20190333 Ver 1_00_WB_PCN_USACE JD_COMPLETE_NoPlans_20190312

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW-
Prepare file folder �
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM �
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Walker Branch Greenway — South Tryon St to Smith Rd
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The purpose of this project is to construct approximately 0.65-mile of 12-foot wide multi-use trail (i.e. greenway), connecting an
existing private developer constructed greenway trail to Smith Road including a pedestrian bridge crossing over Walker Branch, a
neighborhood connection and resurfacing of the existing greenway (Figure 1).
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form AS — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Kimley-Horn; POC Mr. Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form BSb]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project area crosses forested, undeveloped land, running perpendicular from South Tryon Street to Smith Road along
Walker's Branch Creek in Charlotte, NC. The center of the project area is located at 35.105142°N, -80.983642 °W.
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID[PCN Form Bla]: Multiple - Linear Project
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
1 l. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Walker's Branch Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Catawba / HUC: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 � Section 404 ❑
Section 10 and 404 �
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 14
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Pre-Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley>>> Horn
March 11, 2019
Mr. David Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (NWP 14) &
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Walker Branch Greenway — South Tryon Street to Smith Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Mecklenburg County, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed joint
Section 404/401 Pre-Construction Notification for the above referenced project for your review
pursuant to Nationwide Permit 14 and General 401 Water Quality Certification number 4135 as well
as a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (JD) request. Authorization is requested to construct
approximately 0.65-mile of 12-foot wide multi-use trail (i.e. greenway), connecting an existing private
developer constructed greenway trail to Smith Road including a pedestrian bridge crossing over
Walker Branch, a neighborhood connection and resurfacing of the existing greenway. The center of
the project area is located at 35.105142°N, -80.983642°W. The following information is included as
part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre-Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
■ Figure 1 — Vicinity
■ Figure 2— USGS 7.5' Topo (Fort Mill Quadrangle)
■ Figure 3— Meck. Co. SSURGO Soils (2018 Meck. Co. Aerial)
■ Figure 4— PJD Field Sketch (2018 Meck. Co. Aerial)
■ Figure 5 — Proposed Conditions
• Construction Plans of Proposed Walker Branch Greenway — South Tryon St to Smith Rd
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Field Data Forms
■ NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
• Project Site Photographs
• Agency Correspondence

Kimley>>> Horn
Project Background
Page 2
The purpose of this project is to construct an asphalt-paved greenway on new location from the
Steele Creek Athletic Association complex, along Walker Branch, to Smith Road. The project will tie
into a developer constructed greenway associated with the Rivergate Shopping Center and includes
connections to Rivergate Parkway, the athletic complex and Walkers Creek Drive in the Walker's
Creek neighborhood. Construction of the new greenway is not part of a larger greenway network, nor
is a future connection planned. The new greenway seeks to create/enhance neighborhood
connectivity, provide safe bicycle and pedestrian access to the Rivergate Shopping Center, as well as
provide street access.
The scope of this project includes 3,430 LF (0.65 mile) of new asphalt-paved greenway construction
and 2,323 LF (0.44 mile) resurfacing of the existing Rivergate Shopping Center greenway. The
proposed greenway will connect the existing Rivergate greenway with a new location, 12-foot-wide
asphalt-paved trail for 0.65 mile along Walker Branch and end at Smith Road. The project will include
a new 75 LF, pre-fabricated, 12-foot-wide bridge crossing over Walker Branch. A 165 LF, 8-foot-wide
connection will be built on an existing gravel trail connecting Walker Creek Drive to the new
greenway. Two overlooks and a small connection to the Steele Creek Athletic Association complex
will also be constructed.
Existing Conditions
The Preliminary JD information reflects site conditions evaluated by Kimley-Horn staff (Chris
Tinklenberg, PWS). Stream centerlines were collected via survey and verified in the field.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) stream identification methodology was used to
identify potential non-wetland waters of the US. NCDWR Methodology for ldentification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11 (NCDWR, September 2010)
stream forms were completed for each stream. NCDWR Stream Classification Forms representative
of Walker Branch (Stream 1) and an Unnamed Tributary of Walker Branch (Stream 2) are attached.
The project area includes a maintained sanitary sewer easement and/or existing gravel trail
throughout the entirety of the project area. Vegetation within and bordering the maintained easement
consists of fescue (Festuca spp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Eastern
redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), wild onion (Allium
canadense), and Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana).
Jurisdictional Delineation Results
On-site potentiallyjurisdictional waters drain to and include Walker Branch. Walker Branch is part of
the Lower Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103) and is classified as "Class C Waters" by the
NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such
as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival
and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture."
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are two potential non-wetland waters of
the US (Streams 1-2) located within the project area (Figure 3).

Kimley>>> Horn Page 3
Stream 1(Walker Branch) originates offsite and drains approximately 4.5 square miles at the point
where the creek exits the project area. Stream 1 flows parallel along the project corridor and is largely
located beyond the corridor limits; however, approximately 174 linear feet of Stream 1 is present
within the project corridor. Stream 1 exhibited evidence of strong continuity of channel bed and bank,
particle size of stream substrate, depositional bars or benches, recent alluvial deposits, and evidence
of organic debris lines. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is present year-round in a
typical year. Stream 1 scored a 46 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification
Form.
Stream 2(UT to Walker Branch) originates offsite and flows approximately 49 linear feet through the
project corridor to its confluence with Walker Branch. The channel is currently rip-rap lined
throughout the assessed reach. These impacts are likely a result of the Walker's Creek development
which was constructed around 1989. In addition, a small wooden pedestrian bridge is present over
Stream 2. Stream 2 exhibits strong continuity of bed and banks and baseflow; however, lacks
sinuosity and exhibits characteristics more commonly associated with stormwater drainage features.
In-stream aquatic organisms were not observed during biological assessments. Stream
characteristics indicate that flow is present at least seasonally in a typical year. Stream 2 scored a 25
out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form.
No potential wetland waters of the US are present within the project corridor.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
Kimley-Horn consulted the SHPO online GIS service on February 14, 2019, and found no sites of
architectural, historic, or archaeological significance within the project corridor.
Protected Species
A data review was conducted using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer
on February 14, 2019, to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered,
threatened species, or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review,
there are no records of federally-protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the
project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The overall project includes the construction of an approximately 0.65-mile long, 12-foot-wide
greenway trail, including a 165 LF 8-foot wide neighborhood connection and a prefabricated
pedestrian bridge crossing over Walker Branch.
Installation of rip-rap is necessary to stabilize the stream banks along the abutments of the proposed
pedestrian bridge over Walker Branch. Rip-rap placement will extend below the plane of the ordinary
high water mark (OHWM) of Walker Branch. The rip-rap stabilization will result in 25 linear feet
of permanent — no net loss impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US.
An existing wooden pedestrian bridge crossing over UT to Walker Branch (S2) will be removed and
replaced with 25 LF of a 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The overall length of the pipe and
subsequent stream impacts have been minimized by implementing headwalls at the culvert inlet and
outlet. The culvert has been designed and will be installed in such a manner that the original stream

Kimley>>> Horn Page 4
profile will not be altered. The culvert will be installed below the elevation of the stream bed by 20% of
the culvert diameter to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. 24 LF of inlet and outlet
protections are necessary to meet non-erosive design criteria. Rip-rap outlet dissipation will be
placed in a manner that the finished top elevation of the riprap will not exceed that of the original
stream bed in order to prevent de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks downstream of the impact
area and to allow for aquatic life passage. 49 linear feet of permanent impacts to potential non-
wetland waters of the US is proposed as a result of the culvert installation and inlet/outlet
protections. Note: As described above, Stream 2 has been historically altered by the construction of
the adjacent neighborhood and remains rip-rap lined as a result of that development. The loss of
waters results from the 48-inch RCP encapsulation; however, impacts from inlet and outlet
protections effectively maintain the existing condition of Stream 2.
As part of the storm drainage network, culverts are proposed at eight (8) locations perpendicular to
the proposed greenway (Figure 5). Rip-rap outlet protection is necessary at each culvert in order to
meet non-erosive design criteria. Lengths and widths of outlet protection have been minimized to the
greatest extents practicable. The careful placement of the outfalls will impact Walker Branch below
the plane of the OHWM but is necessary to prevent future bank instability and erosion. Rip-rap
aprons at each impact location will be installed so that the finished elevation of the rip-rap does not
exceed that of the existing channel bed elevation along Walker Branch (S1). 125 linear feet of
permanent — no net loss impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US is proposed as a
result of the rip-rap outlet protection.
Overall, impacts associated with the construction of the greenway will result in 174 linear feet
of permanent impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US.
Compensatory Mitigation
Mitigation is not proposed as part of this project based on evidence that Stream 2 has been
previously impacted by development of the Walker's Creek neighborhood. The remaining project
impacts result in a total of 125 LF to potential non-wetland waters of the US, below the mitigation
threshold. These impacts include rip-rap bank stabilization/outlet protection which may result in some
functional loss within the stream-side zone of Walker Branch; however, the impacts will not result in a
total loss of waters of the US and are necessary to prevent future bank erosion.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
��
� `
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Kimley>>> Horn
Attachments
Cc: Brian Bennett, PLA
Project Manager
Mecklenburg County
Page 5

Kimley>>> Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Walker Branch Greenwav — South Tryon Street to Smith Road
Applicant Name and Address: Mecklenburg CountX
POC: Brian Bennett
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte, NC 28208
Telephone Number:980-314-2539
Type of Request: � Nationwide PCN (NWP # 14)
� Jurisdictional Determination
❑ Individual Permit Application
❑ Other:
Included Attachments: � Project Plans � USGS Map � NRCS Soil Survey
� Agent Authorization � Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
� Data Forms (LTp & Wet) � NCDWR Stream Forms � USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation � Aerial Photo � Site Photos
� Agency Correspondence ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On-Site ❑ Off-Site ❑ Other)
County: Mecklenburg Nearest City/Town: Charlotte
Waterway: Walker Branch
H.U.C.: 03050103
Property Size (acres): 4.2 acres
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.105142 °N
River Basin: Lower Catawba
USGS Quad Name: Fort Mill, SC
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.2 ac
-80.983642 °W
Project Location: The proposed project corridor is located along a stretch of Walker Branch that connects a developer
constructed ree enwav associated with the Rivergate sho�ing center at South Trvon Street to Smith Road in southwest
Charlotte, NC.
Site Description: The project area includes a maintained sanitary sewer easement and/or existin�Qravel trail throu�hout
the entiretv of the project area and is bound bv Smith Rd to the east and South Tryon St to the west. The project corridor
is in a lightiv forested area bounded by an existing neighborhood to the north and a neiehborhood currentiv under
development to the south.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Proposed impacts are associated with construction of a new brid�e, stormwater outfall
riprap dissipation and installation of new culvert crossin�. Overall, impacts associated with the construction of the reg enwaX
will result in 1741inear feet of permanent impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US.
Open Water Wetland Stream Channel
NWP (acres) (acres) Intermittent and/or Unimportant Perennial and/or Important
# A uatic Function A uatic Function
Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Tem . Perm. Tem . Perm.
lf ac lf ac lf ac lf Ac
14 174 0.02
Total 174 0.02
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (If/acres) 174/0.02
Total Temporary Impact to Waters of the U.S. (If/acres) I 0/0 I
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenberg�,kimley-horn.com

o��F W ATF9QG
� �
> �
o �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Walker Branch Greenway — South Tryon Street to Smith Road
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Mecklenburg County - Right of Entry Agreements(POC: Brian Bennett, PLA)
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28208
3f. Telephone no.: 980-314-2539
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify:
4b. Name: Brian Bennett
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Mecklenburg County
4d. Street address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC, 28208
4f. Telephone no.: 980-314-2539
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: Brian.Bennett(c�mecklenburacountvnc.ctov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name Kimley-Horn and Associates
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC, 28202
5e. Telephone no.: 704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Mecklenburg County - Right of Entry Agreements
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.105142 Longitude: - 80.983642
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 4.18 acres (Project Boundary)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to �/alker Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Walker Branch - Class "C"
2c. River basin: Lower Catawba; HUC 03050103
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area includes a maintained sanitary sewer easement and/or existing gravel trail throughout the entirety of the
project area. On-site potentially jurisdictional waters drain to and include Walker Branch. Walker Branch is part of the
Lower Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103) and is classified as "Class C Waters" by the NCDWR. According to the
NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish
consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture."
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are two potential non-wetland waters of the US (Streams 1-
2) located within the project area (Figure 3).
Stream 1(Walker Branch) originates offsite and drains approximately 4.5 square miles at the point where the creek exits
the project area. Stream 1 flows parallel along the project corridor and is largely located beyond the corridor limits;
however, approximately 174 linear feet of Stream 1 is present within the project corridor. Stream 1 exhibited evidence of
strong continuity of channel bed and bank, particle size of stream substrate, depositional bars or benches, recent alluvial
deposits, and evidence of organic debris lines. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is present year-round
in a typical year. Stream 1 scored a 46 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form.
Stream 2(UT to Walker Branch) originates offsite and flows approximately 49 linear feet through the project corridor to its
confluence with Walker Branch. The channel is currently rip-rap lined throughout the assessed reach. These impacts are
likely a result of the Walker's Creek development which was constructed around 1989. In addition, a small wooden
pedestrian bridge is present over Stream 2. Stream 2 exhibits strong continuity of bed and banks and baseflow; however,
lacks sinuosity and exhibits characteristics more commonly associated with stormwater drainage features. In-stream
aquatic organisms were not observed during biological assessments. Stream characteristics indicate that flow is present
at least seasonally in a typical year. Stream 2 scored a 25 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDW R Stream
Classification Form.
No potential wetland waters of the US are present within the project corridor.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The total length of all on-site streams is approximately 230 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct an asphalt-paved greenway on new location from the Steele Creek Athletic
Association complex, along Walker Branch, to Smith Road.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will tie into a developer constructed greenway associated with the Rivergate Shopping Center and includes
connections to Rivergate Parkway, the athletic complex and Walkers Creek Drive in the Walker's Creek neighborhood.
Construction of the new greenway is not part of a larger greenway network, nor is a future connection planned. The new
greenway seeks to create/enhance neighborhood connectivity, provide safe bicycle and pedestrian access to the
Rivergate Shopping Center, as well as provide street access.
The scope of this project includes 3,430 LF (0.65 mile) of new asphalt-paved greenway construction and 2,323 LF (0.44
mile) resurfacing of the existing Rivergate Shopping Center greenway. The proposed greenway will connect the existing
Rivergate greenway with a new location, 12-foot-wide asphalt-paved trail for 0.65 mile along Walker Branch and end at
Smith Road. The project will include a new 75 LF, pre-fabricated, 12-foot-wide bridge crossing over Walker Branch. A 165
LF, 8-foot-wide connection will be built on an existing gravel trail connecting Walker Creek Drive to the new greenway.
Two overlooks and a small connection to the Steele Creek Athletic Association complex will also be constructed.
Skid steer loaders, excavators, pavers, and other equipment typical of greenway projects will be utilized during
construction.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo� this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
or Temporary
T
W1 — Impact 1 ❑ Yes ❑ Corps �
❑P❑T ❑No ❑DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
or Temporary (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
(T)
S1 — Impact 1 Rip-rap bridge abutment Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 25
� P❑ T along banks ❑ INT � DWQ
S1 — Impact 2 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 9
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 3 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 17
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 4 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 12
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 5 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 17
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S2 — Impact 6 Culvert installation/Rip- UT of Walker � PER � Corps 6 49
� P❑ T rap inleUoutfall Branch ❑ INT � DWQ
S1 — Impact 7 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 10
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 8 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 15
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 9 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 11
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
S1 — Impact 10 Rip-rap outfall Walker Branch � PER � Corps 15 9
�P❑T ❑INT �DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 174
3i. Comments: The overall project includes the construction of an approximately 0.65-mile long, 12-foot-wide greenway trail,
including a 165 LF 8-foot wide neighborhood connection and a prefabricated pedestrian bridge crossing over Walker Branch.
Installation of rip-rap is necessary to stabilize the stream banks along the abutments of the proposed pedestrian bridge over
Walker Branch. Rip-rap placement will extend below the plane of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Walker Branch.
The rip-rap stabilization will result in 25 linear feet of permanent — no net loss impacts to potential non-wetland
waters of the US.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

An existing wooden pedestrian bridge crossing over UT to Walker Branch (S2) will be removed and replaced with 25 LF of
a 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The overall length of the pipe and subsequent stream impacts have been
minimized by implementing headwalls at the culvert inlet and outlet. The culvert has been designed and will be installed in
such a manner that the original stream profile will not be altered. The culvert will be installed below the elevation of the stream
bed by 20% of the culvert diameter to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. 24 LF of inlet and outlet protections are
necessary to meet non-erosive design criteria. Rip-rap outlet dissipation will be placed in a manner that the finished top
elevation of the riprap will not exceed that of the original stream bed in order to prevent de-stabilization of the stream bed or
banks downstream of the impact area and to allow for aquatic life passage. 49 linear feet of permanent impacts to
potential non-wetland waters of the US is proposed as a result of the culvert installation and inlet/outlet protections.
Note: As described above, Stream 2 has been historically altered by the construction of the adjacent neighborhood and
remains rip-rap lined as a result of that development. The /oss of waters resu/ts from the 48-inch RCP encapsu/ation;
however, impacts from in/et and outlet protections effective/y maintain the existing condition of Stream 2.
As part of the storm drainage network, culverts are proposed at eight (8) locations perpendicular to the proposed greenway
(Figure 5). Rip-rap outlet protection is necessary at each culvert in order to meet non-erosive design criteria. Lengths and
widths of outlet protection have been minimized to the greatest extents practicable. The careful placement of the outfalls will
impact Walker Branch below the plane of the OHWM but is necessary to prevent future bank instability and erosion. Rip-rap
aprons at each impact location will be installed so that the finished elevation of the rip-rap does not exceed that of the existing
channel bed elevation along Walker Branch (S1). 125 linear feet of permanent — no net loss impacts to potential non-
wetland waters of the US is proposed as a result of the rip-rap outlet protection.
Overall, impacts associated with the construction of the greenway will result in 174 linear feet of permanent
impacts to potential non-wetland waters of the US.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The alignment of the Walker Branch Greenway utilizes an existing sanitary sewer and greenway easement and is a single,
complete project not part of a masterplan. The proposed greenway includes one prefabricated pedestrian bridge will be
utilized to avoid stream bed impacts along Walker Branch.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All rip-rap outlet dissipation will be placed in a manner that the finished top elevation of the riprap will not exceed that of the
original stream bed in order to prevent de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks downstream of the impact area and to allow
for aquatic life passage. The overall length of the pipe associated with Impact 6 and subsequent stream impacts have been
minimized by implementing headwalls at the culvert inlet and outlet. The culvert has been designed and will be installed in
such a manner that the original stream profile will not be altered. The culvert will be installed below the elevation of the stream
bed by 20% of the culvert diameter to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Special care and consideration will be
implemented, to the greatest extent practicable, in areas immediately adjacent to the creek in order to prevent incidental
fallback.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 22%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Linear public transportation projects are required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance
with the practices described in the NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. Diffuse flow will be implemented to
rovide ro er draina e and water treatment.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
i mpacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A data review was conducted using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on February
14, 2019 to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical
habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally-protected
species within the project limits or within a mile of the project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO online GIS service was consulted on February 14, 2019, and found no sites of architectural, historic, or
archaeological significance within or in the vicinity of the project corridor.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A flood impact analysis report, no-rise impact certification, and
individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to Mecklenburg County for review and approval prior to
construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact analysis show that there is no net increase in base flood
elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM PANEL 4409 and 4419
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS �'�� � � 3/11/2019
Applicant/AgenYs Signature
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

- o E ; �
_' " a y��e0� � d��G 51�Y
. ,1� -` ��Kca �o gaa � �
stanley � R �;�dy ^
I\
�� ? / A �
Mt Holly , � r `
� � � � v
Ga la_,�= ,� � \� <;). -- � �� -�` f ��°� `55 `% :
�Nmon % - Brag . � o >
- Q ��� I ���� g i o � �
I ���.� I � �: [ihaflOi@ � `u S�cN1e50� �o`\c9bio�.�' 4 0
Figure 1 - M � S�
— . � NIII 'n 0�0� P�a�e � �"`.-\ >
--- -- . v do O < - `� .. . "
, ge� � (40� a,�'° Klywo�th Lnc
�" o� a
e� � 0� o�
'a ` oc
Lam nr
eville �� \ JaY P Paa o o�s `�a0
I� j� ,\ �..� fA ianhail v"<� `q ��
. , � 5� r °� Ct
�'.� ��,�oc y j �l
y 60 �y� 6 � O
�.� \\ u C 11 v
� r � � HO�45�on
�'a � J I� dG � o ���a v `O
o� New Co ,�
Rockyf�ll Miles .�c � �
P G� �
�sbY ln
R '�� � S�a1
�. . i�:�. ?g �cee �r ? � _ S�clon La
U y
. ���:. o,� — r A��yda�e ln 3��
u �
� ��q
,...�...��,f� yoc'�'�a r;... �, Q�`�` y L �ao
�_'.h.:.�l.; F:ii4. � Ln
�`yocs� VEn'm_ � 3 poPp�cto�
5 v' �\,. P�ergate PkwyG�Vn•. .� �aPworth �� `
���-�„
qD �( 4 Py��hleYLn
�\� GC�- p pc PYtchleY �n V
/
�� .,J �:�� i:li.�.�L raiL. e v
n G�e V
o D
. � �3�`1-e�� Jy n � F `ryyn G�
RHarg3le ;� � (�
c`�O� � � �e
�
µo�e� � � Harle4�io D�
Y 'i,.:;,'i �a\ � � U
i�
�a ..� c, N"a�he, 2- Ch o'
�e G�ee� ��oc 4 D oJrP ��� ��
f �' a `o
\ee � H
y v� ac
Hoover Creek Bl�d ����oF Yorkshiro 3 µu�dy ��
Fl,��ty Broo6
<�
Yall�rs
VBranch
Greemvay � � � � Q�� �
� u .�
F w m
r'
e C` 9 aik� s C `s^ �(o°
Slade Gas" _ � °ss� O
� r ':i O�
�n Dr
� �a�har0 � �� CJrraiee
� �ake Dt
� i C��'Ner
� n ga��o0�ass Ct . P
Q � , '.
� � orough Ct ^ ' � �~
Ba/ �"°c(ioss� � °s
yyC.F P� �� �J ,' r�`S'� �O CJ��N F•.
� 0 T o ay ry e/
O
a Jh��� "°�4 s��hb; �°
JscR �� v�P D `tPlanlers Kno6 Cn
i �
�yoU�° N� a �P m
V S� �
� �� �
n
Legend � �
� 0 1,000 2,000
� Project Corridor (LOD) �F` Feet ;
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 1: Vieinity
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

�•t> 4 J ' �� - -_' - -- ^� � , L� • � N
, , � _ ;; , �
: . � _ . ; � ... .� ._ A
• r �� , � ��
� , I I /� � � • �,� 1 �-." �
/ � • r �
, - .,`!� .; �-- ' � � , � . l � l � J
� � � � ..�. ; .-
� � , , ;,., ,,. �-�� . ; .;
� • M � ' � � � ' � ` � �L' � �
R ` ` • ' ��- �' � � ~`.w� /', � �� �� ..r�
. / -�� '� •� 1 \ � r 1 ! \t� � �� �
• � � 1 / � � •
• � �':� � \ 6i� • � �~� _� �f = +;
: ��� •'ti /� ' : � !t�` .. . C�
�� 1 � � w � ...
.
, ;�. � �� � .
. �� . _.��,�o '. . .
• - � '''�` � �, 1,, � i
� \� � - - � ��� -z� , ��
r _ • ' � � O� • �.�t,�• ` �5�..
� � • �"�` �'� � . ���-- _
1 �_ _�.: /� i
,? . --� ,, : � �
� � � .;�� `., AthtetlC �-. �' -.,�. '.�?
� ; � f�d � �� � ���J � � . �,-
� � , � ` � �. ��.
,., 1�� ,
- � ,�' : _ . � �; Q— =-�- / :
��6.i3 , it � - `�` { _ _ .
i �Y l ` - - �� ��•.
� 1 , ` ` _ � :•� � • �, `' ''S-
/ �� � ,::: �
, � � .
, , " '' �� • _ r1
� �� `` ' ,� •-' �r � `•: r� �� � , :�, — ,'
-� � � � � ,.
5 i ! _ --- ` - - r _ i � �` ` t��'� , c
I � \ , , J ( - - ` - "•� - - - _ �'� � •, 1 �
• f ` ;, --`. _ -;/• � -'
, � � --� _ '�� , --�� �; , a J _ .
-,-- J ✓ � — _, ' �_�e _ -� 1�i.
�-- r - �. - -_�
- ,�. � � , �''�-. _ _
�� .-� . ,,..��. ._ � _ _
.— � � - 1� � � 1 �� `�+ `-_ ��' t • � �. _�/`__
r •�l• - � ��f-, \ � : � • � �� \ '\
' /, �1 ,� �- � ' � �
�
� �' ` � \ , ' � � 1 ��'• • ` ,\
��� � 1 i 'j 1 `�.
� � � � i^ . �) . � �' - Q' � • • - ` \
'� ' - ► ?`� - -� • J "4, � ...: -.. '� .
• ' _ --.���1 �,�,L. � � � �, , _ � . � . . - f,
.I� � , • '�:�
-- ' ' ' , •►=- f
:� ' ' � �' - ' \ ,*. _ 1� _/ ' /,� �`' �!� �,,� -
f ' � a 1 " �- � - - � �
'1 ` �.f:�'' / �f J�;,,',. � - / .
t 1� �-6�°�' /, � ��� r /� . '�'� _ - !/.
, '.%r -~ /� j ' , . Q ' f � � �I _� _
' � ' J. A,, J ; �� _ � � .--� � -.
Legend V �• - ' �
`�� ^� l �� 0 750 1,500
� Project Corridor (LOD) � % � /" - , Feet
- � � � . -.�
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 2: USGS Topo
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

� '�� � � ^� . y � � , p^' � n� F�.-�,-� . , �_
� t}
N '
� � �` ���� � � > ��+� � � ' Mecklen6urg County, North Carnlina �NC119]
°;�� �" ' �� � .=��-� " � 7 � � "� � � Mecklenburg Caunty, Norkh Car�olina �
� ' `` � � � .xT
�. "� � �"~ �+� � �. " � �� �t ' # ( N C 119 )
� .� ,.. � � � � .� �,
,,� � ,/y
���k � �, ';�,p� .. �1 * s� ,9�, � � � Map P Acres Percent
�+, y'� 49 �' F � ,:a Unit Ma Llnit Narne in 8f AUI
t�� " ', _,� `� � ;�� �. � Syrn6al AOI
�" '��";° 49 � ' `� �` .�� �``� IrB Iredell fine sandy 0.2 5.3°1n
�;� �� 'Y _�,� ,�'�� '�� ���,p F s �p � ;�
��'� «i''� ` a '".� �;; " �- � , � � laa m , 1 to 8
�� � � � ,rs'`'�� °�� � � %'`� ,� ��`�� ,
a� ,, , : , r,� � � ' percent slopes
.;,,n�� �� „��� , t �' `` !y a _ '
,�
� e'�" • "��` �� .���_ � �,,,s'�r�� � � MeB Mecklenburg fne 0.8 19.8°/fl
� �w
,/�,, :'' ��N F,. �'�� k. /'�' �'� ��a a���s sandy laam, 2 to 8
'� ""�� `� �'� � � �� "� � percent slopes
� � , � � � � � � �
�
'� .„ x��:
A � .. . � , � s �;'; �
�� � , ,� ` %� ��, �� �` ��- � ' � � � MO Monacan loam, � to 3.1 7�.8°!a
� , � � �� � , `0" �`'�
. �� �� _-.���� , . � , ��, 2 percent slopes
;'. r r'' �
a �, , .� �^" � '� � �
+� � ' . . �-M �� .
! � '�p ° ^ � ��
��,� � , � �p,�
� v�' � �, :
� �' � . �
'�§ * M�a � �.
�a'��a� k a �}� � ,�S .
F i�j
: q T `� " � F��'� .� � �
�' Ai1� td M"1✓� 1�`�A
4" �'� �
. w �`�1 �� � ' �
q'�� � �.t � €t;�;.i 3�� �� �� .-, �`. ",
� �'N�;�—+6 r �^� �A��°
.,,, �
���1 .f�\ C ��+�
��'' ` ' s!� � t �� � � "`s ��
�j. r
� �,�" � �, ti
„.� �,, � d�� �
„ r .� . . � �,,,„���t�r
�, � ��. �� �
" � '� � � �.���� '�"'i �'�i
J y . �A; ��
� � � f ��� . `�
1��.�`�--� ., �
� � � ,� `�,� �� � � . _.� ; `�:�
fi, r ,�.
� � P �i � d 4 - � 'x �` � p .
�� 4 �' ' �A� �^ �: �
��� �w'� * ,�>�,a
�;. ��-. �- r `
I f � �
$ ' .
< ;' � °
�� ��
.i � `
' + r,
$ /
� � � r� � �
;, � : ,
� �+ , Y t:�.4. .
�G 5`,�` ��ay� �`?Yr#X � r� � �+t��"ir� i�:
�� .. R � �f����ra�e� rl � � �� � �k�
Legend
Q Project Corridor (LOD)
Hydric Rating
0 Not Hydric (0%)
� Hydric (1 to 32%)
� { � •, h } , �
:F� �^ ; ; � �� � ' ; frequently flaoded
���� ' ��� '� � �� Totals for Area of 4.2 lOU.U°In
4
%�� �` " ,'`--'"�`" � � � - `� Interest
,
.
� �" . �""'�y�. �. �'"`� .
�� � � �y;�r�#�� � ��� � ' +.,6 � � . . � ��� � �� � �� ,��
�► ' � A � ' ; �°% " ,� , . � °
't�� ( �1, , y� � �- .n� .. � *.;.� " t �'�.
� :,�,� � - r � '4�! �,��5
/ #� � � �
��, '�
�/ a � � ' x ��: w '�,, ,s � w'�
w�. ,
� � .� ,, �,� � #� � +. , � a'�.,
: � ��.��
� � �+ �s�� „ . .�y F �
i'�:��. �. . . .�1���_eys,&'ti.�'�0[^��.�¢ t'���''�r�Jiit�.��, .�1,:'� ,..'. . �� \,���.'+���`'� ��ar i,,+M:.
r
7r ` - i . .
'�
m ,�'
'l. a,t .
zIY-;M� ,� ,
��,, ~�` � �i
,� , �
,� � �� ��� ���
� ,�..
����� ��
��" � � r, , .
�• [ �
� �Y � F�� p,Ar� �t �
� ��� � �
�.�F.J Y� .~ � ; �
a e,�, r :
>,�►�y'��� > �� &�'rr91`� �
t`�� � � '�
��, ra
� `. r � �. '`�
, Aa 3}�� J
k�'[ , r+; F��' `� �j �'�'?�i
�
r
e�..Ys. . . _. � , e �i��Y
�r ��a r �� — c � ,'� . _ � �` °� i �.
4n ' �t Y r � � i
'�� f� ��4Y, 'r �; ��R f �t>s'y �� t�"'
'� F�q �' Y� f ��, ` ,�
�`�p',��� r'�� � � Sin �i,,� ��
t
� a���. ,. '�Yt 4��.
�`".a�:..�y� f�.: '"�° '�.J , . \ I ��. �
f�3��: kNP�,p� � .. � �� `1 �— "`
�
�t� t � h
�^",�� � � �w"� a. ._ _ ^" � � y.�ts� �� �`\ � �
���� � ' 3.„�i.�. � � ��j,�. �?`i�i
�� � �,
x�. , ` �,�
��� �' � _�, ;� �.�;
�� � ` ,��._
'� 0
, f !� �� �
, �
.�:= � 3,.,.:
�.. �.
_, -
,, �__ . _ , . . .
,� "�, � - � .� _ . , r.
500
� # ��
��� � A
�� ��;�.
� { +���-�" <„t. ;
� �. � � �� .
1 �i
� f� �,
�� �� `^ ��» .A
���♦ � n, � r
� � ��'T
;�° t�,`� �! e
r'
��..:a ��� ����
.�� z
� [
1� d
� �� ���
� � 'A�
�
�,`� �� �
�
F�' �,��:
�"" ti �'<;
1,000
� Feet
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 3: SSURGO Soils and NWI
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

5� \i � " �AL'`' d , - ° x, lR �, yx
� '�'�- - ♦ �� ^�I. � � � � . f. .. �/{�r �f,� � # .
is �� �t
� `� y� -A . �'! rF�"�` °',� �'�F'r ' "'` Y� S'�.• '��'%,��-
� �� �'' � � ���Q ,���t, �_�,� �, R "�',k � �" � � �'�� � -, ��� °
�-
�, �� '� 1 j � i+� � �� �1� � '���
` " � ' �: � -� � � �,,� fs � Y 7 �t� : , "��.� ' . .
; / ��`�'�v� ;� '1 , , � = (��' ~��� ,�` >•� + yt �t"' t� �$��'s" x � �� . , � ��¢ `+
d �'t�� ,r�E �s`3.f ��� "� �., a,, � + � ��: � t $� sa',f�4+��'
t ' �n.r� � �� '`�' 1 � t,��3� f�r� ' ",
v , � ��q � � � w �' '1� � 6
;F; , ,,, � ���� a �. � 1 � � � � '� �y�; x
� � � s �� � � �.�. �3 , � � �t0 �/�`'�" f
y. �.�� �,� � ,._ � �, , ` �� � �' �. � , ' �, �, �� i �, �' �;l �
,�;t.�,��'d�'��r i , � ?�� , '� . � �'J����, � � �� � " �' ���b'-• i�
�, +, l� � .. `., � r s
'"F "�� � �, � t ;'� �l, ���'KF „� ^, �, y� yt ��'• �� , i�� y:
'�.yr�r i�,� , ♦ Y � � � ij ��'",� �,s L y � � . , - �'^'� ' .
"�el�'� yy "� ♦.r i � �1 Ab1�t . % � �., (R� 1 � . i'AI" � �.'
�.�'�� '�,� � '�. f � �,k / . ✓'.�A,+` `^ � i �'�` _ �: ���� f �t � � .�.
, / /', ' . y, -�4j1�� , r�'''� A
,; � \ �,��,� .l � � r,`..
�� \\ �1' �AR � a � �a �_� y-�s,r
:�P � N.s� .�. � �: � e �, Ys4 ��r �' �:.��� t ' afi ��, • ��� J 'r .
' i i + �' Y.,$s�l1 - �,.�' la �° r vi�'[�J' � � r �` � '�� .,Y �'
% 3 P��r � r���t �y i, � �i' � y u� � � '� � ' � `� F � �
4 d�.�"1 �'s'�,if, . .. � ZJ?��'�., ' � � �+ �� ?� ; * � . .,,
A � a a , ' i } � y�-��� � ! � � '�: '' x �6Y Vk� � � -
Y.,
�! ���✓��f �� �4'�; , � ? '��4` �..�, �" 'y 'F �� n;i... .k � ;�*f:
�; �� 4:��{ i� i�; �.'�. 'r� ; � �'1�� ;' �r r �"' �r�;r?�,.�s '� r�
<, .
„ �
r �� '� � � "��,'� � � ,� �
� u Y�`'�;w �i� ,� ' "� r �„ � •� � �� , �.., ,� s '�: `� � � �
r
!r�t 7 '�'�ri�� �'Pr� ,�0,,3��y�, ��. . �> � � ,r� ,a � ��.a . . �:��s�' �a
� �,i' � k���4�� ��`q�'���3L {'�� �,, / `� ��°' � �� y( v ' �er � ��"� ��1 �a. � " k'�..s �
� � y� �; �
.: � �� s �' �� �p��v+�v y�'� k� �,t. ' o , ► '�
_ , ?�
., ; � � ?
/ � � �„ . ��� �� : � - � v� ,�� 4 .. � 3 �; � 8'' . . � �. F '^ � . .i
�A� , � . � . f'
.�, y�� � p � ��,+�,� �i� �,+ �� k <:� I I�' • .:���
.y�� x �,.� � � �;. ��.Y l�r,. M���� �'��,s� /, �� m•z i �.; � � �.a, a � �
��r� � zr�'a t�l ; �,�� �,^` �°!�c ! K �'�°�' / I ��1t����" ;°�'� "��� '$�� ��^�."�F ���, !��
'�i i �'� , / V
f�a� �irr "�. � p i � -h +1M �f U�..; � �, i� �... 1 � ;�t'` , . . �
s� ��s � '��' �� y�°'�' r����" �e �r�'�'��� � 7 a.� � �•`�'���. r'� ��%' ~�,�+ � R ��F" � "�''
�� � , � � �t17. � v �a � � ✓v" h,y � � � y / � � Y � � ��� ' � '` �, A r . � � e
°, n � k � �s f� €a b ;�s w ! ,� "�t�'��t,i,`�t ° � �,�.., y`��'a. �� ♦� � �. ��` i y vf
r,p.r "�r� J � �'���.'`� .+r �t 3K6 � a �� '��"`� r'��� ��,:; e � Y t , ��v` `�k��� (� � � p. �'M.k...
��� a . r �r- � �, . „`� �
� �� ��..� �°�b�'y�� -� �' '7' ��� i!• A �:� �" u� 3� r �j,
' � �7 t
v y�/
, , � �� t ��� �.�� � � u '� �!'�"��� Q:9�` ;�r�,t Tf� -.
/* �yy ` {�
� � k I �� ��� � V.2�y� d_t�: "e 1 � • ` �� �� i � ,�
� �j �i ' r r� `� „ �' �' ' E `� °er^ 7 ; ,� ,� � '� t� ' `�` � �,
� {��, R,�+,���p`�:�� �,�y�1�,y:� � ,������' '� k� � "5��& 4�fi�'rj i ,,,, �yu� � v �y. � �y ��«a ��� "{ . � � � �n
�i.., s�, � ,1 � �,;� A *. �Mk . 4 �rr ,� � ; � �R >x�ij�., y�V; i. ���d��. :,a�- � -'*ifl w J�� //� �,.
l d .. � fi 3, � �'� / J � �` +�'Y��' �,w7� l t r �. �' ` pT .qy_�,�'� � �.•` \ . .� _ � � M/�y,t t '�* . ; � YY. �� i
�, � f ; r �� � od &�l`( � +% � a� lF�;�� � i i���.�:� �' a ��4E��!G1F�1'� . '� �(� �`"� �`!� ..
�
� t � .� .r $ �'r' �-a" . 'L 4 � / ! V �' �!£ . � � X �' 4 � -, a"1�
.M er p���r �^'� �,�x.;a�f� � ��, .� 12�, �`� �, „t. "'��,�.,�. k �� d�' .,�, .::� �. ��+ �rf-� �t.. .. � .',��y � l. �� i
` r' � ,� � � ' � �` � � ��� 1 � �'� � . �,� ���� � � �" <�; w � � � � ����
�'tµ ' � r' � � .t�., � � d� y � � �, 7 , � ` .
�` h' � � : t . '� �r ,� r / i � �
� ��r y �� *�� � '������;' �� ,', .� j � �w tii o&. r � ��,��� � R � � �,
�'�.�+ �Y;tit�x� �'�i�' ' �,"�` } a.,�� t` ' � ��,t,,� * A; ss � �"��✓ wx�,.>a!� `��,r
, � � � �`„ ,� a. � � � � � r �..�� � +
"� r ° ��` wr '�, �, � �
t , , �j1 '�; '� s �N r `� `' � � � ' w r �� i�y?� �, � < k •
� �� ,�k #. � ` f � � ' �� �e ,� , � ��� � + �� �� 3 �� '`'�"M��� gyrT/ �Y�� �r � � / '
��'y���"' =f+ "+�; � k� �ir�r �W ���C N. �....,.,,,,,�" ,•��� ��'{�', '
.( � _
4 ,: ,� � . � r�
�,�, . � `�.a4 � % � `f','9 r�"$ x'. �a, ��'� ' ,�y�� �,,� �X .y '�si�+W
` .. il - � a,: ' .� s'� . y� s" '�."�+ �"�'r� .�Yt��` " Y, .' +..�.,_ �w"��4�`
r �� .:
, ' . � l , . 't � ;. ��
i , ��[ '�n -�
j � "� �� �` „- ���k'� r��. �{m .3„ '� " r + " ���
: � i � ' � �� �q�' � � .3
�. ��� � ��+� !.H £' '� �'� � ;y 7 1 # ' �;'��z� t'a iwA��"��' �F
� � � � � � ' � � ; � �,�r ��,-
� � � 'f' a �Y � i/ � � � � d �,s.
'�' � '��, �"' �a %/ �`�z o ° � ' / � ` �, ,�F;�: � t ;�;;
'''P�,�r�� � ,:`,� a . i�rf � � , � tMr ' - , � � 'o F -
{ �� �% f $ / � " � -r ''� e e = � �� �
, � � � � � � � � , v� n a ��+ � � � � �� � � � � K � �M ..
' � 4 � p �k �
r . ' � `� r � _, .� . - J � � - ; �f�' . a
Y�O✓ ��,�,�la�l`�� �'v� s ! .. ,C�`�., � a � r�+'�' � � - . �� �� '_� � %�:� `G��� �� ��' '�r
« , 9 i � � � � +r� � "- t� e i,,� �dr�,= � �� /� i�� �"
� k - � t
� � r i t � t a� r i� �i � s � �'� � � r " �� � _ ,��s, t , j i � � 4�� i a � � �:�, ��;'� ,
� � �
m
"'� '� !nN' �,��r��" r� �� ,yd� 1 � � '` .�,. . . ��� ,�i� � '(N'i s ��',�
; , : �
�,,, � � J�'��P ,r19 �7�; , ; ti � � � r ol ��'�..+ •�� � � � _. e ' � � �M,� � � v,����.,�
f�.:��'',�,,� �'°�' ��R x v�i'�� , ����""�'�� rr > ,. '�-�;, r�'—� _ � �;� � _ � �,��J� r�a�, �.� "'i'�r
ye w �wix� r, �V , � �, ���� � ' - �� � " N� � � � � �
(t l� `7 .d 4 , j' xr .� `1 z�� . .� � w,e - �� � q'�t�, .
^ q� �p J 4 � !
�ft:� ��. �.'i _ ' � �"�` �FT E'R°a �`-,} � � ����,,
� � -: :'
i. %r\`� ' ....• ',{
Legend , �_-- � " ; � � ; ��° `+��`, �_�� : � , � , « , � ��`�"'��
/ �''! 9 ` t
� Project Corridor (LOD) � /� � ,�� 0 400 800
� , ��
,� u .� ».�
�- Stream (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS) ����t� ��; ' ' � � F@@t
���
�,.
yy +,� � F
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 4: Preliminary JD Field Sketch
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

_ �� �r . .r a_ � a
� � � �
5
N � �• ' �" ' • � ` � � a
',� � _..l,
� •`"'/ S1- Impact 1- Permanent - No Net Loss ��� ,'�"
n� � �� �,_ - ��
�° ��� 251f, rip-rap bank stabilization associated � ' � ��`�""� � y �
" ' a' with construction of greenway bridge abutment ��y �' ,�r ° ;� �a '
' ' �",�'. �� 'k 1"
�` i . �-� • i �p , . \ � � { � ' _
'�,:�� f. 9 �¢e. I � l�,� � �.�� f ' �. � ' ��7 �.. � � �
�� M�'�#yl^:� .A.�� / _,'G-' ����A�� ��d9,
(ll�}�y9rl�� ��� � l� "o'., l' �. �i. - , ' . .�., . . ` � �� / .
r ti * S1- Impact 2- Permanent - No Net Loss ��'-�
. �
az� � �� ; �� / n F�� ss � , �:
� ��`.�.", ,', � � r.
Y�, � � 91f, rip-rap outfall di ipation �W • ' `� y r�
�t�` �,�, � � . ^ 1 ' ° .
;,�� "� 4 r� i ` �' s� , , f; k � �w,, � „
" ��"��' � � �+� �
�,� ��'�,� „,�� � �� S1- Impact 3 - Permanent - No Net Loss ��:^����'. � '
', k� �sr������ y'�� � 171f, rip-rap outfall dissipation s��` ��
, o- � ��, � �. ` '
i' s � � .. � � r Y � il, �: � � . �' �t a
ts � �
, � .� . ., �. �I t � � � � °�,f ' . �-�n� ¢
�' � I � *' �p '�j'� � , � � �� k' ��� o' � i "' " � ,'� �; �'
�k��`{t��"c,�r��� � z II" `CJ"'''v ';t � '�i� �4N��,','"�' r �''�� �� �.�b� �� �`�q+:�� �,
, ,� b'1 r . , .
� � '� � ,�. � � � �� 1`� ��' � yi, �dl�� � '�,
,,•: � �,,��y k� �: �'� . - , ,' .;, � , S1- Impact 4 - Permanent - No Net Loss • ,
,� ,�,� ;.��,,�'���� � � ��: . �,: �� 121f, rip-rap outfall dissipation '� �
,,, , ,,� �
�� ��, `� Ip� � � � � � � ' � '�
� � �,� � � � , .�
'.�,u,� �+}� ���i.�y I,�+"��'�, �, � , �� ' Ydl�'� .-x.,�s h�'_� II r�y � '���"=J �� . �n yal . rt ���'+' �,,;�9` ��
� �,d � `'� �' 3 -. h '� I�°r. '�`yi ( �� �j. y. y , ��� '§�. €. R• 4. �F.B. .�. 'F .*_.,�+„ �.
�' ���,��������� "� �' *��� � 4 ���} '��� �'�:��_ ��� �� �� S1- Im act 7 - Permanent - No Net Loss �
._ ��, �� �����1 -� �� �� �����.. � �� / r : � ��, � �
p
�� :
�, .�� �'�� � ��������,�{ � , � � � ��� � �,��. ' , 101f, rip-rap outfall dissipation
� � ,4� �. ay �
� .
� ��ra � � �+�% � � ,{ rFd�
��4': > �"� 3Y' Y 1 ' _
I rrr �n � . �� � 'l � �a�
v ' _�
��k� °�2� � 4 � t f��' � *� ��+�� � y
.� � y,7 � �' g� t RW .:. � 7�i" `g'Yr � � � � ,k � � � �'S�`.. !�-�nd�` Y.a�' e'� I ' � i+W � � � .. � �° � � F" � ` R � � R ���.
s, l���`�� �9 ,;a ' y�A ,��""..�Y t� � d,t.- r � � � � �Ir � .�^ .� , il��� � _
��� �,� � � " �d ,� � , ���,� ,t �"�, �� � �`� �� ��,��,�`�, * ��gq �:� �� . Q�`�'. � �[,l '��'�� S1- Impact 8 - Permanent -�No Net L
.� [ . �" .��r� k � � . ���I ` �
'`- y � : ,
' � �Q? ' YS 1 ��� � ^� k"�"� � `3 S G �
�� r�� � � � � �+, ' ����,�, x � � ,�,�!- � �� 151f rip-rap outfall dissipation
.A{� k h " .. M 7 P S�S'7,� nl 1 '�� 7J !? � f ,;. / �,y
R y .^y ,( j�
� �.,i r i, 'K f'.. ��w � 1 P y
�yy'�� ��{� �lwfY�N rr� � 7 4 ��'�`...Yq �`J �'f� f � E\. x l-€ �" F � � ��i.a�l I TiJ ' ' !�' �)
F�
��73"i �a r .�V� t � � ��r � ���`��r � �� � `vy * � , I� t ` ��� �� a ��.: rN `� ' ' � , +�
]� t ,. s � � 1 I �,� � t . � � � � �' ' a, k �'� I � 4 � = �� !k � �
i �t �, r d; �€ � �ar � t f �P �" � � � �� p'`� x . '�t�' 7 "�e ' »�'`9'. r � ; � � � � � � �- :.
y,a , ri s y , d � } �. � � �,tm''� �'' ,. ��. y � � :l �{ . t �O . �1NNh�� �' � ; s
d � +u �. d"E x�,� �` J `� ����' ��'' � 1v
� ^.., �� t= c�` �+..� d p�If ,`��S � r �W,�t A ,�',ds,.� �y� '�i�� , �PG� I� r� � y[�)�.`a� ! �, �/ <
� � ",
9� .�/! �f,, � � y a�, +I� b t�' � ,3 �.
F :`r 1 `y z �� :'C L � ) '� L `.� ' �I �� ! ;i�l l �:.+� ���U�1�� � W' #: � �
�r.� ;-;v "f 3�'M�. `��. v - �' \:$'�•�� �`� � �� `' � � c— �, �' •�' �-
x��, >t�� � � �s;� .,r � �i,,� 4� � . � �.
$r y . x t �I: � �,�$� 4 T �#;� W "!�,� �� � ��1/�,�
< i � �� I � ,'./ ! ��� � . � h��t� �#dV� I
'j� rtj I ,:*��„`9qx e �g''f,�,`k�,{` ' �y�, a
i � 2 r .v�.7' l �: � � .r`Z4 � ,
S1- Impact 5 - Permanent - No Net Loss � "�" �� � � �� � � '� �� ��,,, � ,� �r � . .
171f, rip-rap outfall dissipation �� " � ���, �° `/��� �r����
si F l � � �,CH �."_`"tiyx �ae u r ���^
� � ���� , �;_�, �,
S2- Impact 6 Permanent , { � �,; tr' �, �+; � � � �"
491f, culvert installation �� � `�'� � <�� �� �'�` �r� �
� �� � � ��` � .
(25 If = culvert length �.' � � ! � � �j;�"��,,' '� �-
,
24 If = rip-rap inlet/outlet protection) . •
� ��. � e. .. � ��� �,
� , �_
,; t� ,, -u � ,
� . . �, � �
, `
,. �
, � � � � �� � �
� ° � ; d` � - � o•� �� �� � �!�t� :, �,
�� �� �, � �� � � �y r �. � S1- Impact 9 - Permanent - No Net Loss � � f"� ��� � � � �.
r4�' �r�� � �-� � � �' ,�ir�, � ���'�� � �,'� �r` ` 11If rip-rap outfall dissipation '��,� ",� '�,� '�� T
�° r�„�" { �� ,� � , ,�', '"� ' , ,�. � ,� �
. ��
N,. _ >,, ����d ; w � � F .� � � . - �� �� � ,
. K ,. w� _ ,
e �. ,. �,
S1- Impact 10 - Permanen � � - �� ���� w ..
.� � � ._..,.
" Legend t- No Net Loss � ��a,, '� �`�'�,.�
�. �
� Project Corridor (LOD) 91f, rip-rap outfall dissipation �� �� �' ,
��;� �e� �- : �.' ' ,� '�'��' :
� Greenway (Edge of Pavement) � �`' �° '�' '� 4 � � ;�f
3
r � r
Pedestrian Bridge ���� � �� j�.,.� � �:'�,��� J.� '�,
��� y �' �p� ��� � �c�, i
1� . A `> .� . . l�iT§,'25.. , * .. p � ff � t ���1{
� Storm Pipes �� <'"' , . , � �� ������'. �� � � �`
2 l�. . _� �' e ..j. xf, 4 � ,Mr'� f' ' �. ',: ...
Rip-Rap _ �'^ s ,.;�� :~ � � � 4�� $��
�- Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US
���'� ,r��`� Feet
;
�ys � �v• � �� �� ���,. �� � �„
Charlotte-Mecklen6urg Figure 5: Proposed Conditions
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

