20111022 Ver 1_AFMB-AMR-YR5 - FINAL_reduced_20190112

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 5)
JANUARY 2019
PREPARED FOR:
AFFP, LLC
PREPARED BY:
HEADWATERS RESTORATION, PLLC
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
F
A
R
M
S T
R
E
A
M
M
I
T I
G
A
T
I
O
N
B
A
N
K
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 5)
JANUARY 2019
PREPARED FOR:
AFFP, LLC
PREPARED BY:
HEADWATERS RESTORATION, PLLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................2
II. RESTORATION SUMMARY............................................................................................................2
A. On-site Construction............................................................................................................... 2
B. Planting...................................................................................................................................3
III. MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................... 3
A. Hydrologic Monitoring Wells....................................................................................................3
B. Vegetation Monitoring............................................................................................................. 3
C. Stream Channel Monitoring.................................................................................................... 5
D. Success Criteria...................................................................................................................... 5
IV. MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 5)...............................................................................................6
A. Vegetation Monitoring............................................................................................................. 6
B. Hydrologic Monitoring............................................................................................................. 6
C. Stream Channel Monitoring.................................................................................................... 8
V. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT............................................................................................................ 8
VI. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
Tables
Table 1. Planted Species at Anderson Farm Site.................................................................................. 4
Table 2. Summary of Monitoring Plot Data............................................................................................ 6
Appendices
APPENDIX A — SITE MAP
APPENDIX B — SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C — MONITORING PLOT DATA
APPENDIX D — HYDROLOGIC GRAPHS/WETS DATA
APPENDIX E — STREAM CHANNEL SURVEYS
BANK SPONSOR INFORMATION:
AFFP, LLC
372 Merrimon Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 1
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

I. INTRODUCTION
The Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank site (approximately 25 acres) consisted primarily of
channelized first -order stream systems that had been historically altered as a result of silvicultural and
livestock management practices prior to the initiation of restoration activities. The site is part of a 103 -acre
parcel located just west of Mag Sluder Road, approximately ten miles north of Asheville, North Carolina, in
Buncombe County. The site consists of moderately to steeply sloped terrain and is bisected by two main
stream systems which flow southward into Newfound Creek, a third -order stream located in the French
Broad River Basin (8 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010105) (Subbasin 06010105090020). Based upon the as -
built survey, a total of 2,800 linear feet (If) of stream restoration was completed in addition to 555 If of
stream enhancement (Appendix A). Approximately 16 acres (ac.) of riparian habitat were also restored
through the planting of native hardwood species. As a result, the restoration effort is providing for
increased in -stream habitat, floodwater storage, nutrient retention/sediment reduction, and riparian habitat
expansion for resident and migratory fauna.
II. RESTORATION SUMMARY
A. On-site Construction
On-site construction was conducted between August 5, 2013, and October 1, 2013. Early activities
focused on the removal of invasive vegetation and large trees within the proposed construction zone.
Trees were stockpiled and later utilized as grade control structures per the engineer's specifications.
Following the clearing stage, excavation of the stream bank and contouring of the riparian area were
conducted. This level of disturbance was conducted in 500 -foot (ft) sections throughout the property to
minimize the risk of large-scale erosion and bank failure. Topsoil was stockpiled and redistributed following
the establishment of stable bank slopes. Excavated material was wasted in one of two designated areas
within the Anderson Farm property.
Restoration within the stream channel was conducted in concert with the grading activities. A majority of
the in -stream work focused on the installation of log and/or stone sills across the existing channel. These
structures serve as grade control features and support the development of different habitat niches
throughout the reach. Numerous pools and constructed riffles were also established and/or stabilized to
restore the natural features of the streambed. In addition, three ephemeral drainage channels, located on
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 2
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

