HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0023580_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180820NORTH CAROLINA
ROY COOPER ErrVfr "Fh#1trdf Qrtarrry
Govwnw
MICHAEL S. REGAN
54hT ary
LINDA CULPEPPER
lrrrerfm &'rea w
August 20, 2018
Cove Key Homeowners Association
Post Office Box 4810
Davidson, North Carolina 28036
Attention: Mr. Brent Brower via Email
Subject: Non -Discharge Permit Inspections
Cove Key Townhomes
WQ0023580 Reclaimed Utilization System and
WQCSD0500 Deemed Collection System
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Brower:
Staff of the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) conducted compliance inspections on August 101h, 2018,
which included a review of the collection, treatment and irrigation systems. The MRO would like to thank
Tri-County Wastewater staff, Mr. Chip Hawkins and you for your time during the inspections.
The systems appeared to be operating adequately at the time of inspection; however, please address the
following items to maintain overall program compliance.
Under your Reclaimed Utilization System Permit #WQ0023580:
The ultraviolet intensity display had a loose wire, but when reconnected, would only display "0.0",
although the UV bulbs were functional. Repair options were to be discussed with the
manufacturer or contractor for plant rehabilitation. Per follow-up phone conversation with Tim
Bannister (TCW), on 08-15-18, the display board is just a reading and does NOT affect proper
operation of UV treatment or telemetry.
• The current WWTP daily operator log sheets contain many items that are not utilized. Determine
if a new log sheet should be developed for this facility; otherwise, make appropriate
documentation on the existing form.
• This permit is currently in the renewal process with our Central Office permitting staff in Raleigh.
Please contact Emily.Gercke(a)NCDENR.gov with specific questions related to your renewal.
Under the deemed permitted wastewater collection system (#WQCSD0500):
• Remove and replace a storm water pan for proper access to the collection system. Only 1
of the 5 manholes could NOT be accessed. The manhole covers could all be removed, but
one storm water pan is improperly installed, with the manhole grate seated on top of the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
storm water pan. Per recommendation by the WWTP ORC, the pan was to be cut out and
a new pan seated properly on top of the manhole rim. Routine inspection, removal and
proper disposal of solids build-up is recommended to maintain proper flow. There was
minor build-up of solids within the collection system at the time of this inspection.
There has been ongoing confusion over who is maintaining the pump station log book,
which was missing from the generator. Currently the HOA is contracted for monthly
generator visits. Weekly inspections are required with telemetry; daily inspections are
required with just the audible/visual alarm system. Notations should include: date
inspected, by whom, pump run times, amount of fuel, etc. MRO staff requested plant ORC
clarify who will maintain pump station inspection logs going forward.
Telemetry for the Pump -Station high water alarm needs to be repaired. The WWTP's high-
water alarm is connected. Plant ORC was to discuss with system installer to determine why
auto -dialer was not also working for the pump station. The MRO recognizes the collection
and wastewater systems are currently under-utilized and water levels are such that they are
unlikely to trip an alarm; however, it is a requirement as noted in permit condition:
III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
6. Telemetry equipment... shall be maintained in working order at all times.
• A home owner user education program is also required and should be documented.
15A NCAC 02T .0403 PERMITTING BY REGULATION
Reference the enclosed document for assistance with administering your collection
system program.
The WWTP is showing signs of age and weathering, with rust and paint chipping from
components. MRO staff suggested the HOA consider a cost comparison of repairs vs. a system
upgrade with newer technology, and discuss with their contractor for the best long-term
management. This facility appears necessary for many years, as the Town of Mooresville recently
denied your request to connect via an adjacent, private collection system.
If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit
or the attached inspection reports, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Ms. Maria Schutte at (704)
663-1699 or maria.schutte(cbncdenr.gov. We will be glad to further discuss this with Mr. Long as well.
Sincerely,
EA
DocuSigned by:
fw w N P44ft
F161F969A2D84A3...
