310016_Compliance Inspection_20180404

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number F71 EFT-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency �J
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Ql Denied Access
Date of Visit: }^ , riiv�a�l Time: Departure Time: County: t I Region:
Farm Name: ra. IYis di.li l 2— S Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: //�� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L\4 YC�,I'�1� 9 Integrator: �y —7 Q,
Certified Operator: tl Certification Number: b J / Q
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 2N rktib Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts ,,,(((���
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �l/I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: r
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): -�
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable( ZW_1Ea"L'93
Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (AYK�W 14t ri / �j r /,CG r)
13. Soil Type(s): !
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 09No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 1; ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents NZ
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes /E� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. `�'
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Tranassfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili 1Yumber: - i.0 jDate of inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No VVNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [EXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) `77777f"''''
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other: TTTTTT
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes V�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#t): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
S"VW -d- SUr ( S 121� 117
I JI D co y
Z-S 0. coS
et
2 A - ekeolw v.
reGkof,w�0' C-a T1"V- a-ka - cb-Wc41crlI.� 7':5-V
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 2;`�1.(�L /�n0�-l�Q 2_ Phone: of t(0 'qq
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I
Page 3 of 3 21412015