040002_INSPECTIONS_20181231

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review C) Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit R Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilin. Number Date of N'isit: �Time: �
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted Skertified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: CC6 t X414..,. i'-nr n County: khxa, Fao
Owner Name: Qe'c; l Phone No:
;[failing address: 4't- a i3 OAL 113 pot 1-c-4 1.., >J C . 2tc j 35
Facility Contact: Cee i ( & lam.. Title: U3s-p-r^ Phone No:
Onsite Representative. CA --C,. t A-11ei,, Integrator:
Certified Operator: c'6 { Operator Certification Number: 2-144-;
Location of Farm:
Ofd S2 1Gd�
❑ Swine ® Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 6 Longitude 0 • 0"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle capacity Po ulaeon
❑ Wean to Feeder ID LaverFEc]
Dain,
❑ Feeder to Finish ® Non -Laver Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Veal]
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow- to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I I I ILISubsurtace
Holding Ponds I Solid TrapsNo Li uid'
Discharges & Stream Imtsacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischar?; originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obser ed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discbamge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes x No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes Q9No
❑ Yes ® No
ER Yes [IND
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 13
OSIV3/0I Continued

Facility Number: - Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes 10 No
(1f any of questions 46 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes L0 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
.n.
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
(] Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
51 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
10 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Q No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
— M a P L, (1,...¢S n n f t.r-.'... f6 -e- ( tea �_ Sc.v_vL_ Q d - rfJ
r 60-eJ rt t_t tJ6A. -in� e� V �C G k -,r �f �t C o v� tn. c.s a ate-. �[,'I4� ho C rosi a�
in9 k d! J
�C.c�pa-,� �ef 1�,��r, c,f,�, L.a�.vY ✓�G:� Its
iMe-c� t 6 3 r`e. CaarL-t4 L -J G.Ss/3-
Reviewer/Inspector
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name I...
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .
05/03/01
Date: 47 - C
Continued

a . y
Facilih Number: 4 --2--
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any cN idence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt.
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
?9. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
I. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenutemporary cover?
05/03/01
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 93 No
❑ )'es [5j No
❑ Yes fj� No
❑ Yes 0 No