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
Enclosure(s): WQ0023580 Reclaimed Utilization and WQCSD0500 Deemed Collection System
Inspection Report(s) August 2018
Deemed Collection System Requirements - Assistance Document
CC: Brandon Long, TCW (email)
Tim Banister, TCW (email)
Chip Hawkins (HOA Management Company)
Emily Gercke, Central Office -Non -Discharge Branch (email)
State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Roy Cooper, Governor
Michael S. Regan, Secretary
Linda Culpepper, Interim Director
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Reclaimed Water Utilization System
GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner: Cove Key HOA County: Iredell
Permit #: W00023580 Project Name: Cove Key Townhomes
Issuance Date: 01/29/2014 Expiration Date: 12/31/2018
Permittee Contact: Brent Brower (HOA, Resident) Email: abrentbower(a)gmail.com
Permittee Contact: Chip Hawkins (HOA, Manager) Phone: 704-255-1266
Email: chip(a,mainstreetmanagers.com
ORC Contact: Brandon Long (Tri-County Waste Systems) SI991385 Phone: 704-351-4049 (cell)
Email: brandon(a)tcwwastewater.com
B/U ORC: Tim Banister #SI23910 Phone: 704-324-4145 Email: tb@tcwwastewater.com
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP Facility Start-up
Inspection Date(s): August 8, 2018
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
The treatment system appeared to be functioning adequately, at the time of inspection; however, there a few
items, mostly record keeping, to address for overall compliance as detailed in the cover letter. Additional
maintenance issues are noted in this inspection report.
• Please contact Emily.Gercke(a,NCDENR.aov with specific questions related to your
renewal.
• The MRO should be informed of any changes to the contact information noted above.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary yes X no
Inspector Name/Title: Maria Schutte, Environmental Specialist I
Telephone No.: 704-663-1699 Fax No. 704-663-6040
Date of Inspection: 08/10/2018
Reclaimed Water System Inspection
Permit #WQ0023580 Cove Key Townhomes — Iredell County
Page 2
Type
Activated Sludge Spray, low rate
Activated Sludge Drip, low rate
Lagoon Spray, Low Rate
Lagoon Drip, Low Rate
X Reclaimed Water - Drip
Treatment
Y Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit.
Y Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below.
* List any action items necessary for each unit.
* Comment: The ultraviolet display unit thought to be repaired last year, appears to still have issues. A
poor wire connection was fixed while on -site, but then the display unit continuously read "0.0" intensity,
although lamps were functional.
Cellular telemetry installed last year is operable at the WWTP, but apparently still not connected at the
pump station. The plant ORC will discuss with the installer.
Influent numn station
Y All pumps present, operational N Bypass structure present
Y Bar screen, maintained Y Free of excessive debris
Y Bars evenly spaced * N Bars excessively corroded
Y Back-up power
* Comment: The WWTP package unit is showing si nos of age and corrosion. The ORC is working with the
engineer for a quote on a refurbishment. MRO staff requested HOA representative be present at this
inspection to discuss the system age and plans for ongoingepairs or replacement.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Y Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Y Is flowmeter operating properly?
Y Does flowmeter operate continuously?
Y Does flowmeter record flow?
Y Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Flow Measurement — Water Use Records
Y Is water use metered?
Y Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Aeration Basin
Y aeration pattern even across surface of unit
Y easily accessed
Clarifiers
Y weirs level Y scum rack operational Y easily accessible
Return Pumps
Y in place Y operational
Filters
Y media present Y clear well free of solids
Reclaimed Water System Inspection
Permit #WQ0023580 Cove Key Townhomes — Iredell County
Page 3
Disinfection
* Y Is the system working? * Y Is the system properly maintained?
Tablets Gas Liquid * Y UV
If tablets, proper size? Present in Cylinder(s)?
If gas/liquid, does cylinder/tank storage seem safe?
N If bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand? Dual system. Faciliiy is maintained by TCW and ORC has
access to bulbs on short notice.
Y Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth?
* Comment: Per ORC. UV bulbs are checked weeklv and replaced annuallv. The system was designed
with an intensionpanel that has never worked correctly. During this site visit, a loose wire was repaired
and the intensity still displayed "0.0"even though the bulbs were functional. MRO staLalso conversed
with Tim Bannister (TCW) on 08-15-18, who confirmed the display board has no eLfect on functionality of
UV treatment (as evidenced in the fecal counts) or telemetry.
Intensity readings seem to be the safest way to inspect a UV system, but not the only way if unpredictable.
The ORC was to seek technical assistance for a long-term solution. Replacement expense (about 8K�
seems unnecessaryfor limited to no value.
Residuals The 5-day upset pond was cleaned of tree limbs and heavy debris last year, but lagoons have
not been pumped for bottom residuals. This system has low flow and is under-utilized; therefore, bottom
residuals are unlikely to be an issue, but should be assessed periodically.
