NCS000136_COMPLIANCE_20180213

---. ---STORMWATER-DIVISI'ON-CODING SHEET ---
PERMIT NO.
NC S 000 ) i�
DOC TYPE
❑ FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
X COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ ,% 0 � ) �
YYYYM M D D

• L
h
y,a
Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
EINVIROMMUNTAL QUALITY
Mr. Timothy M. Goodman
SpecGx, LLC
8801 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27616
Dear Mr. Goodman:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
WILLIAM E. TOBY VINSON, JR.
Interim Director
February 13, 2018
�EIVED
FEB 14 2018
CENTRAL FILES
MVR SECTION
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit NCS000136
SpecGx, LLC
Formerly Mallinckrodt, LLC
Wake County
Division personnel received your request to revise your stormwater permit to accurately reflect your new
company and/or facility name.
Find enclosed the revised permit cover page. The terms and conditions contained in the Individual Permit
remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised permit cover page is issued under the requirements of
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Please note that the permit cover page reflects the original date of expiration as November 30, 2016. We did
receive the renewal application for this permit on June 3, 2016 and currently have a back log of renewals
that we are working through. Please continue to abide by the conditions of the expired individual permit
until a new permit is issued for this facility.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Central Office j 1612 Mail Service Center 1. Raleigh, NC 27609
919 707 9200

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Program at
[phone].
Sincerely,
76rWilliam E. Toby Vinson, Jr., PE, CPESC, CPM
Interim Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Program
Central Files

NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
NPDES Stormwater Permit Contacts Summary
NC DEMLR has the followine contact information in our Permit Database for your aermit as of 2/13/201$.
Permit Number: NCS000136
Permit Type: Stormwater Dischargg, Individual
Facility Name: r h Mmaceutical Plant
Facility Addressl: 8801 Canital_Blvd
Facility Address2:
City, State & Zip: Raleioh. KC 27616
Owner Information Details:
MUST submit a Chaege of Nsme/Ownerslt/p form to QEMLR to make any changes to this Ciwner InTprrttation.
See "Mlscellaneous Forms" at httM/ .onai.ncaenr.oralweb/Irinpgsati ormwaxet
Owner Name: Soecgx LLC
owner Type: Non -Government Owner Type Group: 4[aanization
Owner Affiliation: -nmothv M Goodman Title:
Addressi: 8801 Capital Blvd
Address2:
City, State & Zip: Raleigh. NC 27616
Work Phone: 9,19-878-2822 Fax: [phone]
Email Address: tim.goodman(mmallinckrodt.com
*** P.ertnii Annual F,ee Bllling ***
Billing Month: Setstember
Invoice_Number In
Phon EM
%il
Iaclllty Contact Persons+)
Contact Name _ IIU2 _
Address Phone FAX
9MAH
Tim Roberts
8801 Capital Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27616 919-878-2895 919-878-2823
tim.roberts@mallinckr
odt.com
permlt Contect Persons)
Contagt Ilil>3 MiS
Addres Phone E"
F.mXll
Tim Roberts
8801 Capital Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27616 919-878-2895 919-878-2823
tim.roberts@tycoheal
thcare.com
erml Bllling Confect
Contact Name Ift
Address phone FAX
loll
rim Roberts
8801 Capital Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27616 919-878-2800
2/13/2018 Page i

t
Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources
�A Land Quality Section/Stormwater Permitting
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCDENR
NOMV1 CAROLING CE TMCNT OF
EWN MC MONO ftl RCC PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
1. Please enter the permit number for which the change is requested.
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Da
NPDES Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
0 1 0 1 1 13 1 6 Ci
II. Permit status prior to requested change.
a. Permit issued to (company name): Mallinckrodt LLC
b. Person legally responsible for permit: _ Timothy M Goodman
First MI Last
Site Director
DEC 11201�
DENR-Ukt4D QL1AL1r1�0
STORMWASER PER
c. Facility name (discharge):
d. Facility address:
e. Facility contact person:
Title
8801 Caoital Boulevard
Permit Holder Mailing Address
_ Raleigh NC 27616 _
City State Zip
[phone] [phone]
Phone Fax
Mallinckrodt LLC
8801 Caoital Boulevard
Address
Raleigh NC 27616
City State Zip
Timothy D. Roberts [phone]
First / MI / Last Phone
Ill. Please provide the following for the requested change (revised permit).
a. Request for change is a result of. ® Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the facility or owner
If other please explain:
b. Permit issued to (company name):
c. Person legally responsible for permit:
d. Facility name (discharge):
c. Facility address:
£ Facility contact person:
SpecGx LLC
Timothv M Goodman
First MI Last
Site Director
Title
8801 Capital Boulevard
Permit Holder Mailing Address
Raleigh_ NC 27616
City State Zip
[phone] [e-mail]
Phone E-mail Address
Mall inckrodt-Ralei h Pharmaceutical Plant
8801 Caoital Boulevard
Address
Raleigh_ NC 27616
City State Zip
Timothy D Roberts
First MI Last
[phone] [e-mail]
Phone E-mail Address
IV. Permit contact information (if different from the person legally responsible for the permit)
Revised San. 27. 2014

NPDES PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
Page 2 of 2
Permit contact:
Timothy D Roberts
rirst MI Last
Principal Environmental Enaineer
Title /
8801 Capital Boulevard y/
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27616
City State Zip
[phone] [e-mail]
Phone E-mail Address
V. Will the permitted facility continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior
to this ownership or name change?
® Yes
❑ No (please explain)
V1 Required Items: THIS APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED UNPROCESSED IF ITEMS
ARE INCOMPLETE OR MISSING:
This completed application is required for both name change and/or ownership change
requests.
j� Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as relevant pages of a contract deed,
or a bill of sale) is required for an ownership change request. Articles of incorporation are
not sufficient for an ownership change.
The certifications below must be completed and signed by both the permit holder prior to the change, and
the new applicant in the case of an ownership change request. For a name change request, the signed
Applicant's Certification is sufficient.
PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION (Permit holder prior to ownership change):
1, Timothy M. Goodman, attest that this application for a name/ownership change has been reviewed and is
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this application
package ill be returned as incomplete.
l 7 L-4-017
Signature Date
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I, Timothy M. Goodman, attest that this application for a name/ownership change has been reviewed and is
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this application
package will be turned as incomplete.
Signature Date
PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETE APPLICATION PACKAGE TO:
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting Program
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Sew+ V /�� ,x�re5s `�-;_� 7767?Z)3�5
Revised Jan, 27, 2014

Excise Tax
Tax Lot No.
Recording Time, Book and Page
Parcel Identifier No. 1728813805, 1728814800,
1728817928, 1728843117, 1728825093, 1728828027,
1728817266, 1728914918, 1728826294, 1728824048,
1738161048, 1738150018, 1728813606, 1728912468,
1728728280,1728724587
Verified By County on the day of , 201_
By
Mail after recording to: Mallinckrodt LLC, 675 McDonnell Boulevard, Hazelwood, Missouri 63042
This instrument was prepared by: Mallinckrodt LLC, 675 McDonnell Boulevard, Hazelwood, Missouri 63042
Brief description for the Index:
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made as of the 2nd day of December, 2017, by and between
GRANTOR
Mallinclirodt LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
675 McDonnell Boulevard
Hazelwood, Missouri 63042
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC
GRANTEE
SpecGx LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
385 Marshall Avenue
Webster Groves, Missouri 63119

The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
The property herein conveyed is not the personal residence of Grantor.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain
lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina and more particularly
described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 8529, Page
944, Wake County, North Carolina Records.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor has done nothing to impair such title as Grantor
received, and Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by,
under or through Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title.to the property hereinabove described is subject to easements, restrictions, and other matters of record.
This transfer is between affiliated entities, and no money is due or paid by the Grantee to the Grantor.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
SLC-8436663-1.
Raleigh, NC

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in the corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto
affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written.
MALLINCKRODT LLC,
a Delaware limited liability ompany
By:
Name: C, Ste en Kri h ,
Title:_ Vice President & As. ', tant Secretary
STATE OF MISSOURI )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS )
1, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that C. Stephen Kriegh personally came
before me this day and acknowledged that he.is the Vice President & Assistant Secretary of Mallinckrodt
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Grantor, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the
limited liability company, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name. Witness my hand and official
stamp or seal, this 21b day of W wrn Gr , 2017.
(Official seal.)
Notary Public
ANGELA J. SI MAN
Nota Public -Notary Seal
Slate o1 Mlssouri
Commissioned for St. Charles county
toy Commission Expires: August 13. 2016
Commission Number:1451569
SLC-9436663-1
Ralcigh, NC

Exbibit A to Deed
(Legal Description)
FIRST TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE WESTERN LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE
SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD IN THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY OF GENE H. MUELCHI,
NOW OR FORMERLY; AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA PLANE COORDINATES N(Y)
782,700.985 AND E(X) 2,127,941.689, AND RUNNING THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: (1)
NORTH 79° 50' 07" WEST 1934.93 FEET TO A STAKE; (2) NORTH 000 40' 19" WEST 1245.53 FEET TO A
STAKE; (3) NORTH 860 52' 35" WEST 276.64 FEET TO A STAKE; (4) NORTH 680 30' 41" WEST 179.09
FEET TO A STAKE; (5) NORTH 010 03' 29" EAST 621.89 FEET TO A STAKE SITUATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF A BRANCH; (6) NORTH 010 03' 29" EAST TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID BRANCH; (7) IN A
NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID BRANCH TO A
POINT,' (8) NORTH 180 59' 38" EAST TO A STAKE SITUATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAID BRANCH;
REFERENCE LINE A: SAID LINE REPRESENTED BY CALLS NUMBERED (6), (7) AND (8) BEING
REFERENCED BY A TRAVERSE LINE RUNNING FROM THE STAKE AT THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER
(5) SITUATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID BRANCH DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (A) NORTH 270 00, 20"
EAST 295.26 FEET TO A POINT, (B) NORTH 220 20' 21" EAST 137.06 FEET TO A POINT, (C) NORTH 440
48' 47" EAST 445.09 FEET TO A POINT AND (D) NORTH 69° 35' 43" EAST 241.92 FEET TO SAID STAKE
SITUATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAID BRANCH, THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER (8); (9) NORTH
180 59' 38" EAST 2166.94 FEET ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE RIVERBEND
COMPANY TO A STAKE; (10) NORTH 180 59' 38" EAST TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF ABBOTTS
CREEK; (11) IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER OF ABBOTTS CREEK TO A POINT;
(12) SOUTH 210 19' 50" EAST TO A STAKE SITUATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID CREEK;
REFERENCE LINE B. SAID LINE REPRESENTED BY CALLS NUMBERED (10), (11) AND (12) BEING
REFERENCED BY A TRAVERSE LINE RUNNING FROM THE STAKE AT THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER
(9), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (A) SOUTH 510 43' 57" EAST 400.02 FEET TO A STAKE, (B) SOUTH 47°
25' 46" EAST 293.92 FEET TO A POINT AND (C) SOUTH 510 32' 48" EAST 301.08 FEET TO A STAKE; (13)
SOUTH 21° 19' 50" EAST 480.16 FEET TO A STAKE; (14) NORTH 360 23' 02" EAST 471.08 FEET TO A
STAKE; (15) NORTH 360 23' 02" EAST TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF ABBOTTS CREEK; (16) IN AN
EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER OF ABBOTTS CREEK TO THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE
RIVER; REFERENCE LINE C: SAID LINE REPRESENTED BY CALLS NUMBERED (15) AND (16) BEING
REFERENCED BY A TRAVERSE LINE RUNNING FROM THE STAKE AT THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER
(14) DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (A) NORTH 890 58' 04" EAST 224.71 FEET TO A POINT, (B) SOUTH 570
01' 39" EAST 367.91 FEET TO A POINT, (C) NORTH 820 50' 59" EAST 503.20 FEET TO A POINT, (D)
NORTH 580 15' 39" EAST 135.14 FEET TO A POINT, (E) NORTH 680 59' 41" EAST 388.01 FEET TO A
POINT, (F) NORTH 28° 04' 46" EAST 223.70 FEET TO A POINT, (G) NORTH 840 41' 03" EAST 141.22
FEET TO A POINT, (H) SOUTH 160 20' 26" EAST 112.80 FEET TO A POINT, (I) NORTH 720 59' 12" EAST
211.01 FEEL' TO A STAKE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ABBOTTS CREEK AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE
NEUSE RIVER, AND.(3) NORTH 72° 59' 12" EAST A COMPUTED DISTANCE OF 54.40 FEET TO A POINT
IN THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE RIVER; (17) IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE CENTER OF
THE NEUSE RIVER TO A POINT; (18) SOUTH 09° 32' 46" WEST TO A STAKE ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE
OF THE NEUSE RIVER IN THE WESTERN LINE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD PROPERTY;
REFERENCE LINE D: SAID LINE REPRESENTED BY CALLS (17) AND (18) BEING REFERENCED BY A
COMPUTED LINE BEGINNING IN THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE RIVER AT THE TERMINUS OF A
COMPUTED DISTANCE OF 54.40 FEET DESCRIBED IN REFERENCE LINE C(J) ABOVE AND RUNNING THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: (A) SOUTH 010 30' EAST 182.00 FEET TO A POINT, (B) SOUTH
250 00' EAST 238.00 FEET TO A POINT, (C) SOUTH 360 06' EAST z19.00 FEET TO A POINT, (D) SOUTH
340 00"EAST 167.81 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE RIVER AND (E) SOUTH 090 32'
SI.C-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

46" WEST 81.57 FEET TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED STAKE ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE NEUSE
RIVER IN THE WESTERN LINE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD PROPERTY, WHICH SAID
STAKE IS THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER (18); REFERENCE LINE E: SAID LINE REPRESENTED BY
CALLS (17) AND (18) BEING FURTHER REFERENCED BY A TRAVERSE LINE ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE
OF THE .NEUSE RIVER BEGINNING AT THE STAKE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ABBOTTS CREEK AND THE
WEST SIDE OF THE NEUSE RIVER MENTIONED ABOVE AS THE TERMINUS OF REFERENCE LINE C(I)
AND RUNNING THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: (A) SOUTH 000 23' 08" WEST 212.66 FEET
TO A POINT, (B) SOUTH 240 33' 06" EAST 238.93 FEET TO A POINT, (C) SOUTH 39° 01' 37" EAST
215.97 FEET TO A POINT, AND (D) SOUTH 36° 15' 33" EAST 224.10 FEET TO, THE STAKE SITUATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE NEUSE RIVER IN THE WESTERN LINE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE
RAILROAD PROPERTY, WHICH IS THE TERMINUS OF CALL NUMBER (18) ABOVE SET FORTH; (19)
SOUTH 090 32" 46" WEST ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SEABOARD
COASTLINE RAILROAD 1146.91 FEET TO A STAKE; (20) SOUTH 740 46' 41" EAST ALONG THE
SOUTHERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD 167.09 FEET TO A
CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE
RAILROAD MAIN TRACK; (21) ALONG THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD SOUTH 151
34' 00" WEST 281.98 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; (22) CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERN
RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING.A RADIUS OF 1839.86 FEET A DISTANCE OF 1018.02 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; (23)
CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 420 43' 51" EAST
30.00 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; (24) CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING
A RADIUS OF 1869.86 FEET A DISTANCE OF 794.58 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; (25)
CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD SOUTH 710 37WEST 204.63
FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; (26) CONTINUING WITH SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN A
SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH .A RADIUS OF 1949.86 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 1630.68 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT; AND (27) CONTINUING ALONG SAID
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 230 42' WEST 20.56 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT, THE POINT
AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 380.614 ACRES ACCORDING TO A SURVEY AND MAP BY
PRECISE CONTROL, INC., DATED MARCH, 1975, AND RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS 1976, PAGE 28,
WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THE ABOVE REFERENCED DESCRIPTION INCLUDES ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED AS
'TRACT NUMBER 207 - THE NEUSE TRACT", CONTAINING 390.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, CONVEYED TO
HALIFAX TIMBER COMPANY BY DEED DATED OCTOBER 31, 1968, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1850, PAGE
541, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY, LESS THE PARCEL CONTAINING 0.90 ACRES CONVEYED TO THE
SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1972, AND RECORDED IN BOOK
2054, PAGE 43, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; HALIFAX TIMBER COMPANY MERGED INTO HOERNER-
WALDORF CORPORATION ON MARCH 02, 1970 BY ARTICLES OF MERGER RECORDED IN CORPORATION
BOOK 9, PAGE 535, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY. THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT,
INC. BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 9, 1976, RECORDED IN BOOK 2378, PAGE 148, WAKE COUNTY
REGISTRY.
SECOND TRACT:
COMMENCE AT A POINT MARKING THE INTERSECTION OF THE PAVED PORTION OF THE NEUSE DEPOT
ROAD WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE PAVED PORTION OF U. S. HIGHWAY 1 AND RUN THENCE WITH
THE CENTER LINE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD NORTH 59 DEGREES 33 MINUTES WEST 288 FEET TO A
POINT, AND LEAVING SAID ROAD NORTH'26 DEGREES 07 MINUTES EAST 30.09 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD, WHICH POINT IS THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING; RUNS THENCE FROM SAID POINT -AND PLACE OF BEGINNING AND .WITH THE NORTH SIDE
OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD NORTH 59 DEGREES 33 MINUTES WEST 673.73 FEET TO A STAKE AND
NORTH 59 DEGREES 45 MINUTES WEST 820.74 FEET TO A STAKE, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
SL.C•8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

PROPERTY OF R. E. SMITH; RUNS THENCE WITH THE SMITH PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING COURSES
AND DISTANCES: NORTH 31 DEGREES 52 MINUTES EAST 152.2 FEET TO A STAKE, NORTH 58 DEGREES
08 MINUTES WEST 318 FEET TO A STAKE AND SOUTH 08 DEGREES 24 MINUTES WEST 171.90 FEET TO
A POINT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD; RUNS THENCE WITH SAID ROAD NORTH
59 DEGREES 06 MINUTES WEST 259.26 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF A
30-FOOT STREET (UNNAMED) RUNNING NORTH FROM SAID NEUSE DEPOT ROAD; RUNS THENCE WITH
THE EAST SIDE OF SAID UNNAMED STREET NORTH 28 DEGREES 2L MINUTES EAST 674 FEET TO A
STAKE, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SIDNEY P. POWELL PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH
POWELUS LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST `
210 FEET TO A STAKE, NORTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST-210 FEET TO A STAKE AND NORTH 61
DEGREES 36 MINUTES WEST 210 FEET TO A STAKE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAID UNNAMED STREET;
RUNS THENCE WITH SAID STREET NORTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST 225 FEET TO A STAKE;
RUNS THENCE NORTH fit DEGREES 36 MINUTES WEST 15 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SAID UNNAMED
STREET; RUNS THENCE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID UNNAMED STREET (NOW CLOSED FOR THE
PORTION OF THIS CALL) NORTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST 990 FEET TO A STAKE; RUNS THENCE
SOUTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST 15 FEET TO A STAKE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAID FORMER
STREET IN THE LINE OF THE HOLDEN PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH THE HOLDEN PROPERTY THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST 667.50 FEET, NORTH
28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST 535 FEET, NORTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES WEST 7.5 FEET, NORTH 28
DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST 125 FEET AND NORTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES WEST 660 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILWAY COMPANY; RUNS
THENCE WITH THE CURVE OF THE EASTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILWAY 1901.09 FEET IN
A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT, AND CONTINUING WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 20
DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST 85.06 FEET TO A STAKE AND SOUTH 70 DEGREES 09 MINUTES EAST 35
FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY RUNS SOUTH 50 DEGREES 49 MINUTES
EAST 33.4 FEET TO A :STAKE; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 29 MINUTES VEST 34.91 FEET TO A
STAKE IN THE LINE OF THE POWELL PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH THE LINE OF THE POWELL
PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 00 DEGREES 17 MINUTES WEST
294.97 FEET TO A STAKE, AND CONTINUING THE SAME COURSE 498.31 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE
STILL WITH THE POWELL PROPERTY SOUTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES WEST 52.15 FEET TO A STAKE
AND SOUTH 68 DEGREES 10 MINUTES EAST 38 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; RUNS THENCE WITH THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U. S.
HIGHWAY NO. 1 THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 16 DEGREES 43 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 14 DEGREES 57 MINUTES WEST
100 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 12 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 10
DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 09 DEGREES. 39 MINUTES WEST 112 FEET
TO A STAKE AND SOUTH 08 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST 2031.75 FEET TO A STAKE, THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE BAZEMORE PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 59 MINUTES WEST 263.42
FEET WITH BAZEMORE'S LINE TO ASTAKE, AND CONTINUING WITH HIS LINE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 01
MINUTE WEST 336.48 FEET TO A STAKE, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE IN A B. HOLDEN
PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH HOLDEN'S LINE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 49 MINUTES WEST 198.52 FEET
AND SOUTH 05 DEGREES 08 MINUTES EAST 151.34 FEET TO A STAKE, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE THELMA H. JOYNER PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH THE JOYNER LINE SOUTH 14 DEGREES .38
MINUTES WEST 92.5 FEET TO A STAKE AND SOUTH 08 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST 100 FEET TO A
STAKE, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE MRS. L. W. PERRY PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH PERRY'S
WESTERN LINE SOUTH 08 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST 94.95 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 03 DEGREES
38 MINUTES EAST 120 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 19 DEGREES 08 MINUTES WEST 112.3 FEET TO A
STAKE, SOUTH 28 DEGREES 31 MINUTES WEST 125.37 FEET TO A STAKE AND SOUTH 26 DEGREES 07
MINUTES WEST 166.85 FEET TO A STAKE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD, THE
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 122.85 ACRES, ALL ACCORDING TO A SURVEY BY
BONEY & NOWECAB DATED AUGUST, 1965.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO A.J. HONEYCUTT BY THE FOLLOWING DEEDS: DEED DATED
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

OCTOBER 19, 1934, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 695, PAGE 195, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; DEED DATED
DECEMBER 3, 1917, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 318, PAGE 433, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; DEED DATED
OCTOBER 3, 1917, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 316, PAGE 535, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; DEED DATED
SEPTEMBER 4, 1919, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 337, PAGE 526, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; DEED
DATED JANUARY 15, 1913, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 275, PAGE 343, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; DEED
DATED JANUARY 2, 1904, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 187, PAGE 233, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY. SEE
ALSO ORDER OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WAKE COUNTY DATED AUGUST 2, 1965,
AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1663, PAGE 104, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 273, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIRD TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A STAKE INMRS. J. T. HUNTER'S LINE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PUBLIC ROAD
LEADING BY NEUSE DEPOT AND 33 LINKS FROM THE CENTER OF THE ROAD, RUNNING THENCE
NORTH 4 DEGREES EAST 2 CHAINS AND 28 LINKS TO A STAKE, MRS. W. H. PACE'S CORNER IN MRS.
HUNTER'S LINE; THENCE WITH MRS. W. H: PACE'S LINE SOUTH 62 3/4 DEGREES EAST 4 CHAINS AND
27 LINKS TO A STAKE CORNER OF LOT NO. 2 IN MRS. W. H. PACE'S LINE; THENCE WITH LINE OF LOT
NO. 2 SOUTH 4 DEGREES WEST 2 CHAINS AND 28 LINKS TO A STAKE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
AFORESAID ROAD, CORNER OF LOT NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID ROAD NORTH 62 3/4 DEGREES WEST
4 CHAINS AND 27 LINKS TO THE BEGINNING; CONTAINING 90/100 OF AN ACRE.
EXCEPTING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED
FROM A. J. HONEYCUTT AND WIFE TO VANGUARD CLASS OF RALEIGH, INC., DATED DECEMBER 2,
1929, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 579, PAGE 566, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY; SAID TRACT BEGINNING AT
A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD ON THE EASTERN OUTSKIRTS OF THE
VILLAGE OF NEUSE, NORTH CAROLINA, SAID POINT BEING 95.7 FEET WESTWARDLY FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF SAID ROAD AND A STREET, RUNS THENCE ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD
NORTH 58 DEGREES WEST 82.8 FEET TO A POINT WITNESSED BY AN IRON PIPE ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF THE ROAD; RUNS THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES EAST 10.8 FEET TO A POINT ADJACENT, TO A
FENCE POST, SAID POINT BEING WITNESSED BY AN IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES EAST 80
FEET TO A POINT WITNESSED BY AN IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES WEST 126.2 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO A.J. HONEYCUTT BY DEED DATED JANUARY 2, 1904, AND
RECORDED IN BOOK 187, PAGE 233, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY. THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO
MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19, 1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665,
PAGE 273, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
'0111a 7T
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT (HILLSBORO) ROAD, SAID
POINT BEING LOCATED IN THE LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE
ALONG THE LINE OF THE SEABOARD RAILROAD PROPERTY NORTH 26 DEGREES EAST 895 FEET, MORE
OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SCHOOL LOT; RUNS THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF THE SAID SCHOOL LOT SOUTH 63 DEGREES 50 MINUTES EAST 235 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERN
CORNER OF SAID SCHOOL LOT IN THE OLD LINE BETWEEN THE HUNTER AND THE PACE PROPERTY;
RUNS THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES WEST 1000 FEET, MORE OR. LESS, TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE
NEUSE DEPOT ROAD; RUNS THENCE WITH THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD NORTH
61 DEGREES WEST 605 FEET, MORE OR.LESS, TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
BEING THE GREATER PART OF THE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN AS "MRS. HUNTER" ADJACENT TO THE
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY AS SHOWN ON MAP "MARY H. PACE'S PROPERTY" IN BOOK OF MAPS
1685, PAGE 106. EXCEPTING, HOWEVER, ANY PART OF THE TRACT CONVEYED BY A. J. HONEYCUTT
AND WIFE TO VANGUARD CLASS OF RALEIGH, INC., BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 20, 1929, RECORDED
IN BOOK 579, PAGE 566, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO A.J. HONEYCUTT BY DEEDS DATED OCTOBER 211 1968,
RECORDED IN BOOK 232, PAGE 170; MARCH 15, 1912, RECORDED IN BOOK 263, PAGE 137; AND BY
DEED DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 1913, RECORDED IN BOOK 276, PAGE 398, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 273, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
FIFTH TRACT:
LOT NO. 1 IN BLOCK NO. 1 (130 X 123 FEET)
LOT NO. 2 IN BLOCK NO. 1 (145 X 75 FEET)
LOT NO. 3 IN BLOCK NO. 1 (154 X 50 FEET)
LOT NO.4 IN BLOCK NO, 1 (145 X 50 FEET)
ALL AS SHOWN IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, ENTITLED "PROPERTY OF MARY M. PACE", IN THE
WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO A. J. HONEYCUTT BY DEED DATED AUGUST 14, 1926, RECORDED
IN BOOK 451, PAGE 20, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
TOGETHER WITH ALL THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE PARTY OF THE FIRST PART IN AND
TO.ANY STREET, ROAD, ALLEY, PATH OR DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "MAP
OF MRS. MARY H. PACE'S PROPERTY" RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, WAKE COUNTY
REGISTRY.
TOGETHER WITH ALL THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF A.J. HONEYCUTT, IN AND TO THE
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY ABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE
CENTER LINE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 1, AND ALL THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF A.J. HONEYCUTT IN
AND'TO THE PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY ABOVE DESCRIBED
AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE NEUSE DEPOT ROAD.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 273, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
SIXTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE IN THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 10N THE
SOUTH BANK OF THE NEUSE RIVER, RUNS THENCE WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 37
DEGREES 56 MINUTES WEST 787.09 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, SOUTH 37 DEGREES 16 MINUTES WEST
101.79 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, SOUTH 36 DEGREES 05 MINUTES WEST 101.94 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE,
SOUTH 34 DEGREES 17 MINUTES WEST 102.53 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, AND SOUTH 32 DEGREES 34
MINUTES WEST 88.62 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY RETAINED
BY THE GRANTOR, E. T. YOST; RUNS THENCE WITH THE LINE OF THE YOST PROPERTY NORTH 44
DEGREES 59 MINUTES WEST 250 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE; CONTINUES THENCE WITH THE LINE OF
THE YOST PROPERTY SOUTH 48 DEGREES 32 MINUTES WEST 97 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE IN THE LINE
OF THE POWELL PROPERTY, A CORNER OF THE YOST PROPERTY; RUNS THENCE WITH THE POWELL
LINE NORTH 41 DEGREES 28 MINUTES WEST 122.50 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, THE
NORTHERNMOST CORNER OF THE POWELL PROPERTY, A CORNER OF THE HONEYCUTT PROPERTY;
RUNS THENCE WITH THE HONEYCUTT LINE NORTH 00 DEGREES 29 MINUTES EAST 34.91 FEET TO AN
EXISTING IRON PIPE; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE HONEYCUTT LINE NORTH 50 DEGREES 49
SLC-8436663-1
Raieioi, NC

MINUTES WEST 33.40 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE IN THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILWAY; RUNS THENCE WITH THE EASTERN EDGE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY
NORTH 20 DEGREES 06 MINUTES EAST 665.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE IN THE EASTERN EDGE OF SAID
RIGHT OF WAY LINE; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 54 MINUTES EAST 189.02 FEET TO AN IRON
PIPE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST 382.83 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; RUNS
THENCE NORTH 52 DEGREES 24 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 53
DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST 20 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE AT OR NEAR THE SOUTH BANK OF THE NEUSE
RIVER; RUNS THENCE WITH THE SOUTH BANK OF THE NEUSE RIVER IN A SOUTHEASTERLY
DIRECTION TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING (SAID LAST CALL BEING MEASURED BY A
REFERENCE LINE BEGINNING AT THE IRON PIPE PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO AS BEING AT OR NEAR
THE SOUTH BANK OF THE NEUSE RIVER AND RUNS SOUTH 67 DEGREES 19 MINUTES EAST 112.04
FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, AND SOUTH 63 DEGREES 33 MINUTES EAST 341.21 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE IN
THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1), CONTAINING 13.15 ACRES, ALL
ACCORDING TO A SURVEY MADE BY HONEY AND NEWCOMBE, DATED AUGUST, 1965, AND BEING LAND
CONVEYED TO SAID E. T. IOST BY DEED FROM BURLINGTON HILLS CORPORATION RECORDED IN
BOOK 984, AT PAGE 106, AND BY DEED FROM H. H. JOBE RECORDED IN BOOK 630, AT PAGE 541, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
TOGETHER WITH ALL THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF E.T. YOST IN AND TO THE PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERN LINE OF THE PROPERTY ABOVE DESCRIBED AND THE CENTER LINE OF
U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 AND THE PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID PROPERTY
AND THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE RIVER.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 18,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 281, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
EXCEPT FROM THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS THE SIXTH TRACT HEREIN, THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY
LOCATED IN WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA CONVEYED BY DEED, DATED MARCH 24, 1978, BY
MALLINCKRODT, INC., AS GRANTOR TO THE TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, AS GRANTEE, RECORDED
MARCH 28, 1978 IN BOOK 2628, PAGE 227, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT AN EXISTING IRON PIPE ON THE NORTHWESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U. S.
HIGHWAY NO. 1, SAID POINT BEING AT THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT
PURCHASED BY MALLINCKRODT, INC. (FORMERLY MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS) FROM E. T.
YOST, UNMARRIED, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 18, 1965 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 281,
WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY, SAID BEGINNING POINT BEING IN THE LINE OF THE PROPERTY RETAINED
BY THE SAID E. T. YOST, RUNS THENCE WITH THE E. T. YOST LINE NORTH 44 DEGREES 59 MINUTES
WEST 125.00 FEET TO A POINT; RUNS THENCE AS ANEW LINE NORTH 34 DEGREES 17 MINUTES EAST
101.68 FEET TO A POINT; RUNS THENCE AS A NEW LINE SOUTH 55 DEGREES 43 MINUTES EAST
120.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1;
RUNS THENCE WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 SOUTH 34 DEGREES 17 MINUTES
WEST 36.38 FEET TO A POINT, AND SOUTH 32 DEGREES 34 MINUTES WEST 88.62 FEET TO AN
EXISTING IRON PIPE, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING;. AND CONTAINING .315 ACRES
ACCORDING TO A SURVEY ENTITLED "SURVEY FOR TOWN OF WAKE FOREST", PREPARED BY MOORE,
GARDNER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CONSULTING ENGINEERS, DATED NOVEMBER 29, 1977,
EXCEPTING AND RESERVING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. A PERPETUAL RIGHT AND EASEMENT ACROSS,
UNDER AND OVER THE SAID PREMISES ABOVE CONVEYED FOR ALL USES AND PURPOSES, WHICH
USES AND PURPOSES SHALL NOT BE INCONSISTENT WITH OR IN CONFLICT WITH THE USE OF THE
PROPERTY BY THE TOWN OF WAKE FOREST.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. BY DEED DATED AUGUST 18, 1965, AND
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 281, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
SEVENTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE END OF A THIRTY FOOT STREET, A CORNER OF THE
HONEYCUTT PROPERTY, WHICH POINT IS NORTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST 1139.03 FEET AS
MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID STREET FROM A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE NEUSE
DEPOT ROAD; RUNS THENCE NORTH 61 DEGREES 35 MINUTES WEST 620 FEET ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF A THIRTY FOOT STREET TO A STAKE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 54 MINUTES EAST
55 FEET TO A STAKE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 21 MINUTES WEST 1262 FEET TO A STAKE
IN THE EASTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILWAY COMPANY; .RUNS THENCE
WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 24 DEGREES 09 MINUTES EAST 41.55 FEET TO A STAKE AND
NORTH 75 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST 58.13 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE CONTINUING WITH SAID
RIGHT OF WAY AS IT CURVES IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION 1566.56 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE
CONTINUING WITH SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 75 DEGREES 10 MINUTES EAST 175.43 FEET TO A -
STAKE, AND ALONG THE CURVE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 121.95 FEET IN A NORTHEASTERLY
DIRECTION TO A STAKE; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND WITH THE LINE OF THE
HONEYCUTT PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES
EAST 660 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES WEST 125 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 61
DEGREES 36 MINUTES EAST 7.5 FEET TO A STAKE, SOUTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES WEST 535 FEET
TO A STAKE, NORTH 61 DEGREES 36 MINUTES WEST 667.50 FEET TO A STAKE AND CONTINUING THE
SAME COURSE 15 FEET TO A STAKE IN THE CENTER LINE OF A FORMER STREET (NOW CLOSED); RUNS
THENCE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID CLOSED STREET (AND WITH THE LINE OF THE HONEYCUTT
PROPERTY) SOUTH 28 DEGREES 24 MINUTES WEST 990 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 32.21 ACRES, ALL ACCORDING TO A SURVEY BY HONEY & NEWCOMB
DATED AUGUST, 1965.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO INA B. HOLDEN BY ROBERT G. HOLDEN BY DEED DATED
DECEMBER 25, 1917, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 318, PAGE 516, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 278, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
EIGHTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT AN IRON STAKE RUNNING IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SIDE SEABOARD AIR
LINE RIGHT OF WAY ABOUT 240 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE,,A. J. HONEYCUTT"S CORNER; RUNNING
THENCE FROM SAID IRON STAKE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ABOUT 180 FEET TO A POINT;
RUNNING IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION TO AN IRON STAKE ALONG HONEYCUTT'S LINE ABOUT 250
FEET TO A STAKE IN A. J. HONEYCUTT'S AND MANLEY PULLEY'S CORNER; RUNNING THENCE IN AN
EASTERLY DIRECTION 94 FEET ALONG MANLEY PULLEY'S LINE TO AN IRON STAKE, A POINT IN AN
UNNAMED STREET; RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID IRON STAKE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG
LINE OF SAID UNNAMED STREET ABOUT 400 FEET TO A STAKE; RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID IRON
STAKE ALONG LINE OF AN UNNAMED STREET IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ABOUT 360 FEET TO AN
IRON STAKE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 3-2/3 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND SAME
BEING LOT NOS. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 AND 11 OF BLOCK NO. 2 OF MRS. MARY H. PACE'S PROPERTY,
ACCORDING TO BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE FOR WAKE
COUNTY. ALSO ONE ACRE FROM EMMA HOLDEN TO R. G. HOLDEN BY DEED IN THE REGISTER OF
DEEDS OFFICE IN BOOK 451, PAGE 93.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 278, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, SIC

NINTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT AN IRON STAKE RUNNING THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG AN UNNAMED
STREET 300 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE IN A POINT IN AN UNNAMED STREET, RUNNING THENCE IN A
SOUTHERLY DIRECTION 100 FEET TO A STAKE ALONG UNNAMED STREET TO SYDNEY POWELL'S
CORNER; RUNNING THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SYDNEY POWELL'S LINE 300 FEET TO
AN IRON STAKE; RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID IRON STAKE ALONG UNNAMED STREET 100 FEET TO
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2/3 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING SAME AS LOT NOS. 10, 11,
12 AND 13 OF BLOCK NO. 3, ACCORDING TO BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, IN THE REGISTER OF
DEEDS OFFICE FOR WAKE COUNTY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 278 WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
TENTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A STAKE SYDNEY POWELL'S CORNER, RUNNING THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION
150 FEET TO SYDNEY POWELL'S SOUTHEAST CORNER; RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID STAKE ALONG A.
J. HONEYCUTT'S LINE 150 FEET -TO AN IRON STAKE, MANLEY PULLEY'S NORTHEAST CORNER; THENCE
FROM SAID STAKE ALONG MANLEY PULLEY'S LINE 150 FEET TO MANLEY PULLEY'S NORTHWEST
CORNER TO A STAKE, THENCE FROM SAID STAKE ALONG UNNAMED STREET 150 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 5/7 ACRE AND BEING LOT NOS. 16, 17 AND 18 OF BLOCK 3, ACCORDING
TO BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE FOR WAKE COUNTY.
EIGHT TRACT, NINTH TRACT AND TENTH TRACT WERE CONVEYED TO INA B. HOLDEN BY DEED DATED
APRIL 5, 1930, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 592, PAGE 60, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, BY DEED DATED AUGUST 19,
1965, RECORDED'IN BOOK 1665, PAGE 278, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
ELEVENTH TRACT:
PARCEL ONE:
BEGINNING AT A NEW CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE
ROAD 2006; SAID STAKE MARKING THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY FORMERLY
BELONGING TO W. E. TRENTMAN; RUNS THENCE WITH THE TRENTMAN LINE NORTH 170 55' 19" EAST
1598.78 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, CORNER WITH PROPERTY OF CONTINENTAL CAN CORPORATION,
WHICH IRON PIPE BEARS NORTH CAROLINA GRID COORDINATES Y=784,369.36 AND X=2,125,578.98;
RUNS THENCE ALONG OTHER PROPERTIES OF.MALLINCKRODT, INC. SOUTH 680 30' 52" EAST 179.90
FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, SOUTH 860 55' 59" EAST 275.96 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE, SOUTH 00° 40' 39"
EAST 1245.72 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE AND SOUTH 790 50' 23" EAST 659.06 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE,
THE NORTHWESTERNMOST CORNER OF PROPERTY OF DUROW MANUFACTURING COMPANY; RUNS
THENCE WITH SAID DURAW LINE SOUTH 230 45' 10" WEST 940.16 FEET TO A NEW CONCRETE
MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 2006; RUNS THENCE WITH SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE ROAD 2006 THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: NORTH 821,27'
47" WEST 103.77 FEET TO A POINT, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 490 FEET
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 259,72 FEET IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT, NORTH 520 05'
39" WEST 220.41 FEET TO A POINT, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2075.39
FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 157.65 FEET IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT, NORTH 470
44' 31" WEST 346.57 FEET TO A POINT, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 904.57
FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 266.96 FEET IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT AND NORTH
640 39' 05" WEST 119.54 FEETTO A CONCRETE MONUMENT, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING,
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

SAID PARCEL I CONTAINING 40.903 ACRES ACCORDING TO A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR
MALLINCKRODT, INC. PREPARED BY HALL & ASSOCIATES DATED APRIL 1977, WHICH MAP IS HEREBY
INCORPORATED INTO THIS DESCRIPTION AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SAME.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. BY DEED DATED DULY 5, 1977, RECORDED
IN BOOK 2527, PAGE 704 WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
PARCEL TWO:
BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD
2006, SAID MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHEASTERNMOST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND NOW OR
FORMERLY OWNED BY LYNN BAZEMORE ET AL; RUNS THENCE WITH THE BAZEMORE LINE NORTH 231
42' 16" EAST 1005.59 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, WHICH PIPE BEARS NORTH CAROLINA GRID
COORDINATES Y=782,804.93 AND X=2,127,36554; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 790 50' 23" EAST 318.75
FEET WITH THE LINE OF OTHER PROPERTIES OF MALLINCKRODT, INC. TO AN IRON PIPE, SAID PIPE
MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A JOG IN THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH
IRON PIPE IS LOCATED NORTH 790 50' 23" WEST 266.45 FEET FROM AN EXISTING CONCRETE
MONUMENT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD; RUNS
THENCE ALONG THE LINE OF PROPERTY OF SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD AND A CONTINUATION
OF SUCH LINE SOUTH 230 49' 02" WEST 1068.76 FEET TO A NEW CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE
NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 2006; RUNS THENCE WITH SAID ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY NORTH 680 13' 46" WEST 232.29 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING_ A RADIUS OF 2,635.9 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 75.71 FEET IN A NORTHWESTERLY
DIRECTION TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL 1I
CONTAINING 7.349 ACRES ALL ACCORDING TO A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR MALLINCKRODT, INC.
PREPARED BY HALL & ASSOCIATES. DATED APRIL 1977, WHICH MAP IS HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO
THIS DESCRIPTION AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SAME.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. BY DEED DATED JULY 5, 1977, RECORDED
IN BOOK 2527, PAGE 704 WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
EXCEPT FROM THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS THE TWELFTH TRACT HEREIN, THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY CONVEYED BY DEED DATED 27 AUGUST 1997 BY MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL INC. TO THE
CITY OF RALEIGH, RECORDED IN BOOK 7663, PAGE 643, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
COMMENCING AT AN EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE IN THE CENTERLINE OF THE INTERSECTION OF
DURANT ROAD AND THE SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; SAID INTERSECTION
BEING WEST OF CAPITAL BOULEVARD (N.C. HWY. 1) AND EAST OF FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD; THENCE N
57 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 03-SECONDS W, 156.99 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; THENCE ALONG
THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DURANT ROAD, NCSR.2006, N 68 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 22
SECONDS W, 144.69 FEET TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE N 66 DEGREES 25
MINUTES 42 SECONDS W 307.89 FEET TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT, THENCE LEAVING THE
NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DURANT ROAD N 23 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 15 SECONDS E, 15.01 FEET
TO A NEW IRON PIPE TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. THENCE N 23 DEGREES 42 MINUTES
15 SECONDS E, 400.28 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE, THENCE S 68 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 42 SECONDS E
213.20 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE, THENCE S 23 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W 141.63 FEET
TO A NEW IRON PIPE, THENCE S 23 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS W 258.66 FEET TO A NEW
IRON PIPE, THENCE ALONG THE NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DURANT ROAD, N 68 DEGREES 25 MINUTES
42 SECONDS W 212.83 FEET TO THE POINT THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT CONTAINS
APPROXIMATELY 85,154 SQUARE FEET (1.95 ACRES).
THIS PARCEL WAS SURVEYED AND RECORDED IN WAKE.COUNTY REGISTRY ON A MAP PREPARED BY
ROBERT T. NEWCOMBE AND ASSOCIATES, ENTITLED, "RECOMBINATION PLAT OF THE PROPERTY OF
SLC-8436663-1
Relcigh, NC

MALLINCKRODT, INC.", DATED JANUARY 3, 1997, AND RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS 1997, PAGE 1549.
TWELFTH TRACT:
INTENTIONALLY DELETED.
THIRTEENTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT.A STAKE IN THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1,
SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LANDS OF MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORLD
(FORMERLY A.J. HONEYCUTT); RUNS THENCE NORTH 62 DEG. 59 MIN. WEST ALONG AND WITH THE
LINE OF MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS 263.42 FEET TO A STAKE; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 18 DEG.
01 MIN, WEST 336.48 FEET TO A STAKE, SAID STAKE BEING THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF THE
PROPERTY OF INA HOLDEN; RUNS THENCE ALONG AND WITH THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF THE
INA HOLDEN SOUTH 79 DEG. 16 MIN. EAST 304.30 FEET TO A STAKE IN THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE
RIGHT OF WAY OF U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1; RUNS THENCE ALONG AND WITH THE WESTERN EDGE OF
THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1, NORTH 8 DEG. 48 MIN. EAST 260.00 FEET TO THE POINT
AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, SAID PONT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE PROPERTY OF MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS AND CONTAINING 1.91 ACRES ACCORDING
TO A SURVEY AND PLAN OF MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS BY BONEY AND NEWCOMB DATED
SEPTEMBER 23, 1965.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, NOW KNOWN AS
MALLINCKRODT, INC., BY DEED DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 1965, RECORDED IN BOOK 1667, PAGE 442,
WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
IN ADDITION, ALL OF THE RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE PARTY OF THE FIRST PART IN AND
TO ALL OTHER REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, IT BEING THE
INTENTION OF THE PART OF THE FIRST PART TO CONVEY TO THE PARTY OF THE SECOND PART BY
THIS DEED ALL REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING THE BENEFIT OF ANY EASEMENTS) OWNED BY THE
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART AND LOCATED IN SAID COUNTY AND STATE.
FOURTEENTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, A CONTROL CORNER, N. C. GRID COORDINATES N:784795.72
AND E:2130644.56; RUNS THENCE NORTH 800 41' 26" WEST 79.51 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE,
THENCE NORTH 710 49' 14" WEST 202.57 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE NORTH 180 08' 55" EAST
97.00 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 750 22' 05" EAST 249.34 FEET TO AN
EXISTING IRON PIPE AND RUNS THENCE SOUTH 00 17' 55" WEST 105.25 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON
PIPE, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 0.63339 ACRES ACCORDING TO
BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY OF E. T. YOST, DATED APRIL 26, 1989, PREPARED BY BASS,
NIXON AND KENNEDY, INC.
THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF
RECORD AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PREMISES.
FIFTEENTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, SAID EXISTING IRON PIPE BEING LOCATED SOUTH 720 15,
00" EAST 112.44 FEET FROM AN EXISTING IRON PIPE LOCATED IN THE EASTERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILWAY, RUNS THENCE NORTH 09° 30' 00" EAST 287.90 FEET TO A NEW
IRON PIPE; THENCE NORTH 380 22' 03" EAST 104.44 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE; RUNS THENCE
SOUTH 760 57' 00" EAST 105.85 FEET TO A NAIL, RUNS THENCE SOUTH 58° 50' 54" EAST 105.84 FEET
SIX-8436663-1
Aaleiggh, NC

TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 50° 57' 08" WEST 20.66 FEET TO AN EXISTING
IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 541138' 28" EAST 99.91 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH
510 14' 32" WEST 382.87 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE AND THENCE NORTH 720 15' 00" WEST
76.55 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING
1.844 ACRES ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE PROPERTY OF E. T. YOST, DATED MAY 26, 1988,
PREPARED BY G. SCOTT WILSON, RLS.
THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND RIGHTS OF WAY
RECORD AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO THE TWELVE (12) FOOT RETAINING WALL
ENCROACHMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THERE IS HEREBY ALSO CONVEYED TO GRANTEE, ANY RIGHTS OF E. T. YOST OF INGRESS, EGRESS
AND REGRESS OVER AND ALONG THE TEN (10) FOOT WIDE ROAD FROM U. S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 TO THE
SOUTH BANK OF THE NEUSE RIVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH RIGHTS HERETOFORE RESERVED BY
INSTRUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK 1406, PAGE 286 AND BOOK 1665, PAGE 281, WAKE COUNTY
REGISTRY.
SEVENTEENTH TRACT:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE
OF THE SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 590 46' EAST 868.94 FEET TO A
POINT, THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE OF THAT
30.00 FOOT ROADWAY SHOWN IN'BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106. WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY, AND
UNOFFICIALLY NAMED POWELL-PULLEY DRIVE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 290 35' 12" EAST 813.63 FEET"
TO A NEW IRON PIPE SET IN THE EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -OF POWELL-PULLEY DRIVE, THE
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; RUNS THENCE WITH THE EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
POWELL-PULLEY DRIVE NORTH 280 22' 05" EAST 100.00 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE SET IN THE LINE
OF THAT PROPERTY NOW OR FORMERLY BELONGING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC.; RUNS THENCE WITH
THE MALLINCKRODT, INC. LINE SOUTH 610 36' 00" EAST 180.00 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE SET; RUNS
THENCE WITH THE LINE OF THAT PROPERTY NOW OR FORMERLY BELONGING TO SIDNEY POWELL,
SOUTH 280 22' 05" WEST 100.00 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE SET; CONTINUES THENCE WITH THE LINE
OF THE -AFORESAID POWELL PROPERTY NORTH 61" 36' 00" WEST 180.00 FEET TO A NEW IRON PIPE
SET, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING AS SHOWN ON THAT PLAT ENTITLED "PROPERTY SURVEY
FOR MALLINCKRODT, INC.", DATED JULY 29, 1991, PREPARED BY JAMES S. MURPHY, REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR.
EIGHTEENTH TRACT:
BEING ALL OF LOTS 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21 AND 22 OF BLOCK 3 AND LOT 1 OF BLOCK 2 AS
SHOWN ON THAT PLAT ENTITLED "MAP OF MARY H. PACE'S PROPERTY" RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS
1885, PAGE 106, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
NINETEENTH TRACT:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF PULLEY-POWELL ROAD AND DURANT
ROAD; RUNS THENCE NORTH 50 37' 56" WEST 174.53 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, THE POINT
AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, RUNS THENCE NORTH 590 33' 57" WEST 119.79 FEET TO AN EXISTING
IRON PIPE; RUNS THENCE NORTH 51 32' 51" EAST 200.38 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; RUNS
THENCE SOUTH 600 51' 47" EAST 127.64 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE; RUNS THENCE SOUTH 70
565S" WEST 199.88 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON PIPE, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY ;5232 ACRES AND BEING ALL OF THAT UNNUMBERED AND UNNAMED
LOT LOCATED IN BLOCK 1 AS SHOWN ON THAT PLAT ENTITLED "MAP OF MRS. MARY H. PACE'S
PROPERTY" DATED NOVEMBER, 1908 AND RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106, WAKE
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

COUNTY REGISTRY.
BEING ALL OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO MALLINCKRDOT, INC. BY DEED DATED 24 FEBRUARY
1993, RECORDED IN BOOK 5511, PAGE 234, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
TWENTIETH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DURANT ROAD, S. R. 2006, A
CORNER WITH THE PROPERTY NOW OR FORMERLY BELONGING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC.; RUNS
THENCE WITH THE MALLINCKRODT, INC. LINE NORTH 80 24' EAST 171.90 FEET TO A POINT,
CONTINUES THENCE WITH MALLINCKRODT, INC. LINE SOUTH 580 V EAST 318 FEET TO AN EXISTING
IRON PIPE; CONTINUES THENCE WITH THE MALLINCKRODT, INC. LINE SOUTH 31° 52, WEST 152.20
FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF -WAY LINE OF DURANT ROAD; RUNS THENCE WITH
THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DURANT ROAD APPROXIMATELY 250.14 FEET TO THE POINT
AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING ALL OF THAT PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY BARBARA S. SWEAT BY WILL
FROM LOLA T. SMITH, WAKE COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT FILE NO. 81-E-1012, AND
ACQUIRED BY LOLA T. SMITH BY WILL FROM RAYMOND'E. SMITH, WAKE COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR
COURT FILE NO. 19760, AND CONVEYED R. E. SMITH BY DEED FROM A.H. BYRUM AND WIFE, MAMIE T.
BYRUM, DATED APRIL 15, 1936 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 718, PAGE 409, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY,
AND BEING ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNED BY BARBARA S. SWEAT ON.THE NORTH SIDE OF DURANT
ROAD AND HAVING AN ADDRESS OF 9016 DURANT ROAD, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.
TWENTY-THIRD TRACT:
ALL THAT CERTAIN LAND SITUATE IN NEUSE RIVER TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN SET IN THE NORTH LINE OF DURANT ROAD (SF. 2005), AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE FOURTH TRACT OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF MALLINCKRODT,
INC., AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 4034, PAGE 520 (E.M. 1895, PG. 106);
THENCE WITH THE NORTH LINE OF DURANT ROAD, NORTH 640 27' 19" WEST 55.01 FT. TO AN IRON
PIN SET, BEING 40 FT. EAST OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF GRANTOR'S MAIN
TRACK; THENCE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 40 FT. EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF TRACT, NORTH
250 00' 00" EAST 995.97 FT. TO A POINT; THENCE CONCENTRIC WITH THE CENTERLINE OF TRACT
117.19 FT. ALONG THE ARC OF•A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,504.32 FT. AND
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 260 30' 58" EAST 117.19 FT. TO AN IRON PIN 'SET,
THENCE SOUTH 730 49' 00" EAST 55.77 FT. TO AN IRON PIN SET IN THE WEST LINE OF THE LANDS OF
MALLINCKRODT, INC.; THENCE WITH THE LANDS OF MALLINCKRODT, SOUTH 250 00' 00" WEST
1,122.23 FT, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 1,435 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, ACCORDING
TO A SURVEY AND PLAT THEREOF BY W. GRAHAM CAWTHORNE, JR., REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR,
DATED APRIL 21, 1992, RECORDED OR INTENDED TO BE RECORDED AMONG THE RECORDS OF WAKE
COUNTY.
TWENTY-FOURTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A STAKE IN THE EASTERN LINE OF'SIDNEY POWELL PROPERTY IN NEUSE TOWNSHIP,
SAID STAKE BEING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF,SAID LAND AND ON AN UN -NAMED STREET;
RUNS THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID STREET 65 FEET TO A STAKE; RUNS THENCE EAST IN A LINE
PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SIDNEY POWELL PROPERTY 85 FOOT TO A STAKE; RUNS
THENCE SOUTH IN A LINE PARALLEL WITH LINE OF SAID STREET 65 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE SIDNEY POWELL LAND; RUNS THENCE WEST WITH SAID POWELL LINE, 85 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING. THE SAME BEING A PART OF THE LAND CONVEYED BY RICKMAN ALLEN, ET ALS, TO J.
R. MCGEE, WHICH DEED IS RECORDED IN BOOK 286, PAGE 263, AND BEING A PART OF THE LAND
CONVEYED TO SIDNEY POWELL AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 456, PAGE 880, OFFICE OF
5LC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF WAKE COUNTY.
TWENTY-FIFTH TRACT:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE.CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE
(EXTENDED) OF PULLEY-POWELL ROAD; RUNS THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD
NORTH 590 46' 0" WEST 100.24 FEET TO A POINT, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; RUNS
THENCE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD NORTH 590 46' 0" WEST 81.59 FEET TO A POINT;
RUNS THENCE LEAVING THE CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD AND RUNNING WITH THE LINE OF THAT
PROPERTY NOW OR FORMERLY BELONGING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. NORTH 16° 0' 00" EAST 94.61
FEET TO AN IRON PIPE FOUND; CONTINUES THENCE WITH THE LINE OF THAT PROPERTY NOW OR
FORMERLY BELONGING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. SOUTH 730 29' 48" EAST 79.09 FEET TO AN IRON
PIPE FOUND; CONTINUES THENCE WITH THE LINE OF THAT PROPERTY NOW OR FORMERLY
BELONGING TO MALLINCKRODT, INC. SOUTH 160 0' 00'' WEST 113.97 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
CENTERLINE OF DURANT ROAD, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 8,247 SQUARE
FEET AS SHOWN ON THAT PLAT ENTITLED "BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED FOR MALLINCKRODT,
INC." DATED FEBRUARY, 1993, AND PREPARED BY JAMES S. MURPHY, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.
BEING ALL OF THAT PROPERTY CONVEYED TO GRANTOR BY THAT DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 579,
PAGE 566, WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
>,11 AMI "
LOTA
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERN LINE OF STREET, 448 FEET, N. 26-30' E, FROM THE
NORTHERN LINE OF HONEYCUTT LOT, WHICH SAID LOT FACES ON THE NEUSE AND DUNNEVILLE
ROAD; THENCE N. 63-30' W. 150 FEET; THENCE N. 26-30' E. 200 FEET, THENCE S. 26-30' E. 150 FEET;
THENCE.S. 63-30' W. 200 FEET ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID STREET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, BEING LOTS NOS. 2, 3, 4 AND 5 OF BLOCK 3, ACCORDING TO A CERTAIN MAP MADE BY R.
B. SEAWELL, ENGINEER, IN NOVEMBER 1908, WHICH SAID MAP IS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR WAKE COUNTY IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885 AT PAGE 106.
LOT B
BEGINNING AT AN IRON STAKE IN THE EASTERN LINE OF STREET, SAID STAKE BEING 105
FEET SOUTH OF CORNER BETWEEN LOTS C & D, ACCORDING TO A MAP REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE
OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR WAKE COUNTY, IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885 AT PAGE 106, RUNS
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID STREET, 210 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE EAST PERPENDICULAR TO SAID
STREET, 210 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID STREET 210 FEET TO A STAKE; THENCE
WEST 210 FEET TO THE BEGINNING, CONTAINING ONE ACRE, AND BEING THAT PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED BY HICKMAN ALLEN AND WIFE, ET ALS, TO J. R. MCGEE BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 10,
1914, WHICH SAID DEED IS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR WAKE
COUNTY, IN BOOK 286 AT PAGE 263.
TWENTY-EIGHTH TRACT:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 ON MAP TO WHICH REFERENCE IS
HEREINAFTER MADE, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 87 DEG. 37 MIN. 58 SEC. EAST 661.81 FEET FROM AN
EXISTING PK NAIL AT CENTER LINE OF THE INTERSECTION OF DURANT ROAD AND A RAILROAD;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF LOT'8 NORTH 03 DEG. 59 MIN. 25 SEC. EAST 172.58 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF LOTS 5 THROUGH 8,
SOUTH 63 DEG. 30 MIN. 00 SEC. EAST 243.69 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5; THENCE
SLC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF LOT 5 SOUTH 26 DEG. 30 MIN. 58 SEC. WEST 157 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5, NORTH_ 68 DEG. 37 MIN.
11 SEC. WEST 50.10 FEET TO THE COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 5 AND 6; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTHERN LINE OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 8 NORTH 62 DEG. 35 MIN. 11 SEC. WEST 127.68 FEET TO THE
POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING LOTS 5, 6, 7 AND 8, BLOCK 1 OF THAT CERTAIN MAP
ENTITLED "MAP OF MRS. MARY H. PACE'S PROPERTY," RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS 1885, PAGE 106,
WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY. SEE ALSO SURVEY OF M.M. WEEKS DATED 11/2/95.
ADDITIONAL 7 ACRE (MORE OR LESS) TRACT:
LYING AND BEING IN WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A FOUND IRON STAKE ON THE NORTHERN MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
DURANT ROAD, POINT BEING LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF A C.P. & L. POWERLINE EASEMENT
AS SHOWN ON BOOK OF MAPS 1990, PAGE 779 OF THE WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY, THENCE LEAVING
THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND RUNNING ALONG THE SAID C;P.8 L. EASEMENT NORTH 21 DEGREES 50
MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 805.89 FEET TO A FOUND IRON STAKE; THENCE CONTINUING WITH
SAID C.P.&L. EASEMENT NORTH 13 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST 129.81 FEET TO A
FOUND IRON STAKE; THENCE LEAVING THE SAID C.P.&L. EASEMENT AND RUNNING WITH THE
MALLINCKRODT, INC. PROPERTY (AS FOUND IN DEED BOOK 8529 PAGE 944) SOUTH 85 DEGREES 42
MINUTES '10 SECONDS EAST 606.05 FEET TO A FOUND FENCE POST; THENCE WITH SEVEN (7) OF NEW
LINES FOLLOWING THE EXISTING FENCE LINE:
1) SOUTH 05 DEGREES 22 MINUTES'24 SECONDS WEST 282.93 FEET,
2) NORTH 86 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST 156.88 FEET,
3) SOUTH 04 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 200.34 FEET,
4) SOUTH 73 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST 35.37 FEET,
5) SOUTH 28 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST 165.60 FEET,
6) SOUTH 24 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 100.71 FEET,
7) SOUTH 08 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 165.92 FEET (EXTENDING PAST THE LAST
FENCE POST) TO A POINT ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DURANT ROAD;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN MARGIN OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DURANT ROAD NORTH 63
DEGREES 57 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST 123.55 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 7.2402 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
S LC-8436663-1
Raleigh, NC

y
Mallinckrodt
Pharmaceuticals
February 10, 2015
Mr. Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Archdale Building— 9'h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Mallinckrodt LLC - Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Delegation of Authority
Dear Mr. Bennett:
Attached is a copy of the delegation of authority for our new Site Director, Eric McCafferty, for your
files.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this delegation.
Sincerely,
Mallinckrodt LLC
Tim Roberts
Envilronmental Coordinator
Attachment
cc: John }-Tolley - NCDENR DEMLR-RRO, w/Attachment
Eric Berry - Mallinckrodt, w/Attachment
Tim Roberts - Mallinckrodt, w/Attachment
Julie Summers - Mallinckrodt, w/Attachment
Submitted Via EMall
I
8601 Capital Boulevard • Raleigh, NC 27616 919,678.2800 T 919,878.2623 F • www,malIinckr4gt 2m
E
i
E

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The undersigned, Eric Berry, does hereby certify that he is Vice -President and
Assistant.Secietary of Mallinckrodt LLC (Mallinckrodt), and that, as such officer, he is
duly authorized to delegate authority to execute permits, certifications and licenses or any
other such report regarding the discharge of stortnwater. He hereby delegates and
designates the position of Site Diiector for Mallinckrodt's Raleigh, North Carolina,
facility as person authorized on.behalf of Mallinckrodt to execute any permit application;
report or certification and any documents associated therewith which must be certified in
accorciance with applicable statutes and their associated "regulations in connection with
Mallinckrodt's facility located at 8801 Capital Bbulevard,'Raleigh, North Carolina.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this delegation of authority in
the name of and on behalf. of Mallinckrodt as of.the 6rh day of Febbruary, 2015,
Feb 61 201.5
Dater
By:
Eric Berry
The: forego ing,instrument wasacknowledged before me this day of February 2015,
by Eric Berry on behalf of Mallinckrodt LLC: He is personally; known to me'or has
produced appropriate identification.
Notary Public Name: n��,�-�' . ww
Notary'Public Signature`
Commission Expiration' Date: C k9 i � 1-
"ISTINE p, WALL
Notary PuDUC40tary Seal
State of Missouri, Jakeryon county
Commisalon # 13491811
My commisslon Expires ep 9, 2017

1'e
Via Federal Express
June 14, 2011
Ms. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR
Division of Water Quality
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
C3 COVIDIEN
RE: Notification of Conversion of Mallinckrodt Inc. to Mallinckrodt LLC
Dear Ms. Sprinkle:
This letter is to notify you that on or about June 24, 2011, Mallinckrodt Inc., an indirect
subsidiary of Covidien plc, intends to complete an intercompany reorganization that will result in
Mallinckrodt Inc. being converted into a limited liability company, Mallinckrodt LLC. This
conversion is being done in accordance with Delaware corporate law and is tentatively scheduled
to be completed on June 24, 2011. Mallinckrodt Inc. owns legal title to property, plant and
equipment subject to the licenses or permits described on "Exhibit A" to this notification.
The following is a simplified summary of the proposed steps: (1) Mallinckrodt Inc. will file a
certificate of conversion under Delaware law to convert the company into a limited liability
company; (2) after the conversion to a limited liability company, the entity will be renamed as
Mallinckrodt LLC; and (3) the ownership of Mallinckrodt LLC will be transferred to
Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that is also wholly owned
by indirect subsidiaries of Covidien pie. None of these transactions involve any legal entities
which are not affiliated with Mallinckrodt Inc. All of the movement of assets and ownership is
within the group of companies all wholly owned directly or indirectly by Covidien plc. Please
note, Mallinckrodt LLC is the same company, Mallinckrodt Inc., that is currently permitted.
By this letter, Mallinckrodt Inc. is notifying the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources that the above referenced transaction will occur on or about June 24, 2011.
On the date the transaction is completed, an additional correspondence will be sent to your
office, confirming that the conversion of Mallinckrodt Inc. to Mallinckrodt LLC has been
finalized. Mallinckrodt is providing the following information to assist you in your review of the
transaction.
MALLINGKIZ001ING.
8801 CA['] -[AI. IkVD
iZALt:lc;x, NC
z7616-3116
919-878-2800 [d
gig-878-2823[rI
~5 0 Y r=3
Lg
��- ----
JUN 15 2011

1. The new name of the organization will be Mallinckrodt LLC. Their headquarters address
will remain at the current location.
Mallinckrodt LLC
675 McDonnell BIvd
Hazelwood, MO 63442
2. All contact information used for the existing permit including telephone number(s) and
names will remain the same.
3. There will be no changes in personnel having control over the permit and all officers and
managers of Mallinckrodt LLC will be the same as Mallinckrodt Inc.
4. At this time, Mallinckrodt Inc. does not plan any specific changes to the organization,
location, facility, equipment or procedures. If Mallinckrodt does intend to modify or change
the organizational structure which may impact the permit, Mallinckrodt will notify your
agency as necessary.
5. All records retained in connection with the permit will be maintained at the current location.
6. Mallinckrodt LLC will continue to abide by all commitments and representations within the
permit and will maintain all permit terms, conditions, and requirements upon conversion to
Mallinckrodt LLC.
Please note that we would appreciate your expeditious review of this notice and provide a
response if you need any additional information. If you have any questions regarding the
foregoing, please contact the undersigned at 919-878-2895, or, Patricia Duft, Mallinckrodt's
Chief EHS Counsel at 314-654-6314.
Enc:
Exhibit "A" -Permit List
Cc: file
Kay Yoder (Mallinckrodt)
Patricia Duft (Mallinckrodt)
Sincerely,
Tim Roberts
Exhibit A
Page 2

Facility Location License Type License Number
Raleigh, NC Stormwater Retention 01-0344
Pond — Temporary
Diversion Berm
Page 3

Permit: NCS000136
SOC:
County: Wake
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/01/06 Expiration: 04/30/11 Owner: Mallinckrodt Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mallincrodt, Inc.
8801 Capital Blvd
Contact Person: Tim Roberts
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009
Primary Inspector: Judy E Garrett
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time: 09:30 AM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Raleigh NC 27616
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000136 Owner - Facility: Mallinckrodt Inc
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000136 Owner -Facility: Mallinckrodt Inc
Inspection Date: OBl2012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
2r1n❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
Z Q
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfail locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0 ❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
( ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
IB n ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
9 ❑
/0
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan
❑
❑
`b0
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 51 40 y ❑ ❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ,< T �'.
❑
❑
updated an ?
# Is the Plan reviewed and annually?
p
❑
:,,cc]
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes 52 NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
v ❑ Y#
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes Nq NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? V0 ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ !/ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? — ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: ads
U
Page: 3

o`'o� WAr�9p�
CO
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William Secretary Wi am G. Ross, Jr., S c etary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Y
Mr. Tim Roberts
Environmental, Health & Safety
Mallinckrodt Inc.
8801 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27616-3116
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Results of Site Visit for Compliance Evaluatindasection
and Permit Renewal Application Review o 01/30/2006
NPDES Stormwater NCSOOO136
Mallinckrodt Inc. -Raleigh
Wake County
Dear Mr. Roberts:
The January 30th, 2006 interview and tour that you provided to Mr. Ron Boone during his annual
inspection visit to your Raleigh pharmaceutical plant was greatly appreciated. This visit was made for
the dual purpose of performing the annual Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI), as well as to
review facility operations and gather information in support of renewing your stormwater permit,
NCS000136. Your permit was issued 1 April 2000 by authority of North Carolina General Statute
(NCGS) 143-215.1, and is intended to prevent pollution of state waters that receive stormwater
discharges from your facility. Please use the permit references listed throughout this report for further
explanation and compliance details of each item cited.
SITE SUMMARY
Your site is a bulls pharmaceutical production facility that uses many different chemicals in the
production process. Vehicle maintenance activities are not performed on site and therefore Part H,
Section D, of your permit does not apply.
All stormwater generated at your site is collected via a system of in -ground drains that convey the
stormwater to one of five outfalls located across your facility. Outfalls MC001 and MC002
discharge into Perry Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River. Outfalls MC003, MC004, and MC005
discharge directly into the Neuse River. Both waters are classified as class C, nutrient sensitive
waters.
INSPECTION FINDINGS
The list below shows conditions and practices observed during the tour portion of the inspection.
In general your site was clean and well maintained. Of those activities reviewed during the visit, no
observations that demonstrate non-compliance with the conditions of your stormwater permit were
noted.
1�_ Arse Caro ina
tura}!r�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o,enrstate.ne.4s 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled]10% Post Consumer Paper

Mallinckrodt Inc, Compliance Evaluatio Inspection & Permit Renewal Application Review, ruary 30, 2006, NCS000136 Page 2 of 2
The list below shows "nditions observed during the interview portion of the inspection.
• The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SP3) was in good condition. Only minor discrepancies
were noted as indicated below:
• The site plan component of the SP3:
• The general location map does show outfall locations and the receiving waters but lines that
show where each of the outfalls flow, from the point where they leave your property to the
point where they actually combine with the Neuse, should be drawn on the map.
Additionally, the map did not show an accurate latitude/longitude of the point(s) of
discharge. It is noted that there was a latitude/longitude for the "center" of the plant site
within the site plan. We would like to suggest for the purposes of consistency, that you label
the outfalls on the map with the same labels used for your analytical monitoring (Part II,
Section A, Paragraph 1 a).
• The site map did not list existing Best Management Practices (BMP) and did not show the
percentage of impervious surface for each drainage area. Also, the map did not include a
narrative description of the potential pollutants that could be expected to be present in the
stormwater discharge at each outfall. It is noted that complete lists of BMPs and potential
pollutants for each outfall are incorporated in different areas'of your Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SP3). This will meet the requirement if you reference on the site map the
exact location of these items in the SP3 (Part II, Section A, Paragraph lc).
• Your Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP) refers to your Spill Prevention, Control and
Countermeasure Plan (SPCC - as required by the Environmental Protection Agency), to meet
the SPRP requirement. Please ensure that the locations of those components of the SPRP that
are found in your SPCC, are referenced appropriately in the SPRP (Part II, Section A, Paragraph
3).
• Your employee -training program was comprehensive and well organized. However, training
schedules and records were not maintained in the SP3. Please reference the storage location of
the schedules and records in the training section of your SP3 (Part II, Section A, Paragraph 5).
• The SP3 was not reviewed and updated in 2002 and 2003. Please ensure that this annual review
is accomplished and appropriately annotated in the SP3 (Part II, Section A, Paragraph 7).
• Qualitative monitoring results for 2002 were not available. Also, a number of the monitoring events
did not take place during the required timeframes of spring (April -June) and fall (September -
November). Please ensure that all future qualitative monitoring events are accomplished sometime
within the specified timeframes (Part II, Section B and C).
In conclusion, Mr. Boone noted a minimal number of minor discrepancies during his inspection of your
facility. Please continue to be diligent in your efforts to meet the requirements of your discharge permit
and protect the natural habitat surrounding your site. If you have any questions regarding the inspection
or this letter, please contact Mr. Boone at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Raleigh Regional Surface Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files
Non -Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit

ftllw
w
MEMORANDUM
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 1, 2006
To: Bethany Georgoulias
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Through: Ken Schuster 4S V
RRO, Surface Wate Protection Section
From: Ronald Boone (Zo �
RRO, Surface Water Protection Section
Subject: Review of Staff Report and -Facility Operations for Renewal of
Permit NCS000136( allinckrodt Inc.
Mr. Tim Roberts
Environmental, Health & Safety
Mallinckrodt Inc.
8801 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27616-3116
Wake County
The following is a summary of my findings with regards to the renewal of Mallinckrodt
Inc's stormwater discharge permit, NCS000136. I conducted a compliance evaluation
inspection and review of operations at the site on 01/30/2006, with Mr. Tim Roberts.
With regards to the changes you proposed in your staff review and evaluation:
* I concur with your suggestion to retain monitoring based on past results of
analytical monitoring and potential pollutants at the site. The site remains a
significant source of potential pollution to the.Neuse River.
* Given that the site is a potentially significant source of ammonia and nitrates, as
well as the need to gather data to support future ammonia TMDL modeling for the
Neuse River basin, I concur with the proposal to add pH, ammonia, and nitrate
monitoring requirements.
e I concur with the proposal to replace total dissolved solids (TDS) testing with
total suspended solids (TSS) testing because TDS testing is redundant of
conductivity testing, which is also required. Additionally, as you point out in
your report, many elements that are detected with TDS are being monitored
separately (i,e. nitrates, chlorides, and sulfates) and an approximate TDS can be
derived from conductivity measurements.

0
• I concur with your proposal to change all analytical monitoring frequencies to
semi-annual to make them consistent with qualitative monitoring frequencies.
• I concur with your proposal to remove phosphorus -monitoring requirements
because the site is not a significant source of this element and because phosphorus
is not currently the principle element of concern in the Neuse basin. Discussion
during the site visit confirmed the only source of phosphorus is one exposed
phosphoric acid tank located at the wastewater. treatment plant.
• I concur with your proposal to incorporate benchmark values for all parameters.
This will allow the permit holder to use the benchmarks as guidelines to
continually evaluate the effectiveness of its BMPs and SP3.
• I concur with your proposal to remove the total flow -monitoring requirement and
instead require the permittee to update the site map to show the drainage area for
each outfall in acres. This, along with event duration and total rainfall, will
enable the permittee to estimate flows when necessary.
• I concur with retaining the requirement to test for sulfates and adding ammonium
sulfate monitoring. As confirmed during the site visit, the site is a potentially
significant source for sulfates.
• I concur with. your proposal to remove chlorides testing. Discussion during the
site visit confirmed that there is no significant source of chlorides at the site.
• I do not concur with your proposal to add oil/grease testing to the permit.
Although there is a significant amount of petroleum product on site, many units
storing petroleum products are already protected with secondary containment.
Additionally, the chances of an incident occurring in which the stormwater
discharges are contaminated with petroleum product are minimal. Finally,
requiring them to test for oil/grease twice per year doesn't really add any degree
of protection. The only time they would detect any amount is when a spill occurs.
Hopefully, if a spill occurs, they will have already noticed and addressed the
situation before they could have nm an oil/grease test.
With regards to my own observations during the inspection:
When I perform inspections, I like to see the conveyance between the points of
discharge and the receiving streams drawn on the general location maps (GLM).
Part 11, Section A, Paragraph 1 a, only requires the permittee to show the
discharges with the latitudes and longitudes, and the receiving stream. It does not
require them to show the conveyance in between. I think we should require them
to show this conveyance on the GLMs. Also, neither of the terms "outfall" nor
"the point of discharge", are defined in the back of the permit. I would think that
this would be a very important thing to define. Is it the point at which their waste
streams cross their property line, or the point at which their waste streams enter
the waters of the state? The definition will affect the way that permittees label the
outfall, receiving streams, and the conveyances between these two points, on their
GLMs. I guess ultimately, how can we expect the permittee to have the lats/longs
of discharge pointsloutfalls, if we don't define the term(s)? At this point, we're
allowing them to define their own discharges, correct?

.a, ." '00
M
• As a sub -point to the one above, the permit cover page indicates that all five
outfalls at this site discharge directly to the Neuse. This is incorrect. They
actually have five outfalls labeled MC001 through MC005. MCOOI and
MC002 discharge into Perry Creek, a tributary to the Neuse. MC003 through
MC005 discharge directly into the Neuse River. Both waters are classified
C/NS W.
• Part II, Section A, Paragraph le, requires the permittee to include many different
items on the site map. Each item by itself is an important component of the SP3,
however, fitting all the things mentioned in paragraph lc on a map is somewhat
difficult to do without the map becoming very cluttered and difficult to read. I
suggest including some of these things in different areas of the site plan
component of the SP3 rather than requiring them to be included on the actual site
map. Alternatively, write in a caveat that allows the permittee to put these things
in a different area of the SP3 as long as they include a reference to their locations
on the site map. Specific items we should consider for this change are: 1.)
Activities that occur in each drainage area, 2.) Procedural BMPs, and 3.) The list
of potential pollutants for each of the outfalls.
• Part II, Section A, Paragraph I e, requires the permittee to certify that stormwater
outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges. Can
we give some criteria here that the permittee can use to ensure he/she has met the
requirement? In other words, does it have to be an engineer's certification, or a
certification based on lab results? Also, do the outfalls have to be recertified
every so often? If so, how often?
• Part H, Section A, Paragraph 5, requires the permittee to develop a training
program for spill response and cleanup and preventative maintenance activities.
What maintenance activities must be covered by this program? As the paragraph
currently reads, it sounds as if ALL employees must be trained in ALL
maintenance tasks, whereas I think the meaning of the requirement is to have all
those whose job could possibly effect the quality of stormwater discharges trained
the in the preventative maintenance of the equipment they use to do their jobs, as
well as any stormwater BMPs, structural and procedural. Should we clarify this
requirement a little?

W A rF Michael F. Easley, Governor
`o�0 9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co 7 Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Q Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
STAFF REVIEW AND EVALUATION R$0 , f
NPDES Stormwater Permit ��
Facility Name:
Mallinckrodt, Incorporated
NPDES Permit Number:
NCS000136
Facility Location:
Raleigh, NC (Wake Co.)
Type of Activity:
Industrial —Manufactures specialty pharmaceutical products
SIC Code (if applicable):
2833
Receiving Streams:
Neuse River, index no. 27-(20.7)
River Basin:
Neuse River Basin, Sub -basin 03-04-02
Stream Classification:
WS-IV NSW (Reclassified 7/2004); proposed reclassification to
WS-V NSW pending (12/2005?)
Proposed Permit Requirements:
See attached draft permit.
Compliance Schedule:
N/A
Basis for Monitoring:
See attached Monitoring Data Analysis. Retained monitoring, based
on results and potential pollutants at the site. Also added pH,
ammonia, nitrate, and ammonium sulfate monitoring. Removed
phosphorus monitoring because site is not a significant source.
Replaced TDS with TSS monitoring. Activities did not trigger vehicle
maintenance monitoring.
All monitoring has changed to Semi -Annual (spring and fall). This
change is based on the Division's revised strategy for stormwater
monitoring in renewal permits and makes stormwater discharge
sampling frequency consistent with qualitative monitoring. In
addition, DW has incorporated benchmark values into the permit.
Q rP
These benchmarks are not permit limits but should be used as
guidelines for the facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SPPP). New language in the permit specifies that if any
measurements exceed benchmark values, the facility should evaluate
the effectiveness of its BMPs, review and/or update its SPPP, and
document any efforts to address stormwater contamination (see Part
!' II, Sec. B & D).
r
r
Total Flow monitoring has also been removed per DWQ revised
�. strategy (Total Rainfall and Event Duration parameters retained).
' • Instead, Part II. Sec. A clarifies that SPPP site map include drainage
area for each outfall in acres and percent impervious area in each
drainage area (should flow ever need to be estimated).
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
,SvLlrhW
K&l:nR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

NCS000136•
Basis for Other Requirements: N/A.
Response Requested by (Date): February 1, 2006
Central Office Staff Contact: Bethany Georgoulias, [phone], ext. 529
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
NPDES Stormwater Permit Application Materials
S/W Permit File
Analytical &Qualitative Monitoring Results summary
Neuse Basinwide Plans (rev. July 2002)
Central Office Review Summary:
Facility discharges stormwater to a segment of the NeuseRiver that is not on the 303(d) list of impaired waters but
is upstream of the Neuse River Estuary. A TMDL (total maximum daily load) for Total Nitrogen (TN) approved
for the Neuse River Estuary in 2002 intended to reduce TN loading to the estuary by 30 percent. Although this
facility was not allocated a TN loading for stormwater discharges, continued monitoring to support future TMDL
modeling efforts/updates is important. The Neuse Basinwide Plan notes the largest impact from stormwater in this
sub -basin has resulted from intense urbanization in and around the Raleigh and Cary areas; local governments
covered by the Neuse Stormwater Rule are implementing control programs focused on new development activities.
Since last renewal, the company has installed a new valve upstream of outfall #2 and built asphalt curbs in
drainage zone #3 to improve flow segregation east and west of the acetic acid tank farm. The company built an
embankment through the stormwater detention pond in 1997 (approved by USCOA) to separate runoff from zones
3A (manufacturing areas) and 3B (land application fields); outfall #3 was relocated west of the embankment and
discharges only the volume collected from the fields, and the throttling device between the two areas in the pond
has been closed since the end of 1996. In June 2001, DENR authorized Mallinckrodt to retain the diversion
measure as a permanent structure.
Qualitative Monitoring Results: Permittee sent results from 2001-04. Color varied from clear to brown, and some
solids noted in 2004, but overall good.
Analytical Monitoring: See attached Monitoring Data Analysis. Reviewer recommends ammonia monitoring
because water collected in the earthen berm in the ammonia storage area (S-12) is pumped out onto ground
(potential for runoff contamination). Also, the ammonia unloading area drains to sump that is pumped to S/W
conveyance.
The company apparently monitored TKN but did not report total nitrogen during the last permit term (instead
continued to report only nitrates, which had been removed in the 2000 renewal). Nitrates were above the 10 mg/l
benchmark at one outfall, and ammonia is a potential contaminant. Reviewer recommends retaining the TN
requirement and including nitrate and ammonia monitoring. If TN were monitored only because of discharge to
Neuse NSW waters (i.e., to collect data), we would not include a benchmark; however, this site and its processes
are a source of that nutrient in stormwater runoff and will have a benchmark.
Based on monitoring results, this site is not a significant source of phosphorus. Because this facility has few
significant sources of phosphorus (one tank of phosphoric acid in a concrete dike — S-23), and because the discharge
is in the Neuse basin where nitrogen is the principal nutrient of concern, the reviewer recommends removing
phosphorus monitoring.
Sulfate values were below the benchmark at all outfails; however, this site has other potential sources of sulfates.
Ammonium sulfate is the primary by-product of the sulfuric acid used at this facility and has a 1/2 FAV more
stringent than sulfate's (13.75 vs. 250 mg/1). The reviewer recommends retaining sulfate and adding ammonium
sulfate monitoring. Chloride values were below the benchmark but monitoring will remain in the permit because
it is a pollutant of concern (POC) at this site. The sulfate and chloride benchmarks in this permit are based on
water supply standards.
Maximum COD levels at most of the outfalls exceeded the 120 mg/1 benchmark, and monitoring will continue this
term. The site stores numerous chemicals, but regular COD, conductivity, and pH monitoring should be

41 NCS000136 ft-
appropriate surrogates for keeping BMPs and stormwater contamination in check. The reviewer also recommends
replacing the total dissolved solids (TDS) monitoring with total suspended solids (TSS). Because it measures
dissolved minerals, salts, metals, and other ions, TDS monitoring in addition to conductivity is redundant;
conductivity is an indirect measurement ofTDS and usually runs 1-2 times those measurements. This site will also
monitor specifically for sulfates, chlorides, and nitrates --constituents TDS would pick up.
Monitoring frequency will change to semi-annually. This change ensures at least nine data points are collected
through the permit term and makes monitoring frequency consistent with qualitative monitoring. Also, benchmark
values for all parameters have also been added to the permit as a guide for the permittee to check the effectiveness
of BMPs (and document efforts) when necessary.
Follow-up with the company contact (Tim Roberts, 919.878.2895) on 12/ I3/05 (see attached e-mail):
• Tank farm on the hill—S-10 collects runoff from acetic acid, nitrobenzene, sulfuric acid, etc. tanks; BMPs
note water collected in sumps is first tested and diverted either to the WWTP or to the stormwater
conveyance. What triggers WWTP diversion? Any detection at all, or a certain concentration?
Normally only visual inspection. Possibility of leaks or tank release triggers chemical testing, and
any detection will route the water to the WWTP.
• Ammonium sulfate storage in 5-25? Is Ammonium sulfate the likely source of the sulfates detected in
stormwater discharges?
Not the only source. Sulfuric acid used in manufacturing processes, resulting in ammonium sulfate.
Sulfites are also added during production, and some sulfates are in the treated residuals applied on the
hay fields on site (Land Application Permit WQ0005537).
• Vehicle maintenance did not trigger monitoring?
No; all done by a third party off site.
• Phosphorus sources? Noted one phosphoric acid tank... other sources or phosphorus compounds?
Phosphoric acid tank is only source exposed.
• No TN monitoring?
Company did monitor for nitrates + nitrites and TKN; contact will provide summary of data.
[TN monitoring will be in the renewal permit regardless because of sources on site and because
nitrogen is a concern in the Neuse basin.]
Recommendation: Based on the documents reviewed, the application information submitted on October 6, 2004 is
sufficient to issue an Individual Stormwater Permit.
Prepared by (Signature)
Stormwater Permitting I
Concurrence by Region
Water Quality Supervis
Date /z Z L 0 D S
Date I Z� Zf3/Laps`
Date'Z'�
Date `� 6

�.:1111,w
NCS000136
Regional Office Staid' Comments
�Qcc�e, ra-�/ -i D wr���.� iMQ.yYlclrgVl�kvr.. U- 5� t2 �1is1T Yr�a r f`, l�ctJJ
Y.a i16z/a 4
4

Stormwater Monitoring Analysis
Permk:
NCS000136
Facility:
Mallinckrodt
Reviewer.
B. Cx+or�oulias
Receiving Waters:
Neuse Rlvpr
Classification:
WIT -IV
Analysis Guidance:
;Check -for any measured values that equal or exceed benchmark concentration. (Check maximum value)
Also consider: are any borderline, or otherwise still considered a pollutwu of concern (POC)? Use BPJ,
Some values revised for (:rater Supply, given current c"ifucation.
CMC = Criterion Maximum Concentration
FAV = Final Acute Value
Benclunartu last updated T1/01/2005 by B. Georgoulias & J. Wynn
sue :_
aslt
�OutfailtNWM%1&itfalt
l
o04DS
[7utiaU-
�Q r
.8endsir
-..
�1Y1aX
_
"
' _ "�`•
Parameter _-
. Contr
OO1�Max
002'Maii
UO3.IiAax
OOS:Max
Units
�
..., , _� __ � �=�'
1/2 FAV derived from EPKs ECOTOX Database (Feb 2005, J.
Ammonium Sulfate
13.75
-
mgA
Wynn).
CMC = 1/2 FAV ® pH 7.5 (no salmonld fish). Calculated from
App. C in EPNs National Recommended WQ Criteria (Nov 2002).
Ammonia, total as Nitrogen
For other pHs, see p. 86 of EPA Ammonia Criteria 1999 Update
Non -Trout
19.9
mgA
I Document EPA-822-R-99-014 . (Expressed in m of N .
Chloride
230
MkS �<
: & ra'
I
& .:
m
Action Level AL from 15A NCAC 2B .0200s
Chloride
250
96
20
51
18
14
Mo
Water Supply standard from T5A NCAC 28 .0200s
COD (Chemical Oxygen
Demand)
120
170
160 -
81
100
s a i40 ".:
mgfi
BPJ. Generally found at levels 4 x BODS in domestic wastewaters.
Conductivi
None
387
212
784
230
420
uS/cm
N/A
y
National Primary Drinking Water Regulation in 40 CFR 141.11 and
Nitrate + Nitrite (NO3+NOI)
TO
1.3
115
='.'.3!22 "'=
2.1
1.2
mgA
15A NCAC 2B for nitrate (Expressed in mg/I of N).
Nitrogen. Total
30
?
?
?
?
?
meA
TKN + Nitrate + Nitrite Benchmarks (Expressed in mjA of N .
Oil and Grease
30
m
BPJ, based on wastewater permit limits.
H min. max
6-9
-
su
Water Quality Standard (Except Sw waters can be as low as 4.3
Phosphorous
2
0.85
0.48
0.33
0.77
0.43
mgA
BPJ. based on wastewater permit limits for NSW waters.
1/2 FAV derived from EPA's ECOTOX Database (Feb 2005, J.
Sulfate
500
pi�_
._ s
mgtl
Wynn).
Sulfate
250
11
52
160
16
150
m
Water Supply standard from 15A NCAC 2B .0200%
TDS(Total Dissolved Solids
None
i80
84
510
100
330
mM
N/A
TSS(Total Suspended Solids
100
rngA
BPJ, EPA Multi -Sector Permit
It
12/28/2005 Pagel

Aau,,111 � VU1 OLU111MMU1 rV1111Ll MCIMWa UUU130
Subject: RE: Mallinckrodt Stormwater Permit Renewal - NCS000136
From: "Roberts, Tim" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:58:54 -0600,
To: Bethany Georgoulias <[e-mail]>
Bethany,
I was working on a response when I received your voice mail. I hope your
pile is getting lower and I trust my answers below will help move things
along with your review. Feel free to contact me to discuss any questions
you have with our application. Between now and January 4, 2006 I will only
be in the office Tuesday Dec. 20 (AM only) and Wednesday Dec. 21 (AM only).
Thanks!
Tim Roberts
Environmental, Health & Safety Coordinator
Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Tyco Healthcare/Mallinckrodt
8801 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27616
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Bethany Georgoulias (mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:23 PM
To: Roberts, Tim
Subject: Mallinckrodt Stormwater Permit Renewal - NCS000136
Mr . ' Roberts :
I am working on the NPDES Stormwater Permit renewal for Mallinckrodt's
facility in Raleigh, and I just had a few questions. Could you please send
additional information about the following items?
1) In storage area S-10 (Tank farm on the hill), sumps collect stormwater
that is subsequently released to either the WWTP or stormwater ditch after
testing. What triggers WWTP diversion? Any detection of chemicals at all,
or a certain threshold concentration? GENERALLY, STORMWATER IS ONLY
VISUALLY INSPECTED FOR CONTAMINATION AND RELEASED IF DETERMINED TO BE CLEAN
BASED ON PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AND ODOR. IF FOUND NOT CLEAN, WATER IS PUMPED
TO WWTP, IF THERE IS ANY KNOWN POSSIBILITY OF A MINOR TANK RELEASE (E.G.,.
PUMP SEAL LEAK), CHEMICAL ANALYSES IS PERFORMED. ANY DETECTION OF CHEMICALS
IN THE SAMPLE WOULD TRIGGER DIVERSION TO THE WWTP.
2) Ammonium sulfate is stored in the MASL above ground storage tanks in
S-25. This site monitored for sulfates.during the last term of the permit;
is ammonium sulfate the most likely source of sulfates from this site, or
are there other compounds/raw materials stored and loaded that.may also
introduce sulfates in stormwater discharges? WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE
MASL FROM OUR OPERATIONS IS THE SOLE OR MAIN SOURCE OF SULFATES POTENTIALLY
IN STORMWATER. SULFURIC ACID IS USED IN OUR PROCESSES AND AMMONIUM SULFATE
IS THE RESULTING BY-PRODUCT OF ITS USE. WE ALSO ADD SULFITES DURING THE
PRODUCTION OF OUR PRODUCTS, SO SULFUR -BEARING COMPOUNDS ARE IN OUR
WASTESTREAMS. MASL IS ONE POTENTIAL SOURCE HOWEVER THERE ARE SOME SULFATES
IN THE TREATED RESIDUALS APPLIED ON THE HAY FIELDS ON SITE THROUGH THE LAND.
APPLICATION PERMIT # WQ0005537 ISSUED BY NCDENR DWQ.
3) Vehicle fuel loading tanks and areas are noted in the tables of materials
storage. Does this facility perform any on -site vehicle maintenance that
exceeds 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? NO. ALL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
IS PERFORMED BY'A THIRD PARTY OFF SITE.
I of 2 121200009 11 •'>I AM

: Mallinckrodt Stormwater Permit Renewal., 000136
4) Monitoring results showed fairly low phosphorus levels in the stormwater
discharges. Are there many potential sources of phosphorus at this
facility? (I only noted one phosphoric acid tank in the table). This may
not be a pollutant of concern for this facility, depending on the extent of
potential sources at the site. THE PHOSPHORIC ACID TANK IS THE ONLY LIKELY
V SOURCE OF PHOSPOHRUS ON SITE. SOME OF THIS PHOSPHORUS IS ULTIMATELY
DISCHARGED TO THE CITY OF RALEIGH POTW VIA OUR TREATED WASTEWATER EFFLUENT.
THE REST OF THE PHOSPHORUS ENDS UP IN THE RESIDUALS APPLIED TO THE HAY
FIELDS AND SHOULD BE TAKEN UP BY THE GRASSES AS A NUTRIENT.
5) The current permit stipulates Total Nitrogen (TN) monitoring instead of
nitrates, but it appears the facility kept monitoring for nitrates instead.
Was TN monitored' at all during the last term? YES. WE DID MONITOR FOR
NITRATES/NITRITES AND TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN WHICH, WHEN ADDED TOGETHER,
EQUAL TOTAL NITROGEN. DO YOU NEED THIS INFORMATION FOR YOUR REVIEW AND IF :
�P,V�4J r
SO, WHEN DO YOU NEED IT (WOULD EARLY JANUARY BE OK) ?
Thanks so much for your help. I know it has taken us quite a while to work
through our backlog of stormwater permit renewals for facilities like yours, f.
but we are finally making headway! t
Regards,Aovv✓�}�y;�1.
,400 r
Bethany Georgoulias art,
Environmental Engineer
NC DENR DWQl.
Stormwater Permitting Unit
[phone], ext. 529 1�
[e-mail]
-F 1 12/20/2005 11:23 AM

ft
NCS000136
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina`General S6tute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted �th,.e North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Polluti '- Control Act; as amended,
MalLnclrrodt. Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stdrmwa#qrf om a facility located at
£Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as the Neuse River, a class WS-IV NSW stream in the Neuse
River Basin, in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts 1,11,111, IV, V and VI hereof.
Note: Draft Permit Dates'are Approximate
This permit shall become effective April 1, 2006.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 31, 2011.
Signed this day March 27, 2006.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

a
Permit No. NCS000136
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A: Individual Permit Coverage
Section B: Permitted Activities
Section C: Location T
PART II
MONITORIN
DISCHARGE
Section A:
Stormwatt
Section B:
Analytical
Section C:
Qualitative
Section D:
On -Site V
PERMITTED
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER INDIVIDUAL
PERMITS
Section A: Compliance and Liability
1.
Compliance Schedule
2.
Duty to Comply
3.
Duty to Mitigate
4.
Civil and Criminal Liability
S.
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
6.
Property Rights
7.
Severability
8.
Duty to Provide Information
9.
Penalties for Tampering
10.
Penalties for Falsification of Reports
Section B: General Conditions
1.
Individual Permit Expiration
2.
Transfers
t

ft
Permit No. NCS000136
3. Signatory Requirements
4. Individual Permit Modification, Revocation and Reissuance, or
Termination
5. Permit Actions
Section C: Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance .
2. Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
3. Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Section D:. Monitoring and Records
L. Representative Sampling
2. Recording Results
3. Flow Measurements
4. Test Procedures
5. Representative OutfalI
6. Record °YRtsbn,
7. InspectioEntiy
Section E: Reporting uirements
P g q ��'
1. Di c�tiarge,, onitoring Reports
2. Submii ng Reports
3. Availability of Reports
4. Non-Stormwater Discharges
5. Planned Changes
6. Anticipated Noncompliance
7. Bypass
8. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
9. Other Noncompliance
10. Other Information
PART IV LIMITATIONS REOPENER
PART V ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE
REQUIREMENTS
PART VI DEFINITIONS
li

a .•
Permit No. NCSOOO 136
PART I INTRODUCTION
SECTION A: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT COVERAGE
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity. Such
discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored as specified in this permit.
SECTION B: PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until this permit expires or is modified or revoked,
stormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina 4
been adequately treated and managed in accordance
individual permit. All discharges shall be in accorde
Any other point source discharge to surface
allowable non-stormwater discharge or is a
The discharges allowed by this individual p
Water Quality Standards. „
ttee is authorized to discharge
e°storm. sewer system which has
terms=and conditions of this
the c nditions of this permit.
tate is prohibited unless it is an
ter permit, authorization or approval.
cause or contribute to violations of
This permit does not relieve the permittee,from responsibility for compliance with any other
applicable federal, state, or locallwrule; standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
Part I Page 1 of 2

SECTION C: LOCATION MAP Permit No. NCSOOOt36
■ �
11rrr I P i', � f
Latitude: 35'53'55" NCS000136 Facilityis
Longitude: 78*33'40" �
County: Wake Mallinckrodt, Inc. Location a
Stream Class: WS-IV NSW
Receiving Stream: Neuse River
Sub -basin: 03-04-02 (Ne'use River Basin) _ effOtth SCALE 1:14,000
Part I Page 2 of 2

A
Permit No. NCS000136
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR
PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
The permittee shall develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to as
the Plan. This Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part 111, Standard
Conditions, Section E, Paragraph 3 of this individual permit. The Plan shall include, at a
minimum, the following items:
1. Site Plan. The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the
potential pollutant sources which may be expected t4cotribute to contamination of
stormwater discharges. The site plan shall contain &h ,@llgwing:
a. A general location map (USGS
equivalent map), showing the f
routes and surface waters, the in
stormwater outfall(s) discharge
storm sewer system, the namg
waters; and.accurate latitude ar
b. A narrative desc
outdoor process
waste disnosal,.r
map or drafted
lion in relation to transportation
eceiving water(s) to which the
ischarge is to a municipal separate
ipality and the ultimate receiving
of the point(s) of discharge.
practices, loading and unloading activities,
:iculate generating or control processes, and
C. A site map drawiQto scale with the following items:
(1)
Distance legend and north arrow
(2)
Location of industrial activities (including storage of materials,
disposal areas, process areas and loading and unloading areas)
(3)
Drainage structures
(4)
Delineated drainage areas for each outfall
(5)
Drainage area for each outfall in acres and percentage of
each drainage area that is impervious
(6)
Building locations
(7)
Existing BMPs and impervious surfaces
(8)
For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants that
could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge.
d. A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility
during the 3 previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill
impacts.
e. Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of
non-stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in
accordance with the requirements found in Part III, Standard Conditions, Section
B, Paragraph 3.
Part 11 Page 1 of 8

w
ti
Permit No. NCS000136
2. Stormwater Management Plan. The stormwater management plan shall contain a
narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or
minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater, including structural and
nonstructural measures. The stormwater management plan, at a minimum, shall
incorporate the following:
a. Feasibility Study. A review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing
the methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure
of materials and processes to stormwater. Wherever practical, the permittee shall
prevent exposure of all storage areas, material handling operations, and
__---__--"------------manufacturing-or-f ieling-operations: In-areas-where-elimination-o€exposure-is-------
not practical, the stormwater management plan�shall document the feasibility of
diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas,„of potential contamination.
b. Secondary Containment Schedule. A schedule to provide secondary containment
for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage2 f Section 313 of Title III of the
Superfund Amendments and ReauthonzatiokAct (SARA) water priority
chemicals, or storage of hazardods subs8ances to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff. I thsecondary containment devices are
connected directly to stor�mw�atericeyance systems, the connection shall be
controlled by manually acttvatedwalves or other similar devices [which shall be
secured with a locking;me6Hh ism] and any stormwater that accumulates in the
t minimum visually observed for color, foam, outfall
containment area hall'bea
staining, visibIgAeens �Mdry weather flow, prior to release of the accumulated
stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminate�;bythe material stored within the containment area. Records
documenting the mXividual making the observation, the description of the.
accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a
period of five years.
C. BMP Summary. A narrative description shall be provided of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but not limited to, oil and grease
separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and stormwater
detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall be
based on the assessment of potential of sources to contribute significant quantities
of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of
stormwater discharges.
3. Spill Prevention and Response Plan. The Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)
shall incorporate an assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials
inventory of the facility. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the
SPRP shall be identified. A responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility
operations that have the potential to contaminate stortriwater runoff through spills or
exposure of materials associated with the facility operations. The SPRP must be site
stormwater specific. Therefore, a SPCC plan may be a component of the SPRP, but may
Part 11 Page 2 of 8

N
00
Permit No. NCSOo0136
not be sufficient to completely address the stormwater aspects of the SPRP. The common
elements of the SPCC with the SPRP may be incorporated by reference into the SPRP.
4. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program. A preventative
maintenance program shall be developed. The program shall document schedules of
inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment
and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and regular cleaning schedules of
these areas shall be incorporated into the program.
5.
Employee Training. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a
minimum on an annual basis on proper spill response and cleanup procedures and
preventative- maintenance-activities-for-alt-personnel-involved-in-anyof the facility�s — -�-
operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility personnel
or team responsible for implementing the tra: ` n shall be identified.
6. Responsible Party. The Stormwater Pollution%Pfevention'Plan shall identify a specific
position(s) responsible for the overall coordindt16h-.development, implementation, and
,� :.
revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for allcompon nts of the Plan shall be documented
and position assignments provided.
7. Plan Amendment. The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in
Al..
design, construction, operation,sor maintenance which has a significant effect on the
potential for the dischargT�`of�N )Polluta is to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan shall be reviewed and.updated on an annual basis.
The Director may noti the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the
minimum requiremets�of theermit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall
submit a time schedule`to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum
requirements. The permittee shall provide certification in writing (in accordance with
Part lIi, Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 3) to the Director that the changes
have been made.
8. Facility Inspection Program. Facilities are required to inspect all stormwater systems on
at least a semiannual schedule, once in the fall (September -November) and once in the
spring (April - June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities
performed shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s)
making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control
systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be incorporated
into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Stormwater discharge characteristic monitoring as required in Part Il of this permit shall
be performed in addition to facility inspections.
9. Implementation. The permittee shall document all monitoring, measurements,
inspections and maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the
log of the sampling data and of activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the
industrial activities, including vehicle maintenance activities. Such documentation shall
Part 11 Page 3 of 8

00.
90 Permit No. NCS000136
be kept on -site fora period of five years and made available to the Director or his
authorized representative immediately upon request.
Part II Page 4 of 8

0 00 Permit No. NCS000136
SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater subject to the provisions of this permit.
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified below in Table
1.
All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a representative storm event. The required
monitoring will result in a minimum of 10 analytical samplings being conducted over the term of
the permit at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO). The permittee shall complete the
minimum 10 analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified below in Table 2. .
Monitoring results shall be compared to the benchmark values irilTable 3. The benchmark
A i' "_ `r.
values in Table_3 are not permit limits- but should. be used as� Welines,for. the permittee's
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). The perrnitte sha&eV@uate the sources of any
J- , _,, .,4>,..,,
benchmark exceedances and evaluate the effectiveness'.of�any site's Ps. The permittee shall
review and/or update the SPPP and document any eUA 'to'address stormwater contamination.
t tY 7
Table 1. Analytical MonitoringRe ui�rements;,
Discharge s; hr', ;
Clbaracter�stics:F r, ,
,�
,�.:Units..,i
Measurement Frequencyl'r
, ;,�
R,a.t 4: Y ,i,
Sample
T :,�z�
Sam}�te
Locatron?
Conductivi
taus/cm,'
"''`Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids'
,gym"
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Chemical Oxygen Demand
m
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Total Nitra en
mg/L
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Nitrate + Nitrite, as Nitrogen'
'm
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Total Ammonia, as Nitrogen
mg/I,
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Sulfate
mg/L
Semi-annually
Grab-
SDO
Ammonium Sulfate
mom-
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Chloride
mg/L
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
H
standard
Semi-annually
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfall
inches
Semi -Annually
Rainfall Event Duration
minutes
Semi -Annually
Foo�>s:
1 Measurement Frequency: All analytical monitoring will be performed twice per year, once in the spring (April -
June) and once in the fall (September - November). See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge. If the detention pond discharges only in response
to a storm event exceeding a ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative
monitoring shall be performed.
Part It Page 5 of 8

so
MI* Permit No. NCS000136
3 Sample Location: 'Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative
outfall status has been granted.
Table 2. Monito ing Schedule
'1 H. f�:�`r
Monttorinp ereod ,•
!� 11......
.5�
Sam le Numbers.
._ _ ;..
Starts
End !
Year 1 — Spring
1 .
April 1, 2006
June 30, 2006
Year 1 — Fall
2
September 1, 2006
November 30, 2006
Year 2 — Spring
3
April 1, 2007
June 30, 2007
Year 2 — Fall
4
September 1, 2007
November 30, 2007
Year 3 — Spring
5
Aril 1, 2008
June 30 2008
Year 3 — Fall
6
September 1,,2008
November 30, 2008
Year 4 — Spring
7
Apr*1, 2009
June 30, 2009
Year 4 — Fall
8
Sept,; qy , 2009
p November 30, 2009
Year 5 — Spring
9
Api- 2010 `
June 30, 2010
Year 5 — Fall
10
Sept mlie;�2010
November 30, 2010
Footnotes:00) 1
l Maintain semi-annual monitoring during permit rest w�roce'
Table 3. Benchmark Value$�for An .vticalrMonitorinr,
Jscharge�Characferistics!4�
a���� Uaits k,^;°
w _ enchmark
Conductivity ,�
�u cm
NIA
Total Suspended Solids „
,mg/L
100
Chemical Oxygen Demand '
mg/L
120
Total Nitrogen (TN)
mg/L
30
Nitrate + Nitrite, as Nitrogen
mg/L
10
Total Ammonia, as Nitrogen
mg/L
19.9
Sulfate
mg/L
250
Ammonium Sulfate
mg/L
13.75
Chloride
mg/L
250
pH
standard
6-9
Part 11 Page 6 of 8

00
00 Permit No. NCS000136
SECTION C: QUALITATIVE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Qualitative monitoring requires a visual inspection of each stormwater outfall regardless of
representative outfall status and shall be performed as specified below in Table 4. Qualitative
monitoring is for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SPPP) and assessing new sources of stormwater pollution. No analytical tests
are required. Qualitative monitoring of stormwater outfalls is performed when stormwater
discharge occurs but does not need to be performed during a representative storm event.
In the event an atypical condition is noted at a stormwater discharge outfall, the Permittee shall
document the suspected cause of the condition and any actions taken in response to the
Plan.
All qualitative monitoring will be performed twice p 5
once in the fall (September - November).
Table 4. Qualitative Monitoring Requirem nts
DischargeNCharacterastics
Frequency�', �
,Monitoring
�M'kp,ul�
R"E i
y',Locahon,'
Color
Semi-annuall
SDO
Odor
emt-annuall h
SDO
Clan
'S- ly
SDO
Floating Solids
h'n
sSemi-artuall
SDO
Suspended Solids
Senu="annuall
SDO
Foam
Se -annually
SDO
Oil Sheen
Semi-annuallySDO
Other obvious indicators
SDO
of stormwater pollution
Semi-annually
spring (April - June) and
Footnotes:
I Monitoring Location: Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO)
regardless of representative outfall status.
SECTION D: ON -SITE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Facilities which have any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on -site which uses more than 55
gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar year shall perform
analytical monitoring as specified below in Table 5. This monitoring shall be performed at all
outfalls which discharge stormwater runoff from vehicle maintenance areas.
Part II Page 7 of 8

00 00 Permit No. NCS000136
All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a representative storm event. The required
monitoring will result in a minimum of 10 analytical samplings being conducted over the term of
the permit at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) which discharges stormwater runoff from
vehicle maintenance areas. The permittee shall complete the minimum 10 analytical samplings
in accordance with the schedule specified in Table 2 (Section B).
Monitoring results shall be compared to the benchmark values in Table 6. The benchmark
values in Table 6 are not permit limits but should be used as guidelines for the permittee's
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). The permittee shall evaluate the sources of any
benchmark exceedances and evaluate the effectiveness of any site BMPs. The permittee shall
review and/or update the SPPP and document any efforts to address stormwater contamination.
Table 5. Analytical Monitoring Requirements for Qpr,Site Vehicle Maintenance
y q
Discharge ChaGGr.,acteristics
�-� ;Units {, hCi,
Measurement k
Sample ,_k
s
«S� Sample
,�51 y,Pyi=�i"�7%s vrut��'��a 43�
s; 3
i�'Y�� 1'�-+.-,y �'✓n.1 .4* rE
t r a a
ay,? vh,a.-- i�
o _ 1,�.
Fre
7 1 e T$I�.
s ;. ` 2.,.`
rh3 t
x1 7
uenc.,,
. e
:LOCat10R
H
standard
Semaually
Grab
SDO
Oil and Grease
m
Sem ann}t�ally, ,
Grab
SDO
Total suspended Solids
m F
�` $emtann.�..4,��ially
Grab
SDO
New Motor Oil Usage
allons/mont
Semi-annually
Estimate'
-
Total Rainfall
inches;
"ISemi-annually
Rainfall Event Duration
'
mintites
Semi-annuallyF__
-
Footnotes: +
1 Measurement Frequency: All analytical monitoring will be performed twice per year, once in the spring (April -
June) and once in the fall (Sept mber -November). See Table 2 (Section B) for schedule of monitoring periods.
2 If the stormwater runoff is controlled by a stormwater detention pond, a grab sample of the discharge from the
pond shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge. If the detention pond discharges only in response
to a storm event exceeding a ten year design storm, then no analytical monitoring is required and only qualitative
monitoring shall be performed.
Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) that discharges
stormwater runoff from area(s) where vehicle maintenance activities occur.
Table 6. Benchmark Values for Vehicle Maintenance Analytical Monitoring
Discharge; Characteristics„,,Y,Unrts;;�,�.,
�; �'hi K;;Benclimark� #^ z
pH
standard
6-9
Oil and Grease
mg/L
30
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L
100
Part lI Page 8 of 8

*0
00 Permit No. NCS000136
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER INDIVIDUAL PERMITS
SECTION A: COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
Compliance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in
accordance with the following schedule:
Existing Facilities: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented within
12 months of the effective date of the initial permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary
containment, as specified in Part 11, Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this permit,shall be accomplished within
12 months of the effective date of the initial permit issuance. I',)-
Proposed Facilities: The Stormwater Pollution Prevet
the beginning of discharges from the operation of the
annual basis. Secondary containment, as specified in
be accomplished prior to the beginning of discharges
2. Duty to Comply
The permittee must comply with all cc
constitutes a violation of the Clean W
termination, revocation and rotssaanci
ui`sK611;be developed and implemented prior to
al a tivity an&be updated thereafter on an
Section :A aragraph 2(b) of this permit shall
3 operation of the industrial activity.
Jividual permit. Any permit noncompliance
ands for enforcement action; for permit
or denial of a permit upon renewal application.
a. The permittee shall comply ws�d"a ith rds or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the
Clean Water Act for toxic,pblldt nts within the time provided in the regulations that establish these
standards or prohibitions, evenYthe permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement k
b. The Clean Water'IAIQrovides that any person who violates a permit condition is subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed $27,500 per day for each violation. Any person who negligently violates any
permit condition is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. Any person who knowingly violates permit
conditions is subject to criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. Also, any person who violates a permit condition
may be assessed an administrative penalty not to exceed $11,000 per violation with the maximum
amount not to exceed $137,500. [Ref: Section 309 of the Federal Act 33 USC 1319 and 40 CFR
122.41(a). ]
C. Under state law, a daily civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per
violation may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the
terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [Ref: North Carolina General Statutes 143-
215.6A]
d. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Director for violating section 301,
302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any
of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act. Administrative penalties for Class
I violations are not to exceed $11,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I
penalty assessed not to exceed $27,500. Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $11,000
per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class
II penalty not to exceed $137,500.
Part III Page I of 8

90.
Permit No. NCS000136
Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this
individual permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.
4. Civil and Criminal Liabili -
Except as provided in Part III, Section C of this permit regarding bypassing of stormwater control facilities,
nothing in this individual permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities,
liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3,143-215.6A, 143-215.613, 143-
215.6C or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily_ suspended._ T
5. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this individual permit shall be construed to
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or p
under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the I
6. Property Rip
hts
e the -institution of any legal action or relieve
to which:tl a permittee is or may be subject to
1ct. 33 USC 1321.
The issuance of this individual permit does riot conVey 49y property rights in either real or personal
property, or any exclusive privileges, nor d s it aut�hotize any injury to private property or any invasion of
personal rights, nor any infringement of Fdderal,'.State or local laws or regulations.
7. Severability
The provisions of this individual permit are severable, and if any provision of this individual permit, or the
application of any provisio �f this ind
t�oividual permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application
of such provision to other"circumstances, and the remainder of this individual permit, shall not be affected
thereby. F
8. Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director
may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the
permit issued pursuant to this individual permit or to determine compliance with this individual permit. The
permittee shall also furnish to the Director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this
individual permit.
9. Penalties for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate,
any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this individual permit shall, upon
conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more
than two years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first
conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more that $20,000 per day of
violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.
10. Penalties for Falsification of Re orts
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this individual
Part III Page 2 of 8

00 0* Permit No. NCS000136 •
permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be
punished by a fine of not: more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation, or by both.
SECTION H. GENERAL CONDITIONS
I . Individual Permit Ex iration
The permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to receive automatic
authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall submit forms and fees as are
required by the agency authorized to issue permits no later than 180 days prior to the expiration date. Any
ermittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, or any nermittee that_dou not
have a permit after the expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will be
subjected to enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS § 143L 1153.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
2. Transfers
This permit is not transferable to any person except aft fh6tke to and approval by the Director. The
Director may require modification or revocation and reissuancd of the permit to change the name and
A� _ 7\ r t.
incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary,undec tie Clean Water Act. Permittee is required
to notify the Division in writing in the event the perr4Q Ffac lity is sold or closed.
3. Siana. tort' Requirements
w;,
All applications, reports, or i1 ation si }i itted to the Director shall be signed and certified.
a. All applications to be covered under this individual permit shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a c6toration:�/6y a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a
I. -Al
respons1 e:corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice president
of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who
performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (b) the
manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities employing more
than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million (in
second quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or
delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive
officer or ranking elected official.
b. All reports required by the individual permit and other information requested by the Director shall
be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only if-
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the
overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant
manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent
responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental
Part III Page 3 of 8

0* Permit No. NCS000136
4.
5.
C.
matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named
individual or any individual occupying a named position,); and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Director.
Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section shall make the following
certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or'those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are
including the possibility of fines and iml
violations."
The issuance of this individual permit does not prohibit tlie?Director from reopening and modifying the
individual permit, revoking and reissuing the individual em tt terminating the individual permit as
allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations containedghti itle 40! Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122
and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina AdminAistrailve",Mee. Subchapter 2H .0I00; and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 et. al. Z
Permit Actions
The permit may be modified, revaked:and issued, or terminated for cause. The notification of planned
changes or anticipated noncom p1 and a not stay any individual pennit condition.
SECTION C: OPERATION
1.
2.
Proper Operation and Maintenance
ANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and
control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with
the conditions of this individual permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate
laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of
back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation
is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this individual permit.
Need to Halt or Reducg Not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this individual permit.
Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass unless:
a. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage; and
b. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary control facilities,
retention of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry
Part III Page 4 of 8

0*
Pennit No. NCS000136 .
weather. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed in
the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal
periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
C. The permittee submitted notices as required under, Part III, Section E of this permit.
If the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above, the Director may approve an
anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects.
SECTION D: MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall -'be characteristic of the volume and
nature of the permitted discharge. Analytical sampling shall be dior�med daring a representative storm
event. Samples shall be taken on a day and time that is, hara ei nisttc:,of the discharge. All samples shall be
%i �..t��r
taken before the discharge joins or is diluted by any other waste stream; -body of water, or substance.
Monitoring points as specified in this permit shall not be
Monitoring without notification to and approval of
the Director.;>
Recordiny, Results
For each measurement, sample,
requirements of this individual l
a. The date, exact
b. The
C. . The date(s)
activity performed or collected pursuant to the
record the following information:
measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
the sampling, measurements, inspection or maintenance activity;
d. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
3. Flow Measurements
Where required, appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of
monitored discharges.
4. . Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published pursuant to
NCGS 143-215.63 et. seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant
to Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended, and Regulation
40 CFR 136.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this individual permit, all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum
detection or lower reporting level of the procedure. -
Part Ili Page 5 of 8

00 00 Permit No. NCS000136
5. Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that are
required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status. If it is
established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is granted
representative outfall status, then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced number of outfalls.
6. Records Retention
Visual monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at the facility along with the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan. Copies of analytical monitoring results shall also be maintained on -site. The
permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance
records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all
reports required by this individual permit —For o oat leist 5 years om a date of the samp e,
measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time.
7. . Inspection and Entry
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorizediepresentative (including an authorized contractor
acting as a representative of the Director), or in the case of a'N'i"Mity which discharges through a municipal
.0;��.
separate storm sewer system, an authorized representativelof a.municipal operator or the separate storm
sewer system receiving the discharge, upon2th--ApresenArla�*`dtttof credentials and other documents as may be
required by law, to; .�g''
a. Enter upon the permitfee'�S preiiiises wliere-a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted,
tea,, q
or where records must be e t under. the conditions of this individual permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of
this individual permit;
C. Inspect at reasonablb times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment),
practices, or operations rregulated or required under this individual permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring individual permit compliance
or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location. .
SECTION E: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Discharge MonitoriniLReports
Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be submitted to the Division on
Discharge,Monitoring Report forms provided by the Director. Submittals shall be received by the Division
no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.
2. Submitting Reports
Duplicate signed copies of all reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Part III Page 6 of 8

66 00 Permit No. NCS000136 .
Availabilily of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal
Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection
at the offices of the Division of Water Quality. As required by the Act, analytical data shall not be
considered confidential. Knowingly making any false statement on any such report may result in the
imposition of criminal penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-215.613 or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
4. Non-Stormwater Dischr es
If the storm event monitored in accordance with this individual permit coincides with a non-stormwater
discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under the non-stormwater
discharge permit and provide this information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report_
5. Planned Changes
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon
facility which could significantly alter the nature or qua
requirement includes pollutants which are not specifical
notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122�ail '(
6... Anticipated Noncom liance
The permittee shall give notice to the
facility which may result in noncomp
s.
a. Anticipated bypas . if the p
prior notice, if possible at le
11
the anticipated quallty_anea
le df dity_pl@ined changes at the permitted
,olluttantdischarged. This notification
in the individual permit or subject to
possible of any planned changes at the permitted
idual permit requirements.
iittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit
ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of
;t of the bypass.
b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of an
unanticipated bypass.
8. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance which
may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from
the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided
within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances,
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the period of
noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the
anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received
within 24 hours.
Other Noncompliance
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at the time
monitoring reports are submitted.
Part III Page 7 of 8

. �• Permit No. NCS000136
to. Other Information
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in an application for an
individual permit or in any report to the Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
Part III Page 8 of 8

NCS000136
PART IV LIMITATIONS REOPENER
This individual permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply with any applicable
effluent guideline or water quality standard issued or approved under Sections 302(b) (2) (c), and (d), 304(b) (2) and
307(a) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent guideline or water quality standard so issued or approved:
a. Contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluent limitation in the individual
permit; or -
b. Controls any pollutant not limited in the individual permit.
The individual permit as modified or reissued under this paragra kishall''als'orycontain any other
Act then applicable.
�e
PART V ADMINISTERING AND
The permittee must pay the administering and
the Division. Failure to pay the fee in timely i
Division to initiate action to revoke thei_ livi
1. Act
See Clean Water Act.
2. Arithmetic Mean
MONITORING FEE
anc6nonitbring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being billed by
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause this
DEFINITIONS
The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the individual values divided by the number of
individual values.
3. - Allowable Non-Stonmwater Discharas
This permit regulates stormwater discharges. Non-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in the
stormwater conveyance system are:
(a) All other discharges that are authorized by a non-stormwater NPDES permit.
(b) Uncontaminated groundwater, foundation drains, air -conditioner condensate without added
chemicals, springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant
flushings, water from footing drains, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands.
(c) Discharges resulting from fire -fighting or fire -fighting training.
4. Best_ Management Practices BMPs)
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters. BMPs may take the
form of a process, activity, or physical structure.
Parts IV, V and VI Page I of 5

A
ftPermit No. NCS000136
5. Bypass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including
the collection system, which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility.
6. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage capacity of greater than
1,320 gallons.
7. Clean Water Act
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known
USC 1251, et. seq.
8. Division or DWO
The Division of Water Quality, Department of
9. Director
The Director of the Division of;Watere,Qgality,
10. EMC
The North Carolina
11. Grab She
Act (CWA), as amended, 33
Resources.
issuing authority.
Commission.
An individual sample collected instantaneously. Grab samples that will be directly analyzed or qualitatively
monitored must be taken within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
12. Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
13. Landes
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land
treatment facility, a surface impoundment, an injection well, a hazardous waste long-term storage facility or
a surface storage facility.
14. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
A stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self-government such as a city or town.
15. Overburden
Any material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding
topsoil or similar nawmily-occurring surface materials that are not disturbed by mining operations.
Part VI Page 2 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCS000136
16. Permittee
The owner or operator issued a permit pursuant to this individual permit.
17. Point Source Discharge of Stormwater
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance including, but not specifically limited to, any pipe, ditch,
channel, tunnel, conduit, well, or discrete fissure from which stormwater is or may be discharged to waters
of the state.
18. Representative Storm _Event
A storm event that measures greater than 0. t inches of rainfall and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no
storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive
hours of no precipitation. For example, if it rains for 2 hours without producing any collectable discharge, and then
stops, a sample may be collected if a rain producing a dischargebegins again within the next 10 hours.
19. Representative Outfall Status
When it is established that the discharge of stormwater-runoff fro�tn a single outfall is representative of the
discharges at multiple outfalls, the DWQ may grant representatilve outfall status. Representative outfall
status allows the permittee to perform analyticalr onii' " ai a reduced number of outfalls.
20.. Rinse Water Discharge Af z
The discharge of rinse water fr6ih�,e,quip pt 061 ling areas associated with industrial activity. Rinse
waters from vehicle and equipment t;leanmg areas are process wastewaters and do not include washwaters
� ��'S1 t. "mow
utilizing any type of detergent or,cleanln agent
_+j;;
21. Second Containment
Spill containment for the,`cotttents of single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient
freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
22. Section 313 Water Priorit�LChemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -
to -Know Act of,1986;
b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA Title III, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
C. That meet at least one of the following criteria:
(1) Is listed in Appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority
pollutants), Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain toxic
pollutants and hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40
CFR 116.4; or
(3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
Part VI Page 3 of 5 Pages

Permit No. NCS000136
23
24.
25
26.
27.
28.
29
kill
Severe Propeqy Damage
Means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the control facilities which causes them to
become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused
by delays in production.
Significant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production;
hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to
report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes,
slag and sludge that have the potential to be release
Significant Spills
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or ha
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40
CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation
result ofsnowmelt. . 1 ,IA %
s'`idFxcess of reportable quantities
CFR 117.21) or section 102 of
occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and which is
directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site. Facilities
e�
considered to be engaged" utdustrial activities" include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14).
The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
A comprehensive site -specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution and
is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site.
Ten Year Design Storm
The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average once in ten
years. Design storm information can be found in the State of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.
Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the entire storm event occurs. Total flow shall be
either; (a) measured continuously, (b) calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the
amount of built -upon (impervious) area, and the total amount of rainfall, or (c) estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event.
Part VI Page 4 of 5 Pages

sPermit No. IVCS000136 �
31. Total Maximum'Daily Load (TMDL)
A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet
water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutants sources. A TMDL is a detailed
water quality assessment that provides the scientific foundation for.an implementation plan. The
implementation plan outlines the steps necessary to reduce pollutant loads in a certain body of water to
restore and maintain water quality standards in all seasons. The Clean Water Act, section 303, establishes
the water quality standards and TMDL programs.
32. Toxic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
33. Upset
Means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional ando noncompliance with p �, ,; ra , - p
technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors'beyond.the�reasonable control of the
permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent cadsedby operational error, improperly
designed treatment or control facilities, inadequate treatment or control facilities, lack of preventive
maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
34. Vehicle Maintenance Activity
Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, paintingfueling, lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations, or
airport deicing operations.17
35. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral�an organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air,
gravity, or ice from its site0of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye.
36.
The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average, once in 25
years.
Part VI Page 5 of 5 Pages