310455_Inspection_20190326

Division of Water Resoarces
"Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: JO Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other OI Denied Access In
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:® rDepaarture Time:� County: {p,(,,p(' Region: AL Q
Farm Name: an�t( a 1 �c�{M Owner Email: T
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: I/,
Facility Contact: Jac Ui5, r re t I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: (��) „ Integrator:
Certified Operator: ; Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 1144,D Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acit Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I lBeefBroodCow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes x No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DW R) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DW R) E] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of! S 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 1A Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes I N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? t�
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme tal threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes [-] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste A oo lication �y,/
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need I R Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? J'"''
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? � Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? [ iYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check XYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ff
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements Other: 0 C�i AP
2 .Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking�Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections OMonthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [:] No `❑ NA , NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 ojV 15- 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
to appropriate box(es)below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon '
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 34 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues llll
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Y3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond Other: TRW
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? Yes jk No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ommseots(refer to gwntien f: E:ptain any YES answers andMr any add i rdallons or any other wmmeets.
Use drawinp of faft to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
2 - evd- n a o ' wksk lArl+ IDS No ayld rain 10(4 f LM
fl' ppi I vGGe it -"o- ge d 4A . h-0+ i, -,(d c�, .jaUQ 'f -fa
- I ,4 cl i Gt +�k4 runs Lefik4i 4U fie(d a,td tiv(tid•
ku r bl ucK 1 deNt 41" wad hid like lac ?In paid`"ara L*1 IJ Ker,
w1�2 '�� �J roh a N -h wards 4k 7 jz �r r I l� I vy t i�u rAP
S. Iennb'ye, `fie- -FFOM wetwo) M' a� 16*w cb ke wo(1 4,no4 �`Vvtilo�
pn clAnCt � Le a K-t va f'vltNt fJF, DOW Of �,�r-(t�.elurt¢>,e� k Du�c — I t�l4,n
wG II � pOSSI � av ft4wvI AL4f� -�k har �� ( ,
fit, its �IbwS her War�fv101y�(n w frL 11� Aoukp.
4I tt pair( a Vw wey4 � uu eS Jle^�c �jn�. Yu�r FI"��¢��h
�(„Q ( ' p�, - A� i S�i VIA O I n IYVI 4 T� er OAS 19 r 1 S
OYCt rDwrn 1Nf� -}Y'PrS Ql� IoVUSIt t� Q"fa�
#}►� The rnair, 4,ia� fieid UmdZun.P ww eA/ mf =rmd l jov,
ter Sd s s G� In ` tv- rv/Ujp. god �j
Reviewer/Inspector Name: h
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ✓ Date:
Page 3 off S 21412015

Facili Number: - to of Ins ection: — /
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste_W Ct<on equipme as required by the permit? 1 XYes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compli with permit conditions`related to sludge? If yes,check -, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box es)below.
❑Failure t mplete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of firstturvey indicating non-compliance: /
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail t0 pro y dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality s that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Off fo emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard probl over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field agoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection yYitb an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
at 'ttuy answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
dra of r situations(an additional pages as necessary).
�fft pW11111 f
+� 1 i nsPe4k vfeft, maki ti) [tak -- t9 l,j R- mr�Aw, I g-�,
��r �rrle r�r;yh Q,�1 unr+�le }o d> errx�r�e her lrq I�a9�� (lsd-e rlao aI rnA6 ,.,14,
\_Nqw, 11^Q hYwO- Wut- - i rfWdf Wtre daW
Flo Zp l Viq YCtiA h �eu>2{S;
�— rer k
— h.� rrurrttt�l (,t�� ) the
Utz �► ;� ►� yes a rr�Y� ( ra�rll Fec<x�s �r
I j
,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: p/ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: qrF `� Date:
Pagegi qjj r _ 21412015
q "- S

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application ment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with rt condition related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete an sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sl ge levels in any lag n
List structure and date of first su y indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the fac' ' fail provide docu tation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did acility fail to secure hosphorus loss assessprents(PLAT)certification? , ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to operly dispose of animals with 24 hours andr document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality tes that were high than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did th acility pose an odor or quality concern? �/ ❑ Yes ❑ No [� NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Q ity representative imm, lately.
30.Did the facility fail to noti the Regional Office of efnergency situations as re fired by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharg eeboard problems,overfapplication) j
i
31.Do subsurface ti ains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appr Hate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ er:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑-* U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
2 S - by nit dL
S '7 (��e a t s
b l cy os ` el( ( �Ss�o , C �; c ►nvaG' Inez
'7' & hA� a c ur 0 I C S .
d t
*29 - W h10 l rests WWAA .
30 — Vad (I tAk -W r,\ t k I-• FV �l r ecb auf►
,�J0, tyt A, ��+, 2ot�t ph —rhe
,lot ii CA I� wg DINR. Q� PDT+ �t l�n�-TTW,
_71v�3t �� v a liccnct ims�ec� I.� as Pad— o� e
f nr issues, PrU°,�'d� w e � 20 i C irria� re
P aAe�-� t l WOCS m 0' ay� s& s Q cu1ks +D
S ' \ ' ckw\+4�4An/I(Saw
rC s(�FrAPV AfcMsu V
I ( K(kLr1(_ khC cs
°ll0-- '1u 21Ce9 0 uIr(.Qc.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i " O 2 D—(" Phone: A 0-1Ct Q_1M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: LikIq
Page*off 1A C� t �, 4w_f\ y vYWd + Jacabl km(I1/4/2015
f call �tlD -(�2c�---�tkat