� �� � .��-�� � �i,�, �. ,�cf � �� - i,�'
�}
f -- •! % I � ' R.1 �4..-. ..
1 G �.
N ..�,. ��` „�-.�, r r1 � " I �' r, ' 4 � . {�T
� } Y� � � „ . , � ��. � �:
Q` 7 �., i
� ,. � , � z" ,� �� '`�
. �
,: ,.
" .� ` .�s ', ' ,!�' `�j'' ' '�r = , rw
dt}..� � y �� I �. � , 1,�_� �.,��4���' t,. 1��"a�� 1 \ .� ,t��'. J<.
T.. ` � �
'";'"'�` r� •; f� :. wa i � , � � y� �� ��, :: � i . •� 'M , � .
� i�.i' f�&y '�°�'?` �,�y �` �`�i:� -
� � .� � i�r1 � i�`�� �- . ��
� � i. s :2ip� �i - i i q,°, �' J'� \s�a 1�
� ; ,� �
�v � I . �'n � � �2� ... � ,� � � � . � , .. ,�� ,, 7 N .
`'; ` 1 S1 - Impact 1- Permanent - No Net Loss, An/'' ,'� ' ' ,�
.'�l�t` f' - . � � ,�5 r. _
� ,�•'��� 251f, rip-rap bank stabilization associated A-. >
� � . � ��''
L � � - h4j� with construction of greenway bridge abutment � /`` .fi _ � - _ '+ �
� �'.; '�ts'�; 1 a � � . ,. _ s �
' z �. ` � , ' � ,» a - �.' f r
4�.�l;ry �� tiL !�} 7 �.i
"' �4Y/ rq I 1 :F,�� �` ��:.! k . 1 , I . I . L `j� y �-��
�.� /� /� J / iY� , �,3 , ��� I .�• �' /� � ,{�T �� � �'1 � �
7 � .�
q� . ,���y,f ,F' ,� �� �, -� �'�
� r• � �'� ,� , +f , , ;-y;. , � r r� � � � f
� �j'�' f ���IIF.`` ��-�'ox ...�i :. � i.' I f ''�
� �� 1 Y._=� l
i �? �.}
������5���'�4� K � �bt�4� ��r�� � !� '1' I d ' : i•l� .. _ .
� »
�` �, a� �" �`�,"� +��-, ,� r� :;�. � `$` t f' ' ', r„ _ ' j ' � �
� r� � � ' a
,�j;. ,,� � ' � ��� , ,� ; y ��� � � � � ��#. � s+� � � �. a. "� �
�`' ,.. o yr�. , �, rf. ( � `�� .
�� � i� :: �L I �,:., , ,r , hr
�ta:� �.r � �---� � �h�_ .tM :�'�� r�{� . � r-�• � .
'�q ;� r ��, � _ r �'�� � ��1 _ � ,, ,;� Fr j � � , *� ' ;� �
a,� .�r ��i �,��3 �� 4.. "'',��4' ��r�. .�� ��, �C, �����,7 � � � ' `�
y° ~'���y�K � a' :C�. •• / �'s'' r�; `� i� ': '' `(ky'/f '(q / ,a,i� ?���
q :7II r �� ��� �..i� ��$s._'�' :�� � �.' 3. �(� '�1?'� �I,� f
' 9 �
f� � � � , ::.1 � �g_' �t . .t � � � �� �.. p ;, /<ay - �{�i,.
, .* i � " '� r J �������� v . iF 11l� � l �.
'A '.ya. � y ��d � ;� .`;'�h^� i� �.� .�,i! .1,�. � i, , � a�� ¢� � ,y
�� �.� '� v � '� � ;.���. ��, .�.
`r� >
V?rd, 'f f y,`r � � t.(���j a e �
K 7I, �
� .; jr'p,�n r�--� ; w. r1
il ,:
r
� �
+y���'.-��� /� s lr� ,/f awY ..�' �;� � ��� s, +'� Bi..
F ,,tt�� � F ,y..� � ".�1�f .
���-�,. � . / b,t� ��� 1��� � 1 � .r�r� � � y.'�,�� � k �� - 5 ayyy. ,� �� �•` ; .. j�
�..�y,� nl � � � � 3'��1.Y� � �'1 V},� �" J�q�� �� �, �y �•M
a`� '" � �� +����� � ,� . ,� -°7i �iI'!/;�e��/p'`.:� �'"�� `GI y� 94ifiF i" ':;�� �'��� 'A' �y p��
�f' p� \ �;� t'.�.� .� �is �" ' . �� �''� y�F� 'J%'. � �x� r �.1 j� yt��,y�� +� •`N �,y� §� �%� .l �� Jr;. X �r � r � .Vq,�l l i�,[ V .
<?f� 711
�ti��'`�� ' � '!, �y�,, . i' tp �,-� ` k � � yi '2 .. x.j� .,rt !,r r ��F':. �l�'.� ri.�
-': s v `�� �F"�#V ���`' � es ..Scf� F� �H•�� � jr }. r'1 %JY � yh a` '` � � � i? � 14,3�,/e��;i� ; ' � j �..�.. �y.�fi
� y
y�,k' ' �'�k'� j �� ; r t �$ �'Ni !�s ., E' a*'e f 'y �r�' a°� :Y �'� `°r° � ��� '� � �, .� �� � i ,
�� "� r, .x p..
�i ° I 1 „
��~��.. ''.��: 1 .li'� �r �q �.�� �.i''r� r,Jr;a� t �.,.� �,t"� � ���� � +"v ..at ^•� ��^��;i,�.
�' ` µ � b
�. ! ` � �' ���F�;. � :�: t -.� g e r �.w 4 � �e �.. � '
r�.! �j ��� � � �, �C h�� ; }{�,4 Y �(y � �`7 � � . � r � �7'. �+�:� � P� � �./ �3I � S � r'�� � N '� �� � �-
��{ � � � � �'�� .rt ������� �.. �i.i 'Y+''"'� r, �i-��� ��� ��'t � I ��{ a� � 1' � ����`i� �� �' .
N.,� , . -. .y`.., ..:, ' -.s.. � e�,�,y�,, �F.f,�� y ...� +rrii. � i.�-.�.y� 1n .
".� 1..i} � ISjK 7� A Y��' �i �' �" �'?7�:41 x�� ..��...
' � � � � r S1 - Impact 2 - Permanent - No Net Loss � . � � I��,� � �
r � '� -'• /` �'"' � �f� u � ' 'F `� ,��,
�!', � '1��'' 91f, rip-rap outfall dissipation �, ^�, f �y , �, ����� :�;, d
�"r..:r .. � fi� ry �'� ,r ,a,,,: . : , ♦.;.'_ ' . � .-,� �" M L ': f�� -;{�� 1 d.� _�h
r ` �'yt�r�} � / n y, !f J� , � '� .
� �,{1t'r a5 ' � . .� , ,�'� ! 7� ° �.,P � � ° ( � ��. A' ♦.+� �*i+�l�i . , j, � � . / ' � l.a '.�i!. j � t �} e lr v �rrv�.- ( •
�t � ,iy��, � ti (J� F� i+F � ! � !' , �-r�" � �� i �+'�ia� ,,, +�n,�j - i ;. � � �� l '� {
� F���aF g�.'�' /�yj 'f�(� t�ri,�Y� r_'�,�q }`.(�� S.`> .y!'1 f � � � � i '� '«^" �_ v,1
s !� ! q' y. i�.- � p,�
9 +t i � t 1 .s � ��� � 4 . ,�,° s ' " . ., _ ' �, u+s"i�
�?�� ��,.''�,� � ��' ` w ,;����� � � � „-; ,' r �� �! �� � ��,.���- ��°� S1 - Impact 3 - Permanent - No Net Loss � ��
� ��'' ��yh , r � , � ; �,� p ` �; {; 171f, rip-rap outfall dissipation � '� � ;� ''
' •�[ r� y!v i �jq ) � 1 p. � .t` � � ! ���t _ i� y+ � :� 1 � ., . . 1� '' � .
'�.j'*� d'!].lS�a' �°' Ylf z � .Pfl �`� �l �,� r �4S u -,�'�f k � •`� a / I \ "1 ? �'i>,
. f�
='.ti �ri� .? ' � i �� �°' t ' '�� � �i�f?,e�4�,` ' .F� � ��': a,p� �+� '�� i �''1 s � f .��� 1, . \L 4.....
�- t r � k� � � �r � rl�.k L , :'�°+� a�� = a i,+ ' ,s 1 �� � �fr �: $�' a ,• +
K,y ;� �,,fi�� :�� � , , :. � � : , 1� � r a ;.�� k
, b.
a � �r � � a< < �: x,1' �
` � � ,� t F � . l! ��� r5 i 7 � � .,. �� .'L �4�Ju�i1 ��� r ��l��d: �`� ay � �:�6r ! ' .
e: � �'1 k 9 :^ ' i '� � �t. r'4� �c` ' � � i '�{^ ; y � � �'�ir�' �' .•'r
' � ���y ''�,�,�, i .�.� i��, s�i �,,�t ��!Ly�� ".S -�.
Legend :. 1 � ,. r �r,; �a, - ���� � � �` r ��r� �t: � �_.
'�!�� �;� �ff,� �" '�fi� �� N ,;. , : � � ���.��#,��, . ''�, �� :
° ,y.;,.. 'tf c. � � � t 7� dr �� ^^ � � . 4� k'� :Ir� '��, �� rXa d , .
� Greenway (Edge of Pavement) �'`` � , i r t , ��` fi.: ,� r �'� " y'y�n�,r, `�" � ,� , r �'
r � F ` � '" � � . SW � i [ � A 'f/r�{ � � ._
��� ° i'7 � � �� } �f � _ e 3 fi'�! `'a �C Jl'� �� kj,� ��y.; " � '
� Storm Pipes �` � `� � �� r��?�;� , f `� `�u �.� �,f
1 � il�� " fi� 1 k� � f ,�-� � -�.i ._ v� i; ,+r" y i
Ri Ra t' '� � � . � , ���' ��:� a `�� � � �
p- p �� � ,� �,, ��., ,�� � r.� �� 0 80 160
•�r- Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US '" ��'` ,: � ,�y'�!�t i�� �' :, ; Feet
o.i�•,` i �9�. , � i
� ''-.�` f �E , 4 k� �E� + ri
�l i'.?i ,Ei � �:d .- �
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 5a Proposed Conditions
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

�' .Py � � j " r�,�� ,: �, , �_; ; .1 � "� 4�; _ �,. :�
N �� :yd�� 2 di°t f �<` . 1 '�R.
9�11. � � �a- , k � "�. � .
A •' ,� �� �� �� �.,,� � ; ./ �
� ���,
`! � .�`�_� � �
� },�, ��;. � ��'����S1 - Impact 4 - Permanent - No Net Loss "�` r ' � ` � '�'> ��'� �,"�,��
��_ ` �;"� 121f, rip-rap outfall dissipation � � � �x ' r� ,'�, �
�„' `� � .�, ��
���' . - � �' ,i �. .�s 3 s^`�� + a' -
� �� . ��r�' . ,� � S . �, , ' + � ,��. • -
� ?�� ,��'� +�'�. 7 � � � s w. S�A ; lr��� , .:��X _. �j� :. � ' .+ � ' �, Y � .
�f � : . � g�. i � k �yj ..v'��. #�e� .
� 3 :',r ,� � ` ��� �'� ``/ � f r ' ��, { , r • �,. �Y� ;'�
S� i �y ',t�j� �
,� �g. � .��I� � ���.., 7& ti_ ..,� N s r ..'"l�� � ;, �„�r . 3: / f;�;, �.liFj;_ i.�.�� - ���� �S �, j!
, ` �h, ..� � �.� rAp � ��t rF� i .. �' :�y ..a I
�1 �� � �
,� , ,, ,.� �,.
I , i I �` � �, a/ � / � �
.�r�:� �� � �� ' , ���� � � � �� �� �
.� ����� _;,�n���' �
�,� '� .-.� . � S2- Impact 6 - Permanent
.t � a � ' y� } �i
��� �'�� jl��' ,�� �'� 491f �Y �
�, �'� �- } ;,+- ,� , culvert installation ,
a'��'? �1 �,%�A "` r-� �,�'. ',/" { .,, , _ J'
"� ,�; � �' � �"i �, �. ' �; (25 If culvert length , �
�' '��r �, � �� � � � ;� � ��;p� "s� ��x ��� 24 If = rip-rap inlet/outlet protection)
iir� `�L�,�`/'�+,^v ��� r�{k F 1 t.9 e y.. .
;.0 ,��'' � �j, `�, r - e... ..�..�.,�._ :�. �i'y�
Y �FIM�w : � >�. fi���h: / r �,r ",p� ,.- s'�' _ / ,��.. f �
� f� , �•/�� y � fi �{^y �f r � .f au,p � .
� p�`' " � ,, �,::Y
T Y[� � � 5 ��� ��r �
� � - y � f. � � � � '�! � .
}' � � ,� e _ ♦ . � / �' � . -
` � r ; �F.d� � . � - a �., f" i . s� �. - II �'
�t; � . � ��.� � r � , 4� �'r• , � • , �: � � _ . i};.
s � , � t �?. { >l'l � r �' r! >'� ' '�
� � S. ��-n! L' � ..: L� a _f �,./ /., 4 . � � r- f� � .. . - i
� i ,'' v. ( � �� ; � 4 ; � P.� `� � �.�� � ^#�b I� ' ,� i y'_� ,` � ! � � �.', ` '�' �, '£..
�'� ,i� �' �7 :��' �e' �'�;; d � � .:�F � '.
t , � . Mr ` � f Y� ,1�. � . ,. 4
i r' y:..� �� » e'-� µ � ���.i � � � .. r
�� r i � . � ��� � ..
h � �j „�d#r�N (�' (, �� � `��r� yi t�• , ' i l;y;Ati' � '
'.a. 1�� . � i �A��w �. � .
; � �+^�' , � � . �. !J�/ �' J`i a � µ:
�.i �� b.+'RC .F .�'i �� � �'� ��,�j/�'i/ '�� i ,
� F.'.�i�.,� _ Hb'� Y ... ;4f•�P.;. T YA, ' .P��.� �%�:
_ � � . �.' � ,.L�V,: _ � ��' / . F�.
� ..
„ �.. . - r . - �
� ii .. , , �`�••� � ,.,'y
.,�. ., . .. . �- ,� .',�; i w� .
� ;.; . i
S1 - Impact 5 - Permanent - No Net Loss ;;� �,� •� ; �,�` � �.,�
171f, rip-rap outfall dissipation _ � p�+ar ;,� � �`�� ' �,, � � �« a�
, .,,�" � • ��, ' � �`��,: 5 �
4' k iy � � �' Y� {�`� !o , r �.' �l[:�`� � �y %
� A. .;,1 ,;. n - S `����,;. `� t� �lF .��r ���,
�, ' � � +tTu+ ?� , ' �
, �`
.,"�, + na • '" 'I°` �';' � r` '"f
Y `f �° ,� '� ti i i � ��,�j6l�y �a
;,.: I [ .�� �i; �� 1� 5 - . �
.
�'J IU !� t � ,) � �!-
.dG Q: fi ,
d , �
)�.-. Y ey ' � .
��}� j' � � �" 1�� A'� i� f � �� � F/ � l
.I�E !� tb �^r�y �p - � � .,ry a r,.� %I' 1� 1 Y
� �rA, � �a�" fi � r t � e _ Jr` � 3 � r
� , N �' ts� � �•�Cdti� sr � " > �" � d �:�t �r
�y � �'•'�Y +, ..f`' � .. h � r r� � � . ,_�/i f . �P.
,�-`� �1 / �..+'... � ��� ✓ � . '�x, . �-���" ' .���. f�F-,.� !. � i.-x � s , V�r�+t, •y�,�.
'' ���� a` x � � _ � , ��.,�� ��� �.
i � .l y� \ ��'. •� M1� ' i � F . y�y p � ,�.. .
d�{�' �� `.��1� - t r F K.' �� .. Y � '' ��
rfff... , ��."t�q� • .
L,I/, 5 F t�. t�'��'� i � �, _ �h �� � �,� i / } � � �P��..
t f. n e r� {� .*- .
��. s� `. ! � '� c�t y r e h .¢'�
�Fi -wu� 4 � r � �E r �'6� 'G�ti. , •}
jy' i�a �' d�. }�' t F f�� -
( ��f� '�i! t l .:. �lr, �:� ,y� / y �t< �
1�-/ � ' Sr.! � ����� . F"� G � ' _ . "!�.f �' � _e k .��,
"t��; '� �'����r ��'`�` `-� S1 Impact 7 Permanent No Net' Loss
, �
�� ��r f,���t � � �' E � �� ' � � M° ` " " - _
,�, ��' , � f� q�� r. � . 101f, rip-rap outfall dissipation -,..,,
t l� ` ,j � �,�? �I, � 'J x� '' _ ?�r ,-
; r � t `� � � '�e;' --,�
. f ; r , �. , f� >„' �
� Legend -'_� .� ^ �,;.
� •� �,'.r k ` � �Y%
�r� y '
� Greenway (Edge of Pavement) ,r ,��� -',, + ` ,
� � � .� • . ��
r � � �r
f ���f r..� ft ir r .,' r � _ i
Storm Pipes ' �� " " �� �� :�};�r, �F�,� � �' �' �r �r� z` �
� �� r � k f�� k, � ��1,, � , � _ �
Rip-Rap s, `(,��,���� � � ��`,'.:e� �'�����r�'� � $� �6�
, y ,, f I, j ':''� ; ;�
� '' �' ' ` Feet
�- Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US � r���'� �� a�� ��-�^:� +' '�+�c �, ���
-�+w �E 'L�.. �. 1ti 1;;� ag�,
�
�'. �k' � i�' �' . e.af" ' 'v ?� .. '+A . .5�
Charlotle-Mecklen6urg Figure 5b Proposed Conditions
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

