Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0030088_RESP to NOV-2019-0143_20190327 Old North State Water Co. An 14)h"Ve"IrMaW Company March 20, 2019 Morella Sanchez-King, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION &INTENT TO ISSUE CIVIL PENALTY Tracking No.: NOV-2019-LV-0143 WWTP Permit No. WQ0030088 Majestic Oaks WWTP Pender County Dear Ms Sanchez-King: Old North State Water Company appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Notice of Violation issued on March 4, 2019 by the Division of Environmental Quality. The Notice of Violation was issued related to data submitted by ONSWC to the Division for December 2018. The specific violations were for Daily Maximum and Monthly Average Ammonia, Monthly Average Total Nitrogen and a missed nitrogen samples for PPI002 and PPI003. In response to the notice of violation, ONSWC has taken the following action related to the violation. 1. Reviewed all the analytical data for the month of December to validate the limit violations. 2. Audited the laboratory and operations information to validate the missed samples. 3. Discussed action plans with the operator in responsible charge to ensure compliance with the required sample plans. 4. Ensured that the operator in responsible charge had a written copy of the Majestic Oaks Sample Plan Regretfully, we have determined that the missed sample, ammonia and total nitrogen results reported on the December 2018 Discharge Monitoring Report are accurate. Our audit of the operations has resulted in the following findings: Total Nitrogen and Ammonia The total nitrogen results for December were as follows: 12/7/2018—NH3-N=0.3 mg/1 and TN= 1.0 mg/l 12/18/2018—NH3-N=9.7 mg/1 and TN=13.7 mg/l As noted in these results, the plant was performing well in early December but the second sample on the 181h was elevated. The elevated ammonia result are due to a lack of bacteria known as nitrifiers, while the elevated total nitrogen is related to the plant not achieving denitrification. Since December, the operator has been working to optimize the oxygen and carbon feed systems in order to restore the nitrifiers and denitrifying bacteria. Nitrification appears to have been restored in January while denitrification has just recently been restored. Since learning of these issues, we have worked closely to ensure that the operator is educated on the importance of maintaining a proactive approach consistent with our expectations. The operator continues to closely monitor the system to ensure that the proper biology is present to achieve both nitrification and denitrification. At this time, we have received and reviewed our latest data for February, and it does appear that the plant is achieving both nitrification and denitrification in compliance with the permit. In addition, we have worked with our laboratory to ensure earlier notification of results and to raise visibility beyond just the operator in responsible charge. PPI002 and PPI003 Missing Results The lack of Total Nitrogen for the PPI002 and PPI003 sampling cycle in the month December was due to human error. When completing the Chain of Custody, the operator missed the total nitrogen samples. By the time the mistake was discovered, the sample was no longer available at the lab to test outside of the hold time. Our audit concluded that this could have been avoided had the laboratory been provided a copy of the sample plan and permit. This error was the result of the transition in laboratories. Thus, we have ensured the laboratory has copies of the permit and have implemented protocols to ensure that the laboratory checks samples on the Chain of Custody against the permit requirements. While we concur that these do constitute a violation, we hope that our response shows our commitment to providing support to the operator to ensure that future compliance issues receive visibility thorough out the organization and as a check to ensure compliance. As you t are aware, since taking over this facility ONSWC has made considerable investment into this plant and continues to make investments into this facility as requested by the operator. We feel that a civil penalty would not be prudent as we have acted in a responsible manner to address these issues and bring the facility into compliance. Therefore, we request that the Division considers these efforts when deciding on further enforcement. { Old North Water Company strives for excellence and has always welcomed open communication with NC DWR Staff to ensure compliance with any permit and we continue to be concerned about the issuance of NOV's that could have been avoided through open communication. If Old North State Water Company can be of any further assistance or additional information is needed,please contact me at 252-235-4900. Sincerely, Ar Michael J. Myers Old North State Water Company r Cc: David Strum,Envirolink Rebecca Manning, Envirolink Don Feller, Envirolink