040017_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

40 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2-20-2002 'rime:
Facility Number 4 I7
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
© Permitted E3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: --
FarmN:ume:.. ............................. Count.: kusga................................................. .............
Owner Name:l:itli;ttta.lti...................... PVw................. ....... . Phone No: Z.7. -L1.Q....................................................................
.Mailing Address;.......................... !!' st�SbQ. u...N...............---..........---.--..........----... 28170....---- ---.
..............................................................
Facility Contact: ............... ........................... ........Title:.............................. .. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ............................................................ Integrator:
...............................................
Certilied Operator: .................... Operator Certification Number: ..........................
Location of Farm:
Polkton - Ansonville Rd. North of 742 •
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35OF 03 3G Longitude 80OF 10 F 36
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pooulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean 500
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 500
Total SSLW 216,500
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area ❑ Slrrav Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharocs & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`?
DischarL,e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If -discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
�. [f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lmzoon system? (lfyes. notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier: ......................................................
Freeboard (inches):
05/0.3/01
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[]No
Structure 6
Continued

Fairilily Number: 4-17 ]late of Inspection 2-20_2002
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
A,
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
closure plan?
El Yes
❑ No
(if any of questions 4-6 was ansivered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of die siructuics need iiian]teilance/irnprovelllent?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMPr
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ �VUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies «'ere noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Inactive operation, inactive lagoon evaluation:
A,
Lagoon closed out to MRCS standards according to Brown's Creek Soil & Water Conservation District records.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Paul Sherman
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
0510 101 Continued

FdOlity Number: 4-17 Date of Inspection 2-2D-2002
r
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
Additional Conurients and/or Drawings: 19 1
v
05/03/01

NJ
taWAry Number
Aivlsion of Environmental Management �� f'/
Animal Feedlot Operations SIte Vssitation Renard
Date: a
Tone:
Ggntraj Iniorrngt •
Farm Name: !VJ J ! ( "&All 1004- Har_ �.,,,,�,.
.co=y a n
Owner Name: Pe ne No: Qa
_ On Site Representative: _— _ Integrator.
Marling Address:.��/ ..Sax /(g#_ --
cbvrD - Aft -29170
Physical Addreswl ocation: Aik L..seh �w/�r A( Al a¢ W,� 742 _14,
Latitude: I 1 Longitude: 1 I
ration Description: (based on design characterisdcs)
t of Swine No. ?f MiimaU Type ofPoultry No. ofMims Type of Carle
500 0 Layer 0 Dairy
O Nursery O Non -Layer D Beef
D Feedc:
OrherType of Iavartoek Number ofAnirnals:
No. of Aamais
Number of Lagoons:��(iDclude in the Drawinp and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
NOP
Facility Lmpedo
No bd
Yes O
Lagoon
_
Is lagoon(s) freeboard Iesss than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes -0
Nob
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes 0
No PQ
Is erosion observed?:
Yes 0
No lei
Is any discharge observed?
Yrs 0
No 12
D Man-made ❑ Nor Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes 0
Noll
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes 0
Nodi
(list the crops which need &Vrovenwar)
Qrop typt::�
Setback CrUerfa
Is a dwelling located within 200 feat of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Lint Stream?
Is aminal waste land applied of spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Suram?
AOI — January 1749%
Yes 0
No qf
Yes 0
NOP
Yes D
No bd
Yes O
No*

1�Iainte�Ce - •
Does the fw&ty maintenance need impmvcmeat? Yes ❑ No&
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes O Nom
Does record koeping need improvement? Yes 0 No O
i. Did fire hw ity fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Pian on sett? Yes O No 0
Explain any Yes answers:
Si d,�-�- Date:.
ac Faa 4 Atse=mm: UA& Use Atrachmom ffNeeded
Vawi� or Observations:
• .. - . . 'r'.Iy^'h. ..-*. �. w�.+ •r. t� tww .. 1 L • `�rs�rA �.�t'�;'�.r1 v._-� � ���.:
+Yrs«ti...yxw r1��•r w •�r.� I�: i .�=. 4..x. F.r �..���Iww w � - ..
AOI— Jwnuu717.19%

� � M r � � r � l � _p► 1 '.4'.I � 1 �r
ros► +Ki � \ • �_ � ate`` .+ Y'� �'�_,•r+ '�� - �_ rj
Who
00
J \ i•..� rrrn _�A -• ���~ l�nw� .___ -�:`_ti ~ti r ��` /J rr. - 1 �r ± `�
• .. eM� � ���� 'Rj � �} ` 4 rn IL i` J ^� I` ,�' ``t_ Ir , ++ i �' II- � I
��\� +q` l ,.I ��r •MY � T _ �./' t-- ' � 'I +I V L.r � _!f� � rf r ,� � -
i
A� �wl•+uw + ' wt� ryt %N ,� _ it I- 7 �` -\- I CR �.( -ted
-per w� -i
jo
CA
� �-il"b7.., titer �� .:•wl `` 'P � .-' 7.�- ���`
r�
���
11� �
4

Site Requires immediate Attention:
Facility No. C2A -
DIVMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 8 , 1945
Time: � 6: 0 0
Farm Name/Owner: W. t. YbP �
Wailing Address: K o x I o !
County: Asu5pej
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: 6R _OkP
Type of Operation: Swine _.jL_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: G co - Fe o
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: � P?—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No (Seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being utilized: (Si2ray Field or cover crop was not evaluated -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feu from Wells? Yes or No
*Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No*
* Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, orbther
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(waste management records were not
Additional Comments: reviewed)—Thig was
a very of inspection, a more thorough inspection will a Conducted in the—f-uture.
Please contact:.DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine °Blue Line" status.
_If you have questions concerning this report please do -not hesitate to .contact the inspector
at [phone]. please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.