N r � g � e' 4d � � L � I ' �t'. , �� �!,�
+ :
n ' A m,. } }D ... y . . �..
�� � � �� � ��� 'q � �! ��', `
„ �+� �; ''�` �_ � �{ � � �'� �, ,�t�
,�, o � , _ � � �; r :�r ; _ a r �� �'
, � p n �,�. . � -�
� 3 � � � , � f, �� �' � '�
` I'� / ;F i �' �� � , , r , � j r` � � } t .� i i ;�
� ' n
' ' .� yF . � ��� � �/ ' . �� }. �
� � � �" � ll�' • l.r P. � v � � '+ 4 i ��' � j
r�` f�.i a C�i� ��� r r t� r,, � � P fl� { r��''t 4f� r ��
, ;'J � , �' � f; f , � ' 7� •�'
:�� ' ;, � ' ,�F� ��'' '' " , � � ��,,�; S1 - Impact 8 - Permanent - No Net Loss � � ; , ,� �
� #��` ' 151f ri ra outfall dissi ation �#.
,1 `� ; `: ( � 'r ' "�+ ��; �. � p- p p �f ,
`'' `` � '�.% ,�`� �� , l, '�a� ri �' � r 1 `f
���_ y�� n' F r �. �. � r �:. � , �� � � ` � .�. �� � / � � ,�
f , � �, �r ,�� A 4 r ;� v i' , �i'./ it ` s '�t , � �� y� �,
. , � . . rc~ : .�'"*'� :a`. ry�':, ` � t ,� � ,, -!\t` � " /� ".
�t ti"3��` IrY � � `�
,_ .
' " ;' ��. !� " � �
�� .,�, y.�,. � ,� -
a �(e +,r � ��� � x ' �'� � ' <'�; l� � % r / � r i �l_ �I��iy�
�z �" � - . ����;���r�'�rs� '� .�'4�k�.r r :�`'f f' �,:I"''��'..
.�lV�,j" d7'x����,''�� ! �,.r' �.Yr{ �� ? � . � �i . t ( .� ...+�p , - `�1,., I
^�i • )
^W /.�. � � �' �T / �4„� if, r �j .. y !' p � � I ! 1°�
J T ( �
."5��,���,N��.. �.,3 ..i l}G�����.f��I 1/ i..� j�y 1 ..'`I� p � ... � %I ` 1 i,.p.Y7 r %�7% � /� '� �" A-�v� ` ' �J� x� � / ` 1
�u y �/I f'.
; �: r�,k s� r��f��` �.1� ���/ ��,ia...f�^' T���.� � �''� ih�1 / t�!_��� �, l:�P 1aJf<< .. il � r.(; �.
, ' �.�'. �` a ��',l�T°' �'a"`"�, � Jtk � ' i � i ,�a Y `� "t�;�'= f
.
e a;; � ����i�, �}������§yv� n;, � � '� �.' ,- i, � ^ z � r. r +, f f'
. � ( �, �,�1 `Y I h ,� t ' l '�[ y � � ����/ � .r' ! ( y ' 1'Y
�.i J 1 /
� ,� 4�.� �.. �»�irp •� pz-��� 4. � �� %� �,�/ � r� r� ��'I
."u �i, !e� d _ a�.�� t�,7' �. ;R a�, � y ,� m l� I�, �g d �,"..r
1 �. � t� e ��� � 'y '+.c. �+ �5 • � � ��,,�ywi r _. !� `14'.:`. �,� Ir ��, �: �^ I� r. �s . F .
� W x �p P
�j: � �'� �"�"F �r� � ' , +'a,`�,.s�y ,59}��` &'��fil ',��R�'•� � '� % � �� + '�;,7`
� ,
. `
_ y�2/ �. �
�� �� y."6. �, � ^y �,� ,� (� �j ��� r : -. . �` �f'%(�!, �.-•� i�1 � ���G,l�C�y�_ �` o�
f � `e,. � r� , "'e �� p .i . i p _ --"'ili�y, 4 s ;
,��« �f � W y °� , _ #� � � �a fA 2%� �,�t's
o ; � �,4 '� y'� �,� 7 .'" � � .- P t"l�;' �`�;�� . � - � ` �if . yr 7-�� f a �4P� ...i,r.
f ! �' � f�iN� 3�.�Y'• • , , . �� . - � Q�1Y`� r'� :�I'��'' �� ��'�T�
' : r `• � r �` ' .) � ` �t� ���
_ ��p tl +/(��/qq.. � �]' , � � �„'4w . . J n��ra +J �- n
�'L�' N ` A , �� �� i ."� Y' ' . . � �J � �.: �` �. yt F b P�' _ .� `� r �r
. F� �.s K. �I sf�. ..v�� _�''+� ' . _ 1� �,{ 1 , t�oypt � ,� '� Y��,i�i�a iw. .
• �/ „ . .., ... �.
j.: � , � , 1 `: . ` / u ; ,/
Y' ��
l, � ' '„ �� � .� �
, �
r �_ ��`�(�� � � _ A� �, � . : ,,, t,� -
,� ,,� - S1 - Impact 9 - Permanent - No Net Loss � ,� ,�� �r �, . � ��� ';�� {�
', ,_ � �
�. � , � �. r , , , ,�
,��r, � 111f, rip-rap outfall dissipation �� ����� " �'' �, ; J�i � � ._
t s�,r;�:, � Ts � r �� r L .v i��'�" ". s. �Yf� 1 ���
r,�f
f.` �.`, � '6�JF°TM' � �k .�. � �' �; �"' �� ' ",� � �:,�E' �.. e
:. w F ��}�y ! '� �o-� . �ft7 .4 �
_"o- �, �.{�, _s�,S. �4 ' ���. `R" '� ,.x�` ��' � � ^ �f �x1. l�e',l�'f
. �- ., j��� �rr�s� '"�,, .t y�� 'k _4 1 �* 9 �.
��� � .. .. ,� � ,ii j .�,�y, ' �.
- ' �;.� iu" ,, � '5:�� ` �r{
• .i `r.• y 7y � � t ��y(� y �� � � { f
�, ���'�� � � � ' . . $� � 'R.N} ��Y� i .,p � .1 � � � �� � `
,�p t e�' ",isti �T .a f„�-�{��, —s{°�_ � 4. _•s:��
� �, ,�� . .,r � � \ .. _ c �( �•
� ' � �� d ' -r' • _. +•, 4 �; � .. a e, r . . ,�,,' ,,.., ' �x : - � ' �F A
` a, �;��� ,S1 - Impact 10 - Permanent - No Net Loss � , ;`'� �; . i'��' " ,
ry,�� �. Ml��� �� {` �;�,d'�. � � 91f, rip-rap outfall dissipation �t r���` �' �' a ,'
�. .
�,�{ 1� �h� %{�,�s' `� �F � i F �� � . � - � � � y�
f r _ ..
'/ ' �� � - � � . s
� 7' � �/�Y i/X9IFr/' � . �}� y � p� _ ♦'rt �..,
` ii ♦'' .� � i _ � • � �, ,� �� � f i �ot . _" ��� � � ��t A .'��
� �'{q�� � � �k} �'. �%T> � � �1' � / ¢ e i'
✓ �.�+�,, , .�'�' , {Y �i �� �;1' _ l: ,
) �r � A
/i! S. �P � `"�` ' j �z� ^�_'�E ,, r yti' fl��"`' . �c'
. �
� .
� �` .
'� �f}/�_' � -_- � �, ; . ,�4` ��� �' �-� �`�' ,.
`�` `-: 1 �,. �; � �+' �
�' J � >> . � "i;��
� � y � 4� �.
�� �� • i�` � ''
' I' �, �
� � 'yM � � : �.
� :. :�• • � ' w: � �� . . ; f� .
tii'��'�' , � . �.4 _ n4 , ��.
I
;�I �
ti ..� h
' . . .���3.. i ..}: . 1,
Legend �.� ` y ���' `�� ��. ' :
' � ' }t �:r `,��„ �f • j %�::�'
�:�
� Greenway (Edge of Pavement) _ ,�� " �`
�" �, � F R v y,.�:��rf `e' x�
� Storm Pipes f , �,� ,
Rip-Rap . Q $Q 160
�- Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US '�L���. F. �'�' F@@t
'' ' z�.�
Charlotte-Mecklen6urg Figure 5e Proposed Conditions
i„= `]�TA ER, Kimley>>> Horn Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
__ _ Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
se'""es"-� March 2019

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 3/12/2019 ProjecUSite: �/�/alker's Branch Latitude: 35.105142
Greenway/ S1 - Walker's
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg County: Mecklenburg Longitude: -80.983642
Total Points: 40 Stream Determination � Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial .g. Quad Name: Fort Mill
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = 23.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of hiah water table?
0 1 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 1
1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 1
0 0.5 1 1.5 1
No=O Yes=3 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
d
2
2
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75;
d
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
5;
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
d
�
�
�
�
u
�
�
n
u
�
Notes

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 3/12/2019 ProjecUSite: �/�/alker's Branch Latitude: 35.098967
Greenway/ S2 - UT
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg County: Mecklenburg Longitude: -80.976237
Total Points: 25.5 Stream Dete � � circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemer Intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name: Fort Mill
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = 11 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 0
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of hiah water table?
0 1 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 0
1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
No=O Yes=3 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
d
2
2
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75;
d
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
5;
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
d
�
�
�
�
u
�
�
n
u
�
Notes:
Rip-rap lined intermittent stream

Photo Pa e 1
� ' � 'r � i , r� � ,�° � , �' _
� "
� � , � a �F 3� � �[tY ig
, � �,
••.#, �y , � r .
� ' S �^ w � ���� �r
� yq � ., ��
�4. ^�� ..f`e ��
r , •� �,,�_,�„ .f, '.� ,"
' � ^. s � � MR ,� -�'l'-S �,�
�,..� .: .�� . �.' • `"�[k.: � �F � �, '� ' ,�. a. � _ ,� .
4 �+r.�.., ��"+!' -,�f +�' . a ��y�1
f
d�i ' ..� � '�'' `.�/°.. '
� .� .,�, ,� � y e l,�' ���'�
: . * '�r,'* �
r,. �� °� � r � ;J��=�r
F' � � �
r #' .
� �C` ° �
� C . 1T+� r
— . ..i �.' . 'I
rv� � � �e� � � �
''� {
^� .��:. � �� .
�-
Photo 1: Stream 1(Walker Branch) — Perennial - Facing downstream
�' ' � s � ��+ "
r
� .
�,�,� f4,;, � ���`.�� y �a b'� �f'� ° � � _ ��4
� '� � 4
��k � + - �� � �;� : �, �, r :�,� r �i ,��
` y �* �I' � � .
� �� 1 . � #.fi ��5� � � �, �� � . ' � �
� i�� .� � � �4.
. y� g� �� * x ��
, ..-`, +' �. f �� _ � �r
�•i�T =*fi 3`j-�-�#�� �� � #�M � +.��rr
,�, : �.• i� s f �, '.?
'� � 'e � '���
� .�
� k ��w
� . o � � t� . , �
' _ ,�' �i
. �. : � .��� �� :,�. °�-
� . * � �a,
� ..' J , de r � e . �aY�'� �.�
ro -� � _
. i � � , „ �,. ,!; - i
� '�.+�� ' i ' ,
�.
_
. � �
. _. � } ,. {
,� ,w �
� �.e �
,, ✓•
r, x �� �� � ���,.
Photo 2: Stream 1(Walker Branch) — Perennial - Facing upstream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Walker's Branch Greenway — South Tryon St to Smith Rd prepared By
�ChaAotte�Mecklenburg Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
STORM
�jATER Date ProjectNumber Klm�e�`»)HaCn
seryices --.-��.^-^�-- 3/ 12/ 19 015236045

Photo Pa e 2
� .� �=" ` �m'���, � � � Ry ' � �. � � ���
F ' u�: � � ''�,i M ' � ,� �� �' I
�y�� - � +t' � '�}. ?'�� '���i�t ��il'.:
, r ,.
: _.. .� � -
f�� � ir � �+ : ' � �
1 �'�. a # � { �.ry �� �" # •� 1� .4. ..
��r+',`���f1r+ �}�� '+�+ +n �T t�#" � A
�.rj t. FlLA'+'� i sj :.! p �.
q, iie � F �A*l-�
` 4*•�p+��.,� �- PP a " �' #' -
/ at p * �� �p��� � , Aa
{ ��� � � F�� � �✓ � �.
�1i •. ' � '���.# .�5.
���¢. �� � �� � y
;�' � ��� � � I ���+r.,_ ���'� �'i4 +�
- ' � +
� � �� � �
�' Fg it' �:� � �� - .! - !' •'��� # �4 •
�� _�. 1
� : _+�.� ` a`° � r _�". � r�
_� -+k' , �x � '+' ,�` ' t''=� �r
� �� �7R � � x'�
�
�`'s°�d �� ��'!'4� , M r � � � 4��_�y��'��`'��
If:'�� ' �� :'i'v`''�l� ��: . ' !. _°r � � '. �'�iF�, �"�
Photo 3: Stream 2(S2)- Intermittent stream, rip-rap lined, facing downstream towards confluence to Walker
Branch.
: �,- F- •r
i �' , `'�i� . * y *��
� ' �' � � `�
-� ,_
'� _
�`-�-�+P .
�-�:ff
- jti..� .
� . .�:r
: •_ - -
� �� � �, �.�-, C*- -
+�,, � � . �,,, "�,�. ,�.�;� ,. ;: _
�, , "'�,: �: -. . --� P�
_ �y".�•: � .���.'iA �
. �� �� ti,���, ' `�"�' �'��,,�„ F'# �
�r�.� �. ' r
� �.. 4 , � ��� �.�
',� . �; �•.� . t
4��`s,r '" ,y�. i' R� �5' ��}�y��
'�Y� �� ; � ���
�,, fi. . _ : 'r`�
Photo 4: Stream 2(S2) - Intermittent stream, rip-rap lined, facing upstream.
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Walker's Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd prepared By
ChaAotte-Mecklenbuig Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
`S1�TORM Kimley»>Harn
— — Y`jAT�'R Date Project Number
seryices--^`% 3/12/19 015236045

Photo Pa e 3
� a�.� � ' � � ,+,� .
� ��, � + �•
r�� ' �.
�r+rt'{'ti�` �
_ _,�,�j•,�•,3„�r''` *
� �. � -
- "� - .,��
r_ j �
,� t �. �� ,�
, .� '" *'3'' ' ' °'
f ��`� ��.d
a, � �t+' .
�� �T �'� ` �
�.��. -s f� 3'i k� s
�. ���} � � �?I
_ :,s_�a� '{�°4�,P � _ . ti . .
, t.
'-�`� `+Y"F' � 4*' �'��^ _ 4.. �'•�4 - � .
r-� � "�,��, ��� *+'�^ ``� ;���,�� �-r
'r r �. y, "„�aa6,. �. . �
�.� � � .p•.._ •F`Y �a���. �P,� - k•
� �MC � IF 1�a
d`.. � '�^�� � �' � ! La0., �� . } . h� . .� . .
Photo 5: Stream 2(S2) - Intermittent stream, rip-rap lined, facing upstream. Note more of a ditched channel
throu hout reach.
•,d . — . , r' � � rr -
� �: . ! _
_ � .. . � � �{ a , �:,
_ r �.a �'.�
� �,� �k ��''� +�
�I �
e � � . � � �� ��'�
f , •� �r
i � , �� �... ��s • �
� � r� �. ��•
� . . „ .
. d 9
�. �- ��
, a _ - - - -
� .- � . ,.
�� •
. �
• ,r--� ° f �. '. ' o-
_ � � - - �°` �- �, , �� ' .. - ��,,•
t �'
� 1 Y. `L. R.. � � � y ^� A ��
- n. y � 4+ u 4° .` y �.� �1
, 'C� ' fi'e ` � � �
^ �� *, � r
� ,r°, y �,� �.
� � �.
- �. , � .���L• �,u��J�� ' '
Photo 6: Stream 2(S2) - Intermittent stream, rip-rap lined, facing upstream towards pedestrian bridge.
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Walker's Branch Greenway — South Tryon St to Smith Rd prepared By
�ChaAotto-Mecklenburg Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
STORM Kimley»>Harn
- WATER Date Project Number
services--^`% 3/12/19 015236045

urisdictional Determination ReQuest
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmingtan Distrfct
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. armv.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitPro �ram/Contact/CountvLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D— PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D- NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
►:�
B
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Walker Branch Greenway - South Tryon St to Smith Rd
City, State:
County:
Charlotte, NC
Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Mecklenburg County - Right of Entry Agreements
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Tinklen
Mailing Address
Charlotte, NC, 28202
C.
Telephone Number:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
704-409-1802
E1e�troni� lviail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
� I am the current property owner.
� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultantl
� Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
� Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIONZ
Name: Brian Bennett, PLA
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Mecklenberg County, 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte, NC, 28208
980-314-2539
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Aimy Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the put•pose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessaiy, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or•
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
C. �����,�
Print Name
Capacity: �✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
oz /t°► �z.o �°I
Date � _ �
Signature v �
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Checic as many as applicable)
� I intetld to construct/develop a project or pei-form activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resolu•ces under Coips authority.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perfot•in activities on this parcel which may
require authorization fi•om the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and miniinize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a filture permittiug
process.
QI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which inay
require authorization froin the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and tlow of
the tide.
� A Corps JD is r•equired 'ul order obtain my local/state authorization.
� I intend to contest jLu�isdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
conf'ir•m that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resout•ce on the parcel.
� I believe that the site may be coinprised entirely of dry land.
� Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
`� If there are nniltiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
' Must provide agent authoi•ization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F.
a
�❑
n
G.
✓❑
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter OS-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 4• 2 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
� Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.105142
Longitude: -$0.983642
aA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than llx17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For A�roved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
� Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Regulatorv-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Tab1e
AJDS, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Formg
� Vicinity Map
� Aerial Photograph
� USGS Topographic Map
� Soil Survey Map
� Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓
I�l
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
� NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
� www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Portals/59/docs/re,_ulator,�edocs/JD/RGL 08-02_A�_A_Prelim JD_Form_fillable.pdf
g Please see http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Reeulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the proj ect area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and properry location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Chris Tinklenberg, 200 South Tryon St. Suite 200 Charlotte, N� zszoz
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: MeCklenbUrg c�ty: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
�at.:35.105142 �ong.: -80.983642
Universal Transverse Mercator: � 7
Name of nearest waterbody: Walker BranCh
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
Stream 1 35.100345 -80.980292 175 If non-section10--non-wetlandwaters Section 404
stream2 35.098420 -80.976644 55 If non-section10--non-wetlandwaters Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
�■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
� Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
� Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data.
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K - Fort Mill
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Meck. Co. SSURGO Soils
�■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI digital data
� State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA FIRM PANEL 4409 and 4419
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
�■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 Meck. County Aerial
or �■ Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv
been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

a ��■ F2ay Covper. G��+ernor
�� • NC DEPARTMEM1IT �F SLi51 Hdll'11IC411. S�CI'2kd�'yl
�� ■■ N;4TURRL ANd CULTURAL RESOURCES
��� Vyl�lter Clark, Ibirectar, Land �nd LNater 5tewarc�ship
NCNHDE-8251
February 14, 2019
Addie Lasitter
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: Walker Branch Greenway; 015236045
Dear Addie Lasitter:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerC�ncdcr.cov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
:i_:,,�,,,��•�F•� ,,.,� �.r,tll��.�� r,�v� .. . ri �,r;. ;..F�:?.;-;c:t-:
�� . I . � .. � �. ,I � hii. , �iii:) i • �. ..I i��`.. �. � , rll�... � ��.i 1 � I_!
,. ..Lt ... .. ' . i «. � {��� . _

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Walker Branch Greenway
Project No. 015236045
February 14, 2019
NCNHDE-8251
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Group
Freshwater 29447 Villosa constricta Notched Rainbow
Bivalve
Freshwater 29549 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish29434 Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter
Last Element Accuracy Federal
Observation Occurrence Status
Date Rank
2007-03-08 E 3-Medium ---
2007-03-08 E 3-Medium
2016-06-08 E 3-Medium
State
Status
Threatened
Significantly G4 S4
Rare
Special G3 S3
Concern
Global State
Rank Rank
G3 S3
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
�NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde natureserve.ora/content/hel�. Data query generated on February 14, 2019; source: NCNHP, Ql Jan 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Walker Branch Greenway
Project No. 015236045
February 14, 2019
NCNHDE-8251
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Freshwater 29447 Villosa constricta Notched Rainbow 2007-03-08 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G3 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater 29549 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2007-03-08 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S4
Bivalve Rare
Freshwater Fish29434 Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter 2016-06-08 E 3-Medium --- Special G3 S3
Concern
Natural 582 Upland Depression --- 2006 D 2-High --- --- G2G3 S2S3
Community Swamp Forest
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5-Very --- Endangered G3 S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Deflnitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httas://ncnhde natureserve.org/content/hel�. Data query generated on February 14, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

February 14, 2019
� Project Boundary
� Buffered Project Boundary
� ' Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:24,193
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisslopo, O OpenSheelMap conlributors, and
the GIS User Communlry
NCNHDE-8251: Walker Branch Greenway