20190387 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190326

DXR -,,
pbblen of wafer ftwources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r, Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes O No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
20190387
1
Is a payment required for this project?
C No payment required
What amout is owed?*
r Fee received
r $240.00
G Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Washington Regional Office - [phone] Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Elizabeth City Raw Water Transmission Replacement Project
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jonathan Herman
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/26/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Knobbs Creek
Basin
Pasquotank
Water Classification
QSw
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
36.3094 -76.2544
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information W
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pasquotank
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes G No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
V 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Egress
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
C Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C Yes f No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
C Yes O No
C Yes O No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes r No
11. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
C Yes E No C Unknown
tj. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes O No
B. Applicant Information (J
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
❑ Owner R_ Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
mostly ROW and Easements; portion owned by Elizabeth City Watenaorks
2b. Deed book and page no.:
mostly ROW and Easements; no deed info available for parcel
2c. Responsible party:
Richard Olson, City Manager
2d. Address
Street Address
306 E. Colonial Avenue
Address Line 2
CKY
Elizabeth City
Postal / Tip Aide
27909
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from
Site /l1wh a/Fbglon
NC
CoUntrY
us
2f. Fax Number:

3a. Name:
Amanda C. Boone, Public Utilities Director
3b. Business Name:
City of Elizabeth City
3c.Address
Street Address
306 E. Colonial Avenue
Address Line 2
CKY
Elizabeth City
Postal / Zip lode
27909
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(f approixiate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Elizabeth City
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
Rights -of -Way, Easements, a portion on
Parcel ID 7994905981
State / F?ovince / Region
NC
tbuntry
us
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
9.01
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Rights -of -Ways and Easements; a portion of the project is on a City -owned property located at 881 Wellfield Road
Address Line 2
Qty
Stale / Frovinoe / Region
Elizabeth City
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27909
US
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Knobbs Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;Sw
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Pasquotank
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030102050705
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The proposed project area consists of an approbmately 9.01 -acre area. The area consists of three wetlands and an unnamed tributary to Knobbs Creek. The general land use in the
vicinity of the project area consists of West Lawn Cemetery, West Lawn Memorial Park, forested undeveloped land, and residential land.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
C Yes O No C Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 1 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
SOILS MAP.pdf 3.15MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

