20050064 Ver 1_401 Application_20050112

~^
~ ` llun-~
• ~ T' ~1 V
Berewick Town Center~y ~ ~
~~ ~ Q
Charlotte, North Carolina ~~ ~
r
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
~ ~
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE ' ~ ' ~~
SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE t t~ ~" ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 -~ "
~;, ~ ~
Prepared For:
Mr. Charles Teal
Dixie River Land Company
4201 Congress Street, Suite 465
Charlotte, NC 28209
Pt~epared By:
LandBesign, Inc.
223 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-0325
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]
05QtT64
*Subject to verification by the USACE and NCDWQ
Date :1/2005

~, ,

Office Use Only: Form version May 2002
p500fi4
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particulaz item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
~ Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is
not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II, Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name:_ Mr Charles Teal
Mailing Address: Dixie River Land Company
4201 Congress Street- Suite 465
Chazlotte NC 28209
Telephone Number: 704-716-3900
E-mail Address:
2. AgentlConsultant information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must
be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Leonard S Rindner, PWS -Environmental Planning Consultant
Mailing Address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews NC 28105
Telephone Number:, 704-904-2277 _ F~ Number: 704847-0185
&mail Address: rindner~a cazolina.rr com
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Berewick TownCenter,
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NGDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
Gounty: Mecklenburg County Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
see attached location map
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):35 1694 N 80 9784W -Charlotte West Quad(Note
- If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each
crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): +/- 330 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Tributaries of Lake Wylie
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http~//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:, former agricultural land and wooded areas;
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Mixed use commercial business and residential business center. Protect includes mass
~radina to establish urban villaue.
Page 2 of 9

Explain the purpose of the proposed wark:Development of urban village and park area. The
project is according to the Cit~of Charlotte Dixie-Berryhill Land Use Plan.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations andlor permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including ail prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules.
Berewick TownCenter is a proposed commercial, business, and residential village that is part of
the City of Chazlotte's Dixie-Berryhill Land Use Plan. The site and project is closely related to
growth patterns and completion of a large segment of I-485 and the airport expansion. Project
development and environmental planning has been carefully developed with the City of
Chazlotte. Wetland delineation the wetland delineation was verified by the USACE (Steve
Chapin) with additional verification conducted by Amanda Jones. Meetings were held with the
USACE and the NCDENR on March 16, March 23, April 16, May 18 to review the development
of the proposed project. A meeting was held with Mike Parker of NCDENR-MRO on June 22,
2004 to review mitigation requirements for proposed stream impacts. See attached memos and
supportive documentation. Other permits that have been issued in the vicinity of this project
include Berewick Commons Parkway (200330597-DWQ03-0243), Dixie River Road
(200231321 DWQ02-1410).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Additional Hermits are not anticipated -however if required. they will be applied for
~Qropriately --
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly far wetland or stream
Page 3 of 9

mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section 'V'III below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:_ Impacts to streams to dev_elo>7
urban commercial and residential azeas and pazk area. Impacts are primarily limited
unimportant intermittent streams These streams were also verified as not requiring;
mitigation per a meeting with Mike Pazker on 6/22/04.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below: NA
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream.
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
# i NWP #39 +0.02 no < 150 feet PSS1A !!

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts mctuae, but are nor um~tea to: mecnamzeu c~eanng, gruuing, ~~~~,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both strncture and flooding.
** 100-Yeaz floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httb://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (detemvnation of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 3.5 Acres
Total azea of wetland impact proposed: 0.02 Acres
In~l;v;rlti,ally lief all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream linpact
Site Number
(indicate on )
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im act Perennial or
Intermittent?
leases ci )
1 NWP#39 115 if UT +6' Per.
2 NWP #39 2301E UT +4' Int###
3 NWP #39 834 If UT +5' Int###

#### -Verified by Amanda Jones of USACE an March 16, 2004 and Mike Parker of NCDWQ on June 22, 2004.
* List each impact separately and idemify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net toss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Page 4 of 9

** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the U5GS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toaozone.com.
www.maaauest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,179'
_ +/-115 linear feet to perennial streams
- +/ 1 064 dinear feet to intermittent (unimportant streams)
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
~Pa~
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba ,ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts tncmae, vu~ arc nun -.«~,« ~~. ,.,_, ..~...~.a•~==, ....,..g==~~,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation -
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): _ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): .
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Berewick TownCenter is a proposed commercial business and residential vilialze that is part of
the City of Charlotte's Dixie-Berryhill Land Use Plan The site and proiect is closeiv related to
Page 5 of 9

growth patterns and completion of a large sep,~nent of I-485 and the aimort exuansion. Proiect
development and environmental planning, has been cazefullv developed vv~th the City of
Charlotte. Meetings were held with the USACE and the NCDENR on March 16, March 23, Apnl
16, Mav 18 to review the development schematics of the proposed protect. Previous plans_and
The-solution avoids streams within impracticable "canyons" of +/- 40 foot retaining walls. An
existing development was used as an example of this solution The proposed plan creates a
si~uficant park azea associated with a preserved perennial stream The width of the park area is
estimated to be greater that 300 feet wide The plan was designed to avoid the perennial stream
. .,-_-- ,_..__.__:~..a ~,. i,... ...~o...,,,++d„+ oMa~m t2nth the TTCAf:F. and
_NCDENR supported to prop_osed_,plan based on the meeting on Mav 18"'. A meeting was later
held with Mike Pazker of NCDENR MRO on June 22 2004 to review mitigation reauuements
for proposed stream impacts See attached memos and supportive documentatton.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - Ixi accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but aze not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http•//h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/lineaz feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc,), and a
Page 6 of 9

description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The perennial streams and laz a bottomland hardwood wetlands are preserved within locally
reauired SWIM buffers and within a park area as depicted on the attached pian. The project
is subiect to strictly enforced stormwater management treatment requirements. The proposed
project avoids and minimizes impacts to perennial streams.
1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Cazolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o enr state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information: NA
Amount of stream mitigation requested (lineaz feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) NA
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ^ No X
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) NA
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project, The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not iixipacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9

Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Taz-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Huffer Requirements), or other (please identify ~~
Yes ^ No ^ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
( uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of cnannei; gone L extends an
additiona120 feet $~om the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The Stormwater Management Plan has .been developed with the input of the NCDENR -
Wetlands Unit. Ms. Cyndi Karoly has participated in the development of the plan and the
regiorernents as stated below.
The City of Charlotte Engineering and Property Division have endorsed a Stormwater Water
Management Concept Plan for Berewick. This plan will provide review/approvals of all final
plans and specifications far construction of Stormwater. management facilities. Any change to the
Stormwater Master Plan Concept must be submitted to and approved in writing by the Division
of Water Quality.
All development in Berewick as defined on the approved conditional zoning plan shall meet the
requirements of the Lower Lake Wylie Watershed Protection Overlay District. (Total Berewick
land area = 745.88 acres). In addition to removal of 85% TSS from runoff for all azeas having
greater than 20% impervious in the Critical Area and 24% in the Protected Area, a minimum of
95% of ali impervious cover in Berewick, irrespective of the impervious cover within any
individual development "pod", shall also have a minimum of 85% TSS removal. 85% TSS
removal shall be achieved by the use of Stormwater management practices designed according to
the latest version o9f the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. For the
aggregate total of the maximum "allowable impervious cover" in Berewick, no more than 21.5
Page S of 9

acres of impervious cover within the proposed low density development areas may be permitted
without BMP's sufficient to provide 85%TSS removal. Any specific area of Berewick proposed
to be developed at less than 20% impervious in the Critical Area or 24% in the Protected Area,
where 85% removal is not provided for all impervious cover, shall as a minimum provide
velocity dissipation by dispersion of stormwater with non-erosive velocities at the boundary of
the SWIM buffers. A tabulation of impervious cover in Berewick shall be submitted with every
request for individual development "pod" or sub-area of development, clearly indicating the
amount of impervious cover proposed within the specific project and the cumulative impervious
cover for all of Berewick incuding a breakdown of the impervious area receiving less than 85%
TSS removal;
An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive
velocities through the protected stream buffers.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DV~Q)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal System -Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules`?
Yes ^ No X
Isthis anafter-the-fact permit application?
yes ^ No X
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Timin is critical based on contractual relationships between developers and builders. The
~/2~
AppL'cant/Agent's Signature vale
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

Page 1 of 1
LOCATION MAP

TopoZone -The Web's Topographic Map Page 1 of 1
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=3891831.00( USGS CHARLOTTE WEST
Charlotte West quadrangle M=-b.943
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum G=0.01

F,
� -N
Arml

TerraServer Image Courtesy or the U~ci~
1 u~~ i vi ~
Send To Printer Back To TerraServer Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape
Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
~ 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
http://terraserver.microsoft.com/PrintImage.aspx?T=4~ AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 2002
,~ --~.5Km 0' ',25Mi

TerraServer Image Courtesy or me u~~~

Send To Printer Back To TerraServer Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape
Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
© 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
http://terraserver.microsoft.com/PrintImage.aspx?T-4&S=1 I &Z=17&X=1255&Y=9728&... 1/8/2005
a' ' 201 4' ~ 2~Jd

~_ ~.~~
S Q~g~'
~q
$~.~ ~ Z
~~W ! ~ $ ~ W
~„ ~ ~
`.~ ~ ~ ~'
a
g ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ Q
°~'~ m ~ J
®~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
e ~ ~~ ~~ 3 W
~a ~ \ ~
81 4yv ~vr ~ v ' O
~`~- `~ m
z ~ ~ M a
~ it \ ~ s N
f \ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m ~f ~
des ~ ~
n \ ~ ~
g
~ ~ X
1 px ~ °
u ~ ~' ~ a
Pg N ~ Q
~n ~ x6 \ ~ o
:~ ~ 9 \ ,.
~ ~'~ ~~ © y f~ .~
`.
N ~ 7~ n ~ `` Fu
` \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~`g`b~ ~ t 24 a 1 4"Q
m
~~ £ a
~ c~°-: ~
~- ~ ~ •• °
~~ a .~ e~ ~
.-- .
s o ~ - ,.~
4~
~J )-~
,, / ~
~ r

