Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190035 Ver 1_Public Notice Comments_20190314DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 151 PATTON AVENUE ROOM 208 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006 March 14, 2019 Regulatory Division Action ID: SAW -2018-01129 Mr. Patrick H. Brindle Piedmont Lithium, Inc. 5706 Dallas-Cherryville Highway Bessemer City, North Carolina 28106 Dear Mr. Brindle: Please reference the application for an Individual Department of the Army Permit, submitted on your behalf on December 30, 2018 by Mrs. Kelly Thames of HDR, Inc., to discharge fill material into 5,810.5 linear feet of stream, 0.16 acre of impounded waters, and 0.014 acre of wetlands for the construction of a hard rock lithium mine. The proposed project includes the construction of a mine pit, waste rock area, roadways, a concentrator plant, and attendant features. The project area is composed of approximately 971 acres and is centered in the vicinity of 1501 Hephzibah Church Road in Bessemer City, North Carolina. The project was advertised by public notice on January 17, 2019. Comments in response to the notice were received from the National Marine Fisheries Service, the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, the Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. These comments are enclosed for your information. Please provide a detailed written response to the comments. In addition to conducting a public interest review which balances the reasonably expected benefits against the reasonably foreseeable detriments, all Clean Water Act Section 404 permits must meet guidelines for the specification of disposal sites for dredged or fill material under Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1). These comments are being submitted pursuant to the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) guidelines (40 CFR 230). We have completed our initial review of the application and determined that the following additional information is necessary to expeditiously complete our permit decision: 1. During the pre -application meetings on August 23, 2018 and November 8, 2018, you or your agent stated that Piedmont Lithium has drilled extensively throughout the Carolina Tin-Spodumene Belt. Please disclose the location of this exploratory drilling activity and explain why these sites were not selected as the applicants preferred alternative. -2- 2. During the pre -application meetings on August 23, 2018 and November 8, 2018, you or your agent stated that Piedmont Lithium has future plans for a lithium concentrate refinement facility 20 miles away in Cleveland County. This facility would allow Piedmont Lithium to reduce the cost of the final lithium product by avoiding shipment of lithium concentrate to China for refinement. Please disclose any anticipated adverse impacts to waters of the United States associated with the development of this facility and associated infrastructure (water, sewer, rail, gas, electricity, etc.). 3. Figure 11 of the plans (Impact 14-16) shows a small section of Wetland 9 remaining. It appears that the proposed fill would severely degrade the function of the remaining wetland and potentially isolate the wetland from downstream waters. Therefore, this area should also be considered a loss of waters. We have evaluated the conceptual compensatory mitigation proposal included in the permit application. We have determined that, if a permit is issued for the applicants preferred alternative, compensatory mitigation would be required at the following compensation ratios: 0.5:1 for Open Water (Wetland Credits) 2:1 for High Quality Wetlands (Wetland Credits) 1.75:1 for Medium Quality Wetlands (Wetland Credits) 1.5:1 for Low Quality Wetlands (Wetland Credits) 2:1 for High Quality Tributaries (Stream Credits) 1.75:1 for Medium Quality Tributaries (Stream Credits) 1.5:1 for Low Quality Tributaries (Stream Credits) The information requested above is essential to the expeditious processing of the application; please submit one consolidated response to all comments by May 31, 2019. This information is required pursuant to 33 CFR 325 Appendix B and 40 CFR 1506.5. If you do not submit this information within the given timeframe, the application will be administratively withdrawn. Withdrawal of the application does not preclude you from reopening the application at a later time, provided you submit the required information. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at (704) 510-1437 or David.L. Shaeffer(&,,usace.army.mil. Sincerely, David L. Shaeffer Project Manager Charlotte Field Office Enclosure Digitally signed by �rDIV: SHAEFFER.DAVI D.LEIGH.1260750573 PKl, o =U5A, Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, cn=SHAEFFER.DAVI D.LEIG H.1260750573 Date: 2019.03.14 09:02:12 -04'00' David L. Shaeffer Project Manager Charlotte Field Office Enclosure -3- Copies Furnished: Kelly Thames, HDR, Inc. (via e-mail - Kelly.Thames@hdrinc.com) Sue Homewood, NC Division of Water Resources (via email - sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov) ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary LINDA CULPEPPER Director NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality February 19, 2019 DWR # 20190035 Gaston County Piedmont Lithium Inc Attn: Mr. Patrick Brindle 5706 Dallas-Cherryville Highway Bessemer City NC 28016 Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Piedmont Lithium Project Dear Mr. Brindle: On January 4, 2019, the Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs (Division) received your application dated December 27, 2018, requesting a 401 Individual Water Quality Certification from the Division for your project. The Division has determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be processed. The application is on -hold until all of the following information is received: 1. If the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requests a response to any comments received as a result of the Public Notice, please provide the Division with a copy of your response to the USACE. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)] 2. A complete review of the project cannot be conducted until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has verified all stream and wetland locations for the entire project. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(a)(7)] 3. DWR mitigation requirements cannot be determined until a site verification of intermittent and perennial stream calls occurs. Please contact Alan Johnson at 704-235- 2200 to schedule a verification. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(h) and S.L. 2017-10] 4. Provide a site-specific detailed engineering plan, profile view, and cross-section of all proposed impact areas. These drawings must include details regarding proposed final contours for fill/cut areas, stream alignment in relation to pipe alignment, pipe slope, pipe burial, dissipater pad requirements, temporary dewatering design and impacts, adjacent sediment and erosion control measures, and plans for restoration of any temporarily impacted areas. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(b)] North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources �E �� rtvir 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 �� /"� 919.707.9000 Piedmont lithium Inc DWR# 20190035 Request for Additional Information Page 2 of 3 5. Provide the results of the groundwater monitoring and modeling as mentioned in Section 6.4.3 to document the statement "groundwater supply in the surrounding area is not expected to increase or decrease due to activities at the proposed project site'. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(4)] 6. Clarify how stormwater runoff will be managed throughout the mine, including but not limited to stormwater from haul roads, concentrator facility, and waste rock areas. 7. Please explain how the rock spoil rock areas have been designed to protect downstream water quality (e.g. total height and stability, total acreages proposed to be "unstable" at one time, etc.) 8. Provide documentation and/or a detailed technical analysis that shows that there will be no secondary hydrological impacts to any of the retained stream features as a result of pit development. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(4)] 9. The application states that "the proposed discharge of dredge and fill material should not cause increased chemical contamination levels within the aquatic ecosystem." Please provide a technical basis for this statement, specifically addressing potential changes that may occur to the material through the excavation and/or concentration processes and whether they may increase the potential for chemical releases into the environment from the waste rock. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(4)] Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(e), the applicant shall furnish all of the above requested information for the proper consideration of the application. Please respond in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter by sending one (1) copy of all of the above requested information to the 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, INC 27699-1617 -OR- by submitting all of the above requested information through this link: https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/Forms/Supplemental-Information-Form (note the DWR# requested on the link is referenced above). If all of the requested information is not received within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter, the Division will be unable to approve the application and it will be returned. The return of this project will necessitate reapplication to the Division for approval, including a complete application package and the appropriate fee. Please be aware that you have no authorization under the Water Quality Certification Rules for this activity and any work done within waters of the state may be a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code. Piedmont Lithium Inc DWR# 20190035 Request for Additional Information Page 3 of 3 Contact Sue Homewood at 336-776-9693 or Sue. Homewood@ncdenr.gov if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ko", 4 Karen Higgins, Supervisor 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch cc: Kelly Thames, HDR (via email) David Shaeffer, USACE Charlotte Regulatory Field Office (via email) Olivia Munzer, NCWRC (via email) Byron Hamstead, USFS (via email) DWR MRO 401 files DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Filename: 20190035PiedmontLithium(Gaston)_401_IC_HOLD 1�1 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0 Gordon Myers, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Kelly Thames HDR, Inc. FROM: Olivia Munzer, Western Piedmont Coordinator Habitat Conservation DATE: 18 February 2019 SUBJECT: Individual Permit Application for Piedmont Lithium Mine Project in Bessemer City, Gaston County; USACE Action ID: SAW -2018-01129; DEQ Project No. 20190035. Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e). HDR, Inc., on behalf of Piedmont Lithium Inc., has submitted an Individual Permit (IP) application for the proposed Piedmont Lithium Mine centered around 1501 Hephzibah Church Road in Bessemer City, Gaston County, North Carolina. The approximately 971 -acre (ac) hard rock lithium mine would include the construction of a 200 -ac open pit, a 145 -ac waste rock area, a concentrator plant site, access roads, and applicable National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System best management practices (BMP). Little Beaverdam Creek, Beaverdam Creek, and their unnamed tributaries in the Catawba River basin flow through the proposed site. The pit shell areas will impact 1,263 linear feet (If) of perennial stream channel, 4,547.5 if of intermittent stream channel, 0.14 ac of wetlands, and 0.16 ac of ponds. Internal access road stream crossing will impact 178 if of perennial stream channel and a stormwater BMP will impact 55 if of perennial channel. We have records for the dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora; Federal Threatened, State Threatened), bigleaf magnolia (Magnolia macrophylla; State Threatened), bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii; Federal Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance; State Threatened), Virginia spiderwort (Tradescantia virginiana; State Threatened), dwarf threetooth (Triodopsis fulciden; State Special Concern), and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus; State Threatened), which is protected by the federal Bald and Eagle Protection Act, in the vicinity of the site. State significantly rare species found in the area include seagreen darter (Etheostoma thalassinum), Carolina foothills crayfish (Cambarus johni), striate button (Mesomphix pilsbryi), glade milkvine (Matelea decipiends), and Georgia holly (Ilex longipes). Additionally, an undescribed crayfish occurs in Beaverdam Creek downstream of the project, Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation Division • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028 Page 2 18 February 2019 Piedmont Lithium Mine IP USACE Action ID: SAW -2018-01129 and several state -listed aquatic mussels may occur in or downstream of the site. HDR conducted surveys for federally -protected species and none were observed within the proposed mine site. The lack of records from the site does not imply or confirm the absence of state -listed species. An on-site survey is the only definitive means to determine if the proposed project would impact rare, threatened, or endangered species. Additionally, the Eaker Farm Catawba Land Conservancy Easement occurs adjacent to the proposed site. We have concerns on the impacts of this project on aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources. Based upon the Pre -Application Agency Meeting and IP, we offer the following recommendations minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources. 1. We recommend surveys for state -listed mussel and crayfish species within and downstream of the site to determine if relocations are needed. Please contact W. Thomas Russ, the Foothills Aquatic Wildlife Diversity Research Coordinator, at 828-659-3324 or Thomas.russ@ncwildlife.org. 2. We recommend a minimum 100 -foot undisturbed buffer for perennial streams and a 50 -foot undisturbed buffer for intermittent streams and wetlands. 3. The applicant should avoid the removal of large trees at the edges of construction corridors. Due to the decline in bat populations, tees should not be removed during the maternity roosting season for bats (May 15 — August 15). Also, clearing of vegetation should be avoided during the migratory bird nesting season, roughly March to August. 4. Incorporate the following elements into erosion and sediment control plans: minimize clearing and grading, protect waterways, phase construction for larger construction sites (>25 acres), stabilize soils as rapidly as possible (<2 weeks), protect steep slopes, establish appropriate perimeter controls, employ advanced settling devices, implement a certified contractors program, and regularly inspect erosion control measures. 5. Non-native plants should be removed from the seeding schedule. Avoid using Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native and provide little benefit to wildlife. Consider an alternative mix of red clover, creeping red fescue, and a grain, such as oats, wheat, or rye. Specifically, this project would be ideal for planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the reclaimed areas. Pollinators are some insects (i.e., bees, moths, and butterflies) and birds that play an important role in the reproduction of flowering plants, which produce many fruits and vegetables. Habitat loss, disease, and other enviromnental changes have caused a decline in pollinators. Please contact NCWRC for a list of suitable native plants for reclamation. 6. Water discharges from the site should be proportional to the size of the receiving stream so the hydrology of the stream is not altered, and all discharges should comply with NPDES permit requirements. In particular, turbidity of the discharge should be maintained at or below the permit requirement. High water discharge rates and turbidity can negatively impact aquatic resources within and downstream of the site. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species. 7. Existing culverts should be evaluated for their function and allowance for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed (measured from the natural thalweg depth), or if culverts are less than 48 inches in diameter, they should be buried to a depth equal to or greater than 20% of their size. If multiple barrels are required, barrels other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to entrap wildlife or support mosquito breeding Page 3 18 February 2019 Piedmont Lithium Mine IP USACE Action ID: SAW -2018-01129 conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be professionally designed, sized, and installed. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or construction. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species. 9. We recommend reclaiming the relatively shallow sediment basins as wetlands, where practicable. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit application. For questions or comments, please contact me at (919) 707-0364 or olivia.munzerkncwildlife.org. ec: Sue Homewood, NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Alan Johnson, NCDWR Byron Hamstead, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service W. Thomas Russ, NCWRC David Shaeffer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) From: Randy Webb <webbs5@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 9:48 AM To: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Corps Action ID # SAW -2018-01129 Corps Action ID Number SAW -2018-01129 Dear Mr. Shaeffer, Comments being elicited regarding the USACE's findings seems pointless. Q & A is more advantageous to current property owners in the Piedmont Lithium proposed future mining and processing area. The possible environmental degradation with regard to Beaverdam Creek, Little Beaverdam Creek, and their tributaries has been addressed. However, the possible impact to underground aquifers and springs feeding our wells has not been addressed. The breakup of rocks may lead to the leaching of excesses of various minerals and nitrates into our wells. Blasting may effect the structural soundness and flow of wells. If these and other questions are not addressed by Piedmont Lithium and USACE property owners will be left in the dark not knowing the wisest course to take. Therefore, a public hearing would be in the best interest of property owners as this project moves forward. Respectfully, Andrea Webb PO Box 120 1035 Hephzibah Church Rd. Crouse, NC 28033 (Sent via Electronic Mail) Colonel Robert J. Clark, Commander USACE Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1398 Dear Colonel Clark: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Southeast Regional office 26313th Avenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5505 http:ftsero. n rnfs. noaa.gov January 28, 2019 NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) reviewed the project described in the public notice listed below. Based on the information in the public notice, the proposed project would NOT occur in the vicinity of essential fish habitat (EFH) designated by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Mid -Atlantic Fishery Management Council, or the NMFS. Present staffing levels preclude further analysis of the proposed work and no further action is planned. This position is neither supportive of nor in opposition to authorization of the proposed work. Notice No. Applicant(s) Notice Date SAW -2018-00987 Promenade on the Lake LLC January 23, 2019 SAW -2016-02542 Person County; Mega Park January 23, 2019 SAW -2011-01812 Live Oak Bank January 22, 2019 SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium Inc January 17, 2019 SAW -2018-02343 NCDOT; NC 150 January 10, 2019 SAW -2008-03183 NCDOT; Winston-Salem Northern Beltway Eastern Section January, 8, 2019 SAW -2018-00170 Tinsel Town LLC December 21, 2018 Please note these comments do not satisfy consultation responsibilities under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. If an activity "may effect" listed species or critical habitat under the purview of the NMFS, please initiate consultation with the Protected Resources Division at the letterhead address. Sincerely, Pace Wilber for Virginia M. Fay Assistant Regional Administrator Habitat Conservation Division North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry May 10, 2018 Harriet Richardson Seacat HDR, Inc. 440 South Church Street, Suites 800, 900, & 1000 Charlotte, NC 28202-2075 Re: Piedmont Lithium Mining, Hephzibah Church Road, Whitesides Road, & Aderholdt Road, Crouse, Gaston County, ER 18-0800 Dear Ms. Seacat: Thank you for your submission of April 16, 2018, concerning the above referenced project. We have reviewed the information provided and offer the following comments. Three archaeological resources were identified during the cultural resources background investigation, which consisted of both a records check and a limited reconnaissance survey. None of these sites have yet been fully investigated or evaluated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based on topographic conditions and the proximity to perennial streams, as well as the locations of structures on historic maps, there is potential for additional archaeological sites to be present in the project area. Prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, we recommend that a comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist. The purpose of this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding the eligibility status of each site in terms of the NRHP. Conditions may not warrant intensive survey with systematic shovel tests across the entire project that the entire project area; however, all areas not intensively surveyed should still be investigated with pedestrian reconnaissance. Please note that our office now requests consultation with the Office of State Archaeology Review Archaeologist to discuss appropriate field methodologies prior to the archaeological field investigation. One paper copy and one digital copy (PDF) of all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one paper copy and one digital copy (MS Word) of the North Carolina site form for each site recorded, should be forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology through this office for review and comment as soon as they are available and in advance of any construction or ground disturbance activities. A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey. We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures. Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 807-6570/807-6599 The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number. Sincerely, �L� )�4cktaatj�. (Ramona M. Bartos Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) From: Elizabeth Toombs <elizabeth-toombs@cherokee.org> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 9:37 AM To: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) Cc: Wallace, Nancy L CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Beckwith, Loretta A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) Many thanks for the update, Mr. Shaeffer. This Office will look forward to providing comments after reviewing the report. Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns in the meantime. Wado, Elizabeth Toombs, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office PO Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465-0948 918.453.5389 -----Original Message ----- From: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [ma iIto: David. L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mill Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 8:27 AM To: Elizabeth Toombs <elizabeth-toombs@cherokee.org> Cc: Wallace, Nancy L CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Nancy.Wallace@usace.army.mil>; Beckwith, Loretta A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Loretta.A.Beckwith@usace.army.miI> Subject: <EXTERNAL> FW: PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) Ms. Toombs, Please see below. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, David L. Shaeffer Project Manager/Geographer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charlotte Regulatory Office Desk: 704-510-1437 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 -----Original Message ----- From: Thames, Kelly [mailto:Kelly.Thames@hdrinc.com] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 9:25 AM To: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mil> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi David, The cultural and architectural resources field work wrapped up just before the New Year and the results are still be written up. However, I spoke to the cultural resources program manager this morning and he said they will send the Cherokee Nation a courtesy copy of the report upon completion. Additionally, he also said that the field methodology and report was/is conducted in accordance with NC SHPO regulations/standards and the preliminary results are that no significant cultural resources were identified. Thanks, Kelly Kelly Thames, PWS D 704.338.6710 M 704.996.9986 hdrinc.com/follow-us<BlockedBlockedhttp://hdrinc.com/follow-us> From: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [ma iIto: David. L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mill Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 8:18 AM To: Thames, Kelly <Kelly.Thames@hdrinc.com> Subject: FW: PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) See below. Can you send me a separate pdf with just this information? I would pull it from the file but I am super busy today. Sincerely, David L. Shaeffer Project Manager/Geographer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charlotte Regulatory Office Desk: 704-510-1437 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at BlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 From: Elizabeth Toombs [mailto:elizabeth-toombs@cherokee.org] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2019 4:39 PM To: Bates, Letticia D SP4 USARMY CESAW (US)<Letticia.D.Bates@usace.army.mil <maiIto: Letticia.D.Bates@usace.army.mil> > Cc: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mil <maiIto: David. L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mil> > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) Many thanks for the review request, Ms. Bates. This email is to request the related cultural resources survey for this proposed project. Thank you for your time and any additional information. Wado, Elizabeth Toombs, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office PO Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465-0948 918.453.5389 9 From: Bates, Letticia D SP4 USARMY CESAW (US) [mailto:Letticia.D.Bates@usace.army.mil] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:28 AM Cc: Shaeffer, David Leigh (Dave) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<David.L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mil <maiIto: David. L.Shaeffer@usace.army.mil> >; Bates, Letticia D SP4 USARMY CESAW (US) <Letticia.D.Bates@usace.army.miI <maiIto: Letticia. D.Bates@usace.army.mil> > Subject: <EXTERNAL> PUBLIC NOTICE SAW -2018-01129 Piedmont Lithium (UNCLASSIFIED) CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED As you requested, you are hereby notified that Wilmington District, United States Army Corps of Engineers has issued a Public Notice. The text of this document can be found on the Public Notices portion of the Regulatory Division Home Page. Each Public Notice is available in ADOBE ACROBAT (.pdf) format for viewing, printing or download at BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Public-Notices/ <BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Public-Notices/> As with anything you download from the internet, be sure to check for viruses prior to opening. The current notice involves: ACTION ID#: SAW -2018-01129 APPLICANT: Piedmont Lithium, Inc. Project Description: The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from Piedmont Lithium, Inc. seeking Department of the Army authorization to impact 5,810.5 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel, 0.14 acre of jurisdictional wetlands, and 0.16 acre of jurisdictional ponds/impoundments, associated with a lithium mine in Gaston County, North Carolina. Project Manager is: David L. Shaeffer (704) 510-1437 Issue Date: January 17, 2019 EXPIRATION DATE: 5:00 p.m., February 18, 2019 CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED