090124_INSPECTIONS_20171231

- ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number f Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompiiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ?u Arrival Time: Departure Time. County: j c: Gv1 Region:
Farm Name: _77 t3 P y-
-tc. S - --tk 3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: P r 1 t 4- E S L LG Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t. r�l S 5 �t ;,._► ► l� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
it
Certified Operator: a M r_S l �, J" r 51'
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: K&S ll
Certification Number: 16
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
ILayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Daig Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . Pouf
Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
r �
Turke s
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o` ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0_- K ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑Yes ❑ No D-11 " ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No E3-N�C_ ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'1' oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - t apf jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collec 'on & Treatment
4. Is sforage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [3-No--❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [3-NX___ff] NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes a<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ej4q6-0 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q'hlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes L]_Nt5--❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes u 'V U ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G %3 Y'j- P sir - Z)
13. Soil Type(s): No
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
Yes
Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes E 110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes rf;No
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 10
❑ Yes LJ"` o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [:]'Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ t20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Ds ection: U-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑Yes
rz�oNA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0-N6NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
e'1Va ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
o❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑' 6 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[:]Yes
❑'l�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer,to�questsbO) Eaplarn any.:YES`answers and/or any additional,recaminendations or any other com�nents:ti` '
Use_drawings offaci ty abetter egpEam:situatioas(Use.addttioiial:pages as necessary,);*.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 3 t 1 L110 U
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: [phone] � !
Date: rJ cl i U
21412015

Type of Visit: QJCompliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: u Arrival Time: llQ Departure Time:County: �eZhlRegion:
1
r
Farm Name: — < c t.4t Owner Email:
Owner Name: �+(i `G�� t� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CA w •c (7 c{ f (,(lam Title:
Onsite Representative: r `
Certified Operator: IF c r+
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 16 b ?6 S
Certification Number: 4W5 7
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [_Ake, NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[—]'No
EINA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
�A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
0"Tio
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[4'ltlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: v
Waste Collection & Treatment —
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes [A�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): —
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ale— ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [� ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
L3-Ne- ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Eg-W ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
hlo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[-]Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12- Crop TYpe(s):�f
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [::]Yes []-N-6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes QAIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes EE "'o [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�J-go ❑ NA. ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VjlIo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []'No
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�:f No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Pape 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility umber: jDate of Inspection:
r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2 q'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below_
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E� "o [-INA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E]-No❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (Le_, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other;
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E]-No- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LCI '"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [ No
[-]Yes [l�40
❑ Yes F!�No
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412515

type or visit. w c,ompuance inspection tv uperanon xeview tv structure Evaivanon v ieennicai Assistance
Reason for Visit: 46Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:—] Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:g!LF "egion: �Z
Farm Name:" Owner Email:
Owner Name: Pt�itit �1-,L/'if�S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1K'_A!46 6rsA " Title:
Onsite Representative: ? L
Certified Operator: 3-, j tlL`,+
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Phone.
P1.13-S
Certification Number: /IV
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
C4 4� Z.o(6 000 u uob _ C— aj 52,-
Design Current Design Curren#
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity .Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
jNqnLLayer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
D ..Foul Ca achy
l;o
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes [:]No [ A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[fNA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
❑ No
dNA.
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
[v]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

I .'
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: c
Waste Collection &Treatment
ayes
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
lQ.�dv
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q A
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[D-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
E�r_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
[3'5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[/5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes ✓TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 9"_V" j l�::!& S & o
13. Soil Type(s): T. )V 0 _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:]Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
[—]Yes ff No
❑ Yes [f_No
❑ Yes C�rNo
❑ Yes [XNo
[:]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [A No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [! No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [n No
DNA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
�]NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facffi Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [] Yes [�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E�-No 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of fast survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D-yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 4EffNo
[::]Yes [5No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question,#) Explain any -YES answers and/or any additions recommendations,or any.other commeriti '
Use drawings of keility°#o bettei "explain srtnatrons (use'additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: `6�_ I
Date: 2 4
21412014

67t4/G 3�
Structure Evaluation Inspection
Facility Number: 7 Date: b �`t-6 / b
Time in: /(?, Lit( Time out: // %DO4
Farm Name:-Prl�s' -�
Owner Nam : 103-
Farm 911 address:
Facility Contact: is +k y uw(tOnsite Representative: / ( Integrator:
�
Certified Operator: s a, IAA. ‘L F J
Y'l' /---Cert. Number
Is storage capacity less than adequate? Yes r/ao
If yes is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes No
Structure: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Identifier:
Spillway?
Designed Freeboard (in.):
Observed Freeboard (in.): 13,5
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures
observed? Yes No t/
Do any structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes _ No
Does any part of the waste management system need repair Yes No _
Condition of field's 2e'�) c11 ply
Condition of receiving crop ra: r G (4)?
Comments:
pap i\, N.A1

g4-is az
Type of Visit: 40"Conloiance Inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �� Regions
Farm Name: `i. Pc'e<t V
Owner Name: �%�`iei Rwt. -5
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: .((
Certified Operator: 4 19 Rtr1e-,31— -
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: &,s
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
/6 A5
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
La er
on -Layer
Dai Cow
Da' Calf
Feeder to Finish -
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D . P.oul
Layers
Ca acit
Pa
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Turkey Poults
Other J11
10ther
Discharses and Stream Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [—]Yes [:]No ENA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [:j'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes gN5o
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: - rL. Date of Inspection:
. Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[C _bkr- f] NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No EM1 [:] NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[a,_Ka_--E] NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Q.M5"_�❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
QXK ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[&bTa- ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[—]Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [4H< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): E r"r '9 % t7 V" d- Lor'LZC_
13. Soil Type(s): AIV
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
F] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[]!(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[!(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
[] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesWNo
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

s
Fpcility Nun ber: 9- Date of Inspection:
.24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ( io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[;[,WG
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
QX�
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Q�Vb
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Lam` o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[;�Xo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
�io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question.#) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations: or any other comments ,'g 4�
Use drawings of facility to better-explidwsituations (use additional pageslas necessary]:
C"k: � t SIC (L(
1 1b
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
51
Phone:3 3—:3
1
Date:
21412014

IV
IType of Visit: ('Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: erRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
i
Date of Visit: zjUL Arrival Time: Departure Time: Countyq'_ Region:
Farm Name: J pi '4 r3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: f �l �[ rwlGr{/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact- 8 441'- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: LL Integrator: OfS
Certified Operator: ``1 Certification Number: f
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current - Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry' ` Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
lNon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
(07Dairy
Design Current
D , P,oul r Ca aci Pa
La ers
Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non'Daffy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Puults
Other
Discharges and Stream Imnacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1?"" ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:]No ED'lrV ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:]No TTA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [—]Yes ❑ No [J'NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes I_J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facgi Number: -79 Date of Ins ection: j /
l f
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No C3' AA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1 = o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E2-< ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan.?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZINZ ❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Blo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes O N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window �j ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): P a S G b
13. Soil Type(s): 11'll�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q�' oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [r]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
H No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Rectuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
FTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes F:j'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Fac' ' Numbt'r: - Date of Ins ectton:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�� oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 4j"" ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Q�Kb_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Qlgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes <0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [frNo ❑ NA [] NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to, quesdoh. Explain any YES answers and/or any additional: recommendations or,an other comnieuts.
... .,. ... '' - y��:.r Y,. --' ,._ yrL � ._ • • -:..—.'r'.�.i{irc:V� °i`.��4" `` '"_ ..�.. y
Use:drawin &: facility to b6tter�exptam.situation (ilk addttZonal pa�es`as necessary).
6aCbw*--' -�' �q'
. S r/3
tl:4� C/LNI , / 9 4(_ (fo
f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
NJ
Phone: LM iJl`
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
0412014

Type of Visit: t�iC. mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &14"Utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I It,
Time: Departure Timer County]?_ Region: F l W
Farm Name: i �gi _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,tr 1 'P f Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
�' rLe✓'
_ _Title: -TCU6
Phone:
Onsite Representative: I Integrator:
Certified Operator: '19 pett C6_� Certification Number: /�7 4
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Curent;:; Design C►urrent
Swine Capacity Pop.
RPoultry Capacity =Pape Cattle Capacity Pap.
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Ceuta D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,oul -a acE r �Po.. Non -Dairy
La ers Beef Stocker
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layers Beef Feeder
13oars
Pullets
I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turke Faults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [—]Yes [:]No [A-5-A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [—]Yes [:]No [! NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes [:]No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �/N;
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: U Date of Ins ection• c,,
Waste Collection & Treatment
'4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes MITo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [3-Ido— ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [] i• u ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [„ M ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
Q�
~-i ?J'
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): fy V 01-0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑'lTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes
[�+ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Er�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
!! No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes Cleo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 0<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [7I< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes &Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [gl7lo' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] 'C ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
En<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q<O
DNA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question.ft Explain an answers'an or.an additional reeo)men aa. ons organyo_f er�com�
s:
Use drawings of facity o beter explain sitnatons'�useadditiadditional a es as necessary).,:'
Sap f z©c z,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
0A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
DateQ
21412011

=_ : _ IVlSlon of WStei'Quallty �
Facility Number - ] ®Division of Svil and Water Conservation �i -M
7 �-
® Qther Agency �'�
Type of Visit: om//pliaace Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: leMoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 4-157-1-PA—Arrival Time; O Departure Time: ,5'-County: � Region: ___ 0
Farm Name: Y/ a� w� -3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: d,. �t-� Title: -�'Ch . Spr C, Phone:
OnsiteRepresentative: ,(� /T!5'11/­; e-3 Integrator:
Certified Operator: T ]y'� r- T* Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design CurrentDesign
Current
Design Current
Svrine-
Ca aci Po
P P
Wet Poul Ca aci
Po p
Castle Ca aci Po
P . P-
P�
=
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
[�QQ
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
_
D_esign
Current
Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P.oultr
Ca aci
P.o _
Non-DaiTy
arrow to Finish
La ers
Nan -La ers
Pullets
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
-
ilts
tB
oars
Turkeys
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[-]Yes
❑ No
DNA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[-]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[:)Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:Q—
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [S No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Identifier:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes C�jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop /Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crap Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [23 No ❑ NA 0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ g No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Farah Number: - Date of Inspection: - b-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [2jNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes ® No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [1 No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ®, No
Other Issues
28_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit'? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes allo [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes [R No
❑ Yes Callo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain anyYES;ans�rs and/or any addttion�r�e'cainiiiendations�or_any other com- ments.
�o.
Use drastngsof facility`to"betteregplatns�tuationsi(usetaddttionalpages.as neces arv).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �'74 �y3 �� 3 3Ob
Date: — z d v2CD 1
21412011

i
r �_ 'emu ,� � �� s..r.. :. _ - },"'n t•�sa `� "�.�'�
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: — 3 / Arrival Time: : 3a Departure Time: ! p County: e , Region: (
Farm Name: - Tr i r, I __a__s2 fir
Owner Name: d—, ]g Fr r-s T--
Owner Email:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 7." r" Title: C�r�• jl�r� . Phone:
T ,
Onsite Representative: f /'j r Integrator: APj^w,0,4
1 c�
rl 8 �`r Certification Number: Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
C•urreat
Design Current
I'MDesiM6ugrent
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
.Cap tty opA,
Cattlepacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
3 by
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
ate€. ;
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other - .I
ITurkeyPoults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
JKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
Cg[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