LEONARD S. RINDNER, PW S
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning [phone]
Date: April 14, 2004
MEMORANDUM
To: Peter Pappas
Charles Teal
Scott Hebebrand
From: Len Rindner
Re: Berewick TownCenter - Regulatory Summary
The following is a summary of my meetings with Ms. Amanda Jones of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) on March 16, 2004 and Mr. Alan Johnson of the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), Mooresville Regional Office on April 13, 2004. At the meetings I discussed
the overall land use and development plans based on regional and site specific factors,
including traffic corridors, thoroughfares, and proposed crossroads, topography,
wetlands, streams, and other related issues. We also reviewed the various projects within
Berewick and the relationships to one another, including previous permitting. I stressed
Berewick TownCenter's relationship to the region in general, rather than as an amenity to
the residential areas within Berewick.
Summary of Preliminary Review
1) In general, the USACE and the NCDENR agreed in principle to the direction of
the proposed planning efforts.
2) The USACE/Amanda Jones determined that Berewick TownCenter will be
considered a separate project from the adjacent residential projects.
3) The USACE and the NCDWQ agreed with the idea of creating a naturalistic park-
like buffer area adjacent to the perennial stream in the center of Berewick Town Center,
rather than surrounded by walls and/or steep slopes. The stream and buffer complex
should be contiguous to the fullest extent feasible.
4) The upper part of the stream "A" and "B" was determined unimportant based on
USACE review and not subject to the overall 300' important stream threshold. However
unimportant streams remain subject to federal and state regulations. Mitigation may be
required by NCDWQ based on a field determination and are subject to minimization
measures. Although the NCDWQ appeared to open to the potential of approving impacts

to those streams designated as "unimportant" by the USACE, they appear to be reluctant
to approve impacts to streams designated as "important" by the USACE, such as the
lower section of stream "B".
S} Except for a road crossing impacts to the perennial stream "C" should be avoided.
Negt Steus
a) Prepare a more detailed preliminary plan for review by the USACE and the
NCDWQ.
b) Conduct apre-application meeting with the USACE and NCDWQ, concurrently
if possible. Determine mitigation requirements and stormwater requirements, if any.
c) Prepare required plans and details to determine wetland and stream impacts.
d) Submit Nationwide Permit application and supporting documentation, including
eligibility to utilize NCEEP to meet mitigation requirements, if necessary.
e) Generally, Nationwide Permits have a 45 day review process with the USACE
and a 60 day review process with the NCDWQ, with a complete application. The USACE
and the NCDWQ may request additional information, which may or may not delay
approvals.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks.
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Cc: Dale Stewart
Ed Schweitzer
Kevin Vogel

