NCS000350_HISTORICAL WITH APPLICATION_20170503

-µ__ STORMWATER-DIVISION-CODING-SHEET-__
PERMIT NO.
N (s 0003 Sb
DOC TYPE
❑ FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
,�' APPLICATION
❑ COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ �n, ( �QSQ3
YYYYM M D D

NC Dept Ofrnvironmental Quality
MAY - 2017
Raleigh Regional Office
May 3, 2017
Mr. Thaddeus Valentine
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
Energy Mineral and Land Resources, Land Quality Section, Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: 2016 Annual Summary DMR for NPDES Permit #: NCS000350 (Stormwater)
Dear Mr. Valentine:
Edgecombe Genco, LLC (NPDES Permit #: NCS000350) 2016 Annual Summary Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) for Stormwater was received by the N.C. Department of
Environmental Quality on February 16, 2017.
Recently it was discovered that a copy of the report was not submitted to the Raleigh Regional
Office. Enclosed please find a copy of the 2016 Annual Summary DMR for Stormwater.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 252-442-0708 ext. 407.
Regards,
David Herring, Compliance'anager
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
Email: [e-mail]
Cc: Environmental Files

e ..
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)1 SPPP Annual Update DATA REVIEW FORM
Calendar Year 2016
individual NPDES Permit No. NCSoo0350 or
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG❑❑❑❑❑❑
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year should be kepi on file on -site with the facility SPPP.
Facility Name: Ed ecombe Genco LLC
County: Edgecombe
Phone Number: 252 442-0708 Total no, of SDOs monitored 1
Outfall No. SD0#1
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Parameter, (units)
Total
Pb,Sb,Se,T1,Zn,
Rainfall,KAg,As,l3e,Cd,
-SulfatePH-_-inchesu,H9,Ni
AI,B,COD,TSS
Benchmark
N/A
Date SamplehF,
irk' ;-i. r
-4 .
:,i`y.-. .-:-?..✓-.
+-".f.T `teV
'�s. - ••T. -,,l -.}•
ar." �.. P*t..
{ }�
rt I ,c,��v .(- .-. �,-
�4r [1 r YW
..F .'' <.
N' x ✓
Collected,
•'i
r a
_
mmldd/yy.
t..4
Analytical
Analytical
Analytical
9/312016
Results
Results
Results
Attached
Attached
Attached
Analytical
9/22/2016
Results
Attached
,- SWU-264 - Generin. Annual DMR
[ L(Ysed 5/17/2013
i

r
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature
Date Z -Iq-17
For questions, contact your local Regional Office:
QWD Regional Office Contact Information:
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
[phone]
RALEIGH REGIONAL. OFFICE
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
WINSTON-SALENI REGIONAL OFFICE
585 Waughtovoi Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone] -- ---
.� � m
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Systel-Building-Suite 7L4
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889 !!
[phone]_
.CENTRAL OFFICE
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 !
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
[phone]
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
[phone]
'roPraserve.Proved- i
ar"denhalice
�� P;orir� Ga:o±frta�s��valer:.."
SWU-264 - Generin Annual DMR
L� {ised 5/17/2013

Edgecombe Gertco LLC - Storm Water Permit # NCS000360 2016
Sample Type
Grab (G)
Composite (C)
EPS
Rain
Gauge
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Unit of
Measure
Inches
NA
NA
mg1L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mglL
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg1L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Units
Threshold
Value
NA
NA
NA
0.75
0.36
0.07
0.001
1.00
0.007
NA
0.26
0.03
0.05
10-066
NA
0.067
0.75
NA
120
100
500
30
6-9
I
Sample Period
Total
inches
from
Rain
Event
Sed.Pond
Spillway
Overflow
Sample
YIN
Qualitative
Samples
pulled YIN
Ag
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
NI
Pb
Sb
Se
TI
Zn
Al
B
COD
TSS
Sulfate
O&G
pH
Jan.,
NIA
NIA
NIA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
N5
NS
NS
NS
NS
N5
NS
NS
NS
Feb.
NIA
NIA NIA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS NS
NS
NS
NS
N5
N5
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS NS NS NS NS
Mar.
Apr
3:80
0:056 O.fit
N5
May
June
12
O.Q01: <0005` .<0 005�0
0Q
8
005
NS
OD5 < fl
f±IS �N$
<Q.O,E <0,01,
NS 5
a.05
425.0, 10.$0 16_. 0 6:67
ff KAMM NS NB 5 >+aNS
July
Y Y
00,10
Q.7
.QU_01k
Aug
Set 913116
f
f�NS NS
INS
NS
NS
NS N5 NS
Oct
5
NSAINNSIM
AtNSiffii__SIIL
iiin-APB. mild.���_..��__.�r®__��__�rr���._o,w��:n���.�.�._�.�_�®W���
Nov.
,NS
NS NS
DNS
N9
�NfdS
NSN
NS
NS
N5 NSa
NSA
NS N3
NS
NS
Dec.
j9QJjVKN7M
135;�
NSA
Ns'
x NSA
NS NSa N
5
NS
NS tYS
NS N3
tVS NS
NS
DNS _ DNS NS S 5�
Year 6 period 1
.. NOTE: 9/3/16 - The O&G sample bottle was brokenlcracked. 9122/16 - Another O&G sample was collected.
pier 7 perr d 1 F
NS-No Sample
NA -Not Applicable

Alexander, Laura
a�lg�lb�
From: Boswell, Angela <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:35 PM
To: Georgoulias, Bethany; Romanski, Autumn
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Fallow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
Thanks Bethany ... Yes - This does help...
Since we recently implemented eDMR and updated our Wastewater info, we just want to make sure our
Stormwater info is up-to-date as well...
Name/Ownership/Owner Contact has not changed;
Laura - Could you please update our info to indicate the below:
Facility Contact Person -- David Herring, Compliance Manager, no change in address or phone #,
email: David. [e-mail]
Permit Contact Person — Slate Thompson, Plant Manager, 6358 Old Battleboro Rd, Battleboro,
NC 27809, no change phone #, email: [e-mail]
> Permit Billing Contact — David Herring, Compliance Manager, P.O. Box 370, Battleboro, NC
27809, no change phone #, email: [e-mail]
Thanks for everyone's help to get our Stormwater info updated...
-AngeCa. Bosweff Compliance Technician at Edgecombe Genco, LLC with NAES Corporation
Address: PO Box 370 (Bill to): 6358 Old Battleboro Rd (Ship to), Battleboro, NC 27809
Office Phone: [phone] (Ext 406): Fax: [phone], email: Angela. Boswell(@,naes.com
From: Georgoulias, Bethany[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:27 PM
To: Romanski, Autumn; Boswell, Angela
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Ms. Boswell,
We don't have a form similar to what you may be used to using for wastewater permits for delegated signature
authority. As long as documents are signed by individuals according to the signatory requirements in the Standard
Conditions of the permit, you should be fine.
We do like to make sure Owner Affiliation information for the permit is up to date, though. Attached is what we have
on file. Is the Owner Affiliation and other info. accurate? lTo make changes to Owner Affiliation, there is a form we need
signed and returned (that's also attached).
If there has been a Name/Ownership Change for the company, a different form is needed. Please let me know if that's
the case.
Any other changes (Permit, Facility, Owner Contacts) can be emailed to us — Laura Alexander can take care of those
updates for you.
I hope that helps!

From: Georgoulias, Bethany [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:08 AM
To: Boswell, Angela; Romanski, Autumn
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
That's fine to wait until he comes back. Thanks so much!
Bethany
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6372 office
[e-mail]
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing)
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location)
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/stonnwater
Not hing C; am',pare$.00%,�
i
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Boswell, Angela [mailto:Angela.Boswell@nae_s.coml
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:52 AM
To: Georgoulias, Bethany<[e-mail]>; Romanski, Autumn <Autumn.Roma [e-mail]>
Cc: Herring, David <[e-mail]>; Alexander, Laura <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: NC5000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Thanks Bethany...
➢ Stormwater "eDMR" — I hope it will be as user friendly as I've found the wastewater eDMR to be O;
Stormwater outfalls & latitude/longitude coordinates — Sure.... David Herring is the best person to supply
this info, but he is not available today & may not be available until sometime next week. Will next
week be an acceptable timeframe to get this info to you?
Thoughts? Thanks...
Angela. BoSWett; Compliance Technician at Edgecombe Genco, LLC with NAES Corporation
Address: PO Box 370 (Bill to); 6358 Old Battleboro Rd (Ship to), Battleboro, NC 27809
Office Phone: [phone] (Ext 406), Fax: [phone]; email: [e-mail]

From: Georgoulias, Bethany fmaiIto: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 9:33 AM
To: Boswell, Angela; Romanski, Autumn
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Ms. Boswell,
I'm glad you mentioned you are implementing eDMR — we here in the Stormwater Program are working to implement
same system to receive stormwater DMR data electronically.
In preparation for that, could you send us a list of each of your Stormwater outfalls (the labels you use for them, such as
'001') and latitude/longitude coordinates for those? That would be very helpful! Currently we only require permittees
to keep outfall locations in their SPPP records and don't transfer the info. from DMRs submitted. This would give us a
great head start on your permit.
Thanks so much!
Bethany
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6372 office
bethany. georgoul ias[7a,ncdenr. itov
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing)
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location)
Website: http://i)ortal.nedenr,org/web/ir/stormwater
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
30 March 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7006-0810-0002-6048-1528
Mr. Richard Frymyer, General Manager
Cogentrix of Rocky Mount
P.O. Box 370, 6358 Old Battleboro Road
Battleboro, NC 27809
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections for NPDES Permits
NCO077437 (wastewater) and NCS000350 (stormwater)
and Resulting Notice of Violation,
' NOV-2007-PC-0151
Cogentrix of Rocky Mount, Battleboro Plant
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Frymyer:
On 8 March 2007, Ronald Boone, of the Division of Water Quality's (DWQ) Raleigh Regional Office (RRO),
conducted Compliance Evaluation Inspections (CEI) for the subject NPDES permits at the subject site. Your
assistance and cooperation, as well as that of Mr. David Herring, Compliance Coordinator, were helpful and
appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records and inspection findings are listed below.
SITE DESCRIPTION
1. This is a coal-fired power generation facility. Wastewater generated. at the site is treated in one of two
sedimentation/neutralization basins. The effluent is then pumped into a forced main that discharges into
receiving waters known as the Tar River, this segment of which is classified as a Class C, nutrient sensitive
water (NSW) in the Tar Pamlico river basin. The actual discharge point is located approximately four miles
from the plant, in the river on the southwest corner of NC Hwy 97 and Springfield Road.
2. All site stormwater flows into a detention pond and is then discharged via one stormwater discharge outfall
(SDO) located on the southern end of the site. The stormwater is discharged to receiving waters known as
an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch, a Class C, nutrient sensitive water (NSW) in the Tar Pamlico river
basin. Please note that the receiving stream currently listed on the Certificate of Coverage (COC) is Beech
Creek. This is incorrect and should be corrected now, during the ongoing permit renewal cycle. The
appropriate office of DWQ will be sent a copy of this letter to make them aware of the needed change. The
actual receiving stream should be an unnamed tributary to Beech Branch.
INSPECTION SUMMARY —Wastewater (NC0077437)
Nne
C Caro ina
Natumlyk
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
lntemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Cogentrix of Rocky Mount, NCO077437 NCS000350, Compliance Evaluation Inspections 03/30/2007, Page 2V3 1'4
3. There were no problems noted with the wastewater treatment facility. The sedimentation basins, chemical
injection systems, effluent pump station and flow measurement systems were all operational and as
described in the permit. All equipment seemed well maintained and in good condition.
4. Effluent sampling is being accomplished as required in the permit. Comparison of discharge monitoring
reports (DMR) with official lab data turned up no discrepancies and all parameters are being monitored as
required. Field lab test data and procedures were examined and no problems were noted.
5. Outfall 003 and the effluent were observed and no problems were detected. The right-of-way (ROW) to the
outfall was sufficiently maintained to allow access when needed. +
6. It was noted that discharges from the cooling tower blowdown (outfall 002) have become less frequent'since
the new total residual chlorine (TRC) limit became effective back on 1 January 2007 and that you have not
installed any systems to dechlorinate the water in order to meet the limit. Mr. Herring stated that you are
blowing down into outfall 002 less frequently, in part because of the difficulty in meeting this limit. You
may want to consider installing a dechlorination system to ensure you can meet the TRC limit when the time
comes. It was noted that you do use gas chlorine at times to shock the system, along with Sodium Bromide
regularly in the cooling tower system to control growth.
INSPECTION SUMMARY — Stormwater NCS000350
7. The stormwater pollution prevention plan was inspected. All required components were present and met the
minimum requirements.
8. The entire site was clean and well maintained. No obvious pollutant sources of concern were noted.
9. Qualitative monitoring is being performed more often than necessary. Please take note however that even
though it is being performed more often than necessary, it still must be performed during the time periods
specified in the permit, i.e. once during the spring (2nd quarter, Apr -Jun) and once during the fall (Sep -Nov).
10. Analytical monitoring is not being performed as required. According to Mr. Rick Neff, Cogentrix's
engineer that designed the wet Stormwater detention pond, the pond is designed to meet the criteria specified
in footnote #2, for table #1 (Analytical Monitoring Requirements), in Part II, Section B of the permit.
According to this footnote, "If the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a
ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative monitoring shall be
performed". This pond was actually discharging during the inspection, through an orifice placed in the side
of the overflow standpipe, approximately 12" to 24" below the overflow level of the standpipe. This pond
does not meet the intention of the above -mentioned footnote. In order to qualify for this exception, the pond
would need to be designed not to discharge except for a storm event exceeding the 10-year design storm. In
other words, in order to meet the intent of the footnote, the pond would never be allowed to discharge
except in response to a storm event greater than the 10-year design storm. As it is currently designed, the
wet stormwater detention pond at your site is not the correct unit for this application. Therefore, Cogentrix
must immediately begin sampling the pond effluent in accordance with the analytical monitoring
requirements found in the permit.

Cogentfix of Rocky Mount, NCO077437 NCS000350, Compliance Evaluation Inspections 03/30/2007, Page 3 of 3
11. Additionally, the combined facts that it was not raining at the time of the inspection, it hadn't rained for
quite some time prior to the inspection and yet the pond was still discharging during the inspection, strongly
indicates that the pond must also be receiving flow from other unidentified sources. This may constitute one
or more unidentified, unauthorized, illicit wastewater discharges. Cogentrix must immediately undertake to
identify and halt all sources of wastewater, aside from site stormwater runoff, from draining into the pond
and making it discharge during dry periods. Once identified, such discharges will have to be appropriately
permitted.
Please be aware that the issues mentioned in paragraph 10 above, constitute violations of your stormwater
discharge permit. Such noncompliance is unacceptable and these violations may result in the assessment of
civil penalties in an amount of up to $25,000 per day per violation. Please reply to this office within 30 days of
your receipt of this letter, with a detailed corrective action plan, including an implementation schedule, leading
to full and continuous compliance with your stormwater permit. Additionally, please specify your plan to -
identify and correct all illicit discharges into your stormwater system. If you or your staff has any questions
regarding the inspection or this letter, please contact Ron Boone for assistance at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachments:
1. Final Inspection Checklist
cc Stormwater Permitting Unit
Non -Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
Central Files
RRO/SWQ Files

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No, 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires B-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INS 2 51 31 NCS000350 111 121 07/03/08 117
IJ U
181rl 191cl 20I t
LJ LJ LJ
Remarks
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11
1 1_I I _l I LI IJ 11 I I,_16
,1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluatlon Rating 211 QA
--------- ------ ---------- -- Reserved --------------------
67I 169 70I u I 71Lj 72U
u
73� 74 751 1 ] I I 1 11 80
Section B: Facilit Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 07/03/08
02/05/01
Edgecombe Genco, LLC-Battleboro
ExitTime/Date
Permit Expiration Date
63s8 old Battleboro Rd
Battleboro NC 27809
12:00 PM 07/03/08
07/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiaVTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Seth Carter,PO Box 370 Battleboro NC 27809//252-442-0805/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comment s Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
4
,
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boon RRO WQ//919-791-4200/
30-- OC9
— 21—
Signature of Man enZQA vie r Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
gg
�� t1 ?O 2,r7-V
J
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-9 revious editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yrlmo/day inspection Type (cont. 1
3I NC5000350 111 121 07/03/08 I17 18u
Section D. Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additionalsheetsof narrative and checklists as necessary)
SP3 has been developed and implemented.
Qualitative monitoring being done more often than required. However, permittee must ensure that even
though its being done more often than needed, it still must be done at least twice per during the timeframes
specified in the permit, i.e. spring - Apr through June and fall - Sep through Nov.
Also, permittee is not conducting analytical monitoring because they have.a SW detention pond that they
assert meets the criteria, of footnote #2 of table #1, Analytical Monitoring Requirements, in Part II, Section B
of the permit, i.e. the stormwater "...detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding
a ten yar design storm...", However, the pond was discharging at the time of the inspection through an
orifice in the side of the overflow pipe that was placed approximately 12" to 24" below the overflow level of
the overflow pipe. According to Cogehtrix personnel and their engineer, the orifice is the mechanism by
which the level of the pond is kept at the level required for the pond to contain the 10-year design storm
without overflowing at the overflow pipe. This is still considered a discharge that must be monitored in
accordance with table #1.
Finally, the above mentioned pond was discharging during the inspection despite that fact that it was not
raining and hadn't rained for quite some time prior to the inspection. This strongly indicates one or more
unidentified, unauthorized; illicit wastewater discharges through the SW detention pond. The permittee must
immediately undertake to identify all discharges into the pond and stop them and/or have them appropriately
permitted.
Page # 2

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
-
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 ICI 31 N00077437 111 121 07/03/08 117 181rl 191cl 201
LJ U 1 LJ IJ IJ
Remarks
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ll I I I I II11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,I 1 1 I 1 1- 1 1 1 I,1 11 1 I 1 111 J—Lj6E
_I
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA -------------------------Reserved---------------------
671 1 69 70 U 71 j) 72 ) N 73 J J) 74 751 11 I 1 1 I 1 80
�••� 1��
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (Far Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 07/03/08
05/07/01 .
Battleboro plant
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
6358 Old Battleboro Rd
Battleboro NC 27805
12:00 PM 07/03/08
09/10/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)1Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiallTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Sid Frymyer.Po Box 370 Battleboro NC 27809//252-4424805/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal- Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D; Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone RRO WO//919-791-4200/
T /
12-
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yrtmo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0077437 11 12I 07/03/08 117 18ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NCO077437 Owner - Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Date: 03/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laborato
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
13
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
110
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+l- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment; Plant is not described in permit.
Record Keeping .
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Page # 3

Permit: NCO077437 Owner - Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Date: 03/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
■ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑ ❑
1s the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Comment:
Equalization Basins
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the basin aerated?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Are all pumps present?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Are all pumps operable?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Are float controls operable?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
❑
❑
■ ❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: These are actually sedimentation/neutralization basins: two in parallel.
Effluent Sampling
Yes No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■ ❑
❑
Cl
Is proper volume collected?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0077437
Owner -Facility-. Battleboroplant
Inspection Date: 03/08/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
WOOO
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑-00
Page # 5

Georgoulias, Bethany
From: Boswell, Angela <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 201610:40 AM
To: Georgoulias, Bethany
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura; Bennett, Bradley
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Thanks Bethany...
1) Lat/Long for each SDO — Lat/Long for the facility is all we have at this time ... We'll check into this in
efforts to obtain Lat/Long for each SDO.
2) Outfalls - The bulk of all contributing plant runoff waters from a storm event (rain) is dispensed into the
sedimentation pond and subsequent effluent via SD01.
•3 SD02 - SD05 identified outfalls are based on plant topography and deemed what was referred
to by our last storm water regulatory review (NCDEQ-DWR) as "sheet flow".
3) eDMR — 10-4...Thanks...
Thoughts? Thanks...
Angefa, BoswetT Compliance Technician at Edgecombe Genco, LLC with NAES Corporation
Address: PO Box 370 (Bill to), 6358 Old Battleboro Rd (Ship to), Battleboro, NC 27809
Office Phone: [phone] (Ext 406); Fax: [phone], email: Angela.Boswell(a-naes.com
From: Georgoulias, Bethany fma!Ito:bethany.georgouIias(dncdenr.4ov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Boswell, Angela
Cc: Herring, David; Alexander, Laura; Bennett, Bradley
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Hi Angela,
Thanks so much for following up. I was actually looking for the stormwater outfall lat/Ion coordinates. We can use the
plant location coordinates for lack of anything else, but if you have them for SDO1, we prefer those coordinates.
I'm not sure I understand why there is only one SDO (001) that is sampled analytically, but the others are only
qualitatively monitored. Is SDO1 the only outfall with representative outfall status, or do all the other outfalls eventually
drain to SDO1? Some clarification would be helpful.
Update on eDMR:
We are working towards the goal of setting up our database system to accept stormwater monitoring data through
eDMR, like wastewater permits. However, we have a long way to get there, and chances are good NCDEQ will not be
prepared to accept the data by December 215`. We are working on our implementation plan for EPA, and so they are
aware that INC is behind on this step (as are several other states 1 think). Our resource constraints (we are down several
staff right now) have made this deadline difficult to meet. We will be sending out communication to all permittees
about that status in the next 1-2 months.
Thanks,
Bethany
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer

Stormwater Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6372 office
bethyYxe- rF,ouliasPncdenr.gov ;.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing) i
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location)
Websile: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/stonnwater
-::::�''`Nothing Compares.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Boswell, Angela[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:50 AM
To: Georgoullas, Bethany<[e-mail]>
Cc: Herring, David <[e-mail]>; Alexander, Laura <laura.alexander(@ncdenr.eov>
Subject: RE: NCS000350 - Stormwater Permit Delegation of Signatory Authority
Hey Bethany —Hope all is well ... Have a couple of things to touch base w/ you about...
1) 1 apologize for the delay in getting this info to you...
➢ List of each stormwater outfall:
L The storm water detention pond outfall is recognized as: SDO within the
permit - This is the only outfall identified within permit NCS000350.
1. The facility's Integrated SPCC/SWPPP recognizes (5) outfalls:
a. The sedimentation pond as 0011 and (4) other locations S1302, SD03,
SD04, and SD05.
b. Edgecombe performs qualitative and analytical on 001, and qualitative
only on SD02, SD03, SD04 and SD05.
➢ Latitude/longitude coordinates - Plant location is identified as: Latitude: 36.036537;
Longitude: (minus) — 77.752048
2) EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule — I'm understanding this rule also includes stormwater DMRs &
that the Phase 1 deadline to be reporting electronically is December 21, 2016.
➢ What do we need to do to ensure we meet this deadline?
Thoughts? Thanks...
AngeCa Bosweff Compliance Technician at Edgecombe Genco. LLC with NAES Corporation
Address: PO Box 370 (Bill to); 6358 Old Battleboro Rd (Ship to). Battleboro. NC 27809
Office Phone: [phone] (Ext 406), Fax: [phone]. email: [e-mail]

kA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Coleen H. Sullins
Governor '
Director '
June 11, 2010
Mr. Richard S. Frymyer
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
P.O. Box 370
6358 Old Battleboro Road
Battleboro, NC 27809
Subject: Draft NPDES Stormwater Permit
Permit No. NCS000330
Cogentrix
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
6358 Old Battleboro Road
Meektenbl�v► urg County
Dear Mr. Frymyer:
a
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft stormwater permit for your facility. Please review the draft
very carefully to ensure thorough understanding of the conditions and requirements it contains.
The draft permit contains the following significant changes from this facility's current permit:
Analytical monitoring changes:
1. Analytical monitoring parameters have been added to this permit.
2. pH has been added to the analytical monitoring requirements.
3. All analytical monitoring has been set to semi-annually during a representative storm event as defined in
Part II Section B. The permittee must also document the total precipitation for each event. If no discharge
occurs during the sampling period, the permittee must submit a monitoring report indicating "No Flow"
within 30 days of the end of the six-month sampling period. Additionally, samples must be taken a
minimum of 60 days apart, as specified in Table 2.
4. Benchmarks for analytical monitoring have been added to this draft permit. Exceedances of benchmark
values require the permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase record
keeping, and/or install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program. If the
sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside of the benchmark range, for any parameter at
any outfall then the facility shall follow the Tier 1 guidelines which require a facility inspection within
two weeks and implementation of a mitigation plan within two months. If during the term of this permit,
the sampling results are above the benchmark values, or outside of the benchmark range, for any specific
parameter at a specific discharge outfall two limes in a row (consecutive), then the facility shall follow the
'Pier 2 guidelines which require a repetition of the steps listed for Tier 1 and also immediately institute
monthly monitoring for all parameters (except Mercury) at every outfall where a sampling result
exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive samples. See Part II, Section B. of permit text.
5. You are required to collect all of the analytical and qualitative monitoring samples during representative
storm events as defined in Part 11 Section B. Qualitative monitoring is required regardless of
representative outfall status.
6. You are responsible for all monitoring until the renewal permit is issued. See Footnote 1 of Tables 1, 4,
and 5.
Wetlands and ,StonnwaterBranch One1 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Nwh Carolina 27699-1617 NOrthCar011na
P oa e: 9 M 7 Salisbury St. Raleigh, North4941 Carolina 27604
r Service:
�mma rl y
Phone: 919�07-63DD I FAX, 8f9�D7-64941 Customer Service:1-877�23�i748 L LI
Inteme1: www.ncwa1erquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Richard S. Frymyer
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
Permit No. NCS000350
7. The flow reporting requirement has been removed per DWQ revised strategy. (The total'rainfall
parameter is in this permit, however.)
8. Vehicle maintenance monitoring has been revised to semi-annually in order to coincide with analytical
and qualitative monitoring. Monitoring for TPH has replaced Oil & Grease. This requirement appears in
all Individual Stormwater permits, however it only applies to facilities that do vehicle maintenance. If the
facility begins vehicle maintenance during the permitted timeframe then the requirements shall apply.
Other permit changes:
1. Additional guidance is provided about the Site Plan requirements. The site map must now identify if the
receiving stream is impaired and if it has a TMDL established. It must also describe potential pollutants
in each outfall. The map requirements are stated more explicitly. And, the site plan must contain a list of
significant spills that have occurred in the past three years and also must certify that the outfalls have
been inspected to ensure that they do not contain non-stormwater discharges. Additional information is
provided in Part II Section A.
2. Additional requirements for the Stormwater Management Plan have been specified in Part II Section A.
More details regarding secondary containment are provided.
3. Additional requirements for the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan have been specified in Part II .
Section A. The plan must also be updated annually to include a list of significant spills and to certify `that
the outfalls do not contain non-stormwater discharges.
4. The facility must now implement a semi-annual Facility Inspection Program of the site's stormwater
management controls as specified in Part 11 Section A.
5. Information regarding the No Exposure Exclusion has been added to this draft permit. If industrial
materials and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40 CFR §122.26(g), the
facility may qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater discharge permit
requirements. Additional information is provided in Part I Section A.
6. Per the requirements of the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rule, all stormwater drainage from portions of
this site that have been constructed after January 1, 2000 must be discharged through a correctly designed
level spreader or another device that meets diffuse flow requirements per 15A NCAC 2B .0261. Diffuse
flow requirements are described in Chapter 8 of the North Carolina Stormwater BMP Manual, available
at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual.
7. In addition to submitting two signed copies of DMRs to Central Files, a separate signed Annual Summary
DMR copy must be submitted to the local DWQ Regional Office by March 1 of each year (see Part III, E. 2.
of permit).
Please submit any comments to me no later than thirty (30) days following your receipt of the draft.
Comments should be sent to the address Iisted at the bottom of this page. If no adverse comments are
received from the public or from you, this permit.will likely be issued in about two months.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this draft permit, contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail].
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Dave Parnell
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Attachments
Sincerely,
X-1-4
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Unit
ti
2

NCS000350
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
n
In compliance with the provisions of North Caroiin
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted
Management Commission, and the Federal Water P;
EM
1 StatiiW143-215.1, other lawful
orth Carolina Environmental
3 ontrol Act, as amended,
Edgecombe'Genco, LLC
isch�a'rr�g,e stormwater from a facility located at
is hereby authorizlehto,�.d
Eddombe Genco, LLC
6358O1d Battleboro Road
Battleboro, NC
Edgecombe County
to receiving waters designated as Beech Branch, a class C, NgSW stream in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin, in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V and VI hereof.
Note: Draft Permit Dates are Approximate
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2010.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2015.
Signed this day August 15, 2010.
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NCS000350
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A: Individual Permit Coverage
Section B: Permitted Activities
Section C: Location Map
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LW!TATWNS FOR PERMITTED
rT •'� T%
DISCHARGES'
Section A: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan �
Section B: Analytical Monitoring Requi" men p'
Section C: Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Section D: On -Site Vehicle Maintenance: Monitoring Requirements
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES•STORMWATER INDIVIDUAL
PERMITS -,
Section A: Compliance and Liability
1. Compliance Schedule
2.. • Duty to Comply
3. Duty to Mitigate
4. Civil and Criminal Liability
5. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
6. Property Rights
7. Severability
8. Duty to Provide Information
9. Penalties for Tampering
10. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
Section B: General Conditions
1. Individual Permit Expiration
2. Transfers
3. Signatory Requirements
1

• a '
Permit No. NCS000350
4. Individual Permit Modification, Revocation and Rcissuance, or
Tennination
5.
Permit Actions
Section C: Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1.
Proper Operation and Maintenance
2.
Need to Halt or Reduce Not a. Defense
3.
Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Section D: Monitoring
1.
and Records �.
2.
Representative Sampling
Recording Results
3.
Flow Measurements +
4.
,
Test Procedures
5.
Representative Out -I
6.
Records Retention 1
,,.
7.
Inspectiand Entr on',y
Section E: Reporting
f
Requirements
1.
Discharge Monitoring Reports
.2.
Subim�tng'Reports
3.
Availability of Reports
4.
Non-Stormwater Discharges
5.
Planned Changes
6.
Anticipated Noncompliance.
7.
Bypass,
8.
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
9.
Other Noncompliance
10.
Other Information
PART N LIMITATIONS REOPENER
PART V ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE
REQUIREMENTS
PART VI DEFINITIONS
t'
It

Permit No. NCS000350
PART I 'INTRODUCTION 10
SECTION A: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT COVERAGE
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity. Such
discharges shall he controlled, limited and monitored as specified in this permit.
If industrial materials and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40
_CFR § 122.26(g), the facility may qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPrDES stormwater
discharge permit requirements. Any owner or operator�wishingto obtain a No Exposure
Certification must submit a No Exposure Certification"NOI�form to the,Divi.sion; must receive
approval by the Division; must maintain no expo sure ';conditiorisJinless authorized to discharge
under a valid NPDES stormwater permit; and must reapply for the No Exposure Exclusion once
every five (5) years. '
SECTION B: PERMITTED ACT
Until this permit expires or is modified or. 'revoked; the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater to the surface waters -of North Carolina or separate storm sewer system that has been
adequately treated and managedJn accordance with the terms and conditions of this individual
permit. All stormwater discharges shall-be`in accordance with the conditions of this permit.
Any other point source discliargc�td surface waters of the state is prohibited unless it is an
allowable non-stormwater discli ge or is covered by another permit, authorization, or approval.
The stormwater discharges allowed by this individual permit shall not cause or contribute to
violations of Water Quality Standards.
This permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other
applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
Part I Page 1 of 2

