090127_INSPECTIONS_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources•
FayetteVIIe Regional Office
1
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor !�- AMM
1DaHNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DrMION OF WATER QUALITY
April 11, 1947
Mr. Randy Barefoot
Prestage Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection
Prestage Farms Swine Farms
Registration No. 09-127, 09-140
Bladen couny
Dear Mr. Barefoot:
On April 14, 1947, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected the subject swine facilities. Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspwbon Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office based an the
information provided and observations made during the inspection that the facilities were in
compliance with ISA NCAC 2H, Part.0217 at the time of the inspection. Please refer tis the
comments section an the rear of the inspection form for infarmapion regarding your facilities.
PIe= be aware that all swine facilities with a liquid waste collet ion syr designed for
a minimum of 250 hogs must have a certified waste mo agement plan on. or before December
31, 1997. The district NRCS office, Agriculture Extension office, or the Division of Soil
and Water have est available to assist you with upgading of existing facihtws and
certification.
if You have any questions concerning this matter, please call Robert Heath at (910) 486
-
1541.
7
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Ox=K ne - FRO DSW
Sam Warren - Blau Co. NRCS
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayettev[lieNOC
FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301 -SM An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 91D-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of IDWQ-0spection O Follow-uof DSWC review O Outer
Facility Nwaber z
Date of i r/
.. Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Sbtaa: G'f��h F 4 Told 71me (in Lours) Spent enRevicw
lor Inspection (includes travel and proses &o `----�
�/ .t;4
onsite Reprsswtative:bkvam.
Cerfliied Operator: &-✓ Operator Caiilieation N=ber: L�77��
Location of Farm:
Latitude �•���• Longitude 0•�`L._J`
Not Operational Date Last Operated:
of Operation and Desip Capacity
Odw 7ne of Livestock
u
.M
1. Ars there any buffers that nerd maintea13 Yes RNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the opecetion?
a. If discharge is observ4 was the oonvayauoe mm -made?
b. If diseharge is observed, did it reach Surface Wats? (If yes, notify D'WQ)
r" If discharge is observed„ what is the erthwded flow in pl mia?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysoem? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge $am any part of the apendon?
4. Was there any adverse to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsUlding ponds) m iubtAm MI c4dbw
13 Yes IM
p Yes ® No -
13 Yes )m No
E3 Yes JINo
M Yea $3146
O Yes IRNo
E3 Yes FJ No

a b so -m9 not in compliance with any applicable Maack aiterk?
7. Did the facility Lal to Tam a certified opervorin regmsi'bie dop Cif mon after IMM?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be ptvperly clown
Stratrtures fLaeoons and/or Holdiat' Postel
4 Is stnatural freeboard less than adequate?
Fnxboard (8): 18800311 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
,2d 4-
10. Is seepage observed firm arty of the tau Wa?
11. is erosion, or say other threats to the integrity of say of the Muctmms obsa•veM
12. Do any of the st:ucoAm need
of any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental thrat, no" DWQ)
13. Do any of the Wucrtm lack adquate mwkas to Wm* start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Avplication
14. Is there physical evide= of over application?
Of in excess of WIMP, or runoff entering vmft s of the State, notify DWQ)
is. Crop type
I& Do the active crops differ with those desipated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Doa the tae ity have a lack of adequate aero@ for load application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipmetu?
En C trflfied Fac0ities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Mmage ent Plan caddy avat"e?
21. Does the facility fafl to comply with the Animal Waste Management Pian in any vtsy7
22. Does record keeping need imprt
M. Dm i dbV require a follow-up visit by sac agencP
24. Did R.eviewerlW4=tor fail to discuss revie wrtnspecdon with owner or operator in charge?
13 yes too - •
Yea VkNo
D Yes )UNo
13 Yes 13 No
3.agaon 4
13 Yea M30
El Yes No
® Yes $) No
E3 Yes Jallo
❑ Yea ,) No
Q Yes ja No
13 Yes MNo
13 Yes 12 No
E3 Yes JS No
0 Yes M No
13 Yes MNo
13 Yes JUNo
Q Yea JU No
❑ Yes RNo
CommeaiS,(refer to quemon #).-# Explatn,aay YES and%r ano�y recomraend�aac aa9 othu eotrtmeatsy . - fA
Use�draci+�ags'of.fa�lt.,y to better rxpiasn tretuatioas��nse�ad�onal:pagea as °-`�"5� �
w
7;U ss••-'� 'AY
12.
Reviewedlnspecter Name �Vic' —FAV '-
Reviwer,7nspector Signature: �c'�ya� lNIft ! ,T - f7
4= Division of Halm Quality, Water Quality Sectkpn, Faatlhy. umnew Unit

