Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310014_Compliance Inspection_20180404 Division of Water Resources Facility Number 0 ivision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:I� Departure Time:� County: � l� Region: f�K11 r V v Farm Name: D F4VVk9 Si C 3 ��f S Owner Email: {M1 Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: _bb�AA 14 Q Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish I ILayer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder 1 INon-Layer 1 11 Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca aci Po . Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers I Beef Stocker Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Other Discharees and Stream Impacts ,y� 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DW R) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued acili Number: Date of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 `�S,�truucture 5 Structure 6 2 Identifier: DM _3A 3—Z 3-3P 3-3 '� T to 7- w J Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): ia I D 30 LN_ 44 L4q 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:] Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Anolication 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): VJ�1 1 f t%r� Uy l l , w i t p—j rso 13.Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �d No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ YesgNo No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 V4/101 S Continued Facili Number: Date of Inspection: 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I wNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: "`TCCC 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). G�.�I�Yzv{ n� S I s I S� C SuY�S �III$� i7 �M —I 0 4S, Pw1 3-2 0 q3, DR 3-3 WA WI 0, SS , WZ 6 .55, I W3 O,SCe S� r%)Oh m ItS �IV 4aM9 MG+�e sru ve - Ll ow `�W12 X""C / rer t"w'M Reviewer/Inspector Name: ri?s�Ak MA4-n 7_ Phone: 2t -lotLt-13P7 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q 11 Page 3 of 3 2141615