090019_INSPECTIONS_20171231

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follom--u of D%%' ins (_vtion 0 Follow-up of I)SWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
ul✓ F�wry County 1Q�Iau
Farm Name?r. • ...............................................................
Owner Name: ......... . ...Of'!/.i. Phone No:
�.......--•-••- _....................................................................................... ...... ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...........f fe ,_,,,,•..,, Title. . Phone No:
MailingAddress:. ............... t.z �.. ...1� ��r........................... I............ _.............. ..........................
Onsite Representative:,. ..... .---�
.. ................�.........._.......... .... Integrator:-
Certi6ed Operator,......._..- �� 6/""`J ..... Operator Certification
r.._............ ------............................................ - _ ....
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 6 it Longitude ° 44
Nu_mber`of Lagoons /Holding Ponds :� . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
A ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System„
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ yes- 041
❑ Yes EPK10
❑ Yes 63<0
❑ Yes U(No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
[:1 Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lag-oons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
ldentifier:..�. N.��'�' ........
Freeboard (ft):„
........... 1 rr
104 0.
. .................................................................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [}'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
......................................................................
❑ Yes [?'No
❑ Yes allio_
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ©No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ehgo-
(If in excess of WMP or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... 'O `.�: d. yl...1. �r.cz ....... � -r.. [� ...�...i . '..�. yI�..........3................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ witth those designated in the Animal Waste Management lan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5076
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q No.violations ar deFiciencies.were noted during this:visit..Y.ou.w. ieceive )ixo further
:•ctirrespondencea�outtltis:visit"•:-:;:�;•;• -.•�•: :�; :; •:•.•:-:-:;:•:•.•;•;•:•;; ;;,:��•;•
--Yes PINO.S11M ('�
❑ Yes''
sj°Q 4­r�
❑Yes
❑Nose
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #� Explain any, 1'l S answers and/or amy recnti>lanendations orany other. Comtnents
NA - -3'ae. "� -
dwk aad of �•,.+.+�..'k`•`f.9'S6^�+575�4's'
CJse drawt,€igs o facibty to bettereacplai situatipns. (use addihoiial pt�gesas: ry).,
Y,
{
01
A,
10,
7125197
T
Reviewer/lnspector IN
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O Routine
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
Follow-up of 1)
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection !X-/2-97
Facility Number O
Time of Inspection i =his 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Registered © Certified C] Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ............
Farm Name:c dr:� County• ..... ............................. .......................
49.1 ................�..,........_.....,.....
Owner Name: ........ Z5,AM010 L!" ............. .. .......... Phone No: l o....fJZ- ......
f?!?.
Facility Contact:.......... ...... .�.,l�l.►J.. •••... Title:... ....Phone No:
Mailing Address: ..........9/3. ... xf'. s��r���a� ... ...�............ ...... �r¢!'�..,1*7��..Al C, ..2F31�3... ..........................
..
Onsite RepresentatSve:.....1CQ............. GrdlvJ ....... . Integrator:...... L. a!,Fid ...............---..........
Certifiederator,........P /J
Op ............................... .......... Operator Certification Number; ............. �...........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �• �' �" Longitude �• �° �"
w�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance improvement? ❑Yes fia'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes allo
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes A
Design �Current.
4'steri nyf" -.y'
Swine ` °,.w
CapacityPapulatiaa.N ,Poultry _Capacity PoonCatfie x Capacity" Population ;.
❑Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer I JE1 Dairy p`
❑ Non -Layer = ❑Non -Dairy
�
� Farrow to Finish �,� Q
.. ., r^,i.s [�iiM1Aprc -- r3 'WY
�Tpr,T Y.iQara 5
�f
� ,�c N Ys'.$'�. ��3 J✓ P 4T
�
❑ Other K k f R4 s A Y
n Notal D'esJig n Capa ity
Gilts
Boars
TTatai SSL -W
Number of Lagoons l Holding Ponds #1 , El Subsurface Drains Present 1] Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System`
.,�=
w�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance improvement? ❑Yes fia'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes allo
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes A
54%'s
❑Feeder to Finish
F
❑Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
�
� Farrow to Finish �,� Q
❑
�f
❑
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Lf yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes J?No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DV4'(}) ❑Yes 19 No
3, is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes � No
i
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑Yes � No
mai ntenance/improvement?
6. is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes I%No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes )&.L-40
7125197
Continued on
back

Facility Number:
"yiKa 'wa>sox.•.�s.§Y4^'.-.,fo`nClam}_ 'S• �'�b�-A;?"F"S'ea �'°hl'Y �-Rin#�'�'�':^+e✓' tl-»es✓
I Jse drawings of facthtyto bettd explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) � cr
se.•s';F..?w'a. r;e _:�`•,�,w,<"'�"%�` m;, o,c r,v ,.or -� ..k«r .-., . -. sy^2s .xsR z_.•s-...-�.a. aabwt �'.`aezF x.:,.s?"�.� s 'sxh,a%�ez.e.S' :zro..:,.� ..: z' -,`x
8. Are there ]aaoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
JU No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding_Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
eea-6e O'er
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
RrNo
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):............. . ! .............................................................. ...................................................................................._.................................................
.
& � � K a+; i � 4 -?� �•sM"-'-%y..+�m�">.Gwi :7e 2. � Y `�3` y'�M'f�w.,- .ate �P.;E"."` w .^�-.� -vi� t�& wy,. r�
Reviewer/Inspector came
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
J No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Ji No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
\
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
® Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
�WNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
[M'No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
ONo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
J'No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance' of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0- No.viQiatioils•or defcienCies*e're fikei d -during this:visit. - You:vviH ieceive-no-furtlier- : -
comespbfidence aboiut this'visit:
Commeirts {refer'to`questton) ,.O
Explaiin any«YES answersandlor any�ecornmendatfons or any otbe� cornnnents:sa��
"yiKa 'wa>sox.•.�s.§Y4^'.-.,fo`nClam}_ 'S• �'�b�-A;?"F"S'ea �'°hl'Y �-Rin#�'�'�':^+e✓' tl-»es✓
I Jse drawings of facthtyto bettd explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) � cr
se.•s';F..?w'a. r;e _:�`•,�,w,<"'�"%�` m;, o,c r,v ,.or -� ..k«r .-., . -. sy^2s .xsR z_.•s-...-�.a. aabwt �'.`aezF x.:,.s?"�.� s 'sxh,a%�ez.e.S' :zro..:,.� ..: z' -,`x
eea-6e O'er
U
7/25/97
& � � K a+; i � 4 -?� �•sM"-'-%y..+�m�">.Gwi :7e 2. � Y `�3` y'�M'f�w.,- .ate �P.;E"."` w .^�-.� -vi� t�& wy,. r�
Reviewer/Inspector came
Reviewer/Impector Signature: Date: /2 — fZ - 97

Dt ion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
1@Ikuutine O Comnlaint O Follow-up of Dl1'O insncxtion O Follow-uD of DMVC review O Other 1
Date of Inspection
Facility Number O Time of Inspection •(,b 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 10 Not OperaDate Last Operated:
Farm Dame: _..... l .�f�v a iv County _---
r
Owner Name: .................. �......................... .................... Phone No:
Facility Contact: _............Phone Na:
.............�26!! N. . _...... .............
MailingAddress: ................. . -. -----------A. x..... ......................1 ;� f&el............ ,.................................... .............. .._........
Onsite Representative:••,•-....._ f. .... t :f.__F'v . Integrator:,-......
Certilited Operator:.__..-----------:, R 0aP..n.....5,...�,t+.�'........ _ Operator Certification Number,-- ---...
Location of Farm: r 3,v 4~-, r r4w,0- AW
Latitude �• r-�--�6 66 Longitude • ` "
r = Des cv--- UrreIIt "
• avacitv`Populati6n
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F Feeder
DlFarrowtoFinish_
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
,.I - ­­_ -1 -Design -,�'�CUrreIIt,, w 14 % cr
lnsf--
oultry RCapacity' Popttlabon'pr� Cattle
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
10 Non -Layer
:
❑ Non -Dairy
R❑
Other::
Total Design Capacity`
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ; ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JOSprayFieldAma ° z
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface 'Vater? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenance/improve men t?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ Mo'
❑ Yes ❑4fo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes UNU—
❑ Yes C} qr' -
❑ Yes 0-
❑ Yes 0 -Mr -
es Ej-No
❑ Yes l'l�
❑ Yes i��­
Continued on back

Fa,ility.Nwnber: -
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to he properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.1folding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ..................
Freeboard(ft): .._ZP-Z;e........... .................................... ......... .................. ...._....................... ...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
1. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement"
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14_ Is there physical evidence of over application?
(1f in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
P type ...... �tt7 l �.• F)
15. Cro e..........................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. WerSany additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
ErNo.violations or deficiencies were noted during this.visit- .You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes Eleo-
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Der-
0
►ado–❑ Yes 12-1175-
El
x}'1'70❑ Yes [moo
❑ Yes
❑ No
/
❑ Yes
0.90-
❑ Yes
P.Ko
❑ Yes
ETM -3-
0 Yes
❑ Yes
04io-
ff
❑.No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): .,
Gc /moi-ctad- �9a
�. •�� 'okal
t4k*F
GJ 7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 19 2, I