1.27
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
44
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Replacement of existing rawwater transmission mains is a critical need for the City of Elizabeth City. In particular, an existing 10 -inch transmission main, installed over 80 years ago, has
suffered from multiple breaks per year. In addition, the main had an unsafe installation and was barely capable of adequate water supply. Due to funding constraints, the project was
divided into two phases. Phase I was constructed in 2012. The proposed Phase II completes the project.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project (Phase I and II) was designed by Hyman & Robey, PC in 2011. The total scope of work included the installation of 13,760 linear feet of 14" PVC pipe by open cut
trenching and 1,175 linear feet of 16" HDPE pipe by horizontal directional drilling to connect the well field reservoir to the existing Water Treatment Plant.
Phase 1 of the project was completed in 2012. The proposed Phase II will tie the proposed 14" transmission main into the existing 14" transmission main on the east side of the wellfield
driveway and generally run along the southern side of Wellfield Road and West Main Street Extension rights-of-way. At the eastern end of the project, the transmission main with cross
West Main Street Extension through a bored casing pipe roughly 470 linear feet east of the Jessup Street intersection. This line will connect to the existing 14" PVC C-900 installed
during Phase 1. The scope of work includes approximately 100 linear feet of casing pipe to be installed by jack and bore under Forest Park Drive and the restoration of the roadside
ditches, driveways, roadway surfaces, and other items disturbed by the construction. Indirect impacts could include noise, dust, traffic delays, and minor erosion during construction.
These impacts will be mitigated by following all local, state, and federal regulations. The project replaces an existing water line, so no new development is expected as a result of the
project. it is anticipated heavy excavation equipment and dump trucks will be required for the project work.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
19-0322_ECWM_Sub_1.pdf 11.5MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
O Yes
Comments:
O No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
O Preliminary O Approved O Not Verified O Unknown 4 WA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jonathan Herman
Agency/Consultant Company: McGill Associates, P.A.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Elizabeth City RWTR JD Package.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes d No
9.01 MB
4 Unknown
7b. If yes, explain.
The overall project (Phase I and 11) was designed by Hyman & Robey, PC in 2011. The project includes the replacement of approximately 7,980 linear feet of 10 -inch cast iron pipe
which transfers groundwater from the City's well field to the water treatment plant. The existing 10 -inch pipe is more than 50 years old and will be replaced with 14 -inch polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) pipe. This project is Phase II of a two-phase project to replace the entire length of the raw water line, which will complete the overall replacement project. The completed Phase I
consists of two separate segments — the eastern segment terminates near the intersection of Wellfield Road and Azalea Trail, and the western segment terminates near the intersection
of West Main Street Extension and Jessup Street. The proposed Phase II project replaces the remaining portion with a new line along the southern side of West Main Street Extension
and Wellfield Road. The voter line will be installed entirely within existing NCDOT
rights-of-way, existing utility easements, and on City property.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
N/A
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
m Wetlands ® Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.677
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.677
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Utility Trenching Temporary Excavation UT -1 Knobbs Creek Intermittent Both 5 44
Average (feet) (Irx�rfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
44
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
44
Ia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed alignment was moved on to City property to avoid impacts to jurisdictional ditches located in the Wellfield Road right-of-way. A portion of
the proposed alignment near the Forest Park Road and West Main Street Extension intersection was moved outside of forested wetlands to avoid
impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The trench and construction corridor width will be minimized to the greatest extent practical. All wetland impacts are temporary and excavated areas
will be restored to the original grade and seeded with a native wetland seed mix
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why -
All impacts are temporary and areas will be restored following completion of construction activities.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
C Yes O No
If no, explain why:
There are no riparian buffer rules for the Pasquotank River basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested*
• Type of
rJ,rtsdtcition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Utility trenching
T
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
�N.
Both
0.590
(acres)
W2
Utility trenching
T
Hardwood Flat
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.001
W3
Utility trenching
T
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland B
�N.
Both
0.046
(acres)
W4
Utility trenching
T
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland C
No
Both
0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.677
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.677
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Utility Trenching Temporary Excavation UT -1 Knobbs Creek Intermittent Both 5 44
Average (feet) (Irx�rfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
44
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
44
Ia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed alignment was moved on to City property to avoid impacts to jurisdictional ditches located in the Wellfield Road right-of-way. A portion of
the proposed alignment near the Forest Park Road and West Main Street Extension intersection was moved outside of forested wetlands to avoid
impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The trench and construction corridor width will be minimized to the greatest extent practical. All wetland impacts are temporary and excavated areas
will be restored to the original grade and seeded with a native wetland seed mix
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why -
All impacts are temporary and areas will be restored following completion of construction activities.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
C Yes O No
If no, explain why:
There are no riparian buffer rules for the Pasquotank River basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
C Yes f No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
PYes rNo
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information U
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
C Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?*
C Yes r, No
Comments:*
The project is funded by the Community Development Block Grant for Infrastructure program. An Environmental Review Record was submitted on
March 22, 2019 to the NCDEQ Division of Water Infrastructure for review and approval.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)7*
r Yes C No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
C Yes C No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is for a rawwater transmission replacement. No additional development is anticipated as a result of the proposed work.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
d Yes d No C WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
C Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
C Yes C No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
C Yes Q No C Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C Yes O No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
O Yes C No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C Yes C No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
C Yes O No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
C Yes O No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

