20171059 Ver 1_More Information Received_20190325

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 1
20171059
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Paul Wojoski:EADS\pawojoski
Select Reviewing Office:* Central Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
Application Attachments
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Mark McElroy
Who is subrritting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20171059 1
20170001 (no dashes)
Project Name: Camden Plantation
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Camden
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
20190312 Camden Plantation USACE Add Info
23.09MB
Respx comp.pdf
Only pdf or Igre files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:

Response to Agency comments for Individual Permit Application for Camden Plantation (SAW -2015-00317)
Camden County, North Carolina
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled inautorretically.

Kerr Environmental
Services Corp.
14_wp
March 12, 2019
Mr. David Lekson
Chief, Washington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
Transmitted Electronically via E-mail
Re: Response to Request for Additional Information
Individual Permit Application for Camden Plantation (SAW -2015-00317)
Camden County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lekson:
On behalf of Boyd Homes, Kerr Environmental Services Corp. now part of Wetland Studies and Solutions,
Inc. (WSSI) has provided the additional information requested in your letter dated July 25, 2018
(Appendix A) regarding the above -referenced permit application. We have addressed each of your items
of concern below, as well as including our responses to other agency comments, including Section 408
requested information, as instructed by your letter dated July 13, 2018 (Appendix A). This letter is
organized as follows:
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) responses — Page 2 - 5
• North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) responses — Page 7 - 9
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) — Page 10
• North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) responses — Page 11
• North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) responses — Page 12
• Section 408 Information Requested by USACE — Page 1
Copies of the agency comment letters are included in Appendix A with additional supporting information
provided in Appendices B -G of this package.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road Suite 200 • Virginia Beach, Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] . www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 2 of 13
Letter from the USACE dated July 25, 2018 (Appendix A):
Reference the information you submitted entitled, Individual Permit Application and Support Document,
Camden Plantation, Camden County, North Carolina (Document), dated May 2018. As discussed, please
provide the following information to facilitate our evaluation of your application:
1. A complete maps) depicting the boundaries of the 21 offsite alternatives evaluated.
Applicant Response: Please see enclosed Figure 3-a, which shows the boundaries of all 21
offsite alternatives evaluated (Appendix B).
2. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping alone is insufficient to justify the dropping of
alternatives from consideration. As discussed, you should utilize available remote sensing
tools (Web Soil Survey, LiDAR, aerial imagery, etc), coupled with field reconnaissance (as
possible), to present a more accurate estimate of wetland acres that exist on the offsite
alternatives.
Applicant Response: Please see enclosed Figure 3-b and Figure 3-c. Figure 3-b shows hydric
soils, FEMA floodplain data, and the NWI layer overlain on updated aerial imagery (2016)
while Figure 3-c shows LiDAR overlain on the same aerial image (Appendix B). All potential
sites are mapped as underlain by hydric soils. All remaining sites except for Parcels A, B, C,
and the preferred site were eliminated for access, availability to utilities, preponderance of
mapped wetlands, and/or being in the 1 percent FEMA floodplain. Parcel A is encumbered
by floodplain on approximately 50 percent of the site and is mapped as NWI wetlands over
100 percent of the site and has been reverting to forest since the harvesting of timber between
2003 and 2008. This site was eliminated based on the mapped hydric soils, NWI wetlands, and
that harvesting reduces evapotranspiration, increases compaction, and typically reduces
infiltration of rainfall, thereby increasing the likelihood of wetlands on the site.
Parcel B is mapped as 100 percent wetlands as well. It has been returning to a wooded
condition since 2009. This site was also eliminated. In addition to on-site conditions, Parcels
A and B are not currently zoned for residential development, making selection of those sites
for Camden Plantation not compatible with the Camden County 2035 Comprehensive Plan,
per the enclosed Table 1 (Appendix B).
Parcel C is currently zoned for conservation and/or agricultural use per The 2035
Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the parcel is long (17,000 feet) and narrow (2,000 feet)
and would preclude the development of essential elements of the Camden Plantation,
particularly the residential and golf course layouts. As such, this parcel is not a practicable
alternative for the Camden Plantation development since residential uses run contrary to the
County's approved 2035 Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the parcel also lacks water line
infrastructure, has only limited access to an existing sewer line along U.S. Route 17, and
therefore will not accommodate development of any kind. This Parcel is removed from
consideration.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC
March 12, 2019
Page 3 of 13
We have also updated Table 1 with revised wetland impact numbers to reflect the fact that the
site plan revisions for the preferred alternative (Camden Plantation) will only impact 3.09 acres
of wetlands. This analysis, together with the revisions to Camden Plantation demonstrates that
the Preferred Alternative is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
(LEDPA).
3. Amend Table I
a) Add the wetland acres to the column entitled "Potential Wetland Impacts. "
Applicant Response: Please see the enclosed "Off-site Alternatives Revised 3-6-19"
(Appendix B).
b) Delete the last column entitled "Practicable. "
Applicant Response: Please see the enclosed "Off-site Alternatives Revised 3-6-19"
(Appendix B).
4. Provide the North Carolina Department of Transportation access permit that was issued to
you for the connection of the Camden Plantation entrance road to US Highway 17 and other
documentation you have supporting the location of the proposed entrance road.
Applicant Response: A copy of the NC DOT access permit for the entrance road is included in
Appendix C.
5. North Carolina's Dismal Swamp State Park and Dismal Swamp Canal Welcome Center are
both located immediately across US 17 from the proposed development. Pursuant to 40 CFR
Subpart F 230.52 through 230.54, provide information on the measures you have considered
and are taking to minimize the physical and visual impacts of this large development on the
state park, welcome center, and local area.'
Applicant Response: The development will be screened from the Welcome Center by the
forested area on the following parcels located between Camden Plantation and U.S. 17:
0 017071007472400000
0 017071008307500000
0 017071008328040000
0 017071008338480000
0 017071008402490000
Furthermore, the revised plan proposes smaller PFO wetland impacts to accommodate the
entrance off U.S. 17. As such, much less clearing of the existing forested areas fronting the
property will occur, maintaining a sufficient visual buffer.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC
March 12, 2019
Page 4 of 13
6. As discussed, the Corps and resource agencies believe that you can achieve substantial
avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts through redesign of the project including
realigning the entrance road and adjusting the commercial/residential lots and golf course
layout. Accordingly, you must provide a new plan drawing that depicts further avoidance and
minimization of impacts to waters and wetlands resources on the site.
Applicant Response: The Site plan has been revised to significantly reduce impacts to wetlands
from the previously proposed combined total of 28.90 acres of palustrine forested (PFO) and
palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland impacts spread across 5 of the 6 wetlands on the site.
Currently, proposed impacts include 3.09 acres of permanent impacts to PFO, 258 linear feet
(If) of permanent impact to intermittent Relatively Permanent Waters (RPW), 50 if of
temporary impacts to the perennial RPW Joyce Creek (Revised Permit Drawings -Page 1,
Appendix D). Impacts to only two of the six wetlands are currently proposed, while four
wetlands are fully avoided.
Further avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands has been achieved by several
significant site design revisions. First, the applicant has decided to remove the commercial
development from the project; second, the golf course layout has been modified to avoid as
much wetland impact as practicable; third, the alignment of the entrance road of Rt. 17 was
modified to reduce wetland impacts; and finally, the number of single-family home lots has
been reduced by ten.
A summary of the unavoidable impacts is provided below. These are impacts associated with
the entrance off Rt. 17 and unavoidable constraints associated with the golf course, including
fairway width, drainage swales, and safety concerns, as illustrated in further detail on the
Revised Permit Drawings and described below:
• Impact #1: There are 2.27 acres of unavoidable PFO impact at this location associated
with the relocated entrance road and Hole #17 (Impact #1 - Revised Permit
Drawings -Page 2, Appendix D). While the road angle was able to be realigned slightly
to reduce impacts, the location of the entrance itself along U.S. 17 was unable to be
moved from the NCDOT-approved alignment and will result in 0.70 acres of permanent
impacts (Appendix Q. The southwest corner of Wetland Area #5 will be filled to
create the greens and fairway associated with golf course Hole #17. This filling will
result in 1.57 acres of permanent wetland impacts. Even without the necessary golf
course impacts, this part of the wetland would become hydrologically isolated by the
construction of the adjacent road, thus resulting in secondary impacts over time.
Instead, the Applicant is proposing to take golf course impacts here and avoid areas of
the wetland north of the road that otherwise would not be isolated by the construction
of the road.
• Impact #2: This impact will clear-cut and regrade this area in order to construct the tee
complex associated with Hole # 18 of the golf course and provide an adequate angle
and corridor width to the landing area. If this 0.38 -acre impact was not incorporated
into the design of Hole #18, a much more acute angle of the dogleg portion of the first
landing area, would result in an awkwardly positioned landing area that would be
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC
March 12, 2019
Page 5 of 13
hazardous to homes lining the east side of the course (Impact #2 - Revised Permit
Drawings -Page 3, Appendix D).
• Impact #3: This 0.12 -acre impact will be cleared with approximately three quarters of
the area being graded and the remainder being left as rough. Rough will be mowed
twice weekly during the growing season. The filling of the wetland is required to
incorporate a swale for drainage and to provide a sufficient playable turf surface
(Impact #3 - Revised Permit Drawings -Page 3, Appendix D).
• Impact #4: This impact will be cleared to have the ability to place the cartpath between
the fairway bunkers and the newly created edge of the wetland. Approximately 0.32
acres of the southern corner of Wetland #4 is proposed for an impact to facilitate
clearing for visibility, the development of a bunker complex, and the routing of the cart
path. (Impact #4 - Revised Permit Drawings -Page 4, Appendix D)
The Applicant also proposes to cross the intermittent RPW in two (2) locations that runs across
the center of the property. Previously, this entire ditch was planned to be filled. Both crossings
will utilize a 48 -inch reinforced concrete pipe and earthen fill over top. Impact #5 will require 126
If of permanent impacts and Impact #6 will require 132 if of permanent impacts. Table 1 below
summarizes the currently proposed permanent impacts.
Table 1. Summary of Wetland Impacts Currently Proposed
Permanent Wetland Impacts
Impact
Wetland Area
Activity
Acre or if
1
5
Road ROW/Golf Course Hole #17
2.27 ac
2
5
Golf Course Hole #18
0.38 ac
3
5
Golf Course Hole #19
0.12 ac
4
4
Golf Course Hole #8
0.32 ac
5
Intermittent RPW
Culverted Road Crossing #1
126 if
6
Intermittent RPW
Culverted Road Crossing #2
132 if
Totals
3.09 ac
2581f
The Applicant also proposes to remove one 48 -inch culvert located in Joyce Creek at a farm road
crossing in the southeast corner of the project (Temporary Impact #1). A drainage weir and outfall
protection will be constructed in adjacent uplands to convey water from golf course Lake A. The
side slopes of this new drainage feature will be graded so that they do not impact the portion of
the Joyce Creek channel within USACE jurisdictions. This jurisdictional limit is located
approximately 50 feet downstream of the limits of grading (Sheets 8-9 of Revised Permit
Drawings, Appendix D). A revised impacts table dated March 2019, Table 8 included in
Appendix D presents an approximate side-by-side comparison of the currently proposed impacts
to impacts previously proposed nearby. Based on concerns and comments from agencies after the
May 2018 Permit Application, the applicant has reduced impacts associated with the project by
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC
March 12, 2019
Page 6 of 13
26.71 acres of wetlands and 4,304 if of intermittent RPW. Table 2 provides a summary of how
the Applicant has significantly reduced impacts over the permitting life of this project.
Table 2. Summary of Wetland Impacts over Permitting History
Permit
Submittal Date
Wetland Impact (ac)
Intermittent RPW
Impact (If)
Perennial RPW
Impact (If)
Permanent
Conversion
Permanent
Impact
Temporary
Aug -17
33.33
0.94
4,562
0
Jan -18
27.96
0.94
4,562
0
Mar -19
3.09
0.00
258
50
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 7 of 13
Letter from the NCDWR dated July 9, 2018 (Appendix A):
1. The applicant has provided a very specific purpose to the project and has limited the geographic
scope of the project to Camden County, North Carolina.
Applicant Response: The location of the proposed project is limited to the County's demand for
the services as detailed in the project's Purpose and Need. A letter of support from Camden
County's Director of Planning & Community Development Department was included in the
original permit application package. Per the off-site alternatives analysis, the location of the project
is also constrained by several factors.
2. The applicant has not provided an adequate alternatives analysis for the proposed project.
a. The applicant used criteria that was not directly tied to the project purpose when evaluating
alternative sites including: access to potable water, access to sanitary sewer, and compatibility
with local zoning. Although these criteria are relevant, it must be pointed out that a previous
developer -built utility infrastructure to the selected parcel and the selected parcel was rezoned
to fit this type of development making these criteria not insurmountable obstacles to achieving
the project purpose.
Applicant Response: Per the enclosed Utility Installation Chronology exhibit (Appendix
E), water and sewer lines have been installed in the vicinity of the project as well as directly
adjacent to the property over a period of several years. A summary chronology is as follows:
• Tanglewood development is proposed, but Camden County rejects the plan in favor of a
Smart Growth multi -use development around 2000.
• Based on Google Earth aerial photography, Sander's Crossing and Wharf's Landing
residential developments and associated utilities are installed between 2003 and 2005
immediately south of Camden Plantation.
• From 2002 to 2006 current applicant Boyd Homes works with Camden County to plan a
Smart Growth mixed-use development.
• In 2006, Boyd Homes installs sewer lines along McPherson Road to the north and east of
proposed Camden Plantation development, extending from the Wharf's Landing
development. The distance between the terminus of existing utilities from Wharf's
Landing to the Camden Plantation parcel is approximately 1,000 FT, not a significant
distance or cost for Boyd Homes.
• Camden Plantation plans submitted to Camden County for approval in 2007.
• In 2007, sewer force main is installed by Camden County along U.S. Route 17 extending
from Wharf's Landing to just south of the North Carolina -Virginia Border.
• In 2007, Camden County extends sewer line from Eco -Industrial Park (northwest of
Camden Plantation parcel) east along McPherson Road to a lagoon.
• In 2008, Camden Plantation property is rezoned as a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
b. The applicant has not considered the alternative of constructing a residential and commercial
mixed-use development without a golf course, as this could potentially qualify other parcels
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC
March 12, 2019
Page 8 of 13
identified in the applicants' proposed alternatives and would still meet the applicant's stated
purpose.
Applicant Response:
The golf course is an essential element to the entire development's design and County's needs,
as described in the Project Purpose and Need.
3. The applicant has not provided a detailed avoidance and minimization plan for the proposed
project. No alternative layouts were proposed, nor were designs without the inclusion of the golf
course.
Applicant Response: As stated in the above response to the USACE regarding avoidance and
minimization, the Applicant has redesigned the development to greatly reduce the amount of
permanent wetland impacts from 29.80 acres to 3.09 acres and permanent impacts to an
intermittent RPW from 4,5621f to 2581f while keeping the standard -size 18 -hole golf course which
essential to the viability of Camden Plantation.
4. The applicant states the proposed project will have no impact on the Great Dismal Swamp because
of the stormwater management plan, however no further information was provided. The Division
will be requesting additional technical information from the applicant and requests that the
USACE also consider this additional information during the review of the application.
Applicant Response: The pre- and post- hydrology model output to support the Section 408
submittal supports our assertion that the project will not impact the Great Dismal Swamp. See
Appendix F.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 9 of 13
Letter from the NCDWR dated July 18, 2018 (Appendix A):
Title 15A NCAC 02H.0506 requires that a proposed activity has no practical alternative by
demonstrating that, considering the potential for a reduction in size, configuration or density of
the proposed activity and all alternative designs, the basic project purpose cannot be practically
accomplished in a manner which would avoid or result in less adverse impact to wetlands. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) have not determined that the preferred alternative is the
least environmentally damaging practical alternative (LEDPA). The Division cannot review the
preferred alternative until the USACE determines that this alternative is the LEDPA. Upon the
USACE's determination, please provide correspondence from the USACE indicating which
alternative is selected as the LEDPA.
Applicant Response: Following USACE review of the responses herein and the Revised Permit
Drawings, the Applicant will provide correspondence from the USACE that the currently proposed
Preferred Alternative is the LEDPA.
2. If the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requests a response to any comments received as a result of
the Public Notice, please provide the Division with a copy of your response to the USACE. [15A
NCAC 02H. 0502(c)].
Applicant Response: No comments, other than those by agencies addressed herein, were received
by the USACE during the Public Notice period.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 10 of 13
Letter from the USFWS dated June 19, 2018 (Appendix A):
The Service appreciates the general avoidance and minimization measures taken on the site to
limit wetland impacts. However, we note that the wetlands that were avoided are proposed to be
surrounded by lots, roads, or water features that may cause indirect effects in the long term.
Wetlands 2, 3, and 4 are proposed to be cut through the center, fragmenting the remaining portions
that were avoided. Some of the wetlands to remain will be bordered on one or more sides by water
features dug to a much lower elevation, which may adversely affect the hydrology of the wetland.
It doesn't appear that impacts to the avoided wetlands are considered in the public notice. We
appreciate that the remaining wetlands will be preserved by conservation easements; however, we
recommend that mitigation credit not be provided for the preservation of these areas due to
fragmentation and potential indirect or long-term impacts to hydrology, habitat, and water quality
from the surrounding project components.
Applicant Response: Per the Revised Permit Drawings (Appendix D), impacts to Wetland Areas
2 and 3 have been entirely avoided and impacts to Wetland Area 4 have been greatly reduced from
10.91 acres to 0.32 acres. The single impact area within Wetland Area 4 occurs on the eastern edge
and will therefore not divide the avoided wetlands. Potential secondary hydrologic impacts from
water features have also been minimized. No water features are located adjacent to Wetland Area
4. Wetland Areas 1, 2, and 3 are separated from the water features by the golf cart path, major
roadways, the existing intermittent RPW, or a combination of those elements. The Applicant also
no longer proposes to use the avoided wetlands as a source of mitigation credits. Instead, the
Applicant will coordinate with a private mitigation bank and/or the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality's Division of Mitigation Services to purchase credits or pay an in -lieu fee.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 11 of 13
Letter from the NCWRC dated July 9, 2018 (Appendix A):
1. The NCWRC has reviewed the public notice and is concerned with the amount of wetland acres
proposed to be impacted. Our agency participated in a NC Department of Environmental Quality
scoping meeting with the applicant and several other state and federal agencies in 2017. Our staff
noted the amount of impacts and stated impacts needed to be further minimized and recommended
the applicant consider development recommendations from the NCWRC's Green Growth Toolbox
(http://ncwildli e.org/Conservin /Programs/Green-Growth-Toolbox/About-GGT) to incorporate
wildlife friendly options in the development design. Review of the public notice has shown the
current proposal had reduced wetland impacts by 4.43 acres from the earlier proposal. However,
the remaining wetland impact acreage should still be minimized prior to any acceptance of
mitigation. The wetland reduction was accomplished with the redesign of some residential lots
that contained wetlands. This did not significantly alter the design or layout of the development.
An alternate layout that rearranges the golf course design or removes roadside commercial
development may lead to more wetland impact reductions and is recommended.
Wetlands provide important habitat opportunities for numerous game and non -game wildlife
species. They also serve as an important filtration system for stormwater runoff. These
opportunities are not matched by the design of the stormwater treatment system within the golf
course and residential development. Open water spaces may provide areas for some aquatic
species, but their quality and varied habitats are not equal to those of wetlands and streams.
Anadromous species, such as striped bass and blue back herring, utilize the waters of Joyce Creek
and the Dismal Swamp Canal and would not be provided any benefits from the filling of wetlands
and creation of open water ponds. The conversion of almost 600 acres in this area to • development
also removes a large area of land that serves as terrestrial wildlife habitat and travel corridor
along US Highway 17 and other large contiguous lands in the area.
In general, the NCWRC does not believe appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland
impacts has been demonstrated. We request the applicant redesign the development layout if the
project remains in this location. Consideration should be given to impacts imposed upon the
Dismal Swamp State Park and the Dismal Swamp Canal that provide public access and cultural
benefits to citizens as well as their benefits to wildlife.
Applicant Response: Please see our responses above to the USACE and to NCDWR pertaining to
avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 12 of 13
Letter from the NCSHPO dated July 5, 2018 (Appendix A):
We have reviewed the application for wetland impacts associated with the construction of the
proposed Camden Plantation development submitted by Boyd Homes Inc. of Virginia. While no
properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are known to be
on the tract, it has never been surveyed to determine whether they are present. Therefore, we
cannot concur that no historic properties will be affected at this time. We recommend that a
comprehensive archaeological survey be performed by a professional archaeological consultant
over the tract to determine if archaeological resources are present and to assess the significance
of any discoveries as they relate to NRHP criterion. The survey and resulting archaeological
report should follow the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology Archaeological Investigation
Standards and Guidelines. The report and appropriate site forms should be forwarded to us for
review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance of any construction
activities.
Applicant Response: As a preliminary step, the Applicant retained the services of Circa— Cultural
Resources Management, LLC (Circa) to prepare a Management Summary for the project. Circa—
conducted a review of historic maps, search of the NCSHO's historic and cultural resource online
database, and performed an on-site walkover survey. In September 2018, Circa— staff walked the
site in transects and documented conditions using photography, soil analysis, and shovel tests for
artifacts. During the Site survey, no objects of historical or cultural significance were found. Circa—
also concluded that given the Site's location on ditched, low, previously -hydric soils on level flats
and distance from dry soils and water, the possibility of finding historic resources, and in particular
Native American ones, is considered to be low. As a result of their research and field assessment,
Circa— did not recommend additional archaeological work. A copy of the Management Summary
by Circa— is included in Appendix G. Because of the significant reduction in impacts to Waters,
thus the likely reduction in the size of the Permit Area, the need for the comprehensive
archaeological survey recommended above by the NCSHO, is not anticipated.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Mr. Dave Lekson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 12, 2019
Camden Plantation, Camden County, NC Page 13 of 13
Section 408 Materials Requested by the USACE on June 13 and 19, 2018:
Based on input from the USACE regarding Section 408 requirements, the project is providing the
following information in Appendix F:
• Existing Conditions - Rainfall/Runoff modeling showing flow hydrographs that leave the proposed
development site that discharge into either the Dismal Swamp Canal (DSC) and/or Joyce Creek.
• With Project Condition - Rainfall/Runoff modeling showing flow hydrographs that leave the
proposed development site that discharge into either the DSC and/or Joyce Creek.
• Analysis of various Joyce Creek water levels and their effect on the drainage system for the
proposed development.
The upstream limit of the Joyce Creek Civil Works Project is located at Rt. 1233/Culpepper Road, which
is approximately 1/2 -mile downstream of the southeast corner of the Camden Plantation project.
Therefore, the project has requested that the Project Sponsor for Joyce Creek, the Joyce Creek Watershed
Commission, provide a "statement of no objection" for the Camden Plantation project. See Appendix F.
We thank you in advance for your assistance on this project and ask that you contact us as soon as possible
at 757-963-2008 or via email at bkerrgkerrenv.com and mmcelroy&kerrenv.com with any questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc.
Robert P. Kerr, CPWD, PWS
Director, Tidewater Regional Office
-zV,1 a-rit 12 1 -
Mark McElroy, CPWD, PWS
Manager, Environmental Services, Tidewater Regional Office
Enclosures: Appendix A: Agency Letters
Appendix B: Revised Off-site Alternatives Analysis & Table
Appendix C: NCDOT Entrance Permit & Agreement
Appendix D: Current & Previously submitted Permit Drawings & Impact Tables
Appendix E: Utility Chronology Exhibit
Appendix F: Section 408 Information
Appendix G: Cultural Resource Assessment Report
cc: Karen Higgins, NC DWR
Peter Benjamin, USFWS
Maria Dunn, NCWRC
Ramona Bartos, NC SHPO
Jennifer Owens, USACE Wilmington District
Joel Scussel, USACE Norfolk District
Ken Memer, Boyd Homes
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 • Virginia Beach • Virginia • 23451
Phone: [phone] • www.kerrenv.com

