WQ0012630_Staff Report_20190401

Dow& n Envelope ID: 5563EAF1-7372-4026-88F9-1C787C39D675
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: (WQ0012630)
Attn: (Ashley Kabat) Facility name: J&J Washpit
From: (Michael, Meilinger)
Choose an item. Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge fg acili , staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 3/22/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: Michael Meilinger and Helen Perez
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
d. Person contacted: Geno Kennedy and their contact information: (252) 568 - 2648 ext.
e. Driving directions: 34.51'27.2" N 77.52'33.2"W
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5563EAF1-7372-4026-88F9-1C787C39D675
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable`? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
ORC: Geno Kennedy Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: A concrete pad with drain a 202,526 gallon anaerobic lagoon and a 1.68 acre
irrigation area to serve J&J Washpit truck wash facility, with no discharge of wastes to the surface water.
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 550,000 gallons per year (1,500 GPD average)
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.) No monitoring wells were installed. The facility needs to be cleaned up, wash pad had grass growing on it,
concrete on the back wall was broken, trash in the drain pipe leading to the Lagoon. Clean up hoses and electrical
cords laying around wash pad and the Lagoon, and clean up trash in the Lagoon.
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: None of the monitoring
wells were installed.
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain: Never installed
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5563EAF1-7372-4026-88F9-1C787C39D675
Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
O l 11
O I //
O / //
O I It
O / //
O I /I
O l lI
O I it
O l lI
O I II
11. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Working with ORC to complete forms properly
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
12. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
13. Check all that apply:
❑ No compliance issues
® Notice(s) of violation
❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) NOV for
non-compliance for inspection on 3/22/2019.
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain: No monitoring wells have been installed.
14. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
® Yes ❑No❑N/A
If yes, please explain: Monitoring wells need to be installed.
15. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: No
16. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ® Yes or ❑ No
If yes, please explain: Monitoring wells were not installed from last renewal scheduled.
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5563EAF1-7372-4026-88F9-1C787C39D675
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation:
® Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
DocuSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
4/1/2019
Date:
—A C Dolt(A�cuuSigne-d by:
Au
14AC7DC434...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Geno Kennedy (ORC) of J&J Washpit stated that he was meeting with Nathaniel Thornburg (Non -Discharge Branch
Chief) soon to discuss his concern about not needing the monitoring
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 4