090108_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

Ni
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
R
Division of Water Quality.
VR Routine O Complaint _O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSLWC; review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection c �M
Time of Inspection E_ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted © Not O erational ),Daae Last Operated:
�,J `` County• L.l .����..Y~.. -..
Farts Nante:.... i. .S- ? �.:1. Giiy'r�-
. ',,�,]
Ovt�ner Name:... 4.0x- ..V.s.j ................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:. ......................................... ..... Title:..................... . Phone No:
............................................................................................................................
MailingAddress: .... .. ...... .......................................... AV. -............ .5.._....�
Onsite Representative;
Certified Operator; ................................................... ......
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number;...._ ...................................
Latitude Longitude �• 0' �"
Sw_tne ^, Capactty Pa
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
=- ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
� ❑ Gilts
❑ Boars.
kNdrfiU h of I:agoons / Holding Pon
��>�Destgn
Qn Po�iItry " Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer ❑ Dair3
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-
❑Other � w�
` � � Total Design Cape±
t Total SSI
❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
>❑ No Liquid Waste
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2_ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenanceli mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125197
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P&0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ YesT�"o
o
El Yes
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes 1�No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I.agoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.i
9. Is,storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft)'..........................................................................................................................
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
XYes -
❑ No
❑ Yes
�No
Structure 5 Structure
6 .
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or ]Permitted Facili ies Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.violations"or. dericiencies, were n&6d du'r'ing' this,' Visit.- .Yoiu.will i&e' i've' no' Airihei . '
. cvrrespondeince about this. visit::
y b�,8 .4 F S a - +`k 4'.,iia& f� rs ;T+v9'34W hi 1rtt°A"6 k;. E
Cohimi 6ti s {ieferW'#o-question #) Ex aiwany�YES aus rens and/ora eeilatI mac or aev other cammesui
, y�reo€►
v� c e s, tea- s «
USW drawl 5 4f fSCllrl
ttg y to better expiatn situations: (use u�dtlionai pages as necessary)_'
}
. V yV p
7-k c -�,a�`►� 15 o Er I �uSi
S no' n ,1e SS
7125/97
T
Re,tiewer/Inspector Name
w •
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: hate- 1 �� / p 7

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
1i
Facility Number: 09-0108 County: Bladen
Facility Name: Bennett Place Nursery
Certified Operator Name: David Gooden
Operator #
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Lagoon NamelIdentifier (ID):
Spillway (Yes or No): No
Level (inches): 18.5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freebo d elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulicd agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations forbne or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and �AN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within' this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Qualityinior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 115/10
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
41 cv .,c-0
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
PoA Cover Page 2121100
Phone: Y Z 4 `4 t" 7
Date: — 6 -ID

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL_ PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): FL —ag oon 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.5 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 0.5 inches
top of dike surface area according to design
d. (area at below structural freeboard elevation) 42078 ft2
e. line cJ12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 13114 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 44543 ft3
h. current herd # 6080 certified herd #F----6-08-0-1
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f--
4.
=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 11/4/2009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
44543 ft's
©W
26133 W
88109 gallons
0.65 lbs11000 gal.
65.8 lbs. PAN

11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID. 1
line rn =
65.8 Ib PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 65.8 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract # p. field #
{I. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR t TOTAL PAN u. application window'
2 PAN balance BALANCE FOR
(lb/acre) FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
1747
1 OS -Graze
2.48
124.00
307.5 Oct -March
1747
2 OS -Graze
3.20
160.00
512.0 Oct -March
1747
3 OS -Graze
3.16
158.00
459.3 Oct -March
1747
4 OS -Graze
2.53
127.00
321.3 Oct -March
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 1640.1 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 65.8 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) = 1640.1 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -1574 Ib. PAN
(Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
,another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Report: W03332
Grower:
Gooden, David/Channing
Copies to:
3
959 Dewitt Gooden Rd
Ellrabethlown,NC 28337
Waste A nadysis Rohort
Farm:
Received: 11/04/2009 Completed: 11/05/2009
Bladen County
Sample [nformalion
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample 1D.
N
P K Ca
Mg
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Ca
8 Mo
Cl
G
Total 292
56.0 700 122
40.1
61.1
3.16 0.57
1.48
0.95
1.13
1
1N--N
Waste Code:
NH4
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
PH
SS
C-N DM%
CCE%
ALE(K �)
ALS
-NO3
257
7.27
Descrlplion:
OR--N
Swine L on Lig.
Uvea
R co mendations..
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 allows
Other Elements
lbs/1000 allons
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
7.n 01
B Mo
C!
Na
Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
faigatioil
1.2 0.75 5.6 0.71 0.23 0.36 0,02
T
0.01 0.01
0.01
2.1
Sample Information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID.
N
P K Ca
MeS
Fe Mn
Zn
Ca
8 Mo
Cl
C
Total 167
47.6 879 124
34.0
26.9
3.38 0.55
1.31
1.08
1.37
2
IN-IV
Waste Coda.
-NH4
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
PH
SS
ON DM%
CCE%
ALE)
ALS
-NO3
321
7.35
Description:
OR-N
Swine L n 1,19.
Urea
R commen tions:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 allows
Other Elements
lbs/1000
allons
Application Method
N Pa05 Kao Ca A19 S Pe
Mn
Zn Ca
B Mo
CI
Na
Ni Cd A
Ai
Se Li
Irrigation
0.69 0.64 7.0 0.72 0.20 0.16 0.02
T
0.01 0.01
0.01
2.7
Sample information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca
Af
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu
B M0
Cl
C
Total 211
341 722 77.8
21,5
30.4
2.16 0.27
0.77
a61
1,11
3
IN-N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
PH
SS
CN DM%
CCE%
ALE(K W )
ALS
-NO3
259
7.3
Description:
OR-N
Swine LaFDn Lig.
Urea
Recommendations:
I Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000gglim
Other Elements
lbs/1000
zallons
Application Afelhod
N P205 Kao Ca Mg S Fe
Ain
Zn Ca
B Mo
CI
+4a
Ai Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
Irrigation
0.88 0.46 5.8 0.45 0.13 0.18 0.01
T
0.01 T
0.01
2.2

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agrononii/
Grower: Gooden, David/ChanniniKeport: W03332
Page: 2
Sample information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu B Ma
CI C
Waste Code:
ALS
Description:
Seine Lwon Li .
Total 157
IN --N
-NH4
-NO3
OR -N
Urea _F
61.1 Rha 90,0 29 36.8
3.64 0.34
5.02
1.95 1.42
Na M Cd Pb At Se Li tH SS C:N DM%
XR% ALE al)
227 7.69
Recommendations:
I Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 gallons
Other Elements
l6s/l000 allons
Application Method
irrigation
N P2O5 X70 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cr,
0.65 O.S2 7.0 0.53 0.15 0.21 0.02 T 0.03 0,01
R Mo
0.01
Cl
Ara Ni Cd Pb
1.9
Al se Li
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
i1 .4
Thank you far using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
lohacco Irust I-und Commission -Steve Troxier, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncogr.gov/agrononii/
Grower: Gooden, David/Channin]
Report No: 28883
Pg 7
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr VA
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
HW7
1st Crop: BermHay/Pas,M
2.7T
180-220
2040
190-210
$ 0
$
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180.220
20-40
190-210
$ 0
$
0
0
12
Test Results
Son Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Cre-I
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N
N714 -N
No
MIN 0.97 1.30
4.5 36.0
2.9 5.0 49 16
27.0 8.0
56
43
43
82 82
13
32
0.0
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P203
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
BPHH1
1st Crop: Fes/0G/TIm,M
0
120.200
2040
10-30
0 0
0
0
.0 0
13
2nd Crop: Fes/0G/TIm,M
0
120-200
20-40
10.30
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ae pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -1
Mn -A1(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn -AI
Cu -1
S -I
SS -1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 1.08 1.20
6.7 76.0
1.6 6.1 48 69
55.0 16.0
37
38
38
68 68
28
37
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No, Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
BPLF2
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
0
120-200
30-50
0.20
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/0G/T1m,M
0
120-200
30-50
0-20
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soft Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -I
Mn-AI(I)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn -AI
Cn-I
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N
1VH4-N
Na
MIN 0.71 1.15
6.6 80.0
1.3 6.2 44 73
58.0 16.o
48
43
43
81 81
35
32
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
BPSF3
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
0
0 0
0
0
pH$
12
X-
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220
0
0
0 0
0
0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -I Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 1.49 1.19
9.1 86.0
1.3 6.9 180 334
51.0 16.0
38
26
26
424 424
183
44
0.3
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P203
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
RWMR
1st Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
0
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
2nd Crap: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -1
Mn -A1(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -I Za-Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.76 1.20
8.8 82.0
1.6 6,2 169 131
56.0 18.0
77
60
60
197 197
116
31
0.1

