090079_INSPECTIONS_20171231

tacr�uy Nitmbtr. OGi ._�
Division of Environmental Management
Anima! Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:. ' hq
Tune:
Go�a Information-,
Farm Name..
Owner Name: ne No• 5Sg- 6 a
On Site Representative: Integrator:
MaOing Address: oZ ISaxy-3i

Alaints�te -
Docs the facility maintenance aced uznp Yes O No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes O N
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes O No
+� Did the facibty fad to have a copy of the Animal waste Management PLO on ace? Yes D No
Explain any Yes answets;
SignsOut: Date:
cc Fwgiry Assessrr w Unir Use YNeedsd
j2rgwfngE or Observatio=
S. wUL S w.= S �`� o •. �r a �sr`�
i.�ti�: -�J :+S s .. - . � w,r }s r_ry•-+w►. a�-.f •.r =� __' -. S7[' `j.r�rtl �y,�s..y�r-a!+ss v... wr �'�t-_•
_._ .•�. w• �. r ... . rr�-.���r. �w�.-ter w.
���. i. .ti. •!Ys-�'�r«s-�'�[�w•►- ws%F�fit, f•:x ia.
AOI — Januw 717,19% ,

Ja-n-07-00 09:50A usda service center 9208626447
Plan Amendment to include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1 If this facility ran comply with its existing permit and CAWMP It must do so.
2
-----
Temporaty Addition of New Sprayfields (') (Check appropiate boxes.)
E:1 A. acres of cropland. List crop type used:
0 B. acres of hardwood woodland Q 100 lbs PAN 1 acre added.
ED C. ae-es of pine woodland added C 60 lbs PAN 1 acre added.
3 Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
EE A Application window extended for 6.88 acres of perennial grass until first killing frost
(~] B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to Wing frost
P -Y1
4 PAN application Increased for Small Grains b %Mnter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
[] A. PAN application increased up to 2DD lbs per acre for 6.88 acres of small grains or winlar grasses to be harvested,
ED 2. PAN application increased up to 150 b per ecce for acres of overseeded summer perennial included In 3-B-
5 Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box-)
Q A. friar to December 1st, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based an a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event- (Current waste analysis must be used aftor Dec- 1st.)
Q B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6 ftztu 2I3 - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization !Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses- �
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Tanely harvest of forage to Increase yield, and
c. Irrigation during periods of warmer weather.
7 R2qulMd - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential,
A- Making frequent, fight irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigation immedlately before predicted rainfall.
a The owner/ manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impact3, ensure compliance with the fadRtys permit and amended CAWM?, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9 Authorization to use the addtionai practices included In the amendment expires if a facility discharges
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement aeon.
10 The ownerl operatnr is required to keep records of 211 waste 2pp1lr2t10n5.
11 This revision must Include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number 09-79 Ammon Farm
Facility Name
Murphy FgRuly Farms -^ Kraig Westerbeek
Facility Owner l ager me P Tech a 15L
ra:.ility Owner / Manager Si LureT nical ec)a i , Si$nature
Date 11/11/99 Date 11/11199
to surface waters.
NOV 2 2
-
10i
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for Inspection at thi facility
(') NOW temporary sprayfields must meet applicable butter and setback requira;men!5, Waste must not be applied t0 watiandS.

_C:D

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 019-7`!
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: f- Z 1995
Time: 9 S7 ,_ia=off
Farm Name/Owner: /1%ypN 06h- - '#111#4W P %�•t� /�' ZrZ7
Mailing Address: _ -a 'ex>x7S } psE/ / L c- Ale
County: 'H/•9o's9tJ
Integrator: rPhone: &O -orf - Z/! 1
On Site Representative: Phone: /o - s2 F -1( 14,
Physical Address/Location: eroy Z %f Z , o,,j wg sT � , ; .st �:ff,, jt j4A gsi
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: ZSZO Number of Animals on Site: +Z.SZD
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: ' "
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) dPor No
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)?
Is adequate land available for spray? es No
Crop(s) being utilized:�('��3r,¢-L
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from
Actual Freeboard: f 3 Ft. Inches
Yes or&Was any erosion observed? Yes ox�
Is the cover crop adequate? (:abr No
No
100 Feet from Wells?es oF^No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Fso
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes oro
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or(S If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?es r No
Additional Comments: _�AA4,1*&1n - 2 _ A ere- , W/PvM,o
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Permitted Certified E3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered JE3 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: .... .f�L..aZ�........ ...lrLr.�` .. .. County: ...............JS...�C.�.eX..e-��.........._........................
Owner Name: .... ,C.V .Ljr l :i..�.1 ......._ r.M5 ..... Phone No: ........................ .......
Facility Contact: ...Qfil�°.........4............ Title:....... , ..�................. Phone No
.....--.--- .........................
// II ` J ^r v
Mailing Address: 6 S'O .......& wt.. ........ .�.i..lar!^ t$... .... .................... ... ✓.�...� ,�.. 1V L' .......-:��31Q......
Onsite Representative: (��. A Integrator: 1 � •..
p 11fl..1 K
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number...........................................
Location of Farm:
i
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ T
Latitude • ' •• Longitude • ' 44
:Design Current Design ; Current: - Design Curient
{ ... _ _
Swine s -
Capacity Population Poultry *Capacity Populat,on °.Cattle Capacity Population;
Wean to Feeder 2406
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
::I
Nuiber of;La oohs•,; :• - ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holdin 'Ponds./ Sohd s Tra
g� F p � �- ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -•° �"
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes #No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [:]Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? -All; -
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes R 4
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes �No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ij
Freeboard(inches): .......A...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
_
��
E Division of $oil and Water Conservation 'Operapon Renew
Division _Compliance �
� ��
\V!
� oftSod and WaterConserVation inspections
� �r���
-
Dtvisiou of Water Quality ,Compliance Inspection r
m_
Agency Operabon_Review
_Other
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Permitted Certified E3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered JE3 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: .... .f�L..aZ�........ ...lrLr.�` .. .. County: ...............JS...�C.�.eX..e-��.........._........................
Owner Name: .... ,C.V .Ljr l :i..�.1 ......._ r.M5 ..... Phone No: ........................ .......
Facility Contact: ...Qfil�°.........4............ Title:....... , ..�................. Phone No
.....--.--- .........................
// II ` J ^r v
Mailing Address: 6 S'O .......& wt.. ........ .�.i..lar!^ t$... .... .................... ... ✓.�...� ,�.. 1V L' .......-:��31Q......
Onsite Representative: (��. A Integrator: 1 � •..
p 11fl..1 K
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number...........................................
Location of Farm:
i
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ T
Latitude • ' •• Longitude • ' 44
:Design Current Design ; Current: - Design Curient
{ ... _ _
Swine s -
Capacity Population Poultry *Capacity Populat,on °.Cattle Capacity Population;
Wean to Feeder 2406
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
::I
Nuiber of;La oohs•,; :• - ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holdin 'Ponds./ Sohd s Tra
g� F p � �- ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -•° �"
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes #No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [:]Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? -All; -
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes R 4
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes �No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ij
Freeboard(inches): .......A...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 7 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid levet
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? , 4 Excessive Ponding (3 PAN
12. Crop type 1,)e,- M4
❑ Yes/(No
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ,('No
❑ Yes ArNO
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thosp/designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ YesNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yeso
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ElYes fNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
I& Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal. Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Revipwer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ff No
[:]Yes $ 'No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 5NO
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes WNo �11
❑ Yes " No
No•*i61atid is ,et dgfide'nt�es wer6 n6fea• ditrtng tbis'vislt' • Y64 Wiii•i'E(`OW iib �tl)1'tileC . .
corres ondence: abinif this visit. ..... • . • . • ..................:::::: :
Comments {refer to -guest on #) -Explain YES ar severs and/or any recoi rimendattoas:o� any other comments- '-.7--
Wany
Use drawings of -facility to=better_expEain situaliions (use add.itiom pages as -necessary) - w :
�_: . �-. ..�-•._,. _ _.
A® Xo9s eA- side of 7:s �,'e
i� , dltr � SltiCe N��•L �r a 9 �
Reviewer/Inspector Name_j"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 6
e

ikon omments an or: rawings:
3/23/99
Facility Number: D — Date of limpection
Odor Issues
26_
hoes the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
kYes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
;(No
34.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
o
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
kNo
ikon omments an or: rawings:
3/23/99
3/23/99

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
HD Routine O ComWai3nt O Follow-uo of DWO insvection O Follow -uv of DSWC review O Other I
Date of Inspection �J
Facility Number t9 Time of Inspection 3 = 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name re.0. County. /............/.................................................
0,Kmer Name: ...........�leAw... .....�f�.l2�A` -. Phone No: ... ..................................................
Facility Contact: -•••-.- . A490V
,�l7441 ....... Title• f
Phone
� No
• ............
�Mailing Address:.... . ........... lb�............................S....................................
Onsite Representative:...... P- ............................ .......... Integrator:........�¢r
Certified Operator :........... /esC I ......�
-..................................
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude I - •L,'I - 49 . Longitude .1" *1 J41 i46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes fUNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes MNo
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes M No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes PirNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 14No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Wo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes MrNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes W No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes V No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes � No
7125197
Continued on back

Facility Number: 01? —79;
8. Are there lavoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,tioldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .............[.'..R......... ...... ...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes )a No
❑ Yes PfNo
Structure 5 Structure ti
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) -
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is tbere physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type zloeo�.-w.................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWzMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a tack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities OnI
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 -No violations oc deficiencies were noted•during this'visit..You.will receiveino ftirther
correspondence about this:visit::::... : •
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes tO No
❑ Yes IRNo
Cl Yes OriNo
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ;R No
❑ Yes ,M No
❑ Yes JQ No
Cl Yes RNO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes GKNo
❑ Yes ® No
Comments to question #) ,Explain any, TS answers and/or anv recommenilattons' or any tither ca�inetnts � ,
.{refer
Use-trawtngs of facility to,better explain srtuatinns (ise additional pages as;necessary
�c�,& 15�LO' �fr/� ���/.f�/�O' it ���' �� /�- �f � ,O�S/'_•atis��
�
l0.",r d0111 d le
fr
7125197
_
Reviewer/lnspector Name�G:" n
m
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f4.J� Date: /�

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection �-
Facility Number o Time of Inspection 3- D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: JpRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:135 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review C�
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Name: _ .`'.1 �!li _... ........... �. �. _ ... County: _.. ,�!,�•J._ _..�_ .
Land Owner Name:- Phone No:
Facility Conctact:...1!¢-✓!✓v"� C-'?�*�� Title: __ Phone No:
Mailing Address: _ _ _ _ ... ... _ .... ...... .__ W �. _....�.... _,........
......
Onsite Representative:.!►, y---� �tf�- _. �.. _ _....w. Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:..,,..,.. .....,..�....�...._..
Location of Farm:
........... .......... _ ... _.... __ _........_..... ..._.... _......... ...... - _ ----- _........__............-----.........._.._.....,....---..._...._... ......
.... _ __.... _ .. 4
Latitude i Longitude 4 L.
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Design Currents, : Deskgn Current D.esxgn Current .
`rowiner Ca aCk O -a- on
q s POUI fl xBCItV PQ" :Ulfltion . x (8ttle � a e . , `
P C Cit aci Po ulatkon
Wean to Feeder 2 - La ❑ D
❑'Nan -Da
Feeder to Finish Non -Laver
❑
xst RY-
Faw to Wean "max t� #
Farrow s�ys zany "
Farrow to Feeder PTCI iA DCSI II`C� aCl}��', "� ".6
rte: g P
10 Farrow to Finish
�, r�,v°�.a.� ar xo:- a• xsY" �'
Tota USSLW_ 2"c Yc-."z2_
�f ❑ OLI1V. - ...,. ��.`K' h' 'R k. '�� >" f�'�h .� 5a�-. 'F �ih+
is�f .s� war:
li
°.mss umber of Lagoons</ HaldingPonds 4� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
Spray ' Fleld Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance1improvement? ❑ Yes �LNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Wo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ) (] Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �fNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ YesN0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ YesJWNo
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number: ...51 — —...7— Z._
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes �RNo
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes (No
8_
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes No
Structures .a o n. and/or Holding, Ponds)
a
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ,'[J No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes &No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes *0
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes �No
\
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes )(No
Wastg Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes *-No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
s
Crop type __...� ..... 'q :.... ....... ...._..... ._......
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes )PNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes *0
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
XYes ❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ YcSA No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ANo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes )�No
r Certified Facilitie5Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
and/or:ancoendations or any, other comments:
Comments {refer to;queshoti #I) Ezplatn any YES`answers y remm
1j rawtn-g-sof facility to better expiarn situations (use addrtronal,pages`as necessary)
ReviewerAnspector Signature: �i.��
Date: _211,92X-7
a
ReviewerAnspector Name
ReviewerAnspector Signature: �i.��
Date: _211,92X-7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facifin• Number Date of Visit: Time:
=Not erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted (p Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified D Reggistered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm lame: N b.r A e. Faf County: :3sA c&J
Owner Name: 1^'��►r 1�, -a` Farms LLC Phone No: 9
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: SOA,- iz--■c- Title:
Onsite Representative:nn �n�e rt �irsuv.a
Certified Operator: Koberi'
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: _ MQ r F? ,4 N I -)-
Operator Certification number: , lel
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 0' 04 04 Longitude Ow C�1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder 1, Q4 bQ ❑ Laver I ❑ Da'
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Laver I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / C 1❑ Subsurface Drains Present R❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray- Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svitem
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floes- in sal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
ii
Freeboard (inchesl: 3,0
05/03/01
❑ Yes Dd No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
R—
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
EX No
❑ Yes
CM No
❑ Yes JZ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: q — 79 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes]
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
] No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovemcnt?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type QGrr..ucQccaw� . :5».Q Il �oMMatr.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Docs the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[j No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[A No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
M No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
W No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records _& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
[X No
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
M No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
W No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
R No
JIM No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Conimerats (refer to.question #) Explain nav YES answer§ an an recommendations or any:other comments.
,
Use dr.�w�dna.`"-"-ffctybereplisitaon: (use addonra,pageairn„ecessary)
Field Copy�Final Notes
NO 1'er+t- oN even -i" SIncc 19e]g, fa..•-, iS i'n Tile r10roe-cSf fir'
o
b"Ildl lq ct r1Cw lagooN. TEii, /s �c�rwcr 4.fa $0f"C a�' f�c JA-1UP /a.aoQ arC4
not me C'RCe a tl,;s )or" CtOL'. R
���} LO*st1�Cr �G�inC qr _TeG'^r%ic-a` <pCG%A"1+ rcwr%�-G
i.nG.�t.ti�L w.GYc i or-o� c-1. dL rc�lc�f {�.c Gl.a�cJ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05/03/01 r Continued

i
4 . %
Type of Visit tP Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit os Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I
Date of Visit:
Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: _ l~}rrlmcll t )W-sery __ F;'-rn
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: —jo'nn Title:
Onsite Representative: LOw1A
Certified Operator: 12ob�1�-ycKcnA
Location of Farm:
e17 0 Time:
IQ Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County B 16 e"Y VR6
Phone No: 91t, —'Q8C/
�Phonte No:
MIntegrator: u�I,,,..
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 0° Du Longitude
Design
Swine Ca act
Wean to Feeder 1 0&,00 1
❑ Feeder to Finish
Current`-. _
P,o ulatinn Poultry
10 Layer
❑ Non -La er
Design Current ,;::. P A .
Ga achy P,o ulationtCattle
El Dairy
Design Current
Ca aci P,o ulation
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
F.
❑ Farrow to Finish
ElGilts
El
El Boars
Total Design app.
e
Number of Lagoons
❑ Subsurface
Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds! Solid Traps
�� ❑ No Li uid.Waste Management SystemIm
11
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes (� No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) E] Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 4 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El spillway ❑ Yes (VTNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): Wo
05/0.x/01 Continued
❑Non -Dai
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes (� No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) E] Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 4 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El spillway ❑ Yes (VTNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): Wo
05/0.x/01 Continued

1 '.
Facility Number: 9— Date of Inspection 7 0�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes (] No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [] No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IP No
12. Crop type M� 6 ; n O's
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes M No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes [J No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ n No
Required
Records & Documents.
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
lir,
25.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
El Yes
{LI No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
(� No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21-
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
I No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
P No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
©
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
s(re.. x fer to'qu= ;
�Camttteateshon•#) Exp�lat any S answers andlor anv'recammerndaaons or any other comments.
Use�drawmgs of,fact7idty to better eaplatn srtpahons:.(use additional pages as eecessary) ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Varm ►las De ern !'e5i3��c ec�, 0c, ti'<'ta;o� 'vn ast ye4r t�5�:1� c�2�b�u.to� er�,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: b 7 0
05103/01 Continued

of
Facility Number: Date of Inspection d2
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
{Additional Comment`s;and/or Di^aw�
UVI
05103/01

Fac # 9-79
Subject: Fac # 9-79
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:59:35 -0400
From: J R Joshi <[e-mail]>
Organization: DENR-DWQ
To: Toni King <[e-mail]>
CC: Sonya Avant <Sonya.Avant Ca) ncmai1.net>, bob heath <Bob.Heath@ncmaiLnet>
Toni,
This is in response to your earlier request to clarify matters related
to the re -stocking of Fac. #: 9 -79 -
Facility # 9-79 (Ammon Nursey) was permitted on 2/29/2000 as 2600 wean
to feeder operation. Except for Bob Heath's latest site visitation
report which states "this farm is closed since 1998 and no pumping has
been required", I did not see any formal request made to close this
place down. Therefore, as long as they are paying the annual fees, it
appears that the farm can re -stock to permitted capacity and operation
type.
Sonya and Bob: Please correct me if you have any other interpretations
related to this farm.
J. R. Joshi
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] extension 363; Fax: [phone]
I of 1 10/19/2001 1:12 PM

I
-7-:-
7 vision of Water.Qua ity
Q Ihvisioa of Soil and Water. Conservation
_ 0".Other'Ageincy, _ _'
-.---
ype of Visit @ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit • Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number tate of Visit: .� Z d/ Time: � a'D Printed on: 7/21/2000
d
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:..... • ............1-g
/`' •.``'�........c t ..................................... County: r�p.Ep
OwnerName: ...... ....................................................... Phone No:%1O..1C1..1........_...... �.�.........................
Facility Contact: ........ ......t ........c............ Title: ....................`....................................... Phone No ...............
Mailing Address: ............r ..s��.,.... ...... /.. � r...l? er ....11 .......' . �� a.............................
l r� ...
Onsite Representative: ......... /°.........Tv. ..................................._........ Integrator:......................
Certified Operator: ..............�a �. ..... 4 Operator Certification 1\'ember............
Location "of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 44 Longitude ' 4 46
Design: ' Current
Canac"Ity Poonlation
Design Current,
Desrgiu : ; -Current
Poultry Ca' aci Po ulation Cattle Ca : Po Wation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
Other J
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLw
' Namber of Lagoons C ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagk+,i Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holtg Portds / Solid Traps: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System w
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes epm
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes WNo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ,® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IS No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 29 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes A No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............... �2.. ��.._......................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back
Wean to Feeder Z:6pU
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
_
Gilts
_,=
Boars
Design Current,
Desrgiu : ; -Current
Poultry Ca' aci Po ulation Cattle Ca : Po Wation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
Other J
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLw
' Namber of Lagoons C ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagk+,i Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holtg Portds / Solid Traps: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System w
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes epm
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes WNo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ,® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IS No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 29 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes A No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............... �2.. ��.._......................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

L ,
Facility Number: _99 — 7�
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes PKNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .........7 ..`......... .............. .................... ......... .......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc-)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8- Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes DT'Yo
❑ Yes CkNo
❑ Yes OCNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes fia No
11- Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload []Yes $K No
12. Crop type 16144 d'V
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes kNo
14- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes RNo
El Yes --era Xc IA
17. Are rock outcrops present?
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
❑ Unknown
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. bail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ❑ No (?)
❑ Yes Pa No
❑ Yes .5 No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes JQ No
❑ Yes ,N No
❑ Yes [9No
❑ Yes �Q No
❑ Yes ;KNo
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes IWNo
Of/01/0I Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 2 d Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below A'Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes !g No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes DjtNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes kNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes JRNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes tiia No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? P:Yes❑ No
Additionalomments and/orDrawings:
S /.n�tr, � i S PJvS�� ��-' c.+t~ % i / d �.✓� 'Na j3c�.7Pi�-f �t .�! ��*� �
5100 %� 1V9zzK
r�Z Jd/

® Division of Water.Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
` D Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 6 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: /d, Time: �"� Printed on: 7/21/2000
O4 iQ
0 =Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted N Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated orlAbove Threshold: .........................
Farm Name; .............1^�.....l.L��.... ..................... Countv:.._....... ...�fR�.......................
Owner Name: ............ �f ' ..... Phone No. .....
�/..�d Z
, ••,J ' ...........� .
Facility- Contact: ...... J..-....... 4.1.1..................7-itle:......................... . PhoneNo:................................_......_...........
00
'Nailing Address: ... P..�.....� ....�s!. ���.��...�C......... ................ .... .. .,!/� r, ��,�..... js�/� lr�j
Onsite Representative: ....... G+ ........... ..r/F.......................................... Integrator: ..... 5a1�•G
�.em%...........................
G
Certified Operator: ....... / ! - k-'^�.................................. Operator Certification Number :..........................................
Location of Farm: /
a
❑
Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude �• �` �" Longitude �• ��«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle apacity Pol2ulation
Wean to Feeder 1❑ Layer 1 1 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
[I Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imparts
L Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
KNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
9 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagrron system? (If yes, nullfv DWQ)
❑ Yes
N'No
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
;,No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
9No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
NNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure -i Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
r:
Identifie... �./ .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
............... .....................
Freebuard (inches):
5100
Continued on back

i
Facility Number: Q — Date of Inspection L� Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
E] Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes (�rNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes F] No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ,� No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 52 No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes )R No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IgNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to -have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ;j No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes \7TNo
❑ Yes 1KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes IXNo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes [5No
❑ Yes P No
�. Nd. iblatidiis.ot. defiCi nCiQS �rC h6ted• during tbis,visit. • "il �vtil receive Bio i'urthe3r.
C01Tis oitdeDCe. 3b0Ut tliLS V151t. . . . . . . . . '
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
I
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �o Date: /620vd 5100

r
� 4
Facility Number: 619 — 7 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or hplow �J Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Eg No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes' No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
'Additional' Comments and/orDrawings: -
5100

io

r.