Lagoons
Treatment Lagoon (5-Day Pond)
Y Influent structure (free of obstructions)
N Banks/berms (are there signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion)
Y Vegetation (is there excessive vegetation on the lagoon bank)
Y Liner (if visible, is it intact)
Baffles/curtains (in need of repair)
Y Freeboard (>2 feet from overtopping)
N Staff gauge (clearly marked)
N Evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)
N Unusual color (very black, textile colors)
N Foam (are antifoam agents used)
Y Floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics) Duck Weed.
N Excessive solids buildup (from bottom)
Aerators/mixers operational (if present)
NE Effluent structure (free of obstructions, easily accessible)
Comment: Removed floating debris, mainly tree limbs, from S day upset pond last year. And, removed tree
between lagoon bank and fence for safer access around 5-day upset pond. Safety net should be replaced.
Wet Weather Storage Lagoon (check any/all that apply)
NE Influent structure (free of obstructions)
Y Vegetation (is there excessive vegetation on the lagoon bank)
N Banks/berms (are there signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion)
NA Liner (if visible, is it intact)
Y Freeboard (>2 feet from overtopping)
N Evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying downibroken)
N Unusual color (very black, textile colors)
Reclaimed Water System Inspection Page 4
Permit #WQ0023580 Cove Key Townhomes — Iredell County
Comment: The lagoon needs maintenance for vegetation removal. Mr. Brower (HOA) stated that was
planned for fall when threat ofsnakes and stinging insects is reduced.
Flow Measurement — Effluent
Y Is the flowmeter calibrated annually?
Y Is the flowmeter operating properly?
Y Does the flowmeter monitor continuously?
Y Does the flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Disposal (final end use)
Y Is the application equipment present and operational?
Y Is application equipment in need repair? Distribution lines viewed in all zones, with breaks noted in
I & 3s or repair. Lines currently draped over downed trees, will need to be spliced and realigned.
Y Are cover crops the type specified in permit? Permit lust states suitable year-round vegetative cover.
N Is cover crop in need of improvement? This is a forested area which requires routine maintenance
for undergrowth and downed trees.
N Signs of runoff?
N Sign of drift?
N Signs of ponding?
Y Are buffers adequate?
Y Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
N Are there any limiting slopes in disposal fields?
NA Are restrictions for use of these areas specified?
Y Is permit being followed?
Y Is site access restricted in accordance with permit?
Recordkeeping
* Y Is the permit available upon request?
Y Are flow rates less than permitted flow?
* Y Are monitoring reports present: NDMR Y NDAR Y TCW maintains reports at the main
o ace, which are available by request via email.
Y Are operational logs present? Y Complete?
NE Are lab sheets available for review?
NE Do lab sheets support data represented on NDMR or NDAR?
Y Are all samples analyzed for the required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
NA Are annual soil reports available?
Did the last report indicate a need for lime? Was it applied?
Y Is the operation and maintenance manual present?
N Has DWQ received any complaints regarding the facility in the last 12 months?
* Comment: MRO staff brought permit and reporting forms for discussion, so did not request copies from
ORC. Lab data is not kept on -site. MRO will request by email as necessary. This permit currently does not
require groundwater monitoring_
Other noted conditions
The WWTP is showing signs of age and weathering, with rust and paint chipping from components.
MRO staff suggested the HOA consider a cost comparison of repairs vs. a system upgrade with newer
technology, and discuss with their contractor for the best long-term management. This facility
appears necessary for several years, as the Town of Mooresville recently denied your request to
connect via an adjacent, private collection system.
Reclaimed Water System Inspection
Permit #WQ0023580 Cove Key Townhomes — Iredell County
Page 5
This site visit included an inspection of the deemed permitted wastewater collection system #WQCSD0500.
Issues of concern with the collection system portion are highlighted in the cover letter. MRO staff will
attempt to reduce the number of permits, by combining the requirements of the WQCSD0500 permit with the
Reclaimed system permit language during this renewal.
Mr. Banister (TCW) expressed safety concerns over his staff starting and testing any generator systems for
backup power. MRO staff agrees those activities should be handled by contractors familiar with the
generator and appropriate testing schedules addressed within the maintenance and operation plan.