IMPORTANT STREAMS AND UNIMPORTANT STREAM ARE
SUBJECT TO FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS
..~'~
pit~T'I~c7 ~'aKK
• cTR~eu e _
IMP. STREAM
PER USACE
STREAM C
~~~
/-_
NC 160
Y~i~
I-485
//.:/1
UNtMP. STREAM
~ PER USACE
/.
BEREWICK TOWNCENTER

'
/
' l G
f f
'~'
/ ~,
' /
~~
alb
/

` ^ a
°~'_
°' ~ n ~
_ / ~
C vW ~

d
Z

' ~

m F
W ~
UaO
~
~
/ C mm ._
W~oi /~ X,

~ / W
Q
~ '~
3 W~ o
vW~i ~ /~~ W
Q ~
~
~ V1 tWirrM N p
~ a~ V a` ~ o
I Q
I ~ ~ W
N01 \ ~ ~
Q o fO
~ r r
y
~
u.i
~ Q
W
~ °-
w
J
f
~
N ~
y ~
O M c~c
G Z
Q F'
~ lei.
~
D
C Q / ~
~ -~ in ,- Q ~ N ~ d m

z
l Z
~ H
~ z
W m ~
cL -
Z
Z ~ m YN W
C7 - m
W
m Z
C'3
W
m

m
n /~
o \
~
O
~® Q
n
°~ v~ o
~
~ ~
F
-
g
•
Q V1

W J
Q

~' a °'
E z
W
w
z o ~
a
~
Z
C N z
9 ~
w a
m z

N
~

~~

Q~ s

m ~

m m
~
o
W
~
W (V
a a ~
=t
~
~
°
~
L
~.

Z J ~ ~-

4 C
~C'
_
~
~
. N O
J m CV
~ ~
~ m
~
O
~ ~
C

b
h'
`~ O
b
~
d-

\ ~
S

Y
01
O ~
\ U

• r ~ ` / ~ Z i• ~ 7~'
' ~ ~ -- ~ LLJ • . ~\ ~ ~Z. `.~ ~.~ _ ~ '~ CJ ";'--'tea.--
`\ ~ \• i
` r ~` ``;.:. ' . '`-~" ~.-'" U • • '\~,- ~ •\;, `\ ~ 1 ~' Q 'ter\'- ~ ' ` ~` t
,~ -- • . .,. .~; .`;,~ :,,. '~` ~ ~ ~ ~ i( ,' LL' '- o ~ ;..x,,;:11. ~~ ; i~~r ; \ (,j,j _~;-:~~._
~-~; • •~- - (!) °r" ~ ` _ (}r ~ `fit \ . `, ~ .
~!- ~ r/~. : , is ; • ~ .. '~ x , , /`.'~:~ %. / ./~)% ~i 1 \~~`\ iJ'.~',~~ ,
- - -- -

_ PEP STREAM W/RIFFLE POOL COMPLEX
t 111/I~ `I I~'~ 1`) ~~~- ~ ~ ~ ~~/,y~ ~ ~` ,~ ~ ~~ ~
•1 ~`~
~ , 1 l ( ~ 1 / ~ ° ~ ~ . ~' r',J, ~ ;-~-_ ~ 1.
'% ~'l ~,~J~s~ . J t ' ~~ Irfj / ~•' I , ~~~'l'~ _-`\ r~''~ ' ~% ~ ~it v
-- ~ f , ,\ 1J 1 i %~ I~ ~ dVf i'f I ~~ 1 '~;'~` .I 1C~ ./. j ~ IS ~ ))I~ ~ (/ - INr STREAM w/R P COMPLE%'. U~..
/ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~
/!~ y( 1~ -r". E j i' 1 5~ t ~., `) _ \ _ ~ \ / _ ~ ~\ ~ WERM10 - ' , ,
- "' 1
~ - I AREA REOUIREB FURTHER 6TUDY
1% (~ ( 1 E; °t ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ V ~ _~_. 11~~t~1~ L M /Y f. ~ Rono x-INO ~i i ~ - ~ ,~.~ ~ ~ ( . 1
)) ~` /U~-~ \\: ~ ~ .>„ {~ 1 L. -AREA W/WETLAND POCKETS ~r~~ III/ \ `\ / \I. • T~\~\\~ '. s't ~ \ ~ \ 17
/.~-.~\ 7 t -.. _ ` ~W ~ ~.~`' II II'\._ ( 6UBJECT TO INUNDATION ,~... A ~/I \\ ~ ~ .~ \\ ~\~ ..\ .. ~/~ r
.~
"' J ~ 4 . -1 ~ PER STRE AMI .1 t 1 U \, et A'' ~~ 1 I 1 ~ ' '~ /~~ \\~ \ ~ 1 ~ J ,~ ` ~ \\ ( .
1, r~ "(- '~ ~~ ~~' \ \ ~~ ~~(~RIFFL~EI~PO~OLNCO~~MP ~ , PINO6~ _, BEGIN R/P COMP \ ~
~~-~ ~a ~.7 ,~ll t~ -- ~ ~IrIll~.\a 1 I~~Fi1.i~ \ ~ ~~~!\ 1 rv/ ~~~\. \~ \\~
I 7i`° ,J'.;~ .~ _ - I ~ ` .1 . l( (/ ~ EXPOSED BEDROCK ~ ~ I` ~ ~ S \~a
~~ /~ _. } ~ ~ ` ~ , -,_ )7 j INT/PER STREAM "~
/ \ /" • r 7 i I(It )~~ ~.~. ~j ~I I~Ji.,~ .- ~ 1. '_~INi 67RM / -WETLAND
R '~ ~ /// dy \~/ 11i ~~ I ~ ` - .. ,Y / i i J////~ .: WETLAND =7 yI'NT 67AM \ SPRING. /~ f ,1 {i~-\.(!1
'I \\ i)'/ _.7 I 1 I 'J C( ~~~'i~ I lg ~ l~(( ~ / ` V~~ 1 ,1 1 ! J~ ~1. i BEDROCK FA
/ I I ~~ \ ) ~ 11~ ~~~\ ~, (/ ~ \.I/~~ (l\ .. ~~ ~ ) \ s, ~6PRING \1C\ i J WETLAND ~ EPH STREAM
/ ~ ..'- .// ( li/ ~11 ~ I ! \t~ \ WETLAND ~ 111 J~ _.. ~ ~h ~ ~T/ ( ~ ~ ;' , ~ ~~ ~. ~^ ~ -
. I
\ ~ r/ ~~ ': AREA flEOUIRE6 FURTHEfI6TUDY \~~ ~ ( ~ a- f ~// ~1 ~~I + - /11 ~~'~ ~` _ / %/.
. ~ ( _I -. /'.!ITEMP. INUNDATED 'I I~ i _ I (r / ~ Jal~ / ~ ( - C - -
'\\' p '
7
y • !'I .,,..i Y i ~._1 ~ 1.. 0 _ / ..//~~'. -~ / !` I. ~/ ~ WET CHANNEL6~ - i ~ i
1 ~~ - f / F / INT STREAM / I ~ ..1 ~ \ ) "`
~,/ / ~: - - ~~\ ~ JI AREA REQUIRES FURTHER STUDY _ // ~ ~ / ~ 1' ~ 'i
1, ~.. , j(. G J ~ ~ \'_"__ ~_ `~ ~.. 1_' / ~y~-` 1 ACCE6S REOD ~~\~ ~j C / j \ 1I ~ ~Jl~ y/ I,-, !1>r~~l y Is/~ / ti ' /
J T ' ~' I r" B •` 'ir:%' >.~~~ ~Il ~ _ l II \ 1 `~. \1 ~ \ `PER. 6TREAN, / '~~ ~i /'~ ~' f/ / ~ ~1~11' `i/
Y // "^\ 1 / 1\(t ~\'\ \\\~`\~\` __ ~' J ( ('WELL/6EEP1 / (L/~1,~ I ( m~~~~~` `` i
-') ~~ \ ~ sea=' ~'~, I\ \RIFFLE/POOL COMPLEX ~/~ ~ ~ /(~I (/)~i \JI ( ~%/;,' ` - /~: / // [
!{ ~ ~ r \ \~ ;" ~1 M1 WET PB ,
~`. INT 6TREA AND yy J
/I a i -,\t 1 ~ ~lfl 1 1` ~ ~~\ ~ /%~ ( - / 1 L SEE /l. d~ --~
'.a. \ 4 ~~ I/. / ~. - ~ \ 1 \ WETLAND.. , ~.') II .. / /// KC - /I J ~~- ~~J. ~ ~ 1
~'I ~= /~. \ ~: I>v"~ __ f~ `\._~ l .+PEA. STREAM ~~- \ ~/' ~"~,},~~
/~ ~ -I /, \~ \~~_.- ~ ~, ~Il k, ~,~. ~ I\t ;BRAIDED WET CHANNELS
"' ~ , ~ ~ `~'~ (III 71~ .1` \1 t \ ,~_ ) \ _ ~/ ,~ - y B
\~ WETLAND ~St\. 1 ~ ~ ~' i~~ f _-/ EGIN RIFFLEIPOOL MPLEx "~ \/
/. l / ill!-I~ ~ ; l fJ~ j - ( - ~ /'I/I ~. '~/~ _
!~ l .' 1'/ l (.\`\~ ~ ~.\~/ ~ /'~\ ~° \~ ~_-~~~ SPRING r' ) ~~y 'x/y~ _
1. ( \' t ~ / / 1 1 ~~ ~ 'K'RV.! 1. ' 1 ~ " I ~' "_-~.; '~ ~. ~ ' `(}\~~./+Y . / R
/ ~` OVLLY ~ ,/ /, ~ ( ~ ~ END RIFFLE/POOL COMPLEX C ~`~ ( ( • j . V~~ A.i \t
_ !! < / INT/PER STRREAM _ ~ ~ 1 ~/' \ ',~ j
py i ]' ~~. ~ //~:i - i ~-~. \~ 1 1~17~~ ` \ •~~^ ~1~~~~- ~( ~ .' •\\ \ ~ ~~) ~ ~% i ~ PER. 6TREAN `LLL
11{ `/4!~~\~ \\ ~ AREA REOUIRE6 FURTHER B7UUY 1 \ \~~Z^-F ~ C _ / ~ , ~ , ; ,, \ ~y^\/~\ ~.
'\ J ~ -\\~TEMP. INUNDATED -- ~1".`v`f~. - ~_ - ~ `~`- ___ ~~ XP06ED BEDROCK FALL6 -
/ I ~ ~~- \ -~. EXPOSED BEDROCK FALLS ~-__ ~ / \!~ (.
\ \\\ WETLAND ~ ~ --~~\, _~ ~BPRMD~ ~`\ ~ ~
1 1 ~ `~ ~ / .WETLAND ,\,
~ .
-. ~\
~~ 'WETLAND S'~- 6PRING3 v" ~ p \ v -WETLAND ai \ \C ~ `~ /<,
\\ \SPRING` ~ ~ ~ SEEPS , ~x I Y PER. 87REAM ~ ~ "~
- ~ F~~ ~ GULLY r. Y ~ PERENNIAL 6iREAM - ~'T~gA \~ 1 .INT. 6TREAN `_\ ~ .' • ,_. . ~ I~
-.;'~\_I/ ~ \ '';;: INT. 6TREAN- ,yyyy~e ~_ / l~ ~~ .~ r )
2 \~ ~ ~ ~ / • SPRING/WELL! \~~.~ ~ ~. /~R~ f « '1 -~,. (~ / \..-F"
e •` ~ t ~ \~' WETLAND SEEP ~ ~, 017CN ` I~ ~ ~ __ ~ -
!~ 1 '1i r Il / i' ~ I 1 POND ~ t•4 i-/ I f- \ ~ra ~r .
- !/ - INT. SlREM1. 1 /~ I ~ ( e•r I ~. I bbb 1 ' ~I ~ l _ /
• ~ I ~ / I~ ~ I. ~// ~ POND ._.. ~ ~\ _ / - -
C ~ ..e --~
FOR STUDY PURPOSES ONLY ~T~. l
SUBJECTTO USACE VERIFICATION '-' ~\ '-" _.
r'

LEONARD S. RINDNER, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
Faz [phone]
May 15, 2004
Ms. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers -Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue -Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR -Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Berewick Town Center, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
On behalf of Pappas Properties, LLC, I am requesting a meeting to present the proposed
concept plan for Berewick TownCenter. This is a follow-up to our meetings (3/16/04 with
Amanda Jones and 3/24/04 with Alan Johnson) regarding our preliminary planning efforts.
The proposed plan responds positively to the questions and concerns raised at our earlier
meeting and blends environmental concerns and economic development. We are
anticipating submitting an application for the project and look forward to your review. In
