20190289 Ver 1_Individual_20190305

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT REQUEST
PREPARED FOR:
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
ATTN: MR. JOHN FISHER
PREPARED BY:
TIMMONS GROUP
5410 TRINITY ROAD, SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
FEBRUARY 2019
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS
1 of 27
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of Publix Super Markets, Inc (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting this Individual Permit
Request for the development of a product distribution center, to include both on and off-site roadway
improvements at the Guilford County Publix Distribution Center (Project). The proposed Publix Distribution
Park is comprised of 342.5 acres located on Birch Creek Drive, 5 miles east of Greensboro in Guilford County,
North Carolina (Figure 1 -Vicinity Map). In addition, there are approximately 11.7 acres of roadway
improvements proposed along US 70 for a length of approximately 1.5 mile from Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun
Lake Road. Therefore, the total Project area is approximately 354.2 acres.
The purpose of the proposed project is to establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the
following components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry
warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for
associates and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and
future grocery stores within North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. The facility components include a 1.1
million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center, 120,000
sq.ft. food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and
ancillary support buildings (Le fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
Food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems must be well-designed and well-managed to ensure
food safety. In general, grocery sales are a very low margin market. Therefore, efficiency of operations and
minimization of operating costs are crucial to a company's viability and success. Considering the average life
span of a Publix distribution center is 75 years or more, inefficiencies in site selection, layout, or design of a
distribution center would have long lasting negative impacts.
Due to the existing conditions of the preferred site location and the sizing requirements of the proposed
distribution center, a contiguous 2.5 million square feet facility could not be developed without direct impacts
to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. A typical grocery distribution center has significant space requirements to
house the refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, tractor trailer
and associate parking, and ancillary support facilities (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site
security). These components must be contiguous in order to function and adjusting the layout to completely
avoid streams and wetlands on the site would require separation of these components and would not be
suitable for proposed project.
Based on the proposed park layout approximately 4,502 linear feet of stream, 0.8 acres of wetland, and 1.8
acres of open water will be permanently impacted by the proposed project. No temporary impacts are
proposed. Impacts will result from the development of building pads, parking areas, and proposed road
crossings. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million
square feet facility as well as position the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize
impacts to 2nd order streams. Fill slopes will be graded to 3:1 slopes and will be hydroseeded and matted to
stabilize the site and prevent secondary impacts to downstream receiving waters.
Storm runoff from the proposed park will be managed and treated and ultimately directed into off-site waters.
Therefore, the drainage area of the receiving waters located off-site will not be significantly reduced. The
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
2of27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control
Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Stormwater management on-site will be
managed and treated before discharging into down gradient waters in order to protect waters from
degradation. Therefore, the project should have minimal effect on downstream waters, shellfish or other
aquatic species. Rip -rap dissipater pads that will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to
allow for aquatic life passage (see Appendix C for Preliminary Construction Drawings). The proposed project
is a single and complete project and will not spur development or cumulative impacts.
Based on the current layout, potential indirect impacts to downstream waters may occur to the stream located
along the southernmost boundary. Quantification of indirect impacts can be completed upon request. For the
purpose of this application however, the proposed Project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts
through implementation of planning practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream
water quality. Specifically, the project water management system will be designed to detain the 1 -year, 24-
hour storm to pre -development discharge levels. Stormwater ponds have been located to disperse runoff to
both the eastern and western large stream features in a manner that is consistent with pre -development
drainage patterns. As the ponds will be detention facilities, run-off will still be discharged during smaller rain
events with volumes similar to pre -development rates. Pond outlets will be designed to hydrate the remaining
stream "tails" that are not impacted so as to keep these segments as viable streams. The pond drawdown
outlets will also have mechanisms for diffuse flow to prevent erosion due to point discharge.
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable throughout
the planning and design process including the utilization of the delineation, minimization of partial stream or
wetland impacts, minimization of impacts to all primary drainage ways and floodplains, and strict adherence
to all state and local stormwater control measures. Unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through the
purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits through the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
and private mitigation banks, contingent on the agency approval. The purchase of this compensatory
mitigation will ensure the unavoidable impacts proposed by the Project, will result in a "no net loss" of aquatic
resource function and value to Waters of the U.S.
A good standard of living and quality of life requires ready access to and availability of affordable groceries,
including fresh fruits and vegetables. The proposed distribution center will ensure efficient distribution of
groceries by timely product sourcing and packaging as well as efficient warehousing and distribution for the
groceries. Publix refrigerated network currently consists of five facilities, four of which are located in Florida,
including Deerfield, Orlando, Lakeland, and Jacksonville with one facility in Atlanta, Georgia. With the
exception of Jacksonville and Atlanta, each of these facilities has capacity to support projected growth for the
next five years. In order to meet the demand, new facilities will be required to support growth beyond five
years.
When utilization nears 90%, a facility may not be able to meet store growth or unexpected fluctuations in
demand. Achieving over —95% utilization is not ideal because facilities require free space to accommodate
item changes and maintain efficient day-to-day operations. At 100% utilization, a facility would be in gridlock
with no room to receive supplier deliveries.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
3 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Utilization for the Jacksonville refrigerated facility is already near maximum capacity and the Atlanta
refrigerated facility is projected to be at maximum capacity by 2020. These facilities will reach 100%
utilization soon despite numerous changes to mitigate constraints by implementing source of supply (SOS)
changes. A SOS change refers to reassigning which stores are assigned to a specific facility. These changes are
required when capacity constraints prohibit facilities from servicing the store that are closest to their
geographic service areas.
The proposed Greensboro facility was determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the
distribution issues. The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity constraints at the Atlanta refrigerated
facility, reduces transportation costs by $23 million, meets the preferred site requirements since it is a
centralized location where there will be more store growth, presence of a solid interstate system, and
significant government incentives. This option also enables Publix to provide the expected level of service,
quality and lead times throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix's fleet. Finally, the
proposed Greensboro facility provides long-term capacity to support future growth and provides support to
the existing networks during unexpected events.
Furthermore, Guilford County is currently designated by the N.C. Department of Commerce as a Tier 2 County,
or an economically distressed county. Based on the 2016 Census data, 28.4% of Greensboro residents and
17.6% of Guilford County residents are living below the poverty level. Eastern Guilford County is identified by
local officials as especially in need of employment opportunities. The proposed project would add 1,000 jobs
with an average pay of $42,000 to $44,000. These wages are double the current average income for a family of
four currently living in poverty. Furthermore, these jobs will ensure reduced premiums for employees for
health care coverage, short term and long-term disability insurance, access to affordable vision and dental
insurance, 401k match, employee -stock ownership plan, and access to hot meals during scheduled shift.
The property is currently zoned Industrial and the proposed use is consistent with the current zoning and is
considered a permitted use. The proposed distribution center was determined suitable for the proposed
development based on specific industry requirements including, but not limited to, Location, Site
Characteristics, Available Infrastructure, Surrounding Land Use and Availability of labor force. The following
permit support document demonstrates that the proposed Project meets the purpose and need of the
proposed project and is the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA).
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
4 of 27

