NCS000369_COMPLIANCE_20180411

STORMVCIATER-DIVISfON-CODING-SHEET" ---
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
�LCOMPLIANCE
❑OTHER
DOC DATE
q- Zol aj!0�() � 1
YYYYMMDD

r
Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
SNYIROMMENTAL QUALITY
April 11, 2018
Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Attn: William "Ace" May, Power Plant Manager
PO Box 1089
Fayetteville, NC 28302-1089
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCS000369
Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Butler/Warner Generation Plant
Cumberland County
Dear Mr. May:
ROY COOPER
CrDvemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
WILLIAM E. (TOBY) VINSON, JR.
Interim Director
On April 10, 2018, a site inspection was conducted for the Butler/Warner Generation Plant facility located at
2274 Custer Avenue, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. A copy of the Compliance Inspection
Report is enclosed for your review. Along with yourself, Mr. Terry Hayner, Operations Supervisor, was also
present during the inspection and both your and his time and assistance is greatly appreciated. The site visit
and file review revealed that the subject facility is covered by NPDES Stormwater Permit NCS000369.
Permitboverage authorizes the discharge of stormwater from the facility to receiving waters designated as
an unnamed tributary of Locks Creek, a Class C waterbody in the Cape Fear River Basin.
As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be incompliance with the conditions of NPDES
Stormwater Permit NCS000369. Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional
comments and observations made during the inspection.
Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Stormwater Permit are subject to a civil penalty
assessment of up to $25,000 per dayfor each violation. If you or your staff have any questions,
comments; or needs assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please contact me at (910)
433-3394 or by e-mail at mike. lawyer [e-mail].
Sincerely,
.�ichael Lawyer, CPSWQ
Environmental Program Consultant
DEMLR
Enclosure
ec: William "Ace" May, Power Plant Manager — Butler/Warner Generation Plant
Terry Hayner, Operations Supervisor — Butler/Warner Generat' n Plant
Bradley Bennett — DEMLR, Stormwater Permitting Program ✓
cc:- FRO — DEMLR, Stormwater Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality [ Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office 1 225 Green Street, Suite 714 1 Fayetteville, NC 28301
91OA33.3300

0
ComDliance Inspection Renoft
Permit: NCS000369 Effective: 07/01108. Expiration: 06/30M 3 Owner: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Butler/Wamer Generation Plant
County: Cumberland 2274 Custer Ave
Region: Fayetteville
Fayetteville NC 28312
Contact Person: wlliam Ace May Title: Power Plant Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
� 1
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative William Ace May 910-223-4814
On -site representative Terry Hayner 910-223-4236
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/10/2418 JEntry lime•. ,�2:00PM
Primary Inspector: Mike Lawyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant E] Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 04:25PM
Phone: [phone] ExV2T
339y
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

permit: NCS000369 Owner - Facility: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Inspection Date:.04110/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Inspection conducted to determine compliance with currentlexpired permit and as part of the permit renewal process. Met
with William "Ace" May, Power Plant Manager, and Terry Hayner, Operations Supervisor. Discussed aspects of the draft
permit including the significant changes regarding measurable storm events definition, removal of the Iron parameter from the
monitoring requirements, modified tiered response process for benchmark exceedances, etc. Also discussed the annual
review and update requirements pertaining to the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan; listing of significant spills or notation
that none have occurred, re -certification that the stormwater outfall has been evaluated for the presence of any
non-stormwater. discharges, effectiveness of BMPs, and comparison of analytical monitoring data to benchmark values.
Reviewed facility's current Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as well as analytical and qualitative (visual) monitoring
records from 2013 through 2017. Monitoring records indicate no exceedances of benchmark values with a few records
indicating 'No Flow'. Facility primarily uses natural gas for power generation with 92 fuel oil as a backup source. Facility has
seven ASTs that can store up to five million gallons of fuel oil. An earthen dike is provided around each AST for secondary
containment. Drains at the fuel oil off-loading area are tied to an oitlwater separator. Facility has a robust spill prevention and
response plan and conducts mock exercises on a routine basis. Secondary containment is also provided around the
facility's acid and caustic tanks. Releases of accumulated stormwater from this containment structure flow into the facility's
sanitary sewer system. Observations were made of the facility's 5-acre stormwater retention pond, stormwater discharge
outfall and secondary containment structures. Facility appears to be very well operated and maintained.
Page: 2

permit: NOS000369 owner • Facility: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Inspection Date:. 04l1012018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Slonnwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted,its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑.
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
Yea No NA NE
■❑❑❑
Yes No IA NE
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ E ❑
Permit and Outfails Yes No NA NE
#. Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 [] [a []
# Were all-outfalls observed during the inspection?,,
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ N ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 110 ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