Effective 01/01/07 — Deemed Permitted Collection System Requirements
For any questions regarding the applicability of these statutes please call the
Mooresville Regional Office of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) at 704-663-
15A NCAC 02T .0403 PERMITTING BY REGULATION
(a) Collection systems having an actual, permitted or Division approved average daily flow less than
200,000 gallons per day are deemed permitted pursuant to Rule .0113 of this Subchapter provided the
system meets the criteria in Rule .0113 of this Subchapter and all specific criteria required in this Rule:
(1) The sewer system is effectively maintained and operated at all times to prevent discharge
to land or surface waters, and to prevent any contravention of groundwater standards or
surface water standards.
(2) A map of the sewer system has been developed and is actively maintained.
(3) An operation and maintenance plan including pump station inspection frequency, preventative
maintenance schedule, spare parts inventory, and overflow response has been developed and
implemented.
(4) Pump stations that are not connected to a telemetry system (i.e., remote alarm system) are
inspected by the permittee or its representative every day (i.e., 365 days per year). Pump stations
that are connected to a telemetry system are inspected at least once per week.
(5) High -priority sewers are inspected by the permittee or its representative at least once every six -
months and inspections are documented.
(6) A general observation by the permittee or its representative of the entire sewer system is
conducted at least once per year.
(7) Overflows and bypasses are reported to the appropriate Division regional office in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0506(a), and public notice is provided as required by G.S.
143-215.1C. (See details below)
(8) A Grease Control Program is in place as follows:
(A) For publicly owned collection systems, the Grease Control Program shall include
at least biannual distribution of educational materials for both commercial and
residential users and the legal means to require grease interceptors for new
construction and retrofit, if necessary, of grease interceptors at existing
establishments. The plan shall also include legal means for inspections of the grease
interceptors, enforcement for violators and the legal means to control grease entering
the system from other public and private satellite sewer systems.
(B) For privately owned collection systems, the Grease Control Program shall include at least
biannual distribution of grease education materials to users of the collection system by the
permittee or its representative.
(C) Grease education materials shall be distributed more often than required in Parts (A) and
(B) of this Subparagraph if necessary to prevent grease -related sanitary sewer overflows.
(9) Right-of-ways and easements are maintained in the full easement width for personnel and
equipment accessibility.
(10) Documentation shall be kept for Subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(9) of this Rule for a minimum
of three years with exception of the map, which shall be maintained for the life of the system.
Effective 01/01/07 — Deemed Permitted Collection System Requirements
(b) Private collection systems on a single property serving an industrial facility where the domestic
wastewater contribution is less than 200,000 gallons per day shall be deemed permitted.
(c) The Director may determine that a collection system should not be deemed to be permitted in
accordance with this Rule and Rule .0113 of this Subchapter. This determination shall be made in
accordance with Rule .0113(e) of this Subchapter.
As per 15A NCAC 02T .0403 (a)(7) Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) must be reported to
a person (voice mail does not fulfill the requirement) within 24 hours
Therefore, to report SSOs during normal business hours please call the Mooresville
Regional Office of DWQ at (704) 663-1699.
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0023580 Effective: 01/29/14 Expiration: 12/31/18 owner: Cove Key Association Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cove Key Townhomes on Lake Norman
County: Iredell 105 S Cove Key Ln
Region: Mooresville
Mooresville NC 28117
Contact Person: John W Earnhardt Title: Phone:
Directions to Facility:
From 1-77 and Langtree Rd (exit 31), travel south on SR 1205 (Mecklyn Rd). The facility is approx. 2 miles on the right.
System Classifications: SI, WW2,
Primary ORC: Charles Brandon Long Certification: 991385 Phone: 704-776-4443
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Entry Time: 09:30AM
Primary Inspector: Maria Schutte
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Reclaimed Water
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Phone: 704-663-1699
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Treatment
Use Records
Record Keeping Treatment Activated Sludge
Treatment Clarifiers Treatment Disinfection
Treatment Return pumps Storage
Standby Power
(See attachment summary)
Miscellaneous Questions
Treatment Filters
Treatment Influent Pump Station
Treatment Flow Measurement
End Use -Reuse
Page: 1
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Staff of the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) conducted compliance inspections on August 10th, 2018, which included a
review of the collection, treatment and irrigation systems. The MRO would like to thank Tri-County Wastewater staff, Mr.
Chip Hawkins and you for your time during the inspections.
The systems appeared to be operating adequately at the time of inspection; however, please address the following items to
maintain overall program compliance.
