090106_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ other Agency
Division of Water Quality
O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0,01er
Date of Inspection 2 t
Facility Number O
Time of Inspection Z '..J / 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered dcertified M Applied for Permit © Permitted Q Not O eratiottal Date Last Operated:.......
.Farm Name: 2 _S .v County:..........,z��"•..............................................
Owner Name: ....... !rA�r./...ri�,r�+.. / /��w.f ......... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: � �,,�tf� /vAy dTit.le• ........ Phone No: ...
......... �:;�...
�,
Mailing Address:.........T..� . �.� �...�.....7Qa Iri,E.,-�r!! jf. , 5„r.... T J.II ........... ... ......................
Z
17
Onsite Representative:........f .........i ... Integrator:.. r ..........._..
Certified Operator:.......!...-�r!t=.��..................................._... Operator Certification Ntunber:... —.... ............................
Location of Farm; Z/ 2 . i3� 113 /fes . 11.eljyy1 Z�Pw/
Latitude 0• ' 44 Longitude ' 04 ="
Design„LIllleilt 4 `Design .CIIrren#' Design `�IIlPentr
a:..
�"b9 - ?-vi vieJ. T�FS- 5iW ik °Et, 'K r.-FJkmvxFY 1.T iw
S vine m . ,. •y Capacrty_Populapop K� Poly y Capacity Populate©ri » Catiie _ Capacrty :Population
,.
❑ Layer , ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ,,- ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other.
d is ('rt e^as •Mnn
Y� Notal Design Capac►ty'
h .
Total$SSL'W�'ZI
Numiter of Lagoons f Holding Ponds' ! ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Ares Spray Feld Area
_,�� gig. �� �..';�,�r `��'"°'� � � ��• �'""' �" ��k ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
��. FOE�
Feeder
� Finish
at7ow to Wean
�4
❑Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
. ❑Gilts
h
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there
any buffers that need maintenance improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharbe originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface 'Vater? (if yes, notify DR'Q)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow
in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part
of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part
of the waste management system (other than IaRoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in re
sponsible charge?
7125/47
❑ Yes El
No
❑ Yes 10
No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes K
] No
❑Yes [�No
❑ Yes l�l No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes PC
No
Continued or: back

Facility Number: 09 — p�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes J&No
C3 Yes J@ No C 7)
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboardft .......... ..�'.../........ ... �,...........................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
I I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type /
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Qnly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0: No.viWaitions-ot• deficiencies4ere noted -during this' visit. : TYou�-,kill ireceive no further,:.
: • etirresOOdehee iihoi2t this:visit. :
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,� No
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes ,@ No
* Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes
❑ No C �,
Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
00o
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
WO
❑ Yes
i�tNo
f
❑ Yes
P'No
❑ Yes
qNo
❑ Yes
No
Ct►mrttents trefer #o queshoreExpiatii any, YES answers aa/or any mrnnmtendat;ons many_other cotnmenfs.. �$f
d 5a -K
.V
Use drawiptgs opt ility, to better a phut;situattans (usi addittonal pages as ecessaiy) �
59100!01 SUN
l�
wo s 6,e:, Y-3 per—for9,,- o.- r -y1 � e14
�
W�tt� ar'ICWP W45 �6 u�a f� to r— IaLJ O_rr—o. o�
7-;C��•
Marker- lr, la-5ov., S kwe-4 �, dt5Awa t nS � arm
Seer► o� - -o ���w 2ZZ3 ". , kced �o rJeek *starker ;
7125197
Reviewer/I nspector Name * _ ;r- \ ,'. �... F 7
'T
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /ZZ 90