Z 3o Z aSL'd I PLd
iiopinol A;IIppej
r rd row.,
(ulseg JaAlb UlEd-lej) ZO-EO-EO :uiSEq-qnS
MSN 'D :Ssep WE,)AS
yjutla tip,-u u1111 mueto{;5 Gui,yc+x+zi
i-K4,uU.leb .>j-4ullul
M l,9[ ,t"S aU :ONr41G.lu
N ,ITT ,ZO o4E :&PMlEq
Z)N 10.10claplea
J 1 I 'uivaJ ;6(Ituujaf I)j
S
OSEOOOSDN
Jf, ti., ,��t., .+wti1lr�y+"14�.^q•�,kfX� /, f f� rr'r•^r . :. +'S —
`
i77tx i' ;ir �l ' 1', �5•IrT,5 f.»ti..` �Mx `o I n LTA, -
�.•�"�Lrifrrgy„.�Ilj l�`i`,v�ry,^.ti hh. ��. �oti, r;� y. r, ,4✓,j+'Yf i� r�;'�•e. :'
•.yr',r�l i'_r 1 ! L rr tv-:1r';•,, 4 +.,<: ti *:.s k� 'y.;,; :! , I _ ,•rr' y�' i_
lh i`� ,i,t,r Il
;., �,,,�;( �'--a.���' ,,ti 1 F�� �'•,��-'�..'_ �..1� /.ri _„y. ,y� JJ ,�'•,� _---^' r r,' -,N _ f tt�
i++f '+,f
�... y.. � o � .. t I � t. w e � �.� �., I -. !!- �. Jay 3.� { �' s:�J:•
rj w f .irk, r •S t�" �w J i I 1 tirr' . ,i rizJ��.. r i .It 'd..^,, �� r t
f
*A � � e ' �" f r } w�� i .>_ti � �r-'� '-. 1 1i1. f ° �'' _.,�' f, � 1°� `'^�r j� - Lil �:•..?.:4t'.
J' � 11 � ».t•I ti- � , � •Jrr{�
IfJrrl
, f I .-� sf! j"y�j4 y a '' � % � �' h 5jv �'J •� :r�'
�'• rk 1r, : r^ .r' S .r, t :,.� S %t r y R,.`. Ys. ar%`, All
• 6` _ �� X s.r•+. M i k I I ! �; r u' J.. ,>yf -
:;A, . ?1L.
taffy r'._, 3 �--I,!(},J+ w lr�Y k.., •} �+ •/ y ✓ {r !* r «+ +?^ELwV IJ
1". �:":o=. '�i~' •�` Y 1. '•fit, I .?, ry"+���+�' R�AF�rr�+r '- jr 'l r — _ ���
� r r• �: �� �y � ��+ is ��`: ...��_.:�, f �� "� f IQ �..•ti,
Mb,."tifw`..;._,�'7•..':�..:::.�.•��l„,;„�,,;,,,M'i
51! I1• r ir.'_` "+1�-'. '.p "9 t�� j�am�j, 1��+.• jj ••ti 14
Isti.e� ��'� ;.� � `�]}•�4Y i !�� �• � :W , Jy1 r F'� til r +�
i"��ri4i'r �\ r�,. �I�k ��. • .v�' � 1.✓7- ,�;J -� Jf ;�
53F�r`Ji li df �,r� 0I'~`
�I y i-•, ��(jjJJ11
i, ZX ka ii �++ � .II .�lr �' ��• f '�F• �rcJ � c
�J y 1�
lug
"
fir.r�� c, rarYi y)/Q:'fi 4 '
yx! i -rs '% r A yam' .�f.t `
DIX
.ks
rxylyr^ 1 y wY tiff y� ;." +'''•, r rI
�S`�� �I*,Igti���y•�4�;1�r ��.a ��',:?�'�rY�, *15'sl 1 ;� `fC IY'+C� 5','I •'`."y Y1 r
r, �t
q{n� k,-�5� � '� y�J�F �� �J ��� � ryy'Si 1` . ' 0 f'�--N'� � '. �vl • a�.ti'tti•�,
» �N•. �� f�
1 +�� -• r
X1.
L � •5.41�..e,r�-�.1� --- ri i r.'
, 'il tir �dA' 15. I'6'F•� i t7 ntp �.�{+ :: �1 � �J r....�, 14.''`,. 91
i
09ROOSDu 'ON Tad dvty NollvDorl :a I oljl�)gS
i
09ROOSDu 'ON Tad dvty NollvDorl :a I oljl�)gS

Permit No. NCS000350
PART H MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR
PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
The Permittee shall develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to'as
the Plan. This Plan shall be considered public,information in accordance'with Part 111, Standard
Conditions, Section E, Paragraph 3 of this individual permit. The Plan shall include, at a
minimum, the following items:
Site Plan. - The site plan shall provide a description of the -physical facility and the
potential pollutant sources which may be expected to coniribute to contamination of
stormwater discharges. The site plan shall contain the.followin -
(a) A general location map (USGS quadrafi& map or appropriately drafted
equivalent map), showing the facility's location in relation to. transportation
routes and surface waters, thname f the re eivi
e o ng water(s) to which the
stormwater outfall(s) discharges, or%if the discharge is to a municipal separate
storm sewer system, the name'of�rthe municipality and the ultimate receiving
waters; and accurate latitude and' ongitude of the point(s) of discharge. The
general location'map,(or alternatively the site map)'shall identify whether each
receiving water is irmpaired'(on the state's 303(d) list of impaired waters) or is
located in a watershed,for;which a TMDL has been established, and what the
-11
parameter(s) of concern+are.
North Carolina.'s 303(d) List can be found here:
http:llh2o.enr.,stiite.ne.us/tmdl/General-303d.htm#Downloads
North Carolina TMDL documents can be found here:
httR://h2o.enr.sta'te.ne.us/tmdl/TMDL list.htm#Final TMDLs.
(b) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities,
outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and
waste disposal practices. A narrative description of the potential pollutants which
could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge from each outfall.
(c) A site map drawn to scale (including a distance legend) showing: the site property
boundary, the stormwater discharge outfalls, all on -site and adjacent surface
waters and wetlands, industrial activity areas (including storage of materials,
disposal areas, process areas, loading and unloading areas, and haul roads), site
topography, all drainage features and structures, drainage areas for each outfall,
direction of flow in each draipage area, industrial activities occurring in each-" '
drainage area, buildings, existing BMPS, and impervious surfaces. The site map
must indicate the percentage of each drainage area that is impervious.
Part II Page 1 of 1 l

Permit No. NCS000350
K
is
(d) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility
during the three (3) previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate
spill impacts.
(e) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of
non-stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in
accordance with the requirements found in Part IIl, Standard Conditions, Section
Paragraph 3. The permittee shall, re- certify annually that the stormwater
outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges.
Stormwater Management Plan. The stormwater management plan shall contain a
narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or
minimize the exposure of significant materials too stor'm�water, including structural and
nonstructural measures. The stormwater managcme�nt plan, at a;minimum, shall
A,f"�%/
incorporate the following:
(a) Feasibility Study. A review of the technical'and economic feasibility of changing
the methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate' or reduce exposure
of materials and processes to stor`m�w,ateWherever practical, the permittee shall
prevent exposure of all storageareas, material handling operations, and
manufacturing or fueling operations. Tn areas where elimination of exposure is
not practical, the,stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of
diverting the stonnVvdter riZfffeaway from areas of potential contamination.
(b) Secondary ConfainmentnRequirements and Records. Secondary containment is
required for: bulk storage of liquid materials; storage in any amount of Section
313 of Title 11-11 f:thd-Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
water priority ch micals; and storage in any amount of hazardous substances, in
order to prevent leaks and spills from contaminating stormwater runoff. A table
or summary of all such tanks and stored materials and their associated secondary
containment areas shall be maintained. If the secondary containment devices are
connected directly to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be
controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices (which shall be
secured closed with a locking mechanism), and any stormwater that accumulates .
in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed for color, foam,
outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow,,prior to release of the
accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to
be uncontaminated by the material stored within the containment area. Records
documenting the individual making the observation, the description of the
accumulated stormwater, and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a
period of five years.
(cy BMP Summary. A listing of site structural and non-structural Best Management
Practices (BMP) shall be provided. The installation and implementation ofBMPs
shall be based on the assessment of the potential for sources to contribute
significant quantities of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected
Part 11 Page 2 of 11

Permit No. NCS000350
through monitoring of stormwater discharges. The BMP Summary shall include a
written record of the specific rationale for installation and implementation of the
selected site BMPs. The BMP Summary shall be reviewed and updated annually.
3. Spill Prevention and Response Plan. The Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)
shall incorporate an assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials
inventory of the facility. Facility personnel (or the team) responsible for implementing
the SPRP shall be identified in a written list incorporated into the SPRP and signed and
dated by each individual acknowledging their responsibilities for the plan. A responsible
person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to
contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the
facility operations. The SPRP must be site stormwater specific. Therefore, an oil Spill
Prevention Control and Countermeasure plan (SPCC)'may be a component of the SPRP,
but may not be sufficient to completely address.'the stormwater aspects of the SPRP. The
common elements of the SPCC with the SPRY,may'be incorporated by reference into the
SPRP.
4. Preventative Maintenance and Good HousekeepinjPi•ogram. A preventative
maintenance and good housekeeping'prograrwshall be developed. The program- shall list
all stormwater control systems, stormwater discharge outfalls, all on -site and -adjacent
surface waters and wetlands, industrial activity areas (including material storage areas,
material handling areas,.disposal.areas, process areas, loading and unloading areas, and
haul roads), all drainage feat res and.structures, and existing structural BMPs. The
program shall establish schedules,of irispections,-maintenance, and housekeeping
activities of stormwatercontrolsysfeins, as well as facility equipment, facility areas, and
facility systems that present a potential, for stormwater exposure or stormwater pollution.
Inspection of material-Tiand ling areas and -regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall
be incorporated into the"program. Timely compliance with the established schedules for
inspections, maintenance,. and housekeeping shall be recorded in writing and maintained
in the SPPP.
5. Employee Training. Training programs shall be developed and training provided at a
minimum on an annual basis for facility personnel with responsibilities for: spill response
and cleanup, preventative maintenance activities, and for any of the facility's operations
that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility personnel (or team)
responsible for implementing the training shall be identified, and their annual training
shall be documented by the signature of each employee trained.
6. 'Responsible Party. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific
position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and
revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components of the Plan shall be documented
and position assignments provided.
7. Plan Amendment. The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in
design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the
potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. All aspects of the Stormwater
Part II Page 3 of 11

Permit No. NCS000350
Pollution Prevention Platt shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. The annual
update shall include an updated list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants for the
previops three years; or the notation that no' spills have occurred. The annual update shall
include re -certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence
of non-stormwater discharges. Each annual update shall include a re-evaluation of the
effectiveness of the BMPs listed in the BMP Summary of the Stormwater Management
Plan.
The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall
submit a time schedule to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum
requirements. The permittee shall provide certification inwriting (in accordance with
Part III, Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 5) to& Director that the changes
have been made. NYC.
Facility Inspections.. Inspections of the facilit;
part of the Preventative Maintenance and Go(
-a semi-annual schedule; once during the firs
during the second half (July to December), w
dates (unless performed more frequently than
are different from, and in addition to, .thd`stor
required in Part II B, C a d`D oftt sdpe it.
all storriiwater systems shall occur as
�asekeeping Program at a minimum on
ofithe year (January to June), and once
AW
least 60 days separating inspection
-annually). These facility inspections
er discharge characteristic monitoring
.9. Implementation. The permitteeF'JNiI1N*' shallM i.TFmplement the Plan. Implementation of the Plan
shall include documentation of a ilmonitoring, measurements, inspections, maintenance
activities, and training provided'to employees, including the log of the sampling data and
of actions taken to 41p ment'BMPs associated"with the industrial activities, including
vehicle maintenance activities. Such documentation. shall be kept on -site for a period of
five years and made available to the Director or the Director's authorized representative
immediately upon request.
Part II Page 4 of 1 I

Permit No. NCS000350
SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified in Table 1. All
analytical monitoring shall be performed during a representative storm event. The required
monitoring will result in a minimum of ten analytical samplings being conducted over the term
of the permit at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO).
A representative storm event is a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. The time
between this storm event and the previous storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches must be at least
72 hours. A single storm event may have a period of no precipitation of up to 10 hours. For example, if
it rains but stops before producing any collectable discharge, a sample may be collected if the next rain
( producing a discharge begins within 10 hours. f
Table 1. Analytical Monitoring Requirements' ,.
'Discharge
:::Measurement
:Sample;.
<' Ample:,:-:,-
Characteristics: ..::
:: Units
_ -Fre uenc 1.,. a, ;.
T e� :':'..
Ltication3'
40 CFR Part 423 Appendix A:
€�' ' f
Grab
SDO
13 Priority Pollutant Metals
µg/l
r i semi-annual
(Ag, As, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg,
Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, Zn)a�
ta.Fy.
Al
�; "+ ' j' :,
'�; ' semi-annual
Grab
SDO
B
semi-annual
Grab
SDO:..
COD
m � 1
semi-annual
Grab
SDD .
TSS
semi-annual
Grab F
SDO
Sulfate
mg/1
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Oil and Grease O&G)
m
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
H
standard
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfalls
inches
semi-annual
Rain Gauge
-
Footnotes:
I Measurement Frequency: Twice per year during a representative storm event, for each year until either another
permit is issued for this facility or until this permit is revoked or rescinded. If at the end of this permitting cycle
the permittee has submitted the appropriate paperwork for a renewal permit before the submittal deadline, the
permittee will be considered for a renewal application. The applicant must continue semi-annual monitoring
until the renewed permit is issued. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods through the end of this
permitting cycle.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative
outfall status has been granted.
4 Mercury shalt be analyzed by EPA Low-level detection method 1 b31 E. This method also requires a field blank
be analyzed. A benchmark does not apply; however, values above 0.012 µg/l should be noted on annual SDO
DMR reports to the Regional Office.
Part II Page 5 of 11

Permit No, NCS000350
5 For -each sampled representative storm event the total precipitation must be recorded. An on -site rain gauge or
local rain gauge reading must be recorded.
The permittee shall complete the minimum ten analytical samplings in accordance with the
schedule specified below in Table 2. A minimum of 60 days must separate each sample date
unless monthly monitoring has been instituted under a Tier Two response.
Table 2. Monitoring Schedule
Moaitorin '` eriod,' f.�
;;;Sample Number.;::
- Start
End
Year 1 — Period 1
1
September 1, 2010
Februar 28, 2011
Year 1 — Period 2
2
March 1, 2011
August 31, 2011
Year 2 — Period 1
3
September 1,.,2011
February 29, 2012
Year 2 — Period 2
4
Mardhls,,2012
August 31, 2012
Year 3 — Period 1
5
Se`tember 1 2012;
¢ Februag 28, 2013
Year 3 — Period 2
6
� March 1, 2013
August 31, 2013
Year 4 — Period 1
7
Se "teinber.,1, 2013
February28, 2014
Year 4 — Period 2
8
40,"t Mardi i, 2014
August 31, 2014
Year 5 — Period 1
9 „ A
45e� r&ber 1, 2014
February28, 2015
Year 5 — Period 2
10 �:
„w, March 1, 2015
Au ust 31, 2015
Footnotes:��
f:�„se
1 Maintain semi-annual monitoring during!permit,renewal process. The applicant -must continue semi-annual
s'wk:.<.w . IVmonitoring until the renewed permit is issued:
2 If no discharge occurs during the sampling riod, the permittee must submit a monitoring report indicating
"No Flow" within 30 days of tge end of the six-month sampling period. ,
- -The Perm, itfee shall report the nalytical results from the first sample with valid results within the
monitoring period. In addition, a separate signed Annual Summary DMR copy shall be
submitted to the local DWQ Regional Office (RO) by March 1 of each year. The permittee
shall compare monitoring results to the benchmark values in Table'3. The benchmark. values in
Table 3 are not permit limits but should be used as guidelines for the permittee's Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). Exceedences of benchmark values require the permittee to
increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or install
stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program. See below the descriptions
of Tier One and Tier Two.
Part II Page 6 of I I

Permit No. NCS000350
Table 3. Benchmark Values for Analytical Monitoring
Discharge Chairacteristtc's
:'. Units
Berichniark
Aluminum
mg/1
0.75
Antimony
N.
mg/l .
0.09
Arsenic
mg/l
0.36
Beryllium
mg/l
0.07
Boron
mg/1
N/A
Cadmium
mg/l
0.001
Chromium
mg/l
1
Copper
mg/1
,� NO3�0 007
Lead
mg/l003_�/
.j .F
Mercury
µg/l
' , N/A
;� :ti"',
Nickel
mg/l
.; � 0.26
Selenium
mg/l,,r If-
0.056
Silver
eq
mg/l=�,f,
• %' 0.001
Thallium
"ing/L"~�
NIA
Zinc
rF mg/l
0.067
COD
; J mg/l
120
TSS``
,.
,� mg/l
100
Sulfate
mg/l
500
O&G
mg/l
30
pH (see footnote 1)
standard
6-9 t
Footnotes;
1 If pH values outside this range are recorded in sampled stormwater discharges, but ambient rainfall data
indicate precipitation pH levels are within + 0.1 standard units of the measured discharge values or
lower, then the lower threshold of this benchmark range does not apply. Readings from an on -site or local rain
gauge (or local precipitation data) must be documented to demonstrate background concentrations were reiow
the benchmark pH range. N
Part 11 Page 7 of I I

Permit No. NCS000350
If: The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark valu6, or outside of the benchmark
ranc, for any parameter at any outfall;
Then: The permittee shall:
1. Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results.
2. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedence.
3. Identify potential, and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or physical
improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern, or to bring
concentrations to within the benchmark range.
4. Implement the selected actions. -Within two moue s of?"lith(e",inspection.
5. Record each instance of a Tier One response in,the'Storinwa-ier Pollution Prevention Plan.
Inclede the date and value of the benchmark! exbQence, the inspection date, the personnel
conducting the inspection, the selected actiphsAnd the"clate the selected actions were
.Ar
implemented.
All
Tier T
If. During the term of this permit,,, e rsf'valid sampling results from two consecutive
le 10-6
monitoring periods are above the benchmark values, or outside of the benchmark range, for any
specific parameter at a spe'c'ific,discharge outfall;
Then: The permittee shall:
I. Repeat all the required actions outlined above in Tier One..
2. Immediately institute monthly monitoring for all parameters (except mercury) at every
outfall where a sampling result exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive samples.
Monthly (analytical and qualitative) monitoring shall continue until three consecutive
sample results are below the benchmark values, or within the benchmark range, for all
parameters at that outfall.
3. If no discharge occurs during the sampling period, the permittee is required to submit a
monthly monitoring report indicating "No Flow."
4. Maintain a record of the Tier Two response in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Part 11 Page 8 of 11

Permit No. NCS000350
During the term of this permit, if the valid sampling results required for the permit monitoring
periods exceed the benchmark value, or are outside the benchmark range, for any specific
parameter at any specific outfall on four occasions, the permittee shall notify the DWQ Raleigh
Regional Office Supervisor in writing within 30 days of receipt of the fourth analytical results.
DWQ may, but is not limited to:
• Require that the permittee increase or decrease the monitoring frequency for the
remainder of the permit;
• Work with the permittee to develop alternative response strategies; `
• Require the permittee to install structural stormwater§ co" trols; "
• Require the permittee to implement other stormwater"control measures; or
• Require that the perm'ittee implement site modifications to qualify for the No Exposure
Exclusion.
.:,`�
SECTION C: QUALITATIVE<MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Qualitative monitoring requires a visual iris`A ection of each stormwater outfall regardless of
.�- g
representative outfall status and.shdll be performed as specified in Table 4, during the analytical
.monitoring event. [If analyticalfmonitoring is not required, the permittee still must conduct semi-
annual qualitative monitoring.] Qualitative monitoring is for the purpose of evaluating the
effectiveness of the Stormwafer _Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) and' assessing new sources of
stormwater pollution.
In the event an atypical condition is noted at a stormwater discharge outfall, the permittee shall
document the suspected cause of the condition and any actions taken in response to the
discovery. This documentation will be maintained with the SPPP.
Table 4. QuaIitative Monitoring Requirements
Dise.harge Characteri5ties'...::::,;;`;
Frequency) '_
f
Monitoring .
Location2
Color
semi-annual
SDO
Odor
semi-annual
SDO
Clarity
semi-annual
SDO
Floating Solids
semi-annual
SDO
Suspended Solids
semi-annual
SDO
Foam
semi-annual
SDO
Oil Sheen
semi-annual
SDO
Part II Page 9 of I I

Permit No. NCS000350
Erosion or deposition at the
semi-annual
SDO
outfall
Other obvious indicators
semi-annual
SDO
of stormwater pollution
Footnotes:
1 Measurement Frequency: Twice per year. during a representative storm event, for each year until either another
permit is issued for this facility or until this permit is revoked or rescinded. if at the end of this permitting cycle
the permittee has submitted the appropriate paperwork for a renewal permit before the submittal deadline, the
permittee will be considered for a renewal application. T�e applicant must continue semi-annual monitoring
until the renewed permit is issued. See Table'2 for schedule of monitoring periods through the end of this
permitting cycle.
2 Monitoring Location: Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO)
regardless of representative outfall status. 4
SECTION D: ON -SITE VEHICLE MAINTEN
Facilities which have any vehicle maintenance
55 gallons of new motor oil per month when a
analytical monitoring as specified below in Ta
stormwater discharge outfalls which discharge
areas and in accordance with the schedule Dres
monitoring shall be performed during a
Table 5. Analytical
G REQUIREMENTS
ina on=site which uses more than
ove: Fthe calendar year shall perform
,his monitoring shall be performed at all
atenrunoff from vehicle maintenance
Table 2 (Section B). All analytical
storm event.
meets for On -Site Vehicle Maintenance
Discharge Characteristics }
Units
eas,urement-
Fre tieric 1
Y�Sample'
"T '
.;Sample'
L6cation3
H e�"j,
4standard
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
mg/1
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
mg/1
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfall4
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
New Motor Oil Usagegallons/month
I semi-annual
Estimate
-
Footnotes:
I Measurement Frequency: Twice per year during a representative storm event, for each year until either another
permit is issued for this facility or until this permit is revoked or rescinded. If at the end of this permitting cycle
the permittee has submitted the appropriate paperwork for a renewal permit before the submittal deadline, the
permittee will be considered for a renewal application. The applicant must continue semi-annual monitoring
until the renewed permit is issued. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods through the end of this
permitting cycle.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge from the pond.
3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) that discharges
stormwater runoff from area(s) where vehicle maintenance activities occur.
1 For each sampled representative storm event the total precipitaiion must be recorded. An on -site or local rain
•'gauge reading must be recorded. -
Part 11 Page 10 of 11

Permit No. NCS000350
Monitoring results shall be compared to the benchmark values in Table 6. The benchmark
values in Table 6 are not permit limits but should be used as guidelines for the permittee's
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). Exceedences of benchmark values require the
permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or
install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs), as provided in Part II Section B.
Table 6. Benchmark Values for Vehicle Maintenance Analytical Monitoring
Discharge Characferistics ;,..:
''Units'
Benchmark `
pH (see footnote 1)
standard
6-91
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
mg/L
15
Total Suspended Solids
mgl - k
r!X 100
Footnotes: ;;� vA
I If pH values outside this range are recorded in sampled stonTi ater,discharges, but ambient rainfall data
indicate precipitation pH levels are within + 0.1 standard units;of�the measured values or lower, then the
lower threshold of this benchmark range does not apply, Readings from an on -site or local rain gauge (or local
precipitation data) must be documented to demonstrate background concentrations were below the normal pH
range. -
t
Part II Page I I of 11

Permit No. NCS000350
,PART III t STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER INDIVIDUAL PERMITS
SECTION A: COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
1. Compliance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in
accordance with the. following schedule:,
Existing Facilities already operating but applying for permit coverage for the first time: The Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented within 12 months of the effective date of the
initial permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary containment, as specified in Part 11,
Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this permit, shall be accomplished withizn,,12 months of the effective date of
the initial permit issuance. Nt
New Facilities applying for coverage for the first time a d exisfacilities previously permitted and
Vt* ''r "WIX,, V
applying for renewal under this permit: The StormwatefTollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and
implemented prior to the beginning of discharges from42,operation of the industrial activity and be
updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary containme' ,,' s.specificd in Part II, Section A, Paragraph
2(b) of this permit shall be accomplished prior to;the=iieginningof discharges from the operation of the
industrial activity.
Duty to Comply
The permittee must comply with: a 11`conditibns.of this individual permit. Any permit noncompliance
ti5'� � V�
constitutes a violation of the Cl�eari Water Act land is grounds for enforcement action; for permit
termination, revocation anddreissuanc"modification; or denial of a permit upon renewal application.
a. The permittee shall comply..with standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the
Clean Water Act;fdntoxic'pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that'establish
these standards or-prolubitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement.
b. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition is subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. Any person who negligently violates any
permit condition is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to 25,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. Any person who knowingly violates permit
conditions is subject to criminal penalties df $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or
r imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. ' Also, any person who violates a permit
condition may be assessed'an administrative penalty not to exceed $10,000 per violation with the
maximum amount not to exceed $125,000. [Ref: Section 309 of the Federal Act 33 USG 1319 and
40 CFR 122.41(a)]
Understate law, a daily civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation
may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit. [Ref: NC General Statutes 143-215.6A].
d. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Director for violating section 301,
302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing 4ny
of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act. Administrative penalties for Class
I violations are not to exceed $10,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I
penalty assessed not to exceed $25,000. Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed
Part III Page I of 8

t
i
Permit No. NCS000350
$10,000 per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of
any Class II penalty not to exceed $125,000.
3. Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this'
individual permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or -the
environment.
Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Part III, Section C of this permit regarding bypassing of stormwater control facilities,
nothing in this individual permit shall be construed to relieve the pettnittee from any responsibilities,
liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 1421-215.3;143-215.6A, 143-215.6B, 143-
215.6C or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for,effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended. f `{
�1'
5. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this individual permit shall be construed'to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or,penalties'to which the permittee is or may be subject
to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section'3 i I of the: Federal Act, 33 USC 1321.
6. Property Rights
The issuance of this indryidual permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
s;�nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of property, or any exclusive privlege
personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws -or regulations.
7.. Severability
- The provisions of this individual permit are severable, and if any,provision of this individual permit, or the
application of any provision of this individual permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application
of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this individual permit, shall not be affected
thereby.
Duty -to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director
may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the
permit issued pursuant to this individual permit or to determine compliance with this individual permit.
The permittee shall also furnish to the Director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this
individual permit.
Penalties „for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this individual permit shall,
upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not
more than two years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after
a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more that $20,000 per
day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.
Part III Page 2 of 8

Permit No, NCS000350
10. Penalties for Falsification of Report
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation,
or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this
individual permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon
conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000. per violation, or by imprisonment for not more
than two years per violation, or by both.
SECTION B: GENERAL CONDITIONS
0
3.
Individual Permit Expiration
The permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiratio
authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the A.
required by the agency authorized to issue permits no later tha
permittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prio
have a permit after the expiration and has not requested. ne'W
be subjected to enforcement procedures as provided:in. NCGS'i
Transfers
.:date`. In order to receive automatic
Oi
iitRshall submit forms and fees as are
180,:days;pr"ior to the expiration date. Any
to expiration, or any permittee that does not
i at least 180 days prior to expiration, will
�143-215.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
This permit is not transferable to any p ers�on-ex cept er notice to and approval by the Director. The
Director may require modification or'revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the name and
t:%' • 'TU .
incorporate such other requirements ass may�be.necessary under the Clean Water Act. The Permittee is
required to notify the Division in writing m1he event the permitted facility is sold or closed.
Signatory Requirements
All applications, reports,,6JfJhformation submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified.
1W yw
a. All applications to be covered under this individual permit shall be signed as follows:
(1) In the case of a corporation: by a principal executive officer of at least the level of vice-
president, or his duly authorized representative, if such representative is responsible for
the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge described in the permit
application form originates;
(2) In the case of a partnership or limited partnership: by a general partner;
(3) In the case of a sole proprietorship. by the proprietor;
(4) In the case of a municipal, state, or other public entity: by a principal executive officer,
ranking elected official, or other duly authorized employee.
All reports required by the individual permit and other information requested by the Director shall
be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made -in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the
overall operation'of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant
Part III Page 3 of 8

Permit No. NCS000350
4.
manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent
responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental
matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named
individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and „• �,
(3) The writien authorization is submitted to the Director.
C. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section shall make the following
certification:
"I certify, urider penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my`' owledge and belief, true, accurate,
s, &'; 'I:.
and complete..1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
kr rV VYA41k 4:
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for kriowingrviolations."
The issuance of this individual permit does not prohibivihe Director from reopening and modifying the
individual permit, revoking and reissuing the individual permit, or terminating the individual permit as
allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in.Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122
and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0100; and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 et alA`
Permit Actions
jf,r
The permit may be modified, revoked.and reissued, or terminated for cause. The notification of planned
changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any individual permit condition.
SECTION C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and
control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with
the conditions of this individual permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate
laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of
back-up or.auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation
is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this individual permit.
Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense`
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt
or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this individual
permit.
Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass unless:
a. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage; and
Part III Page 4 of 8

Permit No. NCS000350
b. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary control facilities,
retention of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry
weather. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed in
the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during
normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
The permittee submitted notices as required under, Part III, Section E of this permit.
If the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above, the Director may approve an
anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects.
SECTION D: MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Samplinu
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required Jier6in, shall 66Uiaracteristic of the volume and
nature of the permitted discharge. Analytical sampling,shall;be performed during a representative storm
event. Samples shall betaken on a day and time that'js,chi racteristic of the discharge. All samples shall be
taken before the discharge joins or is diluted by any th'er§waste stream, body of water, or substance.
Monitoring points as specified in this permit shall notb;YUianged without notification to and approval of
the Director.
2. Recording Results s...
For each measurement, sample,,lnsp 6t on or;'maintenance activity performed or collected pursuant to the
requirements of this individual permit epermittee shall record the following information:
r
a. The date, exact place, and tuCeof sampling, measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
b. The individual(s)`ivho performed the sampling, measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who'performed the analyses;'
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
3. Flow Measurement
Where required, appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of
monitored discharges.
4. Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published pursuant to
NCGS 143-215.63 et. seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant
to Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended, and Regulation
40 CFR 136.
Part III Page 5 of 8

Permit No. NCS000350
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this individual permit, all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum
detection or lower reporting level of the procedure.
5. Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that are
required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status. If it is
established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is granted
representative outfall status, then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced number of outfalls.
Records Retention
^• r
Visual monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at theffacility along with the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan. Copies of analytical monitoring results,shall also be maintained on -site.. Ttie
permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, includmg all calibration and maintenance
records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and"c6pies of all
reports required by this individual permit for a period of at least 5 y ars from the date of the sample,
measurement, report or application. This period may be�exiehded by request of the Director at any time.
Inspection and Entry,
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor
acting as a representative of the Director), in ^case of a facility which discharges through a municipal
separate storm sewer system,; an authorized representative of a municipal operator or the separate storm
sewer system receiving the di charge, upon thepresentationof credentials and other documents as may be
required by law, to;
a. Enter -upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted,
or where records .must be kept under the conditions of this individual permit;
b. Have access to and "copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions
of this individual permit;
C. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this individual permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring individual permit compliance
or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location.
SECTION E: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Discharge Monitoring Reports
Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be submitted to the Division on
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms provided by the Director. Submittals shall be delivered to the
Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.
When no discharge has occurred from the facility during the report period, the permittee is required to
submit a discharge monitoring report within 30 days of the end of the three-month sampling period, giving
all required information and indicating "NO FLOW" as per NCAC T15A 02B .0506.
Part III Page 6 of 8

Permit No. NCS000350
The permittee shall record the required qualitative monitoring observations on the SDO Qualitative
Monitoring Report (QMR) form provided by the Division, and shall retain the completed forms on site.
Qualitative monitoring results should not be submitted to the Division, except upon DWQ's specific
requirement to do so.
Submitting_ Reports
Duplicate signed copies of all reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
• ti
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
ATTENTION: Central Files.
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
`- In addition, a separate signed Annual Summary DMR_ copyAshall be submitted to the permittee's
DWQ Regional Office (RO) by March 1 of each year".g
3. Availability of ReportsRYIL��
4
Except for data determined to be confidential undeilNCGS IM15.3(a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal
Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accor"dance with the terms shall be available for public inspection
at the offices of the Division of Water Quality A q required by the Act, analytical data shall not be
considered confidential. Knowingly maki g`any`false,statement on any such report may result in the
imposition of criminal penalties as provided fOr`inJR 143-215.68 or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
Non-Stormwater Discharges
If the storm event.monitored'in accordance with this individual permit coincides with a non-stormwater
discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under the non-stormwater
R'm% '�'4
discharge permit and proiii' this -information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report.
Planned Changes
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which could significantly alter the nature or quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification
requirement includes pollutants which are not specifically listed in the individual permit or subject to
notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42 (a).
Anticipated Noncompliance
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which may result in noncompliance with the individual permit requirements.
Bypass
a.•, �., Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit
prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of
,the anticipated quality and affect of the bypass.
b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of an
unanticipated bypass.
Part III Page 7 of 8

Permit No. NCS000350
8,
9
10
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance which
may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from
the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission. shall also be provided
within 5 days of the time the permittee become's aware of the circumstances.
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the period of
noncompliance, including, exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the
anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received
within 24 hours.
Other Noncompliance f
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at the time
monitoring reports are submitted.dj:
li� y yl J
Other Information
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in an application for an
individual permit or in any'report to the Director�it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
Part III Page 8 of 8

t ,
` NCS000350
PART IV LIMITATIONS REOPENER
This individual permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply with any applicable
effluent guideline or water quality standard issued or approved under Sections 302(b) (2) (c), and (d), 304(b) (2) and
307(a) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent guideline or water quality standard so issued or approved:
a. Contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluent limitation in the individual
permit; or
b. Controls any pollutant not limited in the individual permit.
The individual permit -as modified or reissued under this paragraph'.shall also contain any other requirements in the
Act then applicable. ff
PART V
ADMINIISTERING AND
The permittee must pay the administering and
by the Division. Failure to pay the feein,time
this Division to initiate action to revoke-&'Jin
2.
4
Act
See Clean Water Act.
CE MONITORING FEE
Coring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being billed
rdance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause
DEFINITIONS
Arithmetic Mean
The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the individual values divided by the number.
of individual values.
Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges
This permit regulates stormwater discharges. Non-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in the
stormwater conveyance system are:
(a) All other discharges that are authorized by a non-stormwater NPDES permit.
(b) Uncontaminated groundwater, foundation drains, air -conditioner condensate without added
chemicals, springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant
flushings, water from footing drains, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands.
(c) Discharges resulting from fire -fighting or fire -fighting training.
Best Management Practices BMPs)
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters. BMPs may take the
form of a process, activity, or physical structure.
Parts IV, V and VI Page 1 of 5

b '
Permit No. NCS000350
5. Bypass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including
the collection system, which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility.
6. Bulk Storage „of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage capacity of -greater than
1,320 gallons.
7. Clean Water Act 01
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water'Act (CWA), as amended, 33
USC 1251, et. seq. „% '4_p
S. Division or DWQ
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and'Natural Resources.
9. Director 1
The Director of the Division of Water, Quality, 11i" rmit issuing authority
_ �'N!�
10. EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
.11. Grab Sample
An individual sample collected instantaneously. Grab samples that will be directly analyzed or
qualitatively monitored must be taken within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
12. Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
13. Landfill
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land
treatment facility, a surface impoundment, an injection well, a hazardous waste long-term storage facility or
a surface storage facility.
I, I
14. Municipal Separatc Storm Sewer S sv tern
A stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self-government such as a city or town.
15. No Exposure
A condition of no exposure means that all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm
resistant shelter or acceptable storage containers to prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, or runoff.
Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to, material handling equipment or activities,
Part VI Page 2 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCS000350
16
17
18
19
industrial machinery, raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, final products, or waste products.
DWQ may grant a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES Stormwater Permitting requirements only if a
facility complies with the terms and conditions described in 40 CFR § 122.26(g).
Overburden
Any material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding
topsoil or similar naturally -occurring surface materials that are not disturbed by mining operations.
Permittee
The owner or operator issued a permit pursuant to this individual permit.
Point Source Discharge of Stormwater
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance
ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, or discrete fis:
waters of the state.
Representative Storm Event
A storm event that measures greater than 0.1
storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inch(
hours of no precipitation. For examplb,9if4t
stops, a sample may be collected'if a'rairi prc
ly limited to, any pipe,
is or may be discharged to
'rainfall and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no
used. A single storm -event may contain up to 10 consecutive
!,hours without producing any collectable discharge, and then
discharge begins again within the next 10 hours.
20. Representative Outfall Status
When it is established thatH the discharge,of stormwat6r runoff from a single outfall is representative of the
�
n discharges at multiple outfalls, the D:WQ may grant representative outfall status. Representative outfall
status allows the permittee,tolverfartm analytical monitoring at a reduced number ofoutfalls.
sr . ,:
21. Rinse Water Discharge
The discharge of rinse water from equipment cleaning areas associated with industrial activity. Rinse
waters from vehicle and equipment cleaning areas are process wastewaters and do not include washwaters
utilizing any type of detergent or cleaning agent.
22. Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient
freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
23. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -
to -Know Act of 1986;
b. Is present at or above,threshold levels at -a facility subject to SARA Title III, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
C. That meets at least one of the following criteria:
Part VI Page 3 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCS000350
(1) Is listed in Appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on Table 11(organic priority pollutants),
Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols), or Table IV (certain toxic pollutants and
hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40
CFR 116.4; or
(3) , Is a pollutant for which EPA has published.,acute or chronic water quality criteria.
24, Severe Property Damage
wy
Means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the control facilities which causes them to
become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused
by delays in production. ' ' y "A , .
25. Significant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
.t4 •4:e
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; -raw materials used in food processing or production;
hazardous substances designated under section;101(.14)'6f,CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required
to report pursuant to section 313 of -Title III of SARA; fetrtilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as
ashes, slag and'sludge that have the potential to be,released with stormwaterdischarges.
26. Significant Spills
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 31 I -of -the Clean Water pc{(Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) orsection 102 of
CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
27. Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt.
28. Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and which is
directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site. Facilities
considered to be engaged in "industrial activities" include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14).
The term does not include'discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program.
29. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
A comprehensive site -specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution
and is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site.
30. Ten Year Design Storm e. '
4 _
t �!
The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average'6nce in ten
years. Design storm information can be found in the State of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.
Part VI Page 4 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCSoo 0350
31. Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the entire storm event occurs. Total flow shall be
either; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the
amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c) estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event.
32. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet
water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant's sources. A TMDL is a detailed
water quality assessment that provides the scientific foundation for an -implementation plan. The
implementation plan outlines the steps necessary to reduce pollutant loads in a certain body of water to
restore apd maintain water quality standards in all seasons TheClean Water Act, Section 303, establishes
the water quality standards and TMDL programs. UPS",_
33, Toxic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(I).ofjthe C1ean)Water Act.
34. LRa!Lt
ti
Means an exceptional incident in which there is,unmtentional and temporary noncompliance with
technology based permit effluent�limit&i ns because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the
.� � .�,��
permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly
designed treatment or control facilities; inadequate treatment or control facilities, lack of preventive
�rtt;A
maintenance, or careless or improper operation. I
35. Vehicle Maintenance _Act
tAlf
Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, painting, fueling, lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations, or
airport deicing operations.
36. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air,
gravity, or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with -the unaided eye.
37. - 25-year. 24 hour storm event
The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average, once in 25
years.
Part VI Page 5 of 5 Pages

N( S000350
AT;` , . .
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
STAFF REVIEW AND EVALUATION
NPDES Stormwater Permit
Facility Name:
Cogentrix, Edgecombe Genco, LLC, P.O. Box 370, Battleboro, NC 27809
NPDES Permit Number:
NCS000350
Facility Location:
6358 Old Battleboro Road, Battleboro, NC 27809 (Edgecombe.County)
Type of Activity:
Coal Fired Power Plant
SIC Code (if applicable):
4931 or 4911
Receiving Streams:
See Figure 1
River Basin:
Tar -Pamlico River Basin, Sub -basin 03-03-02
Stream Classification:
UT to Beech Branch: C, N5W
Proposed Permit Requirements:
See attached draft permit.
Monitoring Data:
See Table 1
Response Requested by (Date):
May 30, 2010
Central Office Staff Contact:
Return to: Jennifer Jones, [phone]
Special issues:
Issue
Rating.Scale:.1(easy) to 10(hard)„,
Compliance history
3
Benchmark exceedance
5
Location (TMDL, T&E
species, etc)
2
Other Challenges:
Monitoring of
pond
3
Difficulty Rating:
13/40
Special Issues Explanation:
• Not monitoring sw pond. May have sediment issues or illicit WW discharge in it.
Description of Onsite Activities:
• Coal fired power plant for electric generation. All site stormwater flows into a detention pond and
then is discharged via one stormwater outfall at the southern end of the site (SDO 001). Also has FGD
wastewater system and reverse osmosis for WW.
Documents Reviewed: '
Page] of 8 #Rr

NCS000350
History:
NPDES Stormwater Permit Application Materials
National Heritage Program (NHP) Threatened and Endangered Species Database
SPU File
Central Files
EPA Sector -Specific Permit, 2008
303(d) List, 2008 draft, 2006 final
2008 (draft) Yadkin Pee -Dee Basinwide Plan
Inspection reports from RRO
TRI database
Date permit first issued:1996
Date permit re -issued: 5/1/2002-4/30/2007
Date permittee submitted renewal application: 10/25/2006
Page 2of8

1io1jp:)oj AJ!113PA
r" t w►.��►a►wr �+� �
,yf+ Ism
slim •.i.•`
i
S JO C Q&d
(ulseg aanlld wed-ael7 ZO-CO-EO :Urseg-qrr
MSN r3 :Ssen weaAS
4wej8 4-w8 C4 lul :uuea.rjS 6ulnlaD&8
Nwoaabpg .A4unoa
M ,.91 ,K oLL :0PNIbu l
N r,; t rZO o9£ :BPMnel
3N 1oaogajjje9
IZS'8i: T are�S dpid
S
�' `� { L'ri ♦ � r n , �t I � ti~. tJ+.7A.,,,..1i �. �r'��.r r .yam '•►..{ IF ,, y, � t -
"�x�
,i: 4h 1 ! i� .{r.5vs- [-� �y_`�a, �a�: `r ti 1,� r !li I r rg � � � •` �; �y �, .-' .
,i', v�fF Jl t •'�a- '! 'r t ti~t h vi^t C r 4. '� 'T- a.;n �''1 :s.-i, `..: jI
{ f • � 4 rI 7Z,fir' Ir r, �"L�'ti..•9 i' � 1 x f r � 1__.• r. 'I
' t,�°.- tarty h } ;'.^,\ t�'..4r�,� .. ` �_j. r•s�•=' —�.iC i
'r�� � F�.. � � y ,� y{ 1 � � 1 �� • fir " ti [ � � v-• l; % •� \
,d[r"S. tr I � '�f � j f' :, I �'�' �� 1 ''y \ ' rt A'� ti"�"`�rr .� � y.:. � q.. •. i"5, ._ � ' r- ••' `
'r �r��,1 i:l I. Ir 4 �r � tl i � \ ti.. ^.`, ter*"" ' .r •,x r"� ,,,�tir c�t,,w',j• qs T.or�C � n.. �,.arar 1
.•(' � a ' `' 4 Y r. �' i tit �" �,. 4"" � r �"� r, I� s '.` s . -'7 V � �"''.
y.'N, +4� ''"' �i� _`Ltr ,,, I�+- •tom—'f,`i',}N ( `g�
:.k � 5.+4 � Y 1 • t`!r i ' � % "+1�- •Lh _�'{•/, .4''I I QS/.,,. •. '4 r �'}
4
•--., `
•S tzy r." , # s r�'� el y I ,.r �•k '{r. I mo o'" �� :S �rl t`• 4 t14.
its. ! iri jj 't 1t -i I•{i r� r� +�, 5�.• 11 `•y'f�•wyj� ��I:31�
'l�:�r •� 11a �4'r l��' } ''I I M,k ���...�. -.,y �i'z �. i� � y '/ c��,r f. �,�� : , �t�,_
'r 1
- �` �>� ar. tip• r.' _- IL.T
:` L W r -�� .- } � ! r '.'..•.'�ia• y4 i. .`A �: /✓ r 11 L h �' �� ..`ti+,h•
�!V-.Wi_y r•'-.�F } _ ..L x'I �IJ��% L r} +;,,�, 'Fi f i''f'' xr't r �L I tt i.
. y � �'}•,�c [ .. rRq', .11 'A� '.- "w� "W+,,,"`r,� y' ` t_ • i .t. �`+;��`l f•' t �1 r yg.,��
l r 9 . ��7 rOaU2� Q�2bp { . Y `S•� '� +t� 4 �'-�',
��ti `�''� I� � '1~ �?. !�r �`r '•••rt�'a'.� 1�1r.1 ���� - I ! ''��I. x!s o � r ''i „2� - 4 t � } � h� 1 r 1 ��
1 I ��-"is4�rr =, a if •� �i' 'k• ~ +� r [ ??i�F, rL?t
�' I • �-#; �� {�4'j j1 a.i � c - �''E +'' 'v �.4 is r+
4 .ti..r R' /)},^ //�� ,,.. ,r1jy it ` r'rir�'S i 1 s`�yf f Y• s L f,i• -4.4 k } 4 I
I t y\ i �44• I I £t r 4'�
1� U� " -',.%,i���'r � � .�j� �•//n� V 4 �: I � _ I,.. �' ' f ��ar� ¢ x_ i _LY ems' ` 1`.
';'�}'� {;i.r'L3 {� \11�. .. ,,t`�.�t ~4 ��✓.% t-�.f ,''I' ,�,i {(�'h��,MLI�r f%'r. � '� �i:'
` ����rr�� i r4y i i.l� �" f.x 'l'• �' r`� ^
...1 fir. ,t`'.,;,i^ 9 , ''S ''�: ,t r ri^tj i+( r �'• •'yl rr -••a+ ti'
fss �..F r•.'- Tf`•'`..-•�.!n ''_ ,z' L,\ 1
�Rw� r •4}� �' r \'\ +}I ` � t:, f ti k�^ I �"e'" • i N r s�' r �-
1'i� : 7^�:�^�r"ye"'"r-L `•\ "' y+• 'p `l. 1_ ! I",e.;5�4 \ 1 r A.'' �~ -"r 1 k
f r I ,t rr # YI' . k 5 ✓,'t.a,. Yz
y,rs ,,, �4 E rt- „P:wr_-^-• 7; �� �` �• l��I �..�.. "r:l . • J`•�'J�
'r'4 I- �'`4f T'j¢i•` nerd;! V r'� 1 ` _ ¢•J, r ` ; i �z , '� •:�R,r
a" a , ,4r• es ,.rti. y, 14 f e4•_fyAA" I � l � . � x'1 ''S_
z,;Mti w1Y "l .PIS:sl r 61 'j d•...�'•rd'
j r
�� "'e�' ` 's t" [� � �z" .t�, � �""`t r . , f.. t t,'• r� • •�, "-• n`� �:yy- � , . ' �f � s � .
r x 5, s ' r �": n:, i 9 - e'f 'rh�t fl .`i1- `� ,, ,pii... • o♦ � 'i ti.sk,, a ti , •�� /IA. R, s
l~s�t .54 • 1A1, r11 ��'•^r I 1 l�� 5�7�rt1[ 1 ,\1 -v:_. : IeZ.I. 1
j. wµ� •lr?.•. .>? MT�rI Y,:S:. 4,t,.. •, ?t 1 'rJ i7CT t4~ ,4 i 1:1 �r 1' S1 �. ♦ , r•r '',. .
xi! aj� r .h. `w t `•"-"'' f "e
'"4 r •`. I-i', ..�. .,•. '1�_
r L 01,.E `' 1 P #4i- 14 • �, / �\
t i%%�' •ri,•y r F I- SY rtr 1 'r• '� 4 h 4 ,� -!. `_.,I, I
'
L _ � • +yi S • • 'r��
�y• t ;'f�'S lE sY xi i'- s:9 _ r ° • ilr _�� ••" a (( r
X. r la 1�1
a „`•r���..:,�'•9Y..r »;tc .'i�;?c".Wr -�--. �ti4Y_. -....._... � �.}. �_. _✓ ;� r" ��-h�I"I '-- ` - ---.L1.'�
A31IEaeA }o deW :T ainSIA
QS£Oti�05�N

NCS000350
Central Office Review Summary:
1. Owner's Other Permits:
• NPDES Wastewater Permit: NCO077437 — Ltr of violation/warning on 5/1/2008
• FRS 110000604221
• CAA NEI NE143935 / #3706500146 State NOV issued for Air Permit 7/10/2008.
• EP313 TRI 27809CGNTRRTE2S EDGECOMB GENCO LLC 6358 OLD BATTLEBORO RD BATTLEBORO NC
27809
2. General Observations:
o One stormwater outfall (SDO 001). According to RRO reports, qualitative monitoring is currently being
recorded but no analytical monitoring was being reported from $DO 001. SDO 001 was sampled by
the RRO on 5/20/2009 and it was found that Al was 510 ug/l and Fe was 420 ug/l.
0 5/20/2009 Sampling revealed concerns with SW:
1. Al: 510 ug/l, Ar: 7 ug/I, Boron: 65 ug/I, and Zinc 21 ug/I
2. However none appeared to have issues with stormwater OVER benchmark at that date.
o Wastewater has issues with Zinc, sulfate, Boron, Cu, & Mo,
3. Impairment:
o Not on 303D list and does not have TMDL. it is in Tar -Pam NSW however.
4. Threatened and Endangered:
o No T&E species appear to be present in the area.
S. Location:
o South of Battleboro. Permittee needs to know that the facility discharges to Beech Broach not Beech
Creek. Viewed satellite image on Google Maps.
6. Industrial Chances Since Previous Permit:
o WW files indicated changed from wet to dry ash facility.
7. Analytical Monitoring Notes:
o No analytical monitoring of SW outfall for SDO 1 was available to RRO on their inspection in May of
2009. RRO told the facility that they should be monitoring for analytical parameters at that time.
o RRO stated in their EPA/WW permit compliance evaluation report "FGD system evaporates wet FGD
wastewater — this water is sometimes exposed to the driveway (stormwater drains) where it is
located (depending on evaporation rates/water levels) and the solids are removed and land applied
by full circle solns as stated above. The facility removes solids from the WW basins and the solids are
hauled off to the Sampson County Landfill twice per year."
o RRO noted in stormwater evaluation on 5/20/09 "continuous discharging stormwater pond requires
sampling. No analytical monitoring data available. Recommended measuring sediment in SW pond."
Also "Plant refers to SDO 001, DWQ refers to it as SDO 005".
o In 7/3/08 inspection permittee stated again that they did not need to sample based on pond discharge
times (only in response to 10-year storm) however it was discharging at the time of inspection though
the overflow pipe, it had not rained in quite some time prior to inspection. "This strongly indicates
one or more unidentified, unauthorized, illicit wastewater discharges through the stormwater
detention pond." RRO told them to ID illicit discharges. NOV was issued for no qualitative discarges
P but deleted because in 5'h year of permit and permit did not require analytical monitoring at that time.
[ �aUS CG's C4ex, r- r a aoh
15 4L r.4- Page 4of8 qr I 1 J
+ q o v r, Gc w o-T r , �� r�c� j,,4_ s
di 5��a.r�. rtiJc c�ur��n� SLy�e Vi! s!'� o f1 4.2./n . I) Pa".."e 0
�220

NCS000350
o Although RRO states that there is only 1 SW outfali (001), there appear to be at least 4 others (#2-5)�
SWO05 is near coal pile and may be of concern. $ e e in o e G e 6 w °
a Previous permit's (2002) analytical monitoring was
1. TSS, COD, Total Rainfall, Event Duration, Total Flow. All sampled annually on year 1, 2, 3,
quarterly on year 4.
2. No Benchmarks or cutoff concentrations were included in the permit.
8. Qualitative MonitorinjR Notes.
o Notes from 7/3/08 inspection report state: "Qualitative monitoring is being done more often than
required. However permittee must ensure that even though its lone more often than needed, it
still must be done at least twice pe duringthe timeframes specified in the permit.
o There was a summary of qualitative monitoring in the application (2006) but thered'§"e'Otp no
C�
stormwater dates associated with them. Describes 004 and 005 as having possible clarity or turbidity
issues, and 004 as having odor issues. -
Table 1: Analytical Monitoring
5 ct e V t 6 It 0 r\
5 0 ire c ci rrn �►�
GC7 n -Pt .ii' KV-` s h IL+ -f � It r- e- o_
r e cl a S
irrn
Page 5 of 8

�a[�L�IIIIL�317
,.Revised Permit Recommendations: Analytical Monitoring:
1. Monitoring:
a. Adding parameters (Quarterly Monitoring):
i. Semi-annual monitoring for 13 priority metals (Ag, As, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, TI, Zn)
+ Al & B, with benchmarks where available (per conversations with RTI's Robert Scheuster,
Duke University Professor Dr. Avner Vengosh, Regional Office Observations and new SPU
monitoring plan for Coal-fired power plants) . See Attached Monitoring for Power Plant
NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewals in 2009.
ii. Semi-annual Hg monitoring with more sensitive method 1631E.
iii. Semi-annual monitoring for sulfates, and O&G, and pH
b. Keeping monitoring for COD, TSS in the permit (now semi-annual).
2. All analytical monitoring has been set to semi-annually during a representative storm event as defined in Part
II Section B. The permittee must also document the total precipitation for each event. if no discharge occurs
during the sampling period, the permittee must submit a monitoring report indicating "No Flow" within 30
days of the end of the six-month sampling period. Additionally, samples must be taken a minimum of 60 days
apart, as specified in Table 2.
3. Benchmarks for analytical monitoring have been added to this draft permit. Exceedances of benchmark values
require the permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or
install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program. If the sampling results are above a
benchmark value, or outside of the benchmark range, for any parameter at any outfall then the facility shall
follow the Tier 1 guidelines which require a facility inspection within two weeks and implementation of a
mitigation plan within two months. If during the term of this permit, the sampling results are above the
benchmark values, or outside of the benchmark range, for any specific parameter at a specific discharge
outfall three times in a row (consecutive), then the facility shall follow the Tier 2 guidelines which require a
repetition of the steps listed for Tier 1 and also immediately institute monthly monitoring for all parameters at
every outfall where a sampling result exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive samples.
4. The permittee is required to collect all of the analytical and qualitative monitoring samples during
representative storm events as defined in Part II Section B. Qualitative monitoring is required regardless of
representative outfall status.
5. The permittee is responsible for all monitoring until the renewal permit is issued. See Footnote 1 of Tables 1,
4,and 5.
6. The flow reporting requirement has been removed per DWQ revised strategy. (The total rainfall parameter is
in this permit, however.)
7. Vehicle maintenance monitoring has been revised to semi-annually in order to coincide with analytical and
qualitative monitoring.
Other Proposed Changes to the Previous Permit:
1. Additional guidance is provided about the Site Plan requirements. The site map must now identify if the
receiving stream is impaired and if it has a TMDL established. It must also describe potential pollutants in each
outfall. The map requirements are stated more explicitly. And, the site plan must contain a list of significant
spills that have occurred in the past three years and also must certify that the outfalls have been inspected to
ensure that they do not contain non-stormwater discharges. Additional information is provided in Part II
Section A. -
2. Additional requirements for the Stormwater Management Plan have been specified in Part II Section A. More'
details regarding secondary containment are provided."
3. Additional requirements for the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan have been specified in Part-ll Section A.
�The.plan must also be updated annually to include a list of significant spills and to certify that the outfalls do
not contain non-stormwater discharges.
4. The facility must now implement a semi-annual Facility Inspection Program of the site's stormwater
Page 6 of 8

NUS000350
management controls as specified in Part II Section A.
Information regarding the No Exposure Exclusion has been added to this draft permit. if industrial materials
and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40 CFR §122.26(g), the facility may
qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater discharge permit requirements. Additional
information is provided in Part I Section A.
Discussions with permittee: Not needed as RRQ had recently been out there, we had correspondence, and we
have the Monitoring for Power Plant NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewals in 2009. .
Page 7 of 8

NCS000350
Recommendations: Based on the documents reviewed, the application information submitted on October 25,
2006 sufficient to issue an Individual Stormwater Permit.
Prepared by (Signature) Date -,-3 1-0 (0
Stormwater Permitting Unit Supervi r `Date gS17,6 16
for B ey Benrut
Concurrence by Regional Office� A�� Date
RO Water Quality Supervisor
Date Z�
Page 8 of 8

Required
Sampling
Range
Sample Date
Total
Flow
(MGD)
Precipitat
ion
(in)
Duration
(hours)
TSS
COD
Benchma
rk:
100 m IL
Benchma
rk:
120 m IL
Outfall 1
11 I212009
0.79
4.8
15
3/3/2010
0.55
12
22
3/5/2008
1.11
25
26
10/25/2007
1.26
13
<10
4/16/20071
1 1.5
1 1
14
26
E
1 3/12/20071
1na
1 1
3
1 10
Over Current Benchmark
Data Not Collected

' Monitoring Strategy for Power Plant NPDES Stormwater
Permit Renewals in 2009
Renewal Permit Monitoring:
In recent years, the Stormwater Permitting Unit has recognized the complex issues
associated with coal -burning power plants and the increased attention on coal ash storage,
use, and disposal at these sites. Data on stormwater discharges from these plant sites is
limited because the focus has traditionally been on wastewater. Regions have also voiced
concern about potential contamination from metals in stormwater discharges associated
with the activities at these sites. After researching constituents these activities or materials
may introduce to the power plant property (and with them potential for stormwater
pollution), the Unit formulated a strategy for these renewal permits:
• Semi-annual monitoring for: 13 priority metals (Ag, As, Be, Cd, Cr. Cu, Hg*,. Nip-
Pb, Sb,, Se, Tl, Zn) + Al & B, with benchmarks where available:
La
s's: Draft RTI Study ('Human and Ecological Risk Assessment of Coal Combustion
Wastes; RTI, August 2007) and discussions with Robert Schreusdale of RTI suggest
these metals may signal contamination problems. SPU also discussed contaminants
with Duke University researcher, Dr. Avner Vengosh, who researched the TVA ash pond
spill that occurred in Dec 2008 in Kingston, TN (Mtg with SPU on May ¢, 2009). In
addition, RRO/DWQ has sampled discharges from cogeneration plants in the FRO area
and flagged metals of concern. Overall, we have very little data with which to
characterize stormwater discharges from this industry, but we know there is a concern
and need for better understanding about possible stormwater pollution from the
activities here.
+ *Semi-annual Hg monitoring with more sensitive method 1631E but no
benchmark (or obligation to monitor monthly in Tier 2). (FYI - Cost of clean
mercury method around $100.)
Basis: Power plants area potential major source of mercury, and although some Hg
may be regional, there is a risk that significant quantities come from the activities at
the plant itself. While wastewater permit limits are calculated based on low stream
flow and high wastewater effluent flow conditions —and sometimes do not warrant
the lower -detection method—stormwater contributions vary broadly and do not
change the bio-accumulative nature of methyl -mercury. SPU recognizes the
complexity of regional air transport and deposition, as well as the cost and resources
involved in clean mercury sampling protocol, and therefore will exempt Hg from
monthly monitoring in the tier structure. However, if mercury data suggest a problem
driven by sources or activities at the plant, DWQ should investigate further and could
require additional monitoring in the future.
Semi-annual monitoring for COD, TSS, pH, sulfates, and O&G.
Basis: conventional pollutants associated with types of activities here. Note -include
provision to allow pH values below benchmark if facility can document rainfall pH is
as low or lower at time of sampling.
1
Last revised 9/22/2009

Monitoring Strategy for Power Plant NPDES Stormwater
Permit Renewals in 2009
+ Requirement to submit annual data summary. to DWQ.
B. asls: Consistency with current draft General Permits and to facilitate prompter
awareness of monitoring results at the regional office level.
include this option for DWQ response to four -benchmark exceedences: "Work
with the permittee to develop alternative response strategies." SPU will
consider alternative strategies for monthly monitoring in Tier 2, especially in
response to benchmark exceedences of parameters like Cu and Zn, and will make
efforts to discuss possibilities with permittees during draft permit phase. For
example, plants might consider installing bioretention cells for drainage areas
where metals are a problem and monitor for effectiveness, in exchange for
decreased monitoring frequency and/or no benchmark trigger. We will also
consider relieving monitoring if the facility can demonstrate levels are not
attributable to, or else not able to be separated from, industrial activities. SPU will
work with the regional offices to address situations on a case -by -case basis.
Bas15: SPU recognizes the ubiquitousness of copper and zinc, and the low benchmark
concentrations for metals like Cd, but we also know activities at power plants can be
contributors of these pollutants. SPU feels alternatives to more monitoring can
facilitate solutions and that the permit tier structure is flexible enough to relieve the
permittee of monitoring when appropriate.
+ Where coal pile runoff and leachate is not treated and/or permitted under a
wastewater permit, examine for need to apply storwmater effluent limits.
Federal effluent guidelines apply specifically to the Steam Electric Generating
industry, which excludes cogeneration facilities. However, cogeneration plants are
similar in many respects, and coal storage and handling activities may even be
identical. SPU will consider a tailored approach for certain SDOs based on proximity
to coal sources, storage area size, etc. Depending on the size and similarity of the
coal storage and handling (and perhaps other factors), the permit writer could
decide to (a) apply limits initially, or (b) an arrangement where benchmarks
mirroring BPT requirements for coal pile leachate in 40 CFR §423 (TSS of 50 mg/l
and pH 6-9 SU) would become limits after two exceedences (i.e., Tier 2 action), or
(c) just impose benchmarks.
Basis: Federal stormwater effluent limits apply to coal piles atsteam electric
generating facilities, similarity of cogeneration plants (and even elsewhere) warrant
similar scrutiny. Other states such as Virginia, Ohio, and Georgia have already
imposed the same BPT limits on coal pile runoff and leachate at facilities where coal
burning for steam electric generation is not necessarily the primary industrial activity.
The flexibility for North Carolina to do the same follows that lead and acknowledges
the potential for the same pollution problems.
Last revised 912212009

y ' ' Monitoring Strategy for Power Plant NPDES Stormwater
Permit Renewals in 2009
Relevant E-mail Correspondence:
-----Original Message -----
From: Jones, Jennifer M. [mailto:[e-mail]]-
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:05 AM
To: Bethany Georgoulias; Ken Pickle; Cory Larsen; [e-mail];
Jennifer Jones
Cc: Bradley Bennett; 'Robert Patterson'; Mike Randall
Subject: RE: Power Plants & SW Permit Strategy
Just talked to Robert Schreusdale @ RTI.
He said our list of analytes sounds good but we should consider adding Cobalt and
Iron. I mentioned the concerns with Iron ubiquitousness but he said that it may
be present at such high levels that it's a concern.
He suggested background monitoring - I told him the concerns we have with that.
-----Original Message -----
From: Hoban, Autumn
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:52 AM
To: Lawyer, Mike
Cc: Brower, Connie; Jones, .Jennifer; Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject: Correction on FRO Power Plant Sampling Qualification
Mike,
Just needed to follow up on e-mail from April 9, 2009. This e-mail is inserted
between the number lines below in light blue:
I have the lab results from the FRO power plant visits.
***Lumberton NC0058297
outfall 003 - *Arsenic 3.8 ug/L*, *Copper 31 ug/L*, *Nickel 15 ug/L*, Titanium 29
ug/L, and *Zinc 390 ug/L*, *A1 400ug/L*
SW1- *Al 4400 ug/L,* *Arsenic 3.6 ug/L*, *Copper 14 ug/L*, *Titanium 220 ug/L*,
*Zinc 420 ug/L*
Elizabethtown NC0058301
outfall 003 wastewater -*Copper 22 ug/L*, Zinc 20 ug/L
outfall 005 SW- Zinc 11 ug/L
I bolded possible concerns*, "this data is not adequate for determining
compliance."
*
These samples went to lab the same time their freezer went out, so data is
qualified -not the best situation, but for identifying what's there, I think this
is relatively accurate.
Another sampling event would be needed, especially at Lumberton. Sampling should
probably be done at the Progress Energy Plant nearby that has the ash pond.
3
Cast revised 912212009

Monitoring Strategy for Power Plant NPDES Stormwater
Permit Renewals in 2009
These two facilities have coal piles, but no ash ponds on site and neither
facility has been operating consistently. Neither was operating the day we
sampled. If operating expect these would be higher.
Just let me know if I can be of assistance.
-4 i-i-i-i i i-I FTITE ITF 3- i i 1 01 1 1 1 --1 1 1-1 }_ 1-{ 0 0 1 1 1 1
Connie has so kindly pointed out that the metals sample results would not be
effected by the freezer/cooler issues experienced at lab, so my statement about
"results not being adequate to determine compliance" is incorrect. Please review
the laboratory sections qualifiers by each analyte to determine which analytes
were qualified. If you have not received a copy of the results from the lab, I
can scan and send the copies that came to RRO.
Can you let me know if anyone is evaluating Lumberton Site "SW1 outfall" and "WW
Outfall 003" with regards to permit requirements and these sample results. We
may want to resample, since some levels in these results seem unusually high, but
that's up to FRO.
Sorry for the confusion.
-----Original Message -----
From: Drew Zurow[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:56 AM
To: Georgoulias, Bethany
Cc: Larry Hedges
Subject: Re: [stormwater] Coal Pile Runoff 5W Effluent Limitations
Bethany,
Georgia's general industrial stormwater permit has TSS/pH limits for all coal
pile runoff, whether or not thethe source is a Steam Electric Generating Plant.
This has been the case since our first industrial stormwater permit issuance in
1993. We have not yet seen a good reason to modify our original permit language
and exclude facilities that are not Steam Electric Generating Plants from these
limits.
4
Last revised 9/22/2009

NCS000350
Recommendatlons: Based'on the documents reviewed, the application information submitted on October 25,
2006 sufficient to issue an Individual Stormwater Permit.
Prepared by (Signature) Date 'z3 2� t 0
f
Stormwater Permitting Unit Supervi r `` Date
for Br4 ey !nrgt'
Concurrence by Regional Office Date
RO Water Quality Supervisor
Regional Office Staff Comments (attach additional pages as necessary)
A Page 8 of 8
Date

.. - /1 ..,.. era.
,COUN'TY�F:tENUSE' NUNMiR
FACEUT'Y:
CITY: PERT NUMBER
COUNTY:
Permit Information that Needs to be Incorporated into Future Permit Revisions;
DATE COM.NTS
11311
9

1CDGIECOMBE GENCO, LLC
6358 Old Battleboro Road,
Battleboro, North Carolina 27809
September 2, 2010
Point Source Branch
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
NPDES Wastewater Permit No. NCO077437
NPDIES Stornmater Permit No. NCS000350
To Whom It May Concern:
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following
individuals for all permit applications, discharge monitoring reports, and other
information relating to the operations at Edgecombe Genco, LLC as required by all
applicable federal, state, and local envirorvnental agencies specifically with the
requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 213.0506.
Robert J. Montore Projects General Manager
Lauren Billheimer Compliance Manat:er_
In addition, I hereby delegate alternate signatory authority to the following individual for
discharge monitoring reports from the Edgecombe Genco, LLC facility.
Bill Maiden Plant Manager,T
If you have any yueS6U11s rebar'dinb fins Iciicr, JAC-1sC fuel rRx lu colllact Bub 1VIVlliUiC ill
910-777-4095.
Sincerely,
1
Warren MacGillivray
Cm
Vice President`}2.
Edgecombe Genco, LLC

cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section, 1628 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Bob Montore — Projects General Manager
Lauren Billheimer — Compliance Manager
Bill Maiden— Plant Manager
Tony Halcomb — NAES Division Directot

W
EPA IDEA Query Results Page 1 of 5
a,;SYktf 3r,r�
Enforcement & Compliance History Online (ECHO)
Q
tr44 PRO" You are here; EPA Home Compliance and Enforcement ECHO Search Data Search
Results
Detailed Facility Report R6 rt Data
f
Error JQitirOnary
For Public Release • Unrestricted Dissemination Report Generated on 04/23/2010
US Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
Facility Permits and Identifiers
Dmta Dictionary 1i
Statute
System
Source ID
Facility Name
Street Address
City
State
Zip
FRS
1 1QQQ.QQ, 422.1
COGENTRIX OF ROCKY
MOUNT
RTE. 2 SR 1400
BATTLEBORO
NC
27809
CAA
AFS
3706500146
EDGECOMBE GENCO LLC
6358 OLD BATTLEBORO
BATTLESORO
NC
27809
ROAD
CAA
NEI
iVlA3.5.
COGENTRIX OF ROCKY
NC
27809
MOUNT
CAA
INEI
INE143935
Cogentrix of Rocky Mount
NC
27809
CWA
PCS
NCO077437
Edgecombe Genco LLC
8355 Old Batileboro Rd
BATTLEBORO
NC
27809
Batsleboro
TOWN
EP313 ITRI
n',7F'090Q.iNTPATE2$
EDGECOMS GENCO LLC
6358 OLD BATTLEBORO RD
BATTLEBORO
NC
278D9
Facility Characteristics
Data Dlcttonary�
Statute
Source ID
Universe
Status
Areas
Permit
Expiration
Latitude/
Indian
Sic
NAICS
Date
Longitude
Country?
Codes
Codes
LRT.
110000604221
35.907300 ,
No
•77.598100
Major
MACT (SECTION 63
CAA
3706500146
(Fed.
Operating
NESHAPS), TITLE V
NA
4911
Rep.)
PERMITS, SIP , PSD ,
NSPS
CWA
NCO077437
Minor
Active
10/31/2009
35,9781 ,
77,7583
No
4931
EP313
27809CGNTRRTE25
36.0378 ,
NA
4911
221112
-7T 7542
It the CWA permit Is past its expiration date, this normally means that the permitting authority has not yet Issued a new permit. In these
situations, the expired permit is normally administratively extended and kept in effect until the new permit is issued.
For the RCRA program, activities that contribute to an overall facility status of Active are displayed in parentheses using the acronym
HPACS, where H indicates handler activities, P - permitting, A - corrective action, C - converter, and S - state -specific. More information is
available in the Data Dictionary.
Inspection and Enforcement Summary Data
Data i)1 ictionary i
Statute
Source ID
I Insp. Last 05Yrs
I Date of Last Inspection
I Formal Ent Act Last 05 Yrs
I Penalties Last 05 Yrs
CAA
3706500146
15
03/10/2009
10
$00
CWA
NCO077437
13
05/20/2009
10
$0U
F
Compliance Monitoring History (05 years ) t Data Dictfonary
IStatutel Source ID Isystemll Inspection Type Lead Agency Date Finding
http://www.epa-eclio.gov/cgi-bin/get 1cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNutnber=110000604221 4/23/2010

EPA IDEA Quety Results
Page 2 of 5
CAA
137065,30146
AFS
ISTATE CONDUCTED FCEION-SITE
State
09/21
CAA
3706500146
AFS
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
State
0112712006
Result -IN COMPLIANCE
REVIEW
CAA
3706500146
AFS
STATE CONDUCTED FCEION-SITE
State
09/12t2006
CAA
3706500146
AFS
STATE CONDUCTED FCE/ON-SITE
State
03/07/2007
CAR
3706500146
AFS
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
State
0712212007
Result -IN COMPLIANCE
REVIEW
CAA
3706500146
AFS
ISTATE CONDUCTED FCEION-SITE
State
0111512008
CAA
3706500146
AFS
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
State
0112512008
Result=lN COMPLIANCE
REVIEW
CAA
3706500146
AFS
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
State
0211712009
Result -IN COMPLIANCE
REVIEW
CAA
3706500146
AFS
STATE CONDUCTED FCElON-SITE
$late
03/10/2009
CAA
3706500146
AFS
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
State
0210312010
Result=lN COMPLIANCE
REVIEW
CWA
NCO077437
PCS
COMPLIANCE EVAL (NON SAMPLING}
JoinU'State
Lead
07I2712005
CWA
NCO077437
PCS
COMPLIANCE EVAL (NON -SAMPLING)
State
03108i2007
CWA
NCO077437
PCS
COMPLIANCE EVAt (NON -SAMPLING)
ISlare
0520i2009
Entries in italics are not considered inspections in official counts.
Compliance Summary Data
Information on the nature of alleged violations is available on the FAO page.
.E?uts-Dlttl:lanrt
Statute
Source ID
Current SNCIHPV?
Description
Currant As Of
Otrs in NC (of 12)
CAA
3706500146
NO
10311312010
2
CWA
NCO077437
NIA
I
lOcI-Dec09
6
Three Year Compliance Status by Quarter
f��ta Dlctidnanj
Violations shown in a given quarter do not necessarily span the entire 3 months. Information on the nature of alleged vtolaliens is available
on the FAQ page, and information on the duration of non -Compliance is available at the end of this report.
AIR Compliance Status
Statute:Source ID
QTR1
R3
OTR4
OTRS
OTR6
OTR7
QTR1p
QTR11
OTR12
CAA:3706500146
Apr•
IOTR2
Jul-
Oct-
IQ
Jan-
Apr-
Jul-
Oct-
IDeC08
10TI11
Jan-
IQT119
Apr-
Jul-Sep09
Oct
Jan-
Jun07
Sep07
Dec07
Mar08
Jun08
Sep08
MarO9
Juno9
Dec09
Marto
HPV History
Program/Pollutant in Current Violation
MACT (SECTION
C-
C-
C•
C•
C-
C-INSP
C-INSP
C•SHUT
IC -SHUT
C-SHUT
C-SHUT
C-SHUT
63 NESHAPS)
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
DN
ON
ON
ON
ON
TITLE V
C•
C-
C-
C•
C•
C-INSP
C-INSP
C-INSP
C•
C•
C-
C-
PERMITS
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
SIP
C-
C-
C-
C-
C-
V-
V-
C•
C•
C•
C-
C-
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PSD
C-
INSP
C-
IINSP
C-
IINSP
C-
IINSP
C-
INSP
C-INSP
C-INSP
C-INSP
C-
PROCED
C•
PROCED
C-
PROCED
C-
PROCED
NSPS
C-
C-
C-
C-
C-
C-INSP
C-INSP
C-INSP
C-
C-
C-
C-
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
INSP
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
PROCED
High Priority Violator (HPV) History section: "Unaddr" means the facility has not yet been addressed with a formal enforcement action.
"Addrs"means the facility has been addressed with a formal enforcement action, but its violations have not been resolved. Lead Agency
designated can be US EPA, State, Both, or No Lead Determined. It HPV History is blank, then the facility was not a High Priority Violator.
C.Compliance, V-Violation; S=Compliance Schedule.
CWAINPDES Com fiance Status
Statule:SOrrrce ID
QTR1
OTR2
OTR3
OTR4
OTR5
OTR6
QTR7
0TH8
OTi
QTR10
OTR11
OTR12
CWA:NCO077437
Jan-
Apr-
Jul-
Och
Jan-
Apr-
Jul-
Oct-
Jan-
Apr-
Jul-
Ocl-
Mar07
JL11107
Sep07
Dec07
Mar08
Jur)08
S0p08
D0008
Mar'09
Jun09
Sep09
Dec09
Non-compliance in
NIA
NIA
Ill
NIA
NIA
WA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NfA
Quarter
SNC. RNC Status
NIA
NfA
Nil
NiA
Ill
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
Effluent Violations by NPDES Parameter: Get violation charts: all violations custom (click on parameter names for individual parameter
charts)
Effluent violations are displayed as highest percentage by which the permit limit was exceeded for the quarter. Bold, laril Indicates
http://www.epa-echo.gov/cc,i-bin/get1 cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNuniber=110000604221 4/23/2010

EPA IDEA Query Results
Page 3 of 5
0
Significant Non-compliance (SNC) effluent violations. Shaded boxes indicate unresolved SNC violations.
Notices of Violation or Informal Enforcement - AFS, PCS, ICIS-NPDES, off, dactionary
RCRAInfo (05 year history)"
Statute
Source ID
Type of Action
Lead Agency Date
CAA
13706500146
ISTATE NOV ISSUED
State 07/10/2008
CWA
INCO077437
ILTR OF VtOLATs0NrWARNING LT t
State 1051,10112008
Formal Enforcement Actions - (05 year history)
AFS, PCS, RCRAllil NCDB LDataDfct6r ry
Statute ISource ID IType of Action Lead Agency Date lPenaity IP9n71tyDescription
No data records returned.
In some cases, formal enforcement actions may be entered both at the initiation and final stages of the action. These may appear more
than once above. Entries In italics are not "formal' actions under the PCS definitions but are either the initiation of an action or penalties
assessed as a result of a previous action, This section includes US EPA and State formal enforcement actions under CAA, CWA and
RCRA.
116-ka Dicti ry
Primary
Case
Case
Lead
Case
IssuedlFiled
Settlement
Federal
State/Local
SEP
Comp
Action
LawlSectlon
Number
Type
Agency
Name
Date
Date
Penalty
Penalty
Cost
Cost
- No data records returned.
Federal enforcement actions and penalties shown in this section are from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS-FEBC).
These actions may duplicate records In the Formal Enforcement Actions section.
Environmental Conditions f DstaDiclionary
Permit ID lWaterShed lWatershed Name Recelving Waters ISection 303(d) Listing? lCombined Sewer System?
NC0077437 103020101 1 Lover Tar, N.G. ITAR RIVER INO lNo
TRI History of Reported Chemicals Released in Pounds per Year at Data�iotionary
Site:27809CGNTRRTE2S
Chemical releases reported to TRI are provided for context and are not associated with non-compliance for that facility.
Year 1
Total Air
Emissions
Surface Water
Discharges
Underground
Injections
Releases to
Land
Total On -site
Releases
Total Off -site
Transfers
Total Releases and
Transfers
1999
44,490
44,490
44,490
2000
33,840
5
33,845
33,845
2001
46,209
23
46,232
10,302
56,534
2002
56,239
55
56,294
27,812
84,106
2003
68,312
50
68,362
9,115
77,477
2004
68,705
133
68,838
4,745
73,583
2005
68,086
85
68,171
3,425
71,596
2006
57,745
31
57,776
3,404
61,180
2007
58,602
1 20
58,622
2,515
61,137
TRI Total Releases and Transfers by Chemical and Year
Chemical releases and transfers are In pounds except where otherwise noted.
Chemical Name
1999
1 2000
1 2001 1
2002
1 2003
2004
2005
1 2006
1 2007
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
1 1,419
3,104
ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
ill
3,701
1 7.398
COPPER COMPOUNDS
1
1 14,387
1 6,123
littp://www.epa-echo.gov/cgi-bin/getI cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110000604221 4/23/2010

EPA IDEA Query Results
Page 4 of 5
LEAD COMPOUNDS
1 5,285
3,762
3,305
4,273
1 3,090
3,451
2,530
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
34
109
123
59
49
44
40
61
ZINC COMPOUNDS
874
693
HYDROCHLORIC ACID 1995 AND AF
23,000
30,000
24,000
33,564
42,621
42,935
42,504
36,362
36,765
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
2,800
3,700
3,020
4,196
5,328
5.367
5,313
4,545
4,596
SULFURIC ACID (1994 AND AFTER
18,690
1
19,000
17,572
20,041
20,085
19,952
16,782
17,185
DIOXIN AND DIOXIN-LfKE COMPOUN
46
47
44
Demographic Profile of Surrounding Area (3 Miles) jData bkljvnaryr
Open more detailed information in a new window (links leave ECHO): I Mi 3 16 or 5 Mi.
This section provides demographic information regarding the community surrounding the lacility. ECHO compliance data alone are not
sufficient to determine whether violations at a particular facility had negative impacts on public health or the environment. Statistics are
based upon the 2000 US Census data, and are accurate to the extent that the facility latitude and longitude listed below are correct. The
latitude and longitude are obtained from the EPA Loratiunal Reference; I at?hILt3T) when available.
Radius of Area:
3 Miles
Land Area:
99.47%
Households In area:
14,437
Center Latitude:
35.135813
Water Area:
0.53%
Housing units In area:
15,353
Center Longitude:
-80,917796
Population Density:
1326.991s , mi.
Households on Public Assistance:
368
Total Persons:
37,315
Percent Minority:
61.04%
Persons Below Poverty Level:
4,210
Race Breakdown
Persons (%)
Age Breakdown:
Persons (%)
White:
17,294 (46.35%)
Child 5 ears and less:
3,241 ( 8.69%)
African -americans
14.095 37.77°/
Minors 17 years and younger:
9,334 25,01%
His anlc-ori in:
6,082 16.30%
Adults 18 years and older:
27,981 74.99%)
AslanlPacific Islander:
1,814 (4.86%)
Seniors 65 years and older:
1,789 ( 4.79%)
American Indian:
1315 ( 0.84%)
Other/Multiracial:
12,507 ( 6.72%)
flducall Level
Parsons 25 &older)
Persons (%)
Income Breakdown:
Households (%)
Less than 9thgrade:
1,303 ( 6.00%)
Less than $15,000:
1,366 9.46%
9th-12thgrades:
2,628 12.09%
$15,000-$25,000:
1,654 (11.46%)
High School Diploma:
5,827 (26.82%)
$25,000-$50,000:
5,359 (37.12%)
Some College/2- r:
6,264 (28,83%)
$50,000-$75,000:
3,481 (24,11%
B.S./B.A. or more:
15,708 (26.27%)
Greater than $75,000:
12,521 {17.46%)
Please note: Entries in gray denote records that are not federally required to be reported to EPA. These
data may not be reliable.
Notice About Duration of Violations -- The duration of violations shown on this report is an estimate of the
actual duration of the violations that might be alleged or later determined in a legal proceeding. For
example, the start date of the violation as shown in the ECHO database is normally when the government
first became aware of the violation, not the first date that the violation occurred, and the facility may have
corrected the violation before the end date shown. In some situations, violations may have been corrected
by the facility, but EPA or the State has not verified the correction of these violations. In other situations,
EPA does not remove the violation flag until an enforcement action has been resolved.
0,14.
This report was generated by the Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis (IDEA) system, which updates
its information from program databases monthly. The data were last updated: Al 03/13/2010. PCS:
03/13/2010. FRS: 03/11/2010. Tl 05/05/2009.
Some regulated facilities have expressed an interest in explaining data shown In the Detailed Facility Reports in ECHO. Please check
company web sites for such explanations.
http://www.epa-echo.gov/egi-bin/get 1cReport.egi?tool=echo&IDNuniber= l 10000604221 4/23/2010

EPA IDEA Query Results
Page 5 of 5
EPA Home I Privacy and Security Notice I Contact Us
http://www.epa-echo,gov/cgi-bin/getl cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110000604221 4/23/2010

�~ `EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI
Page i of 9
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
httpa/laspub.epa.yov/rnvlro/tris_tnntrnLh'I5_pr1nF)trls td=37EiF39CGN7RR'T'E25
Last updated an rr'idaV, Anrll 21, 261.0
YOU are mere: EPA.Hvme. Envlrofaets TRI Lrlvirorrcta Rrpnrt
Envirofacts Report
14 TRI
Query executed on APR-23-2D10
Results are based on data extracted on MAR-02-2010
Click on "View Facility Information" to view EPA Facility Information for the facility.
FaclHty_Name:. EDGECOMB GENCO LLC Mailing -Name: EDGECOMB GENCO LLC
Address: 6358 OLD BATTLEBORO RD Malling_Addre$S,. PO BOX 370
BATTLEBORO NC 27809 BATTLEBORO NC 27809
County: EDGECOMBE Realon. 4
Facllity Information: View Facility Information TRI ID; 27809CGNTRRTE2S DUNS Number: 131411837
FRSID 110000604221
TRI Preferred Latitude: TRI Preferred Longitude;
Public Contact; BILL MAIDEN Phone: [phone]
Parent Company; COGENTRIX Parent,DUNS: 131411837
Starting with Reporting Year 2006, TRI Facilities began reporting NAICS codes, Instead of SZC codes, to Identify their
Primary Business Activities.
NAICS Codes for2008
�®® NAICS DESCRIPTION
221112 YES Fossll Fuel Electric Power Generation
The above Information comes from 2008, which was the last year NAICS code data was reported for this facility. The
earliest NAICS code data on file for this facility was reported In 1998. n
Map this facility
Map this facility using one of Envlrofact's mapping utilities.
Besides TRI, this facility also does the following:
• has reported air releases under the Clean Air Act
• has permits to discharge to water
More information about these additional regulatory aspects of this facility can be found by pressing the other regulatory data button
below.
Other Regulatory Data
Total Aggregate Releases of TRI Chemicals to the Environment:
For all releases estimated as a range, the mfd-point of the range was used in these calculations. This table summarizes the releases
reported by the facility. NR - signifies nothing reported by this facility for the corresponding medium,
Total Aggregate Releases of TRI Chemicals excluding Dioxin and Dioxin -like Compounds
(Measured In Pounds)
Media
Alr emissJQfla
2008
55571.4401
2007
58602.630i
2006
57745,6301
2005
fi8087.32
2004
68705,5
Z003
fi8313,5852
20D2
56Z40,86
2001
46209
2080
33$40
1999
44490
1998
42900
Isurfac
Water
piadiftEm
ReleaseS_to
1.94
NR
20,514
NR
3L86
NR
86,176
NR
133,836
NR
50,615
NR�
56,b36
OII
2`3`,1`2`
OI
5,11
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
http://iaspub.cpa.gov/enviro/tris_control.tris_pritit?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI
Page 2 of LT I "
Underaround
In ectlon
NR
NR NR
NR NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Total On -Site
Releases
55573.3801
58623.1441
57777.4901
68173,496
68839.336
68364.200z
56297,446
6232.12
33845.11
44490
42900
Site tom
NR
NR
2.8E
3428.E
4745.9
S7i4.05
27813.39
10302
NR
NR
gNTotal
Releases
55573 38D1
58623.1441
57780.3501
71602.04E
73585.23E
74083.25D2
84110,88E
56534.12
33845.11
44490
.. Graphic Summary of this Table I
Total Aggregate Releases of Dioxin and Dioxin -like Compounds
(Measured In Grams)
Media
200E
2007
200E
2005
2004
200i
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
Air_Emission;I
.56
595
588
.687
,694
.689
44.3
F47 17]F
451F
NR
7NR
surface Watar Discharges
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
L R
NR
7 NR
Re
I i n
otal On -Site Releases
NR
NR
.56
NR
NR
.595
NR
NR
.588
NR
NR
.687
NR
NR
.644
NR
NR
,689
NR
NR
44.3
NR
NR
47.17
NR
NRI
46
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Transfer Off-S t to Dispel
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NRI
NR
!VR
NR
otai Releases
56
.545
.588
.687
.694
.689
44.3
47,i7
46
NR
NR
Graphic Summary of this Table
TRI Chemicals Reported on Form A:
Please note that there were no chemicals reported on form A for this facility
NOTE:
All chemicals reported below have release or transfer amounts greater than zero. To see a list of all chemicals reported by this facility
click here•
Names and Amounts of Chemicals Released to the Environment by Year.
For all releases estimated as a range, the mid -point of the range was used in these calculations. NR - signifies nothing reported for this
facility by the corresponding medium. Rows with all "0" or "NR" values were not listed.
Chemical Name
Media
—10-"- �4
2C108
20707
200E
2005
5004
2Q03
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemlcal ID: N010
STACK
Pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
44,3
27
NR
NR
NR
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
7RI Chemical ID: N010
OISF�_ NQN
NETALS
pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
3077
139D
NR
NR
NR
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N010)
WATER
Pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
3.SG
__L J_2
NR
NR
NR
ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 1D: N020)
ALB
Pounds
[:EF
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
74,4
101
106
NR
NR
ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
7RI Chemlcal 10: N020
DISP_NON
pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
7324
3600
NR
NR
FNR
ical ID: ND5
(TRI NICChemical
TRI Chemical ID: N020
���ii��:FA--LLS��``
pounds
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
59
NR
NR
COPPERCOMPDUNDS
(TRI Chemltal ID: N100)
COPPER COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemlcal ID: N100
AIR_FUG
STACK
Pounds
Pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR��
NR
550
750
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COPPER COMPO_UND_S
TRI Chemical ID: N100
DI_SP NON
pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
3666.2
13615
NR
RN
NR
NR
CPE OPR.QMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N100
���I--j��E--TAALL'S
Pounds
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21.13
22
NR
NR
NR
NR
DIOXIN AND DIOXIN-LIKEITACK❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
Grams
56
595
588
687
694
689
44,3
47.17
46
NR
❑
NR
❑
COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N150
HYDROCHLORIC ACID �1995
��nnnnn����nnnn
http://iaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tris_conti-ol.tris_print?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/2010

.Al 'FSPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI
Page 3 of 9
AND AFTER "ACID
AEROSOLS" ONLY]
(TRI Chemical ID;
STACK
Pounds
3a625
36765
U36362
U42504
[12J935L42],521
33564
24000
3 0000
23000
230DO
007647010
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
(TRI Chemical ID:
AIR
Pounds
4328EE
5313
5367
5328
419E
3020E
2800
2900
007664393
STACK
LEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID N420)
A[R FUG
ppund5
tl4
.04
p4
0
0
.035
.04
0
NR
NR
NR
LEAD COMPOUNDS
TR] Chemical ID: N420
STACK
Pounds
26.6E
55.15
E5,15
3L57
31,4
3L7
E6,95
E6
NR
NR
NR
BEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemlcal ID: N420
DISP NO
NIEIALS
pounds
NR
NR
2.85
0047
4220
2036.78
3708.4b
5238
NR
NR
NR
LEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N420
Pounds
1,8E
20,39
31,67
13J5
22,1
29,31
30,3
21
NR
NR
NR
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemlcal ID: N458
Paund5
.0001
,0001
A001
�F
,000E
�D
NR
NR
NR
MERCU Y COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ➢D: N458
AIR
STACK
pounds
1.78
31.44
31.44
36.75
37.1
36.85
33.17
35
34
NR
NR
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemlcal ID: N458
D15P NDN
tl�T.ALS
pounds
NR
NR
O1
9,3
12,9
16,D7
90,93
74
NR
NR
NR
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N458)
VygTER
Pounds
OB
124
.19
.08E
.13E
.175
.18E
.12
.11
NR
NR
S U LFU RI C. ACI D_(199 A_AN D
AFTER "ACID AEROSOL$"
AIR
STACK
pounds
16590
17185EEH2EE
NR
]18690
]17000
ONLYI
(TRI Chemical ID:
007664939
ZINC COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N982)
AIR
STACK
pounds
NR
NR
NR
E50
250
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ZINC COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical iD: N982)
D15P NON
METALS
pounds
NR
NR
NR
372,3
513
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
OallIID:SN982)
�
Pounds
NR
NR
NR
72,34
111,E
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
(TRI CheempcIZINC
Discharge of Chemicals into Streams or Bodies of Water:
For all releases estimated as a range, the mid -point of the range was used in these calculations. Rows with Release Amount equal to '0'
were not listed.
IChemical Name
Y r
Unit_Of MedSN_r@
RQase Amok
r m r B f W t
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID; NO10
2D02
Pounds
3,5E
TAR RIVER
ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 1D: NO1p
2D01
Pounds
2
TAR RIVER
ARSENIC -COMPOUNDS.
(TRI Chemlcal ID: N020
200E
pounds
.59
TAR RIVER
ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N020
2000
Rounds
5
TAR RIVER
COPPER COMPOUNDS
Z003
Pounds
21.13
TAR RIVER
TRI Chemical ID; N100
COPPER COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID; N100
200E
Pounds
22
TAR RIVER
LEAD_COMP_OUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N420
2008
Pounds
1,8E
TAR RIVER
LEAD —COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N420
2007
Pounds
20.39
TAR RIVER
BEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 1D; N420
200E
Pounds
31.67
TAR RIVER
COMPOUNDS I2005
LEAD
TRI Chemical ID; N420
Pounds
13.75
TAR RIVER
LeAD_COMPOL)NDS
2004
pounds
22.1
TAR RIVER
TRI Chemical ID: N420
LEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 10: N420
2003
Pounds
29.31
TAR RIVER
LEAD comPOUNDS
200]2
Pounds
30.3
TAR RIVER
TRI Chemical ID: N420
littp:Hiaspub.epa.govlenviroltris_control.tris_print?tris_id=27809CGNTRR'rE2S 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI Page 4 of 9
LEAD COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N420
2001
Pounds
21
TAR RIVER
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N458
2008
Pounds
.08
TAR RIVER
MERCURY_COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical ID: N458
2007
Pounds
.124
TAR RIVER
IMERCURY COMPOUNDS
2006
Pounds
19
TAR RIVER
TRI Chemical ID: N458
TRI Chemical ID: N458)
2005
PoundsOMPOJNDS
086
TAR RIVER
MERCURY COMPOUNDS.
TRI Chemical ID: N458
2004
Pounds
13b
TAR RIVER
TRI Chemical 10: N458
2003
Pounds
175
TAR RIVER
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID: N458)
2002
❑
Pounds
il
186
TAR RIVER
MERUR_Y,� OP UNQS.
TRI Chemical ID: N45$
2001
Pounds
.12
TAR RIVER
MERCURY COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 10: N458
2000
Pounds
.11
TAR RIVER
ZINC COMPOUNDS
TRI Chemical 10: N982
2005
Pounds
72.34
TAR RIVER
VVVV
ZIN_COMPOUNQS
(TRI Chemical ID: N982}
20D4
Pounds
111.6
TAR RIVER
Transfer of Chemicals to Off -Site Locations other than POTWs:
Please note that transfer amounts are not included in release totals shown above. for all releases estimated as a range, the mid -point of
the range was used in these calculations. Rows with Total Transfer Amount equal to "0" were not listed.
Chomlcal._Name
Year.
Unit Of
Total Transfer
Tran..sfer Slte-Name_and-Address
Type -Of -waste
Measure
Amount
Management
AHTI_MONY
COMPOUNDS
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
2002
Pounds
3077
1D1 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
N010
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27802
ANTIMONY
(TRI Chemical 10:
2061
Pounds
1390
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Other Off -Site
Management
N010)
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27802
ARS'ENIC
COMPOUNDS
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
2002
Pounds
7319
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
N020
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27802
ARSENIC
SAMPSON COUNTY LANDFILL
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
2002
Pounds
5
7434 ROSESORO HWY
Other Landfills
NazD)
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
ARSENIC
COMPOUNDS
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
2001
Pounds
3600
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
N020
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27802
COPPER COMPOUNDS
2003
Pounds
1768.08
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
FACILITY
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
N100)
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
BRTTLEBORO NC 27809
COMPOUNDS
[2�003
Pounds
4.74
WASTE INDUSTRIES
7434 ROSEBORO HWY
Other Landfills
�COPPER
(TRI Chemical ID:
NIOD)ROSEBORO
NC 28382
F2O03
Pounds
2183.22
FAY BLOCK
1108 RAMSEY STREET
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemicah ID:
N100)
FAYETTEVILLE,NC 28302
COPPER COMPOUNDS
2003
Pounds
761.19
PETERS POINT BUSINESS PARK
2782 BOYDTON PLANK RD
1PETERSBURG,VA
Other Off -Site
Management
(TRI Chemical 1D:
N100)
23805
COPPER COMPOUNDS
2 003
❑�
Pounds
760.88
�TAYLORS OF FAYETTEVILLE
9340 CHICKPEE DR.
FtheOff-Site(TRI
ement
Chemical 1D:
N100)
LINDEN, NC 28356
COPPER COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
F200]3FPc.nds7
359.03
�BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
Other Landfills
http://i,,ispub.epa.gov/enviro/tiis 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI Page 5 of 9
IN100) JUI
��
[,f
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
COPPER COMPOUNDS
2003
Pounds
12.28
HQUGHTON INDUSTRIAL PARK
2529 HOUGHTON AVE
Other Off -Site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N100)
SOUTH BOSTON VA 24592
COPPER COMPOUNDS
2002
Pounds
13615
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Other OFF -Site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N100
ROCKY MOUNT NC27802
SOUTHBOSTON RECREATIONAL
MPOUNDS
2008
Pounds
110
FACILITYmical
2411 YOUNGER AVE
Other Reuse or Recovery
[D:
fN4
SOUTH BOSTON, VA 24592
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2008
Pounds
5470
Y BLOCK
BUILDERS BLVD
rFA
[Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
YETTEVILLE, NC 28302
SAD COMPOUNDS
200$
Pounds
1183
AGRICULTURAL PRODUC75 (EVANS
FARMS)
1510 COLONY DR
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
TARBORO NC 27866
LEAD COMPOUNDS
MCGILL SUSSEX
(TRI Chemical [D:
2008
Pounds
993
BEEFSTEAK RD
Other Reuse o=Recovery
N420)
WAVERLY VA 23890
LEAD CO..PO.UNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2008
2007
Pounds
Pounds
162
718
BRANDYWINE FARMS
13705 BUNDLE RO
CHESTERFIELD VA 23838
FAY BLOCK
130 BUILDERS BLVD
ether Reuse or Recovery
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
LEAD COMPQ"'�SLANCASTER
2007
PoundsF
10
FARMS
BRIDGE ROAD
ISUFFOLK,VA
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
23432
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2007
❑�
Pounds
990,09
BRANDYWINEFARMS
13705 BUNDLE ROAD
ICHE57ERFIELD,
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
VA 23838
LEAD COMPOUNDS
[2�UO7
Pounds
767
PETERS POINTE COMMERCE PARK
DO NOT KNOW
IPETERSBURG,
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
VA 23803
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2006
Pounds
2,85
SAMPSON COUNTY LANDFILL
�7434 ROSEBORO HWY
Other Landrills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2006
Pounds
718.38
LANCASTERFARM$
BRIDGE ROAD
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
SUFFOLK,VA 23432
LEAD COMPOUNDS
[2�006
Pounds
802,54
FAY BLOCK
130 BUILDERS BLVD
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28302
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2006
Pounds
1524.54
18RANDYWINE FARMS
13705 BUNDLE ROAD
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
CHESTERFIELD VA 23838
LEAD_ COMPO>))>URDS
2006
Pounds
1,13
PETERS POINTS COMMERCE PARK
DO NOT KNOW
1PETERSBURG,
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
VA 23803
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2006
Pounds
348,16
REUSE
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
11
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27801
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
OMPOUNDS
2005
Pounds
1206.1
FACILITY
Other Off -Site
emical ID:
ff(N42O
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2005
Pounds
1044.4
FAY BLOCK
1108 RAMSEY STREET
Other Off site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
LEAD_COCIQOUNDS
BRtNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
(TRI Chemical ID:
R05
Pounds
796.5
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
Qther Landfills
N420
LAWRENCEVILLE VA 23868
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
LEAD_CONIPOUNDS
1343
FACILITY
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
HEP�,
ds
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
N42D}
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
LEAD COMPOUND5
2 004
Pounds
2$77
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
ILAWRENCEVILLE,VA
Other Landfills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
23868
http://iaspub.cpa.gov/enviro/tris_control.tris_print?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/20.10

