NCS000174_COMPLIANCE_20120817

5T6RNIWATEiiD1VISION-CODING-SHEET
PERMIT NO.
'
NC/SOppr-)y
DOC TYPE
[I FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ `a-y i ). del`►
YYYYMMDD

df A��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Steve Jackson
2202 Burnett Boulevard
Wilmington, NC 28401
Dear Mr. Jackson,
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
Dee Freeman
Secretary
RECEIVED
AUG 2 1 2012
August 17, 2012
ENGINEERING DEPT.
Subject: NPDES Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NC State Port Authority, Wilmington
NPDES Permit No. NCS000174
A compliance evaluation inspection was conducted at the Wilmington Port facility on July 25, 2012.
The inspection was conducted to determine compliance with the NPDES permit NCS000174 and to
provide technical assistance concerning sampling difficulties/concems encountered on site. Enclosed
is a copy of the inspection report.
Please read the enclosed report. Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed compliance
evaluation inspection report, please contact me at [e-mail] or 910-796-7343.
Sincerely,
1 _
l
Linda Willis, Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
S:WQS:NPDES:NCG/NCS Inspections/NCS/2011-2012
CC: DWQ WiRO NCS000174 watt
DWQ CO Files watt
Todd Walton 2202 Burnett Blvd Wilmington NC 28401 Watt
Wilmington Regional office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwater ualit .or
No I: Carolina
aturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000174 Effective: 03/01/08 Expiration: 02/28/13 Owner: NC State Parts Authority
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Port of Wilmington
County: New Hanover 2202 Bumett Blvd
Region. Wilmington
Wilmington NC 28401
Contact Person: Steve Jackson Title: Wilmington Operations Ma Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/2512012 /Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis` -c:,� Zr., (L�� Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): /
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

