100036_Structual Evaluation_20180807

40 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation \
O Other Agency.
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Eva tion O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O mergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ) p tE S Departure Time: ( // County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: / Title: Phone:
l C Onsite Representative: -/� r- 1: A/r Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacitv Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Othcr Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: IQ - Date of Inspection: /
Waste Coliection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? E5Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ems ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 / Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E!f—NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [fNE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EQ
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anolication
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E]NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA R]NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ff NNE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Reauired Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑.DIE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA B-NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2rNE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [3Z
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA �i
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility Number: 10 - 206 Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PNE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAJ "'E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No e-N-A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ETNE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes L_I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [3 i4
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ]fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes J o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additipttpi & es as necessary).
01 _A VGV C O7CC l! 1 oAo - e He( /S`✓,e4c2 /C vim.
On5/ C �� � � f(i-� �G1�o�sL StLII �1CIAC"'PI/ng1u ,d �lGt // � ,
puusl� u �l���,�,Pld ,dl �;�-, s
G-d It t�s,ll, ( an+ �•u •.� raJ�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 04L r Q t7 u1tEL( a SArLWG rs*hone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ✓ Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015