the western side of UT -1 and UT -3, were also stabilized using reinforced coir fiber matting. Rock -lined
pools were also engineered along these features to dissipate runoff velocities prior to their intersection with
the restored channel.
B. Planting
Planting of the site was conducted between December 30, 2013, and January 1, 2014. During this period a
mixture of livestakes and bare root seedlings were planted throughout the site. Livestakes were installed
every two feet along the restored streambank. Bare root seedlings were planted on 8 -foot spacings
(approximately 680 stems per acre) throughout the 16 -acre riparian buffer area. Table 1 contains a
complete list of the planted species. Supplemental planting near the confluence was also conducted
following the Year 1 monitoring event.
III. MONITORING PLAN
A. Hydrologic Monitoring Wells
Documentation of stream flow within the project is being conducted using three pressure transducers (one
in each restored reach). One additional gauge has also been installed within the area targeted for
enhancement. All four wells were re -installed on June 26, 2014. One of the wells (UT -2) was replaced
again in December 2017. These gauges are measuring the elevation of water in the channel throughout
the duration of the project and will be used to determine if the project is meeting the applicable "success
criteria" related to the total number of bankfull events.
B. Vegetation Monitoring
Given the size of the project, 2% of the planted riparian areas are monitored via the establishment of
permanent 0.10 -ac. plots. These areas are located within approximately 16 acres in two different habitat
types. Per the approved mitigation plan, a total of five plots were established. GPS coordinates for the
centers of each sampling plot were recorded and are included with the as -built survey (Appendix A).
During monitoring, surviving planted individuals and volunteers are identified, measured, and enumerated
within each plot.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 3
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

Table 1. Planted Species at Anderson Farm Site
Zone 1 - Streambank
2,800 linear feet
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
34%
1,200
Ninebark
Physocarpus opulifolius
34%
1,200
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
31%
1,100
TOTAL
3,500
Zone 2 - Floodplain
2 acres
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
River Birch
Betula nigra
25%
300
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25%
300
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
25%
300
Ironwood
Carpfnus caroliniana
25%
300
TOTAL
1,200
Zone 3 - Mountain Slope
—16 acres
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Composition
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
25%
2,600
American Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
25%
2,600
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
4%
450
Paw Paw
Asimina triloba
8%
850
Sugar Maple
Acer floridanum
24%
2,550
Serviceberry
Amelanchier laevis
4%
450
American Holly
flex opaca
10%
1,100
TOTAL
10,600
GRAND
15,300
TOTAL
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

C. Stream Channel Monitoring
Given the size, uniform design, and moderate slope (2%) of the proposed project area, cross-sections were
established every 500 feet of stream length (totaling 6 permanent stations). Placement of these stations
was designed to assess the performance of potential problem areas (e.g. severe erosion, structural failure,
etc.) within the restoration areas. These stations were evenly distributed between riffles and pools
throughout the project (Appendix A).
D. Success Criteria
The stream and riparian buffer restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related
to vegetative density and stream stability. A total of five (5) monitoring events will occur following
completion of the proposed work. Additional monitoring may be required if subsequent plantings are
deemed necessary to meet the success criteria listed below. Note that non -planted individuals of
characteristic species may volunteer into the restored areas. Suitable volunteers are an important
component of the riparian area, as they serve as indicators for appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide
increased diversity. The presence of suitable volunteers also demonstrates trending of the site toward
vegetative success.
The primary success criteria for the restored stream systems will be:
(1) Documentation of 2 bankfull events using techniques discussed below within a normal rainfall year during
the initial 5 years of monitoring. These events must occur in separate years. Additional monitoring maybe
necessary in the event of abnormal climatic conditions.
(2) Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 260 trees per acre at the end of 5 years (post -
planting).
Level I Monitoring will be required for the Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank as detailed in the Stream
Mitigation Guidelines. Monitoring will occur five times in the years following completion of construction.
Monitoring reports will be prepared each monitoring year and will include completed Channel Mitigation
Monitoring Sheets with current data, a discussion of any deviations, and whether they are indicative of a
stabilizing or destabilizing situation.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 5
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

