510032_Inspection_20190219

Division of Water Resources
k'aciliq Number � 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O'Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: OfRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other
0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ; County: Vo Region: R Q
Farm Name: F, drr 4p Westbrook- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Rck, P_ l est broo k Phone:
Mailing Address: '1 ,��rr Nnn r II__''
Physical Address: _plc3&10 IT 'z0 fi'AP_ f�/X--, rl7ur L9a s L
Facility Contact: V(fjj J M 11'�he(I( Title: Coo'�rjt I Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: odA,bolo
Certified Operator:(/1d O P. I VP3f k Certification Number: 117 M
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish @BZ0 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry CaDacitv Pon. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets I 113eef'BroodCow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Imaacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �SfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—] Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes tZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes OLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No CNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24-Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [,'� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�(c— EI�/iag� I1Qf Sv Cit3�t CO��lo�i hOwf Iof roll"
Q- SI J� ►n, rcgrC�1�A h >�`F►va �,it{1�, a4d Sid- al i 1 I9, r�id� iY rd/f<<r7
soyl1 QQy Chk ai'jcj( ufl 1n�Spp jo�1 �� U ) , ►✓� �Q�eiwak chP�kal,� SVs)d syV �l
�{ Iii1 2 GI10115 - IRS
a1 - 5otlsott4le I)IIgg si lyQ)o, LIMene4i YJsdlA ®,7T/ocicor4?k
W � d`ys Woo 37gy-sip
to-ao 18
I�-ao-Is WC�o0fi�7 �
$�3 Wtn 6372
q-('riS
-is wo03905-
IBo f:eeLU)jr d ue, � ecrly Marti l w+(esf ead- we+tly) Hole rtrl a�piodt,i cgpy ch�k�t>r a l ablaa q,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: v/oge, 361ii'ple Phone: q)Q NI—y113�
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: beb iQ. oiq
Page 3 of 3 21412015