E
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleiqh, NC 27607
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. - PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER INDIVIDUAL PERMIT
REQUEST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................................................2
1.0 PRJOECT INFORMATION SHEET...........................................................................................................................................7
2.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................................8
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................................................................................11
3.1 Site Location................................................................................................................................................................................11
3.2 Site Conditions...........................................................................................................................................................................11
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED..............................................................................................................................................................12
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................................13
5.1 No -Action Alternative.............................................................................................................................................................14
5.2 Off-site Alternatives.................................................................................................................................................................15
5.3 On -Site Alternatives.................................................................................................................................................................18
5.4 Preferred Alternative..............................................................................................................................................................19
6.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS.................................................................................................................................................. 21
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION.....................................................................................................................................21
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION.......................................................................................................................................... 23
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION................................................................................................................................... 24
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information...................................................................................................... 24
9.2 Cultural Resources................................................................................................................................................................... 26
10.0 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................................................................26
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
5of27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
APPENDICES
Appendix A Joint Permit Application
Appendix B Figures
Appendix C Preliminary Construction Drawings
Appendix D Off -Site Alternatives Location Maps
Appendix E On -Site Alternative Impact Maps
Appendix F Waters of the U.S. Impact Maps
Appendix G Agency Correspondence
Appendix H Mitigation Acceptance Letters
Appendix I Application for Individual Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and
Riparian Buffer Certification for the Widening of US 70 from Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake Road in
Guilford County. NCDOT Division 7, TIP No. U-2581 BA
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS
6 of 27
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
1.0 PRJOECT INFORMATION SHEET
General
Project Name:
State:
Location:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Subject Property Size:
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Publix Distribution Center
North Carolina
Guilford County
36.0805°
79.6556°
354.2 Acres
HUC Code:
03030002
Waterbodies on Property:
Unnamed Tributaries to Little Alamance Creek
Corresponding
Information
USGS Quad:
McLeansville
County:
Guilford County
Applicant Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Name: Mr. John Fisher
Address: 501 North Galloway Road
Lakeland, FL 33815
Contact:
Telephone: C: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
7of27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Agent Timmons Group
Name: Mr. Brian Breissinger
Address: 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300
Richmond, Virginia 23225
Contact:
Telephone: 0: 804-200-6439 C: 804-839-2645
Email: [e-mail]
Anticipated Permit Authorizations
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Individual Permit
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
• North Carolina Division of Water Resources: 401 General Water Quality Certification
• Major Buffer Variance
• Site Plan Permit
2.0 INTRODUCTION
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
8 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
On behalf of the Publix Super Markets (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting this permit request for the
proposed Publix Distribution Center (Project). The Project is located approximately 5 miles east of Greensboro
in Guilford County, North Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map) and is situated on approximately 342.5 acres
located on Highway 70 (Burlington Road) and Birch Creek Road. In addition, there are approximately 11.7
acres of roadway improvements proposed along US 70 for a length of approximately 1.5 mile from Mt. Hope
Church Road to Sun Lake Road. Therefore, the total Project area is approximately 354.2 acres. Land use at the
Project site includes both forested and maintained areas. Forested areas on the site are characterized as pine
and mixed hardwood communities. Maintained areas at the Project site include upland grass areas managed as
a golf course, multiple structures associated with the golf course such as a club house and one single-family
home. Birch Creek Road transects the center of the Project site. The Project site is bound to the north by
Highway 70 (Burlington Road). Land use surrounding the site is comprised of both agricultural and single
family, residential properties.
The applicant's purpose and need is to establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the following
components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse,
return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for associates and
ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and future grocery
stores within North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The proposed distribution facility components
include a 1.1 million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center,
120,000 sq.ft. food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates,
and ancillary support buildings (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
A good standard of living and quality of life requires ready access to and availability of affordable groceries,
including fresh fruits and vegetables. The proposed distribution center will ensure efficient distribution of
groceries by timely product sourcing and packaging as well as efficient warehousing and distribution for the
groceries. Publix refrigerated network currently consists of five facilities, with four located in Deerfield,
Orlando, Lakeland, and Jacksonville Florida and one in Atlanta, Georgia. With the exception of Jacksonville and
Atlanta, each of these facilities has the capacity to support projected growth over the next five years. New
planned facilities will be required to meet the demand beyond five years.
When utilization nears 90%, a facility may not be able to meet store growth or unexpected fluctuations in
demand. Achieving over —95% utilization is not ideal because facilities require free space to accommodate
item changes and maintain efficient day-to-day operations. At 100% utilization, a facility would be in gridlock
with no room to receive supplier deliveries.
Utilization for the Jacksonville refrigerated facility is already near maximum capacity and the Atlanta
refrigerated facility is projected to be at maximum capacity by 2020. These facilities will reach 100%
utilization soon despite numerous changes to mitigate constraints by implementing source of supply (SOS)
changes. A SOS change refers to reassigning which stores are assigned to a specific facility. These changes are
required when capacity constraints prohibit facilities from servicing the store that are closest to their
geographic service areas.
The proposed Greensboro facility was determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the
distribution issues. The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity constraints at the Atlanta refrigerated
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
9of27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
facility, reduces transportation costs by $23 million, meets the preferred site requirements since it is a
centralized location where there will be more store growth, presence of a solid interstate system, and
significant government incentives. This option also enables Publix to provide the expected level of service,
quality and lead times throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix's fleet. Finally, the
proposed Greensboro facility provides long-term capacity to support future growth and provides support to
the existing networks during unexpected events.
Furthermore, Guilford County is currently designated by the N.C. Department of Commerce as a Tier 2 County,
or an economically distressed county. Based on the 2016 Census data, 28.4% of Greensboro residents and
17.6% of Guilford County residents are below the poverty level. Eastern Guilford County is identified by local
officials as especially in need of employment opportunities. The proposed project would add 1,000 jobs with
an average pay of $42,000 to $44,000. These wages are double the current average income for a family of four
currently living in poverty. Furthermore, these jobs will ensure reduced premiums for employees for health
care coverage, short term and long-term disability insurance, access to affordable vision and dental insurance,
401k match, employee -stock ownership plan, and access to hot meals during scheduled shifts.
The property is currently zoned as Industrial and the proposed use is consistent with the current zoning and is
considered a permitted use. The proposed distribution center was determined suitable for the proposed
development based on specific industry requirements including, but not limited to, Location, Site
Characteristics, Available Infrastructure, Surrounding Land Use and Availability of labor force.
Due -diligence completed to date includes wetland and stream investigations, historic and cultural resource
surveys, and threatened and endangered species surveys. In addition, on-site concurrence meetings and pre -
application meetings have been held with Guilford County, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division
of Water Resources.
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). Based on the proposed distribution center layout
approximately 4,502 linear feet of stream, 0.8 acres of wetland, and 1.8 acres of open water will be impacted
by the proposed project. Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum
extent practicable throughout the planning and design process including the utilization of the delineation,
minimization of partial stream or wetland impacts, minimization of impacts to all primary drainage ways and
floodplains, and strict adherence to all state and local stormwater control measures. These unavoidable
impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits through U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers approved private mitigation banks and the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS),
contingent on the agency approval. Therefore, the proposed Project has been determined to meet the purpose
and need of the Project, provide considerable economic relief to the citizens of Guilford County and will result
in the least amount of impacts to sensitive environmental resources.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
10 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location
The proposed Publix Distribution Center (Project site) comprises approximately 342.5 acres and is located
approximately 5 miles east of Greensboro city limits in Guilford County, North Carolina (see Appendix B,
Figure 1. Vicinity Map). To the north, the Project site is bound by US -70. The project is bound by forested areas
interspersed with agricultural fields to the south. To the east, the Project site is bound by forested areas,
agricultural fields, and Knox Road. The western side of the Project is bound by Sprucetree Drive and
residential homes. The proposed Project site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 030300020303)
within the Lower Little Alamance Creek sub -watershed which is within the Jordan Lake Watershed. All surface
waters drain to Little Alamance Creek, located approximately 2 miles to the south east. The property is located
within the Piedmont Physiographic Province.
3.2 Site Conditions
Access to the Project site is via US -70, which borders the Project site to the north or Birch Creek Road which
bisects the Project site from north to south. The portion of Birch Creek Road running through the project limits
has been formally closed by NCDOT. Properties that utilized this section of road for access to US -70 are either
now part of this project or will access the public road network using other right-of-way to the south. No
properties have been left without access to a public right-of-way. Current land use at the Project site includes
both forested and maintained areas. Forested areas on the site are characterized as pine and mixed hardwood
communities. Maintained areas at the Project site include upland grass areas managed as a golf course,
multiple structures associated with the golf course such as a club house, one single-family home, and
maintained transportation corridors. Land use surrounding the proposed Project site is predominately
comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural fields and single-family residential
homes.
The Project site has moderate slopes along a ridgeline that bisects the center of the property. Elevations range
from 628 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 726 feet MSL within the Project site Boundaries. Surface waters
drain to Little Alamance Creek, located approximately 2 miles to the south east of the Project site.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. at the Project site include open waters, wetlands and streams and are
primarily characterized as farm ponds, small headwater wetland systems and 1St and 2nd order streams. The
entirety of the 342.5 -acre Project site was delineated to identify the presence and location of jurisdictional
wetlands and streams. The wetland delineation was performed in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) 1987 Delineation Manual and subsequently issued Regional Supplement to the 1987
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). The delineation was verified by
David Bailey on July 3, 2018 (SAW -2018-00240). There are no wetlands, open water, stream and associated
upland buffers within the Project Area that are under a deed restriction, conservation easement restrictive
covenant, or other land use protective instruments.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
11 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
The applicant's purpose and need is to establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the following
components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse,
return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for associates and
ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and future grocery
stores within North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The proposed distribution center is intended to
meet the retailers 50 -year plan and is to be constructed in two phases to match the timing of expenditures to
the increasing need as well as satisfy the current minimum site criteria.
A good standard of living and quality of life requires ready access to and availability of affordable groceries,
including fresh fruits and vegetables. The proposed distribution center will ensure efficient distribution of
groceries by timely product sourcing and packaging as well as efficient warehousing and distribution for the
groceries.
Food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems must be well-designed and well-managed to ensure
food safety. In general, grocery sales are a very low margin market. Therefore, efficiency of operations and
minimization of operating costs are crucial to company viability and success. Considering the average life span
on a Publix distribution center is 75 years or more, inefficiencies in site selection, layout, or design of a
distribution center would have long lasting negative impacts. The facility components include a 1.1 million
square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center, 120,000 sq.ft. food
manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and ancillary
support buildings (Le fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
Efficiency of design begins with the selection of the geographical area for the campus. Current retail growth
projections show the center of gravity solution to be the immediate Greensboro area. Within the Greensboro
area, the proposed location is required to have suitable access to the interstate system (3-5 miles) while
maintaining minimal efficiency loss due to traffic congestion.
The Atlanta refrigerated facility primarily supports the Atlanta and Charlotte divisions. Future store growth
across Publix is based on the current Three Year Plan and growth projections. Percentage of growth outside of
Florida continues to exceed Florida growth. Current growth projections include an average of 17 stores per
year added outside of Florida through 2028, at total of 584 stores.
Publix refrigerated network currently consists of four facilities located in Florida including Deerfield, Orlando,
Lakeland, and Jacksonville and one in Atlanta, Georgia. With the exception of Jacksonville and Atlanta, each of
these facilities has capacity to support projected growth at least over the next five years.
When utilization nears 90%, a facility may not be able to meet store growth or unexpected fluctuations in
demand. Achieving over —95% utilization is not ideal because facilities require free space to accommodate
item changes and maintain efficient day-to-day operations. At 100% utilization, a facility would be in gridlock
with no room to receive supplier deliveries.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
12 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Utilization for the Jacksonville refrigerated facility is already near maximum capacity and Atlanta refrigerated
is projected to be at maximum capacity by 2020. These facilities will reach 100% utilization soon despite
numerous changes to mitigate constraints by implementing source of supply (SOS) changes. A SOS change
refers to reassigning which stores are assigned to a specific facility. These changes are required when capacity
constraints prohibit facilities from servicing the stores that are closest to their geographic service areas.
Transportation is a key component of service and quality. Deliveries for highly perishable produce items are
scheduled as often as daily to ensure the highest quality and longest shelf life. Long-distance deliveries may
require longer order lead times, which can result in less reliable forecasts, shorter item shelf life, increased
damage to sensitive products and increase shrink at the store.
The proposed project will bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Greensboro and Guilford County.
Guilford County is currently designated by the N.C. Department of Commerce as a Tier 2 County, or an
economically distressed county. Based on the 2016 Census data, 28.4% of Greensboro residents and 17.6% of
Guilford County residents are below the poverty level. Eastern Guilford County is identified by local officials as
especially in need of employment opportunities. The proposed project would add 1,000 jobs with an average
pay of $42,000 to $44,000. These wages are double the current average income for a family of four currently
living in poverty. Furthermore, these jobs will ensure reduced premiums for employees for health care
coverage, short term and long-term disability insurance, access to affordable vision and dental insurance, 401k
match, employee -stock ownership plan, and access to hot meals during scheduled shift.
The proposed Greensboro facility was determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the
distribution issues. The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity constraints at the Atlanta refrigerated
facility, reduces transportation costs by $23 million, meets the preferred site requirements since it is a
centralized location where there will be more store growth, presence of a solid interstate system, and
significant government incentives. This option also enables Publix to provide the expected level of service,
quality and lead times throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix's fleet. Finally, the
proposed Greensboro facility provides long-term capacity to support future growth and provides support to
the existing networks during unexpected events.
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The alternatives that were evaluated to determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) include: (1) The no -action alternative, (2) off-site alternatives, and (3) on-site
alternatives. After consideration of available alternatives to meet the needs of the project, the Preferred
Alternative as proposed, is considered the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA).
The Preferred Alternative has been designed to accommodate the specific site requirements of the distribution
center while meeting the retailers demand in the geographic region.
The criteria evaluated during site selection for this type of facility is extensive. Considering the average life
span of a Publix distribution center is 75 years or more, inefficiencies in site selection, layout, or design of a
distribution center would have long lasting negative impacts. Based on information from Publix, the minimal
criteria for site selection includes the following:
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
13 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
• Retail growth projections determine center of gravity solution
• Must efficiently serve current and future grocery stores in NC, SC and VA
• Must be located within 3-5 miles of I -40/I-85
• At least 250 acres of correctly configured construction pad
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
• Availability of Alternative Routes (in the event of disruption of the primary route)
• Sufficient municipal water and sewer service to support office space, refrigeration systems and food
manufacturing facilities (water/sewer/power)
• Sufficient electrical service to support multiple 3000-4000 amp electrical mains for distribution
systems operations and refrigeration equipment
• Infrastructure improvements must be completed prior to occupancy
• Convenient access to sufficient labor force
• Limited ingress/egress (e.g. fencing, natural buffers) to ensure security
• Compatible land uses on adjacent land to ensure food safety
• Not adjacent to or in the vicinity of airplane flight path due to height restrictions and lighting
requirements
• Proximity to a high quality truck stop
The proposed Greensboro distribution facility was determined to be the Least Environmentally Damaging
Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) as it meets the preferred site requirements listed above, while minimizing
impacts to valuable environmental resources compared to the other alternatives. This solution also provides
long-term capacity to support future growth. Details of each alternative considered are described below.
5.1 No -Action Alternative
The No -Action Alternative, which would avoid all impacts to aquatic resources, is not a viable option given the
purpose and need of the Project is to establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the following
components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse,
return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for associates and
ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and future grocery
stores within North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.
Under the No Action Alternative, the proposed development of the Publix distribution center would not result
in impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and would not require the issuance of a 404/401 Individual
Permit. Publix evaluated the possibility of delaying investment in a new facility through SOS changes and
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
14 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
expansion of existing facilities. However, it was determined that the Jacksonville and Atlanta refrigerated
capacity constraints would require expansion of the existing facility to meet demand. Since northeast growth is
expected to continue, expanding these two facilities would sub -optimize transportation costs. A study
conducted on expanding Atlanta Frozen Foods concluded that it is not economically viable due to the limited
space available and associated high cost per square foot. In addition, store service and product quality would
be at risk due to the long distances and transportation costs would exceed all other alternatives evaluated.
Due to the existing conditions of the preferred site location and the sizing requirements of the proposed
distribution center, a contiguous 2.5 million square foot facility could not be developed without direct impacts
to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. A typical grocery distribution center has significant space requirements to
house the refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, tractor trailer
and associate parking, and ancillary support facilities (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site
security). These components must be contiguous in order to function and adjusting the layout to completely
avoid open waters, streams and wetlands on the site would require separation of these components and would
not be suitable for proposed project.
Due to scattered aquatic resources throughout the Site, impacts to waters of the U.S. are unavoidable, and
therefore, development could not occur without a permit. The preferred layout provides sufficient area to
construct the proposed distribution center along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to
streams and wetlands, avoid all impacts to the 100 -year floodplain, will not encroach on the existing utility
easement, and will require the least amount of cut and fill based on the existing percent slope.
5.2 Off-site Alternatives
As stated previously, current growth projections include an average of 17 stores per year added outside of
Florida through 2028, at total of 584 stores. The Guilford County area was determined to be the most
practicable long-term solution to the distribution issues. This location will enable Publix to provide the
expected level of service, quality and lead times throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix's
fleet. Finally, a distribution center in Guilford County will provide long-term capacity to support future growth
and provides support to the existing networks during unexpected events.
Following the identification of the Guilford County area as the geographical solution, several sites were
considered prior to determining the preferred alternative. The Reedy Fork Corporate Park Site, the Youngs
Mill Site, and the Triad Business Park were evaluated in addition to the proposed alternative. Based on a
comparison of all four sites, the proposed alternative best meets the minimal site criteria. A comparison of all
four sites is provided in Table 1 below.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
15 of 27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Table 1: Primary Matrix Criteria Evaluated for Project Alternatives
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
Publix Distribution Center Site Criteria
Triad
Preferred
Reedy Youngs Mill
Business
Alternative
Fork Road
Park
Retail growth projections determine center of
gravity solution X
X X
X
Must efficiently serve current and future
grocery stores in NC, SC, and VA X
X X
X
Within 3-5 miles of 1-40/1-85
X
X
X
At least 250 acres of correctly configured
construction pad
X
Access to connecting roads that can support
tractor trailer traffic
X
Availability of Alternate Routes (in the event of
disruption of the primary route)
X
Sufficient municipal water and sewer service
to support office space, refrigeration systems
and food manufacturing facilities
(water/sewer/power)X
X X
X
Sufficient electrical service to support multiple
3000-4000 amp electrical mains for
distribution systems operations and
refrigeration equipment
X
X X
X
Infrastructure improvements completed prior
to occupancy
X
X X
X
Sufficient labor force
X
X X
Limited ingress/egress (e.g. fencing, natural
buffers) to ensure security
X
X
X
Compatible land uses on adjacent land to
ensure food safety
X
X
Not adjacent to or in the vicinity of airplane
flight path due to height restrictions and
lighting requirements
X X X
X X
X
Proximity to high quality truck stop
The Reedy Fork Corporate Park site is located on Summit Road, approximately 10 miles north of Greensboro,
in northeast Guilford County and is the northern -most site in consideration within Guilford County. The site is
bound in all directions by undisturbed, forested lands. One utility easement transects the center of the site
from north to south. The Reedy Fork Corporate Park Site is zoned by the City of Greensboro as heavy industrial
and meets the zoning requirements of the proposed project.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS
16 of 27
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
However, this site did not meet all the minimum site criteria required. The Reedy Fork Corporate Park only
comprises approximately 185 acres and does not meet the minimum site acreage criteria. Furthermore, this
site is located over ten miles from a reliable interstate system (i.e. I -40/I-85). Access to the Reedy Fork
Corporate Site is limited to Chickasha Drive, a secondary road that is currently, only partially maintained by
NCDOT. Based on the current condition of Chickasha Road, significant upgrades would be required to
accommodate the tractor trailer traffic anticipated for the proposed distribution center.
Based on a review of available mapping resources including, but not limited to, the most recent QL2 Lidar data,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife's National Wetland Inventory mapping, Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil
Survey mapping, recent and historic aerial photography, as well as USGS Topographic Mapping, potentially
developable areas are significantly limited at the Reedy Fork Corporate Park Site due to the location and size of
wetland and stream systems associated with Reedy Fork Creek. There are several locations with extreme
contour changes, extensive wet areas, and streams fed from Reedy Fork creek. Due to the location and extent
of the existing surface waters, the Reedy Fork Corporate Park would not meet the minimum acreage criteria
for the proposed distribution center.
The mainstem of Reedy Fork Creek, a major waterway, flows along the southern boundary. Reedy Fork Creek
is currently classified by the N.C. Division of Water Resources as a Nutrient Sensitive Water (NSW) and a water
supply water (WS -V). Furthermore, approximately 30 percent (-50 acres) of area within the Reedy Fork
corporate Park Site is classified as occurring within the 100 -year floodzone and/or floodway as designated by
the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA). The close proximity and extent of these environmental
features further limits the amount of developable land at the Reedy Fork Corporate site.
This site does not meet the minimum requirements of the proposed project. The lack of developable land,
limited access to suitable roadways and interstate systems as well as the non -compatible adjacent land use
prohibits the use of the Reedy Fork Corporate Park site from being utilized for the proposed distribution
center.
The Youngs Mill Site is located on Youngs Mill Road approximately 5 miles south of Greensboro in Guilford
County and comprises approximately 250 acres. Current land use at the site includes both forested and
agricultural areas. Several single-family homes and out -buildings are present on the property. In addition, a
high voltage power line transects the center of the property.
All surface water at the site flows to an unnamed tributary to Little Alamance Creek that transects the center of
the Site. Little Alamance Creek is classified by the N.C. Division of Water Resources as a Nutrient Sensitive
Water (NSW) and a water supply water (WS -IV). No areas on the site are designated as occurring within the
100 -year floodzone or floodway.
Land use surrounding the site is limited to residential in all directions. The presence of residential properties
along the boundaries of the site, limits the access off I-85. Furthermore, the Youngs Mill site is currently zoned
as agricultural. Therefore, rezoning would be required to accommodate the proposed distribution center.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
17 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The Youngs Mill site does meet the minimum acreage criteria. A high voltage power line splits the property
and it would not, therefore, support the required layout for the proposed project. The cost and time associated
with moving the transmission line would not be a viable option for the proposed project.
Interstate 85 is located immediately north of the Site. Multiple access routes are available to the site including
via Youngs Mill Road, Hickory Valley Road, Millpoint Road, and Presbyterian Road. All access roads are
classified as secondary roads currently maintained by NCDOT. However, based on the characteristics of the
access roadways, considerable upgrades would be needed to accommodate the tractor trailer traffic
anticipated for the proposed distribution center.
Finally, the property assemblage consists of four different property owners. Based on information from the
Client, assembling multiple parcels is not preferred due to the increased level of risk associated with dealing
with multiple owners.
Based on the lack of a contiguous 250 -acres to configure the construction pad, lack of sufficient roadways to
support tractor trailer traffic, and incompatible zoning, the Youngs Mill site does not meet the minimum
preferred criteria for the proposed project.
The Triad Business Park encompasses approximately 230 acres and is located off South Bunker Hill Road.
Land use at the site consists of both forested and maintained areas. Interstate 40 is located directly south of
the site. Access to the Site is via South Bunker Hill Road or Bending Road. All access roads are classified as
secondary roads, currently maintained by NCDOT.
The site exists in an established industrial park and has been mostly cleared. The site is bound to the north
and west by commercial and industrial development with residential lands bordering the site to the east and
south. The Triad Business Park is currently zoned Industrial by Forsyth County.
Current development in the park indicate favorable soils and all required utilities are available at the edge of
the site. The condition of the property is favorable for construction. However, based on information from the
Client, a portion of the Site is currently under contract with another buyer which would significantly impact
the recommended layout for the distribution center. All other areas are under the control of one land owner.
Furthermore, a large FedEx Ground facility is located adjacent to the property which causes labor concerns
and the cost per acre is more expensive and firm as FedEx recently closed at a similar price.
The Triad Business Park does not meet all the minimum criteria for the proposed project based on the size of
the site, significant risk associated with securing the property, and the lack of sufficient labor force.
5.3 On -Site Alternatives
A typical grocery distribution center has significant space requirements to house the refrigerated warehouse,
dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, tractor trailer and associate parking, and ancillary
support facilities (i.e. fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security). These components must be
contiguous in order to function. To provide an optimal facility layout that is arranged in the most efficient
manner, numerous on-site layouts were examined to locate the Project in a manner that avoids and minimizes
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
18 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
impacts to environmentally sensitive areas to the maximum extent practicable while meeting the development
needs of the Client.
Based on information from the applicant, three optional central operations facility layouts were examined to
determine the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA), while meeting the needs of the
proposed development. The two on-site alternatives considered, in addition to the preferred alternative, are
shown on figures included as Appendix E.
Option 1, includes positioning the entirety of the distribution center project in the easternmost portion of the
Site within parcel 8804696116. Option 1 would result in the greatest amount of direct stream, buffer and
wetland impacts compared to the other on-site options including 7,088 linear feet of stream and 3.1 acres of
wetland impacts.
Furthermore, this option does not meet the applicant's minimum access requirements for the site. Option 1,
only includes one access road into the site from Birch Creek Drive. Birch Creek drive is a secondary roadway
and would not accommodate the tractor trailer traffic anticipated for the proposed distribution center.
Significant upgrades would be needed. Furthermore, this option would not allow for separate entrances for the
personally owned vehicles and the tractor trailers.
Option 2, includes shifting the entirety of the site layout 90 degrees or a north/south orientation. Based on the
size of the proposed facility, including the attendant features, the Site would not be large enough accommodate
the Project. Therefore, additional land was evaluated south of the Project for purchase and/or development.
Based on information from the applicant, the development of areas south of the Site would have required the
construction of a retaining wall of substantial height along the entire length of the development, on the eastern
side. As discussed in more detail in Section 7.0 Avoidance and Minimization, the use of retaining walls for this
proposed Project would result in substantial increases in construction costs and maintenance costs, would
inhibit the relocation of power and communication lines, and would create a safety concern considering the
high volume of tractor trailer traffic.
The selected alternative, provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million square feet
development and allows for separate entrances and parking for both tractor trailer and personal vehicles, an
important site criteria for the proposed development. The selected alternative positions the facility along the
existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams on the property and, therefore,
results in the least impacts compared to the other on-site alternatives.
5.4 Preferred Alternative
The preferred alternative meets the minimum site requirements for the distribution center and was
determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the distribution issues. The proposed project
meets the purpose and need including the establishment of a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the
following components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry
warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for
associates and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and
future grocery stores within North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
19 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
In selecting a suitable option, the applicant applies criteria it has developed based on over 75 years of grocery
distribution experience. Efficiency of design begins with the selection of the geographical area for the campus.
As stated previously, current growth projections include an average of 17 stores per year added outside of
Florida through 2028, at total of 584 stores. The proposed Greensboro facility was determined to be the most
practicable long-term solution to the distribution issues.
As part of the preferred alternative, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
improve the US 70 corridor for a length of approximately 1.5 miles from approximately Mt. Hope Church Road
to Sun Lake Road in Guilford County. The purpose and need for the proposed US 70 improvements is to reduce
congestion along US 70 between Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake Road. NCDOT has prepared an application
for the US 70 corridor improvements pursuant to the October 18, 2018 letter from the Corps of Engineers to
the Department of Transportation and is combined with this application (Appendix I: NCDOT STIP Project No.
U-2581 BA Application).
The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity constraints existing refrigerated facilities, reduces
transportation costs by $23 million, and meets the preferred site requirements since it is a centralized location
where there will be more store growth, presence of a solid interstate system, and significant government
incentives. This option also enables Publix to provide the expected level of service, quality and lead times
throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix's fleet. Finally, the proposed Greensboro facility
provides long-term capacity to support future growth and provides support to the existing networks during
unexpected events.
Efficiency of operations and minimization of operating costs are crucial to company viability and success.
Inefficiencies in site selection, layout or design would have long lasting negative effects. The proposed facility
components include a 1.1 million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse,
return center, 120,000 sq.ft. food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking
for associates, and ancillary support buildings (Le fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
Food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems must be well-designed and well-managed to ensure
food safety. Grocery distribution sites area designed to assure the most efficient use of space and resources
while maintaining a high level of associate safety. Safety on these sites starts with the separation of associates
from forklift and tractor trailer traffic.
This design concept begins with the associate parking areas being sperate from all tractor trailer movement.
Associates are required to use the dedicated entrance for personally owned vehicles and park in the secured
parking area. From the secured parking area associates enter the distribution center complex and make their
way along elevated walkways to the center core support areas of the warehouses.
The Publix distribution warehouses are designed with a center support core which houses associated comfort
needs as well as support functions for distribution center operations. Examples of these comfort and
operational areas are: break areas, better rooms, locker rooms, restrooms, cafeteria, office space, etc. These
areas are concentrated in the center core to maximize efficiencies by minimizing travel time and walk path to
these essential service areas from any point within the distribution center.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
20 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The center core concept is continued by aligning our distribution warehouses parallel to each other. Center
core areas of each building can share resources while maintaining a compact footprint to minimize associate
walk path between two buildings. This minimizes the opportunities for associates to be in contact with rolling
equipment such as forklifts and tractor trailers.
Associates that work in our dispatch office return center, and fleet maintenance garage are provided a
separate entrance and secured parking area. This continues the design concept of separation of associates and
personally owned vehicles from tractor trailer and forklift traffic.
6.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA), as the least impactful action to jurisdictional
areas when compared to other alternatives. To accomplish the goals of the Project, impacts to jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. are unavoidable. The location of impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. identified within
the Project limits are shown on the attached Impact Maps (Appendix F: Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Impacts Maps). All proposed impacts associated with the US 70 corridor improvements have been quantified
by NCDOT and are discussed in Appendix 1: NCDOT STIP Project No. U-2581 BA Application.
Based on the proposed park layout approximately 4,502 linear feet of stream, 0.8 acres of wetland, and 1.8
acres of open water will be permanently impacted by the proposed project. No temporary impacts are
proposed. Impacts will result from the required grading and proposed road crossings. The current proposed
layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million square feet facility as well as position
the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams. Fill slopes
will be graded to 3:1 slopes and will be hydroseeded and matted to stabilize the site and prevent secondary
impacts from sediment discharges.
Storm runoff from the proposed park will be managed and treated and ultimately directed into off-site waters.
Therefore, the drainage area of the receiving waters located off-site will not be significantly reduced. The
project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control
Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Stormwater management on-site will be
managed and treated before discharging into down gradient waters in order to protect waters from
degradation. Therefore, the project should have minimal effect on downstream waters, shellfish or other
aquatic species. Rip -rap dissipater pads that will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to
allow for aquatic life passage (see Appendix C for Preliminary Construction Drawings).
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by
incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout
to avoid and minimize impacts. After the wetlands were delineated, an engineering plan was developed to
meet all needs at the proposed distribution center, while minimizing impacts to Waters of the U.S. The
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
21 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
proposed location results in the least impacts to Waters of the U.S. while meeting the needs of the industry.
The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million square feet
facility as well as position the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd
order streams.
Fill slopes will be graded to 3:1 slopes and will be hydroseeded and matted to stabilize the site. Incorporating
steeper slopes (i.e 2:1 or 2.5:1) was analyzed for the project. However, given the high level of traffic
anticipated for the proposed roadways (i.e. tractor trailer, forklift, etc.), 3:1 slopes were utilized for the project
in order to safeguard the site from any potential slope failures which could result in massive and costly
disruption to operations. Based on the preliminary geo-technical reports completed for the Project, 3:1 slopes
were selected to ensure the site grading would work within the impact envelope, given that the soils may not
be able to structurally withstand steeper slopes. Furthermore, it was determined that a 3:1 slope provides and
increased level of safety for vehicles and pedestrians in the event that either leave the travel way.
The use of retaining walls was also reviewed for the project to reduce potential impact to waterways.
However, retaining walls along the eastern access road would inhibit the relocation of power and
communications lines that are being relocated from the vacated Birch Creek right-of-way. Given the
importance of these lines, placement behind walls or within the geogrid system would not be allowed by the
utility companies. As these lines cannot be located within the secure limits of the distribution center,
placement along the access road is the only option for relocation. Furthermore, in areas where wall could be
utilized to reduce impacts, the benefit of the impact reduction would be significantly offset by the cost of the
wall. The stream section at the southeast corner of the dry warehouse building would require a 20 -30 -ft, four-
sided wall to preserve. It was determined that while there will be guardrail along the walls, they still create a
safety concern for a facility that will experience very high volumes and constant employee and truck traffic.
Given this traffic, any large vertical drop is to be avoided as it represents some level of safety risk no matter
how well protected.
Dissipator pads associated with each culvert will be installed flush with the existing grade of the streambed to
allow for aquatic life passage. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from
entering the adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back
fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into
adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional
streams and wetlands will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project
construction activities initiated within jurisdictional streams and wetlands will be carried to completion in an
expeditious manner in order to minimize the period of disturbance within the jurisdictional streams and
wetlands.
The proposed Project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts through implementation of planning
practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream water quality. Efforts to reduce indirect
impacts generally include:
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
22 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through innovative site planning and
utilization of confirmed wetland delineation
2. Minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts
3. Minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control measures
Based on the current layout, potential indirect impacts to downstream waters may still occur to the stream
located along the southernmost boundary. Quantification of indirect impacts can be completed upon request.
For the purpose of this application however, the project water management system will be designed to detain
the 1 -year, 24-hour storm to pre -development discharge levels. Stormwater ponds have been located to
disperse run-off to both the eastern and western large stream features in a manner that is consistent with pre -
development drainage patterns. As the ponds will be detention facilities, run-off will still be discharged during
smaller rain events with volumes similar to pre -development rates. Pond outlets will be designed to hydrate
the remaining stream "tails" that are not impacted so as to keep these segments as viable streams. The pond
drawdown outlets will also have mechanisms for diffuse flow to prevent erosion due to point discharge.
An Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Plan that meets the latest State and local regulations and adheres to
the methodology prescribed in the North Carolina Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act of 1973 will be
utilized. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every
runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made
immediately to maintain all measures designed. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local
Stormwater Rules. Stormwater management facilities have been strategically placed adjacent to streams
within natural drainageways to manage and treat runoff before discharging into down gradient waters in
order to protect waters from degradation. Therefore, the project should have no effect on downstream waters,
shellfish or other aquatic species (see Appendix C for Preliminary Construction Drawings).
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream, wetland, and buffer impacts can be satisfied by a
combination of purchasing credits from a United States Army Corps of Engineers approved private mitigation
bank or through payment into the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in -lieu fund.
All compensatory mitigation requirements for unavoidable buffer impacts can be satisfied by the purchase of
buffer credits from both the South Fork Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank and the UT to Pine Hill
Branch Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank. Currently, only 525.30 stream mitigation credits can be
purchased from the Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (from the Dairyland Site). The remainder of
compensatory mitigation requirements for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts will be achieved through
payment into the DMS in -lieu fund. Statement of Availability letters are provided in Appendix H for the
purchase of buffer and stream credits from private mitigation banks. Also located in Appendix H is an issued
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
23 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
acceptance letter from DMS stating that DMS is willing to accept payment for stream and wetland
compensatory mitigation requirements.
Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream, wetland, and buffer impacts associated with the proposed
US 70 corridor improvements can be satisfied through payment into the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) in -lieu fund. NCDOT has received a Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) mitigation
acceptance letter associated with the proposed US 70 corridor improvements (Appendix I: NCDOT STIP
Project No. U-2581 BA Application).
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information
Species with the federal listing of Endangered or Threatened are protected under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) of 1976, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). In a list updated on June 27, 2018, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists four federally protected species for Guilford County (Table 1). There is also one
species in Guildford County listed as At Risk. Timmons Group obtained federally listed endangered and
threatened species data from the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) list (Appendix G)
which generates a list of species and other resources that are known or expected to be within or near the study
area. The IPaC list includes considerations for species range and potential indirect impacts. In addition, the N.C.
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer website was used to generate a list of known element
occurrences within one mile of the proposed project (Appendix G).
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
24 of 27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Table 1. Federally protected species listed for Guilford County
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Vertebrate:
Notropis mekistocholas
Cape Fear shiner
E
No
No Effect
Percina rex
Roanoke logperch
E
No
No Effect
Invertebrate:
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic pigtoe
ARS
No
Not Required
Vascular Plant:
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
Yes
No Effect
Isotria medeoloides
Small whorled pogonia
T
No
No Effect
E - Endangered
T - Threatened
T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance.
ARS - At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered Species Act. These species are not afforded protection
under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. As such, formal Section 7 consultation with the USFWS is not required for these species. However, the USFWS
recommends ARS be considered. Timmon's Group evaluated the study area for suitable habitat but did not conduct specific ARS surveys.
A review of the NCNHP database and USFWS IPaC on March 29, 2018, indicated no known occurrences of any
federally protected species, At Risk species, or critical habitat within one mile of the study area. A pedestrian
survey was conducted on May 15, 2018 by Timmons Group biologists for small whorled pogonia and bald
eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). A biological opinion of "No effect" was rendered for both small whorled
pogonia and bald eagle due to the absence of suitable habitat, observation of individuals, and lack of
occurrences within 1 mile of the Project site. The USFWS issued a scoping response letter on September 20,
2018 that stated that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or
threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under
the Act at the property and all requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied. A copy of the
scoping response letters has been included in Appendix G - Agency Correspondence.
On June 27, 2018, the USFWS updated the Guilford County Threatened and Endangered species list to include
Schweinitz's sunflower, Cape Fear Shiner, and Roanoke logperch as endangered species and the Atlantic pigtoe
as an ARS.
A review of the NCNHP database and USFWS IPaC on December 12, 2018, indicated no known occurrences of
any federally protected species, At Risk species, or critical habitat within one mile of the study area. As per
personal communication with the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Field Services Office (December 12, 2018),
Biological Conclusions of "No effect" shall be rendered for the Cape Fear Shiner, Roanoke logperch, and
Schweinitz's sunflower (Appendix G - Agency Correspondence). It is the opinion of the USFWS that the
proposed action will have no impact on these newly listed species for Guilford County.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
25 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
9.2 Cultural Resources
A query of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) database was performed for the
Project site and the vicinity (0.25 miles from the project boundary) to determine the effect, if any, that the
project. No National Register sites or sites Eligible for listing in the National Register are present on the
property or within 0.25 miles of the property. In addition, a background review of maps and files maintained
by the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was conducted on December 17, 2018. No previously
recorded archaeological resources were found within 0.25 mile of the Project site.
A concurrence letter from SHPO was received on April 13, 2017 for a 202 -acre portion of the Project site
stating that no known archaeological sites have been recorded with the project boundaries. A copy of the letter
has been included in Appendix G- Agency Correspondence. At the time of issuance, SHPO recommended that
the 202 -acre site be systematically surveyed for archaeological resources. At this time, a systemic survey of the
entire 342.5 acres is currently being conducted by Terracon Consultants, Inc.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
Publix Super Markets, Inc. (Applicant) proposes the development of a product distribution center, to include
both on and off-site roadway improvements and utility installations, at the Guilford County Publix Distribution
Center (Project). The proposed Publix Distribution Park is comprised of 342.5 acres located on Birch Creek
Drive, 5 miles east of Greensboro in Guilford County, North Carolina. For the purpose of this permit
application, the Project also includes study corridors along adjacent roadways for transportation
improvements and utility installation (Figure 1 -Vicinity Map).
The purpose of the proposed project is to establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the
following components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner: refrigerated warehouse, dry
warehouse, return center , food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, paring for
associates and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and
future grocery stores within North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. The facility components include a 1.1
million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center, 120,000
sq.ft. food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and
ancillary support buildings (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable throughout
the planning and design process including the utilization of the delineation, minimization of partial stream or
wetland impacts, minimization of impacts to all primary drainage ways and floodplains, and strict adherence
to all state and local stormwater control measures. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to
construct the approximately 2.5 million square feet central operations facility as well as position the facility
along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams on the property.
Unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits
through the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and private mitigation banks, contingent on the agency
approval. The purchase of this compensatory mitigation will ensure the unavoidable impacts proposed by the
Project, will result in a "no net loss" of aquatic resource function and value to Waters of the U.S.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
26 of 27

• �� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
e �
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Based on the current layout, potential indirect impacts to downstream waters may occur to the stream located
along the southernmost boundary. Quantification of indirect impacts can be completed upon request. For the
purpose of this application however, the proposed Project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts
through implementation of planning practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream
water quality. Specifically, the project water management system will be designed to detain the 1 -year, 24-
hour storm to pre -development discharge levels. Stormwater ponds have been located to disperse run-off to
both the eastern and western large stream features in a manner that is consistent with pre -development
drainage patterns. As the ponds will be detention facilities, run-off will still be discharged during smaller rain
events with volumes similar to pre -development rates. Pond outlets will be designed to hydrate the remaining
stream "tails" that are not impacted so as to keep these segments as viable streams. The pond drawdown
outlets will also have mechanisms for diffuse flow to prevent erosion due to point discharge.
The proposed Greensboro facility was determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the
distribution issues. The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity constraints at existing facilities, reduces
transportation costs, and meets the preferred site requirements. The proposed Greensboro facility also
enables Publix to provide the expected level of service, quality and led times throughout the network and
allows for delivery using Publix's fleet. Finally, the proposed Greensboro facility provides long-term capacity to
support future growth and provides support to the existing networks during unexpected events. The proposed
distribution center was determined suitable for the proposed development based on specific industry
requirements including, but not limited to, Location, Site Characteristics, Available Infrastructure, Surrounding
Land Use and Availability of labor force. To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the
Preferred Alternative as the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA).
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
27 of 27

APPENDIX A
JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICAN7)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Randy Middle - Last - Barber First -Brian Middle - Last -Breissinger
Company — Publix Super Markets, Inc. Company — Timmons Group
E-mail Address — [e-mail] E-mail Address — [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S
Address -501 North Galloway
ADDRESS: Address -
City - Lakeland State - FL Zip -33815 Country — USA
1001 Boulders
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
863-688-1188 ext. 88425 804-200-6439
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Timmons Group to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit ap 'cation.
t
SIGN TWE
OF APPLICANT DA E
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
11. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Publix Distribution Center
12. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if
UT to Little Alamance Creek
applicable) Address 311 Birch Creek Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 36.4779 Longitude: -W -78.9941
City - Greensboro State- NC Zip -27429
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID: See attached parcel map Municipality:
Greensboro Section - Township - Range -

ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Wake Forest USACE office take NC Highway 98 West. Continue on NC Highway 98 West for approximately 20 miles. Merge onto 1-85
South and continue for approximately 45 miles. Exit onto the Mt. Hope Church road exist and turn right onto Mt. Church Road. Turn right onto
Knox Road. Turn left onto Birch Creek Road.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The proposed distribution facility components include a 1.1 million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return
center, 120,000 sq.ft. food manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and ancillary support buildings
(Le fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Establish a secure corporate campus which: (1) includes the following components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner:
refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for associates
and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located at a site that will efficiently serve its current and future grocery stores within North Carolina,
South Carolina, and Virginia.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s)for Discharge
In order to accomplish the goals of the Project, a total of 4,502 linear feet of stream, 2.4 acres of wetland, and 1.8 acres of open water
are required. Discharge into special aquatic sites will result from the development of building pads, parking areas, roadway improvements and
new road locations All fill material utilized for the project will be free of contaminants brought only from local sources.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
2.4 Acres of wetland, 1.8 Acres of open water
and
4,502 Linear Feet of stream
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions) Please refer to attached permit support document Sections 6, 7, and
8.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes QX No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address -See attached list (4A and 4B)
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
* Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
SIGNATURE O A PLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

TIMMONS GROUP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION AND PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
NCDENR-- Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate and authorize representatives of Timmons Group,
Inc., to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of pen -nit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the day of g°.�� a ° 20 1 �.
(number) (Month) (Year)
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name:t jUll ` � � ' � � �r'" � ' ' ,r,.;� Location _
Property Owner's Name Print
Property Owner's Signature:_ 61
Property Owner's Mailing Address' t'
y ° 2 JTd
Property Owner's Telephone: � o� Fax No.
Property Owner's Email Address:—Llj�,y,, '
� . �. �" �, , syr -i r

APPENDIX B
FIGURES

Path: Y:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-VIC.mxd
_ • ..� f r. til r
:�''�� �•• t� .n-� "`'i• v' �-^r!J L� ,�� i �-tel •� i� •i�� i 1 j l t•�- �'�gr � ��
t C } 1 l
- .�':+ - �� fJ 1,{' I � '•� �yr'dl �f r �2 Ill + {1T�� 17 "AY
* -= Site Limits
.•rJJjj-JI
724
N�7�r
•rr i r-- f..l � ��� �;,.n✓ �r' -;�-rte' � -- i 'P titi ni4--
A`N
-- �"i"`3i � ���/' � • �I�� tJ:, l� �•' 1. �! �_ � �
Site limits are approximate. '� , � ' � `• "� `� °> : _ _
Topographic imagery from USGS.
0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000
:y'
Feet
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIMMONS GR4UP
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 42407 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):MCLEANSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 354.2 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.079016 WATERSHED(S):HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: -79.663402 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030002
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in partand shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction. bidding, and/or construction stakina without the exoress written consent of TIMMONS GROUP