020 f D r- >osW-
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 09-0108 County: Bladen
Facility Name: Bennett Place Nursery
Certified Operator Name: David Gooden
Operator #
Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID)
Spillway (Yes or No): No
Level (inches): 18.5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
�X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 1127110
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
V`�
V
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Phone:
-IC) A�%� Date: - � r
__Q C�Q
Facility Owner/ ger (signature)
PoA Cover Page 2121100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR RIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): La con 1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.5 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 0.5 inches
top of dike surface area according to design
d. (area at below structural freeboard elevation) 42076 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 13114 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 44543 ft3
h. current herd # 6080 certified herd # 6080
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 44543 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design F 261331 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 88109 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11/4/20 0.65 lbs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I = 65.8 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
s. remaining IRR t TOTAL PAN u. application window'
2 PAN balance BALANCE FOR
(Iblacre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
1.
Structure ID: 1
line m =
65.8 Ib PAN
2_
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 65.8 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract # p. field #
y. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR t TOTAL PAN u. application window'
2 PAN balance BALANCE FOR
(Iblacre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
1747
1 OS -Graze
2.48
124.00
307.5 Oct -March
1747
2 OS -Graze
3.20
160.00
512.0 Oct -March
1747
3 OS -Graze
3.16
158.00
499.3 Oct -March
1747
4 OS -Graze
2.53
127.00
321.3 Oct -March
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1640.1 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 65.8 Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (fine v from section III) = 1640.1 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1574 Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
facil
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agrononil/
Report: WO3332
a
Grower,
Gooden, David/Channing
959 Dewitt Gooden Nd
Elixabelhtmm, NC 28337
Copies to:
Analysis Report
,rWaste
Paan:
Received: 11/04/2409 Completed: 11/0512009
Bladen County
Sample Information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample 1D:
N
P K Ca
,lig
S
Fe Mn
Zu
Cu
B Mo
C1
C
]
Total 292
56.0 700 122
40.[
61.1
3.16 0.57
1.48
0.95
1.13
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
P H
SS
CN DM%
CCE%
ALE(Kgal)
ALS
-NO3
257
7.27
Description:
OR -N
Swine Lagpon Lig.
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Croe
lbs/1000 gallons
other Elements
lbs/1000
allons
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe
til"
Zn Cu
B AM
Cl
Na
Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
Irrigation
1.2 0.75 5.6 0.71 0.23 0.36 0.02
T
0.01 0.01
0.01
211
Sample information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca
m
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Ca
B Mo
C1
C
Z
Total 167
47.6 879 124
34.0
26.9
3.38 0.55
1.31
1.08
1.37
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na N1 Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
pH
SS
ON DM%
CCE%
ALE )
321
7.35
Description:
OR -N
Swine Lagwn Lig.
Urea
Reco nda ops:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 allons
Other Elements
lbs/1000
allons
Application Melbod
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Ain
Zn C"
B A10
Cl
Na
Ni Cd Pb
At
Se Li
irrigation
0.69 o.64 7.0 0.72 0.20 0.16 0.02
T
0.01 0.01
0.01
2.7
Sample Informatlon
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample 1D:
N
P K Ca
M
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu
B A10
Cl
C
3
Toial 211
34.2 722 77.8
21.5
30.4
2.16 0.27
0.77
o.61
I' l l
11V -2V
Waste Code:
NH4
ALS
-NQ3
Na Ni Cd
Pb
Al
Se Li
PH
SS
CN D,it%
CCE'%
ALE(K • )
259
7.3
Description:
OR -N
Swine Lagwn Lig.
Urea
Recommendations:
I Nutrients Available for First Crop
MOM xalkas
Other Elements
ibs/1000 gallons
Application Me"
N M5 K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Aln
Zn C"
B Mo
Cl
Na
Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
Irrigation
0.88 0,46 5.8 0.45 0.13 0.18 0.01
T
0.01 T
0.01
2.2

