20090783 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090806

WITHERS A L
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA, 27511
[phone]
FAX [phone]
TO: V'ir -- D , 11i Z> r ?'A
RJETT M oIF TUMSOMOTMUL
DATE
-- I
W JOB NO. ,10Aky1-')53
ATTENTION
aK ?e1•???
PHONE #
RE: gym. ?:+.t.?? cc , a
i1F - L7 13

WE ARE SENDING YOU ? Attached via the following items:
? Shop Drawings ? Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Specifications
? Copy of Letter ? Change order ? Diskette ?
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION

AUG , A 2009
oa?r+-vl??
wEna?osJU?o

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
? For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit
? For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit
s requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return
? For review and comment ?
? FOR BIDS DUE 20 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:

COPY TO: f-?A Q-
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
1
?'
III
WITHERS 0'\ RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
UguS 6, 2009
NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Request for Additional information - Southbridge Trail Connector
W&R Project #: 2090053
DWQ Project #: 09-0783
Dear Ms. Karoly,
We received your request for additional information regarding the proposed Southbridge Greenway. I have
included a brief response to your request below. Your letter asks for the following information:
1) Please provide documentation and calculations explaining the necessity of the proposed scour
holes in the wetlands.
The scourholes are required by the Town ofCaryin order to provide non-erosive flow into the stream buffers
and to prevent the formation ofa gully in the wetland. Scour holes are proposed downstream of all pipe
crossings in an effort to comply with the Town of Cary diffuse flow requirements. Because each culvert
is located in an existing draw, achieving diffuse flow with a level spreader is not feasible. the scour
holes have been designed to dissipate energy during a so-year design storm, and will reduce velocity
and turbulence at the pipe invert so that the stormwater flows downstream at a non-erosive velocity.
Where the greenway has wetlands on both the upstream and downstream side, there is no practical
alternative to avoid wetland impacts with the scour hole location. Calculations for the scour holes are
included in the attachments. They are called out in the plans as FE52o and FE53o.
2) Please separately list both impact sites (Aland B1) in the impact table and complete section B4.....
The PCN has been updated as per yourrequest. Wetlands were delineated by Withers & Ravene% and once
the USACEissues the 4 04 authorization, our delineation is deemed approved. l expect the 4 04 to be issued
within the next few days.
3) Please provide a detail of the proposed bridge
The bridge detail is included with the attachments.
We hope that this information will allow you to complete your review of this project. Please feel free to call if
you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely, ????WLrR
WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
Todd Preuninger AUG . S 2009
Senior Biologist
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Attachments: WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCM
1) Scour hole calculations
2) Revised PCN
3) Bridge Detail
111 MacKenan Drive i Cary, NC 27511 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]oo8 i www.withersravenel.com
7040 Wrightsville Avenue i Suite 1o1 1 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
Brunswick Surveying 1 1027 Sabbath Home Rd, SW i Supply, NC 28462 1 tel: [phone] i fax: [phone]
OW ATF9OG
r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Southbridge Trail Connector
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary
2d. Subdivision name: Southbridge
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NA D
IM IM
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Cary Park Property Owners Association 9
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 09430, pg 0083 DEW - WATEm cK Au ry
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Tom Liebrecht
3d. Street address: 1000 Park Forty Plaze, Suite 300
3e. City, state, zip: Durham, NC 27713
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Proposed Easement Holder
4b. Name: Doug McRainey
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Town of Cary
4d. Street address: 316 North Academy Street
4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513
4f. Telephone no.: 469-4061
4g. Fax no.: 469-4344
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Todd Preuninger
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Withers & Ravenel
5c. Street address: 111 MacKenan Drive
5d. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27511
5e. Telephone no.: 469-3340
5f. Fax no.: 467-6008
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0725609464
Latitude: 35.8109748 N Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 78.9087752°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: NA - Linear Project acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Panther Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV;NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The greenway corridor is wooded, residential housing surrounds the project corridor.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
<0.25 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
about 2000 feet of perennial stream run parallel to the greenway
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to connect existing greenways to the noorth and south of this project
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Typical clearing equipment will be used to grade the corridor and lay asphalt
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ? No ® Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Withers & Ravenel
Name (if known): Todd Preuninger Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Withers & Ravenel conducted a detailed delineation along the proposed corridor and submitted documentation to the
USACE in support of our delineation with our 404 request. When the USACE issues the 404 Permit, our delineation is
deemed approved.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ? No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Permits may have been obtained for the adjacent subdivision, but we are not aware if the Town applied for permits for the
greenway projects nearby.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Additional impacts may be required for future greenway connectors, but we are not aware of any additional impacts
needed at this point.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
Al ®P ? T fill/culvert headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.008
B1 ®P ? T Fill/culvert headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.05
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
Wetland Impacts (acres) I Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temoorarv (T) impact
B1 ?P?T
132 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to the greenway development, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts
to wetlands and 'waters' could be minimized. In the original plans, the greenway was shifted to the south (towards the creek),
to minimize wetland impacts, however; the Town of Cary requested that the trail be re-aligned outside of the 50-foot stream
buffer. Given these constraints, and the existing homes to the north of the greenway, wetland impacts could not be avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
To reduce impacts, the applicant will utilize a bridge at the proposed stream crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: NA - Greenway Trail
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA - Greenway trail
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of a greenway trail within an existing subdivision, therefore, we do not believe that it will
result in additional development or impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA - Greenway
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NHP database does not list any endangered species for the Green Level Quad Map.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
--
? Yes ® No
F-
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The site is not located in a coastal area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
No historic structures were identified when the corridor was reviewed for wetland/stream impacts.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
1 -*TPV, ' A;. on v I'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provide .)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Project Name: Southbridge Trail Connector
City/State: Cary, NC
Preformed Scour Hole Sizing
Project #: 2090053
Date: 11 Jun-09
D50 Rip Rap Class Rip-Rap Thickness Base Width (B) Depth (D) Apron Width (W)
(NCDOT) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
FES 10 B 1 4 1.5 5
FES 20 B 1 4 1.5 5
FES 30 B 1 6 3 5

A
0
0
'o
co
0
0
cn
0
0
0
0
0
w
00
C
=3-
a
a
(Q
CD
O
`D
m
03
0
0
3
m
CD
v
CD
co'
3
O
(n
N
CD
3
0
rn
0
0
CO
X
co
v x
r-n??m=F-0
- -0 m m m p
r
?
m J
n m ? m O
0 D
0?nc
n
Dmom
?DZ.. w w

„ c

0 v
i
0 N? , (
i?
o
Z
m
(? rD? c
DZp?
Z
T>Fn
M _ -
;

g 00M0
p r m

x

-n

-n m
C

c
*mDCDnm!n?? nW N 2 CO N OW m O
- m
r
p
=00 w w N
r
-
m
0v-(
0?
z
?
n
C
0 -<00 n <
G)
o V
O V
O 0
V 000
t0 0
N -I
TIC
? ?
C
p?
it
o
0
- O
CO
coo
<m
m?mzzo?m 0 0 0
mom om-
X cn aZD
m 00 ?n0n
m m
A m
A Np?
A m
<n 0
Cn 0
O OD
O p-
T Z
K
i'np M W 00 A 0 C) Z?
?m -u?;0
mD
D <0
°
?' n
ma
m
Am
Vm
COo
0w
0o
nCZ
Z
p c
m ,
W 4
-4 N - <
Om
=
O
m c
i, w c
i, A
m
Ong

0- n8 m
2
K m ??n m w
? cn
o w
aD :4
? A O ? G)
O m0C 0 V in 0 0 V 0

0
:(1 0 ;
_
m c 0m
-I _0 NZ
w
o
o
w
V
Cn
N
T IV
(0 oD
0 6
0 iQ
0 :-4
4 c)
W O
Oo o
o "O
(n
O
0 0 0 0 l
0 0 0 0
m
0
m O
z
0 0
w
-
p n
mc
n
cn
z X
z
D

D
n
Cl
n
n
n ;D
n X
n
D

m
zz M m "01 -0 m v -i
r
cC
n K
0 o N w o D K
1 6o - 3 ; , 0 4 - A
<
cn
1
D
o
0
o
ca
Z
o
o
0
Z
o
CA 0
p 0 cnn D M O D C
A o
D
X co
p O Cn Z V O Z A _
(] Z O
fn O
0 Cn
0D ?
D to
N 0
O ?
D A
rn mr?
(nmo
m
n
n
D 0 0 0 0 °o °o o (nyo

O
Z cc cn to o co ao oD n
V
(0 M
V O
0) M
V M
W C)
0 M
(n O
Z
p
p
m
-
co
rn
?
oo
cn
?
o `n
n

-?
D
:l
O
OD
IV
W
V
N
O
A
o _

A c
T r

r= r
cn
T OODD ? A W O r o
r
CA cn aD Vt N T=(n
O V to m w--+ ??
X
N
0) N
rn N
rn N
rn N
OD N
00 N
00 p=

N
O
w cn
V 91
A 74 n
(
0) O
O C
C
C
V
-•
N O
_ n
N
N D
O
z
r
N
0 N
m N
In N
co N
0 N
G Cn
0 cn O to W
J
A )
Cn -4 bm
V OD
O N
D0N) (n
m
0
<0?
L.) =
Z X
7, v
m
O m
c
z
V'-/_II QI®/ II ~I-~II ,~rrrrngprrr ~d fO CJ lO GENtERI~INE C: Ieernp~°°; ~nc ® , ~ a Cq,q~'
STRINC~Ei~ b .~~'o~~•~°°°' ~iti''~.
$QUFaRE ~ ~Ess~o . 9
~ 3/~" x 301/x" StRINC~ER ~ 109 Brady Courfi a SEAL r°:
L,4C~ SGREIU LE~41D I-~4L~S ~~Ap a 6 3 5 1/2" - Cary, North Carolina 27511 sago
Tel.. 91 ~ .467-3853 -'°9~ `~~c?NE~
4" DIA. SI-IEAR q.~~ DIAMETER OF LEAD HOLE. IN. ~ ~v
PLAtE ~ , ~ y/~~ ~ Fax, 919 469-4901 ` _ '',,.io,~..~IS~~
~ N 4 office@ dcfengineeringinc.com
DIAMETER THREADED PORTION ~ N d ~,j~ n SHANK c-~12
x ~ x ~ x i ~
BOL~ (UNTHREADED) CsROUP II ~ , O 4 X ~ ~ POf2?ION,.IN. SPEGES Q Si ~ y. - SI I ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~
m m -
~ ~ ~ m m v .4 ~ .9
~ ~ i ~ ~
~ I!2° I/2° 5/16°
C
~ I I ~ ~ 5/S" 5/8" 13/32" ~ ~ 6 3 I I I p 'II P s7 CTYP.) 6 3/~4" x 30 1/~•° St IN ER
~ I C I I 3/4" 3/4" I/2" S L~~ SCREW 8 9'- - - - - - - I I ~ ~ ~ r Q Sl NOT TO SCALE 51
~1~Y11 ~I-`t l' ~ N r
C I 1 I Im'-a••
a~
35'-0°
- - - - - ~ 71E .ROD BR4GIMCs. SEE 9/SI AND
10/Si. ATTACH THE ROD SR4CINCs 9 ~ ~ I
~ ~ AT THE 70P BOLTS IN THE 5 v1 SCALE I/~" = I'-0"
STRI R CONN. SHOE. 2"x1/8" SL07tEp :D _
B/8" DIA. "6 TU~IBUGKLE - HOL$
DOME HEAD tIE ROD CLEFT H,4ND AND ~
BOLTS \ RICsI-4T HANp -
CTYP.). v r~~~ 713/16!' TNREAPI _ _ 2x10 GONT.
~4
8 fi~L~4N DET~4(L ~ 2982~~ - ti ~ ~ _ m 10'-~ 1/2" IN 1 IN Rr41LS
- - - M _ II
THE DETAILS.I=OR THIS BRIDGE ARE
.0 4" ~ - SIMILAR t0 THE DETAILS`1=0R A 5~'ANDARp
6~ LEFT NAND 3•• RICsNT HANA - - ~ ~ EnWood 101= MORRfSVILLE, NC) PEDEStRfaN
THREAD THREAD BRIDGE. 31/2" - -
,m -ROD- ~4SS~M~3Ll' T~NIS IS THE BRIDGE tHAT IS PRE7=ERRED
31. x 5 1/2" GNOICE 01' tHE OWNER
Ral>_
4" DIA. SHEAR St NoT To s~~L~ PL ~4N V f ~ UJ S T f
PLAtE ROUT END FOR NUT AND 3 O~ S1~OE - - - G®NNEGT .THE 5" x 81/~4"
STRINGERS WI l2) HOt -
BOLT PROJEGtION
SF SCALE: 1 I/2•• ~ ~~_0~~ SI SCAL 6 3/4" x 12 3/S" 1 `SCALE. 1 1i2!' = 1'- DOl'1E ,DIPPED C~,4LY. CLIP p HEADED ANGLES L 3 x 3 x 1/~ x
BOLTS ~ 0'-3"'~ ll) S/S" DIA. x 411 LACE
c0 J ~ - SGREW PER GLiP AND l3)
~ , ' FASTEN 7NE 3x10' 10'-0" LOPIfs FLOOR ~p Q PROVIpE ~4 5' THICK 15-0" LONG '':1=LOOR BOARDS WItH - - ~ II
~Lu. BDA~°:HAILS, l3) ~ s 0.203.. DIA. ANNULAfi~ cn tHREr4DED x 2 1/2" LONG '
BY 10'-0" WIDE APPROACH SLAB. 1/4" DIA. x 6" HOT DIPPED CsALV. SOA = I PER SUPPOF2T 3" O.C. PRE'-DRILL IN T ~ AT SOtH ENDS OF THE BRIDCsE )RILL IN tHE SHOP..... ~ ~ NAILS PER CLIP.
i
- - - - - ~ R81NF. W/ M4m14 E;4GH WAY. tF~
- - - - - - - - BLAB SHALL BP i'LAGED ON A
I ~ 9U~CsR4pE GONSIS71NCs # g•• ~A~ TOF OF BULL LENGTH _ _
I SUITABLE CONTROLLED FILL 2'-ID" ~xLULAM STRINCxER ~ ~ 5" x S 1/~•" STRINGER
I ~ _ GOh1PAGTED IN ACGORpANCE WITH CxLULA ~ THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
~ ~
~ CsEOTECHNIGAL CONSULTANT. _ 3x10 FL I ~ - - - - 3x10 DEGIG -SOLID
- 3x10 FLOOR DECKING _ _ _ ~ i:~00R DECK
i S 1/2"
N N • ~ ~ ~
SII x S I/4" LEDGER _ _ - - - - _
' DED SHOE - 8" x 8 <r 1 U - -
-}-a*~p_ `v ~ Q ¢ q° 3/8" PLATE
7 S~CT I Ol ~l ~ S I f~I l ~1~~ l~ 1"4 TOP. @ ~ ~ ? STIFFENEi2 SI SGALH: 3" = I'_0" ~ aNa poT. SEE ~i51
r11=FENER PLATES
rE ~•/S1 WASHERS = = i-~ -
GONt. O ~ ~ _
8 FINISH 6 3/~•" x l2 318"
10 ~D ~
= I--~- -
BENT AWL
SHEAR PLATE 6 TUlrl~t DOWI V M¢~,¢
I I
SI SCALE: t I/2" = p_0~~ ~ ~ ~ 0~-
6 3/4" x 30 1/4°
12" SHAT AT i ~ I•• CsROUT )UT C~J~UL,4M 1'-5 3/16" 1'-S 1/S" Tl'P.
- - - ABUTMENT 5.. I STRINGER
6 3/4" I0'®0.r oUT / OI~T DECK
Z'BOLT SLOTTED _ 4" ~ ~ L 3~~_~,~~ G TO C 4" G. t0 G. _
HOLE FOR ~O~tS
7/8" x 2" j ( ANCHOR SOL.T G J / CONCRETE SUF p~T~~L 3/4" DIA. ANGH ~ ~ EACH SUPFO 9 SI-4EAR PL~4T~ DET,4IL , B,4SE CONN.
BETE SUPPORt UJ/ 12J BUG: ro
2 ~i~ IV. ZOOg )IA: ANCHOR BOLTS . o~~~.~~
mH SUPPORT POINt. SI SCALE 1.1/2" - 1'-®° ~D§~DS ~R
GW
Cary Project Number 09-5P-033
APPROVED
OIrY OF CARV ~
SI NOT 70 SCALE Si SCALE: 1 I/2" i'_0"
Approved by Date N ' E
Planning, Date ~
Engineenr?g Date ,
Revision Date B Designer scale No.
1 09 6/05/09 DCF DCF . VARIES i TOC 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS, 06/1 Sheet No,
Drawn By Date, U T H B") R"' I Ur""GE TrRAILU'UN iNECTk.JR D CF. CG 05 14 09 S T rRh 'U''C T L WITHER RAVENEL
Checked By lob No. UCTURAL DETAILS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS S..1
DCF 2090053,0 CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
I mmummm"
i i i
i

'~ennee
~-----1----------~ I I . ~ 'Z ;pFESS~O~ yy
E. HEAVY TIMSER .109 Brady Court Q s E A 1. r TIMBER '
Cary, North Carolina 27511 ~ s2so
~ - ~ C2) 3/4" DIA: x l'-8.. W/ S" HOOK I ~ - ~ ~ ~ > TIMBER SNALL BE N0.1 SOUTNEiaN PINE PER SPIB. Tel.: [phone] ;;q~,,NC,r~E`~~
~ HOT DIPP£D CsALvANIZED ~ ~1 ~ I. SOLID TIMBER a 3U TREAT IN ACCORDANCE WITI~ AWPA: KILN DRS' '-~D ~`....~~G~~~,
,p I ANCHOR BOLTS. I I 2. PRESSURE 7RE ~ • ~ - :9 ~ ~ II II ~ AFTER Tt~ATM ~ _ _ _ _ ~ FOR THE GONG1zETE ~ `9 ~ 3. CsLUED LAMINA ~ ~ ~q ~ APRON LAYOUT AND ~ ~ i~ ~ 24P-v3 OR 24 F fax: [phone] C Fis ,,,e
TREAtr1~NT. office@ dcfengineeringinc.com eeeeeeee6,
~ LAMIN,4TED PIM~ER SHALL BE COMBINATION N0. C-®412
3 OR 2~ ~-VS !N AGG®RDANCE WITH AITC 11~, i
t.0. SL~4B ELEVATIONS - 4. THE PRIMARY ~ ~ SEE OT+-4ER SHEETS. ~ ~ ~ ~ PRESSURE ?RE I ~ ~ ~ ~ CONtAC7, S7RU ~ CHECK pOR ~ ~ ~ 5. LAMINATEp TIM 2 I SQUARENESS I I ~ ANSI/AITG Ai90. 'RIMAR~' LAMINAPED TIMBER SPRINGER- SHALL BE
3U TREADED IUITN PENN-WR 0.6 PCF FOR GROUND
4GT, STRUCTURAL.
!ATED PIMBER MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO
~IPG A190.1 "DESiC~N STANgARD SPECI~IGATIONS FOR
S2 I ~ I S?RUG7UR4L CA ~ ~ I SPECIES". :TURAL GLUED. LAMINATED UMBER OF SOFTWOOD
IES".
34'-4n ~ ~ 6. .4DH~SIYES SH ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 1. FA6RICATION A ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ AITG TIMBER G EDITION OF ?HE SIYES S+~ALL CONFORM TO AItC A190.
IG,4tIDN ,4ND GONNEGI'IONS 5+~,4LL CONFORM t0 tNE
i'IMBER CONSTRUCTION MANUAL AND Tr-4E 2005 A. LIVE LOADS
7N OF THE NAtIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION.
gg,_2~~ ~ 1 I ~ 8. ALL CANNECTI ~ ( ~ MEMBERS TO E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DETAILED AND :®NNECTIONS GONNECtING LAMINATED TIMBER 1. LIvE LOAD ISUPERStRUCTURE) SS PSF
ERS TO EACH OPNER AND TO SUPPORTS SHALL BE 2. GROSS YENICLE WEIGHT i® TONS
ILED AND FURNISHED BY THE GLULAM 3. WIND LOAD 90 MPI-I
~ ~ I MANUFACTURER ~ - ( I ~ ~ I ARE APPROVE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9. 71MBER DEGKI ~ SOUTHEi~I PINE ~ACTURER. DD NOT FABRICATE UNTIL SHOP DRAWINGS ,
~PPROYED. CODE: 2006 EDIPION NC SPATE BUILDING' CODE
R DECKING SHALL BE 3x1® NOMINAL SELEGP S4S
IERN PINE PER SPIB:
.9 i i 1 I ~ i Im. TIMBER DEGKI 0 1 I PIECES. COMPLI' WITH AASHTO REQUIREMENTS FOR R DECKING S(~ALL BE INSTALLED IN FULL LENGTH
PEDESTRIAN RIDGES.
3 ~ I I ~ II. ,4LL HARDWAR ~ ~ $y~ ~ I I ~ f20DS, BOLT$ I ~ I ~ ~ I HOT DIPPED Cs s„ ~ ~ ~ ~ :S.
IARDWARE, INCLUDING. NAILS, LAG SCREWS, PLATES,
BOLTS AND NUTS, ANCHOR BOLTS, EPC: SHALL BE B• FOUNDATIONS
SIPPED GALVANIZED. 1. tHE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED FOR DESICxN IS 3000 PSF.
2. ALL FILL_SHALL BE PLAGEI~ IN AN S INCH MAXIMUM LOOSE
~ 8.. ~~_IDn I 33'-2u I
~ ~ -0 8~ MISGELLAN~OLIS ,LANEOUS LIFTS AND SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95 PER CENT MAXIMUM DRS' 'DENSITY A5 DETERMINED IN
j I I j j AccoRDANCE WITH ASPM D-~98 ISPANDARD PROetOR
i. t++e st~ucrurz ~ ~ I I ~ GONJUNCTIOh( W ~ ~ I I ~ CONTRACT DR ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 2. THE CONTR,4G7 8" ~ 5" ~ I CONDITIONS IN ~ ~ I vAT21ATION OF ~ ~ ~ I ATTENTION OF PROCEEDINGS W TRUCTURAL DRAU11NG5 SHALL BE USED IN METHOD).
UNCTION WITH AND COORDINATED WITH OTHER 3. THE ABUTMENT pETAILS ARE FURNISHED IN .THE DRAWINGS.
ZACT DRAUJINC~S AND SP~CI~IGATIONS, THE DEPtH OF EMBEDMENT AND TYPE OF SOOTING MAY VARY
~ONTRAC`C~R SH;4LL VERIFY ALL-EXISTING SITE DEPENDING ON ACPUAL MELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNPERED.
ITIONS INDICAtED ON .THESE DRAWINGS. ANY 4. IF ROCK IS ENCOUNTERED, CONTACT THE ENGINEER 0~
~TION OF C®NDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO tHE RECORD AND THE TOWN OF CARP PROJECT MANAGER
1TION OF 1'HE CONSULTING ENGINEERS BEFORE IMMEDIATELY.,
~EEDING WITH GONSTi@UCTION: 5. CONSULt tHE REPOi~T 0~ TM ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT NO.
~ 1 _ ~ ~ ~ s - t ~ ~ 3. PASRIGAtOR'S ~ - - I - ~ ~ _ ~ i I~ ~ ALL MA?ERIAL iA 'fl I I `0 ~I I~ r d I PROPER FA6RI ~ _ - ~ _ J WITH tHE GON7 ~ ~ ~ ~ i FOUND,4T I ON PL,4N ~ ~ ~ a. aNC~orz soLT i I ~ I~ I APPrzov~D S+~ ~ °O ~ S2 NOT TO SCALE I ` ~ I 5. HOT DIPPED Cs NUTS AND BOL MARINE AT 8O "510 (TYP) ICATOR'S SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW AND NOTE 090026EA, DAPED MAY: 13.2009, FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION
IAtERIAL REQUIREq iN SUFFIGIENP DETAIL. F®R RECOMMENDATIONS.
'EIS FABRIGAtION ,4Np ERECTION IN AGGO ANCE 6. NOTI~'f THE TOWN PROJECT MANACxER 24 HOURS PRIOR TO
'ICE GONTRACt 1~RAWINGS ,4ND pOCUMENPS. EXCAVATION OF FOOTINGS.
~R BOLTS SHALL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE U11TH' PHE
OYED SHOP DRAWING ANCHOR BOLT SETTING PLAN.
'IPPED GALVANIZED DOCK U1ASN~RS, LAG SCREWS,. ; G. CAST-IN-PLACE. CONC PE
4ND BOLTS CAN BE PURCHASED: FROM SEA PORT
dE AT 80~-4~6-8056 OR APPROVED EQUAL. l CONCRETE: WORK SHALL CONFORM PO AGI SPEGIFICATiONS.
2. ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCREtE 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE
SPRENGTH SNALI~ BE 3500 PSI IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318.
APPROACH I!1" GHAh1FER CsREENWAY
SLAB UIORK POINT NO. i WORK POINT N0. 2
STATION II + '10.91 STATION 12 + fd6.(d8 D. REINFORCING SPEEL
ELEVATION=28630 ELEVATION=28630
TOP OF WALL 1. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE 'ASTM A-~o15, GRADE 60. OF WALL TO
E J/SI ANp 6/SI SEE t/SI AND 6/S1 SLOPE DOUk~I FOR THE SLAB m i'-~„ FOR THE SLAB I tO 4 PItCH °E .DOWN AT A 2. PLACEMENT OF TI-IE R~INFORCINC~ STEEL v~l,4LL BE REVIEWED
PITCH BY THE STRI~CtURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLAGINC~ CONCRETE. , .
REINF. REINF. 3. DE~'AIL AND F,4PRIGAtE INFORCING STEEL IN ACCORDANCE
WIPH ACI-315. i~EIN~®RGING STEEL SHALL BE PLACED IN
w N g SEE 1/SI ~ v 2~'~ ON SLOPE
w M5g10 NOR 4 12 PoR SLAB j ACCORDANCE. WITH tHE:PROJECT i~OCUMENTS.
~,y' EACH FAGH INF. 4. FABRICATE IN ACCORDANCE'WIPH APPROVED SHOP #410 HORIZ. DRAUJINC~S.
~ ~6„i r~~2O LAP i~
5. Do N0P HEAT BEND. INFORCING BARS. .
M5~1O 8 ~ N5m20 i SEE DETAIL 1/51 5 2
p., VERT. VER'C. ~ FOR ANCHOR BOLT. COMPACTED CLEAR
O THIS THIS ~ BACKFILL.
~ FACE FACE
p O O 0 36~„~,~~ ~a~10 VERT.
IL W,
w ~ O o O "5w1O HOR
} p~ EACH FACE
6. ~i
Q ~ Z1_Zn ~~_$n p_Zn .
O Q "4 DU1L. W/ STA. HK
~ SAME SPCs. AS PERT. "4 10 HORI O ~ STL. ~ NC)RI .
"ep 2x~ KEY
"512 TOP, "412 BOL
~
n ~ ~ ~ 10"5 CONL "4~9 HORIZONTAL IZONTAI. 2,~6,,
t® 4'-~0°
5~-0" ~ FOR Cx~ENWAY LAYOUT, tA. SLAB
'r ELEYAttONB SHE OtH~R SHEETS. Cary Project Number 09-SP-033 '
APPROVED
2 ' L.~~S~ 7~ ~ 7.~ ~~OT D ~ T~ ~ L SPE SHEET S3 FOR TOP OF WALL AND TOP I C~' L ,°o~ of GARY
S2 SCALE 3/4•• 1'_0" OF FOOTINCx ELEVATIONS. S2 S S2 SCALE 3/~" = 1'-0" APProvedby Date N
Planning Date ~ i
Engineering Date
No Revision Date B Designer Scale
DCF VARIES Sheet No.
Drawn By Date 1 TOC 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS, 06/11/09 6/05/09 DCF S 0" U T H 13 R" I r u-"* G E T Kff""'A I L UU N Nk' ECO DCF, CG 05 14 09 WITHER= RAVENEL
"'ETA 'Tt"R ABUTMENT ur Checked By Job No DETAI LS GENERAL NOTES ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS S2
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA DCF 2090053.0 CARP 111 MacKenan Drive Cary; North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
i

eeri ,Inc., ~,~,,~.~~~p~,,~,,.
:,.o~~ any.,,
r-------- ~ 109.Brady Curt ~ ~'a ~sEA ~ r
~ ~ ~ Cary, North Carolina 27511 s2so
~ ~ N ~ ~ Tel.: [phone] ;,o9G~tiv~NE~
~',D C~~~IS~~:~°
i ~ Fax: [phone] ~ ~ ~ ~~~~remeut1~`e
~ office@ dcfengineeringinc.com _ ~ 1
I C®
I
I
I I
~ I
I
I I
I I
I
~ ~
6 I I
st I I
I I
~ e
I
I ~ ~
281.00 T.O.W. ELPV. ~ I ~ 281.00 T.O.IU. Sl
~ 5" THICK CONCRETE ~ ~ APRON SLAS ON
~ COMPACTED
SUBCsRADE_ REINFORCE
_ - - - - - - I W/ ~4~ 14 EACH WAY. ~

~ SPE CIVIL DUXES. FOR ~
~ ~ SLOPE OF THE SLA6. ~ ~ i- -
T.ou~. Ei.~v.=a~~.~0 ~
~ r.O.w. ELEv.=2x630 I I ~ ~ I
1 ~ ~ I I
C27'1.mmJ L-- 1 I I
I
L I C2l~.mm) I I J
- I
- - - - I 13'-5.. I aD -
~
~8. ~ ~

--L---- --------r---------- J-- t ~
-~d
- - . i UIOiJG POIN NO.
~ ~ , + STATION Ii +10.91 0
r NOTES:
~ ELEVATION= 28630
~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. ~,4G It.l. AROUND THE ~4BUTMENtB ,4Np
~ 8~~ I I (271.00) ( c"~ BENE~4tl-I;tWE C~REENlUA1' P,4tH5 5N;4~~ 8~ j
8° ~ INST~I~LED IN A GONTROI.LED M,4NN~R .UNDER
THE OBSERVATION o>= tI~E C~EOTEGNNIC~1.
- ENGINEER.
I ~ a 1
S3 5GA1.E 3/4" = 1'-0" 2. A P~SENt,4tiYE ~ tNE GEOTEGNNiGa~ ENGINEER SHALI. OBSERVE tNE I:OOtING
EXC~4V~TIONS PRIOR TO ~~4GIG~11.l.ING UJITN
~2~_1" GONG tE t0 1=YALU,4tE tHE B~~4RING
GOND ITIONS.
~ , , i
~ l2°P~.00) DENOTES TOP OF FOOTING
E1.EY~1'ION. ~ I N
~ ~ N T.O.U. DENOTES "tOP OF WALE ELEVATION".
~ WORK POINT NO. 2 =
cn ~ ~ J r - StA?ION 12 + O(o.(D8 0 -r
~ ~
~
_
~ A^.
13i'~n
O
~p ter'
~ - , r
1
r ~
(211.00). r---- I
~ 7.O.Ul. ELEV.=28630 ~ _ ~ 1 ~ T.O.UJ. ELEV.=28030
281.00 t.0.U1.
UJ/ ~'4~1~ E~iGH W~'(. 15'-9 3/S" ~ - - - _ _ _ -
_ - - - - - - - " - - - THE 5" THICK CONCRETE APRON SLAB, ON COMPACTED SUSCsRADE. RE It~IPORCEp W/ "4m14 - THE SLAB IS NOT BROWN IN THIS PLAN VIPW OF A6U'I'MENT NO. 2.
r Cary Proa1'e~ct Number 09-SP-033
THP APPROACH SLAB 13 Ifd'-0" WIDE ANp 15'-0" LOP1Cs, ALONG THE CENTERLINE, SUT CURV 35'-0" RADIUS TO MATCH THE CENTERLINE OF THE CsREENWAY. 3UT GU~vED ON ,4 I PROVED
z ~'l~~' ro~~ of caw ® .
2SI.O0 TA.UJ. ELEV. SEE CIVIL DWGS. FOR SLAB CsEOMETR't'.
53 SG~4LE 3/~" = I' Approved by Date Planning Date ~
SEE I/S2 FOR THE FOUNpATION PLAN SHOWI1~lCs tHE ANCHOR BOLT. Engineering Date ~
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale
1 TOC 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS, 06/11/09 6/05/09 DCF DCF VARIES "ETOR 'TM Sheet No.
Drawn By Date r",% "'E TKAIL CONN U WITHERS RAVENEL
DCF, CG 05/14/09 sk-AUTE mmv%lruu ABU UTMENT DETAILS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS S3
Checked By Job No. NORTH acF 2090053.0 CARP WAKE COUNTY NO CAROLINA, 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com