IV. MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 5)
A. Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring was conducted at the site on October 6, 2018. A total of 277 stems were counted
throughout the five plots, which correlates to an average of 554 stems per acre within the project area (a
decrease in 36 stems per acre over the previous year). Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) was the most
abundant woody specie, with a total of 63 individuals. Other planted species such as Green Ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and Sugar Maple (Acer floridanum) were also
prevalent within the monitoring plots. All five of the plots contained sufficient densities of planted and
volunteer species. Plot #3, located near the confluence, registered the highest density with 78 individuals
(down from 94 the previous year). This was likely due to the supplemental planting that occurred in early
2016. Supplemental planting was necessary to counteract poor survivorship due to drought and soil
compaction from previous land use. See Appendix B for photographs of the monitoring plots during the
October 2018 event. Individual plot data is presented in Appendix C.
Table 2. Summary of Monitoring Plot Data 2018
Plot Number
Number of Planted Species
Density per Acre
1
40
400
2
57
570
3
78
780
4
63
630
5
39
390
TOTAL
277
--
AVERAGE
554
B. Hydrologic Monitoring
Hydrologic monitoring wells were reinstalled at the site on June 26, 2014, and one (UT -2) was reinstalled
again in December 2017. Each well records the water level in the stream every 15 minutes, which is
sufficient to capture the impact of most rainfall events. The well installed at UT -2 captures data from -22
inches to 0" (top of unit). The remaining wells capture data ranging from -42 inches (") (bottom of thalweg)
to 0" (top of unit). Rainfall levels were average to below average from January to mid-May 2018. Totals
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 6
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

from June to December were well above average. Corresponding rainfall data reflects the official readings
from the climate database at the Asheville Airport (AVL). See Appendix D for WETS table information and
individual well graphs.
UT -1 b
This well is located at Cross -Section #2 near station 17+50 of UT -1b. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.53 ft. Data from 2018 depict the target hydrologic regime for this
first order stream with a small drainage area. Recorded events were typically brief, lasting 15 to 30
minutes. A 1.05" event on May 11th, 2018 resulted in a bankfull event of -33.0" at this site. A series of
smaller rain events between September 24th and 27th maintained bankfull levels for several days, cresting
at -34.7"
UT -2
This well is located at Cross -Section #4 near station 19+00 of UT -2. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.59 ft. The installation of the new well improved data collection
accuracy and alignment with measured rain events. A bankfull event measuring -15.0" was recorded on
January 12th, 2018 in association with a 0.69" rain event. The January event occurred within a period of
normal precipitation. Several other bankfull events were recorded during above-average rainfall levels.
UT -2 (Enhancement)
This well is located near station 12+00 of UT -2. This section was targeted for enhancement via the
removal of invasive vegetation and livestock watering infrastructure. Both of these tasks were completed in
conjunction with the construction activities on the remaining portions of the reach. Removal of the livestock
infrastructure has allowed the characteristic flow regime to return to this section. Well data provided depict
a normal increase in water levels which correlates to measurable rain events during the winter and spring
of 2018. Data also reflect higher base flow levels for the remainder of the year, corresponding to the
above-average rainfall observed.
UT -3
This well is located at Cross -Section #5 near station 10+25 of UT -3. Based on the design plans, the
average bankfull depth for this section is 0.63 ft. Recorded data from 2018 depict the targeted hydrologic
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 7
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

regime for a small second order stream. A 0.69" rain event on January 121h, 2018, registered a bankfull
event of -31.2". Well data from the remaining portion of the year is missing due to equipment malfunction.
C. Stream Channel Monitoring
Survey work was conducted at each of the six permanent stations in October 2018. Cross-section #1 has
experienced a decrease in pool depth of 0.51" compared to the as -built survey. The riffle present at Cross-
section #2 has also experienced a small amount of accretion, but has remained stable. Cross-section #3
showed a decrease in pool depth and has returned to dimensions resembling the as -built survey. Cross-
sections #4 showed a small decrease in bankfull depth, while bankfull area remained nearly identical to the
as -built. Pool depth at Cross-section #5 was nearly identical to the as -built survey. Mean and maximum
depths at Cross-section #6 also showed little to no change in channel geometry. No bank failures or major
structural issues were observed during the site survey. Overall, the site has performed well through a
number of large rain events and will likely benefit from increased vegetative cover over the course of the
remaining monitoring schedule (see Section V below). See Appendix E for specific information on the
individual cross-sections and the requested comprehensive data table.
V. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Based on comments received from the USACE following a site visit on September 24th, 2018, the bank
sponsor has agreed to the following adaptive managements actions:
1) Kudzu Management — Kudzu will be physically cut and removed throughout the entire UT -1a
reach. This removal will be followed by multiple herbicide treatments. In addition to these efforts, a
controlled burn will be conducted outside of the project boundary to provide an additional buffer
against further infestation. These activities will take place throughout 2019.
2) Supplemental Planting — Additional livestakes and 1 -gallon hardwood saplings will be installed in
the southern section of the project area. 700 livestakes will be installed along the section of UT -3
where survivorship was extremely low. 350 1 -gallon plants will be installed in the adjacent valley in
an effort to achieve the target ecological community. The supplemental planting is currently
scheduled for February 2019.
A report will be submitted to the USACE following the completion of these activities.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 8
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