Lawyer, Mike
From: Lawyer, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 11:58 AM
To: Bennett, Bradley
Cc: '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Permit Renewal Draft for Review and Site inspection
Attachments: Compliance Evaluation Inspection -Butler Warner Generation Plant_NCS000369_
4-10-18.pdf
Bradley;
Conducted inspection at the Butler/Warner Generation Plant yesterday. A copy of my inspection report is attached for
your review and files. Facility is in compliance with the current/expired permit. Please see comments regarding draft
permit renewal below.
+ no objections to removal of Iron from their analytical monitoring requirements
+ based on the amount/capacity of #2 fuel oil storage at the facility (five million gallons) and a few historical oil
spills, the addition of Non -Polar Oil & Grease to their analytical monitoring requirements might be warranted;
they do however have a robust spill prevention and response plan and visually check their ASTs and associated
piping as well as their large (5-acre) stormwater pond on a daily basis
• secondary containment for the fuel oil tanks is in the form of earthen/vegetated dikes without a liner
+ as referenced in my inspection report, there have been no exceedances of benchmark values from 2013 to 2017
and the facility is very well operated and maintained
Please let me know if you need more detail on the comments above or any further information about the facility.
Michael Lawyer, CPSWQ
Environmental Program Consultant
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
910 433-3394 office
mike. IawyerOncdenr.gov
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
'Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Bennett, Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 20181:03 PM
To: La Bounty, Tim L <[e-mail]>; Lawyer, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: Permit Renewal Draft for Review and Site Inspection

Tim and Mike
Hey Guys! If you haven't heard _yet (Mike we've talked so I know you've heard), I'm back working part time on individual
stormwater permit renewals. My schedule is generally Tuesday —Thursday but I modify it some based on how the
weather looks and what I'd rather be doing!
I'm asking for your comments on the attached draft individual NPDES Stormwater permit renewal for Butler/Warner
Generation Plant (Fayetteville PWC) — NCS000369,
Attached are the following documents for your review:
1. Draft permit NCS000369
2. Cover letter to permittee —outlines the major changes from the previous permit
3. NCS000369 Renewal application from permittee
4. Some supplemental monitoring data for the last few years since the application.
The last inspection of their facility that we did looks to have been in 2008. Fayetteville is doing regular inspections under
their MS4 program and I think Mike said they usually copy you on their reports. We are proposing to modify their
monitoring just slightly because the data over the last 10 years is coming in under the benchmarks (see cover letter for
info on the specific changes). We are maintaining some base parameters in the draft permit. I would appreciate your
feedback on this to see if you feel monitoring should be different in any way. I've also adjusted the draft a little with
regards to the footnote that addresses their manual release from their onsite detention pond.
I'm sending the draft permit to the permittee today or tomorrow by mail and the permit is going out to public notice the
first of next week. I would appreciate it if you could schedule a site visit and get me any comments you may have within
the next 30 days. Let me know if that is a problem.
The facility contact person is Ace May — [e-mail] [phone]
Thanks
BB
Bradley Bennett Phone: [phone]
Stormwater Permitting Program Fax: [phone]
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Email: [e-mail]
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612

I 'r
of '
Engineering & Infrastructure
Stormwater Division
March 8, 2018
Terry Hayner
Butler Warner Generation Plant, Operations Supervisor
Public Works Commission
P.O. Box 1089,
Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1089
Dear Mr. Hayner,
On March 8, 2018, a site inspection was conducted at your facility
Custer Avenue in Fayetteville NC drains to a UT to Locks Creek.
Inspection Report is attached for your review and records.
433 Hay Street
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5537
[phone]
www,cityoffavetteville.org
. This facility located at 2274
A copy of the Compliance
At the time of inspection, this facility was found to be in compliance. I would like to thank you
and your staff for the time and assistance in conducting this inspection. If there are any
questions regarding this report, please contact me directly at [phone].
Thank you,
Samantha N. Taylor
Stormwater Inspector
City of Fayetteville
Attachment: Copy of Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Mike Lawyer, NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (e-mail)
Twila Josey, Stormwater Administrative Assistant
013S
The Citv of Fayetteville, North Carolina does not discriminate on the hasis of race, sex, color, age, national origin,
religion, or disability in its employment opportunities, programs, senAces, or activities.

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
FacilityName:
PWC Butler- Warren Generation
Inspection Type:
p yp
Compliance
Plant
NCG
Permit No.:
NCSD 000369
Permit Effective
7-1-2006
Data (if applicable):
Not Applicable El
Permit Status
Active
(If not currently permitted):
Inspection
3 8-2018
Discharges to:
UT to Locks Creek
Date:
Facility Personnel
Inspectors):
Samantha Taylor
Assisting with
Terry Hayner
Inspection
910-22-34236
(Name/Phone Number):
Entry Time:
9:OOAM
Exit Time:
10:15 AM
SIC Code:
4911
Facility Hours of
24 Hours
Operation:
Facility Description: Generation Plant
File Review/History:
Inspection Summary:
During my inspection, I made observations of
the facility and Stormwater outfalls. The facility was clean and neat in
appearance.
This form Is a procedural guide for Inspectors to follow when conducting facility stormwater compliance Inspections.
Page 1 of 5 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection ReporVChecklist
1.-Site Inspection
Were deficiencies observed with the.following items?
(Inspector should comment on violations/deficiencies observed)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
1. Stormwater System: catch basins, open ditches, channels, pipes, outfalls, etc.
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
2. Erosion Issues
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
3. Structural Stormwater BMPs
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
4. Illicit Discharges/ Connections
❑
® ❑ 1 ❑
Comments:
5. Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs): List size, material type, and if secondary
is provided
❑ 101
❑
El
Comments:
6. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Fill Port Area
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
7. Outdoor Material Storage Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
S. Outdoor Processing Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
9. LoadinglUnloading Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
10. Vehicle/Equipment Area(s): fueling, washing, maintenance, storage
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
11. Oil/Water Separator I Pretreatment
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
12. Waste Storage 1 Disposal Area(s): scrap metal, dumpsters, grease bins, etc.
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
13. Food Service Area(s)
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
14. Indoor Material Storage Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
15. Indoor Processing Area(s)
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
Page 2 of 5 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
L Site Inspection (continued)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Flndin
16. Floor drains —illicit connections
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:,
17. Spill Response Equipment
❑ ®
❑ ❑
Comments:
If. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)?
®
❑
❑
❑
If the site has a SPPP then complete questions in Sections II and III.
1. Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
❑ ❑
❑
Facility location in relation to roads and surface waters. Includes: name of receiving stream or name of municipal storm
sewer system, and accurate lat. and long. of point of discharge.
2. Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
I ❑
❑
❑
Should cover storage practices, loading and unloading areas, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or
control processes, waste disposal practices, etc.
3. Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and
❑
®
❑
❑
drainage areas?
Should show
• Location of industrial activities (storage areas, disposal areas, process areas, unloading and loading areas)
• The drainage structures
• Drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area
• Building locations
• Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces and the % of each drainage area that is impervious
• For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the
stormwater discharge.
This forces permittee to analyze the site with relation to stormwater discharges. It is also a tool for the inspector to
understand if the site has changed over time, i.e. if site map does not match facility they must update their plan.
a. Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3
El❑
®
❑
years?
Needs to include corrective actions that were taken. The permittee needs to know what the reportable quantities are for
wastewater, oil pollution, and SARA Title III.
5. Have stormwater outfalls been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
®
❑
❑
❑
discharges?
Signature required:
• Corporation - signed by Responsible Corporate Officer or assigned manager
• Partnership or Sole Proprietorship — General Partner or the Proprietor
Municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency — either principal executive officer or ranking elected official
6. Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
I ❑
❑
❑
• Provide a review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or storage
practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater.
• In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the
feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
7. Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
1 ® ❑
❑ ❑
• Applies to liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials, or by-products
• Single AST capacity > 660 gallons
• Multiple AS containers in close proximity to each other with a total combined capacity of > 1,320
Page 3 of 5 Rev. 0

Storrnwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
IL StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan (continued)
Yes
No NA
Repeat
Finding
• if connected to SW conveyance; controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices? (Closed?)
• Collected water observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens, and dry weather flow prior to release
• Document individual making observation, description of water, date, and time of release
Retain record 5 years
B. Does the Plan include a BMP summary? IN
❑
LiEl
Narrative description of BMPs to be considered including oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips,
infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary.
The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential sources to contribute significant quantities of
pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges.
9. Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
® ❑
❑ I
❑
• Assessment of potential pollutant sources based on materials inventory of the facility
• Facility personnel responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be identified
• Responsible person shall be on -sits at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate
stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
10. Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
®
❑ ❑
❑
Plan?
• Document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and
systems
• Inspect material handling areas
• Regular cleaning schedules of these areas
11. Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®
❑
❑
❑
• Provide at a minimum, annual training for all personnel including: proper spill response, cleanup procedures,
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel Involved in any of the facility's operations that have the
potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
• Develop training schedule and identify facility personnel responsible for implementing the training
12. Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parties?
®
❑
❑
❑
Identify position responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision of the SPPP
13. Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
I ®
I ❑ I ❑
❑
Have there been any changes to the design, construction, operation, or maintenance of the facility, which would have a
significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters? Does plan include changes?
14. Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ®
I ❑
❑
❑
• Inspect semi-annually at a minimum - once in Fall and once in Spring
• Inspection and subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented
a Record date and time
o Individual performing inspection
o Narrative description of the stormwater outfall and plant equipment and systems
• Records should be incorporated into the SPPP
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Comments:
Page 4 of 5 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
III. Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
1. Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
®
❑
❑
❑
Color Odor Clarity Floating Solids
Suspended solids Foam Oil Sheen Other indicators
2. Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance
areas?
❑
❑
®
❑
Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring Comments: Monitoring was done July 7, 2017 and January 12, 2018.
IV. Permit and Outfalls
1. Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
®
❑
❑
❑
2. Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. If the facility has representative outfall status, has it been documented by the NC
Division of Water Quality?
❑
El
®
❑
4. If the facility has a No -Exposure Certificate, has the facility self -inspected and
this on an annual basis?
El
❑
®
El
Permit and Outfalls Comments:
Page 5 of 5 Rev. 0

STORMWATER
February 10, 2017
William "Ace" May
Butler Warner Generation Plant, Plant Manager
Public Works Commission
P.Q. Box 1089,
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Dear Mr. May:
On February 8, 2017, a site inspection was conducted at your facility. This facility located at
2274 Custer Avenue in Fayetteville NC drains to a UT to Locks Creek. A copy of the
Compliance Inspection Report is attached for your revlew and records.
At the time of inspection, this facility was found to be in compliance. I would like to thank you
and your staff for the time and assistance in conducting this inspection. If there are any
question's regarding this report, please contact me directly at [phone].
Thank you,
Danny Stnc la d
Stormwater Inspector
City of Fayetteville
Attachment: Copy of Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Mike Lawyer, NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (e-mail)
Twila Josey, Stormwater Administrative Assistant
433 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301-5537
[phone] 1 www.fayettevillenc.gov I www.faytv7.com
The City of Fayetteville, North Carolina does not discriminate on the basis of race, sec, sexual orientation, color, age, national origin,
religion, or disability in its employment opportunities, programs, Services, or activities.