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI Page 6 of 9
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2 003
Pounds
982.27
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
FACILITY
Other Site
(TRI Chemical ID,
N420)
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
LEAD COMPOUNDS
H
Pounds
WASTE INDUSTRIES
7434 ROSESORO HWY
Other Landfills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
LEAD COMPOUND$
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
2003
Pounds
6,82
�HOJGHTON INDUSTRIAL PARK
2529 HOUGHTON AVE
SOUTH BOSTON VA 24592
Other eSite
Management
LEAD CQMEOUNDS
2003
Pounds
199.45
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
Other Landfills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420)
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2003
Pounds
422.71
�TAYLORS OF FAYETTEVILLE
9340 CHICKPEE DR.
Other emOffSite
Management
(TRI Chemical IQ,
N420
LINDEN NC 28356
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2003
Pounds
422.B9
TERS POINT BUSINESS PARK
82 BOYDTON PLANK RD
OTERSBURG,
Other Off site
Management
RI Chemical ID,
0
20)
VA 23805
LEAD—COMPOUNDS
FAY BLOCK
(TRI Chemical ID:
2003
Pounds
1212.91
1108 RAMSEY STREET
Other Reuse or Recovery
N420)
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2002
Pounds
3704
FOUNTAIN 1NpUSTRIAL PARK
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Other Off Site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
ROCKY MOUNT NC 27802
SAMPSON COUNTY LANDFILL
�LEAD._COMPOUN_D5
(TRI Chemical ID:
2002
Pounds
2.46
7434 ROSEBORO HWY
Other Landfills
11420)ROSEBORO
NC 28382
LEAD COMPOUNDS
F2O1
Pounds
5238
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
ROCKY MOUNT NC 27802
Other Off -Site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N420
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
BRANDYWINE FARMS
(TRI Chemical 1D:
2008
Pounds
47
13705 BUNDLE RD
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458)
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23838
MERCURY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS (EVANS
COMPOUNDS
2008
Pounds
3.4
RMS)
Other Reuse or Recovery
(TRI Chemical ID:
10 COLONY DR
RRBORO,
N458
INC 27866
MERCURY
MCGILLSUSSER
COMPOUNDS (TRI Chemical ID:
2008
Pounds
2.8
BEEFSTEAK RD
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458
WAVERLY, VA 23890
MERCURY
SOUTH BOSTON RECREATIONAL
FACILITY
(TRI Chemical ID;
200$
Pounds
3
2411 YOUNGER AVE
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458)
ISOUTH BOSTON, VA 24592
MERCURY
FAY BLOCK
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
H
Pounds
1.57
130 BUILDERS BLOCK
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458)
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
2007
Pounds
9.75
PETERS POINTE COMMERCE PARK
DO NOT KNOW
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458
PETERSBURG, VA 23803
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
LANCASTER FARMS
(TRI Chemical [D:
2007
Pounds
125
BRIDGE ROAD
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458
SUFFOLK, VA 23432
MERCURY
FAY BLOCK
MP r
(TRI Chemical ]D:
H
Pounds
9,11
130 BUILDERS BLVD
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
MERCURY
BRANDYWINE FARMS
COMPOUNDS Chemical ID:
H
Pounds
12.57
13705 BUNDLE ROAD
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458(TRI
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23838
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
H
Pounds
1.05
REUSE
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
Other Reuse or Recovery
N458
ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27$DI
MERCURY
nF
1
http:lliaspub.epa.gov/eiivii-o/tri.s_control.tri s—print7ti-is—id=27809CGNTRRT.E2S 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI
Page 7 of 9
COMPOUND
R18Chemi al ID:
2006
Pounds
4,59I13705
FARMS
ROAD{Other
BUNDLEA
Reuse or Recovery
NBNDYWINE
VA p3838 i
CHESTMERCURY
SAMPSON COUNTY LANDFILL
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2006
Pounds
Al
7434 ROSEBORO HWY
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
Other Landfills
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2006
Pounds
2.16
LANCASTER FARMS
BRIDGE ROAD
SUFFOLK, VA 23432
Other Reuse or Recovery
MER0B1
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2006
Pounds
2.42
FAY BLOCK
130 BUILDERS BLVD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
Other Reuse or Recovery
MERCURY
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
H
Pounds
2.43
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
Other Landfills
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2005
Pounds
3.19
FAY BLOCK
110E RAMSEY STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
Other Off-51te
Management
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC, SWIFT CREEK
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458)
2005
Pounds
3,68
FACILITY
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458)
2004
Pounds
8,8
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
FACILITY
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
MERCURY.
EE
4.1
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
Other Landfills
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2003
Pounds
1.57
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
Other Landfills
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2003
Pounds
3,34
TAYLORS OF FAYETTEVILLE
LINO CHICKP 8356
LINDEN, NC 2
Other Off -Site
Management
ME&CU
CQMPS?QNQS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2003
Pounds
3.34
PETERS POINT BUSINESS PARK
2782 BOYDTON PLANK RD
PETERSBURG, VA 23805
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
FAY BLOCK
COMPOUNDS
(TR] Chemical ID:
N458
2003
Pounds
9.57
1108 RAMSEY STREET
FAYETTEVILLE, INC 28302
Other Reuse or Recovery
MERCURY
C I Chemical ID:
(TRI Chec
4458)
2003
Pounds
.02
WASTE INDUSTRIES
7434 ROSEBORO HWY
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
Other Landfills
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical [D:
N458
2003
Pounds
7.75
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
FACILITY
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
BATTLEBORO,NC 27809
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2003
Pounds
05
HOUGH70N INDUSTRIAL PARK
2529 HOUGHTON AVE
SOUTH BOSTON, VA 24592
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458
2002
Pounds
90.73
TAIN INDUSTRIAL PARKCOMPOUNDS
FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
[R00:CKY MOUNT, INC 27802
Other Off -Site
Management
MERCURY
COMPOUNDS
(TRI Chemical ID:
N45$
2002
Pounds
2
SAMPSON COUNTY LANDFILL
7434 ROSEBORO HWY
ROSEBORO, NC 28382
Other Landfills
MERCURY -77IF-71
COMPOUNDS
FOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL PARK
Other Off -Site
http://iaspub.cpa.gov/cnviro/tris_control.tris,print?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI
Page 8 of 9
(TRI Chemical ID:
N458)
2001
Pounds
74
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
ROCKY MOUNT NC 27802
Management
REUSE TECHNOLOGY iNC. SWIFT CREEK
ZINC COMPOUNDS
2005
Pounds
147.4
FACILITY
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID:
N982}
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
BA7TLE80R0, NC 27809
ZINC COMPOUNDS
2005
Pounds
127,6
FAY BLOCK
1108 LOCK STREET
Other Off Site
Management
(TRI Chemical ID:
N982
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28302
ZINC COMPOUNDS
2005
Pounds
97,3
JBRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
Other Landfills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N982)
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
REUSE TECHNOLOGY INC. SWIFT CREEK
ZINC COMPOUNDS
2004
Pounds
163
FACILITY
Other Off -Site
(TRI Chemical ID.
N982}
101 FOUNTAIN PARK ROAD
Management
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
Z MP UND
2004
Pounds
350
BRUNSWICK WASTE MANAGEMENT
107 MALLARD CROSSING ROAD
Other Landfills
(TRI Chemical ID:
N982)
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA 23868
Summary of Waste Management Activites
Please note that chemical amounts shown here are not included in Total Aggregate Releases shown above.
Summary of Waste Management Activites excluding Dioxin and Dioxin -like Compounds
(Measured in Pounds)
Year
g�CXCllno
��
Re�]frllna
gy ReOn-Site
Enemy Recovery
Offgly_ ftte
Enerav Re�pYerV
T tmgpt
[
���tIDflflk
Total
Amount
2007
00
oil
0
735120.16I�J
�Off_Site
735120.18
2008
0
0
697297.54
0
697297.54
2009 Projected)
®r D� 01
0
712508.E
�0
712508.E
2010 Pro ected}
©0j ul
0
722109
0
722109
Summary of Waste Management Activites for Dioxin and Dioxin-Ilke Compounds
(Measured in Grams)
This facility did not report any waste management activates for Dioxin and Dioxin -like Compounds.
Chemicals Under Waste Management:
Please note that chemical amounts shown here are not included in the Total Aggregate Releases shown above. Transfers to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works are listed on a seperate table.
Chemical
Name
AND APTERnACID AHYDRO CH LRIIEROSOLS" 1[2007
DNLY1
��
Unit Of
Pounds
On-S!te
Recvclino
����L�
Off -Site
Rp�yclina
Rec11 Ecove�
-Off
RecEnover
On -Site
Trepted
459960
Trea ed
D
Total
Amount
459960
2008
Pounds
00L.01t--�
4328171
432817
2009
Projected)
Pounds
�I
41�
]
450000
�0
450000
2010
I(Projected)
pounds
�I
I��
451000
451000
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
2008
jPourds
0
0
0
0
54102
0
54102
2009
(Projected)
pounds
0
01
Oi
0
54500
�0
54500
2010
pounds
J(Projected)ll��ll
����
56000�
56000
LEAD COMPOUNDS
2007
Pounds
���^-^���
2894
®
2894
2008
Pounds
L�. VIL
-.�0
29950
2995
--J009
2Pro ected
Pounds
I Ol��`
l
3000
3000
2010
Proected
pounds
����
�01
310D
�
3100
http://iaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tris_control.tiis_print?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/2010

EPA I Envirofacts Warehouse I TRI Page 9 of 9
MERCURY COMPOUND5 112007
1pounds
1 01
01
0
01
9.161
0
9.18
2D08
2009
Projected
Pounds
�0
�0
�0
©
8.54
®
8.54
2010
Pro ected
Pounds
0
0
0
9
0
9
5 U LEU RI C. ACI D_(199_4_AN D
AE7ER "ACT122007
Pounds
0
0
0
0
214812
0
214812
ONLY1
2008
2009
Pro'ected
Pounds
pounds
�r--�®�
����
207375�0
205000
207375
205000
2010
Prv'ected)
pounds
����
212000
212000
Transfer of Chemlcals to Publicly Owned Treatment works (POTW):
This facility did not transfer any chemicals to a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW).
Non Production Releases:
This report shows the quantities of the chemicals released to the environment by reporting year as a result of remedial actions,
catastrophic events, or other one-time events not associated with production processes. Chemicals with zero release amounts are not
shown.
Chem 1 Nama R r In Y r
Unit Of M@?54+r Release Quantity
D NANLDl0X1N -LIKE COMEQUNDS112007 IlGrams
F .595
DIOXIN AND DIQXIN-LIKE QQMPO_l)NDS 2006
Grams .588
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
111ounds 4545
LEAD COMPOUNDS
jPounds 3428
MERCURY comPOUNDS 2007
Pounds 31.564
Addttlonal links for TRI:
This information resource is not maintained, managed, or owned by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Envirofacts Support
Team. Neither the EPA nor the Envirofacts Support Team is responsible for their content or site operation. The Envlrofacts Warehouse
provides this reference only as a convenience to our Internet users.
National Library of Medicine (NLM) C
http://iaspub.epa.gov/etiviro/tris_control.tris_print?tris_id=27809CGNTRRTE2S 4/23/2010

NCNHP Virtual Workroom
Page 1 of 1
Legend
Element Occurrences
J
(show after queried)
(✓ ,.' l EO Source Points
EO Source Lines
!ZI, 1�j EO Source Polygons
'1J submitted EOs
3, Sipnll'ir Naturai
' Heritage Areas
Managed Areas
r Roads
�I MuNclpalktles
r.,
'*? RNers and Lakes
!.._! Topo Images
i 112111 Aerial Images (2008)
C� Aerial Image., (1998)
[] Topo Boundaries
!! i........i County Boundaries
I� Redraw Map
NC Natural Heritage Program Virtual Workroom
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 mi
GIS Data Sources: NCNHP, CGIA, NCOOT, uSGS. NCNHP data updated on: 2030-Apr-23
Powered By: ■ WgkM r QM_5DiuUgm ■ MuseryeC r gyp r pestoresOL ■ P-g WIS
■ HQM4 ■ Help
Locator Map
-I-
Map Size:
600 x 450
Functions
G, Zoom In
('• 1 Zoom Out
+ Pan
Identify
Select
1,) Add EO
Coordinates
' Query Database
XClear Selection
Quick View
--Choose Region—
PCQhl4m-.S_Or RuC9t60�57
http;//nhpweb.enr.state.nc.us/nhis/partner/gmap75_main.phtmI?grp_eo_py=Y&grp—eosrc_... 4/23/2010

DIVISION OF WATER QUALM
Clieaistry I a►ara4arT Ilcporll p'+h* Q++Ph
SAIIfPiE TYPE
l.ab N.mber .
[?ate Receired
Tver Receiard
RIVER BAIW4:
jt' t
E j AMEMNT
QA
--wcM
,�,(
j/y EFFUUF 4T
ileused By
RFXORT TO
RAf-i { Regional OS1x
WE
I'trt2wi,f �Le.'/711JA.
CHAIN OF CUSM
I-aKF
EI DWLUEN8
Od6w
n J [[
L
❑ MAEROENCY
1
VISrr 1D
El LSTitARY
Data Rekaxd =
COLLECTOR(S) :
A.. f I1
hole Reported
&AT e C G[ fJoo3Sti.J
16doatedBODRaag-.
Slal:r8aedtl.e:
Srcd:
Ra"Akr: Q. 0 rLT__1_"` zz..P�'�
Cklawlaalyd:
Slatian WIAK fiso Cade
Pate l"f
I Pale Bad lamf
Tire Titnr End
Deptk - DR4, PB, DIEM
Valor Type _ A. H, L
Cmpsito-T, S, B
Sample T
0036P
0
s o
=� ��
BOD 310 mall.
COD IL* 340 _WI_
COD Lma 115 awL
Coldbrm- M1F Fcud 3) 616 /loom[
Colifetm' MF ToW 31504 1100"
Cdifom- rube Fecal 31615 /100m1
Caldmm Fecal 3tucp 31673 /I00nd
R4idur Total 500 met,
Voladc S05 _9L
Fund 510 tTWU
ResAw. Salpeaded 530 _W1,
Ynlnnk 515 mgJL
Feed 540 n{jL
pH e03 unds
Acidity to pH 4,5 436 1OpJ•l.
Aridity 10 pH L3 435 mlp'f.
Alialmuy to pH 8 3 415 MdL
Alkalinity to pH A 5 410 _9fL
7OC 690 myL
N'l
Tmbid" 76 U00ClifolmTaal
oTube Moral
cal ., 94o t1�L
II a EPA445.0 modified option U^
Cale.: T ue 90 C a
Cater -(pH) 83 PIT= tu,
Gina[- pH 7 6 82 e.u.
Cyanide 720 u1�L
Fhmn Ae 951 en8r1-
FumWelelgde 71890 mg/L
C e and Oi11556 mgfL
Hardness vow 9W
Sp,C Cond. 95 0um0✓ran
MBM 38260 ra}fL
Phenols 32730 ug/L
S0lfatr 945 owl-_
-QAkl&r 745 ME
BMM
Tearm & Ci pi. u87.
Hrsawlau Chtarllium uplL
8rarbonne !*L
vbeer>ar m,ldl-
em1 DiuoErad Solids mg/1-
141-0nN610
TM an N 62.5
Np2 phn NO3 as N 630 myJL
P. Toeal an P $65 mg/I-
PO4 as P 70507 F*q-
P. Disiolttd as P 666 mg/4
iC-Pnt:�uur UVIL
Cd- Cad ­as m 1077 u�L
Cr4lramiam.Tala11034 u8J1,
Cu- Capper 1047
WMackel t067 u®1
Pb- Lased I M u8lF_
Z» znw 1092 ag1L
V-Vag& m usaL
AS- Silver 1077 uWL
AI-Allmsinum 1105 aSfL
Be- Beryllium 1012 at/I.
Ca- Crleium 916
Co- Cob1i1 1037 u&FL
Fe-1ma 1045 WA
Mo-Mlolybdemmni aWL
1-Anita n ua/L
Sn-Tm
-Tball um rprL
TwT.xam, uwL
[HkF631 dart,
run Li -Lithium 1132
uf/L
Me. M ngrasum 427
emdl..
MrrM>ugst w i 055
ug[L
Na• Sodium 929
t*L
AnamwTota11002
va
Se. Selrnmm 1147
uWL
Hg Maculy 719w
%,L
B-Ballum
dwl,
ides
Q kilo
Orppe fimgp, Pes<"m
Acid Habeidee
Br.dNenntr+llAeid £tlratlable Organics
TPH Diced Ramge
PwBmble Ot# mf (VOA bottle req'd)
TPHrBTFJI CIa1r111M Rang
P6yt0pl.M.
Teinpciaure om arrinl (�C'}

Reported by
------ cNwpttt2(aburarory Sample ID- A&44308
Checked by
UB flnof)trrLdRcpm Supervisor
Reviewed by
Sample Matrix_ WASTEWATER Lrnergency YewNo COG Ye!vMo
Date
S # Analyto Name PQL Result QuIlfirer Un[ti CAS ✓M Ana" Name PQL Result QualOw UnRs
Sample temperature at receipt by 1.9 C
,

deported by
Checked by
Reviewed by
` _4&VTNt4� Ld5orcf6ry
IVLT _B-dyimfRq-,i
Sample 10: AB41508
Supervisor
Date
Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER
Emergency Yes/No
COG YeaMo
AS # Analyte Name
I M Result
Qualifier
Units GAS 9 Analyte Name PQL Result Quaker Units
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12 12
165
m91L
Chloride
1 1
9.6 J8
mgrL
Flootide
1 0.4
0.4 U,J8
m9/L
Ion Chromatography
1
TITLE_
-QIL
Sulfate
1 2
54 J8
mg1L

Reported by
Checked by
Reviewed by
,F.;�7VM9Q_Gaborarory Sample ID. A134"!
VOT avafylital F[rpmt Supervisor
Sample Matrix. WASTEWATER Emergency YestNo COC Yes/No
Date
AS Analyte Name
PQL Result
Qualifier
Units CAS A Anatyts Name PQL Resuff Qualifier Units
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02 0.02
0.06
XVL as I
Total Kjeldahl N as N in tiquid
0.2 0.2
OA7
ig& as I
NO2+11O3 as N In liquid
0.02 0.02
0.05
ig1L as I
Phosphorus_t W as P in liquid
0.02 0.02
O-W
WL as
~Iw I

Reported by
Checked by
Revkv.ed by
Sample Matrix:
WASTEWATER
Emergency Yes1No
'PVR�La6oratwy Sample ID- AB44500
:kE? �7nufyruul*Pirr SuPennsor
Date
CDC Yea1No
I-fiS 0
Ana" 4Mame
PqL Result
Quallfrer
Unit
CAS N Analyte Name POL Result Qualifier Units
7440-22-4
E9:WPMS
5.0
5
5. U '""
ug/L
, .(7'a,j 1 �• & ,PLA414. - • 00 1 t� )
7429430-5
Al by ICP
So
50
5
ugA-
`!SP-3/1
7440-38-2
As by ICPMS
20
2
0.1.7.0
u9&
3
7429-WS
a by ICP
5o
50
65
ug/L �-- -
L
yyWOA'1k O-
7440-38-3
Ba by ICP
10
10
21
Uw1_
1
7440-41-7
Be by ICP
5.0
5
a 4r 5,0 U
ug/L
r 1
1440-70-2
Ca by ICP
0.10
D-1
38
nxyL
T
7444-43.9
C ICPMS
1.0
1
u9&
- pot �4''
7440-48�1
IGP
by IC S
So
10
So
10
VIS
u$tL037440-47-3
ug/L
_ t7 I
7440-50-8
ICPMS
2.0
2
ug/L
743s- "
Fe by ICP
50
50
420
ug1L
7439-97-6
g 2 .1
0.2
0.2
0.20
U91L . +
r O t 2
7440 09-7
y ICP
0.10
0,1
�2.8
m9/L
7439-93-2
Li ICP
25
25
25 U
ug/L
7439-95-4
Mg by ICP
0.10
0-1
1.7
mWL
7439-9&5
Mn by ICP
10
10
34
U91L
743MB-7
MO by ICPMS
10
10
10 U
ugA-
7440-23-5
Na by ICP
0.10
0.1
7.2 -
mglL
7440-02-0
Nf by ICPMS
10
10
10 U
ug&
7439-92-1
Pb by ICPMS
10
10
10 U
ug1L
7440-3"
Sb by ICPMS
10
10
10 U
ug1L
7782-49-2
Se by 4CPMS
5.0
5
5.0 U
ug/L
7440-31-5
Sn by ICPMS
10
10
10 U
ug/L
7440-28-0
Thallium (TI) ICPMS
10
10
10 U
U91L
7440-32-6
Ti (Titanium) by ICP
10
10
10 U
ugA.
744"2-2
V by ICP
25
25
25 U
uglL
7440-6"
Zn by ICPMS
10
10
10• z1
ug/L
11

Reported by
A At,Qi Cabnrdg,r Sample ID: A641`,d8
Cherked by
;1tE �7nafy[:<a(�[poti Supervisor
Reviewed by
Cate
Sample Mabuc: WASTEWATER Emetgencj YewWo COC YeSlNo
S k Ana" Name PQL Result Qualifier Units CAS Y Ana" Nams PQL Result Qualifier llnfta

United States Environmental Protectlon agency
Form Approved,
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 U N 2 I SI 31 NCS000350 111 12j 07/03/08 117 181 nl 191 .ct 201 I
LJ �J I LJ LJ iJ
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA --------------------------- Reserved ----------------------
67I 169 70I u I 71 I tyk 72 73 LL 74 751 11` I I I 180
t�
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also Include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10;00 AM 07/03/08
02;05/01
Edgecortcbe Genco, LLC-Battleboro
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
6358 Old Battleboro Rd
aattleboro NC 27809
12;00 PM 07/03/06
07,104/30
Name($) of Onsite Representative(s)fritles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Tibe/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Seth Carter,PO Box 370 Battleboro NC 27809//252-442-0805/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection Check only those areas evaluated
Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Findin /Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessa
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ran Boone RRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560.3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPOES yrlmo/day Inspection Type
3I NCS000350 I11 121 07/03/08 +17 18fC
(cont. )
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
SP3 has been developed and implemented.
Qualitative monitoring being done more often than required. However, permittee must ensure that even
though its being done more often than needed, it still must be done at least twice per during the timeframes
specified in the permit, i.e. spring - Apr through ,tune and fall - Sep through Nov.
Also, permittee is not conducting analytical monitoring because they have a SW detention pond that they
assert meets the criteria of footnote #2 of table #1, Analytical Monitoring Requirements, in Part II, Section B
of the permit, i.e. the stormwater "...detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding
a ten yar design storm...". However, the pond was discharging at the time of the inspection through an
orifice in the side of the overflow pipe that was placed approximately 12" to 24" below the overflow level of
the overflow pipe. According to Cogentrix personnel and their engineer, the orifice is the mechanism by
which the level of the pond is kept at the level required for the pond to contain the 10-year design storm
without overflowing at the overflow pipe. This is still considered a discharge that must be monitored in
accordance with table #1.
Finally, the above mentioned pond was discharging during the inspection despite that fact that it was not
raining and hadn't rained for quite some time prior to the inspection. This strongly indicates one or more
unidentified, unauthorized, illicit wastewater discharges through the SW detention pond. The permittee must
immediately undertake to identify all discharges into the pond and stop them and/or have them appropriately
permitted.
05/07/2007, RCB, Reviewed NOV at permittee's request. NOV rescinded because it was initially issued for
failure to perform analytical monitoring as required. However, this inspection was conducted in year five of
the permit, which requires no analyticals. Once I saw the discharge from the orifice in the standpipe, I
assumed the orifice had been there all along (i.e. in previous years) and that they were discharging the
whole time. But the permittee stated that they had not been discharging prior to 10/06 and that the orifice
was not placed in the standpipe until 10/06 and that's why they had never done any analyticals until now.
So, at Chuck Wakild agreement, the NOV was rescinded and will be deleted.
Page # 2

Permit: NCS000350
SOC:
County: Edgecombe
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/01/02 Expiration: 04/30/07 Owner: Edgecombe Genco LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Edgecombe Genco, LLC-Battleboro
6358 Old Battleboro Rd
Contact Person: Seth Carter Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Re presentative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/20/2009 Entry Time: 09:30 AM
Primary Inspector: David R Parnell
Secondary Inspector(s):
Autumn Hoban
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm water
(See attachment summary)
Battleboro NC 27809
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 03:00 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000350 Owner - Facility: Edgecombe Genco LLC
Inspection Late: 05/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
Cl
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
i
■
❑
Cl
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Secondary containment adequate.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Adequate qualitative monitoring
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Continuous discharging stormwater pond requires sampling. No analytical
monitoring data available. Recommend measuring sediment in stormwater pond.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Plant refers to SDO 001, DWQ refers to it as 005
Page; 3

.ir re
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 6-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (Le., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES �-, Jyr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 1 51 31 NCO077437 111 121l 09/05/20 117 is Cl 191 cl 20I '
IJ LJ LJ L l U
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaivation Rating 131 QA --------------------------- Reserved ---------•------------
671 169 70 LI 71 LI 721 1 73 W 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 Li 80
�J LJ
Section i FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industriai Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:30 AM 09/05/20
05/07/01
Batt_eboro oiant
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
6358 Oid Battieboro Rd
Battleboro NC 27609
04:00 PM 09/05/20
09/_0/31
Names) of Onsite Representative(s)Mtles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
David Lee Herring/ORC/252-442-0805/
Name, Address of Responsible Ofcialrfitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Sid rynyer,PO Box 370 Battieboro NC 27809//252-442-0805/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules
Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone anC,
Autumn Hoban RRO WQ/// �t�' � } y� 6.
Y r
David R ?arncll RRO ttiQ//919-791-4.. ��'^n�t �,� NM(/y�' +✓(�.
•,
I'
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/OfficelPhone and
l jr
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

NPOES yrlmo/day Inspection Type
3I NC0077437 I11 121
09/03/20 E 17 18Li
Section D: Summary of FindinglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
This facility has FGD wastewater that is evaporated in a open cement pit close to the main building with
solids being removed as needed and handled by Full Circle Solutions.
DMR review shows issues with Toxcity- High Zn at outfall 003.
Issues with flow- recycle CT water for use at the scrubbers, so all wastewater now discharges out outfall
003. This likely concentrates pollutants and has made it more difficult to meet limits with regards to Zn.
A Reverse Osmosis unit discharges reject water to the cooling tower basin. So same comment as above,
when can no longer recycle they are still permitted to discharge cooling water that has been recycled and
concentrated through re -use practices to their wastewater basins,
RRO conducted sampling to review outfall 003 discharge in light of these operational changes to provide
more information to the Permitting Unit for the Permit renewal coming up.
The sample results showed the following concerns:
Wastewater Discharge Outfall 003: Sulfate = 270 mg/L, Boron = 85 ug/L, Cu = 18 ug/L, Mo = 45 ug/L, Zn =
53 ug/L
The sampling also revealed some concerns with the stormwater:
NCS000350 Stormwater Discharge Outfall: Aluminum = 510 ug/L, Arsenic = 7 ug/L, Boron = 65 ug/L, Zinc =
21 ug/L
Page # 2

