.... i iy ( f . �; .. e . yr. % l�. F n. < , ,.., r t• ' t u l any,
�vt r " r< . T, i.. 'ts` r r<..�3. Y <.
Comments`' refer to uesttbn #). Ex la►n an YES answers and/or, an recommendations or an other
Use drawings of facrltty to better explain situations., (use`add�tionai pages asanecessary) =t sk
.f •g, v !�
7 ZX ,z--4w Owwez ewe 6�
AZ . QaA
rt � 1-.r _ y } .= ! �_ f r� ,r�' rr St's { f,•' � .., �f���'`�3`fU l�Ii;"'y."r�,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,� r� Date: S ,J1 2000

Facility Number:a,!r — 7�
Date of Inspection 3/
Odur Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
,� No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32,
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged (ill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
'Yes
❑ No
ittona ; omments�an or. rawtngs:
.� � .�i �

�� 4..:, f, �.o� � ,.,. �.�'. �. 'i. '3 .�.{j���J1 +�II�--,TIIr- ' � ' � 1. . ..3•_.. , ! ,
FW IN 1 L Y F ^A' R "M' S i i6m1'xa, �rJl
June 6, 1999 FAYEIT EVILLE
NCDENR-DWQ REG. OFFICE
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
RE: 242 Farm inspection of May 31, 2000
Dear Mr. Heath:
Regarding your question about the reporting of freeboard at this farm after Hurricane Floyd, our
notes indicate it was reported to DWQ between 9/16/99 and 9/20/99. For the first several days
after the hurricane, I called Raleigh DWQ as instructed at [phone], [phone], (800)
858-0368, or [phone]. I spoke with a number of different people and they did not give
their names, although I know at least once I spoke with a Mr. Steve Lewis. I called several times
each day as I learned of new freeboard readings.
After the first several days, we contacted each Region directly to report additional freeboards that
fell below the required level. We reported more than 40 farms overall and had no reason to not
report a farm. I think it is reasonable to believe that, in the chaotic and trying times after the
hurricane, the information may have been misplaced after we reported it.
Our records show that the farm had a freeboard of 15" on 9/20/99 (Hurricane Floyd), 23" on
10/4/99, 13" on 10/18/99 (Hurricane Irene) and 24" on 11/10/99.
During a meeting on 9/28/99, Tommy Stevens said "We are not out looking for enforcement or
compliance issues after this catastrophic event." We took Tommy at his word and are
disappointed to now learn eight months later that you are pursuing compliance issues from right
after the 500-year hurricane.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone].
Otherwise I'll assume this information is sufficient to allay your concerns. Thank you.
jJohn Bi i
Land and Nutrient Manager
cc:lwtk 0dyj
Post Office Box. 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

11 r.rkfG./.Yr•
E
� � oaw,r ar R[.Y,ar.J ..wr.w ...• I Mnnv Fn l.iv .••�M MvxM Iv +Hwny���
wrrr. • ✓ M.w.. w wM yr yw.<r M<h•W.<w IMo!
1 v+�wNrr M•Y�.I. ..,•.<.L I<Yrw •V ..". �<rw wv
Vxrow..rw <.11 ,^•ww., ..w...+.... —.w, o. rtyo 7� t
w, ..........,
_ ••Yrri� Y�kOY
YYp `H 4Y
a.
k ' _V� 2 ,•>/"e LLpYV FL WAIKFA
•wc.wuw<
_ ••Yrri� Y�kOY
YYp `H 4Y
a.
k ' _V� 2 ,•>/"e LLpYV FL WAIKFA
•wc.wuw<

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Alan W. Klimek. P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 15 2004
OENA-FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFRCE
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS260070
242 Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cumberland County
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Murphy Family Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS260070 which expires October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the 242 Farm, located in Cumberland County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 1350 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorin .g conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] FAX; 919-715-05881 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1 �aitu �ira�h�
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper L

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules;'sfandards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cumberland County Health Department
Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS260070
APS Central Files