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
Facility Name:
Butler -Warner Generation Plant
Inspection Type:
Compliance
NCG
Permit No.:
NCS0000369
Permit Effective
Date (if applicable):7101
/2008
Not Applicable
Permit Status
Active
(If not currently permitted):
inspection
21812017
Discharges to:
UT to Locks Creek
Date:
Facility Personnel
William "Ace' May
Inspector(s):
Danny Strickland
Assisting with
910-2234814
inspection
Terry Hayner
(Name/Phone Number):
910-223-4614
Entry Time:
09:15 A.M.
Exit Time:
10:30 A.M.
SIC Code:
4911
Facility Hours of
24 Hours
Operation:
Facility Description: Generation Plant
File Review/History.
Inspection Summary: During my inspection,,]
facility was clean and neat in appearance.
s of the facility and Stormwater outfalis. The
Page 1 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
This form Is a procedural guide for Inspectors to follow when conducting facility stormwater compliance Inspections.
Page 2 of 6 Rev. 0

tij
Stormwater Facility Inspection Repo rt/Checkllst
L Site Inspection
Were deficiencies observed with the following Items?
(Inspector should comment on violations/defrciencies observed)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
1. Stormwater System: catch basins, open ditches, channels, pipes, outfalls, etc.
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
2. Erosion Issues
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
3. Structural Stormwater BMPs
❑
®
❑ ❑
Comments:
4. Illicit Discharges / Connections
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
5. Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs): List size, material type, and if secondary
is provided
❑
®
13
El
Comments: (4)'/2 Million Tanks, (3) 1 Million Tanks of #2 Fuel Oil
6. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Fill Port Area
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
7. Outdoor. Material Storage Area(s) ❑
to ❑
❑
Comments:
B. Outdoor Processing Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
9. LoadinglUnloading Area(s)
❑ ®
❑
❑
Comments:
10. Vehiclelf±quipment Area(s): fueling, washing, maintenance, storage
❑ ❑ ®
❑
Comments:
11. Oil/Water Separator/ Pretrealment
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
12. Waste Storage / Disposal Area(s): scrap metal, dumpsters, grease bins, etc.
❑
®
❑ I
❑
Comments:-
13. Food Service Area(s)
❑
❑
®F7 ❑
Comments:
14. Indoar Material Storage Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
15. Indoor Processing Areas)
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
Page 3 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report/Checklist
1. Site Inspection (continued)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Flndl
16. Floor drains — Illicit connections
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
17. Spill Response Equipment
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
IL Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)?
®
❑
❑
❑
!f the site has a SPPP then complete questions In Sections If and I11:
. Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
®
❑ ❑
Facility location in relation to roads and surface waters. Includes: name of receiving stream or name of municipal storm sewer
system, and accurate lat. and long. of point of discharge.
2. Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
❑
❑
❑
Should cover storage practices, loading and unloading areas, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control
processes, waste disposal practices, etc.
3. Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage ❑
®
❑
❑
areas?
Should show
• Location of industrial activities (storage areas, disposal areas, process areas, unloading and loading areas)
• The drainage structures
• Drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area
• Building locations
• Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces and the % of each drainage area that is impervious
• For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present In the
stormwater discharge.
This forces permitter to analyze the site with relation to stormwater discharges. It is also a tool for the inspector to understand
if the site has changed over time, i.e. V site map does not match facility they must update their plan.
4. Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
I ❑ I
❑ I
' ® I
❑
Needs to include corrective actions that were taken. The permittee needs to know what the reportable quantities are for
Wastewater, oil pollution, and SARA Title Ill.'
5. Have stormwater outfalls been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
®
❑
❑
❑
discharges?
Signature required:
• . Corporation -signed by Responsible Corporate Officer or assigned manager
• Partnership or Sole Proprietorship -- General Partner or the Proprietor .
Municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency — either principal executive officer or ranking elected official
6. Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
❑
❑
❑
• Provide a review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or storage
practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater.
• In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility
of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
--
7, Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
®
❑
❑ ❑
• Applies to liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials, or by-products
• Single AST capacity > 660 gallons
• Multiple AS containers in close proximity to each other with a total combined capacity of > 1.320
Page 4 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Repo rtlChecklist
U. stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (continued)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
• If connected to SW conveyance; controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices? (Closed?)
• Collected water observed for color, foam, outfali staining, visible sheens, and dry weather flow prior to release
• Document individual making observation, description of water, date, and time of release
Retain record 5 years
B. Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
1 ®
❑
❑
1 ❑
Narrative description of BMPs to be considered including oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips,
infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary.
The -need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential sources to contribute significant quantities of
pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges.
9. Does the Plan Include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®
❑
❑
❑
• Assessment of potential pollutant sources based on materials Inventory of the facility
• Facility personnel responsible for Implementing the SPRP shall be identified
Responsible person shall be on-slte at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate
stormwater runoff through splits or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
10. Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
®
❑
❑
❑
Plan?
• Document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and
systems
• Inspect material handling areas
• Regular cleaning schedules of these areas
11. Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ®
❑
❑
❑
• Provide at a minimum, annual training for all personnel Including: proper spill response, cleanup procedures,
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved In any of the facility's operations that have the
potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
• Develop training schedule and identify.facility personnel responsible for implementing the training
12. Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parties?
I ®
1 ❑
1 ❑
❑
Identify position responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision of the SPPP
13. Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
1 ®
❑
1 ❑
❑
Have there been any changes to the design, construction, operation, or maintenance of the facility, which would have a
significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters? Does plan include changes?
14. Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®
❑
❑
❑
• Inspect semi-annually at a minimum - once in Fall and once in Spring
• Inspection and subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented
o Record date and time
o Individual performing inspection
o Narrative description of the stormwater outfall and plant equipment and systems
• Records should be Incorporated into the SPPP
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Comments:
Page 5 of 6 , Rev, 0

t
Stormwater Facility Inspection Repo rtlCheckllst
III Quefltative and Analytical Monfbrfng
Yes
No
NA j
Repeat
Findln
1. Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
®
❑
❑
❑
Color Odor Clarity Floating Solids
Suspended solids Foam Oil Sheen Other indicators
2. Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance
areas?
❑
❑
®
❑
Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring Comments. Monitoring was done January 2015 and December 2015.
IV Permit and Ouffalls
1. Is a copy of the Kermit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
®
❑
❑
❑
2. Were all oulfalls observed during the inspection?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. If the facility has representative outfail status, has It been documented by the NC
Division of Water Quality?
❑
El
®
❑
4. If the facility has a No -Exposure Certificate, has the facility self -Inspected and
this on an annual basis?
❑
El
®
Cl
Kermit and Outfalls Comments,
Page 6 of 6 Rev. 0

V
tev&
Engineering & Infrastructure
Stormwater Division
February 19, 2016
William "Ace" May
Butler —Warner Generation Plant, Operations Supervisor
Public Works Commission
P.O. Box 1089,
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Dear Mr. May:
433 Hay Street
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5537
[phone]
www.cityoffayetteville.org
On February 16, 2016, a site inspection was conducted at your facility. This facility located at
2274 Custer Avenue in Fayetteville NC drains to a UT to Locks Creek. A copy of the
Compliance Inspection Report is attached for your review and records. The following item was
noted during the inspection.
The current USGS Map and detailed site map is under revision and was not on
site.
At the time of Inspection, this facility was found to be in compliance. I would like to thank you
and your staff for the time and assistance in conducting this inspection. If there are any
questions regarding this report, please contact me directly at [phone].
Th you,
Danny Strickland
Stormwater Inspector
City of Fayetteville
Attachment: Copy of Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Mike Lawyer, NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (e-mail)
Twila Josey, Stormwater Administrative Assistant
III, yall
The City of Fayetteville, North Carolina does not discriminate on the basis of racA seat, color, age, national origin,
religion, or disability in its employmentopportunitim programs, services, or activities