Appendix A: Agency Letters

Regulatory Division
Action 1D No. SAW -2415-00317
Mr. Iden Merner
Boyd Homes
544 Newtown Road, Suite 128
Virginia Bead., Virginia 23462
Dear Mr. Merner:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Feld Office
2107 W 5`' Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
July 13, 2018
Please reference your application for a Department of the Army individual permit to construct
Camden Plantation, a mixed-use residential and commercial development with recreational
amenities located off the east side of US Highway 17, north of South Mills, in Camden County,
North Carolina. The purpose of this correspondence is to inform you that we have received
comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NC
Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, and the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission regarding their review of the public notice on your application.
It is Department of the Army policy to provide an applicant the opportunity to furnish a
proposed resolution or rebuttal to all comments and/or objections. from government agencies and
other substantive comments before the Corps makes a final decision on a proposed project. In
this regard, I would appreciate receiving any comments that you have on this matter. If you
intend to respond, please give your immediate attention to this matter so processing of your
application can proceed expeditiously.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone]
Sincerely,
k af_-V'�
David M. Lekson, PWS
Chief, Washington Regulatory Field Office
Enclosures

Copy Furnished (with enclosures):
Mr. Robert Kerr
Kerr Environmental Services Corporation
1008 Old VirgiTda-beach Road, Suite 200
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451

t4T Op
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 54" Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
July 25, 2018
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. SAW -2015-00317
Mr. Iden Merner
Boyd Homes
544 Newtown Road, Suite 128
Virginia Beach,'Virginia 23462
Dear Mr. Merrier:
Please reference your application for a Department of the Army (DA) individual permit to
impact 28.9 acres of wetlands and 4,562 linear feet of waters of the United States associated with
construction of the 598 acre Camden Plantation, a mixed-use residential and commercial
development with golf course and other recreational amenities located off the east side of US
Highway 17, north of South Mills, in Camden County, North Carolina. This correspondence also
confirms our meeting on July 17, 2018.
Reference the information you submitted entitled, Individual Permit Application and Support
Document, Camden Plantation, Camden County, North Carolina (Document), dated May 2018.
As discussed, please provide the following information to facilitate our evaluation of your
application:
1. A complete map(s) depicting the boundaries of the 21 offsite alternatives evaluated.
2. National Wetlands Inventory (NWi) mapping alone is insufficient to justify the
dropping of alternatives from consideration. As discussed, you should utilize available remote
sensing tools (Web Soil Survey, LiDAR, aerial imagery, etc.), coupled with field reconnaissance
(as possible), to present a more accurate estimate of wetland acres that exist on the offsite
alternatives.
3. Amend Table 1:
a) Add the wetland acres to the column entitled "Potential Wetland Impacts."
h} Delete the last column entitled "Practicable."

4. Provide the North Carolina Department of Transportation, access permit that was issued
to you for the connection of the Camden Plantation entrance road to US Highway 17 and other
documentation you have supporting the location of the proposed entrance road.
5. North Carolina's Dismal Swamp State Park and Dismal Swamp Canal Welcome Center
are both located immediately across US 17 from the proposed development. Pursuant to 40 CFR
Subpart F 234.52 through 230.54, provide information on the measures you have considered and
are taking to minimize the physical and visual impacts of this large development on the state
park, welcome center, and local area.
5, As discussed, the Corps and resource agencies believe that you can achieve substantial
avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts through redesign of the project including
realigning the entrance road and adjusting the commerciallresidential lots and golf course layout,
Accordingly, you must provide a new plan drawing that depicts further avoidance and
minimization of impacts to waters and wetlands resources on the site.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about the above, or any other
matters related to your application. You stated that you would he meeting with Camden County
to discuss the redesigning of the Camden Plantation project. I am also available to meet with
county officials to discuss the DA permitting process and answer any questions they may have.
Please give your immediate attention to this and to providing the above information so that
evaluation of your application can proceed expeditiously.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
Washington Regulatory Field Office, 2407 West 5" Street, Washington, NC 27889, telephone
910-251-4558.'
Sincerely,
David M. Lekson, PWS
Chief, Washington Regulatory Field Office

Copies Furnished:
Mr. Robert Kerr
Kerr Environmental Services Corporation
1008 Old Virginia beach Road, Suite 200
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
Mr. Mark McElroy
Kerr Environmental Services Corporation
1008 Old Virginia beach Road, Suite 240
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
Ms. Kathryn. Matthews
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Fritz Rohde
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
101 Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Paul Wojoski
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division. of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
Mr. Daniel Govoni
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Ms. Maria Dunn
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889

r.e
�F.
;..t
\Valeo Rewill-ceti
Iat+ 4v11411011:d 4)aallt�
July 9, 2018
Mr. David M. Lekson
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Reguiatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Subject Project: Camden Plantation
Corps Action tD# SAW -201.5-0031.7
Dear Mr. Lekson:
[ZOY COOPER
NUCNAEL 5, REGAN
LINDA C ULPEPPER
hort -i m; I1,)r-f 1w
DWRIt 201.71059
Camden County
On behalf of the NC Division of Water Resources, we respectfully request that you consider the
following comments within your review of the 444 Individual Permit request for the above
referenced property:
1. The applicant has provided a very specific purpose to the project and has limited the
geographic scope of the project to Camden County, North Carolina.
2. The applicant has not provided an adequate alternatives analysis for the proposed
project.
a. The applicant used criteria that was not directly tied to the project purpose when
evaluating alternative sites including: access to potable water, access to sanitary
sewer, and compatibility with local zoning. Although these criteria are relevant, it
must be pointed out that a previous developer built utility infrastructure to the
selected parcel and the selected parcel was rezoned to fit this type of development
making these criteria not insurmountable obstacles to achieving the project purpose.
b. The applicant has not considered the alternative of constructing a residential and
commercial mixed-use development without a golf course, as this could potentially
qualify other parcels identified in the applicants' proposed alternatives and would
still meet the applicant's stated purpose.
3, The applicant has not provided a detailed avoidance and nninimization plan for the
proposed project. No alternative layouts were proposed, nor were designs without the
inclusion of the golf course,
Stale of NuMhC'aroling . Envirotutter+tal Quality ! Water Rtswrces
1617 hfaiI $t1V1CC Ceoier , Raleiglt. NorlhCnmiirm 27699.161 7
419 847 63M
--- —— ---- --- 1.—^—'-r —s Lj
yz'� '.4Fs`;'v.�, i.i �i _. f..•

Page 2 of 2
4. The applicant states the proposed project will have no impact on the Great Dismal Swamp
because of the storniwater management plan, however no further information was
provided. The Division will be requesting additional tech nicai information from the
appli+cant and requests that the USACE also consider this additional information during tine
review of the application.
Thank you for your considering the Division's comments during your review of this Individual
Permit, if you have any questions, please contact Paul Wojoski at 919-807-5354 or
Pau I. Woiaski@ ncdenr.goy.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Suffer Permitting Branch
cc: Robert Kerr, Kerr Environmental Services Corp. (via emait)
Ken Merner, Boyd Homes (via email)
DWR WaRo
DWR — Wetlands and Buffer Permitting Branch
Filename: 171059CamdenPla ntatlon(Cam den)_4o4Comments

