HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190169 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190318Strickland, Bev
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 8:14 AM
To: Staples, Shane; Mairs, Robb L
Subject: FW: [External] RE: FW: Josh Lane
Morning all,
Here is the add info from Mr. Lane concerning boat type and justification for the channel alignment. Please let me know
if there is anything else.
Thanks,
G regg
,Ig EQ��
GreggBodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
252 808 08 ext 215 (Office)
Gregg&odnarP_ncdenr.Zoy
Email corresoundence to and from this address is subject to the
From: Josh Lane - EAE, Inc. <josh@eae-inc.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 3:30 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gov>; dbrooks62@ec.rr.com
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <ryan.davenport@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: [External] RE: FW: Josh Lane
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
report.spam@nc.gov
Hey Gregg,
Thanks for the email. First to answer your question about the boat. A 30' catamaran boat is what sits on the left side lift.
Its been out since the hurricane. We would prefer to not add to the existing footprint. There has been sometime since
that has been cleaned out and I do not want to rely on them to clean out the entire channel to provide me access. It is
also quite awkward trying to dock from that direction in a strong southerly wind which is present for most of the
summer. There is no proposal on going forward of the boat lifts. The Jetski lift area is adequate for its purpose. if going
4' deep vs 5' makes a difference then we could live with that as well.
Thanks,
Josh Lane
Vice President
Enviro Assessments East, Inc.
Josh@eae-inc.com
(c) 252-560-3315
(o) 252-527-3052
(f) 252-527-3055
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: FW: Josh Lane
From: "Bodnar, Gregg" <gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gov>
Date: 3/14/19 8:33 am
To: "dbrooks62@ec.rr.com" <dbrooks62@ec.rr.com>, "Josh Lane - EAE, Inc." <josh@eae-inc.com>
Cc: "Davenport, Ryan" <ryan.davenport@ncdenr.gov>
Morning Mr. Lane and Mr. Brooks,
Mr. Lane, when I spoke to your father after he called to get an update on the status of the project I mentioned
that DMF was interested in checking the site for SAV concerns within the dredge footprint. They conducted
that survey on 3/13 and DMF provided some additional questions below. No SAV was found in the dredge
footprint but there was oyster resource. I spoke with DWR 401 this morning as well and they are interested in
the same questions as well. Please take a look at the email below and provide me with a response to their
questions and proposal I will pass it along.
If you have any questions or want to discuss please give me a call.
Thanks,
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant MajorCoordinator
Division��D- E of Coastal Management
Department o252 f Environmental Quality a 2808
Emailcarrespondenceto t t #:..thisaddress # the
From: Staples, Shane
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 4:12 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Josh Lane
Gregg, after conducting a site visit to Mr. Lane's property on 3/12/19 to assess the area for fisheries resources
that may be impacted by the proposed project I do have some questions I would like clarified by the applicant.
• What is the purpose of going to -5' @ NLW? The bay rider skiff observed on the lift at the property has a
draft nearly capable of operation at nearly any water level without dredging.
• Building on that questions, why not connect into the neighboring footprint to reduce overall bottom
impacts? This would be a preferred alternative by DMF unless some purpose and need if shown for the
deeper access channel.
As a result of the site visit the only SAV beds found were landward on the existing boat lifts and proposed
dredge footprint so impacts to that resource will likely be minimal. My conservation recommendations there
would be to have a 10' buffers from the SAv beds for any dredge footprint. I would likely have resource
concerns if the dredge footprint were proposed to extend up the jet ski lift. The remainder of the bottom in the
proposed work area was soft fine sediment with a good deal of shell hash some showing signs of oyster spat
settlement.
Thanks,
Shane
Shane Staples
Fisheries Resource Specialist
Division of Marine Fisheries
North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality
252-948-3950 office
Shane.staples@ncdenr.gov
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27817
meapmmam,
p EQ� rt ®para mn
apartment ental .
„.,
aoena.vv�,d.n.ew
the
address subject to the
north Convertor PuNkReeords law and may e;,eo al 0 m;.e Dome.
meapmmam,
p EQ� rt ®para mn
apartment ental .
„.,
aoena.vv�,d.n.ew
the
address subject to the
north Convertor PuNkReeords law and may e;,eo al 0 m;.e Dome.