NCS000295_COMPLIANCE_20180713

----- STORMWATER-D'IVISI-ON-CODING-SHEET--
PERMIT NO.
N bcooa
DOC TYPE
❑ FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
;S� COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ 0 k Z 0-7 11
YYYYMMDD

L�
Date: 7 Z
Wastewater Branch
Water Quality Permitting Section
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority ���
Facility Name: _-)/¢{kW SO4U0)o'/Kl?1i_lN6
NPDES Permit Number: N I C 151010101 Z 1 151
To Whom It May Concern:
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following individuals for all
permit applications, discharge monitoring reports, and other information relating to the operations at
the subject facility as required by all applicable federal, state, and local environmental agencies
specifically with the requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 213.0506.
Individual # I
Individual #2 (rfapplicable)
Name:
C-4)tk 7Y b LC_.
"t
Title:
VP a0C P0- -MCW5
Mailing Address:
ISZ W - kt4/41-,V ST .
S YL V,4 9 A) L Z 9r77
Physical Address:
(if different)
Email Address:
G-f vtdal(&)cc 44ompyer. ti
Office Phone:
( — SS�i� 20
Mobile Phone:
L .— 5 06 - o 3 �
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at either the phone
number or email address below. RECEIVED
Sincerely, JUL 13 2918
Y- 4,11� DENR-LAND QUALITY
Aut orized Signing Official's Signature STORMWATER PERMI-rTING
Authorized Signing Official's Name (typeorprint) Title
Mailing Address
t1S1ytJ'e41(P—
Email Address
924 ^ 5�P6 - f3-3 LO z ZD/-6.r/ - 7 S 7
Office Phone Mobile Phone
cc;
(Enter region name)
Regional Office, Water Quality Permitting Section

�' 1.
.f 47VA HFILE CO[',(
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charies Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 13, 2012
Jeff Murphy, Vice President/CFO
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
152 W. Main St
Sylva, NC 28779
SUBJECT: NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Jackson Paper Manufacturing - Sylva Plant
Permit No: NCS000295
Jackson County
Dear Mr. Murphy:
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
March 20, 2012. Linda Wiggs and I, of the Asheville Regional Office /Division of Water Quality
(ARO/DWQ), appreciated the assistance of Josh Carnes, Environmental Manager, during review
of the site. The facility was found to be in compliance with permit NCS000295.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference.
ARO/DWQ recommends that the chip piles be moved approximately 25 feet from surface water
conveyances. This may help to alleviate elevated benchmark values when sampling. Due to the
older infrastructure at the plant, Jackson Paper should continue to evaluate any illicit discharges.
AROIDWQ will work with DWQ's Raleigh Central Office through the renewal process to try to
reduce some of the required monitoring. Jackson Paper has performed ample sampling in the past
3 years and DWQ appreciates the efforts made at the plant. In order for this to be successful,
Jackson Paper should continue to practice good housekeeping and make continued efforts to
reduce pollutant contributions to surface waters.
Location. 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
internel: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Eaual 4000rtunity i Affirmative Action Employer
NonrthCarolina
Amlfl"ally

Mr. Murphy
Page°2 '
April 9, 2012
Please contact me at [phone] or Susan.A.Wilson aMcdenngov, if 1 can be of any further
assistance.
Sincerely,
�'
,'Susan A. Wilson, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Josh Carnes, Jackson Paper Manufacturing
Central Files
ARO Files
Bradley Bennett, SWPU
5:1SWPUacksonlStormwaterl2-EndividuaNackson Paperllnsp March 201210EIJackson Paper.4 2012.doc

Permit: NCS000295
SOC:
County: Jackson
Region: Ashevi4le
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 04/17/09 Expiration: 04/30/12 Owner: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Sylva plant
152 W Main St
Contact Person: Josh Carnes Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Sylva NC 28779
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 03/2012012 Entry Time: 10:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s):
Linda S Wiggs
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ■ Compliant fl Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 05:10 PM
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone] Ext.4653
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000295 Owner - Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Inspection Date: 03/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Susan Wilson and Linda Wiggs (ARO/DWQ) met Josh Cames of Jackson Paper on March 20, 2012. Jackson Paper is
currently under an individual stormwater permit (effective May 1, 2009) which requires analytical and qualitative
monitoring on a monthly basis. Jackson Paper has diligently performed their required monitoring.
They have also conducted upstream and downstream monitoring, as well as an upstream DOT culvert that flows through
the site. Although some benchmarks have been exceeded - there is no direct correlation to instream values. Jackson
Paper has made modifications to the site to prevent excess runoff that may have been contributing to the elevated values
(particularly near the ditch line at the west of the property near the DOT culvert).
SDO-001 - this outfall is essentially the front parking area of the facility. There is a small area that may have some
exposure - but the majority of stormwater contribution comes from the drainage and runoff of the main highway that runs
in front of the plant. After conversations with Josh, there is not an adequate way to eliminate the highway runoff that this
outfall is receiving. ARO/DWQ will recommend to the Central Office that monitoring for this outfall be reduced or
eliminated - and good housekeeping practices be maintained in this area. This outfall has had some. exceedances - that
were likely attributed to road runoff and/or the filter that was used in the drop inlet.
SDO-002 - this outfall is basically a previous drainage/stream that has been culverted beneath the plant. This outfall has
only had a few turbidity exceedances in the past 2 years. DWQ/ARO will recommend to the Central Office that monitoring
for this outfall be reduced or eliminated.
SDO-003 - this outfall receives the majority of flow around the chip piles (which are used for fuel at the plant). It has had
some elevated values. Jackson Paper is working to slow down some flow and provided some protection for this outfall.
Even though some of the values for this outfall have been elevated - they do not appear to be having an adverse effect on
Scott's Creek (based on pre- and post- sampling). ARO/DWQ will recommend that monitoring be reduced at this outfall.
ARO does recommend that Jackson Paper move chip piles approximately 25 ft away from surface water conveyances.
This may help reduce some elevated values. As stated previously, ARO also recommends that any illicit discharges be
identified.
In addition, ARO/DWQ does not expect Jackson Paper (Josh) to obtain samples in the middle of the night. It is
appropriate to mark "no flow" during a month if samples cannot be obtained during regular business hours.
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000295 Owner - Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Inspection Date: 0312012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
n
Cl
O
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
n
n
0
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
0
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
Q
Q
171
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
Q
n
Cl
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
D
Q
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑
it
■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
In
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
0
❑
0
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
n
■
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
Q
❑
0
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
0
Q
D
Comment: Josh has obviously been inspecting the facility and going over practices to
improve the stormwater discharge outfalls (and this was noted with the permit renewal
package). However, the SWPPP does need to be updated (and updated annually).
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ `l 0 n
Comment: Jackson Paper has deligently performed the required qualitative monitoring
on all stormwater outfalls.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ 0 0 0
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? 0 ❑ ■ n
Comment: Jackson Paper has met all the monitoring requirements in the permit (plus
additional voluntary monitoring of various upstream contributors and downstream).
Generally, vehicle maintenance is performed off -site (oil change, etc.). Fork lifts (and
machinery), etc. are maintained inside, under cover.
Permit and Outfalls
Page: 3