Revised April 20,1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number ;V_ - 70
Farm Name: 2elz
On -Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:. �:We
Date of site
Date of most recent WUP: � /t 6 /9e
Annual farm PAN deficit: 13.3 pounds
,�Operatlon is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility Item(s) Ft F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #:1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7, stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part Il, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, Including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 ' Lack of acreage which -resulted in over. application of wastewater (PAN) on -spray
/ field(s) according to farm's last two years -of irrigation- records.
&" F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (nu merous.ditch es; failure to deduct -required
buffer/setback acreage;-or.25% of total acreage -identified in CAWMP includes
small,-irregulady shaped fields - fields less than 5 acresfor.travelers:or less than ;
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage inexcess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Part III. Field by Field 'Determination of 75%, Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER .
FIELD
NUMBER''2"
TYPE of
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL.
ACRES'
CAWMP
ACRES..:.-
FIELD
COMMENTS,3
:Z 4/?—
176,
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place'of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field; inspector/reviewer will have to combine'felds to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be. subjectto WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' --back-up fields with CAWMP acreage. exceeding 75% of its total acres -and having received less -than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the'fami's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, -cannot serve asthe
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. :Back-up felds-mustbenoted in -the comment section and must bemccessible
by irrigation -system.
Part IV. Pending, WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks -following information:
P2 Plan revision may satisfy75%o'rule, based.on .adequate -overall PAN :deficit and by. -
adjusting' all field acreage #o:beloW �75% usexate :':.
P3 Other (ie/in process �f.installing new irrigation system):

I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Farm Number:-26-_-70--�
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
G4:0g�1_121
'T
1••
SEP 't 9 097
Non )ischar;e Permit E H N F1
September 11, 1997
'RECENED
Nova 4 1997
FAYETTEVI LLE
REG. OFFICE
You are hereby notified that 242 Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Preston Hoow6rd, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural ReJW419 1997
Division of Water Quality Nort-Disch,,
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey 9e Permitting
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review. the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by thrI f
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question un w z—
Application Date: R _ :L5 `C=1 —1
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST FAYETTEVILLE.
REG. OFFICE
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. " s.
Applicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Farm's name:
2. Print Land Owner's name: Murphy Family Farms
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: _PO Box 759
City: Rose Hill NC Zip: 28458
Telephone Number: 531-3825
4. County where farm is located: Cumberland
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From intersection of NC 210 and NC 242. travel south on
NC. 242 1.0 miles to farm entrance on the left,
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Murphy Family Farms
26 - 70
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 26-70
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Wean
1350 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; Q no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
TXRe of Swine No. of AGIMals Tvoe of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) O Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 24.4 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 24
4. Number of Lagoons: 1 ; Total Capacity: 605307 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or O (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
(Land Owner's name listed in question II.2), attest that
this application for (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date _ r ZS
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
t %tZ%c—(Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for �-k �Q-y`+--� _ ___._.. . (Farm name listed in question IT. 1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to die best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
THE
Date
Y-1 5 r L• /
ON PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97
Page: 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2/97)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood'
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
(9l9)946-6481
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
.Gaston
Union
Montgomery
lredPll
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3

I I , r
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print aU information that does not require a signature)
xthr ar.: New; ..ar Ex °anded: ..( lease?circle �ne).....>
Name of
Owner(s)
Mailing )
:.'456�
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_
Latitude and Longitude: , _LcL 1 7Y' .33 1 (0 " County: 3i -t_
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): H LOJ ,_.
Qpe[afign
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder 0 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Pullets ❑ Beef
t(Farrow to Wean „I, 50
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: ? `i . `1 Required Acreage: ; `i . 0
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds :�_ Total Capacity:(o 65,aC3 :Z_ __-Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or Q� (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that aIl the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. i (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be Filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
.specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written nodficaion to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Own L
Signature: g Dater
Name of Man a (if if ent mown r): - , sic 4�e r 4�ac 1 iSc
Signature: " Date: 11
AWC -- April ?A, 1996 1

' -I
D) Application and Handling,Fquit2M?nt
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility with existing waste alication equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
© New or expanded facility: or existingfacility acility without existing waste application equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Sp_ecialist (PIease Print): �y w�5 fer�e
Affiliation: / A r
0. ►"\r1
Signature:
III. Certification of Installation
ne No.:
ate:
A} Collegtion,'on
New. expanded or retrofitted facility, (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.: .
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24,1996

D) Annlication and J dling _auinment Tnstallation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approvaLAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: I Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC » April 24, 1996 5

t
I�d
14
WMT
Fm V7
f2A7WW.'
Val
r1r.
Fin
r W-0 -ow

„„ry���■■�^.-���■�■,.,')?**���{A{Aa�� :�11:::"`:`�
Producer: a ` a FA r
Location: 14t�)y a y -a Cc
Telephone.453 I - 3 ga,5
Type Operation: Fo,,-, ,,,, - , .ti .
Number of Animals: 13 50
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting
nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the
crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and avaiiabie.water holding capacities.. Normally
waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With
special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen Either of these conditions may result, in runoff to surface waters which is not .
allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for
analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 1 SA
NCAC 2H0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

vni42i^;„^`.i;�J47J:Li+�:�i�L•:;a:'�..2ri'�•"�
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, t3 tons etc.
1350 animals X�(amt) waste/animal/year = ?a3 (amt) waste/year.
Amount .of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1350animals X5,9lbs. PAN/animal/year = Ut90lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N. C. Tech.
Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job.. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown
and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tune Per Ac. * Utilized Annlication
Off-
Total atIq I-1`la-Ij_ !
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.
NOTE. The applicator is cautioned that P and K maybe over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrientL This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
2

;'v'v7�ri ;,ik,ww:`iw nr is .. �„,�],, ■.���T����(.� ,,e,
.`.«:c;.,;..�'•'?a;:..c':.k*,;�i� �.,..ti.,...::: V::`:'•:.�.,........................:...........:.:.•:.,..,,,.,..,",.,,..,.;:ra:kk:;J:;2Y.�.,...,.,,,,,,,.,.,,.,,.k;:ek;k';:,..,....,..,,,. ,,,.,,...•,.....,,.,,.-..
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
* See footnote for Table].
Totals from above Tables
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 ay,y
1 4a3:
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced
'1 dap
Surplus or e i .
33
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
3

x
w.� . V:IIII`I:I.,F:IA...:...
�;,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,..,,..,...,.,,..,..,.::az��;ae,wxna:M;.;;;;;rz;::,�.w;.:z:
See attached map.showing the fields to he used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate M-Ir Amount In.
1 ,r,
6.5
).0
a
A.A
Se f M LO Jck
0.5
!.a
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BRIG APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SMU AR TABLE WILL
BE NEED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for -LB -days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every,1 MONTHS. In no instance should
the volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation * w IQ,." 11 s
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation J
Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste -
analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to- applying the waste.
4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of$10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS. with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner
who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of
the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there
is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization,
or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for'other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) .
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). if an ACS is used the soil loss shall be
no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
(Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does -not
occur during a•season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)

REQUMED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application..
8. A.nimaI waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste Shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by
a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the application
causes no nmoff or drift from the site.
6

REQUERED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms.and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is, to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels; etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should
be kept on site.

UIIATUI�T FLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: 0? H a 1:�.r�N
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new. facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm The approved plan will be filed on -site at the
farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: L& r � a , I rq,r ► - , 5
(Please PHn0
Signature:x Date: z` Y
Name of Manager(If different from owner): C hr isto pher, _ 4arch s',O
Signature: i q
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)
Address (Agency):
05e- H { ( A/L 84-5L4 S F

RT-W
VI..'rW NW.- Kf.l. T"
VIA RA
2b'
IPI

j Sons Legend I
- C.0-t3- GaMd� �•�
' C,6 A - f jc�d�otia � lnaur�
MURPHY FAMILY FARMS
Rose Hill, North Carolina
FaimiTract Name
Location AoU , 24,? Lladr,Ca,Date 6 a7-9S~
Scale I " -is 2,0 ' Acres jkg_,}
Drawn by. —r
Features drawn from: �rtt. P Ply

Waste Management Plan Changes
FEB 0 5 2037
I DENR-FAYETf MLLEREGIONALOFHCE
Facility _ Farm—"
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
[2,1/Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
❑ Other
Comments:
1 - t
Date

