20190359 Ver 1_USACE PJD F-V HS Offsite Roadway_20190319

March 26, 2018
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr. James Lastinger
Reference: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request and Supporting Documentation
Fuquay-Varina High School Off -Site Roadway Area
Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project 4305-17-234 (CO -1)
Dear Mr. Lastinger:
On behalf of our client the Wake County Public School System (WCPSS), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this
preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request. In support of this request, please find enclosed the following:
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Authorization form completed by WCPSS, right -of -Entry email and exhibit from WCPSS
Figures —USDA- SCS Soil Survey Exhibit (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Exhibit (Figure 2), Color Aerial Exhibit
(Figure 3), Feature Exhibits (Figure 4A, 413), LIDAR Exhibit (Figure 5), National Wetlands Inventory Exhibit
(Figure 6), National Hydrography Dataset Exhibit (Figure 7), and FEMA Flood Zone Exhibit (Figure 8)
USACE Routine Data Forms
NCDWR Stream Form
Site Photographs
Please let me know when you are available to review the jurisdictional features on-site. If you have questions or
need additional information, please contact me at 919.801.3798.
Sincerely,
5&ME, Inc.
Walter Cole, LSS, REHS
Project Manager
ldd� 6bt�_
Ashley Steele
Staff Scientist
S&ME, Inc. 13201 Spring Forest Road I Raleigh, NC 276161 p 919.872.2660 1 www.smeinc.com

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 201 Bengal Boulevard
City, State:
County:
Fuquay Varina, NC
Wake Co.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0667-12-0673
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Walter Cole of S&ME
Mailing Address: 3201 Spring Forest Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone Number: 919-872-2660
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Wake County Public School System
Mailing Address: 1429 Rock Quarry Rd, Suite 116
Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number: 919-588-3572
Electronic Mail Address: Chris Ford: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See attached agent authorization
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
r✓ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
❑ Size of Property or Review Area acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.59628
Longitude: -78.79227
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/26/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Walter Cole of S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road, Raleigh, NC 27616
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Fuquay-Varina
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.59628 Long.: -78.79227
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Terrible Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALTHAT APPLY): Office (Desk)
❑ Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
number
(decimal
(decimal
of aquatic resource
resource (i.e.,
to which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
in review area
wetland vs. non-
resource "may be"
(acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable)
404 or Section 10/404)
W1
35.59639
-78.79222
0.08 acres
wetland
Section 404
W2
35.59657
-78.79164
0.04 acres
wetland
Section 404
S1
35.59628
-78.79227
142 linear feet
non -wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources
in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her
option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's
acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing
a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of
Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or
judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any
Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,
the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination
whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic
features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on
the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should
be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: 2017 USGS NHD Datatset.
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Fuquay-Varina, NC USGS Topographic
Quadrangle, 1:24,000 scale.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1970 Published Soil Survey
of Wake County.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: 2017 USFWS NWI Dataset.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: NCFLOODMAP FEMA Geodatabase for Wake County.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2017 NC One Map aerial orthoimagery.
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site photos taken 03-15-18.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the
Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
03/26/18
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not
respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up
is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

MEW -
s.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION / RIGHT OF ENTRY FORM
Date: In p
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: WCPSS Fuquay-Varina High School Redevelopment
Type of Project: Institutional
Location: 201 Bengal Boulevard, Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, NC.
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name: Wake County Public School System
Mailing Address: 1429 Rock Quarry Road, Suite 116
City, State, Zip Code: Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone No. [phone]
Contact:Mr. Chris Ford
Agent Information
Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
Street Address:
3201 Spring Forest Road
City, State, Zip Code:
Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone No.
919-872-2660
Contact:
Mr. Walter Cole
Authorization: I �d _ limit M.J. Desormeaux, Jr.
(Si nature of Property O er or Appointed epresenPe€ptee�uperintendent for Facilities,
WCPSS, for and on behalf of the
Wake County Board of Education,
pursuant to duly delegated authority.
a duly authorized owner of record of the property/ properties identified herein, hereby authorize
S&ME to act as agent with the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE )
and North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-
DWR) in connection with the above-mentioned project.
1 also authorize representatives of the USACE and NCDEQ-DWR to enter upon the property
herein described for the purposes of conducting on-site investigations and issuing determinations.

Walter Cole
From: Stephen Ford -Staff - PlanningConstruction <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:34 PM
To: Walter Cole
Subject: FW: FVHS offsite survey requests
Attachments: 2018-03-06 Addl ROE summary-FVHS reno.pdf
Walt,
Please take a look at the attached map, which indicates where we have ROE in place. The check mark with the date are
permissible to access. Let me know if this gives you what you need. If so, you can proceed with the additional
evaluations.
Thanks
®WAKE COUNTY
PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
Chris Ford
Senior Project Manager, Facilities Design & Construction
Wake County Public School System
1429 Rock Quarry Road Suite 116, Raleigh NC 27610
Website: http://www.wcpss.net/facilities
phone [phone]
From: Jodi Regina _ Staff - PlanningConstruction
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 12:33 PM
To: Stephen Ford _ Staff - PlanningConstruction <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy S. Rambeau <RRAMBEAU @mckimcreed.com>; Michael Harris <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: FVHS offsite survey requests
Gentlemen,
According to the measurements on GIS (not 100% accurate) and the rights of entries we have already sent for FVHS, I
guestimate that the properties with a check box on the attached are those that need rights of entries. If someone could
take a look and confirm, then I will get the additional ROE's out as soon as I can.
Thanks!
Jodi
Jodi L. Regina
Administrator, Real Estate Services
Facilities Building
Wake County Public School System
1429 Rock Quarry Road, Ste. 116
Raleigh, NC 27610
Direct: 919-588-3588

<Eg
�gE�s
g4�C�
g�eZm
mei$
re nY�
m E�E
b^ t 4 HHo
E �cz
�
JiM o 0
x

SOILS: � � to c A A'
Go: GOLDSBORO SANDY LOAM YV
NoB: NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 2-6% v!
NoC: NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 6-10% N o B
WgA: WAGRUM LOAMY SAND, 0-2%
WaB: WAGRUM LOAMY SAND, 2-6%
WaC: WAGRUM LOAMY SAND, 6-10%
•t W a B
,� WgA
' G
)c �.
WgA �..wo. WgA
- WaC
►,. WaB oB
W a B �k N o B
i
NoC
uay i a
s u
►.�1 a Wa B
` I 55
o ;
0 350 700 � �o��
(FEET) V�
NoC2 o
o REFERENCE: ) I
_ GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 1970 USDA-SCS WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY,
a SHEETS 97 AND 98 AND THE 2017 WAKE COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR
a INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE
APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED Area of Evaluation
m OTHERWISE. °
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
USDA-SCS SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT 1 " = 450 '
DATE:
III E FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH SCHOOL - OFFSITE ROADWAY AREAS 3-26-18 1
201 BENGAL BOULEVARD PROJECT NUMBER
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4305-17-234

0 N PRD RD �
v
1 =J
�o �o
J
NJODD PKWY NE
EAGLE Ey��
w
m
0
O
-1
Z Zy j
i�3
�a GEE)
OCCONEECHEE DR
N50
RED HPC--
0
v�
PITTSBORO ST
S\
r�
0
Nye �
O
71 a�
�C
O J
CHARLOTTE ST
(FEETEET �F
a
BENGAL -BLVD
PER
ARD RD
0
09 JP Q�-
IL�ST
w REFERENCE:
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 NCONEMARCOM AERIAL CI -1)
a ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER, THE 2007 NCDOT LIDAR CONTOUR DATASET, AND THE 2017 WAKE 0 U)
COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL p z
FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL �� w
SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
o z
a 2013 COLOR AERIAL AND TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
III E FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH SCHOOL - OFFSITE ROADWAY AREAS
201 BENGAL BOULEVARD
FUOUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OL
Area of Evaluation
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
1" = 500'
DATE:
3-26-18 3
PROJECT NUMBER
4305-17-234