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of D%ALQ ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
F7aclfity Number Z7 Date of Inspection C�
Time me of inspection L�J Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: 7ih�� Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Nam: �7o%'s o•✓
Owner Name-
County:
iE�✓
Phone No: (9/-4-)
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: -4! -- Integrator—, -_4 -------
Certified Operator. _�_;� Operator Certification Number. 1-77�
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
SwigAm
:N_ a mh Poultry ;,<Namber: C`�ttte„ umber
Wean to Feeder, ❑ ❑
Feeder to Finish ; ❑ Non-Lzm EJ s A ❑Beef
Farrow to Wean"�'��
Farrow to Feeder ME
Farrow to Finish 0 Other Type of Ltvestocl: '
ti
�n6sr��Y iAF�frR` 5''r�
�,y
" }'Number of L`agooas /,Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present a
I.s<goon Area 15P pray Field Area kig
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimpmvetnent? ❑ Yes 13 -No
2 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;gNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance Fran -made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water! (If yes, notify DWt) ❑ Yes P1 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estWaated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, nom' DWQ ❑ Yes ff No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FINo
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IR No
3. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes P No
maintenaacelrmprovemsat?
Contrnrred on bark

6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes O(No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1111'97)?
❑ Yes
RNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
gNo
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
10 No
Freeboard (it): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the saes?
❑ Yes
INNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
XjNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
,� No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff/entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Glop type b¢-� d� ��I"
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
OrNo
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J No
19. is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
i3 No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
M No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
X10
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
jo No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
1QNo
Commeats'(refer to question #) ' smox anyYnswr'an
i rxr xs- d/ora
-Enasany other comments,
Use drawings of facility to better exg[am srttrairons fuse addtaonai1pages as nt °°' �_e
sic
,2.
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name'.
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Divfaien of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

r�
ax x
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency ��� }
® Division of Water Quality
14D Routine O Complaint O Follow-up cif l]kWo inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review, O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 4 /Z Time of Inspection �-24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Registered R Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: F� /7��%.f�jO.r� County:........... / .........................................
.......
Owner Name:..............rf!Z..................................... Phone No:.. .u��.7,.......................
Facility Contact: �/ Title. Phone No :....................
. �...... .. .................
.... /� p
Mailing Address: ................................... / .... Qr. .4 .......... .. ....... 1 .....
Onsite Representative:..... ,,iC��¢�'!�r- . Integrator: ......... f ...if........
Certified Operator; ......... ....a.�...4 ................................... Operator Certification Number:.......l.l.��,?.....
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude 0• �' �"
Desi Ca'rrent� Desi n Current, " �"� ;Design Current
g :.
E
°Pnpulahon
,E x
Pauftry °Capacityw;P©pulation °�Capactyt„Popuiatian `
,Capacity
, , ,«Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
']❑ Layer - ❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish'
R
)] Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy.
Farrow to Wean
<'
rw
Other
Farrow to Feeder
Total Design Capacity. ray
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
�1L'❑
TotA..
Boars
i,n
NWfN
;N(tmher of Lagoons 1 Hblding Po6&1:
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Waste Management System
h
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes AI No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes RrNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANO
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ml/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Wo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes E'No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes N,No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 11 -To
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes iskNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