Permit: NCS000295 Owner - Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Inspection Date: 03/20/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalis observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfali status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Jackson Paper should ensure that no illicit discharges are entering the
storm drain system. Due to the old infrastructure - there could be some connections
they are not aware of. A slight petroleum sheen was noted at SDO-002.
ARO/DWQ will work with the Central Office upon permit renewal to determine the
possibility of monitoring reduction, elimination, or Representative Outfall Status (ROS)
at the facility.
■DD0
■000
0D■0
DDD■
Page: 4

JACKSON PAPER
MANUFACTURING
March 10, 2009
Ms. Linda Wiggs
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Fp L=- C�-
?I
j} MAR 1 2 2009
�,,,+ TTEiR SLIT ��CTION
p VG�C�(r L ,-LC
RE: Response to January 26, 2009 Compliance Inspection Letter
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company (NCS000295)
Sylva, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wiggs:
We received your letter dated January 26, 2009 regarding the December 16, 2008
inspection of our facility. We offer the following responses in regards to your
observations:
Qualitative Monitoring
We conduct qualitative monitoring semi-annually per the permit. These records are
maintained in our SWPP notebook_
Analytical Monitoring
We conducted analytical monitoring in 2005 per the permit. These results were
submitted to DWQ at that time. We received no correspondence back from DWQ
regarding those results, and the current permit has no benchmark limits for the pollutants
of concern.
Based on your comments, we collected samples from two storm events as follows:
1) On January 28, 2009 we collected samples for BOD and COD analysis at Outfall
#3. Those analytical results are included as Attachment 1,
NORTH CAROLINA `S LARGEST RECYCLED PAPER PRODUCER
152 WFsr MAiN SraF�r ® PO Box 667 0 SYLVA NC 28779 TEL [phone] FAX (g28) 556-6755

Ms. Linda Wiggs
March 10, 2009
2) We cleaned out the Outfall I storm drain, and on February 27, 2009 we collected
samples at Outfall 91 to be analyzed for Oil and Grease. We will forward those
results when we receive them.
Stormwater Discharze Outfall
OutfalUDrainage 41: The pump house is used to pump creek water and, as indicated on
the facility diagram, is connected to this Outfall drainage area. The pumps in the pump
house are oilless and no chemicals are used or stored in the pump house.
In response to your concerns about the Outfall 41 northern section flow, last year we
repaired the concrete in that area. The area is now fairly flat and water is retained in that
area until a large amount of rainfall falls. The water then flows toward both Outfall #1
and Outfall #2.
We cleaned out the storm drain for this outfall, as requested, and collected the oil and
grease samples as discussed above.
Ou tfal [/Drainage #2: We collect samples for qualitative and analytical monitoring of
Outfall #2 in the farthest manhole present on our property since the discharge point to the
river is inaccessible and is not located on our property. There are several manholes in the
building that connect to the underground piping for Outfall #2_ However, these manholes
have lids that remain closed unless maintenance is needed on the storm water line. There
are no non-stormwater discharges from the building entering these manholes. As an
additional BMP, we sealed the lids to the manholes after your inspection. The roof drains
from the building drain to this underground line, and, therefore, this is a large impervious
drainage area, and flow can be seen in the manhole even during minimal rainfall.
Most of the flow to Outfall #2 comes from the roof drains. We believe that it is not
necessary to conduct dye testing since there are no non-stormwater discharges coming
from processes or activities at the facility.
Outfal[/Drainage #3: As discussed previously, we have included sampling results for
BOD and COD for this outfall as Attachment 1.
We received a draft of our proposed new storm water permit, and we believe that our
attached analytical results for BOD and COD at Outfall #3 indicate that the outfall meets
the proposed benchmark parameters. Therefore, we request that DWQ take these results
into consideration before imposing any new monitoring requirements/permit limits.
-2-

ak
Ms. Linda Wiggs March 10, 2009
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the above mentioned issues. Please contact
me at [phone] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
co—�-
Tim Coggins
Environmental Coordinator
Jackson Paper Mfg. Co.
Enclosed: Attachment 1 — Analytical Results
cc: Cory Larsen, NCDENR DWQ
Dan Roland, Jackson Paper Manufacturing, Sylva, NC
Erin Moro, ENVIRON International Corporation
-3-

JACKSON PAPER'
MANUFACTURING
March 10, 2009
Ms. Linda Wiggs
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Response to January 26, 2009 Compliance Inspection Letter
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company (NCS000295)
Sylva, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wiggs:
We received your letter dated January 26, 2009 regarding the December 16, 2008
inspection of our facility. We offer the following responses in regards to your
observations:
Qualitative Monitoring
We conduct qualitative monitoring semi-annually per the permit. These records are y
maintained in our SWPP notebook.
Analytical Monitoring
We conducted analytical monitoring in 2005 per the permit. These results were
submitted to DWQ at that time' We received no correspondence back from DWQ�
regarding those results, and the current permit has no benchmark limits for the pollutants)
of concern.
Based on your comments, we collected samples from two storm events as follows:
1) On January 28, 2009 we collected samples for BOD and COD analysis at Outfall
#3. Those analytical results are included as Attachment 1.
NORTH CAROLLNA'S LARGEST RECYCLED PAPER PRODUCER
152 Wes r Mux STRFzr a PO Brno 667 0 Snvn NC 28779 TEL [phone] FAX (S28) 556-6755

Ms. Linda Wiggs
March 10, 2009
2) We cleaned out the Outfall 1 storm drain, and on February 27, 2009 we collected
samples at Outfall 91 to be analyzed for Oil and Grease. We will forward those
results when we receive them.
Stormwater Discharee Outfall
Outfall/Drainage #1: The pump house is used to pump creek water and, as indicated on
the facility diagram, is connected to this Outfall drainage area. The pumps in the pump
house are oilless and no chemicals are used or stored in the pump house.
In response to your concerns about the Outfall #1 northern section flow, last year we
repaired the concrete in that area. The area is now fairly flat and water is retained in that
area until a large amount of rainfall falls. The water then flows toward both Outfall #1
and Outfall #2.
We cleaned out the storm drain for this outfall, as requested, and collected the oil and
grease samples as discussed above.
Outfall/Drainage #2: We collect samples for qualitative and analytical monitoring of
Outfall #2 in the farthest manhole present on our property since the discharge point to the
river is inaccessible and is not located on our property. There are several manholes in the
building that connect to the underground piping for Outfall 42. .However, these manholes
have lids that remain closed unless maintenance is needed on the storm water line. There
are no non-stormwater discharges from the building entering these manholes. As an
additional BMP, we sealed the lids to the manholes after your inspection. The roof drains
from the building drain to this underground line, and, therefore, this is a large impervious
drainage area, 'and flow can be seen in the manhole even during minimal rainfall. )
Most of the flow to Outfall 92 comes from the roof drains, We believe that it is not
necessary to conduct dye testing since there are no non-stormwater discharges coming
from processes or activities at the facility.
OutfaIVDrainage #3: As discussed previously, we have included sampling results for
BOD and COD for this outfall as Attachment 1.
We received a draft of our proposed new storm water permit, and we believe that our
attached analytical results for BOD and COD at Outfall #3 indicate that the outfall meets
the proposed benchmark parameters. Therefore, we request that DWQ take these results
into consideration before imposing any new monitoring requirements/permit limits.
-2-

Ms. Linda Wiggs
March 10, 2009
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the above mentioned issues. Please contact
me at [phone] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Tim Coggins
Environmental Coordinator
Jackson Paper Mfg. Co.
Enclosed: Attachment I — Analytical Results
cc: Cory Larsen, NCDENR DWQ
Dan Roland, Jackson Paper Manufacturing, Sylva, NC
Erin Moro, ENVIRQN International Corporation
-3-

Permit: NCS000295
SOC:
County: Jackson
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Josh Carnes
Directions to Facility:
System Classiflcations:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 04/17/09 Expiration: 04/30/12 Owner: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Syiva plant
PO Box 667
Inspection Date: 0312012012
Primary Inspector: Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 10:30AM
Linda S Wiggs
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Sylva NC 28779
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 05:10PM
Phone: [phone]
Phone :[phone] Ext.4653
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page:

0
permit: NCS000295 Owner - Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Inspection Date: 03120/2012 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Susan Wilson and Linda Wiggs (ARO/DWQ) met Josh Carries of Jackson Paper on March 20, 2012. Jackson Paper is
currently under an individual stormwater permit (effective May 1, 2009) which requires analytical and qualitative monitoring
on a monthly basis. Jackson Paper has diligently performed their required monitoring.
They have also conducted upstream and downstream monitoring, as well as an upstream DOT culvert that flows through the
site. Although some benchmarks have been exceeded - there is no direct correlation to instream values. Jackson Paper
has made modifications to the site to prevent excess runoff that may have been contributing to the elevated values
(particularly near the ditch line at the west of the property near the DOT culvert).
SDO-001 - this outfall is essentially the front parking area of the facility. There is a small area that may have some
exposure - but the majority of stormwater contribution comes from the drainage and runoff of the main highway that runs in
front of the plant. After conversations with Josh, there is not an adequate way to eliminate the highway runoff that this
outfall is receiving. ARO/DWQ will recommend to the Central Office that monitoring for this outfall be reduced or eliminated
- and good housekeeping practices be maintained in this area. This outfall has had some exceedances - that were likely
attributed to road runoff and/or the filter that was used in the drop inlet.
SDO-002 - this outfall is basically a previous drainage/stream that has been culverted beneath the plant. This outfall has
only had a few turbidity exceedances in the past 2 years. DWQ/ARO will recommend to the Central Office that monitoring
for this outfall be reduced or eliminated.
SDO-003 - this outfall receives the majority of flow around the chip piles (which are used for fuel at the plant). It has had
some elevated values. Jackson Paper is working to slow down some flow and provided some protection for this outfall.
Even though some of the values for this outfall have been elevated - they do not appear to be having an adverse effect on
Scott's Creek (based on pre- and post- sampling). ARO/DWQ will recommend that monitoring be reduced at this outfall.
ARO does recommend that Jackson Paper move chip piles approximately 25 ft away from surface water conveyances.
This may help reduce some elevated values. As stated previously, ARO also recommends that any illicit discharges be
identified.
In addition, ARO/DWQ does not expect Jackson Paper (Josh) to obtain samples in the middle of the night. It is appropriate
to mark "no flow" during a month if samples cannot be obtained during regular business hours.
Page: 2

Permit.. NCS000295 Owner - Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
Inspection Date: 0312012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Jackson Paper has met all the monitoring requirements in the permit (plus additional voluntary
monitoring of various upstream contributors and downstream).
Generally, vehicle maintenance is Qerformed off -site (oil change, etc.). Fork lifts (and
machinery), etc. are maintained inside, under cover.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? N ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment: Jackson Paper should ensure that no illicit discharges are entering the storm drain system. Due
to the old infrastructure - there could be some connections they are not aware of. A slight
petroleum sheen was noted at SDO-002.
ARO/DWQ will work with the Central Office upon permit renewal to determine the possibility of
monitoring reduction elimination or Representative Outfall Status (ROS) at the facility.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Jackson Paper has deligently performed the required qualitative monitoring on all stormwater
cutfalls.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yea No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑ ❑
Page: 3

F
Permit: NCS000295 Owner -Facility: Jackson Paper Manufacturing Company
inspection Date: 0312012012 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ E ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Josh has obviously been inspecting the facility and going over practices to improve the
stormwater discharge outfalls (and this was noted with the permit renewal package). However,
the SWPPP does need to be updated land updated annually_
Page: 4

JACKSON PAPER
MANUFACTURING
February 23, 2007
Mr. Bradley Bennett
Supervisor, Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC DENR — Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Change of Contact Information
Jackson Paper Manufacturing_ Company
NPDES Permit #ENCS000295
Dear Mr. Bennett:
nno~ $1
3LVA - NN30
LOOZ z 0 8yW
a
This letter is to inform you of the change in the environmental contact for the Jackson
Paper Manufacturing facility in Sylva, North Carolina. I am now the environmental
contact for the facility, and my contact information is as follows:
Tim Coggins
Jackson Paper Manufacturing
152 W. Main Street
Sylva, NC 28779
Phone: [phone] ext. 355
Fax: [phone]
Email: tco ins a 'ackson a r.net
Please send all future correspondence on the facility's NPDES permit to my attention. I
look forward to working with the NCDENR Division of Water Quality.
Sincerely,
Tim Coggins
Environmental Coordinator
Jacks6n Paper Manufacturing Company
NORTH CAROLINA'S LARGEST RECYCLED PAPER PRODUCER
152 WFsi MAIN STREET® PO Box 6670 SyLvA. NC 28779 TEL[phone] FAX [phone]