NCDAKS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.acagr.gov/agronomi/
Grower: Gooden, David/Channinfieport: W03332 Page: 2
Sample Information
Laboratory Results (parts Per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample 1D:
N
P K Ca
M S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu 8 Mo C1 C
4
waste Code:
ALS
Descriplim:
Swine Lagoon LI .
rural 157
1N --N
-NH4
-NO3
OR -N
Urea
61.1 868 90.0
25.4 36.8
3.64 0.34
5.02
1.95 1.42
,Ya Ni Cd Pb At se Li p H
SS CN DM% CCE% ALE • )
227 7.69
Recommendations:
I Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs 1000 allons
Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Applicalion Melbod
IrNgalion
P105 K2o Ca Mg S Pe
J0,65 0.82 7.0 0.53 0.15 0.21 002
Mn Zn Ca
T 0.03 0.01
8 MO
0.01
CI
Na Ni Cd A At Se Li
1.9
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and .safeguard environmental quality.
Inbacco Irust Fund C oninilssion - Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDAKS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Weh site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Grower: Gooden, David/Channing
Report No: 28883
Pg 7
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample Aro. Last Crop
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
time
N
P203
K20
Mg
S
Cm
Zn
B Afn
See Note
IM7
lsl Crop: Berm llay/Pas,At
2.7T
180-220
20-40
190-210
$
0
$
0
0
12
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,NI
0
180-220
2040
190-210
$
0
$
0
0
H
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
M01-1
Mn -A1(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Ca -1
S -I
SS -1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.97 1.30
4.5 36.a
2.9 5.0 49 16
27.0
8.0
56
43
43
82
82
13
32
0.0
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P20s
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
BPIIIiI
Isl Crop: Fes/O(/Tim,M
0
120-200
2040
W-30
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
0
120-200
20-40
10-30
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Gass JIM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1
Mn-AI(1)
Mq-AI(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
01-1
S-1
SS -I NW -N
A'H4-N
Na
MIN 1.08 1.20
6.7 76.0
1.6 6.1 48 69
55.0
16.0
37
38
38
68
68
28
37
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K10
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
BPLF2
IstCrop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
0
120-200
30-50
0.20
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
0
120.200
30-50
0.20
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac p H P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1
Mn-Al(1)
41n-AI(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -I
S -I
SS -1 A'03 -N
N114 -N
Na
MN 0.71 1.15
6.6 80.0
1.3 6.2 44 73
58.0
16.0
48
43
43
81
81
35
32
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
KzO
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Nate
BP5F3
lsl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pH$
l3
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,&I
0
180-220
0
0
0
0
0
0
pll$
-L2
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -I
Mn-AI(I)
Mn-AI(2)
Za-I
Zn -Al
Cu -I
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N
N114 -N
A'a
MIN 1.49 1.19
9.1 86.0
1.3 6.9 18o 334
51.0
16,o
38
26
26
424
424
183
44
0.3
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
Kz0
Afg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
RWMR
IS(Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class I1M% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1
Mn-Al(I)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn -I
Zn -AI
Cu -I
S-1
SS -I NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.76 1.20
8.6 82.0
1.6 6.2 169 131
56.0
18.0
77
60
60
197
197
116
31
0.1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division} of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Linwood Royal
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 8
White Oak NC 28399
Dear Mr. Royal:
I D E E �-
f ' 1 j l 1191
� 3 EVILLE
REG. DF'+ iCE
Subject: Classification of Animal Waste Management Systems
Facility: Linwood Royal Farm
Facility ID #: 09-108
County: Bladen
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge (OIC) by January 1, 1997, for each
animal wasie management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more
horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management
system Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets
the requirements for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is available for animal waste management system operators. For
information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent. Operator
certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). For information on the certification process, please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit at [phone]. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each
system is based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat
the animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, type A and type B. Type A
animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by monogastric animals
which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management systems are generally used to treat
waste generated by ruminants and other animals which produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and
certification an operator receives should correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For
more information on the classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not
intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or
engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge,
whether yourself or another person, must possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Linwood Royal
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 562
Lumberton NC 28359-0562
Dear Linwood Royal:
1 �11kT1W,A
17 •
A 2
M�ilk
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Removal of Registration
Linwood Royal Farm
Facility Number 9-108
Bladen County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 571or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Bladen Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
)&YT
rGregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Linwood Royal
PO Box 8
White Oak NC 28399
/ • •
NCDENR
NoRTFi CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES'
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Linwood Royal Farm
Facility Number 9-108
Bladen County
Dear Linwood Royal;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 0.25 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledfl0% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
aul Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

Facility Number 09— 108 Lagoon Number ......... Lagoon Identifier jngftime. lagog0.0.1........................
h
0 Active .O inactive
Waste Last Added.fr.-A-9.7............................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): Q.25 ........................
Latitude 34 44 f 27
Longitude 78 42 I 01
By GPS or Map? 10 GPMap
GPS file number: V033119a
Embankment Height (feet): gf.4!.t d .................
Distance to Stream: O X250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet O > 1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? 0 Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? O Yes 0 No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): *<5 O5-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No *Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 3-31-2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches):
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage OO Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
nation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes 0 No OO Unknown with representative OO Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments Attempted several times by phone to contact owner, and stopped by owners house
before doing the assessment No contact could be made.

a
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 09 10$
0 Permitted 0 Certified [] Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 3-31-2000
ro Not O erational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 6:1:17 ............
Farm Name: LbiwAo.d.Rot's.1.k:a,Tm ............................... .......................... County: BjpLdgjU ...............................................FRO.............
OwnerName: Uxkwo9 d ................................ ttQYAI........................................................... Phone No: 9.1.Q 67.439..........................................................
FacilityContact: owint:A:.....................•'-•--•'---.................................Title:............................................................... Phone NO: ....................................................
Mailing Address: P0..D9.x.8..._..._•-•_-
... w.trite.Qak.SIG...................................................... 28.399...............
Onsite Representative . Integrator:.. ..............
Location of Farm:
D. oxrm.Dairy.Rd,..RQmse. ..............................................................
® Swine 0" 'Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current .
Swine
CRacky Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 910 0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total:Design Capacity 910
Total SSLW 122,550
Number of,Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds'/;Sold Tiraps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b_ If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Name
Reviewer/Ins ector
F Scott;Faurcloth_„4 ti . � T • �'' � --,.. �� � � . - � _�t�,. �" � r -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Linwood Royal
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 8
White Oak NC 28399
Dear Linwood Royal:
0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATREC211 f
March 5, 1999
MAq Z 4 1991
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Removal of Registration
Linwood Royal Farm
Facility Number; 9-108
Bladen County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan_
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poul with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
L_�,Ur ljwa,-,�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Fayetteville Water Quality Regional Office
Bladen Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Linwood Royal
P.O. Box 8
White Oak, NC 28399
Dear Mr. Royal:
Alva
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 20, 1998
Subject: Linwood Royal Farm
Farm Number: 9-108
Bladen County
0 `fC 0 2 1998
FAYETTEVILLE-
REG. 0 FFICiF
This is to inform you that staff from our Fayetteville Regional Office inspected the
subject facility on December 11, 1997. It was noted that this facility was not in operation.
Numerous attempts have been made to contact you to determine 'the current status of the subject
facility. These attempts have been unsuccessful. Therefore, as per State law, the subject facility
must not be repopulated above the threshold number established by 15A NCAC 2H
.0217(a)(1)(A) until you have first applied for and received a Certificate of Coverage under the
Division of Water Quality's (DWQ) General Permit for swine facilities. To operate this farm
before applying for and obtaining a Certificate of coverage would be a violation of N.C.G.S. 143-
215.1 and be subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day for each day of operation.
Please be advised that you are also required to manage the wastewater in the subject
facility's lagoon(s) in such a way as to properly treat the wastewater and to prevent any discharge
of waste to waters of the State. Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you
either the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with the State's environmental laws. If
you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], extension 581.
Sincerely,
cc—FRO �Water-Quality-,Supervi§o-F'
on Howard, Jr., P.E.
Shannon Langley
Sonya Avant/Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

M
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
[:)EHNR
April 3, 1997 R C E WI
Linwood Royal APR Q 7 1997
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 8 FAYE i TE _E
White Oak NC 28399 REG. OFFICE
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Linwood Royal Farm
~ Facility Number 09-408
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Royal:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Foran for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
)", -9-'M° 4,41,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, WAw. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 � An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linwood Royal
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 8
White Oak NC 28399
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Linwood Royal Farm
Facility ID#: 9-108
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Royal:
NOV 19 1996
FAN€.� � f E� k11LE
AFFG1. OFT9CE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may 'result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
73
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Direc r
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 X17 RPM 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

AL. IL
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Linwood Royal
Linwood Royal Farm
PO Box 8
White Oak NC 28399
Dear Linwood Royal:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANr> NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
RECEIVED
Fi4 1 7 1001
FAYETTEv:E. Z
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Linwood Royal Farm
Facility Number: 9-108
Bladen County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
be]ow the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certif ed. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please'submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please subnut all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27525-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance..
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a ccrtified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility vxill be re,,riewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility- File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
D`VQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 cic recycled/]017t post -consumer paper