r- 1
•
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (La+oons Holding Ponds. Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Identifier:
❑ Yes JW No
❑ Yes XNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3. Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard (ft): .............fz.y....................................y
..............................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..........kxlg- _....r A�� ,t ..............................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑: No.vitilatioits_or. deficiencies were noted -during' this:visit:" .You:will recei�e.no further:::
:�:•correspi�ndeizceab"out this:visit:�:�:'::':�:� ":••.'::'.'. .' -.-".:'..'.:: .•.•.•:.'. .:'"
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes X�o
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes JXNo
❑ Yes )R No
❑ Yes No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ;&No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes PkNo
❑ Yes PiNo
❑ Yes W No
Cvmmenfs [referto ques#r<on #) #Explant any`YES answers and/or any reeommendaitons or any other cormneats �°��
z � k� "`
-��„^,ccts.`uw,ac - "�"� �" +�;� `v: .� a. -w< .r ,�,.'Yi ,� , �: Aa�C` rte,., -�- S; y3,* '�.�fi' ."''•a
Use dtraw�n�s owfa2+tacrbtykto'�better, explain s�taativas [use additional�pages as:necesssry} a� �� ��°` q�'� �'�°°°
Y; �.'-vG:C..RFn��w h ..3/C•._°i+.� i`..a5. >n�c.o:�:]k.cMxY,.cS`�r[; sf�l-r+[r s,.. -�- Wit v'L'a��` _w+.n^W�Rai�':.i/.#�$aSiE.'�v6`.'.'.�M'..b'�t'.a✓t Mr'v� ���`�.^�.IiN. iv�*�:
�� �(/K-F�Y'•�' ]/�'/�"—Y /Vim /� ���� i
C�25U) Xc
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector 3
Reviewer/In for Name �,�. _
e' i 3f J % a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y �(,�,j ' Date: se--/Z��c�

F— Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection f._!L_4-0 j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered [; Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: t% / .... ...... ...... County: ........
.................. ....... ..................
Owner Name: ............ �i!E;��.....ei /� 1f......._ ........ Phone No: �y2..77 f .............................
Facility Contact: ........ ���.t:�t.......!P>:fi�+.7/...�.... Title:........... Phone No
Mailing Address: / , 0. �C�.Y �.30 L� �✓ iJ.... .C... ....,r2 32 ................................................... ..........................
1–/....
Onsite Representative:.............f.................... Integrator; .......:..............................................................................
.��,
Ae
Certified Operator: ...........(?01 - �E...........,�, ,....................................................... Operator Certification Number:... 3 .............
Location of Farm:
............. ......... ..7 ................................._.. ---...........................I............. ............._...........................................................................................................................
....>...........................................................................................................................................•----.......................--.•--..------..................................................
Latitude �� �� �� Longitude �• ��=
`Design
Current Design "Current:_ Design Current '.
CapacityPopulation
VWean
Ht
Capacity Po ulati6n
°Ca acity .Ro ulation _
❑ to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish❑
Non -Layer = ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean .Z
1
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other • •-
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total DeStign Capacity
—Gilts,
❑
❑Boars
.Total SSL- W '
d: �. : ,
Number of Lagoons
�; ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holiitng Ponds /Solid Traps.
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Discs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I
Identifier:
f.
Freeboard (inches): .............p......._...
Structure 2 Structure 3
36' "/
[]Yes kNo
❑ Yes –xNo
❑ Yes f'No
❑ Yes
�tNo
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ Yes
ZJ No
❑ Yes [gNo
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes �S No
Continued on back
V