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
July 18, 2018
Mr. Ken Merner
Boyd Homes
544 Newtown Road, Suite 128
Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Subject Project: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Camden Plantation
Corps Action ID# SAW -2015-00317
Dear Mr. Merner:
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
LINDA CULPEPPER
'r1,'r nr, rirr.
DWR# 20171059
Camden County
On June 1, 2018 the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application dated May
10, 2018, requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division for the subject project.
The Division has determined that additional information is required to process your application,
therefore this application is on -hold until all of the following information is received:
Title 15A NCAC 02H .0506 requires that a proposed activity has no practical
alternative by demonstrating that, considering the potential for a reduction in
size, configuration or density of the proposed activity and all alternative designs,
the basic project purpose cannot be practically accomplished in a manner which
would avoid or result in less adverse impact to wetlands. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) have not determined that the preferred alternative is the
least environmentally damaging practical alternative (LEDPA). The Division
cannot review the preferred alternative until the USACE determines that this
alternative is the LEDPA. Upon the USACE's determination, please provide
correspondence from the USACE indicating which alternative is selected as the
LEDPA.
2. If the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requests a response to any comments
received as a result of the Public Notice, please provide the Division with a copy
of your response to the USACE. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(e) and 15A NCAC 02B.0233(8), the applicant shall furnish
all of the above requested information for the proper consideration of the application. Please
respond in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter by sending one (1) copy of all
of the above requested information to the 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 OR by submitting all of the above requested information through
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Camden Plantation
Request for Additional Information
DWR Project# 20171059
Page 2 of 2
this link: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Supplemental-Information-Form (please note that the
DWR# requested on the link is referenced above).
If all of the requested information is not received within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter,
the Division will be unable to approve the application and it will be returned. The return of this
project will necessitate reapplication to the Division for approval, including a complete
application package and the appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for this
activity and any work done within waters of the state may be a violation of North Carolina
General Statutes and Administrative Code.
Please contact Paul Wojoski at [phone] or Paul.Woioski@ncdenr,gov if you have any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
cc: Robert Kerr, Kerr Environmental Services Corp. (via email)
Ken Merner, Boyd Homes (via email)
DWR WaRo
DWR — Wetlands and Buffer Permitting Branch
Filename: 171059CamdenPlantation(Camden)_IC_Addinfo2

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Neigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
June 19, 2018
Mr. David M. Lekson, Chief
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2447 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
Subject; 'Camden Plantation
Action ID No. SAW -2015-00397
Dear Mr, Lekson:
RECEIVED
U -S. ARMY CORPS EUG
Washington RegUWWY Rd orc
This letter provides the comments of the U. S. Fish and. Wildlife Service (Service) on the
June 7, 2018 public notice_ for Camden Plantation. The applicant, Mr. Ken Merner, of
Boyd Domes; has applied for authorization ,�o impact 28.9 acres of wetlands and 4,552
linear feet of waters of the U. . to construct Camden Plantation, a 598 acre mixed-use
residential and commercial deve. oprreent with recreational amenities located on the east
side of U. S. Highway 17, north of South Mills, in Camden County, North Carolina.
These comments are submitted in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (FWCA) (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 561-667d). Comments related to the
FWCA are to be used in your determination of compliance with 404(b)(1) guidelines (49
CFR'230) and in your public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) in relation to the protection
of fish and wildlife resources. Additional comments are provided regarding the District
Engineer's determination of project impacts pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act {ESA} of 1973, as amended (1.6 U.&C. 1531-1543).
Project Area and Proposed Activities
The project area is a large parcel, across U.S. 17 from the Great Dismal Swamp State
Park Visitor Center. According to the public notice, the applicant proposes to develop
Camden Plantation in four phases, involving the construction of approximately 1,750
new residential units, associated roads and utilities infrastructure, a commercial center
with a minimum of 160,000 square feet of retaillcommerciWofhce space, an 18 -hole golf
course, and other recreational amenities (tennis, swimming, trail and park system).
Anticipated services to be provided include a grocery store and complimentary retail
business, medical/dental offices, and general office space. The project will impact a total

2
of 4,562 linear feet of waters of the United States and 28.90 acres of nontidal wetlands,
including the permanent loss of 27.96 acres of palustrine forested wetlands and the
conversion of 0.94 acres of palustrine forested wetlands to palustrine emergent wetlands.
Federally Protected Species
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential
to adversely affect those species. The Service has reviewed available information on
federally -threatened or endangered species known to occur in Camden County, Species
occurring near the project area include the red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
(RCW) and the northern long-eared bat (Myodas septentrionaiis). The U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) has determined that the project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the RCW, The Corps has determined that the project may affect, and is
likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat, but the agency is relying on the
provisions of the ESA Section 4(d) rule and incidental take is not prohibited.
According to the public notice, the site was logged in the early 1990s and is currently in
agricultural and silvicultural production. The wooded areas are primarily vegetated with a
mixed pine -hardwood assemblage characteristic of outer coastal plain flatwoods
including loblolly pine, red maple, sweetgum, water oak, laurel oak, and swamp white
oak tree species. Because the site does not appear to contain older, larger pine trees, and
has been largely managed for agricultural and silvicultural production, the Service
concurs with the Corp's determination that the project, may affect, but is not likely to
affect the RCW. Because of the proposal for tree removal to develop the site, the
proposed project may affect the northern long-eared bat, Since the proposed project site
is greater than 150 feet frena a known roost tree and the project does not require
prohibited intentional take, the project has met the criteria for the 4(d) rule. Any
associated take is therefore exempt.
We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for
this project, Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may
affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or.
(3) a new species is listed'or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the
identified action.

4
P
Service Concerns
The Service appreciates the general avoidance and minimization measiues taken on the
site to limit wetland impacts. However, we note that the wetlands that were avoided are
proposed to be surrounded by lots, roads, or water features that may cause indirect effects
in the long term. Wetlands 2, 3, and 4 are proposed to be cut through the center,
fragmenting the remaining portions that were avoided. Some of the wetlands to remain
will be bordered on one or more sides by water features dug to a much lower elevation,
which may adversely affect the hydrology of the wetland. It doesn't appear that impacts
to the avoided wetlands are considered in the public notice. We appreciate that the
remaining wetlands will be preserved by conservation easements; however, we
recommend that mitigation credit not be provided for the preservation of these areas due
to fragmentation and potential indirect or long-term impacts to hydrology, habitat, and
water quality from the surrounding project components.
The Ser -vice appreciates the opportunity to comment on this public notice. If you have
questions regarding these comments, please contact lathy Matthews at 919-856-4520,
ext. 27 or by e-mail at <[e-mail] >.
Sincerely,
C�
P ter Benjamin.
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gotdon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Lekson
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
FROM: Maria T. Dunn, Coastal Coordinator
Habitat Conservation
DATE: July 9, 2018
SUBJECT: Public Notice for Inert Merner, Boyd Homes, Camden County, North Carolina.
SAW -2015-00317
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) reviewed the public notice
with regard to impacts on fish and wildlife resources. The project site is a 598 -acre site off the east side of
US Highway 17 North, approximately three miles south of the Virginia border, across from the Dismal
Swamp Canal Welcome Center, north of South Mills, NC. Our comments are provided in accordance
with provisions of Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and Coastal Area Management Act
(G.5. 1 13A-100 through 113 A-128), as amended.
The applicant proposes to develop a mixed-use residential and commercial development including 1,750
residences, a golf course, trail system, and numerous undetailed retail 1 commercial units. The site was
logged in the early 1900's and is currently in agriculture and silviculture production. There are extensive
ditches in the property to remove water from the property with a perennial RPW along the southern
boundary that directs water west to the Dismal Swamp Canal and east to Cypress Run, a tributary of
Joyce Creel.. Witlwt the 598 -acre project area ate 46.1.4 acres of wetlands. To facilitate the development
proposal, the applicant proposes to impact 4,562' of waters of the United States and 28.90 wetland acres.
The Dismal Swamp Canal is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is all active project of
the US Army Corps of Engineers. Joyce Creek, the receiving waters of Cypress Run is also an active
project of the US Army Corps of Engineers and is designated an anadromous fish spawning area (AFSA)
by the NCWRC.
The NCWRC has reviewed the public notice and is concerned with the amount of wetland acres proposed
to be impacted. Our agency participated in a NC Department of Environmental Quality scoping -meeting
with the applicant and several other state and federal agencies in 2017. Our staff noted the amount of
impacts and stated impacts needed to he further m inimized and recornmended the applicant consider
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center * Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] e Fax: [phone]
13

Ken Menier. Camden Plantation 2 July 9.2018
SAW -2015-00317
development recommendations from the NCWRC's Green Growth Toolbox
(htt ://ncwildlife.or ConserviliPro rams/Green-Gro-tvth-1 oolbox/About-GGT) to incorporate wildlife
friendly options in the development design. Review of the public notice has shown the current proposal
had reduced wetland impacts by 4.43 acres from the earlier proposal. However, the remaining wetland
impact acreage should stili be minimized prior to any acceptance of mitigation. The wetland reduction
was accomplished with the redesign of some residential lots that contained wetlands. This did not
significantly alter the design or layout of the development. An alternate layout that rearranges the golf
course design or removes roadside commercial development may lead to more wetland impact reductions
and is reconunended.
Wetlands provide important habitat opportunities for numerous game and non -game wildlife species.
They also serve as an important filtration system for stormwater runoff. These opportunities are not
matched by the design of the stormwater treatment system within the golf course and residential
development. Open water spaces may provide areas for some aquatic species, but their quality and varied
Habitats are not equal to those of wetlands and streams. Anadromous species, such as striped bass and
blue back herring, utilize the waters of Joyce Creek and the Dismal Swamp Canal and would not be
provided any benefits from the filling of wetlands and creation of open water ponds. The conversion of
almost 600 acres in this area to development also removes a large area of land that serves as terrestrial
Wildlife habitat and travel corridor along US Highway 17 and other large contiguous lands in the area.
In general, the NCWRC does not believe appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts has �
been demonstrated. We request the applicant redesign the development layout if the project remains in
this location. Consideration should be given to impacts imposed upon the Dismal Swamp State Park and
the Dismal Swamp Canal that provide public access and cultural benefits to citizens as well as their
benefits to wildlife.
The NCWRC appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on this public notice and looks forward
to additional information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (252) 948--3916 or at
maria.dunn(Mnewilcliife.orU if i can provide additional assistance.

Nortb Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. $auos,Administrrtot
Governor Roy Cooper
secretary Susi R Hamilton
July 5, 2018
David M. Lekson
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
Office of Archives and MtDry
Deputy Secretary Kevin Chary
Re: Develop Camden Plantation Mixed Use Development, US 17, South Mills, SAW 2415-00317:
Camden County, ER 1.8-1339
Dear Mr. Lekson:
We have reviewed the application for wetland impacts associated with the construction of the proposed Camden
Plantation development submitted by Boyd Homes Inc, of Virginia. While no properties eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) are known to be on the tract, it has never been surveyed to determine
whether they are present. 'Therefore, we cannot concur that no historic properties will be affected at this time.
We recommend that a comprehensive archaeological survey be performed by a professional archaeological
consultant over the tract to determine if archaeological resources are present and to assess the significance of any
discoveries as they relate to NRHI' criterion. The survey and resulting archaeological report should follow the
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology.Archaeo4gical Inuertigadan Siondards and Guideliurr. The report and 'lc
appropriate site forms should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in
advance of any construction activities.
We have detennined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact
Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or [e-mail]�v. In
all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced trackingnumber.
Sincerely,
(L,, boulol�
6.,'Rarnona M. Banos
cc: Robert Kerr, Kerr Environmental Services Corporation
Location- 019 East Jones Street, R46l igh Nr- 27601 mfaitingAtmdresw� 4A17 Mail Service C'.eatar, Raleigh N(27699A617 Telepbone/Fax: [phone]-6594

Appendix B: Revised Off-site Alternatives Analysis & Table

Camden Plantation Project Limits
Parcels > 500 acres and Unoccupied

Camden Plantation Project Limits FEMA 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Parcels > 500 acres and Unoccupied National Wetland Inventory
® Alternatives Evaluated Along With NRCS Hydric Soils
Proposed Alternative
A � G
0
iR 1233 Culp
ePQe`Q-a O�� GO
0.5 1
-`1 Miles
Kerr Environmental OFF-SITE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Services Corp. C am den Plan tabon
-- — w•K. ac�ur[cc EfglrKenrHJlEMirw�rrtGi•:•rirg
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
am aen .r
�.. .
0
REVISED
FEB 2019
2.5 5
Miles
I:1110111:9IM-2.J

Camden Plantation Project Limits Digital Elevation Model (meters) 3-3.5
j Parcels > 500 acres and Unoccupied
` 0
0-0.5
3.5 - 4
4-4.5
® Alternatives Evaluated Along With
Proposed Alternative
0.5 - 1
E�i 4.5-5
�1-1.5
�5-5.5
1.5-2
5.5-6
�2-2.5
->6
0
2.5-3
Dismal Swamp NC State Park
O
it
1
Z
o
-r i
0 0.5
o ,\
j Miles °o oGIW U U oU�IOoQo�O o • • • •
0 2.5 5
Kerr Environmental OFF -SITE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Services Corp. C am den Plan tabon Miles
WowR�Erq�rqIEr,�. t-, ,,:,rp; REVISED FIGURE 3—c
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FEB 2019
I

Appendix C: NCDOT Entrance Permit & Agreement

Ciamdien
P L A N TAT I O N
544 Newtown Road • Suite 128 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
July 21, 2008
By Overnight Delivery
Jerry Jennings
Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Suite 100
113 Airport Drive
Edenton, NC 27932
RE: Request for Control of Access Revision on US Highway 17 at the Existing
Median Crossover for the Camden Plantation Site
South Mills Township, Camden County, NC
Dear Mr. Jennings:
I am writing to request a 150 -foot break in the control of access on the east side of US
Highway 17, approximately 3,500 feet south of McPherson Road (SR 1231). This control of
access break is to accommodate a new road to be constructed to access a major new community
in Camden County to be known as Camden Plantation.
Camden Plantation is a 600+ acre community that will eventually include a commercial
district with retail, office, and restaurant uses, an 18 hole golf course open to the public, and over
1,700 single family and multi -family residences. The commercial district is also anticipated to
include public uses, such as a post office and satellite office for the sheriff's department.
This planned community has been approved by the Camden County Board of
Commissioners and is an important part of their plan for smart growth in the County. Economic
development is vital to Camden County. As a rare county without even one grocery store,
Camden has almost no sales tax base. Camden Plantation will provide a vital business
development area with sewer in the northern end of the County. The importance of this
development to the County is reflected in the enclosed resolution in support of the control of
access break which was adopted by the Board of Commissioners.

