090039_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

ti3 .7 otav,(6 r;b
Structure Evaluation Inspection
Facility Number: -- 3 7 Date: 44 El tb
Time in: c('a f Time out: it 4o
' i�
Farm Name: n4 e /AO Farm 911 address:
Owner Name: I 1
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: leg Integrator: rik,3
Certified Operator: AA* .t(( P°d/i S
Cert. Number
Is storage capacity less than adequate? YesNo
If yes is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes //ICJo
Structure: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Identifier:
Spillway?
Designed Freeboard (in.):
Observed Freeboard (in.):
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures
observed? Yes No V
Do any structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes
Does any part of the waste management system need repair Yes
Condition of field's
N
Condition of receiving crop
Comments:
c 044 s 4,104
Fttk ikk 14(tati, fav-pt
/fc5 I, w4S/9

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper) line m = 529.9 Ib PAN
2. Structure Mitchell Norris 2 (lower) line m = 623.4 Ib PAN
3. Structure line m = Ib PAN
4. Structure line m = Ib PAN
5. Structure line m = Ib PAN
6. Structure line m = Ib PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6=
1153.3Ib PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance (Ib/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window)
3029
3A
Small grain overseed
3.56
100..00
356.0
Sep -Apr
3029
3B
Small grain overseed
1.47
100.00
1.47.0
Sep -Apr
3029
4
Small grain overseed
3.87
100.00
387.0
Sep -Apr
3029
5
Small grain overseed
1.05
100.00
105.0
Sep -Apr
3029
6
Small grain overseed
1.44
100.00
144.0
Sep -Apr
3029
10
Small grain overseed
1.34
'100.00
134.0
Sep -Apr
•
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) =
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) =
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) =
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
1273.0 Ib. PAN
1153.3 Ib. PAN
1273.0 Ib. PAN .
Ib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID):
Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a..current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
g. volume of waste produced according to structural. design
h. current herd # 3672 certified herd #
9.0
19.0
inches
inches
10.0 inches
88256
ft2
550129 gallons
180
121058
3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
11 /04/ 16
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
days
ft3
121058 ft3
0
53666
ft3
ft3
217823 gallons
0.69
Ibs/1000 gal.
529.9Ibs. PAN

•
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID):
Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
h. current herd # 3672 certified herd ,#
7.0
19.0
inches
inches
12.0 inches
88256
ft2
660155 gallons
180
121058
3672
days.
ft3
actual waste produced = current herd # x' line g = 121058 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
11/04/15
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
0
53666
ft3
ft3
217823 gallons
0.71
lbs/1000 gal.
623.41bs. PAN

5556 Braxton Road
Hope Mips INC 28U8
Fax
•
Gailberry Consulting
Services
TO: L�'"""� ��� From: Icatrly Barker
4 8� 0? uses: 11
Phoruk q 10 — 43 3 —Y-S 0U Date: u _ -- t —
Re: _ - CC:

t
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): IMIChell Norris lower lagoon
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
9.0 inches
b. designed structural freeboard zone
12.0 inches
(Norrnalfy 12 inches or greaten)
c. fine b - line a (inches v>ihin str €cturai freebca; d) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below stwcturai freeboard elevation) 8— B-2 5-61 f t 2
e. iine c/12 x fine d x 7.48 ga€io<ns/ft3 165039 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste producers according to structural design +21O58 ft:3
h. current herd # 1 36721 certified herd 3672
actual waste produced = current he, # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume cf wash .eater according to structurai design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (.lines h+ i T j) x 7.48 x 5 uaysrline f=
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied du: ing 55 clay draw down
f. total volume to be land applied line e + line It =
121058 ft:;
� 0 ft3
53665 ft3
36304 gallons
201342 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA; s`5 Da V100

11. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: Mitchell Norris lower lagoon line I = 201342 gallons
2. structure Id: line I = gallons
3. structure ID: line I = gallons
4, structure ID: line I = gallons
5. structure 1D_ line I = gallons
6. structure ID: line l = gallons
n.lines 1+2+3+4}5+a=
o. line n 127154
201.342 gallons
7.41 acre -inches
�s
III. TOTAL. ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIQD1,2
1 While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan.
2Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
. �.
.-
..!U.
remaining
PAN
balance
:.
HEIRS M-
x. total acres available during S day draw down (sum of column t) = 10,00 acres
W. FACILITY'$ PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
Y. line n = 0.74 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
PoA (5 Day) 2121100

Memo
0
To: RVetieviile Regional Office, Division of Water Resources
Rot. Kathy Barker, Gallberry Consufting Services
CC:
Date:
Re: Lagoon status report
Please be advised that the lagoon on PY � &k4- I�LK t Farm, number
- 3 that was reported "in the rest" on j 1- I l - 1 '(date) is now back
in compliance at a reading of I Cl 'r
M

6556 Braun Road
Haile Aels NC 28M
Fax
To; : i iw.. W&.. L4 _ ! ,: � Fro Kathy [icer
ft q ffl— OS -3 3 on Dart= 10
Rim_ _ ___

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
f
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Mitchell Norris 1 (u er)
4 "
2. Current liquid volume in'25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
18"0 inches =
' (
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
i A j
19.0 inches
L'- line b - line Z (inches in red zone) =
1.0'snches'
+ d. top of dike surface area according to design'
• (area at below structural freeboard elevation)
88256 ft2
e-.lire Gl12 x line d x 7.48 gailonsifl3
55013 gallons
3' Projected volume of waste liquid, produced during draw down period
f: temporary storage period according to structural design
180 days =`
g" volume of waste produced according to structural design
F 121058 ft3
h- current herd # certified herd 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x fine'i
I certified herd # ,
i. volume of wash water according to structurl34design
L_ �fi �
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
536B6 t3
k, (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
gallons
• 4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw dovin period
i"-current waste analysis dated 1 04/14/16
1"81 lbs/1000 gal"
m. ((linas e + k)11000) x fine I =
22 .7 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE, ±
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below) '
PoA (30 Day) 2/2 1100. i
r

HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS WALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1,
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
r fine m =
220.71b PAN
2.
Structure ip:
line rb =
lb PAN k
3_
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
r
' 4.
Structure
fine m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
fine to =
lb,PAN
6.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6
220.7 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30
DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS'TO WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE
APPLIED DURING
THIS 30 DAY PE IOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
4
r. acres
s. remaining -
IRR-2 PAN
balance (Iblecr7)
t.TOTALPAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
colurnn r x s
u. applicatian window]
3029
•7ab8ab9ab
SFnali grain 9verseed
23.
50-o0
.. 1161.5
Sep -Apr
k
1State current crop ending application date or next crop applicatign bepjnping date -for availtibleF
receiving craps during 30 day draw'down period.
v_ Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1461.51b. PAN '
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL, PAN BALANCE : ,
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 220.7lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 1161.51b. PAN
y. Overall PAN. balance (w - x) = -941 lb. PAN
Poo (30 Day)2121100
IR

1
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE ~
1. Structure Nameddentifier (Ip): Ross Lewis, Farr9-52_ ,
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structdral freeboard
a. current liquid Jevei according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) 1.0 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 77736ft2
e' line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 5 48455 gallons;
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days, .
g. volume of wiste produced according to structural design 105497 ft3
h. current herd f 3200 certified herd
actual waste produced = current herd # .x'line g 105497 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design 0 3
r _
y j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 47600 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f= 190861 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1- current waste analysis dated 04/14/16 1.37 Ibs/1000 gal-
m. ((tines e + k)/1000) x line I = 327,9 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

- _' II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STOREb WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. 'Structure Ross Lewis Farm line m = 327 9 lb PAN
2. Structure line m = lb PAN
3. Structure line m = lb PAN
. --ram--,
4. Structure fine m = lb PAN
5. Structure line'rn = lb FAN
6. Structure line m = lb PAN
n-lines1+-2+3+4+5+6= 327.9lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINAG FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DO'NN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS 7O WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS -30 DAY PERIOD.
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw dowry period.
i
• v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ 648.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVI�RAL•L PAN BALANCE
r.
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 327,9lb. PAN
x. Crops remaining PAN balance (fine v from section 111) = 648.0 Ib. PAN
y- Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -320 lb. PAN '
M .
' I
L
0 Day) 2121/00

...PLAN -OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: Number: 9 39
County: Bladen
Facility Name: Gooden Farm #3
Certified Operator Name: Kendrick Eason Operator Number:
985736
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways-, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon NameAD: 3B
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 16
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
9/21/2018
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Nicholas Gooden
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Phone: [phone]
Date: 1011512018

i
1211112K4 02:30 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON RAGE 01
5556 8rwdon Read s - • :
Hope MUIS NC 2W46
Services
OR oosq
Fax
To: ' ! bl m: Katy Baker
Fax- q 10 — T 8 io ` Pages:
Phorma10-03- 33ou - DaW_„
PO R Ay
Ne�rris

12/11/2014 02:30 91e4232212 GALLSERRY CON
I
PAGE 02
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line m =
545.7 lb PAN
2,
Structure Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
line rn :
545.7 lb PAN
3.
'Structure
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
n.lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 1091.3lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. 00 NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
0. tract p. field # q. crop r. acres s. remaining L TOTAL PAN u. application Mndowl
IRR-2 PAN BALANCE FOR
balance (lb/acre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
30291 7ab8ab9ab Small grain overseed 23.23 50.00 _ 1151.5 Sep -Apr
1State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) =
1161.5 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from sectlon II) _
1091.3 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) =
1161.5Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
- 0 Ib. PAN

12/1112014 02:30 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 03
r �
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL. PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
-1. Stn.�oti,re Namrelldenfifier (Z) Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2. Guiitoi liclijid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage 8. structural freeboard
a Currant liquid level according to marker
h. designed 25 yr.;24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. lime b - line a (inches in red zone)
6 toffs of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e line c112 x line d x T48 gallons/ft3
I. Prgiec!ed volume of waste #iquid produced during draw down period
$.Q inches
t9.0 inches
1.0inches
88258 ft2
550'! 3 Gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
y volum,;. of waste produced according to structural resign i2i058 ft3
;,I. current hard # 3672 certified herd # 3G72
actual wasta produced = current herd 4 x line g =
certified herd #
i. vclur ie of wash :^later according to structural design
I. exc:e5s rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (line*- h + j + J) x 7.46 x 30 days/line f=
d. 1 natal PAN tc be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11l121174
rn. ((lines 8 + k)/1000) x line i =
iREPEA1 SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click opt the next Structure tab shown below)
cJN (30 Doy) 2121/00
121058ft3
®ft3
53656 ft3
217823 gallons
1bs/1000 gal.
545.7lt7s. PAN

12/11/2014 02:30 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 04
1,
HR> STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
;.
:-;liiic;ttyrr. Wlc htil Norris 1 (upper)
line m =
545 7 !b PAN
2.
ructure Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
lirte m =
545.7 Ib PAN
3.
St.r:t;;turr
line M =
3b PAN
1,
;trcicture
line m =
lb PAN
>.
trtl(,tura
If to rn =
lb PAN
G.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1 2+3+4+55+6= 1091.3lbPAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO N[J 1 LIS'i FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
a tract #
P. field #
q, crop
r, acres
s, remaij)mg
IRR-2 PAN
balance (rnracre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (tbs.)
column r x s
U. application Mr)dowt
~�.102P
_
71h:R7hgah
,c;m i!I .rain overs-ed
23.23
50.00
1151.5
Sep -Apr
EE�
1SWe curien� crop ending application date or next uop application beginning date for available
i-eceivinr t,rcps during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 116 1.5lb. PAN
IV. FACILI'Y'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
vv. Total PAN to be land applied (line in from section 11) = 1091.3 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 1161.5 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -70 lb. PAN

��� DEC 1 6 '�it4 -
�� �' DIVISION i1; V�ASTE IVIANA.GEh�E,,,
NCDENR FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFEIi„
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris # 1 & #2
494 Coley Rd
Elizabethtown, NC 28337-4888
Dear Mitchell Norris:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
December 11, 2014
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090039
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on
November 5, 2014. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey
requirement for the two lagoons at the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2. Due to the amount of treatment
volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed for either lagoon until
December 31, 2019.
Your next sludge survey for both of the lagoons at this facility should be performed before
December 31, 2019. Please retain this letter and keep it with your farm records for reference.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Christine B. Lawson
Animal Feeding Operations Program
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS090039
Kathy Barker
1636 MaO Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: 91M07-64641Internet: http;llww ncdenr.gov1
An Equal Opportunity 1 At irmadve Action Emaoyer— Made in part by recycled paper

03/18/2013 13:68 3104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 02
� 4J
� v hS ve
Memo
To: Fayetteville Regional Office, Division of Water Qualify, AP
Front Kathy�an Gallbeny Consulting Services
.sue qIV-4OG--o10-1
DabL- 9-19 -13
Re: Lagoon status report
Please be advised that the lagoon on hkk C. (j µo rr i S Farm, number
9— 39 that was reported "in the red" on 3 - - 13 (date) is now back
in compliance at a reading of Ion 1-.20"
Afl-h
h -ir'r C.i Gir
r-
1

01/66/2013 11:5E 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 01
Boa
OK92: ;DN StIM) aOOH
peda ualme 94Gq
djc000(�10L'

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
!_ TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Stfucture Namelldentifier (16): Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
NARRAT Vrre,it liquid volume in-25 y024 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 1$.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
..ter......
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(are -a at helnw structural freeboard elevation) $6255 ft2
e. line cli2 x line d x 7.45 gsllons,'ft3 55013 gallons
3. Prcyected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 gays
g. volume of .,caste produced according t0 structural design 121058 ft3
h. current herd Y 3600 certified herd r 3572
actual waste produced = current herd x line g = 118564 P2
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to siructural design
j excess rainfall over evaporation: acccrdi; a" to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f=
4. Tctai PAN to he land applied during.draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated i 10l01112
M, ((fines e + k)11000) x line 1 =
REPEAT SECT ION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
POA (30 Day
) 2!2 1: 00
�fi3
5356n ft3
2148n"3 gallons
2.30 Ibs!1000 gal.
620.7lbs. PAN
Z0 39Vd NOD A6a39-nV9 Z1Z36Zb0T6 9g:TT E106/90/T9

TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STOKED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR_ STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
;. Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line-m = 620.7 lb PAN
2. St,-tvlurE Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
line m =
Ib PAN
3. Structure
line m =
lb PAN
=. Structure
line rn =
Ib PAN
5. Siructure
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure
line m =
ib PAN
n. lines I + 2 } 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 620.7 lb PAN
ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAM( DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
D. 'tract
field
ci. Crop
r. acr�5
S. rernairiing
IRR-2 PAN
Calance (ltlacrS)
t IrO AL PAN
BALANCE FOIE
FIELD (lbs)
column r x s
j. application windowt
3u29
—t0
Small grain
A
5
7.S
15:atw cur, ant :rop encing appii3ation ae,e or next crop applr�aticn begir.n:ng aate ter available
reC-.iving cans during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ `%� lb. PAN
IV, FACILITY'S Pali OVERALL PAN BALANCE=
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 620.7 lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) _ �lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = 620.7lb. PAN
60 3DVd NOD Ald3S-VIVD €ZZE�bO€6 95 L€ ELBZ/99/T0

.:F:
3`00C) �p (0 VOW
Schneier, Roan'.::,
From:. ' Kathy Barker <[e-mail]>
Sent:°;, € Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:17 PM
To: 4 ' ' ,. Schneier, Joan; Guyton, Steve
1 } i
Subject- F ` Mitchell Norris lagoon
Joan and Steve,",!'
The upper lagoon of the; Mitchell Norris farm is back in compliance at 22".
-1
Will get updated pumping records to you shortly.
Mi =.
f c 1 s
Thanks,
Kathy Barker i_ s,: `:;},.�;>: `•.II €
5 '' =h'iE i
Ij 1� •I 1 I
j 1j • I
II ;I,�,,,i,i' :Ilri 13 ii is ;1• ,
i,.
,H
I
is i' •!„ {{�li; ,''� 'i:! .
• � ` +ilia Iai Ili! I;� ;1� 1
-
i
I

08/26/2012 17:09 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 61
I
5556 Brax on Road
Flop-- M is NC 28W
RECEIVE®
AVG272012
DENR-FAYETTEMLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
ro: r From: Kathy Barker
Fa= quo - 070 7 Pages:
mlmw-lif) — 43 Date: A)—
cc-
9-39
'v' d
�Jib-6aS�-G09�f

08f 25/ 2012 17: 09
9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 02
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldenflier 0); Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2. Current Iiquid volume in 2i-'- yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
q,.fq
a. current liquid level according to marker 18A inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr_ storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inci es
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. lop of dike surface area according to design
(aria at below structural freeboard elevation) $82�o ft2
a. line C112 x Ifne d x 7.48 galla,n5/ft3 55013 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid .produced during draw down, period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design I 1$0 days
g. volurne of waste produced according to structural design 121058 ft3
h. current herd # 3500 certified herd # 3572
actual waste Nrcduced = current herd Y x line g = _ 115388 N3
certified hard
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. ;lines i - i + j) x 7,48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Tctai PAN tQ be land applied during drew down pariod
I, current waste analysis dated r— 071 {?J12
m. (Hines e + k}11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
poA (30 Qay) 2121100
L—L----Jf t3
53066 ,t3
221075-4 gallons
1.35lbsl 1000 gal,
358.8lbs. PAN

08/26/2012 17:09 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 03
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE
ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line m = 358.8lb PAN
2.
Structure Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line rn =
Ib PAN
n.lines 1 1-2+3+4+5+6= 358.BlbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE
APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
�. tr9ci #
P. field #
q. crop
r, acres
s. remainl,ilg
IRR-2 PAN
balance (lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN '
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application windvwl
3029
-1 & 14-a
Coastal hay
-• 94
174.00
1381.0
Mar -Sep
i4:ta e current crop ending appllca.ion g2te er next crop application beginning crate tar available
receiving cra:,s during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1381.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 5 81b. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) F 1381.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -1022 Ib_ PAN

02/21S/2013 1F;:03 9104232212 GALLEERRY CON
� �Ij ,a��d,-�e�'j DENR—FRO
j
3556 Braxton Road
Hope Mills NC 28348
mmt���114no
Ma a 4 2W
DWCQ
&00000a.
a Yid f OA Ihs
4— 31
To: :ToQ.lti -ScA h C i er Fran. Kathy Barker .
Fax: L!
per: V3 3_-=
!C�e1,LAkrris AN cc.
0
9�1 _ �ro9Y
PAGE 01

02/28/2013 16:03 9104232212 GALL$ERRY CON PAGE 02
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL. FACILITIES .
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
!. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
,t. tructure `ia nelldamffier (iDi: 1Aitchell Norris i (upper)
2. Cunent liquid volurne in. 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a.--urrent liquid level according o marker 17.0 inches
b. dssiVr',ed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.G inches
C. line c - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 incches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at oelow structural freeboard elevation) 88256 ft2
e. Inc -112 x line d x 7.46 rgallor,5fft3 110026gallon5
3. Pro etc: ed voiurrie of vva,5te liquid produced during diaw clown perlo-
f. temporary storage period according o structural design 180 days
g. Volu; le of Waste produced according to structural design 12 i 0 578 ft3
h. current herd # F-2-5-0-01 cartified nerd #1 3672
tool waste produced = current herd" x line g = 82420 ft3
certified herd
i. v; lurne of ;mash %eater according to struGfurai design:
i. EXCess r3infall over evaporation according to design
k. (!ine5 h � i + j) X 7.48 x 30 days line f=
4Total 7D NI to 1•e lanO s piiecl vurng drag down perod
I. current waste analysis dated �01! 18113
M. i(line; G +'')I1000) x line I =
R kT '`ci Tl:3Ni ; FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE Oil SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
ft3
53666 0
169653 gallons
lds11000 gal.
374.8 lbs. PAN

02/28/2013 16:03
9104232212
GALLBERRV CON
PAGE 03
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL. FACILITIES
sv DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
t. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Narnelldentlfier (ID): JlVlitcneil Narrls 2 (lower)
:) Current l:auld volurne it 25 vr.124 h,. storm S'orBae & strur.- llrAl frPphn2rd
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. des;gne;: 2r yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line � - line a (inches in red zone) = •,, 2.0 inches
d. top of dik6 surlace area according to design
(.area 3t be!-3w structural #reeboard eievaiicn) 1j 852561,ft2
e. iine c112- x lire d x 7,45 gallansi12 110026 gallons
3. ProJected volume of waste lia0d produced during draw down period
. teMporary s:orsge period according to structural design 180 days
g v01t1 -ss:e produced according to structural design 121058 ft3
h. current 1,erd 450 certified herd #1 3672
act.ial Prod&ced = current herd I x iine c = 14836 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume cf vvas l olater according :0 StrUC:ural design
i
exiess Fain€ell over evaporation according to design
k. (lines 'h -- i * j) x 7.4& x 30 days/iine f=
4 Tot --I ,PAN to be land applied dur r:g draw down period
I. current wast.- ana�ysis dated 01/18113
m { Oen e - kV1'-"0^') x line I -
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
{Click on the next Structure tale shown
below)
Pol- (30 Day) 2;21100
Caw
53566 f3
9 gallons
1.371bsi10GD gal.
267.7lbs. PAN

02/28/2013 16:03 '3104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 04
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Morris 1 (upper)
line M =
374.8 lb PAN
2.
54rVc.ture NliiChell Norris 2 (lmver)
line m =
267.7 lb PAN
3.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAIN
4.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Struct.urE
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line m =
- lb PAN
n.lines1+2+3+4+5+£= 642.5lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE
APPLIED DURING THIS 30
DAY PERIOD.
10. trac(�
o. field #
q. E;iop
r. acres
s. remailing
1RR-2 PAN
ba3anr__ ftlaG1`e)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. applicakn windovjl
3029
3A
6errn,�dagrass
3.56
305.00
1055.8
Mar-sep
1 State current el l"'ing applivailon 8-ate or next crop apollcatior beginning date FTor a'ia�lable
recei:rinw crops during 30 day draw down aeried.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of Column t) = 1085.8 Ib_ PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
- 1.1 ;=j 11a 1 2i21i06

06/03/2012 11:56 91142?2212
GALLb'EF.RY C'6thJ
ao�a.DD4� S
PAGE 01
5556 Braxton Road
Hope MIS NC 28348
IM
To: �.]C]f� f'►-,CAYIP I f-Y From: Kathy Barker
Fax: 9% '7 S�i - o 7 Pales: j _
9-39
Alo r-,eo
�p-6a�-6o9�
DENR--FRO
JUN n 4 2012
DWO

061'0312012 11:56 9104232212
GALLEERRV CON
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FRFEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL. PANTO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (10): Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr_124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c, line b - line a.(incheS in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c!12 x line d x 7.48 gallonstft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
PAGE 02
1t3.0 inches
19.0 inches
1.0 inches
86256 ft2
550139allons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 1 180 days
g. volume of waste Produced according to structural design 1 121056 ft3
h. current herd # 3672 certified herd #1 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x Fine g ;
certified herd #
i_ volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 1.48 x 30 daysiline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated ,g—
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100
i 21 Q58 ft3
0 3
b3666 3
217823 gallons
.�•1
LlIbs110Q0 gal.
;3s. PAN

l 6:' �3 j12©12 11: 56 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
Xkbk Alf,' ►s t (Acep,-)
1. structure ID.- _ _1 (upper) _ line m =
2. structure iD:
3. structure ID:
4. structure ID:
6. structure ID:
line m =
line m =
line m =
line m =
FAIGE 03
/-__?,
lb PAN
lb PAN
lb PAN
lb PAN
lb PAN
6. structure ID: line m = ib PAN
n. lines1+2+3+4+5+6 = 5,93 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
D. tract # p. field # q_ crop r. acres s. remaining t. TOTAL PAN u_ application
IRR-2 PAN BALANCE FOR window'
balance FIELD (Ills.)
(lb/acre) column r x s
3029 9a Bermudagras 5.85 250 1462 Apr -Sep
s Hay
"State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving crops
:luring 30 day drativn down pe0cd
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ _1462 lb. PAN
lV_ FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANC41 E."
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2 r"

1 112/2012 06:48 9104232212
--- GALLBERRY CON
-ill a p ILL?
Sect&
a� $ra)acn Road /� �y. /� _
]re i•fkll� NcG Z8343 (Sayld 9#j FOd 1A ��
�,�1� / I f
T.s. ...-- C.whv....ar YS it%A/!l
Kathy Barker
Fax: 910-d86-0707 Pages: 3
Phone: [phone] Hate: 8110112
Re: Mitchell Norris POA CC:
30 clay POA for Mitchell Norris lower €agcon �#1j
Farm # g-39
-TAA4�
91a -bo -6 0o
PAGE 01
DENR--FRC
AUG 13 2012
DWO

V E+6I1'2/2012 06:49 9104232212 GALLBERRY CDN
PAGE 01
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO RE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Namellden;ifier (1D): IMitchell Norris 1 (iovler)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.f24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
9-31
a, current 11^uid level according to marker 8.0 incises
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard i9.0 inches
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) = • 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 88256 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.45 gallon5lfi3 55013 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid ,produced during draw down period
f. ternporary storage period according to Structural design 1 -8-01 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design "s210513 fts
h. current herd # 3672 cerified herd # 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 121058 ft3
certified herd
i. volurne of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporatson according to design
k. (lines h i = j) x 7,48 x 30 days/line f=
4. TcFal PAN to oe land applied during draw dawn period
1. current waste analysis dated I 0711711'
m. ((lines e -� kj11000) x line 1 =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
Poo "-,a Day, 212 1100
t �Jft3
536602
217823 gallons
1.41 Ib5f 1000 gal.
384.7lb5. PAN

j , CIZ/12/2012 06:49 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 02
II_ TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (lower) line m = 384.7
2. Structure line m =
3 Structure line rn
d. Str"i tore line m W
5. Structure line m
6, Structure line rn =
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 384.E
Ili. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRA1
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 31
c. tract i€
p. fiefd 4
q• Crop
r. acres
s. ramai�ing
iRR-? PAN
balance Ilbl; re)
t, TOTAL PAM
BALANCE FOR
FIELD tlbs.)
column r x s
3029
5 & B
Berr�udagrass
2.49
242.05
620.1
1State current crap ending application date or next crop application beginnkng date for availab
r-ceiving crops during 30 day draw dowry ,Period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) W 620.1
�e
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
='r; '' DeV) 2+'21 XQ

q— 31
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR MGH FREEBOARD AT ANIfAAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
i. `;',ructtere rvarlleilCiG�it€tiUr (0); f49itChell i`lorris lower lagoon
2 Current liquid voirrnne in 25 yr,124 hr, storm storage structural freeboard
a ClArrerll Irqui + level according ,o marker 18.0E fiche's
b_ designed 25 yr ,24 hr storm & structural ;reeboard 19.E inoies
c. 4ne b - 4ine a (inches in red zone) _ 11,0 inc ies
d. tog of dil e surface area according to design
(area at beloav structural freeboard elevation) r,, e 2 5,9 ft?
e, line c112 x link: d x 7.48 gallonsift.'; 55rs gt:ilon ,
3 P;,o)eoted Volume rti waste ligturd }itC)Cllsv'4 Lf dtirruq t::a:v °dU-VVZ1 t)erif)d
f tL>;`lt7{)rWi1` sixage Period accoldi S[.i tyi StrU(:t:i61 if(?$Igfl
g voiume of w,4ste [produced acco€fivia tp Structural design 12 t :):6 ii3
h. vurrent herd t F 3(372 certified herd 41 367?
actual waste psoduced = Cur'rem herd ti x fine g = 12 i 058 tt3
certified herd 4
i +:olurne of •: ash v;atef according to Stfuctural design 6615
f
i excess ran.^tali over evaporation accordinn to design 5-,6t 7 ft3
k. (lines h i j) x 7.48 a 30 da;!shine f= 2 177 -1 t, ifc?r'•5
4 Yn-il P!•,N t:) be land applied during draw down period
I corrool analysis dated July 2013 mr, "-)I,
t;i. Qh.ties e -} k): t i 0€)j >, line 1 = 654.8 !b-, PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
I' �j: t.�ii tsri�•r„)t� ter;

03/09/2010 16:36 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE' 01
Memo
Ta Fayetteville Regional Office, Division of Water Quality, AP
Fmne Kathy Harker, Gagbeay Consulting Services
CC:
Datm
q Coro
REc Lagoon status report
Please be advised that the lagoon on 1We4 V- _ n4L * _ Farm, number
9— 3-q- ,.� that was reported "in the red" on A- t0 -t JL (date) is now back
in compliance at a reading of ''* / —
rr
A*�
r �t,r�+.rd�"
s
0
A� &AlaA-
910-kA#-609f

5556 Braxton Road
Hope Miiflss NC 28348
Fax
To-.-- �p -� C From; Kathy Barker
Fam .�. �= a O't o-1 ... _... Pales=... - - - -
Date~
Re: f"QA 9 CC:
it zoos eZo3y

■in
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1 Structure Name/ldPrttifier (ID): Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2- Currant liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
19,0 hnches
C. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
88256 2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
55013 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design 18o days
g. volume of waste produced according to structura€ design 121058 t3
h. current herd 3672 certified herd #1 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 121058 ft3
certified herd 4
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 53686 ft3
k. dines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 217823 gallons
4. Tota PAN to be land applied during dravr dawn period
I. current waste analysis dated Aug 2015 1.60 lbs/1000 gal.
rn. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line i 436.5 Ibs, PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2f',21/01;;

q-34i
II.' TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line m =
436.5 [b PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
4_
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
o.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines I +2+3+4+5+6= 436.5lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract # p- field # q. crop r. acres s. remaining t. TOTAL PAN u. appticat;vn windowl
IRR-2 PAN SALANCE FOR
balance (Iblacre) FIELD (ibs.)
column r x s
Haire Small grain 10.00 50.00 500-0 Seq-Anr
1 St2te current crop endinn annlinn inn data or next rrnn anntiratinn hPninnine: date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period
v_ Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) =
500.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total. PAN to be land applies (line n from section 11) =
436.51b. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) =
500.0 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
-63 lb. PAN

� i 00� 7
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): IMitchell Norris lower lagoon
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
r
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm 8. structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
88256 ft2
e. line ci12 x line d x 7,48 gallons/ft3
555501`3 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design
180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design
121058 3
h_ current herd # 3672 certified herd #1 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
�12 f058ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design ®ft3 0
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 53667 3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= �217824 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
L current waste analysis dated JAUG 2015 1.50 Ibs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I = _^40��ibs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100
0

L
0
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris lower lagoon
line m = 409.3 ib PAN
2.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
3.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines1+2+3+4+5+fi= 409.3lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LAST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE
APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
Q. tract #
p. field #
q. Crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance (Ib/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application windowl
3029
8
Small qrain overseed
4.69
50.00
234.5
APR-SEP
3029
9
Small grain overseed
5-851
5aool
292.5
PR-SEP
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for anal lable
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) =
527.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) =
409.3 tb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section ill) =
527.0lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
4181b. PAN

07/ 15/2©12 12: 34
9104232212
#- �00 0)1q`
GHLLBERRY CON
FAGS g1
5556 Bran Road
}cape Mills NC 7&t48
0
To: J Yli e f Fran: Kathy Barker
Fax: 9l0 AtS _ 6 70 _.
Date:
Re_ `iz.t. e.Qe IIIo rPT s �A M
q' 31

07/15/2012 12:314 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
PAGE 02
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
9-,39 /1
1. StruCture N=elldenVier ND): Mitchel€ Norris lower lagoon �$�` /d�4L-
2. Current liquid vciume ln 26 yr.!4� hr. G:orm storage & stnicturai freeboa:d (f
a. current IigL°iw lever according to marker 17.0inches
b. designed 25 vr.12 = nr. storm & structural freeboard 1 19.0 hr ches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard eievation) 85258 f'L2-
e.
line ci i2 x line d )(.7 .45 gall nr),fl3 1 i 0026 gallons
?. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
`. temporary storage period according io structural design 18Q days
g. volume cf waste produced according to structural design 121058 ft.3
h. current herd # 3572 certified herd #1 3572
actual waste roduced = current herd # x line g = 121058 f'3
certified herd #
i. volrIMe of wash v,-iter accord'n to structural desl'gn
i. excess rainfall over evaporation ecyordfng to design
k. (lines h t f+ j i x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f=
4. Total PAN to b= land aealied d:,-ring draw down Period
I current waste analy.=_is c2tec 1 05/151__
m. ((lines e + 000) x lir.E I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
oA '30 Da Ey i 2121:`OC
�0 ft3
5366' ft3
217824 gallons
2.2= Ibsl1000 gal.
734.4 €bs. PAN

07/15/2012 12:34 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 03
0
HR_ STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris lower lagoon
line m = 734.4 lb PAN
2.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
3.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line rn =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line rn =
Ib PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 734.4 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
t'tKIVU. UV NQ1 L15I I-IELUS 10 WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30
DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #t
P. field #
p. crop
r. acres
9, remaining
IRR-z PAN
baiance (rnlacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
6ALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x e
u. application Wndowl
3029
Hydrants
Bermudagrass hay
1.81
230.00
416.3
PR_SEP
u
Hydrant 2
2.43
230,00
558,9
APR-SEP
3 State current crop enrlinn annlication date or next crop AnDkAtion beoinnina date
for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v_ Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t)
IV. FACILITY'S PDA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PaA (30 Day) 2121100 d
975.2 lb. PAN
f ��T • T
.� a" pAN

-A
A —
RCD ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
December 28, 2011
Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris # 1 and #2
494 Coley Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
DENR-FRCS
DEC 2 9 2011
Resou rces r
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090039
Mitchell Norris # 1 and #2
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
Dear Mitchell Norris:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on December
22, 2011. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon # 1 and 42 at Mitchell Norris # 1 and #2 facility. Due to the amount of treatment
volume available, the Division agrees to an extension for the sludge survey requirement.
The next sludge survey at this facility should be performed before December 31, 2014. Thank
you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS090039
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Locatnn: 2728 Capital Blvd., Ralegh, North Caroiina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] t Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Intemet wt+rw.ncwaterquality.ory
None
rth Carolina
Naturally
An tgUal OPaortunlly l Affirmative ACnorl tmoloyer

5556 Braxton Road
Hope Mills NC 28348
L M10
Gallberry Consulting
Services
To: DW4-Fayetteville Regional office From: Kathy Batker
Fax: 910A86-0707 Pages: 4
Phwm 910-433-3300 DaW: 211012010
Re. POA far Norris lower lagoon (9-39) CC:
ATTENTION:
ART BARNHARDT
RICKY REVELS
STEVE GUYTON
/(:�� 44,64.,
TO 39dd NOD Add39-na9 ZTZZEZti0T5 TT:9T OTOZIOT/ZO

9-39
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
39 !vim
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): IMitchell Norris lower lagoon
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
A�r�
ram -
12.0 inches
19_b inches
7,0 inches
8825s
386090 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g_ volume of waste produced according to structural design 121058 3
h. current herd # certified herd 3672
actual waste produced = curren�herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + 1 + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I_ current waste analysis dated I 02J10110
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121100
0
0 3
536671113
5 gallons
1,20 Ibs/1000 gal_
�Ibs. PAN
Z0 39Vd N0,7 ANN3U-1V9 ZTZZEZti0TG TT:9T 0TOZ/0T/7,0

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris lower lagoon
line m = 542.4
2.
Structure
line m
3.
Structure
line m =
4.
Structure
line m =
5.
Structure
line m
5.
Structure
line m =
n.linesi + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 542.4
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAT
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 31
o. tract # p. field # q_ crop r. acres s. remaining t. TOTAL PAN
IRR 2 PAN BALANCE FOR
lance (iblacm) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x e
3029 07/08/09 Small arain overseed 23.23 25.00 580.8
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for avaitab
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
V. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2/7-1/00
q~ 5`7
f`nl,4:1�1
jrk,v
CO 39vd
N00 Add3E-F1V9
ZTZZ£Zti0T6 TT:9T 0TOZ18T/Z0

9 3-7
/
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 542.4
x_ Grop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section ill) = 580.8
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = !� 38
NARRATIVE:
Grower may use some pump and haul on either lagoon.
POA (30 Day) 2121100
b0 39ti8 NOD AN8391-IVO ZTZZEZV016 TT 9T 0TOZ/0T/Z0

�
a

i
Memo
To: Fayetteville Regional Office, Division of Water Quality, AP
From Kathy Barker, Gallberry Consulting Services
CC:
RW Lagoon status reprt
Please be advised that the lagoon on M-C"a- j-ftA" r Farm, number
that was reported "in the red" on A—/p- (date) is now back
in compliance at a reading of # / —J "
I
A&
&kj pAtls
SfW 611 *-1--
slav1(o
� 0 g
0 Iaolfo L 01-0-tJ
SG �d Dq 0 a 3� SOMf va aba e- ,
ap10000 � �.a
�ptODO�y '/ V ��
Nab @010_ it - I0YI
Zo 39Vd
NOD A683$1-1ti9
ZTZZEZb9TG 9E:9T OTOZI81J7-T

search
Jigc_j-4-jw+ -Ni;. z, C) 10
AJWS-Oci.003ll--,�,
Pagel of
Incident
Detailsl
Incident Freeboard Levels Events
Details2
Incident Type:Non-Compliance Reporting ^
Category: APS - Animal
Started Date/Time 11 /23/2009 12:30 pm
County Bladen
E
Related Incidents
Incident Number: 2-0-1
Farm #: 0
Decimal DD:MM:SS
Latitude: Position Accuracy: ° —Select Value —
Longitude: Position Method: '—Select Value —
Position Datum: —Select Value —
Reporting Person: Anonymous
First Name: _J Address
Middle Name:
Last Na i
me.,: City:
State/Zip
Phone :1 Cell/Pager:
Location of the Incident Mitchell Norris Farm (West/Lower lagoon)
Address:
-
City/State/Zip:;r
Cause/Observation of the incident: Directions
Action Taken: Comments/Findings
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft ; Q '
Surface Water Impacted: (DYes @No *Unknown Groundwater Impacted E)
Waterbody ---Select ValUe---
. ... .. ....
Waterbody (Other) Conveyance.
Report Received By.. Revels, Ricky. RO Contact: —S
Phone [phone] Phone :F__
bttp:libims.enr.state.nc.us: 70011selectOnelncident.do?id=3MO5FMYGO05JGW4BNY40... 2/11/2010

'Agencies
Page I of I
Incident Incident Freeboard Levels Events Related Incidents Action History
Detailsl Details2
Incident Type: Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number: 201000032
Date/Time.- 11/23/2009 12:30 pm Farm#:-0"3f 09o039
County: Bladen City
Freeboard Levels
Waste Structure Waste Structure Freeboard Plan Due Plan Date/Time
Delete Type Identifier (inches) Date/Time Received Freeboard
Date/Time Level OK
,Lagoon WESULOWE 18.0
=FinishGancelJ
http://bims.enr.state.ne.us:7001/maintainlncident2.do 2/11/2010

FQG
dy-31
t POA i K1
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
NOV 23
1. Structure NameAdentifiier (ID): _ 1 + C k i Kf o rr i -s WesD w`- 10-60"
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage $ structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr. 24 hr. storm & structural freeboard ji inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = I inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ASL flz
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. i.jne c x line d x 7.48 1 nns = S 2- gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
€. temporary storage period according to structural design 4 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design lti l_ OS J3 ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = IZ 5 if
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design D ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft3
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days = 1 ;2 3 gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated Z44 0_Ib11000 gal.
m. (Ii-nes e + k) x line I = lb PAN
1000 S I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (30 Day) 2a1100 1
-Z.Q.f-O ODO 32:
?Y'_'rE �7�Ja7-1 i,,�i� v% 76

1.
structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
2.
structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
b.
structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
6.
Structure -ID:.
line m = lb PAN
n.
lirtas,9+2+3+d+5+6=
IbPAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANC* E REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
MMMM�;co1umnrx9_w
•BALANCE
• FIELD
1l
I<
�
-�I
i
i
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN avallabls for all fields (sum of column t) a lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE r� �p
..� I /
PGA (30 Day) W21100
2

a
�nDIMS
HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION FORM
Staff please retain your original and place a copy in the High Freeboard Notification
Box located in Richard Canady's office.
Person Receiving Notification WY-4
Facility Number 69 - 3 q, Date Received — FAG 7, zoio
Farm Name i T-Z Time G: 1& P.M'
Caller's.Name Fx4 Kam., 8wrl�ar
Caller's Telephone Numbers
Home#
Farm #
Cell# 910, Go zlt , �o9S/
Pager#
For all callers PLEASE obtain a phone number where they can be reached at any time.
(Cell phone numbers, home phone numbers, farm phone numbers, pager numbers)
Tell the caller that a member of the CAFO unit or Paul Rawls will contact them as soon
as possible.
Freeboard (in inches)
Lagoon # 1 14.6 Lagoon # 4_
Lagoon # 2 12,0 Lagoon # 5_
Lagoon # 3 Lagoon # 6_
Do not instruct the caller on the action they should take. That is up to the caller. Remind
them that they are to remain in compliance with their Permit and Waste Utilization
Plan.
Make the caller aware that you are assigning a tracking number to their call. Give the
caller the tracking number and tell them to use this number for, all future contacts about
this particular incident and when they call back reporting they are back into compliance.
High Freeboard Level Tracking Number is
Thank the caller for their cooperation_
*Water Quality Staff Only*
If the caller indicates that the lagoon level is <12 inches, contact one of the CAFO staff
AND Paul Rawls. Do not leave a note, e-mail or voicemail without contacting the
CAFO staff AND Paul Rawls. directly on any report of <12 inches.
Treat any report of <12 inches as an emergency event.
*CAFO STAFF ONLY*
Establish a Filemaker/ B1Ms Entry number for this report. -2--o) 0 o d 7 6 9
Print the Filemaker/ BIMs Entry and attach it to this form.

----107f2010 18:16 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 05
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldenbfier (10); JMkheIlNorrfs#1
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 11.0 inches
b. designed structural freeboard zone 12.0 inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) ; _flinches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 88256 ft2
e_ line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonsM3 55+gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 121058 ft3
h. current herd # 1 36721 certified herd M 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5 days/line f =
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + fine k
`1058 ft3
0 3
53666 3
`l%gallons
�91317 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (5 Day) 2/21100

a2/07/2010 18:16 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 06
1-3 9
II. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1, structure ID: Mitchell Norris #1 line I = 91317 gallons
2. structure ID: �— 3°] - line I = gallons
3. structure ID: fine I = gallons
4. structure ID: line I = gallons
5. structure ID, line I = gallons
6. structure ID: line I =gallons
n.lines I+2+3+4+5+6=
o. line n 127154 =
91317 gallons
3.36 acre -inches
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIODI,2
1While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate Tor receiving crop according to its certlFed waste plan.
2Fieids with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
NNW
fflffp�acro
palance
...-
rr��r■w
r�����
x. total acres available during S day draw down (sum of column t) =
PoA (5 Day) 2/21100
4 acres

W.
_92/07/2010 18:16 9104232212
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 07
_S %
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
y. i I e = 0.33 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
line x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information.
Plan to land apply,hydraulic load;
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e_g. Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "traf icabiliW' across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff, etc.)
Producer will be able to use some fields if some drying occurs. There is a possibiity of using pump and haul.
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
DATE: Q2l05/10
j. uaTes of last waste ammcaton event Der neia:
AMOUNT: 2.00 inches
4_ Given nntimum soil and weather conditions_ is irrination enuinmant canahlp of annlvina the volume in
ime "n" at
f3Xi'1611 I
5. Irrioatinn schedule for next 5 days -
rates wnnrn 5 aays't
dailv schedule- Dronosed annhn2tion rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information for consideration.
PoA (5 Day) 2/21/00
L ),

search Page I of 2
AWSd9oo3�! -
Incident
Details)
Incident Freeboard Levels Events
Details2
Related Incidents
* Incident Type: Non-compliance Reporting___ Incident Number: 201
* Category:! APS -AnimalFa
* Started Date/Time : 3,12/08/2009 i:01:10 pm
* County : ; Bladen �- Farm #: 1090.
Decimal DD:MM:SS
Latitude: j s Position Accuracy: —Select Value—
Longitude: - - 1 Position Method: —Select Value— - --- --
Position Datum: —Select Value —
Reporting Person: 0 Anonymous
First Name: _ _ j Address:
Middle Name: !
i
Last Name : !� � City
State/Zip :
Phone: iCell/Pager
* Location of the Incident : !Mitchell Norris Farm (Upper Lagoon) —
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Cause/Observation of the incident:
Action Taken :
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Q
Surface Water Impacted : Q Yes ONo © Unknown Groundwater Impacted: Q
Waterbody :Select value--,
Waterbody (Other):: Conveyance:
Report Received By: " Revels, Ricky. RO Contact: --
Phone : [phone] _ Phone
http://bims.enr.state.nc. us: 7001 /selectOneIncident.do?id=3 M05FMYG0086HDV4BPY70... 2/11 /2010

Agencies
Page 1 of 1
Incident Incident Freeboard Levels Events Related Incidents Action History
Details] Details2
Incident Type : Non -Compliance Reporting Incident Number : 201000034
Date/Time : 12/08/2009 01:10 pm Farm #: 09039
County : Bladen City: Elizabethtown
Freeboard Levels
Waste Structure Waste Structure Freeboard Plan Due Plan Date/Time
Delete Type Identifier (inches) Date/Time Received Freeboard
Date/Time Level OK
0 Lagoon i UPPER LAGOON 18.0 - - --
---
ao
t=inish� �Eancef.
http://bims.enr.state.nc.us:7001 /maintainIncident I .do 2/ 11 /2010

i 12l,08f2009 13:10 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON 1� � �kj PAGE 01
5556 Braxton Road
Hope Mills NC 28348
4e
Tom`'' F- Fayetteville Regional egional Office--DENR From: Kathy Barker
Fam 910-486-0707 Ph&= 4
Pomm 910-433-3300 Date: 1218/2009
Re: POA for Mitchell Norris upper lagoon M.
ATTENTION -
ART BARNHARCT
RICKY REVELS
STEVE GUYTQN
gcci yds
?VA
Zoe o oo° 3 y ,

12:08/2009 13:10 9104232212 GALLSERRY CON PAGE 02
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID); Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
2. Current liquid volume'n 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c, line b - line a (inches in red zone) _
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line G12 x line d x 7.48 gallonsfft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
18.0 inches
19.0 inches
�.0inches
88286 ft2
5^ 5�gallons
f_ temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 1 1210581ft3
h. current herd # 3fi72 certified herd 3672
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
K. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
i, current waste analysis dated 1 09/24/09
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
121�ft3
Jft3
53666tftn
217Igallons
2.00Ibs/1000 gal.
7 lbs. PAN

12/08/2009 13:10 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 03
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1"
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line m = 545.7lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
3"
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line m =
Ib PAN
5.
Structure
line rn =
Ib PAN
6.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
Il.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 545.7lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
rtKIUU. Ili NU I L151 rItL1JN I U ►I MIUM PAN GANNU I tat APPLIED UUKINU IMIS 3p DAY PLI11012.
0, tract # p. field #rs q" crop r. acres Is. ro naining It. TOTAL PAN application windowl
IRR-2 PAN $ALANCE FO_ R
balance (Iblacre)ELD (ins.)
column r x s
3029 11. 12a,12b Small grain overseed 1 11.011 50.00 550.5 SW Anr
1 State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down periDd.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ `�Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

12,/08/2009 13:10 9104232212 GALLSERRY CON PAGE 04
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 545.7lb. PAN
- x. CroWS remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = 550.51b. PAN
Y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -5 lb. PAN
NARRATIVE:
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

NCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves -Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
Mitchell W Norris
Mitchell Norris #] & 42
494 Coley Rd
Elizabethtown, NC 283374888
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090039
Mitchell Norris # 1 & #2
SwineWaste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Bladen County
Dear Mitchell W Norris:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Mitchell W Norris, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2, located in Bladen County, with a swine animal capacity
of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 7344 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
r
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS090039 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC- An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CA WMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this hermit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAK 919-715-05881 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet- www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthC lralina
Aahf [Illy-

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Pennittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Stone Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Wilmington, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.Arh.noaa.Qov/erh1 m/
This facility is located in a county covered by our FeyeaeA ,,le Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Aa
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Bladen County Health Department
Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS090039)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

z05/15/2009 19; 05 9104232212 GALLBERRY CON PAGE 01
5556 Braxton Road
Hope Mills NC 28348
910-423-2212
Fax
RECE-WED
MAY Is m
To: ' Ricky ReVeIS From: KaMv Barker
Fax- 910-486-0707 Pages: 3
Phone: 9I0-433-3300 Date: 05116109
Re: Mitchell Nouis POA cr.
SAM

105/15/2009 19:05 9104232212
r E
GALLBERRY CON
PAGE 03
i
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY .
1.
Structure Mitchell Norris 1 (upper)
line m =
442.3 lb PAN
2.
Structure Mitchell Norris 2 (lower)
line rn =
lb PAN
3.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines I + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 442.3lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
f CKIVU. uV NU 1 LIS I I'MLUb I U WMIUM rAN UANNU 1 Ut ANYLItU PUKINU I MI5 3U UAY F'F.KIUU.
0. tract # p. field #f q. crop r. acres s. remaining IL TOTAL PAN ju. application windowl
IRR-2 PAN BALANCE FOR
balance (Iblacre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
30291 5 & 6 Coastal tlav 1 2.49 305.00 1085.8 Mar -Sea
1State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period-
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
Bulb. PAN
-- qi;.2. 3
J

F/
OU
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT I
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Type:
Farm capacity:
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Mitchell Norris 1,
494 Coley Road
Elizabethtown NC 28337
mitcw Norris
Bladen
Feed -Fin
_7446--- 7 34*
Anaerobic lagoon
180 days
hTigatiron
q— 39
1PR O9
0%-FA*TrWurWjt!�4, 1Rr;r
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at' a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nub ients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in wing you waste uWU2tion plan in order to maximize
the fart tier value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an envi onmentatly safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration ragas, leaching potentials,
c a ion exduuVe capacities, and available water holding cap'acdm.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acne per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated sobs, when it is raining, or when the surface is frazen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
AQUIFFR-PRnTFrT10N SECTION
APR 0 6 7nnq
Page: 1

problems.
6. To ma:dmize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
-. for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. lrgecft the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate c hangmg waste analysis content and crop type. Lune must
be applied to rrwintain.pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the nsgL&ements for cxrrnpliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the EnVur� Management Comatission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
I-
3496�aninu-& X 9W gallanimallyear
734� X 984
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAII~ABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (ibs):
7 animals X 2-30 ft/a0yollyear =
SAW gailons
7, aw, ►81
17,058-W lbs
161891.A0 tbs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner_
The following acreage wilt be needed for waste appika ion based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Page: 2

Tract
3029
Fe4d
Sce
T
Crop
Coda
Y'e
!AC
Ibis N
/unit
ACM
Labs WAC
R
Lbs N
lac
ibs N
RegWred
`r
Tane to
}toY
1
NoA
4.6
50.00
1.81
23f}.0
416.30
Apr b�y
G 2
NoA
4.6
50.00
2.43
230.0
558.90
3A
MoA
C
6.1
50.00
3.56
305.0
1085.80
prep
3B
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.47
305.0
448.35
Aj r
4
r"
C
6.1
5D.00
3.87
305.0
1180,35
5
NoA
C
6.1
50M
1.05
305.0
3W.25
A,pr-SW
6
NoA
C
6.1
60.00
1.44
305.0
439.20
Apr -Sep
7A
NoA
C
6.1
'50-00
2.93
305.0
893.65
Apr -Sep
7B
NaA
C
6.1
50.00
1.17
305.0
356.85
pep
8A
NdA
C
6-1
50-00
4.69
305.0
1430.45
AK -Sep
8B
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
4.13
305.0
1259.65
Apr -Sep
9d
NaA
C
6.1
50.00
5.85
305.0
1784.25
Apr -Sep
9B
NoA
C
6.1
5D.00
4.46
305.0
1360.30
Air -Sep
10
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.34
30&0
408-M
AFr-Sep
I
11
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
4.74
305.0
1445.70
AK -Sep
12A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
320
305.0
976.00
Apir-Sep
12B
Gr
C
5.5
50.00
0.82
275.0
225.50
Apt
1 2
M
K
75.00
4.24
75.0
31&00
Sep 15.Oct3D
f
3-12
All
K
50.00
44.72
50.0
2236.00
Feb4ftr
SePAX
Toffil 48.96
Avaffabie N
*Difference
17144.20 -
':817- / 6.1 89/ . 2
_Z7-40- - a53 . tb
--indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. -interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
anneals.
*A negative number refects the total lbs of adddional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed irk chart. A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not mclu de commerciial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the cmps fisted above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while rneef .ng the N requirements.
In the future. regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc,'irrterseeded in benmuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle show be removed when plants are grazed to a
Page: 3

might of four inches. In Melds where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially We in the season (.e.
April or May). Shading may resutt if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will mutt in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider hanresft hay or silage two to three times during the season, wing on the
time small grain is planted in the W.
The ideal time to Yderplant small grain, etc, is Late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Crop Croce
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Com - Grain
E
Cam - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue - Grazed
H
Fescue - Hay
I
Oats
J
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
O
Soybean
utilbed I unit vield
1.6 lbs N I bushel
50 lbs N I ton
50 lbs N I ton
1.25 lbs N / bushel
12 tbs N I ton
0.12 lbs; N / lbs lint
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N I ton
1.3 lbs W bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 fibs N / acre
50 lbs N I acre
2.5lbs N/cwt
2.4 fibs N 1 bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushe!
Acres shown in the Ong table are conskkwed to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
Page: 4

agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 0.36 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
sludge based on the application method tilted earlier.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 13348.80
pounds of PAN to utilize. assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 30t3 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44-50 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will creed 106.79 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION;
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen creeds of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of lard application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer -to ensure that an irrigation system is irmtMed to property
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. FaMure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid_
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
r- -
1
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many skuations, the application
amount shown cannot be aMAW Muse of the nitrogen Eirri ation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hoar storm.
It is the responsiability of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the connect rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nigh shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Page: 5

Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
r-
Additkmal Comments:
Page: 6

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
owner/Manager Agreement:
Uwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures eslabished in tto approved animal waste nirtrierd management
plant for the faun named above. VWe know that any expansion to the eAsting design capacity
of the waste treatment ardor storage system, or'construction of new facil[ities, will require a
new nutrient nuinagernent plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the nmi.,
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm_ I also certify than the waste wril be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and 4t rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ�uppon request
Name of Facility Owner.
Signature:
Name of Manager (ff different from owner):
Please Print
Signature: .
Name of Technical Specialist:
Sonya J. Barber
Affiliation:
Harvest Net„ Inc.
Address:
P.O. Box 32
Council, NC 28434
Tedphone:
(91 Q) 645- 768
Signature:
n
n
Page: 7

o�0k W A T, 9;q
November 7, 2007
Mitchell W. Norris
Mitchell Norris 41 & #2
494 Coley Rd
EIizabethtown, NC 28337
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
Nov o 9 -soar
ION-FAYETiEVILLE REGIONAL OFRCE
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS090039
Mitchell Norris #1 & 42
Animal Waste Management System
Bladen County
Dear Mitchell W. Norris:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on October
31, 2007. With the survey results, Kathy Dugan requested an extension of the sludge survey
requirement for the lagoons at the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 facility not to be required until 2009.
Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not
needed for Mitchell Norris #1 until 2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey for Mitchell
Norris #1 are to be submitted by March 1, 2010.
However, DWQ feels that an extension is not appropriate for the lagoon at Mitchell Norris #2
due to the amount of treatment volume available, and the rate of sludge accumulation for the
lagoon. The next sludge survey for the lagoon at Mitchell Norris #2 should be performed before
December 31, 2007. The results of the 2007 sludge survey for Mitchell Norris #2 are to be
submitted by March 1, 2008.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919)
715-6937.
Sincerely,
74-��
Miressa D. Garoma
Soil Scientist
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Kathy Dugan
Central Files
1Vo hCaroIins
— Naturally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet_ www.ncwaterguality.or Location: 2729 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50°% Recycled110°/6 Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

MR. MITCHELL W NORRIS
MITCHELL NORRIS FARMAND #2
S
494 COLEY ROAD 7
ELIZABETHTOWN, NCB 7
Dear Mr. Norri
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 27, 2006
Subject: Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool
Mitchell Norris Farms #1 and #2
Permit Number NCA209039
Bladen County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WER".. D
OCT 3120
DENR-FAYFUM1.1_ERE`1141.0RCE
The Division�records show that a completed PLAT Form has NOT been submitted for this facility. An
extension Vt the due date of January 5, 2005 was requested and ample time has been allowed for submittal. If
our recordare in error please resubmit the completed PLAT Form for this farm. If the PLAT Form has not
been suuAtted, please do so by November 30, 2006.
Concttion 1.6 of your NPDES Permit states: "If prior to the expiration date of this permit either the state or
federal government establishes Phosphorus loss standards that are applicable to land application activities at a
facility operating under this permit, the Permittee must conduct an evaluation of the facility and its CAWMP
under the requirements of the Phosphorus loss standards to determine the facility's ability to comply with the
standards. This evaluation must be documented on forms supplied or approved by the Division and must be
submitted to the Division. This evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within six (6) months of
receiving notification from the Division.
The method of evaluation is the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) developed by NC State University
and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. PLAT addresses four potential loss pathways: leaching,
erosion, runoff and direct movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be individually evaluated and
rated as either low, medium, high or very high according to its Phosphorus loss potential. The ratings for your
farm must be reported to DWQ using the attached certification form. The PLAT forms must be kept as records
on your farm for future reference.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a
civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact Duane Leith by email at
[e-mail] or by phone at [phone] or contact the Fayetteville Regional Office at (910) 433-
3300. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely, /
Duane Leith
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: 1Fayettevi1le Regional"Office, Aquifer_Pr�co a tt ion Section
Facility File 9-39
No Can ina
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncWaterguality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G- Ross Jr., Secretary
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL t ,r
_RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED d
Mitchell W Norris `
P
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
494 Coley Rd - --
Elizabethtown, NC 283374888
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/at)s/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR - DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Bladen County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 090039
Murphy Family Farms
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmaWe Adion Employer- 50% Recydedll0% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax 1:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
NJo�Carolina
(919)'; .Vaturatly
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

RECEIVED
ANENIAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICA11ON WO 7 2006
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number _.NC AM 0 361 County
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) VkAdA Cll Worri S it 1 4 9 1
Operator in Charge for this Facility Nid ell Crf 4-- Certification 9 1691400
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year X_
YES - NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste «!as handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
I . Total number of application Fields or Pulls (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Atumal
,G'aste vlai,agennent Plan (C1,NV1P): Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields F or Pulls Pplease check the appropriate box) oil which land application occurred
during the year: Total Acres on which waste was applied3. 5
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
offsite during the year 0 __ tons or gallons'.-- (please check the appropriate box)
6_ Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this iaciiity at any, one time during the previous year:
Largest
Smallest
(These numbers are for infonnational-purposes only since the only pcnnit limit on the number of animals at
the facility is the annual average numbers)
S. Facility-s Integrator if applicable: _ rww
Part_ iI Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELO\ IS "NO". PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLI.ANC:E.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during X Yes No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
II Yes L No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
I�l Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
k4t5ab '` leAhtIS r+ A bU
❑ Yes I`l No
the past calendar year. �� W*S ,+ke- ws.� aieua. j
'4}.Pxt wart K.o��.►,6 it,�ht'I�.oes . pwa uA.� `j taagq rs wtelc[�.
5. There was no PAN application to any elds or crops at this facility gt7eater than the
Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAW'MP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
� Yes ElNo
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑ Yes W. No
W D L&)& * 51 u.dc 6" u" "+ao�a.4 w w�i-f 1 aoo io
9. Annual soils analysis re performed on each fie receiving animal waste during, the � Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's} Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAW W were maintained during the past calendar year on all Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWW for this facility were I. Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
11 Morri
ermittee Name
pnature of Operator in Ch
different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03
o -" Z7 'Q 4
Date
Date

O�OF W A r�19QG Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environ ment and Natural Resources
> y
Y Alan W. Klirnek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 31, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7002 2410 0003 0274 6570
Mitchell Norris
Warren Miller Farm #I & #2
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
RE: Sludge Survey Testin ates
Facility # 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mitchell Norris:
RECEIVED
JUN 1 - 2005
Ogg - FA'f ETityILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your sludge survey information on May
3, 2005. With your results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the
two lagoons at the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 Farm. Due to the amount of treatment volume
available, DWQ agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2007. The results of the 2007
sludge survey are to be submitted with the Annual Certification Form that will be due on March
1, 2008.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: File# 9-39
Larry Baxley, Fayetteville Regional Office
lahtmcrmr
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state_nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Cor[ssutner Paper

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Michael F. Easley, Governor
28 March 2005
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Farm Owner
Mitchell Norris Hog Fames
332 Coley Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Air Permit No. 09497 R01
Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
Elizabethtown, Bladen County, North Carolina
Fee Class: Small
Site Number: 06/09-00080
Dear Mr. Norris:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
B. Keith Overcash, P.E., Director
RECEIVED
APR 0 1 2005
DENR - FAVET731ILLE REGIONAL OFRGE
In accordance with the administrative amendment initiated on March 21, 2005, we are
forwarding herewith Permit No. 09497 R01 to Mitchell Norris Hog Farms, Elizabethtown, Bladen
County, North Carolina for the construction and operation of air emissions sources or air cleaning
devices and appurtenances. Please note the records retention requirements are contained in General
Condition 2 of the General Conditions and Limitations.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request a formal adjudicatory hearing within 30 days following receipt of this
permit, identifying the specific issues to be contested. Such a request will stay the effectiveness of
the entire permit. This hearing request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to G.S.
150B-23 of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. The form for requesting a formal
adjudicatory hearing may be obtained upon request from the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Unless a request for a hearing is made pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, this air permit shall be final and
binding.
Fayetteville Regional Office
Systel Building, 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5094
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http:lldaq.state.nc.usf
An Equal Opportunity! Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Postconsemer Paper

Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
28 March 2005
Page 2
You may request modification of your air permit through informal means pursuant to G.S.
15013-22. This request must be submitted in writing to the Director and must identify the specific
provisions or issues for which the modification is sought. Please note that the permit will become
final and binding regardless of a request for informal modification unless a request for a hearing is
also made under G.S. 150B-23.
Unless exempted by a condition of this permit or the regulations, construction of new air
pollution sources or air cleaning devices, or modifications to the sources or air cleaning devices
described in this permit must be covered under a permit issued by the Division of Air Quality prior
to construction. Failure to do so is a violation of G.S. 143-215.108 and may subject the Permittee to
civil or criminal penalties as described in G.S. 143-215.114A and 143-215.114B.
This permit shall be effective from March 28, 2005 until January 31, 2010, is
nontransferable to future owners and operators, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations
as specified therein.
The Permittee is responsible for carefully reading the entire permit and evaluating the
requirements of each permit stipulation. The Permittee shall comply with all terms, conditions,
requirements, limitations and restrictions set forth in this permit. Noncompliance with any permit
condition is grounds for enforcement action, for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or
modification, or for denial of a permit renewal application.
Specifically, Stipulation A5 was corrected to reflect the Odor Management Plan you
submitted on May 29, 2001 to further control potential odor sources at the facility. Stipulation
A5(II) states that if not already installed, the items listed in your Odor Management Plan shall be
properly installed, operated, and monitored by May 1, 2005. The air permit application submitted
was to control odor in addition to the measures already in place with the water quality permit and
the Odor Management Plan. Therefore the Administrative Amendment was initiated to clarify the
air permit.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Thomas McKinney, or
me, at [phone].
incerel
n
Steven F. Vozzo
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
tin
Enclosures
c: Central Files
Fayetteville Regional Office
Gary Saunders, RCO
DWQ FRO Supervisor

NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Issue Date:. March 28, 2005
Expiration Date: January 31, 2010
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
AIR PERMIT NO.09497R01
Effective Date: March 28, 2005
Replaces Permit: 09497R00
To construct and operate air emission source(s) and/or air cleaning device(s), and for the
discharge of the associated air contaminants into the atmosphere in accordance with the provisions
of Article 21B of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina (NCGS) as amended, and other
applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
Mitchell Norris Rog Farms
494 Coley Road
Elizabethtown, Bladen County, North Carolina
Fee Class: Small
Site Number: 06/09-00080
(the Permittee) is hereby authorized to construct and operate the air emissions sources and/or air
cleaning devices and appurtenances described below:
Emission!
Source
ID
Emission Source
Description
Control
'
System
ID
Control System
Description
i TCHELL
NORRIS HOG OPERATIONS:
S-1
$knimal Operations consisting
CD-1 I
Control Systems for Odorous Emissions:
of -
ES -la a
(1) six swine houses;
CD -la
(1) system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the I
floor surfaces of the swine houses;
ES -lb #
(2) two anaerobic lagoons;
CD -lb
(2) bioreactor treatment system to provide '
i
�
supplemental microorganisms to the lagoons;
I
I
ES -lc
(3) land application field.
CD -lc
(3) Aerway applicator for the land application field.
f
in accordance with the administrative amendment request, including any plans, specifications,
previous applications, and other supporting data, all of which are filed with the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) and are incorporated as part of
this permit.

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 2
This permit is subject to the following specified conditions and limitations including any
TESTING, REPORTING, OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
1. Any air emission sources or control devices authorized to construct and operate above must
be operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained herein. The
Permittee shall comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission
Regulations, including Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter
2D .0202, 2D .0521, 2D .0535, 2D .0611, 2D .1800, and 2Q .0309.
2. EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - At least 90 days prior to the expiration date
of this permit, the Permittee shall submit the air pollution emission inventory report in
accordance with 15A NCAC 21) .0202, pursuant to N.C. General Statute 143 215.65. The
report shall be submitted to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ. The report shall document air
pollutants emitted for the 2008 calendar year. The Regional Office will send information on
how to submit the emissions inventory, along with a reminder to renew your permit, about
six months prior to your permit expiration. If you do not receive this information, please
contact the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
3. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D
.0521 "Control of Visible Emissions," visible emissions from the emission sources,
manufactured after July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged
over a six -minute period, except that six -minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent
opacity may occur not more than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour
period. However, sources which must comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source
Performance Standards" or .I 110 "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions requirements contained therein.
4. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of
a source of excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that results from a
malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal
conditions, shall:
a. Notify the Director or his designee of any such occurrence by 9:00 a.m. Eastern time
of the Division's next business day of becoming aware of the occurrence and
describe:
i. the name and location of the facility,
ii. the nature and cause of the malfunction or breakdown,
iii. the time when the malfunction or breakdown is first observed,
iv, the expected duration, and

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 3
V. an estimated rate of emissions.
b. Notify the Director or his designee immediately when the corrective measures have
been accomplished.
This reporting requirement does not allow the operation of the facility in excess of
Environmental Management Commission Regulations.
5. CONTROLS SYSTEMS FOR ODOROUS EMISSIONS --
I. This animal farm operation is permitted by NC DENR DWQ and is identified as Mitchell
Norris Farms #1 and #2 (DWQ ID 909). The Permittee shall comply with the proper
operation and maintenance procedures to control odor as filed with the application(s) for
the DWQ permit(s). Any modifications to this information shall also be filed with the
Division of Air Quality within 15 days of approval from DWQ.
II. In addition, an Odor Management Plan was submitted on May 29, 2001 to further
control potential odor sources at the facility. If not already installed, these items shall be
properly installed, operated, and monitored by May 1, 2005:
a. Improvements shall be made on the flush and recycle system to result in increased
flushing intervals and cleaner flush pits. The Permittee shall conduct daily visual
observations of the cleanliness of the flush pits.
b. Maintain on site the results of the NPPC Environmental/Odor Audit from 1998 and
2001, and maintain compliance with the recommendations in these plans.
c. Leland Cypress trees will be planted and maintained as a wind break on the East -
Northeast corner of the property.
d. Each employee will be trained on the odor control methods used at the facility. Data
will be recorded in a logbook indicating the name and date of training as well as any
training updates provided.
e. Records on facility clean out between groups of animals and other housekeeping
activities will be maintained.
f. Implementation of a plan to reduce the number of spider webs present in the
buildings. Plan will be maintained on site and updated annually.
g. A fence shall be constricted and maintained around the dead containers on this farm.
In addition the mortality management methods outlined as part of the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) of this facility will be followed.
h. Insect control guidelines as part of the CAWMP of this facility will be followed.
Records will be kept and maintained.

Permit No. 09497RO I
Page 4
Results of biological additives and other technologies being researched through the
Smithfield/AG agreement will be followed with respect to applicability for odor
control at this facility. Permittee shall annually evaluate the product(s) of this
agreement and develop a plan where appropriate for the implementation of the
technology. Annual analysis shall be maintained on site.
III. In addition to the Odor Management Plan, a permit application was filed under the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2D.1800 to further control the odorous emissions from the
animal farm operations (E-1). These odorous emissions shall be controlled as described
in the permit equipment list and in accordance with the schedule of requirements shown
below:
a. Installation, Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Requirements - To comply
with the provisions of this permit and ensure the control of odorous emissions, the
Permittee shall comply with the following:
i. The system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine
houses shall be properly installed and operating by May 1, 2005.
ii. The bioreactor treatment system shall be properly installed and operating by
May 1, 2005. Proper operation includes, but is not Iimited to, properly
grown supplemental organisms discharged to each lagoon NOT LESS than
once per 12 hour period.
iii. The "Aerway" applicator for the land application field shall be properly
installed and operating at the issuance of the initial air permit. All waste
applied to the land application field shall be applied using the Aerway
application method.
b. Recordkeet�ing, Requirements - The Permittee shall record the following events and
actions in a logbook. The logbook (in written or electronic format) shall be kept on -
site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.
i. For each of the odor controls indicated in the DWQ permit application,
and for those items listed in the May 2001 Odor Management Plan, the
Permittee shall record all identified actions as well as maintenance activities,
including any variances from the manufacturers' recommendations including
corrections made and dates of actions.
ii. For each of the control systems for odorous emissions, the Permittee shall
record all maintenance activities, including any variances from the
manufacturers' recommendations or from those given in this permit,
including corrections made and dates of actions. The control systems for
odorous emissions include the system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 5
floor surfaces of the swine houses, the bioreactor treatment system, and the
Aerway applicator system;
iii. in addition to the periodic maintenance, the Permittee shall conduct an annual
inspection to re -certify that the control systems are properly operating. The
inspection and any corrective actions required shall be recorded;
iv. The Permittee shall (i) record the mixture concentrations and the initial
schedule, and any future changes in schedule, for the time periods of
application of bacteria and surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine
houses, and (ii) record monthly the volume of bacteria and surfactant applied
that month.
v. The Permittee shall record (i) the completion of each bioreactor treatment
batch including the date and time, and (ii) record daily the time each
bioreactor discharged to each lagoon;
vi. The Permittee shall record the operating periods for the Aerway applicator
system to indicate the dates, times of operation, the amount of material
applied, meteorological conditions, and any other key criteria to assure
proper operation.
Notification and Reporting Requirements - The Permittee shall submit written
notifications and reports to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, according to the
following schedule:
i. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 10 days after
beginning operation of the bioreactor treatment system;
ii. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 10 days after
beginning operation of the system to apply bacteria and surfactant floor
surfaces of the swine houses;
iii. The Permittee shall submit quarterly reports to the Regional Supervisor by
April 30tb for the period of January 1 thm March 31, by July 30th for the
period of April I thm June 30, by October 30th for the period of July I thru
September 30, and by January 30th for the period of October 1 thru
December 31. Each report shall include the following:
A. Summary of the performance of the system to apply bacteria and
surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine houses during the
previous three months including the amount of material applied each
month;

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 6
B. Summary of the performance of the bioreactor treatment system
during the previous three months; and
C. Summary of the performance of the Aerway applicator system during
the previous three months, including a copy of the records for the
waste application.
6. RECORDS MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain records of all
information specified above in permit stipulation no. 5 for a minimum of two years from the
date of recording, unless otherwise specified.
7. CONTROL OF ODORS FROM ANIMAL OPERATIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 21)
.1800 thru .1804, the Permittee shall not operate the facility without implementing
management practices or installing and operating odor control equipment sufficient to
prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to objectionable
odors beyond the facility's boundary.
8. PERMIT REOPENING - In accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.108(c), upon the Director
becoming aware of any credible air emissions data not previously considered by the DAQ
during the application review process, the Director may require the Permittee to submit
additional information including, but not limited to, emissions estimates and air dispersion
modeling. Based on this information, the Director may modify and reissue the permit with
additional emission controls and/or additional operational restrictions necessary to
demonstrate compliance with any applicable regulation

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 7
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
1. REPORTS TEST DATA MONITORING DATA NOTIFICATIONS AND REQUESTS
FOR RENEWAL shall be submitted to the:
Steven Vozzo
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Air Quality - Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville; NC 28301-5094
(910) 486-154€
2. RECORDS RETENTION REQUIREMENT - Any records required by the conditions'of this
permit shall be kept on site and made available to DAQ personnel for inspection upon
request. These records shall be maintained in a form suitable and readily available for
expeditious inspection and review. These records must be kept on site for a minimum of 2
years, unless another time period is otherwise specified.
3. PERMIT RENEWAL REQUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least 90 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal by letter in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2Q .0304(d) and (f). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(i), no permit application fee
is required for renewal of an existing air permit. The renewal request should be submitted to
the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
4. ANNUAL FEE PAYMENT - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(a), the Permittee shall pay
the annual permit fee within 30 days of being billed by the DAQ. Failure to pay the fee in a
timely manner will cause the DAQ to initiate action to revoke the permit.
5. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION - A new air permit shall be obtained by the Permittee prior to
establishing, building, erecting, using, or operating the emission sources or air cleaning
equipment at a site or location not specified in this permit.
6. This permit is subject to revocation or modification by the DAQ upon a determination that
information contained in the application or presented in the support thereof is incorrect,
conditions under which this permit was granted have changed, or violations of conditions
contained in this permit have occurred. The facility shall be properly operated and
maintained at all times in a manner that will effect an overall reduction in air pollution.
Unless otherwise specified by this permit, no emission source may be operated without the
concurrent operation of its associated air cleaning device(s) and appurtenances.

Permit No. 09497R01
Page 8
7. REPORTING REQUIREMENT - Any of the following that would result in previously
unpermitted, new, or increased emissions must be reported to the Regional Supervisor,
DAQ:
a. changes in the information submitted in the application regarding facility emissions;
b. changes that modify equipment or processes of existing permitted facilities; or
c. changes in the quantity or quality of materials processed.
If appropriate, modifications to the permit may then be made by the DAQ to reflect any
necessary changes in the permit conditions. In no case are any new or increased emissions
allowed that will cause a violation of the emission limitations specified herein.
8. This permit is nontransferable by the Permittee. Future owners and operators must obtain a
new air permit from the DAQ.
9. This issuance of this permit in no way absolves the Permittee of liability for any potential
civil penalties which may be assessed for violations of State law which have occurred prior
to the effective date of this permit.
10. This permit does not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying with all
applicable requirements of any Federal, State, or Local water quality or land quality control
authority.
11. Reports on the operation and maintenance of the facility shall be submitted by the Permittee
to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ at such intervals and in such form and detail as may be
required by the DAQ. Information required in such reports may include, but is not limited
to, process weight rates, firing rates, hours of operation, and preventive maintenance
schedules.
12. A violation of any term or condition of this permit shall subject the Permittee to enforcement
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.114A, 143-215.114B, and 143-215.114C, including assessment of
civil and/or criminal penalties.
13. Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(2), no person shall refuse entry or
access to any authorized representative of the DAQ who requests entry or access for
purposes of inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor shall any person
obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such representative while in the process of carrying
out his official duties. Refusal of entry or access may constitute grounds for permit
revocation and assessment of civil penalties.

Permit No. 09497ROI
Page 9
14. The Permittee must comply with any applicable Federal, State, or Local requirements
governing the handling, disposal, or incineration of hazardous, solid, or medical wastes,
including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) administered by the
Division of Waste Management.
15. PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the
air permit at the site. The Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon
request, the current copy of the air permit for the site.
16. CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION_ 112(r) REQUIREMENTS - Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 68
"Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the
Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)," if the Permittee is required to develop and register a risk
management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act, then the
Permittee is required to register this plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
17. PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL RELEASES - GENERAL DUTY - Pursuant to Title I
Part A Section 112(r)(1) of the Clean Air Act "Hazardous Air Pollutants - Prevention of
Accidental Releases - Purpose and General Duty," although a risk management plan may not
be required, if the Pen nittee produces, processes, handles, or stores any amount of a listed
hazardous substance, the Permittee has a general duty to take such steps as are necessary to
prevent the accidental' release of such substance and to minimize the consequences of any
release. This condition is federally -enforceable only.
Permit issued this the 28"' March 2005
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Air Permit No. 09497RO I

.___��,7�-A
�
RECEIVED
FEB .0 S 2005
w-FAYETPE1lLaAMI}1 h0FRlX
lgCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
B. Keith Overcash, P.E., Director.
4 February 2005
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Farm Owner
Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
332 Coley Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject- Air Permit No. 09497R00
Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
Elizabethtown, Bladen County, North Carolina
Fee Class: Small
Site Number: 06/09-00080
Dear Mr. Norris:
In accordance with your application received September 30, 2004, and all additional
information received through November 10, 2004, we are forwarding herewith Permit No.
09497R00 to Mitchell Norris Hog Farms, EIizabethtown, Bladen County, North Carolina for the
construction and operation of air emissions sources or air cleaning devices and appurtenances.
Please note the records retention requirements are contained in General Condition 2 of the General
Conditions and Limitations.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request a formal adjudicatory hearing within 30 days following receipt of this
permit, identifying the specific issues to be contested. Such a request will stay the effectiveness of
the entire permit. This hearing request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to G.S.
150B-23 of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. The form for requesting a formal
adjudicatory hearing may be obtained upon request from the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Unless a request for a hearing is made pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, this air permit shall be final and
binding.
Fayetteville Regional Office
Systel Building, 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5094
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http:lldaq.state.nc.usl
An Equal Opportunity ! Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Postconsumer Paper

Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
4 Feliruary'2005
r
Page 2
You may. request modification of your air permit through informal means pursuant to G.S.
1508-22: This "request must be submitted in writing to the Director and must identify the specific
provisions or issues for which the modification is sought. Please note that the permit will become
final and binding regardless of a request for informal modification unless a request for a hearing is
also made under G.S. 15013-23.
Unless exempted by a condition of this permit or the regulations, construction of new
air pollution sources or air cleaning devices, or modifications to the sources or air cleaning
devices described in this permit must be covered under a permit issued by the Division of Air
Quality prior to construction. Failure to do so is a violation of G.S. 143-215.108 and may
subject the Permittee to civil or criminal penalties as described in G.S. 143-215.114A and 143-
215.114B.
This permit shall be effective from February 4, 2005 until January 31, 2010, is
nontransferable to future owners and operators, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations
as specified therein.
The Permittee is responsible for carefully reading the entire permit and evaluating the
requirements of each permit stipulation. The Permittee shall comply with all terms,
conditions, requirements, limitations and restrictions set forth in this permit. Noncompliance
with any permit condition is grounds for enforcement action, for permit termination,
revocation and reissuance, or modification, or for denial of a permit renewal application.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Thomas McKinney at (910)
48b-1541.
incerely,
Steven Vozzo f
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
tin
Enclosures
c: Central Files
Fayetteville Regional Office
Gary Saunders, RCO
DWQ FRO Supervisor

r
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Issue Date: February 4, 2005
Expiration Date: January3l, 2010
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
AIR PERNIIT NO. 09497R00
Effective Date: February 4, 2005
Replaces Permit: (new)
To construct and operate air emission source(s) and/or air cleaning device(s), and for the
discharge of the associated air contaminants into the atmosphere in accordance with the provisions
of Article 2 1 B of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina (NCGS) as amended, and other
applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
Mitchell Norris Hog Farms
494 Coley Road
Elizabethtown, Bladen County, North Carolina
Fee Class: Small
Site Number: 06/09-00080
(the Permittee) is hereby authorized to construct and operate the air emissions sources and/or air
cleaning devices and appurtenances described below:
Emission Control
Source Emission Source System
ID Description ID
MITCHELL NORRIS HOG OPERATIONS:
ES-1 Animal Operations consisting CD-1
of:
Control System
Description
Control Systems for Odorous Emissions:
ES -la (1) six .swine houses; CD -la (1) system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the
floor surfaces of the swine houses;
ES -lb (2) two anaerobic lagoons; CD -lb (2) bioreactor treatment system to provide
supplemental microorganisms to the lagoons;
ES -lc (3) land application field. CD -lc (3) Aerway applicator for the land application
field.
in accordance with the application 0900080.04A received September 30, 2004, and all additional
information received through November 10, 2004, including any plans, specifications, previous

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 2
applications, and other supporting data, all of which are filed with the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) and are incorporated as part of this permit.
This permit is subject to the following specified conditions and limitations including any
TESTING. REPORTING, OR MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
Any air emission sources or control devices authorized to construct and operate above must
be operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions contained herein. The
Permittee shall comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission
Regulations, including Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter
21) .0202, 2D .0521, 2D .0535, 2D .0611, 2D .1800, and 2Q .0309.
EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - At least 90 days prior to the expiration date
of this permit, the Permittee shall submit the air pollution emission inventory report in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .0202, pursuant to N.C. General Statute 143 215.65. The
report shall be submitted to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ. The report shall document air
pollutants emitted for the 2008 calendar year. The Regional Office will send information on
how to submit the emissions inventory, along with a reminder to renew your permit, about
six months prior to your permit expiration. If you do not receive this information, please
contact the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
3. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D
.0521 "Control of Visible Emissions," visible emissions from the emission sources,
manufactured after July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged
over a six -minute period, except that six -minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent
opacity may occur not more than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour
period. However, sources which must comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source
Performance Standards" or .1110 "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions requirements contained therein.
4. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of
a source of excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that results from a
malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal
conditions, shall:
a. Notify the Director or his designee of any such occurrence by 9:00 a.m. Eastern time
of the Division's next business day of becoming aware of the occurrence and
describe:
the name and location of the facility,
ii. the nature and cause of the malfunction or breakdown,
iii. the time when the malfunction or breakdown is first observed,

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 3
iv. the expected duration, and
V. an estimated rate of emissions.
b_ Notify the Director or his designee immediately when the corrective measures have
been accomplished.
This reporting requirement does not allow the operation of the facility in excess of
Environmental Management Commission Regulations.
5. CONTROLS SYSTEMS FOR ODOROUS EMISSIONS —
This animal farm operation is permitted by NC DENR DWQ and is identified as Mitchell
Norris Farms #1 and #2 (DWQ ID 9a39). The Permittee shall comply with the proper
operation and maintenance procedures to control odor as filed with the application(s) for the
DWQ permit(s). Any modifications to this information shall also be filed with the Division
of Air Quality within 15 days of approval from DWQ.
In addition, a permit application was filed under the requirements of 15A NCAC 2D.1800
to control the odorous emissions from the animal farm operations (E-1). These odorous
emissions shall be controlled as described in the permit equipment list and in accordance
with the schedule of requirements shown below:
a. Installation, Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Requirements - To comply
with the provisions of this permit and ensure the control of odorous emissions, the
Permittee shall comply with the following:
i. The system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine
houses shall be properly installed and operating by May 1, 2005.
ii. The bioreactor treatment system shall be properly installed and operating by
May 1, 2005. Proper operation includes, but is not limited to, properly
grown supplemental organisms discharged to each lagoon NOT LESS than
once per 12 hour period.
iii. The "Aerway" applicator for the land application field shall be properly
installed and operating at the issuance of the initial air permit. All waste
applied to the land application field shall be applied using the Aerway
application method.
b. Recordkeeping Requirements - The Permittee shall record the following events and
actions in a logbook. The logbook (in written or electronic format) shall be kept on -
site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.
i. For each of the odor controls indicated in the DWQ permit application, the
Permittee shall record all maintenance activities, including any variances

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 4
from the manufacturers' recommendations including corrections made and
dates of actions.
ii. For each of the control systems for odorous emissions, the Permitte shall
record all maintenance activities, including any variances from the
manufacturers' recommendations or from those given in this permit,
including corrections made and dates of actions. The control systems for
odorous emissions include the system to apply bacteria and surfactant to the
floor surfaces of the swine houses, the bioreactor treatment system, and the
Aerway applicator system;
iii. In addition to the periodic maintenance, the Permittee shall conduct an annual
inspection to re -certify that the control systems are properly operating. The
inspection and any corrective actions required shall be recorded;
iv. The Permittee shall (i) record the mixture concentrations and the initial
schedule, and any future changes in schedule, for the time periods of
application of bacteria and surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine
houses, and (ii) record monthly the volume of bacteria and surfactant applied
that month.
v. The Permittee shall record (i) the completion of each bioreactor treatment
batch including the date and time, and (ii) record daily the time each
bioreactor discharged to each lagoon;
vi. The Permittee shall record the operating periods for the Aerway applicator
system to indicate the dates, times of operation, the amount of material
applied, meteorological conditions, and any other key criteria to assure
proper operation.
Notification and Reporting Requirements - The Permittee shall submit written
notifications and reports to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ, according to the
following schedule:
i. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 10 days after
beginning operation of the bioreactor treatment system;
ii. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 10 days after
beginning operation of the system to apply bacteria and surfactant floor
surfaces of the swine houses;
iii. The Pen-nittee shall submit quarterly reports to the Regional Supervisor by
April 30`h for the period of January 1 thru March 31, by July 301h for the

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 5
period of April 1 thru .tune 30, by October 30th for the period of July 1 thru
September 30, and by January 30th for the period of October I thru
December 31. Each report shall include the following:
A. Summary of the performance of the system to apply bacteria and
surfactant to the floor surfaces of the swine houses during the
previous three months including the amount ofmaterial applied each
month;
B. Summary of the performance of the bioreactor treatment system
during the previous three months; and
C. Summary of the performance of the Aerway applicator system during
the previous three months, including a copy of the records for the
waste application.
6. RECORDS MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain records of all
information specified above in permit stipulation no. 5 for a minimum of two years from the
date of recording, unless otherwise specified.
7. CONTROL OF ODORS FROM ANIMAL OPERATIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D
.1800 thru .1804, the Permittee shall not operate the facility without implementing
management practices or installing and operating odor control equipment sufficient to
prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to objectionable
odors beyond the facility's boundary.
PERMIT REOPENING - In accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.108(c), upon the Director
becoming aware of any credible air emissions data not previously considered by the DAQ
during the application review process, the Director may require the Permittee to submit
additional information including, but not limited to, emissions estimates and air dispersion
modeling. Based on this information, the Director may modify and reissue the permit with
additional emission controls and/or additional operational restrictions necessary to
demonstrate compliance with any applicable regulation

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 6
B. GENER4,L CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
1. REPORTS. TEST DATA, MONITORING DATA, NOTIFICATIONS, AND REQUESTS
FOR RENEWAL shall be submitted to the: n
Steven Vozzo
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Air Quality - Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
[phone]
2. RECORDS RETENTION REQUIREMENT - Any records required by the conditions of this
permit shall be kept on site and made available to DAQ personnel for inspection upon
request. These records shall be maintained in a form suitable and readily available for
expeditious inspection and review. These records must be kept on site for a minimum of 2
years, unless another time period is otherwise specified.
PERMIT RENEWAL REQUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least 90 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal by letter in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2Q .0304(d) and (f). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(i), no permit application fee
is required for renewal of an existing air permit. The renewal request should be submitted to
the Regional Supervisor, DAQ.
4. ANNUAL FEE PAYMENT - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0203(a), the Permittee shall pay
the annual permit fee within 30 days of being billed by the DAQ. Failure to pay the fee in a
timely manner will cause the DAQ to initiate action to revoke the permit.
5. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION - A new air permit shall be obtained by the Permittee prior to
establishing, building, erecting, using, or operating the emission sources or air cleaning
equipment at a site or location not specified in this permit.
6. This permit is subject to revocation or modification by the DAQ upon a determination that
information contained in the application or presented in the support thereof is incorrect,
conditions under which this permit was granted have changed, or violations of conditions
contained in this permit have occurred. The facility shall be properly operated and
maintained at all times in a manner that will effect an overall reduction in air pollution.
Unless otherwise specified by this permit, no emission source may be operated without the
concurrent operation of its associated air cleaning device(s) and appurtenances.

Permit No. 09497R00
Page 7
7. REPORTING REQUIREMENT - Any of the following that would result in previously
unpermitted, new, or increased emissions must be reported to the Regional Supervisor,
DAQ:
a. changes in the information submitted in the application regarding facility emissions;
b. changes that modify equipment or processes of existing permitted facilities; or
c. changes in the quantity or quality of materials processed.
If appropriate, modifications to the permit may then be made by the DAQ to reflect any
necessary changes in the permit conditions. In no case are any new or increased emissions
allowed that will cause a violation of the emission limitations specified herein.
8. This permit is nontransferable by the Permittee. Future owners and operators must obtain a
new air permit from the DAQ.
9. This issuance of this permit in no way absolves the Permittee of liability for any potential
civil penalties which may be assessed for violations of State law which have occurred prior
to the effective date of this permit.
10. This permit does not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying with all
applicable requirements of any Federal, State, or Local water quality or land quality control
authority.
11. Reports on the operation and maintenance of the facility shall be submitted by the Permittee
to the Regional Supervisor, DAQ at such intervals and in such form and detail as may be
required by the DAQ. Information required in such reports may include, but is not limited
to, process weight rates, firing rates, hours of operation, and preventive maintenance
schedules.
12. A violation of any term or condition of this permit shall subject the Permittee to enforcement
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.114A, 143-215.114B, and 143-215.114C, including assessment of
civil and/or criminal penalties.'
13. Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(2), no person shall refuse entry or
access to any authorized representative of the DAQ who requests entry or access for
purposes of inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor shall any person
obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such representative while in the process of carrying
out his official duties. Refusal of entry or access may constitute grounds for permit
revocation and assessment of civil penalties.
14. The Permittee must comply with any applicable Federal, State, or Local requirements
governing the handling, disposal, or incineration of hazardous, solid, or medical wastes,
including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) administered by the
Division of Waste Management.

*nit No. 09497R00
_,e 8
15. PERMIT RETENTION REQUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the
air permit at the site. The Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon
request, the current copy of the air permit for the site.
16. CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 1 I2(r) REQUIREMENTS - Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 68
"Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the
Clean Air Act, Section I I2(r)," if the Permittee is required to develop and register a risk
management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act, then the
Permittee is required to register this plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
17. PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL RELEASES - GENERAL DUTY - Pursuant to Title I
Part A Section 112(r)(1) of the Clean Air Act "Hazardous Air Pollutants - Prevention of
Accidental Releases - Purpose and General Duty," although a risk management plan may not
be required, if the Permittee produces, processes, handles, or stores any amount of a listed
hazardous substance, the Permittee has a general duty to take such steps as are necessary to
prevent the accidental release of such substance and to minimize the consequences of any
release. This condition is federally -enforceable only.
Permit issued this the 4th of February 2005
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
' f
Steven F. Vozzo
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Air Permit No. 09497R00

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
January 20, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr- Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Farm Status and Update
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Mitchell Norris 4 1 & # 2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
Recently, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality have
been working with you for your permitted, NCA209039, swine farm located on Coley Rd. in
Bladen County. This letter serves as a follow up to the events that have occurred over the past
several months.
In November of 2003 staff member Larry Baxley visited your farm and became concerned
about the high freeboard levels on the two lagoons. Later one of these would enter the structural
storage level and stay there until aerway applications in December lowered it to above 12" on the
marker. The entry of a lagoon into the structural storage level is considered by this office an
emergency situation and must be responded to within five days. Every reasonable effort must be
made to achieve compliance while staying in accordance with your Permit. ,
The options available to regain compliance are choices made by the producer and their
integrator for their particular situation. Common responses are water conservation procedures
within the confinement barns and weather permitting to apply wastewater to their spray fields.
Another option would be to pump and haul the waste to another legal site. Culling of animals
from the confinement houses and depopulation help to reduce the waste flow into the lagoon and
thus the volume that has to be removed in order to achieve compliance. Modification of the
CAWMP by the incorporation of more application area or the changing to better- suited crops can
also be done with the help of a technical specialist.
It is the opinion of this office that restocking should not occur until compliance of lagoon
liquid levels have been met and hopefully somewhat exceeded. Recently, you purchased an
aerway waste application system for use on your farm. This office encourages you to continue to
expand your waste handling options by all means that are in accordance with your Permit. While
events of the past cannot be changed this office recognizes your recent efforts and looks ahead to
working with you in the future.
wwl
NR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 2tt301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

t
Mr. Norris
01-20-04
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Larry Baxley, Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincere]
Paul . Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
' '01
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. N RCS
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO
Central Files - Raleigh
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville. North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax (910) 48"707
NMF-NR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

5
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govemor Division of Air Quality William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
B. Keith Overcash, P.€., Director
10 June 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Karen Priest
P.O. Box 1721
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Timeline of Odor Investigations and Plan Failure of Best Management Plan for
Mitchell Norris Farms #1 and #2 (DWQ ID 9a39, Bladen County)
Dear Ms. Priest:
The North Carolina Division Of Air Quality (DAQ) has prepared this letter in response to a recent
email inquiry concerning actions taken at the farm referenced above. The DAQ has reviewed it's
information and prepared the attached timeline. The information'contained herein represents the major
activities taken through the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO) and the Raleigh Central Office (RCO).
As noted in your email, nearly three years have passed between the initial notification of an
Objectionable Odor Determination (the regulation does not make reference to a "violation") and the
notification of the BMP Plan Failure. We have discussed this case on a number of occasions both on the
phone and through email. Our office has been very instrumental in investigating odor complaints on an
emergency response basis over this three year period throughout Bladen County. However, what cannot
be asserted at this point in time is that the Mitchell Norris Farms continuously created conditions that met
or exceeded the thresholds for determination of an objectionable odor.
As noted in the attached timeline, with the exception of the January 3, 2003 equipment failure of the
flush system and the odor problem associated with that failure, no determinations of the presence of
objectionable odor were found from February 2002 until February 2004. This does not mean that the odor
had been eliminated; only that it did not meet the threshold deemed by the DAQ as "objectionable." Note
that the objectionable odor determination is based on .... therefore the logbooks that you maintain and
submit to the DAQ are a vital part in making objectionable odor determinations. As long as odor levels are
being kept below objectionable criteria levels, a plan submitted to the DAQ under the BMP requirements is
presumed to be acceptable until such time the objectionable odors recur and are not adequately addressed
by the waste management plan or the odor BMP.
Fayetteville Regional Office — Division of Air Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Intemet: httpJhvww.ncair.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acton Employer — 50% Recycled1l0% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally

The early stages of this rule appear not to allow for fines but instead requires the farmer to take
additional actions. Only when we get to the permit phase can violations occur. Under normal
circumstances when an odor BMP is found to be insufficient to adequately control odors, the DAQ would
require the BMP to be modified to incorporate additional measures, evaluate the modified BMP to
determine if it adequately addresses the additional issues, approve and reevaluate it's effectiveness. In this
case, however, the failure to complete the original BMP after the requested extension and the existence of
objectionable odors from the farm left the DAQ the only regulatory alternative of declaring a plan failure
and thus a permit application is now due.
As for the future time allowances for control implementation, that is also specified by the regulations.
Currently, the Mitchell Norris Farms are within the 90-day allowance to respond and prepare a permit
application for review by the DAQ. The permit application must include a schedule that reflects a schedule
for installation, including increments of progress, of 12 months or less from permit issuance. The
regulations allow for adjustment of the schedule by the Director, provided the owner/operator shows cause
for the schedule adjustment. The regulation further stipulates that the schedule cannot exceed 24 months
from the date of permit issuance for the control installation to be completed (see 15 NCAC 2D .1802 (k)).
As always, we again encourage you to carefully maintain your odor logs and to contact the regional
office per our previous instructions. Our inspector, Markus Elliott, has spent many hours investigating
odor complaints in your community. Most of these are after dark and are in response to the special 1-800
pager we established for you to call. Receiving emails or calls the next day after a bad odor episode are
informative but are difficult to investigate after the fact.
I hope this information has been useful. This is still a new rule and we are now in a part of the rule
that has never been tried before. Thus we are all working through the rule together. We appreciate your
patience and willingness to assist us in implementing this rule. We are also attaching a copy of the
regulation. If you need additional information about this case, please contact Markus Elliott or me at the
Regional Office at 910-486-1541. You can also contact Gary Saunders at the Raleigh Central Office at
919-733-1497.
y'y,F. Vozzo
Regional Air Quality Supervisor
S V/gls
Enclosure — Odor Regulations
cc: Gary Saunders - RCO
DAQ Central Files (Bladen)
FRO County Files (Bladen)
B. Keith Overcash - RCO
Markus Elliott -FRO
Paul Rawls, FRO DWQ

N
10 June 2004
Summary of DAQ FRO Bladen County Case #1
Objectionable Odor Determination
Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2 (DWQ ID 9a39) .
Elizabethtown, NC, Bladen County 6 / 09-00000
The Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2 (DWQ ID 909) located on Coley Road in the Elizabethtown
area of Bladen County, has been the subject of numerous complaints received by the Division of
Air Quality Fayetteville Regional Office [FRO DAQ]. The following is a brief summary of key
events. Note the odor assessment dates are for the dates in which the odor was `objectionable'
and does not include the many investigations were the odor intensity was less.
(1) 17 April 2001. Objectionable Odor Determination made by DAQ RCO and letter sent_
This letter was based on data that include the odor observations made by the FRO DAQ staff.
The dates that the FRO odor team documented intense/objectionable odors were
February 6, 2001, March 1, 2001, March 2, 2001 and March 13, 2001.
Note there was also an addendum for the odor assessment on 23 March 2001.
Note: due to failed tracking of the certified mail response, no date could be proven on which
Mr. Norris received his letter thus DAQ could not accurately track the 90 day requirement for
a Odor Management Plan submittal.
(2) 08 August 2001. After Regional Office contacts Mr. Norris and Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
(Murphy Farms), DAQ received Best Management Plan.
(3) 11 September 2001. Letter to Mr. Norris stating plan was inadequate and incomplete.
(4) 29 October 2001. Updated Best Management Plan was received from Mr. Norris. Still did
not include a schedule for implementation. Mr. Norris and Mr. Westerbeek were contacted
by DAQ RCO and a schedule was requested.
(5) 30 January 2002. FRO sends RCO an addendum to the investigation package. Strong odors
were still being observed by the neighbors. Markus Elliott continues to investigate for
FRO. Strong odors determined on:
08 January 2002, 10 January 2002, and 28 January 2002.
(6) 1 May 2002. DAQ RCO sends Mr. Norris a letter notifying him of the "Completion of the
Best Management Plan" timetable of six months from the date of submission of the plan.
Mr. Norris verbally requested that the planting of the Leland Cypress trees be delayed due to
drought conditions and that planting occur after the drought conditions had passed.
Observations conducted by DAQ at that time indicated that odor levels were not detectable at
the property boundaries.
(7) January 2003 investigation of odor complaint. Flushing system failure was believed to be the
cause. Repairs made. This problem appeared to be due to equipment breakdown, thus not
explicitly cover under the BMP. DAQ encouraged rapid repair and the development of a
plan for preventive maintenance to prevent like problems. FRO staff also discuss the odor

management plan and the requirement for trees to have been planted. _ Request for
Additional Compliance Info made to Mr. Norris.
(8) February 5, 2004 Request for Odor BMP failure requested from RCO DAQ. Odor observed
on several occasions. Leland Cyprus trees were not planted according to WQ inspector and
drive by observations by DAQ staff.
(9) February 21, 2004. Objectionable odor observed at complainant's residence.
(10) February 23, 2004. Notice of Odor BMP was sent to Mr. Norris at the address listed in the
DWQ database. Letter was subsequently returned to DAQ as undeliverable.
(11) March 19, 2004. Notice of Odor BMP letter was reissued with a new address.
(12) April 2, 2004. Notice of Odor BMP received by Mr. Norris according to the returned
Certified Mail receipt. Therefore an air permit application is due postmarked on or before
July 2004.
(13) May 25, 2004. Received a written request to amend BMP from Mr. Norris. Response
indicated he had planted some of the trees but also purchased equipment to better incorporate
the wastewater into the soil and this should also help to eliminate odors. FRO forwarded this
response to RCO for review and consideration.

s
ENR -- ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
SECTION .1800 - CONTROL OF ODORS
.1801 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions apply:
(1) "Animal operation" means animal operation as defined in G.S.
143-215.10B.
(2) "Child care center" means child care centers as defined in G.S.
110-86 licensed under Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General
Statutes.
(3) "Construction" means any physical change (including fabrication,
erection, installation, replacement, demolition, excavation, or
other modification) at any contiguous area under common
control.
(4) "Control technology" means economically feasible control
devices installed to effectively reduce objectionable odors from
animal operations.
(5) "Existing animal operation" means an animal operation that is in
operation or commences construction on or before February 28,
1999.
(6) "Historic properties" means historic properties acquired by the
State pursuant to G.S. 121-9 or listed in the North Carolina
Register of Historic Places pursuant to G.S. 121-4.1.
(7) "Modified animal operation" means an animal operation that
commences construction after February 28, 1999, to increase the
steady state live weight that can be housed at that animal
operation. Modified animal operation does not include
renovating existing barns, relocating barns, or replacing existing
lagoons or barns if the new barn or lagoon is no closer to the
nearest property and if the new barn or lagoon does not increase
the steady state live weight that can be housed at that animal
operation.
(8) "New animal operation" means an animal operation that
commences construction after February 28, 1999.
(9) "Objectionable odor" means any odor present in the ambient air
that by itself, or in combination with other odors, is or may be
harmful or injurious to human health or welfare, or may
unreasonably interfere with the comfortable use and enjoyment
of life or property. Odors are harmful,or injurious to human
health if they tend to lessen human food and water intake,
interfere with sleep, upset appetite, produce irritation of the
upper respiratory tract, or cause symptoms of nausea, or if their
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-1
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
chemical or physical nature is, or may be, detrimental or
dangerous to human health.
(10) "Occupied residence" means occupied residence as defined in
G.S. 106-802.
(11) "State Parks" means State Parks as defined in G.S. 113-44.9.
(12) "Technologically feasible" means that an odor control device or a
proposed solution to an odor problem has previously been
demonstrated to accomplish its intended objective, and is
generally accepted within the technical community. It is possible
for technologically feasible solutions to have demonstrated their
suitability on similar, but not identical, sources for which they
are proposed to control.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a) (1); 143-215.107(a) (11); 143-
213,
Temporary Adoption Eft' April 27, 1999, March 1, 1999,
Eff July 1, 2000.
.1802 CONTROL OF ODORS FROM ANIMAL OPERATIONS USING
LIQUID ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this Rule is to control objectionable odors
from animal operations beyond the boundaries of animal operations.
(b) Applicability. This Rule shall apply to all animal operations.
(c) Required management practices. All animal operations shall be
required to implement applicable management practices for the control
of odors as follows:
(1) The carcasses of dead animals shall be disposed of within 24
hours after becoming aware of the death of the animal according
to the methods approved by the State Veterinarian for disposal of
dead domesticated animals under G. S. 106-403;
(2) Waste from animal wastewater application spray systems shall be
applied in such a manner and under such conditions to prevent
drift from the irrigation field of the wastewater spray beyond the
boundary of the animal operation, except waste from application
spray systems may be applied in an emergency to maintain safe
lagoon freeboard if the owner or operator notifies the Department
and resolves the emergency with the Department as written in
Section II1.6 of the Swine Waste Operation General Permit;
(3) Animal wastewater application spray system intakes shall be
located near the liquid surface of the animal wastewater lagoon;
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-2
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - 2D .1800
(4) Ventilation fans shall be maintained according to the
manufacturer's specifications; and
(5) Animal feed storage containers located outside of animal
containment buildings shall be covered except when necessary to
remove or add feed; this Subparagraph does not apply to the
storage of silage or hay or to commodity boxes with roofs.
All animal operations shall be in compliance with this Paragraph by June
1, 1999.
(d) Odor management plan for existing animal operations for swine.
Animal operations for swine that meet the criteria in the table in this
Paragraph shall submit an odor management plan to the Director
according to the schedule in the table in this Paragraph. The odor
management plan shall describe how odors are currently being
controlled and how these odors will be controlled in the future. The odor
management plan shall contain the elements described in Rule,.1803(a)
of this Section. The animal operation shall only be required to submit its
odor management plan only once.
100 pounds
steady state live
weight of swine
Distance in feet to the boundary
of the nearest neighboring
occupied property with an
inhabitable structure, business,
school, hospital, church, outdoor
Date by when
the odor
management
plan is to be
submitted
at least
but
recreational facility, national
less
park, State Park, historic property,
than
or child care center
10,000
20,000
less than or equal to 3,000
January 15,
2002
20,000
40,000
less than or equal to 4,000
July 15, 2001
40,000
less than or equal to 5,000
January 15,
2001
For the purposes of this Rule, the distance shall be measured from the
edge of the barn or lagoon, whichever is closer, to the boundary of the
neighboring occupied property with an inhabitable structure, business,
school, hospital, church, outdoor recreational facility, national park,
State Park, historic property, or child care center. All animal operations
for swine that are of the size in the table in this Paragraph shall submit
by the date specified in this table either an odor management plan or
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-3
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
documentation that no neighboring occupied property with an
inhabitable structure, business, school, hospital, church, outdoor
recreational facility, national park, State Park, historic property, or child
care center are within the distances specified in the table as of the date
that the submittal is due. After July 15, 2002, the Director may require
existing animal operations for swine with a steady state live weight of
swine between 1,000 to 10,000 hundredweights to submit an odor
management plan if the Director determines that these animal operations
may cause or contribute to an objectionable odor. The Director may
require an existing animal operation to submit a best management plan
under Paragraph (h) of this Rule if the existing animal operation fails to
submit an odor management plan by the schedule in this Paragraph of
this Rule.
(e) Location of objectionable odor determinations.
(1) For an existing animal operation that does not meet the following
siting requirements:
(A) at least 1500 feet from any occupied residence not owned by
the owner of the animal operation;
(B) at least 2500 feet from the property boundary of any school,
hospital, church, outdoor recreation facility, national park,
state park, historic property, or child care center; and
(C) at least 500 feet from the boundary of any other property not
owned by the owner of the animal operation;
objectionable odors shall be determined at neighboring occupied
property not owned by the owner of the animal operation,
businesses, schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreation
facilities, national parks, State Parks historic properties, or child
care centers that are affected.
(2) For a new animal operation or existing animal operation that
meets the siting requirements in Subparagraph (1) of this
Paragraph, objectionable odors shall be determined beyond the
boundary of the animal operation.
(0 Complaints. The Director shall respond to complaints about
objectionable odors from animal operations as follows:
(1) Complaints shall be investigated to the extent practicable.
(2) Complaints may be used to assist in determination of a best
management plan failure or a control technology failure.
(3) The Director shall respond to complaints within 30 days.
(4) Complaint response shall at least include a written response of
the Director's evaluation of the complaint.
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-4
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
(5) The investigation of a complaint shall be completed as
expeditiously as possible considering the meteorology, activities
at the animal operation, and other conditions occurring at the
time of the complaint.
(g) Determination of the existence of an objectionable odor. In deciding
if an animal operation is causing or contributing to an objectionable
odor, the Director may consider one or more of the following:
(1) the nature, intensity, frequency, pervasiveness, and duration of
the odors from the animal operation;
(2) complaints received about objectionable odors from the animal
operation;
(3) emissions from the animal operation of known odor causing
compounds, such as ammonia, total volatile organics, hydrogen
sulfide or other sulfur compounds at levels that could cause or
contribute to an objectionable odor;
(4) any epidemiological studies associating health problems with
odors from the animal operation or documented health problems
associated with odors from the animal operation provided by the
State Health Director; or
(5) any other evidence, including records maintained by neighbors,
that show that the animal operation is causing or contributing to
an objectionable odor.
(h) Requirement for a best management plan for controlling odors from
existing animal operations. If the Director finds that an existing animal
operation is causing or contributing to an objectionable odor, the owner
or operator of the animal operation shall:
(1) submit to the Director as soon as practical, but not to exceed 90
days after receipt of written notification from the Director that
the animal operation is causing or contributing to an
objectionable odor, a best management plan for odor control as
described in Rule .1803 of this Section; and
(2) be in compliance with the terms of the plan within 30 days after
the Director approves the best management plan (compliance
with an approved compliance schedule in the best management
plan is deemed to be in compliance with the plan).
(i) Requirement for amendment to best management plan. No later than
60 days from completion of a compliance schedule in an approved best
management plan or if the best management plan contains no
compliance schedule, no later than 60 days from the implementation
date of the best management plan, the Director shall determine whether
the plan has been properly implemented. If the Director determines that
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-5
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
a plan submitted under Paragraph (h) of this Rule does not control
objectionable odors from the animal operation, the Director shall require
the owner or operator of the animal operation to amend the plan to
incorporate additional or alternative measures to control objectionable
odors from the animal operation. The owner or operator shall
(1) submit a revised best management plan to the Director as soon as
practical but not later than 60 days after receipt of written
notification from the Director that the plan is inadequate; and
(2) be in compliance with the revised plan within 30 days after the
Director approves the revisions to the best management plan
(compliance with an approved compliance schedule in the best
management plan is deemed to be in compliance with the plan).
(j) Plan failure. Any of the following conditions shall constitute failure
of a best management plan:
(1) failing to submit the initial best management plan required under
Paragraph (h) of this Rule within 90 days of receipt of written
notification from the Director that the animal operation is
causing or contributing to an objectionable odor;
(2) failing to submit a revised best management plan required under
Paragraph (i) of this Rule within 60 days of receipt of written
notification from the Director that the animal operation is
causing or contributing to an objectionable odor;
(3) failing to correct all deficiencies in a submitted best management
plan under Rule .1803(c) of this Section within 30 days of receipt
of written notification from the Director to correct these
deficiencies;
(4) failing to implement the best management plan after it has been
approved; or
(5) finding by the Director, using the criteria under Paragraph (g) of
this Rule, that, after the best management plan has been
implemented and revised no more than one time (voluntary
revisions and revisions made pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D .1803(c)
shall not be counted as revisions under this Subparagraph), the
best management plan does not adequately control objectionable
odors from the animal operation and will not adequately control
objectionable odors even with further amendments.
(k) Requirements for control technology. If a plan failure occurs, the
Director shall require the owner or operator of the animal operation to
install control technology to control odor from the animal operation. The
owner or operator shall submit within 90 days from receipt of written
notification from the Director of a plan failure, a permit application for
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-6
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
control technology and an installation schedule. If the owner or operator
demonstrates to the Director that a permit application cannot be
submitted within 90 days, the Director may extend the time for submittal
up to an additional 90 days. Control technology shall be determined
according to Subparagraph (1) of this Paragraph. The installation
schedule shall contain the increments of progress described in
Subparagraph (2) of this Paragraph. The owner or operator may at any
time request adjustments in the installation schedule and shall in his
request explain why the schedule cannot be met. If the Director -finds
that the reason for not meeting the schedule is valid, the Director shall
revise the installation schedule as requested; however, the Director shall
not extend the final compliance date beyond 24.months from the date
that the permit was first issued for the control technology. The owner or
operator shall certify to the Director within five days after the deadline
for each increment of progress described in Subparagraph (2) of this
Paragraph whether the required increment of progress has been met.
(1) Control technology. The owner or operator of an animal r
operation shall identify control technologies that are
technologically feasible for his animal operation and shall select
the control technology or control technologies that results in the
greatest reduction of odors considering human health, energy,
environmental, and economic impacts and other costs. The
owner or operator shall explain the reasons for selecting the
control technology or control technologies. If the Director finds
that the selected control technology or control technologies will
effectively control odors following the procedures in 15A NCAC
2Q .0300 or .0500, he shall approve the installation of the control
technology or control technologies for this animal operation. The
owner or operator of the animal operation shall comply with all
terms and conditions in the permit.
(2) Installation schedule. The installation schedule for control
technology shall contain the following increments of progress:
(A) a date by which contracts for odor control technology shall
be awarded or orders shall be issued for purchase of
component parts;
(B) a date by which on -site construction or installation of the
odor control technology shall begin;
(C) a date by which on -site construction or installation of the
odor control technology shall be completed; and
(D) a date by which final compliance shall be achieved.
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-7
s 4a

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
Control technology shall be in place and operating as soon as
practical but not to exceed 12 months from the date that the
permit is issued for control technology.
(1) New or modified animal operations. This Paragraph does not apply
to activities exempted from the moratorium on construction or
expansion of swine farms in S.L. 1997, c. 458, s. 1.1 provided that the
owner or operator demonstrates to the Director that the activity will not
result in an objectionable odor.
(1) Before beginning construction, the owner or operator of a new or
modified animal operation raising or producing swine shall
submit and have an approved best management plan and shall
meet the following: A house or Iagoon that is a component of an
animal operation shall be constructed:
(A) at least 1500 feet from any occupied residence not owned by
the owner of the animal operation;
(B) at least 2500 feet from any school, hospital, church, outdoor
recreation facility, national park, State Park, historic
property, or child care center; and
(C) at least 500 feet from any property boundary;
(2) Before beginning construction, the owner or operator of a new or
modified animal operation other than swine shall submit and
have an approved best management plan.
(3) For new or modified animal operations raising or producing
swine, the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied that is a component of an animal operation shall be:
(A) at least 75 feet from any boundary of property on which an
occupied residence not owned by the owner of the animal
operation is located, and
(B) at least 200 feet from any occupied residence not owned by
the owner of the animal operation.
(4) The Director shall either approve or disapprove the best
management plan submitted under this Paragraph within 90 days
after receipt of the plan. If the Director disapproves the plan, he
shall identify the plan's deficiency.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.107(a)(11); 143-
215.108(a);
Temporary Adoption Eff. April 27, 1999,• March 1, 1999,
Ef1`.' July 1, 2000,
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-8
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
.1803 BEST MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
(a) Contents of a best management plan. The best management plan for
animal operations shall:
(1) identify the name, location, and owner of the animal operation;
(2) identify the name, title, address, and telephone number of the
person filing the plan;
(3) identify the sources of odor within the animal operation;
(4) describe how odor will be controlled from:
(A) the animal houses;
(B) the animal wastewater lagoon, if used;
(C) the animal wastewater application lands, if used;
(D) waste conveyances and temporary accumulation points; and
(E) other possible sources of odor within the animal operation;
(5) contain a diagram showing all structures and lagoons at the
animal operation, forced air directions, and approximate
distances to structures or groups of structures within 3000 feet of
the property line of the animal operation; a recent or updated
aerial photograph may be submitted in place of a diagram
provided the items required under this Subparagraph of this Rule
are shown;
(6) for existing animal operations, contain a schedule not to exceed
six months by which the plan will be implemented (a new
animal operation is to have and be in compliance with its best .
management plan when it begins operation); for an amended best
management plan, the implementation schedule shall not exceed
six months;
(7) describe how the plan will be implemented, including training of
personnel;
(8) describe inspection and maintenance procedures; and
(9) describe methods of monitoring and recordkeeping to verify
compliance with the plan.
(b) The Division shall review all best management plan submittals
within 30 days of receipt of the submittal to determine if the submittal is
complete or incomplete for processing purposes. To be complete, the
submittal shall contain all the elements listed in Paragraph (a) of this
Rule. The Division shall notify the person submitting the plan by letter
stating that:
(1) the submittal is complete,
(2) the submittal is incomplete and identifying the missing elements
and a date by which the missing elements need to be submitted
to the Division, or
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D- 1800-9
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
(3) the best management plan is incomplete and requesting that the
person rewrite and resubmit the plan.
(c) Approval of the best management plan. The Director shall approve
the plan if he finds that:
(1) the plan contains all the required elements in Paragraph (a) of
this Rule;
(2) the proposed schedule contained in the plan will reduce
objectionable odors in a timely manner;
(3) the methods used to control objectionable odors are likely to
prevent objectionable odors beyond the property lines of the
animal operation (the Director shall not consider impacts of
objectionable odors on neighboring property if the owner of the
neighboring property agrees in writing that he does not object to
objectionable odors on his property and this written statement is
included with the proposed best management plan; this
agreement becomes void if the neighboring property changes
ownership. If the neighboring property changes ownership, the
plan shall be revised, if necessary, to prevent Objectionable odors
on this property unless the new owner agrees in writing that he
does not object to objectionable odors on his property); and
(4) the described compliance verification methods are sufficient to
verify compliance with the plan.
Within 90 days after receipt of a plan, the Director shall determine
whether the proposed plan meets the requirements of this Paragraph of
this Rule. If the Director finds that the proposed plan does not meet the
requirements of this Paragraph, he shall notify the owner or operator of
the animal operation in writing of the deficiencies in the proposed plan.
The owner or operator shall have 30 days after receiving written
notification from the Director to correct the deficiencies. If the Director
finds that the proposed plan is acceptable, he shall notify the owner or
operator in writing that the proposed plan has been approved.
History Note: Authority G. S. 143-215.3(a) (1); 143-215. 65, 143-215. 66,•
143-215-215.107(a) (11);
Temporary Adoption E$ April 27, 1999, March 1, 1999,
El% July 1, 2000.
.1804 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
If the Department receives an odor complaint about an animal
operation, the Department may require the owner or operator of the
animal operation to submit the following information:
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-10
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
(1) the name and location of the animal operation;
(2) the name, title, address, and telephone number of the person filing
the report;
(3) the type and number of animals at the animal operation;
(4) potential sources of odors, such as animal housing structures,
lagoons, collection and handling devices, and storage containers,
with a physical description of these sources;
(5) waste water land application procedures; and
(6) measures taken to reduce odors.
This information shall be submitted to the Division within 15 days after
receipt of the request..
History Note. Authority G. S. 143-215.3(a) (I), 143-215. 65, 143-215. 66,•
143-215-215.107(a) (11); .
Temporary Adoption Eff. March 1, 1999,
EB" July 1, 2000.
[pages 12 thru 14 reserved]
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-11
S 40

ENR -- ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
.1806 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this Rule is to provide for the control and
prohibition of objectionable odorous emissions.
(b) Definitions. For the purpose of this Rule the following definitions
shall apply:
(1) "Commercial purposes" means activities that require a state or
local business license to operate.
(2) "Temporary activities or operations" means activities or
operations that are less than 30 days in duration during the
course of a calendar year and do not require an air quality
permit.
(c) Applicability. With the exceptions in Paragraph (d) of this Rule,
this Rule shall apply to all operations that may produce odorous
emissions that can cause or contribute to objectionable odors beyond the
facility's boundaries.
(d) Exemptions. The requirements of this Rule do not apply to:
(1) processes at Kraft pulp mills identified in Rule .0528 of this
Section, and covered under Rule .0524 or .0528 of this Section,
(2) processes at facilities that produce feed -grade animal proteins or
feed -grade animal fats and oils identified in and covered under
Rule .0539,
(3) motor vehicles and transportation facilities,
(4) all on -farm animal and agricultural operations, including dry
litter operations and operations covered under Rule .1804 of this
Section,
(5) municipal wastewater treatment plants and municipal
wastewater handling systems,
(6) restaurants and food preparation facilities that prepare and serve
food on site,
(7) single family dwellings not used for commercial purposes,
(8) materials odorized for safety purposes,
(9) painting operations that do not require a business license, or
(10) all temporary activities or operations.
(e) Control Requirements. The owner or operator of a facility subject to
this Rule shall not operate the facility without implementing
management practices or installing and operating odor control
equipment sufficient to prevent odorous emissions from the facility from
causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the facility's
boundary.
(f) Maximum feasible controls. If the Director determines that a source
or facility subject to this Rule is emitting an objectionable odor by the
procedures described in Paragraph (g) of this Rule,. the Director shall
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-15
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
emissions, with the most effective control option at the top of the -
list. The list shall present all the control technologies that have
not been previously eliminated and shall include the following
information:
(A) control effectiveness,
(B) economic impacts (cost effectiveness),
(C) environmental impacts: this shall include any significant or
unusual other media impacts (for example, water or solid
waste), and, at a minimum, the impact of each control
alternative on emissions of toxic or hazardous air pollutants;
(D) human health impacts,
(E) energy impacts.
However, an owner or operator proposing to implement the most
stringent alternative, in terms of control effectiveness, need not
provide detailed information concerning the other control
options. In such cases, the owner or operator shall only
document, to the satisfaction of the Director, that the proposed
control option is indeed the most efficient, in terms of control
effectiveness, and provide a review of collateral environmental
impacts.
(4) Evaluate most effective controls and document results.
Following the delineation of all available and technically feasible
control technology options under Subparagraph (b) (3) of this
Rule, the energy, human health, environmental, and economic
impacts shall be considered in order to arrive at the maximum
feasible controls. An analysis of the associated impacts for each
option shall be conducted. The owner or operator shall present
an objective evaluation of the impacts of each alternative.
Beneficial and adverse impacts shall be' analyzed and, if possible,
quantified. If the owner or operator has proposed to select the
most stringent alternative, in terms of control effectiveness, as
maximum feasible controls, he shall evaluate whether impacts of
unregulated air pollutants or environmental impacts in other
media would justify selection of an alternative control
technology. If there are no concerns regarding collateral
environmental impacts, the analysis is ended and this proposed
option is selected as maximum feasible controls. In the event the
most stringent alternative is inappropriate, due to energy, human
health, environmental, or economic impacts, the justification for
this conclusion shall be fully documented; and the next most
stringent option, in terms of control effectiveness, becomes the
primary alternative and is similarly evaluated. This process shall
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-18
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
continue until the control technology evaluated can not be
eliminated due to source -specific environmental, human health,
energy, or economic impacts.
(5) Select maximum feasible controls. The most stringent option, in
terms of control effectiveness, not eliminated under
Subparagraph (b) (4) of this Rule shall be selected as maximum
feasible controls.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.107(a)(5);
Ef% April 1, 2001,
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-19
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
2D .1800
documented health problems associated with odors from the
source or facility provided by the State Health Director.
History Note Statutory Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1), 143-
215.107(a)(5),
Eff April 1, 2001.
1807 DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM FEASIBLE CONTROLS FOR
ODOROUS EMISSIONS
(a) Scope. This Rule sets out procedures for determining maximum
feasible controls for odorous emissions. The owner or operator of the
facility shall be responsible for providing the maximum feasible control
determination.
(b) Process for maximum feasible control determinations. The
following sequential process shall be used on a case -by -case basis to
determine maximum feasible controls:
(1) Identify all available control technologies. In the first step, all
available options for the control of odorous emissions shall be
listed. Available options include all possible control
technologies or techniques with a practical potential to control,
reduce, or minimize odorous emissions. For the purposes of this
document, in some specific cases a comprehensive, effective
odor control plan can be listed among the possible odor control
technologies as a viable and satisfactory maximum feasible
control technology option. All available control technologies
shall be included on this list regardless of their technical
feasibility or potential energy, human health, economic, or
environmental impacts.
(2) Eliminate technically infeasible options. In the second step, the
technical feasibility of all the control options identified under
Subparagraph (b)(1) of this Rule shall be evaluated with respect
to source specific factors. A demonstration of technical
infeasibility shall be clearly documented and shall show, based
on physical, chemical, or engineering principles, that technical
difficulties preclude the successful use of the control option
under review. Technically infeasible control options shall then
be eliminated from further consideration as maximum feasible
controls.
(3) Rank remaining control technologies by control effectiveness.
All the remaining control technologies, which have not been
eliminated under Subparagraph (b) (2) of this Rule, shall be
ranked and then listed in order of their ability to control odorous
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-17
S 40

ENR - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2D .1800
require the owner or operator to implement maximum feasible controls
for the control of odorous emissions. (Maximum feasible controls shall
be determined according to the procedures in Rule .1807 of this Section.)
The owner or operator shall:
(1) within 180 days of receipt of written notification from the
Director of the requirement to implement maximum feasible
controls, complete the determination process outlined in 2D
.1807 and submit the completed maximum feasible control
determination process along with a permit application for
maximum feasible controls and a compliance schedule to the
Division of Air Quality; the compliance schedule shall contain
the following increments of progress:
(A) a date by which contracts for the odorous emission control
systems and equipment shall be awarded or orders shall be
issued for purchase of component parts;
(B) a date by which on -site construction or installation of the
odorous emission control systems and equipment shall
begin;
(C) a date by which on -site construction or installation of the
odorous emission control systems and equipment shall be
completed; and
(D) a date by which final compliance shall be achieved.
(2) within 18 months after receiving written notification from the
Director of the requirement to implement maximum feasible
controls, have installed and begun operating maximum feasible
controls.
The owner or operator shall certify to the Director within five days after
the deadline for each increment of progress in this Paragraph whether
the required increment of progress has been met.
(g) Determination of the existence of an objectionable odor. A source or
facility is causing or contributing to an objectionable odor when:
(1) A member of the Division staff determines by field investigation
that an objectionable odor is present by taking into account
nature, intensity, pervasiveness, duration, and source of the odor
and other pertinent factors;
(2) The source or facility emits known odor causing compounds
such as ammonia, total volatile organics, hydrogen sulfide, or
other sulfur compounds at levels that cause objectionable odors
beyond the property line of that source or facility; or
(3) The Division receives epidemiological studies associating health
problems with odors from the source or facility or evidence of
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE D-1800-16
S 40

5&% Bramn Road
Hope N Ts NC 2B348
9,(w23,=1z
Fax
Toc _J�hn Has�t►__ _
Fina 910 486 0707
Phone:910AW1541
Ret _ Lagoon levels, fbDa o_ tom_____
Gallberry Consulting
Services
Fmm:__Kathy Dugan
.-
Date: 4/1 /03
cc:
( Ulm ( For RoWew ( Please Comment
( Please Reply (pleas e Recycow
John, as recommended last week, this is a fapow-up on the lagoon levels reported on 3r21/03.
1- Glenn Brisson-.
Croaked Branch Nursery
Big Bay Nursery 1 i p
a ( �RalrivAn Branch Nursery -
� a
2. Jerry Graham Finishing Farm -
3. BarTy Billups_
�Faiiaidrig farm •-
b. Nursery #1 at Ammon
r L•`I
— c, Nursery #2 at White Oak MOM 0' Iq �
Ronald Hutchinson - Iq
5- Mitchell Norris:
9k a. Farm 1 -�
��Q r It q I
U" o b. Farm 2
.j
10 3DVd NCJRQ hHldA ZTZZEZti8T6 bZ=SO ZO0Z/10/00

DWQIFRO
Fyi and Pass Along L ]
TO:
_ Staff Report Recornmendations L
Ken Averitte ]
( ] Larry Complaint Investigation L ]
(� L ]
Todd Bennett Spill / ER Follow-up
L /Mark Brantley + Please Complete by
ate bytiPlease Investigate L ]
[ ] Richard Canady � •�
Last Person, Please File
Grady Dobson Lam! 4
[] to L] I
( ] Belinda Henson — Return
L]
Michael Lawyer _ Return to Paul Rawls L }
( ] Dale Lopez —
( ] Don Register
( ] Ricky Revels —
( ] Hume White 1 r
a�+ 3

1 Nl A rE Michael F_ Easley, Govemor
RQ Division of Water Quality
�O G
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
N North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
June 10, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Mitchell Norris # 1 & # 2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
Over the past several months this office has attempted to document the actions you have
undertaken in order to regain compliance on Mitchell Norris #1 & #2. During this period this
office has held discussions and meetings with you on how these circumstances occurred, the
possible permit conditions that have been violated, and this office's expectations of this farm
regaining compliance in all areas of the permit. In order for this office to begin this final
assessment of these events some additional information is necessary_
The Division of Water Quality makes the following request: Submit copies of the following
information for Mitchell Norris#1 & # 2.
1. The CAWMP that your farm is operating under now. Please include all amendments or
changes made in the past year.
2. Complete irrigation records for the past year until the present date.
3. Lagoon levels for the past year.
Please send this requested information to the Fayetteville Regional Office. This office should
receive this information on or before July 2, 2004.
A
iZaERR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

r�
Mr. Mitchell Norris
06-10-04
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me, Mr.
Larry Baxley, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely, ootl C. Baxley
Environmental Specialist 11
PR/lb
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO
Central Files - Raleigh
N_ C. Division of Water Quality 225 Caren Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone]
*A
WbENR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6749

I
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W_ Klimek, P. E. Director
April 12, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28377
Subject: SHOW CAUSE MEETING RESULTS
SHOW CAUSE MEETING 02/02/04
Mitchell Norris #1' l & #2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
This letter is to forward to you the results of the Show Cause Meeting held 02/02/04. Based
on the information provided during the Show Cause Meeting held 02/02/04 and further review of
regional files we have determined that this office will not pursue making recommendations to the
Director for violation of the reporting requirement in your permit.
This letter is also to inform you that based on site visits, file reviews and the Show Cause
Meeting held 02/02/04 that this office will be forwarding recommendations to the Director for
enforcement action relating to your ongoing high freeboard levels that have been recorded for
your farm over the past months.
If you have questions or comments regarding this matter please call Mr. Larry Baxley,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
PR/lb
Sincerel
rPaul �E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO L
Central files - Raleigh Raleigh A
#JGLl��t
M C. Division of Water Quality 22i Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Dgv=nent of Environroent and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P, E. Director
February 2, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28377
Subject: NOTICE OF SHOW CAUSE MEETING
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
Recently, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality have
been working with you for your permitted, NCA209039, swine farm located on Coley Rd. in
Bladen County. Events of this past year have not been easy and require difficult decisions to be
made. During 2003 the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 farm has spent approximately six months of the
time within the storm or structural liquid storage levels in the two lagoons. In addressing these
issues this office has three primary concerns.
1. What circumstances caused or contributed to the farm being in noncompliance?
2. What actions have been taken to regain compliance?
3. How will the farm maintain compliance in the future?
This in conjunction with this facilities history of compliance issues demonstrates to this office
that consistent and predictable compliance with your permit has been a problem.
Based on a brief file review your facility has had the following compliance history:
1. 02/25/99 NOV- Insufficient freeboard in two lagoons.
2. 03/21/00 NOV/NOI — FRO staff inspected the facility and observed wastewater ponding in
the spray field and entering an adjacent pond.
3. 08/14/00 NOV — Failure to maintain waste receiving crop fields properly.
4. 10/05/00 NOD- Self reported high freeboard of 16 inches.
5. 4/17/01 Determination of Objectionable Odor by DAQ Inspections.
6. 08/20/01 NOV — Self reported high freeboard.
7. 04/15/03 NOV — Request for Information as result of self reported high freeboard.
8. 10/20/03 N�OV/NOI —Failure to notify FRO of high freeboard. — y 1 i CY - 0 3
O f 1 •
INtrM
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Greer► Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. Norris
02-02-04
Page 2
Due to the items discussed above the Fayetteville Regional Office is considering
recommending to the Director to take enforcement action in this case. The Fayetteville Staff
would like to offer you the opportunity to discuss these issues and present information that you
feel would "show cause" for this office not to proceed with enforcement action.
This "Show Cause Meeting" would take place in the seventh floor conference room of the
Division of Water Quality Offices located in the Systel Building at 225 Green Street in
Fayetteville, North Carolina. You should bring any records, CAWP, diagrams or any other
information as to why the Division of Water Quality should not proceed with Enforcement
Action. The proposed date of the meeting is Thursday February 19, 2004 in the Seventh Floor
Conference Room at 10:00 am that morning.
Please respond within 10 days of receipt of this letter to acknowledge your desire to discuss
this matter or this office will make final decisions pertaining to this case based on information
currently on hand.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
Mr. Larry Baxley, Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
.M
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO
Central Files - Raleigh
AA
Ncbrp—dt
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-674N

asdfasdfasdfasdf
f .
E
s
r
Subject: asdfasdfasdfasdf
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:47:23 -0400
From: Paul Rawls <Paul.Raw] [e-mail]>
To: larry baxley <[e-mail]>
Show Cause Meeting Results
Show Cause Meeting ##/##/04
Mitchell Norris Farm
Facility Number
Bladen County
This letter is to forward to you the results of the Show Cause Meeting
held ##/##/04.Based on the information provided during the Show Cause
meeting held ##/##/04 and further review of regional files we have
determined that this office will not peruse making recommendations to
the Director for violation of the reporting requirement in your permit.
This letter is also to inform you that based on site visits, file
reviews and the Show Cause meeting held ##/##/04 that this office will
be forwarding recommendations to the Director for enforcement action
relating to your ongoing high freeboard levels that have been recorded
for your farm over the past months.
If you have questions or comments regarding this mater please call
1 oft 4/12/2004 1:26 PM

o�0�
r
1� Y
April 12, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28377
Subject: SHOW CAUSE MEETING RESULTS
SHOW CAUSE MEETING 02/02/04
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Enviromnent and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimck, P_ E. Director
This letter is to forward to you the results of the Show Cause Meeting held 02/02/04. Based
on the information provided during the Show Cause Meeting held 02/02/04 and further review of
regional files we have determined that this office will not pursue making recommendations to the
Director for violation of the reporting requirement in your permit.
This letter is also to inform you that based on site visits, file reviews and the Show Cause
Meeting held 02/02/04 that this office will be forwarding recommendations to the Director for
enforcement action relating to your ongoing high freeboard levels that have been recorded for
your farm over the past months.
If you have questions or comments regarding this matter please call Mr. Larry Baxley,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerel ,— - ,
I Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
PR/lb
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - SWC, FRO �*
Central Files - Raleigh aCiJE®
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax (910) 4X6-0707 Customer Smite
1-877-623- i748

A--��
..
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
B. Keith Overcash, P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE"
February 23, 2004 EIVED
Mr. Mitchell Norris F E $ 2 5 2004
Mitchell Norris Farms DENR
289 Turtle Cove FAYEMILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
White Lake, NC 28377
Subject: Notice of Plan Failure of Best Management Plan for Mitchell Norris Farms #1 and
#2 (DWQ ID 909, Bladen County)
Dear Mr. Norris:
On February 4, 2004, in response to an odor complaint, the North Carolina Division of Air
Quality (DAQ) reviewed the status of the Best Management Plan (BMP) for the Mitchell Norris
Farms. One element of the BMP to minimize odors, the planting of trees, has not been completed
in a timely manner as outlined in the BMP. As a result of this review, the DAQ has determined
that this constitutes a BMP plan failure as defined under 15 NCAC 2D. 1802 6)(4), Plan Failure.
Upon a finding of plan failure, the regulations require the installation of control equipment
to control odor (15 NCAC 2D. 1802(k). As part of these requirements, you are required to submit
a permit application, within 90 days of receipt of this letter, to install the control equipment
including a schedule for installation of the equipment. The procedural requirements are enclosed
in the attached regulations (see 15 NCAC 2D. 1802(k)).
Any violation of an air quality regulation is subject to the assessment of civil penalties per
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.114A. This General Statute provides that civil penalties
of not more than ten thousand ($10,000) may be assessed against any person who violates any
classification, standard, or limitation established pursuant to General Statute 143-215.107, Air
Quality Standards and Class)7cations. In addition, each day of continuing violation after written
notification from the Division of Air Quality shall be considered a separate offense. Neither this
letter, nor any subsequent action, absolves you from responsibility for any violation or damage to
public or private property or from any enforcement action available to this agency.
1641 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641
2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] Intemet: www.ncair.org
NorthCarol.ina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Mitchell Norris
February 23, 2004
Page 2
We appreciate your prompt attention to this environmental concern. If you have any questions
with respect to this matter or in meeting the regulatory requirements, please contact Steven Vozzo,
Fayetteville Regional Office Supervisor (910-486-1541) or Gary Saunders at the Stationary Source
Compliance Branch (919-733-1497).
Sincerely,
T.i�thOvercash, P.E.
BKO/gls
Enclosure — Odor Regulations
cc: Gary Saunders - RCO
DAQ Central Files (Bladen)
Steve Vozzo — FRO
Markus Elliott -FRO

war4S
Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�oF
o
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
y
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
o -c
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
January 20, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mitchell Norris
494 Coley Rd.
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: Farm Status and Update
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
Mitchell Norris #t I & # 2
Facility No. 9-39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
Recently, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality have
been working with you for your permitted, NCA209039, swine farm located on Coley Rd. in
Bladen County. This letter serves as a follow up to the events that have occurred over the past
several months.
In November of 2003 staff member Larry Baxley visited your farm and became concerned
about the high freeboard levels on the two lagoons. Later one of these would enter the structural
storage level and stay there until aerway applications in. December lowered it to above 12" on the
marker. The entry of a lagoon into the structural storage level is considered by this office an
emergency situation and must be responded to within five days. Every reasonable effort must be
made to achieve compliance while staying in accordance with your Permit.
The options available to regain compliance are choices made by the producer and their
integrator for their particular situation. Common responses are water conservation procedures
within the confinement barns and weather permitting to apply wastewater to their spray fields.
Another option would be to pump and haul the waste to another legal site. Culling of animals
from the confinement houses and depopulation help to reduce the waste flow into the lagoon and
thus the volume that has to be removed in order to achieve compliance. Modification of the
CAWMP by the incorporation of more application area or the changing to better- suited crops can
also be done with the help of a technical specialist.
It is the opinion of this office that restocking should not occur until compliance of lagoon
liquid levels have been met and hopefully somewhat exceeded. Recently, you purchased an
aerway.waste application system for use on your farm. This office encourages you to continue to
expand your waste handling options by all means that are in accordance with your Permit. While
events of the past cannot be changed this office recognizes your recent efforts and looks ahead to
working with you in the future.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, North Carolina 29301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone]
AVVA
l4MMRA
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. Norris
01-20-04
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Larry Baxley, Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerel
Paul .Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
PR/lb
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO
Central Files - Raleigh
sew
�NR
hi. C. Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street Fayetteville, forth Carolina 28301-5043 [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

AND4AL FACILITY. ANNUAL "CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number s D 39 County *081� G�-- _ Year 200�
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit} ACKC-AL o r -_i 5 # + 2—
Operator in Charge formthis Facility- �T�2 - -� Orris Certification # (p
Land application of_ animal waste as:allowed by the_above permit occiured:during the past.calendar year
YES NO: If NO, skip.Part I and Part II and prgceed to the-certification.:,.Also,. if anima[ waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑.ox Pulls (please chcck the_ appropriate box) in the: Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): �'� Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number-offields ❑.or Pulls :(please check -the appropriate box) on which -land 'application
occurred during the year: _ _�_ Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds_ of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied ' during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to. be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the: year, .0 tons 1.i or gallons ` (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number'of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallestnumber_of animals by type at this facility.at any one.time:during,the previous year:
Largest
Smallest
(These numbers -are for informational purposes only since the only permit, limit"on'the number of animals
at the facility is -the, annual . average .numbers} ,
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: YVAt�r rO u) h
Part H: Facg! Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED. TO -BE TAKEN. TO
BRING THIS FACILITY -BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during $ Yes []No
the past calendar year.
RECEIVED
AFACF 3-1"3 1 1 MAY � - 2005
GtMR - FAY4ii EV LI_E REGIONAL URGE

2.
The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct. runoff.of waste from
1 Yes ❑ No
the facility (including'the houses; lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3.
There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past]
Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4.
There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility. during
❑ Yes No
the past calendar year.
5.
There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
b.
All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
Yes ❑ No
7.
Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
Yes ❑ No
was, designed or reduce the lagoon's -minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed..
8.
A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
Yes ❑ No
9.
Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
14_
Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
I Yes ❑ No
11.
All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12.
All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
L1 Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWIAP .were maintained during the past. calendar year on all Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAV;W for this facility were )Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal -waste during -the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision, in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted: Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are.-significant.penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
L+-Che-l l Kc) rr
Permittee N e aria 1(iu�e (type or print)
S niturd -ofPermittee Datd
p[ature of Operator in Ch
different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
Date

Part 2, Question 4
Lagoon levels exceeded the 19 inch required freeboard. Animals were
removed temporarily. Information pertaining to freeboard violation was
sent to the Fayetteville Regional office.

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Norris #1
Lagoon Identification 1
Person(s) Taking Measurements
RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler": NA
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 2.3 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1,33 acres: 2.3 acres x 6= 14 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon guage pole): inches
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 37.2 Inches
The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level C.60 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 12.02 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance form the present liquid surface level
to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): j:4 �.,, e Feet�V®
HAY 4 - 2005
f F"'71-7-c'ALLEREGIONAL OFEICE

Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the.sludge layer: 2.8 Feet
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone:
Note: If the Calculated thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or
contact DWQ for more information.
Completed By: Danna Westerbeek Printed Name
ty 1)1,[ Date
Feet

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansville, NC 28349
Appendix 2: Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
Lagoon Identification
Person(s) Taking Measurements
Date of Measurements
Norris #1
Ro Britt
20-Mar-04
Grid Point Distance from liquid Distance from liquid Thickness of sludge
Surface to top of surface to lagoon layer
Numbersurface
bottom (soil) y
1
10.75
12
1.25
2
8.75
12.5
3.75
3
8.75
12
3.25
4
8.50
12
3.50
5
8.50
12.25
3.75
6
7.75
12.25
4.50
7
8.75
12.25
3.50
8
9.50
12
2.50
9
9.00
12
3.00
10
10.25
12.25
2.00
11
9.25
10.5
1.25
12
11.00
12
1.00
13
11.00
12.25
1.25
14
10.25
12
1.75
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
9.4
12.0
2.6

Farm,Narne: Norris #1
Date: 3/20/2004
Grower : Mitchel Norris
Lagoon ID Lagoon 1
Top of Dike Elvation
Ft.
Bottom of Dike Elevation
Ft.
Start Pump Level
85.30
Ft.
Stop Pump Level
82.20
_ Ft.
Current Freeboard
13.00
In.
Top of Dike Length
400 Width
230
Grid Point
Water Deoh
Distance From
Liquid Surface to
Toe of Sludge
Thickness of Sludge
1
12.00
10.75
1.25
2
12.50
8.75
3.75
3
12.00
8.75
3.25
4
12.00
8.50
3.50
5
12.25
8.50
3.75
6
12.25
7.75
4.50
7
12.25
8.75
3.50
8
12.00
9.50
2.50
9
12.00
9.00
3.00
10
12.25
10.25
2.00
11
10.50
9.25
1.25
12
12.00
11.00
1.00
13
12.25
11.00
1.25
14
12.00
10.25
1.75
15
0.00
16
0.00
17
0.00
18
0.00
19
0.00
20
0.00
21
0.00
22
0.00
23
0.00
24
0.00
i

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansviiie, NC 28349
Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Norris #2
Lagoon Identification 2
Person(s) Taking Measurements RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if malting a direct measurement with "core sampler': NA
Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 2.3 acres
Estimate number of sampling points:
a_ Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acres: 2.3 acres x 6= 14 , with maximum of 24.
At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level
to the Present Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon guage pole): Inches
Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level 37.2 Inches
The distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level 3.02 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level
to the lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points): 11.IJ7 Feet
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance form the present liquid surface level
r to the top of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 7.7 Feet

1Y -
Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 3.4 Feet
Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone: ;:,,..,,,!f.,3 Feet
* Note: if the Calculated thickness of the existing Liquid "treatment Zone is less than 4 feet, a
sludge removal and utilization plan may be required by N. C. DWQ. See your specific permit or
contact DWQ for more information.
Completed By: Danna Westerbeek Printed Name
,Date

Rainman Environmental, LLC
Post Office Box 115
Kenansviite, NC 28349
Appendix 2: Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Norris #2
Lagoon Identification 2
Person(s) Taking Measurements RO Britt
Date of Measurements 20-Mar-04
Grid Point Distance from liquid Distance from liquid Thickness of sludge
surface to top of surface to lagoon layer
Number sludge bottom (soil) Y
1
7.00
10.25
3.25
2
7.50
11
3.50
3
7.50
10.75
3.25
4
7.75
11.25
3.50
5
6.50
10.25
3.75
6
7.75
11.5
3.75
7
7.50
11.25
3.75
8
&00
11.25
3.25
9
7.75
11.5
3.75
10
7.25
11.25
4.00
11
7.50
11
3.50
12
8.25
11.25
3.00
13
8.50
11.25
2.75
14
9.25
11.25
2.00
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average
7.7
11.1
3.4

arr+fName Norris #2
Date: 3/20/2004
Grower: Mitchel Norris
Lagoon ID Lagoon 2
Top of Dike. Elvation
Ft.
Bottom of Dike Elevation
Ft.
Start Pump Level
85.30
Ft.
Stop Pump Level
82.20
Ft.
Current Freeboard
18.00
In.
Top of Dike Length
400 Width
230
Grid Point
Water Depth
Distance From
Liquid Surface to
Top of Sludge
Thickness of Sludge
1
10.25
7.00
3.25
2
11.00
7.50
3.50
3
10.75
7.50
3.25
4
11.25
7.75
3.50
5
10.25
6-50
3.75
6
11.50
7.75
3.75
7
11.25
7.50
3.75
8
11.25
8.00
3.25
9
11.50
7.75
3.75
10
11.25
7.25
4.00
11
11.00
7.50
3.50
12
11.25
8.25
3.00
13
11.25
8.50
2.75
14
11.25
9.25
2.00
15
0.00
16
0.00
17
0.00
18
0.00
19
0.00
20
0.00
21
0.00
22
0.00
23
0.00
24
0.00
in reef
■
F

Waste Management Plan Changes
Facility Q - Farm
i
f
12 3 2004
This farms farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes 1
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
0 Other
Comments:
)Pk2(u
n 1.rncti k-
k
°- Date

The following table is to be used when irrigation is done with the "Aerway" irrigation system. The
acreage used is the total field acreage, minus the wetted acres, as this system wets the entire field.
This amendment is based on the NUP written by Sonya Barber in Oct. 2001. PAN and windows
reflect that NUP. Aerway may be used in fields 3&3a, but no additional acres will be gained.
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tine Per Acre Utilized Annlication Pulls
30291
subfield 1
NoA
Bermuda(G)
305
1,491
454.45
April -Set
5,6
3029
subfield 2
NoA
Bermuda G
230
3.74
860.2
April - Set
1,2
3029
subfield 4
Gr
Bermuda H
275.
2.25
618.75
April - Set
12b
3029
subfield 5
NoA
Bermuda H
305
01
521.55
April - Set
10
3029
subfield 6
NoA
Bermuda H)
305
3.13
954.65
April - Set
3a,3b,4
-subfield 2
Small Grain
75
3.74
280.5
septl5-0ct;F-March
1,2
1,4,5,6
Small Grain
50
8.58
429
Sept - April
0
0
0
Total 1 12.321 4,119.10 1
'This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE. The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of
North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
a
Ownerl 955nager
-Jul U3 .1"
Technical Specialist
_bt Is-64
Date
k' � a40.3
Date �r

ArN
1 i� �,���d i F ' �11 .. •
To: John Hasty/Zany Baxley/DWQ, Fayetteville
From Kathy Dugan, Gallbery Consulting Services
CC: Mitchell Norris
Minn 5/5/03
Pin Response to 4/16/2003 Notice of Violation
1. Current freeboard levels: lagoon 1 s if lagoon 2 a.
2. Freeboard level records for past 12 months —see attached
3. Spraying re: -,orris for the past 12 months --see attached
4. Rainfall records --not available
5_ Cropping system —see attached
6. Actions taken to restore freeboard:
a. land application to regular spray sites when the soil was dry enough to allow pumping without
ponding
b. removal of animals from site
c. delay in re -stocking animals
7. They freeboard violation at this facility was entirely due to chronic and unusual rainfall.
sfV&L - aoo

8 May 2002
Memorandum
To: Paul Rawls
From : Steven Vozzo
Re: Summary of DAQ FRO Bladen County Case #1
Objectionable Odor Determination
Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & 42 (DWQ ID 909)
Elizabethtown, NC, Bladen County 6 / 09-00000
The Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2 (DWQ ID 9a39) located on Coley Road in the Elizabethtown
area of Bladen County, has been the subject of numerous complaints received by the Division of
Air Quality Fayetteville Regional Office [FRO DAQ]. The following is a brief summary of
events. Note the odor assessment dates are for the dates in which the odor was `objectionable'
and does not include the many investigations were the odor intensity was less.
(1) 17 April 2001. Objectionable Odor Determination made by DAQ RCO and letter sent.
This letter was based on data that include the odor observations made by the FRO DAQ staff.
The dates that the FRO odor team documented intense/objectionable odors were
February 6, 2001, March 1, 2001, March 2, 2001 and March 13, 2001.
And an addendum for the odor assessment on 23 March 2001.
Note: due to failed tracking of the certified mail response, no date could be proven on which
Mr. Norris received his letter thus could not accurately track the 90 day requirement for a
Odor Management Plan submittal.
(2) 08 August 2001. After Regional Office contacts Mr. Norris and Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
(Murphy Farms), DAQ received Best Management Plan.
(3) 11 September 2001. Letter to Mr. Norris stating plan was inadequate and incomplete.
(4) 29 October 2001. Updated Best Management Plan was received from Mr. Norris. Still did
not include a schedule for implementation. Mr. Norris and Mr. Westerbeek were contacted
by DAQ RCO and a schedule was requested.
(5) 30 January 2002. FRO sends RCO an addendum to the investigation package. Strong odors
were still being observed by the neighbors. Markus Elliott continues to investigate for
FRO. Strong odors determined on:
08 January 2002, 10 January 2002, and 28 January 2002.
(6) 1 May 2002. DAQ RCO sends Mr. Norris a letter notifying him of the "Completion of the
Best Management Plan" timetable of six months from the date of submission of the plan.
lsfv
cc: FRO County File

AVA�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
MEMORANDUM
To: Keith Overcash c/o Gary Saunders, RCO TSB
Through: Steven Vozzo
From: Markus Elliott
Re: Addendum to FRO Request for Odor Determination for
DAQ FRO Bladen County Case # 01
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Date: 01/30/2002
The attached information is additional compilation of data regarding odors emitted by Mitchell Norris
Farms #I and -#2 (hereafter referred to as Norris Farms) located on Coley Road in Bladen County, NC. The
following is a timetable of events related to Norris Farms:
l . 17 April 2001 - An odor determination was made by RCO
2. 29 May 2001 - Management Plan was submitted by Norris Farms
3. 11 September 2001, a certified letter was sent to Mr. Norris stating the Management Practices
were incomplete.
4. 08 October 2001 New Management Plan submitted by Norris Farms
The FRO requests the attached information also be used in the evaluation of the Norris Farms Odor Control
Management Practices. This additional information was collected after the mentioned Management Plan
was submitted RCO.
(a) I, Markus Elliott, received three after hours telephone calls from Karen Priest and was able to respond to
two of the calls.
(i) The first investigation occurred on the evening of January 8, 2002 at approximately 8:10 PM. I was
onsite for approximately 1 hour and the intensity was 3 to 4 for most of that time.
(ii)The second call came in on January13, 2002 at approximately 6:30 PM. By the time I arrived the odor
had dissipated and was not detectable. The wind direction had shifted and increased in speed during the
twenty minutes it took me to drive to the Priest residence.
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street— Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Internet httpJldaq.state.nc.us/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

(b)I have also received several complaints from William A. Hair since Norris Farms submitted the final
management plan.
(i) On January 8, 2002 Karen Priest informed me she had spoken with Alex Hair. He wanted me to stop
by his residence after I left her residence. When I arrived at the Hair residence the odor intensity was
approximately 4 with increases to 5. '
(ii) On January 10, 2002, at approximately 7:50 PM, I received a page from Alex. When I contacted him,
he stated the odor was terrible. I proceeded to his residence. Upon arrival, odor intensity was about a
3. Mr. Hair joined me in the yard and said the odor was not as bad as earlier.
(iii) A third call came the evening of January 13, 2002, at approximately 7:35 PM. I proceeded to Mr.
Hair's residences to investigate. When I arrived, the odor was 5 intensity. The odor increased and
declined during my visit. When I departed it was 5 intensity again. _
(iv) On January 28, at approximately 10:15 PM, I received a page from Mr. Hair. He stated that the odor
was really bad. When 1 arrived I noticed the odor along Coley Road past the Norris Farm. (I was
traveling north on Coley Road.) In Mr. Hair's yard, about 75 yards off Coley Road, the odor intensity
was a bout 5. The odor intensity started to decline. And for about 15 minutes went away. Then the
intensity started to increase and back to a 5 when I departed. I was on site for about an hour. Mr. Hair
gave me his logs for the past couple of months.
All incidences occurred when the wind was from the general direction of the Norris Farm. There are
'no other farms within a 1 mile radius of the Hair or Priest residences. Due to wind direction and close
proximity of the Norris Farm to the Hair home, it appears that the Norris Farm is the source of the
objectionable odors. A copy of the odor investigation reports are attached.
I
Mitchell Norris submitted an odor management plan to DAQ RCO October 2002. Based on these
observations and evaluations, the plan has not been implemented or is not working.
Imae
Attachments
cc: DAQ Central Files, RCO
Paul Rawls, DWQ FRO Supervisor (w/o attachments)

1.
L

Rug 06 01 02:56p
289 Turtle Cove Rd
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
August 6, 2001
Paul Rawls
Regional Neater Quality Supervisor
225 Green St
Suite 714 "
Fa ttevill NC 28301
DENR-FRO
M 6 2001
A.
Yk.
DWO
Dear Mr. Rawls,
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation issued to Norris Farms (FN: 09-39)
on July 23, 2061. As requested in your letter, a technical specialist has been contacted to evaluate
the existing berrnuda fields_ The field behind the pump house will be re -sprigged this week or
next, weather permitting_ Any additional fields will be re -sprigged according to Kathy Dugan's
5
recommendations. Ms. Dugan will be visiting the farm on August 7. In addition, all fields will be
sprayed for weed control this week if weather permits.
If you need additional information, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
lv
Mitchell Norris

North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
Alan W. E31mek, P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL 7000 0600 0028 7275 4367
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
April 17, 2001
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris Farms i#1 & #%
125 Hairelson Road
Clarkton, North Carolina 28433
Subject: Determination of Objectionable Odor
Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2
Elizabethtown, NC, Bladen County
Dear .Mr. Norris:
NCDENR
RECEIVED
APR 2 4 2001
DENR
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
6 / 09-00000
The Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2: (DWQ ID 9a39) located on Coley Road in the Elizabethtown
area of Bladen County, has been the subject of numerous complaints received by the Division of
Air Quality Fayetteville Regional Office [FRO DAQ]. Odor observations were made by the
FRO DAQ staff. The dates that the FRO odor team documented objectionable odors were
February 6, 2001, March 1;2001; March 2,-2001 and March 13, 2001. Subsequently, upon
discussion between myself, as Director of the Division of Air Quality, and Steven Vozzo, the
Supervisor of the Fayetteville Regional Office, and after careful consideration of all criteria, it
has been concluded that your operation is the subject of an Objectionable Odor Determination,
per North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2D .180,
(g). This letter is to inform you that you are now required to prepare and submit a Best
Management Plan (BUT) as described in NCAC 2D.1803 Best Management Plans for Animal
Operations.
The permanent rule for the control of odors from animal operations became effective on Julyl,
2000. The rule, 15A NCAC 2D.1800 Control of Odors, defines the type of operation that is
applicable to the rule and lists the Required Management Practices (RMP) of these operations.
The rule defines objectionable odors as:
15A NCAC 2D.1801 (9) - "Objectionable odor" means any odor present in the ambient
air that by itself, or in combination with other odors, is or may be harmful or injurious to
human health or welfare, or may unreasonably interfere with the comfortable use and
enjoyment. of life or property. Odors are harmful or injurious to human health if they
tend to lessen human food and water intake, interfere with sleep, upset appetite, produce
1641 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641
2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX; 919-715-7175 Internet: http://dQ.state.nc.us/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLED / io% POST CONSUMER PAPER

w
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris Farms
April 17, 2001
Page 2
irritation of the upper respiratory tract, or cause symptoms of nausea, or if their chemical
or physical nature is, or may be, detrimental or dangerous to human health.
The criteria for determining objectionable odors is also listed in the rule:
15A NCAC 2D.1802 (g): Determination of the existence of an objectionable odor. In
deciding if an animal operation is causing or contributing to an objectionable odor, the
Director may consider one or more of the following:
(1} The nature, intensity, frequency, pervasiveness, and duration of the odors from
the animal operation;
(2) Complaints received about objectionable odors from the animal operation;
(3) Emissions from the animal operation of known odor causing compounds, such as
ammonia, total volatile organics, hydrogen sulfide or odor;
(4) Any epidemiological studies associating health problems with odors from the
animal operation or documented health problems associated with odors from the
animal operation provided by the State Health Director; or
(5) Any other evidence, including records maintained by neighbors, that show that
the animal operation is causing or contributing to an objectionable odor.
The permanent rule can be -viewed at: http://dau.state.nc.us/Rules/Ruies/Dl8OO.pdf
A copy of the peiin ent rule has been included with this letter.
The owners)/operator(s) of Mitchell Norris Farms #1 & #2 have a maximum of 90 days from
receipt of this letter to prepare 'a Best Management Plan (BMP) as described in Section .1803 -
Best' Management PIans for Animal Operations. The Director has a maximum of 90 days from
receipt of the BMP to approve' the plan. The owner(s)/operator(s) then have a maximum of 30
days from approval of the plan to be in compliance with the terms of the plan. Failure of the
owner(s)/ope'rator(s) to meet the required timeline shall be considered a violation of the
regulation and also constitutes "Plan Failure". Plan Failure will require odor controls and an Air
Permit per NCAC 2D.1802(k).
Any violation of an air quality regulation is subject to the assessment of civil penalties as per
North Carolina General Stattrte:143-215.114A. This General Statute provides that civil penalties
of not more than ten thousand ($10,000) may assessed against any person who violates any
classification ,' standard,'limitaiion established pursuant to General Statute 143-215.107, "Air
Quality Staniiaids-and Classifications". In addition, each day of continuing violation after

W--
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris Farms
April 17, 2001
Page 3
written notification from the Division of Air Quality shall be considered a separate offense.
Please be advised that neither this letter, nor any subsequent action, absolves you from
responsibility for any violation or damage to public or private property or from any enforcement
action available to this agency.
We appreciate your immediate attention to this environmental concern. If you have any
questions with respect to this matter, please contact Keith Overcash, P.E., DAQ Deputy Director
(919-71 `i-6290). or Steven Vozzo, Fayetteville Regional Office Supervisor (910-486-1541".
Sincerely,
11 -
Alan W. Klimek. P.E.
AK/sfv
Attachments -Odor Regulations
cc: Keith Overcash
Gary Saunders
DAQ Central Files
Fayetteville Regional Office
Regional Supervisors

mroy'l Microbac Laboratories,. Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
http://www.microbac.com
CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR • WASTES • FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. B. Heath
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KNO03
SAMPLE ID: 1. Ditch - ID #OOMX85535
2. Pond = ID .#00 ID #OOMX85536
3.
NC #11
NC #37714
USDA #3787
DATE REC'D: 08/08/00 SAMPLED: 08/08/00
SAMPLED BY: B. Heath
DELIVERED BY: B. Heath
SAMPLE CODE: Ditch/Pond, Grab
REFERENCE: Mitchell Norris Farm
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 08/22/ 0
++++a++f++++++•r++a•a4t++a++++a++++++a+++aa++++a++aaaaaaaa+*a+*a+++a+++++a++a+++a++a+k+*#a++
ANALYSIS METHOD 1 2 3
*++as+iF****a#aai*a++a+a+aa++++++ate+a++++Ma+***** r++a++aa
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 410 818
NITRATE (mg/L) EPA 353.3 <1.0
COBS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the IPAE IPAB E R
sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for
advertising or other purposes without written approval from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

O Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
- FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC ##11
817 CASTLI`HAYNE STREET NC #37714
Microbac FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA ##31787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
http:Hwww.microbac.com
CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR • WASTES • FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
' Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: -Mr. B. Heath
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KNO03
SAMPLE ID: 1. Ditch - ID #OOMX85535
2. Pond ID ##00 XD #OOMX85536
3-
DATE REC'D: 00/08/00 SAMPLED: 08/08/00
SAMPLED BY: B. Heath t.
DELIVERED BY: B. Heath
SAMPLE CODE: Ditch/Pond,Grab
REFERENCE: Mitchell Norris Farm
DATA REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED: 08/ / 0 `� R
*rfr#+a+a*�t+ttrt##ta3*k**ti*fa+ffk+t++r+++fa#+*#a}a*#++atrt+#+r++aa++#+++#+ff{f++#}++#+
ANALYSIS b0'FHOD 1 2 3
COLIFORM, FECAL (per -100 ml) SM18 9222D 410 818
NITRATE (mg/L) EPA 353.3 <1.0
a
CAS: < = Less than
> - Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
r
t
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the
sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon the condition that it is not to be�reproduced wholly or in part for
advertising or other purposes without written approval from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research
r
MEMBER

. ='47
Plan Amendment to include S&WCC Chronic Rainfan Prac*sces and Standards
through M rch 31, 2000
i
New spray fieFas a3cd_-- --.-
(Check approprate 5DX)
A. acre of cropland added
F. acres of hardwood woodlanc
C. =es of pine woodland adde
z Summer PerannWs Grass
(Check appropria=e box)
A. Application window mend
grass
B. An addltonal 50 Is. Of PAN =Plied to acres of
M. PAN Apniicuion Lncrme: for Small Grains & Winter Grasses
(Check appropriate- box)
?.�04- Acpuczuon increasei to 200 ids De- acres for2L acres or E
j small grains O�Vrirtzr grmes t
3 2001 FAN applications incased to 150 dos pe~ acres of over seeded
Ali,D s� percnr�al inriud in B. �
ry , Max :►.tm 12:1irager. U ilization Vieasurt-s for Siwdl C-raLns tad Wintar
C-13�5�5 � - %� f
�Caci:BT}'7FDpi:aC box) M k4,e- JjL{l�ti1.
A- Use of higher sexing r-aies
B. Timely harvest of forte to increase yield
C. Irrigating during periods of war -me.- we=" er
V. llmigation Ma.,- p-mert Techniques Reduce Rnnoffand Ponding
Pt; rental
k making frt-quen_, light irrigaficn applications
B. of imgtiil before predicted rainfall
Fzciiity Numb e_-
Fa liry C-4-uv'Mar Inturt Te`ruu i s
Dar 23 Date z y 9
ibis domment mun be Med the SWCD OMCZ 2zd available far insertion at the fWjUrf.
'.. .. =ter .4:r•� �e"�� l?i- _
60"d~ L��9Z980i6 .�aaua� anL!^-A0s lepsrl V90-0i 00-90-mole

G,AFO TELEPHONE LOG
Foyetteville Regional Office
AcOMPLANT
--r REG2UEST FOR INFORMATION
OTHER
DATE/TIME _3-- ! -7 i
DWO GONTACi
PERSON GONTAGTING THE
RETURN TELE
ADDRESS
FARM NAME: f V1
FARM OWNER
GOUNTY &�� �A FAGUTY NO
NARRATIVE:

To : State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
attn : Mr. Grady Dobson
Dear Mr. Dobson,
July 9, 1996 G%
JUL
ENV. MANAGEMENT
VWEVILLE BEG- OFFICE
Per your request, I am writing you in response to your letter of July 1, 1996. The
following outline explains the events leading to and immediately following the incident
that occurred on my farm on Tuesday, June 25 1996:
-Approximately 8:00 p.m. --I finished an irrigation routine onto a field of newly
sprigged coastal bermuda.
-Approximately 8:30 p.m. --Due to several factors (courtesy to neighbors, newly
sprigged bermuda , and forecasts of possibly severe weather) I decided to start
another irrigation routine. (This was a pull that had not been made before because
there was not an actively growing crop. Also, this is the first season in which I
have had a permanent irrigation system and the first season in which I have done
any irrigation because the facility was new last year.)
-Approximately 9:00 p.m. --I moved my irrigation equipment and pulled out the
irrigation gun. After starting the pump, I went to check the system. At this point,
I realized that the effluent was spraying on the state road. I immediately stopped
the pump. My wife and I drove to the area on the road where the effluent had
sprayed and assessed the situation. There was no ponding of runoff.
-Approximately 9:45 p.m. --I went to the farm office and had Terry Tate contacted.
-Approximately 10:00 p.m. --Mr. Tate called the farm and I explained to him what
had just occurred.
-Approximately 10:15 p.m. --Mr. Tate arrived at the farm and proceeded to make
an assessment of the situation. He agreed that there was no ponding or runoff.
Mr. Tate contacted Mr. Gary Scalf of the Murphy Family Farms Land and Nutrient
Management Department. Mr. Scalf informed Mr. Tate that he would contact the
D.E.M.'s office on Wednesday, .tune 26.

•
-Approximately 10:30 a.m., June 26--Mr. Scalf contacted Mr. Tate, who
proceeded to leave me a message to assure me that the D.E.M. had been
contacted.
Throughout this incidence, I have given a great deal of thought as to how this
unfortunate incident could have been avoided, and how I can prevent any further
problems. I have consulted with and had a farm visit with Terry Tate. Since then, plans
have been made to make measurements and mark the end of pull lanes to prevent this from
happening again. Also, a detailed map has been drawn and is located at the farm.
I thank you and your office for your understanding regarding this unfortunate
incident and assure you that I am malting every effort to see that only the best
management practices are in place. Again, thank you for your cooperation and input.
Mr. Mitchell Norris

CAFO COMPLAINT
TO :Mitchell Norris Hog Farm
Bladen County
THROUGH :Ed Buchan, Water Quality
Grady Dobson, Water Quality
Paul s of the WQ staff was contacted at home at approximately
10:00 p.m. Tuesday June 25, 1996. The anonymous complaint indicated
that the farm had/was spraying swine waste onto a nearby state
road. The Complainant indicated the road was wet but no runoff was
observed.
Mr. Gary Scalf, Nutrient Manger, Murphy Farms contacted the Grady
Dobson with FRO WQ June 26, 1996 at 10:00 to report that the
overspray noted above that had occurred the previous night.
Mr. Scalf was contacted by Terry Tate, Area Service Tech.. Mr. Tate
had been contacted by the farmer, Mr. No to alert all concerned
parties that the overspay had occurred.
Mr. Norris also wanted DELI notified.
The report indicated No ponding, No runoff, No surface waters were
reported to be affected.

1 -
1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional puce
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
=>fi
..
r
. s
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 11, 1996
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Route 1, Box 65-K
Clarkton, NC 28433
SUBJECT: Norris Hog Farm
Reg. # 09-39
Bladen Co.
Dear .Mr. Norris,
In response to a citizen's complaint, staff from the
Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Environmental
Management inspected your animal operation and the spray field(s)
serving this operation on 1/4/96. It was observed that some water
appeared to have ponded in the southwest corner of your spray field
adjacent to SR 1709. This ponding appears to have resulted from
the construction of a earthen berm which prevented water from
draining into a nearby ditch. However, a breach in the berm was
fabricated which allowed some of the ponded water to flow off the
field into the bordering drainage ditch. This runoff was sampled
by the Bladen County Health Department and the results- did not
indicate the presence of significant animal waste levels in the
runoff water. It should be noted that a rain event occurred on
the date of sampling. It was also observed that on the date of
inspection, the ponded water did not exhibit any noticeable odor
which usually characterizes the presence of animal waste.
As per our conversation on 1/5/96, it is recommended that you
do not spray on that portion of the field until the ground is
properly graded. This is especially important during the winter
months as the soil's infiltration rate is decreased and the cover
crop does not uptake nutrients as rapidly which can lead to
wastewater runoff. Therefore, please be aware it is a violation of
North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface water$ of -the State without a permit. The Division of
Environmental Management has the authority to levy a civil penalty
of not more than $10,060.00 per day per violation.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville ��y� FAX 91GA86-0707
North Carolina 2W1-5043 N`�a/ C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

i
Page 2
1/11/96
Mr. Norris
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Ed
Buchan or Michael Wicker at [phone]. Thank you for your
time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Sam Warren - NRCS Bladen County
Chris Walling - Soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Don Yousey - Bladen County Health Department
u

zite KeQuu= in7mcui= niumnon: -- N;
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 11141,1996
Mme:
Farm Name/Ownax:_ Uatrig. F nm I m i Eft 1e r ; c
Mailing Address: Cat' 1 _ Bax (0 e-N*'ri<{-b rtG_ ?!R `# 3 3 --
�tnty: 31wdw► ., _
Integrator- �JrA��. _ Phone: o z - z -~
On Site Representative.(J 3. 3. Pr;4Z4 Phone:
Physical Address/Location: OFF L4* 8 7 a... F -_to w T , �. f6.n, l eFf- ra,;
SR t7o S _ -�
Type of Operation: Swine ,)I_ PoultryCattle
Design Capacity:: Lf®oo ' Number of Animals on Site: 367a
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude. '
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Te N14- Actual Froeboard:_^J(+_Ft. _n4�&Lnches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? rr
as any erosion observed? Yrs*sa-ATa N A
Is adequate Iand available for spray? I&or No Is the 664 crop adequate? QY�ic r No
Crops) being utilized: ,c txx
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? dii or No
100 Feet from Wells? ZD or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orb
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or Mo
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or, 0 If Yes, Please E4plain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (vol es of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or& — Inlo0-& re.qu-'MJ 42—
Additional Comments: *s A - Pjat A-PplsJ6�
At vhe. Norr-src '.Sp) -A oA f+4L Sapp,,
4xov1 0�- 1;eeU uA+i I es ruPe'l y yr '
OCL,gtJG�Gµ
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

January 2; 1996
TO: Mr. Grady Dobson
Fayetteville Region DEM ENV. MANAGEMENT
225 Green St. FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Suite 714 WACHOVIA Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
FROM: Don Yousey, MPH
Director
SUBJECT: Complaint Regarding Mitchell Norris Farm Hog Waste Run -
Off
1. Per our recent telephone conversation regarding the above
complaint, our Environmental Health Section (EHS) took a sample
of the ditch water adjacent to Mr. Norris' ILO on Colex Road in
Bladen County. Please find attached a copy of the test results
run for coliform. While there is no actual standard, the 17,000
result is certainly higher than one would normally expect (I am
told the average for such tests is 1000).
2. 1 received another complaint about this operation on December
24th and revisited the site. It was apparent that the owner had
made an effort to contain the waste water on the site. He had
plowed up a wall between the drainage ditch and the spray field
to hold the water in. The complainant stated that the owner had
breached the wall on purpose Christmas Eve because, "He knows
none of you are on duty to do anything." As stated, I did
revisit the site and did in fact find that someone had taken a
shovel (or some similar instrument) and cut a channel through the
dirt wall to allow the waste liquid to overflow into the ditch.
3. From the amount of waste going into the ditch, it seems that
too much liquid is being applied. This may be because the
application plan is wrong or the soil type is now allowing the
material to be used up as planned. I have no expertise. in this
area and request that you look into the matter. One of the
original complainants has called and is aware'of the test
results.
4. Any assistance you can render in this matter will be greatly
appreciated. I know that you and I felt that the test might come.
back within normal limits and that would be the end of the
matter. Sadly, that is not the case. Further, request that you
supply us with a letter spelling out the actions you take.

STATE OF WORTH CAROLINA 000869 DFr 0.895
Envirvrment. Health. and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
Envirowent.al Sciences Section
MICROBIOLOGICGAL AMLYSIS OF WATER
Microscopic Examinations -and Culture Tests
CO 1i0r TRITE IN THIS SPACE
fG WATER DESCRIPTION BLANK — FILLED IN BY SENDER
COLIFORM ANALYSIS — PRIVATE SUPPLY Type of Andlysls PAquested
ner or Tenal`; 131 i ix, ` &, ,l 1^;.,ti _ G''� ` �M., I
i _. ` ; • , , *M I c roscop i c Exams*
,A �+aes..I�av4r¢ia
1
ype of Sarnpl g Poinl u P : r-e: I I V4.• ctt# ft
-A' 1PrA
Coftec.ed sy
Source: D Wt
Signed
3v:
Name
-'elvlNsrlfi+L .
I Incicate: tt.D. or 5a� n_ it;,;n
.:adress 13f,tw.1,
��jj,,,
City �\(I��.c*ti41tih- Lv�- _ -Z'p )7
IIEnNR trja lA�.nfW SQgt� ��— *Culture Tests*
t %o+aeuq cAv-e . 1143) ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE GIVEN. �
} Total Coliform Dilution
�• (j() Fecal Colifosm Dilution
4-6w: (`) Sulfate-Reducing/Sulfur Bacteria
( ) identification of Bacteria
( ) ActinwWcetes
( ) Fecal Coliform/Fecal Streptococcus
{ ) Ps-I'm.rdwonas
v
Date Reported: /,p - % �% _ _ _ t ) Heterotrophic Plate Count
( ) Staphylococcus j
( ) Other
L_L Spr,ng i Omer:
It,
� r) v gv-)5 ot,
t� S'
RKSUL= � RAW I7000
A// Am NNz- JW
oEHNR 1704 (6140 Rev.)
Laboratory Services

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: it , 1995
Farm NarWOwner: ' S 1, # \` s
UgUg Address: -R& s _QenhL r.sk' C 64-_L%e.. *�c. ZVA33 (Clio) (0g -§Sao
County:
�4 n Phone: �o S ` sg y .�
titer- --
On Site Represents ve. .s Phone: 5`88 — 4?g�0
Physical Addressliaocation• ;1 n
_ _ Q.rti I105
Type of Operation: Swine g Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ 6e2e't Number of Animals on Site:
*D�iE�M Certification Number: ACE Longitude:
Certification Number: ACNEW
L,Ltude:� �,� �r Longitude:, JA , &] ?r
Circle Yes or No �
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Frecboard:—L-A—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or l&Was any erosion observed? Yes or, (seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Not Evaluated;
Cr*s) being utilized: Spray Field or cover crop was not evaluated)
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DweHin s? �or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orqii*
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, ordther
similar man-made devices? Yes or<& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No{Waste management records were not
Additional Comments:
This a very briefe more thorough inspection will be glMducted in ture.
Please contacV_DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Blue Line" status.
_If you have questions concerning this report please do not hesitate to".contact the in__spector
at [phone]. Please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
Inspector Name
Q.J/ f�Uer�
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
w -,AI w.3-S f 11 `bf
• Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
iDepartment of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 11, 1996
Mr. Mitchell Norris
Route 1, Box 65-K
Clarkton, NC 28433
SUBJECT: Norris Hog Farm
Reg. J 09-39
Bladen Co.
Dear Mr. Norris,
In response to a citizen's complaint, staff from the
Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Environmental
Management inspected your animal operation and the spray field(s)
serving this operation on 1/4/96. It was observed that some water
appeared to have ponded in the southwest corner of your spray field
adjacent to SR 1709. This ponding appears to have resulted from
the construction of a earthen berm which prevented water from
draining into a nearby ditch. However, a breach in the berm was
fabricated which allowed some of the ponded water to flow off the
field into the bordering drainage ditch. This runoff was sampled
by the Bladen County Health Department and the results did not
indicate the presence of significant animal waste levels in -the
runoff water. It should be noted that a rain event occurred on
the date of sampling. It was also observed that on the date of
inspection, the ponded water did not exhibit any noticeable odor
which usually characterizes the presence of animal waste.
As per our conversation on 1/5/96, it is recommended that you
do not spray on that portion of the field until the ground is
properly graded. This is especially important during the winter
months as the soil's infiltration rate is decreased and the cover
crop does not uptake nutrients as rapidly which can lead to
wastewater runoff. Therefore, please be aware it is a violation of
North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface wate:r5 of' the State without a permit. The Division of
Environmental Management has the authority to levy a civil penalty
of not more than $10,060.00 per day per violation.
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville . FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-55W NiffAnEqual Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
1/11/96
Mr. Norris
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Ed
Buchan or Michael Wicker at [phone]. Thank you for your
time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Sam Warren - NRCS Bladen County
Chris Walling - Soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Don Yousey - Bladen County Health Department

HEALTH DIRECTOR
0
PdAN �sss
C, ENV. MANAGEMENT
n Coiut�
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
91. 0. rBox 188
Janu�,V1�95337
TO: Mr. Grady Dobson
Fayetteville Region DEM
225 Green St.
Suite 714 WACHOVIA Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
FROM: Don Yousey, MPH
Director 414"
SUBJECT: Complaint Regarding Mitchell Norris Farm Hog Waste Run -
Off
1. Per our recent telephone conversation regarding the above
complaint, our Environmental Health Section (EHS) took a sample
of the ditch water adjacent to Mr. Norris, ILO on Colex Road in
Bladen County. Please find attached a copy of the test results
run for coliform. While there is no actual standard, the 17,000
result is certainly higher than one would normally expect (I am
told the average for such tests is 1000).
2. I received another complaint about this operation on December
24th and revisited the site. It was apparent that the owner had
made an effort to contain the waste water on the site. He had
plowed up a wall between the drainage ditch and the spray field
to hold the water in. The complainant stated that the owner had
breached the wall on purpose Christmas Eve because, "He knows
none of you are on duty to do anything." As stated, I did
revisit the site and did in fact find that someone had taken a
shovel (or some similar instrument) and cut a channel through the
dirt wall to allow the waste liquid to overflow into the ditch.
3. From the amount of waste going into the ditch, it seems that
too much liquid is being applied. This may be because the
application plan is wrong or the soil type is now allowing the
material to be used up as planned. I have no expertise in this
area and request that you look into the matter. One of the
original complainants has called and is aware of the test
results.
4. Any assistance you can render in this matter will be greatly
appreciated. I know that you and I felt that the test might come
back within normal limits and that would be the end of the
matter. Sadly, that is not the case. Further, request that you
supply us with a letter spelling out the actions you take.
91 D-862-6s00
130-01-500

�v
PCM
January 2; 1996
TO: Mr. Grady Dobson
Fayetteville Region DEM ENV. MANAGEMENT
225 Green St. FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Suite 714 WACHOVIA Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
FROM: Don Yousey, MPH
Director
SUBJECT: Complaint Regarding Mitchell Norris Farm Hog Waste Run -
Off
1. Per our recent telephone conversation regarding the above
complaint, our Environmental Health Section (EHS) took a sample
of the ditch water adjacent to Mr. Norris' ILO on Colex Road in
Bladen County. Please find attached a copy of the test results
run for coliform. While there is no actual standard, the 17,000
result is certainly higher than one would normally expect (I am
told the average for such tests is 1000).
2. I received another complaint about this operation on December
24th and revisited the site. It was apparent that the owner had
;Wade an effort to contain the waste water on the site. He had
plowed up a wail between the drainage ditch and the spray field
to hold the water in. The complainant stated that the owner had
breached the wall on purpose Christmas Eve because, "He knows
none of you are on duty to do anything." As stated, I did
revisit the site and did in fact find that someone had taken a
shovel (or some similar instrument) and cut a channel through the
dirt wall to allow the waste liquid to overflow into the ditch.
3. From the amount of waste going into the ditch, it seems that
too much liquid is being applied. This may be because the
application plan is wrong or the soil type is now allowing the
material to be used up as planned.. I have no expertise in this
area and request that you look into the matter. One of the
original complainants has called and is aware of the test
results.
f.
4. Any assistance you can render in this matter will be greatly
appreciated. I know that you and I felt that the test might come
back within normal limits and that would be the end of the
matter. Sadly, that is not the case. Further, request that you
supply us with a letter spelling out the actions you take.

STATE OF NORTH CAWLIM 000869 DIET' 18 95
%. Department of Envirornent, Health, and Natural Resources
! �I division of laboratory Services
Environmental Sciences Section
MICROBIOLOGICAL APALYSIS OF bATER
Microscopic Examinations and Culture Tests
DQ NOT TRITE IN TI4IS SPACE
DRINKING WATER DESCRIPTION BLANK — FILLED IN BY SENDER
COLIFORM ANALYSIS -- PRIVATE SUPPLY
/� Type of Analysis PaNWsted
Name o%.owner or Tenar.. 13 aj h 4 o-,� Nit �1 ^ `L i
L _ t - ,-•, - *Microscopic Exams*
r r x A4 x
.L1 � �eea8�o�r+a
Type of 5ampl g Point u ��_� Li.'r _�t L�.;. 'ct+•ram
Collec:ed'3y I'A' , �'i�t )DATE T1r.tiE S Pr.4
Source: Vr II L Spr;ng — Q;�er 7�r i ; {s'
} vcvisri:.a_
Signed dame � '�./•,. L•I - tier
�l
IInCicatc: P.i.D. or 5anir ""n
,
Andress jj dti o% L. N G I' � `
Ir ..
City �� �. - '?` 1_t _ ,C-
,7EHNA 1294 IA.,nsee ip.'97r .
+ �oratory rRe.,eMfr:�3) ALL INFORMATION REOUESTED MUST BE GIVEN.
Date Reported:
RESULTS � ! �li/� ,Al-M
DEHNR 1704 (6/90 Rev.)
Laboratory Services
*Culture Tests*
() Total Coliform Dilution
(�) Fecal Colifonn Dilution
{ ) Sulfate-Reducing/Sulfur Bacteria
{ ) Identification of Bacteria
( } Actincmycetes
{ } Fetal ColifonrVFecal Streptococcus
{ ) Pseud=m as
( } Heterotrophic Plate Count
( ) Staphylococcus j
( ) Other
MPS/= 17000
9 ct[�5

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Envirorment. Health. and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
Environmental Sciences Section
MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF 144TER
Microscopic Examinations and Culture Tests
0()()869 PF- 1' j,3 95
00 NOT WUTE IN THIS SPACE
DRINKING WATER DESCRIPTION' BLANK — FILLED IN SY SEINDER
COLIFORM ANALYSIS — PRIVATE SUPPLY Type of Analysis Requested
IN.-im-P al &.vner or Tents
C k z . r 4l: r r� ' • � � *14 1 cruscop i c Exaws*
Pj
T%,pe of Samci 9
P "A
coflec:ec 3,1 AX-,, DA T E_j 2:
4; t�4 -TILIE
Source: 7 Viull C,' S p c, 7- r, e r:
Signec Tr, j, } ./ I
I / ;
,�Ccress
City
Incica:e- 11J..D. or Sanit—n
-her-
4, -
CEr,14R :29-4 lAq,-sec 10.51)
Lanwatory I R",a- 1 1,13ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE GIVEN.
Date Reported: 2? - 1-3- q 6-
RESULTS
*Culture Tests*
k) Total Coliform Dilution
Fecal Coliform Dilution
Sulfate-Reducing/Sulfur Bacteria
Identification of Bacteria
Actinamycetes
Fecal Coliform/Fecal Streptococcus
Psvidawnas
Heterotrophic Plate Count
Staphylococcus
Other
7000
DEHM 1704 (6/90 Rev.)
laboratory Services

Horne#_
Farm #
HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION FORM
Staff please retain your original and place a copy in the High Freeboard Notification
Box located in Richard Canady's office.
Person Receiving Notification 4 ,- I I e -K L
Facility Number 9 -!_ Date Received // ,2210 '
Farm Name 1*,;3 Z- 2 Time E.s 00 d
Caller's.Name.
Caller's Telephone Numbers
Cell# L?A
Pager#
For all callers PLEASE obtain a phone number where they can be reached at any time.
(Cell phone numbers, home phone numbers, farm phone numbers, pager numbers)
Tell the caller that a member of the CAFO unit or Paul Rawls will contact them as soon
as possible.
Freeboard (in inches)
Lagoon #f 1 / � Lagoon # 4
Lagoon # 2 Lagoon # 5
Lagoon # 3 Lagoon # 6
Do not instruct the caller on the action they should take. That is up to the caller. Remind
them that they are to remain in compliance with their Permit and Waste Utilization
Plan.
Make the caller aware that you are assigning a tracking number to their call. Give the
caller the tracking number and tell them to use this number for all future contacts about
this particular incident and when they call back reporting they are back into compliance.
High Freeboard Level Tracking Number is . R Qo
Thank the caller for their cooperation.
*Water Quality Staff Only*
If the caller indicates that the lagoon level is <12 inches, contact one of the CAFO staff
AND Paul Rawls. Do not leave a note, e-mail or voicemail without contacting the
CAFO staff AND Paul Rawls.directly on any report of <12 inches.
Treat any report of <12 inches as an emergency event.
*CAFO STAFF ONLY*
Establish a Filemakerl BIMs Entry number for this report.
Print the Filemaker/ BIMs Entry and attach it to this form.

N
N
4

Infv,rmation contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWO Facility Number
g 39
Farm Name
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Caller's Name
Mitchell Norris
Q Reporting O Complaint
Callers Phone #
910-874-2526
Access to tarn►
Farm Accessible
from main road 10 Yes O No
Animat Population
Confined 10 Yes ONO
Depop 10 Yes O Na
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Mortality O Yes O No
Spray Availabilitv
Pumping
Equipment
O Yes O No
Available
O Yes O Na
Fields
Date 11/29/2004
Time 18.00am
Control Number P671
Region JFRO
La oon Ouestions
Breached
O Yes O No
Inundated
10 Yes O No
overtopped
10 Yes O No
Water on
O Yes O NO
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
10 Yes O No
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
(? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoon1 18
12/1/2004
Lagoon2 18
i 2/1/2004
Lagoon3
Lagoon4
Lagoons
I�
Lagoon6
r. Norris called and stated both of his lagoons were at 18". He was advised that he should send a 30
iy..P.OA-ta.the.FRO..►ncithin. 48..ho.urs.. ............................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
c. llcr „Sfio�0�. ...... . /o'�..G. .....
�r�................. ... ......................
G. �.. ......c� �.e. e....... . f"... T:. s...[....................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
;.� Ch _�, it .. ..., -:.,•- :_-"..: i,i. . - .. _ _
_. - -- .. ... .., e. ..
_ .. ..-:'h?:?vYnt.i.'rJS�ir51:'=J.aYx.:
person taking
call Larry Baxley
Comments2

r= �
5556 Braden Road
Hone Wi Is NC 2&W
RECEIVED
DEC 0 6 2004
OENR- FAYE-ML LE REGIONAL OFRCE
To: !_arty Baxley Foam: Kathy Dugan
ra= 910-4W-07O7 Pages: 5
PIM 910486r1541 Rate: 12/512004
Ike: Mitchell Norris POA CC.
Laq,
POA for Mitchell Norris, reference number is LV 004 (1 think).
I will:be in the office for a while Monday, Dec. 6, then we have to go to Chapel Hill for
an appt.
.TM-4AA JV 'Dw 0- e-,`. 5�
I)e(, 5 aODL� (&" S-a0 fvy�-
TQ 39Vd NV!)FIG AHIVA ZTZZEZb6T6 EE:ZZ b6BZ/EB/ZT

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY aRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure N=alldbntifier (1D): IMitchell Norris East (1)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./'�4 hr. Storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr_/'�:4 hr, storm & structural fruubaurd
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. cop of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural fkvbaard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/0
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw dawn period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 121058 43
h. current herd Af 3 6-7-2-1 certified herd # 3672
18_U ' ches
inches
1.0 inches
SS255 112
55013 lops
acrual waste produced = current herd # x line S r210SS R3
certified herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design ®i}3
J. axed rdinfull over cvaporxtion according to design 53666 M
k. (lines h + i + D x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 17�gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11/22/04
m, ((lines e + k)11000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION l FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next StruGWre tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
1.50 lbs/1000 gal.
�40.31bs, PAN
Z6 30Vd Nti9nG AHIVA ZTZZEZVOTS EE:ZZ V00Z/E0/Z1

. i
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
i. Structure Name/identifier (ID): Mitchell Norris West (2)
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.0-4 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 finches
b. desilmed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard L9.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in r�4 zone) _ `inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) s8256 tt1
o. line 012 x 6nc d x 7.46 gallons/f13 55013 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design i$0 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 121058 ft3
h. current herd 4f3672 certified herd ## 3672
actual waste produced = current hercl # x line g 121055 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j, exctss rainfall over evaporation according to design
k (lints h + i + j) x 7'.48 x 30 dnysJline 1=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11/22/04
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Dayr 2i21/00
L�J�3
53066 3
� 71i?+g� f lnnc
1.70 lbsll000 gal.
81bs. PAN
E0 39bd Nvona AHIVA ZTZZEZV016 EE :ZZ 170OZ/60/ZT

11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR ZS YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure Mitchell Norris East (1)
2. Situcwre JMitchell Norris West (2)
3. Structure 1
4. StruchLre I
3. Structure I
A. Stnrcture I
line rn = 409.3 lb PAN
line m = 463.8 lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m_
lb PAN
line m =
1b PAN
n.Ones 1 +2+3+a+S+6 973.1 1bPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD.' DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PER
o. tract #
. field #
q. crop
r. acres
5. remaining
lrut 2 PAN
batance
flblarre)
L TOTAL PAN
EW ANCE
FOR FIELD
itrs.j
column rxs
LL apPlleatlon
VwindaWl
3029
Small grain overseed
1.81
50.00
90.5
Sep -April
3029
ZSmall
grain averseed
2.43
50.00
121.5
3029
SmaU grain overseen
3.5b
30.00
178.0
3039
Small grain overseed
1 A7
50.00
73.5
3029
Small grain overseed
1.05
50110
52.5
3029
fo
Small grain overseed
1.44
50.00
72.0
3029
7 A
Small grain overseed
2.93
50.001
146.5
3079
Small gnpin overseed
1.17
50.00
593
3029
p
Small grain overseed
1.34
50.00
67.0
3029
l
`'reall grain overs=d
4.74
50.00
237.0
1 timte current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning hate for avaitatne
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1097.0 lb. PAN
Pao (30 Day) 2121 /00
Pe 39Vd INdonQ AHIV I ZTZZEZVei6 EE:Z3 b00Z/E0/ZZ

IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) 973.1 lb. PAN
,x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line w from section 111) = 1097.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =-224lb. PAN
NARRATNE:
PaA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
90 39Vd NG9na AHiVA ZZZ6EZVOT6 EE:ZZ V00Z/E9/ZI

Wettable Acreage Determination For Existing Irrigation System
Mitchell Norris Farm
Facility No: 9.39
Wettable Acreage Computations
Hard Hose Traveling Gun: 3" Ag Rain with 1.08 In ring nozzle.
Hydrant
Field
Lane Spec.
Wet. Dla,
Pull Length
Pull Ac.
Stop Area
Start Area*
Pull"
Total Ac ***
1
3029-2
240
300
225
1.39
0.63
0.39
0.76
1.81
2
3029-2
240
300
490
3.04
0.63
0.39
0.80
2.43
3A
3029-6
240
300
480
2.98
0.00
0.58
1.00
3.66
3B
3029-8
240
300
1 250
1.56
0.83
0.77
0.60
1.47
4
3029-6
240
300
500
3.10
0.00
0.77
1.00
3.87
5
3029-1
240
300
86
0.53
0.63
0.39
0.68
1.05
a
3029.1
240
300
240
1.49
0.63
0.77
0.60
1.44
7A
3029-3
240
300
330
2.05
0.51
0.77
0.88
2.93
78
3029-3
200
300
180
1.03
0.68
0.72
0.50
1.17
8A
3029-3
220
300
780
3.94
0.00
0.78
1.00
4.69
8B
3029-3
220
300
670
3.38
0.00
0.75
1.00
4.13
9A
3029-3
240
300
820
5.08
6.00
0.77
1.00
5.85
913
3029.3
240
300
720
4.46
0.00
0.00
1.00
4.48
10
3029-5
300
128
0.77
0.66
0.40
0.73
1.34
11
3029-3A
200
300
1 870
4.99
0.00
0.72
0.83
4.74
12A
3029-3A
200
300
890
5.11
0.58
0.72
0.50
3.20
12B
3029-4
300
30
0.19
0.66
0.80
0.50
0.82
4a.Va
"Start Area has been reduced accordingly for pulls with less than a full throw of gun In the start area.
"Pull Is a factor adjusting for the throw of the gun. A value of 1 is a full throw of gun, 0.6 Is a half throw of gun.
*"Total Acreage is the sum of Pull Acreage, Stop Area, and Start Area multiplied by Pull factor.
Wetted Diameter of 300 feet Is achieved with a 1.08 In ring nozzle at 60 psi.
tty
o,�a
#6
I,��
tt(e
IJAO

� ' rya•. �f,. •tij;,;; ' .r.i•
�� / as �� ' � �t "i •
5� •
i 1
IV
47
D � nr rri+r ,.� r'... � _ �. ��:_ 'tl �•; '�f I fw. ,� I ° 'r �1 'Fy
L ' 'f }.• '• 'f if M104.
+3�+'. .I..._�.�i.4t'. :L�:�'. '. .. �5�1r1Gi`.ad�,:,•.....: id+�r;� 3�, ..i �: ;1�.�<.i ;:..�,� ! , .i:�!,

44U11IIp
444448"p
y
�
&41
.4
.11
• •� 1 41.
allIslas
1 �� IM -
��
ygyg�� gj1Rg
silos Its
f
. � r•
.1
�i
h "6
1
1
Y•NI
1•
y;
f
f � 1 y •'
•.1
r

.i f. '' .��' "' .i1• �'• � '�.. r. �i i'•� 4 .I ., i lt•'I�•. 1'^ .lam I I... •�._ 11r� �' •�rl 'rf.
' � r � . r; � _ �! ..3 r ��.'� ,S •'l 'ti l• ••• � k' - \ y '.r^/\ ,.J. 'r '•^i
� � _ S ' �+ .J i , , l + 'i - • j •• � + '�, —• r •t ti'r, � ~ � i - 1 , i .r .'1 •.•1 i'4 7 . I•' S ;. ! .. ! 1.. .. a _ � r. • � I _� t'• �'' ,
I �• ,,� r o.rr rt' � > i }� .. .� 1 ! ,! „�L. r`. `� ,' I �r� ,jam I, 'r•�1. i j �•• 5 1 ?. � .�
�#. ,'''•.'I, `. s•• k', .. �: r1 .i`•1r•.� +I Swat i �I..r .t ,.1,• ,�; .. •� .J•ti�f r.. f, r „1 t'i 1 .��I' I�.�'�
. '+� — •I F•I• � '-�' .i }I 5. + .. +, I'. M�J. i !•,S •••!,.'E v1 �1' ,••i4 /E^ 11."l ..V. S .'f r �r r -i •� `'.. �... ..
' }' � ,'r.l tii^ � �.' �r ,•i ,. I. _'�� ,•r •r•* •'i �• I !. l ;., a' r• ,ri ,,ti•!i, `,
.+� . 1}. ,, . % .. �f• `t :^ 4 • . .5 �I,. �.. r �' r , `.�j I r. ^l:t! I •J'l - �s j . ,- ,` r _ i ', !' ,s
• i.51 i ! r r' ,Jr.. .`,' -, �'f ,!''Y'I' i t' fl '� .1 -_ ��
•,y (... "j!"+•`�t r�'„ •I .i�.. „s• A. f� •1, 5 •� �.• �y�'� �r• '���I .'i: :.%, `'�r+Jl+
y ,, , ! r
'� •r •'' ��,��' �,rl •t' •� ti"!'• :• .,�� .,•e Ali I f,�' .. ti� �r! .. '.k .L,4. 1, ti 4 '.I ..r, 'S1•_ I+
•5. ., y'� if�. 'Lt5•• 'i•t11. .•I•,�"! � ��I•'r! 4 ''' •'1E �1 J, r', •r',`! '.r•�•�'�,„�••i•L. �•I `•r4`!..'i �_
ly � 1r •��+1 5.t '`,7 f,•r •o. {,•'r'r,• r� 1',''ri� ,�'1 ,, J4 ���%-f �,+^,1 .' 'Lf •�`• •• � I ;�' ;,
• l.5;' •r• � .! � r I ,4 r" + y4' q r .��• :. .. ,,, rr
i�, r✓ f r�•1 •, .,y,5•y �• ',yf �• ,, .1'•r"r', .! !� i'".;J ^'rI !� r r', !' ,.,,
5 , { f '✓ r �1..r�. + ,I` Y rw,I ..,�'. .. j1,. F.1 1 �'• !•,�!',1 ; %" I•
',,^, ry �� ', ''� � � .�wfr Y.. , 'r ,. r " 4,'�^•' �\ 5�rt^ dy '1,.,' /"'.r I•, � ,
! f�'j"' .r'i" ter• r'•� I.ylr �{5 •..,� ,�,,"'•,5�.. 'i`t,r d'�" � ''•'S •... �. �.jf.i,. .'r'1..51 !11,..
•1'� '��' �y' ! � i �. ] r• .� �. f.., f i�.n ,�I`� s I .� i r. f ��� 4°' ��. � %. �f µS�,�! ti�l f '•. �{^�i ..''S., •. _
.. ••%. �r ,1 •k- ,.i��r~ �■�s ep!'. MJ1 �t�. i1 S ti '!, 'r, y,P '1.r .'I '• ? I• i• ! '''.
' i •1 r I. � • � , t 5 '. . , r � .� 1• . ,' ,,• ..
1 ) I - 1„w!•'F.�. 5 �,�, �, I W• -�1.r r •4..5� '.. .lw;r`i''�' ��•• •r � �'"'
• 7 j' .r •i• y • {: 'J�•F��.� :. ..' 3''`,l. •�1 { � '•, '"�,.! ti .• �'r•I, �''i• �^ r ,ny fn I'lt �1`r.• �'il'r, �' '+•I + , j'
I., . ' -'I .. � � I ,. � 1 �.,• — � I •4 + � ' 4 f ti ' + .✓ , f 5 1! l r 1 ��
.s•,�+'�� :1' r' ..l".. �.,! 1�.1 '�� ', `` ♦r �11'•1' t ti ., J.MJ,�4 f: 'tip' I,'�,,� t f,.l, +1.
' '' •'r r k ' � • • � •>.' 7 � 1 l �,,,�' '.. ' ..f '•} r • - .•1'eJ, !'• � f •yr � I ..• +'t
��•1.f•`.!•, 'F� .� f .r '�'.•.�.� 4�I .✓ i r.l�� _ i � t Ir �.. ,'S.,.rts r 1 ^•I ..
�•.i !, { �%:, •S r,, •Ylr r ')+� } �, �wl!n!:, 1• '�I Pr j I. f+, .. ' ! r;""r \i..W i.,J ti'I' •'„r. •, ,1, rr I
�••`• �I 4
;� i ,, -r �._ 14 �f 1 �f �� ��. s'It�r4' h �',.} 1, J � �; � r .f •�° r• � •- �-� ,.
�51,, hl ���,'� � �• I .I` IiJ4 4'�' r r a �lr`Ilrt ��llir •`r!� 1 J F•, •�, 4�, y .1 •.`! yly �'' •i i.,••r�i'ri ,��r
j y •J• •�• i•y,F' I i I "� '��51 'll' � t' i{r�k���l'rllk„�I�I !I �� i••! •I. "_ •,'� _+I r~�., I �! 1 �', i ' � ,
• � V r �' •�i �. I , 1 `�g,5,�'v��f '��1�a ri1 �t 1' ,! ,I � 1! ,4 ! . �. y ' J r I
rrl • � I ,} �• s� r• •' ,y'• F}6�.I;;� r. � I f !� ,. � r 1, �+, I f ,
' ,� � .r, 1 •• . � � •, ..4 i�, r�.l1 !',4 lI•j .1 � •�. •� .r �'••1 �y t i.. •a,, •. i'',� f �� 'I + � ��
• •� � • I ' � it .. I •� 'r': { '. ,„• 1 � ,j' �, • S1 ,..r ..`^ s � '. 1• � t •
•■ ••'i,r•' 'I

IW
10
Reid r. M -0 i In - CAP hn as
HAM HOSE Laced apFfirati-i neaused onas6i pnxkm:don farnits nuat be field
AND CABLE ca=rated OrewakgoJNxe d in eWsfing design charts and tables
TOW TRAVELER aMM&M to niks that went kft effect SqMmd)w 1, 1996. Technical
IRMCATION SYSTEM SPedarst CMWYbV waft Ina"age"Wd Ph= after SePte"'be' 1, 1996, must
also certify that operators have been provided calibration and adjustment
guidance for all land application equipment The rules apply to irrigation sys-
tems as well as all other types of liquid, slurry, or sofid application equipment_
Information presented in manufAchirers' charts are used on average op-
erating conditions for relatively new equipment Discharge rates and applica-
tion rates change over time as equipment ages and components wear. As a
resift equipment simid be field calibrated regularly to ensure that applica-
tion rates and unifionnity are consistent with values used during the systenn
design and given in manufacturers! specifications- Reid calibration hwolm
collection and ineasureinent of the material being applied at several locations
in the application area. This publication contains step-by-step guidelines for
field calibration of hard hose and cal* tow traveler irrigation systems.
Operating an irrigation system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application mite,
uniformity of coverage, and sobs the appfica-
tion uWkm*. Operating with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential far drift,
and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. PunV
wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow
With conthmed use., nozzle wear results in an increase
in the nozzle opening, which will hxrease the
dbxba%e rate while decreasing the wetted diametm
Clogging of nozzles or Of main ones
— cany11ini, r milo' pressure but reduced
flow at the gun- Plugged hM will. reduce operating
Pressure- An operating pmoure below design pressure
greatly reduces the coverage diameter and applicaticm
undmunty Field capon help ensure that nLAd
eats from animal waste am applied uniformly and at
tates prom .
The calibration of a hard hose or cdAe tow g
involves oat conecfMccMuillets-
the the anKWInt Of wastewat"
collected in each container, and then comporting the
-.....average application volume and application imifor-
An m-Em fbw meta Installed m the main
in4ttion line provides a good estimate of the total
vuhnne pumped hum the lagoon duringm each NW
tion cede: The averW appficatim depth can be
deternained by dividing the pumped volume by the
application area. The average application depth is
computed foam the formula: -
Average appbmtion dq)th (axim)
Vbkxne pumped (gallom)
27,154 (gWac4n) X Application area (aces)
The average application depth is the average
amount applied thiroughouk the field- UnkThmately,
molders do not apply the same depth of water
throughout their wetted diameter Under normal
operating conditions, appUcation depth demmes
tower is the outer pedmeter of the wetted diametm
B% Xmn spdmkkx sysbms qpicOy have aoedaP
based an a design Tacing of 70 to 80
percent of the wetted sprinkler diameter to cDmpen-
n3

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
sate for the dechxmg application along the outer
perimet m Whe m operated at the defqp per, this
overlap results in acceptable aRgicasion mAlkwa ty
When %xzn)ed hVropedy, weR41es*med systems
vrill not p wvMe aamptabW appiikm uniformity.
fm esan x0e, if the pzessru 1 is too UM the apPTIca-
tion depth will be several tinges higlnez near the
menu of spzinUer and water will not be thrown as
far firm the sprier as hkilcated to mmubcmxere
charts. Even through the average apphcafion dew
may be acoeptad3le, some areas mcE9ive easy
high applic3flon whae athexs rea4h a no
at all.
The volume (depth) collected during calibration
rhouW be read soon afwr the sprkLUm gun cart has
named one wetted z Wbn past the collection gauges
to zodtimnibe evaporation hx mo the min - Whew
a p noedure must be pehbnnmed more than once,
sbnold be read and values recmded
y after each setup.
Calibrai�ion Setup forHard Hose and
Cable Tow Trav eftg Guns
Hard hose and rate tow unveift guns are meted
by placing a row (tom) of coMOction conuinam or
when steva� is=
� wah� . m it
s v m me 4U � tM Ua�, �
L'>Etre
important fin demndae time � aop€lfortrhhp
aulger l on each end of the row shaakl
CAlectiont ao� dialbated it r glaaut The
extend past the fihtithesfd�e the gam well throw
application area mast be used to evaha to ap n
washtwrOm to come t
uaffonn�
tt
the mfid1wwetted d�m�r of the gun spdakler
Many types of ooutamea can be used to caIIect
z Mu1TTpie uoart a the acrmacy of the calfaatioo.
ftw and deterralhe the '-
COntalints should be hnther apart no than
Staxndard ram" gages wady best and are nmow-
1116 od the sreiind of the Sion smiler not
mended berme they ah eady have a mad stele
toes d 7S 1�L At Aesast 16 gages be used to
from which to m d the depth.
the . Sixuezh des w� be
fans p� ems, ar aaythift with a
vvhesre tine owette�i
u form opening and emu section can be used
4E10 het.
provided the oor is deep enough (at bust 4
betyveen.
i gyp) to and �e eva xmar -
_ ' as feet x 16 — 400 fee#.) shaohi be set
flan, and the ao�cted can be easily trans- " .
= at least ache itdl of throw f eitlrn
fened to a s mled r fiat . Ail corn- -
- of the thavel lane, as shown in 1.
tair�ess should be the same sifaeand shape to spanghiy
= The should be �� such that the
app d
= distume of the lam the
All should be set up at the
= we[ind of throw A vobtumes
same height zdative to the height of the Mmidki er
it Abe read as soon as the last smp being
nozzle (&mbaW )_ Nom=Uy, the tap of
each container should be no more than 36 izicixes
above the grouncL CkMecton should be located so
that there is no interference ham the crop_ The crop
canopy shout! be trimmed to prude woe
or splash into the collection ambiam
Calibration should be pedornaed during periods
of low evaporation. Best times are be6om 10 a.m. or
after 4 p.m. on days with light wind (I= than 5
miles per hour). On cool, cloudy days the calibration
can the performed anytime when wind velocity is less
than 5 mph-
(-4)

WK
J
flow of
codedfon '•"'-��j
gauges
okee on of araid
HARD HOSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
load cart
Left I Wd
a 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Q O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CAD
CWt
1bad At leap am welted
cam � ch6neter a id of fiM
Figure 1. General layout and arlentittion
of can gauges for cafflum*m of a hard hose and table tow traveler irrigation systems.
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
1. Determine the wetted diarswW of the gun. =
2. Determine the number of collection gauges and spaamg between gauges. For a wetted diameter of 320
feet„ the rain gauge spacing AKw1d not exceed 20 feet. (320 ft / 16 = 20 ft).
3. Label gauges Outward from the gun cart as either left Or right (Ll, 1,2, 1.3, etc; R1, R2, R3, etc)
4 Set out gauges along a raw as labeled and shown in Rgure 1, ecryailj► spaced at the dWmxe determined in
Item 2 (20 feet). The row should be at feast one wetted diameter from either end of the pull. The first
gauge on each side of the travel lane should be 1 /2 the gauge spacing from the center of the lane. For a
gauge spacing of 20 feet, Ll and R1 should be 10 feet from the renter of the lame.
S. Operate the system for the time required for the gun to completely pass all cOtled3on containers. Record
the "startling" time that wastewater begins to be applied Wong the row of gauges and the "ending" time
when wastewater no longer is being applied anywhere along the row. Also record the distance traveled in
feet for the time of operation.
6. Immediately record the amounts collected in each gauge. (Refer to Table 1 for an example.)
7. Identify those gauges that fail outside the effective lame sparing, Figure 2. This volume is the overlap
volume that would be collected when operating the system on the adjacent lane.
S. Superimpose (left to right and vice versa) the gauges just outside the effective width with the gauges just
imside the effective width. Add the volumes together.
✓ For the layout shown in Figure 2, add the volume (depth) collected in gauge R8 (Outside the effective
Line spacing) to volume (depth) cogected in gauge L5 (inside the effective large spacing). Similarly, R7 is
added to L6; IB is added to Its; and L7 is added to R6. This Is now the application volume (depth) within
the effective lane spacing adtated for overlap.

Field CaMxatlon Procedures
for Animal Wastewater ApprWation Equipment
Obectlan of awM
Lane 1
Red oat — ;-P
I LAft
8 716 5 4 3 2 1
0 0I0 0 0 0 0 0
/00
Figure Z Aaccoun ing for oveAap
when calibrating a hard hose traveler system.
tarse 2
Lett
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
00 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gun
1 2 3 4 5 6 Cwt
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CAl11311A lON1110C®UVIS ( -• .
9 Add the ooilemed �n gaeige� ar�d die.by the i of gacer�es wislrin the area.li►is
is the aiierage a�pt�iaai d tf( ) vir�l�ivwvnoc6ire bane srpackq
Stein of are MMts coBerLtiad in A gam
appe de .—.
Iisrd3s af_go vaVft eNecthe vAdth
10. Cie tlie:detiiation depth for-eadiThe deviagan depth is the sae bebveeYn each
kidnWi"ga�gie value and ate avegage vale"o€ ag ga0ges (#4 Me'd d* vakee of each
depth: /fh9olube"vie ewes the sign of the russ�er (negatesign) is dropped and ait values are
treatiad,asi�esyrn6d �r a5sahete value is a strait than ri,e. 14 rseeans treat the
rismttia 2 as `ar ,absoiacel tt does: noz n e the ttesalher 1 Zl. Be®�e tins symbol canlead to
rrnns�naersi r#mgf, U s pint used wgh i_ un ed in -the w eds at the end of this p�cadon_ The
s�t�l�s:e.t9ediriiahsnrda�t_�ttiete�.;
. -jpepttn d'in i-average
eistio the gain number_
11 Am am ants ki#1 ato get :` ian of the deviamore5"' frarn the average depth and divide by the rwmber of
9ges m- .
-> Sheehan of deviations (add m omits aangyute d in 910)
&wage die depth .
of gas=ges vein effecam lane spacing -
tch4mftxm*depth
the, time (ieaters)
reragevpkatlon depth (tde)nxXviiatim raft
.
_ Appbmfm *ne)
L7

l✓
HARD HOSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
CAUBRATION PROCEDURES (aydinued)
13. Compute the average travel speed
Distance traveled (feet)
Average travel speed =
Time (minutes)
14 Determine the application uniformity. The application uniformity is often computed using the
mathematical formula referred to as the Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient
It is computed as follows:
Averatge depth (#9) - Average deviation (#11)
U, = X 100
Aveadge depth (
15. Interpret the.caftation results. The higher the index value, the more uniform the application. An index of
100 would mean that the uniformity Is perfect — the exact same amount was collected in every gauge.
For travelers with proper overlap and operated in Eight wind, an. application uniformity greater than 85 is
common.
Application uniformity between 70 to 85 is in the good" range and is acceptable for wastewater
application.
Generaif r, an application unformity below 70 is considered unaccepUk a for wastewater irrigation using
travelers. ff the computed Uc is less than 70, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation
dealer or CxrWW Technical Specialist for assistance.
Table 1. lExantple calibration daM for a 0aveCmg gum syste rn operated in parallel lanes. lane
spacing 7Q p of sprinkler wetted dWrneter:
a. Manufacbaws' Specifications: Gun Model i 50 Type Ta�Bore
Nozzle Dia. 0.9 high Pressure (Gun) Z0 K4 Reel 103 0
Wetted diameter 320 ft Effective Spacing 224 ft Flow 197 GPM
Hose Sizes Length $0_0ft Diameter3 in
b. Spacing between collection containers (spacing 3X(ft) / 16) = &ft
c. Number of gauges =16
d. Start of Irrigation event 7•i 5
e. End of Irrigation event 9-0 a.m.
f. Duration (ems 105 minutes
g. Travel distance 320 feet
h. Operate the system and collect data.

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
Table 1. Calibration Data (continued)
Gauge
Distance
Volume
Overlap
Corrected
Deviation
No.
from Center
Collected
Admit
Voftane
from Average*
(feet)
()
(inches)
(irtdhes)
(inches)
Ll
10
.94
.94
.235 (1 - j)
L2
30
.80
.80
.095 (2 - j)
L3
50
-59
-59
.115 { etc)
L4
70
.61
.61
.095
L5
90
-50
.13
.63
.075
L6
110
.42
ZO
.62
.085
L7
130
.33
L8
150
.07
RI
10
.73
.73
.025
R2
30
.81
.81
.105
R3
50
.92
.92
.215
R4
70
.64
.64
.065
R5
90
-50
-.07
.57
.135
R6
110
27
.33
.60
.105
R7
130
.20
-
R8
150
.13
*Absolute vafuie� heat aff vahm as eve.
i. Sum of all volumes collected in #h SAS inches
j. Average catch (i/number of gauges within effeclive width (12) 0 705 inches
k. Compute the average travel speed = Distance traveled (ft) 320 ft— = 3.04 fttmin
Time (min) 105 min
average depth (inches) 0.705 in
L Precipitation rate = — = d.44 in/h
application time (hour) 1.75 hr
m. Stem of deviations from the average catch LMO
n. Average deviation from average catch (m/12) 0.113
o. Uniformity coefficient
0.705 - 0.113
Lk = 0.705 X 100 = M
14
r
p- Interpret results. Uniformity coefficient of 84 is in the good range for a traveler system_ No adjustment 14
is necessary.

HARD HOSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
[J
of
r
Iniga"m System Cammra"m Data Sheetfor Hard Hose Traveler I igi W - SYSWm
DATr- Land Owner Farm Nkx
aL mmilauurme SpeaTkabo m Gun Model Type _
Nozzle Dias. ---in in Presme (Gem) (ilea!)
Vietbed drameter ft Iledim Spadrrg ft Fiow GPM
Hose Sm Laigth ft Dometw in
b. Sparing between a McWm cmAm rs (% 16) = ft
c_ v000d cliax ubw 90
N iruber of gees = II, , 9 00
d. Start of kroal m event
e. End of brigades
f. Duratioer (e d)—min
.dome
g. Travel distance feet
6.. Oper" ilea WMeft aoNe+ct data,
and reaord on the voinimheet ar page &
i_ Sum of all cabdres iirdres
j- Average c;dr (Q%MldW of gargeS) bVJMS
Dance trav+ded (t_.
L Average travel Weed = _
Time (rein)
1_ Swn of a0 devkgmn fiom the average catdr
m. Average deviation morn average catdr
n - lriffarrdty aoefirierrt
Q — (m)
u � x 100
t
_ Q
3l�3 uwz
EM ill
,ft US3
• 7 6 3 4 3 2 3 i s 3 4 3 i 7 a
O R R 00000 p o 0 0 0 R 0 0
I 3� WAN I I
3i iK$4'32f 3 234 si
oo�lb/o�ppe pooaoo 0 os
trrterpret the lion data and sloe necessary adrrstrnents
For bavelgs vv8h psoW avedap and apaaI P,al in fight vArKL an appfiadm rerfonrrily Coe iaent. greater des
85 is cnrmrmm
App atmn uni mniLy bdween 70 to 85 is in the "good" range and b aacepUW for wastewalw appRr dmi
GerraallX an appBC.mon rzulorrrky below 70 is - si llered urratoaeptAle Wr wed irrigation U*Q
travelers. 8 the aor plod Utis less dran 70. sysmn a*Mnents we mwu ed. Coni act yeaur migabm dealer or
CertMed TednriralE Spet st for .
n

7 ► .l
f�I
u
j
+� D
w0
bD
n0
•0
�D
NO
�Wl
0
Me ��
T MO
Me
•D
g ND
�D
A 0
eD
b_
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0
C

0
I

PRODUCER:
LOCATION:
MITCHELL NORRIS
CLARKTON
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
August 8, 1996
NC 28433
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 7416 hogs design capacity
PAGF
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specifies
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be_balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure.that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different inf ilitratior
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions Should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
` waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for*injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management - Commission.

WASTE UTIL17,ATION PLAN
�f
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7416 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 14090.4 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7416 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 17056.8 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
PAGE
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
PAGE
RA
S-
DETERMINING_ PHASE
CRO
CODE
S
AW N
CO
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPL:
TIM]
30219
105
1067. !
1
N6MLK 0-2x$fir
6.1
MAR-O4
. M . I ""'.. I ! ` Ii�i-Oi
.i I-V" I I-,J 1AA-K-0"
1"""
I w -k I J V 1+1 1
jJ1 MAR-O'
3029- 14 1URITHEY 2-991 1275
MAR-O
3029 5 INORFOLK0-2 BH 16.1'. 1305 1 12.0 1610
MAR-0
3029 b INORFOLK0-2 IBM 16.1 1305 1 19.5 128-97.
MAR-0
S u L 7 1 -All 1V VAr V14% u-4 $' ..r.C�� i.�4�"jjj fr 3 i / 4. 4 l j 4 i3 4 1 SEPuA
TOTALI 17170
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.
(Required only if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
PAGE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & C S-
CROp
YIELD
LRS
COMB N I
**
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USE
APP'
TIl
END
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseec
in bermudagrass), forage must be -removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
Aril or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen. being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay'or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small drain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
!height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
E
i�
M
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNI
BC
HYBRID BERKUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
50
BR
HYBRID BERNUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
TABLE 1 1 48.4 17170.46
TABLE 2
TOTAL1-48.4
AMOUNT
*** BALANCE
177170.46
17059.8
-11 .6
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres In the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE:, The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land 'application of sludge"at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 2743.92 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This fic4ure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE By IpRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irritation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The*
application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
+: applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ei
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis r
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the pi
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
None. F:e<Ic/ 2, 3,�� has rta-r been e aL7
�Qr rnu A,%-' TA- -. S 'r0 b i 9 !
-T- ecu- 11 c .5Y 5 c� (=I. A 9 (ISO40 r y� P'A.7
f
e7� V 5e 51�'la
G r o cn 4K use <a-c_
Y
'1
L•

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAC
Plans and specifications
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct dischar
during operation o7e land application. Any discharge of waste whi
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are sub ec
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Divisior
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. if the producer does not own
.adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS
with a cony of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable -proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibilityof the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for. other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
�- strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not ocpur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the MRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Xl Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take --,up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare -soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present: (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
.provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
appl.ied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc.., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.
PAGE

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow -mod implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I fwe) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon mn a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: MITCHELL NORRIS
SIGNATURE: (� i Y�+]1s D� �Lj�„ DATE:
NAME DF MANAGER (if different from owner)
please prim
SIGNATURE: DATEt.
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: R. Dean Morris
AFFILIATION: USDA-- NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 122 Ag. Sprvice Ctr.
Elizabethtown NC 28337
ipr.�.ceP: Gam' 6. GLb4*,- a�C g 9-96

Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: '4111T
Owner(s) N
4 0Z Facility Number: 0 9 -_ -3 9
Phone No: '110-B 2_ 23SY
Mailing Address: 4-H _h?C_X & ��T G zk&7
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acre Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wettable Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization. Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan_ Any future neodifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
rmdifirations to the existing- irrigation-systern-ox-any-new- irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner
Owner
Technical Specialist Name: &
Technical Specialist Signature:
I>< asserted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature: Date:
Submit this form to:
Attn: Sonya Avant
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures
for Wastewater Application Equipment
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET*
1. Make and model number Ile- eAlAl -:?
Z. Hose length [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) %Y [inch]
3.. 'Gun make and model number Akzsiq Al s
4. Gun nozzle size / [inch], ✓ ring orifice, taper bore orifice
5. Gun arc angle -3kr [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing 201T2-VO[feet]. Indicate whether uniform or ✓ random.
i
Number of exterior hydrants Number of interior hydrants Z
7. Gun wetted diameter 300 [feet]. measured or ✓ based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure ('70 [psi] ✓ observed at working gauge,
determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
'*9. Operating pressure at hose reel [psi]. observed at working gauge or
provided by owner.
**10. Supply line size G" [inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
111. Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance)
**12. Supply line type PVC or aluminum
**13. Pump make and model number
**14. Pump capacity [gpm]
**15. Engine matte and model number
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note. It is strongly recommended that you field determine wetted diameter and operating
Pressure at the reel and gun.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
� JJ
Date Date /7-
*** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data Worksheet.

Wettable Acreage Determination For Existing Irrigation System
Mitchell Norris Farm
Facility No: 9-39
Waste Managem2otElAnLWettable Acreage Comparison
Hydrant
Field
Crop
PANIac-
Total Ac.
Total PAN
1
3029-2
Gr. Ber/SG
304.40
1.81
550.96
2
3029-2
Gr. Ber/SG
304.40
2.43
739.89
3A
. 3029-6
Ber HISG
379.40
3.56
1350.66
3B
3029-6
Ber HISG
379.40
1.47
667.72
4
3029-8
Ber HISG
379.40
3.87
1468.28
5
3029-1
Ber HISG
379.40
1.06
398.37
6
3029-1
Ber HISG
379.40
1.44
546.34
7A
3029-3
Gr. Ber/SG
334.40
2.93
979.79
7B
3029-3
Gr. Ber/SG
334.40
1.17
391.25
8A
3029-3
Gr. Ber/SG
334.40
4.69
1568.34
8B
3029-3
Gr, Ber/SG
334.40
4.13
1381.07
9A
3029-3
Gr. Ber/SG
334.40
5.86
1956.24
9B
3029-3
Gr, Ber/SG
334.40
4,46
1491.42
10
3029-5
Ber HISG
379.40
1.34
508.40
11
3029-3A
Ber HISG
379.40
4.74
1798.36
12A
3029-3A
Ber HISG
379.40
3.20
1214.08
12B
30294
Bar HISG
349.40
0.82
286.51
46.98 17187.47
Total PAN
17056.80
Avail. PAN
-130.67
PAN Deficit
Calculated wettable acreage exceeds available PAN produced by Farm.
CAWMP revision is not necessary.

06/29/2001 11:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NDN DISCHARGE BR PA
W State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor D C N p
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary G rl
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Date
Division of Water Quality
Non -Disc urge Pernli'fing Unit
Location: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh. N.C. 27604
Mailing Address: 1617 Mall Service Center, RaWgh, N.C. 27699-1617
F
of
J R Joshi, Phone: [phone] ext.
nanws inciudina this sheet: -7
FAX. [phone]d8
FAX NUMBER: Ff2 O f
rtqKesI Zk 11+r-0 SM4-
If you receive this fax by mistake call: J R Joshi at [phone] ext 363

06/29/2001 11:45 919-715-604B DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR
Y Bladen Date: 04/03/95
,tCfY�e�yl '.WUI"r'15 oun
r r.
(other, than owner)'. 0 feet
Etidence
atsce ��6;neare.st r
' AVEFAGE IVE:WEIGHT (ALW)
(fto finish) x 1417 lbs. = 0 lbs
s arrow
V5 x 522 lbs.
0 1 s
(farrow to )
�.:�..
ead (finishing only) x 135 lbs. = 495720 lbs
,
sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs. y 0 lbs
'�` ':• '0 head (wean to feeder] head 3Q lbs. — 0 1b4
.ci:= Aescribe other 0
Total Average Live Weight = 495720 lbs
MINIMUM RERUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 495724 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
.Volume = 495720 cubic feet
. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)------------------------ 400.0
Inside top Width. (feet) ------------------------ 230.0
Top of dike elevation 101.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet) ---- ------ 88.0
Freeboard (feet)------------------------------ 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon) ------------------ 3.0 1
Total design volume using pr-ismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2' SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEATH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 394.0 224.0 12.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
394. Q1 8E4. 0 68256 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
322.@ 152.0 48544 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH * 4
358.0 i88.0 269216 (AREA OF MIDSECTION # 4)
CU. FT. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM3 DEPTH/E
8B256. m 269216.0 413944.0 2.16
il- Total Designed Volume Available = 812832 CU. FT.
02

06/29/2601 11:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DID BR
F
NAORARY STORAGE
}lE(�UIRED
DRAINAGE AREA -*
dike
Lagoon (top of
Length 1� Width = uare feet
400. 4 230.0 920Q►a. @ sq
t►uildings (roof and lot water)
Describe this area.
0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 92+300. m square feet la0 days.
Design teaparary storage period to be
�. volume of waste produced 1.37
roduction in gal./day per
135 lb. ALW
Feces & urine p a 1.37 gal/day lae days
ALW
Volume = 4957EO Ial Aor ?-105B.? cubic feet
Volume = 905515 gals• or
B. Volume of ,wash water flnor-s or volume
used Flush systews that recirculate
This is the amount of fresh water stem.for washing
Of fresh water use dpfaecountedhfor in SR.
the lagoon water' a' s storage/7.48 gallons
Be day per CF
Volume
0,0 gallons/day
Volume = 1z.0 cubic feet
Valuee of rainfall in excess of evaporation
�• when rainfall exceeds evaporation amount'
by largest
Ilse period of time7.0 inches
180 days excess rainfall
_
7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot.
Volume.
Volume = 5:•E66.7 cubic feet
03

06/2912001 11:45 919-715-664B
:. lo/ DWQ NON DISCHARGE ER
84
Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches t 12 inches per foot * DR
Volume = 53666.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE,
5A.
121058
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
53667
cubic
feet
5D.
53667
cubic
feet
TOTAL.
228392
cubic
feet
. SUMMARY
Temporary storage =c====) 180 days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========) 7.0 inches
25 year - 24 hour 7.0 inches
1.0 feet
Side slopes== 3.0 ¢ 1
Inside top length-====- _=_= _- _-) 40Q.0 feet
Inside top width-==-=_______==_-__-_=___ -_) 230.0 feet
Top of dike 101A feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 88.0 feet
Total required volume= _-- -_--_> 724112 cu. ft.
Actual design $12832 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SFW)=-a) 94.0 feet
Stop pumping 96.2 feet
Must be ) or = to the SHWT 94.0 feet
Must be ) or = to min. req, treatment el.=) 94.a! feet
Required minimum treatment volume= =====) 495720 cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_____==) 503572 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.==--- _-__--_) 99.3 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==) 759165 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation======-=) 751957 cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped--======= _===-_) 174725 cu. -ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped======_===) 248385 cu. ft.
Main. thickness of soil liner when required==) 1.9 feet
DESIGNED 'BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

06/29/2001 11:45 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR
�tor:Mitchell Norris #2County: Bladen
'tance to nearest residence (other than owner):
AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finis43 x 1417 lbs.
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs.
3672 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs.
@ sows (farrow to wean) x, 433 lbs.
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs.
Describe other
Total Average Live Weight = 495720 lbs
>„ {MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATME14T VOLUME OF LAGOON -
Date: 04/03/95
1200.0 feet
= 0
lbs
= 0
lbs
- 495720
lbs
0
lbs
- @
lbs
0
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 495720 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside -top length (feet)---------------------
400.0
Inside top width (feet) ----------------------
230'0-
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------
87.0
Bottom .of lagoon elevation (feet)------------
74.0
Freeboard ( feet) ---- ------------------------
1.0
Side slopes ( inside lagoon) --------------------
3.0 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 394.0
224.0 12.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
394.0 224.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH
322.0 152.0
8B256 (AREA OF TOE)
48944 (RREA OF BOTTOM)
U
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
358.0 188_0 269216 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = EAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
8825E. @ 269216- 0 48944.0 2.0
05
Total Designed Volume Available = 812832 CU. FT.

06/29/2001 11:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR
MAORARV STORAGE RE12OIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length Width J oars feet
400.0 "c 30. 0 92L400.0 s q
B+silding5 (roof and lot water) area.
ware feet
0.0 sq Describe this •
TOTAL DA ,20@0.e square feet
Resign 180 days.
temporary storage period to be
Volume of waste produced
al./day per 135 lb.
AtN ].37
Feces & urine production in 9
37 al/day ]B0 days
volume = 495720 lbs. ALW/135, lb,,. ALW * 1. g
volume = 905515 gals. or 121058.2 cubic feet
;B. Volume of :wash water flours or voluse
This is Flush systems that recirculate
the amount of fresh water used far washing
of fresh water used for a flush systez
the lagoon water are accounted for in +A• e/7.48 gallons
volume = 0'0 9
allons/day * 180 days 5torag per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
.O. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation largest amount.
Liss period of time when Tainfall exceeds evaporation by
7.0 inches .
180 days excess rainfall
0 in pq / 12 inches pee• foot
Volume = 7.
Volume = 5'666,7 cubic feet
0
06
x•

06/29/2001 11:45 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR
.T W
i
�oiume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot AR
Volume = 5.3666.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 121058 cubic feet
5P. 0 cubic -feet
5E. 53667 cubic feet
5D_ 53667 cubic feet
TOTAL 228392 cubic feet
. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period=--=------___ 183 days
Rainfall in excess of evaparationw===== __=) 7.0 inches
25 year -- 24 hour rain fai7.0 inches
1.0 feet
Side slopes==-==_= _a.0 : 1
Inside top length== == _====== ____=____=-===1 400. @ feet
Inside top Width====--===- ___= =__) 227Z.0 feet
Top of dike elevation=== = =======_--=__) 87.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation=-===---_-_=--- => 74.0 feet
Total required volume-===-===m===—= =_= =—) 724112 cu_ ft.
Actual design v o 1 um e----=__=_—_____________) 812832 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===) 77.0 feet
Stop pulping elev.-----_____-----_-------_..=) 82.2 feet
Must be ) or = to the SHWT elev. ===_=__===) 77.0 feet
Must be ) or = to min. req. treatment e1.=) 8@.@ feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====--- =_) 495720 cu. ft.
Volume at stop pulping elevation==========__) 503572 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.=--____- ______-=---__) 85.3 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25,yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==) . 759165 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========) 751957 cu. ft.
Required volume to be .pumped== =========_-_) 174725 cis. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped== =====) 248385 cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==) 1.9 feet
. DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS
07

State of North Carolina OV
r Department of Environment and Natural Resources to"
x Division of Water Quality
' Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review, the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
IA Facility Name: Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: -Mitchell Norris r1r—Ut: 1 H L U
1.3 Mailing address: -K /7 -f — AWe/0fr_L 40/3 JQD . l i I N 1998
��
City, State:. Clarkson -lam _. _ Zip: 28433
Telephone Number (include area code): 862-235
FAYETmmLLE
AEG. 01-Fich
1.4 County'where facility is located: Bladen
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 1709 Coley Road
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / tegrator s ame (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Murphy Farms Inc. Murphy Family Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation; l /21 4
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): %yA"
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 09 (county number); 39 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
7344- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
TYP2 Qf Swine No. of Animals
Type of Poula
No. of Atiimals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Layer
0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Non -Layer
0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
_ No. of Animals:
_
REC'EIV D
taltl i 4 1998
(,;oHLffY SCUM
u-'mplsance Enf.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1t26/98 Page 1 of 4

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): "2300 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
1to�tsla��+ 1�y�a��
2.4 Number of Lagoons: 2 ; Total Capacity: — Cubic Feet (0); Required Capacity: (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: Q; Total Capacity: a (0); Required Capacit (ft3)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
&or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations,where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 .Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan,
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional
components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4

Facility Number: 09 - 39
Facility Name: Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1,
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for _M , ZL �agg 1 !F Z _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incaurnleM
NO
Signature
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]

A.MTHAL WASTE MANAC22CENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR XX ANDED FEEDLOTS
rn lease retuthe completed fo= to the Division of Ptzvironmaatal Hanagemeat at
tho addroan on the revaraa side of thin form.
Name of farm (Please print):
Address t 1 Rox -K
_ __f'larkf n NC 28433 ,_ Phone No.:(910862-2352
County: Bladen
Farm location: Latitude and Long itude:,3A°34'_47'I_ 28_!_32 L 4Qiequired) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Swine
Design capacity (number of animals) : _ 3672 Finisher
Average size of operation-(12 month population avg.): 3672
Average acreage needed for land application of waste t23
-�caa=aaaaaaeaa===a=as==aaaaaaaaaaas=a'aaaaaaa.r���sa:oss�pc=ar3an�zazzaeasaaaaaaa
Technical Specialist Caztification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F _0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
triter is have been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers) ; liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-yeas, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Tech- ical Specialist (Please J. Neal Tucker
p (_ _e_se Pint) :
Affiliation; Murphy -Farms, Inc.
Address (Agency)�xP_fl -Box 759 Rose Hill, NC _Phone No.(,91 0) 2.89-21 1 1_ F.:
Signature
v=a-case:
y -. - c v •t l U�"
Date:
asaa-aa aaauc=c=panaazz�szaassaa�aaaaaaasa=aaa=aaszazssc3a��aaa
Ow=er/iKamagnr Agreement
? (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for,the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the fazm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land own r pleas Print) : Mitchell-W. Norris _
Signature: b Date:
Nape of Hanager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature:
XgZe ; A change in land ownership requires
(if the approved plan is changed) to
Environmental Management within 60 days of
ie
Date:
notification or a new certification
be submitted to the Division of
a title transfer.
DM4 USE ONLY : ACNEW #
t. 717

AN121LXL WASTE MANAG22MNT PLAN CERTIFICTITION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Enviwonneatal X nagament at
.the address on the reverse side of this form.
t1ame of farm (Please print) : Mitchell Norris # 2
Address: Rt. 1 Box 65-K
Clarkton, NC 28433_ _ Phone No_ : 91 0 862--2359
county: Bla en
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:3A°3A r_33nLB_o 32' 53"(required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): Swine
Design capacity (number of animals) :_ 3672_ -Finishing
Average size of operation'(12 month population avg.): 3 672
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
=_-=oc-==�aaev==���-�aa�rrra==rarra:=snrrsr.n==�ss�=sxv,a=a=;ac=era=sssa�aeaea=o=svn
Technical Specialist Certification,
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 211.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding -minimum
criteria- have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour
storm.
Name of Tat. :ical Specialist (Please Print) :__J. Meal Tucker
Affiliation -
Address (Agency) : R:O. Box 759 Rose _Hill, NC Phone NoT9TIQY2892111 Ex
28458
Signature: ��,� Date: Zf
ra=====sx 7aa=�=e=c.poa=�at�aserr�=aera3��e3as��ac�aa�=sans=acra�==}c=�aaa
owner/21anager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established ir. the
approved animal waste management plan for.the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance -or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the ,farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Owner ( left2�
itchell W_ Norris
Signature: A,=Date:
Name of M-Magor, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Ngte: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACbTE1 #
t. 717
10

` 1 h
f•1 �.Sggt�. r. �
,= ....`;ti. B l aden Date: 04/03/95
OAerat©r�Mitche;ll;Nor•ris #iCvunty: .
s t 'residence (other than owner): 1100.0 feet s ance::�� o�;neare
1=AVERAGE;"LIVE :WEIGHT (ALW)
i'-'•i.e;si.-._�..;.,n7; 0 lbs
@;=sorts (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs.
} : ;0.='Sows ( farrow to feeder) x 52 s. — s
<- ":3672:=head (finishing only) x 135 lbs. 495720 lbs
sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs. — 0 lbs
'0 head (wean to feederl x 30 lbs. = 0 lbs
Describe other 0
Total Average Live Weight = 495720 lbs
?, MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 495720 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic -feet
. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside_'top length (feet) ---------------------
400.0
Inside tap width. (feet) ------------------------
230.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)---------------------
101.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)----------------
88.0
Freeboard (feet)---------------------------------
1.0
Side s lopes (inside lagoon) ---------------------
3.0 1
Total design volume rasing prismoidal formula
SS/ENDi SS/END2 SS/SIDEI SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 394.0
224.0 12.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
394.0 224.0 88256 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
322.0 1 ;2. 0 48944 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
358.0 188.0 26921€, (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
8B256. 0 269216.0 48944.0 2.0
.' Total Designed Volume Available = 812832 CU. FT.

5- • TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
5
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
400.0 230.0 92000.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 92000.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 clays.
A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 905515 gals. or 121058.2 cubic feet
B. Volume of ,wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume.= 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot.
Volume = 53666.7 cubic feet

;D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 53666.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
121058
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
53667
cubic
feet
5D.
53667
cubic
feet
TOTAL 228392 cubic feet
. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period=====_______________>
160
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation==== ======)
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall=== ______________)
7.0
inches
Freeboard====_______________________________)
1.0
feet
Side
3.0-.
1
Inside top length====----===------=--------)
400.0
feet
Inside top width=========--=- =------====-=-)
230.0,feet
Top of -dike
101.0
feet
Bottom of lagoon
88.0
feet .
Total required volume_______________________>
724112
cu. ft.
Actual design
812832
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===)
94.0
feet
Stop pumping elev.__________________________)
96.2
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====_____=>
94.0
feet
Must be ) or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
94.0
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====_____)
495720
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====______)
503572
cu. ft.
Start pumping
99.3
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==)
759165
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation=====_____>
751957
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped=====______-____)
174725
cry. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_=___)
248385
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==)
1.9
feet
DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATI0N PLAN
COMMENT S :

• , . �.=,..uYcftN��W r•�rtir��trvn��t.c ir�n�■ �� a r. ------------- —�
t
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
_:.fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
',.-due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year -- 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). if the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating -convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order -to -apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of'. -disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre --charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water. should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land applications.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 99.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 96.2 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 174725 cubic feet or
1306942 gallons.

IqW
r' 4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per• hour• Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to 'be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right—of—ways.
9. The Glean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

.• SPECIFICATIONS FOR C13NSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
The foundation area of. the lagoon embankment and building pad Shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders, sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped. and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
MOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet 'in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre—feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.9 ft.
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over —
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie — CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

�i G Ur C
Sail liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
Minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum moisture
pontent which relates to that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
§hall be added to borro4 as necessary to insure proper moisture content
during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
Material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
pompacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth or hard, the previous lift
#hall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
jift.
fhe single most important factor affecting the overall compacted perme—
gbility of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
fhe sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab—
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
t-ompaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
-jhe soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
yr using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
�Jlternatives to soil liners are synthetic litters and bentonite sealant.
0hen these are specified, additional construction specifications are
)ncluded with this Construction Specification.
r,;IJTOFF TRENCH:
-------------
F; cutoff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
yhown on a typical cross section in the plans. The final depth of the
r•utaff trench shall be determined by observation of the foundation
materials.
QFGETAT I ON :
11 exposed embankment and other~ bare constructed areas shall be seeded
o the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc—
ion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
n areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
hall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
ates for seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
s possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
AL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
--------------------------
en tile drains are encountered, the the will be removed to a minimum
10 feet beyond the outside toe of slope of the dike. The tile
ench shall be backfilled and compacted with good material such as
, CL, or, CH.

]perator:Mitchell Norris
##2County:
Bladen
)istance to nearest residence
(other
than
owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT
(ALW)
0 sows (farrow to
finish)
x
1417
lbs.
0 sows (farrow to
feeder)
x
522
lbs.
3672 head (finishing
only)
x
135
lbs.
0 sows (farrow to
wean)
x
433
lbs.
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
Describe other
Bate: 04/03/95
1200.0 feet
— 0
lbs
— 0
lbs
= 495720
lbs
— 0
lbs
— 0
lbs
0
Total Average Live Weight = 495720 lbs
s. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON '
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW x Treatment Voiume(CF)/Lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/Ib. ALW
Volume = 495720 cubic feet
;. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
1. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside -top length (feet)---------------------
400.0
Inside top width (feet)----------------------
230:@:
Top of dike elevation (feet)-----------------
87.0
Bottom .of lagoon elevation (feet)--------------
74.0
Freeboard (feet)___________________________ _
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)-------------------
3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 .3.0 3.0 3.0 394.0
224.0 12.0
AREA OF TOFF
LENGTH * WIDTH =
394.0 224.0 68256 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
322.0 152.0 48944 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
358.0 188.0 269216 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
88256. 0 269216.0 48944.0 2.0
Total Designed Volume Available = 812832 CU. FT.

�. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
400.0 230.0 92000.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 92000.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
;A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 495720 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 1B0 days
Volume = 905515 gals. or 121058.2 cubic feet
iB. Volume of :Dash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or Volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per OF
G. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 53E66.7 cubic feet

D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 53666.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 121058 cubic feet
5@. 0 cubic -feet
5C. 53667 cubic feet
5D. 53667 cubic feet
TOTAL 228392 cubic feet
. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====--__--=— =- ===)
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========)
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==========_ =_====)
7.0
inches
1.0
feet
Side s lopes==____-__=_____===-_______ ___=-)
3.0
. 1
Inside top length___________________________>
400.0
feet
Inside top wilth==__________________________)
230.0
feet
Top of, dike ___________)
87.0
feet
Bottos of lagoon elevation=== =============)
74.0
feet_
Total required volume ===-==________________)
724112
cu. ft.
Actual design volume========-=______-_____>
812832
cu. ft.
Seasonal high Watertable elevation (SHWT)===)
77.0
feet
Step pumping elev.__________________________>
82..2
feet
Must be ) or = to the SHWT elev.====_=====)
77.0
feet
Must be ) or = to min. req. treatment el.=)
80.0
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=======_ ==)
495720
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============)
50357E
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.==_______________________)
85.3
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25.yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==).
759165
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation====�_____>
751957
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped================)
174725
cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========)
248385
cu. ft,
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==)
1.9
feet
. DESIGNED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

VrGnn �iau ran a�a�ta arti. a•�� r�n.a W
a . ---"—�--�•---- ---
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment tpermanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
.(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included -is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). if the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 112 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start --up. pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling,
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 85.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 82.2 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 174725 cubic feet or
1306942 gallons.

c ur c
4: The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
b. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is -to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
---------------------------------------------------
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders, sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed Excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches.in thickness when louse and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF'THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre -fret or more fall under the ,jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent_ excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.9 ft.
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

'SDil liner material shall come from an approved -borrow area. The
minimum water content of 'the liner material shall be optimum moisture,
• content which relates to that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
shall be added to borrow as necessary to insure proper moisture content
during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698-Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth or hard, the previous lift
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
lift.
The single most .important factor affecting the overall compacted perme-
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab-
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
compaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The soil liner shall be prote:-`-,d from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
or using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and bentonite �_e-.Iant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with this Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH:
--------------
A cutoff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
shown on a typical cross section in the plans. The final depth of the
clstoff trench shall be determined by observation of the foundation
materials.
VEGETATION:
All exposed embankment and-other,bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after. construe--
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Teaporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
------------------------------
When the drains are encountered, the tile will be removed to a minimum
of 10 feet beyond the outside toe of slope of the dike. The tile
trench shall be backfilled and compacted with good material such as
SC, CL, or CH.

M

MCiP 16 ' 94 1 7":"-9 �� W PAGE. 00?
UNIFY m STATES SOIL, i . Scivice Ctr.
DUARYMFi r OF CONSERVATION htnigm, NC 29337
AGRICULTM SERVICE 910-962-6936
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACiiM SM EVALUATION
GENERAL INFoMATION
NAME1
TELEPHONE
SIZE. OPERA710N
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROMINEAREST RESIDENCE NO: OW:NFD BY PP.ODCCER J_0_FT.
IS SITZ WITHLN I00-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN'! YES NO �
if yes, SCS canml Praride assi L xace.
IS Sri£ AT LEAST 100 FT_ FROM A 'BLUE. LINE' PERENNLAL
STREAM? YE5 ND
It M, si& most be rvlocs�.
IS SrM WrIfUN I MB' E ZaNING AMSDICTION OF A
MUNICTI+ICI:2M YES No
vy*6- "G&tea.mmift head a set
.AAE-U7AAlR&IN cvr;=0NAX T YES Nd
y�u�.+�7 T .vL-CLBA.%sG W00DLJ*k \D OR -ANY NON
V+aL ACfI N -LT Ri SW YESM- -
IF WE EXR6S ARE LWOL.VED, rr. IS THE-
.CXN'i'ACr_TM_ 3S_ARXY CQR?_OF.ENVUU
AL MANA� TO
�. 1 i* AN'w SL3OUD BE
WRrnr 13 AMOVAL fkdU SCS, US ARMY OFE4Ckft-MS AND
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGTMEN`I'.
U-6)w of.AD-M& me&
O'Dew CONTROL
�
...... ::f7{!t �1Tisi/DBLSCTKWa�f
.............
.............. M 3 CU. FT./LR. C* ANNAI?
........:.... LAGOON WrrH -FF4M WATER ;AF fw►Tm
tk—JL Tsw dw-
_. .

7
OTHER EHVUtoAtMENiAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED ANWOR THRE.ATEIV'ED SKICIES HABI-rAT PRESENT?
YFS____^ NO_/ _
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENFIC AREA INCLUDED N. Tf•iF PL.A.%, NTNG
AREA OR WILL PLAN-NED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL'
SCENIC AREA? YES NO k1l,
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL S= LOCATED IN THE PLANNED
AREA? YI' S - N0�_
.kRE THERE PR ME, UNIQUE. STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT ANT FARMLANDS Tl% THE '
OPERATING UNIT. YES ti0
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING^ YES NO
If yes to am of the--c gwec'dom, refer to form NC-CPA-16 for policy soorue5. The form doit. riot
need to be completed. {
WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LkN. -D TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WA=. YES NO
iF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCE SS TO.MORE LAINTD?
- YES ► . NO'
LAND ON WMCHTO APPLY WASTE?
Waste UbTm6 , PI*n to dft er a.)
-3 tUMASLE FOR LAGS
UAMAY LWERR YID'i--J.00`• _
tZ YE$, IS CLAY AVAn AKE MM=. -�� } � "rfjM
IS A COU iREwS REED? _Ya.iti0
At# smit ta.vitej
MMMENTS 1-5
' S 7 iS�1+7 PVPM ! 1; ram. X i ALM AS �..c7f![R�I *]�i* � y�
• L11i�C.�d i V a9M�' ' iH
iit"']C III MAY' '�;1}�4r
p4palp.

N
am
IF
F.
:.:. 9, 1. 6
11MOMMEMEN
INEMENERE
ANNE MEN
IMINEMBIEME
ME
Mamma 0 MUS
-NOW
Wwramm'NOWNWINK WINUM

'• ;,, :TYPES UNzj Ix= IN BQ WG.;-7.-
MAT CC3►t4tes►s�elalra.--�.
A_..-... (Us�s1OF ...
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION - y
GW -Well grsdOd grevela; Fsasl. Bond srlx
'g= gtivel f
GP -Poorly Qaded gravels
a -sand
Gm- Silty gravels: Qatel-saad-silt Brix
vfs - very fine sand. :
GC -Clayey gavels; gavel -sand -Clay plx
sl=Sandy loam '-.• -
sw -Nell grad�sd surds: rood-p> f w1 p"
fsl -fine sandy Iasm
SP - Poorly psaed isrds - •
1- Soars
sm -silty sand
gl - gravelly born
SC -clam saeds; sow6cur saes - : -
at -slit , -
ML - Silts; silts. T. fins ssads; saady or clayey silt
sil - silt loam
CL -Clays of lar to rredim Plasticity
c1-clay loom
CH -Lunazic class of WO Plasticity
sic I -silty clay loam
MH- Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loem
OL - Organic Silts avid ailty clays, low plasticity
sic - silty clay
OH - Organic clays, medinw to higtr Plasticity
c - clay
L Suitable zuterW !ar ambwdmawt is arai abls colrea NO -th.Aoeu rAws &NA"d as oft JANkh on
REMARKS. �
Ile-
2. +�Y lyafardr lequsrinj atteatsorilss dram rSrraayc, ago.-rpC1♦r k!G) - .
-EWERAL REMARKS:
21.
25
2612,
2$
29
30
31
320
33
34
35
36
37
38
3 !
40
41
42
43
M
45
46
47
48
19
50
51
e
_
..]

ti - UNITED STATES SOIL 122'9s•�'ice Ctr. .
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Elizabethtown, NC 29337
t AGRICULTURE SERVICE 910-862-6936
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
^'
NAME
TELEPHONE
LOCATION
SIZE OPERATION
LOCATION DATA'
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER J500 FT.
IS SITE WITHIN I00-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?
If yes, SCS cannot provide assistance.
YES NO ✓
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL
STREAM? YES_, -'NO
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN I MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A
MUNICIPALITY? YES NO��
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required permits.
Permits must be obtained prior to design approval.
ARE' UTl1XrIES iN-CONSTRUCTION .AREA? YES NO ✓
_.If.yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site evaluation.)
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON -CROPLAND?
YES NO ✓
If yes, producer must complete a Form AD-I026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES . NO_t —
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBIL13-Y OF THE PRODUCER TO
CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE
REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS. SHOULD BE ALTERED UNTIL PRODUCER RECEIVES
WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS, US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
(A copy of AD4026 and CPA-026 should be attached to'site evaluation.)
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER .............
.......:..:.. PREDOMINANT.WIND DIRECTION? YESLZNO
.............. POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT VOLUME FROM I CU FT. UPWARDS
.............. TO 3 CU. FT.ILB. OF ANIMAL? YES ✓ NO
.............. PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST W OF THE
.............. CAPACITY? YES NO
.............. USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN LAND APPLICATION OF
.............. WASTE? YES �/ NO

OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES NO r
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED'IN THE PLANNING
AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ()WAIN ADJACENT NATURAL
SCENIC AREA? YES NO ✓
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED
AREA? YES NO,-_-'
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN �'IiE
OPERATING UNIT? YES NO ,
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING?
YES NO
If yes to any of these questions, refer to form NC-CPA-16 for policy sources. The form does not
need to be completed.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WASTE? YES�NO
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND?
YES��NO
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON
LAND ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES,NO
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.) ;J , - _ /_ I " _ _ / _
SOIL INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES_�NO
IS A CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES +*'�NO
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES__ NO
QUESTIONABLE
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?. YES ✓ NO
(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
SITE APPROVED YES_ NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS L 3 cn
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN REASONABLE TIME PERIOD. UNDUE DELAYS OR
HESITANCY IN CONSTRUCTION MAY REQUIRE THAT -SITE EVALUATION BE
INVALIDATED.
SIGNATURE DATE A % qq
r
a
f
/.i�iy'/'►S
rage AofA

r
TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW -Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s-sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs- very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mix
sl -sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -grovel mix
fsl-€ine sandy.loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
SM -Silty sand
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
l - loam
gl -gravelly loam
si - silt
ML - Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sil - silt loam
CL- Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl-silty clay loam
MH-Elastic silts
scl-sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plWicity
c - clay
L Suitable material for embankment is available OYes [:] No fl�rs wh.ye 1or�tec ore u. s�Csrd� on
Boa. stQy
REMARKS:
,:5,em/ie In ,441 Is-o- ✓'eg? U r Pd /r2`
2. Explain bazarde requiring special attention in design (sewapR sp pr,00lc �1
GENERAL REbIARKS:
24
25.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
136137138
39040
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
A
1 a a 1 ■ a a a o 0 o 91 u 11 u r

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper Iagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according'to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the Iagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet.periods.
Overflow from the.lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
r.. covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10--10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following: -
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
I. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. FilI new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of Water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible: pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. 'This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the Iagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
latD
goon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
PH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Practice water conservation --minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Management:
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, Ion, -stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored Iong term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby,cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient -and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. CIose
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic Iiner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. items- which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid Ievels---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity --protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during_ sIudge
removal, or rupture*from lowering lagoon liquid Ievel below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist -for assistance.
'Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Animal Waste Management Systems Manual

l•Iortality n•Ianagement l'IethodS
(check which nletllod(s) are bin;,! implemented)
J Burial three rect beneath the surface of the ground within 24 tours after
kno%vlcdec of the death. The burial must be at least 300 reef from any flowing
stream or public body of watcr.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed undc: G.S. 106.163.7
C7 Complete hici{teralion
i7 In the cast or dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and'design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
G Anv method which in Elie professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
Insect Control Choddist For Animal Operations
Smlrcc - - - C:unse I1alI's Iu Cuutrul MSC is Silt SlIedrit: I'r'nttiCUS
U1111lii Systems
1:I101 C11111Vrs • ACCltllullnlion ursuilds 1"J Fltlsll SYSIC111 is dusiLned unll o1wriiled
511MICienlly to runtuve ucCuuluLnell sulills rroln
gullt:rs us ticsil;nCtl.
0 ltutmove bridallig of aCcnululalcd solids pt
Ilist;hnrt;u
l.u4u►,lu Inul fills Crlls{ctl Sulids Mllirltnill 111800115, scllliilt; basins Ilnll hits wllcra
Iles{ hreeding is npllarenl to minimizu lilt;
crustins orsolicls to u deplll of tlo moru Than G -
inchus over nlnrt; limn 30% orsurfacu.
IaCesi k.1; fto"livc DecuyulL veLctatitm -1 M;untuut vegelUllve Contlol alurll; hunks ul'
{iluulll 1aLoons luul enter iulpnnndnlell ls to pruvenl
aCC11111lliaom, or tiecityntt; ve8ci ltivc II1aller
lllonty %v;lter% edge ell impotnulmcnl's perimeter.

1,
Sunrru
Swine; Farm Wasto Management Odor Control Chocl[list
We
]IN-1 Ps In I111+Ilulfzt: Cl+lnr
Fali3weall Swine ploduc0011 lef CCCialivu or wooded buficrs;
Vccnnnuciidl:d'besl niauaGl:iucal pructiccs;
ond judgalcol and common seaso
Auin1•rl holly surfaces • hiriy III alulrc-covcrell uni111111s 0 Dry floors
11nur wilaces • WC1 urinurc-cuvered flours Slullud floors;
,fit Wulurers localud over sluned floors;
❑ Rulers ul 1111;11 cad of solid floors;
C1 Scralic manure buildup from floors;
Cl IVtidertloor vcnlilalinil for drying
Manure Collccliull pits • llriuc; %VrellIM11 IM1111IC rcalovill by
• Pal lial lnicrullial 1lecouipnsilioll ur smile;
Uudurlloor venlilili lon
VCIIIilalilnl C,.1lillisl 1111IS • V111i11ilc Cases; Cl 1'111i alailllenaliCe;
Dose CI fiRicicnl uiruillvement
Situ Specific P1.11clicci
lluluur SIII[i1CCS
Dust
Wushdnwn between gruaps urauinwis;
CI
I ved url+fitivus;
.A
reciter covers;
n
feed dullvery i1mvtlspnlll extl:+ldurs Io rtwilcr
Covers
Flush liinks
• AlAutlon oNecyclud higoon
f=1
1'111s11 11111k Cams;
lilpild while lucks urn: filling
Cl
lixicud fill lilies lu neur hollum of taiihs %via,
u1111-si hnu vcnis
1:111111 alleys
• Aghatiun dnriag %vuslumitur
n
Underfloor flash wish imilcrlloor vewilatiuu
Convcyunce
111 I'Aliu-ge lluillls
Agi1aliull of recycled lal;nnn
fa
Exluad ruclulrLu lines III near bullulu 111'11ils
14111111 whlle Ails arc 111111118
Willi. 11n11-silillow vL:als
- -
I.ih alaiiuns
• Ag'1111tinu 11116118 sunlp hulk
CI
Sump look covers~
'
filflnL curl dr:Iw+luivu
0111silla drlin culiucliun
• Agilulinu durfag wasluivitier
i7
flux c11ver$
ur juuetinn 1111KCS
Cormyonce
,Ahl[1[: • '�hlvculhl:r I I, I'J'Jf,, I'ui1u 3 •

Salim : Cullsu HMI's to M111h,lize nllol• Sits Specific 1'ruelIces
End ordraitlpipes ul • Aniiulioii duriiig %viisiewulcr C1 Exlcnd discharge poini of pipes tiadcntcath
lacnorl culiveyallcc goon ligula level
Lagullll silfrucs Volatile gas cluissiaus; :)(Correci
'rnper lagoon liquid capticily;
• Iliolagical 1111xirlg; lagoon slarlup procedures;
• Auilutiall Miullnlun surfnco area-la'
-vuhi,me raiio;
' .,,� Miuitrluut ayilalloll wltcn,punllllnl;;
Cl. Mechanical acralloil;
C1 Provell 111olnalcul u111011ves
fi-daiili11i1 spriuklcr • I ligh pressilte uyiltllfuu; ,;�`
nuul4s Wind drift G►imlull rccolluticlulcd operaliitg pressure;
��Ilmup intake ucnr Itlguan liquid surface;
l7 I'u1111t from $CC011d-slogs 1a(;aall
Slimige t11111. or Irrlsill • I'll,0111 milerullia{ devallipnsilioll; n Iluitn111 urnlidl4vc{ luiUlilll;;
i'!rl'Icc • MIXII18 Mills filling;; Q 'I'illik covers;
• Agilatiml wlicn ling;
Cl Nsill. stirrace Mats orsulids;
n
Proven llioingicill additives or oxillpuls
Sculil)8 basill sill Idea
Pulliul rlli:(ubial decalliplsiliull;
C1
I'munll ilruiapipu nuileis midimmulb liilriil}
•
Mixing; while: filling; -
level;
•
Agilullon when culptying
_ CI
Remove Wiled solids regularly
Mmuire, slurry urslnllg;e •
Ag;imlinn when sprundhtg;
Cl
Soil Injection ursinlryla11111ges;
SIIrcullcr 0111lcls •
ValalilC gas emissions
C1
Wush'resichull manure from sprcadgr rifler nsc;
CI
Proveii hinloijeal nddidyes or oxldaws
Ihicuvered 111t111111-C, •
Va11111le Bas elllisslons while
0
Suil injeetlull ul•shilly/sladacs
shirr), or sludge nn f icfll
drying;
l:l
Sail incorporalion %vilhin 18 lirs.;
sill likes
17
Spread in Olin mdrorm layers for rapid dryhic;
Cl Ytrnven binlogicul additives oroxidluils
Dead Imillmis • Carcass decumposidon Proper dispasillon orearcusses�
^Dcnd itIliullll 1161111s111 9 Cul-case decalllpuslnpll C1 Cuiuplcic cuvcrinl; of c+ucnsses iu Gurlal pity;
Nils Q Proper Inculioll/cmislrliclinn nl'disposal Ails
Illcil11:rmm's • lucuulpldle culuhlrslinn n Secillllhlry shick hnillers
r ' • �' - : AMjC}f! Nr1Ylanticr L 1, 191ti, P1lllir �1

Silt Specific Practices
.S+l+ncc Cuusn JIM11s In hfinimi'cc Odor
Slandiog miler arumlil • Imptuln:r druinap; Ciradc and l�unlscnhu s+IcL IhsH watcr,lr�lius
Cacili►ics . Micrui,iul dccoatllositiou of 41way from fucililics
arganic mauer . /
Alanl,rc trucke+l mina • ^'Poorly ulai,tt 11%cd access roads �� Fanu access raid mailllcna+tcu
-
- -
Imblit: [nulls final rarm
Recess
Ad+lilional I+Iforumlloa :
Avallullle cram
Muuure Managemenl ; 0200IiuIAMP Packcl
NCSi1, County I -We lsion Center
II
-Whit: Prodocilon Farm Polcutlal 0dorSourecs and Itcowdles ; EDAL r'acl Shecl
NCSIJ - IIAI:
'
Swine Production Pucilily Manure Muuagcntcul: I'll Itccllurge - l.uUnun Trealment , FDAE, 128-88
MCSU - IIAI:
Swills Pf"thIctinit Faellily fvluuuru Manugumcul: Underfloor Plush - Laguon'1Trcalnlcnl ; 1:13AIt 129-88
NCSW - IIAI:
Luiplon Design and Management fur 1.1vcslock Manure'rrculluent and S1nrnge ; FMAR IW-a]
NCSIJ - IIAI:
Culiluati„u otMunurc uutl Wustc�vulcr Aplflicaliun l:rluiJtu,cllt ; EI]AU Fact Shcel
NCSIJ - IIA Is
Cunlrulling Otlurs from Swine Uulldings ; I'll l-]]
NCSU - Swillc l:ktcuslult
I:uviroumcolul Assllrunce Prngrum ; NI'PC Manual
NC Park Producers Assoc
Opliuns fur ManugJnL O,lnr ; it Pelson from Ills Stvinc Odor Tusk Fnrcc
NCSU ALA CunummIc'nllofts
Nulsaltce C,mcurns lit Anlmul Muuurc Managemeal: Odors and Plics ; PRO107, 1995 Courcreiieu Proccct1higs
I'lorldn Conllt:ralive I-xienslon
li
.AMt IC • Wuvumbur 11,M6, 1'ttp 5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE 1
August g, 1996
PRODUCER: MITCHELL NORRIS
LOCATION:
CLARKTON NC 28433
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 7416 hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be.balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infilitration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for 'injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management,Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7416 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hags/year = 14090.4 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
PAGE 2
74:16 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 17056.8 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACREs OWNED BY PRODUCER
PAGE .3
TRXCT
FIELD
SOIL -TYPE& S -
CR P
CO
*
* BS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
---3t
APPLI
TIME
�_ —
�~
T. i 4SO
106
1
O 0-2
MAR-OC
3029
0-2$
-I230
12
INORFOLK
�14.6
1 12
I_M4_A6__0_
R_OC
3029
2A
NORFOLK
0-2
BH
6.1
305
3.9
1189.5
•
MAR-OC
3029
3
0-2
BC
5.2
INORFOLK
1260
1 122.5
15850
MAR-OC
3029
3A
NORFOLK0-
6.1
1305
14.0
11220
MAR-OC
3029
4
-6
1
IGRITNEY
J1275
12715
MAR-Ot
3029
5
0-2
BH
6.1
INORFOLK
1305
1 12.0
1610
MAR-Oc
3029
16
INORFOLK
0-2
BH
16.1
1305
1 19.5
2897.i
J VL V + All VV14-r-V14% U—L �}'.r-C a.. i�d—'�jj YV ] .S 1 / 4.4 40 • 4 I SEP VAi
TOTAL 117170.
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties -of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required on-y if operator does not own adequate
land. See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
PER AC
AC
END
PAGE
7AW
APPL
TIP
OT 0
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseed
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach 'maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small drain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
-height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (CoMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
�j
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
S
CROP,CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNI
5o
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-CONTROLLED GRAZED
TONS
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
so
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
so
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
AMOUNT
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
48.4 1 17170.46
*** BALANCE
1 1 1 0.46
17056.8
-113.66
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE:_ The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land 'application of sludge 'at agronomic rates. The sludge will -be
nutrient rich and will"require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 2743.92 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

�• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
t
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. Theapplication
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to en
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis rE
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the pr(
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
None. %��c� 2,3,E SJ })a5 Ao-F- %een eS`�ablis�e�1
�3e..c <Yr v &a._ TT- - S To b S
Pay v Se 5.�a ir

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAG
• Plans
and Specifications
1 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation cdr land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subiec
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental. Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a cony of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to 'secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the NRCS Technical Reference Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the' soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take-�up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter. strips
are present: (See Standard 393 -- Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
Areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
menting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.
PAGE i

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 9
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow -..and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the. ap- ,
prdved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I �•
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design' capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new* certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: MITCHELL NORRIS
SIGNATURE: WIYP�AaQ DATE: U-1
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: R. Dean Morris
AFFILIATION: USDA- NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 122 Ag. Service Ctr.
Elizabethtown NC 28337
40
- '0'rv�ej: 'f _qz

y .,
�:•`:i�' :.!•' ,�. Cis.. ��+:�?,�:�.',•�;s�.L�l.i .
nr
a!v., �' r,• 1.l r;A. (, .Fd;���� l ri�yl �r�s��a�✓��1
�,S r .i , ,, s r 1 e1� , , 4�1/•• �d .. A.1 ��
�A�'`<� ^� ,•` `��_' �v1; +�"�;��•� �r.�i ,, Asir l,��r•. , ,y
v 3P 9i IT r
:"�i,_ � - ; `� 'r ry'�'!T"'}, !n tir sSlLr 'r-t ,i'� f:. r•
/S - �! .�. •,i i,f - ! i"ri •• r7i , rl: r Y l y.ti r R.�r, •�`�ti�'Fr 4��1•'•• �l Y VV T
y � , "•��. �j 4, r' yti, 3 i 5 si ', k,5rS�1f� it �: \� 1
, � di� ! ! , ` %' t, ,3' trF 1 ��. 7''"�_•� rig � t
p} s{ „y 11 '' i 1'. �` h Sl=' r ," gT, ', sr, j��f•L�i b! \;,�'
, Y i � r r L17 1 ` J , 1!. • , � � i )! C T'J. Tr � r _ r 1� 1! �' - � W" ST �(i •yy3 +
+1,^l' !i � 51 AA A1r .a{,'�•. �F:�' •l1-Ir y�'jt Rr �i"�Af +lhk��lk1 ;.
,1, � t`, �r1 •, � }. 't F+�l � � �_ = r c E:ti� I + e`:� �' .tv�,+1�`��K e�l� r {,
, +r i ''� EYt t'f. tir �' .�� � a �� rG ti e�2t':�t_�,�✓y�' S<� � ��,' ! 1'
1I,
�, a ,! tr lit -I, YF = '�.l��d�S 1 7ti T+'. q�)= _`}ti}}h: t•.1. ',�.t r,L +., t4: �*,:e1r rr,, 1''�
},F\ �r to `�,,•l ,34 1 �;ti. Awls; .•'i7,q'e7•`iiA'�-•�rf. y.:i}[2."'. .:�, 4
J `{` 'i � 1.•r -k 5 r rL to '+ ! ` y5 5 }k 1 }i� 1��� _� lr 5�'r•S��r`i ,�'4, �4 �,'f1r
�f r ,ti•; r
tf ._ •A 4
. rn•; , �.,. r;�'r ., i t r' ! it L •r+ •r, .:,',:'. r'!i' 4: �-! r 1 <w �-.
•�1, ry: ''i _•, n•, 1' 1. yi •r. r; '%"."i, Ai ,", `»�, . ?,, ,1 •4 '1^^ ;(� �/ r.. . 'R+. •': �'" ,'' oy { �.
:.tir., rr ,;y'• ',' . ..0 ;..• rk' tY '•'S :i .4' w 1:�'?: Yi,Y',.1�'=5' ;�:
„' .I�:S— •� ^7.`•r, 'i•r", F• "�k�r5•F'{ +�� •5•�"r1I�) ,1 ! Y .64'I;a='-• ',
SS 1•F _�, � �. .r= .li.�:' }... ,1r.r��'s.:�;r• ��jr,, �Y. i•�}rJP.C!' t•. :jc
•�•'.�;': iT. ,{i� ::r{� i... ;.6q' ?•, ar ",r'!r"::`•:,: \:- f` ;"e.'.'• 'i+.'{S r:.:''•r i� r�,�
-� '' ti`�•4Z ;+•,fir'` '1't�,,y,� r�►r`�'Tr�
.k 1.
13
' l -ICI,
t l! a; �F! �»i pt�i. •7 ra`� '',4�� k'..141y{
•off rrr.ri' yli.Z"!' ( �j'k % r +`� s. 4�
.....•�i: Cl9i:`,I•,��... !,���i+i�t•a,a�i'� .-'S4',IWY �ti`•'�'x!a
4

1 .........
Nm
t ar ty-.' �`• ;� s�T '� t.��:e • xV0
� �. ` ;�j�. ,,.• err-.• `", �;;''' •� µ it ; •. ! • � � t ��
TZ
sl
.tides U t, .� ' 4'':, ''Vi4�I,k ai5:�•i••�f��
I �: / � .V.••�fi L� �'.':�: �� .y`Yi•�� air
1-6
i� ✓k" E.•'_M�-Y .•x4.. F:�i?�: V�'L•���S�r ,� :'Y''f 1,�f ,I ir.
r � : t� s t •�.. ,.fi�:• � r� j:
s "
j
I

PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) Qla- q�('- /,Sq!
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS) 910- - Vlfoo
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) lo- z;.-- G 3L
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) TQLA- 3(
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES) q16-
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
9. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
,e. Make sure no'surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
171
a. Stop recycle pump.
b: Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house,
flush systems, or solid. separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

r
W
LLM
W
I Q
co
M
J
0
CV
l
O
CV
C
O
Q
f�
tn

�''
• � t2 b'15

�� �a �� �
.._— -
�4
� � ,�, 4F.Sa•w�
�- �-�:
r rj�. -; i���
f
,>

F"
,_ .. '.�
f�
�r

x-n
' t

1;.

4
1
OF
is
W :�

vaa<'
vw
_ , .. ram-•

R.

er'
4� *-/ ti .lam
-V