addition to your review, the planning has been closely scrutinized by the City of Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, and concerned environmental groups and individuals.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you
for your consideration.
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist

TopoZone -The Web's Topographic Map

Page 1 of 1
http:i/www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=3891831.00009179&e=501968&5+50&size... 5/15/20U4
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 kN G
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 O.B i wi
Map center is 35.1694°N, 84.9784°W (WGS84/NAD83)
Charlotte Wept quadrangle M=-6.943
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum G=0.01

Wage 1 of 1

LOOATiON MAP

LEONARD S RINDNER, PWS_______ -
>unvironmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning (704) 84b-0461
Date: May 19, 2004
MEMORANDUM
To: Peter Pappas
Charles Teal
Scott Hebebrand
From: Len Rindner
Re: __ Berewick TownCenter - USACE/NCDENR Meeting Results
On May 18, 2004, I met with Ms. Amanda Jones of the USACE and Mr. Alan Johnson of
the NCDENR to review the proposed plan for Berewick TownCenter. This was afollow-
up of previous reviews, discussions, and responding to comments. 1 also presented the
artist renditions of the proposed village. Mr. Scott McLendon -head of the Asheville
Regional Office was also present at this meeting.
Both the USACE and the NCDENR were supportive of the plan, subject to submittal of
the application and mitigation requirements.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Cc: Dale Stewart
Ed Schweitzer
Kevin Vogel

LEONARD S RINDNER, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning (704) $46-0461
Date: June 24, 2004
MEMORANDUM
To: Peter Pappas
Charles Teal
Scott Hebebrand
From: Len Rindner
Re• Berewick TownCentex -Stream Miti~atioa Requirements
As a result of my meetings with the USACE and NCDENR in April and May, I met with
Mike Pazker of the NCDENR on June 22, 2004 to determine whether mitigation would
be required by the NCDENR for proposed impacts to streams that were verified as
"unimportant" by the USACE at Berewick TownCenter.
Based on this meeting, Mike Parker agreed with the locations verified by Amanda Jones
on Mazch 1 b, 2004 as the beginning of the perennial streams. Impacts to the intermittent
streams upstream of these locations would not require mitigation. These points should be
surveyed and utilized for project planning in conjunction with previous input from the
NCDENR and the USASCE.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks.
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Cc: Dale Stewart
Ed Schweitzer
Kevin Vogel

~'I
{b
f
Wv ~
Vd W
~' ~. ~ 1 ~ \
(~ h- I- X _ ~ ~ ,
ti ` 1
~ ~," x '~ d ~ ~ Ir
Q Z v ,~..:~ • ~/ W i
---
J•---" ~l i I- ~
M ~ - -
~~~{~ a .
N ~ ice" Cta U W s ~ ~ ~ ~` ~~ t ., f/7
Lid ~ ,1 ~ '~` 2 W ~ ~ ~i I ~~-- ~ N .~;
..
.:
~ ~`-~ .,
.,,
~ ,,
c ~
- ,.
u 1t~
~ ~~ / .,
~~
,~. ~~
~---~-
"~~ G j
~ ~ U _ 7, %,
`,', W .Q '~ .'fr`y ` d ~ W 11 l l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~' ~ Z
va ~~ ~, `, uu_ ,
..w
w ~ .'
~` .~ k
a
~. WI ~~ 1 /' O ' 1
~.- / l
y~ ~ r
Jf ~ ~ w
~ % ~'
r '
..- ~ -- ~~ 3 e.r ~~ ~ ~ _ I I
~,~ ,. /. Y ,F .. -