.�1
Permit: NCO077437 Owner -Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Date: 05/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The permit application was received April 3, 2009.
The facility has a Reverse Osmosis Unit that discharges reject water to the cooling
tower. Water used in cooling as well as reject water from the RO unit (can be
discharged) when needed through the permitted wastewater outfall. No information
regarding the RO unit reject water was provided in the application.
Also some condensate comes back from Hospira (next door) that can be re -used or
re-routed to the cooling tower, again until the cooling tower is purged, and then at that
point, discharges to the permitted wastewater outfall.
Compliance Schedules Yes No NA NE
Is there a compliance schedule for this facility? Cl ❑ ■ ❑
Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids,
pH, DO, Sludge ■
❑
❑
❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 3

r ,
Permit: NCO077437 Owner - Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Date: 0512012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Flow measurement consists of a 9' parshall flume and ISCO flowmeter that
was last calibrated December 29, 2008.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
❑
is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: DMR's for 2007 and 2008 showed elevated levels of zinc at outfall 003.
Samples were not taken in 2007 and 2008 at outfall 002, the facility reported no flow at
002 during that time period.
Results of outfall 003 sampling event during the inspection are on the summary page of
this inspection report.
Solids Handling Equipment
Yes
No
NA
N
Is the equipment operational?
n
n
■
n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is storage adequate?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
❑
❑
■
❑
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
❑
❑
■
❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0077437
Inspection Date: 05/20/2009
Owner -Facility. Battlebora plant
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Solids Handling Equipmenk Yea No NA n
Comment: A copy of the Sludge management plan was collected for the file.
The facility has a pugmill and silo for dry fly ash handling.
Full Circle Soln's land applies fly ash solid waste.
****FGD system -Evaporates wet FGD wastewater- this water is sometimes exposed to
the driveway( torm rains) where it is located (depending on evaporation
rates/water leve s and the solids are removed and land applied by Full Circle solns as
stated above.
The facility removes solids from the Wastewater basins and the solids are hauled off to
the Sampson Co Landfill twice per year.
Equalization Basins
Yes
NO
NA
Nt
Is the basin aerated?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
# is basin sizelvolume adequate?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Facility has duel Cement Wastewater Settling Basins.Ph adjust effluent as
needed with sodium hydroxide or sulfuric acid.
Chemical Feed
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is containment adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is storage adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are backup pumps available?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide fed to effluent as needed.
Nutrient Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
❑
❑
■
❑
Type
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page # 5

permit: N00077437
Inspection Date: 05120/2009
Owner - Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Nutrient Removal Yes No NA NE
Is nutrient removal process operating properly? ❑ Cl ■ ❑
Comment: Only Total Phosphorus is in the permit. I did not see ferric on -site for
removal of Phosphorus, but did run nutrients and the results are in the summary of the
inspection. This facility does discharge to NSW- Tar River.
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
. r I
Comment: The effluent pipe is an 8 inch forcemain to the Tar River approx. 5 miles
from the site. Effluent samples were taken in the wet well prior to leaving the plant site.
The final outfall of the effluent pipe was not viewed the day of the inspection.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: No upstream downstream sampling required by the permit.
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
❑
❑
■
❑
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the level of chlorine residua! acceptable?
❑
n
■
n
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is there chiorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Comment: City water is used for makeup water in the plant. The city water contains
Chloramines. The facility does not add additional chlorine.
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Cl
❑
❑
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Maybe overfeeding dechlor-based on chemical readings of the effluent the
day of the inspection,
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Page # 6

Permit: N00077437 Owner -Facility: Sattleboro plant
Inspection Date: 05120I2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
ran-d-hinrinn+inn Yes No NA NE
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44,5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (800) set to 20,0 degrees Celsius +1- 1,0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Lab -James R Reed and Associates Lab certified in NC and VA
Facility holds field parameter certification #5287.
ORC- Sandy Bunn PC-1
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, compiete and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab, reg, required 5 years)?
IN
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of individual performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
❑
Name of person performing analyses
❑
Transported CM
❑
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 7

Permit: NC0077437 Owner • Facility: Battleboro plant
Inspection Date: 05/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ■ O ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
■000
Page # 8 1

r•�
D"ION OF WATER QUALITY
CFeesiatt7 Laboratory RgmA J Water Quality
SAMPI Lnn
SJOiFN7Y � }:l r/ PIU�
RIVER DASIL4: AIHBMNT QA MKF-.M I]CI PYFLUFW
REPORT TO 0 S Reponal ORioe ,JSJ COMPL IAM-F ❑ OWN OF CUSTODY LU:£ ❑ INF3_UENT
f,e r;4o„ f fzr.aFwrZ
OKer EMERGENCY WSW ID h.'SfLIARY
COLLECTOR(S) :�14 _ 12, `��'YL�J}t? l
E.ab N..ber
Ebte Rccetx:d
Time Raii.ed
Rzcc,led By
Dda Relea
Dw. Rcponcd
T (Y FN N n
Esfma" ROD R.0c.: Slation Lxatian: p 43,'w
Seed: �� Cklarinued: Rem.ha: _-J.g—'S �PC� dh+ Saban fl!Lacafi oo Code Dale (yyfo dd) Date kad (yytr- Tlee Relax iLme Fvd DepeY - D.'1t, D$, UR►! Vahe Typr -.4, H, L Cowpwk -T, S, B c.Mpk Type
r p < o S ;3�
HOD 3 t0 mp/L
t sD nO 340 MWL.
COD low 33 5 fl*L
Cdifo MF Fecal 31616 llfgml
Conform: MF TOW 31504 - 1100nd
CGhlieln- tube Fed 3 16 t 5 /100e,1
Colifwm Fecal Strep 31673 iloDrd
R4 dac Tu1.1 500 MeL
Yutatdc S05 mg'L
Hoed 510 -wL-
Resduc Su Spcnded 510 -Og L
Yolalde 515 mg•L
Fued 540 -W'L
pF1403 um"
Acidity 10 pH 5 436 mw3.
Acidity to pH It 3 435 -JVL
Atkahn.q to pH R,3 415 t:*(L
AlWieny 1. pH 4 5 410 tr4s1L
TOC 680 -.WL
Twbidn 76 MU
Culifinm Taal Tube 1100 ml
Cbla.tde 940 maJL
Chlamph70 a EPA 445 0 ntodlftcd option ugyL
Calm: Tree 90 an.
Calor:(PH) X3 PW c.u,
CaiorpH7.6 82 C.
Cymidc 720 mg/L
Fleonde 951 nlgji.
Fatanldchyde7113O mF/L
C c and Oils 5%
Herda Twirl 900 -9(L
Spo ific Cond_ 95 umhoskm
MDAS 38260 MIL
Phenols 32730 -
Salfate 945 a�7.
Sulfide 745 me'L
Domn
1'amm St Limn nS(L
1}.rdrnt Chroeuten ug7_
Aitzbmale wkwL
CwtcA le trwL
TO1a1 Dcudwd SOw, .81L

Reported by
Checked by
Reviewed by
'F91'7 D%iW Lalxnatory Semple ID: AB44507
�:38 �nafytiral7(eFrort Supervisor
Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER Emergerscy YeslNo COC YeslNo
Date
AS 0 Analyte Name PQL Result QuatlBer tJnits CAS R Analyto Name PQL Result Qualifier Units
Sample lemperature at receipt by 1.9 'C

Reported by Sample ID,
'EA%�,La6oraimy
Checked by
Sl]PeNI40i
Reviewed by
Date
ASM1507
Sample Matnx- WASTEWATER Emergency Yes1N0 CDC Yes1No
q Analyte Name PQL Resuft Qualifier Unft CAS # Analyte Name PQL Rssldt Qualifier Un is
Cherrdcal Oxygen Demand in liqui 20 2D 35 mg1L
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid 12 12 684 mgfL
Chloride 1 1 - 58 J8 ngtL
Fluoride 1 0,4 4.0 if P J8 mWL
Ion Chromatography 1 TITLE_ mgfL
Sulfate 1 2 270 J8 mg1L

Reported bv
Sample ID: AB41507
'E"�'�Dtt'r2 LaSora tory
Checked b]t
Y17 Tnafytica(4�!pcf Supervisor —
Reviewed by
Gate
Sample Mlatax: WASTEWATER Emergency YeVNo CDC Yes/No
S i Analybe Name
POL Result
QU3M@F
Units CAS q Analyte Name PQL Result QUdlfie► Units
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02
0.02 U
)glL as I
Total Kfeklahl N as N in liquid
0.2
0.2
0.75
7Q& as l
NO2+NO3 as N in &quid
0.02
0.02
2.0
IA as 1
Phosphorus —total as P in liquid
0.02
0.02
2.2
V/L as

Reported by
Cha*ed by
Rer—v
, '71-qVDft4ZC4Sanlfo y
!OFT 7MdytrcAf xirt
Sample ID:
Supennsor
A844607
bf' Date
Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER Emergency Yes/No CQC YcVNo
FAS
It Analyte Name PQL Result Qualifier Units CAS # Ana" Marra PQL ResuR Qualifier Unit
7440-22-4 Ag by ICPMS 5.0 5 5.0 U ugtt
7429-90-5 Al by ICP 50 SO 54 ug1L
7440 3&2 As by furnace 20 2 2.0 U ug/L
7429-90-5 B by ICP 50 50 85 ugA
7440-38-3 Ba by ICP 10 10 66 ug/L
7440-0I-7 Be by ICP 5.0 5 5.0 U U91L
7440-7Q2 Ca by ICP 0.10 0,1 46 mplL
7440-43-9 Cd by ICPMS 1.0 1 1.0 U U91L
744D48.4 Cobalt by lCP 50 50 50 U uglL
744047-3 Cr by ICPMS 10 10 1 D U uglL
7440-50.8 Cu by ICPM5 20 2 16 ug/L
7439-SM Fe by ICP 50 50 230 vglL
7439-97-8 Hg 245.1 0.2 0.2 0.20 U uglL
7440-09-7 K by ICP 0.10 0.1 9.3 mg1L
7439-93-2 Li ICP 25 25 25 U ug/L
7439-95-4 Mg by ICP 0.10 0.1 8.2 mg1L
7439.9&5 Mn by ICP 10 10 19 ugA-
7439.9&7 MobylCPMS 1D 10 45 ug&
7440.23.5 Na by ICP 0.10 0.1 160 "KA
7440-02-0 M by ICPMS 1D 10 10 U ugfL
7439-92-1 Pb by ICPM5 ID 10 10 U ug1L
744048-0 5b by ICPMS 10 10 10 U ug/L
778249.2 Se by furnace 5.0 5 5.0 u ug/L
7440-31-5 So by ICPMS ID 10 10 U u911-
7440-28-0 Thalbum (fl) ICPMS 10 10 10 U uglL
7440-32-6 Ti (Titanium) by ICP 10 10 10 U u91L
7440-62-2 V by ICP 25 25 25 U uglL
7440-66-6 Zn by tCPMS 10 10 53 U91L

Jones, .!ennifer
From: Parnell, David
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Corporon, Joe; Jones, Jennifer; Romanski, Autumn
Subject: RE: Cogentrix (Edgecombe Genco LLC) NC0077437
Joe and ten,
Autumn and I can work on a staff report for you and schedule a visit to the facility (would have to be after March I — and schedule is tight even then). We could
probably schedule a visit in a half day time frame. What is your timeline for issuance of the permits?
The Stormwater Permit number is NCS000350, you can locate the Stormwater inspection report in BIMS from May 20, 2009.
Keep me informed as to what you are needing from RRO.
Thanks,
Dave Parnell
791,4260
From: Corporon, Joe
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:04 AM
To: ]ones, Jennifer; Romanski, Autumn
Cc: Parnell, David; Herzberg, Barry
Subject: RE: Cogentrix (Edgecombe Genco LLC) NC0077437
Confirmed - I am the assigned Permit Writer. Sorry for the slow response, ya'll (burried under some problem renewals), Edgcombe has yet to surface from my pile
of folders.
• Have not yet located the Stormwater inspection report.
• A Staff Report might be prident - help me clarify their current conditions and proposed system changes.
• Sounds like I should join a site visit for this one - let's discuss.
Out of the office today (but monitoring email) - back in Thur and Fri.
From: ]ones, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 3:20 PM

To: Romanski, Autumn; Corporon, Joe
Cc: Parnell, David; Herzberg, Barry; Jones, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Cogentrix (Edgecombe Genco LLC) NCO077437
Hi Autumn,
Thanks for the data. I do have the stormwater permit renewal in my office. Just have not had a chance to get to it... rrrr.... I'm really sorry = there is just so much
to do! Arg.
Joe I would like to work with you — we should get together on discussing outfalls and on writing both permits — looks like there are some concerns here and also
that they are having some "continuous discharge" from their SW outfalls?
Dave — I'm in the office right now. Give me another call or let me know by email info you have for me -- email might be better because I can keep on file then-
--
I am assuming you want to talk about this?
"The sampling also revealed some concerns with the stormwater: NCS000350 Stormwater Discharge Outfall: Aluminum = 510 ug/L, Arsenic = 7
ug/L, Boron = 65 ug/L, Zinc = 21 ug/L"
Yikes.
Thanks for cc'ing me Autumn and giving me a call Dave.
Jen
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: jennifer.iones(a)ncdenr.eov
Website: http://Portal.ncdenr.orp,/web[wq/ws/su
**E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third
.►J

parties.**
From: Romanski, Autumn
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 2:41 PM
To: Corporon, Joe
Cc: Parnell, David; Jones, Jennifer; Herzberg, Barry
Subject: FW: Cogentrix (Edgecombe Genco LLC) NCO077437
Joe,
Can you let Dave Parnell and myself know who is working on the Genco Co Gen power plant renewal? NCO077437
Attached please find a copy of the fast inspection done in May 2009. Sampling was conducted and findings of concern were listed with the result in the summary
section of the inspection.
We would like the permit writer to review prior to renewing the permit. If you need a complete staff report on this one, please let me know.
Preliminary Sample results are also attached and final QA/QC copies are available from the lab. No changes were made to the findings after the preliminary
results were posted on lab works.
Jennifer Jones may also be interested in the stormwater sampling results in relation to the permittee's NCS000350 stormwater permit, so I have copied her as
well.
Sincerely,
Autumn
From: Herzberg, Barry
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:26 AM
To: Corporon, Joe
Cc: Romanski, Autumn; Smith, Danny
Subject: Cogentrix (Edgecombe Genco LLC) NCO077437
Joe,
I got a call from these folks this morning. They wanted status of their permit renewal. Maybe you could call Cheryl Sawyer at 757-238-9571 with an update.
3

Also, as an FYI, they'll be looking for advice as to possible changes in the permit due to a change in their ash handling. I told them they'd need an ATC as it
sounds to me like a process change (going from dry ash to wet ash). I also gave them Autumn's name as our resident coal fired power plant expert.
Barry
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may
be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.
Barry Herzberg
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - DWQ
Raleigh Regional Office
Voice 919-791-4249
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

NC®EN�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
10.2.09
Mr. David Herring, Environmental Manager
Cogentrix
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
P. O. Box 370
6358 Old Battleboro Road
Battleboro, NC 27809
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPOES Individual. Stormwater Permit%NCS000350
Cogentrix
Edgecombe County.
Dear Mr. Herring:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On May 20, 2009, Autumn Hoban and Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality, performed a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) for the
NPDES Individual Stormwater Permit at the subject site. Your assistance.was helpful. and
appreciated. The following observations were noted during the Division of Water Quality
inspection: .
SITE DESCRIPTION
This is a coal-fired power generation facility. All site stormwater flows into. a detention
pond and is then discharged via one, stormwater discharge outall (SDO) located on the
southern end of the site. The stormwater is discharged to receiving waters known as an
unnamed tributary to Beech Branch, a Class C, nutrient sensitive water (NSW) in the Tar -
Pamlico river basin. When corresponding with the Stormwater Permitting Unit, please .
correct the stream name currently listed as Beech Creek to Beech' Branch.
INSPECTION SUMMARY
1. The Individual Stormwater Permit expired on April 30, 2007 and the Stormwater Permitting
Unit has not received an application for renewal. Please note that an application for renewal
On
e
NhCarolina
Avura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center. Raleigh; NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled710% Post Consumer Paper

Cogentrix Energy, Inc.
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
is required 6 months prior to the expiration of.the permit. Neglecting to apply for the
renewal of the permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. Please
contact Jen Jones of the Stormwater Permitting Unit immediately at 919 807.6379,
concerning the permit renewal process.
2. The Best Management Practices (BMP) plan was available during the CEI. The
documented records of BMP inspections were reviewed and they were found to be in'order.
3. SDO 001 was visited during the inspection. As noted above, SDO 001 has continuous flow,
and therefore, both qualitative and analytical monitoring is required. A documented record
of the monitoring is required. If the flow is absent, the comment "no flow" should be
entered on the monitoring report. Qualitative monitoring is currently being conducted at
SDO 001, but analytical monitoring results were not produced. Please begin sampling the
discharge from the stormwater pond immediately as required by your permit. There
was some discrepancy in the SDO numbering shown on the SPPP plan (SDO 001) and
DWQ records (SDO 005) which creates confusion. Please notify this office'of the correct
SDO number.
4. SDO 001 was.sampled during the CEI. The following parameters were reported by the
DWQ Chemistry Lab. Sample result for total recoverable Aluminum (Al) was 510 ug/L.
The Iron (Fe) results were 420 ug/L.
Please address and respond in writing to the above item; shown in bold, to this office, by September
15, 2009. If you have any questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings, please
contact me at: [phone] or email: david.i)[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Dave Parnell
Environmental Specialist
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure: May 20, 2009, Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cc RRO/SWP files
DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit

. OCT 1 6 2009
EtlR Rr;LEA 2' .:,.,
VAgecombe«f .erten, l_l.C. _ — October 14, 2009 RO. N"-V 3ifj
Ark L.ner % Nc; 6353 Old Niticl :wo Hamil
garlcburiY,'NC 17909
Mr. Dave Parnell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1 628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Response to Compliance Evaluation Inspection {CEI} dated 10.2.09
For Edgecombe Genco LLC, Storrs Water Permit NC5000350
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Parnell:
In regards to the CEI conducted by yourself and Autumn Hoban of the Raleigh
Regional Office on May 20, 2009 for NPDES permit compliance, Edgecombe wishes to
respond to three listed action items from the inspection Summary:
The Individual Stormwater Permit expired on April 30, 2007 and the Stormwater
Permilling Unit has not received an application for renewal. Please note that an
application for renewal is required 6 months prior to the expiration of the permit.
Neglecting to apply for the renewal of the permit is a violation of North Carolina
General Statue 143-215-1....
Edgecombe Genco response:
Edgecombe has on file (EHS 1.8.2) a copy of the permit renewal application submitted to
NCDENR-DWQ on October 25, 2006. The permit application was submitted via certified
mail. Attached to this letter are copies of the original submittal and of the certified mail
receipt. '
2. SDO 001 was visited during the inspection. As noted above,- SDO 001 has
continuous flow, and therefore, both qualitative and analytical monitoring is
required.... Qualitative monitoring is currently being conducted at SDO 001, but
analytical monitoring results were not produced. Please begin sampling the
discharge from the storm water pond Immediately as required by your permit.
There was some discrepancy in the SDO numbering shown on the SPP plan (SDO
001) and DWQ mcords (SDO 005) which creates confusion. Please notify this office
of the correct SDO number.
Edgecombe Genco response:
In regards to analytical testing of the Storm Water Outfall, our decision not to conduct the
analytical portion was based on Section B; Analytical Monitoring Requirements Footnote 2
to Table I which says:

• Page 2
October 15, 2009
Iif the storm water runoff is controlled by a stoma water detention pond, a grab sample
of the discharge from the pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of
discharge. if the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event
exceeding a ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only
qualitative monitoring shall be performed.
A letter was submitted to Mr. Chuck Wakild of NCDENR-DW4 on March 16, 2007 detailing
the specifics for our: determination that this pond was a storm water detention pond, and,
therefore, exempt from the analytical monitoring required: by the permit. In Mr. Wakild's
response dated April 30, 2007, while accepting,that the pond's status changed from a storm
water detention pond to a wet detention pond with the addition of an orifice to release
ground water collected by the pond, he stated the pond was NOT a storm water detention
pond but a wet detention pond and analytical monitoring was required. However, at that
point in time the.time period encompassed by the storm water permit had expired (April 30,
2006 was the latest time period covered for analytical monitoring).
Based on Mr. Wakild's response, Edgecombe did pull. analytical samples from the storm
water detention- pond discharge. These samples were analyzed for Total Suspended Solids
and Chemical Oxygen Demand along with the specific rainfall event data. Edgecombe
submitted these resufts to Central Files on three occasions dated: 04/16/07, 10/25/07, and
03/05/08. If those results cannot be found, we will resubmit them.
Since seven sampling, events were required by the rives -expired 'permit, Edgecombe Genco
will conduct four Trion- querterty sampling events to complete . -the. requirement, for SDO 5
(Stormwater Outfall 5) flow and rainfall permitting. The results of the analysis will be
submitted to NCDENR-DWO once received. As indicated, we will designate this outfall as
SDO 5. Once the new Stormwater Permit is issued, we will conduct all of the required
monitoring per the hermit requirements.
3. Lastly, the now -expired permit listed the discharge location as Beech Creek and that
is the terminology used in the narrative of our SPPP plan. However, based on your
letter, we will change the description to Beech Branch.
While your letter stated that we should respond by September 15, 2009, it seemed apparent
that October 15, 2009 was the intended. response date since ,your letter was dated 10.2.09.
Should you require any more information, please do not hesitate to contact me at: (252)
442-0708 oryla email ([e-mail]).
Regards,
Bill Maiden
General Manager, Edgecombe Geneo, LLC

' UWQ Laboratoly Section &sults
County:
F-DOECOMPE
Sample ID.
A944608
River Bases
TA
NA 7'F
sf ti ro
PO Number fe
9W4318
Report To
RROSP
r} f rR
Date Received:
OwS1r2t309
Collector:
AA HpBAN
I -.
n� w,.�t•-' -.r��' .-4
Time Received:
06.15
Region
RRO
=i�i '
Labwortrs LoginlD
SMATHIS
Dave Reported`
7rti09
Sample Matrix;
WASTEWATEf;
Luc. Type:
EFFt VENT
Report Generated:
M2912098
Ernergency YealNo
� COO YeatNo
1las;lD
cr
1,1101
Loc. Descr.: BAT C2,EN 003 SVJ
/
Location ID:
BATCOGENO03SV1
Coifect'Dwe; OS120r2o09
Collect Time: 12:15
Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes rater to 1rnrrw.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more detarmin2jons N3-Estimates concentration is < POL and >MDL
81-CovnYsWe membranes vrM <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established a{}t,
132- Counts from 0 f'3tr t7 were Iero.
83-Countable membranes with more than 60 or 50 ooloniez; Estimated o-Etevated Pt7L due to matrix interference andto. sample diulion
04-Filters have Counts of trots; >60 or 80 and < 20: Estimated O t-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at tab.
85-Too Many colonies were present too numerous to memt (iNTC) 02• Hafdlrg time exceeded lallaw ng receipt b7 tab
32- Reported value fa$ed to meet QC triteria for either precision or accuracy-.EstimatedPOL- Practical Qoan+.itatian Limit -subject to Chang a due to Instrument sensitivity
ti- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J3-Ttre sample matrat interfered with the abillity to make arty accurate determination; Estimated
.jti-The 1eb analyas was ham an unpreserved or improperly chemically prose vied sample: Estimated X7- Sample not ansiyzed far this campoiutd
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based an mass spectraf liorary search and has an catenated value
LAB
Laboratory Section>> 1621 Mali Service CenW, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 (919) 733,3908 Page 1 of 4

XC DWQ La6oratory Section Xesu(ts Sample ID AB44509
Locution 10: SATCOGEN003SW Collect Data: 05+20r2m
Loc. Descr.' SAT COGEN O03 SW "ect Time;: 12i1S
Vials 10
CAS 4 Analyse Name PQL Resutt Qualifier Units Ana'.ysVDote Approved By /Date
Sampie tenVeneWre e% reoetpt by lab 1.9 'C HPARVZR SMATHIS
w4MW Ratwence SC199 W!M9
WET
ton ChromaWgraphy
_TITLE_
-GA-
AVVILLUWS
CGREEN
MtthcdRtferem EPA300.0
613m9
&12109
Total DISMOM3d Sdh:b In Ilquid
12
165
RKOL
AQEXTER
CGREEN
►legtod Re'arerxe Act-iA�:�•18;!-
�:6G9
SR&'39
Ct1tt)ride
1
9.6 is
MCA
AWLLWAS
CGREEN
m4rbed Re`ertrxe EPA 3M.0
r5sw
601209
Fhxxi"
0.4
0.4 U-18
mglL
AVALLLkM5
CGREEN
McVrodRetertece EPA300.0
&VO
w1z"
SOI M
2
54 J8
MO&
AVALLIAMS
CGREEN
L1sMod Relenmm EPA3MO
f-S"
&IZ.4i9
NUT
NH3 as N In nqutd
0.02
Om
ffTA as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
M44wd Refeterre Lac30•107-M-1-!
S,2309
5nal%
Total KjekWd N as N In UgL4d
0.2
OA7
fng& as N
MOVF-RfAAN
CGREEN
Lteffwd Reference taCwI071162-+i
527,09
arm
NO2*1403 az N in UqtW
0.02
0.05
ffG& as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Ne9wd Reference keC14107-C4-:•c
5xzM)G
W73R9
Putt. as P In Ugtffl
0.02
0.07
MWL as P
18ELA
CGREEN
fta9lodP.e'wwn Laclio0i&OIAEF
SOWS
&4..V9
MET
7A40-224 Ag by iClWS
5
5.0 V
UWL
.;JUAGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
4 ogvd Referare EPA 2C0-8
SIA109
a717109
7429.90.5 Al 5y ICP
SC
510
LwL
SGDSS
ESTAFFORD
McOwd RefAfertce EPA 200 7
V27r09
9n2109
7440-38-2 As by'%CPMS
2
7.0
uglL - �-- -
BSKiNNER
ESTAFFORD
McCiod References EPA 200.9
GMIN
W12M
7429-W5
8 by ICP
SG
65
UWL
SGDSS
ESTAFFORD
Method ReTwvxm
EPA 2CR7
stem
6n2M
74e0-36-3
an by tCP
10
21
�Ot
SGDSS
ESTAFFORD
Mstllad Rc fw*i a
EPA 2W.7
3rs"
U12M
744041-7
So by iCP
5
&0 U
Lot
SGDSS
ESTAFFORD
motthad Rehuwxe
EPA 2C0.7
507M
ah=9
7440-70.2
Ca by iCP
0.1
38
IrOL
SGDSS
ESTAFFORD
L1eibOd Refarwxe
EPA 2C0.7
Sr28t09
W)00
Labomovy Sectlon» 1623 Mall Service Celstvr. Raltlgh. NC M99-1623 (919) T33-3M Page 2 of 4
N

NC tD`U(lQ Laboratory Section 1Resufts sample ID A844508
lotion ID: BATCOGEN003SW Collect Date- OSM012009 7
Loc. Dew.: BAT COGEN 003 SW Collect Time:: 12:15
Vatt ID
CAS # Analyze Name PIQL Result Qualifier Units AnalystlDate v Approved By /Date �—
7440-43-9 Cd by ICPMS 1 1.0 U u91L JJURGEVICH ESTAFFORD
mete 7W Reference EPA200.8 6r24v09 W12Ki9
7440-484 CoW by lCP 50 50 U ugA- SGOSS ESTAFFORD
MOT" Reference
EPA 200,7
SW"
W12i09
7440.47-3
Cr by ICPMS
10
10 U
kt!YL
JJI JRGEViCH
ESTAFFORD
6leifta7 Re!eeance
cPF. 2D08
W%109
6t12109
7440-50-8
CubyICPMS
2
20 U
UWL
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
Method RdtMMCe
EPA 2.008
529.b9
6112A79
7439-09-6',
- Feby}CP;
50
420
ugA.
SGOSS
ESTAFFORD
Method Rele
EPA 20Q7
5r27RPJ
8r12109
7439-97-6
He245.1
03
0.20 U
aglL
ESTAFFORD
ESTAFFORD
methw Reterenco
EPA 24FK 1
6r11109
W12MS
74404)9-7
K by ICP
0.1
2.8
-WL
SGOSS
ESTAFFORQ
Melltod Reference
EPA 2D0.7
WSW
6n z=
7439-93-2
U tGP
25
25
U
Vt
SGOSS
ESTAFFORD
Metrwd Referenc4
EPA 200.7
5+-2-a05
W12ID9
7439-95-4
Me by ICP
0.1
1.7
MWI
SGOSS
ESTAFFORD
r
We9rodRdareisce
EPA240.7
Sr2&04
aA2109
7439-9r-5
Wnby1CP
10
34
LOL
SGOSS
ESTAFFORD
Mete Reterenca
EPA 200.7
1a127r09
611M .
7439-93-7
MobyIC MS
40
10
U
uglL
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
kleu:od Rarer, -rue
EPA M.8
5t291e9
611z"
7440-23-5
Na by IQP
D.1
7-2
mg1L
$GOSS
ESTAFFORD
Mdt1e4 Reference
EPA 2110.7
5r2&O9
W12MG
7440-02-0
NI by.ICFMS
10
10
U
tv&
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference
EPA 20A
5.29A9
611?"9
7439 92-1
Pb by ICPMS
10
10
U
ug/L
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
Method Roterence
EPA 200.E
5r19109
W12109
7440-36-0
SbbyICPMS
10
10
U
UWL
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
uvvr t Rerererca
EPA 200.A
sles,09
en 2109
7782-49-2
Se byICPMS
5
5.0
U
ugh-
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
irte hod Ralenence
EPA 2.00.E
&'29009
-&12109
7440-31-5
Sn by ICPM3
10
10
U
UO&
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
MsrA)d Reterenc6
EPA200.8.
529A9
4112.09
7440.28-0
Thallkirn M K3WS
10
10
U
UIPL
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
Method Reerenoe
EPA 20R6
Stz91p9
W12109
Laboratory Sectiuv> 1623 Mail Service Center, Ralsigh, MC 27699 623 (919) 733-3M Page 3 of 4

WC (DWQ Laboratory Section (Resufts Sample ID ,gB44503
Location ID: SATCOGFN003SW Called Date: 05120l2009
Lnc. poser,: SAT COGEN 003 SW GoOect Time;: 12:15
Yisit ID
CAS d
An -ay a Kama
POL kcyuYf Qualifier Umt5
AnafysLnaatr
Approved fsy IDate
7440.32.6
_
TI fritpnhtm) by ICP
TO 10 U UG&
SGO SS
ESTAFFORD
m*Ood Reference EPA 200 7
W&C9
@ll21Ca
744C.62-2
V by ICP
25 25 U Ug&
SGOSS
ESTAFFORD
Lsethed Reference EPA 200.7
577M9
W121n5
7440-F-"
7ntry 1CPMS'
10 21 vg/L
JJURGEVICH
ESTAFFORD
MotiiodPeference EPA--aO.8
929+09
W12,119
�x
Laboratory Seclloe» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 1919) 733-3908 Page 4 of 4
i

y�°� wnrEAoc PERMIT COVERAGE
RENEWAL APPLICATION FORM Permit Number
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NCS000350
Stormwater Discharge Permit
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED ALONG WITH THE REQUESTED SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION TO THE DIV. OF WATER QUALITY IN ORDER FOR YOUR FACILITY TO QUALIFY FOR
RENEWAL OF YOUR STORMWATER PERMIT NCS000350
The following is the information currently in our database for your facility. Please review this information carefully
and make all corrections as necessary in the space provided to the right of the current information.
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner/Org. Name: EDGECOMBE GENCO LLC
Owner Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number
E-mail address:
Cdq,F_ Cq,%d.A 0mcric.a LLC ^ ��
R. C�A�f� �• rr41M .0 C r
P.O.
.ary 1rJ 1
004o
FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Name: EDGECOMBE GENCO, LI..C-BATrLEBORO
Facility Contact:
Facility Address: 6358 OLD 13A'iTLEBORO RD
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
Phone Number:
Fax Number
E-mail address:
PERMIT INFORMATION
Permit Contact: fi e
Mailing Address: PO BOX 370
BATPLEBORO, NC 27809
Phone Number: 2524420805
Fax Number:
E-mail address:
DISCHARGE INFORMATION
Discharge Receiving Water
Stream Class:
Basin:
Sub -Basin #:
Number of outfalls:
CERTIFICATION
_aez;j ,
_('_ t+15 w _
"1A i___AawAla-co -
1 certify that I am fa 'liar with the informat' n contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and
belief such inform n is t ,complete a accurate.
Signature Date O1.2xll_dl
Print or type name of person signi g a ve Title �7
Please return this completed renewal application form to:
Individual Permit Renewal
Attn: Mr. Mike Randall
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

`
\ / �
. ~
^ ^
^ ^
'
^
m

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR RENEWAL OF INDIVIDUAL NPDES
STORMWATER PERMIT
Two copies of each of the following shall accompany this submittal in order for the application to be
considered complete:
(Do not submit the site Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan)
Initials
ulr� 1. A current Site Map from the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The location of
industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas and
loading and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall, building
locations and impervious surfaces should be clearly noted.
A_ 2. A summary of Analytical Monitoring results during the term of the existing permit (if your
permit required analytical sampling). Do not submit individual lab reports. The summary
can consist of a table including such items as outfall number, parameters sampled, lab
results, date sampled, and storm event data. *
—Q�n� 3. A summary of the Visual Monitoring results. Do not submit individual monitoring reports.
The summary can consist of a table including such items as outfall number, parameters
surveyed, observations, and date monitoring conducted.
'k,A 4. A summary of the Best Management Practices utilized at the permitted facility. Summary
should consist of a short narrative description of each BMP's in place at the facility. If the
implementation of any BMP's is planned, please include information on these BMP's.
—OW 5. A short narrative describing any significant changes in industrial activities at the permitted
facility. Significant changes could include the addition or deletion of work processes,
changes in material handling practices, changes in material storage practices, and/or
changes in the raw materials used by the facility.
6. Certification of the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan for the permitted facility (Sign and return attached form).
* if the final year analytical monitoring of the existing permit term has not been completed
prior to filing the renewal submittal, then the last years monitoring results should be
submitted within 30 days of receipt of the laboratory reports. (i.e. do not withhold renewal
submittal waiting on lab results)
Representative storm sampling may now be conducted anytime during the year (the April to
November window has been eliminated) and the representative rainfall event is now
defined as a storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches and is preceded by at least 72
hours in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred.