• e
B. r
+ra r
fog. R4SBC
s
.fL��'uyyyr;;;��''`
SUB
�P BH r
JWIL
-'--
Y RE
a # !
R4SBC
i f• 0 t4!
3 r.
titi ' :id s/ ' •a.3 - �i
i,. ,zce rover... +4'✓p I ,,,qqq,,, -A��: �''. . j1
VIP
0 4440
1,000 - "F•p �f 4
' P
(FEET) �,"
r
w REFERENCE: =
o GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 USFWS NATIONALWETLANDS ' ` '
p INVENTORY DATASET, THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER, AND THE 2017
Y WAKE COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. 1-
�� -- �' � � Area of Evaluation
ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL
3 SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. % ® NWI Wetlands
o b
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY EXHIBIT 1 = 500
DATE:
III E FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH SCHOOL - OFFSITE ROADWAY AREAS 3-26-18 6
201 BENGAL BOULEVARD PROJECT NUMBER
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4305-17-234

e
g
b ma
:,9 - -
JL
r
i
- , ',;� •row I�✓� N �:4�,� � us' w' -'.'
Iv
` s
0 500 * + 1,000 ,i. "' 140 " e
;4
REFERENCE:
a GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2017 USGS NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY' K'
p- DATASET, THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER, AND THE 2017 WAKE
Y COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL Area of Evaluation
FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL
SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. fi _ NHD WaterbOdy
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATASET EXHIBIT 1 = 500
DATE:
I I I FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH SCHOOL - OFFSITE ROADWAY AREAS 3-26-18 7
201 BENGAL BOULEVARD PROJECT NUMBER
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4305-17-234

e -
_ I► R � r.. .p rmi . 9
1 A 'jam• *,. �• ' 1 � �.. y ' d, :v
4 s • ' A ' P��' Y � ' � !�
n ° i
a
♦ 4 \ J T. ///
fog
�r ' ��� f` �'�, I�sA ¢ r '-. `tYQy ►l1ill,;����i�t�e, � � 'J,.
F+
F' YJL
P
A
� ' � � , • �+k.r:, ., ,a,.,..:,��� fir
• 'L1 ,� AW
Ok
i A Tf7� Y
s` f.
f
X11
x
C � Y
1,000La
w REFERENCE: Area Of Evaluation
a GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCFLOODMAP FEMA GEODATABASE FOR FEMA Flood Zone
p- WAKE COUNTY, THE 2017 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER, AND THE 2017
Y WAKE COUNTY PARCEL SHAPEFILE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard, BFE Not Determined
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
3 BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. ® 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard, BFE Determined
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
FEMA FLOOD EXHIBIT 1 = 500
s DATE: Q
I I ® FUQUAY-VARINA HIGH SCHOOL - OFFSITE ROADWAY AREAS 3-26-18 8
201 BENGAL BOULEVARD PROJECT NUMBER
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 4305-17-234