Murphy -Brown, LLC
1 /31 /2007
A.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy Brown, LLC
HWY 242 Farm
County. Bladen
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean 1350
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Wean to Finish
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure: Anaerobic
Storage Period:
Application Method:
>180'days
Irrigation
Lagoon
RECEIVED
FEB 0 5 2007
DENR - FAYETTEIIII.LE REGIONAL OR
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied In an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods In the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applicatlon
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH In the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, If carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.):
.Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
1350 Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
4,336,200 gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Finish
838 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
I gallyr
Total 4,336,200 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
-Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
1350 Farrow to Wean 5.4 Ibs/yr 7,290 Ibs/yr
Farrow to Feeder 6.5 Ibslyr Ibs/yr
Farrow to Finish 26 Ibslyr Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder 0.48 Ibs/yr Ibslyr
Wean to Finish 1.96 Ibslyr Ibs/yr
Feeder to Finish 2.3 Ibs/yr I Ibslyr
Total 7,290 Ibs/yr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big Job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops Indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under Irrigation may uptake and utilize
In the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 32.93
Total N Required 1st Year: 8314.95
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 8,314,95
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 7,290.00
Nltrogon Balance for Crops: (1,024.95)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil I st Crop Tinve to IstCrop IstCrop LbsWAc Lbs N Tabd lbs N
� �� �� �■■� � �■� � �� � ■■ram �� � � � �� � � �■■�� � �■
3(6) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine Inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, Is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late In the season (I.e,
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage Just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to Interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling Is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two Inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N I ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N 1 lbs lint
G
Fescue- Grazed
50 lbs N I ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be Irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown In the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.

SLUDGE APPLICATION;
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications
PANT rlanimal Farm Total/ r
1350 Farrow to Wean
0.84 1134
Farrow to Feeder
1
Farrow to Finish
4.1
Wean to Feeder
0.072
Wean to Finish
0,306
Feeder to Finish
0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1134 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5670 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 18 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 45.36 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,.it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop Is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored In your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
* Inches
1
AuA
C
0.6
1
2
AuA
C
0.6
1
3
AuA
C
0.6
1
4
AuA
C
0.6
1
5
CaB
C
0.4
1
6
CaB
C
0.4
1
7
CaB
C
0.4
1
Leased
1
AuA
N
0.6
1
6of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: HWY 242 Farm
Owner: Murphy Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy - Brown, LLC
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Toni W. King
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
r-
Signature:
Date
Date
Date
8of8

Additional Comments:
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fail or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste Is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an -illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste Is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

Farm Hwy 242
Scale: 1 "=400'
Corner of House w/200' offset Well w/100' offset
Total Field — 9.88 AC. Gig
Well w/100' offset
Total Field = 26.20 Ac.
Corner of House
w/200' offset
7X
Hog Houses
and
Lagoon
k
t
9

�QF WA TF9p C��t Michael F. Easley, Governor
�� C. p ! William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
`J UG.North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Coleen H. Sullins Director
DENR _EAYEMu.ILE REG'10MAL ()ffiCE Division of Water Quality
August 11, 2008
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Sludge Compliance Requirement Change
Dear Permittee:
In accordance with Condition 111.19 of State General Permit AWG 100000, your facility is
required to maintain compliance regarding sludge accumulation in your animal waste treatment
lagoon(s). As you know, the previous compliance limit was to have a minimum of four (4) feet
of treatment depth between the designed stop pump and the average elevation of the top'of the
sludge blanket. This requirement was based on NRCS Standard No. 359, which was recently
modified.
As of July 2008, Standard No. 359 does not use the 4-foot requirement. Sludge compliance is
now to be based on the sludge volume as a percentage of the total treatment volume. The revised
Standard states that sludge accumulation in the permanent treatment zone must be less than 50%
of the planned treatment volume. Also, there must be a minimum of 2.5 feet of liquid above the
sludge at the pump intake location. If either of these conditions is not met then sludge must be
removed or managed in accordance with an approved Plan of Action for Lagoon Sludge
Reduction (POA). A new sludge survey worksheet has been developed to calculate sludge and
treatment volumes to determine compliance.
Our records indicate that you have filed a Sludge POA for one or more of the lagoons at your
facility. Based on the changes to the sludge requirements in Standard No, 359, your lagoon(s)
may already be in compliance without any sludge removal. Using your lagoon design (or as -
built information) and current sludge survey measurements, complete the NEW sludge survey
worksheet. If you have any difficulty in locating or understanding your lagoon design
information, please contact your technical specialist or county Soil & Water office.
None h Carolina
Natura!!U
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwater ualit .or Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50°% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper

Send both sludge survey worksheets, OLD and NEW, to the address below if you feel that your
lagoon(s) is in compliance and wish to withdraw your=POA: Our staff will review the
information and notifyyou of our decision.
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: (919).733-3221
If you have any questions about the new sludge requirement, sludge survey worksheet, or any
related matter please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-
3221.
Sincerely,
Keith Larick, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files WRM&