'
CL
._
oannury
D7
rts4.
i
a
_.
Z
•y,
02
10
=`�
_ !n N O E
041 0
I-
I
V
v
Cs
so
i> O
N
J
IC E
E
.
T y E y
3
t
ars
_P rmantort _
m`` y
SAUX
Mo JN TArN
I w�++. qn9. " m Golf•:tub ...
Z Folk m .lir 0ilina¢d�
C r �•
'p@@ N"da Il i
03010102.
:,, Wirings t:;
ini
': -:.I, Club 4Y'cnt;.o rth e1LL _i ed //Rnxhon BILI Lte.
. 4"
to-hUrg r z I J r°, Cr°sk •.
!i's
Reed Cr... Cree -- gFor
w R- M 0
n
1 .. LAe`G .. tl�ner Branrn .eye G -- '
>tGTeek • "qr(y hR} eek '
cvnnLti
a'1 03010103 �Jyy LL 03010104 _ �__ _ 03020101
cv f
nn Creek -
N be
Pine Hal I'
a
I "_._ . � I Vsex. l G A1rr4•. '.a7`Flal Q°Fp� ';.y� ...
°g� r
1 Cx ee>!• 1 � , a,• }A. Cs e� . ._ r ik. Urleee
• Sj9 t�lcse^'e °rryre e •4°° - 1 S041h F-1.0 R, Cap
I �. v f rat . • 1 ...
�C `
e* q"+' 1 Tim 6e h-' }e
-`\ h Heinle Milk i
ci EIaW ';Oiv 1
rirr f•r
x� Cieµ
CoQ PI0sLecl H 11 $Fox Hgt'k,
geek
c:n_•r.etl. 4
I :,: k:',45 ': I'•. •::. - ._� ._ ._. .. �• ........ - � � _-:. t; LrI L'FO.fib : r�,y` - -" - ._ _- - ._ _. _ _ _, g .- _ _ - .. -
5[i•Resi4ile --, FLrer - - _ _ - - _ _ -9tsgry_.1 LA2,1A ry F
Smte eP
. __ _ Park i vrrlan CYre .,t ."'r Pr
I
:]
Haw Rirer .: - Owens creek •. 2�rtn F°rk Vlrrlr. .,.E, 1
ger
owe Invnt
Bro,L'ra Summlt ••rf l ✓phn
x r
JF oi 1
Sum me rtleM 1 l�� a - u SM n,
5� 03020201
Mi ll Cr FiEedY. FOrfr ic: .. Pa�
rk tY• 1 e Sa W6i E.afrhl, r'F
ff Y F.tl Mama nn P't
•Jak rf lJ•�.• ro'. �dy f°
`ems
'e -1 Gro �e R yer
ur•hti 11 - .cC' _ee ' iIW o
.. 53
Park
1 , °
I
p Ga �' - �c gee of crr a
f[r•'r Itis Y N - §r � I L a - - '- .
er' -
a I I. Fw iC.rP 1 _
Bull r,er
r r^ nu•t .
•k V� � TreVbu rn� 16 i,l::•.1i•I
�_..," sn.e 03030002.
MIX. Imo`^�s� A 2d - •i.F.:''
Piejmq»t + c�unny
03040101 u Inri crw
Awpri
' •1• � -� R- : - 1 pek � � RC LE3n3YlIe- _ GiR6R ITVlp? I rF '
: :il-1 •`.:tQD-S alen3 I'•] rJfµ o� � � Flc.n � 1 .' -----. '•�-
.s Satem 1 9 Qe<` n rguR"� - `F
La k°Pa�k '. d East AO o _ .,.. n k. k�L.ri ,
SaVr'.Gre°x n ze 'kO yr TL -- P.ur]fngton "
1
P4O re r Con r Ly
Ffl.virl r , Eno R—I
.sane - - - t; - .. ro // SLI i.. r„I `aIIS LaF:e
GFeeftShQFQ X Crank .. .�laP`� ` Y HiIlsCr ru31,
x y 'hhitsell.. �1? -tea.
n ,Greha m
S C� �:' i::.r:.r a`-•
Pb ” " _ _ _ . Y� arr7"• �' +.85"9R 6ack Cre ('W' C,k .. r
�. 1 .. ,.. .,- -. Lrrtl.. p•Ia`� c I .. .. yxv ,.. `�;..'' noµ 1 x ... •. rf
- $�0 eurF G[e nil n:; nce - � ' e% Leg - � $SogY � ' n b _ _ � .Ur6� � 7 � Fanke s laSbte
Croesdaib Fer iNoran A—
... F Country .. QsflF� ! 1^1
Soak. Cdeek _ .. Club rbc Gram .5.. r 'GaLLs LukeFl
_ ;,A�Qsq •� $ 1 .Swepso uvtlk: - "\.15 ~� 1 !
Auh
J�R`c �n>n
.. l k cracx- � I .• I ... ., @ "
dry Wry Duke
....G�, Ja mas[o•an r • ... ...y.. .'r''r�d..t_ pl9a acv, 1 n` 1 o CF"4nwvrmry
1 1 `°t .: Durham ...
Fare sl On ks 4d- Lsa C-1—kH 1
Par4 ❑. C3 Pff - - .- .. .. r. • - -.
FS :rte a Clout
..Fg1:icy nyg.
GvifCoursa
q�V1 din -, >. L
edi. a. ,�h; s�
S S SL,n>tis 1 Cry e r
.. :.....� ^d N 'IE•3 rs nt -o O [ea'e w .... - - - .. _ - -. ti _� • • '4 ak
Garden bs 4``naprs C gra �Rt F y k�
G Ina' �' r +Ac" 1 Trrin
Hi h Point o �o . a' �° C—k
P� u .
- : e, a I-�s,e•a-. p 1 c. % r r
P.0.Crecx { �;roaa:cam[' o 1 t .\ I 6 tL°rr c=`
rh
' [sutr Jor �. Pr r u a
Pa:k GulleCreel[.. _ 1
curl -- cRu�cia; �x ,L44JN ZAr7J5
Ken N� crr,.v; .. _ 2 ` 1 Mai Caeek • • .. ,
r1°gy M ; - ^C e i � eeK � ys I Camlirra .
1 Fo _ .
C
e`
Uk@r$
earn.,.
Y.
Chapel Hill f o fr
-_
RnNnnLv;
ounce Fork 1 Arc ale
�{ Trinity
Cane Gtevh Bmw Camp
a s _ Thvmasmr6
�o� f d . o rank
1
>>m�'vs Creek Cobnia{ `fro. 1
_ t.4i5.9nf' T.ountry
Club
.eaL DurF.-gym
� d Q• • r _ ._ .._ _. _- -�iA rt':�r. I lril'I AaWn
♦-
�p 1 .n -reek +Ljm zaHd '
Y
i.' Lil:eity Q- • 'Ki�G ums mad
•! - - ^slaw P.v rt
a nd. A.. AMA CF +
Chatham
CHATHAM r - � .
1 :lub
1.. •.II Fi•.ii 1 of .. �� i;t1 41
hia
c
.• __ � �� Randleman Rocpy Fi e � hti• a` � •.. h:lnrrts•; illy , -
"- -Ga.Q° b� •k �.e r*h.:' { � S ,,erroll5 G`� x [>>�� ..
In Alam ..
. \ +� • it reak PICRsan Csa�' ... .. my Cilk in'a°r C..r•.
d�Rr°
1 Pre a tJ i i Iwod
sbi bi y an - rvd
n I �]letr q��
v Sandy �G I SioG Club al Gal y
' •�` °e Cr�k iPrS .. =nq Fyi Rrlpe _ i '
C -Il C mb S
:29 R
'%
eqy g Gtr 8ro' - Q - umra wly
•.»rf 03030003 Jti-n
S
-' h 7 Ma03040103 f r:rklirnilte r
"
.-'r c Ci .Ramse ul r I ��o -----
_�clmsr
... .... _ ..... , h.3 Ff _ 1
'pe
• ✓Y... i - �• _ Y ____" - .•� � I Siler CIIy.-.. - •
r r yack s"+tr Cre . • _ . Bea
VN' Crcek .. Y.,%, Rani
itkbom
=t�'i >r C • d- fan r15,1M Ctae7[ Lr• �k on Jvrdnr' '•'''- rk
BtL
s' .•.. �[} Asheboro a na Hlo°d RSP �. Lala Stagy - .• .. % _ . irt, d
1 .. Merl Ceac% FI 1 Game. - - --- Creak Jordan �a�eeea i'
r Sit. Ci
p1e�Qoy jure y Lakc i�
IcF rf
1 re"y_ _ ry clan k er Crenlr ..
1 �C IC G1 �-- n ,.Z G i00 5eS4 - -
�.
w
- . '
creex._....
.�o A' - - c ,M , v Hill O; B .. +.
7 E, g 4
pp'�C •i' rY Ridge Cic if
1 b�av Oil` @ur 1' Oake .aA. ryd.e Cla _ CktM1
` �nU 1 dick Crersk ti ` ShadO°F rack ' H II]' SPnr3s R oqe : ..
1 r
... I
Tot }Yi ll' " r. r3r�,, t Clutr. .
Ur nk,n i .le .Fa. Goll
1 dClub% Nb ml, Ca rokna eek
Hirsh' F,-,isK 4` C 20.L'ji-i Park.
il; r r
1 ��
$R®a ron
i._q<,, weed _ � y.�w I a� _ - �~,� - Rbrx: + I-brrtr
gek ¢et ou51a r
nirY 4' C ree k
- :Park
r 5
1 Birkhead
lub
reek kl--inn
",uidFg
.' I ..
_ _ 03030004
Legend
CI_uck GuldS n
03040104
L
\ ! y :.^ I' rw 1'vo1nti716G i e
\ Cab+ '''c irk CreRlgn . %r t F1Jr z J'f r [ee Sucks
Site Marker
UWMARt3/E rvlounrr /NS i' ��•
Geo, _ 1
1
Lan,' -%'s L'
t eek 4 �`k� r, ,:,'' ,. 1 h Sea Cr% r 1.1':5. r / - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
` Cr�k [ic nrleil eek °p cedar _ - `
• I [i . Ce Creek ' •' r 11 �i' lTuphnsCr°e4 -\ Haw (Cape Fear River Basin)
... r:. ` Cr .m°rx r9s r' t� _ 1 �.J,� r, rr,•-w
a <,r, g �" rP zP. Hydrologic Unit Code (03030002)
es � � .r , Sea roye 1 fa°rran Greek ' ti •
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
CL
V;
D7
a
Z
{7 O
CD
3 M
02
10
=`�
_ !n N O E
041 0
I-
V
ICNW
U 3 0 Qc
W
i> O
N
J
IC E
E
.
T y E y
3
t
V W
�0 3
00
D
U
ao
O
C111
LL
cc
JO
LL
a
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
�rrW
r
Z
IU
I-
0
J
00
00
D
U
C111
LL
JO
LL
L
X
�
J
W
li
DATE
11/29/2018
PROJECT NUMBER
42407
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
A. MEHFOUD
NOTES:
Site marker is approximate.
HUC from USGS.
Topographic basemap from
Esri Online.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 2:
HYDROLOGIC
UNIT CODE MAP
Miles
0 3 6
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE SHEET NUMBER
H:
1 " = 3 Miles 1
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-HUC.mxd

PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
C
IX
D
W
O
0
z
� o
O M
y
I--
z
�` •3 1A
u) c-4 E
~ N V
�O
O
J
l�3N
[� tD
W � > 0 0
N
OU
M■
> E
W a r o E
.
i E co w
s J
LL
U:2
5.2 3
/
0 IX
Z
Oz
o
_
D
d'
4
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
IX
W
F—
z
LU
U
I--
z
Z
O
�O
O
J
F—
m
OU
�
O=
LL
D
�O
X
Oz
J
M
D
DATE
11/29/2018
PROJECT NUMBER
42407
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
A. MEHFOUD
NOTES:
Project Limits are
approximate.
NWI from US Fish and
Wildlife Service.
Soils data from SSURGO.
National Hydrography
Dataset from USGS.
Aerial imagery from VGIN.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
FIGURE 3:
ENVIRONMENTAL
INVENTORY MAP
41
SCALE (FEET)
0 360 720
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE SHEET NUMBER
H:1 " = 350'
Y:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-EIM.mxd

Path: Y:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-Parcel.mxd
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
TIMMONS GROUP
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
r
FIGURE 4: PARCEL MAP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:42407
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):MCLEANSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS:354.2 ACRES
DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE:36.079016
WATERSHED(S):HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: -79.663402
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030002
hese plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of I IMMUNS GKUUP ara may not be rep roa used in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, Inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\Adjoings_Parcels_Table.mxd
IDENTIFIER
PIN
OWNER NAME
MAILINGADDRESS
MAILING CITY
MAILING STATE
MAILING ZIP
1
8805108913
WAY, DEBORAH 0
5405 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
2
8805211189
BURGIN, FRED E; BURGIN, KATHY M; ALLRED, JAMES 40617 MILLINGPORT RD
RICHFIELD
NC
28137
3
8805203822
TRIAD WORSHIP CENTER CHURCH OF GOD;
ROYSTER, MARTHA TRUSTEE; BROWN, SHIRLEY
P 0 BOX 13049
GREENSBORO
NC
27415
4
8805205717
POOLE, GLORIA
5515 BURLINGTON RD
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
5
8805224956
GORIA, PIERRE A; GORIA, CAROLYN E
PO BOX 39
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
6
8805209891
WEDDINGTON, MARYT
5523 BURLINGTON RD#A
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
7
8805300621
TURNER, DAVIDTHOMAS; WEDDINGTON, MARYT
5521 BURLINGTON NEAR RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
8
8805313590
NSR, COMPANY
PO BOX 741
HENDERSON
NC
27536
9
8805411227
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH INC OF MCLEANSVI LLE
5585 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
10
8805511023
CARTER, MORRIS E; CARTER, BARBARA G
235 BIRCH CREEK RD
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
11
8805501613
SOUTHERN NET INC
22001 LOUDOUN COUNTY PARKWAY
ASHBURN
VA
20147
12
8805502730
SOUTHERN NET INC
22001 LOUDOUN COUNTY PARKWAY
ASHBURN
VA
20147
13
8805503730
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
14
8805504731
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
15
8805505723
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
16
8805506755
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
17
8805516068
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
18
8805600685
ALLISON, MORRIS PHILIP; SZOSTAK, SARA LYN
5617 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
19
8805602862
HAMZE, AHMAD H
104 SUN LAKE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
20
8805603603
FLORES, GLADYS BARRERA
5623 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
21
8805604603
HODGIN, WILLIAM S
3307 HUFFINE MILL RD
GIBSONVILLE
NC
27249
22
8805605721
MILES, THOMAS W; MILES, CAROLJ
5627 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
23
8805606691
MITCHELL, PAULJ ; MITCHELL, CHANISTY H
1525 BOWMORE PL
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
24
8805608648
HARPER, LEROY A
5631 BURLINGTON RD
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
25
8805609525
GANNON, ROGER B; GANNON, DONNA G
PO BOX 28
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
26
8805700510
MANN, JOSHUA; LEHMANN, DANIELLE
5635 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
27
8805700484
GANNON, ROGER B; GANNON, DONNA G
PO BOX 28
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
28
8805702369
CAILLOUT LIVING TRUST; CAILLOUT, LES TRUSTEE;
221 BOBBITT ROAD
HILLSVILLE
VA
24343
29
8805704306
CAILLOUT LIVING TRUST; CAILLOUT, LES TRUSTEE;
221 BOBBITT ROAD
HILLSVILLE
VA
24343
30
8805800170
NEWSOME, EDDIEGENE; NEWSOME, LAURA
100 SUE DR
LIBERTY
NC
27301
31
8804891835
LAMARR LIVING TRUST; LAMARR, C JACK TRUSTEE;
5715 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
32
8804892786
LAMARR LIVING TRUST; LAMARR, C JACK TRUSTEE;
5715 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
33
8804894675
CHAMBERS, WALTER LEE 1R; CHAMBERS, DEBORAH S 5801 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
34
8804895670
PARHAM, JULIAN THOMAS; PARHAM, LINDA W
5803 BURLINGTON RD
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
35
8804894360
MOOREFIELD, VONDA; WILLIEN, BRIAN; FULCHER,
5810 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
36
8804898125
WILLIEN, DELLA 1
5810 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
37
8804984483
JAMES TUTTLE AND REITA TUTTLE LIVING TRUST;
TUTTLE, JAMES C TRUSTEE; TUTTLE, REITA A TRUSTEE 5926 BURLINGTON RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
38
8804976826
MILES, DAPHNE RESTATES
5045 HARVEST RD
MC LEANSVILLE
NC
27301
39
8804975261
DEES REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
3905 KATIE DR
GREENSBORO
NC
27410
40
8804665671
IC PAISLEY GORDON LIVING TRUST; GORDON, C
2215 QUEENS RD EAST
CHARLOTTE
NC
28207
41
8804672045
BATEMAN, MARTHA
5424 PAISLEY FARM RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
42
8804579559
GABRIEL, BERNARD F
1302 WHILDEN PLACE #13
GREENSBORO
NC
27408-2077
43
8804570673
BOLEJACK, NORMA S
5507 GREENRIDGE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
44
8804479987
ISLEY, ALMA MILES
351 BIRCH CREEK RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
45
8804479872
WARD, LINWOOD N
355 BIRCH CREEK RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
46
8804475957
LOWDERMILK FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOF 2013;
LOWDERMILK, STEVEN CTRUSTEE; MICHAEL, MARY
350 BIRCH CREEK RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
47
8804474729
BRADLEY, BENNIE SAMUEL
354 BIRCH CREEK RD
LIBERTY
NC
27301
48
8804470683
WAGONER, DAPHNA L; WAGONER, WAYNE
362 BIRCH CREEK RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
49
8804370486
FAMILYTRUST OF ROGER WAYNE SMITH; SMITH,
136 RIVER RUN RD
STATESVILLE
NC
28625
50
8804287043
WILLIAMS, ANDREA GAIL
506 DEBANNE RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
51
8804287565
INGLE, TANYA LEE HOBSON ; INGLE, TOMMY
5306 HOOPER RD
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
52
8804196112
C M & D R CLAPP LLC
260 CLAPP FARMS RD
GREENSBORO
NC
27405
53
8804199312
BRIDGES, NORMAN LEEJR
127 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
54
8804199423
ORTIZ, MOSES JR; ORTIZ, BRENDA F
125 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
55
8804199523
N EAS, JOSHUA S; GULLEY, SARAH CATHERI N E
7105TH AVE
GREENSBORO
NC
27405
56
8804199632
POPE, DOLLY R
119 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
57
8804199639
POPE, DOLLY R
119 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
58
8804199830
HARVELL, CLAUDE VERNON; HARVELL, PAMELA W
115 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
59
8804199943
ROBERTS, GARY L; ROBERTS, SHERREE B
111 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
60
8805109054
COLEY, DEBROAH HANSON
109 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
61
8805109157
KELLY, BRIAN ; KELLY, PATRICIA
107 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301-9621
62
8805109268
WILSON, ROY ALAN JR; WILSON, MARTHA F
105 SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
NC
27301
63
8805109463
POWELL, GERALD D; POWELL, HAZEL)
1103SPRUCETREE DR
MCLEANSVILLE
I NC r
27301
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 413: ADJOINING PARCELS
I hese plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of I IMMUNS GKUUP and may not be reproduced
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
TIMMONS GROUP ,■■•■��
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. •
any purpose

Path: Y:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-NRCS.mxd
. 477
ti- 1 r N d
' 'tf �S •i1.� � titt''�
r TOR
NO L
r17pf3 .. �� - ..I •' -
EnEt
It..
i py 1170a
■.. �■ ■ -
2.
■ ■ �:,�ysy
f..I,S' v F�
� e:rlR
Ar A
A.
rt
E n.q
FJ
It
F t1l + 7 w
Legend
�■ �� Project Limits - 354.2 Acres i y
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 Site limits are approximate.
Feet �{ Soils data from NRCS web soil survey.
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER TIMMONS GROUP •
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA"
FIGURE 5: NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:42407 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):MCLEANSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS:354.2 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE:36.079016 WATERSHED(S):HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: -79.663402 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030002
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

BURLINGTON
Y
kRIAN PLJFFE�R
OWNS 11
-----�-- -- 1. —_..
i
••• 11111 IIIIIIIIIII�����I III II�����IIIIIIIIIII�����IIIIIII
111111111111P11111
-
_-.
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
rn E
Q 'T
0
Y z E _
W w of t
W F— -00
Q YJ
UU
uj
oU —
2 U.
a o —C) 47 z
U Uj0 = o
10m EXISTING 5' CONTOURS
zvi�-`l' V �
z cn M U
' (TYP) a W Q +� Q
O
~ ro N H Ln
LU
�\ \ 720 O N M I1�!
� J m
0 00H r
0
— — — — — — — — —----- — --
�--------- ---� �� --- ---- -- _' 700 \
� o �
\ ° af Nf
700 �o
fel o —
o
LU
700 _- t � \ / cb�`? � I f r � I ' ) o `� � J = w Q
' • —_ ._.`%%i /////i q//=/////i %�i5r ilii - ^ I j ■ �_ _� • /''• • _ DATE
t j ■�1211712018
' , ' 5411 , •
DRAWN BY
_ i ����%''s i i • ■1. MOORE
DESIGNED BY
•111 .1���I���II =� ' • J. .. ,
•• • • ■tom I ,G • CHECKED
BY
'• ' / ,------------- .---------------- .. ------ n n li■■■■■■■■■► ■ ■■■■■■■■■i • Ifi■■■■■■■■■■l n ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ C • ---�I J. MATEY
. ,i� �, � °�����,�� ,,..IIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII[ � �IIIIIIII�III!!11111�1iillllll ,;� iIIIIIIIIIhIII�E.��lllll�'SCALE
� -- �� �:� • '
h '
1 200'
FFE 697.36
54" DOCKS
A � .� � \\\�' �////moi. I // •
\\., .�� �\\� .•ate �\\o .\\\\ % •
I j
.. • . •wi_
• • 111���� WFINE001 LU
_ �����\\�\ _ '^ it / j ••
•
• I ' � I,Y�YY:YY:YY�Y ■_ ../,-rr%1 �I' I � �lI�II• • •'
�_ � � ►ii Gid- � �� II. • I I� •
• v^-. I I
I' I
..
.• ,
= � j 1 DOCKS
X00, i ,' •• • • •
•
"
• '' '
• - • _ I _ • •
•
I ) I
c , •^ • .
• \
• . 0`
i
I � I
'oo" /ooll
N,
Ul)
•
• • • • • • • �� % • ��� •LL
O ° O 0
O
\
00 00
° 0 0 �
p
`
of
0 °
°
° 0 0
0 0 0 p�
fJ
�0
° ° 0 '
�
°
O
° O
O
0 ° °
o °
0 I
° °
1
°0
0
°
Cb
0
0
O 00
0
0
00
0
n
00
0 00
SCALE 1"=200'
NOR
0 200' 400'
L
IN Imillidol Pill 0
00 L7•
• ` �o°c •
. • \\ .'
i�,;/ /moi,,, •
V ' •\\ \\\\\\O\\\ •
,_�vvvo:��vvv •
✓ X
I ti l t o I \ m
I 1 y \ JOB NO.
42407
SHEET NO.
EX1.0
O
C
Q
U
c
3
c
�a
�O
a�
o�
U)
Q
22
02
T
�o
a
c m
CL o
0w
C7 3
U)
Z rn
O m
2 a
g x
0
H o
o w
r 0
m
0
2
rn
0.0
L�
Y
c_
Y U
�o
EC
0 f0
0 m
m
-0
m �
o
0 0
m
°
-02 co
co�
0 O
C °
`—° o
o -a
0 0

0
0
a
m
a
00
0
N
00
O
N
a
0
L
egg
---� — _ -0
PARKING SUMMARY
VEHICLE PARKING:
LOT 1A: 183 SPACES
LOT 1 B: 557 SPACES
LOT 2: 483 SPACES
LOT 4: 379 SPACES
TOTAL = 1,602 SPACES
PROPOSED LOADING DOCKS:
RIGHT TURN LANE TO BES
INSTALLED IN CONJUNCTION
i WITH NCDOT PROJECT
ACCESS CONTROL
POINT BADGE ACCESS
(3 LANES IN, 2 OUT)
100K SF
EXPANSION
MANUFACTURING
(11 TRUCK DOCKS)
TRUCK TURN AROUD
MANUF.
EXPANS.
57,000
SQFT.
�I
NCDOT PROJECT U-2581 BA
PROPOSED ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS
LOT 1A:
183 SPACES
LOT 1 B:
546 +11 ADA = 557 SPACES
SECURITY
BUILDING 1
SECURITY
BUILDING 2
LOT 2:
474+9 ADA = 483 SPACES
RIGHT TURN LANE TO BE
INSTALLED IN CONJUNCTION
WITH NCDOT PROJECT
j—=-6 W v V —
. Wilsilloo"m
11
REFRIGERATED
I WAREHOUSE
W/ 162 TRUCK DOCKS
:1
12b I'RAILER SPACES
,1
DRY WAREHOUSE BUILDING
(TRUCK DOCK COUNT TBD)
I
GUARD HOUSE
#1
FUTURE NCDOT RIGHT OF
WAY (10' OFF BACK OF CURB,
TYP)
GATED EMERGENCY
EXIT GUARD HOUSE
#2
i
il
L RETURN CENTER —
(37 TRUCK DOCKS]
- W
12'
06 w—
_()
I-�Of
=W
J=-100'
179.92'= co
`\ 160' FLEET SERVICES
• 100'
BUILDING, FUEL TANKS,
60' (TYP) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I & FUEL PUMPS
`\ 219 TRAILER SPACES
_---------------------- --- -------------------------------------------- ---
REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE: 162 DOCKS
MANUFACTURING: 11 DOCKS
RETURN CENTER: 37 DOCKS I ri
TOTAL = 210 DOCKS _
BIRCH I
EK RD
TRUCK/TRAILER STORAGE: TERMINUS
I
O.T.R. LOT: 90 SPACES
ALL OTHER STORAGE: 1,089 SPACES /
TOTAL = 1,179 SPACES 00
0
a
z —
TRACTOR PARKING:
LOT 3: 301 SPACES
TOTAL = 301 SPACES SCALE 1°=200'
NOTE: ALL VEHICULAR PARKING SPACES HAVE 0 200' 400'
BEEN SIZED AS 9'x18.5'.
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1,
30' (TYP)
OTR STAGING:
90 SPACES
LOT 4 (TRUCK DRIVER PARKING):
379 SPACES
DISPATCH
BUILDING
10 SLEEPER CAB
TRUCK SPACES
LOT 3 (TRACTORS):
301 SPACES
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
�E cm
� o _O
^�
N� O
o =
U
E
Lu o V
F- -.0ul
`47
Q Lu r
U
o UL- Cl
LL. (� N
arlO—o L Z
0000 :!Q:)!o V
V) :3 U
L
Q w a Q ui w
� w
4 M
, L Z
_ o =
F--
tf6 N
N �
tD i
6 LuM
N M
;.0 w
rb F- 4kJ
10
tY �
O �
2
(D
7
O 4w
= C
F -
III EIII
w CL w
z O Q
Q O
O 47
U) Q DATE
>
12/17/2018
O (n
DRAWN BY
J. MOORE
• DESIGNED BY
• 1. MOORE
• CHECKED BY
• 1. MATEY
• • SCALE
• 1 " = 200'
•
• 0
• c/
0
coCL
L
z
W
W
L.L0(
z
J H
<"-IH
U `:
W
I..L O (DW � z
� H
z z �
Lu°Q
Uma
0 0
zJz
0 Q
0,
° ::)
m O
z Q
M w
LLJ w J
(D Lu
o
()
(n U
VH
0
X
m
D
JOB NO.
42407
SHEET NO.
EX1.1
0
c
tn
U
C
N
0
0
.4
m
3
m
0
0
a
a
T
C
a
a
m
0
m
tn
coC
v -
r6
O_
3
C

APPENDIX D
OFF-SITE ALTERNATIVES LOCATION MAPS

Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland ImpactsWlternative_Sites\Reedy Fork\42407-ReedyFork-VIC.mxd
BOB49
1
�..' •804
_ — Site Limits26
lb
( +� �� ,•� l�fls !! 6i9 I [ % a
m
Site limits are approximate. ia;
Topographic imagery from USGS.
x
0 2,000 r 4,000 6,000 + 8,000
Feet' i
Q
PUBLIX - REEDY FORK TIMMONS GR4UP •' `��
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION( ACHIEVFD THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 42407 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): BROWNS SUMMIT
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 185.4 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.18881 WATERSHED(S): (HAW) CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
LONGITUDE: -79.718217 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 3030002
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bid din a, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\Alternative Sites\Triad Business Park\42407-TriadBusPark-VIC.mxd
it
.'! __ "i � �• ,es' /� . Imo_ +�7 �i�+,1�-`. � L. '' V�. r- ��" C�
�` tea,•' �,. t -ti.'. [t; -- �_. � . � ;, �J •� 1 �
!�� �i _ .� ��. � .. r•mrir Vis,, _-� - - � \)� t: ;
�k Ir ;. Site Limits . ' ...Colfax -
t
'tr � _- .. _ �- � rte• _ {{ �t
977) j -rel \
-
-'oe�.
IQ
.. >> _
7�5 Ilk
' :.'• .� � �: iii .� , � - - �,., ��_ � '��� �• -_ ��
,
-
'
..� ��'l.•�_:r - � _ � ,, '� jam`' >�� �_ ,• � • �
1
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS.
is
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 ' 41
r�r9
Feet
e
PUBLIX - TRIAD BUSINESS PARK TIMMONS GROUP ; e owe
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. +
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 42407 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): KERNERSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 229.6 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.10611 WATERSHED(S): (DEEP) CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
LONGITUDE: -80.023349 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 3030003
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\Alternative_Sites\Youngs Mill\42407-YoungsMi11-VIC.mxd
781
�Yfl'W�11'(
�' f',� r ��' - f of �� �`.� r f��''%� ' � •�. y L�
'Y6
els 1l
kSite Limits
15
Ch
.01
i
`• � , � . r �� � - � ^ 4 iii Y ��-J �� •. f J ?� �•
�� � � r •� 1. - •ink ,.�r
f e^1
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS. _ _ �'• —h �': f
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 • -' =�v
S
PUBLIX - YOUNGS MILL TIMMONS GRaUP 0' 00*
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. s
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 42407 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): MCLEANSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 249.7ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.030576 WATERSHED(S): (HAVI9 CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
LONGITUDE: -79.702565 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 3030002
m
0
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

APPENDIX E
ON-SITE ALTERNATIVES IMPACT MAPS

Sky +ILII �7r
t'ern,a „t
Paustey Farm I' ,j
Legend
r-. ---I
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres
r LOD
I Limits of Disturbance - 120.5 Acres
S 001 J
----- Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impacts - 4.8 Acres
Zone 2 Buffer Impacts - 2.9 Acres
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Stream Top of Bank
Stream Impacts - 7,088 If
Wetlands
Wetland Impacts - 3.1 Acres
O � �
co Z O
O
co
o
a
Sky1f
A
a
drM 1r'
--%i& "ft #
I
Barbell•Cir
0
f LOD � LOD
C
r
a
�
cofeL'e io
---_
_ _
..—
m
a`
— 0
ry,y�fi'Rd �
S
21
sq t.
i
_
z
ca
M
O
=
viNO E
■
"0' V
—
��—
Cedarceest
GtlQCOurse
--I
■
L■
■
T7
�
'
�_
I
.
=
■
�
I
.
i
z
mom~
a
o
(A
o
t'ern,a „t
Paustey Farm I' ,j
Legend
r-. ---I
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres
r LOD
I Limits of Disturbance - 120.5 Acres
S 001 J
----- Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impacts - 4.8 Acres
Zone 2 Buffer Impacts - 2.9 Acres
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Stream Top of Bank
Stream Impacts - 7,088 If
Wetlands
Wetland Impacts - 3.1 Acres
O � �
co Z O
O
co
o
a
Sky1f
A
a
drM 1r'
--%i& "ft #
I
Barbell•Cir
0
f LOD � LOD
C
r
o
LOD O
�
cofeL'e io
---_
;Conferenc
,
Rooms,
— 0
iSite Adm.
x71,78
S
21
sq t.
0
,Srrmathers Ln rs'�n
QI Smathe �
�
Coroncept
l
rrci.)
Future HV/LV
(approx. 1,080,000 sgft.) Ory
xpartsit
173,624
sgft.
I
ff�►��x�r��f�1��~;;f Sflltlff �1Gi1
- -SHIPPING ---_lf,���lllf�fl��iff
0. -----
Frozehippin --20' }28` '
_Do:ry aM 35°VIP r
if
Emig Refrigerated l 1
Expansion
80 9 71 s t±
0° Fr W ° n 4 i,
35*
--1
..,�� RECE1 NIC <--
\ i 1 + ��li iili'li •li r; � -�—� � ((
-~ I
- I
w
1 �
f 1 t
t
sleyFarm°Rd
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
C
r
D0
a
a
W
>
Q
J
~
�
OO
UQ
0U
O�
—O
�z
0
_
z
ca
M
O
=
viNO E
"0' V
LU
A N O 6
3Qoc
>E
'
�_
la
d N E
3
'00
.
=
y O a+
3
U
�sW
3
i
z
mom~
a
o
(A
o
a
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
r
w�
F-
W
V
z
OZ
�W
m
F -
(j)
—
�v�
W
>
Q
J
~
�
OO
UQ
0U
O�
—O
�z
Q
z
J
J
m0
z
a.
DATE
12/19/2018
PROJECT NUMBER
42407
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIX
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2.Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
ALTERNATIVE
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
SCALE (FEET)
0 300 600
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE SHEET NUMBER
H:1 " = 300'
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\Alternative—Sites\On-Site Alternatives\42407-WTIM—On-Site—Altl.mxd

Sky +1II �7r
PaLvey Farm I'ta
■
Legend
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres
r LOD
I Limits of Disturbance - 128.8 Acres
S 001 J
----- Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impacts - 2.4 Acres
Zone 2 Buffer Impacts - 1.7 Acres
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Stream Top of Bank
Stream Impacts - 4,549 If
Wetlands
�������-�ipg � mi�
I
I
I
I
:
I
I
■
I
I
I
I
?banne-Rd
Verna -Rd
Barbell -Cir
0
O v r
O
� 9`b
� O
a° Sky Hdl-Dr \
' I
I
r
1
\lt I\✓
N
l II
tl
1
fF J-/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — -- — --
------- I
■
Ilnnru�n�., ---
iT
001 001
�
p
q
N
n
D0
_ ..—
m
a`
ry,y�fi'Rd �
CV
W
Q
LU
~
Z)
OO
UQ
O�
J
—O
�z
i
i mm=�n
Z
o �
i?
o
M
O
=
o)
vi N O 1=
■
V
—
��—
Cedarceest
Ga1lCaurs
--I
■
L■
■
a
'
M N E
0 E
.
=
■
�
I
.
i
z
mom~
a
o
�
o
PaLvey Farm I'ta
■
Legend
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres
r LOD
I Limits of Disturbance - 128.8 Acres
S 001 J
----- Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impacts - 2.4 Acres
Zone 2 Buffer Impacts - 1.7 Acres
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Stream Top of Bank
Stream Impacts - 4,549 If
Wetlands
�������-�ipg � mi�
I
I
I
I
:
I
I
■
I
I
I
I
?banne-Rd
Verna -Rd
Barbell -Cir
0
O v r
O
� 9`b
� O
a° Sky Hdl-Dr \
' I
I
r
1
\lt I\✓
N
l II
tl
1
fF J-/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — -- — --
------- I
■
Ilnnru�n�., ---
iT
001 001
�
p
q
N
�
D0
a
CV
W
Q
LU
~
Z)
OO
UQ
O�
J
—O
�z
0
i mm=�n
Z
o �
i?
o
M
�Snnathers Ln
I Smath ers'
i
1 °Concept
oo�
X00
n a
1�
LOD
a
z
-
_ e
L CD
k'] r // I
77
f II 11
0D x � \I\
� Tb +++yyy I
I
z
1 '
_ .1 x
-'tom41 (101 n- F--� 71
(101
I I' �ll�/I�I�I///f�
O �• J fj��/�I�I�����/��� I i
1 Return. Cuter Ind 1�IC L/ � 1 I
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
D0
a
CV
W
Q
LU
~
Z)
OO
UQ
O�
J
—O
�z
0
J
m0
Z
i?
o
M
O
=
o)
vi N O 1=
V
(G
LU
faNO 6
3Q0 c
>
'
M N E
0 E
.
=
y O 00 a+
3
U
�sW
3
i
z
mom~
a
o
�
o
a
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
W
W
V
Z
OZ
�W
WQLL
U)
—
CV
W
Q
LU
~
Z)
OO
UQ
O�
J
—O
�z
Q
z
J
J
m0
Z
a.
DATE
12/19/2018
PROJECT NUMBER
42407
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIX
DESIGNED BY I DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2.Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
ALTERNATIVE
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
SCALE (FEET)
0 300 600
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE SHEET NUMBER
H:1 " = 300'
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\Alternative_Sites\On-Site Alternatives\42407-WTIM_On-Site_AIt2.mxd

APPENDIX F
WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACT MAPS

,,y�rwri4M
.tib Aw �Rv v
a
v � 5
Y rn! �•.r
Ian pr
Sky kill Dr '
x�
E � �
rr0o91a Rd - -
v � �
r'aMiny Farm Rd
a
v �
impacts lame
Wetland (sq. ft) Stream Buffers (sq. ft) Stream (If)
Impact ID Impact Conversion Impact Impact
Temporary Permanent Permanent TemporaryPermanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
(Open Water)
W 1 142
W2 764
W3 6,203
S5 57
S6 373
S7 2,249
B1 -Z1 2,784
B1 -Z2 1,595
B4 -Z2 843
135-Z2 3,421
Total 0 sq ft 76,123 sq ft 35,786 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 105,518 sq ft 0 If 4,502 If
0.0 ac 1.8 ac 0.8 ac 0.0 ac 0.0 ac 0.0 ac 2.4 ac
Legend
r
Project Limits - 354.2
I------8
LOD
F
I
Limits of Disturbance - 219.9
ao1 —
z
V
Stream Impact
C
Wetland Impact
-----
Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impact
Zone 2 Buffer Impact
M
Perennial Stream (R3)
D
X
0
Intermittent Stream (R4)
MJ
W
Stream Impacts
=
o N
tn No E
Stream Top of Bank
Wetlands
IN N V
tD
Wetland Impacts
NC DOT TIP Project: U-2581 BA -
y
LiO 0
15.1 Acres
Gr
Bar.
6
NCDOT TIP Project: U-2581BA
810410, Cir
,moo
Qi
OC 411
0
s
N
I pc'�RI
k n....
_, -IYIG
• r •Vs rrriy r �r '' •YO;�► - , ►► . � � . A+;- 7 •Y� o
.� rrrrrr�i�ir�y�rry ,0�0� d�Jd 1 � . � ►�° �' "�' � 4 �� �
S ■ rimer/��� /3i• rr��Fr:►''�►► r ' 0 '•`- � � �`►' �°::....p���a
�`�rrrrr`; frrirrrr r El s ��d': ' �1/� � !'� 1 �` ■
S' Jnrir •tr rr - • flj YY v
40.
`JVV10
+ .
Iy► � i ► %
riz
eq 2? "�II+i101iI.Ir►►1►►'.► � �!-
. 1
■
t
ILL
W
CL
V;
F—
Z
D7
LU
U
I--
z
ZZ
0
a
J
m
ry
�U
0
0
M
D
X
0
y
MJ
W
=
o N
tn No E
IN N V
tD
612
y
LiO 0
Z
�
N
a0ol=
0
L CO w
.
0
U
Q
t W
W
3
Z
mom~
•
p
r
0
in
o
ILL
W
F—
Z
LU
U
I--
z
ZZ
0
�O
0
J
m
ry
�U
0
LLJ
D
X
�0
Z
MJ
W
a
DATE
12/18/2018
PROJECT NUMBER
42407
PROJECT NAME
PUBLIX
DESIGNED BY I DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2.Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
LiDAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS OF THE
U.S. IMPACTS MAP
SCALE (FEET)
0 400 800
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
SCALE SHEET NUMBER
/ H:1 "=400'
Y:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\42407-WTIM.mxd

APPENDIX G
AGENCY COORESPONDANCE

Franklin, Samuel W
From: James Carter <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:08 PM
To: DCR - Environmental Review
Subject: N Certified Sites Program - 311 Birch Creek Road
Attachments: 202 Acre Map - Timmons Group.pdf
Greetings,
My name is James Carter and I work for the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce. At present, we are working to certify
202 acres located at 311 Birch Creek Road in McLeansville, NC 27301 through the program. A map of the property
boundaries is attached.
I would like to request an archeological report on the property; I appreciate any next steps or guidance you can share.
Thank you.
Regards,
James
James Carter
Project Manager
Greensboro Chamber of Commerce
WE'VE MOVED!
111 W. February One Place I Greensboro, NC 27401
CCG Office: 336.387.8313
Mobile: [phone]
CIRCLE OF CHAMPIONS
PLATINUM
CONE HEALTH • FAIRWAY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING - GLOBAL BRANDS GROUP
LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP • UNITEDHEALTHCARE • VF CORPORATION
SILVER
ALLEGACY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION . STAUNTON CAPITAL, INC.
Learn mdre about the Circle of Charn.Pions

S;a 5rA7t a
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
April 13, 2017
James Carter
Greensboro Chamber of Commerce
111 West February One Place
Greensboro, NC 27401
office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Certified Site, 311 Birch Creek Road, McLeansville, Guilford County, ER 17-0645
Dear Mr. Carter:
Thank you for your letter of March 13, 2017, requesting our review of the proposed NC Department of
Commerce certified site. We have conducted a review of our files and offer the following comments.
There are no known recorded archaeological sites within the project boundaries. However, the project area
has never been systematically surveyed to determine the location or significance of archaeological
resources. We recommend that a reconnaissance level survey of the parcel be conducted by an experienced
archaeologist. The purpose of this investigation is to identify archaeological remains that may be readily
apparent and to identify areas that have a high probability for containing archaeological sites that may be
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. If archaeological sites are found on the
parcel and/or if it is determined that the potential for eligible sites exists, additional archaeological
investigations may be recommended at such time as development activities are proposed.
If an archaeological field investigation is conducted, one paper copy and one digital file (PDF on disc) of
each report, and one paper copy and one digital copy (MS Word on disc) of each site form should be
submitted to the OSA for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance of any
earth moving activities. PDF -A (Archival format) is preferred but a high-quality standard PDF file is also
acceptable. A letter will be sent to you for submission to the NC Department of Commerce Certified Site
Program for final certification.
Staff archaeologists at the Office of State Archaeology are available to assist you in the development of
Request for Proposals (RFP) and a Scope of Work (SOW) for the reconnaissance survey. Please visit their
website at www.archaeolog, .ny edcr.goy for the appropriate staff archaeologist.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.&ov/nearch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists
listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisoiy Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFlt Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
env ironmental.rey ewancder goy. In all futurc communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
61MIRamona M. Bartos
cc: Susan Fleetwood, NC Department of Commerce

Christopher Inscore
From: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 10:00 AM
To: Christopher Inscore; Leigh Mann
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Project Sky Update: Schweinitz's sunflower
Chris,
The Service would also concur with a no effect determination for Atlantic pigtoe, Roanoke logperch, and Cape Fear
shiner.
John
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:49 AM Ellis, John <john [e-mail]> wrote:
If you feel you need to do so you can. If not, I wouldn't worry about it.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:48 AM Christopher Inscore <[e-mail]> wrote:
John,
Thank you for checking with Dale. Would you like for me to resubmit a species conclusion table with all of the new
species we discussed?
Chris Inscore, AWB
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.352.3249 1 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
To send me files greater than 20MB click here.
1

From: Ellis, John <lohn [e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:44 AM
To: Christopher Inscore <[e-mail]>; Dale Suiter <dale [e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Project Sky Update: Schweinitz's sunflower
I checked with Dale Suiter, our botanist, and he said he doesn't believe surveys are warranted and could concur with a
no effect determination.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:37 AM Christopher lnscore <[e-mail]> wrote:
John,
As per our phone conversation, I just wanted to get your opinion on the new listing of Schweinitz's sunflower for
Guilford County and if it would impact this Project Site.
Regards,
Chris lnscore, AWB
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.352.3249 1 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
To send me files greater than 20MB click here.

I`I'I ♦ ♦t ♦11��1`I ♦ t1��11 ♦ ♦ \1 1�1 ♦ ♦ 1 t1-► ♦ 11 tt11 ♦ ♦ ♦ 1..I'7 ♦ t♦ t11��1'I ♦t ♦ 11..'7 ♦ 1 \'I ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ \`I t♦ ♦ 1 \1 1�1t 1'�I \'I \-► ♦ ♦ 1♦ 1����/ \'7 ♦ ♦ 1��/ 1 \'I 11'/10
♦ \/ ♦1 1�1111'I ♦1
P:1 111„ 11, 1►,}.;11 111.,,!„ 11111111,1,111 ►.1111,,15 II01011��N 111.111111104 111111111,Nil 11.11111111111 I ►111111.11111111 1.��11111111 1,�„ 11,11111,11 11►.11.I ►,!411,11 11111,11.1111111.1 11111,111,�11,!1111.�,11 LAN 11
111111!�� it
loom /lelOffill1111111I11����11 11111111
11 IINI I111 I11.11111.;1 111111111111►1.111.111.1►\,1111111P'i 1 11111111 I111111111ii IN 1l,I1I; l IlP,ill\,;

NCNHDE-7721: Publix Distribution Center
December 12, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
M
1:25,968
0 0.225 0.45 0,9 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Sources: Fan, HERE, Gaurrin, Intern%ap, increment P Corp-. GEBCO, USGS,
FAQ NPS, NRCAN, GeoBaw IGH, Kadastft NL, Ordnance Survey, Eml Japan,
METI rwi 0ima (Hong Kong). vvjisstopo, ®OpanStreetMap contrilnulom and
Ute GIS hoer Comrnunjty
f
�Rna rid
L IW Rd
R'
kv"
N
4.1
w E
December 12, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
M
1:25,968
0 0.225 0.45 0,9 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Sources: Fan, HERE, Gaurrin, Intern%ap, increment P Corp-. GEBCO, USGS,
FAQ NPS, NRCAN, GeoBaw IGH, Kadastft NL, Ordnance Survey, Eml Japan,
METI rwi 0ima (Hong Kong). vvjisstopo, ®OpanStreetMap contrilnulom and
Ute GIS hoer Comrnunjty

12/12/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Guilford County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
lJJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFD DAY3EXPG BX467E/resources 1/10

12/12/2018
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
FOS
IPaC: Explore Location
A
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 2110

12/12/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and ,�
project -specific information is often required. J
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).V
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 3/10

12/12/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 4/10

12/12/2018
IPaC: Explore Location
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
...........................................................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 5/10
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
TH.E TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS AVERY LIBERAL
................................................................................. X%W\*
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
...................................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
........................................................................................
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
%.......................................................................................................
THATTHE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
3
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 5/10

12/12/2018
IPaC: Explore Location
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( ) 1k *_0
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1) 4L I
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 6/10

12/12/2018
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
.................................................
(This is not a Bird of
Conservation
................................
Concern (BCC) in this
area, but warrants
attention because of
the Eagle Act or for
...............................................
potential
......................
susceptibilities in
..........................................
offshore areas from
.................................................
certain types of
......................................
development or
......................................
activities.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
..................................................
IPaC: Explore Location
116 -0-01i 1111 nd 11111111 lc.: -- -111111111111111
– — -1 –1 -11111111111111111 -- --
111111 --- -- -- ----
in the continental
......... ..............................
USA and Alaska.)
........................................
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement o avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 7/10

12/12/2018
IPaC: Explore Location
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: <\O�
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 8/10

12/12/2018
IPaC: Explore Location
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
4
National Wildlife Refuge lands .0-1h Nk \\We
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns. 0 -W
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
0
Fish hatcheres
VC'N "I
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 9/10

12/12/2018
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
PF01C
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
PUBHx
RIVERINE
R2UBH
R5UBH
IPaC: Explore Location
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. r
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site. U
U% -06f
Data exclusions .4.a
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XKSQTSSPPZFDDAY3EXPGBX467E/resources 10/10

United States Department of the Interior
George Buchholz
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
September 20, 2018
Re: Project Sky — Guilford County, NC
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
https.,,'/www.fws.gqv/raleip -P.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that
are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal aglencies (or vicir desrgnated- i]oli-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern xeceive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species... However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse, impacts to
federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the aeti.on on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
2

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
All(
to Benjamin
Field Supervisor

MITIGATION ACCEPTANCE LETTERS

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS9
Riparian Buffer Credits Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 02 Jordan Lake - Haw River Subwatershed
December 12, 2018
Mark Miley
Publix Super Market, Inc.
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Building #3
Lakeland, FL 33802
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Publix" project
Bank Name: UT to Pine Hill Branch Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings, IV, LLC
DWR Project Number: 2017-0886v2
Permittee: Publix Super Market, Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 3.31 acres (144,074 sq. ft.)
Cape Fear 03030002 River Basin
Dear Mr. Miley:
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient riparian Buffer credits from the UT to Pine Hill Branch
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank to satisfy some or all of the riparian buffer mitigation
requirements related to the above-mentioned project (including the attached South Fork SOA). The
project is located within the service area (HUC 03030002) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality approving the Riparian
Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holding III,
LLC. We will then issue a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources and to you for your records
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
205-807-0800 or ihazel hoff@wild landseng.com if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
��z
Ian M. Hazelhoff
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Land Acquisition
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ex. 120
M: [phone]
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS9
Riparian Buffer Credits Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 02 Jordan Lake - Haw River Subwatershed
December 12, 2018
Mark Miley
Publix Super Market, Inc.
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Building #3
Lakeland, FL 33802
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Publix" project
Bank Name: South Fork Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings, IV, LLC
DWR Project Number: 2016-0225v2
Permittee: Publix Super Market, Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 2.53 acres (110,315 sq. ft.)
Cape Fear 03030002 River Basin
Dear Mr. Miley:
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient riparian Buffer credits from the South Fork Nutrient
Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank to satisfy some or all of the riparian buffer mitigation requirements
related to the above-mentioned project (including attached Pine Hill SOA). The project is located within
the service area (HUC 03030002) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality approving the Riparian
Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holding III,
LLC. We will then issue a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources and to you for your records
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
205-807-0800 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
(�z
Ian M. Hazelhoff
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Land Acquisition
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ex. 120
M: [phone]
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

fires
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability December 13, 2018
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
David Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Publix Distribution Center
This document confirms that the Publix Super Market, Inc. (Applicant) for the Publix Distribution
Center (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 525.30 Stream Mitigation Credits from the EBX
sponsored RES Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 525.30 stream credits from the
Dairyland Site, in the Cape Fear HUC 03030002. As the official Bank Sponsor, Environmental Banc &
Exchange, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1075.
Best Regards,
V
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Mark Miley
Publix Super Market
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway
Lakeland, FL 33802
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 12, 2018
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/12/2019
Project: Publix Distribution Center County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type impact Quantity
(t -di it HUC
Cape Fear 1 03030002 Warm Stream 1 4,502
Cape Fear j 03030002 1 Riparian Wetland 1 2.57
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: George Buchholz, agent
D
Sincerely,
James B tanfill
Asset agement Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mittgation Services
217 W.Iones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

APPENDIX I
Application for Individual Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Water
Quality Certification, and Riparian Buffer Certification for the Widening of US
70 from Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake Road in Guilford County. NCDOT
Division 7, TIP No. U-2581 BA

p SSATE q
�`aww.d
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
January 18, 2019
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
ATTN: Mr. David Bailey
NCDOT Coordinator
JAMEs H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Individual Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, and Riparian Buffer Certification for the Widening of US 70 from Mt. Hope
Church Road to Sun Lake Road in Guilford County. NCDOT Division 7, TIP No. U-2581
BA, Debit $570 from WBS 34840.1.4.
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to improve the US 70 corridor for a
length of approximately 1.5 miles from approximately Mt. Hope Church Road to Sun Lake Road in Guilford
County (NCDOT STIP Project No. U-2581 BA).
This application is combined with the Publix Distribution Center Individual Permit Application pursuant to
the October 18, 2018 letter from the Corps of Engineers to the Department of Transportation.
Please see the enclosed Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) mitigation acceptance letter, permit drawings,
and buffer drawings.
PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose and need for this project is to reduce congestion along US 70 between Mt. Hope Church Road to
Sun Lake Road in Guilford County.
Mailing Address: Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Telephone: [phone] BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS UNIT Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH NC 27610
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website: www.ncdot.gov
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598

NEPA DOCUMENT HISTORY
This project was initially developed as U-2581 B/R -2910 (US 70 Improvements from Mt. Hope Church Road
(SR 3045 /SR 2819) in Guilford County to Westbrook Avenue (SR 1309) in Alamance County). A Federal
Environmental Assessment (EA) was under development, and the project was in the Merger Process for
concurrence on project milestones (Concurrence Point (CP) 1 was signed on October 11, 2011, CP 2 and 2A
signed on November 20, 2013). In July 2015, a partial Draft EA was developed, however, due to a lack of
funding the project was placed on hold.
NCDOT is restarting a portion of the larger U-2581 B project as a state -funded project, but limit it to
approximately 1.2 miles of the original corridor (section BA); subsequent environmental review and design
stages will follow for the BB and BC sections of U-2581 B.
A Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist for U-2581 BA was completed on September 12, 2018 to ensure
proper documentation of this revised project.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
The project will not have an "effect" on property or site listed on the Natural Register of Historic Places or
require the additional right of way from publicly owned parkland or recreational area.
1.4 0 M11 0 l I W11 I/:V it IR
Wetland and stream determinations within R-2581 were conducted using the field delineation method outlined
in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and subsequent guidance including the Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement. Mr. John Thomas of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) conducted a jurisdictional determination, and Mr. Brian Wrenn conducted a determination of the
applicability of the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules on May 22, 2012.
The jurisdictional resources on this section were revisited on November 17, 2018 to ensure they remain
accurate. The extent of these resources remains unchanged.
Two jurisdictional streams were noted in areas outside of the previous NRTR study limits. Those streams are
noted as Sites 1 and 6.
Jurisdictional features within the U-2581 BA project are all within the Cape Fear River Basin, Hydrologic Unit
Code 03030002.
U-2581 BA Individual Permit & Buffer Certification Application I January 2019 1 Page 2 of 6

IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Tables 1-4 provide impact values and descriptions of jurisdictional water resources for the project. Site numbers correspond with the permit (hydraulic) drawings
included in this application.
Table 1: Wetland Impacts (values in acres)
Permit NRTR
Wetland
PermanentMechanized
Perm.
Hand
ACOE
DWR
NC WAM Classification
Fill in
Class/
Impact Description
Site Site
Size
Wetlands
Clearing
Clearing
NRTR ID
2 WAB
Headwater Forest 0.1
0.02
0.01
--
Fill for roadway widening.
4 WD
Headwater Forest 0.3
0.05
0.03
--
Fill for roadway widening.
Mitigation
UT to Little
Perennial
Fill for roadway widening and culvert replacement, and
5 WB
Riverine Swamp Forest 0.1
< 0.01
--
__
Alamance Creek*
WS -IV NSW
10
19
10
--
ad for discharge of a 36" reinforced concrete pipe.
Total Wetland Impacts:
0.07
0.04
--
Total Loss of Water Impacts
0.11
Total Wetland Impacts Requested from DMS:
0.11
Table 2: Stream Impact (values in linear feet)
Permit
Stream Name/
Status/
Perm.
Temp.
ACOE
DWR
Class/
Channel
Channel
Required
Required
Impact Description
Site
NRTR ID
Index
Impacts
Impacts
Mitigation
Mitigation
UT to Little
Perennial
The existing 24" reinforced concrete pipe will be upgraded to a 30".
1
Alamance Creek*
WS -IV NSW
10
19
10
--
The impact is a result of the pipe and riprap pad installation.
16-19-3-(0.5)
A 24" base ditch will outlet adjacent to the stream. Due to the small
size of this system, it would not be possible to use bank stabilization
2
UT to Little
Perennial
6
10
6
__
without impacting the channel bottom. As such, the impact was
Alamance Creek
SC
WS -IV NSW
16-19-3-(0.5)
accounted for as loss of water.
The 15" corrugated metal pipe will be replaced with a 30" reinforced
3
11
16
11
__
concrete pipe.
UT to Little
Perennial
The 46 -foot long 10' x 6' culvert will be replaced with a 127 -foot long,
5
Alamance Creek
WS -IV NSW
251
33
251
'-
10' x 8' culvert with sills.
SB
16-19-3-(0.5)
UT to Little
Perennial
The existing 18" reinforced concrete pipe will be upgraded to a 24"
6
Alamance Creek
WS -IV NSW
20
15
20
--
reinforced concrete pipe. The impact is the result of raising the grade
**
16-19-3-(0.5)
of the road as well as the larger pipe.
Total Stream Impactsl Impacts
298
1 93
298
0
Total Requested from DMS:
298
* This system was outside of the original NRTR study limits. It was included due to the need to capture stormwater on the lane taper/transition.
**This stream was outside of the original NRTR study limits. Raising of the grade of this intersecting road was not originally accounted for.
U-2581 BA Individual Permit & Buffer Certification Application I January 2019 1 Page 3 of 6

Table 3: Riparian Buffer Impacts (values in square feet
Road Crossing/ Allowable Road Crossing/ Mitigable
Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Total
2,836 896 3,732 11,763 4,355 16,118
Minus Wetlands in Buffer: none or this project
Total Buffer Mitigation requested from DMS: 11,763 1 4,355
Table 4: Buffer Cross -Walk (Buffer Sites to Corresponding Permit Drawing Site)
Buffer Site Number
Jurisdictional Resources Site Number
1
1
2
5
3
6
U-2581 BA Individual Permit & Buffer Certification Application I January 2019 1 Page 4 of 6

Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under
provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS
lists the following federally protected species for Guilford County.
Table 5: Federally protected species listed for Guilford County as of October 4, 2018
Common Name
Scientific Nome
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Last Survey
Status
Present
Conclusion
Schweinitz's
Helianthus
Endangered
Yes
No Effect
October
sunflower
schweinitzii
2018
Small whorled
Isotria medeoloides
Threatened
Yes
No Effect
May & July
0 onia
2012*
Cape Fear shiner
Notropis
Endangered
Outside of
No Effect
n/a
mekistocholas
Range
Roanoke logperch
Percina rex
Endangered
Outside of
No Effect
n/a
Range
*Limited habitat is found in the U-2581 BA project area. However, surveys will be updated during the
appropriate survey season in 2019.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and
minimize jurisdictional impacts, at all stages of a project, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of
all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts.
Specific avoidance and minimization measures include:
Roadway Plansheet 5: Avoidance
Wetland WA and Stream SA were avoided.
Roadway Plansheet 6/ Permit Drawing Sheet 6/ Site 2: Minimization
Slopes were steepened to reduce impacts to Wetland WD.
Roadway Plansheet 7/ Permit Drawing Sheet 8/ Site 3: Minimization
The existing 46 -foot long culvert is perched, and does not allow for aquatic passage at normal stream flow.
The culvert will be replaced with a 127 -foot long, 10' x 8' culvert containing alternating sills intended to
retain natural streambed material and approximate natural stream velocities. The new structure will also
be buried to allow for aquatic passage.
MITIGATION
NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent practicable as
described above. Tables 1-4 display the describe the wetland and stream impacts for each section of this
project and summarize the mitigation as proposed for the project.
Please see the attached mitigation acceptance letter from DMS.
U-2581 BA Individual Permit & Buffer Certification Application I January 2019 1 Page 5 of 6

REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404: Application is hereby made for an USACE Individual 404 Permit as required for the above-
described activities.
Section 401 and Jordan Lake River Riparian Buffer Authorization: Application is hereby made for an
Individual 401 Certification and Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Authorization from the NC Division of Water
Resources. In compliance with Section 143 215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we will provide $570.00 to act as
payment for processing the Section 401 permit application previously noted in this application (see Subject
line).
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Michael Turchy at [e-mail] or [phone]. A copy of this application and
distribution list will also be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages.
Sincerely,
Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M.
Environmental Analysis Unit Head
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
U-2581 BA Individual Permit & Buffer Certification Application I January 2019 1 Page 6 of 6

North Carolina Department of Transportation y`'•
llif,ilw,."ig P P
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018) mum FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 34840.1.1 TIP No.: U-2581BA County(ies): Guilford Guilford Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 34840.1.1 ITIP Number: U-2581BA I Project Type: Roadwa Widenin Date: 12/21/2018
NCDOT Contact: Craig Lee, PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
Brandon Barham, PE
Address: 1590 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590
Address:
Phone:
Email:
940 Main Campus Drive
Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
919-741-5779
Email: c'lee ncdot. ov
[e-mail]
Cit /Town: Mcleansville
CounOes : Guilford
River Basin(s): Cape Fear
CAMA Count ? I No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Descri tion
Project Length lin. miles or feet):
1.5 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Residential, Agriculture, Forest
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
14.0 ac.
8.6 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
4@ 12' lanes, 2 @ 6' turn lanes, 2'-6" C&G, 10' sidewalk behind curb
3@10' lanes with variable paved shoulder
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 25,890 Year: 2039
Existing: 15,430 Year: 2019
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
This project proposes the widening of US 70 (Burlington Rd) from west of SR 3045/SR 2819 (Mt. Hope Church Rd) to just east of SR 3175 Birch Creek Rd. The existing
roadway will be widened with proposed C&G with sidewalk behind the curb. There is an existing 1 @ 10' X 6' RCBC with headwall that will be replaced with a 1 @ 10' x 8' RCBC
with beveled headwall. The proposed culvert will be buried V and sills will be included. The culvert conveys UT to Little Alamance Ck underneath US 70 from north to south.
UT to Little Alamance Ck is not a FEMA studied stream. The proposed project calls for Rip Rap both upstream and downstream of the new culvert in order to stabilize the
existing bed and banks of UT to Little Alamance Ck. Whenever possible proposed drainage systems were stubbed into the side of the proposed box culvert in order to dissipate
energy and avoid erosion along the fill slope. All other proposed outfalls within the project will utilize Rip Rap outlet pads to provide energy dissipation and lessen erosive
velocities.
Surface Water Body (1): UT to Little Alamance Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-19-3-(0.5)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply IV (WS -IV)
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
Yes Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? I N/A
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
I N/A
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I

c
ID3
E
L
a
T
i
co
LnN
7
/
0-
0-
Z
a�
3
0
L
0
N
E
0
L
c
Ir
Iliw
i
Ir
/
0
0
ao,
M T -i
Lri=
r2
ti [If
Qq
00
N
H
U
O
See Sheet 9B For Conventions/ Symbols
CFI PLANS
BEGIN TIP PROJECT U-2581BA
—L— PC STA. 12 + 32.17
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 11 +85.00
GR
ro
BOR0 �V
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- STA. 18+14.00
S'I'A'I' OP' N C( R'I'li CARO LIN A
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
LOCATION. US 70 (BURLINGTON ROAD) FROM WEST OF SR 30451SR 2819
(MT. HOPE CHURCH ROAD) TO JUST EAST OF
SR 3175 (BIRCH CREEK ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, SIGNALS AND CULVERT
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
* EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED
8TAT8
STAT6 PROIRGT R�RRENCE NQ
ICTAL
SHE -
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
1 U-2581 BA
I
DESIGN DATA
WA- Mm.—
P.APROLNO.
DRBCRD.TION
34840.1.1
50 25 0 50 100
PE
h VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus D276 Su a 500
RM/, UTIL.
CONST.
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
Raleign,Ncnsos®BP
�'//
P.E.
�
® s
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
JIMMY GOODNIGHT, PE
PLANS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE.
50 25 0 50 100
T = 6 Q/Q *
V = 50 MPH
(TTST 1 + DUAL 5)
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
OCTOBER 30.2018
PROJECT ENGINEER
JERRY
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y6- STA. 12 + 90.00
—L— POT STA. 91 + 00.00
-Y7- STA. 11+00.00
ICA
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 91 + 80.00
0 w
,, Z H
N � � END CONSTRUCTION
SITE 2 -Y4- STA. 12+43.00
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/ W ACQUISITION
A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF GREENSBORO AND McLEANSVILLE. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD ??. UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared for the North Carolina Department of Transportation
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
In the office of.
50 25 0 50 100
ADT 2019 = 15,430s�;f
h VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus D276 Su a 500
ADT 2039 = 25,890
K = 12 %
D = 60 %
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
Raleign,Ncnsos®BP
�'//
P.E.
�
® s
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
JIMMY GOODNIGHT, PE
PLANS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE.
50 25 0 50 100
T = 6 Q/Q *
V = 50 MPH
(TTST 1 + DUAL 5)
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
OCTOBER 30.2018
PROJECT ENGINEER
JERRY
s
`"��
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
LETTING DATE.
OCTOBER 15, 2019
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
7JDAVELLANA,ESIGN ERPE
10 5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS =
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
®F
ENCDOT CONTACT LAURA SUTTON, PE
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

-Yl- PT Sta. /2+64.86 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
I � U-258/80 4
-L- CURVE DATA -Y2- CURVE DATA / I ( —
0 RM/ SHEET NO.
Pl Sta 17+66.4/ Pl Sto /3+49.93 w I I I I I
oN ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
_ /2 58' //J' (LT) D = /4 39 423' (LT) o RETAIN I I o v ` ENGINEER ENGINEER
D= P 13' 08.6" D= 2.06' 23.3' I b m �O
L = 1063.9/' L = 696.04'
T = 534.24' T = 349.93' / _ — INCOMPLE E PLANS
--
R = 4,70000' R = 2,720.00' I I + RETAIN SYSTEM
` I DO NOT USE FOR / W ACOUISCCION
SE = 0.025 SE = 0,04 03 E RETAIN - E — —I5 RCP 0
RO = 105' RO = 144' I e6 °a,Ae' BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I
INC = 42' / z -Yl- POT Sto.13+4500 / II
r
US 70 (BURLINGTON RD-)
AT MT HOPE CHURCH RD.
p 3770
0
6310 2019 ADT
_
2039
Prepxma by
1550
3240
u 440
, 520
US 7o
us 70
(BURLINGTON RD.'—(BURLINGTON
15430
RD.)
13030
25890 2330
1040 21500
2790
1120
a
--1b.D=t.0
3.7 _ —
O=
5150 =
u
6460
_
+5 -Y/-
V
DETAIL 1 55 O/ 3 5V DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
SPECIAL BACK FRCPURRBBP CUT DITCH UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
l
\
TO scALe) w.
NATURAL Mu..d=1.o Ff.
THOMAS L --RD PAYNE
DB 3829 PG 416
?�
w , 'v 2
, I I
ONE WAY
BAPTISIT CHURCH
Prepxma by
-(NOT
GROUND
�� --
•
PB 98 PG 89�,
eo.00•
+35
BE IN 2'-6'C
D 4
-•,
.,
--1b.D=t.0
3.7 _ —
V
I
20 119M
+5 -Y/-
p8 113 PG 25
hb
\
D'6
a
- .
N I
I III1
I> II I'n
Ilo. m
Pi
aa�i.����c�m'P
IB �i g C PC (C-3705)
r-
GeoleRSle Type of Uee CLASS B Rip -Pp
I I
I�I
v 11m_
FROM STA. 20+75 TO STA. 26+88 -L- RT
u
+65
END r -
1 1-�
//
�F�
\
W
+15l3 -I-
-�
-
PERMIT D RAW I N G
JURISDICTIONAL
i
GINc&STREAM
SHEET 2 OF 14
wQ \
REMOVE
N
I
TEMP SURFACE
WATER IMPACT
X
50' o'
50'
2 \
I
I
LP
O P B I
REMOV I
II
111
ca
N
pE 1,
I I
I
I,11 ( I
s
11 �81
GRAPHIC SCALE
25' o'
25'
III \ oat 1 INSET SCALE P5 I _ mem
Z BEGIN TIP PROJECT U-258160
I
&c —RErai _ _ W IOD
H N 1' - ii WOODED S 7g•p'S5' E 168.22' S 69'00'09' E 5 74°23'S6�
-L- PC STA. 12 + 32.17 \ _ c " 3°°4'20' E ~ I 6E.52' �3 °°•61"
C 46.04' I I 73° a' N
BEGIN MILL/RESURFACE &G N
BEGIN WIDENING (LT SIDE ONLY) 30'
w'f� RCP_ly $ I I I I OVE LARRY MICHAEL OVERBY
DB 3983 PG 562 I POND P9CIF9sl PGE EASEMENT r
1 PB 105 PG 114
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION Q $ END r-CC&G I I REMOVE 3
+35 -Y/-
T
-L- POT Sta.11+85.00 \ SITE 1
N SURFACE I m I
W WATER aI I I I END z-s•Cac -L- PT Sto. 22+9609
Mca ° � O \ IMPACT Z 111 4, +79r2 -n-
�° 65.62' NC DOT 57 -L- POC Sta.18+37,75= ((
CL455 B RIP RAP ti I
DB 4381 THOMAS EDWARD PAYNE a �+ a O
1 s e mm y FAG 970 Esr 5 TONS M -Yl- POT Sto. 20+2464 _ LLI O cs� 5
c Oy w� PB 8 EST 16 SY TONI DUKE PAYNE _ BEGIN 2'-6'C 4
GEOTEXTILE DB 7430 PG 2333 Z -Y2- PC Sta. IO+OOAO 1 _
�I _3 G 38 w cR LL +1136 -Yl-
n PB 8 P 38 -
MCLEANSVILLE „� O N LADY LUCK LLC
�W - �\ LIONS CLUB 2 IV 1 \ �, INVESTMENTS LLC DB 8313 P� 2180
w 3 SITE 1 �I 20+00 \ \ PS 188 PG 76
O ¢� REMOVE EXISTING
v1 `°' n DB 2850 PG 529 I I / \ w DB 7804 PG •1634
24" RCP AND z
J+� I PB 98 PG 89 I I 40 �+ i PB 191 PG 44
ISFp `W / REPLACE, IT �+ 22B''EG/N
30" RCP- iO I I \A I I I w -6 C&G
N N RETAIN 1 i SCJ O Ff63 -L- InI �y 1
SYSTEMI/) v rcw WOODE X L-� 36• CHL \� " c'.� I
2 EIP P I CAP I 0 0 P ROP. _ '- BEG/N 2'�' C&G
\ la
T" +57 -L- 1 -L- 111 X F -
4P DE `m LT `L
•-Ca' / CAPP
WOODED EX. RM' 80' LT I
_ �c s _ �T_ _ �D ,5• G
u1i 1 INV_72792'
m RETAIN SYSTEM EXIST INS R/w sH — . ESD E Q
rn 24•BLK WALL / RETAIN\ \ CItY of GreeO `IGS O I D
1
GRA SS qu SYSTEM 8 p TRAFFIC SIGNAL nsboro, IS .PVC o
FUEL TANKS oe 4<e7 pC l0e m\ BEGIN 2'�•C&G O {O 8 GRASS O O ^m T�+800- WOODED
L°5 C1 CURB CUT DITCH
-L- POT Sta. /0-1-0000 \ � — � � � 1�'BAY T 8 O Oa oAf � � � E 1 � SPECIAL BACK OF
70MB ONE O Corp„ app PAIR, COPPER O (p O' Oi
�. REMOVE AND REPLACE qT&7
EX/ST/NG ___ APER �\ / SEE DETAIL 1
(APPROX.l07 _ W �' BEGIN Z-6' C&G b ' RT 9' RT 88' RT
c / IT +3026 -Y2- SPENCE & ROBINSON
.) ; x -------- 350'R/GHT TURN
N n\s"I
_, \ I c? COLTIVATED FIELD REAL ESTATE, LLC
° EDDIE P. NORRIS 25BKo DB 8647 PG 925
i ELIZABETH C. NORRIS MT. PLEASANT ~ArYR15, I��� O
cl DB 4692 PG 1032 METHODIST CHURCH I +99 -Y2
Ll DB 5332 PG 809 DB 173 PG 180 9 ILO 75' LT
DB 200 PG 694
w DENOTES IMPACTS IN O +4"s°�a6 /W STA. 12+00.00 (SEE SHEET 101
SURFACE WATER 53 BE /N 2'_-6'C&G PROP. 4" CONCRETE SIDEW
BEGIN GRADE + MATCFILINE YZ- 11
`° � DENOTES TEMPORARY � END MILL/RESURFACE FOR —L— PROFILE SEE SHEET
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
—L— POC STA. I3+50.00 EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED FOR —Yl— & —Y2— PROFILES SEE SHEET 14
M=
��
L—
-
__
•
o
J L , !.1[:'•
mA \� #
Qom\•
!\
-•,
.,
V
.
_
_ _
• .
-�
- .
�_ — � SIR b +�•
�^
,
�A1
_ _�F
! w_
.�L.(�,a`
1 1-�
//
�F�
���W`•=
I,
�
-�
-
ISA■
M"-
REMOVE
_ �c s _ �T_ _ �D ,5• G
u1i 1 INV_72792'
m RETAIN SYSTEM EXIST INS R/w sH — . ESD E Q
rn 24•BLK WALL / RETAIN\ \ CItY of GreeO `IGS O I D
1
GRA SS qu SYSTEM 8 p TRAFFIC SIGNAL nsboro, IS .PVC o
FUEL TANKS oe 4<e7 pC l0e m\ BEGIN 2'�•C&G O {O 8 GRASS O O ^m T�+800- WOODED
L°5 C1 CURB CUT DITCH
-L- POT Sta. /0-1-0000 \ � — � � � 1�'BAY T 8 O Oa oAf � � � E 1 � SPECIAL BACK OF
70MB ONE O Corp„ app PAIR, COPPER O (p O' Oi
�. REMOVE AND REPLACE qT&7
EX/ST/NG ___ APER �\ / SEE DETAIL 1
(APPROX.l07 _ W �' BEGIN Z-6' C&G b ' RT 9' RT 88' RT
c / IT +3026 -Y2- SPENCE & ROBINSON
.) ; x -------- 350'R/GHT TURN
N n\s"I
_, \ I c? COLTIVATED FIELD REAL ESTATE, LLC
° EDDIE P. NORRIS 25BKo DB 8647 PG 925
i ELIZABETH C. NORRIS MT. PLEASANT ~ArYR15, I��� O
cl DB 4692 PG 1032 METHODIST CHURCH I +99 -Y2
Ll DB 5332 PG 809 DB 173 PG 180 9 ILO 75' LT
DB 200 PG 694
w DENOTES IMPACTS IN O +4"s°�a6 /W STA. 12+00.00 (SEE SHEET 101
SURFACE WATER 53 BE /N 2'_-6'C&G PROP. 4" CONCRETE SIDEW
BEGIN GRADE + MATCFILINE YZ- 11
`° � DENOTES TEMPORARY � END MILL/RESURFACE FOR —L— PROFILE SEE SHEET
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
—L— POC STA. I3+50.00 EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED FOR —Yl— & —Y2— PROFILES SEE SHEET 14
M=
��
L—

Q
RICKY N. rSMITN\ ww
DB 4014 PG 16335 a
PB 17 PG 94
/ 4.7 \SPECIAL LATERAL
SEE DETAIL 4
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
F -L- 2 W0 66',L PERMIT DRAWING
RM/ SHEET NO.
Ex. SHEET 4 O F 14 ROAENGINEER DWAY DESIGN ENGINEERS
2 E
SB'�� W I
ABAND \ 62 --- INCOMPLE E PLANS
!� I DO NOT US6 FOR / W ACQUISITION
DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4 z
W /C I STANDARD BASE DITCH SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH D
15" R Wo m S ala) Nono Sale)
BNal Nafurcl GD
I�_ / 62 Ground \ Groun
VIS /— ?I D '1•' N rl /� 3 a( SRI
I_
Ground 3.
Min. D=1.5 F. D DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
N O B-2.0 Fr. UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
J
_ AT STA. 12+30 -Y4- LT Min.D=1.0 k. Rrepared by
FROM STA. 12+50 TO STA. 14+50 -Y3- LT
/ FROM STA. 11+50 TO STA. 13+00 -Y3- RT
0619 (MOVE CLONNIE FILL IN WETLAND FROM STA. 14+00 TO STA. 14+50 -Y3- RTb
OVERBY BURK 9 Np�Pc.(c-37 5)
DS 2951 PG 9 50' 0' 50' v"s�i lq reek r+ n sm�
_ — — — — — 31
GRAPHIC SCALE i��
—L— PC Sto. 46+50J/ /
�F 24 2s' 0' 2s' / Z �� // N=1a�
C DEBORAH 0. WAY }{ny A* BUF�GIN // 3�na
CHARLES R. OVERBY, JR. m
DB 7901 PG 1530 INSET SCALE JAMES_C:eALLRIl Quo
/ PR B- JDDYB. 5 6g�4pILMED
r — I —L— POC Sta. 47+70.07= 31
� —Y5— POT Sto.10+00.00 PB 134 G 91
SITE 4 11----\ n riDa�/ LIP E'P —L— PRCl1§t0.49 l2
_ 45+6K�
-L- POT Sta. 42+86.77= _� ��c�
GR /. �3 WO ESu�s#e0 RI RAP s
-Y4- POT Sta.10+00.00 - - -- - EST >t SYM
GF / GE91TE)gILE \ SI 4
SITE 2
PU �TT ff�E°PUE PUE PUE PUE U PUE U PUE WOODEDPUEPUE PUE WOODED E \ Wo ED
DI / F
-- 61 061 ` _ --- W
BL
C
D,
a
'�
N
r
62
x
E
58 ,n
a
ROGER COAT
TDBL
z
10 PGP
�r
I,
W
000
����
rte•
�aI/�
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
F -L- 2 W0 66',L PERMIT DRAWING
RM/ SHEET NO.
Ex. SHEET 4 O F 14 ROAENGINEER DWAY DESIGN ENGINEERS
2 E
SB'�� W I
ABAND \ 62 --- INCOMPLE E PLANS
!� I DO NOT US6 FOR / W ACQUISITION
DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4 z
W /C I STANDARD BASE DITCH SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH D
15" R Wo m S ala) Nono Sale)
BNal Nafurcl GD
I�_ / 62 Ground \ Groun
VIS /— ?I D '1•' N rl /� 3 a( SRI
I_
Ground 3.
Min. D=1.5 F. D DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
N O B-2.0 Fr. UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
J
_ AT STA. 12+30 -Y4- LT Min.D=1.0 k. Rrepared by
FROM STA. 12+50 TO STA. 14+50 -Y3- LT
/ FROM STA. 11+50 TO STA. 13+00 -Y3- RT
0619 (MOVE CLONNIE FILL IN WETLAND FROM STA. 14+00 TO STA. 14+50 -Y3- RTb
OVERBY BURK 9 Np�Pc.(c-37 5)
DS 2951 PG 9 50' 0' 50' v"s�i lq reek r+ n sm�
_ — — — — — 31
GRAPHIC SCALE i��
—L— PC Sto. 46+50J/ /
�F 24 2s' 0' 2s' / Z �� // N=1a�
C DEBORAH 0. WAY }{ny A* BUF�GIN // 3�na
CHARLES R. OVERBY, JR. m
DB 7901 PG 1530 INSET SCALE JAMES_C:eALLRIl Quo
/ PR B- JDDYB. 5 6g�4pILMED
r — I —L— POC Sta. 47+70.07= 31
� —Y5— POT Sto.10+00.00 PB 134 G 91
SITE 4 11----\ n riDa�/ LIP E'P —L— PRCl1§t0.49 l2
_ 45+6K�
-L- POT Sta. 42+86.77= _� ��c�
GR /. �3 WO ESu�s#e0 RI RAP s
-Y4- POT Sta.10+00.00 - - -- - EST >t SYM
GF / GE91TE)gILE \ SI 4
SITE 2
PU �TT ff�E°PUE PUE PUE PUE U PUE U PUE WOODEDPUEPUE PUE WOODED E \ Wo ED
DI / F
-- 61 061 ` _ --- W
BL
C
D,
a
'�
N
r
62
x
E
58 ,n
a
ROGER COAT
TDBL
z
10 PGP
Q L— EMOVE
m ,
62
N
D DONNVG.—
co c
= BAIT�TT y
N DB 7b PG 885
59 -
0 1
SEE DETAIL
c 0300 M
� R/W
E
C--
0
L GR
L 03000M
w MEGAN J/T R/S EIKER
SHAUN J/T R/S EIKEI�
DB 7347 PG 1 N
PB 17 PG 94 �^
° y Q
= O
� f
!r
6 a 15' RCP -IV CB ® 15" RCP -IV EREMOVEE
- .. - - .. .. .. .. bl CB ABAND H
P
62
CB S - E%ISTING R/W 061 CB _ 15" RCP -IV _
— _ _ — Q STING /W 7 "
P EIP EXISTING R IW
0 0
SJt
62 C
----------- ---- 15" RCP -IV REMOVE 61 CB REMOVE +
DT — — —FSS— — —------ RCP -IV
E
7AT&T
CorP.. 4 — — _ _czisT v
B
o �
P~J
Clty f Greensboro 16 '. DIP / E F \ 6 E E E REMOVE D �Ay CRA£5 I
BST (' I GRASS I 3 �CONr GRASS iE7E if {p .71..71. * .K. .k• C I
AT&T Corp., 600 PAIR COPPER WOODED 72' CHL & 3SBW � C W
I _ BST CONC Ow �00 30' RCP -IV E —
AT&T Corp., 2 ', COND IT \ C7C�'Y���(J777 — — — GATE �--J _� � I iC 61 Z
WOODED Ow \\ i is HTR MTL ISFD S�r I z
I \ i W LL PLUG SHED s a I` fl ION IIv-
0y,0 GR �+T P�JANTER 77RE01CT Q
�C S "RIP RAP I I \ i 2 j GR X WQQDED' © SITE 3 5. M N y 6 SITE 4
TroNs TONYA D. COLE\ ah D
T SY GEOT )MILE O RONNIE D. OVERBY DB 6958 PG 849\ I RONNIE D. OVERBY / \ DARRYL L. BEAN - , SITE 3
I I D PB 517 PG 9415 71 m D'B 776,9 PG OVERBY
11131 DB 7314 PG 2672 62 1
2Q AN
DB 7707 PG 2835 Pp "- -' 94 \^
PB 17 PG 94 '� ; Sc II cR o GARAGE ALINL
/ ROBERT C. MCDONALD 22 \ 1 II g PB 17 RG 94 PB 17 PG 94 �uy�.,, REMOVE r DB 3572 PG 4
LREMO DB 1458 PG 131 \ I 2V d y J O
52 _ 19 PB 17 PG 94 21 I II O i \ 2.7 _ Im
TIMOTHY A. APER SITE 2 \� I �I I \\ �-/ a X �IALD D. POWELL 29
NORMA J. AYERS I� 2' BASE DITCH i \ I. a 4 A7fl J. POWFI I
DB 6020 PG 1128 1 1 SEE DETAIL 3 \ 5
PEI 17 PG 94 EST-SbE15 7-5% J<
e c I ,. €sr sDDe I " END CONSTRUCTION
p p I r
ir.I1IRISDIC IONAT L ` — —Y5— POT Sta.11+85.00 "g I mi I m T�
LD P AN ER
R END CONSTRUCTION RETAIN o SITE 2 �
—Y4— POT Sta. 12+43.00 W II I I (3 oNAL
DAVID D. HARRIS I rc M tUR15D�°T
I DAVID E. RYALS ti 15" C STRFAF/`
I' - KRISTIE H. HARRIS I� �CLASS B RIP RAP LAURA F. RYALS w
E o DB 4553 PG 2076 EST 5 -
PP - 94 �e o ~ _ EST 14 TSY
ONS DB 5071 PG 916
m / GEOTEXTILE PB 17 PG 94 �
END GR E 18 I� - BAGAULDINUE"—
Y3— .13+25.00 O MARY P. I W I � DB 6347 PG 981 62 III 3 GR
20H02BE 1217 RETAIN PB 17 PG 94 I �� 2.0 III REMOVE
BST -- = BST
b2 Q I 48IN Q DAVID E. RYALS O T I SITE 3
G}�
LAURA F. RYALS WINFRED LEE RIGNEY In L _ c
60 DB 5071 PG 919
MARY ANN RIGNEY ¢ t,.?
G DB 2949 PG 963 I n K nN o PB 17 PG 94---x48,CHL
DONALD G. BATES PB 17 FIG 94 I RACHEL M. DENOTES FILL IN
ERNESTINE C. BATES
I DB 2601 PG 742 m _ LEVENS 62 Q a F F WETLAND
DB 2084
PB 17 PG 94 �/ • PG 14
RETAIN PB 17 PG 94 ao ° DENOTES MECHANIZED
GR BST SHIRLEY M. E
o DB 046 PG 2194 TAYLOR aN F�� R CLEARING
,,nnTT PB 17 PG 94
: WINFRED LEE RIGNEY \ m I T� RACHEL M. G VEN5
DONALD G BATES < DB 1907 PG 655
MARY ANN RIGNEY `~ w DENOTES IMPACTS IN
ERNESTINE C. BATES DB 2388 PG 757 -T� Il` PB 17 PG 94 0
DB 2793 PG 171 PB 17 FIG 94 is - fF SHIRLEY M. 0 SURFACE WATER
In PB 17 PG 94\ \ I DB 569 g.3 COWC s,
_ \ z 0 O PB PG 104 — IQ
DENOTES TEMPORARY
x A -Y4- POT Sta.15+46.72 IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
__BST
—J

,'.E'E'E'E'E'E'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm"mm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'0,0,0,0,0,0,0,'no'E'E'E'E'E'E'E'E'N'O'N'm'm'm'm'm'm'm"mm'0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,m"mm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'0,0,0,0,0,0,m,m,m,m"mm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'0,0,0,0,0,0,O'N"mm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm'm"no'E'E'E'E'E'E'E'E'
looloolooloolim I I I � � �
nommoommommommommm
OMMMOMMMMOOMMMO
mommomommoommom
, IIIIIIIIER
0 FIIIIIIIEPIIIIIIIIR ORIIIIIIIIN 0,111111110, Orlillillin, n,lillilliororillillilmoo,smillilliporlilliill!mrumlillillo,orillilillp 0,11IIIIIIN0,04IIIIIIIINO 0,11111111
nomc-ir.zmm&mammm
mwlff"6100mmmmmm
mommom mommommo
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
11111MENHEMEMEM . ...... --., ... p. 11
ME - - -q ..o..IlmmliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilimmiimmoommommommommoommmmEnsommmoom
I , Ilm F 00 ..................
9
I
0
0
0
0
nommomommmommommomi I q - 'a III -1jr.11LIF,FA1 I ,I% 11411 .... ONEEMENEEMENEEN .....................
no 0 , , 11 I- MOM'lo moommommommommommommoommoommommommommoommmmoommmmmmommommommonommommommommommommmmmmmmm m 0 0 0 moommon 0 ME I No 0 No 0
..i.C�ill "'Niii NOUN III al I I III I jI 0F.ZILWAS I h: LINES! 000000000000000000000oommommommommoommommonmmommommmmoommmmmmmmoommoommommommoEmEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEN
I 1. m
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
0 rL -30WM'--'100FMO I 'NOON EF, JIMEMENIINE.
IIENUE001111111H1111i MMENKNI]MOLMWAINEENEL moommom 0000000ommommom
nommomommoommommommom "
nommomommommommosommo ft 0 mom
nommomommommommoso .000 �m
mommommommom
nommommommommom
nommommommommom
mENr,-.T=mmmmmmmmmmmm
ONOMMMO
MOMEMEMENOMEMEMEOMMEMOMEMEMEME moommon
0000010
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mommomm
0000010
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mommomm
mommommommommom mommomm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm moommon
NEON: r.zmmmmmmmmm
OMM mmmmmommommoomm mommomm
no mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm moommon
nommommommommommommommmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmom Mmmmm
0
001111111101 001111 moon
mommommommommom mommomm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm MENEEME
nommomoc-olmr,ommmmmmOOMMMM0000
MUMVIoff mmmmmmmm
.......... mommommommommom
................. mommommommoommo
11,11,11,111,
moommoommoommom
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mooc'-T=Emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,IN
FAI411, IMMEMEMENEEMENE
moommammmmommommo
nommomommmomm
nommomommmommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 00111111100 00
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mmmmmmmmommommoommmon
mommommommommommoommommommomm0
MENC7!'.V MONEEMEME
MMOV,Ill�l ANNE mommoommommom sintra"'Ons.
mommoommoom
0 .....
mom
mommomm
mommm momommmommommommm
0
mmm
no
nommommommommommommommmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
nommomommommoom mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mommommommomm
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mommommommommom
mooc.'3r. mommommoo mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ommommommoomm
"", :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: MENNEN
.... :.N,m NOMMENNEENNEENE w
mommommommommom
moommoommommoom
moommoommommoom OMMOMMOM
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
nommommoommmoommmmmomMMMMMMMMm moommomn
nommomommommoom
nomc-ir-loommommm
:::F.1:1.".J::::::::
nommomommmmmmom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
nommomommoommom
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
nommomommoommoo
mENr.-.v=mmmmmmmmmmm
IFAIVA immoommmommmmoomm 1111� IMMO
00 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm :::::Imm
mom :::::::::::::::
mmmmm mommommommommom
no MEMMEMEM1110111111 Ell mommosons
nommommommommommommommmmmmmm on Ii! mmmmmm!2000000000 jarMEN mmmmmmml!mrm m
nommomommommoom m ME Emmallimommi I
Ill,mm l! ma'SiTimmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mommommommommom Arommummommoom moommommoomm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm MN moommommommommommommommommomm0 0
001111111100 001111
momc,'Jr. mommommoo ::::Mmmmmmmmmmmmmommmommommomilimmommommommommoommomommoommommommommomommmoomm r. 0
" ff WIN No
NINN
mmmmmmmmmmmmMoommoMMMMMMMMMM,immmmmmmmmmMommommomommommommommoommommomommommommoommoommommommommm moommommommommoo-o-m-0.0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0.0-0-0-0--m-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-00mmomm
m:..:".J:::m:::: .IN NEON
IIIIIIIIIIIII mommmmmmllimmmmmmmommommommommommommommoommommommommommommommoommomm-m-mommomommommommonommommomommommomm-0--mommoo-o-o-m-moo-momommonommoo-moomm-0--moommoommommoo-m-0--mommo0-0-0-0-000-0--mon
nommommommommommommonmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommomommon
mommommommommommoommommommomm0m moommom mommommommoom 001111111100 IMINNOME
mommommommommom ................
nommomommmommom ommommommommommmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommmommommllimmommoommommommommommommommommommommommoommommommmomommoommmo-omm-0-0-mommommomm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
000000000001111111
nomc,-ir-lmmmmmmmm
, 001100
:0000volofflo4lojo0momOMMOOMMOMMO I mommommommommom MENOMONEE 11 imi IN OVA in nommoommommommom 11 ON a W �I ..:Ummmmmmmmmmmmm
0011100 0011100 M111100 I I I I I MENEEMEMEMEMOMM F 46A IMEMOMMMMMM fJ'IALIN�MIMMMMMMM!MlololooMMM0001MMMF.limmpmmmmommommoommommommmomommomm,limommommommommommommommoommomommommommommommommomommmommomOMMOMMEMOMMOMMEMEMEMEMommommommommommon--.
0011131AN-TTEMEM =P!M- - -_= --- - -- ===
� Er - -T-Momt,FFU'IE,,Jgm 'Nomommmmmmolim MIMMINOM V.F.Moommommommom
- - - il - - - - - �. - --l.....,
4T 9"�—!Eft!=!WMMFkMdmMkIM mi'm- �!!! --- M—F, morimmoommmmmmo, moommommommommommommoommommommommommommommoMEMEMEMEMEMommmmommommommommoommommommoommommommonommommommommmmoommmmommom III 1111-mr! mom
0 r.=NAEEEEEEEEEMN
nommommommommoommomm.MMMIM-i'minolI moommommon NONE M�l i-li-li-li-IFli...Ammmmmm " ..lL.mr4,.11mmmmmmmmm
e T5==C=Z=N==C s-.11Ir.F.xs-.a .-.I..S.gmmmm moon mommoommmo Moommom mmommm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm IN
Nmmmmm. misommommommompon-M
mommommommommom a IN p q P 2 r &
NONE
nommoommoommomm mmm600mmmmmmmm:m:m, ;- s! n g
nommomommommoom No No 00000000mmomC.",=Emm
moory.-T=Mmmmmmmm
moorAI41i.loommoommommommommoommom 0 mommoomm '%NNoNN
momom mommoom :MENOMONEE ,
� I omm
nommommoommoommommommMMMMMMMMM i Emmmm,lmp,.RIL 'Witolif�
nommomommmommom mmm 11 INEI 10r$A,-IIFL-A�-!A'00
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
00000101111111110
nomc.ir.zmmmmmmmm
MUFS1.11 mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmOMM ::F.�ff.I."I M0
IN 'MMMOOMMMO mmmmmmmm ommommommoommommommmmmmmmmmmmm
mommommommommom mommommommommom
"Mommommoommom mommomm
Mommommommommom
ommommmmmmmmmmm mommomn
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IMEN: r-.Immmmmmmmm Ir
00ommommoommomm moommum
IEEE mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mommoommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
00000000000111100
moocy.-T=Mmmmmmmm
moorAI41i.loommoommommommommoommom NONE soorm, ,...
'0000 mommoom :MENOMONEE mmmmm
MEN
mmommon
mommommommommommommomommo
mommommoommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmommommommommommmon
nommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
0 mr,-.9.lmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommonom mommom ommmmmo 0 mmmommommommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
,N, ........... 0 ...... I ....... mg ... :::::::::::::::
MEMEEMEMEMEMEMEMEMONEMEMMMMMEM
nommomommoommom
moommommomm
nommommoommoommommommMMOMMOMMOMMOM IIIIII00 ,NEON
,
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
0011100 ImIllom 0011100 IIIII00 0011111111 1111100 0011111111
MEN: 3 on
mmm F,ffm,lmmm
00111103 Mr.031100 0011100
mmmwlffmll mosommoomm
mommon 100 mmmiimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmomi 0
0,00000000momommommomommo oommommommommommom
I
nommommommommommommommmmmmmm
00000IIIIIIIIII
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
00000IIIIIIIIII
mommommommommommoommommommomm0 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
00,0,c,ljr mommommoo
::Mmffmtammmmmmmmmmmmmmomm We
:::::::::::::::
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommommm ommomm
nommommommommommommonommommomm
no 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
mommoomm
MMMllMMMMMMMMMM mommoomm
mommommommommommoommommmmmmmmm mommommoommommo
nommommoommoommommmomOMMOMMO00
moommormol,.,MM=MMMMMMmommmmomm0
ONA141). IEEE mmmmmmmmmmmmm::::::: mommommmommommmmmmmmommmmmmmmm
' ::::MENNEN
nommomommmommoom 000001110111101
mommommommoommo
nommomommmomm m
nommommommommommmomommmmmmmm
IN
. . IN
0
0 momomErAnnommmmmm,Aa mommommimmoommom 1� EEEEEEE?P A MENEENEE!Ammm 00 -a Mmmmmm-
IN IN "
I I mom MENEEMENEEMEMENEEN MENEEMENEEME mommommommommom�,

moommoommoommom
"I'll'I'll""
looloolooloolim
nommoommommommommm
OMMMOMMMMOOMMMO
I I I � � � 11111111111111111111111111M �
mommomommoommom
MENNEN
mommimmmmmmmmmm=mmmmmomm
MENEEMEMENI
0
U141).
moor
.,riiii NONE v
,-.T=EEFAMREEEEEEE am
loommoommommoommom
0
0
moon0mirommoommmmi
00
0 0 mom 00 m
mmoommumMOV7.':
00 .... � ........ !..0.0.0.0.0.0.!M.M..M.-400000000000000000000ommommommommommommommoommoom
mom 0 0 0 MIN
mmmmm
k1n, M11ME Ell
nommomommmmmmimmoor7. = 7
no MOMMpNNNMMNNV - , 0 mommommmmommom
Mom r., V JA 11,11 IF AN-SEENIMEMON MENEM
!;I
ilrAmml:=Emmllmmmm
WIM" limommiloomm
-m .F '100000 mommmom-mommommommmmommoll,lilloomom
ir.F.Emmoom .
'MIN MEMONVINIONOMENEENEENommommommommomonsommommmommmmommoaffikilmo-momm�mmommoommoEMEMEMSEMMOOMMOMM
oil
RMF. MMFIMMMMMMMMM
0000000000 MMMM,,I,,M,AF
nommomommmmmmilloommooll'�-
IF-` NommoommommommommommoommoommommoommommmmommNELE
0 WOLILARAM 11 lik:lk'%,,MMMMIMM MEMEMOVER
mommommommommiloommos:0M,� moloommoommoomm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiqhL
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmffimMIMI
,mom 0011111
.Emmmmr 00
00 'Emmo,immmmmmm::�O.O.O.O.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.O.O.O.M.M.M.M.0 ... 0.
...
ME " ONE Emommoommmmmmmm
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. Mo M ... 0.1111113 .0.1i..Emmmmmmmmmmmmmm
REENOMMERNMENN ... 1 I ..�..".,M,T,mmmmmmm.mm
on"n", . IIIIII
..................................I 0 ma,mi'loommoom mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm--i
no - 11
MOMMpNNNMMNNV A onma,,,:m MI -10"
nommomommmommill mommor,2y . moommllmmmmm nommoom
mommon.� � ............
ONEEMEME ......................... moo..
mmmmmmmmmm'mmamm m Room
mommommommi
"
nomm",.q r 0
'a
In .i..All§EEEI-ii MOORE
00 ........ i.....�O.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M..
... r'li-IlIFAM.E.E..EE.N.il.m.m.m.m.m..*.A.Us .0
.o
,
ENNEN on 0 No I moommomm 0 0 0 moommon
0 ME I No 0 m.m.m.m.m.m.m.m.rull7i:
.. ..
iiiiiiiiiiiimmlmlmlmlm"mmmmmm�ommmom MEMEMEMENOMMEN mmmmmmmmo.z.mqlll
orqm
a
�
mommoommi
00
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii No No
I No
nommomommomMommoommomm - 'I'M 0
mommommommommommoom moi tillmmmmmmmmm
I.
- a I
0 NONE 0
0 ii 0 I I
iiiiiiiiiiii I iim im
0 0 -0000000000
� ommommoommoommommom
I
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmi
I
moor.-.T=mmmmmmmmmmm moz nommommommommommomommommommommommommommommoommommommoommommommomm.
... 0 m
1. moommommommommommommommorsommommommoommommommommirmmMMWIUMF
momom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm,4ommm
m moommommooff.,Mmmm.M.M...M,M,M.I,im.m.m.m.o.m,m,m,m,m,m,m,,,M,M,,r
00 00 -:
�;
MMOMOMMMMMOMMMOMMMMOMommo�l000mmommommommoommmmommmMMOMMOMMOOMMOM
nommoommommommommommoommoommiloommommommonoommommommoommommommoommomp"lqlmomm'Lloommopp�
"OP5 sommommommomme mok'NEEE=========
mmmorla =AkEE-qmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommom
---- i.i
, U.Mg.mommmommmo
OMEN MENEEMENEENEEN-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-00000-0-0-0-000-0--mon MENEEMEMENIE MGM I'd,
MENOMONEE Nomm000mmolF,MLO.A:,.d.115
jr,R VENOM moommomm-0--mmo mommommommomm-m-m-mom00--rzwm-mlmmmmmmmmmmm-m-0-00
Mou-NE-0-000-MENEEM MENEENE- E0000
MENEM!!!
mmll!m-0-0-00-mommommommommo-000mm-0-0-0-1
iiiiiiiiiiiimmiiiiiiiiiii"I
z
. am-ou
......
---
iiillmimiim-m-m-m-mmm
- ­ -------- - M - - - - �nn­-TM ........... � ,,�
mffim- - =-
�.MMMMM
16 ....
--
E
0011!0-0--momm-mommommommomm-oommo-M-0-0-1
==rzxz -! ..h!-rop00000000000loioii���
;39 I!J!.Mdool000
... ="!E,!.,!,,E.,.!
-0 0 -0 -0 = ZMEMMEMMEESE .... .... ommommommommoom
loolooloolooloo
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmo
mommommommommom mommommommommommoommoommoom
mmoomm..b..-.is;:==!! oommosom
0
.
. ME .b..fi ;3=
mommoommommommommomm000
- moomb.sommomom
obiq
MEMERNMEMEN
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
nomr.,,,-immmmmmmmmommommommommimmmmommomommoommomm mommoommommommommommommoom
EEP!5=kummm
r. .A opi.Twoommoommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmi
MEMMMO
ommom
... ....... 1 ................... p
OMMMOMMMMOMMMMO mommmmommilm.
0
RlEENNEENEEN
....
,00000000011000000000ommommommommommommommor.:
........................................In
MENOMMEN 1.);;
nommommommommom 41.7L'-AMII MF,Mr4MEM
nommommommommom U.
L"JIM 'APIIFAIE'�Amommoommmmmmmoommommoommommommommommommommoommoommommommonommoommoommommommonommommommonommommommommommummommoommmommommoommoommommoommoommoommoommoommomm
mommommommommom
ROOM
mm-, MENEEMENEEMENEmmmmm
mom -.Mp..Emmmmmml
N
Eli MENEEMENEEMENEEMENIINmomm-.E E r.16..d.dmmmmmm
:1
nommommommommom momommmmmmmommommommoommommommommommommommoommommoommonnommoommommommommommommommommoom
nommomommm, =E;-.ii.mommoommom
.... mommommoommommmommommoommommommommommoommmmMOm-
MEMEMENOMME
F-91. Ms==
0 0
sommommommomono mommom 0111i
M000mon NOMMEMONO mmmmmmm,mmm
mommoommom IT
ommo
lt "i
OOMr,.IF, F'O'.,Ir,.'Ez.,IF,.EmmmommommommommommommommoommI
,1',,IP,.'MML.1k.'MMMM
nommomommmommom
mommommmommo0
moory.,=Mmmmmmmm
Emumr.r,.Llmr..�w.1
MIIIIIIIIIMM 00IIII MERNMERNMEMMERNMER
_ No
EEN000.,C, 0000000mmmmmmmmmmmmomrmy,1
:::I.,.A.ImmmmmmmmmmmmmE
-,MI6. , 1010111111 MI'M
EEEEEEEEEEmmmmmm:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Mmmmmmmmommommommono
MOMMOMMEMEMEREI
mommommommommof.71:
MENEM
mommommommoommommomm000mmommom
......
mommommommommimmoommmmmmi
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
mmmmi
mmmmmmi
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiimcmr,.,Mm=iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimmmc.:
moorAI411k]mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommommommommommomom .... so .... 0 ... MEEN-NE ... MENNEN
momma mmommom mommommoommommommmmomommmommommommommoommommm
moommillillimmil
loolmilloillo
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
MENC7" MONEEMEME
MORM,11ki ANNE mommoommommom
NEEMO
EEr,II;
mmmmm
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmi
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
moor.,.T=mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommom 0 ... No ... MENNEN .... No .... M--MMMMM-MM-
iiiiii
-.:
mommomirN,
... 1. �A.Immoommmommmmoommmmoommoommmoommmoommoommmmoommmmommommoommommmo
...
mommmmoommmm
mom
no
ommi
MENNEN iiiii
looloolooloolim
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
- 1:
moor.-v,immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommommoommommommommommommommoommoommommommomm
1. 'I'lipimmmmmm
...
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiir
1.);;
mommmmoomm-M
no
mom
ommi
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
moor -,7=EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEommommoommommommommommmmommoommommommommommoommomommommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,In
- .:
iiiiiiiiii,r,.,
... 1.,.A.lmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
moommommom
no
mom
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommilillinimil
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
momc7l.v mommommoo
... 541A INEEMEMENEENNEENE
OMEN,
11:
In
00 EMIS
mommommommommom
iii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmoI
looloolooloolim
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
rAill.limommoommommomm ,,I
nomc,-.v-gmmmmmmmmmmmommommommommommommommoommoommommommommommonommommoommommo
iim00
mmm
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommillillilloo
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
f. 'A.1mommoommommoom ,
moor.-.v=mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommonsommonommoommommommmommon
...
1. ;
MEMENOMMEN
mom
no
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommilillilloom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1. ""IFAMEMSEE ,
moor..Iplmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommommommommonommmmmoommoommmommommommommommommom
...
1.v
mommmmoomm-M
mom
No
momi
mmiiiiiiiiiimmii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
looloolooloolim
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
r:%MEMMEOEMM
,
MENC
I
1111M
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iii
iiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
loommommilimill
nomrr.-T=Mmmmmmmm
momrII41AINEEMENEEMENommoommommoommomm
'0000 mommoom mommommoom
"111:
om
moommillilmolooll
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommillooloolim
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
momcl*vllmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmorAill'i AMEMSEEMEMEMENE iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiismimommmommililloom
"
::::::,.,,,I
iimmmm
no
-.-.-.-.-.-.---'!
I
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
mmommilI
looloolooloolim
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
In .:
1. "A.Immosommoommomm
moor.-.T=mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommossommonommoommoommommommoommommom ...
...
mmommmmommoommommmomimmommoom
m " ,;
MENOMONEE
mom
no
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
0,0,mr.11-immoommommommommommommom 0 ........ MENNEN .... No .... MOORE
iiiiiiii
00 -1:
m,O.O.M.,,,r,F
I I.N;IlrjmmmmmmmmmmmmmMENEEMENENOMMMMMMMMOMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mom
ommommom
mom
no
Mmmmmmiiiiiiiii
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
mommommommommommomommMMMMMMMMm
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiEmimmmmiimmmmii
iiiiiiiiimmiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
mommommommommommomommMMOMM0000
. .
- -
iiiiimplomqmllii,oll iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
mommommoommommmnommmmmmw,Amom
looloolooloolli
mmmmmmmmmmm:mmm
iiiiiiiiiinriiii
A11110 mmo
iiiiiiiii'm
MENNEN
ormommo
0
mI
-M

