310007_Compliance Inspection_20180712

41 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 0 ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4P Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -I It 1 Arrival Time:© Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: D C NhW �ro dh �7 fy�. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: T)pNv'y '1311-0 WV'. Title: Phone: S )D Z?� 3 S`1H
r
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator. Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder JOL400 Non-La er I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca paci Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No EP NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? 77
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No )K NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No W NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: No. 1 N0.Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 101•5
Observed Freeboard(in): 3,q
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:] Yes LPJ
SM No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? I;m Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes §L] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop('Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 3)?a "L t�VP
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes it] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes CEPNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield 115120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes C52No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ;g NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection: 1
24. Did the'facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?I I ❑ Yes [5§No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of fast survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Y cs No'"`❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes MI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E;a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). L n-
5J I It 117 zrt c' -1c� c �r a� eC 151UG(/ o6a
W A- j i� rJ 1 .t� G5 r-►r l'o, I
or- r- �ac�+ar
P to tJ (1-C C z3�--�—4�•� = 1 -7'Lv9c� 'o SS
Ca� � � ►Y
S�J, Z61k
1�t(brg w-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: S JP, � �� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ` Date: 4 Z 1 O
Page 3 of 3 214615