Murphy -Brown, LLC
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
4/3/2009
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy Brown, LLC
HWY 242 Farm; Fac. No. 26-
Count : Bladen
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean 1350
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Wean to Finish
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
z4vp 070
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
/.PR 0 9 M
0W—FAYE11TEV11,l.E f8lDNAI NM
RECEIVED f DENR / DWQ
Aquifer PrOtPrAiOnSeCOOn
APR 06 2009 ..
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10'tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 11

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
1350
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
4,336,200 gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Wean to Finish
838 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gall r
I gall r
Total 4,336,200 gall r
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
1350
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
7,290 Ibslyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Finish
1.96 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
1 2.3 Ibslyr
I Ibsl r
Total 7,290 Ibs! r
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 24.63
Total N Required 1st Year: 7418.55
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 7,418.55
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: . 7,290.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (128.55)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 11

Tract Field Irrigated Soil list Crop Time to Ist Crop Ist Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N 2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N —f:—1
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized Code �Reception Area Specifications
3(h) of 11

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator Is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading'as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain Is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to Interplant small grain, etc, is late September or.early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1.6 Ibs N 1 bushel
50 Ibs N 1 ton
50 Ibs N 1 ton
1.25 Ibs N 1 bushel
12 Ibs N 1 ton
0.12 Ibs N 1 Ibs lint
50 Ibs N / ton
50 Ibs N 1 ton
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
50 Ibs N / acre
50 Ibs N / acre
2.5 Ibs N / cwt
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
4.0 Ibs N / bushel
40 Ibs N I acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations, Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will'be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of11

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT r/animal Farm Totall r
1350 Farrow to Wean 0.84 1134
Farrow to Feeder 1
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Wean to Finish 0.306
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1134 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5670 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 18 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 45.36 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of11

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
Inlhr
inches
1
AuA
C
0.6
1
2
AuA
C
0.6
1
3
AuA
C
0.6
1
4
AuA
C
0.6
1
5
CaB
C
0.4
1
6
CaB
C
0.4
1
7
CaB
C
0A
1
Leased
Optional
1
AuA
O
0.6
1
Optional
-1
AuA
L
0.6
1
--1
AuA
WC
0.6
1
6of11

Additional Comments:
This plan revised to show the correct acres in the leased field 1 and to change
'the crop options for this field to a soybean wheat rotation with the option of
planting either a winter cover or a small grain hay crop. Also, the leased field
may be considered as optional land since the owned fields show a PAN deficit.
'Applications made to a winter cover crop must be taken from the following
crops' PAN rate.
7of11

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: HWY 242 Farm; Fac. No. 26-70
Owner: Murphy Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
llwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy - Brown, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address:
_
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
[phone]
Signature:
Date
8of11

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and files.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9 of 11

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have .been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
10 of 11

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
11 of 11

17
t:OPs?
Facility Number and Name: Mur hy's 26-70 242 Farm
ON,
Instructions on last paw
z
1sch_ a s
High Freeboards
Wettable Acres
Description of Concerns
-�:
No NOD or NOV found for this issue.
Wetted acreage determination requested.
pg =fR
1 /16/99 — 15", out 2/ 13/99 — 30"
=r
9/18/99 — 14", out 10/2/99 — 21"
7M10/16/99
— 15", out 11/13/99 — 20"
vs-
-,"'r ^•V' f ��.. .. P �x
�'.�'�.^� ..: :.eta•" _.a�^^_..x^-��:.�..6 _ .may
Response-
p
M -` ` s w -�
1/16/99 high freeboard due to surface water
Wetted acreage determination was completed
P
s—" n E
problem that was repaired in Spring 94.
and sent in on 2/20/2000.
Pam,
-c
Remainder of high freeboards were a result of
S
r1y+. ".
Hurricanes Floyd.
��t' �•r .�z�-r`�""' °^ r"$`r far ".i`+--,
i
g,
x•
�_-V'.i
. � ma's T.'E-.r _..�'xc.-
�"�-sa-�+::�. pia
G

to
Facility Number and Name: Mur h 's 26-70 242 Farm
Instructions on last page
.i' ...�-?s- �,..x"t-3.:-v..
^ IRE-"
ETNA_ _
---
�'.c ^�a•. _
-�Subsur-faceDrains
_ - _, �`CJve�.A
�._ha:.. '-°ate;,: '
= .Cropping
_ licat�on
"•«$;Ar ,i .--:'_..'r
ks
y. l-'M
Sructural-Issues
Issues
Description of Concern
psi `- 4gt' _ "" i..t
M � Y
,m-F. - i i
_Nov
'.�C, -
issued 5/17/99 in part for poor
bernrauda stand.
_
tea_-:. ..-�r''S_--
_
_
r
"'.-a.£'�"" [. �..
-.-�'*,y-_e-.� .� -�..
"rt t..«^�x'rbe•-. ,--••- _ "tom-'."� '�
Q_��,<
IS-
. � '� .'� •z.�r�a�..3.-^:...-�.y
�—�....-'��
�"- a ` �� x. 4
s+
G'
���`c��"-`�''{�=�� ^`"fir ��a.a�' - T�`.a��".""�-t•�.: �"��
�� �-' }ter - ��. "x^"y:vr.�--�' <
_'�'r_.e:... �-:-d--=-c•�'r" '�.'^ i ."`
IN, .c,'^
cr:^
��^�
li *_
:?�.:�_:. «�.,., - f's -'� w,.r
�.^.-"�zrx.�"*._.:-'��•..k e. r_.s..=x-�-�y.��^.�n�� -._ -z:.� ..-e�
��,Y��...�'�Y.. �.'£�x.�'��-..-•--�ac..-a=... �-.�i�
Response
p
���
,_ a
M��w
Coastal bermuda re -sprigged
x
­�'�"` Gam'= :ic _-'f_L:.'°_i.'�i�'�, _,..` T-`C"^' _`-
e
r UL
- '
.�% �` '. V S:.. �"..
µme-_
�`�
_�
'� g =�
3^G��`....a.-
m
3/99;matua overseed removed
6/00 and did not result in an lon
y g
term negative effects on the
rx
x
=z. Y=
-�
- =-
-y h.a bcr'.v--";.".:.-5x^
�r
== =— _�--
g_
'.`.w*.x,."H:ss 'Mr..
bermuda quality.
'«Y 3.-3-.`'-+„'�s�.. a� .+a
�";
.. �.[-.. �`. iY .N`,' _ P�"+-"F,'mr ` 5'" :p-�:+°s'i C_C`"S
�-�-��
L F.��">�'.'_..c. 'ice --..� - 9
��.
A recent visual inspection of the
4'b".•_A
-4_r"�:^." 1=•;s_ •' -r.'
--
5..�.
-$-� �.-�=-�--�-�-; _ z_t
spray fields revealed the need to
y
_�
-
I U_ _ _
x :W
i -
p
further improve the bermuda
;VI
stand on this farm through
x= - N • - a
Ut
AOI
r u=�
increased weed control. Weed
-.=
--•_
control measures have been
,, ,� •��
AN�
w 6�"^'°.."'..::
rER
�. art t
implemented.
�C.�.�'.�, �„ �„.,y• r �." ^e' s
-
x^'--�G2.�"S.YA":-^ �'%ei'3'.�.
'>-s.S x __
„v.~ -4 �r+ni` _..='k'•.�f.. _ 1'_�`-
SMA
ins. 4 . .S C ..
l.'��•- ..ER�,9'^^. c'��u-
.yam 'r; C-rr.-i'
-zs-. �''..
-"=,ter _ z- '•.'T-
.. �Ya
' -z. ';aSc'_�1irr _ 'z-..�r`s �_"._
'
."=s..-'��s•y s `�-+
P .'may..
'-
-ram
G.
..-w' �r = Art_-7^..3',g"
,r.:......-�. -
,.`'�' x„�. -'"-'^-,
r-.. _
:^e =» na"".,z
/ f
, � b.60 =
�s
' � R ' ' sue f' �
'�,, ..r - ..-..
e _ �. -'r- r - x "-'"' - '� • s'y�
4 �, �. - --�. •�,t .tea, J''+.'.
"? rs«:;�-�..T"T"'�CY � .:..d`f -', ,�$-�.,e� J .y .-F� �y�;��a '�t"'
-sty �.i'„„ 'm' :".P..„'- t�"�3 ��. •• 9Y�_ � �'t��� sa �
.y�'s�•^•'O'�.,; .'C-"k�-��_ �..lZj."y'�^�'�: _tP"'� `^^��.
�j"4"'S.�3-^ � 1�w''�"«11��^."bm 'S: �� �S �[..`.�,
,ry�.2_"^ a` R ��5� s.m««�� n,.3 jL'a
'?a '5+:3.�.�'� '�i- - � ry
�.L. -4 '�� Y "T'�',� 5 �~-'Y � Y`Y :-'' L.."a��
�� � _.,.rW-��`.:�'-+-,� - '3M Si�F� .�X
v.L »-3� '.' � fy�h+?��.'��.-,R��22v-.y.•L"µ'�.. ..a"yT-1�.,`
.. _• -r'3"" 1�

i Concerns are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated ___). With the exception of "discharges," which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 2000.
` Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed,.the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a
schedule for completing the measures.
3 If subsurface drains are present, state whether you know that the drain(s) is discharging groundwater uncontaminated by hog waste, and if so, the basis for that conclusion.
3

f,
Facility Number and Name: Mur hy's 26-70 242 Farm
Description of Concern
Res
Instructions on last pale
Huh Freeboards
No NOD or NOV found for this issue.
1/16/99 — 15", out 2/13/99 — 30"
9/18/99 — 14", out 10/2/99 — 21"
10/16/99 — 15", out 11/13/99 20"
1/16/99 high freeboard due to surface water
problem that was repaired in Spring 99.
Remainder of high freeboards were a result of
Hurricanes Floyd.
1
Wettable Acres
Wetted acreage determination requested.
Wetted acreage determination was completed
and sent in on 2/20/2000.

IV
Facility Number and Name: Murphy's 26-70,242 Farm
Instructions on last pagge
jo;t
e,� Subsurface s
R_
P,
05 3=5
Wra
Cropping Issues
Description of Concern
_NZ %
"I' ­
" K A
4�
74�
I
Nov issued 5/17/99 part for poor
Zl­
2M_ _Q
NKIO-2;
bermuda stand.
� �g2
NIPP o-
Ik—R
%
Oa
S g N,­ k­-- A
Z
6
M3AiA
R-
M2P
­5..
7
2,
- .1. 1S,
7�_
gig
w�
§0
Response
M� ON-71V %OZ k,7,
-0
Coastal bermuda re -sprigged
nk AM
W6
Z,� 7� WQ
4
_4 t 'K
3/99;matua overseed removed
�Q
Mm.
5
Z_Q
% M
OP, OPTIN
6/00 and did not result in a y long
IR X__
M
TMIRMAM 0�
�Et
� g& V-E-4_5 KT;
term negative effects on the
Wyg UP—
M-1 :1
Nt 4
bermuda quality.
z
- MAE
�_N
A�-, RY
IM
f 19 rz R
M AN
M�
;0
ME. NUNN
A recent visual inspection of the
3r V
— - -1
REM_ Z-1 4;L A
-
T U M.
spray fields revealed the need to
7 �7
M
- Iz- 0:
f Otw;it Mn g N, M
EM _10
-
NEM
further improve the bermuda
4=W
INI_
M _
A
I .M17T
E- Vincreased
s.-
A0PM
stand on this farm throughm
weed control. Weed
_2M7 Mncontrol
Mfl
BNN
measures have been
implemented.M
N
-
� —_4wM
M �P
—MM
A
POW
NS
.3 �02 ffl_�.P
i K�3 -
TL

1 Concems are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated `_). With the exception of "discharges}" which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 2000.
` Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed, the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a
schedule for completing the measures.
3 If subsurface drains are present, state -,vhether you know that the drain(s) is discharging groundwater uncontaminated by hog waste, and if so, the basis for that conclusion.

01/06/00 11:21am 910 484 3157 ClMBERLAND FSA-->19197153559
ECM Pg. 10/12
NO V 1 ' AU99
Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through -March 31, 2000
1 _ if this fxdilty can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP It most do so.
2 Temporaty Addition of New Sprayfiefds {') (Cheat approprate Danes.)
d' A. awes of cropland. List crop type used:
Q 0. ages of hardwood woodland 11100 lbs PAN 1 acm added.
Q C. aQerof ping woodiand added @ 60 lbs PAN I acre added.
3 Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
['] A - Application window extended for . 24.40 acres of perennial grass until first killing fMt
Q B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost
4 PAN application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)'
Q A. PAW application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for 24.00 acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
Q B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3.8,
5 Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
El A. Prior to December 1st, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last anatysls taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event, (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec. 1st)
Q B. Use current waste anatysls to determine PAN.
6 geguiCed - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses. '4
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
S. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
c, irrigation during pericia of warmer weather.
7 Rectilred - irrigation Management TeUtnlqu9s to Reduce Runoff and Pending Potential,
A. Making frequent, li;ht, irrigation applications, and
B. Not Irrigation immediately before predicted rainfall.
8 The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the fauilfty to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's pdrrnkt and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9 Authorization to use the additional practices Inciuded in the amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters,
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action,
10 The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11 This revision must inciude a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number HWY 242 Farm
Facility Name
Mur h emit Farms Kraig Westerbee
Facility O r l alma PR Technical S ecfa' RIN11
Factfity, Owner I Manager Si afjfie Techni ' -Specialist Signature
Date 11111199 Date 111/11/99
This document must be filed at the SWCo office and be attbehed to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for Inspection at the facility
('} New temporary sprayfrefds must meet applicable buffer and setback mQuirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
p,f.i 113

HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION
DATEnME
DWO Contact
Name of Person contacting DWQ: J° ��� r' rG Telephone Nof
FARM Nome , SGP &�,,j
County
Facility No.
Freeboord level of the Logoon:
Conditions of the spray fields:
NARRATIVE; (Include any instructions given to the former at the time of the cal{}
(A copy of each notification should be forwarded to the "CAFO BOX" in John Hostys office
as soon as possible)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
VA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 27, 1999
RECEVED
S is p J 1999
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
242 Farm
Facility Number 26-70
Cumberland County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Bob Heath on 5/5/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility that
receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the following
two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Bob Heath the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Bob Heath, at 225 Green Street, Suite
714, Fayetteville, NC 28301, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Bob Heath at [phone]. If within 90 days you are unable
to provide Bob Heath with the information you are automatically required to complete
a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within 180 days
of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, ]forth Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%b recycled110% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District.
Facility File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
1 • •
.NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
N"EC: ;�" E I V L J
►AN 6 2000
FAYETTEMLLE
REG. OFFICE -
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 26-70
Cumberland County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Murphy Family Farms
242 Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Murphy Family Farms:
A
IT
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OR
ENVIRON ND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 15, 2000 MCJV
U
4' 4 Y 2. 2 2000
FA11ETi C-ViLLv'
REG.
Subject: Status Update Wettable Acre
Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 26-70
Cumberland County
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is hereby requesting a status update concerning the
completion of a Wettable Acre Determination for your subject facility. A letter dated August 27,
1999 was sent to advise you that your facility was required to complete a Wettable Acre
Determination within six months (see' attached letter). As of May 10, 2000 DWQ has not
received the facilities Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form. Please submit to DWQ
within 10 days a written explanation as to why a Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form
has not been submitted. Please include the necessary information detailing the steps taken to
certify this facility for Wettable Acres.
Please be aware that not submitting this certification within the allotted six months may
result in civil penalty assessments, permit revocation, and/or injunctive relief.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County
Ordinance, or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
X. e4,�-Zx,-
Sonya Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JUN-07-00 05:32 PM
I
g�, !.
P. 01
June 6, 1999
NCDENR-DWQ
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 29301.5043
M( 1 R PHT
.• r
FIMItY FAR?A8
a
.t�
RE: 242 Farm Inspection of May 31, 2000
` UN 8 2000
Ce
Dear Mr. Heath:
Regarding your question about the reporting of freeboard at this farm after Hurricane Floyd, our
notes indicate it was reported to DWQ,between 9116/99 and 9/20/99, For the first several days
after the hurricane, I called Raleigh DWQ as instructed at [phone], [phone], (800)
858.0368, or [phone]. I spoke`with a number of different people and they did not give
their names, although I know at ]cast once I spoke with a Mr, Steve Lewis. I called several times
each day as I learned of new flreeboard readings.
After the first several days, we contacted each Region directly to report additional freeboards that
fell below the required level, We repoited more than 40 farms overall and had no reason to not
report a farm. I think it is reasonable to believe that, in the chaotic and trying times after the
hurricane, the information may have been misplaced after we reported it.
s
Our records show that the farm had a freeboard of 15" on 9/20/99 (Hurricane Floyd), 23" on
10/4/99, 13" on 10/19/99 (Hurricane Irene) and 24" on 11/10/99.
During a meeting on 9/28/99, Tommy 19tevens said "We are not out looking for enforcement or
compliance issues after this catastrophic event," We took Tommy at his word and are
disappointed to now learn eight months later that you are pursuing compliance issues from right
alter the 500-year hurricane.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone],
Otherwise I'll assume this information is sufficient to allay your concerns. Thank you.
.s
John Bi'
'i
Land and Nutrient Manager
rc tyrrll, Or�1 .
i;
Pest. Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]