https://ecos.fm.gov/ipact
pact
https:Hnenhde.natureserve.org/content/home
Consultation Documentation Upload
USFWS Response. pdf 1.17MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes d No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://mw.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhniapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes O No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
hftp://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpovieb/
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HISTORIC PRESERVATION MAP.pdf 292.27KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No structures are proposed as a part of this project. The project proposes a buried utility line which, by definition, is not considered a structure by
FEMA.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
https://fris.nc.gov/fris/Indexasp)OFIPS=139&ST=NC&user=General Public
Miscellaneous
Comments
See the attached Impacts Maps for wetland and stream impact locations.
For additional information about the project see the attached Environmental Review Record.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
FINAL ERR 3-21-19.pdf
Elizabeth City RWTR Impacts Map.pdf
19.37MB
3.99MB
Signature U
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jonathan Herman
Signature
Date
3/26/2019

✓ McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: ELIZABETH CITY RAW WATER TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N/A THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS
PARCEL ID: N/A
STREET ADDRESS:
Please Print
Property Owner/Representative: RICHARD OLSON
(If Representative) Title: CITY MANAGER OF ELIZABETH CITY, NC
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jonathan Herman &Jon Swaimof McGill Associates P.A.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or
certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's/Representative's Address (if different than property above):
GARDNER MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 306 E. COLONIAL AVE., 2ND FLOOR
P.O. BOX 347 ELIZABETH CITY, NC 27907-0347
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our
knowledge.
Authorized Signaure
Date: 2-1
Authorized Signature
Date:
1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA 28607 1 828.386.1920 1 www.mcgillengineers.com

NC STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MAP
4'
aC.
L
4r
3
PK09M Harr's:Family
Farm 199
PK0765 Charlie Pat
Pritchard Farm {Cpone� 1957
■
�c
a* a4ec�.o
[111; Rot at C'algl firs
rp
CL
JOhnse n Rd Pln eT,
R
b
4� Lnrk st �
PKOB 5 Spence B. Carter Win sli)w St
House
Vel€fsdl R(I
PK0768 Tam K. Pritchard
Far m
le PASQUOTAWn�*-Iy
Redgate Lir
b
M Darr a Mary St I�
H
rn
f
M
J z vl9t[ar 0+
R'idd4�k Rde�da St _ 1
6G
s
Yr � �fJLEFCII St wchu�rchr.)N CIty 13F
or
o-
4 4LRi3VeA I?
f
e
September 13, 2018
NR Points ❑ Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
40 NR Individual Listing SL Points
NR Listing, Gone 0 SL Individual Entry
NRHD Center Point A SL and DOE entry
NR Boundaries 0 Study List Entry, Gone
❑ National Register Boundary
1:16,136
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA,
USGS

Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
Index Sheet
386100 386400 386700 387000 387300 387600 387900 388200
N
388500
36° 19'2" N
a_5
K
w-
8
m
36° 18' 2" N
385800 386100 386400 386700 387000 387300
3
Map Scale: 1:13,200 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet
Meters
N 0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projedion: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: Ul-M Zone 18N WGS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
387600 387900
8
-- 36° 18'2"N
388200 388500
3
"v
12/17/2018
Page 1 of 7

385830
36° 18'39" N
rn
8
36° 18'25" N
Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
Map sheet 1 of 4
385900 385970 386040 386110 386180 386250
386460
36° 18' 39" N
0
m
385830 385900 385970 386040 386110 386180
3
ro
Map Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: JrM Zone 18N WGS84
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
386250 386320
m
36° 18'25" N
386390 386460
3
[V
N
1
Map Sheet Location 12/17/2018
Page 2 of 7

386490
36° 18'39" N
.Y
J
_ro
36° 18'25" N
Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
Map sheet 2 of 4
356560 386630 386700 386770 386840 386510 386980 W7050
N
387120
36° 18' 39" N
m
386490 386560 386630 386700 386770 386840
3
[V
Map Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
386910 386980 387050
36° 18'25" N
387120
3
N
2
Map Sheet location 12/17/2018
Page 3 of 7