VI. CONCLUSION
The Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank has performed as designed during the fifth year following
construction. Stream features remain intact and stable after several large rain events, and a variety of
native hardwood species, grasses, and shrubs occupy the floodplain ecosystem. Each of the three
reaches registered definitive bankfull events. Natural hydrologic conditions were also enhanced in the
upstream section of UT -2.
Vegetation densities increased as compared to Year 4 monitoring results due in part to the supplemental
planting and adequate precipitation levels during the growing season. Given the current population levels,
it is anticipated that the site will maintain sufficient densities to meet the aforementioned success criteria in
the remaining years.
The sponsor has agreed to more aggressively manage the kudzu throughout 2019 as well as to conduct
additional planting to ensure that the site continues to progress towards the goal of reestablishing the low
mountain alluvial and bottomland forest ecosystems.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank 9
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

APPENDIX A - SITE MAP
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

APPENDIX B - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

.�.r�7.•i- h.i•• ' 1 A

5) View of Plot #3 facing North.
6) View of Plot #3 facing West.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-3
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

7) View of Plot #4 facing North.
8) View of Plot #4.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-4
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

9) View of Plot #5 facing North.
10) View of Plot #5.
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank B-5
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

APPENDIX C - MONITORING PLOT DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

Summary of Anderson Farm Year 5 Monitoring Plot Data - 2018
Plot Number
Number of Planted Species
Density per Acre
1
40
400
2
57
570
3
78
780
4
63
630
5
39
390
TOTAL
277
--
AVERAGE
554
Most Abundant Target Species
Name Total
Tulip Poplar 63
Green Ash 62
Sycamore 45
Sugar Maple 29

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #1
Date/Time: 10/6/2018 - 11:OOam Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Green Ash
3
1
Green Ash
5
1
Persimmon
5
3
Persimmon
6
1
Red Oak
2
1
Red Oak
4
2
Red Oak
6
1
Sugar Maple
3
3
Sugar Maple
5
3
Sugar Maple
6
1
Sugar Maple
8
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
5
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
6
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
7
1
Sycamore
3
1
Sycamore
4
2
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
6
2
Sycamore
7
1
Sycamore
8
3
Sycamore
12
1
Sycamore
14
1
Tulip Poplar
1
1
Tulip Poplar
6
4
Tulip Poplar
8
1
Total
40
Notes: Species seen previously include Sugar Maple, Swamp Chestnut Oak,
Sycamore, Persimmon, Tulip Poplar, Green Ash, Red Oak, White Oak,
River Birch
Use 37' radius for plant counts.

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #2
Date/Time: 10/6/2018 - 11:30am Weather: Sunny, 80°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Elderberry
14
1
Green Ash
5
1
Green Ash
20
1
Pine
6
1
Pine
10
3
Sugar Maple
3
1
Sugar Maple
12
2
Sycamore
10
1
Sycamore
12
3
Sycamore
14
2
Sycamore
20
1
Tulip Poplar
2
3
Tulip Poplar
3
5
Tulip Poplar
4
8
Tulip Poplar
5
6
Tulip Poplar
6
8
Tulip Poplar
8
1
Tulip Poplar
12
2
White Oak
15
1
Willow
6
1
Willow
8
1
Willow
12
1
Willow
16
1
Willow
18
1
Willow
25
1
Total
57
Notes: Species seen previously include Sugar Maple, Swamp Chestnut Oak,
Sycamore, Persimmon, Tulip Poplar, Green Ash, Willow, Nine Bark,
River Birch, White Oak, Red Oak

