040021_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

f)♦ Division of. Water Quality
0 Di -vision of Soil and Water Conservation -
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
!late of Visit: 2-24-2002 'Time:
Facility :\wubrr -t 21
0 Not O erationrl 0 Bel wiv Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: .................... County: A.usn l................................................. F.K.0 .............
Owner Name: D -avid .................... .. C.4.6 —...................... ........ Phone No: �� �-�3�.1....................................................................
Mailinu _Address: Rt..1.......................
Facility Contact:...........................................I.........
Onsite Representative:. -
Certified Operator:..........
Location of Farm:
................................... M.,QF.1x.N.(...---------.....---.........------......................... 18.11.9 .............
Title:................................................................ Phone No:................... -
............I ................... Integrator:...................................... ..
...................................... Operator Certification Number:......................
....................
wy. 742 South of Wadesboro to NC/SC State Line and turn Rt. at Sing Soy's Canipe's Dairy Farm. t
❑ Swine [I Poultry ®Cattle El Horse Latitude 34 ' 49 00 Longitude 80 • DG 00
Design Current
Swine C'anacity 11nnnlation
❑ %Yuan to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver JZ Dairy 1 100
❑ Non -Layer In Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 100
Total SSLW 140,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon area ❑ Spra)- Picld Arra
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste ,Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. I f discharge is observed- was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ ;\To
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E] No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treattnent
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? El Spillway E] Yes E] No
Structlufe 1 Stnicture 2 Structure -i Sti-uctu e 4 Stricture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............
Freeboard (inches): _
05103/OI
Continue!

I
1q,tcility Number: 9-21 Date of Inspection 2-20-2002
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
6.
Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
closure plan?
❑Yes
E] No
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
S.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste_At)i)lication
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documenis
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Inactive lagoon evaluation:
Lagoon closed out according to Brown's Creek Soil & Water Conservation District.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Paul Sherman
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05/03/01
Continued

'acility Number: 4-21 Date of Inspection 1 2-20-2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
34. Were any major maintenance problems with'the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31- Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pennanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
05/03/01
05/03/01

�`ltisl`' State of North Carolina
w Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
November 15, 1995
David Canipe
Canipe Dairy Farm
Rt. 1, Boa 450A
Morven, N.C. 28119
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation
Canipe Dairy Farm
HWY 742
Anson County
Dear Mr. Canipe:
On November 14, 1995 an inspection was conducted of your animal operation by the
Fayetteville Regional Office with the assistance of Mr. Robert Horton, DC and Mr. Lin Taylor,
District Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District. The inspection,
attached, revealed that the waste holding lagoon had no more than one (1) foot of freeboard at
the time of the inspection.
. As you may already know, freeboard must be maintained at one foot plus sufficient
capacity to hold a 25 year 24 hour storm event or a total of approximately nineteen (19) inches
(in this case freeboard represents the level of the lagoon liquid in relation to the lowest point of
the lagoon bank). You should immediately lower the waste level and maintain a minimum
freeboard level of 19 inches.
During the site visit you indicated that you may be going out of the dairy business.
Should you discontinue the use of the lagoon you are urged to contact Mr. Lin Taylor, District
Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District at [phone] for technical
guidance in proper closure of the lagoon.
-continued-
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Canipe
November 16, 1995
Page 2 of 2
If you have questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Environmental Specialist
Attachment
cc: DEM Facility Compliance Group
Mr. Lin Taylor, District Technician
1706 Mwwn Rwd
WWc*or% N.C. 28170-31+2
j • . a

