090165_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

P
NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Ruai

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
APS Case Number: DV-2016-0066 County: Bladen �.'V ter Quality Regional
Assessed Party: Allen Norris ?ions Section
Permit No.: AWS090165 Amount assessed: $8478.92
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver ofRight to an Administrative Hearing, and Shpulatiarz of Facts"
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in determining your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty
assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)
occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. By law [NCGS 133-215.6A(f)) remission of a civil penalty may be granted when one
or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to
your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why
the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
included in the attached penalty matrix and/or listed in the civil penalty assessment
document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you tools to correct the violation and prevent
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare far);
._ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil. penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
*!See a 0 + Lc,6_A
\kern. req.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
ALLEN NORRIS )
PERMIT NO. AWS090165 )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
NOV .'�. 0 20113
FILE NO. DV-2016-0066 1(Vatr;r Qyahty R'agioi !
Opera!: ""ids 30C�k, l
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $8478.92 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated, October 26, 2016, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water
Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in
support of a remission request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice
of assessment.
This the day of o J el''"�'6CK , 2016
ADMES S
13301is\eA 14iJ6r .
etAe_,x , AJc:_ 3 9-a
FEW f®r. a, a i�j71 /
1 lr�
t s
TELEPHONE
MiO� 5Y9 1475 I

Norris Farm Incorporated
November 4, 2016
Miressa Garoma
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1636. Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Ms. Garoma,
Below you will find the detailed explanation specific to the Justification for Remission Request
for Case Number DB-2016-0066. The explanations are ordered in the same way they appear on
the form.
'One or more of the civil Pernalty assessment factors in NCGS 143E-282.1(b) were wrongfully
applied to the detriment of the petitioner'
While we do not dispute many of the findings of the original violation letter, and have
acknowledged as much in the follow up letter on this incident, we do feel that items J and K
under the findings of fact were wrongfully applied in this case for the reasons stated in our
original follow up letter. We were unaware that a discharge had occurred, and, therefore, had
not called DWQto report it. The permit is clear that the 24 hour notification requirement is
specific to 'first knowledge'. While we should have possibly been knowledgeable that a
discharge had occurred, we did not know. We ask that you reconsider these two items.
'The violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation'
Clearly, once we were made aware of the discharge, immediate steps were taken to promptly
abate the issues noted. The discharge pipe was unplugged in the case of the barn issue, and
the irrigation system was shut down in the case of the ponding issues. Subsequent to the

event, employees have been retrained, and have participated in the OIC training program. New
irrigation equipment has been purchased to replace some outdated equipment on the farm. In
addition, we are planning to install secondary containment structures to serve as a safeguard
against any future barn issues,
'The violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident'
Clearly the incidents here were accidental. We take our obligations to abide by our permits
very seriously. We have acknowledged that additional training and attention are needed, but
the unfortunate incident was accidental.
'The violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations'
There have been no violations on this farm during the time that we have owned the farm. We
purchased this farm in 1997.
._Payment of the civil Penalty -will prevent Payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions'
The proposed fine of $8478.92 will prevent, or at least make difficult, our ability to install
secondary containment on this farm. The projected cost of two secondary containment
structures, with the appropriate valves and piping, is estimated to be between $8000-$10000.
We feel these structures will provide significant protection against future recycle system or
plugging issues. We would ask that you consider a reduction in the fine amount to allow for
their installation in a timely manner.
Sincerely,
Keith Norris
Owner,S

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
October 26, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL - #7015 1520 0000 7838 4153
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Allen Norris
Norris Farm #2
92 Baldwin Branch Church Road
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Dear Allen Norris:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Farm # 09-0165
Bladen County
Enforcement File No. DV-2016-0066
Director
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Allen Norris in the amount of $5500.00, and
$2978,92 in investigative costs, for a total of $8478.92. Attached is a copy of the assessment document
explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality (do not
include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any
continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment to the attention of.
Miressa Garoma
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
OR
State of North Caroluta � Environmental Quality I Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
t636 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
919 807 6464

Assessment of civil penalty
Allen Norris
Enforcement # DV-2016-0066
Page 2 of 3
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below, as
they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is
not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the
factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your
right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation and agreement that no factual or legal issues are in
dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be
remitted, and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed below. In determining
whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282. l (b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the violator;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator has been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in
writing. The Director of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and inform you
of their decision in the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding
the case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee).
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original
remission request considered by the Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil
Penalties, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit
the enclosed "Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following
address:
Miressa Garoma
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a petition for an
administrative hearing, You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Assessment'of civil penalty
Allen Norris
Enforcement # DV-2016-0066
Page 3 of 3
You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The petition may be filed
by facsimile (fax) or electronic mail by an attached file (with restrictions) - provided the signed original,
one (1) copy and a filing fee (if a filing fee is required by NCGS §15013-23.2) is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within seven (7) business days following the faxed or electronic transmission.
You should contact the Office of Administrative Hearings with all questions regarding the filing fee and/or
the details of the filing process. The. mailing address and telephone and fax numbers for the Office of
Administrative Hearings are as follows:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Tel: [phone]
Fax: (9i9)431-3100
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
DEQ
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice, as evidenced
by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action,
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period
of this assessment. 1f you have any questions, please contact Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sincerely,
on R' d, Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
ATTACHMENTS RECEIVED
cc: Belinda Henson, Fayetteville WQROS Regional Supervisor w/ attachments pEQ�pWR
File # DV-2016-0066 w/ attachments
WQROS Central Files w/ attachments
Bladen County Health -Department NOV 0 4 2016
FAYET7EVILLEQROONAL OFFICE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF
ALLEN NORRIS
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
File No. DV-2016-0066
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental
Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources (DWR), I, Jon Risgaard, Chief of the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section of the DWR, make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Allen Norris owns and operates Norris Farm #2 a swine animal operation in Bladen
County,
B. Allen Norris was issued a Certificate of Coverage AWS090165 under General Permit
AWG100000 for Allen Norris on October 1, 2014, effective upon issuance, with an
expiration date of September 30, 2019.
C. G.S. 143-215.1(a) states that "no person shall do the following things or carry out any of
the following activities unless the person has received a permit from the Commission and
has complied with all the conditions set forth in the permit: made any outlets into the waters
of the State."
D. Condition I.L General Permit AWG100000 states in part that "Any discharge of waste
which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as otherwise provided in this
General Permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions. Waste shall not reach
surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application and
direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as State waters."
E. On February 2, 2016, DWR staff from Fayetteville Regional Office received a complaint
that swine waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton Creek. DWR staff visited
the facility on February 3, 2016 and observed that waste had bypassed Norris Farm 42
waste collection system by overflowing from a hog house into a fresh water drain system.
Waste flowed from the drain through the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creek,
which are Class C waters of the State within the Cape Fear River Basin.
F. Condition 11.5. of the General Permit AWG 100000, states in part that "In no case shall land
application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given application
event."

7
G. On February 3, 2016 when staff entered the Norris Farm #2, it was observed that waste
was being applied by two reels. Staff documented by photographs and water samples that
the reel closet to the lagoon was applying waste that was ponding and running off into a
drainage ditch and in a low area next to the woods.
H. Condition II.17. of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that "The OIC or a
designated back-up OIC of a Type A Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or
a person under the supervision of an OIC or designate back-up OIC shall inspect, the land
application site as often as necessary to ensure that the animal waste is land applied in
accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall the time between inspections be more than
one hundred and twenty (120) minutes during the application of waste. A record of each
inspection shall be recorded on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division and shall
include the date, time, spray field number and the operator for each inspection. Inspections
shall include but not be limited to visual observation of application equipment, spray fields,
subsurface drain outlets, ditches, and drainage ways for any discharge of waste."
Mr. Norris stated that the reels had been running about an hour and no one had checked the
fields after they were started.
Condition III.13.a. of the General Permit AWG100000 states in part that "The permitee
shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon as possible,
but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events: failure of any component of the animal waste
management system resulting in a discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands."
K. The Fayetteville Regional Office had not received notification within 24 hours of the first
knowledge of wastewater discharge from Allen Norris Farm. The DWR received
notification from a member of the general public of this discharge. Mr. Norris stated he
was not aware of the discharge.
L. On February 11, 2016, the Division issued a Notice of Violation /Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NOV/NOI) to Allen Norris identifying violations of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 and
General Permit AWG100000, The violations include the unlawful discharge of wastes to
waters of the State, failure in maintaining land application rates not resulting in excessive
ponding or any runoff, and failure to provide notification to the regional office.
M. The NOV/NOI letter was sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and received on
February 16, 2016.
N. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $2978.92.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
11. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Allen Norris is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-
212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to. waters of the State for purposes
of G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(1), for which G.S. 143-215.1 requires a permit. The discharge also
violated Condition I.1 of General Permit AWG100000.

D. The above -cited failure to prevent excessive ponding and runoff violated Condition II.5. of
the General Permit AWG100000.
E. The above -cited failure to inspect the land application site, to assure that waste is applied
in accordance with the CAWMP violated Condition 1I.17. of the General Permit
AWG100000.
F. The above -cited failure to provide notification to the regional office violated Condition
111.13.a. of General Permit AWG100000.
G. Allen Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00)
per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Allen Norris pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
1. The Chief of the Water Quality Regional Operations Section, Division of Water Resources,
pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental
Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, has the authority to assess
civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following;
III. DECISION:.
Accordingly, Allen Norris, owner of Norris Farm #2 at the time of the noncompliance is hereby
assessed a civil penalty of:
c�U For making an outlet to the waters of the State without a permit as required
by G.S. 143-215.1 and in violation of Condition I. 1. of the General Permit
AWG100000.
dot) For violating Condition II.5. of the General Permit AWG100000 for
failure to prevent excessive ponding and runoff.
$ 5-Go For violating Condition II.17. of the General Permit AWG100000 for
failure to properly inspect the land application site to insure that the animal
waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP.
$ 0 00 For violating Condition 11L 13.a. of the General Permit AWG100000 for
failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon
as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge
of the occurrence of wastewater discharge.
$ Sin TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY which is percent of the maximum
penalty authorized by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A.
$2978.92 Enforcement costs
$ % K 1$ _ 52 __ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into
account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at N.C,G.S. 143B-282.1(b),
which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
IV. NOTICE:
I reserve the right to assess civil penalties and investigative costs for any continuing violations
occurring after the assessment period indicated above. Each day of a continuing violation may be
considered a separate violation subject to a maximum $25,000.00 per day penalty. Civil penalties and
investigative cost may be assessed for any other rules and statutes for which penalties have not yet been
assessed.
V. TRANSMITTAL:
These Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision shall be transmitted to Allen Norris, in
accordance with N.C.G.S.143-215.6(A)(d).
(Date) AW
n ard, Chief
rQuality Regional Operations Section
ivision of Water Resources

DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Violator: Allen Norris
County: Bladen
Case Number: DV-2016-0066
Permit Number: AWS090165
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
In reference to the cited violation, no harm to the natural resources of the State was observed, to the
public health, or to private pr perry was documented. However, runoff of hog waste occurred onto
another private propertyt �+ �„�.(, orr Fi.e rt.4 r Q-d Rxcr6t%"4 ����.� aK.k wac�
t'JCCvre�.
2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
The precise duration and volume of waste discharged from this v' lation is unknown.
�vM ytz+s� ,, caw CQ�{'6K14.. fr �nac,7 w%L-111
Sys" T
3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
The effect on groundwater quality was not measured. Visual and analytical evidence confirmed that
wastewater was discharged from the pit recharge system of the waste system and from the spray field
during a waste application event. Oo4►r+s�rr,.... Sa.,r (;. 41 e(t,,.«L+,S
a� Tree.(/one N �� 5�`„Mcr c.•c..�..i;� i.
4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
This factor cannot be determined because no data exists to establish the presence or extent of damages.
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
No monetary savings can be determined.
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
Based on the information provided by Mr. Norris concerning the discharge of waste from the flush
system, the discharge was not committed wildly or intentionally. The DWR staff could notfnd any
physical evidence that contradict his statement.
Mr. Norris knowingly failed to comply with permit conditions by failure to properly inspect the
application site to ensure no waste was ponding or runoff was occurring.
7) The prior record of the violator In complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
The Norris farm #2 has no past history of any discharge violation.
8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. y 5�, '�.� �.d ."
$2978.92 T a r)ear.. , Sa�.rer a F
_10/2 Zul f�
Date sgaard
rev 1.0 - 8,31.09

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST } ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OFTACTS
ALLEN NORRIS
PERMIT NO. AWS090165 ) FILE NO. DV-2016-0066
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $8478.92 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated, October 26, 2016, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water
Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in
support of a remission request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice
of assessment.
This the day of , 2016
Signature
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

. JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
APS Case Number: DV-2016-0066 County: Bladen
Assessed Party: Allen Norris
Permit No.: AWS090165 Amount assessed: $8478.92
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission Waiver o Ri ht to an Administrative Heartg& and Stipulation o Facts "
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in determining your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty
assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)
occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. By law [NCGS 133-215.6A(t)] remission of a civil penalty may be granted when one
or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to
your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why
the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the_petitioner (the assessment factors are
included in the attached penalty matrix and/or listed in the civil penalty assessment
document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for „any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent_payrnent for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
\Rem. req.

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
1,113E ED1NMEOIDW R
N 0 V i 0 2016
APS Case Number: DV-2016-0066 County: Bladen
Assessed Party: Allen Norris +. ,pater Quality Regions[
(-)v^raLians SectionPermit No.: AWS090165 Amount assessed: $8478.92
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Reguest For Remission, Waiver ofRight to -an _Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts"
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in determining your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty
assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)
occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. By law [NCGS 133-215.6A(f)] remission of a civil penalty may be granted when one
or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to
your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why
the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penally assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1 b were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
included in the attached penalty matrix and/or listed in the civil penalty assessment
document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental_ damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for an revious violations;
(e) 12gMent of the civil penalty_will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
4% i' LC'ke 1
\item. req.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
ALLEN NORRIS )
PERMIT NO. AWS090165 )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
1, ECEIVEDINCDE0,1DIf1i
NOV 1.0 2015
FILE NO. DV-2016-0066 Water Oriality Regloiial
operations sectio'l
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $8478.92 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated, October 26, 2016, the
undersigned,. desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in
the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water
Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in
support of a remission request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice
of assessment.
u {h
This the I day of o v c ^^6—K , 2016
Wture
j�i
ADDRESS L,, �1
133 0 �w i l A CA 1 `i ckby4f
Al11 C 3 �d
TELEPHONE
M1u� 5 Y9 1475 1

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Allen Norris
Norris Farm #2
92 Baldwin Branch Church Road
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Dear Mr. Norris:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
November 14, 2016 DECEIVED
WR
Nov 16 2016
FAYETrEVIL EQoREGIONAL OFFICE
SUBJECT: Remission Request
Farm # 09-0165
Bladen County
File No. DV-2016-0066
Permit No. AWS090165
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request, on November 10, 2016, for remission of the
civil penalty levied against the subject facility. The Director of the Division of Water Resources
will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your remission request.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Belinda Henson, Fayetteville WQROS Regional Supervisor
File # DV-2016-0165
WQROS Central Files (AWS090165)
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources/Water Quality Regional Operations
1636 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919 707 9129

art!JAI
ON-
oi op
�' gay aa► f

:�onnectGIS
&CONNECTGIS
wE5
1:100 Fee:
C2009-2017 Dude Solutiorm All Rights Restmed- I Software Notices
Page I of 1
Welcome Guest users Online: 762
Help Mobile View SRT:0.168sec
Layers
LeFarmnuan
Parc0s
-� Ityl Y
USTax Data
PIN:
133000347873
Owner Name:
SOUTHERN DIVERSIFIED LLC
Owner Name 2:
Owner Address:
ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STE 1700
Deed Book:
0751
Deed Page:
0170
Owner City.
PORTLAND
Owner State:
OR
DeedYear.
2016
DeedAcres:
455
Owner Zip:
97258-2039
PlatBook:
PlatPage:
SalesAmount
0
Map Acres:
455
Parcelid:
17179
OwnerA&
ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STE 1700
OwnerCity.
PORTLAND
OwnerState:
OR
OwnerZip:
97258-2039
PID:
17179
TaxDistric: ELIZABETHTOWN FD
NeighbCode:
0
LandASVCur
354900
ImproveASV:
0
Land RateTy,
AC
LandRateCo:
W D P
Saleslns 1:
Saleslnstr.
TaxahleVal:
354900
TotalTaxOw:
0
PhysStreet:
NC 87 HWY E
XXTIAC:
0
LegalDescr.
133000347873 v
yL alDes_1:
Legend
day 50 Results
ittps://bladen2.connectgis.com/Map.aspx 1/23/201

f
Hutr_htn- F-aarms
I. GOOgl2

CD
1
N611

®®
14:
47
t �• r
i J �
- f.9rr�ri-,r� � � •ff � ��
I-W
- 41
-_ - - `�J m f '�

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road -- Fayetteville, NC 28306 (910) 864-19201864-8774 fax
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF 1
CLIEKr NAME s ADDRESS'. g
u•`
Q c� a s w1
PCW PROJECT! LOCAn.ON: py� l 6
LLI
J
O
O
TYPE
OF
ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
1
V
rA.
B � "Nb3 (ptKQ) + <4V C-
C = H2SO4 (ph<2).+ -WC
D =: NaOH + e-4'C
E = ZN Acetate .+ C4"C ;
F =Sodium Thla '
-
CONTACT PERSON:
4
PHOhE ¢ S r
(v - 3 0� - 0
LE PB:
DATE 1 METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
LAB 10 #'
Sample Type
StartDate
StartTime
Sample
Date
Sample
Time
COMP
GRAS
Ph
D.O.
TEMP'C
LoR
GHDRINE
A
d 6
��skr w
(a-►�' �
I( Iro
00
G
('(0.
1-
SD Ll JC it,
l(fl
0
Ae[ltcdshed
Date
Time
Received by:
Date
Time
Comments or Special Hazards:
711k1
*14-j a
I; S)
2
IC)-14-1
1.51
Temp:
Relinquished dyQ
Date
Time
Received by;
Date
Time
3
4
pf{;
Retinquishedby'.
Date
irtme
!Received by'.
Date
Time
5
6
Flow:
Relinquished try:
Date
Time
Received by.
Date
nme
7
S
Additional Sample Comments:

NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water)
Ms, Belinda Henson
225 Green Street, #714
Fayetteville NC, 28301
�g)MICROBAC"
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
Project: Creek Sample - Hutchinson Farm - 9-168
Source, grab
K610456-04
Date Reported: 10120Y 16
Date Received: 10/ 14116
Date Sampled: I0i 1411 h
Sampled By: Watts
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Nitrate asN 0.781 mglL 10/17/16 10:08 AC EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Nitrite as N 1.08 mg/L 10/17/16 10:08 AC EPA 300,0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Notes and Definitions A
G3 No sample dilution met the requirement of a DO depiction of at least 2.0 mg/l- and/or 1.0 mg/L
Respectfully Submitted
�,eaacxr-
Jeanne Overstreet, Overstreet, Project Manages
Thank you for your business. We invilr yaurJeedback on our level ofservice ro you. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864.1920 with any
questions. You mate also contact J. Trevor 8ovice, President at presidenlQmicrobac.com
Microbac Laboratories, Inc. page 2 of 2
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1910.864.1920 p 1910,864,8774 f I www.microbac.com

6)MICROBAC'
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water) Date Reported: 10/20/16
Ms. Belinda Henson Project: Creek Sample - Hutchinson Farm - 9-168 Date Received: 10/14/16
225 Green Street, 0714 Date Sampled: 10/14/16
Fayetteville NC, 28301 Sampled By: Watts
Downstream, grab
K6J0456-01
Analyte
Result
Units
Analyzed
Analyzed By
Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayettevllle
BOD
19.1
mg/L
10/14/16
18A5
ELM
SM 5210 B-2011 G3
Coliform, Fecal
9300
per 100 mL
10/14/16
16:00
JR
SM 9222 D-1997
Nitrate as N
0,201
mg/L
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Nitrite as N
0,101
mg/L
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Upstream, grab
K6J0456-02
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
BOD
36.7
mg/L
10/14/16
18:45
ELM
SM 5210 B-2011
Coliform, Fecal
460000
per 100 mL
10/14/16
16:00
JR
SM 9222 D-1997
Nitrate as N
0.108
mg/L
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0. Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Nitrite as N
0.132
mg/L
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0, Rev, 2.1 (1993)
Preconfluence, grab
K6J0456-03
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
BOD
1010
mg/L
10/14/16
18:45
ELM
SM 521013-2011
Coliform, Fecal
290000
per 100 mL
10/14/16
16:00
JR
SM 9222 13-1997
Nitrate es N
0.426
mg/L
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Nitrite as N
0.604
mg/1-
10/17/16
10:08
AC
EPA 300.0, Rev. 2.1 (1993)
Source, grab
K6J0456-04
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Mlcrobac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
BOD 2290
Coliform, Fecal 170000
mg/L 10/14/16 18:45 ELM SM 5210 B-2011
per 100 mL 10/14/16 16:00 JR SM 9222 D-1997
Microbac Laboratories, Inc,
Page 1 of 2
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1910,864.1920 p 1910,864,8774 f I www.microbac.com

Hutchinson, Bladen Co.
October 14, 2016 Release
Table 1 Analytical Results
Analyte
Downstream
Upstream
Pre -Confluence
Source
BOD
19.1
36.7
1,010
2,290
Coliform
9,300
460,000
290,000
170,000
Nitrate'
0,201
0.108
0.426
0.781
Nitrite'
0.101
0.132
0.604
1.68
Note: Eventhough "nutrients" were requested, the lab did not analyze for TKN or ammonia.

PAT MCCRORY
f. .
i t, Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
C. Secretary
WdterResources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 11, 2016 Director
CERTIFIED MAIL 7012 3050 00019398 7522
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Allen Norris
92 Baldwin Branch Church Rd,
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATIONINOTICE OF INTENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304
NOV-2016-DV-0066
Norris Farm 2 Facility No. 09-1.65, Permit No. AWS090165
Bladen County
Dear W. Norris:
On February 3, 2016, staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (Division), Water Quality Regional .
Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the. Norris Farm 2 and the permitted waste disposal system. We
wish'to thank Mr. Allen Norris and Mr. Keith Norris, who were present and assisted during the
inspection.
Asa result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1304, you have been
found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I,
Failure to prevent discharge of waste to surface waters of wetlands. N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 OC - (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section Conditions I 1 and 12),
On February 2, 2016 the Division received. notification from a member of the general public that swine
waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton Creek. Division staff responded .by visiting the
unnamed tributary and observed that waste was in the stream and documented with photographs' With
limited daylight left it was determined that the Division.would return on February 3, 2016 to investigate
the origin of the waste. .
On February 3, 2016, staff returned to the stream and took water samples, photographs and continued the,
investigation for the origin of the waste. At 10:45am staff entered Norris Farm 2, and with your
permission looked for a possible discharge. Staff documented with photographs and water samples that
waste had bypassed your waste collection system by overflowing from a hog house into a fresh water
drain system. Waste flowed from the drain through the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creek
State of North Carolina j; Environmental Quality I. Water Resources
225 (green Street -Suite 7141 Fayetteville. North Carolina 29301-5043
910433-3300

Mr. Allen Norris `
February 11, 2016 M
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Determine the cause of the discharge in your waste collection system, take action by repairing, cleaning
or changing management practices to prevent this from happening again.
Violation 2:
Failure to notify Division of Water Resources a failure of any component of the animal waste
management system resulting in a discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands. (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section. M. 13a)
Your permit specifically requires notification by telephone as soon as possible, but in no case more than
24 hours and a written report within 5 calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence of a
reportable permit condition, The Division of Water Resources has no record of receiving the 24-hour
notification. The 5 day written report was received on February 8, 2016.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 2:
In the future, please notify the Division of Water Resources of the occurrence of any reportable events in
accordance with your permit.
Violation 3:
Failure to apply animal waste at rates in accordance with your permit and Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during
any given application event. (Permit No. AWS090165 Section II 5)
On February 3, 2016 when staff entered your farm it was observed that waste was being applied by two
reels. Staff documented by photographs and water samples that the reel close to the lagoon was applying
waste that was ponding and running off into a drainage ditch and in"a low area next to the woods.
Required Corrective action for Violation 3:
If you have not already done so, immediately cease application methods of animal waste that causes or
contributes to ponding and runoff, and take all necessary'steps to insure this violation does not reoccur.
The steps could include but are not limited to modification of you Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan and/or adjustment and calibration of the spray irrigation equipment.
Consider construction of a control structure to prevent possible runoff from application events.
Violation 4:
In no case shall land application. rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event, (Permit No. AWS090165, Condition 1I. 17).
On February 3, 2016 while applying hog waste to spray fields, failure to make visual inspection of the
land application site to �ensurerunoff that excessive ponding and runowould not occur. Documented with
photographs and water samples on February 3, 2016.

Mr. Allen Norris
February 11, 2016
� Page 3
Required Corrective action for Violation 4:
In the future,'during land application events, a designated Operator in Charge (OTC) of a type A Animal
Waste Management System or an employee under the OIC's supervision must walk the application fields
looking at application equipment, subsurface drain outlets, ditches and drainage ways for any sign of
ponding or discharge from the spray fields as required by your permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action above, please
submit the following items on or before March 15, 2016:
1. An explanation from the OX for this farm regarding how this violation occurred.
2. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will he taken to prevent these violation from
occurring in the future.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before March
15, 2016 and.to provide a written response to this Notice by.March 15, 2016. Please include in your
response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not
addressed.
As a result df the violations in this Notice, this office is considering a recommendation for a civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division. If you,wish to present an explanation for the violations cited,
or if you believe there are other factors, which should be considered please send such: information to me
in writing within ten (10I days following_ receipt of this letter. Your response will be reviewed, and, if an
enforcement action is still deemed appropriate; it will be forwarded to the Director and included.for
consideration.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not mare that
twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against' "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please. contact Steve Guyton or me at [phone].
Sinc rely, � %7�D Belinda S. enson
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
cc: Christine Lawson, DWR Animal Feeding Operations Program
Smithfield Hog Production -PO Box 856-Warsaw, NC 28398-0856 (Attn: Toni King)
Fayetteville Regional Office WQROS files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B..Howes, Secretary [DIEHNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 30, 1997.
Mr. Allen Norris
Rt. 1, Box 188A
Elizabethtown, N. C. 28337
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Norris Swine Farm # 2
Facility No. 09-165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
On July 16, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an annual inspection at Norris Swine Farm #2 (formerly Hickory Hill) to determine
compliance with their certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP). At the time of the
investigation our staff confirmed that the facility had not planted all the required crops (soybeans and
or wheat). In addition, some of the waste application fields required root removal and other
preparation prior to planting a winter crop. 25 of the required 48 acres of waste application spray
field were planted in soybeans . The waste application records were not completed because the farm
had recently changed owners (July 1, 1997). The facility had no grass cover in several areas on the
lagoon dikes. In addition, you are requested to address the following items:
1. Immediately complete the land clearing and preparation for planting the required crop (wheat)
per your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) in the 23 acre spray
application fields to allow for the application of waste at agronomic rates.
2. Begin immediately to record all waste applications on the 1RR-2 form or a similar form per
hydrant rather than per field.
3. Plant a cover grass on the bare spots on the lagoon dike to prevent erosion.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone] .
North Carolina 28301-&M3 v«/ C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
Mr. Allen Norris
July 30, 1997
Please provide a written response to this office on or before October 17, 1997, regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
n.z , �/— �
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
KTS/RFH
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine, FRO, NC DSWC
Sam Warren, Bladen County NRCS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Allen Norris
Rt. 1, Box 188A
Elizabethtown, N. C. 28337
AILWT4 -d I k-WA
00
[Dr-=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 30, 1997.
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Norris Swine Farm # 2
Facility No. 09-165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
On July 16, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an annual inspection at Norris Swine Farm 42 (formerly Hickory Hill) .to determine
compliance with their certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP). At the time of the
investigation our staff confirmed that the facility had not planted all the required crops (soybeans and
or wheat). In addition, some of the waste application fields required root removal and other
preparation prior to planting a winter crop..25 of the required 48 acres of waste application spray
field were planted in soybeans. The waste application records were not completed because the farm
had recently changed owners (July 1, 1997). The facility had no grass cover in several areas on the
lagoon dikes. In addition, you are requested to address the following items. -
Immediately complete the land clearing and preparation for planting the required crop (wheat)
per your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) in the 23 acre spray
application fields to allow for the application of waste at agronomic rates.
2. Begin immediately to record all waste applications on the IRR-2 form or a similar form per
hydrant rather than per field.
3. Plant a cover grass on the bare spots on the lagoon dike to prevent erosion.
Wachovfa Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville NO FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
Mr. Allen Norris
July 30, 1997
Please provide a written response to this office on or before October 17, 1997, regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
n .,r cc
�z
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
KTS/RFH
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine, FRO, NC DSWC
Sam Warren, Bladen County NRCS
J'
;rr'E

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
. ?MAI
E)EF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 30, 1997.
I,..- ,_a • , UK,$ Im
Mr. Allen Norris
Rf 1, Box 188A
Elizabethtown, N. C. 28337
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Norris Swine Farm # 2
Facility No. 09-165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
On July 16, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an annual inspection at Norris Swine Farm #2 (formerly Hickory Hill) to determine
compliance with their certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP). At the time of the
investigation our staff confirmed that the facility had not planted all the required crops (soybeans and
or wheat). In addition, some of the waste application fields required root removal and other
preparation prior to planting a winter crop. 25 of the required 48 acres of waste application spray
field were planted in soybeans. The waste application records were not completed because the fhrm
had recently changed owners (July 1, 1997). The facility had no grass cover in several areas on the,
lagoon dikes. In addition, you are requested to address the following items:
1. immediately complete the land clearing and preparation for planting the required crop (wheat)
per your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) in the 23 acre spray
application fields to allow for the application of waste at agronomic rates.
2. Begin immediately to record all waste applications on the IRR-2 form or a similar form per' b.
hydrant rather than per field.
3. Plant a cover grass on the bare spots on the lagoon dike to prevent erosion.
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N%q
C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

fi
Page 2
Mr. Allen Norris
July 30, 1997
Please provide a written response to this office on or before October 17, 1997, regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
KTS/RFH
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine, FRO, NC DSWC
Sam Warren, Bladen County NRCS