FacWty Number: - Date of Inspection: — j --
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
FM No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Z .9lfC/rY"rP/
13. Soil Type(s): (-Aj_a!;� _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 1l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
_Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IE§,No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ® No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
O Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of fast survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [R_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No
[—]Yes K No
[-]Yes R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain-.any--YESanswers and/or any additional recommendations or' any„otl er'comments: ` !j
Use drawings of-facdity_to:better explainrsituahons 6i§e14ddttional pages as necessary). :
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:-
2/4/2011

,K1" 1i - !! - a b1 O
Z
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit autine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: %'Z — 0 Arrival rime: 2.'�r Departure Time: S: County: Region:
Farm Name: I"r es T �G v+-+xt 3 Owner Email-
Owner Name: .T . Z r�'es Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: �7
Facility Contact: �• $ I r t e' .S Title: 4&6111 e-411` Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: '
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [__1 c = { = u Longitude: = o = & = u
MEN Design Curren# Design Curren#
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Design Current
C*attle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
-Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
• Pullets;
❑ Boars
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
[I Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
❑ Other ❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
LEA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
��A❑
NE
L3<A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ NA
ElNE
❑ Yes�N�o
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —ayl
-7 �ra
Date of Inspection 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freehoard (in): Z74 If
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > I0% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
S`
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes PNo
o NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 <N�0,0NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes L'No LJ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to q stton #) Explain any YES ansae s and/or any �ecoitimendations or anv othercomments
..
Use drawin s of faciL ; to better ex' faro situations use.additio
g . t3 p ( nal pages as"necessary): �,�
y`
Reviewer/Inspector Name � ~ w ---�� Phone: '5�10� )CU 330 O
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -ZOID
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 09 —f2 Date of Inspection
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
. the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Desig
n El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes L?K'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E� oo [I NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ 1< Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
EK.
❑ NA
❑ NE.
❑ Yes
Cl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes RIG ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments aad/ar Drawn s u
r
1.
AL
Page 3 of 3 12128104

TXts 10-09-0009
sion of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- - O Other Agency
Type of Visit ompuance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit autine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: T .�0� Departure Time: %�'00 ,.. County: X/Q J" ✓ Region: r!:�W
Farm Name: ��ti DS Vs^— . Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��*� f Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ./
Facility Contact: 1��,l-4G �✓ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: i1�✓ Pirr f' Integrator: Au•-a��,
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [= o = g = Longitude: ED ° = I = u
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
L Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 36 7Z
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges Si Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
• F .
Design Currents
Capacity. Population.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dahy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
ElDry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
-1
❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
EI NA
ElNE
ElYes
ElNo
M-16
❑ NE
BNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Ej ]moo
❑ NA
El NE
El Yes
L7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ®� �Z ' Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents ��//
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes L� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Desig
n ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
1v ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste
Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and P Rain
Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
//
[a o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
LT"No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Ejllo ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Dio ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [�'�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes
T/o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ef <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 2'Ivo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 3<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D-4- ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

• Facility Number: Q / — %Z
V-;ec --0,7
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes B5. ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes B-5. ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes l _"I'Nore❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,�,�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes EN" ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
3e v_A' ct d... 66; ro
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
El— Yes
ENo
ET'
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElYes
No
ElNA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name j P,i/�S Phone-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: --- ems Date: F--z'% —ze)0
12128104 Continued

611.s eAlker-d 'L //-2ao$ R2
iVtston of Water Quality
Facility Number o 9 /Z O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
— ._��_� .. 0 ©E6er Agency-
wn.
Type of Visit (-6ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Q -Q Arrival lime: /d ` Departure Time: Z i 3U County: Ndfal eAl Region:
Farm Name: ld�_4 —14-2km 413Owner Email:
Owner Name: U�. R I P Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ae4d—,. Ulil Title:
Onsite Representative: 6ss4.. bKCa-r +�• l�ti,� -
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
rAPhone No:
Integrator: /1/r�! �pjf� _ grd aid
Operator Certification Number: 17 9G
Back-up Certification ]Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = = « Longitude: ED o = , = "
Desi
rf re n ta
n Current
Swine
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Gap 13 Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
110
Non -Layer I I
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
13111
❑ Dairy Heifer
Dry Poultry.
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
La ors
rO
❑ Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ TurkeyPoults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
&Stream Impacts
1.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
h. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Ycs
(9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[I Yes
54 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑Yes
P6 No
❑ NA
❑ NF..
other than from a dischar-le?
Page 1 of 3
12/28/04
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 10170
Waste Collection & Treatment
�4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Oyes No
❑ Yes ZI
Structure 5
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Desigmed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes trd
in No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Annlication
10.
Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11,
Is there evidence of incorrect application? 1f yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or I 0 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ EvidenceofWind Drift Application Outside of Area
12.
/❑
Crop type(s) 8Ef'/a.ta��Gt t/�aS �L / �iHtCC � Af h1 1 0.5. ,
13.
Soil type(s) No
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA W M P?
❑ Yes
[A No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
[;y No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ rNo ❑ NA
El NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
f No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to; question #):.Explain any YES anskleirs and/or any recori ni datrons or any other comments `{ "
+� Y
Use draw ings of+facility to better explain situti aons {u� se adtlitianal pages as necessary.) r
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
s. Phone:
/Q, V33, 3330
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
—OS/ -ZOOS
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

f Facility Number: Date of Inspection f<—O
e uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes (WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El other
2 l . Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [--]Yes [dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
(O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29_
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
' No
[INA
ElNE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Commenfsa"ndlor Drawings 4
Page 3 of 3 12128104

E;,11,e.-ed by PR '7-z y-- z a o '7
® Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 10 l Z Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: 6 Z O7 Arrival Time: Departure Time: :A7 County: ! '16 ✓ Region:
Farm Name _�. g ptri cS f` A117- 3 _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ,/
Facility Contact: '/a �. �LC4Gi✓ _ Title:
41
Onsite Representative: 2>1""'. /'T+11
pyi Gs f
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
�o �
Latitude: �=
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Layer
❑ on-Layet
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 6 1I &O
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other -
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a, Was the conveyance man-made?
Phone No:
Integrator: A, 1, g 3"B G,/AV
Operator Certitication Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Longitude: [= ° f= d = Ii
Cattle
Design sy Current
Capacity:: Population
❑
Dai Cow
❑
Daia Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dal
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: F
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
17 No
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 0 /Z Date of Inspection �O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Iess than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 27
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
P14o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
PVNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
QTNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Croptype(s) Sr4:n/ S
13.
Soil type(s) Alo 4
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18_
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
� No
El NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Review•erfinspector Name Phone: 9/,9 5�33. 33 d o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Confinued

= i
�•~ Facility Number: O —/z Date otinspection Z O 71
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWM P readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Desig
n El Maps [3 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes V3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
,K] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[NNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
(;VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
" No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: II Arrival Time: Z J 4 Departure Time: County: m4Al
Farm Name: a—• R , P-�` Favwr/+gym, ,�_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: , ' 1 g . p Yi'S5 - Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: `�
Physical Address: ////
Facility Contact: h�Y�h 2i14* A_1 Title: / Gcd, 4ae4 . Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: dLA:a �r'U�✓/✓
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = O = 1 ❑ Ii Longitude: ❑ o = ` ❑ u
Design Current Design Current Design Cnrrentillill
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dai Cow
❑ DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Z
L_ 7
Dry Poultry
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy__
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
❑ Turke s
Other ❑ TurkeyPoults`
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
PBoars
Discharges &Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
QfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
[� Na
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters ofthe State
El Yes
1% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
I2/28/04
Continued

Fagitlty dumber: fj — Z Date of Inspection
.Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes [� No
El NA El NE
El NA ❑NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: s - ,4
Spillway?: C7
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ZL
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
L( No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
jo No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
[�No
[I NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
JO No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes
LuNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) _aiC_11414 a_ at•"3
ro • 1
— -
13.
Soil type(s) / Y p A
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Ezplain any YES answers and/or any recommendatioAr any other commentslity to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name i �v . __. Phone: 9 O 4 3 -3 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /O ZUd
Page 2 of I2/l8/U4 Continued

Facility Number: Q -%Z Date of Inspection O 4
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check (--]Yes QgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VPNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crap Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[;_F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23_
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA W MP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
10
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit Q0Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Q Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: (z ArmWA Time: r 2 : Departure Time: County: grad r'w Region: F#qeO
Farm Name: _ ____.� g PC-( GS'_ r&A-� Owner Email:
Owner Name: > _\ST Phone:
Mailing Address: Z L-�s 6-,, aV ^ C_ - N C_ �
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: +/ - Title: t Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �ua casr`- / 9 �r; �V�Integrator:
Certified Operator: Pt~`� r� t ____ ��� Operator Certification Number: rb 9(01 9-
Back-up Operator: _ t�i �f i �S `� - Back-up Certification Number: / & 17 Y
Location of Farm: Latitude: E—] o E_1 ' =" Longitude: = ° = I = u
EgMnC�,,,urjent rfrti::Design Current Design Current
es'`�;Capulation Wet Poultry Capaty Populationattle o Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -La et ❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish El Dairy lleifet
❑ Farrow to Wean °`' " ❑ D Cow
Dr} Pot>!ttry
❑ Farrow to Feeder "`'"'-' ' - ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑Non -Layers
El Pullets � ❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars �❑ Beet Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other � ❑ Turkey Pouets f ,
❑ Other ❑ Other Nsmberof Structures: ETI
Discharees & Stream Facts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
(gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[Z NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
;UNA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
RNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Date of Inspection l L
Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®,No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[RNA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: -
Spillway?: tnb
Designed Freeboard (in): _ ,hGY:, j
Observed Freeboard (in): -%
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Oe/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
(4 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[3No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
H _ Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) � V�,qr— vK (76L
13. Soil type(s) f ` o A
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
L?No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[Q No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ER No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E!�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;�`T _s ; z Phone: f5CO2
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: Z
12128104 Continued

Facility -Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W"UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps ❑Other
21 _ Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Qj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28_ Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Q9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
E� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e fi
At}dtbooalCaiimeats and/o,Drawgs,x
12129104

WAT
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�pF
G
`O
WilliamG. Ross Jr., secretary
C
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�i
p Y
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 28, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 6891
J.B. Priest
Priest Farm #3
4132 Lisbon Rd.
Council, NC 28434
RE: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Facility # 9-124
Bladen County
Dear J.B. Priest:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your sludge survey information on
March 1, 2005. On your behalf, Kathy Dugan requested an extension of the sludge survey
requirement for the lagoon at Priest Farm #3. Due to the amount of treatment volume available,
DWQ agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2007. The results of the 2007 sludge
survey are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March 1,
2008.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
rL`'
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 9-124
Mark Brantley, Fayetteville Regional Office
Kathy Dugan
1) Cup ina
afu,ly
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportun4iAtrmfative AGion Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

(Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection O Operation review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number /n7 Date of Visit: /.l ,(3 Tune:
0 Not erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date -Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: rrn .3 _ _ County:W . _�14W
Owner Name: _ „ , Upp • Pr '.S Phone No: ID 5I,S3v2
Mailing Address: y/3a2 iS o,v IQoa _- __. _ _ ._ o[�n 1C _ ...� -)8Y3
Facility Contact: -- Title:..__ _ _ Phone No: ,
Onsite Representative: �. Q . Pr Desk I k-&t�� ---�-u o,c. Integrator. �%7u r,
Certified Operator o Q . . �� ;y �,s-� —,:S � , Operator Certification Number. � -!!Le- PC .S
Location of Farm:
GPI Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' " Longitude '
Diischames & Stream Imparts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Qf No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? _ Al 1A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112M3
Continued

Facility Number: 9 —
Date of Inspection %3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
I2_ Crop type �,-•� c c cr2 b r G 'L«C
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ($ No
❑ Yes CA No
❑ Yes [P No
❑ Yes [1 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IT No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) Ibis facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes UWo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ]4 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes F No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 14 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [S No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 151 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes 1] No
Air Quality representative immediately.

lFacilitYNt tuber 7 - /.2y hate of Inspection .? /
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes m No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application 10 Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis W Soil Sampling
24. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes f$1 No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 10 No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
2$. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [ No
29. Welt any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
NPDES Permitted FacRides
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, slap questions 31-35) U Yes ❑ No
31. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes JJ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes 91 No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

.. ' Site Requires Immediate Attention: AG
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: / I995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: _ l�� zr'b P,-,t,, ) - - -
Mailing Address:_ _ .Pt- _Rs- A _rZ,ya 40,
County:_ _ 13/a ..,
Integrator: Ajy,RAe Phone: vs — 6 6 97
On Site Representative: Phone: 2eq - Z. / 1
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry ___,_ Cattle
Design Capacity: (,3A�Lk iz Number of Animals on Site: 2- F.ti-0ftj
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNE
Latitude: Longitude: "
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) es or No Actual Freeboard:,�2LFt. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the
Is adequate land available for spray',
Crop(s) being utilized:
i(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or -No
or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin '7 V.�or No
100 Feet from Wells? 'or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or I�0
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,_ or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or l%o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Sr No
Additional Comments:
" Z&A
Inspector Name 100,
Signat e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

-
�1521
-- --' - '
'
BAY
BAY

search Page I of 2
zo 10
Incident Incident Freeboard Levels Events Related lncidentc
Details] Details2
Incident Type: ron-Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201
Category: APS - Animal
Started Date/Time ::103/04/2010 04:39 Pm
County Bladen Farm #: 10-90
Decimal DD:MM:SS
Latitude: 'Position Accuracy: --Select Value —
Longitude; Position Method: --Select Value —
Position Datum: ---Select Value---ry
Person: El Anonymous
First Name Kathy
Middle Name:;
Last Name Dugan
Phone :
Location of the Incident Priest Farm #3
Address:
City/State/Zip: Council
Cause/Observation of the incident:
A,
Action Taken:
Directions
Comments/Findings :
Address
City
State/zip :1
Cell/Pager:;
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : 0
Surface Water Impacted: OYes ONo *Unknown Groundwater Impacted : 0
Waterbody ---Select Value—
Waterbody (Other): Conveyance
Report Received By : Revels, Ricky T-j RO Contact: ReN
MEA,
Phone : [phone] Phone: Pii
_031(
http:llbims.enr.state.ne.us:70011selectOnelneldent.do?id=3M05FMY000665DX4B653RC... 3/17/2010

search
Of
Page 2 of 2
Date/Time : 03/04/2010 04:39 pm
Referred Via Voice mail
Specific Causes :
El Severe Natural Condition C7 Vandalism
Date/Time-:04:1.
.
Referred Via : ' Voi
0 Pump Station Equipment Failure Efl .
Finishi GancelW::
http://birns,enr.state.nc.us:7001/selectOnelncident.do?id=3M05FMYG00665DX4B653RC... 3/17/2010

search
Page 1 of 1
• incident Detailsl. Incident Details2 Freeboard Levels Events
Incident Type: Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201001046
Date/Time : 03/04/2010 04:39 pm Farm #: 090124
County: Bladen City: Council
Responsible Party:
Incident Owner :
Permit : ,AWS090124
Facility •
First Name::
Middle Name
Last Name:
Company Name :
Phone: '
mar Responsible Partvl
Find Owner Clear
-_- __` Find Permit [Clear]
Find Facility Clear
Address
City
State/Zip
Cell/Pager :
Onsite Contact
First Name:
Middle Name:
Last Name:
Contact Agency : Report Entered By : t Revels, Rid
Phone : - -- Phone: ig10)433-33
Cell/Pager; DatelTime : 03/05/2010
Fish Kill: OYes O- No *Unknown Estimated Fish Kill:
Containment : Yes 0 No � Unknown Cleanup complete. 0Yes O
Storage tank: G AST OUST
Written Report Requested : . Well Contractor Cert#: ---Select Va
Information Requested
Closed Date:
Finish Cancel .
http:/ibims.enr.state.nc.us:7001/maintainlncidentI .do 3/17/2010

Agencies Page 1 of I
Incident Incident Freeboard Levels Events Related Incidents Action Histor
Details] Details2
Incident Type: Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201001046
Date/Time : 03/04/2010 04:39 pm Farm #: 090124
County: Bladen City : Council
Freeboard Levels
Delete Waste Structure Waste Structure Freeboard
Type identifier (inches)
[] Lagoon 09-124 16.0
Add: �-.;Defete�
FinishCancgl
Plan Due plan Datell'ime
Date/Tirne Received Freeboard
Date/Time Level OK
0310412010--
--._
05:02 pm
http://bims.er r.state.nc.us:7001/maintainincident2.do
3/17/2010

-�q!
a:
��
� ,p
�1: r,
� yr'
9
����� r' � � ,,.,-.
n
, t
�
PFd'��y�
r �.,r.
1�p{0., �
t u
♦ ! ��.

` s�
/yam }-�/ �2�°©�% /�
�}����^«2\�`� � �
G� � � \� � }\ � 1\� v,l�� $

` A.
.i. B. Priest
4132 Lisbon Road
Council NC 28434
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
GrowaT(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Type:
Farm Capacity:
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
J.B. Priest
Farm 3
Bladen
Feed -Fin
3672
Anaerobic Lagoon
160 days
Irrigation
IA 0 9 2M
M-1AM71:1gff pQAlA1 c7Fg�
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollutiar� --
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 3 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
RECEIVED 1 DENR I DWQ Page: 1
AQUIFFR-pRr)TFnT1nN SFCiiON
APR 0 6 Anna

problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages brealdng dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with .15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission_
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
3672 animals X 985.50 gallanimallyear =
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
3672 animals X 2.30 Ibs/animal/year =
3,618,756 gallons
8,445.60 Ibs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Page: 2

Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Code
Yield
IAc
lbs N
/unit
Acres
Lbs NIAC
Residual
Lbs N
IAc
lbs N
R uired
Tune to
A
NoA
4.6
50.00
1.52
230.0
349.60
Mar -Oct
131
NoA
B
4.6
50.00
2.98
230.0
685.40
Mar -Oct
B2
NaA
ID
4.6
50.00
0.82
, -;<
230.0
188.60
Mar -Oct
C
NoA
$
4.6
50.00
2.22
230.0
510.60
Mar4)ct
D
NoA
0
4.6
50.00
5.18
230.0
1191-40
Mar -Oct
E
NoA
S
4.6
50.00
5.01
230.0
1152.30
Mar -Oct
F
NoA
iS
4.6
50.00
2.18
230.0
501.40
Mar -Oct
A
NoA
K
50.0
1.52
50.0
76.00
S-April
B1
NoA
K
50.0
2.98
50.0
149.00
SApril
B2
NaA
K
%0
0.82
50.0
41.00
S April
C
NoA
K
50.0
2.22
50.0
111.00
S-April
D
NoA
K
50.0
5.18
50.0
259.00
S-April
E
NoA
K
50.0
5.01
50.0
250.50
S April
F
NM
K
50.0
2.18
50.0
109.00
S-,Apnl
Total 19.91
Available N
*Difference
5574.80
4902- 04_-
-672.80
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
*A negative number reflects the total lbs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
�adxeage listed in chart. A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
in the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, andfor silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass_ This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
Page: 3

being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier_ You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October_ Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Corn - Grain
E
Com - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue- Grazed
H
Fescue- Hay
I
Oats
3
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
O
Soybean
Lbs N utilized 1 unityield
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N I ton
50 lbs N I ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
- -12 lbs N / ton
0.12lbs N/ll3sl1ra- — -
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N I ton
1.3 lbs N I bushel
2.4 lbs N I bushel
100 lbs N 1 acre
133 lbs N 1 acre
2.5 lbs N l cwt
2.4 lbs N I bushel
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan musk contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facilely will produce
approximately 0.36 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
sludge based on the application method listed earlier.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately
Page: 4

pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22.03 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 52.88 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed_ Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and _
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
soil
T
Cro
Application Rate
in/hr
Appl'icatian Amount
' inches
All
NaA
BK
0.50
1.00
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
it is the responsiability of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Additional Comments:
Page: 5

J
3ZS--
iAr
Page: 6

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Fanm:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Uwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. l/we know that any expansion to the e)dsting design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWO before the new
animals are stocked.
Vwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge oars from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. i also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff. — -
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
--,Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist
Affiliation:
Address:
Signature:
Please Print
Sonya J. Barber
Harvest Net, Inc.
P.O. Box 32
Council, NC 28434
(910) 6454758
/o%3a/o
Page: 7

t
. .mman Environmental, LLC pp
Post Office Box 115 W
Kenansville, IBC 28349
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number JB Priest
Lagoon Identification 1
Person(s) Taking Measurements RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler: NA
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 3 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. if more than 1.33 acres: acres x 6= 18 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon guage pole): C�Inches
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 24.6 Inches
The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level t .80 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 10.38 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance form the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 7.3 Feet

Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 3.1 Feet
Calculate the thickness of the existingLiquid Treatment Zone: J
q ,.....rye Feet
* Note: If the Calculated thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or
contact DWQ for more information.
Completed By: Danna Westerbeek Printed Name
f. _ �1 _Signature
� - 1 b -D4. Date