Jerry Jennings
Division Engineer
July 21, 2008
Page 2
Without this control of access break, ehicular traffic to and from Camden Plantation will
all be funneled to McPherson Road and Cul pper Road, both of which are narrow roads without
intersections designed for the level of anticipated to be generated by the growth of
Camden County. The intersection planned by Camden Plantation, as shown in the attached
documentation, will address these important safety issues. This work will be done without cost
to either NCDOT or Camden County.
The proposed new road will align with an existing median break with turn lanes. It also
coincides with an existing farm access to the property, which has been in use for some time.
These features make this location the natural choice for an additional intersection with US
Highway 17 to accommodate the anticipated growth of northern Camden County.
In support of our request, we have attached the following items:
• Control of Access Revision Form
• Vicinity Map — Figure 1
• NCDOT Roadway Sheets 1 & 16 from Project # 8.1112204
• Camden Plantation Land Use Plan — Figure 2
• Intersection Layout Plan — Figure 3
• Aerial of the C/A Break Location — Figure 4
• Ordinance No. 2008-07-02, Resolution Of The Camden County Board Of
Commissioners In Support Of Vehicular Access On Highway US 17 For The
Development Of The Mixed Use Community Known As Camden Plantation.
Please submit this package through the proper channels for due consideration. If there is
any additional information that would be helpful in your consideration of this matter, please
contact me at 757-271-0078 (o) or 757-943-0078 (c), and we will be happy to help in any way.
Sincerely,
David S. Rudiger
President / General Counsel
enclosures

Charlotte
800 West Hill Street
Suite 202
Charlotte, NC 28208
980.321.0202
980.321.0108 fax
Hampton Roads
201 Production Drive
Second Floor
Yorktown,VA 23693
757-594.1419
757.594.9010 fax
Access Management
Traffic Signal Design
Traffic Control Plans
Air Quality Modeling
Traffic Impact Analysis
Roadway Signing Plans
Traditional Neighborhoods
May 6, 2008
Ms. Gretchen A. Byrum, PE
District Engineer
NCDOT - District 1
1929 North Road Street
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
RE: Request for Control of Access Revision on US Highway 17 at the Existing
Median Crossover for the Camden Plantation Site
South Mills Township, Camden County, NC (08050)
Dear Ms. Byrum:
As you are most probably aware, an important aspect of the development of the
Camden Plantation site is the installation of a major site access proposed at the
existing median crossover on US Highway 17, located approximately 3,500 feet
south of McPherson Road (SR 1231). This will necessitate a 150 -foot break in the
control of access on the east side of US Highway 17.
Attached are three (3) packets with the following information:
o Control of Access Revision Form
o Vicinity Map - Figure 1
o NCDOT Roadway Sheets 1 & 16 from Project 4:8.1112204
o Camden Plantation Land Use Plan - Figure 2
o Intersection Layout Plan - Figure 3
o Aerial of the C/A Break Location - Figure 4
At your earliest convenience, please submit this package through the proper
channels for due consideration. Also, please let us know if we can provide any
assistance in expediting this matter.
Sincerely,
E, A4v- aC
Randy E. Goddard, PE
Principal
cc: Ken Merner – Boyd Homes
File
www.kubilins.com I Creating a higher quality of life through partnerships for innovative transportation solutions

Right of Way Disposal
and/or
Control of Access Revision
Committee meets second Tuesday of each month ****Agenda deadline: 2 weeks prior to meeting.
1. Name and address of requesting party
Camden Plantation Homes, Inc.
544 Newtown Road, Suite 128, Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Attn: Kenneth S. Merner (757-490-1959)
2. Is requesting party the adjacent property owner? ✓ Yes No
3. Name of adjacent property owner(s) (if other than requesting party)
4. Type of Request
5.
6.
7.
Right of Way Disposal
New Access Point
✓ Control of Access Revision
Intended Land Use: Mixed -Use Golf Course Community
County: Camden
Route: US Highwav 17
City/Town: South Mills Township
At/Near: 3,500' South of McPherson Rd
Proiect Information
8. Project Phase: Planning Design
Construction V Completed
9. Has R/W claim for the requested area been settled? ✓ Yes No
T.I.P. No. R-71AD
State Project No. 8.1112204
F.A. Project No.
Station(s) 212+44 (211+69 to 213+19)
10. Posted Speed (mph) 60 mph
11. Average Daily Traffic 13,700 Year 2007 (Ifavailable)
12. Do you anticipate problems with/or are the following involved?
Wetlands Sight Distance
Traffic Signals Environmental Permits Required
Bridges/Culverts
13. Is a municipality involved? Yes ✓ No
(If yes, municipality recommendations)
14. Provide aerial photos of the requested area.
15. Show station(s) and offset(s) for requested area on plan sheet.
(Please do not send a partial copy of plan sheet.)
Revised January 26, 2006

Camden Vicinity Figure 1
— — — — — Plantation Map
TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.

I
Z
0
��I
T
-O
t'
-W
i.
Ej 1.0 tSl'c`y
i I
Z
m in -, s - cq
��I
.11 -ILI
zn
t'
018 IG I n"
i.
Ej 1.0 tSl'c`y
i I
�xv
I Eli
IIS
N. N
w i,
LLI �l
C,WWI,
cn
nVIL-8
n"l
UIy
O al� o
a:
m in -, s - cq
��I
wl
t'
018 IG I n"
i.
Ej 1.0 tSl'c`y
i I
�xv
;A tM/
N. N
-07
OR
a:
m in -, s - cq
of
wl
t'
018 IG I n"
JIR R11
WN
;A tM/
N. N
-07
OR
C,WWI,
de,
nVIL-8
o
a:
m in -, s - cq
of
wl
t'
018 IG I n"
JIR R11
WN
;A tM/
N. N
-07
OR
C,WWI,
nVIL-8

V-1 B:
I

s
yy
' � o
arl
IN
g S
ff s d H€6do���
ll� s
W
tiq=jr`f
iJe� �i il�i l� ; il; ifglpEoi ;1 �!p { lii'�e I
! n 0
i
�!'li ,;� ; s� � !�� �;� it ° m
er it r l 1! f{� �'� l� n 3> Z
It OM
it v Z
'i lel !'Ei ii lli 1�, , jE it {li it =�i Z m r
1{ 5 l��li�j •( ire .6 II i! ;' !1' !; ili i� c
e � zi, �!1►��j�!'i 4`I 1� �i li 'I �{ �h ie � Z
e
X11=e3j!
0
D
r
Land Use Plan Figure 2
rna �seonrnTioN cnooa, iNc Plantation
Nggg�q�F kve9eR%ggu 10
%ggggq R�Bga
D
�! �fl 0•fl � Q e a a� a� r prr s earl
b asi axle $ .� b ��a `•�Sa�a�l:���s�areia�`aa�
"£u«E« CC«C 0�-
66' �"O,
0
M
Camden
�

L6 Awkm
C3�

CD
LVAIII
- •'

r:i
STATE OF NORTH O—
DEPARTmE TT 4F TRANSPORTAnoN
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONT[, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 30, 2009
Ms. Margaret Kubilins, P.E.
Kubilins Transportation Group, Inc.
800 W Hill Street, Suite 202
Charlotte, NC 28208
Dear Ms. Kubilins:
This letter is an update in regards to the October 31, 2008 letter that you received from this
office in regards to your request for a revision to the existing control of access along US 17
near SR 1233 (Culpepper Road) in the South Mills Township on behalf of Camden
Plantation Homes, Inc. The October 31, 2008 letter was based on a draft approval as
received by the Division after the Department's Right of Way Disposal and Control Access
Review Committee approved your request. Once the Committee reviews a request the final
approval is issued by the Highway Administrator. The draft approval required that the
following provisions had to be followed:
• The requesting party shall be responsible for enhancement fees associated with the
access revision,
• The requesting party shall be responsible for the design and construction of a
superstreet along US 17 at the proposed intersection. The superstreet design shall
include right-in/right-out movements with a leftover at the break location and u -tum
movements approximately 800' to 1000' north along US 17.
• The North Carolina Board of Transportation has identified US 17 as a Strategic
Highway Corridor. In order to protect the safety, mobility and traffic carrying capacity
of this Strategic Highway Corridor, the access break along US 17 may be closed or
relocated if an alternative access is developed in the future or if any safety concerns or
other traffic impacts arise.
The final approval that we received is authorized as follows:
• The requesting party shall be responsible for the design and construction of a
superstreet along US 17 at the proposed intersection. The superstreet design shall
include right-in/right-out movements with a leftover at the break location and u -tum
movements approximately 800' to 1000' north along US 17.
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932, Phone [phone], Fax [phone]
- w 144T- 11-ge g, i t, -r I,

• If the control of access claim is not settled and recorded within two years from W( #7 C Lif / W l � Ed •�a"`
November 19, 2008, the approval is no longer valid.
• If the site plan and/or Traffic Impact Analysis is revised, the approval is no longer valid — 7)W 6,�y` 6 No 510, 4 i rI if 'rime—,
and the request must be resubmitted
• The North Carolina Board of Transportation has identified US 17 as a Strategic
Highway Corridor. In order to protect the safety, mobility and traffic carrying capacity
of this Strategic Highway Corridor, the access break along US 17 may be closed or
relocated if an alternative access is developed in the future or if any safety concerns or
other traffic impacts arise.
Please note that this approval is also subject to Camden Plantation Homes, Inc. being
responsible for the following:
• Obtaining an encroachment agreement and driveway permit initiated in the District ,;%l S
Office
• Obtaining the underlying fee ownership of the area —
• Enhancement fees associated with the access revision is
• Accommodating all existing utilities (if applicable) r
• All costs associated with the construction of required geometries, signal installation, &V#f J/S De314,l Xtr00
and revisions (including lane configurations necessitated by the proposed development)
required by the Traffic Engineering Branch and/or District Office
• All costs associated with the re-establishment of a new control of access fence along 1,-4r ,n1" I%1 c r
the new control of access
I have attached the supporting documentation concerning this authorization. A
representative from the Department's Right of Way Branch will be contacting you. In the
mean time if you have any questions or need additional information please respond.
JDJ/SDB/sic
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Acting Division Engineer
5 d) 01 -a-
dr -
Sterling
Sterling Baker, P.E.
Division Maintenance Engineer
Atta.
cc: Jon Nance, P.E. - Chief Engineer - Operations
Art McMillan, P.E. - State Highway Design Engineer
Gretchen Bynum, P.E. - District Engineer (w/ attachments)
Chad Edge, P.E. - Division Traffic Engineer (w/ attachments)
Mike Kinlaw - Division Right of Way Agent
File (w/ attachments)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
MEMO TO: Doug Allison
Manager, Right of Way Branch
ATTENTION: Denise Amato
Real Property Agent J ��
FROM: Art McMillan, PE
State Highway Design Engineer
DATE: November 24, 2008
SUBJECT: State Project 6.803143, R/W, Camden County
F. A. Project F-75-5(14), R/W
�grj�cc
e p
F'' Ci': 2008
DIVISIOfti I
OFFICE
LYNDO TIPPETr
SECRETARY
At its October meeting, the Right of Way Disposal and Control of Access Review Committee examined
the request from Ms. Margaret Kubilins, PE of Kubilins Transportation Group, Inc. on behalf of
Camden Plantation Homes, Inc. for a break in the existing control of access along US 17 near SR 1233
(Culpepper Road) in the South Mills Township. Based on the eommitteels evaluation, the request is
approved. This approval for a 150' break in the existing control of access along US 17 from approximate
centerline Station 211+93-L- Lt. to approximate centerline Station 213+43-L- Lt. is subject to the
following:
• The requesting party shall be responsible for all costs associated with the design and construction
of a superstreet along US 17 at the proposed intersection. The superstreet design shall include
right-in/right-out movements with a left -over at the break location and u -tum movements
approximately 800' to 1000' north along US 17.
• If the control of access claim is not settled and recorded within two years from November 19, 2008,
the approval is no longer valid.
• If the site plan and/or Traffic Impact Analysis is revised, the approval is no longer valid and the
request must be resubmitted.
• The North Carolina Board of Transportation has identified US 17 as a Strategic Highway Corridor.
In order to protect the safety, mobility and traffic carrying capacity of this Strategic Highway
Corridor, the access break along US 17 may be closed or relocated if an alternative access is
developed in the future or if any safety concerns or other traffic impacts arise.
This approval, as shown on the attached drawing, is also subject to Camden Plantation Homes, Inc, being
responsible for the following:
• obtaining an encroachment agreement and driveway permit initiated in the District Office
• obtaining the underlying tee ownership of the area
• enhancement fees associated with the access revision
• accommodating all existing utilities (if applicable)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE [phone]
LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
CENTURY CENTER Cowin
HIGHWAY DESIGN BRANCH
ENTRANCE A 1
1594MAXSERVICE CENTER WESWE: WWW.00H.DOT.STATE.NC.US
1000 GiRCH RIDGE ORWE
RALEIGH NO 27899-1584
RALEIGH NC

Doug Allison
Page 2
November 24, 2008
• all costs associated with the construction of required geometrics, signal installation, and revisions
(including lane configurations necessitated by the proposed development) required by the Traffic
Engineering Branch and/or District Office
• all costs associated with the re-establishment of a new control of access fence along the new control
of access
Attached is a copy of the State Highway Administrator's concurrence with this approval. Please proceed
with the steps necessary to implement this request as approved.
AM/tct
Attachments
ec/att: Jon Nance, PE
Jim Dunlop, PE
Tommy Cozart, PE
Daniel Keel, PE
Mohammed Mah}oub
Eric Midkiff, PE
Jerry Jennings. PE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GovRpaioa
MEMO TO: William F. Rosser, PE
State highway Administrator
FROM: Art McMillan, PE
State Highway Design Engineer
DATE: November 4, 2008
SUBJECT: State Project 6.803143, R1W, Camden County
F. A, Project F-75-5(14), R/W
IUC,IiWAYD SIGN F3"-NUri
NOV ^c a 2008
_-__R8y _. _H;d ZStaff
_Str itis _E10
Gao _C']tuto _sec.
LYNDo TIPPETT�
�ectlrt•AnY
:inn Action
At its October meeting, the Right of Way Disposal and Control of Access Review Committee examined
the request from Ms. Margaret Kubilins, PE of Kubilins Transportation Group, Inc, on behalf of
Camden Plantation Homes, Inc, for a break in the existing control of access along US 17 near SR 1233
(Culpepper Road) in the South Mills Township. Based on the committee's evaluation, I recommend
approval for a 150' break in the existing control of access along US 17 from approximate centerline
Station 211+93-L- Lt. to approximate centerline Station 213+43-L- Lt. subject to the following:
• The requesting party shall be responsible for all costs associated with the design and construction
of a superstreet along US 17 at the proposed intersection. The superstreet design shall include
right-inhight-out movements with a left -over at the break location and u -turn movements
approximately 800' to 1000' north along US 17.
• If the control of access claim is not settled and recorded within two years of the approval date, the
approval is no longer valid.
• If the site plan and/or Traffic Impact Analysis is revised, the approval is no longer valid and the
request must be resubmitted.
• The North Carolina Board of Transportation has identified US 17 as a Strategic Highway Corridor.
In order to protect the safety, mobility and traffic carrying capacity of this Strategic Highway
Corridor, the access break along US 17 may be closed or relocated if an alternative access is
developed in the future or if any safety concerns or other traffic impacts arise.
This approval, as shown on the attached drawing, is also subject to Camden Plantation Homes, Inc. being
responsible for the following:
• obtaining an encroachment agreement and driveway permit initiated in the District Office
• obtaining the underlying fee ownership of the area
• enhancement fees associated with the access revision
• accommodating all existing utilities (if applicable)
• all costs associated with the construction of required geometries, signal installation, and revisions
(including lane configurations necessitated by the proposed development) required by the Traffic
Engineering Branch and/or District Office
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION:
NC OEPAR T HENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CENTURY CENTER COMPLEX
HIGHWAY DESIGN BRANCH ENTRANCE Al
1584 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WE srm— WWW.DOH.DOLSTATE.NC,Us 1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH.NC 27899-1684 RALEIGH NC

William F. Rosser, PE
November 4, 2008
Page 2
• all costs associated with the re-establishment of a new control of access fence along the new control
of access
No adverse environmental effects are associated with this action. This action is classified as a
Categorical Exclusion in accordance with 23 CFR 771.117(d)(7).
Thank you for your concurrence with the recommended approval.
AM/tct
Attachments
cc; Denise Amato
Appr'o4ved-
William F. Rosser, PE Date

_ Camden I Vicinity I
Plantation Figure 1
TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. Ma p

uo!}��U�ld �NI'dflU![9 NOl.LV1llOd5N1'![1
ajn6l� ueld asn pu�� uapweo
w
U
O I(Y)'A
zo
Oj
ji `{lilt 1
t �� i tFsi t jllz�i! �1 f
CL
it lilf
LUz 1 }t lJt
if
W � 16e;!�= }l ll# � � 1. l[ ��! �#! �! I[l►!�lil !il m f
1Ion- 03w
1.i.1 ;I ll; ill ij i l� i1,
'
I iii l� l a till mill 11111. !iii,
w [�
Min P,14
Ma
Oil! : �s
Q )
�9
4
C

. � i.' �I I I� �� .I` � ]�Q}T�aa�zi ��${ rte"^• x� ��9'�Y 'a�
_ {off•' ' Sp�� 5K '��.� I
- s. 3 3 jty 1 •3� 1
- -'gym._ . � ' - y J -� a _ 3 - f � C � J c' r � E �gggg� ••
o'
-
q
w A_jr
N f 5 a o
o
i,••� o ` ixi�as`Z.i +p a v1-i o
m' I A
� V Iy:1 O tan
���
• it � 0 �J O
`II x W VIi
LJ _ ^ c c. Earrs i iq QJp w o
54
{� S 401 d RZ �Im p LL
NJ-
m
"+ a
-
I
tit u
OVIL71 'S 10,-r4 Hd

RM 6
z
LU
Z
--o
cr)
T- Lf) f—
cr) I Z
<
0 Lf)
Co N -j
. I (L
CO LL
..z
0000
LUWU") -3 C\I
000
CC 1=
CL_ CL --
-F-LU
z -j
r I
+
.. +
+
cf)
oz:l
C)
0)
+ <
Cf)
C\1
+
cr)
coca
C'4--
+
<0
Cf)L.LJ
T4C
0
4
r I
1.
+
.. +
+
cf)
oz:l
C)
0)
+ <
C\1
coca
1.