L Drainage Ares t
Drainage Area I
sbm
Drainage
+ ; Drainage Area I Dra nags Area 8
aA a o I `s
Area 4 � 1 rtin� �r-• ���`,
,✓': i 1 , —
O P o P 0I
} a
O CP
/ j A Drainage At" 9
f s !! - - - 1 i o o +[�• tdava m,hazle ratr,
Drainage Area 3
•��� � � � I ��y--� I' a ��• r Eetcalalsweeltyerd� r^ ��r--' �
T i I I ,aura I� Drainage Area 19
Drainage Area 1 ` F --- ¢ —O-� .�— L., I = =r=---►—=�f
•, _' � a Area 6
De Area 7 ? ` \• rt' rf
+ I ii •.,nl�Jl� � Y
1 y T
OudalOudal Nler
Ne, 1 CCII &mmwaW �l Smm.re'.lr atne+nwn�'
Ctttla't No. 2 f , I AOLdfA No. 3 OL9!O m_ t
Legend
Pawed Surface
> Sbm watm Flow Diiradiwn
Gravel Statece
.......... Sit11n mmler Seller MO**
— — Drainage Area: Boundary
° Dranage Crgch Bath
StarrmNaler Dgd1
[ram StnrrnravaWr Outfall
Drainage awale
PalantlaiyExpased Msbrh&
rnrs • Smmmimr Overland Flaw
Area Drehrkg 10 Nbsborater Syshrm
5bmwdw
Odld
TOW
Am
0-4
komb
Wask Bads
V-11
N*Aps
Area
VOTA
ln"mmn
Am
VA*
Famik
h9mvkra
P-= 01
Ma in Wk •
wlKBeb
CatkhftmAspe
Aeaf
No. t
14.76
2.40
12.35
4.55
V%
I
DAL OA3, OA4, O9
Ns.2
1.75
-
1.75
1.20
8%
0%
am
No.3
1.41
-
'Al
OA2
3m
0%
OA7
No.4
1.41
1.41
0.41
25%
0%
OAio
Ne.5
Im
1-C2
024
V%
0%
0"
Owwwwp4w
S."
575
1J4
32%
0%
ml
No Owd
2.70
2.70
-
100%
OAS
Figure 3. Edgecombe Gerterdting, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Site Plan Showing Drainage Features and Areas Where Industrial Materials are Potentially Exposed to Stormwater
rD &&*q
swat rd alloto al
quaraay w mu)
O Ba1er au"
FP64414
2 at 1,900 and 4 at 100
OS1292
1011. 150; v d 2 a1400
601Hum trydmxpa
100-,150
Q Twbkn 13tW rg
UANkSUM
00CarfflnLKEMM� ks
2 al 2.0
a EJ-IC Cerdraesra
Mydirvfle W
29180
o FOO lkjrstam
Lute
WA (aot61
a aq Hoa n
Ash
WA (soli
M E dlimm 6laem
WA
WA
o Aah Harding
Ash
WA (soUM
a Condonaa4 Tent
WA
WA
r Tmn$f mW Yardl
Tramiku rrar o4
2 a19,170 ud 2 a1 It90
Of Trap P%
Wee. of prow
13,126
K Admhdafra0an Oala
WA
WA
L DatnttenlmK
t31>fhuk add
rid 4Z
_ _
250; and 4 Z
r Dsmkf aump f arkra Tank
Me. waalewster
50O
r Tsdc
Wagewder
3e,P00
125
Oa 'hornka4
mism
400
ery
WA
WA
RawvvmwTar"
WA
WA
IF.P.Tramforrr>rrTranstmerof
Otrmpatm I Urdv. Waite
WA
WA
C00%V Ttlwwo
Go*" lower draminla WA
wasmwaltr Baskm
WA
WA
wnlslvSW Brrtklwtg
BN�
2 a
ac
6655
worehouse! 6hop
MLU. hduaM products Mtdlpls, a0 a65
a Trawar
WA
WA
T Dr mr 9foraga Ama
Used o5
6m
Y ON Stange ell"
Mlae, of ptoduds
Mttflple, ai -65
Cmdaromm Ream
WA
WA
Coal Unbodtrg Cmaakumni No. 1
Tank
1 A
Ok"
N
wla
Trmw a$
�
Unloedrq Bey
WA
WA
spamr Area
Hydrarrwc ON
30
Locomotive Parift
ARsc. oe products
.66
ICar
CaU 1iL kota Conwittr
Coal
WA
Coat Pia
Cal
WA
Cool Campr
Cal
WA
N Laydown Nee
WA
WA
4 Wscete{twq

Drainage Area 1
Drainage
Area 4
R
y a
■
R � I
' ' N r e II Drainage Area 3
(v I, r
Drainage Area t
Sto arar
Met Ma.1
Legend
I� FIRM swbm
> Sbmrwa6u Fbw Dhcdm
Gra"I Swbm
....•..... Stomm515r Sneer (6urlWO
— Dt4ri W All, Boundary
Y Dreinape Catch Bnlln
......-- SWrrwAsw Di(Oh
StWnrrffier DIAhd
= == DrairM Swab
Po(en11* Exposed tl labbw
Stour nbi Weft d Pm
Area Dr5"b Weab*&Ir 9r t II
O
a
6
Fe
NVIN
Drainage Area 1
n
Drainage Area 4 �! �~ Drainage Area B
i
it
• AF -L-7
Drainage Area g
(diim Io Wmvwabr&LIiN
UCI Drairaga Area 10
Dra rage Area 6 �� \ L?
Drainage Area 7 it\• I //////
�4 i �I ..•nnrt, y
H
E
5brruaabr
Odd
low
Ma
01:01114
Mato
ftdo Bath
V-d
b map
Am
Va"
mp r mre
Ma
VA*
pmma --
mrpavla.
pmaadd
AmInWadw
"brBmir
CmffbramgC 1 0
Arne
W.1
14.76
240
1235
4m
37%
In
DA$ DA3, DM, DA5
No.2
675
-
135
1.20
0%
0%
oAA
ft3
IAI
-
I.41
9.42
m%
0%
DA7
W.4
IM
-
IA1
0.47
20%
0%
DAM
No.5
142
-
1.02
024
23%
0%
DAD
OmIWFba
5.7a
D.7e
IA4
32%
0%
DA1
'.No00d
270
270
ION
DAD
Figure 3. Edgecombe Generating, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Site Plan Showing Drainage Features and Areas Where industrial Materials are Potengaily Exposed to Stormwater
N BuAdrrp
A4rdvfd
41u�igty (alon)
Qadwaulft
MP54414
28t1900Wd4at100
400
t00; 160; �tOOW;
Ba tW a
ISO
Q Turt4nts Buedlrng
LuWcAlon
s6
of
Cor*rmnzMn
tAAn
e eHC Carmolara
al
20180
o FBD Bytom
Lk"
WA (to"
a Bag Nmmes
Ash
WA (a"
F� h&M RUM
WA
WA
o Ash hrarding
Ash
WA (@din
K CarndermtaTank
WA
WA
r Tmnskmmr Yards
Ttarmbmer or
21 l %170 Wd 2 ar M
01 Trap Pa
NUr. al poduele
13.126
R Adminftbillm OfAca
WA
WA
L DemirmtMor BuNing
suftle
130 md,,5ag
la�epk�a�a
280 ad 4
DisaN Kral
0 Damto sump 19** Tart
Mhc raslewWer
sm
R NeumdzdmnTonk
Westardtt
35,W0
o EFP.Trankmnr
Tnrnbmlarol
126
P Damin Ctmriksts
Bo1500
4m
a UNCIR g Bay
WA
WA
R Rm WWer Tints
WA
WA
a Drmtprisn I Uniu, Was1a
NA
WA
T Co" TOW=
Coorkq tower OmffkA rs WA
u wadsweler auks
VA
WA
v Vftovm tar Buldhq
2 a 6d
Br�tamAft
Wsraffirrsa l shop
WK. kdoatlar wndmis ULd", ao go
t Trder
WA
WA
r onsn emraga Am
Lhod of
am
= 01 st mp Buntlmg
her- of Prodrreta
mlej a, ag eg5
Cwd a= Ram,
WA
WA
Coe! ureeadirra CW" mynr TWAI
I
D�1 No.
A
Kercum To*
ON
UnbeArg64ry2
WA
WA
CWapw6srAraa
Nydrsrmeal
30
LocomOm Poking
Nbr. D! produeS1
6D
Corr sbdod Conwym
Cal
WA
Coe[ Pik+
Cal
WA
Ow CmmrmYCr
Coo
WA
a Ltyd7Rn Mee
WA
WA
o mSmile ON[)

Item 3. Summary of Visual Examination of Stormwater Runoff Data
Edgecombe Generating, LLC; NPDES Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350
Parameter OutfallI Outfall2 Outfall3 Outfall4 Outfall5
Color and Extent
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Odor
Absent Absent Present Present
Absent
Clarity or Turbidity
Absent Absent Absent Present
Present
Floating Solids
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Settled Solids
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Present
Foam
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Oil Sheen
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Other Obvious Indicators of
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Stormwater Pollution
Notes: 1.
See EHS Form 055 for description of the parameters.
2.
The "Present" odor at Outfalls 3 and 4 was observed to be
"musky"; neither Outfall drains an industrial area of the plant.
3.
The "Present" turbidity at Outfalls 4 and 5 is likely due to
influences from farm field immediately east of the Plant.

Item 3. Summary of Visual Examination of Stormwater Runoff Data
Edgecombe Generating, LI.C; NPDES Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350
Parameter
Outfall1 Outfall2 Outfall3 Out#a114
Outfall5
Color and Extent
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Odor
Absent Absent Present Present
Absent
Clarity or Turbidity
Absent Absent Absent Present
Present
Floating Solids
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Settled Solids
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Present
Foam
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Oil Sheen
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Other Obvious Indicators of
Absent Absent Absent Absent
Absent
Stormwater Pollution
Notes, I.
See EHS Form 055 for description of the parameters.
2.
The "Present" odor at Outfalls 3 and 4 was observed to be
"musky"; neither Outfall drains an industrial area of the plant.
3.
The "Present" turbidity at Outfalls 4 and 5 is likely due to
influences from farm field immediately east of the Plant.
Edgecombe Generating, LLC - Location of Stormwater Outfalls
Stormwater
Ouffall No. 5
00r.5
00
Storrrtwater Stormwater Stomnwater Stormwater
Outfall No. 1 Outfall No, Z Outfall No, 3 Outfall No. 4

WORKSHEET A7
VISUAL ExArmNAT1oN OF STORMWATER QuAL[TY ' FORM EMS 055
10 ('
aentiiX NPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES OCTOBER 2004
ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTMTY
STORM.EVENT INFORMA,TION , ,.,
Duration: hours minutes
Outfall No.
Date:
Precipitation: inches
Time:
RunofF gallons
Examiner:
Preying Event: �_ days �_ hours
Rain: Snow:
•ACCEFFABLE CONDITIONS FOR CONI)UCTIiVG EXAM1NATiON
Meets Re uirement
Requirement for Acceptable Examination
Yes
No
I. Observations began =I -hour of start of discharge:
2. Storm Event >O.I-inches of precipitation:
3. Storm Event occurs >72-hours of previous storm event with >0. I -inches of i nation.
EXAMINATION RESU1 Ili
Observations
Parameter
Method
Absent
Present
Describe if Present
Observe sample through a clean 1.0-L, glass beaker against a
Color and Extent
white background. If sample is the same as white background.
mark 'Absent" otherwise mark "Present'. Note the color and
intensity (e.g., gray. light or brown, dark).
Smell the sample and mark `Absent" or 'Present' and if
Odor
"Present', note type (e.g.. earthy, sewage, musky, oily, etc.)
and strength (eg.. weak, moderate, or strong).
Observe sample through a clean 1.0-L, glass beaker against a
white background. If sample is the same as the white
Clarity or Tumidity
background. mark `Absent" otherwise mark "Present". If
'Present',
note (1) cannot see background, (2) can see that
beaker but cannot read newsprint, (3) can see thru beaker and
read newsprint, or (4) the water is faintly turbid.
Floating Solids
Observe if "Absent" or 'Present" and describe the sollds.
Settled Solids
Observe if any material settles to the bottom of the 1.0-L
beaker after 5-minutes.
Suspended Solids
Observe If 'Absent' or 'Present' based on the results of the
Clarity and Settle Solids tests and describe the solids.
Foam
Observe if "Absent" or "Present". If "Present" note thickness.
coverage of channel, and color.
Oil Sheen
Observe if "Absent" or 'Present'. If 'Present' note coverage
of channel and color.
Other Obvious Indicators
Describe what was ' observed that would lead a reasonable
of Storm Water Pollution
person to believe that the stormwater was polluted.
CERTIFICATION
I certify under penalty of Iaw that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name and Title Print
Si tore
Date

WORKSHEET A7
r=_117
08.1m
VISUAL EXAMINATION OF STORMWATER QUALITY FORM EHS 055
NPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES OCTOBER 2004
ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY
STORM[ EVENT' ON "
Duration: hours minutes
Outfall No.
Date:
Precipitation: inches
Time:
.Runoff- gallons
Examiner.
Preceding Event: days ❑ hours
Rain: Snow:
ACCEPTABLE CONbITIONS,FOR CONDUCTING EXAIYIINATIO N
Meets R uirement
Requirement for Acceptable Examination
Yes
No
1. Observations =1-hour of start of discharge:
2. Storm Event >0.1-inches of precipitation:
3. Storm Event occurs >72-hours of previous storm event with >0.1-inches of precipitafion.
EXAMINATION RESULTS ::
Observations
Parameter
Method
Absent
Present
Describe if Present
Observe sample through a clean 1.0-L, glass beaker against a
Color and Extent
white background. If sample is the same as white background.
'Present'.
mark "Absent" otherwise mark Note the color and
Intensity (e.g., gray, light or brawn, dark).
Smell the sample and mark 'Absent" or 'Present' and if
Odor
'Present', note type (e.g., earthy, sewage, musky, oily, etc.)
and strength (e g.. weak, moderate, or strong).
Observe sample through a clean 1.0-L, glass !esker against a
white background. If sample is the same as the white
Clarity or Turbidity
background, mark "Absent' otherwise mark "Present-. If
*Present'.
note (1) cannot see background, (2) can see thru
beaker but cannot read newsprint, (3) can see thru beaker and
read newsprint, or (4) the water is faintly turbid.
Floating Solids
Observe if "Absent' or "Present' and describe the solids.
Settled Solids
Observe If any material settles to the bottom of the I.0-L
beaker after 5-minutes.
Suspended Solids
Observe if 'Absent' or "Present" based on the results of the
Clarity and Settle Solids tests and describe the solids.
Foam
Observe if 'Absent" or "Present'. If "Present" note thickness,
coverage of channel. and color.
011 Sheen
Observe if "Absent" or "Present". If 'Present" note coverage
of channel and color.
Other Obvious Indicators
Describe what was observed that would Iead a reasonable
of Storm Water Pollution
person to believe that the stormwater was polluted.
CERTIhICATION .
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name and Title not
Signature
Date

WORKSHEETA5 Facility: Edgecombe Genclatirq , LLC
EXISTING/TRADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.. I
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date. October 23, 2006
Page: 1
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
COMMENTS
Maintenance of Secondary Containment Areas — See Table A5.1 for secondary
containment area details. All secondary containment areas will be routinely observed to
determine fitness for service; any deficiencies will be reported to the Plant management.
Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program —The Rocky Mount Plant
regularly maintains and keeps in a clean, orderly manner, areas which may contribute
pollutants to storm water discharges. Good housekeeping procedures implemented at the
facility include the following:
1. Perform general weekly inspections of facility and equipment areas to maintain a
safe and trash free environment. Street sweeping is performed as needed.
2. Routinely inspect exposed plant equipment for leaks or conditions that could lead
to discharges of chemicals or petroleum products. Records of inspections are kept
in the fax room on the first floor of the administration building.
3. Proper inventory control procedures to insure that stored chemicals and petroleum
products are maintained at the minimum level necessary.
4. Proper material storage practices to ensure that materials are stored in containers
adequate for the locations, such that corrosion and deterioration of the containers
is minimized. This includes proper labeling of all containers and maintenance of
MSDS on materials stored.
The preventive maintenance program for the facility includes inspecting and maintaining
the storm water management devices, equipment, and systems, on a semi-annual basis, to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. In addition, the storm water
management devices, equipment, and systems are visually inspected on a daily basis. Bulk
storage tanks, transformers, and heavy equipment are inspected on a quarterly basis, and
visually inspected on a daily basis. Records of quarterly/semi-annual inspections are kept
in the Administration Building.
Employee Training — The Plant conducts annual training programs for personnel
responsible for any aspect of storm water management, including those individuals
responsible for implementing activities identified in the Plan. This training will inform
responsible personnel of the components and goals of the Plan and will address topics
related to storm water management, such as:
1. Good housekeeping;
2. Spill prevention and response; and
3. Material handling and storage practices.
In addition, each member of the Plant's Pollution Prevention Team will undergo initial
training on the Plan prior to implementation. If a member joins the Team after the Plan has
been implemented, they will be trained prior to becoming listed in the Plan as a Team
member. Where possible, employee training under the Plan can be conducted in
conjunction with training under other regulatory programs (e.g., hazardous waste
management training, SPCC training). Currently Plan training is conducted at least
annually through the safety meeting program. Employees attending Plan training will sign
the attendance roster. Names of those in attendance are recorded in a plant -wide training
matrix. A manager and/or section leader will follow up with employees who were not in
attendance at the Plan training. Records of the training programs will be maintained on file
in the Administration Building.
Responsible Party — The Plant Manager is the responsible party for the Rocky Mount
Plant. See Section 2.2 above, for the Plant Manager's signed certification of this
Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Stormwater Management Plan

WORKSHEETA5 Facility: Edgecombe Generating, LLC
EXISTING/TRADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.: 1
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date: October 23, 2006
Page: 2
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
COMMENTS
Plan Amendment — The Rocky Mount Plant will amend/revise the Plan whenever there is
a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect
on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan will be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
Facility Inspection Program — One of the core stormwater requirements is to conduct
Facility Inspections on at least an annual basis — Worksheet A2 can be used for this
purpose. Members of the Pollution Prevention Team will conduct the evaluation annually.
This evaluation provides a basis for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the SWPP Plan.
The compliance evaluation includes the following elements:
I . A visual INSPECTION of the site
2. Based on the results of the INSPECTION, revisions to the SWPP Plan and
implementation of any additional measures and controls
3. A written report summarizing the results of the annual evaluation (Worksheet AG
may be used for this purpose)
Implementation of changes — Based on the results of the annual INSPECTION, necessary
revisions to pollution prevention measures, controls, and the SWPP Plan should be initiated
within 2 weeks of such INSPECTION. Revisions should be completed within 12 weeks of
the INSPECTION.
• The SWPP Plan shall be reviewed and the following sections updated, where
necessary:
• Changes to the Pollution Prevention Team member roster (Worksheet Cl)
• The inventory of SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS and BMPs (Worksheet Al, Site Drainage
Map)
• The history of significant SPILLS and leaks (Worksheet BI)
A report summarizing the CSC Evaluation will be prepared and maintained in accordance
with Worksheet A( in the Plan. Among other things, this Report will summarize major
observations relating to the implementation of the Plan, describe necessary or appropriate
revisions to the Plan, and identify incidents of noncompliance with the Plan. If no
incidents of noncompliance are identified in the Report, the Rocky Mount Plant will certify
that the facility is in compliance with this PLAN,
The CSC Evaluation Report, and any necessary certification, will be maintained on file in
the Administration Building,

WORKSHEETA5 Facility: Edgeeombe Generating, LLC
EXISTING/TRADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.: I
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date: October 23, 2006
Page: 3
I BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE I COMMENTS 1
Pollution Prevention Team — Worksheet Cl in Appendix C identifies individuals within
the facility organization who have been designated as members of the facility Pollution
Prevention Team. Team members are responsible for implementing and maintaining this
Plan.
The number of members on the team will vary depending on the size of the facility. As a
standardized approach, the FACILITY MANAGER and the Compliance Supervisor assigned to
the facility ("Facility Compliance Supervisor") are core members of the team and are listed
in Worksheet C 1. FACILITY MANAGERS are encouraged to assign additional site members
to the team as part of their employee involvement initiatives. Additional Pollution
Prevention Team members and their responsibilities should be listed in Worksheet Cl.
The FACILITY MANAGER is ultimately responsible for the implementation of this Plan. The
FACILITY MANAGER is accountable for the prevention of SPILLS and leaks that could
adversely impact surface water or ground water. The FACILITY MANAGER is responsible
for ensuring that:
1. The Plan is implemented, maintained, and amended at the intervals required in the
Plan;
2. Appropriate measures and controls (BMP's) are implemented and maintained;
3. Periodic INSPECTIONS are conducted;
4. Corrective or follow-up actions are completed in a timely manner;
S. All SPILLS are promptly reported and cleaned up; and
6. Employees are periodically trained on Pollution Prevention.

WORKSHEETAS Facility: EdgecombeGenerating, LLC
EXISTINGfF ADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.: I
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date: October 23, 2006
Page: I
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE -
COMMENTS
Maintenance of Secondary Containment Areas — See Table AS.I for secondary
containment area details. Ali secondary containment areas will be routinely observed to
determine fitness for service; any deficiencies will be reported to the Plant management.
Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program — The Rocky Mount Plant
regularly maintains and keeps in a clean, orderly manner, areas which may contribute
pollutants to storm water discharges. Good housekeeping procedures implemented at the
facility include the following:
I . Perform general weekly inspections of facility and equipment areas to maintain a
safe and trash free environment. Street sweeping is performed as needed.
2. Routinely inspect exposed plant equipment for leaks or conditions that could lead
to discharges of chemicals or petroleum products. Records of inspections are kept
in the fax room on the first floor of the administration building.
3. Proper inventory control procedures to insure that stored chemicals and petroleum
products are maintained at the minimum level necessary.
4. Proper material storage practices to ensure that materials are stored in containers
adequate for the locations, such that corrosion and deterioration of the containers
is minimized. This includes proper labeling of all containers and maintenance of
MSDS on materials stored.
The preventive maintenance program for the facility includes inspecting and maintaining
the storm water management devices, equipment, and systems, on a semi-annual basis, to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. In addition, the storm water
management devices, equipment, and systems are visually inspected on a daily basis. Bulk
storage tanks, transformers, and heavy equipment are inspected on a quarterly basis, and
visually inspected on a daily basis. Records of quarterly/semi-annual inspections are kept
in the Administration Building.
Employee Training — The Plant conducts annual training programs for personnel
responsible for any aspect of storm water management, including those individuals
responsible for implementing activities identified in the Plan. This training will inform
responsible personnel of the components and goals of the Plan and will address topics
related to storm water management, such as:
1. Good housekeeping;
2. Spill prevention and response; and
3. Material handling and storage practices.
In addition, each member of the Plant's Pollution Prevention Team will undergo initial
training on the Plan prior to implementation. If a member joins the Team after the Plan has
been implemented, they will be trained prior to becoming listed in the Plan as a Team
member. Where possible, employee training under the Plan can be conducted in
conjunction with training under other regulatory programs (e.g., hazardous waste
management training, SPCC training). Currently Plan training is conducted at least
annually through the safety meeting program. Employees attending Plan training will sign
the attendance roster. Names of those in attendance are recorded in a plant -wide training
matrix. A manager and/or section leader will follow up with employees who were not in
attendance at the Plan training. Records of the training programs will be maintained on file
in the Administration Building.
Responsible Party — The Plant Manager is the responsible party for the Rocky Mount
Plant. See Section 2.2 above, for the Plant Manager's signed certification of this
Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Stormwater Management Plan

WORKSHEETAS Facility: Edgecombe Generating, LLC
EXISTING/TRADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.: I
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date: October 23, 2006
Page: 2
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
COMMENTS
Plan Amendment — The Rocky Mount Plant will amend/revise the Plan whenever there is
a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect
on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan will be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
Facility Inspection Program — One of the core stormwater requirements is to conduct
Facility Inspections on at least an annual basis — Worksheet A2 can be used for this
purpose. Members of the Pollution Prevention Team will conduct the evaluation annually.
This evaluation provides a basis for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the SWPP Plan.
The compliance evaluation includes the following elements:
. A visual INSPECTION of the site
2. Based on the results of the INSPECTION, revisions to the SWPP Plan and
implementation of any additional measures and controls
3. A written report summarizing the results of the annual evaluation (Worksheet A6
may be used for this purpose)
Implementation of changes — Based on the results of the annual INSPECTION, necessary
revisions to pollution prevention measures, controls, and the SWPP Plan should be initiated
within 2 weeks of such INSPECTION. Revisions should be completed within 12 weeks of
the INSPECTION.
• The SWPP Plan shall be reviewed and the following sections updated, where
necessary:
• Changes to the Pollution Prevention Team member roster (Worksheet Cl)
• The inventory of SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS and BMPs (Worksheet Al, Site Drainage
Map)
• The history of significant SPILLS and leaks (Worksheet B 1)
A report summarizing the CSC Evaluation will be prepared and maintained in accordance
with Worksheet A6 in the Plan. Among other things, this Report will summarize major
observations relating to the implementation of the Plan, describe necessary or appropriate
revisions to the Plan, and identify incidents of noncompliance with the Plan. if no
incidents of noncompliance are identified in the Report, the Rocky Mount Plant will certify
that the facility is in compliance with this PLAN.
The CSC Evaluation Report, and any necessary certification, will be maintained on file in
the Administration Building.

WORKSHEETA5 Facility: EdgecombeGencmting,LLC
EXISTING/TRADITIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Rev.: 1
PRACTICES WORKSHEET Date: October 23, 2006
Page: 3
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE I COMMENTS I
Pollution Prevention Team -- Workshect Cl in Appendix C identifies individuals within
the facility organization who have been designated as members of the facility Pollution
Prevention Team. Team members are responsible for implementing and maintaining this
Plan.
The number of members on the team will vary depending on the size of the facility. As a
standardized approach, the FACILITY MANAGER and the Compliance Supervisor assigned to
the facility ("Facility Compliance Supervisor") are core members of the team and are listed
in Worksheet Cl. FACILITY MANAGERS are encouraged to assign additional site members
to the team as part of their employee involvement initiatives. Additional Pollution
Prevention Team members and their responsibilities should be listed in Worksheet C1.
The FACILITY MANAGER is ultimately responsible for the implementation of this Plan. The
FACILITY MANAGER is accountable for the prevention of SPILLS and leaks that could
adversely impact surface water or ground water. The FACILITY MANAGER is responsible
for ensuring that:
1. The Plan is implemented, maintained, and amended at the intervals required in the
Plan;
2. Appropriate measures and controls (BMP's) are implemented and maintained;
3. Periodic 1NsPeCTIONs are conducted;
4. Corrective or follow-up actions are completed in a timely manner;
5. All SPILLS are promptly reported and cleaned up; and
6. Employees are periodically trained on Pollution Prevention.