i
Facility Number: 0 — f ,Z7 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes )(No
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kpqo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes >(No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes WNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes DINo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes XNo
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes XN6
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? KYes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes KNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XNO
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(lel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑
Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (lel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ?�_-"No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IRNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ,�i]' No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes I'k-No
-0, Jr. Clef de.n pi -"rC doted• di illg ,gills• visit: • Y:oil will-t'&6*0 iiq further • : • :
�_ Q
corres orideiice ahanit this:visit :: ::::: :::::: :::
Comments {refer to question #):M Explainany YES answers and/or any:recolnlnendations or any other comments
Usedrawings of facility to Better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)
w
j..� •�il!.c �,��� 9.c',os� N�1 roc E u/a..� ,��/,cv�.rr � ��.c�d.�
Reviewer/Inspector Name W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 15"— f
3123199

.5
Facility Number: V — 12.7 Date of Inspection L
Odor Issues
26_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below KYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes M -No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes JjNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes gNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes NNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes kNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes KNo
ddition ottta -e' n" -
_.. ... _.
3/23/99
3/23/99

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency-,
� _
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of "Visit: 8- iine: ® Printed on: 7/21/2000
Z
Q Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted Certifi
led [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
P^ 1 j
FarmName: „-�5 /. T`.. .............................................. Lounty:.......... { s .............................................
OwnerName:.... .............. .JFG Wt. .....................-.......................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facthty Contact: ....1..�........ �4....... ..... Title: .......................
NailingAddress:..........�.............................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ... Q.-.1Integrator:...................?...................................................................
Certified Operator:___( a_/a.......,. 1.1.1.e.G.r. ......... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
r1q
T
❑ Swine 0 Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� Longitude �• ����
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Fecder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
[:],Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ Layer I I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagnrnn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Disci & Stream lmpaC
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance Evan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water cif the Stater (If yes, niftily DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system" (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4• Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I St Cturc 2 Structure Struclure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....----�-�....................................................................................................................................................................
.............................. .
it r1 �f
Freeboard (inches): `t3
5100 Continued on back

i
Facility Number: Q — 12-7 Date of Inspection -->' `� Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, E] Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management. system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ YesN0
Waste Application -`
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A2 -No
11. Is there evidence of over applicati n? ❑ Exc ssive Ponding [IPAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload E]Yes JkNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those des nated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes/� No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ YeskNo
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? [:]Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ElYeso
16. Is there a lack ofadequate waste application equipment? ElYeso
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes *No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes WNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes �o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
:: NO•yiolatiQris:ok- def de'ncies •were noted• during Ais.visit: - Yoo will -0'64i a ti©: #'urthe; -
comes oridence: about this visit......:::: :::::... :............ .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (u/se additional pages as necessary):
i Sr/h IJ LJa/OWi €' /,j/eS"hG/�2r�d W,l/� he— %Esitad f �^cl�+•� rce
�r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5;�-/Cj-av 5/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 •
` Fayetteville Regional Office WPM
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 11, 1997
Mr. Randy Barefoot
Presstage Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection
Prestage Farms Swine Farms
Registration No. -09---127-,--09-140
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Barefoot:
On April 14, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected the subject swine facilities. Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office based on the
information provided and observations made during the inspection that the facilities were in
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part.0217 at the time of the inspection. Please refer to the
comments section on the rear of the inspection form for information regarding your facilities.
Please be aware that all swine facilities with a liquid waste collection system designed for
a minimum of 250 hogs must have a certified waste management plan on or before December
31, 1997. The district NRCS office, Agriculture Extension office, or the Division of Soil
and Water have specialist available to assist you with upgrading of existing facilities and
certification.
If You have any questions concerning this matter, please call Robert Heath at (910) 486-
1541.
Sincerely,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSW
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Wachovia &gilding, Suite 714, Fayetteville ���� fAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% postconsumer paper

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of EDWQ ifispection O Follow-uofDSWC review O Other
Date of MWeetion
Fadilty Number z Time of Inspection I Use 24 hr. dw
r,� / �. Tota! Time (#n hours) Spent onRcwiew
Firm Gr�ER77' 4 - - - -
lor Inspeedon (indndes Navel and prooe:sing)
4 -
Fam Name:%so�•R� �� BEd_
Owner Name:�.c
AffIling Address•
Onsite Representative: �-�' _ .. Inte�mr: _ l!�'E,.�'E �•P,�
Cathed Opauor; " Operator Ce:dleation Number: %773;`
Location of Farm:
Latfmde Longitude
D Not 2Rerationsi Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
. e,. x ?ret". "�, r..3 � �� s ...a►s. -' - ''s �.� � i$' k�''�'"^w`' - ..'@ .. � w
g 3� n. �Nnmber onlhy .`�zMl i .�liamber„ {Cattle � r» n Number•
Wean to Feeder'vairy
`
4�.Y.
Feeder to Finish Nos- ❑ Bad
Farrow to We3II
Farrow se FmIer
EUM 19 Finish
s 0 Othw Type of westock
g
o
Subsurfau Drano Present R.
� _ . r <��� _�, � 8 �. Spray Fidd Area
.. � 22_
1. Are there any buffers that need Me %--- E3 Yes UNo
2 h any discharge observed fi orn any part of the opeaation? ❑ Yes PtNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the cowmyanae maninedc? CI Yes ® No
b. If&scharge is observed. did h read Swface WatrO (Ifyrs, notify DWQ) 13 Yes PNo
c. If discharge is dmaved, what is the estimated flow in galftmin?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (UM notify DWQ) ❑ Yes tfNo
3. h there evidence ofpast discharge from any part of the oper WoO D Yes $No
a. Was there any adverse impacts to the wafers ofthe State other than from a dischage? D Yes IR No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other bran lagoaras/holding ponds) require 13 Yes ja No

C Is fi cility not in compliance with nay appHicable adack cdtnia? `
7. Did the Sciility fail to have a cettiSad operator in nVonsble charge (ifingwion a8rr 111197)?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly ekwv
Strnrtares (i,at?ooas and/or HaldfngUdo
9. Is strtttbrral frabowd less than adoquate?
Frabowd(fi). Lagoon 1 latgoon 2 lagoon 3
a w
14. L seepage observed from any of the strumm?
11. is aosion, oar nay other threats to the integrity of nay of the atreeexe m observed?
12. Do nay of the need .
of any of questions 9-12 was answered yet, and the sftnation poses an
immtdiate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do nay of the swwtures lark adgnate markers to identify start and slap pumping levels?
Waste ARE! kation
14. Is there pbyucal evidence of over application?
.(if in excess of WW, or =off entering waters of the Seale, notify DWQ)
15. crop we
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Managesnew Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for lead application?
18. Does the cover crop need Wit?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Far Certified Facilitid
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plane readily ava&Mc?
21. Does the fiecility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in nay way?
22. Does rccw keeping need Wit?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Rcvkwer kgmctor fuel to discuss n viewfraspettion with owntr or opdamr in charge?
r
i Yes D(Na '
Yes RNo
[3 Yes PN*
Yea 10 No
lagoon 4
D Yea ®No
D Yes JC No
® Yes 10 No
D Yes allo
D Yes X No -
13 Yes JM No
D Yes Wo
D Yes 12 No
D Yea JR No
D Yes M No
D Yes IffNo
D Yes j'No
D Yea JU No
D Yes 5tNo
t:oanreents (refer to, quesieon :. E=plarn aa3i YES ans�vess aadloiaa�ry detiot s_oT an otha_aoetiasat.2`
Usa�dra Ings: of
Woo,
to better a�plara =thsatioas fuse adait anal paged as,; - : ` , ": � ` � �'� _ ��� "
12-
Reviewer/fnspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Data 1121"
cc: Dividtow of Water Qualf y, Water Quality Secdvm6 Fadky Assmment Usk 11/14/'96