310005_Structure Evaluation_20181009

i
�� Division of Water Resources T clw(7 A
Facility Number - IJ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other O Denied Access
vI
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: sd,4 Fr m Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: NUc�aC/1 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Laver Dairy Co"
Wean to Feeder I INon-LaNer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Roars Pullets I 113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Puuets
Ocher Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts �J
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes (,�'f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field ❑ Other: 'T
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes KrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structures II Structu9rec2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: '313 1 _3 17 E 3 M
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? ��CC
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ElNo ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) Pd
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA WNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement? JJJ""""'
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA XNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Reauired Records& Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [kNE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA �klNE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA YNE
Page 2 of 3 2141,2015 Continued

]Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA k NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box(es)below. JV
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA l�IINE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 7v
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes )d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA JXNE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA NYNE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ioe fK I_fvel dUHI fkI'1'I (C(A 'VhYe u
skrrwi — 3�2t, n� 6'
313
cvt,ti-ttr� — Zg
Reviewer/Inspector Name: I/� NtAtt ^e Phone: t O��I G _(7 P7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lb a
Page 3 of 3 21412015