Under your Reclaimed Utilization System Permit #WQ0023580:
• The ultraviolet intensity display had a loose wire, but when reconnected, would only display "0.0", although the UV bulbs
were functional. Repair options were to be discussed with the manufacturer or contractor for plant rehabilitation. Per
follow-up phone conversation with Tim Bannister (TCW), on 08-15-18, the display board is just a reading and does NOT
affect proper operation of UV treatment or telemetry.
• The current WWTP daily operator log sheets contain many items that are not utilized. Determine if a new log sheet
should be developed for this facility; otherwise, make appropriate documentation on the existing form.
• This permit is currently in the renewal process with our Central Office permitting staff in Raleigh. Please contact
Emily.Gercke@NCDENR.gov with specific questions related to your renewal.
Under the deemed permitted wastewater collection system (#WQCSD0500):
• Remove and replace a storm water pan for proper access to the collection system. Only 1 of the 5 manholes could
NOT be accessed. The manhole covers could all be removed, but one storm water pan is improperly installed, with the
manhole grate seated on top of the storm water pan. Per recommendation by the WWTP ORC, the pan was to be cut out
and a new pan seated properly on top of the manhole rim. Routine inspection, removal and proper disposal of solids build-up
is recommended to maintain proper flow. There was minor build-up of solids within the collection system at the time of this
inspection.
• There has been ongoing confusion over who is maintaining the pump station log book, which was missing from the
generator. Currently the HOA is contracted for monthly generator visits. Weekly inspections are required with telemetry;
daily inspections are required with just the audible/visual alarm system. Notations should include: date inspected, by
whom, pump run times, amount of fuel, etc. MRO staff requested plant ORC clarify who will maintain pump station
inspection logs going forward.
• Telemetry for the Pump -Station high water alarm needs to be repaired. The WWTP's high-water alarm is connected.
Plant ORC was to discuss with system installer to determine why auto -dialer was not also working for the pump station.
The MRO recognizes the collection and wastewater systems are currently under-utilized and water levels are such that they
are unlikely to trip an alarm; however, it is a requirement as noted in permit condition:
III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
6. Telemetry equipment... shall be maintained in working order at all times.
• A home owner user education program is also required and should be documented.
15A NCAC 02T .0403 PERMITTING BY REGULATION
Reference the enclosed document for assistance with administering your collection system program.
The WWTP is showing signs of age and weathering, with rust and paint chipping from components. MRO staff suggested
the HOA consider a cost comparison of repairs vs. a system upgrade with newer technology, and discuss with their
contractor for the best long-term management. This facility appears necessary for many years, as the Town of Mooresville
recently denied your request to connect via an adjacent, private collection system.
Page: 2
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit or the attached
inspection reports, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Ms. Maria Schutte at (704) 663-1699 or
maria.schutte@ncdenr.gov. We will be glad to further discuss this with Mr. Long as well.
Page: 3
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Yes No NA NE
Infiltration System
❑
Lagoon Spray, LR
❑
Single Family Spray, LR
❑
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
❑
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
❑
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
❑
Recycle/Reuse
❑
Single Family Drip
❑
Reuse (Quality)
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: UV bulbs are working, but intensity display board does not function properly. Replacement
expense (about 8K) seems unnecessary for limited to no value.
Treatment Influent Pump Station
Yes No NA NE
Is the pump station free of bypass lines or structures?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the general housekeeping acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are floats/controls operable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms operational?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Are SCADA/Telemetry alarms required?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are SCADA/Telemetry available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are SCADA/Telemetry operational?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Comment: ORC has contacted installer. The WWTP autodialer is same system and it works. iust need to
verify the pump station was also linked and calleing the correct #.
Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 4
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records
Is water use metered?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This is the flow -meter for irrigation. It was down for approx.
a month until a new unit could be
installed. Is now operational. The flow was divert to the wet weather pond when application
meter was out.
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source?
❑
❑ ❑
Is generator operable?
❑
❑ ❑
Does generator have adequate fuel?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The standbv aenerator is Dresent. but needs to be started when the system aoes out. Per
conversation with Tim Bannister (TCW), they do not test generators for safety purposes. They
can inspect for adequate fuel. Currently the HOA has a generator contractor inspect the pump
station generator monthly, but they need to improve records documentation for proof. A weekly
inspection seems overkill for this 12 home facility.