N
387140
36° 18'39" N i
rn
I
Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
Map sheet 3 of 4
387210 387280 387350 387420 387490 387560
r
'IF - may not b v li i
ap y e a d attt
36° 18'25" N 1✓i _ 1� :Zt.
387140 387210 387280 387350 387420 387490
Ln
Map Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
387630 387700
387560 387630 387700
N
387770
36° 18' 39" N
rn
36° 18'25" N
387770
v
3
Map Sheet Location 12/17/2018
Page 4 of 7

3
'a
m
387800
360 18'37N
rn_
360 18'25" N
387800 387870 387940 388010 388080 388150
3
Map Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A landscape (11"x8.5") sheet.
Meters
n N 0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
Map sheet 4 of 4
387870 387940 388010 388080 388150 388220
3
M
"v
m
388430
360 18' 39" N
m
360 18'23'N
388430
3
v
n
4
Map Sheet Location 12/17/2018
Page 5 of 7

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Soil Map Unit Polygons
:im if
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
(off
Blowout
0
Borrow Pit
Wet Spot
Clay Spot
(j
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
„
Gravelly Spot
Other
Landfill
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Lava Flow
Special Line Features
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
(
Perennial Water
%„
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Transportation
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
(study corridor)
MAP INFORMATION
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/17/2018
�iiill Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 7
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
.�
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Transportation
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
.
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 31, 2009—Oct 4,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/17/2018
�iiill Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 7

Soil Map—Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
study corridor
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/17/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 7 of 7
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BeA
Bertie fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.5
11.8%
percent slopes
BoA
Bojac loamy fine sand, 0 to 2
0.2
3.8%
percent slopes
CwA
Chowan silt loam, 0 to 2
0.1
2.2%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
DeA
Deloss mucky fine sandy loam,
0.7
16.2%
0 to 2 percent slopes
DrA
Dragston fine sandy loam, 0 to
0.4
10.0%
2 percent slopes
GrA
Gertie silt loam, 0 to 2 percent
1.1
25.5%
slopes
NmA
Nimmo fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.4
9.3%
percent slopes
TeA
Tetotum fine sandy loam, 0 to
0.4
9.5%
2 percent slopes
ToA
Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0 to
0.5
11.6%
2 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
4.2
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/17/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 7 of 7

��' a •Y - . _ +. �- SCALE: w -
.' • " ` ` - -~ 1 INCH = 2000 FEET
i
40 a
PROPOSED 14 INCH • '� '•
. '••
PVC RAW WATER t
TRANSMISSION LINE �• 1
• - lions Clsb
P'ah
a
40
ch
•� - __..__—_ - '� tea• _ T •^ a •'• _ - •. • • ~ i•
! " • J_ Z�
• ## �� 4 _
m
0 Cog~
.� ' •• ' • as a / 1• J
� Vim` 1 � S•
USGS TOPO MAP MMcGffl
CITY OF ELIZABETH CITY A S S O C I A T E S
ErcirEEaiN,G.PLnr-FINANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA A(2)3WlM
C5NSEpC1N59