ti
Permit: NCS000174 Owner - Facility: NC State Ports Authority
Inspection Date: 07/25/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Technical assistance was provided concerning sampling requirements. Rain events greater than 0.10" trigger the
requirement for sampling, however, such rain events would not generate enough rain to result in discharges from many of
the outfalls. Rain storms then occurring within 72 hours of the qualifying rain event would occur but would not be an
allowable event for sampling. As a result, opportunities for sampling would be missed. The Port Authority utilizes a
contract tab to pull all samples on site. The contract lab personnel would not make it to the site in time to collect samples
or would only be able to collect samples from some of the outfalls but not all of the required sampling locations, resulting
in the need for the contract lab to return to the site resulting in added expenses for the Port Authority for return trips. To
alleviate the problem concerning missed opportunities for sampling due to rain events occuring within 72 hours of a
qualifying rain event, WiRO supports the collection of samples within 72 hours of a qualifying rain event provided the
previous rain event was monitored (inches fallen) and documented and provided the previous rain event was not of
sufficient volume to result in the site being flushed prior to sampling.
q.
Representative Outfall Status Discussions:
Representative outfall status was also discussed for outfalls 1001 an 1001A1 nd 902. All are common to the same
collection area. 902 is tidally influenced. Sampling should not be con the stormwater is comingled with incoming
tidal water. WiRO would be amenable to any one of the three being sampled as representative of the others (provided
902 is not used when impacted by high tide). Outfall 1304 does not include any industrial area. It takes in the NC State
'Forts Authority Office area on Barnett Blvd and the associated parking area_ The only industrial activity for 1304 is
overseen by Air Quality for an area where fumigation is taking place for containers. The fumigant used is in aerosol form.
A review of past data (2003 and 2004) did not indicate elevated pollutants even close to the benchmarks. WiRO would
support the elimination of analytical requirements for this outfall. In order for WiRO to grant representative outfall status,
the Port Authority must request as much in writing to the Wilmington Regional Office, attention Linda Willis.
Observations and General Comments:
Outfall 2501 had been receiving groundwater contamination from the bulk storage facility to the south of the port. The
Port Authority slip lined the drain three years ago to resolve the infiltration of free product from that site to their stormwater
outfall. The Port Authority is receiving assistance from the Registered Environmental Consultant Program for the area of
Warehouse Storage in the vicinity of 6B. The building "Cl" is used for storage of fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) due to leaks
in the roof that have resulted in contamination to the ground beneath.
Outfall 1704 consistently reflects high chemical oxygen demand due to the debarking operations in the vicinity. WiRO will
support alleviating monthly monitoring with the acknowledgement/agreement by the Port Authority that the debarking
operations are consistently generating an extremely poor quality stormwater discharge that has the characteristics of
wastewater rather than impacted stormwater. Please request alleviation for monitoring at this outfall in writing to the
Wilmington Regional Office. Future actions by DWO conceming this operation could include the requirement to collect
and treat_ WiRO recommends that the Port Authority investigate all avenues for treatment/disposal including utilization of
disposal via the sanitary sewer since stormwater generated in the NCSPA Maintenance area and the discharge
generated by the vehicle washing area for the garage located in the vicinity of outfall 2006 are both being disposed of via
the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA).
In the vicinity of outfall 206, there are two new large bulk storage tanks (4.5 MG each)that holds liquid urea ammonium
nitrate (UAN). Secondary containment is provided. The rail and truck loading area is protected from stormwater for both
of these storage/transfer tanks.
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000174 Owner - Facility: NC State Ports Authority
Inspection Date: 07125/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Iron pellets stored in the vicinity of outfall 2012 have been moved indoors. The impervious area where iron pellets were
once stored still have iron pellets present. Housekeeping could be improved in this area. The pH for the stormwater from
that area is acceptable and below the benchmarks. pH is in an acceptable range, although somewhat depressed.
The Vopak facility has two areas where samples are collected. A visual inspection of the pond at the northwest comer of
the facility indicates extremely heavy algal growth with an appearance of septic conditions. No stormwater analytical has
been provided for either of the two locations in this vicinity for review.
1+ The unavailability of contract labor to collect samples for the Part Authority will not be an acceptable reason for failure to
monitor. It might be prudent to ensure that on site employees receive appropriate training so that NPDES permit
sampling requirements are met.
This permit is expiring in February 28, 2013. The permit renewal application is 6 months prior to expiration. Please
ensure that samples are collected in accordance with the permit requirements (semi annually).
In order for DWQ to grant representative outfall status (ROS), a representative outfall status request must be submitted in
writing to DWQ. You can find the ROS form on line. If you need assistance locating the form, please contact Linda Willis
at 910-796-7343 or email address [e-mail].
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 00011
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0000
Comment: The site inspection was conducted to assist in determining appropriate
representative outfall status locations as well as discuss issues the Port Authority is
having with controlling pollutants of concern (such as TSS and elevated COD) in the
vicinity of the area leased for debarking operations.
Page: 3

MOREHEAD CITY
CAROLINA
�1-1VA �
WILMINGTON.�
Marl: Blake P.E.
Director of Engineering and Maintenance
May 20, 2010
Mr. Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supertirisor
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington NC 28405-3845
Subject: North Carolina State Ports Authority
Petroleum Spill on May 17
Port of Wilmington
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Shiver,
This letter is follow up to the May 17, 2010 reported petroleum leak at the NC
State Ports Authority as required by our NPDES permit. The NC Department of
Emergency Management was notified due to the fact that no one was available in the
WIRO water quality section the date of the leak. The Coast Guard and National
Response Center (NRC) were also notified of the incident. The NRC incident number is
940489.
On May 17, 2010 at approximately 11:20am the Coast Guard notified the Port that a
sheen was present in the Cape Fear River near berthing area 6. Upon further
investigation it was discovered that an unknown petroleum product had been leaked on
the berthing area and was being transported to the nearby drains due to the moderate
rainfall. The Ports maintenance staff immediately deployed absorbent booms and pads
to stop the further spread of the product. The Ports also used two vacuum trucks to clean
the berthing area and to collect the contaminated water from, the berthing surface.
The source of the petroleum product is not known. All stevedore and Port cranes,
forklifts, and maintenance vehicles that were in the area prior to the incident were

inspected for leaks; however all were found to be in sound condition. The Ports is
estimating that less than a quart of product was leaked onto the berthing.
The Ports is continuing to investigate the incident in an attempt to identify the source of
the leak. The submittal of this report and also the notification of all appropriate agencies
should satisfy the Ports NPDES permit requirements for during and after an incident of
this nature occurs. If there is additional information that may be required please feel free
to contact me at 910-251-5578 or todd walton@.ncports.com. Thank you for your
assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
e4.
Todd C. Walton
Environmental Supervisor
North Carolina State Ports Authority
Cc: Chris Tant, NC Emergency Mgmt
Files

Ak
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 2, 2009
North Carolina Port Authority
Wilmington Port
2202 Burnett Blvd.
Wilmington NC 28401
Subject: NPDES Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NCS000174
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Eagar,
A compliance evaluation inspection of the Wilmington Port facility was conducted on May 7, 2009.
This inspection was to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the requirements specified
in the NPDES Stonnwater Permit (NCS000174). The findings and comments noted during this
inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report entitled "Compliance Inspection
Report".
In general, the site appeared to be well kept. Good housekeeping and best management practices
outlined in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan appear to be implemented by personnel on site.
The outfall locations identified in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan were inspected. Should you
have any questions concerning this correspondence or the enclosed inspection report, please contact me
at 910-796-7343.
Sincerely,
Linda Willis
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
CC: CO DWQ files
WiRO NCS004174, New Hanover County wiCz.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterauarrty.ora
N orth Carohna
�atul'Qllly
An Equal Opporiunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50 o Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000174 Effective: 03/01/08 Expiration: 02/28/13 Owner: NC State Ports Authority
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Port of Wilmington
County: New Hanover 2202 Burnett Blvd
Region: Wilmington
Wilmington NC 28401
Contact Person: Tom Eagar Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/0712009 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: 5tormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000174 Owner - Facility: NC State Ports Authority
Inspection Date: 05/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit. Routine
Inspection Summary:
SWP3 had been reviewed and amended. Qualitative and quantitative monitoring requirements are being met.
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000174 Owner - Facility: NC State Ports Authority
Inspection Date: 0510712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible altematives to current practices?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a SMP summary?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment. -
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical MonijR!inq
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑ 110
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

o� W A TF9
�0 QG
J
O 't
December 6, 2004
Mr. Layton Bedsole, Environmental Affairs Manager
North Carolina State Ports Authority
Post Office Box 9002
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Dear Mr. Bedsole:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Departrrcm of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Port Of Wilmington
NPDES Stormwater Permit Number NCS000174
New Hanover County
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality conducted a recent inspection of The Port of Wilmington
on November 17, 2004. This inspection was conducted to determine if the facility is operating in compliance
with the conditions and requirements specified in NPDES Stormwater Permit Number NCS000174.
Please find attached a copy of the'Industrial Stormwater Inspection Report, which indicates the findings
of the inspection and a summary of compliance issues.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me at the Wilmington Regional Office,
telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
Edward Beck
Environmental Engineer
eb: ncs000174
cc: Wilmington Regional Files
Central Files
Ed Beck
IAa`�aCarolina
_ furully
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal hive Extension Wilmington, NC 29405 Phone [phone] Customer service
Wilmingrton Regional Office FAX [phone]
An Equal OpponunitylAffurnative Action Employer - 50% Retyded110% Post Consumer Paper