Z
0
L_
I
-L- CURVE DATA
P1 Sto 53+54.53 P/ Sto 6/+02.09
A = 6' 19' 47S (LT) L = 12'2256.,f (LT)
D = 0' 41'55.4' D = 2'06'23.Y
L = 905.9/' L = 587.83'
\ T = 8,200' T = 295.06'
.
R = Sz000a R = 2,720oa
SE NO SE=0.04
\ RO = 168'
I \
I \
\\ `\
r32)\ 32
.J�
\ GLORIA POOLE COLO 'DB
A3800LE
\ DB 38314 \ \G 1558
GLORIA POOLE PG 2041 \
I DB 3207 PC PB 70 PG 535 - \`
31 '->
TRIAD WORSHIP CENTER 3Z
CHURCH OF GOD
DB 7215 PG 1959
PB 139 PG 91 SITE 5 CLASS II RIP RAP!
u� EST 245 TONS
EST 280 SY
' GEOTEXTILE
m
( ISBKD All
II SBKD
r 8VWOODED20' CITY F GREENSBORO PERNANENT TILITY EASENENL.I. DB 4 fG.I
H PUE A
W REMOVE
W W
I6 I I QTR
O _
O —
O N _
h
w C
Z --
U
-PUE Pm 'E © PU ,
1 REMOO� GRA S
— E%IBTING R%W
E ------- E3--36" CSP
W/ELBOWS 73
F_ — _
SITE 5
36" RCP -III
CLASS I RIP RAP—
EST 10 TONS
EST 23 SY
GEOTEXTILE
U1NE REID COOPER
DB 3572 PG 4
29
JB
FILL IN WETLAND
INLET DETAIL
NTS
1@ 10' x 8' RCBC EXCAVATION
ESTI 325 CY
NG r3�
N
CLASS 11 RIP RAP
W/ GEOTEXTILE C
THICKNESS = 2'
WOODED
1H I
I
�E/
k
t��.
F
RCBC
SHE
RM/ SHEET NO.
Pi1L
W/SILX8'
W/SILLS
ROA
3o RCP To E�E—
ENGIN ERDWAYSIGN
INCOMPLE
DAVID T. TURNER
50' 0'
OF PROPOSED
MARY T. WEDDINGTON
/W ACQUISITION
PIERRE A. GORIA
CAROLYN E. GORIA
MARY T.
WEDDINGTON
DB 7355 PG 452
PB 101 PG 8
DB 3818 PG 1989
DB 4391
PG 1180
PB 101 PG 8
2' BASE DITCH w/ 34
NSR COMPANY, LLC
O
33 I
CLASS B RIP RAP
SEEDETAIL 7
I SLOPE
DB 7079 PG 711
STREAM BED
25' Do
=2.8%
EST 75 TONS
36
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
LASS II IP RAP
EST 200 SY GEOTEXTILE
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
EST 3 TONS
EST 35 CY DDE
EST 25 SY GEOTEXTILE
b
SPECIAL BACK OF
CURB CUT DITCH
m W/CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 1
-L- PCC Sta. 58+07A3
60
I
m I
E
Q •I
M.a en
WOODED
1H I
TP
k
t��.
F
RCBC
SHE
RM/ SHEET NO.
Pi1L
W/SILX8'
W/SILLS
ROA
3o RCP To E�E—
ENGIN ERDWAYSIGN
INCOMPLE
STUBBED IN WALL
50' 0'
OF PROPOSED
y
/W ACQUISITION
BOX CULVERT
Z
p
CLASS II RIP RAP
GRAPHIC SCALE
EMBEDDED INTO
0
STREAM BED
25' Do
EST 35 TONS
EST 60 SY GEOTEXTILE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
LASS II IP RAP
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
EST 3 TONS
R,epe dby
EST 25 SY GEOTEXTILE
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH,INC.
OF MCLEANSVILLE
DB 5726 PG 196
REBECCA P.L
SOLE IT
37 -L- PT Sta. 63+9485 DB( 2333 P,
38
65+`01
71 E- I I
D
THOMAS G. LOWDERMILK 1 1
o�
DO
92 PG 49
39
1
1
I 2SBKD
I
DETAIL 7
STANDARD BASE DITCH
INol to Swle)
N.W.1 N.—I
Ground ?:� 1.� Groond
d D
--h=A,in.
Max. d=1.0 Ff.
^Khan B is < 6.0' B=2.0 H.
Type of Lina,= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 57+30 TO STA. 58+40 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
WITH RIP RAP
/�-NATURAL (NOT TO SCALE) Min. D=1.5 F.
L GROUND--- Maz.d=1.0 FI.
7.7 \
D 3'
Geo,extile Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 58+50 TO STA. 60+30 -L- LT
-E
E
40
THOMAS R. LOWDERMILK AND
WIFE, REBECCA P. LOWDERMILK
DB 2153 PG 286
DB 3697 PG 546
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
F F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
OUTLET DETAIL
EXCAVATION NTS
EST 155 CY 10 10' x 8' RCBC
NG
TILE (TYP)
2'
M
III
k
t��.
.�
IL0 Lu
�::i
SHE
RM/ SHEET NO.
Pi1L
8 OF 14
ROA
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH,INC.
OF MCLEANSVILLE
DB 5726 PG 196
REBECCA P.L
SOLE IT
37 -L- PT Sta. 63+9485 DB( 2333 P,
38
65+`01
71 E- I I
D
THOMAS G. LOWDERMILK 1 1
o�
DO
92 PG 49
39
1
1
I 2SBKD
I
DETAIL 7
STANDARD BASE DITCH
INol to Swle)
N.W.1 N.—I
Ground ?:� 1.� Groond
d D
--h=A,in.
Max. d=1.0 Ff.
^Khan B is < 6.0' B=2.0 H.
Type of Lina,= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 57+30 TO STA. 58+40 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
WITH RIP RAP
/�-NATURAL (NOT TO SCALE) Min. D=1.5 F.
L GROUND--- Maz.d=1.0 FI.
7.7 \
D 3'
Geo,extile Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 58+50 TO STA. 60+30 -L- LT
-E
E
40
THOMAS R. LOWDERMILK AND
WIFE, REBECCA P. LOWDERMILK
DB 2153 PG 286
DB 3697 PG 546
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
F F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
OUTLET DETAIL
EXCAVATION NTS
EST 155 CY 10 10' x 8' RCBC
NG
TILE (TYP)
2'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
PERMIT
DRAWING
U -2W 7
SHE
RM/ SHEET NO.
SHEET
8 OF 14
ROA
ENGIN ERDWAYSIGN
INCOMPLE
ENGINEERS
rE PLANS
50' 0'
50'
DO NOT USE FOR
/W ACQUISITION
Z
p
GRAPHIC SCALE
25' 0'
25' Do
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
INSET SCALE
R,epe dby
b
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH,INC.
OF MCLEANSVILLE
DB 5726 PG 196
REBECCA P.L
SOLE IT
37 -L- PT Sta. 63+9485 DB( 2333 P,
38
65+`01
71 E- I I
D
THOMAS G. LOWDERMILK 1 1
o�
DO
92 PG 49
39
1
1
I 2SBKD
I
DETAIL 7
STANDARD BASE DITCH
INol to Swle)
N.W.1 N.—I
Ground ?:� 1.� Groond
d D
--h=A,in.
Max. d=1.0 Ff.
^Khan B is < 6.0' B=2.0 H.
Type of Lina,= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 57+30 TO STA. 58+40 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
WITH RIP RAP
/�-NATURAL (NOT TO SCALE) Min. D=1.5 F.
L GROUND--- Maz.d=1.0 FI.
7.7 \
D 3'
Geo,extile Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 58+50 TO STA. 60+30 -L- LT
-E
E
40
THOMAS R. LOWDERMILK AND
WIFE, REBECCA P. LOWDERMILK
DB 2153 PG 286
DB 3697 PG 546
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
F F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
OUTLET DETAIL
EXCAVATION NTS
EST 155 CY 10 10' x 8' RCBC
NG
TILE (TYP)
2'

moommoommoommom
"I'll'I'll""
nommoommommommommm
looloolooloolim
OMMMOMMMMOOMMMO
I I I � � � � �
mommomommoommom
MENEEMEMENI
iiiiiiiiii0riiii
Momm
EMENg MEMMEMEnaMMEMEMEMS2 mmommmmummommI
Iiiiiiiii'M12
mommommomm
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmiiiiimmw,F.F.F.F.aF.�a
-
mama paili-.Ilmlllmllppllgmpoliilm,lm,m,llllllllillillillillillillilliilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliil
MIM110C
iiiiiiiii
nommomommmommommomi I
no
I
I - mommommommommommmmommoommoommmmommommommommommommommommommommmommommoommoommonommommommoommmmommonomommommonnommommommomm000mmon
311-11. IF", I 11171 ,III F..MIIIIM1MMMMMMMMM
I A 01 IEEE 19,1,4"'S'A'Al 11 W KIF-IMMMIMMENEEMENEENommommoommommmmommommoMENEEMENEEMENEEMENEEMEommommoommmommmommommommommommoommoommommommmmommommoommoommommommommommommommoommommommmmmmmommom
i M
0 0 0 moommon
MINUHHUNINUH
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMI
61 no
W-9 mummoommommomm
:::i
nommomommommommommomeimmom
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM..IIMM
I
MEMNON 01 IMMUNFA IEEE mommosom
IMIM mmmimiimmr,mki-so llrm�,!mmmmmmsommommommommommommoommommommommommommommMmoommmmmmommommommommmmommommommomommoommommoommommommommommommommoommommommoommommommommommommmmommmmmommommonommommommommommommonommommommommomommommoommMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEmmommoommommonommommommoommommommommommommommoommommommoommommommommmmmmommommmmommommommommommommommoommo
nommomommommoommommolimom
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM memo------
Id mmwmbmommoommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm:::0 MENEM
mommommommommommom
20 nuMENNEN
nommommommommommom
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
m�mmillooloolooloolool000mmommillooloom
0 nommommommommoommommoommommommommommommommoommomommommommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ommommommommommommommommom
nommommommummom
MMMMMMMM
mommomommmimmmmommo
OMMOMMOOMMOMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
moorl,,-Immmmmmmm
,
OMNI. "IFAMEEEEE
... mommmmoommmo
mmmmmmmmmmlml,m�i
nommoommommommo
nnommomommoommoommoommommommomi
nommommommommommommommmmmmmm
nommommoommoommomommommommomm0
001111111IMM 001111
mmmmmmi
-v=mmmmmmmmm
mmmmrmm"i
moor
1.,.A.Immmmmmmmmmmmmm
mom
MMMf.T,:
1111i
Moo
No
mollim'lm'm'llm'm'll
mommommommommommomommOOMMOMM00
III IIIIIIII
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
-7-immmmmmomm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
illillililI
moor
f.,,,l,FAEEEEEEEEEEEEom
mom
iii,r":
........
mom
no
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
miii
mmmmmmmmmmi
mommommommommomommommMMMMMMm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
Ellor 7=00000momm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiii
0 [.,N,Immmmmmmmmmmmmm
...
mmg MEMEMEMEMEEM
Er
ii1r.-T,i,
no 0
no
..........
ME MEMEMEMEMEEME
IN ... . 0
1IM I MU111111111111ii in! momillillillill
IN
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommommoommoommommommMMMMMMMMM
HUH111011111 MENEM! 111111111111111100000ommmmmoommommomom
mo .......
..............................
MENEEMENEEMENNE ...........................
1111.1111111111111111illillillillillillilliililI
::Ommmmmi
mmi-. mmmmmmmmmmmmm
IN
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
MEMNIMMEMI
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
Emir 7.100000momm
I
OMMMOMMMMOOMMMO
FI
:12'.2:51111110-1111
mommommommommom
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmoommomi
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
NONE!
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1-04.111WHIMMEMEMEMEME
moor.u=mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommommommommommommommoommoommoommommommommommommom
...
,
,;
mom
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
moor -,7=EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEommommoommommommommommmmommoommommommommommoommommommoommmommmoommomqmmmmmmmom
..:
0,IIIIIIIIIIII, r
1.,.A.lmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
...
,
"
m.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E..00.0.miii
mom
no
11
MMMMMMMMi
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
mommoomm
mommommommommom
'.I
iiiiiiiiii-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.I
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
moor 17--loommommoo
M
m.m.m.0.0.,4,0.0.�E.E.E.E.E.E................-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-..-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.--.-.1-T":
... I.T"Ilrjmmmmmmmmmmmm
OMMMOMMMMOOMMMO ::Emmmmmmmm.
ml!I 0 IVAI
in MENOMINEE
..... IN MEOIW'AiimomENEENm:::::MMMOMMLI:�IONEENEMENE
mmmmmwmiommmomm .........
MEMEMOME
MOMMOMMOMMOMM0111 ........................
mommommommommom
mommommommommoommoom
........ FF.F.F.rzzr.===Emmmmm
0 NEENEENONEIIIIIIENEEL .,
. IIMIEENIMMMMMMM====�=ma
E MEMEEMEME01A L-AIAU
_
=====m
. Moo"A"
... MEMMEMEMEMEMEME HER
mommommommommommoommo
mommommoommoommono -10 00 NE It
.... MENNOMMI�ll-� mommommommommom 11
.......... mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommi
001110H
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
'W'SIMME
immmommmmumiffirmamm mac==EmmzmmmEEEE..-���ffi��magammommm:mmm=====
I nriimoo
m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmoommomi
--==== = mmffimmam��N ....... I!!!!!!!=====� ===r.rrr.FF.Fi......
nommomommmommomMELlop-,a.:iimmmmmommommommommommommommmmoommmmoo
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
......... .... R -...................-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-IN
........... I ....-.-.-.--., mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmi
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Moor 7=000MONEEM
MMMMMMMMMM M som
moommommomm�mmo mmmmmmommommomr .
...
mommoommommommommommoEMEMMOMME
,-W.mmmm
0
MENOMONEE
NONE IXI
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
,!:I
oommmmm.wFi;z!!!N-m
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi
nommommoommma., -=C7.
MMMMMMMMMMIWOMM
i..I..Nmmmmmm on .
............. 1
rNMMMMMMMnMMMM 0 MMIIIIIMMMMMMMMMMM
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnommommoommono,
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
1LAM
A!,,11 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
MoMmiL rdLLMZMMMMM
..... 0011i
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Moor _IMMMMMMMMM
7.
MOMA
M! ......
Moo.
mommommommommommomommommommomm
:11IIIIIIIIIII, 'I
MMMMMMMMMMOMMMM
r Z=!"Rp.ommmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
nommilillilloom
onommi 2mmemmm,m.qmm.m.mmmm
iffilmmill
EMEMEMMI
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
MMEM
M NOME!
i-loommommoommi
nommommoommmoommmmmmmMMMMMMMMm
mommommom
1.7i,A,IEEEEEEEEEEEE
mMMr,N=MMMMMMMMMMMMMEMMMMM
MOMMMOMMOMMOMOMMOMMOMOOMMMOMMO HOMMEMEMEN.
...........
of, MENIFFAVAIMIrATAIM
I MILWASIAMMIMMIN
MINALIAIN ommmo.m.m.m.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M..Mm.m.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M..MM.M.M.M.M.M.0.0.0.0.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M..Mm.O.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.M
::::::::I1111
.2.21
...... mmmmmmmmm-m-I
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
0MMMM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
- I:
I. "liviommomm
moor'.."Emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommommommommommommommommommoommom
mom
...
I. -;
iiiiiiiiiiiiir
MEMEMEME
mom
no
looloolooloom
miii
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
-,7=EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEommoommommommommommommmmommoommommommommommoommommommoom
. ,:
r
1.,.A.lmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
moor
...
...
I.",
MEMEMEME
.00
on
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
nommillooloolim
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
moor "Y-IMMEMEMONO
mmmf.,,,l,FAEEEEEEEEEEEEEm
...
v"
..........
mom
no
miii
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Moor 7=000000000
... [.,N,lmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
...
1XI
mom
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
iiiiiiiiiiiimmii
moor 7-400000momm
... l.7,KIFAEEEEEEEEEEEEEm
mom
l'f,i
mom
no
mmiiiiiiiiiiiii
mommommommommo0
nommomommmmmmom
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
MENNEN ":
E'lir
mmmr,N=Emmmmmmmmmmmmmommommommommoommommommommoommoommmommon
[.,i,h.lmmmmmmmmmmmmmE
...
,m,m,m,m
....... W.,
mmmmmmmmmm-M
mom
no
ommi
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommoommommorm,lo-sommomommommommommommommommommommommonommommoommommommommommoommommommommoommommommommommommommmommommommommommommommommommmmmmmmmm.mmiimmmommommoommommomommoommommommommommommommommommmi
iiiiiiiiii0riiii
111110 mmo
INNNUIN
Iiiiiiiiir", MMMM
A L
No
mI
-M

IN N '� I I PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
Ij'I I \ U -25818A 9
ill VIII / PERMIT DRAWING s WN SHEET NO.
I
SHEET 12 OF 14 00 ROADWAY
ENGIN ERSIGN ENGINEERS
57
• I BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y6- POT Sta.12+90,00 -L- CURVE DATA �/ 12112
Q INCOMPLE E PLANS I /
Z DO NOT USB FOR / W ACOUISCCION
Pl Sta 78+3/.90 � � � � 56 E
In I I I -Y6- PC Sta 12+99.38 0 = 10' 12 58.5' (RT) L �'5
~ w II +34� I I N 6 AN09 D = 0' 42' 10.9'
tPUE T = 1,453.20'728.5 ' II N I BZ 2 MORRIS PHILIP AWSON
R = 8✓50DO' I 1 y SARA LYN SZOSTAKA'c?
SE - NC 2 Co I I 24" RCP -III DB PB Z8 p� 25 2DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
IN 1 9 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I.I"/a SITE 6 50' 0'50' I BZJURISDICTIONAL
� TEMP.SURFACEBi 2 �'WATER IMPCAT STREAMN gP29—E2N 24" RCP-u� -Y6- PT Sta. /3+34.64 n6.oST BZ t GRAPHIC SCALE . / I Z ISTREAM
—,-.I92 —_ MORRIS PHILIP ALLI92P25' 0' 25' — + /— � �� SARA L28 P 2602
-�S �I I(I CLASS B RIP DBP8928 PG ?502 0l 1 Prepa�dbY
92 CLASS B RIP RAP MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
EST 15 TONS I CF a
I I G I I a EST 14 SY SARA LYN SZOSTAK � � � EST 5 TONS
{� GEOTEXTILE DB 7928 PG 2602 INSET SCALE I I I NI so
EST 14 SY
BY5-130 I PB 21 PG 15 0A'E vee�� meermy Np,s.,0000sl
�bVE �6, I GEOTEXTILE,°s,mp„
2' SPECIAL LATERAL I O - N 90 g5� I I (rte N I ,e,gn rvc neon°i"
BASE DITCH W/ I 10 VJ
CLASS B RIP RAP II I L Z8� z 1 3 O I I L�Z� 50.00' N 8996'04' W 101.53' L,7
SEE DETAIL b u, 44 / I I RENG9VE -Y7- POT S10.104
° -5A'0Z C o x I D AHMAD H. HAMZ
3'% N I x MORRIS E. CARTER AND N T°GgS� 3/ \+ I� n ,n�, o DB 7661 PG 3026
WIFE, BARBARA G. S mol w
CALVARY BAPTIST I W CARTER -Y6- PC $ta. 15+87,60 N 82°43'16' E f>, PB 20 PG 59
CHURCH, INC. __ DB 4TI3 PG 515 I III 7+ Ze MO IS PHILIP A 1
01.95' II ^
OF MCLEANSVILLE I N 82°34'17° E I V 1 I I N SA LYN SZ T
DS 5726 PG 196 a o I - IG4.48' I o SURFACE WATER - DB P sot f �
g 1 00' I W IMPACT PB PG a
f CLASS B RIP RAP CHL
EST 2 TONS SITE 6 I
N I I BEGIN 2'-6'C&G SOUTHERN NET, INC. EST 7 SY esr
W I +16.68 -Y6- DB 3342 PG 815 GEOTEITILE 49 MORRIS PHILIP AWSON N 84°08'04' W PORI
,s PB 21 PG 15 MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON X II 8—x
- I I SARA LYN SZOSTAK -X 37.05' 52.93' 48' CHL X N 86°18'29' W
a _ SARA LYN SZOSTAK MORRIS PHILIP AWSON -
Ln DB 7928 PG 2602 MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON 85*oo DB 7928 PG 2602 s I £ RETAIN " 100.00'
SARA 92 SZOSTAK
R OVE PB 21 PG 15 DB 7928 PG 2602 SARA LYN SZOSTAK PB 21 PG 15
I. PB 21 PG 15 DB 7928 PG 2602 5fl BEGIN CONSTRUCT/ON -��
END - C PB 21 PG 15 BST "
+31.4 I I h/T z 100'8 TAPER 4'6 a z MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON -Y7- POT Sta //+00.00
a CLASS B RIP RAP WOODED'
'0 I SOUTHERN 47 4g - SARA LYN SZOSTAK WIC ,
IS 3 TONS DB 7928 PG 2602
Do I 1 NET INC. - ES7 to SY PB 21 PG 15 2 GLADYS BARRERA a
H" { /5' / DB 47 PG 81 091 -I- GEOTEXTILE a \ O1 FLORES
W 2 9' E n \ I I w 51 Q DB 7741 PG 1802 Q
_ + 1 I E z \ PASTURE WOODED I / r o m PB 20 PG 59
AHMAD H. HAMZE
WOODED / ISBKD 7y�C&G I DEI 7881 PG 3026
/EL ow p E E N .. E I pG90 +1332 -YlC I PB 20 PG 59
N - - FW LuJ \
O __ / - - - C - - - _ _ - - X X =x 1 -sV p-IJE =7C PUk / E3 SPECIAL I I ISFD
O I °- - NC HW - - - -"- - - - GRAS R 091 -x �x P L +6687 DITCH EST
O C`�p u ` - - - - TO R/W bor- D UE � I� SEE DETAIL CLASS B RIP
CB - - - �O m/ pUE--� �T W m I5A4'LT GEo ExrIL�
ODRUN Cr "REMOVE T Fo- MCI CommYr� Ions Services Inc
n I - - _ rc
GRASS
�GRAS —< 15"RCP-IV 'I 90
90 B C 15" RCP -IV 15" CB 9p L`�C m u - - - - _ _ _ _ - — - - �— --- _ IS• RCP IS' RCP EI
Z C CB C D C 90 F --- F w i F _ C 091 L7SS' ROP-&eensbo 16 •, DIP
�[�� _ 15" RCP -IV }
J� E D E �� -_��90
I
H0
P D FIEL E a a —E E E® E 91 E 92 RCP -IV Cg a- - - 1- _ S 70 URUNG70N RD 39'BST
D til �x E E 92 -----
x X
48'CHL
C I I I --- -_
0' IN I
-D -
L"J Ict I CUT SPECIAL
DTCHCK OF CURB
r
-X—x _ X I
SEE DETAIL 9
a GR R IMS
-L- POC Sta. 79+09.64=
E
E—E REMOVE
I
-Y6- PT Sta.18+09.82
D-
m
oo�o
N
-
I
Ili
-L- PT Sta. 85+56.57
�o
9 A
830
129
13740
a
C
22450
I
II
BURCH u.__... HM, LLC
N
N
'-'
42 Q ' 1
ROBERT W. DARNELL & LYNN D. THOMPSON
I� yBY-131
I
BURCH CREEK FAH,
I�
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
Of
JOHN P. PAISLEY, SR AND 1 I
DB 6226 PG 1416
=
(NOT TO SCAU)
WIFE, EULA K. PAISLEY ° '41
o
DB 6594 PG 1190
1n
BURCH CREEK FARM,LLCz4
DB 2958 PG 595 O I
o
m
RETAIN
I
a °El
�
o
ROBERT W.DARNELL &
LYNN D.THOMPSON
"g I mI o
i
�m O xl
FROM STA.80+65 TO STA.81+65 A RT
-L- POT STA, 91 + 00,00
_
DETAIL 2
US 70 (BURLINGTON REW
AT BIRCH CREEK--RD-
REEKRD.2020
E—E REMOVE
2020
_
2870 2019
ADT
m
w 20 39
N
-
I
Ili
-L- PT Sta. 85+56.57
V
830
129
13740
1190
1580
14100
22450
22740
US 70 (BURLINGTON RD.)
m
E—E REMOVE
o
I I
CULTIVATED FIELD
E
725'LANE DROP TRANSI?lON
N
-
I
Ili
-L- PT Sta. 85+56.57
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
C,41
90+00
I
I I
SURFACEWATER
N
'-'
�I3'E _ y
B
202.14' �
I� yBY-131
I
BURCH CREEK FAH,
80' TAPER
TIE TO EX/ST/NG
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
Of
• I
-
�I
(NOT TO SCAU)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
°
BURCH CREEK FARM,LLCz4
NnTuaaL
G ND
DB 6D4 P G 1190
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
a °El
ROBERT W.DARNELL &
LYNN D.THOMPSON
= x
FROM STA.80+65 TO STA.81+65 A RT
-L- POT STA, 91 + 00,00
Q -o
DETAIL 2
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
I
ol.
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
Not Style,
M
DO 6226 PG
DB 6594 PG 1910 E
ti¢
DETAIL 6
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
(Not to Swle)
Notorol
Gi--d 3.7 D s'iope
d
Geoma 1e B
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Mox. d=1.0 Ft.
B=2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap
FROM STA. 14+68 -Y6- TO
STA. 17+60 -Y6- RT = 78+45 -L- LT
E—E REMOVE
CULTIVATED FIELD
725'LANE DROP TRANSI?lON
1\
-L- PT Sta. 85+56.57
90+00
-L- POT Sta. 90+16J5=
43 -Y7- POT Sta. 12+76.74
LASS B RIP RAP
EST 2
EST 7 SY SY
GEOTE)M E
DETAIL 9
BURCH CREEK FAH,
80' TAPER
TIE TO EX/ST/NG
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
ROBERT W. DARNELL & LYNN D. THOMPSO,
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
(RT SIDE ONLY)
(NOT TO SCAU)
DB 6226 PG 1416
NnTuaaL
G ND
DB 6D4 P G 1190
----
ENTIP PROJECT U-2581 BA
FROM STA.80+65 TO STA.81+65 A RT
-L- POT STA, 91 + 00,00
DETAIL 2
END CONSTRUCTION
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
Not Style,
-L- POT Sta. 91+80.00
Frog
Ditch
Notuml � 3', ote Slope
t
Ground o'.7 D F\�
Min. D=1.5 H.
FROM STA.90+63 TO STA.91+40 -L- LT
FOR —L— PROFILE SEE SHEET /3
EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED
FOR —Y6— & —Y8— PROFILES SEE SHEET 16

*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
12+02/12+07 -L- LT
30" RCP
< 0.01
< 0.01
10
19
2
10+86/12+50 -Y4- RT
Roadway Fill/24" Pipe
0.02
0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
6
10
3
11+30/11+50 -YS-
30" RCP
11
16
4
49+00/50+47 -L-
Roadway Fill
0.05
0.03
5
54+92/55+93 -L-
1@10'x8' RCBC/Roadway Fill
< 0.01
0.05
< 0.01
251
33
6
14+60/14+66 -Y6- LT
24" RCP
< 0.01
< 0.01
20
15
TOTALS*:
0.07
0.04
0.05
< 0.01
298
93
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb

L"
v
Qq
N
See Sheet 9B For Conventions/ Symbols
CFI PLANS
BEGIN TIP PROJECT U-2581BA
-L- PC STA. 12 + 32.17
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 11 +85.00
ro
GRo NrOW
KORO lV
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- STA. 18+14.00
�V1L°�'1LV1le 0A,' IN CARC(yLIN A
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
LOCATION. US 70 (BURLINGTON ROAD) FROM WEST OF SR 30451SR 2819
(MT. HOPE CHURCH ROAD) TO JUST EAST OF
SR 3175 (BIRCH CREEK ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, SIGNALS AND CULVERT
BUFFER IMPACT PERMIT
* EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED
BTATH
STAT6 PROIRGT R�RRRNCR NQ
SOTAE
HEFTS
��
U-2581 BA
I
DESIGN DATA
Or— PROLN0.
P.APROLN0.
D88CR@TfON
34840.1.1
50 25 0 50 100
PE
940 Main mpus Dri Suite..
hl HB EKl—C,'ng NC, , S ;G 5Qa
RM/, UTIL.
HOOF
CONST.
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
W '1111gn Ncnaoe
V
P.E.
® C�
® �w
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
JIMMY GOODNIGHT, PE
PLANS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
50 25 0 50 100
T = 6 %
V = 50 MPH
* (TTST 1 + DUAL 5)
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
OCTOBER 30, 2018
PROJECT ENGINEER
JERRY
SIGNATURE:
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y6- STA. 12 + 90.00
-L- POT STA. 91 + 00.00
-Y7- STA. 11+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 91 + 80.00
r .., ......., ., w Z
N 0 � � END CONSTRUCTION
-Y4- STA. 12+43.00
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF GREENSBORO AND MCLEANSVILLE. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD 22. UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared for the North Carolina Department of Transportation
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
In the office of.
50 25 0 50 100
ADT 2019 = 15,430
940 Main mpus Dri Suite..
hl HB EKl—C,'ng NC, , S ;G 5Qa
HOOF
ADT 2039 = 25,890
K = 12 %
D = 60 %
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
W '1111gn Ncnaoe
V
P.E.
® C�
® �w
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
JIMMY GOODNIGHT, PE
PLANS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
50 25 0 50 100
T = 6 %
V = 50 MPH
* (TTST 1 + DUAL 5)
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT U-2581BA = 1.490 MI.
OCTOBER 30, 2018
PROJECT ENGINEER
JERRY
SIGNATURE:
sa
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
OCTOBER 15, 2019
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
DVENLANA,ERPE
10 5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS =
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
NCDOT CONTACT LAURA SUTTON, PE
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