G'- R
s` r D
», ►r. �5 A ^ rti 1 _'• �. i.... ,•k y ° r �i.?,lRx q ,-ti tl �,<'j ' r_ .. fid►, �e s
� 1 Vii" .� �`+i 9M��V71 y, "�••� �� � Y
,
r F
.4
s. � ,� ••;- .A-,
} rte
PIN
ok
".Ott '.TT �� •� :';j - r,. ,,11,, ,� 14'+F-�� C '� 4 .,._a '�"�''.` -.� (• f.� ,
n
F
rl` ., �• eY.v py f R,,, :�... �- 't � � ,!-�,f ,oy'in r - - � r,' ' ' •,k: ,q, � �,W: �! _ afk. - q� � 1�'; f „
1
p
�y
` + v _ 1 1�� �• e^�
N! � �'r'"�,r••",.r-�}�,� c s�,r:: � J- rv. �a r :r:." _ �� � j ,ti..
�74-s
_ �i 11�rreee
rok."
.-_ r.../ ! r, � � .. 'd'.p� � .fir: •+- y; �;.3�
+
r
I "��►° A
r �
INSET 7 INSET 8 r�r r INSET 9
LD RD
INS5 >r�
ET WELLFIE
INSET 1 _ INSET 2 .1..„� 'r,� INSE — — � �¢ w� ;; t� � �� ; *�a `'" � � WETLAND C
- IM t k
e .�
a ETL
s4.
— — —o aF : UT -1 KNOBBS
,• � a''�, `" REEK
Ike
k
W ETLAN
,
� •:i- rte"";# fir ,,:r'° a,F, . 4
v
�� � ,� �• ,.�► � _ �.. �- �' `� � �.�'
;r
rwe
a•!r# '� '" � ^'^ e � '• F .Y a .z` / ;,siert t ,
Ps�7 �,i14 �� Y- i. � wt� , irk �s' - �; P � �{ �' �'�'� r • e Y r ;
'�,, AE'"ia 'a -c�' - } a�� 'r'.h �r+ - �� \ ., ^' .%�: �i•:�'R" � � `,v }wE. �..`u� 5, s .� f0.��,.e.`/'+'}.t" «fir- .0
GRAPHIC SCALE
-600 0 300 600
1 INCH = 600 FEET
IMPACT OVERVIEW MAP PROJECT # McGill
ELIZABETH CITY RAW WATER TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
FEBRUARY 18, 2019 18.08504 PASQUOTANK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA A S S O C I A T E S
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • FINANCE
1011 STATE FARM ROAD BOONE, NC 28607 PH. [phone]

INSET 1
IN
WELLFIELD RD
--
F
IMPACT- W1
INSET 2
_
—0.59 AC.)
• s
z NOR7H
—°"�— --_—
TEMPORARY
WELLFIELD RD
n_ IMPACTS
25+
,
20+00 1+00 22+00
23+Oo 24+00
18+n0
N
mi
�
w
IMPACT- W1
INSET 3
—0.59 AC.)
NORTH I
WELLFIELD RD
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
N
+O( 26+00 60' RM +00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+0 32+00
4•
-
T
Amamb
IMPACT- W1
INSET 4
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
33+00 WELLFIELD RD
35+0 36+00 37+00
38+00 39+00
-----------------------------------
INSET 5
IMPACT-S1
P CTLF)
NOTE: SEE IMPACT MAP 2 FOR
-
(M
NORTH WA -IN
I
TEMPORARY IMPACT —
LEGEND
40+00 41+00 4
00 43+00— WELLFIELD RD
GRAPHIC SCALE (ALL INSETS)
_
F
r
'
IMPACT- W1Lu
(-0.59 AC.)
-100 0 50 100
z WA -OUT
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
1 INCH = 100 FEET
IMPACTS
MAP 1
PROJECT #
ELIZABETH CITY RAW WATER
TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
McGill
18.08504
ASSOCIATES
MARCH, 2019
PASQUOTANK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • FINANCE
1013 STATE FARM ROAD BOONS, NC 28607 PH. [phone]

