HomeMy WebLinkAbout250007_Inspection_20190220Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 250007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS250007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/20/2019 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Farm Name: Sutton Family Farm, LLC
Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr
Mailing Address: 6309 Wyse Fork Rd
Physical Address: 3391 Dover Fort Barnwell Rd
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: North SR 1262 Craven Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Craven Region: Washington
Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 252-523-0474
Dover NC 28526
Dover NC 28526
Integrator: Carolina Howard
Latitude: 35' 17' 07"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other issues
Longitude: 77' 21' 46"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Woody A Sutton Operator Certification Number: 17713
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Woody A Sutton
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis 1-14-19 1.15
9-11-18 1.16
7-4-18 1.30
Soil Test 6-28-17 w/ highest lime 1.9 tons } applied lime
Cu & Zn values w/in range
Calibration complete 9-26-18 w/ 161 gpm
Sludge Survey 11-17-18 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-4.7'
Pump intake-4.5'
Crop yield complete
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation
Page 1 of 5
Permit: AWS250007 Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number: 250007
Inspection Date: 02/20/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,320 I 4,320
Total Design Capacity: 4,320
Total SSLW: 583,200
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 02/23/2005 03/18/1992 19.50 30.00
Page 2 of 5
Permit: AWS250007 Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr
Facility Number:
250007
Inspection Date: 02/20/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
MEIEI
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters
of the ❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
MEI
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Page 3 of 5
Permit: AWS250007 Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr
Inspection Date: 02/20/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
250007
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Page 4 of 5
Permit: AWS250007 Owner: Woody A Sutton Jr Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/20/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
250007
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Page 5 of 5