~~,awav~~.....
9YiF'L[F'Y0L j SLEO'FECYOL ~A
IDZBC 7N'~M~D ~+5wW9NCLL
E
~ i
/ ~.~ , .~
/`\
~ ~ I
~~ i ~~
WE~LANC~ / /, / -
~ V~
~ ~\
_, ~
" ` ~ ~~
~31N3~ NMOl ~~'X3
# laa4S
J~NbdWO~ aN`dl 2~3nI~J 31XIa
i boooo I ~# 7~afaid
a`d02~ 2~3/~ILi 31XIa M~ N ,DD I = ~~ I :ale~S
~I~ IM32138 b0/5/ I :a~s4
/ n r
r
~
~ .r.

;
I
- -....
%, /
~
/ I ~ ~
"
, ~ -
~
~" "
/ ~ ~ MECKLENBURG - ~ -
/ ~ ~ ~ -- COUI~iTY PARK ~ ~ ~'

\\ ^~ i
~~ ~/G. ~~ - ',
~ ~ , -~ "7s~L--f _" - -
,.1.. rs~ucccw n.y
.~~
.~,
`.~ , x G ~ ~.. -tea ~:. 4
''"• y
r ~~>A
~: _~
~=; ~~
/a ';
:t
~~.,..a ~.~ ~;)
. ~ ~r -~.
~, ~ .. ~:4 .. ,,~ _ - ~` ~
"' ;{ ,;
~ 1 ~ ~ ~a
\ f / 1 ~ ~~~
~ ~; _ ,,
/ /
~ ~ _.f ~ I
~. ~ a
~~
__~.l-
z.
^~.
~ i
~ ~'.
,I
J G ~`
TiON
j~ i ~~~ ~ SINGLE FAMILY ~~ ~ ~ '~, ~.
~? PARCEL w ~43UEFE "~'~ ~\
~~
\ `~\ ~~ ~\
b /.
~~~ iii 1 / S~av~f •ar~
/ \! 1
l ~~xi ti
~~
~`d; \ << ~, ~;, TOWN HOMES
~''t ~~~,1 _:.- PARCEL
~ ;,
~; i ~ 3: P
\ \~ ° "l` PERENNfAL STREAK/ ANA PAF~~
via
`,
.~• ~ ~
1
/ __
/ _ - - ~~ r~Gr
'
~
Icy
\
y ,
` `~\ ~`
/ /~
" /~~
L~C
~
is
~
,, ,,
~- ~ ~/
' ~

" EUCKLAND PHP,SE `/I ~
~ __
OMES
-~ TO
/
/
IM!I HOMES;
~ ~` ,
,
PARC
~~ ~%
J ,-~ _
~ ~BEREWICK AMENITY
~ ---
~ tir~ ~, -~ l
~

/ .
,~ ~ ~ r

1
~
~ ~ ~ RESIDENTlP.L ~ -
~
~
_ /
~ '` ~
~
9
--
i - ~ ~

~ ~ t~. ~ i ~ ~

Y ~- t ti
i

2131N3~ NMOl q~-X3
~~,awav~.rM.. :# laa4S
9KfZEF'WL a SLEO'CEE'/0L ~A
LOLBZ ~N~Mk7 ~+iS~R+9NCii J.N`ddWO~ aN`dl ~13n12~ 31XIa
1600001 ~# Uafwd
~, a`dO2~ ~J3/~I~J 31XIa /V~3N ,ool =.1 :aiE~s
~~IM32138 ~/s/.:a}Ya
- - --. _ / -
I
".
`" - /~ ~ ~ ~ I i I
- ~ a _ / ~ ~ I
J"~ qtr ~ ]S K t''~f`I~i ~~ ~ ~ \~ 1 I I I
~- ~ ~__~ _ ri_ ,~ ~ ~ BUSINESS PARK e ~ I ~
,,
.".. , ,.
1--~ ! I i'' ' ~
a ~ I.
r ~. ~ ~ _ ~!
. li E~15
. >.~ ~ .'1 , ~~ _ . NG DIXIE RIVERI~tp I
1 ~.R. #
~"
„ - _-
~ ,~
u T
. R =~
~. \ , . _~ it r ' / ~ ~ 1 / \ ~'~.
~ ~ _ ~,~
'/
? ~ ', PERENNIAL STREAM -PARK
,~ , ~
r~, ~ ~~
j ~ .~'
-,~,.' __~ ~~~ // a~_.;..UN4.. SEWER Eq>Et •. L!•1'~ 1!!'i
~p~-z_~ 5 ~ ~I
\ it
* ~~ ~'~ ~'. A 'r
y / ~ I ~;
D~ 1 - /4 .. ` ~ I
°RE - a
.f ~~ / ,,,~ // `
~ ~~ '
-. ~ ~ •~ . j '~ / i ~/~
/ /
.:, ~`.~"' ~ ~~ ,~~ / ., ~ _-~ ~'~ ~ FUTURE MIXED USE PER ~~ /
~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~''~ DIXIElBERRYHILL PLAN / ~ !
":. ~ r i ~~
-- ,- ,
~~ ~ ~ ti i~ ~
~- ~ ~ -II /_ -'
PERENNIAL STREAM ~~
/ '` ',~• u
~~ - ~ --
~ ~ ~ r
a ~ ~ i ,
~"~` r i
i ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ } ~~+i rte'
~\
k~' - ~ -~ ~ ~,~ iii ~, ~
>~ ~ •, ~~
), ~ iii ~ \ ` °o, fib`
_ _ ~,

~o~~~~
9YLEZECIOC ~ RLO'FEC/0L ~A
7DEBL 7N'~+~^V'NJ ~°'~5 "R4' ~ N CLL
e
_ - ,_ - ~
_.._ .. Q
..
~~ G
~.
~, ~
w
---_4 W `I
~I~IM32138
~-X3
# 1aa45
1600001 ~# y~al~d
,OOB = . I :aleJs
soisi I a~a
~ ~

~ ` ~*
~a ~
~.,o ;~
..¢
~~
~`.`~
~ ~, ~\
i ,,- ~~`~~~ --_
~,E
,;,;
;~,;,. ,.
~~-
.-
. '`~~ ~
,-
~~~ ~ ~~'
- ~ ~
_ ~, ~ ' ~ .1
~ ; ~. ~ }.
* ~ '`~ ' CL
~ ~-> '~.
~' ~ ~~
~ .~_,~
~ .__...
~ '%
,.
'" ~ ,.~.
.~
~ ~'~~ W
. ~-
~,
<< ~
'~
~ ~
.~
~~ o
`-~_
:~;_ - - - _
_._~_
. ---
~Y_.~
1
`..'~`
F- ~, ,~
~~~, ~ ~,.
,~
t` .~ i
_ _ ~-
~~ ~ ~'. ~
--
i ~~ F ~-
i i ~ ~\ ~ ~
~'`` '
4
,Y ~
~ - ',~~
;i
,tom - '. \!4 ~~.\ z
.~\ .;~~ L
`~
,~
"`'~ 1
c•.