TREELINE INSET 6
WB -IN � � S REeJ
EkT
NORTH u: WB
-OUT
61+00 62+00 63+00 64+Q0 .7,
Xpp
65+00 66+00
_
IMPACT -W2 IMPACT -W3 n
(-0.001 AC.) (-0.046 AC.) N
TEMPORARY IMPACT TEMPORARYIMPACTS Z
IMPACT -W3 , 1,'E INSET 7
u (-0.046 AC.)
NORTH
--�oHu—TEMPORARY IMPACTS
— OHU—-
-
7+00 (SST MAIN60' R1w 6 0 - 69+00 7Q+Q071 tQ WEST MAIN
- 72+QQ STREET EXT. 73+00 74+00
1w w
* i�''•'' ; 1 INSET 8
I
NORTH b II
— – ---_ _ WC -OUT -- =: —OH – WC -IN
567ST MAIN ST EXT - WEST MAIN'
5+ ;R 1309) 60' R/W 76+00 +- 77+00 78+00 STREET EXT. 80+10 81+00 82+00
L
IMPACT- W4
;
(-0.04 AC.)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
+ t IMPACT- W4 `. as'�n� " INSET 9
NO (^-0.04 AC.) '.
— _ °" TEMPORARY IMPACTS
83+ 84 0 85+00 WEST MAIN (86+00 0 fw 87+
— STREET EXT. — _ _ i. 8g .`
0
891400
LEGEND
Proposed Water Line
Replacement
—_ —_ — GRAPHIC SCALE (ALL INSETS)
Wetland Limits
Stream Limits
-100 0 50 100
Study Limits
Temporary Wetland Impacts
1 INCH = 100 FEET
Temporary Stream Impacts
IMPACTS
MAP 2
PROJECT #
ELIZABETH CITY RAW WATER
TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
McGill
18.08504
ASSOCIATES
MARCH, 2019
PASQUOTANK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • FINANCE
1013 STATE FARM ROAD BOONE, NC 28607 PH. [phone]

McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
September 17, 2018
Mr. John Ellis
The US Fish & Wildlife Service
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
RE: Raw Water Transmission Replacement Project
City of Elizabeth City, Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Scoping Request
Dear Mr. Ellis:
The City of Elizabeth City is in the process of performing an environmental review pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act for the CDBG Infrastructure program in order that it may
assess the environmental impacts of the above referenced project in Pasquotank County, NC.
Please find enclosed figures which include a project location map and other supporting
documentation. McGill Associates, P.A. is requesting comments from your office regarding
potential Threatened and Endangered Species issues or other concerns relating to this project.
The proposed City of Elizabeth City Raw Water Transmission Replacement will replace an aged
well field raw water transmission line. The project includes the replacement of approximately
7,980 linear feet of 10 -inch cast iron pipe which transfers groundwater from the City's well field
to the water treatment plant. The existing 10 -inch pipe is more than 50 years old and will be
replaced with 14 -inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. This is Phase II of a two-phase project to
replace the entire length of the raw water line, which will complete the overall replacement
project.
As part of the process, we are requesting your assistance in gathering information regarding
Federally -listed species, critical habitat, and migratory birds from your office. We request a list
of any Federally -listed or proposed threatened or endangered species and designated or proposed
critical habitat that may be present in the project area. In addition, please advise us of any
present concerns you may have related to possible effects of the project on such species or
critical habitat, as well as any other wildlife concerns. If additional information or studies are
needed let me know. We look forward to your comments on this matter and respectfully ask for
a response within 30 days to adhere to the project schedule.
If you have any questions, please free to contact me at our office phone number of (828) 386-
1920 or my email address [e-mail].
1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA 28607 1828.386.1920 1 www.mcgillengineers.com

John Ellis
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Page 2
Sincerely,
McGill Associates, P.A.
Jonathan M. Herman
Environmental Planner I — Environmental
Cc: Mike Ballard, P.E. — McGill Associates, P.A.
List of attachments:
1. LOCATION MAP
2. AERIAL MAP
3. PASQUOTANK COUNTY ENDANGERED, SPECIES, THREATENED SPECIES,
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN, AND CANDIDATE SPECIES

United States Department of the Interior
Jonathan Herman
McGill Associates
1013 State Farm Road
Boone, NC 28607
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
October 12, 2018
Re: Elizabeth City Raw Water Transmission Replacement — Pasquotank County, NC
Dear Mr. Herman:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
https://www.fws.gov/rdleimh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
a£"https:Hecos.fws.gov/ii5ac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that
are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation maybe
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
' The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. -However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species ,of concem.. ,

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
2

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Benjamin
. Supervisor