100036_Structual Evaluation_20180730

Division of Water Resources
=.acifiqr I '? - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structu�r�e E aluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 00 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 7 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I //gQlayl' Arrival Time:® Departure Time:� County: Region:
Farm Name: �� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: / Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ` A rc lP oe n Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer Dairy Cow
ean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish J 3 y Dairy Heifer
arrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacitv Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers I Beef Stocker
ilts i4j 6�10 P) Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I lBeefBroodCow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q-%1
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: o
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is-storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: h,^�5�'�I J 0� Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VNE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ENE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EjNF'
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA E N
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E]'14
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Reunited Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'1`I .
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-QE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D<E
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NF�
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility Number: f, Date of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E]_T�E
the appropriate box(cs)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'1 Ili
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ei- I�A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA JD NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo. ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [2-NIff
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
;70 y
La c,�ss� ��si,s9��
fnsC rU C vt C� 1
WwTP, L51-�' 1107'L6 7z►br�,
P reams y-F- Hll trw-s
� l
/ ��-'_ "ors L/ctty
� // LL
\ 6k (�..*//
j<4Per a fjs�^
n� 7v
q(o-774
Reviewer/Inspector Name: f7✓ l29 k Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� I Date:
Page 3 of 3 214,12015