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Appendix 2: Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
Lagoon identification
Person(s) Taking Measurements
Date of Measurements
JB Priest
1
RO Britt
20-Mar-04
Grid Point Distance from liquid Distance from liquid Thickness of sludge
surface to top of surface to lagoon layer
Number sludge bottom (soil) y
1
9.00
10
1.00
2
8.75
10
1.25
3
8.25
10.25
2.00
4
8.25
10.5
2.25
5
9.25
10.5
1.25
g
9.25
10.25
1.00
7
8.50
110.5
2.00
8
1.25
11.5
4.25
9
7.00
10.5
3.50
10
7.50
10.5
3.00
11
6.00
10.25
4.25
12
6.25
10.25
4.00
13
5.50
10
4.50
14
4.50
10.5
6.00
15
4.75
10
5.25
16
6.00
11
5.00
17
7.50
10.25
2.75
18
7.50
10
2.50
19
20
21
22
23
24
Averaae 7.3 10.4
3.1

Farm Name: S. B. Priest
Date: 3/20/2004
Gower: J. B. Priest
LagoonlD Lagoon 1
Top of Dike Elvation
Ft.
Bottom of Dike Elevation
Ft.
Start Pump Level
43.30
Ft.
Stop Pump Level
41.25
Ft.
Current Freeboard
23.00
In.
Top of Dike Length
400 Width
305
Grid Point
Water Depth
Distance From
Liquid Surface to
Top of Sludge
Thickness of Slud e
1
10.00
9.00
1.00
2
10.00
8.75
1.25
3
10.25
8.25
2.00
4
10.50
8.25
2.25
5
10.50
9.25
1.25
6
10.25
9.25
1.00
7
10.50
8.50
2.00
8
11.50
i 7.25
4.25
9
10.50
7.00
3.50
10
10.50
7.50
3.00
11
10.25
6.00
4.25
12
10.25
6.25
4.00
13
10.00
5.50
4.50
14
10.50
4.50
6.00
15
10.00
4.75
5.25
16
11.00
5.00
5.00
17
10.25
7.50
2.75
18
10.00
7.50
2.50
19
0.00
20
0.00
21
0.00
22
0.00
23
0.00
24
0,00
IYV I M. MII aPUUWC IVIV4bUI UPI 90IJ119 III I-VUL
i J
ti
E,
I

Ra.inman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number JB Priest
Lagoon Identification 2
Person(s) Taking Measurements RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
MethodsJDevices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler": NA
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 2.1 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acres: 2.1 acres x B= 13 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon guage pole): 9.B Inches
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 2l3.4 Inches
The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level 1.40 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 1 10.23 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance form the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 7.0 Feet

Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 3.2 Feet
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone:
Feet
" Note: If the Calculated thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or
contact DWQ for more information.
Completed By: Danna Westerbeek Printed Name
i..
L -Signature
Date

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Appendix 2: Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
Lagoon Identification
Person(s) Taking Measurements
Date of Measurements
JB Priest
2
RO Britt
20-Mar-04
Grid Point Distance from liquid Distance from liquid Thickness of sludge
surface to top of surface to lagoon layer
Number sludge bottom (soil)
y
1
8.50
10.5
2.00
2
9.50
10.5
1.00
3
9.50
10.25
0.75
4
7.00
10.5
3.50
5
5.00
10.25
5.25
6
4.25
9.75
5.50
7
5.50
10
4.50
8
8.75
10.5
1.75
9
7.50
10
2.50
10
7.00
10.25
3.25
11
6.50
10.25
3.75
12
7.00
10.25
3.25
13
5.50
10
4.50
14 ,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
7.0
10.2
32

Pam name; J. B. Priest
Date: 3/20/2004
Grower: J. B. Priest
Lagoon ID Lagoon 2
Top of Dike Elvation Ft.
Bottom of Dike Elevation Ft.
Start Pump Level 106.95 Ft.
Stop Pump Level 104.75 Ft.
Current Freeboard 30.00 In.
Top of Dike Length 400 Width 220
Grid Point
Water De h
Distance From
Liquid Surface to
Top of Sludge
Thickness of Sludge
1
10.50
8.50
2.00
2
10.50
9.50
1.00
3
10.25
9.50
0-75
4
10.50
7.00
3.50
5
10.25
5.00
5.25
6
9.75
4.25
5.50
7
10.00
5.50
4.50
B
10.50
8.75
1.75
9
10.00
7.50
2.50
10
10.25
7.00
3.25
11
10.25
6.50
3.75
12
10.25
7.00
3.25
13
10.00
5.50
4.50
14
0.00
15
0.00
16
0.00
17
0.00
18
0.00
19
0.00
20
0.00
21
0.00
22
0.00
23
0.00
24
0.00
NU i 1::: All SIuG a Measurements in Feet
l/
\ / I \i
e �
Wlat�tr

Rainman Environmental, LLC S
Post Office Box 115
Kenansviiie, NC 28349 (A\t
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number JB Priest
Lagoon Identification
3
Person(s) Taking Measurements RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler": NA
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 2.3 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use S points
b. If more than 1.33 acres: 2.3 acres x B= 14 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon guage pole): 7.1 Inches
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 26.4 Inches
The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level 1.B1 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 10.93 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance form the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): $.7 Feet

Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 2.8 Feet
Calculate the thickness of the existing,Liquid Treatment Zone:
q _ . _ �-6 Feet
* Note: If the Calculated thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or
contact DWQ for more information.
Completed By:
Danny Westerbeek
Printed Name
Signature
4 - tb" ID q Date

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Appendix 2: Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
Lagoon Identification
Person(s) Taking Measurements
Date of Measurements
J13 Priest
3
RO Britt
20-Mar-04
Grid Point Distance from liquid Distance from liquid Thickness of sludge
surface to top of surface to lagoon layer
Number sludge bottom (soil) Y
1
8.50
10.5
2.00
2
9.25
10.5
1.25
3
8.50
11
2.50
4
8.25
10.75
2.50
5
7.25
10.75
3.50
B
7.00
10.5
3.50
7
8.75
10.75
2.00
8
8.25
10.5
2.25
9
7.50
10.5
3.00
10
9.25
12.5
3.25
11
8.75
12
3.25
12
8.25
11
2.75
13
7.00
10.75
3.75
14
7.00
11
4.00
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
8.1
10.9
2.8

' .. .�
^~
FA '
------Priedt
--' —
Date: 3/20/2004
Grower: J. B. Priest
Lagoon ID Lagoon 3
Top of DikeEhatip
Bottom ofDike Elevation
Start Pump Level
Stop Pump Level
Current Freeboard
Top pfDike Length
FL
F1
48.30 Pt.
47.10 Ft.
27.50 __
400 V��� 235
_____ _____
Grid Point
Water Depth
Distance From
Liquid Surface to
Top of Sludge
Thickness of Sludge

W-,. r
�OF W ArF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
`Q Q.
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 12, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. JB PRIEST
PRIEST FARM #3
4132 LISBON ROAD
COUNCIL., NC 28434
RECEIVED
APR 13 2006
O NR-FAYEi11:VMAEMOMLOWE
Subject: Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool
Priest Farm #3
Permit Number NCA209124
Facility 9-124
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Priest:
The Division's records show that a completed PLAT Form. has NOT been submitted for this facility. If
our records are in error please resubmit the completed PLAT Form for this farm.
There is a condition in your Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit addressing the
completion of the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool for your animal feeding operation upon
notification by the Division of Water Quality (Division).
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA209124 Condition I.6 states:
"If prior to the expiration date of this permit either the state or federal government
establishes Phosphorus loss standards that are applicable to land application activities at a
facility operating under this permit, the Permittee must conduct an evaluation of the facility
and its CAWMP under the requirements of the Phosphorus loss standards to determine the
facility's ability to comply with the standards. This evaluation must be documented on
forms supplied or approved by the Division and must be submitted to the Division. This
evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within six (6) months of receiving
notification from the Division.
The method of evaluation is the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) developed by NC State
University and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. PLAT addresses four potential loss
pathways: leaching, erosion, runoff and direct movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be
individually evaluated and rated as either low, medium, high or very high according to its Phosphorus
loss potential. The ratings for your farm must be reported to DWQ using the attached certification form.
The PLAT forms must be kept as records on your farm for future reference.
The Division's records show that you received the notification to conduct PLAT on April 6, 2005. To
avoid possible enforcement action for a violation of your permit, The Division of Water Quality requests
that the following items be addressed:
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterr uality.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportun4/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Regdedl10% Post Consumer Paper
Nam` Carolina
)Vaturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

1. Submit justification for not responding within 180 days of receipt of the PLAT notification
letter.
2. Consult with your technical specialist and submit a written schedule for completing the PLAT
evaluation.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in a civil penalty assessment for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to
levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
Please provide this office with a written response on or before May 15, 2006.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or
contact the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Duane Leith
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
CC" FayettevilletRegional,Office �Agw�fP,totection S�
Facility File 9-124

` • NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
F'AYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 17, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. J. B. Priest, Jr.
4132 Lisbon Road
Council, NC 28434
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Priest Farm #3
Facility No. 09 -124
Permit No. AWS090124
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Priest:
On January 28, 2000, you or staff from your farm notified the Fayetteville Regional Office
of the Division of Water Quality, as required by General Permit condition 111.6.e, that the freeboard
level of the lagoon was less than the minimum required by the General Permit. The liquid level of
the lagoon was reported as 16 inches. General Permit condition V.3 states that "The maximum
waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus as additional 1 foot of structural
freeboard.".
The Division of Water Quality will take no further action for this reported incident at this
time. However, you are asked to please notify this office in writing within 15 days of receipt of this
letter as to what date the lagoon was lowered to the required freeboard level. This information is
essential in determining if the lagoon was lowered within the specified time frame in which the Plan
of Action (POA) allotted. It will also close this event out within your file. If you have any questions
conceming this matter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
effery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Central Files
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Sam Warren, Bladen Co. NRCS
Murphy Family Farms
Z25 GREEN STREET. SUITE 714 1 SYSTEL EIL0. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX 910-4B6-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEW10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division: Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. I Facility Name: Priest Farm #3
1.2 Print Land owners name: 3 B J!Ijest. Jr.
1.3 Mailing address: 4132 Lisbon Road
City, State: Council NC _ -Zip, 28434
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-645-4532 __
1.4 County where facility is located: Bladen -
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Elizabgthtown take, Hwy 87 S. A.5 mules turn
right on SRC 1715go I In miles. turn left on SR 1712 to dirt td on left turn right on SR 1721, farm on right approx. 2
miles.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / gratoes n (if applicable; please circle whi
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: '� 3
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
type is listed): Murphy Family Farms
2.1 Facility No.: 0 9 (county number); 124 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
3672- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the um number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Tyne of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals
TyM of Poultry_ Noof Animals
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
Typg of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): _ > 26.5 : Required Acrespe (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number of Lagoons: I ; Total Capacity: � Cubic Feet (ft3); Required Capacity: 30 34,a' up)
Number of Storage Ponds: 0 ; Total Capacity: (0); Required Capacity: (ft3)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NR tandards, etc.) (Swine Only)
ES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? Y9V
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 1319M
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicant%,titals
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
held locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required MRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional
components with your submittal.