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #3
Date/Time: 10/6/2018 - 12:20pm Weather: Sunny, 85°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Green Ash
2
2
Green Ash
3
7
Green Ash
4
27
Green Ash
5
9
Green Ash
6
4
Green Ash
7
2
Red Oak
3
3
Red Oak
4
2
Sugar Maple
3
2
Sugar Maple
5
2
Sugar Maple
7
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
6
1
Sycamore
3
3
Sycamore
4
2
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
6
3
Sycamore
8
1
Sycamore
12
1
Tulip Poplar
4
1
Tulip Poplar
5
2
Tulip Poplar
6
1
White Oak
3
1
Total
78
Notes: Species seen previously include Sugar Maple,White Oak,
Red Oak, Sycamore, Tulip Poplar, Green Ash, Swamp Chestnut Oak

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #4
Date/Time: 10/6/2018 - 1:OOpm Weather: Sunny, 85°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Elderberry
6
1
Green Ash
1
1
Green Ash
2
3
Green Ash
3
2
Iron Wood
6
1
Persimmon
5
1
Pine
2
10
Pine
3
5
Red Oak
5
1
River Birch
4
1
River Birch
5
2
River Birch
6
1
River Birch
12
2
River Birch
14
1
Sugar Maple
2
1
Sugar Maple
6
1
Sugar Maple
8
1
Sugar Maple
11
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
Sycamore
2
6
Sycamore
6
1
Tulip Poplar
1
1
Tulip Poplar
2
1
Tulip Poplar
3
1
Tulip Poplar
5
1
Tulip Poplar
7
1
Tulip Poplar
8
1
Tulip Poplar
12
1
White Oak
1
2
White Oak
2
2
Willow
4
1
Willow
7
1
Willow
8
1
Willow
12
2
Willow
14
1
Total
63
Notes: Species seen previously include Sugar Maple,White Oak,
Red Oak, Sycamore, Green Ash, Swamp Chestnut Oak, River Birch,
Elderberry, Silky Willow, Persimmon, Tulip Poplar

Site: Anderson Farm Plot: #5
Date/Time: 10/6/2018 - 1:45pm Weather: Sunny, 90°F
Data Collector(s): Brent Manning, Lisa Manning
Specie
Height (feet)
Quantity
Green Ash
10
1
Iron Wood
4
1
Iron Wood
6
1
Iron Wood
8
1
Persimmon
3
1
Red Oak
2
1
Red Oak
4
1
Sugar Maple
2
2
Sugar Maple
3
3
Sugar Maple
4
1
Sugar Maple
6
1
Sugar Maple
8
1
Sycamore
4
3
Sycamore
5
1
Sycamore
6
1
Sycamore
12
1
Sycamore
14
1
Sycamore
18
1
Tulip Poplar
2
4
Tulip Poplar
3
2
Tulip Poplar
4
3
Tulip Poplar
5
1
Tulip Poplar
6
2
Tulip Poplar
12
1
White Oak
2
2
White Oak
3
1
Total
39
Note: There were 50 pine trees seen at 2-4 feet in height.
Live Stake Assessment: 10/6/2018 - 2:20pm - South of Plot 5
--Low survivorship. 1 planted species seen every 8-10 feet.
--Mostly willow seen.
--Between Plot 5 and last transect - only about 30 planted live stakes survived.
Other Notes: Species seen previously include Sugar Maple,White Oak,
Red Oak, Sycamore, River Birch, Elderberry, Persimmon, Tulip Poplar
Use 37' radius for plant counts.