Filed in Carnden County,NC
on Apr 23 2010,at 10:44'.07 AM
by Peggy C. Kight
Register of Deeds
Book 284 Page 768
Prepared by: E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, North Carolina Department
of Transportation, Attorney General's Office, 1505 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-
1505
Return to: NCDOT, Attn: Denise Amato, 1 South Wilmington St., Raleigh, N.C. 27601-
1453
The hereinafter described property does not include the primary residence of the DEPARTMENT.
NORTH CAROLINA
REVISION OF ACCESS
STATE HWY. PROJ. NO. 8.1112204 (36109.316)
CAMDEN COUNTY
This REVISION OF ACCESS executed this the _24th day of _March 2010,
by and between the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of North
Carolina, 1546 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27611, (hereinafter "DEPARTMENT")and the
CAMDEN PLANTATION HOMES, INC., 544 Newtown Road, Suite 128, Virginia Beach, VA
23462, (hereinafter "GRANTEE");
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, in the construction of State Highway Project No. 8.1112204 in Camden
County, North Carolina, the DEPARTMENT acquired right of way by instrument recorded in
Deed Book 70, Page 351, Camden County Registry; and

a
Book 284 Page 769
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, access to the right of way is controlled; and
WHEREAS, the GRANTEE, an owner of property adjoining the right of way, has
requested one (1) break in the control of access along said right of way; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Transportation, by resolution dated March 4, 2010, has
approved the GRANTEE'S request;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the sum of SIXTY-SIX
THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($66,300.00) and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the DEPARTMENT does hereby
grant to the GRANTEE: (1) a 150 -foot wide break in control of access beginning at approximate
survey station 211+93 Left of survey line -L- and ending at approximate survey station 213+43
of survey line —L-; as shown on Master Plans for State Highway Project No. 0.1112204, in
Camden County on file in the offices of the DEPARTMENT in Raleigh, North Carolina.
This grant of a break in the control of access is made expressly subject to the rules,
regulations, conditions, specifications, and permit processes of the DEPARTMENT and its
Policy On Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways, and those of any local
governments, as presently existing, or which may be in effect at the time of any application for
an access connection to the highway from the adjoining property, including but not limited to the
submission to, and approval by, such governmental entities of a proposed site development and
traffic plan and the fulfillment of any conditions imposed upon the permit. This grant shall not
be construed as a contract or other guarantee that any application for a driveway permit will be
granted. Nothing herein is intended to limit the DEPARTMENT'S police power or its authority
to protect the health, safety and welfare of the traveling public.

Book 284 Page 770
Paige 3 of 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the DEPARTMENT has set its hand and seal on the day and
year first above written.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[NCDOT SEAL]
By:
Vir ' demore
Man r of Right of Way
ATTES
SECRETARY00 THE BOARD M
TRANSPORTATION AND CUS IAN
OF THE SEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
Approved as to form:
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
By: f i
SpecialDep _ Att ey General

11001284 page 771
Page 4 of 4
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
This the 24th day of March , 2010, personally appeared before me,
Denise Amato, a Notary Public of said County and State, Tammy Denning, who being by me
duly sworn, says that she knows the Seal of the Department of Transportation and is acquainted
with Virgil Pridemore, who is Manager of Right of Way of the Division of Highways of said
Department, and that she, Tammy Denning, is the Secretary to the Board of Transportation and
Custodian of the Seal of the Department of Transportation, and saw said Manager of Right of
Way sign the foregoing instrument, and that she, the said Secretary to the Board of
Transportation and Custodian of the Seal of the Department of Transportation, affixed said seal
to said instrument and signed her name in attestation of the execution thereof in the presence of
said Manager of Right of Way.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal, the 24th day of March '2010.
My Commission Expires: October 28, 2014.
ts�6E A Denise Amato
Qui Os NOTARY PUBLIC
gIOTARY
(Doc. #147383) PUBLIC
.ev
U
��

Appendix D :Current& Previously Submitted Penn itD raw ings
& Im pactT ables
-C urrent P erm it D raw Ings
-I ay 2018 Drawings
,June 2017 D raw ings
-C urrent Im pact T able
-I ay 2018 Im pact Table
mune 2017 Im pactT able

LEGEND
RT. 17 RIIAHTQF WAY
TOTALS
EXISTING WETLANDS:
46.14 ACRES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
■ TEMPORARY IMPACT
#1 -JOYCE CREEK
LESGRIPTION'. v0 LINEAR FEET OF IMPAL' TO PERENNIALRP W
o NER1 K sNMs ESNNOPPN� TFa<i111I.T a NH`s oNN- rm—
rfscRlPr oN z zT ACREs o- nrAcr
%EGET " I—I.N.FOR;1. FIS; INI
#2 GOLF#18
13-11 ON. OkRE ACRES0 1.1—
#3 GOLF 09
C£SCRIPTION, OPry2CRE6 O :MPAGT
11 TO F—IR IF
#4 - GOLF #8
CESCRI' ION'. 0.32 l+ ORES o- MTACT
#5 -NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY
C.SIOCIPT
N'.
VERT CRQ-NG OF INTERMITTENT GTREPM W PRWIDE PR-RY ACCE
W - SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH
CISCRI-1014.
NEO xF..iTFVTwECFft'MFrrt F INTERMITTENT GTE— TO PP.WIRE PFIWRY
t JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS WERE ISSUED FOR THE
SITE IN.
2001 (USAGE NO 2062 - 10093y
2009 (SAW - 2006 - 00287 (
2015 (SAW - 2015 - 00317)
�S
0 200 400 500 �/
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
PERMANENTIMPACT
ENGINEER:
3,09 ACRES
KEVIN TUCKER
AVOIDED WETLAND
SITE
43.05 ACRES
PROPOSED WATER FEATURES
IMPROVEMENT
32.41 ACRES
_---
PERENNIAL RPW
ASSOCIATES
5,858 LINEAR FEET
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
INTERMITTENT RPW
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
4,304 LINEAR FEET
eva=
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
DIRECTION OF FLOW
SECTION LOCATIONS
RT. 17 RIIAHTQF WAY
TOTALS
EXISTING WETLANDS:
46.14 ACRES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
■ TEMPORARY IMPACT
#1 -JOYCE CREEK
LESGRIPTION'. v0 LINEAR FEET OF IMPAL' TO PERENNIALRP W
o NER1 K sNMs ESNNOPPN� TFa<i111I.T a NH`s oNN- rm—
rfscRlPr oN z zT ACREs o- nrAcr
%EGET " I—I.N.FOR;1. FIS; INI
#2 GOLF#18
13-11 ON. OkRE ACRES0 1.1—
#3 GOLF 09
C£SCRIPTION, OPry2CRE6 O :MPAGT
11 TO F—IR IF
#4 - GOLF #8
CESCRI' ION'. 0.32 l+ ORES o- MTACT
#5 -NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY
C.SIOCIPT
N'.
VERT CRQ-NG OF INTERMITTENT GTREPM W PRWIDE PR-RY ACCE
W - SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH
CISCRI-1014.
NEO xF..iTFVTwECFft'MFrrt F INTERMITTENT GTE— TO PP.WIRE PFIWRY
t JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS WERE ISSUED FOR THE
SITE IN.
2001 (USAGE NO 2062 - 10093y
2009 (SAW - 2006 - 00287 (
2015 (SAW - 2015 - 00317)
�S
0 200 400 500 �/
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL: CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPROVEMENT
AND SOLUTIONS USACE PERMIT APPLICATION
GOLF COURSE
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
BEACH ROAD LOCATION OF IMPACTS, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY
3/11/2019
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451 (6 PERMANENT IMPACTS & 1 TEMPORARY IMPACT) PAGE #1

10' WESTERN BOUNDARY 305'
i CAMDEN PLANTATION PARKWAY
VNETLAND 100' ROW
WEST BOUND—,MEDIANS /–EAST BOUND CART PATH /–#17 TEE EXISTING GRADE
16
15SO THER ROW
14 \LNORTH RNR W
10' EASEMENT (FILL)
13 ORTH EDGE OF IMPACT
12
11
10
9 -
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
■ 1A - SECTION - LOOKING EAST FROM HWY #17
VERTICAL SCALE: 4" =1'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=20'
%A/rC -r rif-%1 IAIr-N A P')\/
LAKE I BAN K -15:1
L-r,r,.u-- -livi
(POOL EL=10. )
1 —I 1
150 160 170 180
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
■ 1 B - PROFILE -CAMDEN PLANTATION PARKWAY
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=5'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 150'- 0"
PROPERTY BOUNDARY / ROW
4- WETLAND BOUNDARY
a 1 A �, WETLAND #5-
1A AREA= 1.9.86 ACRE
� p `� 1+00
1-
�� pp��`�`Dp
LIMITS'OF IMPACT
THIS AREA
IMPACTED BY
HOLE #17
PERMANENT
IMPACT #1
AREA= 2.27 AC
10 FT EASEMENT
SOUTHWEST
PORTION OF
WETLAND #5
OTE:
I UAL AREA OF WETLAND
#5 IMPACTED BY CAMDEN
PLANTATION PARKWAY &
HOLE #17 IS 2.27 ACRES.
CAMDEN PLANTATION PARKWAY
Xy
X x
■ PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #1 - CAMDEN PLANTATION PARKWAY
& GOLF HOLE #17 0 150' 300' 450'
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 2.27 ACRES. North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT IMPACT #1
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES
and SOLUTIONS
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
BEACH ROAD
HWY17 ACCESS & GOLF #17 3/11/2019
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #2

HOLE #18: PAR 5, 565 YDS - SLIGHT DOGLEG RIGHT
DESCRIPTION -
TIAL
'MENT
TO FURTHER MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO WETLAND #5, A SMALL PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN CORNER IS PROPOSED FOR IMPACT TO FACILITATE
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEE COMPLEX. THE CART PATH HAS BEEN MOVED TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE MAJORITY OF THE TEE COMPLEX,
DECREASING THE SIZE OF THIS IMPACT. THE CORRIDOR WIDTH IN THE AREA OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WETLAND #5 IS AS NARROW
AS IT CAN BE AND SAFELY PROVIDE FOR THE DIRECTION OF THE SHOTS WITH HOUSING AND WALKING TRAILS LOCATED LEFT AND RIGHT OF
THE LANDING AREA. ADDITIONALLY, A CRITICAL DRAINAGE WAY FLANKS THE RIGHT SIDE OF THIS FAIRWAY.
IF THIS 0.38 ACRE IMPACT WERE NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THIS HOLE, A MUCH MORE ACUTE ANGLE OF THE DOGLEG OF
THE FIRST LANDING AREA WOULD RESULT WITH AN AWKWARDLY POSITIONED LANDING AREA PLACING HOUSING ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
THIS HOLE IN HARM'S WAY.
THIS IMPACT WOULD CLEAR-CUT THE MAJORITY OF THIS AREA TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT THE TEE COMPLEX TO ACHIEVE AN
ADEQUATE ANGLE AND CORRIDOR TO THE LANDING AREA AND TO RECEIVE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SUNLIGHT TO GROW TURF ON THE
TEE COMPLEX. FILL WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TEE COMPLEX.
■ PLAN -PERMANENT IMPACT #2 -GOLF HOLE #18 0 50' 100' 150'
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 0.38 ACRES.
North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPROVEMENT
AND SOLUTIONS
PERMANENT IMPACT #2
GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.BEACH
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
ROAD
GOLF HOLE # 18 3/11 /2019
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #3

CART PATH
`E❑
i
p0
z A- G___'00�_
SWALE
DRAINAGE
PIPING
Q;�)
�_.��00000
FAIRWAI - -
E&IMETER -
PERMANENT
IMPACT #3
AREA= 0.12 AC
WETLAND #5
TOTAL AREA =
19.86 ACRES
(NORTHEAST
CORNER)
HOLE #9: PAR 5, 587 YDS - DOUBLE - DOGLEG RIGHT
DESCRIPTION
0
GOLF COURSE
CENTERLINE
,TO GR�t'�
PROPOSED
LIMIT OF
CLEARING
PROPOSED LIMIT
OF GRADING
VEGETATIVE
SHELF
(10 FT WIDE)
WALKING TRAIL
(WITHING 20'
EASEMENT)
RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
TO FURTHER MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO WETLAND #5 AND THE INTERMITTENT STREAM A CORRIDOR WAS SELECTED TO PLAY OVER THE
INTERMITTENT STREAM WITH AN ANGLE THAT MINIMIZES THE IMPACT TO WETLAND #5. TO ESTABLISH ADEQUATE FAIRWAY WIDTH AND TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE AREA FOR DRAINAGE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FAIRWAY, AN AREA OF 0.12 ACRES IS PROPOSED FOR IMPACT.
THE AREA IMPACTED WOULD ALSO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WIDTH FOR A NORMAL LANDING AREA AS WELL AS CREATING IMPROVED
VISIBILITY.
IF THIS 0.12 ACRE IMPACT WERE NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THIS HOLE, THE LANDING AREA WOULD BE NARROWER THAN
STANDARD CRITERIA, RESULTING IN IMPOSSIBLE SECOND SHOT, FOR TEE SHOTS HIT TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE FAIRWAY. ADDITIONALLY,
WITH THE FLAT TERRAIN AND THE EXTREME PROJECTION OF THIS CORNER OF WETLAND #5 INTO THIS FAIRWAY, IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY
AWKWARD FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TO BE DEVELOPED.
THIS IMPACT WOULD CLEAR-CUT THE ENTIRE AREA. THE CLEAR-CUT AREA WOULD BE GRADED INCLUDING SWALE DEVELOPMENT FOR
DRAINAGE AND 35 PERCENT INCORPORATED INTO THE FAIRWAY. THIS IMPACT WOULD ALSO BE CRITICAL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE TURF ON
A PORTION OF THIS FAIRWAY. AREA CLEARED BUT NOT FILLED WILL BE MAINTAINED AS ROUGH AND MOWED TWICE WEEKLY.
■ PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #3 - GOLF HOLE #9 0 50' 100' 150'
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 0.12 ACRES. (I
North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NEWTON RD
IMPROVEMENT
AND SOLUTIONS
PERMANENT IMPACT #3
GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT
544
SUITE 128
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
ED
GOLF HOLE #9
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
VIRGINIABBEACH, VA 23451
V
3/11/2019
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
PAGE #4

\i
PERMANENT
IMPACT #4
AREA= 0.32 AC
WETLAND #4
TOTAL AREA =
14.10 ACRES
(SOUTHEAST
CORNER)
CART PATH
PROPOSED LIMIT
OF GRADING
PROPOSED LIMIT
OF CLEARING
■
m
HOLE #8: PAR 4,447 YDS - DOGLEG RIGHT
DESCRIPTION:
0
I-]
GOLF COURSE
CENTERLINE
HOLE #8
PAJR AY PERI E
BUI KER 0
I
0
I
- o
BU K
o
/
TO GREE
,
,
BUNKER
INTERMITTENT
STREAM
TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO WETLAND #4 AND THE INTERMITTENT STREAM, A NARROW CORRIDOR WAS SELECTED BETWEEN THE WETLAND
AND THE INTERMITTENT STREAM CREATING AN ACUTE DOGLEG RIGHT. TO MAKE THIS HOLE MORE STRATEGIC AND SAFE 0.32 ACRES OF
THE SOUTHERN CORNER OF WETLAND #4 IS PROPOSED FOR AN IMPACT TO FACILITATE CLEARING FOR VISIBILITY, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
BUNKER COMPLEX AND THE ROUTING OF THE CART PATH.
IF THIS 0.32 ACRE IMPACT WERE NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THIS HOLE, GOLFERS IN THE FAIRWAY (HITTING THEIR SECOND
SHOT) COULD BE IN JEOPARDY OF GOLFERS TEEING OFF. ADDITIONALLY, IF THE LANDING AREA OF THIS HOLE IS NOT WIDENED, IT WOULD
BE CONSIDERED AN AWKWARD, AND UNFAIR HOLE, BECAUSE OF THE NARROW CORRIDOR, RESULTING FROM PRESERVING THE MAJORITY
OF THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF WETLAND #4 AND THE INTERMITTENT STREAM.
THIS IMPACT WOULD CLEAR-CUT THE MAJORITY OF THIS AREA TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO PLACE THE CARTPATH BETWEEN THE FAIRWAY
BUNKERS AND THE NEWLY CREATED EDGE OF THE WETLAND. FILL WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUNKERS.
CLEARING OF THIS IMPACT IS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE TURF. AREA CLEARED BUT NOT FILLED WILL BE MAINTAINED AS ROUGH
AND MOWED TWICE WEEKLY.
■ PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #4 - GOLF HOLE #8 0 50' 100' 150'
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 0.32 ACRES. (I
North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT IMPACT #4
544 NEWTON RD
IMPROVEMENT
AND SOLUTIONS
GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT
SUITE 128
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
BEACH ROAD
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
GOLF HOLE #8 3/11/2019
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
PAGE #5