o�°FwnrERoc PERMIT COVERAGE
RENEWAL APPLICATION FORM Permit Number
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NCS000295
Stormwater Discharge Permit
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED ALONG WITH THE REQUESTED SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION TO THE DIV. OF WATER QUALITY IN ORDER FOR YOUR FACILITY TO QUALIFY FOR
RENEWAL OF YOUR STORMWATER PERMIT NCS000295
The following is the information currently in our database for your facility. Please review this information carefully
and make all corrections as necessary in the space provided to the right of the current information.
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner/Org. Name: JACKSON PAPER MFG CO
Owner Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax -Number
E-mail address:
FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: JACKSON PAPER MFG CO - SYLVA
Facility Contact:
Facility Address: 152 W MAIN ST
SYLVA, NC 28779
Phone Number:
Fax Number
E-mail address:
PERMIT INFORMATION
Permit Contact: GARY POPE
Mailing Address: PO BOX 667
~k k VV\ C A' C- A— I
54 1 t.,.1 C 24-7`T
� 743�- 5534
� C�3 l - c79 Sri
toe
S52 l..I '%4A Si .
SYLVA, NC 28779
Phone Number: SN5865534 db 9C 175 3 9 2- so
Fax Number: _rat° 3� oei G 4
E-mail address:
DISCHARGE INFORMATION
Discharge Receiving Water: SCOTTS CREEK
Stream Class: C TR
Basin:
Sub -Basin #: 040402
Number of outfalls:
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am �fi ar with the informati n contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and
belief such infozrfiatiois true, omple ace ate.
Signatures Date 7 ,3 t / DCa
Print or type name of person signing above Title
Please return this completed renewal application form to:
Individual Permit Renewal
Attn: Bill Mills
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR RENEWAL OF Pl DIVIDUAL NPDES
STORMWATER PERMIT
Two copies of each of the following shall accompany this submittal in order for the application to be
considered complete:
(Do not submit the site Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan)
Initials
E-'0j:)— 1. A current Site Map from the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The location of
industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas and
loading and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall, building
locations and impervious surfaces should be clearly noted.
-tLQ0f— 2. A summary of Analytical Monitoring results during the term of the existing permit (if your
permit required analytical sampling), Do not submit individual lab reports. The summary
can consist of a table including such items as outfall number, parameters sampled, lab
results, date sampled, and storm event data. *
T_)alk— 3. A summary of the Visual Monitoring results. Do not submit individual monitoring reports.
The summarycan consist of a table including such items as outfall number, parameters
surveyed, observations, and date monitoring conducted.
4. A summary of the Best Management Practices utilized at the permitted facility. Summary
should consist of a short narrative description of each BMP's in place at the facility. If the
implementation of any BMP's is planned, please include information on these BMP's.
5. A short narrative describing any significant changes in industrial activities at the permitted
facility. Significant changes could include the addition or deletion of work processes,
changes in material handling practices, changes in material storage practices, and/or
changes in the raw materials used by the facility.
��-- 6. Certification of the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan for the permitted facility (Sign and return attached form).
* If the final year analytical monitoring of the existing permit term has not been completed
prior to filing the renewal submittal, then the last years monitoring results should be
submitted within 30 days of receipt of the laboratory reports. (i.e. do not withhold renewal
submittal waiting on lab results)
Representative storm sampling may now be conducted anytime during the year (the April to
November window has been eliminated) and the representative rainfall event is now
defined as a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches and is preceded by at least 72
hours in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
CERTIFICATION
N.C. Division of Water Quality, Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Facility Name: JACKSON PAPER MFG CO - SYLVA
Permit Number: NCS000295
Location Address: 152 W MAIN ST
SYLVA, NC 28779
County: JACKSON
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) document and all attachments
were developed and implemented under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information required by the SPPP. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information gathered is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete"
"I certify that the SPPP has been developed, signed and retained at the facility location and the SPPP has been fully
implemented at the named facility location in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stormwater general
permit."
"I am aware that there are significant penalties for falsifying information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations"
Sign (according to permit signatory requirements) and return this Certification. DO NOT SEND THE
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WITH THE CERTIFICATION.
Signature
a r—
Print or type name of person ' g above
Date -7/ 3 t ! d
Title
SPPP Certification V99

i
�s• muft
*aim
G
i
I
-----'—'—'— _----- .
a� —
_—_
r TA= >CNS
AQW
d L�7
'm L
��¢ q
mcc' �o __ /rrn7t� ay kA•A rni
10 TG _
aline GL
/
ft-
of ad ]00 oLLl� ��.c xr V
' \ /- - Im01 lAa7 oW.L— Om ISS 4L�[ f4L LiWii St+A-C —I�F INLEi,R.� %ALh— a V �C Asp
C-m=
wn.o w.+e woc ANT� auw.a
TT
CL�ALL
� a
00—C AW w 1 r�/VI w�0� RRP�� �iTAIR�I fiall� J - .
..ws ..sec � � � ❑ .,,�, � -� _ _ — - .
�.
�C YT
J. � ,•' -�
w _ :
l: F
_ ulows pt . i a
` slam a cr
at=
DRAINAGE
AREA No.
OUTFALL
DRAINAGE AREA
(ACRES)
PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS
I
Sw001.
3.1
84
II
5w002
5.8
26
III
SWO03
17.1
3g
ry
ww r
I 0.08
100
In TT.� _ p , ems• � ". � .�: � m�
Re-% iced 06-06-06
f ti i of
SITE DRAINAGE MAP
JACKSON PAPER
WW= SYLVA NORTH CAROUNA
rc SCALE �rr.c+c ► _ Ia... r.. r c
Eta nsoc h
h I I Ar�
N293-02

0
Summary Storm Outfall Sample Results
Outfall Date Total Flow BOD COD TSS
Number Sampled MGD
2
04/02/2005
0.109
3
04/02/2005
0.349
2
06/07/2005
0.079
3
06/07/2005
0.248
2
09/26/2005
0.04
3
09/26/2005
0.127
2
12/03/2005
0.029
3
12/03/2005
0.093
12
30
10
40
20
80
16
96
70
550
<50
450
<50
400
<50
600
20
50
10
28
14
72
16
96
pH
7.3
7.6
7.2
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.1

Summa of Visual Monitorin Results
August 2, 2006 Jackson Paper Mfg
Fall 03' inspection, 10-3. Well water bypass, drinking fountain, and turbine
cooling water discharges to Outfall 9002 were discontinued on April 16.
Areas okay.
Spring 04' inspection, June 24 and 25. Boiler polymer chemical area needed
cleaning. Directed C.W. to do this. Outside paper storage had some litter.
Minor migration of ash due to spillage during routine cleanings. Other areas
okay.
Fail inspection 05'. Drum storage of special wastes too high. Will plan to
reduce. Lot of erosion south of Harold street on creek bank due to
September storms. Railroad installed rip rap. Other areas along creek ok.
Spring 05' inspection, 4-20. Some litter at outside paper storage, "normal".
Other areas okay.
Fall 05' Inspection, 9-19. Bottom ash inventory high. Areas okay.
Spring 06' Inspection, 4-17 & 18. Lot of wind has blown dust around. Litter
cleanup in progress. Areas inspected okay. Ash inventory coming down.
Some oil sheen in outfall 92. Began regular checks. No turbidity with sheen,
not process water. Sawdust area drains being cleaned.
April 19 we had a heavy downpour during am, pm Mike Beck and Tim
Coggins looked for sheen and didn't see any indication of sheen. Later pm
on 19th Mike and Tim (me observing) placed an absorbent boom at Outfall
42 Shack. April 20 at 1.-15 pm Tim Coggins and I looked at boom and
outfall and saw no presence of oil on or behind boom or discharged into
creek.
April 24-looked good at 92. May 1, looked good #2. June 6, good and no oil
behind boom -boom does not seem to be discoloring (would otherwise be
evidence of regular intermittent or small continuous oil source).
Periodic checks since finding oil sheen originally have not seen since.
dda

Summary_ of Best Manaement_Practices
August 2, 2006 Jackson Paper Manufacturing
No additions or changes planned.
Industrial Activitv - Sienificant Changes
111M."M
2006. Waste water treatment area. Steel storage tank for collected waste
water from recycle replaced with two new tanks. Old tank scrapped and
removed.
2004. Steel tank at recycle abandoned, scrapped, and removed for metal
recycling.
May 23-25 2006. Added backflow preventors for fresh water supply
locations from TWASA (local utility).

