040012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

jj;:..a � w3 - - - 11
Type of Visit Ik Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit (P Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J�� ti3 Time: L_.3 _E�
Facility• Number
NOM O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted [3 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _ l= 4- M Far., s Count-: _ki s,rs n
Owner Name: eD C-swer ,;n Phone No: 7,04._ Z, ]ET -A3
Mailing Address: 114-1 LI -OK 2 e }
Facility Contact: d 6S G-9,QC 4n Title: 0 i� Phone No-
Onsite Representative: f P b114.j ��,_U _� _ __ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm -
Operator Certification Number:
o P- aP S2 14S1D
w
C9 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Caltie ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �' �• K
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Ca ackv Population Cattle Ca acih• Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver❑
DairyElFeeder
to Finish
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow- to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars I
Total SSLW
I Number of Lagoons I IL.1 Subsurface Drains Present IILJ Lagoon Area jLl Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps D No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischzme is observed; was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is obsmed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection 8 Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
OSIV 3/01
❑ Yes Cab
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
U Yes U No
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes �o
Structure 6
Condnaed

i
Facility Dumber. Date of inspection �S
Odor Issue,
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28_ is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads. building structure, and/or public propem•)
24. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
ad. Wcre an.° major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storave bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover?
05/03101
❑ 1'es V No
❑ Yes No
[] Yes No
❑ Yes �R No
Cj 1'es Y"' No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes JK No

Facility Number: 4 — 1,:p
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes R No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes [5i No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [$1 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [,0 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes qNo
11. is therea�dence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding [IP❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes [P No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving ops differ with those designated in the Certifi Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility la adequate acreage for land applicatio ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a ettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a ettable acre dete enation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need impro ent? i ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste applica equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Cove e & General P it or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have components of the Ce 'fled Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, desi , maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping ed improvement? (ie/ irrigation, free d, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in c pliance with any applicable setback criteria t ffect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facili fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to no' y regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Genera ermit?
(ie/ d' arge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did eviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representativ ❑ Yes ❑ No
24_ Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [:]No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
a-7iv3/v■ t onunuea