INDUSTRIAL STORAIWATER INSPECTION REPORT
FACILITY:
Port of Wilmington
North Carolina State Ports Authority
LOCATION/ADDRESS:
Located on the Cape Fear River in Wilmington at the terminus of Shipyard Boulevard
Post Office Box 9002
Wilmington, NC 28402
CONTACT NAME/PHONE NUMBER:
Layton Bedsole, Environmental Affairs Manager
[phone]
ADEQUACY OF SWPPP:
The SWPPP is well developed and is readily available. It describes the activities on the site and
presents BMP controls to reduce impacts. Updates and monitoring reports are included in the
file. Also included are reports of inspections done by a consultant to evaluate the
implementation and effectiveness of the BMPs on the site. The evaluations appear to be quite
objective and thorough.
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AREA:
It appears that maintenance is done within buildings with little exposure to rainfall. The
surrounding area appeared clean and free of oily residue.
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT WASH AREA:
Heavy equipment is pressure washed and the wash water is pretreated with an oil/water separator
system prior to being discharged to the City sanitary sewer system.
TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WASTE MATERIALS:
It appears that storage of waste materials outside is kept to a minimum and is not problematic.
OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS:
Some materials are staged outside while in transition between shipment and receipt. Some bulk
materials are routinely stored outside under fabric covers. The covering of wood chips is not
practical but does not appear to be problematic. Secondary containment is employed where
needed.
SPILL RESPONSE AND CLEANUP PROGRAM:
It appears that very effective vacuum sweeping is done on the site to control spills of solid
products and to keep the site clean. It is anticipated that the site would respond to a spill of
liquid product is a satisfactory manner.
ERROSION CONTROL ON SITE:
The site is generally paved so there is little opportunity for erosion. Problems were not observed
on the site.
ILLICIT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION:
This does not appear to be a problem on the site.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES:
Oil/water separators are the only treatment systems on site.
STREAM IMPACTS/RESULTS OF SAMPLING:
Sampling does not indicate impacts to surface waters resulting from stormwater discharges.
SUMNLARY:
It is clear that the site, and water quality in the river, benefit from the implementation of the
stormwater program. The management of the program, including monitoring, record keeping,
updating of the SWPPP, and oversight of activities on the site, appears to be done very
effectively. Spilled dry product is no longer being swept and washed from the pier into the river
as it was in the past. Vacuum sweeping is being effectively used to keep the whole port area
quite clean, thereby reducing the potential for constituents to enter surface waters during rainfall
events. Companies operating on the site appear to be generally mindful of the need to use good
housekeeping procedures to limit drips and spills and to reduce exposure of materials and
activities to rainfall. Bulk product piles are generally covered to the extent that it is practical.
Secondary containment is in place where it is needed. The facility is, therefore, determined to be
compliant with the requirements of the stormwater permit.
One activity of concern is the washing of bulk material handling hoppers on the pier. More
effective control measures should be considered for disposal of the wash water in a manner that
does not result in a direct discharge to surface waters.
Inspected by: Ed Beck
Date: November 17, 2004

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 2, 2004
MEMORANDUM
To: Aisha Lau
Stormwater Permitting Unit
From: Ed Beck &Jt4-,
Wilmington Regional Office
Through: Rick Shiver
Subject: Permit Number NCS000174
North Carolina State Ports Authority
Port of Wilmington
New Hanover County
An application has been received for renewal of the subject stormwater permit. An
inspection of the site was done on November 17, 2004. The Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan and associated material were available at the site and in good order.
The SWPPP is well developed, describes the many activities on the site, and
presents BMP controls to reduce impacts. Updates and monitoring reports are
included in the file. Also included are reports of inspections done by a consultant to
evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of BMPs on the site. The evaluations
are quite objective and thorough and indicate that the facility is generally compliant.
A review of the site was done. It is clear that the site has benefited from the
oversight of an environmental manager who strives to keep the facility compliant
with the requirements of the permit. Frequent sweeping keeps the site free of solids
that could be flushed by stormwater into the adjacent river. Secondary containment
is in place where needed. There are several areas where bulk materials are stored
and handled. The product piles are kept covered as much as practicable. Equipment
wash areas are generally tributary to the sanitary sewer. The writer will guide the
permittee to utilize better control measures when washing the bulk material crane
hopper.

It is recommended that the permit be reissued for a period of five years containing
conditions similar to those contained in the current permit.
eb: ncs000174.124
cc: Wilmington Regional Files
Central Files
Ed Beck