Pate 1 of
5Ey1I- uN-N-,U STOR;tiMATER DiSPECTION REPORT
JAMCN PAPER NLAINFLT'ACTURLNG CO.
S�'L•r4;�, �i ORTH C•-�.ROL.�i.a LL--
Sprint (.�prii - June): � pate; 4-0 0 "7
Pall (Seoc. - Vov.): ❑ Inspector: v�•�
DIRECTIQNi : Inspect facility and ill stbrmwater systerns semiannually, once in the tall and once during the
spring. Document all subsequent maintenance' activities performed co correct unacceptable situations. File in
Aooendix H - Records of SWP;, Weatber conditions (indicate any recent precipitario and cu eat caaditio,4s,
conduct inspection under dry weather conditions): 1A n v-e, i_ Cam«
A. FACMITY
Consider the following questions for all areas chat could come into contacr with stormwater. These items would
be items to be corrected:
Are there:
• Leaky containers, pipes, pumps, etc.?
• Cracks in secondary containment?
« Situations that could cause spills or sears j
(rusted containers, bad housekeeping, etc.)?
• Evidence of spillage?
• Evidence of solids erosion? Drain cloegina? I
Description
Condition Comments, Work Required to Correct
Good Not Acceptable
Polymer Tank
f
WWTP Sludge Storage
Boiler Polymer Scora;e
Kerosene-tanlc
Gasoline Tank
Diesel Tank
RX ank
Outside Pacer Storage
r- _ /i0f
Truck Dock: Oil Tank
c /
Shipping Dock Area
H.D. Chest Area
,�Ii_H Water (South/North
Basin)
Rail Dock
Drum Storage
Bouom Ash Storage
Plastic Storatye
Form A
9il��e� I

pave 2 of
5TOR. NVATER LNSPECTION REPORT (continued)
B.ASH POND
• is ash rntgratmg from.area?
.abnormal Spillane/Flooding
C. SAWDUST PELE
• Is sawdust migrating from area?
• Is there extensive erosion in piles'?
• Are area storm drains clogged?
Y Q
Y U.N
Comments
Y VINIJ
Y
Y N
) -
D. STORMWATER SYSTEM[
Consider the following questions for the stormwater conveyance system. including all storm drain inlets,
detention ponds, and outfalls.
Is there:
Comments
• Anv area where significant soil erosion has Y
occurred?
• Debris or other visible obstruction or any
non -permitted discharge from:
• Outfall001 Y N
• Outfall 002 (Sze below) Y
• Outfal1003 Y N
Oucfall-002 has the following permitted non-srormwater discharges:
1. Well wateVUnlain
ass Y v
3. Drir ki ' Y N Gllam``t�
3. Tuoine cooling water Y N
Outfall Out
If there is any discharge, does it have: 002 00"
• Color'? Y Y
• Foam? Y o-N
Y N
• Oaor? Y Y N
• An oily sheen? Y Y N• A known potential source YY
(e.;. boiler breakdown)?
Form A

p, "� _ of _
E. SPELL RESPONSE EQLgFNLE4-T
Check the avaiiabiliry and quantities of spill response equipment at the following locations:
Accentable' Comments:
1. Maintenance area Y
�. Recycle Dock 1C w✓� S f C�eJzt� ��. `L-
3. Sawdust Y N
Additional Comments
CERTIFICATIOtN:
i
I
'I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered !
and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
1subm2r�
c
itting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
fowin vio! ions.'
Sii a Date
Form A

Pace 1 or 3
SEMI-.AINF Ui; L STORynVATER P SPECTIOi`i REPORT
JACKSOiv P —FER A-iNUACTL°RLNG CO.
SYLVA, `FORTH CAROLR � _
Boring (April - lape): O / Date:
Fail (Sept. - Nov.): Inspec.or:
DIRECTIONS: Inspec: facility and all stortnwater systems semiannually, once in the fall and once during the
spring. Document ail subsequent maintenance activities performed to eorrect' unacceptable situations. File in
Appendix H - Records of SWP;. Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and current conditions,
conduct inspection underdry weather conditions): �d t'��_�—�u��3r.�� cr�•� S
A. FACULITY
Consider the following questions for all areas that could come into contact with storrrtwater. These items would
be items to be corrected:
Are there:
• Leaky containers, pipes, pumps. etc..'
• Cracks in secondary containment'?
• Situations that could cause spills or leaks
(rusted containers, bad housekeeping, etc.)?
• Evidence of spillage?
• Evidence of solids erosion? Drain cloQeine•?
Description
Condition
Comments, Work Required to Correct
Good
Not Acceptable
Polymer Tank
WWTP Sludge Storage
Boiler Polymer Storage
Kerosene tank
Gasoline Tank
ddAe>
Diesel Tank
RXf rank
/
Outside Paper Storage
Truck -'Dock Oil Tank I
�'
Shipping Dock Area
H:D. Chest Area
Mill Water (South/North
Basin)
/
+/
Rail Dock
Drum Storage
.�
Bottom Ash Storage
cAf i.z�f'�j� J'C� ✓C�c, vz^ ) ti
Plastic -Storage
Form A
A

I
SE'YU-A-N-L\FU.A-L STOP-NINVATER 134SPEMON REPORT (continued)
B. ASH POND
• is ash migrating from area?
• abnormal SpillaselFiooding
C. SAWDUST PII.E
• is sawdust migrating from area?
• is there extensive erosion in piles?
• Are area storm drains clogged?
Y 6)
Y N
Y
Y• N
Pace 2 of
Comments
D. STOR.N WATER SYSI'EN1
Consider the following questions for the stormwater conveyance system, including all storm drain inlets,
detention ponds, and outfalls.
Is there: Comments
• Any area where significant soil erosion has Y J ty J
occurred?
• Debris or other visible obstruction or anv
non -permitted discharge from:
• Outfall001 Y
f
• Outfall 001 (See below) Y
• Outfall 003 Y v
Oucfall 002 has the 'oliowinff pe tted non-storrnwater discharges:
l . Well w te'r bypass Y t
2. �xiftkin, fountain Y--
%.--Turbine cooling water Y
Outfall Outfall
If there is any discharge, does it have: 002 003
• Color? Y N� Y N
• Foam? Y `1- Y N
• Odor? Y N Y IN
• An oily sheen?, Y Y
• A known porentW source Y Y N
(e.g. boiler breakdown)?
Form A

E. SPELL:RE5P.ONSE EQL!P.NM.Ni•
Check the avaiiabiliry and quantities of spill -r=soonse equipment ac the tollowing locations:
acceptable'
Maintenance area 'l
Recycle Dock N
Sawdust i l
Additional Comments
CERTIFICATION:
Comments:
Pai7z 3 of
'I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
or suoervision in accordance with a system designed co assure that qualified personnel properly gathered
and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information suornitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
ign'fi ant penaltie a submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonmenc
for � o vto a tans. "�
4 r9.
Sian tu' Date
Form A

t
t, t
Page 1 or
SEMI-A:NN .-!�L STOR.-NnVATER PIWECTION REPORT
JACKSON PATER yL-�--N-UFACTL-RfNG CO.
SYZV:�, NORTH C_�ROLL�i.-� �r/ JJ
Siring (April - June): � Date: �(I 1'7 2CJoC,
Fall (Sent, - -Nov.): ❑ Iaspec:or: o,
DIRECTIONS. inspec, facility and ail scot-nwacer syste-m semiannually, once in the Call and once during the
spring. Documenc all subsequent maintenance activities performed to correct unacceptable situations. File in
Aopendix H - Records of SWP;. Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and current conditions,
conduct inspection under dry weather conditions):
A. F.ACELITY
Consider the following Questions for all areas that could come into conract with stormwater. These items would
be ite,ns to be corrected:
Are there:
• Leaky containers, pines, pumps, etc.?
Cracks in secondary containment'?
• Situations that could cause spills or lealks
(rusted containers, bad housekeeping, etc.)?
• Evidence of scillace?
• Evidence of sands erosion? Drain clog°:ne'?
Description
Condition
Comments, Work Required to Correct
Good
No Acceptable
Polyrner'Taiuk
,
1 Q�
�VIVVTP Sludae Stoi•aae
Boile: Polymer Storage
/
Kerosene tar ;<
Gasoline Tarik
P u, 4
1- ,
t
Diesel Tanis
Outside Paper Storage
jot ,, .•���
Truck Dock Oil Tank
rf
Shipping'Dock Area .
"H. D. Chest Area
Mill Water (SourhlNonh
Basin)
l f�
Rail Dock
v
Drum Storage
Bottom.Ash Storage
�✓
Tr,✓ <��,�,.'.� - „��t��-• [,'
Plastic Storage
'j Ur ;.. _ R
form A

pa.ae OL
r 5EyII- �ti�+i:�L STOR-NMA'TER 17-NSPECiION REPORT (continued)
t B.ASH POND r ! rr
Is ash mi=rating ,Torn area'? Y �V-5 +�tc�,�,. �s"C CXIV�,,.:�
■ Abnormal 5oillage?3='loodina Y 0
C. SAWDUST PELF.
Comments
• Is sawdust nugrating from area? Y N ,wa
• Is there extensive erosion in piles? Y
• Are area storm drains clogged? Y
D. STORNMATER SYSTEM[
Consider the fo[lowine questions for the stormwater conveyance system, including all storm drain inlets,
detention ponds. and outfalls.
Is there:
Comments
• Anv area where significant soil erosion has
Y 6
occurred?
`
• Debris or other visible obstruction or any
non-per=miaed dischar3e `t'rom:
• Outfall001
Y
Outfall 002 (See below)
Y s
• Outfall003
Y N
Outfall 002 has the fo[lowing permitted non-stormwater discharges:
l . Well water ass
Y N
a ��
/� ON
S ��,-,,,�,:✓ -1'c� r
?. Zri'Kn fountain
Y Ne
cooling water
Y N
_
t Outfall.
Outfall
If there is any diwhar;e, .does it have: 002
003
• Color'? y Y(9
Y L
• Foam? Y i
i
Y r N
• Odor? Y :'
Yr
• An oily sheen? (9 N
Y`1. `
• A known potential source Y
Y ,
Av
7'✓r e ,
� a>�:G?r_.�
(e.g. boIlei breakdown)?
i
t
if Form A

E. SPU-L RESPONSE EQLZPlfEw-T r
CZec?c the avaiiabiiirt and Quantities of soill :esuonse equipment at the ;OIto�vi .2 !ecatiors:
Acc_ntable? Comments: / 1
I. tilaintenancc .-krea Y Y r4; v.S ins . , /S' c•�• tlug� v�i/S
Recycle Dock N [�a�lrr� ase,Iy'✓� _
3. Sawdust N
,additional Comments
CERTIFICATION:
"I certify under penaity of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system -designed to assure that qualified ae=nnel properly gathered
and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best or' my ! wledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
-i s or subautting false information, including the possibility or fine and imprisonment
[r .
I '
own vtolati ns." '-
4-10-cro
Date
Form A

Sorin, (April - June):
Fall (Sept. - !Nov.)..
OI r
STOJ yI, n .kl'ER ENSPE CTTOti REPORT
JACKSON PAPER __NLA_,N_ FACTLTR_DG CO.
S`r LVA, YORTH C AROLt A
Date: I ! !ai_T (0 _
Inspec,or:'- , M pro / T C OQ9 1 n S
DIRECTIONS: Inspect facility and all stormwater systems sermannuaily, once in the fall and ouce during the
spring. Document all subsequeru maintenance activities perrormed to correct unacceptable situations. File in
Aopendit H - Records of SWP;. Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and cur-,= conditions,
conduct inspection under dry weather conditions): Co U - 0-1 CLLr LtS " F
A. FACELITY
Consider the following questions for all areas that could come into contact with szorrnwater. These items would
be items to be corrected:
.ire there:
• Leaky containers,- pipes, pumps, etc.:'
• Cracks in secondary containment?
• Situations that could cause spills or leaks
(rusted containers, bad housekeeping, ex.)?
• Evidence of soilla2c?
• Evidence of solids erosion? Drain cloagine'?
Description
Condition
Comments, -Work Required to Correct
Good Not :acceptable
l s?olxrnu�ptctdt
1
- -
f
-f here .
� ��' IOn�er _
-WWTP Sludge Storage
I
l
Boiler Polyntcr Storage
Kerosene snit
✓
Gasoline Tani:
✓
J
Diesel. Tank
I Nz
RX-36 Tank kecv)cl•e C3{oc.4
✓
Some- wa_. 10LUO irN C'vMArM
Outside Paper Storage
Truck Dock Oil Tartic
�'
I&A o ri p( jai n �-
-Stripping Dock Area
H.D. Chest Area
V
Cracks in ootnwo' . Nei ivihu
Mill Water (Sown/North
Basin)
Rail Dock
i/
L(Ebp. (7t YI S t
Dram Storage
Bottom Ash Stora-e
Plastic Storage
Form A
Tra s �r ►r-
�rt��rt+e�.,
sa.w us+ an t.
7-H a4e
runnAu4j
4r rcf"

Page of
SEyLTOR.NnVATER D45PECUOtti REPORT (continued)
(
3 B. ASH -POND
Y
• ls:ash rnigrat�.n, Torte area•?
• .abnormal Spillage/Flooding
Y
C. SAWDUST PELE
Comments
Y
N
• Is sawdusE migrating from area?
• Is there extensive erosion in piles?
Y�1
Y
• Are area storm drains clogged?
u
D. STORNnVATE R SYSTEy[
Consider the following questions for the stormwater conveyance
system, including
all storm drain itilets,
detention ponds, and outfalls_
Comments
Is there:
• Anv area where significant soil erosion has
Y
occurred?
• Debris or other visible obstruction or anv
non -permitted discharge from:
• Outfall 001
Ylfit-
e
Outfall 002 (See below)
Y `©
• Oucfall.0031
Y N
Outfall 002 has the following permsued non-storrnwater
dischar;es:
1. Well water bypass
Y N
ni© 0AC I s
1 Drinking fountain
Y N
3. Turbine cooling water
Y N
&to jorE
Outfall
Outfall
If there is any discharge, does it leave: 002
003
• Color? Y N
Y N
NO At
• Foam? Y N
Y NIN
r�
• Odor? Y
Y N
• An oily sheen? Y N
Y IN
• A known potential source Y N
Y N
(e.g. boiler breakdown)?
Farm A

P-!-? _ CC
SPILL RESPONSE EQLU- 'N E'-T
Check the avaiiabiiiry and quantities of soul ,csoonse cauhament at the tollo-ing.locations:
Ac=jrabie? COMMen15:
1. ylaintenance :area N
3. Recycle Dock Q N
S. Sawdust QY N
Additional Comments
CERTIFICATION:
'I Certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered
and evaluated the information subnutred. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible For gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of-mv knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 13rn aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.'
Signature Dare l
Form A

Semi -Annual Stormwater Inspection Report
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co.
Sylva, North Carolina
Spring (April —June): Date:. 6 - Z cl - c,7
Fall (Sept —Nov): ❑ Inspector:T� _0OQ� cr.,
-- j
DIRECTIONS: Inspect facility and all stormwater systems semiannually, once in the fall and
once during the spring. Document all subsequent maintenance, activities performed to correct
unacceptable situations. File in Appendix H — Records of SWP3.
Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and current conditions, conduct inspection
under dry weather conditions): O. ?�" o ��11 N _ keC -�y�b_ -� "0-7 0v����uT
it c�,�cl i O N 5 lDIL
A. FACILITY
Consider the following questions for all areas that could come into contact with stormwater.
These items would be items to be corrected:
Are there:
• Leaky containers, pipes, pumps, etc.?
• Cracks in secondary containment?
• Situations that could cause spills or leaks (rusted containers, bad
housekeeping, etc.)?
• Evidence of spillage?
• Evidence of solids erasion? Drain clogging?
Description
Condition
Comments, Work Required to
Correct
Good
Not Acceptable
WWTP Sludge Storage
Boiler Polymer Storage
Kerosene Tank
Gasoline Tank
Diesel Tank
Rec Oe Biocide Tank
CV04ail)FIVA4- oreck neqI5 doge ;,,�
Outside Paper: Storage
Truck Dock Oil -Tank
Shipping Dock Area
H.D. Chest Area
Mill Water (North/South
Basill)V
Rail Dock
Drum Storage
Bottom Ash Storage
Plastic Storage
B. Ash Pond Comments
• Is ash migrating from area? Y
• Abnormal Spillage/Flooding? Y [raj
Page I of 3

Send -Annual Storniwater inspection Report (continued)
C. Sawdust Pile Comments
• Is sawdust migrating from area? Y
• Is there extensive erosion in piles? Y Q
• Are area storm drains clogged? Y I
D. Stormwater System
Consider the following questions for the stormwater conveyance system including all storm drain
inlets, detention ponds, and outfalls.
Is there: Comments
• Any area where significant soil erosion has occurred?
Y
• Debris or other visible obstruction or any non -permitted
discharge from:
• Outfall001
Y
)
• Outfall002
Y
• Outfall003
Y
C4
Is there a discharge from:
• Outfall002?
[
N
• Outfall003?
C
N
.If.there is a discharge, does it have:
• Color?
• Foam?
• Odor?
• An oily sheen?
• A known potential source
(e.g. boiler breakdown)?
Outfal1002
Otitfall003
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y?
Y (�i]
Y 1
Y 1i)
Y ON Y `&
Page 2 of 3

Semi -Annual Storniwater Inspection Report (continued)
E. Spill Response Equipment
Check the availability and quantities of spill response equipment in the following locations:
Acceptable?
• Maintenance Area N
• Recycle Dock N
• Sawdust N
Additional Comments:
Certification:
Comments
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gathered'and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the Information submitted isi.to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I aril aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
:(violations."
Signature of lns ctor Date
>ignature Responsible O icial Date
Page 3 of 3

IN
r
Semi -Annual Stormwater Inspection Report
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co.
Sylva, North Carolina
Spring (April — June): ❑ Date: I I L2 10-7
Fall (Sept — Nov): Inspector:
DIRECTIONS: Inspect facility and all stormwater systems semiannually, once in the .fall and
once during the spring. Document all subsequent maintenance activities performed. to correct
unacceptable situations. File in Appendix H — Records of SWP3.
Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and current conditions, conduct inspection
under dry weather conditions): _ CCr_a L } C. L-et" 12 9(_ - " I~
A. FACILITY
Consider the following questions for all areas that could come into contact with stormwater.
These items would be items to be corrected:
Are there:
• Leaky containers, pipes, pumps, etc.?
• Cracks in secondary containment?
• Situations that could cause spills or leaks (rusted containers, bad
housekeeping, etc.)?
• Evidence of spillage?
• Evidence of solids erosion? Drain clogging?
Description
Condition
Comments, Work Required to
Correct
Good
Not Acceptable
WWTP Sludge Storage
Boiler Polymer Storage
t i 3-T— I tv Ste:
Kerosene Tank
Gasoline Tank
I/
Diesel Tank
�!
Recycle Biocide Taank
Outside Paper Storage
✓
Truck Dock Oil Tank
Shipping Dock Area
H.D. Chest Area
yi
Cv�,;��1� 5 u N �srac ezC�rz e
Mill Water (North/South
)38SI li�
Rail Dock
>r
Drum Storage
Bottom Ash Storage
t/
Plastic Storage
B. Ash Pond
• Is ash migrating from area?
• Abnormal Spillage/Flooding?
Y%
Y 6�
Comments
Page I of 3

Semi-Arinual 5tornnyater Inspection Report (continued)
C. Sawdust Pile
Comments
• Is sawdust migrating from area?
Y
(0
• Is there extensive erosion in piles?
Y
{
• Are area storm drains clogged?
Y
D. ,Stormwater System
Consider the following questions for the stormwatcr conveyance system including all storm drain
inlets; detention ponds, and outfalls.
,
Is there:
Comments
• Any area where significant soil erosion has occurred?
Y
• Debris or other visible obstruction or any non -permitted
discharge from:
• Outfall001
Y
• Outfall002
Y
CN
• Outfall003
Y
Is there a -discharge from:
• Outfall 0027
L�Y�
N
• Outfall 003?
Y
If there is a discharge, does it have:
Outfall 002
Outfall
003
• CoIor?
Y tNi
Y
N
• Foam?
Y
Y
N
• Odor?
Y
Y
N
• An oily sheen?
Y�
Y
N
• A known_potential source
(e.g. boiler breakdown)?
Y
Y
N
I
Page 2 of 3

Sena -Annual Stonimater Inspection Report (continued)
E. Spill Response Equipment
Check the availability and quantities of spill response equipment in the following locations:
Acceptable?
• Maintenance Area G) N
• Recycle Dock ('Y) N
• Sawdust (7) N
Additional Conunents:
Certification:
Comments
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision. in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
.gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my -knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am mNure that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations."
L7. 7
Signature of ItiS ector '� Date
2 Gis"
Date
Page 3 of 3