4ngv
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILL.E REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 24,1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Allen Norris
92 Baldwin Branch Church Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Norris Farm #1 and Norris Farm #4
Facility Nos. 09-32 and 09-165 '`
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
On June 8,1999, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality conducted routine inspections on your swine facilities located in Bladen County. It
was noted that freeboard records were not being maintained weekly as required by the
General Permit issued to these facilities. General Permit condition 111.2 states that "Waste
lagoon and storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by
the DWQ.".
The last waste samples taken from both facilities were dated in December of 1998.
General Permit condition 111.4 states that "An analysis of the animal waste shall be
conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least 60 days (before or
after) of the date of application.".
It was also noted that both facilities failed to have a copy of the Certificate of
Coverage (COC) and General Permit on -site. General Permit condition 1.4 states that "A
copy of this General Permit, COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner agreements,
and the CAWMP shall be readily available at the farm (stored in places such as the farm
residence, office, outbuildings, etc.) where the animal waste management activities are
being conducted for the life of this permit. These documents shall be kept in good condition
and records shall be maintained in an orderly fashion.".
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be performed:
1. Immediately begin to record weekly freeboard levels on both facilities to be in compliance
with the General Permit.
225 GREEN STREET. SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28901-8048
PHONE [phone] FA% 910-4136-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r
Page 2
Norris Farms
June 24,1999.
2. Take a waste sample as close to the date of application as practical but at least 60 days before or 60 days
after application as required by General Permit condition 111.4 and the CAWMP.
3. Need to get a copy of the COC and General Permit to keep on -site for both facilities.
Please notify this office in writing on or before July 23,1999 at the letterhead above as to the actions
taken or proposed to be taken to resolve these deficiencies. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving
this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have or may result from these deficiencies.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Jimmy Vinson - Brown's of Carolina, Inc.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT or,
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
September 15, 2000
110 M30 1411CROMME : •
Mr. Allen Norris
.92 Baldwin Branch Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Alien Norris Farm and Allen Norris #2
Facility Nos. 09-32 and 09-165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
On September 12, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality performed an inspection of the Allen Norris Farm and the
Alien Norris #2 Farm located in Bladen Co. The inspection revealed that the
freeboard records at both farms are not being kept per the General Permit. The
inspection also revealed that the waste analyses were not current for either farm.
The General Permit Condition 1II.2., states, "...waste lagoon and storage pond
levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the DWQ." The
General Permit Condition 11I.4,, states, " An analysis of the animal waste shall be
conducted as close to the time of application as practical and "at least within 60 days
(before or after) of the date of application...."
In regard to the deficiency(s) noted during the inspection, the following actions
are requested:
1. Keep weekly freeboard levels of the lagoons.
2. Keep waste analyses current (approximately every four months to stay
In compliance).
GiROUNOWATER S6CTiON
228 GR4EN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BLD• FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-8043
PHONE:[phone] FAX: [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIYR ACTION EMPLOYER - SO9.' RECYCLED / 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FRIZZ HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Norris
9-15-00
Page 2
Please provide a written response to this office on or before September 29, 2000 as to the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve the deficiency(s). Nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted
or may result from these deficiencies.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact John Hasty at (91'0) 486-1541.
Sincerely,
?ohn
CHasty, Jr.
Environmental Specialist
cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Central Files -Raleigh
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Sam Warren-Bladen Co. NRCS

f
a Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 it Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
-so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to
24r Allen Norris
92 Baldwiti Brancb Ad
Elizabethtown NC ' 28337
09-32 & 09-165
A. Received by (Please Print CtearYy) I B. Date of Delivery
C. S' attfcre -
X }may 0 Agent
L Addressee
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes
It YES, enter delivery address below: © No
3. Service Type
'X§2pertffied Mail 0 Express Mail
© Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.D.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Feel © Yes
2. Article Number {Copy from service taboo
Z 425 691 096
PS Form 3811..1uly 1999 Domestic Saturn Receipt wzs9s ss teas
i�

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D,
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 7, 2602
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Allen Norris
92 Baldwin Branch Church Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
'Allen Norris'Farm & Norris Faun k2 "
-Facility Nos: 09-32 &,09-165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 1 SA NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of.your 2H .0217
Permit.
On April 25, 2002, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality performed a
routine inspection of the above referenced swine farms in Bladen County. These inspections revealed that lagoon
waste analysis was not being performed within 60 days of an irrigation event. Several irrigation events had
occurred in January 2002 without a valid waste sample. These items have,been addressed in two previous notices
(NOD dated June 24,.1999 and NOD dated September 15, 2000) and previous inspections and reviews conducted
by the Division of Water Quality and the Division of Soil and Water.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Collect lagoon waste samples at a minimum of every 120 days during periods of wastewater irrigation. Waste
samples are valid for 60 days before and 60 days after the sample date.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that, this notice does,not prevent the Divisiornof Water Quality from taking enforcement,
actions for this violation or any past or future viol ation..Furtherm'ore, the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 7141 SYSTEL BUILDING 1 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW-FNR,S1AT9.NC.Us1ENR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE; 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Norris
5-7-02 F ,
Page 2
Please provide this office with a written response on or before May 22, 2002 as to the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to avoid these situations in the future. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Paul Sherman, Environmental Engineer, or myself at [phone].
Sin r' 1!r
mps/PR ' Paul . Raw1s
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: DWQ Raleigh -Compliance Unit
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Christopher Bordeaux-Bladen Co. NRCS
Central Files -Raleigh

■ Complete Items-1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) B.
Date of Qe4ery '
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you. C. Signature
i
w Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X
❑Agent
or on the front if space permits.
❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
❑ Yes
1. Article Addressed to:
If YES, enter delivery address below:
❑ No
'' Mr Allen 'Norris
92 Baldwin :Bxanch :Church Rd,
Elizabethtown �NC '• 2$337
[[ 3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
© Reglstered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
t
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O,D,.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
❑ Yes
2. Article Number - i ! : i j
001111132 i22a3 ;.�
(lrertstarTromseivicelaneljl709934QtQ
PS Form 3811, March 2401 DomesticReturn Receipt - .
to25a5-ot 11Ma
{
i�.€�
C3
a
ru A1I.en Norris Farm & Norris Farm #2
ru
P
f ru Postage $ • 34
m
r-q Certifled Fee 2.10
�Postmark
i Return Receipt Fee Here
' r-1 (Endorsement Required) 1.50
rq
t3 Restricted Delivery fee
C3 (Endorsement Required)
a Total Postage & Fees $ 3.94
Hams (Please Print Clearly) tto be cc) totery by mailer)
m
Mr__Allen._Norrr ii.....................•----------------- ----- -.....-
Street, Apt. No.: or PO Sax No.
42._.�e.l dwin • Brch., Church --Rd ---_ -•----------------
' -City, $tote, ZIPa!
F1 i zabethtown NC 28337-.9011111:11_
BUU;�.yuly, i;lt3ti

r'
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
March 23, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL - #7009 2250 0000 80871832
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Allen Norris
Norris Farm #2
92 Baldwin Branch Church Road
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Dear Allen Norris:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Farm # 09-0165
Pitt County
Permit No. AWS090165
File No. DV-2016-0066
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources considered the information you submitted in support of your
request for remission and remitted $1000.00 of the $8478.92 civil penalty assessment. The revised
civil penalty is therefore a total amount of.$7478.92, which includes $2978.92 in investigative
costs. A copy of the Director's decision is attached.
Two options are available to you at this stage of the remission process:
1) You may pay the penalty.
if you decide to pay the penalty please make your check payable to the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ). Send the payment within thirty (30) calendar days of your
receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Miressa Garoma
NC DEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations grogram
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
OR
-�Nothing Compares`--..
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations section
1636 Mail Service Center { Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919.707-9129

Allen Norris
Enforcement # DV-2016-0066
Page 2 of 2
2) You may decide to have the Environmental Management Commission's (EMC)
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions make the final decision on your remission
request.
If payment is not received within 30 calendar days from your receipt of this letter, your request
for remission with supporting documents and the recommendation of the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources will be delivered to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for final agency decision.
If you or your representative would like to speak before the Committee, you must complete
and return the attached Request for Oral Presentation -Form within thirty (30) calendar days of
receipt of this letter. Send the completed form to:
Miressa Garoma
NC DEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
The EMC Chairman will review the supporting documents and your request for an oral
presentation (if you make the request). If the Chairman determines that there is a compelling
reason to require a presentation, you will be notified of when and where you should appear. If
a presentation is not required, the final decision will be based upon the written record.
Please be advised that the EMC's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will make its
remission decision based on the original assessment amount. Therefore, the EMC may
choose to uphold the original penalty amount and offer no remissions, they may agree
with the DWR Director's remission recommendation detailed above, or the penalty
amount may be further remitted.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
RECEIVED Sincerely,
DEQIDWR
MAR 2 7 2017
WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Fayetteville WQROS Regional Supervisor
File # DV-2016-0066
WQROS Central Files (AWS090165)
�`� J.
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations, and
Ground Water Protection Branch

r
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSION FACTORS
Case Number: DV-2016-0066 Region: Fayetteville
Assessed Entity: Allen Norris
County: Bladen
Permit: AWS090165
® (a) Whether one or more of the civil penalty' assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner:
No civil penalty was assessed for Condition III. 13. A.
The other factors were not wrongly applied.
® (b) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation:
Violator did promptly'discontinue Environmental damage.
® (c) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident:
The violation of the discharge from the swine building was a malfunction of the waste system, but should have
been noted much earlier.
The violation of the discharge and ponding from the spray field was not inadvertent, was a failure to inspect the
spray field during waste application.
® (d) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations:
No previous assessed civil penalties.
® (e) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions:
Unknown if payment will prevent the proposed construction of two secondary containment structures by Norris
Farms. The construction of two containment structures was not part of any remedial actions requested by DWR
The construction of the containment structures could provide significant protection against future malfunction of
the waste management systems.
DECISION (Check One)
Request Denied ❑
Full Remission ❑ Retain Enforcement Costs? Yes ❑No ❑
Partial Remission , te (Enter Amount Remitted)
3�Zo/7
S.bftonerman Date
rev 1.0 — 8.31.09 /�

4i
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST:
ALLEN NORRIS
DWQ Case Number: DV-2016-0066
REQUEST FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
I hereby request to make an oral presentation before the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions in the matter of the case noted above. In making this request, I assert that I understand all of the following statements:
• This request will be reviewed by the Chairman of the Environmental Management Commission and may be either granted or denied.
• Making a presentation will require the presence of myself and/or my representative during a Committee meeting held in Raleigh,
North Carolina.
• My presentation will be limited to discussion of issues and information submitted in my original remission request, and because no
factual issues are in dispute, my presentation will be limited to five (5) minutes in length.
The North Carolina State Bar's Authorized Practice of Law Committee has ruled that the appearance in a representative capacity at
quasi-judicial hearings or proceedings is limited to lawyers who are active members of the bar. Proceedings before the Committee on
Remissions are quasi-judicial. You should consider how you intend to present your case to the Committee in light of the State Bar's
opinion and whether anyone will be speaking in a representative capacity for you or a business or governmental entity. If you or your
representative would like to speak before the Committee, you must complete and return this form within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this letter.
Depending on your status as an individual, corporation, partnership or municipality, the State Bar's Opinion affects how you may
proceed with your oral presentation. See www.ncbar.com/ethics, Authorized Practice Advisory Opinion 2006-1 and 2007 Formal
Ethics Opinion 3.
• If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation before the Committee,
then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you intend on having another individual speak
on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the
meeting in order to avoid violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law.
If you are a corporation,yartncrshiu or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation before the
Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a
license if he or she is not a licensed attorney. Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
If you choose to request an oral presentation, please make sure that signatures on the previously submitted Remission Request form
and this Oral Presentation Request form are: 1) for individuals and business owners, your own signature and 2) for corporations,
partnerships and municipalities, signed by individuals who would not violate the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of
law.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with hearing your case If the
Committee is informed that a violation of the State Bar occurs.
This the
day of
20
SIGNATURE
TITLE (President, Owner, etc.)
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
I

�D-e,OF%
r'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
COUNTY OF BLADEN
FILE NO. DV-2016-0066
IN THE MATTER OF
ALLEN NORRIS
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ) CIVIL PENALTIES
GENERAL PERMIT AWG1000000 )
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1 }
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources (DWR), 1, Jon
Risgaard, Chief of the Water Quality Regional Operations Section of the DWR, make the
following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Allen Norris owns and operates Norris Farm 42, a swine, operation located along
604 Powell Rd. in BLADEN County.
B. Allen Norris was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS090165 under General
Permit AWG100000 for Norris Farm #2 on October 1, 2014, effective October 1,
2014, with an expiration date of September 30, 2019. This permit does not allow
the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
C. On February 3, 2016, DWR staff observed a discharge of wastewater at Norris
Farm 42 from confinement house and spray field to unnamed tributary to Upton
Creek, which are Class C waters of the State within the Cape Fear River Basin.
On February 2, 2016 the Division received notification from a member"O'f the
general public that swine waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton
Creek. Division staff responded by visiting the unnamed tributary and observed
that waste was in the stream and documented with photographs. With limited
daylight left it was determined that the Division would return on February 3, 2016
to investigate the origin of the waste.

r
On February 3, 2016, staff returned to the stream and took water samples,
photographs and continued the investigation for the origin of the waste. At
10:45am staff entered Norris Farm 2, and with the permission of Mr. Norris DWR
staff looked for a possible discharge. Staff documented with photographs and
water samples that waste had bypassed Norris Farm #2 waste collection system by
overflowing from a hog house into a fresh water drain system. Waste flowed from
the drain through the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creek.
D. Allen Norris had no valid permit,for the above -described activity.
E. On February 11, 2016, the Division issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to Allen
Norris identifying violations of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 and Permit No. AWS090165.
The violations include the unlawful discharge of wastes to waters of the State.
F. The NOV letter was sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and received
on February 16, 2016.
G. On February 11, 2016, a Notice of Intent to enforce letter was issued to Allen
Norris for violations of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 and Permit No. AWS090165.
H. The Notice was sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested and received on
February 16, 2016,
Condition No. 1. l of the General Permit AWG1000000 states in part that any
discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands by runoff, manmade
conveyance, is prohibited except as otherwise provided in the General Permit.
J. DWR documented that waste reached waters of the state in part by manmade
conveyance (fresh water drain `system).
K. Condition No. 1 2 of the general Permit AWGi000000 states that the General
Permit does not allow the Permittee to cause a violation of any of the water
quality standards established pursuant to title 15A, subehapter 2B of the North
Carolina Administrative Code and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the North
Carolina Administrative Code.
L. Water samples taken by DWR Staff documented water quality standards were
violated.
M. Condition No. III Ba of the General Permit AWG1000000 requires that the
Permittee shall report by telephone to the Fayetteville Regional Office as soon as
possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
5 ;r

occurrence of failure of any component of the animal waste management system
resulting in a discharge to ditches, surface waters, wetlands.
N. The DWR received notification from a member of the general public of this
discharge. Mr. Norris stated he was not aware of the discharge.
O. Condition II 5 of the General Permit AWG1000000 states in no case shall land
application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event.
P. The DWR staff documented with pictures and water samples during an active
spray application event that waste was ponding and runoff was accruing.
Q. Condition II 17 of the General Permit AWG 1000000 states in part that the
operator in charge (OIC) or a person under the supervision of an OIC shall
inspect, the land application site,as often as necessary to insure that the animal
waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP. Inspection shall include
but not be limited to visual observation of application equipment, spray fields,
subsurface drain outlets, ditches, and drainage ways for any discharge of waste.
R. Mr. Norris stated that the reels had been running about an hour and no one had
checked the fields after they were started.
S. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$2,97892.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
11. . CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Allen Norris is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. Unnamed tributary to Upton Creek constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6) as a result of:
On Allen Norris caused the discharge of waste to waters of the State On February
2, 2016 the Division received notification from a member of the general public
that swine waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton Creek. Division
staff responded by visiting the unnamed tributary and observed that waste was in
the stream and documented with photographs. With limited daylight left it was
determined that the Division would return on February 3, 2016 to investigate the
origin of the waste.
On February 3, 2016, staff returned to the stream and took water samples,
photographs and continued the investigation for the origin of the waste. At
10:45am staff entered Norris Farm 2, and with Mr. Norris permission looked for a

possible discharge. Staff documented with photographs and water samples that
waste had bypassed Mr. Norris waste collection system by overflowing from a
hog house into a fresh water drain system. Waste flowed from the drain through
the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creels.
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which G.S. 143-215.1 requires a permit.
D. The above -cited failure to prevent any discharge of waste that reaches surface
waters or wetlands by runoff, manmade conveyance, is prohibited except as
otherwise provided in the General Permit. Violated Condition No. I 1 of the
General Permit AWG 1000000
C. The above -cited failure to prevent cause a violation of any of the water quality
standards established pursuant to title 15A, subchapter 2B of the North Carolina
Administrative Code and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the North Carolina
Administrative Code. Violated condition No. I 2 of the General Permit
AWG 1000000,
F. The above -cited failure to report by telephone to the Fayetteville Regional Office
as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge
of the occurrence of failure of any component of the animal waste management
system resulting in a discharge"'io ditches, surface waters, wetlands. Violated
Condition No I1I 13a of the General Permit AWG 1000000.
G. The above -cited waste application event where waste was applied at rates that
resulted in excessive ponding and runoff. Violated Condition No. II 5 of the
General Permit AWG 1000000.
171. The above -cited failure to inspect the land application site as often as necessary to
insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP.
Inspection shall include but not be limited to visual observation of application
equipment, spray fields, subsurface drain outlets, ditches, and drainage ways for
any discharge of waste. Violated Condition No. II 17 of the General Permit
AWG 1000000
Allen Norris may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
is required but fails to apply for"or.to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
J. General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8) provides that the
reasonable costs of any investigation, inspection or monitoring survey may be

assessed against a person who violates any regulations, standards, or limitations
adopted by the Environmental Management Commission or violates any terms or
conditions of any permit issued pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.1, or special order
or other document issued pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.2.
K. The Chief of the Water Quality Regional Operations Sections, Division of Water
Resources, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, has
the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of L,aw, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Allen Norris is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ for violating Condition No. 1. 1 of the General Permit
AWG1000000 for failure to prevent any discharge of waste
that reaches surface waters or wetlands by runoff and
manmade conveyance.
$ for violating Condition No. I. 2 of the General Permit
AWG1000000 for failure to prevent the violation of the
water quality standards in the unnamed tributary to Upton
Creek established pursuant to title 15A, subchapter 213 of
the North'Carolina Administrative Code and Title 15A,
Subchapter 2L of the North Carolina Administrative Code.
$ for violating Condition No. III 13a of the General Permit
AWG100000 by failure to report by telephone to the
Fayetteville Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no
case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of failure of any component of the animal waste
management system resulting in a discharge to ditches,
surface waters, wetlands.
$ for violating Condition No. II 5 of the General Permit
AWG1000000 for a waste application event where waste
was applied at rates that resulted in excessive ponding and
runoff.