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
Notch Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
❑ `C
October 12. 2004
North Carolina Ports
Attn: Mr- H. Layton Bedsole Jr R.E.M
P.O. Box 9002
Burnett Blvd.
Wilmington, NC 28401
,clan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
•� ��
LS Y:
Ob. 6 �04
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Permit Number NCS000174
Individual Stormwater Permit
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Bedsole;
The Division of Water Quality's Stormwater and General Permits Unit hereby acknowledges receipt of your renewal
application for coverage under NPDFS Permit Number NCS000174 on October 1, 2004. The submitted renewal package
contained the following items:
Signed application
Site map
Y Analytical monitoring results summary
Visual monitoring results sumrnary
y Best Management Practices summary
Y Narrative describing significant changes at the permitted facility
> Signed Stormwaer Pollution Prevention Plan certification
A preliminary review of the submitted renewal application package has been conducted and it appears to be complete- No
further information is required at this time- If you have any questions about the renewal process or would like to discuss
this letter, please contact me at [phone], extension 578.
Since r y,
&i,,Ia H. Lau
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files
OCT 1 5 goo
is Carolina
Awwru!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer
Service
Internee: h2o.enr.5tate nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal 4pporturitylAlfutnative Action Employer - 50% Recycted/10% Post Consumer Paper

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 3, 2006
Name Layton Bedsole
Facility Name Wilmington Port
Address 2202 Burnett Boulevard
City, State, Zip Wilmington, NC 28401
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility Name Wilmington Port
Permit Number NCS000174
County New Hanover
Dear Mr. Bedsole,
Alan W. Klimek, P-E_ Director
Division of Water Quality
On January 26, 2006, Linda Willis and Wes Hare, of the Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office,
performed an inspection of the subject facility. The following items should be addressed to prevent problems in the future:
1.) Please include routine inspection of the pH meter at Vopak N and S to ensure proper operation.
As part of the inspection, a tour of your facility was conducted. All observations and recommendations are noted
in the Summary of findingslcomments of this inspection report. Remember, it is our goal to insure the quality of the surface
waters of this State.
Please review the attached report. If you or your staff have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Linda Willis
or myself at 910-796-7215.
Sincerely",
Edward Beck
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Central files
WiRO/DWQ Stormwater Compliance Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Danny Smith, NIPS and Compliance Oversight
Linda Willis, WiRO
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 One
Phone: [phone]/Fax: [phone]ntemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper NaturffIly

©� NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER INSPECTION FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Facility: NC State Port Authority Wilmington
Date: April 26, 2006
Location Address: 2202 Burnett Boulevard
COC #: NCS000174
Contact Name: Layton Bedsole
Phone Number: [phone]
Contact Mailing Address: P.O. 9002 Wilmington NC 28401
County: New Hanover
Directions:
Shipyard Boulevard (heading west) to Port
x
Routine Compliance Inspection
Rescission Request
Complaint Investigation
x
Other — Expiain Permit Renewal Inspection
,A.,z r
4STORM``zWATER<POLLUTION PRI~VENTION 1PLAN-
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
1.
Is a copy of the signed and certified SWPPP at the facility?
x
Manifest not reviewed
2.
Does the facility's SWPPP address the minimum BMP
requirements?
x
3.
Are amendments to the SWPPP clearly documented?
x
4.
Is the current SWPPP complete?
x
8�'
y
l� .�t'�' 4. �
; VEHICLE EQUIPMENTA _?
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Were the vehicle/equipment maintenance areas inspected?
x
2.
Are vehicle/machinery leaks and drips properly managed?
x
3.
Is vehicle/equipment washing done in a designed area so that
wash water can be properly managed?
x
4.
Was the vehicle fueling area inspected?
x
5.
Are vehicle maintenance activities kept indoors?
x
6.
Were the vehicle/equipment storage areas inspected?
x
7.
Are current BMPs in vehicle/equipment/fueling areas adequate?
x
�Cr,
;,WASTE MANAGEMENT ���,��;
,...
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Are containers for temporary storage of wastes labeled?
x
2.
Are waste materials recycled?
x
3.
Are hazardous wastes properly handled and disposed of?
x
4.
Is processed debris removed regularly?
x
5.
Is there secondary containment for liquid wastes?
x
6.
Are current waste management BMPs adequate?
x
D
4Mi4TERa IALST RAGE�p4 r
Yes
No
NIA
1.
Are there appropriate BMPs for outdoor storage of raw materials,
products, and byproducts?
x
2.
Are containers for chemical substances labeled?
x
3.
Is there secondary containment for liquid storage?
x
4.
Are current BMPs in material storage areas adequate?
x

Et `
SPILT GONTROL� " _,, ,
- �.
Yes No
NIA Comments
1.
Are there procedures for spill response and cleanup?
x
2.
Are appropriate spill containment and deanup materials kept on -site and in
convenient locations?
x
Manifests not reviewed
NIA
NIA
NIA
x
x
NIA
No samples taken
3.
Are used absorbent materials disposed of in a timely manner?
4.
Are current spill BMPs adequate?
x
F.
EROSION t4-t';C . t : f ?..a_t�
Yes No
1.
Are unpaved outdoor areas protected from water/wind erosion?
x
2.
Are drainage ditches or the areas around the outfalls free of erosion?
x
3.
Do implemented BMPs appear effective in controlling erosion?
x
;lit i
.�4.' .a f. - w A.: .• _ _ <_.i ..ai .r . -jy 3._
3NON-STORM WATER MANAGEM&T e i; z :F s �'
Yes NO
I.
have all illicit water discharges been eliminated or permitted?
x
2.
Are BMPs for authorized non -storm water discharges properly implemented?
x
3.
Are current BMPs adequate for management of authorized non -storm water
discharges?
x
x _ ,.�
,p ....[:� S+- -'. -.. � _. -�`--r.w r+�-•axt-tom :-^:-_, .='3- '` Y--'.:- :,•: r � �;
FiZOgSS WASTEWATEWCONTROL'S`AND MONli0.NGw r .Y, :.3
Yes No
1.
Are wastewater treatment facilities properly maintained?
2.
Has monitoring been done?
t �
14
`STREAM OBSERVATIONnMPACTS . r� = °
Yes No
1.
Were there any stream impacts?
x
2.
Were field parameters taken for phi or DO?
x
3.
Were there any stream standard violations/
4.
Were there excessive solids in the stream?
x
5.
Were pictures taken?
x
Were samples taken?
x
^i6.
`� #d
'J
`
'3 .^S.W.t_ b- -. �sp� 'H �.. � 47! ',�pw? yR� .' ) 4"- t i ����"� � Y f�.y � -3" fk's"h 1' k .s"�.�e. Yy�k, �j'..r L "SKy` Y `� F � - ���• � -+�'.
,SUMMARY{! ADDITIONAL COMMENTS b w ,_ a* _ ':` _: � �^�k ; t W . f
See attached report
1K
� {
rRATiNG LEVEL (C[RC LE ONE
`Y+
1.
Indusry in substantial compliance
2.
Minor deficiencies noted. (date).
3.
Major deficiencies or discharges noted and require prompt correction. Revisit scheduled for (date).
4.
Critical deficiencies or discharges noted and require immediate correctioin. Revisit scheduled for (date).
5.
Rescission is appropriate.
6.
Rescission is not appropriate.
Logged by:
Inspected by: Linda Willis&Wes Mare WiRO

INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER SUMMARY OF FINDINGS REPORT
Date of Inspection: January 26, 2006
FACILITY:
Port of Wilmington
North Carolina State Port Authority
LOCATIONIADDRESS:
Located on the Cape Fear River in Wilmington at the terminus of Shipyard Boulevard
Post Office Box 9002
Wilmington, NC 28402
CONTACT NAMEIPHONE NUMBER:
Layton Bedsole, Environmental Affairs Manager
[phone]
ADEQUACY OF SWPPP:
The SWP3 was reviewed on March 22, 2006. The plan had updated revisions documented for changes to the Best
Management Practices at the Port for the year 2005. The plan appeared to address all areas of concern for potential
pollutant releases. An inspection of the berths, container storage areas, vehicle maintenance areas, vehicle washing
station, bulk conveyance, fueling location, and bulk storage areas were conducted. The results of the Analytical
Monitoring (as required by the stormwater permit) accompanied the permit renewal application. A summary sheet was
also included with the permit renewal package for the Qualitative Monitoring Requirements.
VEHICLEIEQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AREA:
Maintenance appears to be conducted inside buildings with little exposure to rainfall. The surrounding area was free of
oily residue.
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT WASH AREA:
Heavy equipment is pressure washed and the wash water is pretreated with an oillwater separator system prior to
being discharged to the City sanitary sewer system. The inspection records were not reviewed to determine the
frequency in which the oil water separators are maintained.
TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WASTE MATERIALS:
No waste materials were seen stored outdoors.
OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS:
Some materials are staged outside while in transition between shipment and receipt. Some bulk materials are routinely
stored outside under fabric covers (wood chips). This practice is utilized to provide space for materials that may need
storage inside.
SPILL RESPONSE AND CLEANUP PROGRAM:
The site was exceptionally clean. The berth areas were clean and clear of any debris including dirt and gravel. The
housekeeping practices are excellent.
EROSION CONTROL ON SITE:
The site is primarily paved on the majority of the exposed surfaces and therefore not a concern for erosion.
ILLICIT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION:
This does not appear to be a problem with the Port Authority. The Port Authority has become aware of illicit discharges
from groundwater contamination sources and immediately responded with action to minimize the impact to the
receiving waters. The Port Authority Environmental Affairs Manager notified both DWQ and the Aquifer Protection
Section. These events have been related to neighboring facilities. The company located south of the Port Authority
(Apex) has groundwater contamination that had surfaced at the outfall 2501. The Port Authority has been extremely
cooperative and proactive in their efforts to reduce the impacts of any outside influences and have worked closely with
the Aquifer Protection Section.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES:
Oillwater separators are the only treatment systems on site.
STREAM IMPACTS/RESULTS OF SAMPLING:
The fourth year 2"d quarter results at outfall 103 had an elevated level of COD (173 mg/L). The fourth year 3`d quarter
results at outfalls at Vopak N and S had extremely low pH. The Environmental Affairs Manager indicated this was likely
due to a faulty pH meter. If not already included in the SWPPP, please include a schedule for regular inspections of all
pH meters to ensure their proper operation. The fourth year 4'" quarter results at outfalls 1001 and 2006 for TSS were
139 and 108 (mg/L) respectively and ou#fall 206 was 474 (mg/L). COD levels were 113 and 99 (mg/L) at outfalls 1001
and 206. Please continue to seek solutions that can be implemented in the SWPPP to reduce the concentration of
TSS and COD at the outfalls mentioned above. It may be beneficial to consider including BOD analysis at outfalls
103, 1001 and 206, and COD for Vopak N and S in the upcoming permit renewal. Adding COD to Vopak N and S
may help confirm a discharge of a low pH chemical and eliminate any questions whether the pH meter is working
properly.
SUMMARY:
The high pressure washing of the bulk material hopper used to receive and then deliver bulk free product to the
transport trucks is of some concern. The wash water from that operation would drain directly to the receiving waters.
There is currently no way to determine what the impact is since the wash water is not captured prior to discharge and is
not analyzed. The washing operation utilizes a high pressure washer to reduce the amount of water use during the
washing process and reduce the amount of time needed to wash the hopper. The SWPPP audit identified utilizing
catch basins to be built to capture the wash water. This was one of the few suggestions not acted upon by the Port
Authority.
Although there were occasions of elevated levels of COD and TSS, the overall impact from the operations at the
Wilmington Port appears quite minimal. This Port is handling more break bulk business that inherently reduces the
exposure of the imported/exported/stored materials to the environment. The majority of the monitoring results were
exceptionally low considering the amount of activity and business the Port receives. The facility is maintained
exceptionally well.
The efforts taken at the Port to maintain a clean site and minimize the impacts of their activities to the environment
appear effective. The facility is therefore determined to be compliant with the requirements of the stormwater permit
N CS000174.
Wilmington Region Recommendations:
The Wilmington Regional Office has no objection to renewing the Stormwater Permit NPDES NCS000174. Maintain
the previous permit monitoring requirements and please consider including BOD analysis at outfalls 103, 1001
and 206, and COD for Vopak N and S in the upcoming permit renewal.
Inspected by: Linda Willis and Wes Hare (WiRO)
Date: April 3, 2006--L� �/_
oa�. Z �41do