NgwStormwater Discharge Assessment and
Completed By: Tim Coggins
Certification
Title: Technical and Quality Manager
Date: November 29, 2007
Date of Test
Outfall Directly
Method Used to
Describe Results from Test for the
Name of Person Who Conducted
or Evaluation
Observed During
Test or Evaluate
Presence of No"tormwater
Identify Potential Significant Sources
the Test or Evahiatinn
the Test
Discha a
Discha e
11/29/2007
Outfall l
Visual Examination
No Discharge
Not Applivable
Tim Coggins
11/29/2007
Odtfall 2
Visual Examination
Clear Uncontaminated Disclvax e
Uncontaminated Groudwater
Tins Coggins
11/29/2007 Outfall 3
Visual Examination
No Dis2hne
Not Applicable
Tim Co ins
Certification
1, Dan Roland , certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction and supervision and in accordance with a system to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system and those persons directly.responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name and Oficial Title (print) f '
B. Area Code and Telephone Number
f l 'f['l. 1 y�1Fati i✓/L
�J� 11:�' E;-'�L- 565 q
C. Signature `
D. Date Signed
azs-i

Serni-Annual Stormwater Inspection Report
Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co.
Sylva, North Carolina
Spring (April — June): 06 Date: (v :� "j U
Fall (Sept — Nov): ❑ Inspector; ? i ryi r N : -c sl.t ra vofrX65
DIRECTIONS: Inspect facility and all stormwater systems semiannually, once in the fall and
once during the spring. Document all subsequent maintenance activities performed to correct
unacceptable situations. File in Appendix H — Records of SWP3.
Weather conditions (indicate any recent precipitation and current conditions, conduct inspection
under dry weather conditions): /��wk� ra��` 1«v.�ra hnR.. 1414 ze � U.'v �A40NJ4=/4LL.
plieyiou: r+3
A. FACILITY
Consider the following questions for all areas that could come into contact with stormwatcr.
Thesc items would be items to be corrected:
Are there:
• ' Leaky containers, pipes, pumps, etc.?
• Cracks in secondary containment?
• Situations that could cause spills or leaks (rusted containers, bad
housekeeping, etc.)?
o Evidence of spillage?
• Evidence of solids erosion? Drain clogging?
Description.
Condition
Comments, Work Required to
Correct
Good,Not
Acceptable
WWTP Sludge Storage
vl�
Boiler Polymer Storage
7.z;m%jt c C
Kerosene Tank
Gasoline Tank
Diesel Tank
Recycle Biocide Tank
Outside Paper Storage
Trick Dock Oil Tack
Shipping Dock Area
H:D. Chest Area
Mill Water (North(South
Basin).
Rail Dock
Drum Storage
Bottom Ash Storage
e r
Plastic Storage
B. Ash Pond
• is ash nugrating from area?
• Abnormal Spillage/Flooding?
Comments
Y ON
Y O
Page 1 of 3

Sena -Annual Stonmvater Inspection Report (continued)
C. Sawdust Pile Comments
{ • Is sawdust migrating from area? Y ON
• Is there extensive erosion in piles? Y 0-
a Are area storm drains clogged? YN
D. Stormwater System
Consider the following questions for the stormwater conveyance system including all storm drain
inlets, detention ponds, and outfal Is.
Is there: Comments
• Any area where significant soil erosion has occurred?
Y
• Debris or other visible obstruction or any non -permitted
discharge from:
• Outfall001
Y
• Outfall002
Y
• Outfall003
Y
Is there a discharge from:
• Outfall002?
4/
• Outfall003?
Y
If there is a discharge, does it have:
• Color?
• Foam?
• Odor?
• An oily sheen?
• A known potential source
(e.& boiler breakdown)?
I
QN)-
N [L�nI�nt:w w nzr
f N 1
Outfall002
Outfall003
Y O
Y t.]
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
QN
Y
Y
Y
Page 2 of 3
I

Semi -Annual Stomrwater Inspection Report (con inued)
E. Spill Response Equipment
Checktheavailability and quantities of spill response equipment in the following locations:
f (91emi('ol e
5-h) `o , a�q
Acceptable? Comments
,y
• Maintenance Area
Y� N
• Recycle Dock
y N
• Sawdust
O N
Additional Comments:
Certification:
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments wereprepared under my
direction or.supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who managc'the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief,:tnie„accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the passibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
'violations."
Signature of Onspector Date
Date
Page 3 of 3

No"tormwater Discharge. Assessment and
Certification
Completed Byi Tim Coggins
Title::Technied and Quality Manager
Date:.June 27,1008
Date of Test
or Evaluation
Outfall Directly
Observed During
the Test
Method Used to
Test or Evaluate
Discharge
Describe Results from Test for the
Presence of Non-Stormwater
Discha e
Identify Potential Significant Sources
Name of Person Wiro Conducted
the Test or Evaluation
6/27/2008
Outfall 1
Visual Examination
No Discharge,
Not Aplicable
Tim Coggins and Kiesha Bridges
6/27/2008
Outran 2
Visual Examination
Clear Uncontaminated Discharge
Uncontaminated Groundwater
Tim Cogg'uns and Kiesha Bridges
6/27/2008
Outfall 3
Visual Examination
No Discharge
Not Aplicable
Tim Coggin and Kiesha Bridges
Certification
I, _Dan Roland_ (responsible official), certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction and supervision and in accordance with, a system to assure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information sub
A. Name and Off ' I Title ' t)
GiJ Dc /ati` S /YIN ���
13. Area Code and Telephone Number
S3 L$ 553 `f
C. signature
D. Date Signed

Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�0� w A rF9Q�
March 31, 2006
Jackson Paper Mfg Co
152 W Ma -in St
Sylva, NC 28779
Subject: General Stormwater Permit Inspections
Jackson Paper Mfg Co - Sylva
Permit No. NCS000295
Jackson County
Dear Sir or Madam:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Your facility holds a general permit from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to
discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities performed at your facility. Please be
advised that the Asheville Regional Office will be performing NPDES stormwater inspections
sometime in the near future.
If this office has not previously inspected your facility, you should be prepared to demonstrate
compliance with all terms and conditions included in the permit. Specifically, we will be
evaluating the following: your stormwater pollution prevention plan, stormwater outfall
locations, qualitative and analytical monitoring data and any other activities required by your
permit. Please note that any data reported to the State must be analyzed by a facility that has a
North Carolina laboratory certification, either as a full laboratory or as a facility certified to
perform on -site field testing. If you have any questions regarding the generation of your
facility's data, please feel free to call Gary Francies at [phone].
Copies of the general permits and accompanying documents can be accessed from the following
webpage: http:llii,It,is,.ncwater-gzialitj�.a-g/su/Forms_Documents.htm#stormivaterGP.
If you have any questions, please contact me in the Asheville Regional Office at [phone],
cc: NPS Compliance & Assistance Oversight Unit
SWP-Central Files
ARO riles
Sincerely,
None
rthCarolina
A1rrtut'allf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 13.S. Hwy 70
Internet: http:ltwww.ncwaterguality.org/
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]