Facility Number. --?--__Z2
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:.,.?
Time: 3
General Infonnation:f
Farm Name: County: /a -do .v
Owner Name: Phone Nc04S4 z y
On Site Representative:f%6o �1,/��� _ Integrator:
Mailing Address: '?/3
Physical Address/Location: c� \ „�C A,4 ; z
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Qs—ow Z(02 s O Layer O Dairy
O Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder -T-fa A_.W..
_�n a0o Sam /�ni�P Baa
OtherTwe of Livestock — _ Number of Animals: m �.'.-•���+
Number of Lagoons:__ (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than l.foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is evasion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
O Man-made O Nor Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
(lin the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:,�'f-,h-( Acreage:Al
tn= 46t3
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located withizi 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well Iocated within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled.within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray iiiigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI — January 17,1996
Yes ❑ No 0"
Yes ❑ No f3` -
Yes ❑ No Gk---
Yes
d'Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No .W��
Yes ❑ . No ❑'11
Yes ❑ No G
Yes ❑ �No ;r".
Yes ❑ No LY
yes ❑ No C�'

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes 0 No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Dues record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No Q
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes U No U
Explain any Yes answers:`
= Facility Assessment Unit
jDrawines or Observation. ••.
!S ` .
Dom^ • .
Date:
Use Attachments if Needed
y + �
- - _ ,� � ice, z� z� - �� 1�•�-�-� � �; �� - , 6`°,."� -.. /?s" .
r . -2
r �
!/ ?-
v
rJ�7J"'�..^� rs�• .� _.._ _ _` .,r..,-_ �_� �- _^�'. ".'rs {'.�.F.r�1nr:.cr-rte-_'���.° __,
' r•r.:�..-..-nom-n .�!-..•t- .. ♦1..i �{:i .*:.•'L..s•. 1., ♦+•.-....•+�w�.• n. ..
Ali �+
AOI -- Jauua y 17,19%
v
rJ�7J"'�..^� rs�• .� _.._ _ _` .,r..,-_ �_� �- _^�'. ".'rs {'.�.F.r�1nr:.cr-rte-_'���.° __,
' r•r.:�..-..-nom-n .�!-..•t- .. ♦1..i �{:i .*:.•'L..s•. 1., ♦+•.-....•+�w�.• n. ..

9
k
Facithy Number:,_-__ 19
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: June 26, 1996
Time. 3:15 p.m.
General Information:
Farm Name: R.E. Colvin Farms County. Bladen
Owner Name: Robert Colvin —Phone No: [phone]
On Site Representative- Robert Colvin Integrator. Independent
Mailing Address: 913 Chicken Foot Road
Tar Heel, NC 28392
Physical Addressl=ation: From Fayetteville, take NC 87 Fast to Tar Heel. At Tar Heel
take SR 1004 ro SR 1300 (Chicken Foot Rd.). navel for approx. 2.5 miles
to white painted block church on left. Take dirt driveway back to
Colvin Farm.
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: ! I
Operation Description: (based on design characterMcs)
Type of Swine No. V Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Q Sow 16U sows O Layer O Dairy
❑ Nursery O Non -Layer a Beef
deli or
13Feoderlagoon
OrherTypeofLivesrock Number of Animals: sow farrow to finish. Currently,
Number of Lagoons: 1 (iaciude in the Drawings and Observations she freeboard of each lagoon) Colvin
-No G.
only has
Vo M
160 sow to
No
feeder
Facility 1nsDection:
operation.
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes 0 No M
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑ No M
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑ No
Is any discharge observed? -
Yes ❑ No Ck
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Seees NQ 19
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ _ No M
(list the crops which need improvement) See .Comments
Coastal Be da 20-30 acres
Clop 1°hT Lvi s rarm is curren� t cer i Te ego eating.. 1:h
private adjacent land owners for usage o their TIan�or and applying
Setbacysergna
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI — January 1744
Yes ❑
-No G.
Yes ❑ .
Vo M
Yes 13
No
Yes ❑
No

Maintenancel i 4
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No
is them evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? T:es eroR
Does record keeping need improvement?es No la
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Pian on sits? Yes ❑ No 0
Not yet
required.
Main any Yes answers;
cc Facairy Assesmenr Unix `"
]Drawings or _hservati�i
Dam is
to be
seeded
with
common
Bermuda -
in the
next few
weeks for a
permanent vegation
for the lagoon dam.
Date- 6/26/96
Use Anachr w= ff Needed
Freeboard in excess of 10 feet
Old Lagoon O pump station under constructic
Hog Hog Hai New House not yet
House House Hous in operation.
Mr. Calvin's facility is only registered. Through the State's cost share program, a new lagoon was completed in
the late fall of 1995 to handle the waste from this facility. The new lagoon is not connected directly to the s'�e
houses at the current time. Mr. Colvin indicates that a specialty pump for the pump -station has been ordered and
that all final connections will be in place by August 1, 1996. The existing lagoon, which is not a:NRCS design,
is currently being pumped into the new lagoon to be utilized as a bacteria seed. Mr. Colvin does not currently spray
on land due to the major herd cutback. Mr. Colvin previously had his 300 sow farrow to finish operation on the
ground. He is negotiating with private property owners for a lease agreement to spray swine effluett onfo 4`' tal
Bermuda grass.. Once the plumbing is connected and the land owner agreements are finalized, the Bladen County
MRCS office can certify a Waste Management Plan for Mr. Colvin. Mr. Colvin appears to be making a progressive
and honest effort to comply with NCAC 2H..02000 regulations.
.Y• .: i,. wJ.r -.f .�-�- w •wl.�: fI(:ti I.f.-'1. L. �.I.+...Ia/aµ. war. .- ....-
AOI -- January 17.19%

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 2, 1995
Mr. Robert E. Colvin
Colvin Swine Farm
Route 2 Box 136
Tarheel, North Carolina 28392
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Colvin Swine Farm near Tarheel
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Colvin:
On September 25, 1995, I visited your swine operation in Bladen County
near Tarheel. A copy of our Compliance Inspection Report is enclosed for your
information and review. At the time of this visit the waste level in the "old"
lagoon was high enough to be discharging out through the low area at the south
end of the lagoon. However, this waste flow follows a'natural drainage path
into the "new" lagoon, which had approximately 4 to 5 feet of freeboard
remaining. however, it is imperative that the work on the new lagoon be
completed as soon as possible and sufficient diversions constructed to
eliminate the entrance of surface water into bqth lagoons. We also request
that the dense vegetation around both lagoons be mowed and maintained in a
fashion to provide easy access for inspection. This will simplify monitoring
of the lagoon levels for all parties concerned. As we discussed on the site,
we recommend that you contact the local MRCS office for their inspection
during the course of this work since cost share money is involved and their
certification will eventually be required.
We urge you to give this your immediate attention, especially considering
the wet conditions often occurring during the fall and winter seasons. If you
have questions concerning the inspection form, or if we can be assistance,
please call at [phone]. We anticipate reinspecting your farm on or
about October 26,1995.
Sincerely,
K n Ave itte
KA/ka
cc: Facilities Assessment Unit

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _ a9 -/!f
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: f-,7-4- , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:_ (i _ 2gfh6ajE AJ 32 z.-
County:���/ —
Integrator: SN ���osa�7- Phone:
On Site Rearesentative: rl,
Physical Address/Location:
1 , A®
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle oyo- Ri#d
Design Capacity: _4&m Number of Animals on Site:VP
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: "
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ha su ient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes oPs.
Actual Freeboard: 45 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the agoonYes or o Was any erosion observed?©or
Is adequate land available for spray&es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ;?-Ar r C.A&>� 0 /1A4V _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? � 7or No
100 Feet from Wells? <�g or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ori
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes ollo
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o&D If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (vol es of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on sped c acreage with cover crop ? Yes o No /
Additional Comments: v v&ZXj
/N1'a> /dam A"Aj ,9W0WAta �_ Qm.✓s
,old /,a ems,✓cera Il14 �.ae Rrca+•� 40%.3 '- c kt-rd�k) .
storm event
No
IAV t I I n E -I AJ C-7 ARocUiJ't> Ut-tat:v, X10 . 1TY -5-- -
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
f Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
ID FE F11
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL !MANAGEMENT
May 9, 1995
Mr. Robert E. Colvin
Route 2 Boa 136
Tarheel,.North Carolina 28392
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Confined Animal Feedlot Operation
(CAFO)
Robert E. Colvin Farm
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Colvin:
On May 2, 1995, an inspection of your confined animal operation was
conducted by staff of the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find
enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It
is the opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A
NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly
performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
either myself or Grady Dobson at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ken Averitte
Environmental Technician
ICA / ka
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Bladen County MRCS
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer %% recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

Fj
STH CLVOLINs DEPS OF Env HEALTH A NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF KNVIROIDGMAL �
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
Fare Name/owner Inspection Date Farm No.
_Robert E. Colvin Farm 5/2/92
Mailing Address
Rt. 2 Box 135
Tarheel, NC 283922
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform.the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION I
Confined Animal Operation Type: SWINE
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
SECTION II
I. Does the number and type of animal meet
the CAFO (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation RMIgTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12 -month period?
4. Does this facility have a CKWrIFMM ANIMAL
W STE MAIiAGEM M PLAN?
Y N Comments
-X—
—
_X_
-X_
X

S. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
Administration and Program Management
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
SECTION III
Field Site Management
I. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION PIAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
B. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
X
Y
N
Comments
X
Y
N
Comments
--- -
-X—
—
X
-X_
—
—
-N / A-
X
-X—
—
-*—
—X—
—
—

I
S=ION IV
* Comments
Prior to expansion of this facility, a waste management plan must be
developed and certified as adequate by a certified technical specialist.
This plan will address the specific land, crop, and lagoon storage
requirements for the expanded hog population you have proposed, as well as
overall management for this facility.
Based on information you provided, construction of a new lagoon is to
commence during the week of May 8-12, 1995. This lagoon should be inspected
during the course of construction by the technical specialist certifying the
waste management plan. As an independent producer, you may wish to contact the
District Conservationist with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (SCS)
concerning this matter.
It is recommended that you keep written records of all wastewater land
application events, identifying specific times, locations, and volumes of
waste applied.
Although your waste holding lagoon was not discharging at the time of the
inspection, it is apparent that the potential for discharge exists,
particularly during wet seasons. This is due mainly to the breach in the south
end of the lagoon dike. This breach should be filled immediately. Suitably
filled, this should provide adequate freeboard until the new lagoon is
completed.

r
f
1
Inspection Form for Animal Operations
(Note: Numbers 25-37 must be completed in order to
determine assessments)
1. Date of Inspection:
2. Regional Office:
3. Name of Owner of Property:
(Check Register of Deeds or Tax Office)
4. Naive of Operator: � �
5. Address: &1- Z �OX /�
Z- 5�b
6. Phone Number; — iD T, jf�„ _.,
7. Description of Facility Location (State Road Nos., etc.
Attach a Map)
8. Date this facility began operation:
9. Date of last expansion: f
Explain:
10. Has the facility registered with DEM? Yeses._ No
If yes, date registered
11. Does the facility hav an approved Animal Waste Manag nt
Plan? Yes No � Is one required? Yes No�date
Approved:
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? Yes Nojz"�'
If yes, date issued:
13. Type of Operation {Examples: fa to finish, tapping:
dairy: beef, cattle: Poult ree er, layers or
broilers, turkey, etc.):
14. Numbe and type of Animals
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled,
or confined and fed or maintained in any 12 month period.
1

46
16. Are crops, pasture, or post-harvest residues sustained in
1 the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or
facility?
17.
Type of Waste Management (Examples: 1) type of confinement:
tall barns, ctMeltered or limited shelter dirt lots
paved or dirt open�lots,houses, or pasture; 2) type off:`
waste handling: direct spreading in solid form, slotte
floor with lagoon or pit, ingle or multi -cell lagoon�
aerated lagoon, 1�d lication of liquid manure,. spray
18.
Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity
and proximity to same or other surface waters:
19. Proximity of facility„to neighboring houses, wells, etc.:
Approximate depth of groundwater table in the area of the
facility or discharge: a 4 edt
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and
class of surface waters) :
22. Animal waste discharge (including photos and witness' names,
addresses, telephone numbers and statements of fact).
23. Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the State? If
so, how? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing systems,
or other similar man-made device): >711
24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event
less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm? (If yes,
.include a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes.):
X142
2

25. What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation?:
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation?:
27. Water Quality Assessment: (include description of sampling,
field measurements, visual observations and slope and
vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of
rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or
frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process
wastewaters). The effect on ground or surface water quanity
or quality or on air quality:
28. What is the cost of rec ifying the damage?:
77
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?:
3o.
31.
Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?:
Yes No Explain:
What is the prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority:
32. What is the cost to the Sta
procedures?:
3
or the enforcement

aoform
Vol. K-1
33. 'Type or general nature of business:
34.
What is the violator's degree of cooperation (including
efforts to prevent or restore) or recalcitrance
(stubborness) :
35. Are ther any Mitigating Circumstances:
36. Assessment -Factors:
a. IWC
b. Receiving Stream
C. Damage YIN If yes, include report from WRC
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/operator:
39. Reconunendat ions for Further DEM Action: (Re -inspect, Nov,
Enforcement Action, designate, etc.):
40. Other Conunents:
4