$ for violating Condition No. lI 17 of the General Permit
AWG1000000 for failure to visually and physically inspect
the land application site as often as necessary to prevent
ponding and runoff.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY which is percent of
the maximum penalty authorized by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ Investigation costs assessed
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G,S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into
account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
IV. NOTICE:
I reserve the right to assess civil penalties and investigative costs for any continuing
violations occurring after the assessment period indicated above, Each day of a
continuing violation may be considered a separate violation subject to a maximum
$25,000.00 per day penalty. Civil penalties and investigative cost may be assessed for
any other rules and statutes for which penalties have not yet been assessed.
V. TRANSMITTAL:
These Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision shall be transmitted to Allen
Norris in accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(A)(d).
(Date) John Risgaard, Chief

Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1

r-
PAT MCCRORY
Gciveriior .
DONAL.D R. VAN DER VAART
Wa ter Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALITY
February l 1, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL 7012 3050 0001 9398 7522
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Allen Norris
92 Baldwin Branch Church Rd.
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304
NOV-2016-DV-0066
Norris Farm 2 Facility No. 09-165, Permit No. AWS090165
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
,crerary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
0irecrar
On February 3, 2016, staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (Division), Water Quality Regional
Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Norris Farm 2 and the permitted waste disposal system. We
wish to thank Mr. Allen Norris and Mr. Keith Norris, who were present and assisted during the
inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1304, you have been
found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation l:
Failure to prevent discharge of waste to surface waters of wetlands. N.C.G.S. 143-215.10C - (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section Conditions I I and 12),
On February 2, 2016 the Division received notification from a member of the general public that swine
waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton Creek. Division staff responded by visiting the
unnamed tributary and observed that waste was in the stream and documented with photographs. With
limited daylight left it was determined that the Division would return on February 3, 2016 to investigate
the origin of the waste.
On February 3, 2016, staff returned to the stream and took water samples, photographs and continued the
investigation for the origin of the waste. At 10:45am staff entered Norris Farm 2, and with your
permission looked for a possible discharge. Staff documented with photographs and water samples that
waste had bypassed your waste collection system by overflowing from a hog house into a fresh water
drain system. Waste flowed from the drain through the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creek
Stale of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
225 Green Street -Suite 71+ Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5047

Mr. Allen Norris
February 11, 2016
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Determine the cause of the discharge in your waste collection system, take action by repairing, cleaning
or changing management practices to prevent this from happening again.
Violation 2:
Failure to notify Division of Water Resources a failure of any component of the animal waste
management system resulting in a discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands. (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section III. 13a)
Your permit specifically requires notification by telephone as soon as possible, but in no case more than
24 hours and a written report within 5 calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence of a
reportable permit condition. The Division of Water Resources has no record of receiving the 24-hour
notification. The 5 day written report was received on February 8, 2016.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 2:
In the future, please notify the Division of Water Resources of the occurrence of any reportable events in
accordance with your permit.
Violation 3:
Failure to apply animal waste at rates in accordance with your permit and Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during
any given application event. (Permit No. AWS090165 Section 11 5)
On February 3, 2016 when staff entered your farm it was observed that waste was being applied by two
reels. Staff documented by photographs and water samples that the reel close to the lagoon was applying
waste that was ponding and running off into a drainage ditch and in a low area next to the woods.
Required Corrective action for Violation 3:
If you have not already done so, immediately cease application methods of animal waste that causes or
contributes to ponding and runoff, and take all necessary steps to insure this violation does not reoccur.
The steps could include but are not limited to modification of you Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan and/or adjustment and calibration of the spray irrigation equipment.
Consider construction of a control structure to prevent possible runoff from application events.
Violation 4:
In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event. (Permit No. AWS090165, Condition 11. 17).
On February 3, 2016 while applying hog waste to spray fields, failure to make visual inspection of the
land application site to ensure that excessive ponding and runoff would not occur. Documented with
photographs and water samples on February 3, 2016.

Mr. Allen Norris
February 11, 2016
Page 2
Required Corrective action for Violation 4:
In the future, during land application events, a designated Operator in Charge (OIC) of a type A Animal
Waste Management System or an employee under the OTC's supervision must walk the application fields
looking at application equipment, subsurface drain outlets, ditches and drainage ways for any sign of
ponding or discharge from the spray fields as required by your permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action above, please
submit the following items on or before March 15, 2016:
1. An explanation from the OIC for this farm regarding how this violation occurred
2. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will he taken to prevent these violation from
occurring in the future.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before March
15, 2016 and to provide a written response to this Notice by March 15, 2016. Please include in your
response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not
addressed.
As a result of the violations in this Notice, this office is considering a recommendation for a civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division. If you wish to present an explanation for the violations cited,
or if you believe there are other factors, which should be considered please_send_such information to me
in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this letter. Your response will be reviewed, and, if an
enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, it will be forwarded to the Director and included for
consideration.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that
twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Steve Guyton or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Belinda S. Henson
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
cc: Christine Lawson, DWR Animal Feeding Operations Program
Smithfield Hog Production -PO Box 856-Warsaw, NC 28398-0856 (Attn: Toni King)
Fayetteville Regional Office WQROS files

Mr. Allen Norris
February 11, 2016
Page 2

� I,
Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road -• Fayetteville, NC 28306 (910) 864-19201864-8774 fax
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD .
PAGE 1 OF 1
�. rum PROJECT I LOCATION:
%0r I�llJ/�/
SEs�ru—.S� D r ►r Fair r✓v
% CONTACT PERSON: _
(JL' i $I t �J� Drt
PHONE:
LED BY; / ""' 33 z V
DATE! METHOD OF SHIPMENT: J
- U)
D
L'
0.
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
;'r
-�.
L
CODE: A = None
'
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6`C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2)'+ <6`C
D = NaOH + <6°C
- . E = zN Acetate + <6°C .
F = HCI
G = Sodium Thio
LAB ID # SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP •C
RES•
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
G{Zni��a(!Rx 'ice yr%+ �s� �7tc-Gt rnut .- �StrJc�d+�rt c+ao--k- 'pvrL P-4-tLa Lab Initials-♦
i1sh dY: Date Time Received r. (sigeatu Date Time turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
i� z a- KO a �
I:n by: Detz Time Renekea by: (slgneture) Date Tim.. Comments or Special Hazards. RT►',
3 4
Ished 6Y: Datn Time Received by: (Signature) NEW"Date Time
5 6
---- N" —t'.u: water Level 01 IS DATA- FOR REG. COM_ PLIANGS-�PURPOSF7
Temp Field 1: Temp Fiend 2: Water Level #2 NO YES WHICH:

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - Fayetteville, NC 28306 (910) 864-19201864-8774 fax
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RIWCORD
PAGE i OF i
:LIEN T NAME & ADDRESS:
�,�C��.L'
a r"e vi, St
.�t;IC Ak
c! t � �
PO
) rl-. - rryv
;;;=/I
W
0
M
TYPEOF
ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
11
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH-2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6^C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6'C
F = HCI
= Sodi m i
PH FLOW TEMP'C SULFIDE
CHLORINE
CONTACT PERSON:
G( C�
Ad
S 2 �,
3LL
WPLEO BY:
�i: l i pur�i4
❑ 1ME.THODOFSHIPMENT:
LA Et ID s
SAMPLE
TYPE
DATE
TIME
coup
RB
GA
3 e- t
i, co gir`
2131r L
1 Jt
I ✓
�O
0 f#
W3
iW:Sa
r
C
+�,� 1�;�
.�'i i Z4 rn,
, is
� (,) : p�
i✓
In
Lao Irttuals-0.
squished by:
Date
Time
Received,' , Signature) _
F
❑ e
Time
1a,
:1
2_3r�
1 15
squished by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
3
4
squished by:
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
5
6
ph Field: ph Field:
Temp Field 1: Temp Field 2:
Water Lave! #1
Water Level #2
Turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:
IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
NO YES WHICH

WaterResotirces
ENV1RON1MENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN- DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
February 11, 2016 Director
CERTIFIED MAIL 7012 3050 00019398 7522
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED - -
Mr. Allen Norris
92 Baldwin Branch Church Rd.
Elizabethtown, North Carolina'28337
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/NOTICE OF INTENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2T .1304
NOV-2016-DV-0066 .
Norris Farm 2 Facility No. 09-165,"FermitNo, AWS090165
'Bladen County.
Dear Mr. Norris: : y
On February 3;.2016) staff of the NC Division, of Water Resources (Division), Water Quality: Regional
Operations Section (WQRQS), inspected. the. Norris Farm 2 and the permitted waste disposal system.. We
wish;to thank W Allen Norris and Mr. Keith Norris, ,who were present and assisted during the
inspection. "
As'a result of this inspection, you, are hereby_notified that, having been .permitted to. have a non -discharge
permit ,for the. subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to-15A NCAC 2T .1304, .you have been
found to be in violation-of.your permit as: follows,: '
Violation) 1:
Failure to prevent discharge of"waste to surface waters of wetlands'. N.C.G.S: 1!13-215.10C - (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section Conditions I 1 and L2).
On.February 2; 2016 the Division.received notification from a member of the general public that swine
waste was observed in an unnamed tributary to Upton Creek. Division staff responded by visiting the .
unnamed tributary and observed that "waste was in the stream and: documented with photographs: With
limited daylight left it was determined that the Division.would return on February 3, 2016 to investigate . ,
the origin of the waste. .
On February 3, 2016, staff returned to the stream and took water samples, .photographs and continued the.
investigation for the. origin of the waste. At 10 45am staff entered Norris Farin.2, and'with your...
permission looked for apossible discharge, Staff documented with photographs and water samples that
waste had bypassed your waste collection system by overflowing-frorn a hog house into a fresh water
drain system. Waste flowed from the drain through -the woods into the unnamed tributary to Upton Creek
State amorth Carolina I Environmental Quality I WatorAesourcea
225 Green Street -Suite 7141 Fayetteville, North Carolina 21301-5043
910-433-3300

Mr. Allen Norris
February 11, 2016 r
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Determine the cause of the discharge in your.waste collection system, take action by repairing, cleaning -
or changing management practices to prevent this from happening again.
Violation 2:
Failure to notify Division of. Water Resources a failure of any component of the anirhal waste
management system resulting in a discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands. (Permit No.
AWS090165 Section III, 13a)
Your permit specifically requires notification by telephone as soon as possible; but in no case more than
24 hours and a written report within 5 calendar days following first knowledge of the,occurrence of a
reportable permit condition. The Division of Water Resources has no record of receiving the 24-hour .
notification. The 5 day written report Was received on February,8, 2Q16. , .
Required Corrective Action for. Violation 2:.. '
In the future,'please notify the Division of Water Resources of the occurrence of any reportable events in
accordance with your'permit.
Violation 3:
Failure to apply'animal wasteIt rates in accordance'*ith your'permit and Certified Animal.Waste
Management Plan. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding'or any runoff during
any given application event. (Permit No. AWS090165 Section II 5)
On February 3, 2016 when staff entered your farm it was observed that waste was being applied by..two
reels. Staff documented by photographs and 'water samples that the reel close to the7n was
. applying
waste that was ponding and running off i.nto-a drainage , ditch and in'a'low. area next to the woods:
Required Corrective action for. Violation 3:
If you have not already done so, immediately cease application methods of animal ,waste that causes or
contributes -to ponding and runoff,, and take all necessary'steps to, insure'this:violatiori 'does not reoccur..
The steps'couid include but are.not limited to modification'ofyou Certified.Aninia&Waste 14anagemelif
Plan and/or adjustment and calibration of the spray irrigation equipinent:.''`
Consider construction' of a control structure to prevent possible runoff from application events.
Violation 4:
In no case shall land application rate8 ii' ,sult in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given`'
application event., (Permit No.',AWS090165, Condition IT. 17).
On February 3,.2016 while applying hog waste to spray f elds, .failure to make visual inspection of the.
land application site to ensure that excessive ponding and runoff would not occur. Documented with
.. .
photographs and water samples on February 3, 2016. : '

Mr. Aifen Norris
February 11; 2016 .
Page.
Required Corrective action for Violation 4:
In the: future, during land application events, a designated Operator in Charge (01C) of a type A Animal
Waste Management Systein or'an employee under. the OIC's supervision must walk'the application fields
looking at application equipment, subsurface drain outlets, ditches'and drainage ways for any sign of
ponding or discharge from the spray fields as required by your permit:
The Division- of -Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action above; please
submit the following.items on, or.before March:15, 2016: ;
I. An explanation front the. OIC far this farm regarding how, this violation occurred.
2. A list from the OIC concerning the steps that will be taken to prevent these violation from
occurring in the future.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before March
15, 2016 and to provide A,written response to this'Notice by.March.15; 2016. Please include in your
response all corrective actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective- actions not
addressed.
As a result of the violations'in this Notice, this office is considering a recommendation for a civil penalty
assessment to the Director of th&Division. If' u:wish to present an explanation for the violations cited,
or if you believe there. are other factors,.which should be considered; please send such'information tome
in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this letter. Your. response.will be reviewed,. and, if an
enforcement action is still deemed appropriate; it willbe forwarded to the Director and included for
consideration.:
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to
the Director.of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not morel that
twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any `.`person" :who: violates or fails to act in accordance
with the terms, conditions, or.requirements of a permit under authority.of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please. contact Steve Guyton or meat [phone]:'
Sint rely, 11
Belinda.S. enson
Regional 'Supervisor
.Water Quality Regional Operations Section.
Division of Water Resources
cc: Christine Lawson, DWR Animal.Feeding Operations Program
Smithfield Hog ProductiionbPO Box 856 Warsaw; NC 28398-0856 (Attn: Toni King)
Fa yettevilleiReg�orial.O ce�WQROS.iiles

US
CERTlFIE-b MAILY,;; RECEIPT-
-(Domestic Mai!`Ori!y; Nvo insurance CaV&age Provided) _
�oE ifcfivery;information,visit:burIFFICIAL USE
vrebstYe'ai-vmw;usps:com
�F
Certified Fee 3i 1r
Postmark
O Refum Recut Fee �Jj
a!i Cl (£ndwsemeni Required? ((// Here
Reshictsd De>ivery t ee I
�� � (Endorsement Requi[edj .. /'���
EC] -Total Postage &Fees $ ! /
;jm