18
17 TOP OF BANK
16
15
14 ORDIN RY HI H WA ER MARK
O E FOOT ABO E FLOOR
13
12 — —
11
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
■ 5A SECTION - INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL: a"= 1'-0" / HORIZONTAL: 1 "=20'-0"
20
20
2+00 3+00 4+00
■ 513 - PROFILE NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY @ INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 "=2'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=60'-0"
WALK
RIP RAP
OUTFALL
�i
WALK
EP. 3+45.73
5� INTERMITTENT RPW
i
C;
IP RAP INFALL
5B
126 LF 48" DIAMETER
RCP @.24%
TOTAL IMPACT 126 LF
NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY
PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #5 - NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY 0 60' 120' 180' (1
PERMANENT IMPACT: 126 LINEAR FEET INTERMITTENT RPW North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
PROPOSED
GRADE
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
ROADWAY
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
�1
MIN.
GOLF COURSE
3 MI
IMPROVEMENT
3 MIN.
ARCHITECT
16
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
16
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
CULVERT
NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY 3/11/2019
126'-48' RCP a -).24%
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #6
E
ISTING GRAD
12
12
10
10
2+00 3+00 4+00
■ 513 - PROFILE NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY @ INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 "=2'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=60'-0"
WALK
RIP RAP
OUTFALL
�i
WALK
EP. 3+45.73
5� INTERMITTENT RPW
i
C;
IP RAP INFALL
5B
126 LF 48" DIAMETER
RCP @.24%
TOTAL IMPACT 126 LF
NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY
PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #5 - NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY 0 60' 120' 180' (1
PERMANENT IMPACT: 126 LINEAR FEET INTERMITTENT RPW North
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT IMPACT #5
GOLF COURSE
IMPROVEMENT
AND SOLUTIONS
ARCHITECT
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
ASSOCIATES
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
BEACH ROAD
NORTH PLANTATION PARKWAY 3/11/2019
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #6

18
17'
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
kTER MARK
AVE FLOOR
0 10 20 30 40 50
■ 6A - SECTION - INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL: "'=1'-0" / HORIZONTAL: 1"=20'-0"
at]
20
DEVELOPER:
ROADWAY
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
TOP
OF BAN
K
WETLAND STUDIES
1
1
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
2'
MIN.
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
3 MIN.
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
3 MIN.
PAGE #7
16
16
4ORDINARY
CULVERT
132'-48' RCP 0 C.06%
!
EXISTING
12
12
IGH W
ONE FOOT
AB
kTER MARK
AVE FLOOR
0 10 20 30 40 50
■ 6A - SECTION - INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL: "'=1'-0" / HORIZONTAL: 1"=20'-0"
at]
20
10+00 11+00 12+00
GRADE
■ 6B - PROFILE- SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH @ INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
TOTAL I M PACT
132 LF
132 LF
48" DIAMETER
RCP @ 0.06%
Ar
INTERMITTENT
RPW
RIP RAP
5 I N FALL
11.70
/ 6B
RIP RAP OUTFALL
WALK
SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH
PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #6 - SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH 0 60' 120' 180'
PERMANENT IMPACT: 132 LINEAR FEET INTERMITTENT RPW
O
Norm
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ROADWAY
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
PROPOSED GRADE
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
1
1
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
2'
MIN.
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
3 MIN.
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
3 MIN.
PAGE #7
16
16
CULVERT
132'-48' RCP 0 C.06%
!
EXISTING
12
12
10
10
10+00 11+00 12+00
GRADE
■ 6B - PROFILE- SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH @ INTERMITTENT RPW
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 2'-0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
TOTAL I M PACT
132 LF
132 LF
48" DIAMETER
RCP @ 0.06%
Ar
INTERMITTENT
RPW
RIP RAP
5 I N FALL
11.70
/ 6B
RIP RAP OUTFALL
WALK
SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH
PLAN - PERMANENT IMPACT #6 - SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH 0 60' 120' 180'
PERMANENT IMPACT: 132 LINEAR FEET INTERMITTENT RPW
O
Norm
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMANENT IMPACT #6
SOUTH CAROLINA ARCH 3/11/2019
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
AND SOLUTIONS
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
BEACH ROAD
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #7

OUTFALL WEIR
Ig" LAKE -A
�, � �- •� I ., � Imo- _i �
-�I �•.�� .,� . Z. �j . ROAN
ELEV: 144
� o
o /
o 0
o /
o 0 5:1 SLOPE
FARM RDZ �Tb /
-4, SLOPE
JOY LR,h,E�;
'UPSTREA MIPQ'�\
50 LF OF
WATERS Q THF\O\ � 0
STREAM BED EL:$ �\\� TEMPORARY CENTERLINE OF -SWAP E
CHANNEL �/ PARALLEL T-PI§0U'T.HF-RN
(ORDINARY HI H WAT€ , ,\ �` o IMPACT BOUND Y iVVE�T!'9 8
TWO FEET A O E BED)�� �,
4:1 SLOPE
FAIRWAY
PERIMETER \RE�IOVE 18"
CART PATH ULVERT" / ' �� •�/
-FT - �Aj
REMOVE
I /' •,
CULVE / / / , / / � �l\
SOUTHEASTERN
�> •` BOUNDARY CORNER
REMOVE 48
CULVERT
'/' // /' / / / / // � // /ice �� \ / /^� ♦♦ �•
/ F%RM RO�D TO//// / // / /�/� �� 'END OF ♦♦
/ BE RrEM///// /' �/ / /��/ DISTURBANCE ♦♦
X/ ''� . //" / ` ��' �_ ♦` APPROXIMATE
/ // / �/ / / / , i / \ ♦ CENTERLINE
EXCAVATE CHANNEL 50\FEET ♦♦ JOYCE GREEK
REMOVE 1 ' SOUTH OF POINT OF BEGINNING ♦♦ •�
CULVERT
■ PLAN - TEMPORARY IMPACT #1 - JOYCE CREEK 0 20' 40' 60'
TEMPORARY IMPACT: 50 LINEAR FEET PERENNIAL RPW
NOTES: North
1. REMOVE FOUR CULVERTS WHICH DISTRIBUTE RUNOFF TO JOYCE CREEK.
A. 48" DIAMETER, FLOWING SOUTH INTO JOYCE CREEK, PRIMARILY CONVEYANCE UNDER FARM ROAD.
B. 18" DIAMETER FLOWING WEST, SOUTH OF 48" CULVERT, AND A MINOR CONVEYANCE UNDER TRAIL TO SOUTH FROM FARM ROAD.
C. 18" DIAMETER, FLOWING EAST INTO POINT OF BEGINNING OF JOYCE CREEK, A MINOR CONVEYANCE UNDER A TRAIL TO THE NORTH FROM FARM
ROAD. FLOW CONVERGES INTO DITCH NORTH OF INFALL OF 48" CULVERT.
D. 18" DIAMETER, FLOWING EAST, SOUTH OF 48" CULVERT AND A MINOR CONVEYANCE UNDER TRAIL TO SOUTH FROM FARM ROAD.
2. DISTURBANCE TO JOYCE CREEK IS TEMPORARY AND LIMITED TO:
A. REMOVAL OF CULVERTS (FOUR)
B. 48" SHALL BE REMOVED AND SIDE SLOPES GRADED NOT TO IMPACT EXISTING CHANNEL 50' SOUTH OF UPSTREAM LIMIT OF USAGE JURISDICTION.
C.GRADING SHALL NOT OCCUR BELOW CONTOUR TEN, TWO FEET ABOVE BED OF JOYCE CREEK (EL. 8.03)
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY IMPACT #1
JOYCE CREEK 3/11/2019
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
AND SOLUTIONS
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
BEACH ROAD
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
UPPER LIMIT OF WATERS OF THE US PAGE #8

16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
15' 2U' 15'
i III I I �1 ELEV = 11.5 ELEV - 11.5 f r
ELEV = 10.0
RIPRAP
d" THICK CONCRETE FILTER FABRIC
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
A OUTFALL WEIR
9 NTS
LIMIT OF 50'
STREAM BUFFER
/ EXISTI G G DE
Al
GRADING BEGINS
CART PATH
ORDINARY HIGH WATER, TWO FEET ABOVE BED
20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
JOYCE CREEK, STREAM BED= 8.03
■ Tl -A SECTION - JOYCE CREEK AT END OF DISTURBANCE
VERTICAL SCALER" = 1'- 0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "= 20'- 0"
SOUTHEASTERN BOUNDARY CORNER,
ELEVATION: 12.0
EXISTING GRADE (FARM ROAD)
TO BE REMOVED
F
ORDINARY HIGH WATER, TWO FEET ABOVE BED
GRADE
CART PATH Bill
ROUGH
FAIRWAY
BEGINS
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY IMPACT #1
JOYCE CREEK 3/11/2019
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
SOUTHEASTE
N
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
PROP SED E
NO ALTERATION SH4
BEYOND
PAGE #9
BOUN
ARY CORNER
BANKN
ENT 5:
L OCC
JR BEL
POIN
F OF B
LIMIT OF 50'
STREAM BUFFER
/ EXISTI G G DE
Al
GRADING BEGINS
CART PATH
ORDINARY HIGH WATER, TWO FEET ABOVE BED
20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
JOYCE CREEK, STREAM BED= 8.03
■ Tl -A SECTION - JOYCE CREEK AT END OF DISTURBANCE
VERTICAL SCALER" = 1'- 0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "= 20'- 0"
SOUTHEASTERN BOUNDARY CORNER,
ELEVATION: 12.0
EXISTING GRADE (FARM ROAD)
TO BE REMOVED
F
ORDINARY HIGH WATER, TWO FEET ABOVE BED
GRADE
CART PATH Bill
ROUGH
FAIRWAY
BEGINS
SLOPE
)W 10.03
GINNING
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 \�0 110 120 130 140 150 160
48 DIAMETER CULVERT- INVERT =8.03 TO BE REMOVED
■ T1 -B SECTION - FARM ROAD AT 48" DIAMETER CULVERT
VERTICAL SCALE: 4" = l'- 0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0"
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY IMPACT #1
JOYCE CREEK 3/11/2019
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
AND SOLUTIONS
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
BEACH ROAD
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
PROP SED E
NO ALTERATION SH4
BEYOND
PAGE #9
BANKN
ENT 5:
L OCC
JR BEL
POIN
F OF B
SLOPE
)W 10.03
GINNING
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 \�0 110 120 130 140 150 160
48 DIAMETER CULVERT- INVERT =8.03 TO BE REMOVED
■ T1 -B SECTION - FARM ROAD AT 48" DIAMETER CULVERT
VERTICAL SCALE: 4" = l'- 0" / HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0"
GOLF COURSE DESIGN:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
CAMDEN PLANTATION
KEVIN TUCKER
BOYD HOMES
SITE
WETLAND STUDIES
CAMDEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY IMPACT #1
JOYCE CREEK 3/11/2019
GOLF COURSE
ARCHITECT
1601 COUNTRY CLUB PL.
544 NEWTON RD
SUITE 128
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES
800 JUNIPER CRESENT
AND SOLUTIONS
1008 OLD VIRGINIA
BEACH ROAD
COOKEVILLE, TN 38501
23320
CHESAPEAKE, VA 23451
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451
PAGE #9

Legend Totals
Conversion Impact Existing Wetlands: 46.14 acres
0.94 Acres
Permanent Impact
27.96 Acres
Avoided Wetland
17.24 Acres
Proposed Water Feature
37.3 Acres
Avoided Perennial RPW
5,858 Linear Feet
Permanently Impacted Intermittent RPW
4,562 Linear Feet
Proposed Non -Jurisdictional Swale 0 •
Project Boundary
Direction of Flow
Wetland Area2
Wetland Area 4
0
Ns
Wetland Area -31
O
.
U
Y,
T
Wetland Area
I C13 :L
H,
T.T.T..r
Wetland Area 6
—1 -T-T'-
Offsite watershed
0_.
tir--_
0 250 acres +/-
e Ly
Ak
X
Wetland Area I
49
U
A
k,
A
z
4
Offsite watershed
0_.
tir--_
0 250 acres +/-
e Ly
Ak
X
Wetland Area I
49
ow- Ed
Wetland Area Master Plan 0 600 1200 1800
Scale: V = 600'-0"
North
Project Name: Camden Plantation
Permit Application
Date: 06/08/17 Revised: 05/18/18
for Sheet Name: Wetland Area Master
Camden Plantation Proposed Conditions
Sheet Number:
Kevin Tucker Camden County, North Carolina
W100
Golf Course Architect
U
A
k,
ow- Ed
Wetland Area Master Plan 0 600 1200 1800
Scale: V = 600'-0"
North
Project Name: Camden Plantation
Permit Application
Date: 06/08/17 Revised: 05/18/18
for Sheet Name: Wetland Area Master
Camden Plantation Proposed Conditions
Sheet Number:
Kevin Tucker Camden County, North Carolina
W100
Golf Course Architect

Legend Totals
�
Conversion Impact Existing Wetlands. 46.14 acres
w= ,
.44 Acres
Proposed Ponds: 30 acres
Permanent Impact Pro p
33.33 Acres
Avoided Wetland
11.87 Acres
Perennial RPW
5,858 Linear Feet
Intermittent RPW
4,562 Linear Feet
0`
Z"'^X
Wetland Area 3
Fill
ro
', 11 � ;� � ��/ _ .',"� • �� ! ISI
1y I y III` I \ • � C / fj ��� {1 -
n '
O ' Wetland Area 1
Wetland Area 4
Intermittent RPW
1 .�
1:3 C)
000
l , / -� '1.: / 1 •' `} j ~ V tip.- , I `` _ 4 '{IV
Wetland Area 5 ° r``
� ,p, 1 � • I I �O O I-
--
_ �,o
_
Wetland Area
r r LJ hI LJ L=J
l r u
li `'�i•T ". - � I I ��� t� } FI I
Perennial RPW 1
Wetland Area Master Plan 0 500 1000 1500
Scale: 1" = 500'-0"
North
■ ■ Project Name: Camden Plantation
Permit Application Date: 06/08/17
for Sheet Name: Wetland Area Master
Camden Plantation Proposed Conditions
■ ■
Kevin Tucker Camden County, North Carolina Sheet Number:
YY I
Golf Course Architect WIN

