Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190327 Ver 1_T&E Supplemental info for R130 ePCN Form_20190307Supplemental Information ePCN Form — NCDOT Division 10 — SR 1120 (Dickie Little Road) over North Fork Jones Creek Project Number 17BP.10.R.130 G. SupplementalInformation 5. Endangered Species and Critical Habitat STV conducted protected species habitat assessments on September 5, 2017. As of June 27, 2018 the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) lists three federally protected species, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) far Anson County (Table 1). Far each species, a discussion of the presence or absence of habitat is included below along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the project study area (PSA). Table 1. ESA federally protected species listed for Anson County Scientific Name Common Name Federal Habitat Biological Status Present Conclusion Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's sunflower E Yes NE Lasmi ona decorata Carolina heels litter E No NE Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No NE E - Endangered NE - No Effect Schweinitz's sunflower USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August-October Habitat Description: Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina. The few sites where this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in Xeric Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights-of-way, maintained power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings and edges of upland oak-pine-hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and other sunny or semi-sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. This sunflower is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from other vegetation. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston, Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion, among others. This plant is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived from mafic rocks. Biological Conclusion: No Effect Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present in the PSA along roadside shoulders. Plant by plant surveys were conducted by STV biologists Brandon Phillips, CHMM and Joshua Kotheimer, WPIT, throughout areas of suitable habitat on September 5, 2017. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed and the September field survey was Supplemental Information — Anson 080 conducted during the flowering season. A review of NCNHP records on July 25, 2018 indicates no known occurrences within one mile of the PSA and no effect to Schweinitz's sunflower is anticipated. Carolina heelsplitter USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year round Habitat Description: The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and Catawba River systems. The Carolina heelsplitter exists in very low abundances, usually within six feet of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with moderate current. The more recent habitat where the Carolina heelsplitter has been found is in sections of streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and with wide riparian buffers. Biological Conclusion: No Effect A mussel survey for the Carolina heelsplitter was not conducted. Suitable habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter is not present in the PSA and the North Fark Jones Creek had low to no flow at the time of the field review. A review of NCNHP records on July 25, 2018 indicates no known occurrences within one mile of the PSA and no effect to Carolina heelsplitter is anticipated. Red-cockaded woodpecker USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year round; November-early March (optimal) Habitat Description: The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open, mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW eXcavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW is normally no mare than 0.5 mile. Biological Conclusion: No Effect No red-cockaded woodpeckers were observed in the PSA during the field review, and it was determined that no potential habitat is present due to the lack of mature pine or pine- hardwood forests. Forested habitats containing pine trees within the PSA have been actively managed resulting in a dominance of trees 15 to 25 years in age and not contiguous enough to support appropriate RCW nesting or foraging habitat. NCNHP records on July 25, 2018 indicate no known occurrence of red-cockaded woodpeckers within one mile of the PSA. Based on the field reviews and available habitat, it is determined that the project would have `no effect' on red-cockaded woodpecker. Supplemental Information — Anson 080