Discharge Notification
a) Description of the discharge: See attached. COve_29
b) Time of discharger The exact time of discharge, is unknown. 7khe pit plug was pulled on House
10 at approximately 4pm-5pm on Monday, February 1, 2016.On Tuesday, February 2, 2016, the
discharge was discovered around Sam by an employee.
c) Caus2 of thg dis har e: After the pit was drained, a blockage of solids prevented flow through
the drainage pipe into the lagoon. Unknown to us, the recycle valves which refill the pit were
open. Normally, water fills the pit until the pit level is full and the overflow drains into the
drainage pipe to the lagoon. In this instance, solids had built up and caused an obstruction in
the drainage pipe. The pit water then overflowed around the drainage pipe.
d) 5 e s t ken:
When the obstruction was discovered by the employee on February 2, 2016 around gam, the
obstruction was cleared by the employee. The employee stated that there was no visible
ponding on the ground around the pipe, so he thought that it was draining into the lagoon. The
employee then returned to his routine duties of the day, without notifying anyone else of the
Issue, since -he believed it was rectified.,,,
A. 1,
After DWR representatives left the farm on Wednesday, February 3, 2016, a farm meeting was
held where the employee revealed to owners that he had encountered a problem with House
10 on Tuesday morning, including the steps he had taken to address it. After the meeting, the
following actions were taken to prevent reoccurrence of this problem:
I. Salt buildup was cleaned from the discharge pipe.
2. The house was then flushed thoroughly to ensure patency.
3. Employee will be enrolled in next available Animal Waste Operator Certification
Training class on April 21, 2016 to increase his awareness of systems and controls.
e) Analysis of the waste: See attached.

p Q1 --> SNIA 9 0 lo� G.Q

NCOMM Apronandt Ohlsloa Phone: (BID) 7334M' Vhbsft: www.ncagrAadapronowll FY184Y004M
Jed Nonft Pape 2of2
RM P'N Jurafroatim
NUbfKd and OdW MWISUMUSAIS
NdroW IN (PPM) P (WW K (Avon) Ca (wrW NO sms S (Awn) Fe (leem) Ain AvW Z? OPW Cu ftW 8 &AT# Na Wn) C (AUM)
SaMISMID. 2200
YMasfe (,)cola ALS
TOWN 39.1 575 105 40.1 44.1 6.07 043 IAS 1.49 0.74 256
08SWWW.-
T09W**kWN 601 ------ -------- 1-1*1 ------ ----------- 11 -------
8wh" Uvoon Liq-
PH DU (%) SS (10-BSkffl) EC pmm) COE (NJ ALE(I0009W-) QN
Worgaft N
NH4-N 7.38
NO3-N
Omark N Alfto Cd(ppW PbAwn) Af(wW Soap* LJMpV AsUO Gropoo COMPM CtbvW Ab*prn)
umn
EsOnate of ndftft AvaMM for Fbst Crop (IbIlowgul.) OIMr Ekmmb (lb ( IOW gOL)
APPOcation ANIW
N P2M K20 CS Afa S Fe AM zn cu 0 AID Cl Ago N Cd Pb Al So u
Irrigation
2.51 0.75 8.76 0.88 0.33 OX 0.07 0.01 0L01 0.01 0.01 2-13
il—dendox thD We"' RePolt" - addbonei Wbma5m., www.ncanr.aovtaaronomtfpdfflleshwaste.pdf & www.ncaqr.aovlawanomVpdMIss stesiulde.pd
.dent oonowdrations and offierdate on Oft report are pmvkledso Metwaste runic feks can beappbod at agronomic rates, thereby suppknWnftQor oedarl fertillver application and
preventing umbronumMoonlarnbollonAn r Ha ling the Laboratiory Reardb Sutton. rmlxfnber that malsrtNa wNh 15%dry rraltter (generally ()gotta) ere anetyrsd as receNed; a8 other
WaSIBS M &W Poet VMu" In to Esftdo of Iftebub AvvftW for First Crop motion we based on the Mn of waste and uwOwd of application you qxmffy and relhed the led OW
only 40-60% of OW MOW and 70-100% of 00M rudrients b000nve avalaMe wlM one year of application. The renteinder my orb eva b000rle available.
- ppm a parts per MIUM S - shernans; nd ndlisletnens; T -trace (-c0.005 bkwft EC - elechical conft*wgr, OCE - cdchnn coibonate equMdencw. ALE - agricuituFal bone
oWlvalanow. PH - oddity or bes"; ONM % dry matter Fx serni-solid and soM waste mnpkm ads vacua MdMafts oonversion of dry -basis coincenballona (pprn) bat* to we"asis of
odakud samplel QH redo - cmbw:nWogon redo.

Date of Visit: Arrival Time:1 Departure Time: '3 County: ��-
Farm Name: p rT ; 5 �'=�r./n �.-. � � Owner Email:
Owner Name:ly�,.i N47�ri,j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: 14/l rr'L %ip / /';S Title: 696uy z'/ Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �;Ize/�
Certified Operator: 150-. c— Certification Number: / 6.3 0 3
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pap. Cattle Capacity Pap.
Layer DairyCow
Non -La er DairyCalf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
lvA-
Design Current
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Der P,oultr. Ca aci P.a
La ers
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Other
Other
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: r Structure Application Field Other: Ffr_� w�(a;s.0 � ZiiL4-6
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ® Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes [:]No NA NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Poo -y"
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes No [] NA [] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes No NA NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes No NA NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - r Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
FZ71 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in): �p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[ a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
JE No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Ej Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 10 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ,/)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fait to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [a NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [,NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA -® NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ RainfaIl ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA g]NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
[DNA ®NE
❑ NA ZI NE
Page 2 of 3 121412014 Continued

H'acili Number: 5, t I Date of Inspection: — 3— lb
1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Yes
[:]No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�� GUOS i`c n Tram•-��� �ju
7�t�Gz�r-/ lr-c:� pL-'Tdac�Pc�i% F�rFu.�- �i� *-,STr'c
�v%fh ,��✓� �/� D .� s CY alp 1•5,1
✓/ �yz �/7J� D � L/ iS � � �� f rr
44
Jr
Xu
A--
417
57-
Gam `
A
�vr►a►'�- Ala ,--
n Or. it'i �Y1 ��/I VJIt fiwv f7 ri 74 r`
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 9,17"-s.3 .�e-MD
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412014

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 090165 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS090165
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint County: Bladen Region:
Date of Visit: 02/03/2016 Entry Time: 10:45 am Exit Time: 1:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: N°Ms Farm #2
Owner: J Allen Norris
Mailing Address: 92 Baldwin Branch Church Rd
Owner Email:
Phone:
Elizabethtown NC 283375348
❑ Denied Access
Fayetteville
910-645-4842
Physical Address: 604 Powell Rd Ctarkton NC 28433
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 32' 28" Longitude: 78° 32' 37"
At the end of SR 1720 off of SR 1719 approx. 1 mile east of Its intersection with SR 1708, northwest of Lisbon, NC.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack A Norris Operator Certification Number: 16303
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Allen Norris Phone:
On -site representative Allen Norris Phone :
Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Belinda S Henson
Bill Dunlap
Trent Allen
Inspection Summary:
910-433-3300 Ext.726
page: 1

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
1.recived complaint on 2-2-2016 , documented hog waste in stream. Due to time of day it was too late to sample for facial and to
dark for futher investigation.
2-3-201 B meet with staff from FRO to sample and determin which farm the wate was coming from. Onsite visit to this farm it was
documented that waste had been discharged from a hog house into the fresh water drain system, Also they were pumping waste
on to the fields and pond ing and runoff was acurringat the time of this visit Waste did reach a unnamed tributary that flows to
Upton Creek In the Cape Fear Basin.
Samples were taken along with pictures to document the events. The farm sloped pumping and contained the waste to stop
futher discharge.
9. determine the cause of the discharge from the hog house and repair.
30. Owner did not report the discharge said he was not aware of the discharge.
11. Ponding from spray application also was discharging from the field.
Belinda Henson ! Trent Allen T Bill Dunlap from FRO helped with this site visit.
page: 2

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection hate: 02/03/16 lnppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 19.00 26.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number, 090165
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
DischaMes & Stream Impacts
Yes No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
M
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
moo
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
1000 pause
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
110
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑M
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storane A Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
1]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9, Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
M
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
1101111
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility: J Allen Norris Facility Number:
090165
Inspection Date: 02103M6 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Complaint
Waste Application
Yae No Na He
Crop Type 1
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
oats)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number:
090165
Inspection Date: 02/03/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Complaint
Records and Documents
Yee
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ []
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
■
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
1111
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
N
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
❑ ❑
❑
page: 6

oD-2-vf.tp Tc—nc7P
f1- 3 - I N r
Type of Visit: Compli nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emereencv 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I Y D Dv Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: rl/ 1 r �-�-D //Js Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: a Title: li9le-e-on Phone:
Onsite Representative: �SGy,«� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Region: `�L
�„ Design Current
Swine °w m °' Cap parity Pap.
Wet Pouitry
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop,
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Fop.
Wean to Finish
�1Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
Calf
Feeder to Finish
Design Current
Dt. P,ou1 Ca aci P,o .
Da' Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
1-
Other ::,11
OtherIFAI
Turkeys
Turke Poults
10ther
Discharges -and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[] Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
rNo
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
6
Waste Collection & Treatment
' 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑-Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ^19—
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,'and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes CE-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesIN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive.Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window J ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �v�{��f?r,, /Go(ti
13. Soil Type(s): r— }4- A / jMP4
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
wa
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA [.] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Ej� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [I Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [RNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ®No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
' 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes EQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.c., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond , ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNIP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
�' Fa/w- W a.� z �"=� Gh � ors-ryt�� �j7,/z�',�► �-
c
/
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes (Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes - ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ �--- Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412014

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
090165 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS090165
Denied Access
Inppectlon Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Bladen Region:
Fayetteville
Date of Visit:
02/23/2016 EntryTime: 10:00 am
Exit Time: 11:33 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Norris Farm #2
Owner Email:
Owner:
J Allen Norris
Phone:
910-645-4842
Mailing Address:
92 Baldwin Branch Church Rd
Elizabethtown NC 283375348
Physical Address:
604 Powell Rd
Clarkton NC 28433
Facility Status:
❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 34' 32' 28" Longitude:
78° 32' 37"
At the end of SR 1720 off of SR 1719 approx. 1 mile east of its intersection with SR 1708, northwest of Lisbon, NC.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack A Norris Operator Certification Number: 16303
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Allen Norris Phone:
On -site representative Allen Norris Phone:
Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
4. Lagoon level was reported and POA revived
Note: farm was going to change to Bermuda last year was not able to plant had to change to car. wheat is planted now will talk to
agronimist about when to plant bermuda.
picked up 10 day letter for 2-3-2016 discharge NOVlNOI on 2-8-2016 2:39pm
picked up the 30 day response letter during this inspection
farm will receive a NOD for freeboard
page: 1

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection Date: 02/23/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 1,800
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 19.00 18.50
page: 2

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection Date: 02/23/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharpes & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
[]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑M
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
j]
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collec ion,_Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
[]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
MEI
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
ate ARelication
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
[]
page: 3

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection Date: 02/23/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Applicapon
Yes No Na Ns
Crop Type 1
Cam (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Cxum very fine sandy loam,
0 to 3% slope
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[J
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pen -nit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑0
❑
❑
tf yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS090165 Owner - Facility : J Allen Norris Facility Number: 090165
Inspection Date: 02/23/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other lesu@s
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
1101111
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Norris Farm Incorporated
February 18, 2016
Belinda S. Henson
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street —Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Ms. Henson,
I am writing this letter in response to the Notice of Violation / Notice of Intent (NOV-2016-DV-
0066) sent on February 11, 2016 regarding a discharge that occurred on my farm on February 2,
2016. 1 will address the violations in the order in which they appear in this letter.
Violation 1 Failure to prevent discharge of waste to surface waters or wetlands
There is no dispute regarding the facts as presented. Wastewater was discharged from one of
the swine buildings due to a blockage of an overflow pipe intended to prevent such a discharge
from occurring. A farm employee noticed the blockage at around 8am on the morning of
February 2"d, and immediately cleared the blockage. There was no visual signs that the
blockage had occurred for any extended period of time due to it immediately running into an
underground drainage feature intended for rainwater. The employee did not realize that there
had been a discharge and, therefore, did not report it to farm management. To prevent this
from re -occurring, this employee has and will continue to receive additional training, including
the N.C. OIC course to insure a better understanding of the significance of these types of
events, and ways to prevent them from re -occurring. In addition, we are considering installing
secondary containment structures on this farm as a back-up procedure. Information is
currently being gathered on how this may best be accomplished.
Violation 2 Failure to notify the Division of Water Resources of a failure of any component of
the animal wastes management system resulting in a discharge
As stated previously, neither the employee nor farm management was aware that a discharge
had occurred from the farm. If aware, the discharge would have been reported as required.
Our first knowledge of a problem was when DWR staff arrived at the farm.
Violation 3 Failure to apply animal waste at appropriate rates
The field staff noted during their visit that a reel that had been running for approximately 1
hour was causing ponding and runoff from the spray field to a low area adjacent to the ,

application field. Application was immediately stopped upon this being found. Going forward,
land application events will be monitored more closely to insure against ponding and/or runoff.
Violation 4 In no case shall land application rates result in excessive Ponding or any runoff
during any given application event
See response above. Additional measures have been implemented specific to inspection and
oversite of land application activities.
We are very disappointed that this situation occurred on our farm. We have never had any
issues regarding permit compliance. In addition to the steps mentioned above, we have re-
evaluated our overall management of our facility and implemented changes in training and
oversite, as well as made field improvements as weather has allowed, to insure that no further
discharges occur from our facility.
Sincer y, /A
eith Norris
Q-Owner

�
LOME$, / WIN

------ ......
-I I 11-r
9 iut I I "o-f-A
I 1 Rr
FOmTF#,'&,m As �jw*
ME MON in)

/(c-,, ZC 31
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Visit 10:
Tug
-- —1
Central Laboratory (Water Sciences Section)
Water Sample Collection St Submittal Form
{opr,'-',: ), • IT
15 )
AC26146
Location Descriptionj /!� /
c]
Location Code:,
i NO�QI Jr /�y,Q1yt
_
L14M Received:
County:, t ��
Calfector
Priority:
WohL ° Location Type.r�s,�
DWRRegion:
'A / E
VWRoffrce.
for ZO
❑Ambient
y❑River/Stream
❑Lake
� me R { y(-
(dcted an @n+ayJ �(// //
agency name) ��
Surface ❑Esnrary
❑Canal
Received By: (
s
River Basin: /!� rA�
Jute:. i
2
❑ Routine
❑Stormwater
e' C"SICompliance
j /
1//
❑Ground ❑Monitoring Well
❑Water Supply
State Courier
Delivery I ❑Hand Delivery
Notes;
.'7 p iQ�Ytil/T
Trim. I _ev.p,
❑COC'
❑Waste ❑Effluent
❑Influent
method.
❑Other
❑ Chlorinated ❑De -chlorinated in Field
sbmprrng Grab Composite
❑Emergency
❑Field Blank
❑ Blank
Trip Blank
.
.-Med+od: ❑C)ther
❑Fllter0lank
Tempenmrre('CJ'.
)
Dissolved analysis: Enter"DIS"
❑ Filtered in Field
- (
Sample DeFth: i
DQA
❑solution Other.
.:onArrrvcl: f , e
s
in check -boxes for parameters
- _ - 1
Calledor's [omments �
. r
'
Microbiology Parameters:
MBAS (surfactants)
mglL
Metals parameters:
Tin (Sn) Vg/L
Acidity, as C2CO3, to pH 4.518-3 mg/t
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (AI)
Vg/L
Titanium (Ti) µg/L
Alkalinity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.5/8.3 mg/L
Phenels, Total Recoverable
Pg/L
Antimony (Sb)
Pg/L
Vanadium (V) VOL
SOD: Biochemical OMen Demand, 5-day mg/L
Residue: Total (Total Solids)
mg/L
Arsenic (As)
Pg/L
Zinc (7n) µg/L
cBOD: Carbanaceous BOD, 5-day mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Ba)
Pg/L
Coliform: Fecal MF /300ml
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
Ilg/L
Boron (8). Total WL
Cafiform: Total MT: /100ml
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
Cadmium (Cd)
pg/L
Mercury 1631, low-level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal /100ml
Tf1S -Total Dissofved Solids
mg/L
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
Coliform: Tube Totai /loom)
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
Pg/L
Organics Parameters
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C umhas/cm
Sulfide
rnglL
Cobalt (Co)
Pg/L
Acid Herbicides
TOC • Total Organic Carbon mg/L
Tannin & Lignm
mg/L
Copper (Cu)
Pg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Turbidity NTU
Iron (Fe)
Pg/L
Organonitrogen Pesticides
Other Parameters:
Lead (Pb)
Pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Wet Chemistry Parameters:
pH
S.U.
Lithium (Li)
pg/L
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)
Bromide mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCO3 - by titration•.
mg/L
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Manganese (Mn)
Pg/L
Semi -Volatile Organics (B&'As)
Fluoride mg/L
Mercury (Hg)
Vg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate mg/L_
Nutrients Parameters,
Molybdenur:t(Mo)
Pg/L
Chlorophyll a Pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (Ni)
Pg/L
Volatile Organics (VOA)
Color: ADMI C.U.
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N)
mg/L
Potassium (K)
mg/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt C.U.
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/t
Selenium (Se)
)1g/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemical (hygen Demand mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (fP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
Vg/L
Cyanide, Total mg/L
Nitrite as N (NO2-N)
mg/L
Sodium (Na)
mg/L
Biological:
Formaldehyde mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated)
mg/L
Strontium (Sr)
yg/L
Phytoplankton / Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (CrC+) mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thallium M)
yg/L
LAB COMMENTS :
I Field Pararrreters(aptiww1J =I Water Temp (°Cl: I PH (s.u.): I I Dissolved Oxygen (ppm): I Conductivity (Prahos/cm): I _ Salinity (ppt):
Revision:

AC26146 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section LaboratoryResults
Loc. Doscr.: SOURCE 1
County, LB ADEN
Collector:
TALLEN
VislilD
Region: RO
Report To
FRO
Location ID: NORRISFARM
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Collect Date:
0 02! 312016
Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency
Collect Time:
11:20
Sample Matrix: AWRFACEwATER
COC Yes/No
Sample Depth
Loc. Typo: OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
CA 2614s
PO Number #
18w2631
Date Received:
(1210412018
Time Received:
06:45
Labworks LcginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
NC COURIER
Flnaf Report Date:
312116
Report Print Dale:
0310812016
If this report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/ Method Analysis Validated by
CAS !# Analyte Name PQL Qualifier Units Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 3.2 'C 214116 MswIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid 2.0 4500 mg1L SM 5210 B-2001 214116 ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid 0.02 380 J6 mg1L as N EPA 350.1 REV 2 2/10/16 CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid 0.02 0.2 U,P J6 mg1L as N EPA353.2 REV 2 2110116 CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid 0.2 530 J6 mg1L as N EPA351.2 REV 2 2111/16 CGREEN
Sample Comments
NUT: All-J6-Estimated-sample not preserved or improperly preserved.
NUT-NO3NO2 - U,P- Pql adjusted; sample diluted due to high amount of solids
wSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail service Center, Raleigh, NC 27690-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte Is not detected at or above the PQL
For a detailed description of the qualifier codes rotor to
https:llncdonr.93.amozonows.com/s3fs-publiclwator°/*200ualltylChamistry%2OLablOperations/Quallty%2OAssurttncolQualifierCodes0625201 S,pdf
Page 1 of 1

CL., z,�X^J
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sample Collection & Submittal Form
Central Laboratory (Water Sciences Section)
Visit ID:
1
(optional)
---
{ AC26145
� -
Date Receh ed: { 2 l
c
Location Description:)
Vi�irE
+
Location Code: I
e /
: Courtly: <: `� �/
Coue[tor -EQ N /�
.Priority
waterMotriu
, ..4 Lchcation'Type:. : -. ,v-
-
-❑River/Stream ❑Lake
❑Estuary ❑Canal
❑Stormwater
❑Monitoring well ❑Water Supply
❑Effluent ❑!n(Ivent
❑Freed Blank Trip Blank
❑Filter Blank
Other:
Il
7(me Recetwed: I
i
DWR Region.
(laasedancounty). 'J/E
'DWROffice: €
{oroyenryrrarneJ'l t
❑/�+/Zi%� Ambient
❑Routine
Compliance
❑COC
Emergency
❑QA
Surface
Q Ground
❑Waste
C Blank
❑Solution
Received Sy:
River Basin. I
A;9A
Date.
�� ��p
j State Courier
oe(rveryMethod: ❑Hand Delivery
—]Other
Notes
7i D
�•� 9M
❑ Chlorinated ❑De -chlorinated in Field
�"'°g Gad Composite
-Method: Other:
t
Temperatt—IX), � +
on Arriv?f : • € C
I
Dissolved analysis Enter'DIS"
El Filtered in Field
in check -boxes for parameters
"
SampleDepMi:'
Collector's Comments:
Microbiology Parameters:
MBAS (surfactants) mg/L
Metals Pararrieters,
Tin (Sri) pg/L
Acidity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.5/B.3 mg/L
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable mg/L
Aluminum (A:) pg/L
Titanium (Ti) WJL
Alkalinity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.5/8.3 mg/L
Phenols, Total Recoverable pg/L
Antimony (Sb) pg/L
Vanadium (V) j g/L
BOD: lirocherrrcai 0ryaen Demand, 5-bay mg/L
Residue: Total (Total Solids) mg/L
Arsenic (As) VOL
Zinc (Zn) pR/L
cBOD: Carbonaceous SOD, 5-day mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total mg/L
Barium (Ba) pg/L
Coliform: Fecal MF /100ml
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids) mg/L
Beryllium (Be) pg/L
Baron (B), Total µg/L
Colifcrm: Total MF /100m1
I Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended mg/L
Cadmium (Cd) pg/L
Mercury 1631, low -Level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal /100ml
TDS -Total Dissolved Solids mg/L
Calcium (Ca) mglL
Corrform: Tube Total /100ml
Silica mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total pg/L
Organics Parameters:
Specific Conductance, at 25 `C umhes/m
Sulfide mg/L
Cobalt (Co) pg/L
Acid Herticides
TOC -Total Organic Carbon mg/L
Tannin & Lignin mg/L
Copper (Cu) pg/L
Organechlorine Pesticides
Turbidity NTU
Iran (Fe) pg/L
Organanitrogen Pesticides
• Cater Parameters:
Lead (Pb) pg/L
Organo phosphorus Pesticides
Wet Chemistry Parameters:
PH S.U.
Lithium (Li) pg/L
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)
Bromide mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCO3 - by titration mg/L
Magnesium (Mg) mg/L
Chloride rng/L
Manganese (Mn) pg/L
Semi -Volatile Organics (BNAs)
Fluoride mg/L
Mercury (Hg) pg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate mg/L
NuttientsParameters-
Molybdenum(Mo) pg/L
Chlorophyll a pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N) mg/L
Nickel (Ni) pg/L
VolaLle Organics (VOA)
Color: ADM C.U.
NA
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N) mg/L
Potassium (K) mg/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt C.U.
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (TKN) mg/L
Selenium (Se) pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (TP) mg/L
Silver (Ag) pg/L
Cyanide, Total mg/L
Nitrite as N [NO2-N) mg/L
Sodium (Na) mg/L
Biological:
Formaldehyde mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated) mg/L
Strontium (Sr) pg/L
Phytoplankton / Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+) mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4) mg/L
Thallium (Tt) pg/L
LAB COMMENTS:
Reid Parameters(aptiona)): WaterTemP {C): PH (S-u.) Dissolved Oxygen (ppm): Conductivity (pmhos/cm): Salinity (pp*
' - — )
Revision: 2/06/2015

AC26145 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc, Deecr.: S u
County; BLAOEN
Collector:
DUNLAP
VisibD
Region: FRO
Report To
FRO
Location 10: NORRISfARM
River Basin
Collect Data:
0210312016
Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency
Collect Time:
13:00
Sample Matrix: 3URFACEWATER
COC YeSINo
Sample Depth
Loc. Type: OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC26145
PO Number 4
16W2630
Date Received:
0210412016
Time Received:
08;45
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
NC COURIER
Final Report Date:
2=1
Report Print Data:
03/0912016
If thts report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/ Method Analysis Validated by
CAS # Analyte Name PQL Qualifier Units Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
MIC
3.2 °C
2A116 MSWIFT
BOD, 5-Day in liquid 2.0 4200 mg1L $M 5210 B-2001 214116 ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid 0.02 530.16 mg1L as N EPA 350.1 REV 2 2110/16 CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid 0.02 0.2U,P J6 mg1L as N EPA353.2 REV 2 2110118 CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N In liquid 0.2 660J6 mglLas N EPA 351.2 REV 2 2111/16 CGREEN
Sample Comments
NUT: All-J6-Estimated-sample not preserved or Improperly preserved.
NUT-NO3NO2 - U,P- Pql adjusted; sample diluted due to high amount of solids
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mall Service Cantor, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 t919) 733.3908
"Not Detected" or "U" does not Indicate the sample Is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the PO
For a detailed description of the qualifier codes refer to
https:tlncdonr.s3.amazonaws,comle3fs-pu bilcMater4/a2OQual ity/Chemistry°/*2OLab/OporatlonolQuality%20Aesurance/QualiflarCodoao6252Ol 6.pdf
Page 1 of 1

16w "Z.,C 21 �
North Carolina Division of Water Resources Visit ID: Tag
Water Sample Collection 8t Submittal Form !
Central Laboratory (water Sciences Section) . (optiorial) _. j
AC26142
Locagon Description:
�
Location Code:?
i
�--
Arm
Sampw r..... _. --
Dart Received:
I
County: 1 N.
;Collector: , ! j
1 j
Priority:
Water 14lafri_x_
Lacotiarr Type:
rmeRecehred:
0 Region. [
fbasedanmunty) j
f— T4[tfr
DWROffice: f
laragengnaW) ' S
j
❑Amb'reni
❑ Routine
�'
`L�Compliance
❑COC
❑Emergency
❑cA
��
LlSurface
❑Ground
❑ Waste
❑ Blank
❑Solution
❑River/Stream
❑Estuary
QStarmwater
❑Monitoring Well
❑Effluent
[I]FIeld Blank
❑Filter Blank
�,/r:
(JOthe
❑lake
❑Cana€
❑Water Supply
❑influent
rip Blank
Received By. )
River Basin: r
e a i
I
Date: L
bbt,
State Courier
Delhmry Method: ((( [:]Hand Delivery
f ❑Other:
Notes:
Tom:
e} s s
❑ Chlorinated ❑De -chlorinated in Field
Sampling I rab Composite
Mew_ _ = € ❑Other:
t
remperaw'-rC)
�^ Arrfval i 34
t
Dissolved analysis: Enter "DIS"
❑ Filtered in Field
in check -boxes far parameters
Sample
_
Collector's Cammenis.
i
Microbiology Parameters:
MBAs [surfactants)
mg/L
Metals Parameters:
Tin (Sn) ttg/L
Acidity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.5/8.3 .
mg/L
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (Al)
pg/L
Titanium (Ti) pg/L
jOIkalinitV. as CaCO3, to pH 4.S/8.3
mg/L
Phenols, Total Recoverable
µg/L
Antimony (Sb)
pg/L
Vanadium M WL
BOD: Biechemwal oxygen Demand, 5-day
mg/L
Residue: Total (Total Solids)
mg/L
ArseniL (As)
pg/L
Zinc (Zn) µg/L
cROD: Carbonaceous BOD, 5-day
mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Bal
pg/L
Caliform: Fecal MF
/100ml
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
pg/L
Boron (B), Total t1g/L
Caliform: Total MF
/100ml
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
Cadmium (Cd)
pg/L
Mercury 1631, low-level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal
1100ml
T35 -Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
Caliform: Tube Total
/100ml
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
pg/L
- Organics parameters:
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C
umhas/Lm
Sulfide
mg/L
Cobalt rco)
pg/L
Acid Herbicides
TOC - Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
Tannin & Lignin
mg/L
Capper (Cu)
µg/L
Organochlarine Pesticides
Turbidity
NTU
iron (Fe)
pg/L
Organanitrogen Pesticides
Other Parameters:
Lead (Pb)
pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Wet Chemistry Parameters:
pH
S.U.
Lithium (Li)
pg/L
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)
Bromide
mg/L
Hardness, Tota€ as CaCO3 - by titration
mg/L
Magnesium (Mg)
m91L
Chloride
mg/L
Manganese (Mn)
pg/L
Semi -Volatile Organics (BNAs)
Fluoride
mg/L
Mercury (Hgl
µg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate
mg/L
Nutrierns Parameters:
Molybdenum (Mo)
pg/L
Chlorophyll a
pg/L
01
Arnmonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (Ni)
pg/L
Volatile Organics (VOA)
Color: ADMI
C.U.
Nitro:e-Nitrite as N (NO3+1402-N)
mg/L
Potassium (K)
mg/L
Color Platinum Cobalt
c-u-
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/L
Selenium (5e)
pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand
mgJL
Total Phosphorus as P (TP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
µg/L
Cyanide, Total
mg/L
Nitrite as N (NO2-N)
mg/L
Sodium (Na)
mglL
7
Biological:
Formaldehyde
mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N ca€culated)
mg/L
Stmntiu m (Sr)
pg/L
Phytoplankton / Algae'
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+)
mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thailium (TI)
pg/L
LAB COMMENTS:
t
Field Parametersfopuawo; Water Temp rc): PH (s-u.): Dissolved Oxygen (ppm): Conductivity (pmhos/cm): Salinity (ppt):
Revision: 2/06/2015

AC26142
North. Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Deser.:
County:
Region:
River Basin
Emergency
CDC Yes/No
CONFLUENCE
I3L DA EN
Collector:
B DUNLAP
V€ai11D
�t0
Report To
FQO
Location ID: NORRISFARM
CAPE FEAR
Collect Date:
0&0312018
Priority QQMPLIANCF
Collect Time:
12:50
Sample Matrix: SURFACEWATER
Sample Depth
Loc. Type' OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC26142
PO Number fi
1 OW2627
Date Received:
02 0 1
Time Received:45
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
NC COURIER
Final Report Date:
31 8
Report Print Dale:
231081201 6
If this report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/ Method Analysis Validated by
CAS # Analyte Name PQL Qualifier Units Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 3.2 °C 214116 MSWIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid 2.0 120 mg/L SM 5210 B-2001 214116 ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid 0.02 41 mglL as N EPA350.1 REV 2 2110116 CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid 0.02 0.68 mg/L as N EPA 353.2 REV 2 2MGM6 CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid 0.2 48 mg/Las N EPA 351.2 REV 2 2/11116 CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27609.1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not Indicate the sample Is analyte free but that the analyte Is not detected at or above the PQL
For a detailed description of the qualifier codes refer to
httpa:Nncdenr, s3.amazanaws.comis3f a-publiclWater%200usi ItylChomistry%2OLab/Operatlona/Quality%20Assurarice/Quallfi*rCodosO52520 i S,pdf
Page 1 of 1