Table 8. Proposed Impact Summary
Camden Plantation
March 2019
Impacts Mitigation
Wetland Area
Wetland Type
Impact Area
Proposed Use
Total Wetland
Area Wetland
Avoidance Area
(ac) Jan 2018 vs.
Mar 2019
Converison
Impact -
Impact
PFO:PE(credits)
(acres)
Fill Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation Ratio
Mitigation
Requirement
Percent
Avoided
1
PFO
la
lb
N/A
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1:1
1:1
0.00
0.00
100%
N/A
2
PFO
2a
2b
N/A
4.59
4.59
N/A
0.00
0.00
2:1
1:1
0.00
0.00
100%
N/A
0.00
3
PFO
3a
N/A
2.10
2.10
0.00
2:1
0.00
100%
4
PFO
4a
N/A
14.10
13.72
0.00
2:1
2:1
2:1
2:1
0.00
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.00&
0.00 _
0.00
97%
4b
4c
Golf Course #8
0.32
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
4d
0.00
4e
0.00
2:1
4f
0.00
2:1
4g
0.00
0.00
2:1
5
PFO
5a
Golf Course #17
19.86
17.15
1.57
2:1
3.14
1.40
0.00
0.76
0.24
0.00
860N)
5b
Road ROW
0.70
2:1
5c
N/A
0.00
2:1
5d
Golf Course #18
0.38
0.12
0.00
2:1
2:1
2:1
5e
Golf Course #19
5f
N/A
6
PFO
-I
-
1 2.49
2.49
-
-
-
-
100%
I Totals: 1 46.14 1 43.05 1 0.00 1 3.09 1 - 1 6.18
Table 9. Impacts By Proposed Use
Proposed Use
Impact Type
Fill Impacts (acres)
Golf Course
Avoidance
PFO
2.39
Road ROW
Mitigation
PFO
1
0.70
Total Impacts
Fill Impacts (If)
3.09
Key
Golf Course
Road ROW
Residential
Commercial
Table 10. Impacts By WOUS Type
Total WOUS
Avoidance
Mitigation
WOUS Type
Proposed Use
Fill Impacts (If)
Mitigation
Requirement
Length (If)
length (If)
(credits)
Perennial RPW
5,858
5,858
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Intermittent RPW
1 4,562
4,304
Road Crossings 2
258
N/A
N/A

Table 5. Proposed Impact Summary
Camden Plantation
January 2018
Impacts Mitigation
Wetland Area
Wetland Type
Impact Area
Proposed Use
Total Wetland
Area (ac)
Avoidance Area (ac)
Aug 2017 vs. Jan 2018
Converison
Impact -
PFO•PEM
(acres)
Fill Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Requirement
(credits)
Percent Avoided
1
PFO
la
lb
Golf Course #1
Golf Course #2
3.00
2.33
0.40
0.27
0.00
1:1
1:1
0.40
0.27
78%
0.00
2
PFO
2a
Golf Course #6
4.59
3.70
27.96
0.68
2:1
1.36
0.21
85%
2b
Golf Course #6
0.21
0.00
1:1
3
PFO
3a
Golf Course #6
2.10
1.50
0.60
2:1
1.20
71%
4
PFO
4a
Golf Course #7 & 8
14.10
3.19
5.78
2:1
11.56
23%
4b
Road ROW
0.90
2:1
1.80
4c
Residential
0.00
2:1
0.00
4d
Commercial
4.00
2:1
8.00
0.36
0.10
0.06
4e
Residential
0.18
2:1
4f
Golf Course #9
0.05
2:1
4g
Golf Course #8
0.06
0.00
2:1
5
PFO
5a
Golf Course #9
19.86
4
1.65
2:1
3.30
21%
5b
Road ROW
4.01
2:1
8.02
Sc
Golf Course #18
Residential
2.83
2:1
5.66
1.02
0.04
13.50
5d
0.51
2:1
5e
Residential
0.02
2:1
5f
Commercial
6.75
2:1
6
PFO
-
-
2.49
2.49
-
-
-
-
100%
Totals: 46.14 17.30 0.94 1 27.96 - 56.86
Table 6. Impacts By Proposed Use
Proposed Use
Impact Type
Conversion Impact
ac
Fill Impacts
acres
Golf Course
Fill Impacts
PFO
Mitigation
11.59
Conversion PFO:PEI
0.94
0.00
Road ROW
PFO
Mitigation
4.91
Residential
PFO
0.71
Commerical
PFO
10.75
(credits)
Totals by Type
0.94
27.96
Total Impacts
28.90
N/A
Table 7. Impacts By WOUS Type
Key
Golf Course
Road ROW
Residential
Commercial
Total WOUS Length
Avoidance
Fill Impacts
Mitigation
WOUS Type
(if)
length (If)
Proposed Use
(1f)
Mitigation
Requirement
(credits)
Perennial RPW
5,858
5,858
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Intermittent RPW
4,562
0
VARIOUS
4,562
N/A
N/A

Figure 2. Proposed Impact Summary
Camden Plantation
August 2017
Wetland Area
Wetland Type
Impact Arca
Proposed Use
Total Wetland
Area (ac)
Avoidance Area (ac)
Converison
Impact -
pFO:PEM
(acres)(credits)
Fill Impacts
(acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Requirement
Percent
Avoided
Conversion PFOYEM
la
lb
Golf Course #1
Golf Course #2
Road ROW
Mitigation
0.40
0.27
0.00
1:1
1:1
0.40
0.27
0.00
2
PFO
2a
Golf Course #6
4.59
3.70
0.21
0.68
2:1
1.36
0.21
85%
2b
Golf Course #6
0.00
1:1
3
PFO
3a
Golf Course #6
2.10
1.50
N/A
0.60
2:1
1.20
68%
4
PFO
4a
Golf Course #7 & 8
14.10
1.91
5.78
2:1
11.56
13%
4b
Road ROW
0.90
2:1
1.80
4com
Residential
1.28
2:1
2.56
8.00
0.36
0.10
0.06
4d
4e
Commercial
4.00
2:1
Residential
0.18
2:1
4f
Golf Course #9
0.05
2:1
4g
Golf Course #8
0.06
0.00
2:1
5
PFO
5a
Golf Course #9
19.86
0
1.65
2:1
3.30
0%
5b
Road ROW
4.01
2:1
8.02
Sc
Golf Course #18
2.83
2:1
5.66
1.02
8.22
13.50
5d
5e
5f
Residential
Residential
0.51
2:1
4.11
2:1
Commercial
6.75
2:1
6
PFO
-
-
2.49
2.49
-
-
-
-
100%
Totals: 1 46.14 1 11.93 1 0.94 1 33.33 1 - 1 67.60
Figure 3. Impacts By Proposed Use
Proposed Use
Impact Type
Conversion Impact
ac
Fill Impacts
acres
Golf Course
Fill Impacts
PFO
Mitigation
11.59
Conversion PFOYEM
0.94
0.00
Road ROW
Mitigation
PFO
4.91
Residential
PFO
6.08
Commerical
(credits)
PFO
10.75
5,858
Totals by Type
0.94
33.33
Total Impacts
34.27
Figure 4. Impacts By WOUS Type
Key
Golf Course
Road ROW
Residential
Commercial
Total WOUS
Avoidance
Fill Impacts
Mitigation
WOUS Type
Length (H)
length (If)
Proposed Use
(if)
Mitigation
Requirement
(credits)
Perennial RPW
5,858
5,858
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Intermittent RPW
4,562
0
VARIOUS
4,562
N/A
N/A

Appendix E: Utility Chronology Exhibit

v
a I
t
L Camden P hntatnn P roj�ctLin its
Parcels > 500 acres and Unoccuphd
FEMA 1% AnnualChance Fbod Hazard
N atiDnalW ethnd inventory
SewerLhe
T r
W aterline by dram eter (aches) r r
14 - 1�AFL
,.
12
10
8 y➢ '
< 8
0 2
Kerr Environmental UTILITY INSTALLATION CHRONOLOGY
Services Corp. Camden Plantation M ibs
_ — WYK. Rertlur[cc EfqfKenrHJ I EMi—Grirg
CAMDEN COUNTY,NORTH CAROLEA MARCH 2019 FIGURE 4

Appendix F: Section 408 Information

Camden Plantation - EPA SWMM Modeling
(SIA Results 6-20-2018)
10 -yr S town
Link
Ex.Cond_ CN -4 Fbw
Fbw ReductDn %
CN -4 Fbw
Albwed (cfs)
Pmp.Cond�:bns
Fbw(cfs)
E101 -E003
110.01
3.42
1062
70.86 ok
E202 -E201
75.36
3.42
72.8
69.45 ok
E302 -E301
1023
3.42
9.9
7.89 ok
E402 -E401
12.95
3.42
12.5
10.88 ok
TOtalFbw ID
D ism alSwap Canal
98.54
3.42
952
8822 ok
100--rrStonn
Lick
Ex.Cond_ CN -4 Fbw
Fbw ReductDn %
CN -4 Fbw
Albwed (cfs)
Pmp.Cond�:bns
Fbw (cfs)
E101 -E003
2492
1.93
244A
141.72 ok
E202 -E201
198.75
1.93
194.9
146.04 ok
E302 -E301
1921
1.93
18.8
24.46 ***
E402 -E401
55.44
1.93
54A
29.75 ok
TOtalFbw ID
D ism alSwap Canal
273 A
1.93
2681
20025 ok
Joyce C reek
S outhei in C onnect hn to D S C
M ildb C onnect hn to D S C
N orthern C onnectiDn to D S C
Joyce C reek
S outhei in C onnect hn to D S C
M -bdb C onnect hn to D S C
N orthern C onnectiDn to D S C
Outfall Conditions
Node TailaaterEbv
Keeter Barn Rd 8
201 8.42
301 8.42
401 9.55
Outfall Conditions
Node TailaaterEbv
Keeter Barn Rd 8.7
201 9.63
301 9.63
401 9.63
*** S light%cmase n fbw atm ildb connection to D ism alS w am p C anal 0 SC) is m idgated by reduced fbw s h otherconnectbns . Totalfbw ti> D SC is reduced.

Camden Plantation - EPA SWMM Modeling
(SIA Results 6-20-2015)

From:
Mark McElroy
To:
"joycecreekCfyahoo.com"
Subject:
Camden Plantation
Date:
Wednesday, March 6, 2019 11:05:00 AM
Attachments:
JCWC Sponsor Statement to ACOE.JPG
20170420 1-11 Vicinity_pdf
Importance:
High
Mr. Albertson,
Thanks for taking my call this morning. As discussed, I represent Boyd Homes that is planning the
Camden Plantation community at Rt. 17 and McPherson Rd. in northern Camden County. I am
contacting you regarding the requirement by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 408
regulations that the potentially affected Civil Works Project "project sponsor' has to provide a
statement of no objection for the proposed project. The potentially affected Civil Works Project
here is Joyce Creek. The upstream limit of this Civil Works Project is located at Rt. 1233/Culpepper
Road, which is approximately 1/2 -mile downstream of the south east corner of the Camden
Plantation project.
For your convenience, I have attached a copy of the letter that you provided for the Mill Run
Subdivision in 2017. We need a similar letter specific to the Camden Plantation project. I have also
provided a location map for Camden Plantation.
We are in the middle of the permitting process and would appreciate your prompt attention to the
request. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Respectfully,
Mark McElroy I Manager - Environmental Services, Tidewater Regional Office
Kerr Environmental Services Corp., now part of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc.
1008 Old Virginia Beach Road, Suite 200 1 Virginia Beach, VA 23451
Office: 757-963-10108bile: 757-506-IBIR: 757-963-8322
[e-mail]�-ww.kerrenv.cofnaww.wetlands.com

LICK RUIN, VA.
Condition of Improvement, June 30, 1974
Acts Work authorized Documents
Section 205
,lune 30, 1948
As Amended
Present project
Detailed Project
Report, approved
May 24, 1967
PROJECT: Authorized May 24, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control
Act, as amended, and provides for excavating and paving a channel
with 30 -foot -bottom -width, vertical sides, and depth of 10 feet, along
Lick Run, from storm -sewer outlet in city of Roanoke downstream for a
distance of 6,000 feet to the confluence with Tinker Creek.
PROGRESS: Project completed June 1972.
COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $958,655 Federal; $285,000 contributed.
JOYCE CREEK, N. C.
Condition of Improvement, September 30, 1990
Acts Work authorized Documents
Section 205
June 30, 1948
As Amended
Present project
Detailed Project
Report, approved
March 29, 1957
PROJECT: Authorized March 29, 1967, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood
Control Act, as amended, and provides for excavated channel improvements
beginning at the mouth of Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C., and extend-
ing upstream along Joyce Creek and Mill Run to County Road 1232, and along
Cypress Run to County Road 1233, a total distance of 9.5 miles, with
bottom widths ranging from 10 feet to 40 feet.
PROGRESS: A construction contract was awarded September 23, 1982 and was
completed on October 28, 1983.
COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $384,259 Federal; $105,243 Non -Federal.
75g

L:UKVb Ur tNUINttKZ) U,7. APC N1
LEESVILLE
LAKE
LEESVILLE . VIRGINIA
1000 0 7000 FT
LICK RUN, VIRGINIA
LEESVILLE , VIRGINIA, &
JOYCE CREEK
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALES AS SHOWN
CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON, N.C.
MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 1981

Appendix G: Cultural Resource Assessment Report

Circa— Cultural Resource Management, L.L. C.
453 McLaws Circle, Suite 3
Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
[phone]
Management Summary
Camden Plantation
600 Acres
South Mills, North Carolina
November 7, 2018
Introduction
In September 2018, Circa— Cultural Resource Management, L.L.C. (Circa) conducted a
walkover of the approximately 600 -acre Camden Plantation located just south of the Virginia
border in South Mills, North Carolina (Figure 1). The development is Camden County's first
ever, premier master -planned community with homes to meet the needs and desires of most,
ranging from apartments to townhomes to smaller carriage -style homes, and larger manor -style
homes with an 18 -hole golf course that features a continuous -course cart path system and a full-
service practice fairway. The project area is bordered by Route 17 to the west, rural residential
land to the north, south, and east, and to the north by McPherson Road. Carol D. Tyrer, Principal
Investigator, completed the walkover. Dawn M. Muir, Architectural Historian and Historian,
completed the historic research and graphics.
A,a
�w
WA )7 '
:s$
Y
5 1
Figure 1. Approximate project location, South Mills and Lake Drummond Southeast USGS
quads.
1

Environmental Background
The primary reasons for incorporating environmental studies into archaeological projects are: to
learn of possible environmental constraints or lack of constraints; to determine the presence or
absence of critical resources that might have influenced site distribution, etc.; and to discover
environmental factors—erosion, deposition, subsidence, and historic land use patterns—that
might influence the integrity of archaeological sites once they have formed. Keeping these
objectives in mind, a brief environmental summary of the project area is provided below.
The project area is located in the tidewater region on the Coastal Plain of North Carolina and is
comprised of two agricultural fields and forested areas just to the east of the Dismal Swamp
Welcome Center, in northeastern Camden County, North Carolina. Numerous man-made ditches
placed roughly west to east and north to south help aid in the drainage of the land. However,
even with the ditches, portions of the project area are still heavily ponded during rain episodes.
Elevations across the tract range from 17 feet to 13 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). No
streams or rivers are located within the tract. The project site can be accessed by Route 17 and
McPherson Road.
Aerial photos from 1990 to the present show little change within the project area during the last
27 years (Figures 2 - 8).
Figure 2. 1990 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
2

�_ 1R -r
-id
Figure 3. 1993 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
Figure 4. 1998 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
3

pY
Google Earth
s -
'E
`r •
•.I jI
/ 1
• \{
Figure 5. 2004 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
Figure 6. 2008 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
4

Figure 7. 2014 aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
Figure 8. Current (2018) aerial view of project area, from Google Earth.
5

Soils
At least seven different soil types and soil type variants exist within the project area (Natural
Resources Conservation Service [NRCS] 2018). These include Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0%
to 2% slopes; Roanoke silt loam, 0% to 2% slopes; Perquimans silt loam, 0% to 2% slopes;
Portsmouth fine sandy loam, 0% to 2% slopes; Nimmo sandy loam, 0% to 2% slopes; Augusta
fine sandy loam, 0% to 2% slopes; Udorthents, loamy (Figure 9 and Table 1). Each of these
types and variants are described below including references to drainage, hunting and gathering
potential, and horticultural and agricultural productivity potential. Further, conclusions
regarding the suitability of each for historic and Native American occupation and archaeological
site probability are also explained.
Soils maps and associated data provide an analysis of soil types within a geographic area.
Despite comprehensive and detailed coverage of most areas by soils surveyors, researchers often
miss microenvironments due to their small footprints. Unfortunately, resource rich
microenvironments were often common sites of cultural activity. As such, this analysis of
archaeological potential is a "best -guess" using the best available data.
Well -drained, agriculturally- and horticulturally -productive soils proximal to transportation
corridors were the best choices for historic period occupation. Secondary areas, such as those
containing wet soils and acid soils, after improvement such as drainage and liming may have also
been suitable choices for historic occupation. No navigable waterways exist within the project
area; thus, water travel is not a factor in the site probability analysis of this tract.
Areas of wet soils may have been attractive to Native American cultures. In these areas, edible
herbaceous plant species may have been gathered and faunal species browsing these areas may
have been hunted with success. Well -drained soils proximal to these resource -rich areas may
have made adequate hunting and gathering campsites where the hunted and gathered resources
were processed. These sites would have left an observable archaeological footprint. Little
archaeological evidence would be located within the wet areas, the immediate locale of resource
procurement.
Areas containing gravelly soils may have been especially attractive to stone tool -manufacturing
Native American cultures, but the level of attraction may have depended on the type and quality
of the gravels available in these locations. Well -drained soils proximal to quarry -able, gravel -
rich areas would have made adequate lithic material procurement campsites but in this case,
archaeological materials may be located at both the campsites and the quarry sites.
Table 1. Soils Identified Within the Proiect Area Boundaries.
Soil
Soil Name
Acres
Location
Percentage
Symbol
Within the
Within the
Within the
Project
Project Area
Project Area
AreML
ToA
Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0% to
276.90
Northern
46.00%
2% slopes
Central
RoA
Roanoke silt loam 0% to 2%
149.40
Southern
24.80%
slopes
11