Facility Number. 09 - 124
Facility Name: Priest Farm #3
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, W//- /6 Ab6y- ✓K, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for AP-1 E _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be return to me as ivcomnlete..
Signature
Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Managers name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]

A2 nEAi. WAS= HANACMMM PI" CERTIFICATION FOR HILV OR EXPXNDED FEEDLOTS
Please retu= the completed form to the Diviaica of Environmental Management at
the addxeaa on the raverme aide of this form.
Name of farm (Please
Address: - 4132 ]
int) : Priest Farr #3
Wuricil Mk-: [0'334 Phone No.: (910 ) 645-453 -
County: W ajen
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:34_°' 01'/ 78(required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified_
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy cam] :line
(number capacity (nuber of animals)
Average size of operation-(12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres)a z�•
=a.==axaa=asaaaaoaaagaasaasaaaswane:aaasaaasrassaaaaagras�aaaaar��aaarraaaaaaasxas
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001--.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria. have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
StOrI15.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): in Weston
Affiliation: IW.
Address (Agency) : Ose Phone No. .(910)289 •17 11
Signature _ +� T✓ _^ Date: z
wa�aaazaaasasaasaaassaaaasaasaaasaaasvaaaaaaasaai a7am Rert�a aeaaaasssiasas
Owner/Hanaaer Agreemaat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for.the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land owner (Please Print): Priest Jr,
Signature: Date:
Name of Hanager, if different from owner (Please print):_
Signature:
Nam: A change in land ownership requires
(if the approved plan is changed) to
;nvironmentat Management within 60 days of
Date:
notification or a new certification
be submitted to the Division of
a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:ACNE±,1#_

w
•

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name--:JB Priest 13 County:BLADEN
Mail Address-:CLARKTON, NC
Type of production unit ---- :FEED -FIN
Number of animal units-----: 3672
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATION
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------:
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-:
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------:
6977 tons/year
8446 lbs./year
0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation_ The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
r' for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
net more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract Field Soil Crop
Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code
/Acre /Unit Used Apply
5315 3 NoA J
40 2.40 14.0 1344 S-APRIL
5315 5 WaB C
5.5 50.00ti6 1.0 275 MAR-OCT
5315 4 WaB C
5.5 50.00-0 4.0 1100 MAR-OCT
5315 3 NoA C
6.1 50.00 y 14.0 4270 MAR-OCT
5315 2 WaB C,
5.5 50.00 P" 2.5 687.5 MAR-OCT
5315 1 WaB C
5.5 50.001� 5.o 1375 MAR-OCT
Total 40.5 9052
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial) 8446
Surplus Or Deficit -606
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
I=Oats-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons J=Rye-bu.
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons K=Small grain(graze)-acre
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
L-Small grain(hay)-acre
E=Corn(silage)-tans
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
W=Wheat-bu.
G=Fescue(graze)-tans
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons

If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown
then additional acres of Land may be needed. A
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
Page 3
in this plan,
three to fifteen
seeded along all
JLr� aley,- ed
�1tr�l:��tr�t� _�r�I%� �r�__ Cal S.c� L.__ sc�l� ,�c.✓ r�i�_ � �� _
`-------------------------------------------------
C% .Cx C. t +r� R�.�. o..P� : -Mj. C no -
Prepared
by: =� r,G,�aG,tU,J Title:,b[ Date:
Concurred in by: Date: 1�{
P cer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
o. Date: yff
Pkddffcer
Technical Spec ia1is �l�C/ -.� �C? Date:
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

a
0
x
12
k
r

'! --tom- �•-.C-'R-
�IDs•':._
FYS; e - •'e - -si.
v.�

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by nmofl� drink manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct
discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of
adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste,
he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her
the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available
land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crap yields based on soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the
field_ (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off -site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to depth
that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard
393 - Filter Strips).

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECffICAMNS
(continued)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land applications site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and in a manner that causes no
runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal
waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed area {lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs,
etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody
species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion_
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc_, should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and
spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping
volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A .
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years, and a liquid waste analysis shall be taken at least twice each year consistent with
waste utilization plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five
yes.
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations_

1•Iortality 31 anagement Methods
(check which lncthod(s) arc being implemented)
a
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface on titc ground within 24 hours ai'tcr
kitowlcdVtc a1' the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from pnv flowing
stream or public body an water.
Rendering at a rendcrutg plant licensed under G.S. 106-1 63.7 '
L"1 Complete tltcincration
❑ it, the case of clad poultry only, placing in a dispWal pit or a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
C1 Any method which in [lie professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would '
rtt 6 possible tile: s. wage on pact of n dead animal's value without endangcrill"
lutman or allintal health. (Written approval of the State Vaerinarlan must be
attached) ,
insect control cl�ocltust for AnImel Operations
tii�„rcc �:unse ilil4l's iu C+snlrul 1+isccls Silt: Sliedfic 1'+'++ltllt7
1,11111115 stcnls
blush Mcunntlitliun urstilitl: O 111131t systefll Is dellatied and upurilietl
suracienoy In retlluve uccitnionicd sulitis rr111n
sutlers us dcslt;llt:d.
Cl • Itt:rllnvu itridt 111t; ol'uxcr1nt111alt tl solids III
,ditet�nrao _.—
t.t,gn+nls tutu Pill Umictt Suiids Mttlnlu111 hlt;nmis, sctili1lu Isusills u1111 Nils ►r1ler's
• liest breeditlt; Is nilllitrent 1U 1111n111OU IN
crusline orsalids to u dvlilit unto stare lilan G -
Il itious over itinre omn jo% onstn'rucu.
71,Ceslive VgVI-AYL: • ticcuylut; VC4011ttun Mniuluin vel;eti111vu colillel 111tutU tsirltl;s ul-
tituultl I+Unotls uud ntlicr 1n111nuridmculs Ito pre-VC111 ,
itccilltlllialloll Ortleellying vcut:tiltive 111t111cr
uluill; %V111ces ellga till 111111t11111,111mit's perinteler.

Swlno Farm "Wasto Manago{nant odor Con rol Chor-ldist
�1lnrtc Come ltAtl's l uiuthi (llt4lr Slic 5 iccifle I'rj+cllvcs
1�a11n,tcall ;;1r1nt:111udu1;lilsn Vt:{;cialivo ur wooded U11fl►:rs; '
�ltecnlllllttlltietl'Unsl nlantlGculc:nl prttclices;
(iaoti �11111;1ttcul alld common VIM
A1ti111aI homy sm filets Ditly nlnitllrt:-uovcretl uui111u1s 1)1•y 110111's
(dour sm dicey, • Wei In1111t1ru•lcomed 111m's ;ilutled Iluals;
walcrers lucaled over slotted floors;
vectien ut itiuil clld of sulid Iluors;
Scrape manuro btliltlap front floors;
L1 1,110crilnor veolllnliuu fur dryU11;
tiluuult t 1tilct lion hits • 1lrinc; l�lctluenl 111rumru rc111ovul 11y lls 1
• t'u1ti111 1n{crulllui dt:culnpnsitinit t1r scrupt:;
El �Undt:r{inor veal{{nllnn
Vrnlil.11ion c"llultst l'uus Vululile (;1tsu:; Fa11 utu{tltclu11lc1:;
Mist i Ilfficleol air movemmil
hiibwr sit tfucts Dust Wus114111wit bwmelt drulys firu111ntais;
rI fructl uthIllives;
ry I1ceder covers;
L1 Pactl delivery tillwill tiol :x1enders 111 feeder
cow:rs
I-Iuslt luui:s • ALiluliun of recycled lubouil Cl lclllsit lank ctivcrs;
1111uid ► wild lurks ure 11111111; 0 INIeltd (ill Him to licur helium cif 1111ILs Willi
a1111•51tlttttl veltls
1:11101 uI1%:V%
• ALiltlliult th
cnnveylloce
lecllmp! 111tittis +
lilt si:llilnls
IUdslllu tirlltn cnllcrll ilt •
ur jn11C1111111t11m
�vnssutvtttcr
Agiiuliuil ofrccycltd hicl1tt.
liquid while phs arc Iillbia
Anitulion 111111110 s11111111ur11-
11111n1; and drawilown
At;ttututtl dta ltt wuslowlltur U ilax covers
C11l1YCjIt111CQ
11 Under[luor Ilush Willi lmdurilnur ventiluthut
cl lixielul ruclttlrua llncll lu n1t1r bull,nn aCMils
with nn1{-si111u111 Vellls
0 S1111111111111: clivels

• •r-
Snnrce
Cl.msu
11M1's lu hil'ilIlo . C Otlill' SIIIC S ledl C PI'nCllces
Gad of tllaiiipipes ill
laCaa+l
•
Agilatiou duriul; wailemilur
Cl 1:xlcnd Iliscliargo lsoiul of piiies until riicntll
cnnvoyonce
Ingonn 14111111 level
1.11puu sill film
V01111+1t: gas Cluissiuns;
Troller lagoull Inlaid calracily;
•
11iulaglca) utixillL;
yt�' Correct lagnall slattup prucedures;
•
Agiluliuu
er Miulinutil surface area -in -vulnma ratla;
'
+X�' Mlithtinni agilallou whcn,pumplllg; .
Cl Mechanical acrallull; '
n Proven biological allllilives
bC'9111inll'116ILler
•
Iligll pnustlic ugitaliuu;
lulgatu utt dry days wills 11111a or Ito wind;
nuul�x
+
Whid drill
Mllilntinit rccnunucndcd niscratiug pressurl:;
1OCT_ lhtnlp intake Clear lagoon 14juld surfuce;
CI I'nmp frulil secolul-slago lauoun
5u,lagu tank ur I,nsiu
•
I'a11i11I uiicnitliul 1lrcurull+Isiliun;
f Ilutlnlu ur ulidlevel luutliog�
sill 11It:C
.
Midig wlllla rui114;
CI 'i'uuk covers; '
Al;llallnll 1VIIG11 CIIilltyltli;
❑ RusIll surlilce ismis orsalills;
C1 Provvit blalogicai additives ur nxilla ils
Solli+rg basin sill Gl+e
I'ullial nliclullild ducmlilonsiliun;
C1 I.Wend druitlpipu millcls undcruealli llipdd
•
Mixing while lillinu; •
luvul;
•
Agiluilon Mica eliiptying
Cl Remove sellied sulltls regniarly
A'llulnru, sbirry ilr sludge
•
Agitudun when splcallilig;
11 Sail ioJeciwit ufslurrylsimices;
spicader utsllels
•
Vrtlalile has emissions
Cl Wash'residmil immure Canis sllrcatl4r Our Ilse; '
Cl I'ruvcri hlulal;icld Itddiliyus ur nliidl+nts
I111cliverull 1111111111•C, • Vullilil,: sits cililssiuns while Cl Sail 111JUIiuu uI'sluu'ylsludl;cs
sillily or slulll;c uIi lii;ld tlryhlls slul7ecs n Soil &tcorlinrallun withlu ,18 lirs.;
is Spread lit Ili iii imIrirm luyt:rx fur rap Ili dryinL;
Cl Proven blulotical additives or uxithmis
Deall nttiln;lis
• Clllcros decumJIBS ilioll
t
I°{t111er llis11115iIlUll ill 1 llrei155CS
Ilearl u11h111►1 +lisptwil
• Curcuss decuullsusilinn
CI
Cumpictu euvurint; of eurcusses in imrio lolls;
111ti
❑
Proper lucaliolllcmisiructioll ul'dlspnsal ells
lilt: inelulurs
• 11u:11n11slulu c11111I111slllnl
GI
Sucunllary stitek burner's
14tivendmr 11. 1946. l'unu 4

:1
tfr�1R�RMtlCwa•�
Suurcr Cuusn l{nll'z Iu 1111glwltc {?slur
.SIIC 5 IL'One I'illflifrs
SwIldilib ►viler nnluuil 11111,11uper drailldhoe; Orndtl and lgndscalia s1Ic11 that stfatcr ilvahis
z lcililirs r WC:m lal deeunslinsiaun or way rroln racllitles
orranlc inaller
Iracl'C,l uulo Not ly lilahllu ued access roads I -unit access road Illntlrletlailco
rtont rurrn
'
lrcccss '
Addhinnsl lurrlrmnllnit :
Avullllhle Fro111
S1vilic JYluunr.s hliuln4culetll ; I}2llil Iiulc/1lMl' I'uckcl
NCSII, C111u1ty lixtensluu Center
Slriva 1'rudllctiuu burin Ibtentlul OdnrSullrccs uud Itcllicilias ; ITDAH Fact Sheol
NCSI1- IIAI! '
Swine Pruducllon Ncllily Manure M;1uagcuicnl: I'll Itecllnrge - Lagoon Trcuhawl ; IMAM 120.68
t•ICSl1- IIAI:
S►vilie I'rniluc1111n Fllclllly 1vi11nuiu M1uiageuient: Undcrlluor Flush - Lag000 Treatmew ; EIIA 11 129.88
NCSI1-11A1's
I.1junifil l)c51g11 111111 Mulingellicnt rur Llveslock Mu1111ra Treulinvil and SlnnCe ; MIAi3 I113-03
NCSI1- IIAll
Culil,raliun arm unure and Wusimulcr Altllllcaliun L'ilulpoicnt ; EDAL 1'iiel Sheol
NCSI1- IIAII
Cunlri1111ng (]durs Front 5tvinc Ilnlldhlgs ; 1'll i-J3
NCSU - S►villn RK11:11slull
VIiArnnniewal Assurunce 1'rol;ruln ; NI'1'C Muuual
NC link Producers Asmc '
njoina, rltr Alpllucilid Qilllr; n tepott i'raln Ilia Sivine Odor Task Force
NC`IJ Agri Cnnlnllilrlcullnns
Midsalice Cutictmis In Aulntul Muntire Maitattual: Odors unit Pllus ; PRO107, 1995 Coartuncc I'ruccullucs
Flurlda C11111 entlivu INIM13II111
,. Ahitu; Ivuft. Pop 5

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the Iagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet -periods..
Overflew from the. lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour _storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the darn.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, 'if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
1. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert .familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low Ievel. This will allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full, '
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking Iot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon Ievel will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2:" Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least'half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. ' This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
—� spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Management.:
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage Ievel.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid. level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter. _
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

r proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient -and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels --high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during_ sludge
removal, or rupture -from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

f
EMERGENCY ACTION -PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 910--486--1541
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD 910-862-6936
NRCS '9 0-862-6936
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site.• You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.•
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow --possible solutions are:
a_
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an acceptable
rate.
c_
Stop
all flows to the lagoon
immediately.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is
entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field —actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contaih waste.
r C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and -eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields '
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
�- a. Stop recycle pump.
h C{-^n i rri m;4i- i nn ni mn _

the incident from iten 2=above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 911.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 910-862--4591, local SWCD
office phone number 910-862-6936, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
.910-862--6936.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone:
6: contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: -Y�W
b. Phone: I Z m
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
<I.ud elnrshh. a r dl.m 9a a [y! m. do �
Sept 12.96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 27, 1998
J.B. Priest, Jr.
Priest Farm #3
4132 Lisbon Road
Council NC 28434
_ f
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF -
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. 09-0124
Additional Information Request
Priest Farm #3
Animal waste Operation
Bladen County
Dear J.B. Priest, Jr.:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by May 27, 1998:
1) Lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information
requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before May 27, 1998 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a
permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

�rator:JBPRIEST 4-3 County: SLADEN
stance to nearest residence (other than owner):
AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
Date- 11/04/94
1600.0 feet
e
sows
(farrow to
finish)
x 1417
lbs.
0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
feeder)
x 522
lbs.
0
lbs
3672
head
(finishing
only)
x 135
lbs.
— 495%2e
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to
wean)
x 433
lbs.
— 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x 30
lbs.
- 0
lbs
Describe other :
0
Total Average Live Weight = 496720 lbs
MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 495120 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/ib. ALW
Volume = 495720 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume - 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
inside top length (feet) -
Inside top width (feet) —
'Top of dike elevation (feet) --- --
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet) ---
Freeboard (feet) --
Side slopes (inside lagoon)---- -- --- -
dotal design volume using prismoidai formula
SS/EN01 SS/EN02 SS/SIOE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 394.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH
400.0
235.0
51.3
39.3
1.0
3.0 : l
WIOrH DEPTH
229.0 11.0
394.0 229.0 90226 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
326.0 163.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH " WIDTH * 4
361.0 196.0
53464 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
283024 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)

TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width —
400.0 235.0 94000.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 94000.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 clays.
Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume — 905515 gals. or 121058.2 cubic feet
Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per GF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in y DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 54833.3 cubic feet

Volume of 25 year - 24 hour- storm
Volume = 7.5 inches % 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 68750.0 cubic fleet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
121058
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
54833
cubic
feet
5o.
58750
cubic
feet
TOTAL 234642 cubic feet
SUMMARY
Temporary storage period ----
)
180
bays
Rainfall in excess of evaporation--- ---_)
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall-- --,
- -)
7.5
inches
Freeboard_____
1.0
feet
Side slopes
)
3.0
. 1
Inside top length-- -
)
400.0
feet
inside top width-
)
235.0
feet
Top of dike elevation --
51.3
feet
)
Bottom of lagoon elevation----
)
39.3
feet
Total required volume
730362
cu. ft.
Actual design volume
782309
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation
(SHWT))
43.5
feet
Stop pumping elev.
47.1
feet
)
Must be ) or = to the SHWT elev.
)
43.6
feet
Must be ) or = to min. req. treatment
el.=)
45.3
feet
Required minimum treatment volume-
=• )
495720
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation
-)
512331
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev. ----
49.3
feet
)
Must be at bottom of freeboard t
25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr.
rainfall—)
723559
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation
— )
693940
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped-----
---)
175892
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped—)
181609
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner- when
requir'ed�)
1.8
feet
DESIGNED 8Y: APPROVED BY:e/,
jMk
DATE: 111-0 9fe
DATE: lflfl9"r
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
buiiding(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker- must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff ar leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Cara should be
token when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 112 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start --up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors_ Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 49.3 as marked by permanent marker. atop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 47.1 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 175892 cubic feet or
1315669 gallons.

SHEET" 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further- details.
S. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7_ All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
S. Keep a minimum of 26 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right—of—ways.
9. The Clean Water- Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ—
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
A

�OF \N A 7 LCAQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E_ Director
p Division of Water Quality
August 22, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. B. Priest, Jr.
4132 Lisbon Road
Council, NC 28434
Subject: Inadequate Freeboard
No Further Action
Priest Farm 93
09-124
Bladen County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 16,
2003. The Fayetteville Regional Office has determined that no further enforcement actions will
be taken by the Division for the inadequate freeboard.
However, upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Fayetteville Regional
Office has determined that an NOV is appropriate due to poor operation and management.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
yCl_7Eh.
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
1 800 623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled i 10% post -consumer paper
http:J1h2o.enr. state.nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
P ul E. Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: FRO File: 09-124
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
DWQ Central Files

O�OF W A T ,�9QG
f
Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
{a `C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J B Priest, Jr.
4132 Lisbon Road
Council NC 28434
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Priest Farm #3
#9-124
Bladen County
Dear Sir or Madam:
" --PR .2 3 2003
—..
On April 9, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on June 8, 1998. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this non-
compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can consist of
one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or a
requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will be based
on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the actions taken
to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the problem from
reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Fayetteville Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-BT7-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /AffinnadveAction Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enrstate.nC. us
WWI
dV #7FC�
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP_ If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Fayetteville Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter_
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Fayetteville Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ian W. Klimek, P.;:
Director
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

J . -
High Freeboard Evaluation Form
Facility Name: 'f f eS4 F�m #3 Facility Number: - Id y
Person Completing Form: T'' S6_rma1-) Date Form Completed: 7/%/63
Date Information Due to DWQ: Date information received 4�
Extension Due Date:
Information Received:
Current Freeboard Yes ZNo _ Level(s) (in inches) . ad
Freeboard Levels for Previous 12 Months Yes ZNo Incomplete
Spraying Records for Past 12 Months Yes ✓No Incomplete
Rainfall Records For the Past 12 Months Yes _ No _ NIA ✓ Incomplete
Cropping and PAN Information Yes ✓No Incomplete
Summary of Actions taken to Restore the Needed Freeboard(s)
Yes — No Incomplete
Description of Water '"onservation Measures In Use
Yes _ No Incomplete
An updated POA if the Freeboard is still in Violation Yes _ No _ N/A
Detailed Description of Actions Taken or Proposed to be Yes _ No ✓
Taken to Prevent Future Freeboard Violations Incomplete
Date High Freeboard Level Was First Reported to DWQ by Producer
Date of First Violation from Farm Records
Items proposed in the Plan of Actions to Bring the Facility Back into Compliance
Pump and Haul Remove Animals Delay Restocking
Add Land to NMP Add Application Equipment
Spray when site is acceptable Others (Please Specify)
HFEF 5-12-03
i

Information for Lagoon(s) or Storage Basin(s) (Add Additional Pages as needed)
Lagoon Storage Basin (Check as Appropriate)
Lagoon or Storage Basin Identifier -q 3
Design Total Days of Storage for the Facility (From CAWMP)
Stop Pump Level for lagoons or the bottom of the storage basin (inches)
Lowest Liquid Levels Reported in the month of:
Month
August
September
October
November
9 /I,[ /o a
to Xjloa
ILA /0-Q
Level (in inches)
3 (P
so
ag
440
Required Minimum Freeboard (red zone in inches):
Does the Minimum Include a Chronic Rainfall Factor Yes
Recorded Freeboard Violations
Pate
is v 3
Level (inn inches) Date POA Submitted
1 1 �I�G .�Cl17Mi [TC[J�
[We
5 or 30 day
HFEF 5-12-03 2

Facility PAN Balance From the CAWMP (pounds)
& %c�
Did the Facility Comply with its NMP for the Past 12 Months Yes -"No
If No, What Violations Were Identified:
From the review of the facilities irrigation records, does it appear that the facility made
optimal use of the days when irrigation should have taken place. If not, please ,plJain:
O ne 'od kc n "n Ice6e
i� A}no O`.,2 At. r. r^rjc
If the Facility has Installed Water Conservation Devices, what devices were installed and
when:
OIL rv2 r1
What Actions have been taken or proposed to be taken by the Facility to Prevent Future
High Freeboard Violations (check appropriate items):
Better Management of the System
Add Additional Storage Volume
Add Lagoon Covers
Add Additional Land Application Sites
Add Additional Irrigation Equipment
Install Water Conservation Equipment
Reduce the Number of Animal at the Facility
Change Type of Operation
Others (please explain)-
0
nc 51
HFEF 5-12-03 3

f
If applicable, recorded rainfall data from August 2002 through April 2003 at
Facility #
Month
Amount of rainfall
per month (in inches)
# of days it rained
per month
August 2002
Out of 31 days
September 2002
Out of 30 days
October 2002
Out of 31 days
November 2002
Out of 30 days
December 2002
Out of 31 days
January 2003
Out of 31 days
Februa 2003
Out of29 days
March 2003
Out of 31 days
April 2003
Out of 30 days
Total Rainfall
out of274 days
Comments from Producer:
Comments by Reviewer:
HFEF 5-12-03 4

0
Tlr John Hasty/Lary Baxley/DWQ, Fayetteville
Fr 4:r.. Kathy Dugan, GallberryConsul#ing Services
o`.: J. B. Priest
D. ro x 5'8! 03
Re!: poi ise to 4/162003 Notice of Violation for J. B. Priest Farrms� 1,2 and 3
1. Current fne-A)oard levels: lagoon 1 94- lagoon 2 lagoon 3
2. Freeboard lave) records for past 12 months see attached !�
3. Spraying records for the past 12 months —see attached
4. Rainfall reo,)rds—not available
5. C: rcpping systern--see attached
6, io: ons takoii to restore freeboard: land application to regular spray sins when the soil was dry
e: icugh to �iEcw pumping without ponding
7. Thy f-eeboard violation at this facility was entirely due to chronic and unusual ra in fal.

. 4'
N
rl
N
Ir
i4
4.
o__I` I W 4 1 1 I
74tr�
I I I
CAI
I
l i I ! I I I
�I ��
�
�'� I I; I � I� f l� .!
I I I I
I I I
I I�+� I I �
1
C�,,
1Iti�1
ftzl
Q1
J -I

con 1 N
I 1 _._I
I �I
!_
I I
i
sl»
Ll
�
I�°
i`w.1!
�'
!
i.a.�
�
�
I
i I I I I
v 1
1 4ZI
I
:E
fA
ml
'NI
0
0
43
ri
0
CL
vt r`
C
'NJ
r-N. C'q
Ll
I
I
I 1.j
all
-Z a
-3
t"4.
--A
9
T
-I
w
J
;. -
7i
V1 q CX C'EiL
'a
CA

b�
' y...r1.
�,`'�
,�` •{.�
,�,: ;, A:, ;�:;
,, .,;.>;
�I' Yi fin' �`,'� ;*� j c� � � x.,
� � ., ��
�[, �A' i�.' ,f� �'
rt..�,Yl w �3,•
+q�ia�„r�',���. 1� to �"�� � ' s"�.
.. �. ... �; e .:7;, A .. � �: i. ...
.. {

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 8, 1998
J B Priest, Jr.
Priest Farm #3
4132 Lisbon Road
Council NC 28434
f
NCDENR
NpRtH CAROLIr1A DEPARTMEwr OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOuRcF-5
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090124
Priest Farm #3
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Bladen County
Dear J.B. Priest, Jr.:
In accordance with your application received on April 14, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J B Priest, Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Priest Farm #3, located in Bladen County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 3672 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a naive change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r
Certificate of Coverage AWS090124
Priest Farm #3
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
�( A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
-N LDcc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) ECE��
Bladen County Health Department
Paymewlle4;tegit l=O#`iee,—Water'E tysSmtion-;.=- JUN 0 9 1998
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File F'�yE1�iLL�
REG. OiTiCE

C1� 1,14 A rr- Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Kfimek, P.E. Director
O .r Division of Water Quality
August 22, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. B. Priest, Jr.
4132 Lisbon Road
Council, NC 28434
Subject: Inadequate Freeboard
No Further Action
Priest Farm #3
09-124
Bladen County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 16,
2003. The Fayetteville Regional Office has determined that no further enforcement actions will
be taken by the Division for the inadequate freeboard.
However, upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Fayetteville Regional
Office has determined that an NOV is appropriate due to poor operation and management.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
These methods include, but are not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
=*A
NCCENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
1 800 623-7748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 1 10% post -consumer paper
http:!lh2o.en r. state, nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
3
i
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the staff of our Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
P ul E. Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: FRO File. 09-124
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
DWQ Central Files

July 1, 2007
J B Priest
Priest Farm #3
4132 Lisbon Rd
Council, NC 28434
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleco H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
I... i n 2;'•7
w i.. { C7 h�...l
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090124
Priest Farm #3
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
Dear J B Priest:
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J B Priest, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Priest Farm #3, located in Bladen County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 3672 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition M.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must' be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaieroualitv.orE Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded lO% Post Consumer Paper
lvorthCarolina
,Natura!!y
Raleigh. NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .01 I l(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Bladen County Health Department
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS090124

LMAR
t1Vkp
7 20MANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATIA�QNAL Ol�10E
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number MCA County Year 200
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) T '5. Tyie_Sf G1y v%'* 3
Operator n. Charge for this Facility --Dr. 13 :'Plri rS+ -Xir . Certification # I (A !o S
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part I1 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part _I_: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields �or Pulls 0 (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): '1 _ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields $ or Pulls 7L (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: _ Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
slaI3
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: +49 D ,Z
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year 0 tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
3L�40 - —
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest _
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average. numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: MuLyt? 79r0 W lti
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during l ` Yes ! I No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

..4
2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
"�, Yes
El No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
- the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
t Yes
a No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
% Yes
D No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the.
Yes
! 1 No
levels specified in this facility's CAW V during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
Yes
[]No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon !,Yes Li No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual SIud e Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. J Yes ' No
pex 16wa.:. 6kvAde Z)ur m. 1 t tAAreA _ o�u r��+l l too
9. Annual soils ana ysts ere perfv on each f, receiving m waste durusg e C)L Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? Yes G No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes U No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during % Yes 'El No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWVIP were maintained during the past calendar year on all $L Yes -L No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWW, for this facility were I k Yes 7— No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify- under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
S . 6. lyrics+ , Sr. .
Permittee Name and 'l-ttle (type or print)
Signature of Operator in Ch;
(if different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
Date
Date

f ' ANEV L FACILITY ANNUAL'.CERT.MCATION. FORM:
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number _ NC A 4M 17-4County I� i a d e,� Year 200 L�
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) 3. 3 .2r i c 15t 4-LtX N"
Operator in Charge for -this Facility ` 6 c A- Certification # % S
Land application of anima'. waste as,allowed by the above permit occurred.dunng:the past calendar year .
C YES NO. If NO, skjip Part. I and Part.II and proceed to the. certification:;. Also,; if animal waste
was generated'but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information_
1. Total number of application -Fields Ib6 or Pulls'd-(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified: Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): _ '� Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields ❑..or Pulls (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: _ - Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied d„ring "the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed tobe land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater'sold or,given to other persons and taken
off site during the year :tons' E or - gallons .El (please check the. appropriate box)
6. Annual average number'of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:. .
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by: type at this facility at any -onetime -during �the previous year:
Largest
Smallest - _-- -
(These numbemare -for informational:purposes only since the only -permit, limit on the number of animals
at the faci*.:is t6. annual average.numbers),
8_ Facility's• Integrator if applicable:' nl &Ac - rQ1A.P--- _
Part II: Facuity status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN. TO
BRING THIS FACILITY -BACK INTO COMPLIANCE._..
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during [A yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-43 1

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there: was no direct runoff of waste from
Yes ❑ No'
the facility (including'the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the`application"sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at -this, facility. during .
Yes :❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no: PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Yes ❑ No
levels -specified in this, facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
L' Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the °lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than'the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on -each field receiving anima] waste during the
Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the pemut during the past calendar Year?
Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
fl Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division. of Water. Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the. CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on.ali ll Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were I Yes ❑ No
maintained during -each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.-
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted.' Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information -submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that .there.are-significant penalties for
submitting false information, -including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
-T.13 -Pri
r
or
. Date
Date
different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2

HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION FORM
Staff please retain your original and place a copy in the High Freeboard Notification
Box located -in Richard Canady's office.
Person Receiving Notification J i c k j
Facility Number 6- I Z '74 Date Received 3/47ft/20/0.
Farm Name eri e S a v..• _ -#-3 Time = 3 q .p,
Caller's.Name Ka'� 84 vkc_✓
Caller's Telephone Numbers T
Home#
Farm # -
Cell#_
Pager#
For all callers PLEASE obtain a phone number where they can be reached at any time.
(Cell phone numbers, home phone numbers, farm phone numbers, pager numbers)
Tell the caller that a member of the CAFO unit or Paul Rawls will contact them as soon
as possible.
Freeboard (in inches)
Lagoon # 1 Ito' ) - Lagoon # 4
Lagoon # 2 Lagoon # 5
Lagoon # 3 Lagoon # 6
Do not instruct the caller on the action they should take. That is up to the caller. Remind
them that they are to remain in compliance with their Permit and Waste Utilization
Plan.
Make the caller aware that you are assigning a tracking number to their call. Give the
caller the tracking number and tell them to use this number for all future contacts about
this particular incident and when they call back reporting they are back into compliance.
High Freeboard Level Tracking Number is
Thank the caller for their cooperation.
*Water Quality Staff Only*
If the caller indicates that the lagoon level is <12 inches, contact one of the CAFO staff
AND Paul Rawls. Do not leave a note, e-mail or voicemail without contacting the
CAFO staff AND Paul Rawls directly on any report of <12 inches.
Treat any report of <12 inches as an emergency event.
*CAFO STAFF ONLY* V
Establish a Filemaker/ BIMs Entry number for this report. 201001046
Print the Filemaker/ BIMs Entry and attach it to this form.

Memo
To: Fayetteville Regional Office, Division of Water Quality, AP
From Kathy Barker, Gallberry Consulting Services
M
Rer Lagoon status report
TB pViCS+ 4y
Please a advised that the lagoon on :S76 Pri es* -A 3 Farm, number
9-3$ - s that was reported "in the red" on A a.- 2-4-10 (date) is now back
in com lia-'nee at a reading of - l
it 3 - A3
1321�
qio- 6';W-60V
--A�h AR-r)6a;-tLku-�ct
�. ,

search Page 1 of 2
Incident Incident
Details! acid Freeboard Levels Events Related lncident5
Deta
* Incident Type: Non -Compliance Hepa!Uig Incident Number: 201
* Category: ; APS - Animal =
* Started Date/Time :. 03/04/2010 04:39 pm
* County : � Bladen - Farm #: 090
Decimal DD:MM:SS
_ _....._..... ._....
Latitude: Position Accuracy:select Value--- -`=s
-- _
Longitude:! Position Method: --- Seie-.t Value_ --
Position Datum:---Selecrt�,V�e- --M
Reporting Person : _Anonymous — to �/
First Name : Kathy � � Address
Middle Name C
Last Name : Dugan � City :
State/Zip
Phone:
* Location of the Incident: Pde---
Address:
City/State/Zip: , Cr uncii
Cause/Observation of the incident
Action Taken:
Cell/Pagcr
Directions
._........
_
VOIF
Comments/Findings
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft :
Surface Water Impacted : Yes - No Unknown Groundwater Impacted: _ :1
Waterbody. .---Se1Rct ValLle---
Waterbody (Other) : ` _ — Conveyance : --
Report Received By: Reveis; Ricky. RO Contact: Re3
Phone: 191 ;F „-3:s7() 720 Phone: {9 i f
Date/Time : 0310412010 04.39 pm Date/Time
D4::
ht1p:/Ibims.enr.state.nc.us:7001 /selectOnelncident. do?id=3M05 FMYG00665DX4B653RC... 9/30/2010

,search
Page 2 of 2
Referred Via: Voice iiiail
Specific Causes :
. Severe Natural Condition Vandalism
Referred Via: Voi
Pump Station Equipment Failure
i� Wish_ Cancel:
http://bims.enr.state.nc.us:70011selectOnelncident.do?id=3M05FMYG00665DX4B653RC... 9/30/2010

search
Page 1 of 1
Incident Details] Incident Details2 Freeboard Levels Events
Incident Type : Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201001046
Date/Time : 03/04/2010 04:39 pm Farm #: 090124
County: Bladen City : Council
Responsible Party :
Incident Owner:
Permit: AW 8090124
Facility
First Name :-- _-- --_�_
Middle Name :
Last Name
Company Name
Phone:
Clear Responsible Party_]
Onsite Contact:
First Name:
Middle Name •
Last Name
Contact Agency
Phone
Cell/Pager
Fish Kill: Yes No g Unknown
Containment: Yes No z Unknown
Storage tank: AST _. UST
Written Report Requested:
Information Requested:
Closed Date :
Find Owner Clear
Find Perrnit Clear
Find Facility [Clear]
Address • _ � ____
City
State/Zip
Cell/Pager :
Report Entered By : Rune--1s, RicN
Phone : [phone]
Date/Time : G310512010
Estimated Fish Kill:
Cleanup complete: ; Yes , )
Well Contractor Cert#: ---Select Va
W.�
i 'Finish _` Cancel
http://bims.enr.state. nc.us: 7001 /maintainlncident1.do 9/30/2010

Agencies Page 1 of 1
Incident Incident
Details] Details t Freeboard Levels Events Related Incidents Action I-Iistoil,
Incident Type : Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201001046
Date/Time : 03/04/2010 04:39 pm Farm #: 090124
County : Bladen City: Council
Freeboard Levels
I1, S
Waste Structure
Waste Structure Freeboard
plan Due
flan Date/Time
Received Freeboard
Type
identifier (inches)
Date/Time
Date/Time Level OK
—.
- -- -
03.104!2010 -
- -Lagoon
f 3,109-124 16.0
-_ �.
(15:02pm
Add Da-lete
Fi.qish I Cancel_
sbcv-\
eo
http://bims.enr.state.nc.us-7001/maintainIncident2.do 9/30/2010

fl.-,N"04/2010 17:02 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 01
5556 Braxton Road
Hope Mulls NC 2t3348 Gallberry Consulting
To: DWQ—Fayetteville Regional office From: Kathy Barker
Faor: 91 "8"707 Pages: 4
Pharws: 91 o-43�3300 Date: 3/4/2010
Re: 30 day PQA for JB 13riest#3 CC: p4 te
ATTENTION:
Art Bamhardt
Ricky Revels
Steve Guyton
Called this farm in to Ricky Revels voice mail on 3-4-10 at app. 3:40 pm as "in the
red" at 16 inches_
*4u-,4—
q jo - ioqf

n3/174/2010 17:02 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 02
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1.5tructure NameAdentifier (ID): J B PPriest#3 9-124
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr_ storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b_ designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 90226 fig
e_ line c ll2 x line d x 7.48 gallonsM 168723 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 ays
g_ volume of waste produced according to structural design 1 121058 3
h_ current herd # 3672 certified herd 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 121058 ft3
certified herd #
i_ volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + 1 + j) x 7.48 x 30 daysAine f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I_ current waste analysis dated 02/10/10
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
4 3
54833 ft3
219277 gallons
1.30 Ibs11000 gal.
504.4lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

e3/.04/2510 17:02 9104232212 GALLSERRY CON PAGE 03
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure JB Priest #3
line m = 504.4
2.
Structure
line m =
3_
Structure
line m
4.
Structure
line m =
5.
Structure
line rn =
6_
Structure
line m =
n.lines 1 +2+3+4+3+6 504.4
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAT
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 31
0. tract # p. field # q. Crop r_ acres s. remaining TOTAL PAN
IRR-2 PAN BALANCE FOR
helenre (Wacre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
D Hvbrid bermudagrass 5.18 230.00 1191.4
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for availab
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _1191.4
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

Gl+.04/2-010 17:02 9104232212 GALLSERRY CON PAGE 04
w_ Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section R)
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) _
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
NARRATIVE;
PoA (30 Day) 212i/00
�5
04.4
1 91.4
-687

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
November 5, 2007
RECEIVED
J. B. Priest
Priest Farm #3 NOV 0 7 2W
4132 Lisbon Rd
Council, NC 28434 Ali-FAtI MLLEFMh0II M
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090124
Priest Farm 43
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
Dear J. B- Priest:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on October
31, 2007. With the survey results, Kathy Dugan requested an extension of the sludge survey
requirement for the lagoon at the Priest Farm #3 facility not to be required until 2009. Due to the
amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed
until 2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey are to be submitted by March 1, 2010.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919)
715-6937-
Sincerely,
7'y�
Miressa D. Garoma
Soil Scientist
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Kathy Dugan
Central Files
Aquifer Protection section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper
NN�p�►Carolina
11Vatura!!J
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

9 40
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO 13E LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Narnelldentifier (ID)- JJB Priest #3 9-124
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr 124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a_ current liquid level according to marker -13 0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
9Q226 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 1.48 gallonslft3
56241 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
1 80ays
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
121058 3
In. current herd # 3672 certified herd # 3872
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
121058 0
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design p 3
j_ excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 54833 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7,48 x 30 daystline f= 219277 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I, current waste analysis dated 12/291 55 1.88 Ibs/1000 gal.
M. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I = 518.0 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

It. TOTAL_ POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE. STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1, Structure J13 Priest #3
2. Structure
3. Structure
4. Structure
5. Structure
6. Structure
line m =
518,0 lb PAN
line rn =
—lb PAN
line m =
—lb PAN
line rn =
—lb PAN
fine m =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+5= 518.0lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
• • f f • • • •
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
N. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 518.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) 518.0 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 518.0 lb. PAN
Y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -0 lb. PAN

��'A DEIVR—FRc
,®
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Priest Farms, LLC
J. B. Priest Farm 3
155 Robbins Road
Council, NC 28434
Dear Priest Farms, LLC:
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Thomas A. Reeder
Director
October 21, 2013
OWo
John E. Skvarla, Ili
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090124
J. B. Priest Farm 3
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Bladen County
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received October 18, 2013, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Priest Farms, LLC, authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000-
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the J. B. Priest Farm 3, located in Bladen County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 3672 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS090124 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoringconditions onditi.ons in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keepingforms.
orms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1635
_oration: 512 h. Salisbury Sl. Raleigh, North Carolina 27644
Phone: 919-a07-6464 � FAX: 91M07-6492
Internet: www.nmaterquality.orq
.An Equal opporunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. _
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Wilmington, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.szov/er/ilm/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water. Quality Regional Operations Section Staff' may be reached at [phone]. If you need ,
additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding
Operations Branch staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Tho A. Reeder
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
CC" (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Bladen County Health Department
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS090124)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

DENR-FRC
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
J. B. Priest
Priest Farm # 3
4132 Lisbon Rd.
Council, NC 28434
Dear J. B. Priest:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
January 25, 2012
JAN 7 6=z
Owo
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090124
Priest Farm # 3
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on
December 22, 2011. Please be aware that we did not receive sludge survey data for 2011. As a
Condition of your permit, you are required to perform a sludge survey each year unless an extension
has been requested, and granted by the Division. This is a violation of your permit.
With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for lagoon 1,
lagoon 2, and lagoon 3, at the Priest Farm # 3 facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume
available, the Division does not find it appropriate to allow and extension for lagoon 1, and lagoon 2,
however; an extension is granted for lagoon 3.
The next sludge survey at this facility should be performed before December 31, 2012
for lagoon 1, and lagoon 2. An extension is granted for lagoon 3. The next sludge survey should be
performed before December 31, 2016 for lagoon 3. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Larry W. W e PE
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS090124
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone., 919M7-64641 FAX: 91 "07-6496
Internet www wwaterauOy.orn
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer
olle
N C&olina
.NJTA A

_PLAN.OF_ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH.FREEBOARD.AT-ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 9-124
Facility Name: JB Priest Farm #3
Certified Operator Name:
James B. Priest
County:
Bladen
Operator Number: 16965
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
N
5
2. Check all applicable items
X Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
9121/2018
I hereby certify that i have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Priest Farms, LLC Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 9/28/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

0
",0F W A ��Rpt
Michael F. Easley, Governor
co William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J B Priest
_ N
1 „ ^ • d Priest Farm #3 �_u _ •_ _ -3
4132 Lisbon Rd "
Council, NC 28434 -
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/os/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits,you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The apQlication form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two 2 copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 090124
Murphy Family Farms
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org .o Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAEfrrtnarrve Action Employer— 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone:
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
� NCarolina
(919) Naturally
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]