North Carolina Division of Water Resources visitlri: ; Tag'
Central Laboratory (water sciences Section] Water Sample Collection &Submittal Farm (optional) fn 3 i AC26'I 44
Location Description:I-E t , .1�5�+� r✓l� +
I `} l W
Location Code:
f n % s y—
Z (/ 1r r ` l�Q
Dote Received: /
County:
Calleetor; j
r _, 4h Rile jai�—
' Priority:' _
Water Matrix.
Silrface
❑Ground
❑ Waste
❑$€ank
❑Solution
: Location Type: "
TlmeRecehred.
DWRRegion.
fbasMon[nunry]' e
\%t
DWROfxe:
(aragrncyrrameJ f OS
❑Ambient
❑Routine
r��
Ten<rnpliance
❑ COC
❑Emergency
❑0,4
❑River/Stream ❑lake
❑Estuary ❑Canal
❑Stormwater�ived
❑Monitoring well ❑Water Supply
❑EfBuent ❑Influent
❑Field Stank
npBtank
[]Filter Blank
Lu ther:
i3y
I
River Basin: ,
e-
ec {
:
Date:
) `� i Z /
State Courier
OefwtryMethod: i ❑Hand Delivery
❑Other:
Notes:
TI'Me; ^Z
J
❑ Chlorinated ❑De�h€urinated in Field
Sampling_ ; rab LjCornposite
-
Metlrod=... ; ❑Other:
-
T[mperatureCC) ,
an Arrival:
�
El Filtered in Field Dissolved analysis: Enter-DIS" parameters
in check -braces for
SamFfe
� _
Callector's CammeritL
Microbiotogy Parameters:
MBAS (surfactants)
mg/L
Metals Parameters: -
Tin (Sn) ug/t
Acidity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.518.3
mg/L
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (Al)
pg/L
Titanium (Ti) µg/L
,Alkalinity, as CaCO3, to pH 4.5/9.3 mg/L
Phenols, Total Recoverable
Wt.
Antimony (Sb)
pg/L
Vanadium (V) tq/L
SOD: Biochemical Oxygen Demand, S-day mg/L
Residue_ Total (Foral Solids)
mg/L
Arsenic (As)
pg/L
Zinc ¢n) pg/L
cBOD. Carbonaceous BOD, 5-day
mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Ba)
pg/L
Cofiform: Fecal MF
/100m1
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
pg/L
Boron (B), Total tsg/L
Coliform_ Total MF
/loom€
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
I
Cadmium ICd)
pg/L
Mercury 1631. low-level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal
/100m1
TDS - Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
Calcium (Ca)
Mq&
Coliform: Tube Total
/100ml
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
pg/L
Organics Parameters:
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C
urrhas/cm
Su4fide
mg/L
Cobalt (Co)
pg/L
Arid Herbicides
TOC - Total Organic Carbon
rng/L
Tannin & Ugnin
mg/L
Copper (Cu)
pg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Turbidity
NTU
Iron (Fel
pg/L
Organonitrogen Pesticides
Other Parameters:
Lead (Pb)
pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Wet Chemistry Parameters:
pH
S.U.
Lithium (Li)
ug/L
PCBs (potychiminated biphenyls)
Bromide
mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCO3 - by titration
rng/L
Magnesium [,Mg)
mg(L
Chloride
mg/L
Manganese (M,n)
pg/L
Semi Volatile Organics (SNAs)
Fluoride
mg/L
Mercury (Hg)
pg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate
mg/L
Nutrients Parameters:
Molybdenum (Mo)
pg/L
Chlorophyll a
pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (Ni)
pg/L
Volatile Organics (VOA)
Color: ADMI
C.U.
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N)
mg/L
Potassium (K)
rng/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt
c-u.
97
Total Kjeldah€ Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/L
Selenium (Se)
pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand
mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (TP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
pg/L
Cyanide, Total
mg/L
Nitrite as N (NO2-N)
mg/L
Sodium (Na)
mg/L
BEalogiral:
Formaldehyde
mg/L '
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated)
mg/L
Strontium (5r)
pg/L
Phytoplanktan / Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+).
mg/L
fi
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thallium (l1)
pg/L
LAB COMMENTS:
I Field Parxmeters(opriomd).1 Water Temp ('C)• -- pH (s.u.): j ! Dissolved Oxygen {ppm): ( I Conductivity (}tmhas/tm): ; I Salinity (ppi): i

A026144 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laborator Results
Loc, Descr•:
DOWNSTREAM 1
County:
SLADEN
Colloctor,
TALLEN
VlsltID
Region:
FRO
Report To
FRO
Location ID:
NORRISFARM
River Basin
CARR FEAR
Collect Date-
02 0! 312016
Priority '
COMPLIANCE
Emergency
Collect Time:
09:30
Semple Matrix:
SURFACEWATER
COO YesIND
Sample Depth
Loc. Type:
OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC26144
PO Number #
,18 N2620
Data Received:
0210412010
Time Received:
08j45
Lobworks LogintD
TASCENZOI
Delivery Method
NC COURIER
Final Report Dale:
3fm
Report Print Date:
0310812015
If this report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/
Method
Analysis
Validated by
CAS #
Analyte Name
PQi-
Qualifier
Units
Reference
Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
3.2
'c
214116
MSWIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
2.0
73
mg1L
SM 5210 B-2001
214116
ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N In liquid
0.02
13
mglL as N
EPA 350.1 REV 2
2110116
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
2.9
mglL as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
2/10/16
CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
18
mg/L as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2
2M1116
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory>a 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not Indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte Is not detected at or above the PQL
For a detailed description of the quellfler codas refer to
https:llnedenr.s3.amaxonaws,comis ifs•publicfWatar"/o200unlity/Chemistry°%2OLablOpervtlons/Ouslity'/e2DAssu rance/QuallflerCodea0S252015.pdf
Page 1 of 1

16W 267-,,y
[North Carolina ]Division of Water Resources
Central Laboratory (Water Sciences Section)
Water Sample Collection & Submittal Form
Visit ID:.
.
(optional)
j
Tug /i
1D C�
( —_-­ ` �' — "—' ----�
AC26143
—
eRe�: ' I
Location Description:
.�
.�r.,r�restil 2
Location Code:
1o�2Q rS /�
Caumy: } f
Cvltector'.
t . Priority:
Water 1LRatrix
' Location Type:'
J�
j
Trrie Received f
DINR Region:: ;
lbesedencourrty}-
��
[3WR Offioe:
lorageniyrr —)
IJAYcP12O
❑ Ambient
[]Routine
Compliance
❑ COC
[]Emergency
❑CA
Surface
❑Ground
❑Waste
❑ Blank
❑Solution
—� A
-❑River/Stream ❑lake
❑Estuary []Canal
❑Stormwater
❑Monitoring Well ❑Water Supply
❑Effluent ❑influent
[]Field Blank Blank
�
[]Filter Blank TripTemperature
Other:
R By.,4
; -
RhwBasin,
Date:
�
2ZXi
State Courier
De6treryMethod: � ❑Hand Delivery
; ❑Other:
Notes:
Tirrfe; �
0 Q. �C.
❑ Chlorinated ❑fie -chlorinated in Field
S—AL'V . i Grab Composite
Method: � 1 ❑ Oiher.
}
(_ C)'
on Arrival: -
Dissolved analysis: Ente. 'DIS"
❑ Filtered in Field
in check -bows for parameters
Sampk,Oeprh:
...I
Collecttor's Comments:
t
Microbiology Parameters:
MBAS (surfactants)
mg/L
Metals Parameters:
Tin (5n) R/L
Acidity, as CaCO3, to pH 4,5/8.3
mg/L
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (Al)
Pg/L
Titanium (ti) VOL
Alkalinity, as C.0O3, to pH 4.518.3
mg/L
Phenals, Total Recoverable
Pg/L
Antimony (Sb)
llg/L
Vanadium (V) pg/L
800: Bicchem-sal Oxygen Cemano, 5•aay
mg/L
Residue: Total (Total Solids)
mg/L
Arsenic (As)
Pg/L
Zinc (Zn) µg/L
cB00: Carbonaceous BOO, 5-day
mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Sa)
Pg/L
Cotiform: Fecal MF
/iooml
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
PS/L
Boron (8), Total WL
Coliform: Total MF
/iooml
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
Cadmium (Cd)
Pg/L
Mercury 1631, low-level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal
/100ml
TDS - Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
Cakium (Ca)
rnglL
Caliform: Tube Total
/}ooml
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
Pg/L
Organics Parameters:
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C
_mhos/tm
Sulfide
mg/L
Cobalt (Co)
Pg/L
Acid Herbicides
TOC - Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
Tannin & Lignin
mg/L
Copper (Cu)
Pg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Turbidity
NTU
Iron (Fe)
Pg/L
Organanitrogen Pesticides
Colter Parameters:
Lead (Pb)
Pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Wet Chemistry Parameters:
pH
S.U.
Lithium (Li)
Pg/L
PCBs (potychlorinated biphenyls)
Bromide
mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCC3 - by titratior,
mg/L
Magnesium (Mg)
mgiL
Chloride
mg/L
Manganese (Mn)
PgIL
5emi-Vulatile Organics (SNAs)
Fluoride
mg/L
Mercury (Hg)
Pg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate
mg/L
NuirierftParameters:
Molybdenum (Mo)
tig/L
Chlorophyll a
Pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (Ni)
Pg/L
Volatile Organics {VOA)
Color: AD MI
Cu.
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N)
rng/L
Potassium (K)
mg/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt
c.u.
Total Kjeldaht Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/L
Selenium (Se)
Pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemial Oxygen Demand
mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (TP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
Pg/L
Cyanide, Total
mg/L
Nitrite as N (NO2-N)
mg/L
sodium (Na)
mg/L
Biological:
Formaldehyde
mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated)
mg/L
Strontium t5r)
Pg/L
Phytoplankton I Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (CrS+)
mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thallium (TI)
lig/L
LAB COMMENTS:
IField Parameterslopticrxrll:I Water Temp f°C): I PH (s.u.): Oissolved oxygen (ppm]: Conductivity (Pmhos/cm): I Salinity (ppt): I

AC26143 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Watcr Sciences Section Laboratory Results_
Loc. Descr.: DOWNSTREAM 2
County: l�pE{
Region; FRO
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Emergency
COC YAW%
Collector:
S GUY_TON VlsitlD
Report To
FRO Location ID:
NORRIMARM
Collect Date;
0210312DIO Priority
COMPLIANCE
Collect Time:
10:94 Sample Matrix:
SURFACEWATER
Sample Depth
Loc, Type:
OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC26143
PO Numbor#
16w2sall
Dale Received:
021041201 s
Time Received:
1.:45
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
CC�O 7 IER
Final Report Data:
' It 6
Report Print Date:
03/0812016
If this report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes,
Result/ Method Analysis Validated by
CAS # Analyte Name POL Qualifier Units Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
3.2 °C
2/4116 MSWIFT
MIC
BOO, 5-Day In liquid
2.0
32
mg1L
SM 5210 B-2001
214116
ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.11
mg/Las N
EPA350.1 REV 2
WOMB
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
2A
mgll as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
2I10116
CGREEN
Total Kieldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
0.83
mglL as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2
2111116
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27099-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not Indicate the sample Is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the POL
For a detalied doscrlption of the quallfler codes refer to
https;Nncdenr.e3.omaxonews,comis3fs•publlclWater%29QualltylChemistry h20LablOperationslQuality%20Assurance/QualifierCodeso62S2015.pdf
Page 1 of 1

��wzC�ss
North Carolina Division of Water Resources is
... VitIb:._�" Ta
Central Laboratory Water Sciences Section Water Sample Collection & Submittal Form
Cent
ry ( } [opuoria'1)"`:i lD i :i A r--,2R172
ocafian Desuiption:j (J S-fC4 W-0
Location Cade. F .No rr �s
F�k r wo
"�' to �::. '`i2-5
•r- _ =�a ` -�
I
'. -.•'.mot si: _'.a ,-.�
Calift ctor:y
t.L
- -'ii�
Priaiity: `
Ament
LIbi—
❑Routine
,Compliance
❑ COC
❑ Emergency
❑Q4
-�'',VPri�
Water Mtrtrix
—{:
�urface
❑Ground
❑Waste
❑ Blank
❑Solution
.�.a �%.r.r.jV .-.-
--`4+ -
Time Received:
-DWRRegian:
fhoxdagwirntyl. .! � +�}�
OWROffrce:
faragcgcl r+cmel: U) bC
❑River/Stream ❑Lake
❑Estuary ❑canal
❑5tormwater
❑Monitoring Well ❑Water Supply
❑Effluent ❑rnfluent
❑ Feld Blank rip Blank
❑Fitter Blank
�/ er.
IOih
ReiefvedAr:, /'�/a/
t u
River 14ashi: ' !
C i
`LIM'— ' _�
+ 1 G
�}
: = State Courier
- •: pi=•: S
Delivery.Method:'i ❑Hand Delivery
_ . .
?:i;� - F ❑other:
,gates:
::gib me:;; � :.� ' 3 S �3'Y'�
,..;- •,'. 1
Chlorinated De -chlorinated in Field
❑❑
SamphttQ Grab (Composite
� M
Method El
_
Temper i!kir (Q
- 'onAiriraf:
+
Dissolved analysis- Enter"DIS"
❑ FAtered in Field
in check -boxes for parameters
r
Sample Depth:;.
colfector"s comments:
-bialogy Parameteri:. -A
MBAs (surfacta)
MetPm-
.
Tin (Sri)
gL,:M
Acdity,asCaCO3,topH4.5/B.3
mg/L
Oil and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (AI)
Ug/L
Titanium (Ti) jWL
Alkalinity, as CaCO3, to pH 4-51a.3
mg/L
Phenols, Total Recoverable
pg/L
Antimony (Sb)
pg/L
Vanadium (V) µg/L
BOD: Otochemkal Oxygen Demand, 5-day
mg/L
Residue: Total (Total Solids)
mg/L
Arsenic (As)
pg/L
Zinc (Zn) pg/L
c6OD: Carbonaceous BOO, 5-day
MCA
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Ba)
pg/L
Coliform: Fecal MF
/100mk
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
pg/L
Baron (6), Total l g/L
Coliform: Total Mir
/10DMI
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
Cadmium (Cd)
pg/L
Mercury 1631, low-level ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal
/100ml
TDS - Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
Calcium (Cal
mg/L
Coliform: Tube Total
/100ml
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
pg/L
Organcs Parameters:
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C
umhos/cm
Sulfide
mg/L
Cobalt (Cc)
pg/L
Acid Herbicides
TOC - Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
Tannin & Lignin
mg/L
Copper (Cu)
pg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Turbidity
NTU
Iran (Fe)
pg/L
Organonitrogen Pesticides
-Other Parameters: _
c.
Lead (Pb)
pg/L
Organaphosphorus Pesticides
,WetCFiemistry:Parameters:,-
_,
pH
s-u.
Lithium (Li)
pg/L
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)
Bromide
mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCO3 - by titration
mg/L
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
Chloride
mg/L
Manganese (Mn)
pg/L
Semi -Volatile Organics (BNAs)
Fluoride
mg/L
Mercury (Hg)
pg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate
mg/i
t►tsParairieters: =" -
molybdenum (MD)
pg/L
Chlorophyll a
pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (Ni)
pg/L
Volatile Organics (VOA)
Color: ADMI
cu.
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N)
mg/L
Potassium (K)
mg/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt
C.U.
Total Kieldahl Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/L
Selenium 15e)
pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: Chemical O=ygeo Demand
mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (TP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
pg/L
Cyanide, Total
mg/L
Nitrite as N (NOZ-N)
mg/L
Sodium (Na)
mg/L
'=
kliokogital:•_" - -- _
Formaldehyde
mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated)
mg/L
Strontium (Sr)
pg/L
Phytoplankton / Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+)
mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thallium (TI)
pg/L
LAB COMMENTS;
- .3. .-.
FFeld Paramelers(aptonct): Water Tem C PH.(s=u•1= Oissatved Q?tYgi?n IPPm1: ' __ ^ Cnnduct(vity (pmhos/cm)-+_.:Salinity (ppt).
P-('-)'
Revision: 2/06/2015

AC26172 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratgry Re.salts
Loc. Doter.:
UPSTREAM
County:
OLADEM
Region:
FRO
River Basin
CAPE FEAR
Emergency
CDC YeslNo
Calloctor.
S GUYIORO
Vis111D
Report To
E$O
Location ID: NORRISFARM
Collect Date:
QgLW2016
Priority COMPLIANCE:
Collect Time:
13:3a
Sample Matrix: SURFACEWATE
Sample Depth
19
Loc. Type: OTHER
Final Report
Sample ID:
q 26172
PO Number
1GW2656
Date Received:
021051201
Time Received:
a
Lobwarks LoginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
CNC URO IgR
Final Report Date:
fa iris
Report Print Date:
03108/2016
if this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/
Method
Analysis
Validated by
CAS #
Analyte Name
POL
Qualifier
Units
Reference
Data
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
0,9
'C
215116
MSWIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
2.0
9.4
mg1L
SM 5210 B-2001
215116
ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
EPA 350.1 REV 2
2YI0116
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.88
mglL as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
2110M15
CGREEN
Phosphorus_total as P in liquid
0.02
0.13
mglL as P
EPA 365.1 REV 2
2111116
CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
0.88
mglL as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2
2/11116
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raloigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not Indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the POL
Fora detailed description of the qualifier codes refer to
https:ltncdonr.o 3.arnazonows.comls3to-pubileMatar%200ualitylC homistry%2OLablOperationolQuality%2OAasurance/QualiflerC odos06252015, pdf
' I
Page 1 of 1

Analytical Costs for NC DWR Chemistry Lab
Date 711/15
The OFFICIAL COPY is the on-line version. All other copies are considered unofficial and
uncontrolled
:11 n o f bo i' i s -reu a-d aiw cie o o a l -
branchlsupplies-technical-assislr ce#Cost-ner-Analysis
MEDIUM
PARAMETER
Water,
Solid*
Tissue
Metals
Aluminum(Al)$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Antimony Sb
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Arsenic As
$14.55
$43.66
$58.22
Barium (Ba)
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Beryllium Be
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Boron B
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Cadmium Cd
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Calcium Ca
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Chromium Cr
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Cobalt Co
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Copper Cu
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Hardness by Calculation
$0.00
NA
NA
Hardness by titration
$16.30
NA
NA
Iron Fe
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Lead Pb
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Lithium Li
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Magnesium M
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Manganese Mn
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Mercury H
$24.02
$72.06
$96.08
Mercury by EPA Method 1631 H
$63.04
NA
NA
Molybdenum Mo
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Nickel Ni
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Potassium K
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Selenium Se
$14.55
$43.66
$58.22
Silver A
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Sodium Na
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Strontium Sr
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Thallium (TI)
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Tin Sn
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Titanium(TO
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Vanadium V
$13.01
$39.03
NA
Zinc Zn
$13.01
$39.03
$52.04
Microbiolo
ALKALINITY
$11.64
BOO 5 DAY
$25.65
FECAL MF
$22.69
TOTAL MF
$21.14
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE
$10.55
TOC/DOC
$27.04
$108.15
TURBIDITY
$9.99
Nutrients
AMMONIA
$15.12
NITRATE calculated
$16.05
NITRATE + NITRITE
$18.69
NITRITE
$14.64

MEDIUM
PARAMETER
Water
Solid*
Tissue
ORTHOPHOSPHATE -
$15.65
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
$20.48
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
$20.39
Wet Chemistry
CHLOROPYLL a
$34.73
COD
$19.84
COLOR ADMI
$46.26
COLOR Platinum Cobalt
$13.52
CYANIDE
$32.61
DISSOLVED SOLIDS
$13.43
FORMALDEHYDE
$38.11
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
$27.66
Ion Chromoto rah Bromide, Chloride, Fluoride, and Sulfate
$41.87
MBAS
$29.23
OIL & GREASE
$37.80
$113.40
H
$6.58
PHENOL
$25.54
SILICA
$14.58
SULFIDE
$16.10
SUSPENDED RESIDUE
$12.85
Suspended residue -fixed
$9.16
Suspended residue -vol
$9.16
Tannin and Li nin
$10.34
TOTAL RESIDUE
$11.90
ORGANIC PARAMETERS
Water :
:' Solid* '
Tissue
Volatile Or anics
GC/MS Volatile Organics $115.33
$346.00
Gasoline Range Organics (TPH) $57.94
$173.81
Semivolatile Or anics
GC/MS SemiVolatile O anics/$23.18 For extraction
$251.24
GC/MS SemiVolatile Or anics/$69.53 For extraction
$753.72
Diesel Range Organics TPHDRO /$23.18 for extraction
$84.33
Diesel Range Organics TPHDRO /$69.53 for extraction
$252.98
Pesticides
Or anochlorine Pesticides/$23.13 for extraction
$130.56
Or anochlorine Pesticides/$69.53 for extraction
$391.82
Or anonitro en Pesticides
$138.33
Or anonitro en Pesticides
$414.99
Or ano hos horus Pesticides
$140.74
Or ano hos horus Pesticides
$422.22
Acid Herbicides/$23.18 for extraction
$164.56
Acid Herbicides/$69.53 for extraction
$493.66
PCB's /$23.18 for extraction
$124.15
PCB's /$69.53 for extraction
$372.44
* Solid includes sediments, soils and sludge(residuals)

Fayetteville Division 2592 Dope Mills Road — Fayetteville, NC 28306 [phone] 1864-8774 fax
CHAIN tat= CUsroiov Rccotao
PAGE I OF I
'LIENTNAAIEBADDRESS:
41
c! 7�/l rC •
IT(/t Y
PO:
PROJECT 0 LOCATION:
C"r r �. tCCrd�
0
U-
O
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <fi°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH - <6"C
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
F = HC1
.G-= Sodium Thio
CONTACT PERSON: u
✓Y !!1 Gt i ! r`J't �. -L
PHONE: /�
/D __ l Jam-- �.�
�M LIED -BY,
t METHOD OF
FSHIPMENT;—
- / '�
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP •C
RES.
CHLORINE
SULF10E
J
Lab Initials-*
nquished by:
Dale
Time
Received y)(t ifgnatureI f
Date
Time
-- 7
nqulsh by:
Date
Time
Received by: {Signature]
Date
Time
3
4
vquished by:
Tat¢
Tlme
Received by: (Signature)
Dale
Time
5
{
Turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Soecial Hazards'
ph Field: ph Field: Water Level #1 IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
Temp Field 1: Temp Field 2: Water Level #2 ND YES WHICH:

c.+JG I iupty wimp r1U[7u " rdyUkVVVIIIG+ IVV eUVVV �0 «r1 vv�- I d V + — - -. • • . -^
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE 1 OF I
.ucn 1 NAM[ & 4UI1Kt5S: PO # PROJECTIL L - N.
4,lt=.lo�;' I0�I n
1' rr f? iG� r 5
•l X� C (fe it �� CONTACT PERSON:
O� �fe r4
� 0111", A/C `'nks G,i�7
E! a l l PHONE:
SMPLEO 8Y: 0 �,3 � � � � �
-rent Ai1�r� li
! D 1 METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
t As ID i SAMPLE TYPE DATE TIME COMP
_
(trb
GRAS
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
U)
L
i—
F0
LL
O
-
PRESERVATION (CODE]
CODE: A =None
6 = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6°C
D = NaOH + <6aC
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
F = HCi
= 5adi m I
PH
FLOW
reMd •C
RES.
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
. r,;
�f
ay.3�
✓
t
at 6
J �1: �►�
.,
Lab Initials--i. _
Turnaround lime
Quished by: Date Time
Received% • Signature)
O e
Tlme
qulsbed by; Date Time
Received by; (Signature)
Date
Time
3
d
Tuished by: Date Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
5
6
REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Soecial Hazards:
N++ r+t:iu: ph Field: Water Level #1 IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
Temp Field 4: Temp Field 2: Water Level #2 NO YES WHICH:

�MICROBAC'!`
M Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water) Date Reported: 02/05/16
Ms. Belinda Henson Project: WW & Stream Samples - Norris Farms Date Received: 02/04/16
225 Green Street, #714 Date Sampled: 02/04/16
Fayetteville NC, 28301 Sampled By: NC DENR
Upstream, grab
K6B0205-01
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Coliform, Fecal 800 per 100 mL 02/04/16 16:43 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
State Certifications: Respectfully Submitted
NCDNR #11
NCDOH #37714«
Jeanne Overstreet, Project Manager
Thank you for your business. We invite your feedback on our level ofservice to pm. Please contact the Division Manager, Rob Dermer at 910-864-1920 with any
questions. You may also contact J. Trevor Boyce, President at president rr erobae.com
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
2592 Hope M111s Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 1 910.864.1920 p 1910.864.8774 f I www.microbac.com

<-,.,MICROBACe
Fayetteville Division
Certificate of Analysis
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water) Date Reported: 02/05/16
Ms. Belinda Henson Project: WW & Stream Samples - Norris Farms Date Received: 02/03/16
225 Green Street, #714 Date Sampled: 02/03/16
Fayetteville NC, 28301 Sampled By: NC DENR
Source #1, grab
K6B0141-01
Analyte Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac laboratories, Inc. - Fayettev;Ve
Coliform, Fecal 300000 per 100 mL 02/03/16 17:11 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
Source #2, grab
K6B0141-02
Analyze Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Coliform, Fecal 1000000 per 100 mL 02/03/16 17:11 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
Confluence, grab
K6B014 l -03
Analyle Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Coliform, Fecal 100000 per 100 mL 02/03/16 17:30 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
Downstream #1, grab
K6B0141-04
Anal c Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Microbac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Coliform, Fecal 28000 per 100 mL 02/03/16 17:30 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
Downstream #2, grab
K6B0141-05
Anal to Result Units Analyzed Analyzed By Method Qualifier
Analyzed by: Mivobac Laboratories, Inc. - Fayetteville
Coliform, Fecal 52 per 100 mL 02/03/16 17:55 CCR SM 9222 D-1997
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
2592 Hope Mills Road I Fayetteville, NC 28306 19110.864.1920 p 1910.864.8774 f I www.microbac.com

Sill To:
NC DENR - DWO {Surface Water)
Ms. Belinda Henson
225 Green Street, #714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Project:
WW & Stream Samples - Norris Farms
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Fayetteville Division
2592 Hope Mills Rd
Fayetteville, NC 28306
910.864.1920
[e-mail]
PO #
EP4759308
Invoice
Invoice Number: KA61300232
Invoice Date: 0210612016
Client Cade: KNO03
Terms: 30 Days
Serviges Provided for:
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water)
225 Green Street, #714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Received Date
02/03/2016
Work Order(s) Quantity AnalrstslDesaiutlon Base Price Surcharge Unit Cost Extended Cast
K6610141 5 Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Water $30.00 0% $30.00 $150.00
Total Amount $160.00
Prepaid Amount $0.00
Balance Due $150.00
Please detach invoice stub below and return with remittance
dam------------ -------------------------------- ----------- .......
INVOICE #: KA61300232
INVOICE Date: 02/05/2016
CUSTOMER #: KNO03
Remittance To:
Microbac Laboratories, Inc
Attn: Locator KA
P.a Box 644733 4
Pittsburgh, PA 15264-4733
KAKNO03KA68002320502201600015000
Balance Due $150.00
Terms: 30 Days

OMICROBACO
Bill I To:
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water)
Ms. Belinda Henson
225 Green Street, #714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Project:
WW 8 Stream Samples - Norris Farms
Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Fayetteville Division
2592 Hope Mills Rd
Fayetteville, NC 28306
910.864.1920
[e-mail]
PO #
EP4759308
Invoice
Invoice Number: KA6600231
Invoice Date: 02106/2016
Client Code: KNO03
Tennis: 30 Days
Services Provided for:
NC DENR - DWQ (Surface Water)
225 Green Street, #714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Received Date
02/04/2016
Work Order(s) Quantity AnaWWRAsdedon--- ease Price, Surcharge unit Cost Extended Cost
K680205 1 Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Water $30.00 0% $30.00 $30.00
Total Amount $30.00
Prepaid Amount $0.00
Balance Due $30.00
Please detach invoice stub below and return with remittance
------- --- -- --- ---- --- ----
INVOICE #: KA000231
INVOICE Date: 02/05/2016
CUSTOMER #: KNO03
Remittance To:
Microbac Laboratories, Inc
Attn: Locator KA
P.0 Box 644733 4
Pittsburgh, PA 15264-4733
KAKNO03KA6B002310502201600003000
Balance Due $30.00
Terms: 30 Days

Gooale

Guyton, Steve
From: McKoy, Kimberly S
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 2:26 PM
To: Guyton, Steve
Subject: Info.
Mere is the information you requested: 2/3/16 — Vehicle # 240445 —120 miles — 0.50 rate.
Kimberly S. McKoy
Office Assistant IV
Division of Environmental Assistance & Customer Service
NC Department of Enviornmental Quality
910-433-3325 Office
910-486-0707 Fax
[e-mail]
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
"Nothing Compares,....
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Y
MCOuAACS
Apronamfc Olddon Phew; IMO) 7334= t+ d NO wnw.neO9-4Mn,daarawmFf FY1D-WM4690
n.-•r
Ysy,.
PfOdl0tilyd
Cent Jad Nortia Adrfaor.
Noels Famm
Waste Report
92eftabeftmfr,
;4
MC 28W
....,�,.
tlladen County
e 0122=16 RmcwVO& 01MM16
Cempbine D210212016
Famr: t.inks to Helpful Informatlon
iioUbm It end odm Alsrasurem rrts
NrOopaa (M (pAW P Wn)
K fawn} Ce (apm) A(p rspzO
S W4 Fe (oam) AM Mw* ZO mam) car &p B mwa) No &OW C Op")
12DO
Tofa1 N 24.1
797 92.0 34.2
27.0 2.59 0.41 0.60 0.79 0.69 231
1� Cade: ALS
Desedwm.
ToW#Qeld&NN 530:..... ..................
.................. I ........................................
.--------------------- - .......................
9 Mrta Lagoon L[q.
)norglrnic N PH
DM (%) SS (10-as tw
EC fmskm) CCE IW ALE(1000 98L) C:N
NH4-N 7.37
NOWY
Otgenio N Aff favor)
Cd (oom) Pb foam) At (aaa)
Se (mm) Li foam) As man) Cr Oram) Co maW Cl loom) Afro (AM)
Urea
Fps of mn", d A ArAO% for Firs) Cron (lb 11000 pal.)
Ottror Flamers (lb 11000 gal.)
AppOceMbnAfoMod
N P205 K20 CO MR
S Fe Aft Zn
Cu a Ab C1 Ne Am Cd m Al Se Li
1"Odion
2.21 0.46 7.98 0.77 0.28
0.23 0.02 T 0.00
0.01 0.01 1.93
North Carolina
c%5
l.�hxiu Lint Ford Cwm k—m
Rep WwmT ft d the syde n that makes ads report posai6le is W ft funded
anuo a grart from the No* Cwdbm TobmwThat Frail Camff*cdon.
1'�fc'� �1a8 cgiavromfc nrrvlass to mm� and �emd o q+aoliry.
- Srow lhzder. Commismim not

Fayetteville Division 2592 Hope Mills Road - FayeE eville, NC 28306 [phone] / 864-8774 fax
CHAIN OF: CUSTODY Rr.CORD
PAGE i OF 1
%LIENTNAMEBADDRESS:
/L
Y /t
Pop
PROJECT I LOCATION:
w
Q
m.
LL
Q
#
TYPE
OF ANALYSIS
PRESERVATION (CODE)
CODE: A = None
B = HNO3 (pH<2) + <6°C
C = H2SO4 (pH<2) + <6'C
D = NaOH + <6°C
E = ZN Acetate + <6°C
E = HCt
G = Sodium Thio
CONTACT PEHbQN:
k?I t- C u
PHONE: T� Lf
6�5�
AM i.EQ6v:IV
rStY-
DATE) METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
— f
LAB ID #
SAMPLE
TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
PH
FLOW
TEMP C
Res'
CHLORINE
SULFIDE
s
Lah
inqulshed by:
Date
Time
Received
y; {Signature)
Date
Time
2
vi iC�
��-7
c�= 5 /
inquish by:
Date
Time
Received by: t$Ignaturej
Date
Time
3
4
inquished by:
Date
Time
Received by: {Signature)
Date
Time
5
FI
Initials----O�
Turnaround time: REGULAR RUSH
Comments or Special Hazards:
ph Field: ph Field: Water Level #1 IS DATA FOR REG. COMPLIANCE PURPOSE?
Temp Field 1: Temp Field 2: Water Level #2 NO YES WHICH: