HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190289 Ver 1_Public Notice SAW201800240PN_20190228
US Army Corps
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: February 28, 2019
Comment Deadline: March 30, 2019
Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00240
TheWilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received anapplication fromPublix
Super Markets,Inc. and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
seeking Department of the Armyauthorization to dischargedredged or fill material into
4, linear feet of stream channel, 0. acre of riparian non-riverine wetlands,
and 1.8 acres of open water impoundments, associated with developing a grocery
distribution center inGuilford County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx
Applicant: Mr. Randy Barber
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
501 North Galloway Road
Lakeland, Florida 33815
Mr. Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
AGENT: Mr. Brian Breissinger
Timmons Group
1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300
Richmond, Virginia 23225
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory
Authorities:
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
(33 U.S.C. 1413)
Location
Location Description:
Project Area (acres): 354.2 Nearest Town: McLeansville
Nearest Waterway: Unnamed Tributary to Little Alamance Creek
River Basin: Cape Fear
Latitude and Longitude: 36.0805 N, -79.6556 W
Existing Site Conditions
The grocery distribution facility site is located approximately 5 miles east of Greensboro
in Guilford County, North Carolina and is situated on approximately 342.5 acres located
on the south side of US Highway 70 (Burlington Road). In addition, there are
approximately 11.7 acres of roadway improvements proposed along approximately 1.5
miles of US Highway 70, from Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake Road. The total
project area encompasses approximately 354.2 acres. The proposed grocery distribution
facility site is bordered on the north side by US Highway 70. Birch Creek Road, which
has been formally closed by NCDOT, bisects the site from north to south.
Historically, the site was used primarily for farming, with forested areas on the steeper
slopes and bottomlands. Current land use in the grocery distribution facility site area
includes both forested and maintained areas. Forested upland areas on the site are
characterized as mixed pine-hardwood communities, with canopy species such as loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), white oak (Quercus alba), and tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera). Understory species consist of Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense) and herbaceous species such as Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
Maintained areas include upland grass areas managed as a golf course, multiple structures
associated with the golf course such as a club house, one single-family home, and
maintained transportation corridors. Land use surrounding the project area is
predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural
fields and single-family residential homes.
The project area has moderate slopes along a north-south ridgeline that bisects the center
of the property. Elevations range from 628 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 726 feet
MSL within project area boundaries. Soils mapped on site are presented in the table
below:
Soil Type Map Unit Symbol Hydric / Non-hydric
Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes ApB Non-hydric
Appling sandy loam, 6-10% slopes ApC Non-hydric
Cecil sandy loam, 2-6% slopes CcB Non-hydric
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded ChA Hydric
Coronaca clay loam, 2-6 % slopes CrB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2-6% slopes EnB Non-hydric
Enon fine sandy loam, 6-10% slopes EnC Non-hydric
Enon fine sandy loam, 10-15% slopes EnD Non-hydric
Enon clay loam, 6-10% slopes, moderately eroded EoC2 Non-hydric
Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 2-6% slopes, moderately eroded MhB2 Non-hydric
Vance sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes VaB Non-hydric
Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex, 10-15% slopes WkD Non-hydric
Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex, 15-45% slopes WkE Non-hydric
Wynott-Wilkes-Poindexter complex, 2-10% slopes WwC Non-hydric
Among the 14 soil types that occur within the project area, only one (ChA) is listed as a
hydric map unit. This hydric map unit occurs along the two larger stream valleys flanking
the east and west project area extents. Average annual precipitation for Guilford County
is 41.99 inches.
The entirety of the grocery distribution facility site was delineated by Soil &
Environmental Consultants, P.A. in November 2017, to identify the presence and location
of jurisdictional waters of the US. The wetland delineation was performed in accordance
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Delineation Manual and subsequently-
issued Regional Supplement to the 1987 Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). The delineation was field verified by David Bailey on
February 1, 2018, and included 12 streams, 38 wetlands, and 2 open water
impoundments; an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) was issued on July 3,
2018 (Corps Action ID: SAW-2018-00240).
Waters of the US along the US Highway 70 improvements corridor portion of the project
area were delineated by The Catena Group and field verified by John Thomas (Corps) on
May 22, 2012, as part of a larger NCDOT US Highway 70 widening project study
(Transportation Improvement Project No. U-2581B/R-2910). An AJD was issued for this
review area on September 25, 2012 (Corps Action ID: SAW-2012-01543). According to
NCDOT, the delineation on this section was revisited by NCDOT representatives on
November 17, 2018; the location and extent of waters have not changed since the AJD
was issued. However, two additional streams were noted in areas that were outside of the
2012 AJD; those features are noted as Sites 1 and 6.
All streams in the project area are considered Relatively Permanent Waters, which flow
via Little Alamance Creek and Big Alamance Creek to the Haw River, a Traditionally
Navigable Water (Hydrologic Unit Code \[HUC\] 03030002. These streams all carry the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) best usage classification of
-
drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I, II or III classification is
not feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses. WS-IV waters are
generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Areas. The
nutrient
management due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic
vegetation. There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality
Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-I), or Water Supply (WS-II) waters within 1.0 mile
of the project area.