J . . f
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - 0 9 --. t
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 14, 1995
Farm NamelOwner: Ca i m 1 C .n;w.
lWailing Addr= :_R4 -.f t Rp x 4 sr� A... lrlrwt,eQ AI.C. 2g[1'4 _ _ �_-
Ommty: lsNstn _
integrator:N« _ Photo:
On Site Representative: —g& -,A Ct.••; Re Phone: �►o 1�5133lI
Physical AddressnAxation: W W !� �, 43 tic sc s 6&c i z ,o -
Type of Operation: Swine Z Poultry Cattle '
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: • '
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or® Actual Freeboard:_ L_Ft. o Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No (seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being utilized:LSpray Field or cover_ crop _was not evaluated _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? mor No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
A, Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oto
k Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, orbther
similar man-made devices? Yes oijj�) If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(Waste management records were not
Additional Comments: _ reviewed) .
--This was a very,brief insQection. -a more thorough inspection will be conducted in the_£=ure.
Please contact -DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters. -
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine uBlue Line" status.
I)_ - '1 rA in • r __
If v6b
concerning this report please do not hesitate to.contact the inspector
at [phone]. Please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department
d alR
ATrAHHalth anNturaeouces •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Hater Quality Section
November 15, 1995
David Canipe
Canipe Dairy Farm
Rt. 1, Box 450A
Morven, N.C. 28119
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation
Canipe Dairy Farm
HWY 742
Anson County
Dear Mr. Canipe:
On November 14, 1995 an inspection was conducted of your animal operation by the
Fayetteville Regional Office with the assistance of Mr. Robert Horton, DC and Mr. Lin Taylor,
District Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District. The inspection,
attached, revealed that the waste holding lagoon had no more than one (1) foot of freeboard at
the time of the inspection.
. As you may already know, freeboard must be maintained at one foot plus sufficient
capacity to hold a 25 year 24 hour storm event or a total of approximately nineteen (19) inches
(in this case freeboard represents the level of the lagoon liquid in relation to the lowest point of
the lagoon bank). You should immediately lower the waste level and maintain a minimum
freeboard level of 19 inches.
During the site visit you indicated that you may be going out of the dairy business.
Should you discontinue the use of the lagoon you are urged to contact Mr. Lin Taylor, District
Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District at [phone] for technical
guidance in proper closure of the lagoon.
-continued-
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Campe
November 16, 1995
Page 2of2
If you have questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Rawls
Environmental Specialist
Attachment
cc: DEM Facility Compliance Group
Mr. Lin Taylor, District Technician
1706 U/uvm laid
wededan. N.C. 2117063142

Site Requires Immediate Attention: .
Facility No. _ o 4-- a r
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMF.Ni'AL MANAGEMENT
ANDVIAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DA'I'S: Alvemiff- 19, 1995
30
Farm NamelOwner: Lai+;
7Vl9 ttg Address: R4-- I e2% 4sr,Aa. { moc,,*r, 6,6 2019
County: Amsen
integrator:_ _N jk _ _. Phone:
On Site Representative:+.��:d C�..:� _ Phone: q10 ) QS! 3311
Physical Address/L=tion: uw-!(7-ta wog Nc sc. .sem
Type of Operation: Swine _x_ Poultry Cattle '
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: SO
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number. ACNEW
Latitude: • Longitude: 0 '
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately i Foot + 7 inches) Yes or® Actual Freebaard:___LFt. _a—Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No (Seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being Utilized: (Spray Field or cover crop was not evaluated)
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? ®or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
* Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, oNwher
similar man-made devices? Yes of� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes Or No(waste management records were not
Additional Comments: reviewed) _
This was a very brief inspection. a more thorough inspection will be conducted in the future.
Please contact -..DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine 'Blue Line" status.
concerning this report please do not hesitate to .contact the inspector
at [phone]. Please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
�21 2. -
Inspector Name signature
oc: Facility Auessment Unit
mun,
Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
David Canipe
CanipeOs Dairy Farm
Rt 1 Box 450-A
Morven NC 28119
Dear David Canipe:
i • �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAi- RESOURCES
Much 3, 1998 RECEIVE®
MAR 5 199$
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject. Removal of Registration
Facility Number 04-21
Anson County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,OW per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] eat 502_
-C6K
cc: =Payettevllle=Water• Quality-RegionalOffce
Anson Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10 % past -consumer paper