Worksheet A5.1 Summary of Secondary Containment at the Edgecombe Generating, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Largest
Containment
Map
Plan Section /Location Description Significant Material
Capacity
Single Rainfall
Runoff
Volume
ID
(gallons)
Capacity (gallons)
Direction
(gallons)
(gallons)
6.2.1 / Boiler Building A Various boiler chemicals Unit I Bulk Tank for HP54414
1,000
Unit 2 Bulk Tank for HP54414
1,000
Unit 1 Day Tank for HP54414
100
Unit 2 Day Tank for HP54414
100
Unit 1 OS 1292 Tote
400
1,000 NIA'
2,1002,1 NIA'
Unit 2 OS 1292 Tote
400
Unit 1 OS 1292 Day Tank
100
Unit 2 OS 1292 Day Tank
150
Unit I Sodium hydroxide tank
100
Unit 2 Sodium hydroxide tank
150
6.2.2 / Turbine Building B
Turbine lube oil sumps
Lubricating oil
2,000
N/Al
See Note 4
NIA'
C
EHC units
Hydraulic oil
80
N/A1
270
NIA'
6.2.3 / Transformer Yards I
Transformers
Transformer of 1
9,170
N/A5
See Note 4
to Oil Trap Pit
6.2.4 / Oil Trap Pit I
Oil trap pit
Misc. oil products
9,170
1,420
13,125
Industrial6
6.2.5 / Demineralizer L
Bulk acid tank
Sulfuric acid
4,500
6,730
NIA'
6,730
NIA'
Building and Adjacent
Bulk caustic tank
Sodium hydroxide
4,500
6,950
N/A1
6,950
NIA'
Areas
Acid day tank
Sulfuric acid
130
340
NIA
340
I
N/A
Caustic day tank
Sodium hydroxide
280
Tank for diesel fire pump
Diesel fuel
300
650
NIA'
650
N/A�
O EFP Transformer Transformer oil 125 650 N/A5 650 Industrial6
P Outdoor chemical storage Continuum AEC3153 1,625
OX1202 (sodium bromide) 400 1,910 N/A6 1,910 Industria16
BD 1500 400
Page 1 of 2
Print Date: 19.Oct.2006

Worksheet A5.1 Summary of Secondary Containment at the Edgecombe Generating, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Largest Containment
Map Capacity Single Rainfall Runoff
Plan Section /Location ID Description Significant Material (gallons) Capacity (gallons) Volume Direction
(gallons) (gallons)
6.2.6 / Wastewater V
Acid drums (2)
Sulfuric acid
55
55
N/Al
55
N/Al
Building
Caustic drums (2)
Sodium hydroxide
55
55
N/A1
55
NIA`
6.2.7 / Drum Storage Y
Used oil tank
Used oil
500
500
N/A7
2,270
Stormwater7
6.2.8 / Oil Storage
Multiple oil products with a
Z
Builidng
Multiple oil products
combined volume of ±1,1GO-gal
55
55
N/A1
350
N/Al
6.2.9 / Rail Car Unloading Bb
Diesel Tank No. 1
Diesel fuel
11000
Area
Diesel Tank No. 1
Diesel fuel
250
Kerosene tank
Kerosene
300
1,000
2,B 10
14,380
Stormwater
Spare transformer
Transformer oil
99
Dd Car spotter unit 8 Hydraulic oil 30
30 130
2802'8 Stormwater
6.2.10 / Locomotive Ee Locomotive parking area Miscellaneous oil products 210 210 120 440 Stormwater
Parking Area
Notes: l . No accumulated water because tanks/equipment are located indoors.
2. Exempt from SPCC per 40 CFR 112.1(d)(5).
3. Exempt from Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350 because area is located indoors.
4. Meets 40 CFR 112.7(c) by diversion to the Oil Trap Pit.
5. Oil is in Operating Equipment, no provision for accumulated water required per 40 CFR l I2.7(c).
6. Drains into the Wastewater Basin and discharged per NPDES Permit NC0077437, Outfall 003.
7. No accumulated water because tanks/equipment are fully under a roof.
8. Exempt from Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350 because Significant Material is in operating equipment.
Page 2 of 2
Print Date: 19.Oct.2006

Worksheet A5.1 Summary of Secondary Containment at the Edgecombe Generating, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Largest
Containment
Map Capacity Single Rainfall Runoff
Plan Section 1 Location ID Description Significant Material (gallons) Capacity (gallons) Volume Direction
(gallons) (gallons)
6.2.1 / Boiler Building A Various boiler chemicals
Unit I Bulk Tank for HP54414
1,000
Unit 2 Bulk Tank for HP54414
1,000
Unit 1 Day Tank for HP54414
100
Unit 2 Day Tank for HP54414
100
Unit 1 OS 1292 Tote
400
1,000
NIA'
2, 1002,1 NIA'
Unit 2 OS 1292 Tote
400
Unit I OS 1292 Day Tank
100
Unit 2 OS 1292 Day Tank
150
Unit 1 Sodium hydroxide tank
100
Unit 2 Sodium hydroxide tank
150
6.2.2 / Turbine Building B Turbine lobe oil sumps
Lubricating oil
2,000
N/A'
See Note 4 NIA'
C EHC units -
Hydraulic oil
80
N/A'
270 N/A'
6.2.3 / Transformer Yards I Transformers
Transformer oil
9,170
N/A5
See Note 4 to Oil Trap Pit
6.2.4 / Oil Trap Pit J
Oil trap pit
Misc. oil products
9,170
1,420
13,125
Industrial6
6.2.5 / Demineralizer L
Bulk acid tank
Sulfuric acid
4,500
6,730
N/A'
6,730
NIA'
Building and Adjacent
Bulk caustic tank
Sodium hydroxide
4,500
6,950
N/A'
6,950
N/A'
Areas
Acid day tank
Sulfuric acid
130
340
N/A'
340
N/A'
Caustic day tank
Sodium hydroxide
280
Tank for diesel fire pump
Diesel fuel
300
650
NIA'
650
N/A'
O
EFP Transformer
Transformer oil
125
650
N/A'
650
Industrial6
P Outdoor chemical storage Continuum AEC3153 1,625
OX1202 (sodium bromide) 400 1,910 N/A6 1,910 Industrial6
BD 1500 400
Page 1 of 2
Print Date: 19.Oct 2006

Worksheet A5.1
Summary of Secondary Containment at the Edgecombe Generating, LLC; Rocky Mount Plant
Largest
Containment
Plan Section 1 Location
Map
Capacity Single Rainfall
Description Significant Material
Volume
Runoff
ID
(gallons) Capacity (gallons)
(gallons)
Direction
(gallons)
6.2.6 / Wastewater
V
Acid drums (2) Sulfuric acid 55 55 N/Al
55
N/A'
Building
Caustic drums (2) Sodium hydroxide 55 55 N/Al
55
N/A'
6.2.7 / Drum Storage
Y
Used oil tank Used oil 500 500 N/A'
2,270
Stormwater'
6.2.8 / Oil Storage
Z
Multiple oil products with a
Multiple oil products 55 55 N/A
350
NIA i
Builidng
combined volume off1,100-gal
6.2.9 / Rail Car Unloading Bb
Diesel Tank No. 1 Diesel fuel 1,000
Area
Diesel Tank No. 1 Diesel fuel 250 1,000 2,810
14,380
Stormwater
Kerosene tank Kerosene 300
Spare transformer Transformer oil 99
Dd
Car spotter uniY'e Hydraulic oil 30 30 130
2802"'
Stormwater
6.2.10 / Locomotive
Ee
Locomotive parking area Miscellaneous oil products 210 210 120
440
Stormwater
Parking Area
Notes:
1.
No accumulated water because tanks/equipment are located indoors.
2.
Exempt from SPCC per 40 CFR 1 ] 2.1(d)(5).
3.
Exempt from Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350 because area is located indoors.
4.
Meets 40 CFR I I2.7(c) by diversion to the Oil Trap Pit.
5.
Oil is in Operating Equipment, no provision for accumulated water required per 40 CFR I I2.7(c).
6.
Drains into the Wastewater Basin and discharged per NPDES Permit NC0077437, Outfall 003.
7.
No accumulated water because tanks/equipment are fully under a roof.
S.
Exempt from Stormwater Permit No. NCS000350 because Significant Material is in operating equipment.
Page 2 of 2
Print Date: 19.Oct.2006

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
CERTIFICATION
N.C. Division of Water Quality, Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Facility Name: EDGECOMBE GENCO, LLC-BATTLEBORO
Permit Number: NCS000350
Location Address: 6358 OLD BATTLEBORO RD
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
County: EDGECOMBE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) document and all attachments
were developed and implemented under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information required by the SPPP. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information gathered is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete"
"I certify that the SPPP has been developed, signed and retained at the facility location and the SPPP has been fully
implemented at the named facility location in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stormwater general
permit."
"I am aware that there are significant penalties for falsifying information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations"
Sign (according to permit signatory requirements) and return this Certification. DO NOT SEND THE
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WITH THE CERTIFICATION.
Signature Date _ / ,x Y/d L
R�►rd• i'i�'1�4Sr r
Print or type name of person signing above Title
SPPP Certification 2/99

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
CERTIFICATION
N.C. Division of Water Quality, Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Facility Name: EDGECOMBE GENCO, LLC-BATTLEBORO
Permit Number: NCS000350
Location Address: 6358 OLD BATTLEBORO RD
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
County: EDGECOMBE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) document and all attachments
were developed and implemented under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information required by the SPPP. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information gathered is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete"
"I certify that the SPPP has been developed, signed and retained at the facility location and the SPPP has been fully
implemented at the named facility location in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stormwater general
permit."
"I am aware that there are significant penalties for falsifying information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations"
Sign (according to permit signatory requirements) and return this Certification. DO NOT SEND THE
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WITH THE CERTIFICATION.
Signature Date 4 J�Y �Q 4-.
Acd S• F-s—wc� r +MA,49A E r
Print or type name of person signing above Title
SPPP Certification 2/99

March 17, 2006
Mr. Richard S. Frymyer
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
6358 Old Battleboro Road
Battleboro, NC 27809
Dear Mr. Frymyer:
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Permit No. NCS000350
Edgecombe Genco, LLC
Formerly Cogentrix of Rocky Mount,
LLC
Edgecombe County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to transfer coverage under the Individual Permit
Number NCS000350, received on February 9, 2006.
Please find enclosed the revised permit cover sheet. The terms and conditions contained in the remainder of the
permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised permit is issued under the requirements of North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek P. E.
cc: DWQ Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Npne
r hCarolina
atrrra!!�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality .1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 PAX [phone] 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT NO. NCS000350
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
EDGECOMB.E GENCO, LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
EDGECOMBE GENCO, LLC SITE
ROUTE 2, STATE ROAD 1400
BATTLEBORO
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Creek, a class C NSW stream, in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, I1, III, IV, V, and VI hereof.
This permit shall become effective March 17, 2006.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire on April 30, 2007.
Signed this day March 17, 2006.
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 5, 2006
EDGECOMBE GENCO, LLC-BATTLEBORO
ATTN: SETH CARTER, OR SUCCESSOR
PO BOX 370
BATTLEBORO3 NC 27809
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Edgecombe Genco, LLC-Battleboro
Permit Number NCS000350
Edgecombe County
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently covered for stormwater discharge under NPDES Permit NCS000350. This permit expires
on April 30, 2007. North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2H.0105(e)) requires that an application for
permit renewal be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. In order to assure your continued
coverage under your permit, you must apply to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit.
To make this renewal process easier, we are informing you in advance that your permit will be expiring. Enclosed
you will find an individual permit renewal application form, supplemental information request, and Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan certification.
Filing the application form along with the requested supplemental information will constitute your application for
renewal of your permit. As stated above, the application form must be completed and returned along with all
requested information by in order for the permit to be renewed by April 30, 2007.
Failure to request renewal by may result in a civil assessment of at least $500.00. Larger penalties may be
ssessed depending on the delinquency of the request. Discharge of stormwater from your facility without
overage under a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
esult in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Fyou have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact Mike Randall of the Stormwater
'ermitting Unit at [phone], ext. 545.
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files
Sto`rmwater'P�il�tin nttU Files
Raleigh; Regional Office
� J�a
pia Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
y.ncwaterquality.ora Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
1tnfty/Affirmafive Actlon Employer— 50% Ratycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

NCS000350
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Cogentrix Energy, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Cognetrix of Rocky Mount
Route 2, State Road 1400
Battleboro
Edgecombe County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Beech Creek, a class C NSW stream,
in the Tar Pamlico River Basin
in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set
forth in Parts I, I1, III, IV, V and VI hereof.
This permit shall become effective May 1, 2002.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on April 30, 2007
Signed this day April 12, 2002.
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
for Gregory J.Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

16
Ole a r 06 Permit No. NCS000350
Y
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A: Individual Permit Coverage
Section B: Permitted Activities
Section C: Location Map
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED
DISCHARGES
Section A: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Section B: Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Section C: Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Section D: On -Site Vehicle Maintenance Monitoring Requirements
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS
Section A:' Compliance
and Liability
1.
Compliance Schedule
2.
Duty to Comply
3.
Duty to Mitigate
4.
CiviI and Criminal Liability
5.
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
5.
Property Rights
7.
Severability
8.
Duty to Provide Information
9.
Penalties for Tampering
10.
Penalties for Falsification of Reports
Section B: General Conditions
1.
Individual Permit Expiration
2.
Transfers
I

*• *1*
Permit No. NCS000350
3. Signatory Requirements
4. Individual Permit Modification, Revocation and Reissuance, or
Termination
5. Permit Actions
Section C: Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance
2. Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
3. Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Section D: Monitoring and Records
1.
Representative Sampling
2.
Recording Results
3.
Flow Measurements
4.
Test Procedures
5.
Representative Outfall
6.
Records Retention
7.
Inspection and Entry
Section E: Reporting Requirements
1.
Discharge Monitoring Reports
2.
Submitting Reports
3.
Availability of Reports
4.
Non-Stormwater Discharges
5.
Planned Changes
6.
Anticipated Noncompliance
7.
Bypass
8.
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
9.
Other Noncompliance
10.
Other Information
PART IV LIMITATIONS REOPENER
PART V ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE
REQUIREMENTS
PART VI DEFINITIONS
M

910 •0
Permit No. NC5000350
PART I INTRODUCTION
SECTION A: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT COVERAGE
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
pen-nittee is authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity. Such
discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored as specified in this permit.
SECTION B: PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until this permit expires or is modified or revoked, the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina or separate storm sewer system which has
been adequately treated and managed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
individual permit. All discharges shall be in accordance with the conditions of this permit.
Any other point source discharge to surface waters of the state is prohibited unless it is an
allowable non-stormwater discharge or is covered by another permit, authorization or approval.
This permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other
applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
Part I Page I of 2

go
0 • Permit No. NCS000350
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR
PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
The permittee shall develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to as
the Plan. This Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part III, Standard
Conditions, Section E, Paragraph 3 of this individual permit. The Plan shall include, at a
minimum, the following items:
1. Site Plan. The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the
potential pollutant sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of
stormwater discharges. The site plan shall contain the following:
(a) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map or appropriately drafted
equivalent map), showing the facility's location in relation to transportation
routes and surface waters, the name of the receiving water(s) to which the
stormwater outfall(s) discharges, or if the discharge is to a municipal separate
storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the ultimate receiving
waters; and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge.
(b) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities,
outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and
waste disposal practices.
(c) A site map drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of
industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas
and loading and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each
outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area, building locations, existing
BMPs and impervious surfaces, and the percentage of each drainage area that is
impervious. For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants
which could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge.
(d) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility
during the 3 previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill
impacts.
(e) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of
non-stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in
accordance with the requirements found in Part III, Standard Conditions, Section
B, Paragraph 3.
2. Stormwater Management Plan. The stormwater management plan shall contain a
narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or
minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater, including structural and
nonstructural measures. The stormwater management plan, at a minimum, shall
incorporate the following:
Part II Page I of 6

040 •0
Permit No. NCS000350
(a) Feasibility Study. A review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing
the methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure
of materials and processes to stormwater. Wherever practical, the permittee shall
prevent exposure of all storage areas, material handling operations, and
manufacturing or fueling operations. In areas where elimination of exposure is
not practical, the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of
diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
(b) Secondary Containment Schedule. A schedule to provide secondary containment
for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of Section 313 of Title III of the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water priority
chemicals, or storage of hazardous substances to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are
connected directly to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be
controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices [which shall be
secured with a locking mechanism] and any stormwater that accumulates in the
containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed for color, foam, outfall
staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow, prior to release of the accumulated
stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminated by the material stored within the containment area. Records
documenting the individual making the observation, the description of the
accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a
period of five years.
(c) BMP Summary. A narrative description shall be provided of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but not limited to, oil and grease
separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and stormwater
detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs. shall be
based on the assessment of potential of sources to contribute significant quantities
of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of
stormwater discharges.
3. Spill Prevention and Response Plan. The Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)
shall incorporate an assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials
inventory of the facility. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the
SPRP shall be identified. A responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility
operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or
exposure of materialsassociated with the facility operations. The SPRP must be site
stormwater specific. Therefore, a SPCC plan may be a component of the SPRP, but may
not be sufficient to completely address the stormwater aspects of the SPRP. The common
elements of the SPCC with the SPRP may be incorporated by reference into the SPRP.
4. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program. A preventative
maintenance program shall be developed. The program shall document schedules of
inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment
and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and regular cleaning schedules of
these areas shall be incorporated into the program.
Part lI Page 2 of 6

*I*
so
Permit No. NCS000350
S. Employee Training. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a
minimum on an annual basis on proper spill response and cleanup procedures and
preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved in any of the facility's
operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility personnel
(or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified.
6. Responsible. Party. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific
position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and
revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components of the Plan shall be documented
and position assignments provided.
7. Plan Amendment. The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in
design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the
potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall
submit a time schedule to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum
requirements. The permittee shall provide certification in writing (in accordance with
Part III, Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 3) to the Director that the changes
have been made.
8. Facility Inspection Program. Facilities are required to inspect all stormwater systems on
at least a semiannual schedule, once in the fall (September -November) and once in the
spring (April - June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities
performed shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s)
making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control
systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be
incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Stormwater discharge characteristic monitoring as required in Part II of this permit shall
be performed in addition to facility inspections.
9. Implementation. The permittee shall document all monitoring, measurements,
inspections and maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the
log of the sampling data and of activities taken to implement BMWs associated with the
industrial activities, including vehicle maintenance activities. Such documentation shall
be kept on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his
authorized representative immediately upon request.
Part It Page 3 of 6

r 040 Per
mit No NCS000350
SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater subject to the provisions of this permit.
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified below in Table
1.
All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a representative storm event. The required
monitoring will result in a minimum of 7 analytical samplings being conducted over the term of
the permit at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO). The permittee shall complete the
minimum 7 analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified below in Table 2.
Table 1. Analytical Monitoring Re uirements
Discharged`
lj, �'0.-
Me ur�m�nt�FregueW1t
M G
Sample
Saaple
Chai�aeter sties ..
Untts
.. �$ .: ,.
y a
Eo {zone
Total Suspended Solids
mg/1
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
guarterly year 4
Chemical Oxygen Demand
mg/1
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
Quarterly year 4
Total Rainfall4
inches
Annually year 1, 2, 3
_Quarterly year 4
Event Duration4
minutes
Annually year 1, 2, 3
_
Quarterly year 4
Total Flow4
MG
Annually year 1, 2, 3
_
SDO
Quarterly year 4
Footnotes:
1 Measurement Frequency: Once per year during years 1, 2, and 3 of the permit term. Each quarter during the 4'h
year of the permit term. A year is defined as the 12 month period beginning on the month and day of issuance of
the Permit. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge. If the detention pond discharges only in response
to a storm event exceeding a ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative
monitoring shall be performed.
3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative
outfall status has been granted.
4 For each sampled representative storm event the total precipitation, storm duration, and total flow must be
monitored. Total flow shall be either; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area
draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c)
estimated by the measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event.
Table 2 Monitoring schedule
Part II Page 4 of 6

Ole
00
Permit No. NCS000350
r
o 'iVlonttonrtg pertod�4
,: a , �.::Tr
_'Sample Number m
x ,
g Start4 „ `
``- Irnd " r y
Year 1
1
May 1, 2002
April 30, 2003
Year 2
2
May 1, 2003
April 30, 2004
Year 3
3
May 1, 2004
April 30, 2005
Year 4 - V quarter
4
May 1, 2005
July 31, 2005
Year 4 - 2'd quarter
5
August 1, 2005
October 31, 2005
Year 4 - 3"' quarter
6
November 1, 2005
January 31, 2006
Year 4 - 4"' quarter
7
February 1, 2006
April 30, 2006
SECTION C: QUALITATIVE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Qualitative monitoring requires a visual inspection of each stormwater outfall regardless of
representative outfall status and shall be performed as specified below in Table 3. Qualitative
monitoring is for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SPPP) and assessing new sources of stormwater pollution. No analytical tests
are required. Qualitative monitoring of stormwater outfalls does not need to be performed during
a representative storm event.
In the event an atypical condition is noted at a stormwater discharge outfall, the Permittee shall
document the suspected cause of the condition and any actions taken in response to the
discovery. This documentation will be maintained with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan.
All qualitative monitoring will be performed twice per year, once in the spring (April - June) and
once in the fall (September - November).
Table 3. Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Characteristics :;
yy,,
Fr equency,
'..
.ti.: i('�C's
MoliltdM,�* ig
'01t ati4n1
Color
Semi -Annual
SDO
Odor
Semi -Annual
SDO
Clarity
Semi -Annual
SDO
Floating Solids
Semi -Annual
SDO
Suspended Solids
Semi -Annual
SDO
Foam
Semi -Annual
SDO
Oil Sheen
Semi -Annual
SDO
Other obvious indicators
of stormwater pollution
Semi -Annual
SDO
Footnotes:
Part 11 Page 5 of 6

041 040
Permit No. NCS000350
I Monitoring Location: Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO)
regardless of representative outfall status.
SECTION D: ON -SITE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Facilities which have any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on -site which uses more.than
55 gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar year shall perform
analytical monitoring as specified below in Table 4. This monitoring shall be performed at all
outfalls which discharge stormwater runoff from vehicle maintenance areas.
All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a representative storm event. The required
monitoring will result in a minimum of 7 analytical samplings being conducted over the term of
the permit at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) which discharges stormwater runoff from
vehicle maintenance areas. The permittee shall complete the minimum 7 analytical samplings in
accordance with the schedule specified in Table 2 (Part lI, Section B).
Table 4. Analytical Monitor in Re uirements for On -Site Vehicle Maintenance
Dtshar kx�T�`
g Uhara terishcs
r ` Unt
Measuremen
Sample
Same c�
ocatran
pH
standard
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
Quarterly year 4
Oil and Grease
mgll
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
Quarterly year 4
Total Suspended Solids
mg/1
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
Quarterly year 4
New Motor Oil Usage
gallons/month
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Estimate
-
QuarterIX year 4
Total Flow4
MG
Annually year 1, 2, 3
Grab
SDO
Quarterly year 4
Footnotes:
I Measurement Frequency: Once per year during years 1, 2, and 3 of the permit term. Each quarter during the e
year of the permit term. A year is defined as the 12 month period beginning on the month and day of issuance of
the Permit. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge. If the detention pond discharges only in response
to a storm event exceeding a ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative
monitoring shall be performed.
3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) that discharges
stormwater runoff from area(s) where vehicle maintenance activities occur.
4 Total flow shall be; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall,
the amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c) estimated by the measurement
of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and duration of the rainfall event
measured shall result from the sampled representative storm event.
Part 11 Page 6 of 6

0 • 00 Permit No. NCS000350
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER INDIVIDUAL PERMITS
SECTION A: COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
Compliance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in
accordance with the following schedule:
Existing Facilities: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented within
12 months of the effective date of the initial permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary
containment, as specified in Part II, Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this permit, shall be accomplished within
12 months of the effective date of the initial permit issuance.
Proposed Facilities: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented prior to
the beginning of discharges from the operation of the industrial activity and be updated thereafter on an
annual basis. Secondary containment, as specified in Part II, Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this permit shall
be accomplished prior to the beginning of discharges from the operation of the industrial activity.
2. Duty to Comply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this individual permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit
termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit upon renewal application.
a. The permittee shall comply with standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the
Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these
standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement.
b. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition is subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed $27,500 per day for each violation. Any person who negligently violates any
permit condition is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. Any person who knowingly violates permit
conditions is subject to criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. Also, any person who violates a permit condition
may be assessed an administrative penalty not to exceed $11,000 per violation with the maximum
amount not to exceed $137,500. [Ref: Section 309 of the Federal Act 33 USC 1319 and 40 CFR
122.41(a).]
C. Under state law, a daily civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per
violation may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the
terms, conditions; or requirements of a permit. [Ref: North Carolina General Statutes 143-
215.6A]
d. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Director for violating section 301,
302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act; or any permit condition or limitation implementing any
of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act. Administrative penalties for Class
I violations are not to exceed $11,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I
penalty assessed not to exceed $27,500. Penalties for Class 11 violations are not to exceed $I 1,000
per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class
11 penalty not to exceed $137,500.
Part III Page I of 8 Pages

0 • r , . •
Permit No. NCS000350
3. Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this
individual permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.
4. Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Part III, Section C of this permit regarding bypassing of stormwater control facilities,
nothing in this individual permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities,
liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3, 143-215.6A, 143-215.613, 143-
215.6C or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended.
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liabilit
Nothing in this individual permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject to
under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1321.
Property Rights
The issuance of this individual permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of
personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
Severability
The provisions of this individual permit are severable, and if any provision of this individual permit, or the
application of any provision of this individual permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application
of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this individual permit, shall not be affected
thereby.
Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director
may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the
permit issued pursuant to this individual permit or to determine compliance with this individual permit. The
permittee shall also furnish to the Director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this
individual permit.
Penalties for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate,
any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this individual permit shall, upon
conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more
than two years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first
conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more that $20,000 per day of
violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.
10. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this individual
Part III Page 2 of 8 Pages

0
• • Permit No. NCS000350
permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be
punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation, or by both.
SECTION B: GENERAUCONDITIONS
Individual Permit Expiration
The permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to receive automatic
authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall submit forms and fees as are
required by the agency authorized to issue permits no later than 180 days prior to the expiration date. Any
permittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, or any permittee that does not
have a permit after the expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will be
subjected to enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS § 143-2153.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
Transfers
This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to and approval by the Director. The
Director may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the name and
incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act. Permittee is required
to notify the Division in writing in the event the permitted facility is sold or closed.
3. SigranatoryRequirements
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified.
a. All applications to be covered under this individual permit shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a
responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice president
of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who
performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (b) the
manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities employing more
than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million (in
second quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or
delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
. respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive
officer or ranking elected official.
b. All reports required by the individual permit and other information requested by the Director shall
be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the
overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant
manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent
responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental
Part III Page 3 of 8 Pages

0 • •• Permit No. NCS000350
matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named
individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Director.
C. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b.-of this section shall make the following
certification:
1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
4. Individual Permit Modification Revocation and Reissuance or Termination
The issuance of this individual permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the
individual permit, revoking and reissuing the individual permit, or terminating the individual permit as
allowed by the' laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122
and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0100; and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 et. al.
5. Permit Actions
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The notification of planned
changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any individual permit condition.
SECTION C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
Proper Opgration and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and
control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with
the conditions of this individual permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate
laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of
back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation
is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this individual permit.
2. Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this individual permit.
Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass unless:
a. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage; and
There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary control facilities,
retention of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry
Part III Page 4 of 8 Pages

90 •. Permit No. NCS000350
weather. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed in
the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal
periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
The permittee submitted notices as required under, Part I11, Section E of this permit.
If the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above, the Director may approve an
anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects.
SECTION D: MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Sampline
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the volume and
nature of the permitted discharge. Analytical sampling shall be performed during a representative storm
event. Samples shall be taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge. All samples shall be
taken before the discharge joins or is diluted by any other waste stream, body of water, or substance.
Monitoring points as specified in this permit shall not be changed without notification to and approval of
the Director.
2. Recording Results
For each measurement, sample, inspection or maintenance activity performed or collected pursuant to the
requirements of this individual permit, the permittee shall record the following information:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling, measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
b. The individual(s) who performed the sampling, measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
3. Flow Measurements
Where required, appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of
monitored discharges.
4. Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published pursuant to
NCGS 143-215.63 et. seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant
to Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended, and Regulation
40 CFR 136.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this individual permit, all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum
detection or lower reporting level of the procedure.
Part III Page 5 of 8 Pages

00 00' Permit No. NCS000350
Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that are
required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status. If it is
established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is granted
representative outfall status, then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced number of outfalls.
6. Records Retention
Visual monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at the facility along with the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan. Copies of analytical monitoring results shall also be maintained on -site. The
permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance
records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all
reports required by this individual permit for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the sample,
measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time.
Inspection and Entry
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor
acting as a representative of the Director), or in the case of a facility which discharges through a municipal
separate storm sewer system, an authorized representative of a municipal operator or the separate storm
sewer system receiving the discharge, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be
required by law, to;
a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted,
or where records must be kept under the conditions of this individual permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of
this individual permit;
C. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment),
practices, or operations regulated or required under this individual permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring individual permit compliance
or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location.
SECTION E: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Discharge Monitoring Reports
Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be submitted to the Division on
Discharge Monitoring Report forms provided by the Director. Submittals shall be received by the Division
no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.
2. Submitting Reports
Duplicate signed copies of all reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Part III Page 6 of 8 Pages

0• } _ 0•
Permit No. NCS000350
Availabilit_y_of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal
Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection
at the offices of the Division of Water Quality. As required by the Act, analytical data shall not be
considered confidential. Knowingly making any false statement on any such report may result in the
imposition of criminal penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-215.6B or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
4. Non-Stormwater Dischariz
If the storm event monitored in accordance with this individual permit coincides with a non-stormwater
discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under the non-stormwater
discharge permit and provide this information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report.
5. Planned Changes
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which could significantly alter the nature or quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification
requirement includes pollutants which are not specifically listed in the individual permit or subject to
notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42 (a).
6. Anticipated Noncompliance
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which may result in noncompliance with the individual permit requirements.
7. BYpas
a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit
prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of
the anticipated quality and affect of the bypass.
b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of an
unanticipated bypass.
8. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance which
may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from
the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided
within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the period of
noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the
anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received
within 24 hours.
9. Other Noncompliance
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at the time
monitoring reports are submitted.
Part III Page 7 of 8 Pages

00 1 010
Permit No. NCS000350
10. Other Information
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in an application for an
individual permit or in any report to the Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
Part III Page 8 of 8 Pages

*0
F ' •
0 Permit No. NCS000350
PART IV
LIMITATIONS REOPENER
This individual permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply with any applicable
effluent guideline or water quality standard issued or approved under Sections 302(b) (2) (c), and (d), 304(b) (2) and
307(a) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent guideline or water quality standard so issued or approved:
a. Contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluent limitation in the individual
permit; or
b. Controls any pollutant not limited in the individual permit.
The individual permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any otber requirements in the
Act then applicable.
PART V ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE
REQUIREMENTS
The permittee must pay the administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being billed by,
the Division. Failure to pay the fee in timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause this
Division to initiate action to revoke the Individual Permit.
1. Act
See Clean Water Act.
2. Arithmetic Mean
93
4.
PART VI DEFINITIONS
The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the individual values divided by the number of
individual values.
Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges
This permit regulates stormwater discharges. Non-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in the
stormwater conveyance system are:
(a) All other discharges that are authorized by a non-stormwater NPDES permit.
(b) Uncontaminated groundwater, foundation drains, air -conditioner condensate without added
chemicals, springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant
flushings, water from footing drains, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands.
(c) Discharges resulting from fire -fighting or fire -fighting training.
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters. BMPs may take the
form of a process, activity, or physical structure.
Parts IV, V and VI Page I of 5

00
•0 Permit No. NCS000350
5. Bypass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including
the collection system, which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility.
6. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage capacity of greater than
1,320 gallons.
7. Clean Water Act
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended, 33
USC 1251, et. seq.
8. 'Division or DWO
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
9. Director
The Director of the Division of Water Quality, the permit issuing authority.
10. EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
11. Grab Sample
An individual sample collected instantaneously. Grab samples that will be directly analyzed or qualitatively
monitored must be taken within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
12. Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
13. Landfill
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land
treatment facility, a surface impoundment, an injection well, a hazardous waste long-term storage facility or
a surface storage facility.
14. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer S stem
A stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self-government such as a city or town.
15. Overburden
Any material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding
topsoil or similar naturally -occurring surface materials that are not disturbed by mining operations.
Part VI Page 2 of 5 Pages

L F �•
Permit No. NCS000350
16. Permittee
The owner or operator issued a permit pursuant to this individual permit.
17, Point Source Discharge of Stormwater
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance including, but not specifically limited to, any pipe, ditch,
channel, tunnel, conduit, well, or discrete fissure from which stormwater is or may be discharged to waters
of the state.
18. Representative Storm Event
A storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no
storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive
hours of no precipitation. For example, if it rains for 2 hours without producing any collectable discharge, and then
stops, a sample may be collected if a rain producing a discharge begins again within the next 10 hours.
19. Representative Outfall Status
When it is established that the discharge of stormwater runoff from a single outfall is representative of the
discharges at multiple outfalls, the DWQ may grant representative outfall status. Representative outfall
status allows the permittee to perform analytical monitoring at a reduced number of outfalls.
20. Rinse Water Discharge
The discharge of rinse water from equipment cleaning areas associated with industrial activity. Rinse
waters from vehicle and equipment cleaning areas are process wastewaters and do not include washwaters
utilizing any type of detergent or cleaning agent.
21. Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient
freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
22. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -
to -Know Act of 1986;
b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
C. That meet at least one of the following criteria:
(1) , Is listed in Appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table 11 (organic priority
pollutants), Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain toxic
pollutants and hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40
CFR l 16.4; or
(3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
Part VI Page 3 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCS000350
23,
24.
Severe Property Damage
Means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the control facilities which causes them to
become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss
caused by delays in production.
Significant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production;
hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to
report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes,
slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges.
25. Significant Spills
26.
27
28.
29
30.
31
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of
CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt.
Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and which is
directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site. Facilities
considered to be engaged in "industrial activities" include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14).
The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
A comprehensive site -specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution and
is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site.
Ten Year Design Storm
The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average once in ten
years. Design storm information can be found in the State of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.
Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the entire storm event occurs. Total flow shall be
either; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the
amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c) estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event.
Toxic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
Part VI Page 4 of 5 Pages

..
Permit No. 1VCS000350
32. Upset
Means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with
technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the
permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly
designed treatment or control facilities, inadequate treatment or control facilities, lack of preventive
maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
33, Vehicle Maintenance Activity
Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, painting, fueling, lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations, or
airport deicing operations.
34. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air,
gravity, or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye.
35. 25-year, 24 hour storm event
The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average, once in 25
years.
Part VI Page 5 of 5 Pages