The wetlands within the project area are primarily of the Headwater Forest wetland type,
with Bottomland Hardwood Forest wetland types occurring along the two larger stream
valleys flanking the east and west grocery distribution facility site extents, according to
the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM). These features contain a
mix of plant assemblages, with forested wetland areas generally dominated by an
overstory of river birch (Betula nigra), tulip poplar, and red maple. Saplings and shrubs
of the same species, as well as Chinese privet occur in the understory. The vegetation in
the non-forested wetlands are dominated by herbaceous species due to the disturbance
activities within the maintained golf course and pond-edge areas which prevents
development of the canopy and shrub strata; common species include soft rush (Juncus
effusus) and cattail (Typha latifolia). Soils within these features are primarily loamy with
a low chroma (2.5Y 6/2) matrix and bright (2.5Y 6/6) redoximorphic concentrations.
Typical of wetlands in topographic drainages, these wetlands display hydrology
indicators such as water-stained leaves, seasonal saturation, and oxidized rhizospheres on
living roots.
Additional details regarding existing site conditions can be found on the District Website
at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx.
The purpose of the proposed project, as stated by the applicant, is to establish a secure
corporate campus which: (1) includes the following components arranged in a
contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return
center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for
associates and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently
serve its current and future grocery stores within North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Virginia. The proposed distribution center is intended to meet the retailers 50-year plan
and is to be constructed in two phases to match the timing of expenditures to the
increasing need as well as satisfy the current minimum site criteria. Additionally, the
proposed project is designed to reduce project-related congestion along US Highway 70.
Project Description
Grocery Distribution Facility:
The proposed grocery distribution facility components would include a 1.1 million square
foot refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million square foot dry warehouse, return center,
120,000 square foot food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor
trailers, parking for associates, and ancillary support buildings (i.e. fleet maintenance,
fleet fueling, dispatch and site security). The applicant states that the facility is designed
and managed to ensure food and employee safety. The distribution warehouses are
designed with a center support core to house employee comfort needs, including break
areas, locker rooms, restrooms, a cafeteria, and office space, as well as support functions
for distribution center operations. These areas are concentrated in the center core to
maximize efficiencies by minimizing travel time and walking distance to these essential
service areas from any point within the distribution center. Further, the distribution
warehouses are aligned parallel to each other, enabling the center core areas of each
building to share resources while maintaining a compact footprint to minimize employee
walking distances between the two buildings. This also minimizes the opportunities for
employees to be in contact with rolling equipment such as forklifts and tractor trailers.
The facility is also designed to separate employee parking areas from all tractor trailer
and forklift movement.
Based on the proposed distribution center layout, approximately 4,502 linear feet of
intermittent and perennial stream channel, 0.8 acre of riparian non-riverine wetlands, and
1.8 acres of open water impoundments would be permanently impacted by the proposed
project. No temporary impacts are proposed. Impacts would result from the required
grading and proposed road crossings. The applicant states that the proposed layout would
provide sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million square feet facility
along the existing ridgeline, thereby minimizing impacts to 2nd order streams. Fill slopes
would be graded to 3:1 slopes, hydro seeded, and matted to stabilize the site and prevent
secondary impacts from sediment discharges.
Storm runoff from the proposed distribution center would be managed and treated on-
site, and ultimately directed into off-site waters; the applicant states that the drainage area
of the off-site receiving waters would thereby not be significantly reduced. The project
would meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered
Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
Stormwater management on-site would be managed and treated before discharging into
down gradient waters in order to protect waters from degradation; as such, the applicant
states that the project should have minimal effect on downstream waters, shellfish or
other aquatic species. Rip-rap dissipater pads would be installed flush with the existing
grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage.
US Highway 70 Improvements:
Improvements to approximately 1.5 miles of US Highway 70, to be completed by
NCDOT, would result in permanent impacts to approximately 298 linear feet of
intermittent and perennial stream channel, 0.11 acre of riparian non-riverine wetlands (fill
and mechanized clearing), and temporary impacts to 93 linear feet of stream channel.
This portion of the proposed project would widen the existing cross section of three 10-
foot travel lanes, to four 12-foot travel lanes and two 6-foot turn lanes with curb and
gutter and a 10-foot sidewalk, from approximately Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake
Road. An existing 10 X 6 foot reinforced box culvert (RCBC) with headwall would be
replaced with a 10 X 8 foot RCBC with beveled headwall. The invert of the culvert
would be buried 1 foot and sills would be included. The culvert design includes rip rap
both upstream and downstream of the new culvert in order to stabilize the existing bed
and banks of the stream. Whenever possible proposed drainage systems were stubbed
into the side of the proposed culvert in order to dissipate energy and avoid erosion along
the fill slope. Additional impacts related to the proposed road improvements are related to
widening fill slopes into wetland areas and small culverts into stream channels to
accommodate the widened road footprint, as well as a rip rap outlet pad at a proposed
stormwater outfall to provide energy dissipation and lessen erosive velocities.
The applicant submitted additional descriptive information about the proposed project,
including an Alternatives Analysis for three off-site and two additional on-site
alternatives. This supplemental information, as well as a project proposal narrative and
plans, can be found on the District Website at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or
minimize impacts to the aquatic environment:
Grocery Distribution Facility:
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the
wetland delineation to adjust the layout to avoid and minimize impacts. After the
wetlands were delineated, an engineering plan was developed to meet all needs at the
proposed distribution center, while minimizing impacts to Waters of the U.S. The
proposed location results in the least impacts to waters of the U.S. while meeting the
needs of the industry. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct
the approximately 2.5 million square feet facility as well as position the facility along the
existing ridgeline which would serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams.
Fill slopes would be graded to 3:1 slopes and hydro seeded and matted to stabilize the
site. Incorporating steeper slopes (i.e. 2:1 or 2.5:1) was analyzed for the project.
However, given the high level of traffic anticipated for the proposed roadways (i.e.
tractor trailer, forklift, etc.), 3:1 slopes were utilized for the project in order to safeguard
the site from any potential slope failures which could result in massive and costly
disruption to operations. Based on preliminary geo-technical reports, 3:1 slopes were
selected to ensure the site grading would work within the impact envelope, given that the
soils may not be able to structurally withstand steeper slopes. Furthermore, it was
determined that a 3:1 slope provides an increased level of safety for vehicles and
pedestrians in the event that either leave the travel way.
The use of retaining walls was also reviewed for the project to reduce potential impact to
waterways. However, retaining walls along the eastern access road would inhibit the
relocation of power and communications lines that are being relocated from the vacated
Birch Creek right-of-way. Given the importance of these lines, placement behind walls or
within the geogrid system would not be allowed by the utility companies. As these lines
cannot be located within the secure limits of the distribution center, placement along the
access road is the only option for relocation. Furthermore, in areas where walls could be
utilized to reduce impacts, the benefit of the impact reduction would be substantially
offset by the cost of the wall. In order to preserve the stream section at the southeast
corner of the dry warehouse building, a 20- to 30-foot, four-sided wall would be required.
It was determined that while there would be guardrail along the walls, they still create a
safety concern for a facility that would experience continuous and very high volumes of
employee and truck traffic. Given this traffic, any large vertical drop is to be avoided as it
represents some level of safety risk no matter how well protected.
Dissipater pads associated with each culvert would be installed flush with the existing
grade of the streambed to allow for aquatic life passage. Measures would be taken to
prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional
streams and wetlands. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill would be
placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion
into adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated
material within jurisdictional streams and wetlands would be strictly prohibited as part of
the construction of this project. All project construction activities initiated within
jurisdictional streams and wetlands would be carried to completion in an expeditious
manner in order to minimize the period of disturbance within the jurisdictional streams
and wetlands.
The proposed project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts through
implementation of planning practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on
downstream water quality. Efforts to reduce indirect impacts generally include:
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through innovative
site planning and utilization of confirmed wetland delineation;
2. Minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts;
3. Minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains;
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control measures.
Based on the current layout, potential indirect impacts to downstream waters may still
occur to the stream located along the southernmost boundary. Quantification of indirect
impacts can be completed upon request. For the purpose of this application however, the
project water management system would be designed to detain the 1-year, 24-hour storm
to pre-development discharge levels. Stormwater ponds have been located to disperse
run-off to both the eastern and western large stream features in a manner that is consistent
with predevelopment drainage patterns. As the ponds would be detention facilities, run-
off would still be discharged during smaller rain events with volumes similar to pre-
development rates. Pond outlets would be designed to hydrate the remaining stream
drawdown outlets would also have mechanisms for diffuse flow to prevent erosion due to
point discharge.
An Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Plan that meets the latest state and local
regulations and adheres to the methodology prescribed in the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act of 1973 would be utilized. All erosion and
sediment control measures would be checked for stability and operation following every
runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs
would be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. The project would meet
all relevant requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater
Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Stormwater
management facilities have been strategically placed adjacent to streams within natural
drainage ways to manage and treat runoff before discharging into down gradient waters
in order to protect waters from degradation. Therefore, the project should have no effect
on downstream waters, shellfish, or other aquatic species.
US Highway 70 Improvements:
For the proposed US Highway 70 improvements, NCDOT stated that impacts to a
wetland and stream within the project area would be avoided and roadway fill slopes
would be steepened to reduce wetland impacts. Further, the existing 46-foot long culvert
under US Highway 70 is perched, and does not allow for aquatic passage at normal
stream flow; this culvert would be replaced with a 127-
containing alternating sills intended to retain natural streambed material and approximate
natural stream velocities. This new structure would also be buried to allow for aquatic
passage.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment:
Grocery Distribution Facility:
Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream, wetland, and buffer impacts can be
satisfied by a combination of purchasing credits from a United States Army Corps of
Engineers approved private mitigation bank or through payment into the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) in-lieu fee program. Currently, only 525.30
stream mitigation credits can be purchased from the Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation
Bank (Dairyland Site). The remainder of compensatory mitigation requirements for
unavoidable stream and wetland impacts would be satisfied through payment to NCDMS.
Both the Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank and NCDMS have provided acceptance
letters stating that they are willing to provide stream and/or wetland compensatory
mitigation requirements.
US Highway 70 Improvements:
Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream, wetland, and buffer impacts associated
with the proposed project-related US Highway 70 corridor improvements can be satisfied
through payment into the NCDMS. NCDOT has received a NCDMS mitigation
acceptance letter associated with the proposed US Highway 70 corridor improvements.
mitigation plan can be found
on the District Website at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx.
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this
Public Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The
that the proposed project would not effect EFH or
associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of
33 CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C,
the District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version
of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the
presence of prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not
been formally surveyed for the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are known to be present in
the vicinity of the proposed work. Additional work may be necessary to identify
and assess any historic or prehistoric resources that may be present.
Per a letter to the applicant dated April 13, 2017, the North Carolina Division of
Natural and Cultural Resources (NCDNCR) recommended that a majority of the
project area be systematically surveyed for archaeological resources. The
applicant indicated that a systemic archeological survey of the entire 342.5 acre
site is currently being conducted by Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Note also that NCDOT stated that the US Highway 70 portion of the project
would have no effect on property or sites listed on the National Register of
Historic Places or require additional right-of-way from publicly owned parkland
or recreational area
The
coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full
historic properties within the Corps-identified permit area.
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area,
examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North
Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:
The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
This determination is made specific to the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis
mekistocholas), Roanoke logperch (Percina rex), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia
masoniHelianthus schweinitzii), and small whorled
pogonia (Isotria medeoloides), based on correspondence between the applicant
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) via letter dated September 20, 2018,
and via email on December 12 and 13, 2018. Further, NCDOT provided
information for the US Highway 70 improvements corridor that stated that
individuals being found. NCDOT also states that limited habitat for small whorled
pogonia is found in the road corridor but that surveys will be updated during the
appropriate survey season in 2019; however, note that the majority of the
potentially suitable habitat for this species occurs on the 342.5-acre grocery
distribution center site, indicating that the above-referenced USFWS
correspondence should apply for this species.
The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
The Corps reviewed this project in accordance with (IAW) the NLEB Standard
Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) between the
USACE, Wilmington District, and the Asheville and Raleigh USFWS Offices,
and determined that the action area for this project is located outside of the
highlighted areas/red 12-digit HUCs and activities in the action area do not
require prohibited incidental take; as such, this project meets the criteria for the
4(d) rule and any associated take is exempted/excepted.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate
State agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not
make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state
Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt
of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at
the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a
401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this
request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional
information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central
Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application
for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by March 21, 2019 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies
with and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved
North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2
(b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of Army (DA) permit for the
proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the Corps and
the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the
n. As the application did not include the
consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt, concurrence or
objection from the NCDCM.
Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application
for a Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would
affect the coastal zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Act (16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That
decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be
relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof;
among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values
(in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety,
food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the
activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of
the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the
Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for
this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered
species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other
public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to
determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing will be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to
the proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, March 30, 2019. Comments should be
submitted to David E. Bailey,Raleigh Regulatory Field Office,
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 , Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587, at (919) 554-
4884 extension 30, or David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil.