20190347 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190314

DWR
Urtslpu of W.-10"Revourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
C1wW only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20190347
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Goldston - North White Street Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Bob Zarzecki
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/14/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn Creek; stream index no. 27-23-4)
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.998207
Longitude:
-78.483802
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information -
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Franklin
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
P Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

V Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F- Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
R 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F- Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F- Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Goldston - Buffer Mitigation SOA.pdf 124.55KB
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
V Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
DS Traditions Sub LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book 016835 / Page 01063 (Wake Co.) & Book 2103 / Page 357 (Franklin Co.)
2c. Responsible party:
Sean Cooney
2d. Address
Street Address
3335 E. Indian School Road
Address Line 2
Suite # 150A
City
Phoenix
Fbstal / Zip Code
85018
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
29. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rovince / Region
Arizona
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
(formerly referred to has Sedgefield Park North)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Wake Forest
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1851-28-7593 (Wake Co.) & 1851-29-8044
(Franklin Co.)
2c. Project Address
Street Address
0 N. White Street (Wake Co.) & 1255 S. Cross Street (Franklin Co.)
Address Line 2
City
Wake Forest
Fbstal / Zip Aide
27587
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn Creek; stream index no. 27-23-4)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
03020202-0107
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
30.83
State / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is current vacant, forested land. Rural residential properties exist immediately south of the site. Hunters Crossing subdivision exists to the south just beyond these larger rural
residential properties. Young Forest subdivision exists to the north. North White Street, railroad tracks and commercial/industrial businesses exist to the West. Del Webb at Traditions
subdivision exists to the east. This subdivision Will be consistent with these surrounding subdivisions.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Goldston - USGS.pdf 816.45KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Goldston - Soil Survey (Wake).pdf 221.59KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
+/-2
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
+/-3,137
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To construct a residential subdivision.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision with an anticipated 72* single family lots (* total lot count is subject to change), roads, utilities and stormwater
management devices. Heavy equipment such as excavators and bull dozers typically used for the construction of such subdivision will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Goldston - Impact Maps 3-14-2019.pdf 3.95MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown

Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
AID No. not yet issued. Attached email verification with intention to issue PJD along with NWP
verification.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki
Agency/Consultant Company: S&EC, PA
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
PJD Email verification dated April 14, 2017 (attached).
Neuse Buffer On-site Determination No. NBRRO # 18-302 (replaces 09-108)(attached).
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Goldston - USACE PJD Verification April 2017.pdf 2.88MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
[7 Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
❑ Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * M 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition * M area*
N1.08) Road Shoulder Fill P Headwater Forest EN1.08 Yes Both 0.010
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.010
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.010
2h. Comments:
A retaining wall was used to minimize wetland impacts.
3. Stream Impacts
. _.... _.......... .. _......
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3a. Reason for Impact(?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
(EN1.01) Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
Perennial
Both
10
71
Creek)
Average (feet)
(M1n�rfeet)
32
(EN1.01) Construction
Temporary
Other
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
Perennial
Both
10
26
Access
Creek)
Average (feet)
(In�rfed)
S3
(EN1.04) Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Hatters Branch (a.k.a.
Intermittent
Both
10
74
Dunn Creek)
Average (feet)
(In�rfeet)
S4
(EN1.04) Construction
Temporary
Other
UF to Hatters Branch (a.k.a.
Intermittent
Both
10
51
Access
Dunn Creek)
Average (feet)
(in�rfed)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:

0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
145 77
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
222
3j. Comments:
Upstream and downstream temporary impacts listed on the exhibits were combined into a single impact in the table above. Temporary stream impact
areas will be returned to original stream contours and banks stabilized with vegetation.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
R Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
❑ Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
(EN1.01) Road Crossing
P
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
6,528
4,110
Creek)
(EN1.02) Stormwater BMP Discharge
P
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
356
192
Creek)
(EN1.03) Stormwaater BMP Discharge
P
Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
329
246
Creek)
(EN1.04) Road Crossing
P
UT to Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
6,622
4,322
Creek)
(EN1.04) Grading in Zone 2 only (exempt)
T
LIT to Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
0
256
Creek)
(EN1.05) Grading in Zone 2 only (exempt)
T
In to Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
0
1,233
Creek)
(EN1.06) Grading in Zone 2 only (exempt)
T
UT to Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
No
0
493
Creek)
(EN1.07) Road Impacts other than crossings
P
UT to Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn
Yes
317
2,160
Creek)
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 1,982.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 14,152.00
11,030.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 14,152.00
13,012.00
61. Comments:
Permanent & Temporary buffer impacts at the road crossings were combined in the impact areas provided above as simply "permanent' under the
"road crossing" use.
(EN1.07) Are buffer impacts associated with a "T' turnaround area that would result in road impacts to the buffer other than crossings of surface
waters and as such are considered "Allowable Ad Mitigation". Payment into a private buffer mitigation bank is proposed. The impacts could not be
avoided due to safety vehicle turn around requirements. It should be noted however that the permanent impacts have been limited to Zone 2 with only
some temporary construction impacts to Zone 1. Mitigation however is proposed for both zones.
Supporting Documentation
Goldston - Impact Maps 3-14-2019.pdf 3.95MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:

The developer hired S&EC to delineate all wetlands, streams and Neuse Buffers on the property. This designer then used this information to try to
avoid impacts to the greatest extent possible. Those impacts that could not be avoided were minimized. Minimization efforts included the use of
headwalls at the stream crossings and retaining walls elsewhere.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
An erosion and sediment control permit and construction stormwater permit will be obtained prior to land clearing in an effort to protect downstream
waters during construction. A post -construction stormwater management plan will be approved by the Town to treat runoff from impervious surface
and protect downstream voters post -construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts to wetlands have been minimized to 0.01 acres (well below the 0.1 acres typically used for requiring mitigation). Permanent impacts to streams have been minimized to 145 If for
two stream crossings combined (less than the 150 If typically used for requiring mitigation).
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
e Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHW T)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
V Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormvater flowthrough the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOTs Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
O Yes a No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
CYes re, No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
e Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
GL Local Government ❑ State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
P Phase II Fl NSW ❑ USMP C Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Wake Forest
Comments:
A stormwater managment plan will be approved by the Town of Wake Forest for this project. The plan proposes the use of two wet detention ponds discharging through the buffer to the
streams. The plan also proposes a sand filter (near the "T" road turnaround area) that will discharge to a low flat area outside of the buffer and wetlands at non-erosive velocities.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a single family residential subdivision that is surrouneded by similiar existing subdivisions. Projects such as this typically are not
considered to have any significant potential to result in additional development that could have cumulative impcats to water quality. Any potential
additional development resulting from this project would be subject to similiar Federal, State and Local regulations protecting water quality (e.g.
404/401, Neuse Buffers, stormwater management, etc.).
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater from the project will be discharged to the City of Raleigh (CoR) sanitary sewer collection system and treatment plant. The Town of Wake
Forest (ToWF) contracts with the COR for this service. The CoR, ToWF and State will ensure that adequate capacity ebsts for this development.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r- Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
ryes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
FWS & NHP websites and databases
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA-EFH Mapper website - The project is located Whtin the piedmont of NC, far from any EFH areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO-HPOWEB website
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA regulated floodplain stops at the pond on Hatters Branch (a.k.a. Dunn Creek) downstream of the proposed road crossing.

Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Goldston - Soil Survey (Franklin).pdf 189.84KB
Goldston - Aerial Sketch.pdf 188.29KB
Goldston - NBRRO# 18-302 (8-29-2018).pdf 3.02MB
Signature
-
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Bob Zarzecki - S&EC, PA
Signature
Date
3/14/2019

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC. 27615 • lhrnne: ()Pl 846-59(0 • Fos
S;uldec.coni
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: NORTH WHITE STREET PROPERTY S&EC Project #8685
Date: 2018
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: James LaAinger Field Office: USACE Raleigh Re u�ry Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC} staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Site Address:
City, County, State:
1 1b51- z9l - 804+
t►1 tsr��lrc sT2�E5
u 30,,V -E FVL&'T_. 0C_
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: D5 i DiTie.aS 6,)F5 I-L—c-
Address: _333y l~. i,1DrA„� 5C-?kaL- r -i> A- Pr � QHtvE­.)+x. 142.
Picone No.: (Lv; 4$1-` 01 Fax No.: ( } Mobile No.: ( )
Email: a r_ot>0C- i di i P+i iAt_ Cz)in
5rc_ft l Capp aE't 14 08-15-18
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

`\
\ 1 I I
i�
/
\°
of
lip
01
\ \ A
0
\
111•<\ `` \\
IL
I 1 I
�\ \\\ �♦ \1 11 i i I ( � ; \♦I ♦I 1
\ ♦ \ I 1 / I / I / 1 /
\ ♦ `�
I Lil,
/
r
I
1
l
I
\
//// //,% A 1\1 1 I \ \
�/ � 1, • • I r� / :' _ _ \ \\ �\� \
1
A/;/ if ► 111\x" 1 /�� =�1 j \\ \I'I
• / /ill li-i J/ /
III 1 \\\\`\ ♦\♦ \\`♦ `\`\\ \\ \
ii l 11\ 11 \♦.♦\ i i 1\ \\ \`�
`-
11
- \\ 1 I\ \\\� \` `�`♦ ``
Legend
Stream
��
.
��---ter % / 'I 1, I°\I':.1
\ `\`\♦♦��\`\ ` -- ---�- / 1
`.
��♦
./ . /
\ \\
.!"� --
• !
°��♦`\\`,`.\ Ems:. I
Nil
\\\ \ `\-.
I
/
�
\\ \\ 11
1 -\♦♦:__ \ \\\\\ 1 111 1
l
�. i/i
i�� I
I � ♦ice
_ � 11\\ ;i(; lii\"
//// //,% A 1\1 1 I \ \
�/ � 1, • • I r� / :' _ _ \ \\ �\� \
1
A/;/ if ► 111\x" 1 /�� =�1 j \\ \I'I
• / /ill li-i J/ /
III 1 \\\\`\ ♦\♦ \\`♦ `\`\\ \\ \
ii l 11\ 11 \♦.♦\ i i 1\ \\ \`�
`-
11
- \\ 1 I\ \\\� \` `�`♦ ``
Legend
Stream
��

fires
EBX Buffer Mitigation Banks
Statement of Availability March 13, 2019
NC Division of Water Resources
Stephanie Goss
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Building, 9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re Project: Goldston -North White Street Subdivision
This document confirms that DS Traditions Sub LLC (Applicant) for the Goldston -North White Street
Subdivision (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 4,191 Sguare Feet of Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Credits from one of the following banks, EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer
Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES Neuse Buffer and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank, or EBX
Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank. Specific bank sites that may be debited are
Arrington Bridge I, Buffalo Branch, Selma Mill, Cedar Grove, Hatley, Ezell, Polecat, Hannah Bridge,
Meadow Spring, and Stone Creek, all located in HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-
Neuse 1, LLC and EBX, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1075 or cparkergres.us if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
J �' f� FT�
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Bank Sponsor — EBX-Neuse I, LLC and Environmental Banc & Exchange (EBX)

19
Project Number: Map Title:
8685.W5 N
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
BZ Sedgefield Park
Scale: Wake & Franklin County, NC
1" = 600'
Date:
Source: Franklin County Soil Surveya
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Rolesville & Franklinton Sheets
4/03/17 1 S Palk of N. -Road. Su k L04. Rrteigh, NC 27615 • Ph.. (919) VA -YM • Fax: f9197 844T :?
i
OR
i
l
a
�j
46
a
l 1
t
q
Ma 13
WHW
19
Project Number: Map Title:
8685.W5 N
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
BZ Sedgefield Park
Scale: Wake & Franklin County, NC
1" = 600'
Date:
Source: Franklin County Soil Surveya
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Rolesville & Franklinton Sheets
4/03/17 1 S Palk of N. -Road. Su k L04. Rrteigh, NC 27615 • Ph.. (919) VA -YM • Fax: f9197 844T :?

+fie 5
P
f.
kr.
4ti p' s R�
1.1 � � , .. "'y'� , I
PV(
_ A p B
`{ s
DuB
Ce
2
,.,.
i
f • .. ; lCeCZ"
COGS f
U DUB
1° i2
CeS2
41
Ma Q,
C?T
DUMP
` t C 1 ` l
Project Number: Map Title:
8685.W5 N
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
BZ Sedgefield Park
Scale: 1 600' Wake & Franklin County, NC
" =
Date: Source: Wake county Soil Survey Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4/03/17 Sheet 11 8512 Falk of N.—Road. Sulk 104.R kigh. NC 27615• Ph...(919)81659W• F-;(919)94&9 ,'
d."—

Bob Zarzecki
From: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 10:58 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Subject: RE: Sedgefield Park North - PJD Request
I don't think I need to go out on this one. I will issue the PJD when the PCN comes in.
James Lastinger
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x32
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Sedgefield Park North - PJD Request
Importance: High
James
Attached is a PJD Request for a property on North White Street in Wake Forest that straddles the Wake/Franklin County
line. Please let me know if you would like to visit the property. Otherwise, please forward the PJD when you are able. I
suspect that a permit application will be coming in for it, but it may be months out.
Thanks!
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615

[phone] Office Phone
[phone] Direct Line
[phone] Fax
[phone] Mobile
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Visit us at SandEC.com <Blockedhttp://www.SandEC.com> !
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain
confidential information. This electronic communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality
control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should
not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal.
If you are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and
delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC), Bob
Zarzecki, 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Raleigh, NC 27615 = Agent for James D. Goldston
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory Field office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: #FOLDER LOCATION_DIRECTIONS#
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake / Franklin City: Wake Forest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.9988° Long.: -078.4841°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hatters Branch 27-23-4
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): March 29, 2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
a licable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
S1
35.996900
-78.482643
1,967 LF
Riverine
Section 404
S2
35.997701
-78.481208
1069 LF
Riverine
Section 404
S3
35.998770
-78.481039
101 LF
Riverine
Section 404
W1
35.996462
-78.481948
1.03 Acres
Palustrine
Section 404
W2
35.998290
-78.483894
0.09 Acres
Palustrine
Section 404
W3
35.999110
-78.484262
0.80 Acres
Palustrine
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Wetland / Stream Sketch Man
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Rolesville / Franklinton Quads
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Wake County Sheet 11 / Franklin County
Rolesville & Franklinton Sheets
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FENIA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): DWR Buffer Letter (NBRRO#09-108)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Digitally signed by Bob--ki
Bob Zarzecki D.P Bob Zarzecki,—,ki,111d1C Slands
Department email=bzaaeckipsa0deccol-d,
Dale: 2011.04.1014:43:48-09'00'
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 0 N White Street
City, State: Wake Forest, NC
County: Wake & Franklin
Directions: The property is located just north of Burchblind Drive in Wake Forest.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1851287593 (Wake Co.)
1851-29-8044 (Franklin Co.)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: S&EC - Bob zarzecki
Mailing Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address 1: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: James D. Goldston
Mailing Address: 13100 old Creedmoor Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address3: N/A
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See Agent Authorization Form Attached
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F-1 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
F-1 I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
FV1Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area +/- 36 acres
y l I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form 6.
V Project Coordinates: 35.9988 Latitude -078.4841 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
VAerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
FVIOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
F-1 USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
1-1 Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
F-1 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
F-1 Aerial Photography of the project area
1-1 USGS Topographic Map
F-1 Soil Survey Map
F-1 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatorVProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By, The Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Name: James D. Goldston
Address: 13100 Old Creedmoor Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Sedgefield Park North S&EC Project # -905-, /1
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, tonish upon refit est supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The �- day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to
visiting the site. —r- '- , 4 ) ) r -
James D. Goldston
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR — DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
wner's or Municipal Official's Signa e
cc: Mr. Jason Payne
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 L.ePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Ake
NGDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27614
BASIN:
Neuse River
(15A NCAC 2B .0233)
X
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
August 12, 2009
Tar -Pamlico
(15A NCAC 2B .0259)
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NBRRO#09-108
Wake/Franklin County
Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Goldston Property
Location/Directions: Subject property is located on east side of SR 1130 Rd in Wake and Franklin
Counties; USGS Rolesville;
NOTE: Renewal determination of NBRRO#04-0184
Subject Stream: UT to Richlands Creek
Date of Determination: July 2, 2009
Feature
E/I/P* Not Subject
Subject
Start@ Stop@
Stream Soil USGS
Form Pts. Survey To o
1
X
Flag SO
X
2
X,
Throughout
X X
3
X
Throughout
X
4
X I
I I
I X
*E/I/P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake and Franklin County,
North Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is
checked "Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are
checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There
may be other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly , DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination
by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for
an ad judicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including
One
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant NhCarolina
Natllmalily
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10%a Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]

Goldston Property
Wake/Franklin County
August 12, 2009
Page 2 of 2
conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask
for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Bearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army
Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
i% 1 l r4
Martin Richmond
Environmental Specialist
cc: Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
RRO/SWP File Copy

726 000mE 727 728
was compiled by the U.S. Department of
ural Resources Conservation Service.
orthophotographs prepared by the U.S.
Geological Survey, from 1994 aerial
ydrography and culture information were
le Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Datum of 1983 (NAD83). GRS-80 Spheroid
s: Universal Transverse Mercator, zone 17.
ticks and land division data, if shown, are
ositioned. Digital data are available for
C)
QUADRANGLE LOCATION

IQR'm CAROLINA — SHEET NUMBER 11
VF
Ic
e
;,• fir.
eB f
App
ids p C
ApC2 Ci
WkC
' C ZP
r
co CeB� V ,
/ DUB
ApB? NV
:eB j 1 �� r�B
Ce62
`CeC:�
ApC2
f r CeC2
Cef32� CeC2 f ~
U DUB Ems' D
UK
Ma 4.�Q f', C
CITY n £'` Le�1
DUMP
�,Q' WkE' 'APL " C
CeD E� 1
HeC2
T ,
A p C 2 !
ApC2 /-' U MdB2
Ap$2 'ec U/ CeB2 -�
r
Me Mtli32 t
- CeS2I LLD
CeC2 10 APB2
APC ,
`1\ ti W k E. ' W v+r F •.
-o Apcz
M C^L
„v

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sedgefield Park City/County: Wake Forest /Wake&Frank) Sampling Date: 03/29/17
Applicant/Owner: James D. Goldston State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): S&EC - Bob Zarzecki Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.999464 Long: -78.484630 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ApC2 - Appling Sandy Loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F7 -]No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0✓ No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �F No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I v l No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J V L No=
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No Q Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes=
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4"
No ❑ Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3.
6.
50% of total cover: 35%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Acer rurbum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 45%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1 Vaccinium crassifolium
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
40%
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
30%
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
6
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
83%
(A/B)
70%
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
14%
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
_ 20% of
total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
20%
Yes
FAC
FACW species
x 2 =
70%
Yes
FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
90% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18%
50% Yes FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
70% Yes FAC
70% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35% 20% of total cover: 14%
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes n No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-20" 2.5Y 3/2 90% 2.5Y 5/6 10% RM M SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sedgefield Park City/County: Wake Forest /Wake&Frankl Sampling Date: 03/29/17
Applicant/Owner: James D. Goldston State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): S&EC - Bob Zarzecki Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HillSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.999344 Long: -78.484803 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ApB - Appling Sandy Loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F7 -]No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0✓ No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No=
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches): N/A
n
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches): N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Cornus florida
3. Prunus serotina
A Liriodendron tuliDifera
6.
50% of total cover: 50%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 40%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
40%
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
10%
No
FACU
(A)
10%
NO
FACU
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: _
3no/
voc
FAf`II
100% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 20%
50% Yes FAC
30% Yes FACU
80% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16%
= Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
(A)
(A/B)
(B)
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 20% Yes FAC
,? Lonicera iaDonica 40% Yes FAC
4.
5.
60% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30% 20% of total cover: 12%
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes n No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4" 2.5Y 4/4 100%
4-20" 2.5Y 5/6 100%
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SECRET p6 A \
M- r nfr-�k"'�Zi
MOULTONI�0�0�2
C
Project Number:
8685.W5
Project Manager:
BZ
Scale:
1" = 600'
Date:
4/03/17
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Sedgefield Park
Wake & Franklin County, NC
NC USGS
Franklinton and Rolesville Quads
N
0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet J4
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PAI
$412 Yalk of N,— Rmd.S.k 144. R.Ivsh. XC 27615 • Pham. (419) W9 5900• Fax: (419) &169467
—d--

+fie 5
P
f.
kr.
4ti p' s R�
1.1 � � , .. "'y'� , I
PV(
_ A p B
`{ s
DuB
Ce
2
,.,.
i
f • .. ; lCeCZ"
COGS f
U DUB
1° i2
CeS2
41
Ma Q,
C?T
DUMP
` t C 1 ` l
Project Number: Map Title:
8685.W5 N
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
BZ Sedgefield Park
Scale: 1 600' Wake & Franklin County, NC
" =
Date: Source: Wake county Soil Survey Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4/03/17 Sheet 11 8512 Falk of N.—Road. Sulk 104.R kigh. NC 27615• Ph...(919)81659W• F-;(919)94&9 ,'
d."—

III
0
C
tki
ARr
Project Number: Map Title:
8685.W5 N
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map 0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
BZ Sedgefield Park
Scale: 1 600' Wake & Franklin County, NC
" =
Date:
Source: Franklin County Soil Survey Soil & Environmental Consultants, Ptd Rolesville & Franklinton Sheets
4/03/17 kAlYlallc of N—Rnd. Suk IOJ. &ukigh, NCY751S•Wwr, (914) $465910•Pax: (419)84fi 4u'

`\
\ 1 I I
i�
/
\°
of
lip
01
\ \ A
0
\
111•<\ `` \\
IL
I 1 I
�\ \\\ �♦ \1 11 i i I ( � ; \♦I ♦I 1
\ ♦ \ I 1 / I / I / 1 /
\ ♦ `�
I Lil,
/
r
I
1
l
I
\
//// //,% A 1\1 1 I \ \
�/ � 1, • • I r� / :' _ _ \ \\ �\� \
1
A/;/ if ► 111\x" 1 /�� =�1 j \\ \I'I
• / /ill li-i J/ /
III 1 \\\\`\ ♦\♦ \\`♦ `\`\\ \\ \
ii l 11\ 11 \♦.♦\ i i 1\ \\ \`�
`-
11
- \\ 1 I\ \\\� \` `�`♦ ``
Legend
Stream
��
.
��---ter % / 'I 1, I°\I':.1
\ `\`\♦♦��\`\ ` -- ---�- / 1
`.
��♦
./ . /
\ \\
.!"� --
• !
°��♦`\\`,`.\ Ems:. I
Nil
\\\ \ `\-.
I
/
�
\\ \\ 11
1 -\♦♦:__ \ \\\\\ 1 111 1
l
�. i/i
i�� I
I � ♦ice
_ � 11\\ ;i(; lii\"
//// //,% A 1\1 1 I \ \
�/ � 1, • • I r� / :' _ _ \ \\ �\� \
1
A/;/ if ► 111\x" 1 /�� =�1 j \\ \I'I
• / /ill li-i J/ /
III 1 \\\\`\ ♦\♦ \\`♦ `\`\\ \\ \
ii l 11\ 11 \♦.♦\ i i 1\ \\ \`�
`-
11
- \\ 1 I\ \\\� \` `�`♦ ``
Legend
Stream
��

4
SECRkA \-ET PO%aF AFmo NBORO
C
Project Number:
8685.W5
Project Manager:
BZ
Scale:
1" = 600'
Date:
4/03/17
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Sedgefield Park
Wake & Franklin County, NC
NC USGS
Franklinton and Rolesville Quads
N
0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PAA
rJ121-+I1x ,il'ticuse Rmd. Suilc 14d, Rulsigh. �C 27615 • PMnr. X91?) Silr59PP• Fax: (419) $1!r"Wi7
xendn..wn

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
August 29, 2018
Bob Zarzecki
[e-mail]
ROY
COOPER
(i, I e, no,
MICHAEL S. REGAN
se" etury
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #18-302
Wake and Franklin County
This buffer determination letter replaces buffer determination 09-108
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 213.0233)
X Fla S1 X
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 28 .0259)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer
X Throu hout X
ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
X Throu hout X
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
—S3
S4
projects)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
North White Street
White
Determination Date: August 28, 2018
Wake Forest
Staff: Ray Milosh
Stream E/I/P*
Not Subject Subject Star[ 2 Stop ti Soil Survey
USGS To o
S I
X Fla S1 X
X Throu hout X
X
—S2
X Throu hout X
—S3
S4
X Does not exist X
*E111P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Explanation: The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey and/or
the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject"
has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present.
Streams that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be
at least an intermittent stream. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps
referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
'"%^Nothing Compares', - ..
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919 -70? -9000

This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you e questions regarding t i ete nation, please feel free to contact Ray Milosh at [phone].
Sincerely,
Danny Smith/
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy

18-302: North White Street Property
11,
Stream
E/I/P*
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
S 1
X
Flag S 1
X
S2
X
Throughout
X
X
S 3
X
Throughout
X
S 4
X
Does not exist
X
�,054A7fa
Legend: � > �Z
Map provided by NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
-Approximate Site boundary: ���
Locations are approximate
"
and are provided for
reference only

18-302: North White Street Property
.; S,
�
kLrN
r
Stream
E/I/P*
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
S 1
X
Flag S1
X
S2
X
Throughout
X
X
S 3
X
Throughout
X
S 4
X
Does not exist
X
.STATFo Map provided by NCDEQ
Legend:
Division of Water Resources
-Approximate Site boundary: }i Locations are approximate
pproxounry and are provided for
M. �/ reference only ::