Soil
Soil Name
Acres
Location
Percentage
Symbol
Within the
Within the
Within the
Project
Project Area
Project Area
A
Area
PeA
Perquimans silt loam, 0% to 2%
121.20
Central
20.10%
slopes
PtA
Portsmouth fine sandy loam, 0%
26.50
Western
4.40%
to 2% slopes
NoA
Nimmo sandy loam, 0% to 2%
20.60
Northern
3.40%
slopes
k.bs��:i4mrvrrrm.rced rFv.�v�r.n
R N �
Naxt�nlw NwNF� �aw �rtF Nr[�rr. .. rM1N+�
AtA
Augusta fine sandy loam, 0% to
6.40
Northern
1.10%
2% slopes
Ud
Udorthents, loamy
0.50
Northwestern
0.10%
iS.$
R
RSP i.Mr (.. t' He41C.0—
�Lrndn� Pp�py
-
R
R
'
A
1 •
f'
k.bs��:i4mrvrrrm.rced rFv.�v�r.n
R N �
Naxt�nlw NwNF� �aw �rtF Nr[�rr. .. rM1N+�
y ■wrr iWare« YWOCW S.�.+.
CprwvMbn tnr4e. RYRpW CmP.raRw Se15.n�y
ts�
aw 1 d]
Pd:
Figure 9. Project area soil map, from NRCS website.
7

Soils Identified Within the Project Area
Tomotley Soil (ToA)
Tomotley soil is a very -deep, poorly -drained, moderately- to moderately -slowly -permeable soil
formed in loamy marine and fluvial sediments found on terraces of the Coastal Plain (MRCS
2018). The solum thickness ranges from 30 inches to over 60 inches and depth to bedrock is
over 60 inches in this extremely acid to moderately acid soil. The content of rounded pebbled
ranges from 0% to 5% throughout the solum and some pedons have a few concentrations of
ironstone. This soil features a slow surface runoff. Mostly cultivated, this soil can support corn,
soybeans, small grains, truck crops, and pasture when drained. Where wooded, the soil can
support loblolly pine, willow oak, yellow poplar, red maple, water tupelo, sweet gum, black
gum, and water oak. Understory species include inkberry, large gall berry, southern bayberry,
switch cane, blueberry, sweet bay, and American holly.
Roanoke Soil (RoA)
Roanoke soil is a very -deep, poorly -drained, slowly- to very -slowly -permeable soil formed in
clayey fluvial sediments found on the southern piedmont and the upper and middle coastal plain
in Virginia and North Carolina (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness ranges from 40 inches to 60
inches with a depth to bedrock greater than 60 inches. This soil is extremely acid in the solum
unless limed and features a very slow surface runoff. This soil is mostly wooded. Some areas
are cultivated and can support corn, soybeans, small grain and pasture. Where wooded this soil
can support red maple, sweet gum, black gum, sycamore, willow oak, white oak, river birch,
yellow poplar, bald cypress, water tupelo, and scattered loblolly pine.
Perquimans Soil (PeA)
Perquimans soil is a very -deep, poorly -drained, moderately -slowly -permeable soil formed in
loamy marine sediments found in the Coastal Plain (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness ranges from
30 inches to greater than 60 inches with a depth to bedrock of greater than 60 inches. The water
table is seasonally high and ranges from 0 inches to 12 inches from November to April. This
very -strongly -acid soil features a very slow surface runoff. This soil is mostly cultivated and
where cultivated can support corn, soybeans, wheat, cucumbers, cabbage, potatoes, and pasture.
Where wooded, this soil can support loblolly pine, sweet gum, water oak, willow oak, green ash,
black gum, red maple, yellow poplar, sweet bay, inkberry, large gall berry, greenbrier, giant cane
and southern bayberry.
Portsmouth Soil (PtA)
Portsmouth soil is a very -deep, very -poorly -drained, moderately- to rapidly -permeable soil
formed in loamy marine sediments located on the Coastal Plain (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness
ranges from 20 inches to 40 inches with a depth to bedrock greater than 60 inches. This soil has
a seasonally high-water table that ranges from 0 inches to 12 inches from November to May.
The soil ranges from extremely acid to strongly acid unless the surface has been limed and
features a very slow to ponded surface runoff. These soils are mostly wooded. Where
cultivated, this soil can support corn, oats, soybeans, small grain, truck crops, and pasture.
Where wooded, this soil can support loblolly pine, red maple, sweet gum, water oak, willow oak,
sweet bay, red bay, bayberry, gall berry, reeds, and greenbrier.
E3

Nimmo Soil (NoA)
Nimmo soil a very -deep, poorly -drained, moderately -permeable soil with a slow surface runoff
that formed in loamy and sandy marine and fluvial sediments on marine terraces of the Coastal
Plain (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness is 25 inches to 45 inches and depth to bedrock is over 60
inches in the extremely acid to strongly acid soil. This soil is mostly cultivated and can support
corn, soybeans, small grains, truck crops, and pasture. Where wooded, the soil can support
loblolly pine, willow oak, yellow poplar, red maple, water tupelo, sweet gum, black gum, and
water oak. Understory species include inkberry, large gall berry, and southern bayberry.
Augusta Soil (AtA)
Augusta soils are very -deep, somewhat -poorly -drained, moderately -permeable soils formed in
loamy alluvial sediments and located in the stream terraces of the Southern Piedmont and Upper
Coastal Plain (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness ranges from 40 inches to 80 inches with a depth to
bedrock greater than 60 inches. This soil has a seasonally high-water table between 12 inches
and 24 inches from December to May. This soil is very strongly acid to moderately acid except
where limed and features a slow surface runoff. This soil is mostly cultivated. Where cultivated,
this soil supports corn, oats, soybeans, small grain, and pasture. Where wooded this soil supports
white oak, red oak, post oak, loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, hickory, red maple, sweet gum, elm,
American holly, flowering dogwood, sassafras, greenbrier, giant cane, and inkberry.
Udorthents (Ud)
Udorthents soils are generally -flat, level soils that are disturbed as a result of a combination of
materials excavated from borrow pits, soil cuts, and original soil remnants (MRCS 2018). These
soils tend to be dense and moderately to slowly permeable in their uppermost levels and can
support lawns, gardens, and landscaping, though they are sometimes contaminated by various
toxic materials.
Previous Research
Circa— performed an archival search for the project area using the North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology records on September 2, 2018. This research was completed to determine if
historic resources exist within the project area boundaries. The search identified two
archaeological resources and no architectural resources within a one -mile radius of the project
area boundaries. Table 2 lists all of the resources within one mile of the project area boundaries.
Figure 10 shows the approximate project area boundaries and resources within close proximity.
Of the resources identified, no archaeological resources and no architectural resource were
identified within the project area. Although there is no site number, the Great Dismal Swamp
Canal is located to the west on the opposite side of Route 17 from the project area.
Table 2. Resources Within a One -Mile Radius of Proiect Area Boundaries.
Survey Number Date of resource I Description of resource I S rmation I Recommendation
Archaeological Resources
31CM12
Unknown
Indeterminate site
Site recorded
None made
12/12/78
31 CM70
Historic
Location of the stone Culpeper
Phase I survey
Recommended
Lock at the Great Dismal
2/24/10
further work if site
Swamp canal that was removed
will be impacted
during the "Great Enlargement"
2/24/10
of 1896-1899
E]

LAs Crum no rd
S
i
Lynch. Cwrwr Soukh �,v '•L �`�•`
Figure 10. Map showing previously -identified resources within a one -mile radius of project area
boundaries.
The historic maps show the project area within the swamplands at the headwaters of Joy's or
Joyce Creek. Maps of the area drawn during the 19th and 20th century show no development
around the project tract (Figures 11 — 16). No development is noted within the project area at
any time. Major towns appear around the project area as early the 1861, particularly the town of
South Mills to the south.
Figure 11. Detail of Colton's new topographical map of the eastern portion of the State of North
Carolina with part of Virginia & South Carolina from the latest & best authorities. J. H. Colton,
1861.
10
�1
•M1
1 m"R
proal, ate
� A•kL
'
G,uq
Ui
•r
,tk,H611a`
ViLL
.
y
i
ILi
`
•.
�..
x,,�
L
I •1
�,cx k
FIT
Figure 11. Detail of Colton's new topographical map of the eastern portion of the State of North
Carolina with part of Virginia & South Carolina from the latest & best authorities. J. H. Colton,
1861.
10

11irkary Groluld
NAV
wINTE OAj(SPRING Ca N`
11op 1,
Me
APPI(oximate
Projectillocation
fh
al
Figure 12. Detail of Eastern portion of the Military Department of North Carolina. United
States. Army Corps of Engineers, 1862.
Figure 13. Detail of Maps showing the Norfolk, Albermarle & Atlantic Railroad and its
connections. G.W. & C.B. Colton & Co., 1891.
11

PON--OPa Mi,
O[ff► ML
511
Sharon
a u
� I �
Lilly
1
pp\roximate
oject location
C/o
not to scale
Figure 14. Detail of 1940 South Mills quad.
projectlocation
Sharon '"_``�
'Lilly �y
FAR ,
Tar
Corner
L -P
t to scale
Figure 15. Detail of 1952 South Mills quad.
12

'ATES
'HE INTERIOR
SURVEY
:17.31 E 1 wna, .'crow r3
P
1
STATE PARK �4
..1
S
STATE OF NORD
DEPARTMENT OF NATO
AND COMMUNITY L
RALEIGH. NORTH
20' R SF r&I DB2 1ipRs adUMId�oI
tn4 —
)y 1
CI'M
projectlocation
r v
1 BM
,on 1 u
Map not to scale
Figure 16. Detail of 1982 South Mills quad.
Results and Summary
This study was conducted to provide information on the current condition of the property, as well
as to assess the potential for the presence of archaeological or architectural resources within the
project area. Fieldwork was completed in September 2018 and included a pedestrian walkover
of the tract to identify any obvious archaeological or architectural resources and the
archaeological site potential of various landforms.
The project area is located on level flats with multiple drainage ditches to aid in the conversion
of the landform from wetlands to agricultural fields in the early 201h century. The area is
currently either forested or overgrown, abandoned fields. All open, exposed areas were
inspected for the presence of artifacts and signs of cultural features. Circa— walked the tract at
150 -foot intervals and the ground visibility was roughly 10% to 30% visible. A few modern
oilcans and plastic water bottles were noted just to the east of Route 17. No other artifacts were
noted during the walkover. In addition, judgmental shovel tests were excavated to sample the
stratigraphy of the landforms. Sixteen judgmental shovel tests revealed one soil stratum above a
sterile subsoil (Figure 17). In the agricultural fields, Stratum A ranged from approximately 0.87
feet to 0.96 feet thick and consisted of a medium grayish brown (7.5Y 2/2) sandy loam
plowzone. Subsoil consisted of a saturated reddish brown (2.5YR 2/6) compact clay (Figure
18). In the forested areas, Stratum A ranged from approximately 0.65 feet to 0.78 feet thick and
consisted of a medium grayish brown (7.5Y 2/2) sandy loam relic plowzone. Subsoil consisted
of a saturated reddish brown (2.5YR 2/6) compact clay. It appeared that the forested areas were
timbered at some time in the past. No artifacts were recovered from the shovel tests. Plates 1
through 27 in the attachments illustrate the current conditions of the project area.
13

Figure 17. Map showing shovel test locations.
ST 3
v'
A
S'
B is
A = MeeOlnl g laylsh brown V.5Y
22 5DWY WM plow7Anc
n = Si hsrvl - Saluraled reddish
dawn (2. WR ZQ) �arrruacl clay
ST 11
0
A s
A- Medium greyish blown f75Y Z2
adridy kxmI plowww
B - S165a1I - 5akvat[ d reddish brawn
12 5Y 216 rnmparl+lay
ST 6
o'
A 5.
13 1.0'
A- Madium gray+stl brown {7..SY
2+2 serWy lawn parweui%
B _ $LDW1-Snturaled re"h
brown fa.SYv 2+131 cumpact Lay
ST 15
o•
A g
T.a
A- Medium nraw9h hrrnun {7.5Y X
ge" loam pOW W
9 - Wmil - S$aaaled r2ddl Sh
brown (LSYii M) wwpucl clay
Figure 18. Representative shovel test profiles.
14

A review of historic maps and soil surveys indicate that the project tract is comprised of
previously -converted hydric soils and wetlands with the excavation of the drainage ditches in the
early 20th century. The project area is part of an extensive flat in this area that consists of hydric
soils, drained to convert the land into agricultural production. Even with the addition of the
drainage ditches, Circa— noted that some of the project area was still in decline from the moisture
retained in the soil and ponded on the ground surface during the initial and later site visit.
Conclusion
Given the project area's location on ditched, low, previously -hydric soils on level flats, and the
distance from dry soils and water, the possibility of finding Native American resources on the
project area is considered low. Most of the previously -identified Native American resources in
the vicinity in both North Carolina and Virginia were found on elevated, dry soils adjacent to or
along perennial stream channels.
Given the project area's location on ditched, low, previously -hydric soils on level flats, and the
distance from water and dry soils, the possibility of finding historic resources is considered
low. The previously -identified historic resources in the vicinity in both North Carolina and
Virginia were found on dry soils adjacent to or along perennial stream channels and/or early
transportation routes.
The historic map research, the walkover, and limited shovel testing did not record any resources
within the project tract. These results are similar to the previous surveys located nearby in
Virginia on similar, historically -drained hydric soils. No further archaeological work is
recommended.
15

7�
5
27 26
10
16
W
Photo location
/// _
ti
.
19
*
23
20
. arU
21
��`• 1
22
i
�17
14
t� 15
15 13
L`
7�
5
4
10
16
W
Photo location
/// _
Google Earth
'C

Project Area Photographs
Plate 1. View of drainage ditch within the Project Area, looking southeast.
Va'
ti., •'� eYL ••r• n�#�aJ�iF '.VltSir'r r�w�4itira. v t r. 4�R.,�� �1�$I�t�. F- i A�� F �M �M.se.- .�iu�w5 _ 4i1i9`a'E'i'i
Plate 2. View of overgrown field within the Project Area, looking east.
17

Plate 3. View of overgrown field within the Project Area, looking east.
Plate 4. View of overgrown field within the Project Area, looking southwest.
I:3

1

tt �
� ; J �` - ' ` �� if •�, \
Y
� � yyam�.. 'y' � j_ Z ,�_i•'l`f�.�iFi-�iYi:�`yy"�y-�� ����"-3"' 'K
t.!
A-bi.�lN` .-

�M

��' r .kms; ,• YI. r. � I•t u 6 f � �k'»
l• ii -4. �: } ` I
�I Digi
+ 9 i

vi

r

0

IN
4 �
9 _
41.

lu A

11 -;�
Plate 25. View of agricultural field within the Project Area and housing along the edges, looking
north.
Plate 26. View of planted pines within the Project Area, looking west.
29

h+-5
+.4`�'�
�_ a .^1A
�.'''d\EY.��£8� }�'� ,ate.
..