Treatment Activated Sludqe
Yes No NA NE
Is the aeration mechanism operable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the aeration basin thoroughly mixed?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the aeration equipment easily accessed?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is Dissolved Oxygen adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
Are Settleometer results acceptable?
❑
❑ ❑
Is activated sludge an acceptable color? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: DO is only examined for trouble shooting purposes with this reclaimed system package plant.
Treatment Clarifiers Yes No NA NE
Are the weirs level? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the weirs free of solids and algae? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scum removal system operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scum removal system accessible? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Is the sludge blanket at an acceptable level?
Is the effluent from the clarifier free of excessive solids?
Comment: There is little scum with this system. The system has more difficultv due to low flow. Sludae
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
blanket was at about 2/3rds, which MRO questionsed, but ORC states this system runs best
when he keeps that sludge blanket; otherwise, he pets plant upsets due to the low flow and food
for his plant biology.
Treatment Return pumps Yes No NA NE
Are they in place? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are they operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Filters
Yes No NA NE
Is the filter media present?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the filter media the correct size and type?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the air scour operational?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scouring acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the clear well free of excessive solids?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mud well free of excessive solids and filter media?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does backwashing frequency appear adequate?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Filters are washed manually as needed.
Both the mud well and clear well were free from bottom
or floating solids.
Treatment Disinfection
Yes No NA NE
Is the system working?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there adequate detention time (-30 minutes)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the system properly maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the chlorinator accessible?
❑
❑ ❑
If tablets, are tablets present?
❑
❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑ ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
❑ ❑ ❑
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is it a dual feed system?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
Page: 6
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: As noted above. the UV intensitv disDlav board has never functioned adeauatelv. However. the
bulbs are funtional, the system autodials if power is lost and fecal testing indicates adequate
treatment. The display board sits in the direct sun and this system design may be why the unit
has not functioned correctly. MRO staff recommends a new log form for properly recording UV
system cks when ORC is on -site, since the intensity data is not reliable.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
❑ ❑ ❑
NDAR?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are application rates adhered to?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
❑
❑ ❑
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
❑
❑ ❑
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
❑
❑ ❑
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
❑
❑ ❑
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
❑
❑ ❑
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
❑
❑ ❑
Are annual soil reports available?
❑
❑ ❑
# Are PAN records required?
❑
❑ ❑
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
❑
❑ ❑
If so, has it been applied?
❑
❑ ❑
Are operational logs present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab sheets available for review?
❑
❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
❑
❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
❑
❑ 0❑
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
❑0
❑ ❑
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Comment: MRO staff recommends a new log form for properly
recording UV system cks when ORC is
on -site, since the intensity data is not reliable.
Also, recommended that ORC document sytem
maintenance (bulb cleaning, replacement, etc.)
onto weekly log forms for simplicity. MRO has
requested better communication between HOA and WWTP contractor as to who will document
weekly collection system inspections, per deemed collection system rules.
End Use -Reuse Yes No NA NE
Page: 7
Permit: WQ0023580 Owner - Facility: Cove Key Association Inc
Inspection Date: 08/10/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Is the acreage in the permit being utilized?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the acreage specified in the permit correspond to the measured acreage at the site?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are all essential units provided in duplicate?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is an automatically activated standby power source available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the equalization capacity adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is aerated flow equalization present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the turbidity meter been calibrated in the last 12 months?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the turbidity meter have recording capabilities?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is all flow diverted at the appropriate times?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is all upset wastewater diverted from reuse storage unit?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is all upset wastewater treated, retreated, or disposed of acceptably?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is upset wastewater treated prior to discharge to irrigation storage?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is public access restricted from irrigation area during active site use?
❑ ❑ ❑
If golf course, is a sign posted in plain sight on the club house?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the cover crop acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are buffers adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of ponding/runoff?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the acreage in the permit being utilized?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment acceptable?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application area free of limiting slopes?
❑ ❑ ❑
How close is the closest water supply well?
❑
❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within the CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Is municipal water available in the area?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells required?
❑
❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RIB and CB?
❑
❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: There was a line break noted in zones 1 & 3, planeed for repair. This is a drip system on
forested acreage. Maintenance is on -going for dripline repairs, downed trees and underbrush.
MRO staff advised the HOA conduct a cost assessment of continued maintenance vs. an
upgrade for this system. TCW staff had already requested a system rehab quote, as some
componants are rusting.
Page: 8