310014_Compliance Inspection_20181217

Division of Water Resources f
Facility Number - © O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q� :Routin�e 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency er Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: fl ' "�`�l� 7 //Y Arrival Time o Departure Time: P Y S- County: Region:
Farm Name: T Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: A— Lr n �`� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Laver Dairy Co"
Wean to Feeder I INon-La)er I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacitv Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Lacrs Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Pouits
(Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 01NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Condnued

Facili Number: - 14 1 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P-Nf
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EfNE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 6NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DW R
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [-] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 l
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA gZE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA fTNE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ENE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA T❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LJ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ LeaseAgreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Surve
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: JL
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 J
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑No NA {{� NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IE
Other Issues Dej
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Z<o ❑ NA
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? /
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor Or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D_N
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ZI NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VN
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
QOC t t(ck C­ d CO^Le(1A-6C//__� [, I '�C Pre C}n (r try�wt
(egw � a �io . } off Of cP l r � ( Cevlei—,
C-/J-
(�_� 1,r 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: (r Vl L) �( 2 Phone: �� P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ( Date: 2 7 f g 1
Page 3 of 3 214C201 S