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Fuquay-Varina High School Redevelopment City/County: Fuquay-Varina/Wake Sampling Date: 16 -Mar -18
Applicant/Owner: Wake County Public School System State: NC Sampling Point: Data Point 1
Investigator(s): Walter Cole Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 2.0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.599062 Long.: -78.790263 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldsboro Sandy Loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes • No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes CP) No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No * Is the Sampled AreaYes ❑ No -,
n within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 NO ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Yes 00,No ❑
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Acer rubrum
3. Platanus occidentalis
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft.x 50 ft. )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Smilax rotundlfolla
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: Data Point 1
Absolute
Rel.Strat. Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
25❑
38.5%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
20❑
30.8%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
10
❑
15.4%
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
10
❑
15.4%
FACU
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
0
El
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 75 (A) 230 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.067
0
❑
0.0°i°
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is > 500/0
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
10
❑d
100.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
-
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
10
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
0
0.0%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
0
❑
0.0%
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
-
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°i°
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
-
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
-
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
0
= Total Cover
Herb stratum -Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
5❑
50.0%
FACU
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
5d❑
50.0%
FAC
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0 ❑0.0%
-
0
❑
0.o%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation -.
10
= Total Cover
-
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: Data Point 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _% Color (moist) . % TvDe 1 Locz _Texture
0-6 10YR 3/4 100 Sandy Loam
6-18 l0YR 5/4 100 Sandy Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A30) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A36)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Fuquay-Varina High School Redevelopment City/County: Fuquay-Varina/Wake Sampling Date: 16 -Mar -18
Applicant/Owner: Wake County Public School System State: NC Sampling Point: Data Point 2
Investigator(s): Walter Cole Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.596511 Long.: -78.792074 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wagram loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes • No (, � (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes CP) No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area
� Yes ❑ NO
n ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes U NO ❑ within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ No C
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Liguidambar stvraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Quercus nigra
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft.x 50 ft. )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Microstegium vimineum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Lonicera iaponica
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: Data Point 2
Absolute
Rel.Strat. Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
40❑
57.1%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
20❑
28.6%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
10
❑
14.3%
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
70
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
0
El
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
FAC species 77 x 3 = 231
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 107 (A) 331 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.093
0
❑
0.0°i°
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is 500/0
0
❑
0.0%
>
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
15
❑d
100.0%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
-
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
15
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
10❑
83.3%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2
❑
16.7%
FAC
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
-
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0°i°
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
-
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
-
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
12
= Total Cover
Herb stratum -Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
5❑
50.0%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
5❑
50.0%
FACU
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0 ❑ 0.0%
-
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation -.
10
= Total Cover
-
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: Data Point 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _% Color (moist) % TvDe 1 Locz _Texture
0-4 10YR 4/4 100 Sandy Loam
4-16 2.5YR 5/6 100 Sandy Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A30) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A36)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Fuquay-Varina High School Redevelopment City/County: Fuquay-Varina/Wake Sampling Date: 16 -Mar -18
Applicant/Owner: Wake County Public School System State: NC Sampling Point: Data Form 3
Investigator(s): Walter Cole Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 2.0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.596446 Long.: -78.792227 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wagram loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes • No (, � (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes CP) No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO ❑'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes U No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
n within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 NO ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
d❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)d❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)d❑
FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Yes 00,No ❑
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Liauidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Ulmus americana
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft. x 50 ft. )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 50 ft.x 50 ft. )
1. Woodwardia areolata
2. Juncus effusus
3. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: Data Form 3
Absolute
Rel.Strat. Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
30❑
46.2%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
20❑
30.8%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
15❑
23.1%
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
0
El
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 100 (A) 280 (B)
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.800
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
0.0%
0 Dominance Test is 500/0
0
❑
0.0%
>
0 Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
15
❑d
100.0%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
-
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
15
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
10❑
50.0%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
5❑
25.0%
FACW
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
5❑
25.0%
FACW
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
in height.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
-
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
-
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
-
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
20
= Total Cover
Herb stratum -Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
0
❑
0.0%
height.
0 ❑ 0.0%
-
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation -.
0
= Total Cover
-
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: Data Form 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox
Features
(inches)
Color (moist) _%
Color (moist)
% TvDe 1
Locz
_Texture Remarks
0-4
2.5YR 3/2
Loam
4-12
10YR 5/2 75
2.5Y 5/6
15 C
PL
Clay Loam
+mottle
2.5Y 5/6 10
C
PL
Clay Loam
12-18
10YR 4/1 90
2.5YR 4/4
10 C
PL
Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑d Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A30) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A36)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3/18/2018
Project/Site: Fuquay-Varina HS Off -Site Roadway
Latitude: 35.59628
Evaluator: W. Cole
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.79227
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 30.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Feature S1 - Terrible Creek
at
Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >: 19 or perennial if> 30*
2 •
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1 ®
2 Q
30
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2 •
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 O
1 e)
2®
30
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 ®
1 ®
2 (F)
3 C)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1 ®
2 •
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 •
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 •
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 •
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 ®
0.50
1 C)
1.50
10. Natural valley
00
1 0.50
1 •
1.5®
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 00
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0® 1®
2 C)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 • 10
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.50 1 O
0.5®
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 ® 0.5 •
1 ®
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 U
1 •
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 IC
Yes = 30
10
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 •
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 •
2 ®
10
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 •
in
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 •
0.50
10
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 •
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0(F)
0.50
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 •
1 Q
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
O
FACW = 0.75QOBL
= 1.500ther = 0 (F)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41