The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310005_Compliance Inspection_20180306 Division of Water Resources Facility Number L✓� - r5_1 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency V Type of Visit: C mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: outine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency O Other �� 0 Denied Access r', `,/.L` Date of Visit: (� Arrival Time:� Departure Time: County: Region: �/ �IyiJ Farm Name: �� rn Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: , 11 Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: jb&W j (�V�lJ f rs Integrator: Certified Operator: L it r NMI— Certification Number: V h b Z0 S3 Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Vs Wean to Finish La er I I Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish I Layers I Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets I 113eef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Other Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(if yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment �[ 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;y(I No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: M-i 31 lb a 3� Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): 2 Observed Freeboard(in): 7(j 2 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes brVo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes kd No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window I ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): Wm W 1(NQ�t 1 k(6 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ['0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Kumber: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [)fNA ❑ NE Other Issues yj 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I]V No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? T 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes O�No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O(No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 777777��''" 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes hNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ), zNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use gddi 'onal pa I es as necessary). — VtCwa VV ��VlCtn c cti I ' u*( 1 f7 ' tr �>;m 313 - d'M'+ �fl del e� �� s ay� is , t o lo� re v4m" a hd V b s a�� I o�m • T y 6>w+ LDS n - 0wbj rrncU l -fi r �+1YI� h�a rd� all �Ptxw 44 bar' aD l n S-L'& P C'n Reviewer/Inspector Name: V ch,i_ hAal 4r. Phone: (ID- Z/��_/3a 7 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /t� Page 3 of 3 21412015