~~~P~~ ~3~11191HX3 l~`ddWl W`d32l1S aN`d aN`d113M Z#X3 ~
9YEaCE'y0C ~ SECO'CEF/OL ~A
EQBL JN'~~V'~4J »5~'M 7NEZE ~,N`ddWO~ aN`~1 ~13n12~ 31XIa
1600001 :# l~a!ad
,. 1191HX~ 17`ddWl ~~b21~n0 ,may=,1 :a~e~S
>I~IM32l38 SO/Sl l :a~4
------ ~~ € ~ I- ~~~ =-- 1 =
I ti
-~ ~,
,~,
u ~ ;~ ~ Wi
.~ _ ,~ ~,
" , i~~~ ,?
~ ~
- - ~ I _ -.~:r .
° ~ - ~ r
,_ ~ ~ _
,,
__ a
_" -
.~ ., _..
_ W - _ -
F ~-tip `Z ry• ____ ~ E~
~'`
~ ~.` / r ~
. , -- ~ -
,_, -
I ~~ `.
:\ ~:
- ~ ~ t' JIB ti _ _,- '~,,'
J
i -
/~
` ~i,
,,
_.
i 3
' ~~ ,-' I ! -- ~.4~ f 1 E r l ~ W
.. ._ ..
~ ~ ~ ~\
V - t; 4 ` t
yr r
i
r'
r
• ~ = t_ ,
..
~ ,
' ~rF
,: ~ ~' : ~~,. .gib ~ O
1 _ _ w
'~~ ~ __ ~~€, o ~ - -~ , ~'
_ ,,
\~ki~ W ~~~~ - U ~ Lu
~~ v' r, ~- G' m ~ ~ _
~ ~~ E ,~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ;,
~ y~~ ~ a $ - ~ _ ~ / _ ~ ~ , ~I,
~, 'yam ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~p~ -~~.
~ ~ ~ ^' ~ ~ --- W ~~ ~/ ~ ,
!1 ~; ,._
~;. ~ i
i. .
,vC'ant
~~. _ ~ r -
fr~
_ , ~~ ~_ t
- v _ -. ,. ~. -.. ~ > ..
_-
y}~ 1 i ~i-'~ I _ ~~ t 1 1 I
. -

•
��Aaaw•r---
91CFZCF40C � ftEQFEC'i0C �n
Mm 3N ..^D -5"""""`U
apaer,�IDIM31113
1 iDVdWI W`d3"dlS
J.N`ddWOD CNVI d3AId 31XIG
JJ3(0\Jd )iDIM \d38
£'dO
1# aaa45
1600001
,OOL — . I 'alEDS
50/s/1 �wa
i
/
000
/
r
1 1
I
�G
A IH \l �.

Ogg- 7-1

__~__
_,
4 ~,, ' ~
0

t
-~