dw �...
Stormwater facility Inspection Report/Checklist
Facility Name:
Butler -Warren Generation Plant
Inspection Type:
Compliance
NCG
Permit No.:
NCS0000369
Permit Effective paw (if applicable);
710112008
Not Applicable
Permit Status
Active
(If not currently permitted):
Inspection
2/1612016
Discharges to:
UT to locks Creek
Data:
Facility Personnel
Inspector{s�:
Danny Strickland
Assisting with
William "Ace" May
Inspection
910-223-4814
(Name/Phone Number):
Entry Time:
09:15 A.M.
Exit Time:
10:30 A.M,
SIC Code:
4911
Facility Hours of
24 Hours
Operation:
Facility Description: Generation Plant
File Review/History:
Inspection Summary: During my inspection,
I made observations of the facility and Stormwater outfalls. The
facility was clean and neat in appearance.
Page 1 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Report[Checklist
This form is a procedural guide for Inspectors to follow when conducting facility stormwater compliance inspections.
Page 2 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility inspection Report/Checklist
L Site lnspecdon
Were deficiencies observed with the following items?
(Inspector should comment on violaWns/deh'ciencies obsenred)
yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
1. Stormwater System: catch basins, open ditches, channels, pipes, outfalls, etc.
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
2. Erosion Issues
❑
❑
❑
Comments:
3. Structural Stormwater BMPs
❑ 0.1
❑
I ❑
Comments:
4. Illicit Discharges / Connections
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
5. Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs): List size, material type, and if secondary ❑
containment is provided 1
®
❑
❑
Comments: (4) % Million Tanks, (3) 1 Million Tanks of#2 Fuel OU
6. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Fill Port Area ❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
7. Outdoor Material Storage Area(s)
❑ ®
❑
❑
Comments:
8. Outdoor Processing.Area(s)
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
9. Loading/Unloading Area(s)
❑
®
❑ ❑
Comments: -
10. Vehicle/Equipment Area(s): fueling, washing, maintenance, storage
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
11. OiWdater Separator/ Pretreatment ❑
jg
❑
❑
Comments:
12. Waste Storage I Disposal Area(s): scrap metal, dumpsters, grease bins, etc.
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
13. Food Service Area(s)
❑
❑
® I ❑
Comments:
14, Indoor Material Storage Area(s)
❑
® ❑
❑
Comments:
15. Indoor Processing Area(s)
❑
❑
®
❑
Comments:
Page 3 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection Repoit/Checklist
r Site Inspection (continued)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
16. Floor drains —illicit connections
. ❑
_
®
❑
❑
Comments:
17. Spill Response Equipment
❑
®
❑
❑
Comments:
11. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)?
®
❑
❑
❑
if the site has a SPPP then complete questions in Sections II and III.
1. Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
®
❑
❑
Facility location In relation to roads and surface waters. Includes: name of receiving stream or name of municipal storm sewer
system, and accurate tat. and long, of point of discharge. --
2. Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
❑
❑
❑
Should cover storage practices, loading and unloading areas, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control
processes, waste disposal practices, etc.
3. Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage
❑
®.
❑
❑
areas?
Should show
• Location of industrial activities (storage areas, disposal areas, process areas, unloading and loading areas)
• The drainage structures
• Drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area
• Building locations
• Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces and the % of each drainage area that is impervious
• For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the
stormwater discharge.
This forces permIttee to analyze the site with relation to stormwater discharges. It is also a tool for the inspector to understand
if the site has changed over time, I.e. if site map does not match facility they must update their plan.
4. Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑
®
❑
Needs to include corrective actions that were taken. The permittee needs to know what the reportable quantities are for
wastewater, oil pollution, and SARA Title lit.
5. Have stormwater outfalls been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
®
❑
❑
❑
discharges?
Signature required:
• Corporation - signed by Responsible Corporate Officer or assigned manager
Partnership or Sole Proprietorship — General Partner or the Proprietor
Municipality, Stale, Federai, or other public agency — either principal executive officer or ranking elected official
6. Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®
❑
❑
❑
• Provide a review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or storage
practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater.
• In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility
of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
7. Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑
❑
• Applies to liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials, or by-products
• Single AST capacity > 660 gallons
• Multiple AS containers In close proximity to each otherwlth a total combined capacity of > 1,320
Page 4 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection ReporUChecklist
IL Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (continued)
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
FindinSl
• If connected to SW conveyance. controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices? (Closed?)
• Collected water observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens, and dry weather flow prior to release
• Document individual making observation, description of water, date, and time of release
Retain record 5 years
8. Does the Plan include a 13MP summary?
®
❑
El
❑
Narrative description of BMPs to be considered including oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filler strips,
infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary.
The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential sources to contribute significant quantities of
pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges.
9. Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
I ® 1 ❑
❑
❑
• Assessment of potential pollutant sources based on materials inventory of the facility
• Facility personnel responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be identified .
• Responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate
stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
10. Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
®
El
El
ElPlan?
• Document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and
systems
• Inspect material handling areas
• Regular cleaning schedules of these areas
11, Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
• Provide at a minimum, annual training for all personnel including: proper spill response, cleanup procedures,
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel Involved I any of the facility's operations that have the
potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
• Develop training schedule and identify facility personnel responsible for implementing"the training
12, Does the Plan Include a list of Responsible Parties? I ® I
❑ ❑ I
❑
Identify position responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision of the SPPP
13. Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
®
❑
❑
❑
Have there been any changes to the design, construction, operation, or maintenance of the facility, which would have a
significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters? Does plan include changes?
14. Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®
❑
❑
❑
Inspect semi-annually at a minimum - once in Fall and once in Spring
• Inspection and subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented
o Record date and time
o Individual performing inspection
U Narrative description of the stormwater outfall and plant equipment and systems
.. Records should be incorporated into the SPPP
Ston-nwater Pollution Prevention Plan Comments: Employee training was completed on 12-9-15 and the semi-annual
facility inspection was completed on 4-21-15 and 10-26-15.
Page 5 of 6 Rev. 0

Stormwater Facility Inspection ReportlCheckllst
III. Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
Repeat
Finding
1., Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
®
❑
❑
❑
Color Odor Clarity Floating Solids
Suspended solids Foam Oil Sheen Other indicators
2. Has the facility conducted its Analytical Monitoring?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. Has the facility conducted Its Analytical Monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance
areas?
❑
❑
®
❑
Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring Comments: Monitoring was done January 2015 and December 2015.
IV Permit and Outfalls
1. Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
®
❑ '
❑
❑
2. Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
®
❑
❑
❑
3. If the facility has representative outfell status, has it been documented by the`NC
Division of Water Quality?
❑
❑
®
❑
4. If the facility has a No -Exposure Certificate, has the facility self -inspected and
documented this on an annual basis?
❑
❑
❑
Permit and Outfalls Comments:
Page 6 of 6 Rev. 0

• k ,
Cuvof
wettev&
Engineering & Infrastructure
Stormwater Division
December 16, 2013
William "Ace" May
Butler Warner Generation Plant, Operations Supervisor
Public Works Commission
P.O. Box 1089, .
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Dear Mr. May:
433 Hay Street
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5537
[phone]
www.cityoffayetteville.org
On April 4, 2014, a site inspection was conducted for compliance with your facilities for NPDES
Stormwater Discharge Permit NCS000369 Certificate of Coverage This facility located 2274
Custer Avenue in Fayetteville NC. This facility drains to a LIT to Locks Creek. A copy of the
Compliance Inspection Report is attached for your review and records.
At the time of inspection, this facility was found to be in compliance with your permitted
Certificate of Coverage. I would like to thank you and your staff for the time and assistance In
conducting this inspection. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me
directly at [phone].
Thank you,
Danny Strickland
Stormwater Inspector
City of Fayetteville
Attachment: Copy of Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Mike Lawyer, NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Nikkia Benitez, Stormwater Administrative Assistant
10�
The City of Fayetteville, North Carolina does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, age, notional origin,
religion, or disability in its employment opportunities, programs, services, or activities.

Permit t#: onto — Effective; "f-) • tA•i . Expiration; (p •30. ?A13
SM _ „YR I I -
Contact Perron: e- M- 4,
Facllity Address,. z7-1.1 tu-141 4,x— � Ee
Facility:.1,7 `
or
Owner.
Title:
Inspection Date: ' $ntry Time, , DSO' Exit Time:
Primary Inspector: Phone:
Reason for Inspection: X Arluo_ Inspection Type: Co
Permit Inspection Type:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
MStorm Water
Notes/Comnlents:
tica<t,ri`7aKtr't UT -tn Lk.ks &tr-
339 ALEXANDER STREET
FAYL*1TTSYILLE, NC 29101-3797
[phone]/1661 • FAX [phone]
www' cityvffayettevill o. ora
An equal Opportunity Employer

Pcnnit: I honer- Facility:
Inspection Date: InspeetionTypo:
ReasomibrVisit Routine
Storm %ftr PON& PreventianplanYCS
Ne
NA
NE
# Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) ntap?
❑
R ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan Include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does 1hePlan Include a detailed site map tuoluding outfall locations and drainage areas?
L;�, ❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan Inalude a IIst ofsignificant spills occurring during the past 3 years? Ro $16)
❑
- ❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated fe"hie alternatives to current practices?
`—' ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan Include it BMP summary?
�❑
❑
❑
Er� ❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan Include aPreventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
C] -
# Does the faollity provide and document Bmployce Training? &t pM- fw' i.Is
�
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Parly(s)?
� ❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
6 0
❑ .
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Progrant?
4fr ❑
❑
❑
# tins the Stormivater Pollution Novention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
ua ltati e Monitoring
# Has the facility conducted #ta Quaptative Monitortng semi-annually? 'JA U11
E ❑
❑
❑
Comment:. ... ..,,' ., I �•t i
nal ticai 119an1,��L
-
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring7 -TAA ' %viq A,)• Lot 3
EI'❑
❑
❑
# Has the lhcility conducted itsAnalytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance arras?
❑ ❑
RII'R1I1~ and Qnlfalia
# Is a copy of the Permit and fie Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
❑
❑
# Were ail outfalis observed during the inspection?
�Q
❑
❑
-_# Ifthe %cillty has representative outllcll status is'It pr pecly dooumentcd > y ILE Dlvt316-0 — 0 ❑ --- ❑ _---_.......
# Has the Acility evaluated all illicit (non storm water) dischargos? �❑ ❑
Comments:

,1 OF \NA rF9
W co
0 -c
March 3, 2008
Mr. Reggie Wallace
Butler/Warner Generation Plant
PO Box 1089
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
PWC
Butler -Warner Generation Plant
NPDES Stormwater Individual Permit-NCS000369
Cumberland County
Dear Mr. Wallace:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
On February 22, 2008, I, Trent Allen from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality, conducted a site inspection at the Butler/Warner Generation Plant facility located on SR
1723 Custer Avenue, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Ike Coplead and John Ezzell were also
present during the inspection and their time and assistance is greatly appreciated. Stormwater from this
facility drains to Locks Creek, a Class C waters located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The site visit and
file review revealed that the subject project is covered by NPDES Stormwater Individual Permit-
NCS000369.
Accordingly, the following observations were noted during the Division of Water Quality
inspection (please see the attached addendum for information about your permit):
1) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been developed, recorded, and properly
implemented.
es ■ No ❑
2) (Nalitative Monitoring
Qualitative monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
es ■ No ❑
3) Analytical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
es ■ No ❑
No ` Carolina
Xtura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street, Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301.5043 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwateNuality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled1100/. Post Consumer Paper

Other Observations:
Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional observations and comments.
Please be advised that violations of the NPDES General Permit are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff has any
questions, comments, or needs assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Trent Allen
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
cc: FRO -Surface Water Protection
NPS-Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit

Permit: NCS000369
SOC:
County: Cumberland
Region: Fayetteville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 03/15/00 Expiration: 03/31/05 Owner: Butler
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Butler/Warner Generation Plant
Sr 1723 Custer Ave
Contact Person: Allen R Wallace
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Fayetteville NC 28301
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 02/22/2008 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Trent Allen ��� 3 - 3 —dd Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): j� r��,t
Belinda S Henson13t4' Phone: [phone] Ext.726
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: C) Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000369 Owner - Facility: Butler
Inspection Date: 02/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
No analytical monitoring occured due to not having a discharge. The permit states that no analytical monitoring is required
if the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a ten year design storm.
Requested that PWC calls the regional office if they decide to lower the detention pond prior to a storm event.
The low area of the detention pond wall ( area close to the power plant) needs to be elevated to the proper elevation to
keep storm water from short circuiting the detention pond. Storm water can enter this area instead of through the inlet
pipes and exit the pond outlet pipe without having much detention time.
PWC reps onsite - Ike Coplead and John Ezzell
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000369 Owner - Facility: Butler
Inspection Date: 02/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
#,Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Employee training is once a year.
The stormwater plan is revised as needed.
QualitativeMonitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ D ■ ❑
Comment: The facility has not conducted its analytical monitoring due to not having a
discharge. This facility utilizes a storage pond before discharging, and the pond did not
discharge on the year they needed to sample.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■ Cl
❑ ❑
Page: 3

a
Permit: NC5000369 Owner - Facility: Butler
Inspection Date: 02/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment:
Page: 4

Post Office Box 902
207 West Fourth Avenue
Red Springs, NC 28377
Telephone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
July 10, 2003
Mr. Paul Rawls
Water Quality Section
North Carolina Depaftment of Natural Resources
225 Green Street
Fayetteville, N.C. 28301
Subject: Oil/Water Separator Spill Incident Report
PWC Butler -Warner Generation Plant
Storm Water Retention Pond
Custer Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
GPS: N 350 5.810' . W 78049.848'
1AUG if' 4 2003
Pursuant to an authorization from Mr. John Ezzelle, Environmental Director,
Fayetteville PWC, the following is submitted for your consideration.
On May 24, 2003, at about 1:30 pm, a PWC worker was making inspection of
subject facility when they discovered evidence of a yellowish colored oil on part of the 5
acre retention pond near the influent, discharge pipes. A supervisor was notified
immediately and those on -site personnel began the placement of absorbent boom along
with other measures to initiate response to this incident. Mr. Ezzelle was notified and
then contacted our office and placed us on stand-by until he could get further
information. Within the next hour Mr. Ezzelle requested our assistance to respond and
made notification to the NCDENR emergency number to advise them of this incident.
EHC Environmental responded with a vacuum trailer, response trailer(boat,
boom, etc) and a total of a five -man crew with supervisor. PWC maintains a 50-foot
section of 18 inch hard -boom within 100 feet of the main influent area to the retention
pond as a safety measure. This hard -boom retained probably 90 percent of the oil in this
area, with only a slight oil sheen observed in other areas of the pond. The effluent area of
the pond was secured with additional absorbent boom as the area has a gate valve for
Serving`Nonh & South Carolina
since 1986—
www . environmentalnc . com

IPA
releasing water, which was already closed. Concern was that this area has an emergency
runoff area in case of extremely high water, but was still a foot or so below this point. It
was everyone's opinion that a heavy rainfall event had already occurred and more was
expected so cleanup was very important to be completed this date.
EHC Environmental personnel were on site from about 5:00 pm until 8:00 pm and
were able to skim the pond of most of the oil and secured the area with absorbents. Some
oil was observed in part of the storm drain up gradient and measures were taken to
address this area as well. It was our opinion that the majority of spill cleanup was
accomplished the date of the incident discovery.
During initial response and inspection of the drainage system it was determined
that the likely source was an oil/water separator near the unloading containment area.
Due to the previous night rainfall event, rainwater overflowed the system and an
overflow pipe was connected to the storm water drainage system in that area. Mr.
Ezzelle made arrangements to have this changed over the course of the next week.
Also, during the evening of May 24, 2003, PWC and EHC Environmental
personnel conducted an additional sweep of all areas of the plant facility to visibly
inspect for other possible sources. No other areas were found.
The total amount lost was estimated to be between 50 and 100 gallons. EHC
Environmental skimmed approximately 558 gallons of water and oil during the cleanup
efforts and transported to our facility for final disposal at a permitted facility.
EHC Environmental and PWC management made inspections of this area over
the next several days and no additional free product was observed entering the pond. By
June 16, 2003, all remaining absorbent materials were removed and a final inspection of
the pond area indicated no further evidence of any oil sheen.
Based upon the actions taken for this incident, it is our opinion that this incident
be considered for closure. If you should need additional information or clarification,
please advise.
cerely,
4 a,
TA o Ammons
Project Manager
C: Mr. John Ezzelle, PWC, P.O. Box 1089, Fayetteville, N.C. 28302

Now,
J
♦ ['"7 ^�•S M `�� 1�� "w r 7 vRl � � 0 i � M '�' J '� � a: I i Y I . �a ,
- _ ��.�=�i w: _ ='"^ :.�_�••._- _ �� ''"`-may_ ' '`�
EH