APPENDIX D - HYDROLOGIC GRAPHSMETS DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

16
14
12
10
2018 - 30-70 Rainfall Analysis
Month
30 -Day Running Total
30%
70%

UT -1 Stream Gauge - Year 5 Monitoring - 2018
Daily Precipitation Water Level
-29
-30
-31
-32
v -33
U
U
C
j -34
J
-37
-38
-39
ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
Date
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

-10
-12
-14
-18
-20
-22
UT -2 Stream Gauge - Year 5 Monitoring - 2018
Daily Precipitation Water Level
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O Ii m I� V r-4 00 I- -i r j 00 � �--I 00 u1 N O1 l0 M O lO M O rq ci 00 u1 ci 00 u1 N O1 u1 N Ol l0 M
\ \ \ \ N \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ Ln M \ \ \ lO \ \ \ I� \ \ \ 00 M \ \ \ M \ \ \ O
a -I ci c -I c -I N N N M M M Ln Ln Ill lO w lO I� r- n 00 00 00 Ol Ql M r -I
Date
3.5
3
2.5
1
0.5

-10
-15
-20
N
J -25
-30
-35
-40
UT -2E Stream Gauge - Year 5 Monitoring - 2018
Daily Precipitation Water Level
co 00 00 00 00 0o c0 c0 W W o0 00 0o c0 c0 00 00 00 00 00 0o ao 00 00 00 00 0o ao ao 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
O o o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
,-i W Ln N M Ln N M LD Ln N M lOO N M (D M O r, -zt ci 00 V T --I 00 V) N O\1 tD M O l0 M O r� M O n -zt cI
N \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ L/1 \ \ \ l0 \ \ \ I� n \ \ \ 00 \ \ \ 01 \ \ \ O
ci c -I ci N N N M M M Lr) Ln Ln w l0 lO r- N N 00 00 00 M Cr) Cr) ci
Date
3.00
2.50
2.00
In
v
U
u
C
C
O
1.50
.Q
U
U
1.00
0.50
1 11
a

UT -3 Stream Gauge - Year 5 Monitoring - 2018
Daily Precipitation Water Level
-30
-31
-32
33
-35
-36
-37
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.4
0.2
-38 ' M M M ' 0
00 CIO 00 00 00 00
00
00 00 00 00 00 00 CIO 00 00
Cb
tiy yy� Btitititi1�y\�4
QN, QN, (3N QN, (SN QN, ON (3N QNQN, QN, QN, QN, QN, QN, 6N C3N QN, 6QN, O�
-\'V 115\'V � o�ti\�\�\T,h\�,o\titi\ti
y\1y\\\,NNS$\\yXN\�\-�"\; tib; y\"-"�N "\", "\,v
Date

APPENDIX E - STREAM CHANNEL SURVEYS AND CROSS-SECTION DATA
Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report (Year 5)
January 2019

Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
Cross -Section Data Through Year 5
Cross -Section
Number
Riffle or Pool
Monitoring
Year
Survey Date
Bankfull Area
(ftZ)
Bankfull Width
(ft)
Maximum
Bankfull Depth
(ft)
Mean Bankfull
Depth (ft)
Width to Depth
Ratio (Bankfull
Width/Mean
Bankfull Depth)
Maximum Pool
Depth (ft)
As -Built
Oct. 2013
6.51
8.61
1.60
1
Oct. 2014
8.25
9.80
1.71
2
Feb. 2016
4.01
7.00
1.06
1
Pool
3
Dec.2016
5.11
7.81
1.05
4
Nov. 2017
4.18
8.31
0.96
5
Oct. 2018
3.98
8.60
1.09
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.25
6.98
0.88
0.47
14.99
1
Oct. 2014
5.07
9.67
1.09
0.52
18.44
2
Feb. 2016
2.90
8.18
0.85
0.35
23.07
2
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
2.97
9.2
0.74
0.32
28.50
4
Nov. 2017
1.59
5.89
0.57
0.27
21.82
5
Oct. 2018
1.84
6.07
0.45
0.30
20.02
As -Built
Oct. 2013
5.39
7.3
1.44
1
Oct. 2014
11.95
8.87
2.76
2
Feb. 2016
11.43
8.02
2.71
3
Pool
3
Dec.2016
10.41
6.58
2.60
4
Nov. 2017
5.80
7.00
1.30
5
Oct. 2018
4.79
7.48
1.24
As -Built
Oct. 2013
4.02
6.66
1.06
0.60
11.03
1
Oct. 2014
3.13
7.58
0.80
0.41
18.36
2
Feb. 2016
4.02
7.88
0.86
0.51
15.45
4
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
3.59
6.99
0.77
0.51
13.61
4
Nov. 2017
4.14
8.05
0.85
0.51
15.65
5
Oct. 2018
3.54
7.24
0.77
0.49
14.81
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.87
6.23
1.11
1
Oct. 2014
3.39
6.62
1.13
2
Feb. 2016
3.41
7.59
1.08
5
Pool
3
Dec.2016
3.18
6.20
1.09
4
Nov. 2017
4.59
9.17
1.11
5
Oct. 2018
4.09
9.05
1.15
As -Built
Oct. 2013
3.12
7.78
0.70
0.40
19.40
1
Oct. 2014
2.76
6.78
0.62
0.41
16.66
2
Feb. 2016
2.63
6.90
0.69
0.38
18.10
6
Riffle
3
Dec.2016
1.85
5.47
0.54
0.34
16.17
4
Nov. 2017
2.21
5.26
0.73
0.42
12.52
5
Oct. 2018
2.35
7.10
0.67
0.33
21.45

Immmmmo
■■■■■■■■■■
mmmomm
■ice � -
ja4mmmml
■■■
ll
1:9
MEN
2
A5-51JILT CRO55-5ECTION 1 -POOL
HORIZONTAL: !" = 4'
VERTICAL: I" m 2'
0 o a oa o
A5 -BUILT CROSS-SECTION 2- RIFFLE
HORIZON AL: I' - 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
■■■■■■■■■■
■ice � -
=��■
■■■
ll
1:9
MEN
IMME&Mi■■■■
0 o a oa o
A5 -BUILT CROSS-SECTION 2- RIFFLE
HORIZON AL: I' - 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION I - POOL
HORIZONTAL: I " = 4'
VERTICAL: I' = 2'
lommommommom■■■■■■■■■■
■ice � -
=��■
■■■
ll
1:9
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION I - POOL
HORIZONTAL: I " = 4'
VERTICAL: I' = 2'
lommommommom■■■■■■■■■■
■■■
ll
1:9
MEN
o e p e S p o e
MONITORING CRO55-SECTION 2- R1FPLE
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT. 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
5 YEAR BED [OCT. 2018]
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
HORIZONTAL: I. 4'
VERTICAL: I. = 2'

1970
1970
E
$
7971
mom
1971
limal
�
9
1999
�
� �
1996
7968
1968
� M .�i � ayi � ani
A5-5UILT GRO55-5ECTION 3- POOL o
HORIZONTAL: I " - 4'
VERTICAL: 1' - 2'
a e e p 4 a a a e e e e
A5-5UILT CRO55-5ECTION 4- RIFFLE
M RWONTAL: 1' — 4'
VERrrCAL: 1'- 2'
z 2 0 � - 4 -7 g �� P A �3 N
v v e o A e e o v o
MONITORING GRO55-5ECTION 3- POOL
HORIZONTAL: i' - 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
E
$
7971
mom
1971
limal
�
9
1970
1970
1089
1909
a e e p 4 a a a e e e e
A5-5UILT CRO55-5ECTION 4- RIFFLE
M RWONTAL: 1' — 4'
VERrrCAL: 1'- 2'
z 2 0 � - 4 -7 g �� P A �3 N
v v e o A e e o v o
MONITORING GRO55-5ECTION 3- POOL
HORIZONTAL: i' - 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED [OCT. 2014]
2 YEAR BED {FEB. 2018}
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
5 YEAR BED (OCT. 2018)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
MONITORJNG CRO55-5EGTION 4- RIFFLE
M RIZO AL: 1' = 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
tl CAR0���%
3 AL
.� L-4647 R.
.��° suRyo. .
moma■
mom
limal
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED [OCT. 2014]
2 YEAR BED {FEB. 2018}
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
5 YEAR BED (OCT. 2018)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
MONITORJNG CRO55-5EGTION 4- RIFFLE
M RIZO AL: 1' = 4'
VERTICAL: I' - 2'
tl CAR0���%
3 AL
.� L-4647 R.
.��° suRyo. .

A5-13UILT CR055-SECTION 5- POOL
HOW NTAL: I' - 4'
VERTICAL: I" - 2'
MEMO
MEN
r
a
NONE
W
MEMO
N■■NES■t■■NNE
EMEEMMOMMEME
MEN!
lrdli-a
ME
_
1949
MENEMN
100
MEMO
N■■■ONMENNE
ME■M■■M
7949
EMEEMMINEENE
..
A5-13UILT CR055-SECTION 5- POOL
HOW NTAL: I' - 4'
VERTICAL: I" - 2'
oe v q p e v e v v
A545UILT CR055-5ECTION 6- RIFFLE
I10RIZONTAL: 1' = 4'
VERTICAL: I" = 2'
MEMO
MEN
r
a
NONE
W
MEMO
N■■NES■t■■NNE
EMEEMMOMMEME
MEN!
lrdli-a
ME
_
1949
MENEMN
100
N■■■ONMENNE
7949
oe v q p e v e v v
A545UILT CR055-5ECTION 6- RIFFLE
I10RIZONTAL: 1' = 4'
VERTICAL: I" = 2'
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
FfORIZQNTAL' I" = 4'
VERTICAL: 1" - 2'
MEMO
MEN
r
NONE
W
MEMO
N■■NES■t■■NNE
EMEEMMOMMEME
MEN!
lrdli-a
ME
_
MENEMN
100
N■■■ONMENNE
EMEEMMINEENE
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION 5- POOL
FfORIZQNTAL' I" = 4'
VERTICAL: 1" - 2'
M fv m ♦M1♦ v
o e ❑ e O O p O O o
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION 6- RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL. I " = 4'
VpRTICAL: i " = 2'
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT- 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
5 YEAR BED (OCT- 2018)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
��1114111f1��,
CAR •rf�i
~ AL—
..yy L-4647
MEN
NONE
W
MEMO
N■■NES■t■■NNE
EMEEMMOMMEME
M fv m ♦M1♦ v
o e ❑ e O O p O O o
MONITORING CRO55-5ECTION 6- RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL. I " = 4'
VpRTICAL: i " = 2'
LEGEND
AS -BUILT BED
1 YEAR BED (OCT- 2014)
2 YEAR BED (FEB. 2016)
3 YEAR BED (DEC. 2016)
4 YEAR BED (NOV. 2017)
5 YEAR BED (OCT- 2018)
❑ BREAK SYMBOL
��1114111f1��,
CAR •rf�i
~ AL—
..yy L-4647

88 Central Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801
[phone] License #: C-3039
Report of Survey_
Survey for: Headwaters Restoration, LLC
Job: 1810134 -Anderson Farms Monitoring YEAR 5
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SUBJECT
- PROPERTY
zc,
_y
I certify that this project was completed under my direct and responsible charge from an actual survey
made under my supervision; that this ground topographic survey for the purpose of stream monitoring
was performed at the 95% confidence level to meet the Federal Geographic Data Committee Standards
and is in compliance with the North Carolina Standards of Practice for Land Surveying (21-56.1600); that
the survey location data was performed to meet the requirements for a topographic ground survey to the
accuracy of Class A Horizontal and Class C Vertical(21 NCAC-56 section .1606), and the original survey
data was obtained the date of 10125118; that the survey was completed on 11/14/18 and the final
documents were digital files supplied on this date(see items below); all distances are horizontal ground
distances and coordinates are based on the projects ground control network from the As -Built survey and
was established in compliance with the Standards of Practice for Land Surveying (21-56.1600)
Digital Files Certified:
• pdf. files of cross-sections
• CAD file
■ csv file
� A � � ,I/`� This 14th Day of November, 2018
CL SEAL -yam
•. r L-4647
y D• 1
'Pk''F_'
Phillip B. Kee, PLS NC -4647