310036_Compliance Inspection_20181116

D[vlsfon of water Resources
=�cilityber - E� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Coo�npliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I , r
Date of Visit: 11 I 1 1/. 114. I ,Arrival Timer Departure Time: ee
County: 1 Region: W
Farm Name: W tl I(� �ry`� Owner Email:
Owner Name: u I, Sl�yhyy. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L—k 610 ujt*% Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I JI-ayer I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca pad Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I I Pullets I 113cef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes v 00 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 53NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [?]A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E TINA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Wastg Collection&Treatment �
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes l�l 4�"" ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ea.-INW ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _7:�_>
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 31 i1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes U to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes k� ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes U' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,__, �
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L j4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U.P ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes tba""" ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes R� V�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0]'K5' ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 91,41 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reunited Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [j1Qb ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes DD Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P* ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [[ �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

]Facility Number: Date of Inspection. I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a],46 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ©' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes tom ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 6g Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes D21Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 62'<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L.I Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes g:�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require afollow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
gaeatlba#):RIP101"tiny YE5 Attswets' rany additional reeotnmen ittions or any other conmeots.
a &*Winp of bouty to nae addlitioug~as
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: !o Z r —7j
1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015