Z
0
U
C
E
E
0
0
c
w
N
w
-L- CURVE DATA
Pl Sto 17+66.4/
Z� = /2'58'1U'(LT)
D = /' I3' 08.6°
L = 1063.9/'
T = 534.24'
R = 4,70000'
SE = 0.025
RO = 105'
INC = 42'
-Y2- CURVE DATA
Pl Sta /3+49,93
A = /4' 39' 42.3' (LT)
D = 2' 06'23-3'
L = 696.04'
T = 349.93'
R = 2,720.00'
SE = 0,04
RO = 144'
US 70 (BURLINGTON RD-)
AT MT HOPE CHURCH RD.
57 :'
p 3770
0
6310 2019 ADT
_
2039
\
Geolexnle Type of Uner-
1550
3240
u 440
, 520
US 70
US 70
D.
(BURLINGTON RD.'_
15430
(BURLINGTON RD.)
13030
25890 2330
1
1040 21500
2790
1120
a
ci
0=
5150 =
u
6460
_
I
V
BEGIN TIP PROJECT U-2581BA
—L— PC STA. 12 + 32.17
BEGIN MILL/RESURFACE
BEGIN WIDENING (LT SIDE ONLY)
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- POT Sta. 1I+85.00
W
Nc
oy 65.62'
W
NC DOT CLASS B RIP RAP -
C
S .1c 8, �.� Wm PC 94 01 EST 5 TONS
0.EST 16 SY
G 38 w GEOTEXTILE
w W o I TE 1
ISFD
Nry �/RETAINII a WC
=' SYSTEM///J v rcw
Z P/ I CAP PO
� EIP
4P
C p• _ CAPP IP
18' RCP—��m. 3�0. C&G RETq
- US 70/BURUN('TON RB 5 BEG/'y 2+�•C,�
sr
IS' RCP —
END UNK
S� J
— SS
I I �EIF
\\ � O
GRASS EIP
\ /�Q
RETAIN SYSTEM •LT /a-,/ PVC
1 RETAIN SYSTEM
24'BLK WALL BL IO
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
/ z -Yl- POT Sta.I3+45A0
DETAIL 1 55 $
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
\ —WITH RIP RAP
(NOTTO SCALE) MIn.D=1.5 Ft. THOMAS L- -RD PAYNE
NATURAL w
GROUND Mo=.d=1.0 Ff. DB 3829 PG 416
PB 98 PG 89 t-
\
3./ .1 ---��—
57 :'
EDDIE P. NORRIS :o
o,
THOMAS EDWARD PAYNE
p3
a
TONI DUKE PAYNE
DB 5332 PG
\
Geolexnle Type of Uner-
CLA66 B Rip -Rap
�-
FROM STA. 20+75 TO STA. 26+88
-L- RT
w JURISDICTIONAL
m STREAM
\
30X" RCPT
z
X L- P j6• CHJL
I
DB 4,354 PG 1434
N
m
80' LT VV 87' LT
75' LT
- p' R
DED
I
I 0 0 B
\
W
�>
N
J I,/
I
x
--
\
SITE 1
57 :'
EDDIE P. NORRIS :o
o,
THOMAS EDWARD PAYNE
ELIZABETH C. NORRIS
1809
TONI DUKE PAYNE
DB 5332 PG
DB 7430 PG 2333 m
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE\1
PB 8 P 38
�-
REMOVE EXISTING
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2\
24" RCP AND .
REPLACE, IT
9
30X" RCPT
iO
X L- P j6• CHJL
I
DB 4,354 PG 1434
N
m
WOODED
of
MA
-L- rVl, JTa. la'rJT f J=
-Yl- POT Sta. 20+24.64
-Y2- PC Sta. /0+00.00
MCLEANSVILLE
LIONS CLUB
DB 2650 PG 529
PB 98 PG 89
O //
+EX. 57 -L-
/S+Op / / 72' LT
RM
I
born, 16 ', DIP / PUE —
BST
FUE / RETAIN\ \ I O\ CItY oforo, I6 ', PVC 'ea
p I
GRASS pU� SYSTEM L TRAFFIC SIGNAL
1 OB 4957 pC log m\ BEGIN -1-6 C&G O {O 8 GRASS g O
L TANKS 1 L�5
-L- POT Sta.10+00DO REMOVE AND REPLACE 00 BAY T TOMB ONESO O %®OT&T Corp, app
'h+85 -Yl-
70' RT I
APER PAIR, COPPERQhd
O C0 I
y. -------- 35O'R/GHT TURN
MT. PLEASANT
METHODIST CHURCH
DB 1374 PG 609
DB 73 PG 180
DB 200 PG 694
53
BEGIN GRADE
END MILL/RESURFACE
-L- POC STA. I3+50.00
i
I I II
I I
Ibl d,
PT
(APPROX. dJ s
m
EDDIE P. NORRIS :o
-RETAIN SYSTEM
ELIZABETH C. NORRIS
1809
_- =-=15=,RCP-__-
DB 5332 PG
x xxxxx
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE\1
I
ENGINEER
1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2\
APER PAIR, COPPERQhd
O C0 I
y. -------- 35O'R/GHT TURN
MT. PLEASANT
METHODIST CHURCH
DB 1374 PG 609
DB 73 PG 180
DB 200 PG 694
53
BEGIN GRADE
END MILL/RESURFACE
-L- POC STA. I3+50.00
i
I I II
I I
Ibl d,
PT
gtan�,�^ee.ing NC PC (C-�p05)
I v
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 7
4 r
WI1 as E 50' 0' 50'
11 I-
IW II Q
II s GRAPHIC SCALE \
II,I �81 25' 0' 25'
XY
+47.95-YI-�:;w1; INSET SCALE
L'_2' LT mo
WOODED S 7312' S 69'00'09' E S 74°23'S6�
55' E55• E I6�
Tia 3 100.61'
6 / � /
5'E ap
55' a
VE p
LARRY MICHAEL OVERBY I
DB 3983 PG 562 POND PBCIF�P6E44EMENT
PB 105 PG 114
REMOVE O
o- -L- PT Sta. 22+9609
)41
1 \ �\
3 4
4 LADY LUCK LLC
1`�1N "- ^'SITE \ \ N DB 6313 PC 2160
Ylw - INVESTME
20+00 NTS, LLC PS 188 PG 76
DB7804 PG 1634
N PB 191 PG 44
Iw \ BEGIN
C&G
d BEr-
N 6'C&G \ P-63
IQ +a1 -Y1- _ 0
EX. -35 Wt x BEGIN -1 C&G� ER
N I BAS" . r
2'-6' CAS 250' Rly _ N + + 5 -�77L- w
+14b2 +42 -L- T E END 2'-6 C&G esr e�'P9c9r EX,R4N N
+6391 Bsr
4U E IS E
P O
CB � C)
SYSTEM
zl
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
m
U-258/80 4
-RETAIN SYSTEM
-- -- --�
_- =-=15=,RCP-__-
ROADWAY DESIGN
Y,
O
I
ENGINEER
1
56
rE PLANS
ONE WAY
DO NOT USE FOR
BAPTISIT CHURCH
-
DB 4,354 PG 1434
PB 113 PG 25
gtan�,�^ee.ing NC PC (C-�p05)
I v
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 7
4 r
WI1 as E 50' 0' 50'
11 I-
IW II Q
II s GRAPHIC SCALE \
II,I �81 25' 0' 25'
XY
+47.95-YI-�:;w1; INSET SCALE
L'_2' LT mo
WOODED S 7312' S 69'00'09' E S 74°23'S6�
55' E55• E I6�
Tia 3 100.61'
6 / � /
5'E ap
55' a
VE p
LARRY MICHAEL OVERBY I
DB 3983 PG 562 POND PBCIF�P6E44EMENT
PB 105 PG 114
REMOVE O
o- -L- PT Sta. 22+9609
)41
1 \ �\
3 4
4 LADY LUCK LLC
1`�1N "- ^'SITE \ \ N DB 6313 PC 2160
Ylw - INVESTME
20+00 NTS, LLC PS 188 PG 76
DB7804 PG 1634
N PB 191 PG 44
Iw \ BEGIN
C&G
d BEr-
N 6'C&G \ P-63
IQ +a1 -Y1- _ 0
EX. -35 Wt x BEGIN -1 C&G� ER
N I BAS" . r
2'-6' CAS 250' Rly _ N + + 5 -�77L- w
+14b2 +42 -L- T E END 2'-6 C&G esr e�'P9c9r EX,R4N N
+6391 Bsr
4U E IS E
P O
CB � C)
SYSTEM
zl
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
1
�\
U-258/80 4
RM/ SHEET NO.
W 1
I
Z
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
O
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE
rE PLANS
12' PS 1
DO NOT USE FOR
/W ACOMISMON
0
l
+99 -Y2
zdF I
75' LT
- p' R
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
gtan�,�^ee.ing NC PC (C-�p05)
I v
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 7
4 r
WI1 as E 50' 0' 50'
11 I-
IW II Q
II s GRAPHIC SCALE \
II,I �81 25' 0' 25'
XY
+47.95-YI-�:;w1; INSET SCALE
L'_2' LT mo
WOODED S 7312' S 69'00'09' E S 74°23'S6�
55' E55• E I6�
Tia 3 100.61'
6 / � /
5'E ap
55' a
VE p
LARRY MICHAEL OVERBY I
DB 3983 PG 562 POND PBCIF�P6E44EMENT
PB 105 PG 114
REMOVE O
o- -L- PT Sta. 22+9609
)41
1 \ �\
3 4
4 LADY LUCK LLC
1`�1N "- ^'SITE \ \ N DB 6313 PC 2160
Ylw - INVESTME
20+00 NTS, LLC PS 188 PG 76
DB7804 PG 1634
N PB 191 PG 44
Iw \ BEGIN
C&G
d BEr-
N 6'C&G \ P-63
IQ +a1 -Y1- _ 0
EX. -35 Wt x BEGIN -1 C&G� ER
N I BAS" . r
2'-6' CAS 250' Rly _ N + + 5 -�77L- w
+14b2 +42 -L- T E END 2'-6 C&G esr e�'P9c9r EX,R4N N
+6391 Bsr
4U E IS E
P O
CB � C)
SYSTEM
zl
SPECIAL BACK OF -�
1
�\
CURB CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 1
~
W 1
I
IT
3026 - 2 C&G
25BK0
\
c? CULTIVATED FIELD
1 D
I
12' PS 1
4dR�' 15' 1
z I
+99 -Y2
zdF I
75' LT
- p' R
z
+tDO
86'
SPECIAL BACK OF -�
-L- +04 -L
CURB CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 1
RT 88' RT •,
SPENCE & ROBINSON
REAL ESTATE, LLC
25BK0
DB 6647 PG 925
O
+eN� 2C&G ATCHUNE vz SIA TZ+oo.00 ISEE SHEET TDA - - _ PROP. 4" CONCRETE SIDEW
NA FOR L PROFILE SEE SHEET 11
EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED FOR -YI- & -Y2- PROFILES SEE SHEET 14

I
-L- CURVE DATA
P1 Sta 53+54.53 P/ Sta 6/+02.09
A = 6' 19' 47S (LT) L = 12'22'56 f (LT)
D = 0' 41'55.4' D = 2'06'23.Y
L = 905.9/' L = 587.83'
\ T = 8,200' T = 295.06'
.
R = Sz000a R = 2,720oa
SE NO SE=0.04
\ RO = 168'
I\
I `
\
r32)\ 32
.J
\ GLORIA POOLE �+LO BIA3800LE
\ DB 38314 `RG 1558
GLORIA POOLE PG 2041 \
I DB 3207 FIG PB 70 PG 535 — \�
31 '->
TRIAD WORSHIP CENTER 32
CHURCH OF GOD
DB 7215 PG 1959
PB 139 PG 91 i„ CUSSa RIP RAPT
u� SITE 2 EST 245 TONS
EST 280 SY
dm GEOTEXTILE /
(� ISBKD 55
J+, ISBKD \
BM3
F
o WOODED m
It
W
Ln P U E A
LU REMOVE
W W
7CTQ
CLAY
O N
+
In
Fa -
N
I
E
C
0
w
W
--PJUE
REL VL
i-�ecry.F,O..I�RECT E
E�
20'CITY OF GREENSBORO
V PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT
P © PU OB 9 329 PU
/
REMOVE GRASS
O
EXISTING R%W
15' RCP ——
70 CB
If1Q US 70/BURUN
GREU TL -3
JB
36" RCP -III _ o{�
CUSS I RIP RAP____
EST 10 TONS
EST 23 SIL
EST 23 TILE
SY
SITE 2
I
ALINE REID COOPER \\
DB 3572 PG 4
�0
II
II
II
I I
I I
LI
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
IPROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
BUFFER DRAWING U -2W SHE 7
RM/ SHEET NO.
SHEET 3 OF 7 ROA
ENGIN ERDWAYSIGN ENGINEERS
50' o' 50' INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NOT USB FOR / W ACOUISCCION
GRAPHIC SCALE 0
OD
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared by
/E/ `�vhb
9mui.uYein ng Nor,.eRC (C--3705)
Raleigh ric ndea�
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.
/ DAVID T. TURNER OF MCLEANSVILLE
MARY T. WEDDINGTON DB 5726 PG 196
PIERRE A. GORIA MARY T. DB 7355 PG 452 REBECCA P. L
SOLE h
CAROLYN E. GORIA WEDDINGTON PB 101 PG 8 37 —L— PT Sta. 63+94.85 DBI2333 Pr
DB 3818 FIG 1989 DB 4391
O PG 1180 NSR COMPANY, LLC
PB 101 PG 8 2' BASE DITCH W/ DB 7079 PG 7118
CLASS B RIP RAP �
SEE DETAIL 7
33 SLOPE =2.8% 36
EST 75 TONS ,I,�
EST 200 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 35 CY DDE +61 -L-�
/-SITE 2 SPECIAL BACK OF +54 8 'LT
80' LT
CURB CUT DITCH 80' LT
m W/CUSS B RIP RAP -BEGIN 2:CC&G
SEE DETAIL 1 END 2'-6'C&G +92J8 -L- 1y
I = 76222 -L-
WOODED
pUE N
-L- PCC Sta. 58+07A3TAPER pUE EIP
F
I 60-`00 +64 -L- 100' BAY ?UE
,A I +5957EE�C I Gq 83' LT ..
DE h N I +89GB5 L E s 4 I I 200 RIGH1" TURN PUE
72 72 pUE O
PUE.
� DUE DUE DUE DUE �UE �
30, 71 WOODED
EI
BST
B
:UL
CB 071 71 a
15" RCP -IV- -Fs r FF "� 72rip
1�
QERISTING BL-�E
U D 18 RCP- ---�� D 72 E
71 CB �w D 71
THOMAS G. LOWDERMILK !/1�
E 1N@ID'L%S' RCBC Q lTyPJ a� 4Z INC. DO
BPB 92 PG 49 1 1 4V
30" RCP i0 W E� E� 39 \ THOMAS R. LOWDERMILK AND
STUBBED O WALL ESE O \ WIFE, REBECCA P. LOWDERMILK
OF PROPOSED DB 2153 PG 286
BOX CULVERT 1 \ DB 3697 PG 546
CUSS II RIP RAP
^, EMBEDDED INTO I 2SBKD
STREAM BED
/ 0 EST 35 TONS
SITE 2
II IP RAP EST 60 SY GEOTEXTILE
" TONS I
25 SY GEOTEXTILE
DETAIL 7
STANDARD BASE DITCH
1Not to Bwle)
N.W.1 Noluml
Ground ?:� .L.� Groond
d D
--h B Min. D=1.5 F.
Max. d=1.0 F.
^Khan B m < 6.0' B=2.0 F.
Type al Liner= CLASS B Rip-Rop
FROM STA. 57+30 TO STA. 58+40 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
\
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH
WITH RIP RAPS
(WITHTO SCALE) Min.D=1.5 F.
-
/�-NATURAL M.X. d=1.0 F7.
L GROUND
3'
D
Geo,extile Type of Liner= CLASS BRip-Rop
FROM STA. 58+50 TO STA. 60+30 -L- IT

u
E
E
C
0
c
w
N
w
Iz
W + /
S
N
W I -
W - -
O / _
0 CQ 0 4�-
O 4�
J GRAS 0 15" RCP -IV 90
W 2'-6'C&G 90
BT T C
Z C C D C 90
� E D
2 J
U D
X 48' CHLX r
IN j
-x—x - x rh I
GR R IMS
0o I.
�o
S al
I
42
JOHN P. PAISLEY, AND o o `n41 1 l o l c
WIFE, EULA K. PAISLEY
DB 2958 PG 595
RETAIN i
I
'p I
Qm vlXI o
a II
I z
. I I
I
I
c III
- III I
S 85°37'13' E SW I y BY -
202.14' I
z4 e
BURCH CREEK FARM, LLC I n
ROBERT W.DARNELL & _
LYNN D.THOMPSONI Di
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL I m
DB 6226 PG 1416 I
DB 6594 PG 1190
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y6- POT Sta 12+90,00
I -Y6- PC Sta. 12+99,38 623 q0 E
I I j Apo
SITE 3
w
I
PB 21 PG 15
-
'a4 I i i IJ
_
24" RCP j"
-Y6- PT Sta. 1.3+34.6,
�1
92
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
9
V
CLASS B RIP RAP
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
92
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
\ II
DB 7928 PG 2602
Q
x MORRIS E. CARTER ANDN
BY5-130 -
2'SPEC AL LATERAL I
OD
BASE DITCH W/ I
h
CLASS B RIP RAP III
SEE DETAIL 6
3'7
CARTER
CALVARY BAPTIST
t�
,
CHURCH, INC.
—i
�i
OF MCLEANSVILLE
I
DS 5726 PG 196 i
r,
I
N 82.34'17" E
I i.I
7jp4'48
\5
25' 0' 25'
w
I
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
MORRIS PHILIP ALUSON
Z
O
�J
j
IT
n
END
+31.4
III
I II
u
E
E
C
0
c
w
N
w
Iz
W + /
S
N
W I -
W - -
O / _
0 CQ 0 4�-
O 4�
J GRAS 0 15" RCP -IV 90
W 2'-6'C&G 90
BT T C
Z C C D C 90
� E D
2 J
U D
X 48' CHLX r
IN j
-x—x - x rh I
GR R IMS
0o I.
�o
S al
I
42
JOHN P. PAISLEY, AND o o `n41 1 l o l c
WIFE, EULA K. PAISLEY
DB 2958 PG 595
RETAIN i
I
'p I
Qm vlXI o
a II
I z
. I I
I
I
c III
- III I
S 85°37'13' E SW I y BY -
202.14' I
z4 e
BURCH CREEK FARM, LLC I n
ROBERT W.DARNELL & _
LYNN D.THOMPSONI Di
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL I m
DB 6226 PG 1416 I
DB 6594 PG 1190
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y6- POT Sta 12+90,00
I -Y6- PC Sta. 12+99,38 623 q0 E
I I j Apo
SITE 3
w
I
PB 21 PG 15
-
I
I I BZ 2
_
24" RCP j"
-Y6- PT Sta. 1.3+34.6,
�1
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
9
V
CLASS B RIP RAP
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
EST 5 TONS
EST 14 SY
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
f GEOTEXTILE
DB 7928 PG 2602
REOV�
y
PB 21 PG 15
-
2020
_
- •24"
U
�1
RCP -111
U -2W 9
V
830
129
13740
U, 44
22450
22740
E
I
• .1
x MORRIS E. CARTER ANDN
ROAENGINEER SIGN ENGINEERS
1(1��CL
OD
•ES
h
'l
1111
CARTER
-Y6- PC Sta.15+87.60 N 62.43'16' E
t�
,
� PIMA
•
�i
�n
101.95'
DO NOT USB FOR / W ACOUISCCION
I
REOV�
y
PB 21 PG 15
-
2020
_
SITE 3
U
Z Z8 �
U -2W 9
V
830
129
13740
U, 44
22450
22740
E
I
(V�
(�
x MORRIS E. CARTER ANDN
ROAENGINEER SIGN ENGINEERS
5q 02
TO 6;.v
OD
WIFE, BARBARA G.
50' 0' 50'
10
CARTER
-Y6- PC Sta.15+87.60 N 62.43'16' E
Q
INCOMPLE E PLANS
I DB 4T13 PG 515
iN6jQ5p06
\
101.95'
DO NOT USB FOR / W ACOUISCCION
I
N 82.34'17" E
7jp4'48
\5
25' 0' 25'
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
MORRIS PHILIP ALUSON
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
o
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
INSET SCALE / z DB 7928 F 2802
6 E P8 21 PG 15
N E2' u
CLASS B RIP RAP
DB 7928 PG 2602
f
EST2 TONS
PB 21 PG 15
BEGIN 2'-6'C&G
SOUTHERN NEINC.
T,
EST 7 Sy
Ii6.08'
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
�
�n
AN B -I
I +16.68 -Y6-
DB 3342 PG 815
GEOTEXTILE
z SARA LYN SZOSTAK
Q
O
PB 21 PG 15
MORRIS PHILIP AWSON
OI
I
Prepared by
PB 21 PG 15
N-1
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
MORRIS PHILIP AWSON
I
so
_
45
DB 7928 PG 2602
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
85+00
. R OVE
PB 21 PG 15
DB 7928 PG 2602
SARA O
DB STAK
7928LYN SZPG
I
l00 B
V
46
TOPER 3
PB 21 PG 15
47
PB 21 PG 15 15
a
CLASS B RIP RAP
I NEThINCN
-
48
EST 3 TONS
1 DB 47 PG 81
091 P
1-
EST 10 SY
GEOTEXTILE
2 8 Eo
I 1 E
z
\ SIN
PASTURE Nlo
WOODED
0 . M PUS ' _ D
,.
C
mak= 3"
F
TO R/W CB
CrC m-
_ 091 CB L9SS' RqP�#'
E—E E ---
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB -
CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 9
-L- POC Sta. 79+09.64=
-Y6- PT Sta.18+09.82
43
BURCH u.__... -rRM, LLC
ROBERT W.DARNELL & LYNN D.THOMPSON
ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
DB 6226 PG 1416
DB 6594 PG 1190
US 70 (BURLINGTON REW
AT BIRCH CREEK--RD-
REEKRD.2020
2020
_
2870 2019
ADT
U
w 2039
U -2W 9
V
830
129
13740
1190
1580
14100
22450
22740
US 70 (BURLINGTON RD.)
DETAIL 6
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
INm to Swlel
Noturol
3.7 D si.pe
d
Ge.reytip.
le B
Min. D=1.5 F1.
Mo,. d=1.0 Ft.
B=2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B Rip -Rap
FROM STA. 14+68 -Y6- TO
STA. 17+60 -Y6- RT = 78+45 -L- LT
it�( N I sleigh rvcn
N 8916'04' W �
50.00' � N 8996'04' W 101.53'
I -Y7- POT Sta.10+0060
30 \ x I ter: O N {•'3 AH.
H. HAMZ
X ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ��� + o DB 7661 PG 3026
I PEI 20 PG 59
XXXXX ZONE 1 MO IS PHILIP A I a
SAF LYN SZ T Q4�
s DB P 602 f N }�
PB PG 15 x O D 2//'� 6
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS I �yi50
ZONE 2 I —
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON N 84'06'04' W x II X� PORT
SARA LYN SZOSTAK _X 37,05' 52.93' 48' CHL X X N 86'18'29' W
O DB 7928 PG 2602 s I £ RETAIN 100.00'
PB 21 PG 15
50 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I�
MORRIS PHIUP ALLISON -Y7- POT Sta. 11+00.00 W =gym
SARA LYN SZOSTAK WDODED''
DB 7928 PG 2602 f +/g
h PB 21 PG 15 a GLADYS BARRERA 3
I FLO
DB 77a11 PG 1802 Q
/ AHMAD H. HAMZE O a PB 20 PG 59
I
WOODED / ISBKD 7y�C&G I DB 7661 PG 3026
0G90 +1332 -YlC I PS 20 PG 59
PUk I OG30 D 1 I I I ILA
X a I + I DPTCH L S1A55 B RIP
FQE ___6 m l W I5D F L SEE DETAIL GEOE)RILE I
iOOCB ED
- - - - STONE O1 C GRAS _ GRASS I I 6 RETAIN
- - - - - - -T - - - CB - - - CHC92_ - �^z
G-
E-
E—E
CULTIVq TED FIELD E E
-L- PT Sta.
-L- POT Sta. 90+11 I EST 7 SY
43 -Y7- POT Sta. 12+76.74 GEOTEXTIU
Bd T,
DETAIL 9 BURCH CREEK FAR. TIE TO EX/S
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH ROBERT W.DARNELL & LYNN D. THOMPSO, (RT SIDE OA
(NOT TO SCALE) ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
NnTuaaL DB 6226 PG 1416
G ND DB -- 6D4 P
G 1190
ENTIP PROJECT U-2581 BA
FROM STA.80+65 TO STA.81+65 A RT -L- POT STA. 91 + 00,00
DETAIL 2 END CONSTRUCTION
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
I— $wle, -L- POT Sta. 9I+80.1
From
Ditch
"
1:17 3', ot• Slope
Ground o'.�7 D F\� �
Min. D=1.5 H.
FROM STA.90+63 TO STA.91+40 -L- LT
FOR —L— PROFILE SEE SHEET /3
[:j17EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED FOR —Y6— & —Y8— PROFILES SEE SHEET 16
HD -14'1
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
BUFFER DRAWING
U -2W 9
E
SHEET
RN✓ SHEET NO.
SHEET6 OF 7
(V�
(�
ROAENGINEER SIGN ENGINEERS
OD
50' 0' 50'
o
Q
INCOMPLE E PLANS
GRAPHIC SCALE
iN6jQ5p06
\
Z
DO NOT USB FOR / W ACOUISCCION
\5
25' 0' 25'
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
SARA LYN SZOSTAK
o
INSET SCALE / z DB 7928 F 2802
6 E P8 21 PG 15
N E2' u
m
o X
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
25p
X
_
Ii6.08'
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON
�
�n
AN B -I
�IIl
�
113
z SARA LYN SZOSTAK
Q
o DB 7928 PG 2602
OI
I
Prepared by
PB 21 PG 15
N-1
N
I
so
it�( N I sleigh rvcn
N 8916'04' W �
50.00' � N 8996'04' W 101.53'
I -Y7- POT Sta.10+0060
30 \ x I ter: O N {•'3 AH.
H. HAMZ
X ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ��� + o DB 7661 PG 3026
I PEI 20 PG 59
XXXXX ZONE 1 MO IS PHILIP A I a
SAF LYN SZ T Q4�
s DB P 602 f N }�
PB PG 15 x O D 2//'� 6
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS I �yi50
ZONE 2 I —
MORRIS PHILIP ALLISON N 84'06'04' W x II X� PORT
SARA LYN SZOSTAK _X 37,05' 52.93' 48' CHL X X N 86'18'29' W
O DB 7928 PG 2602 s I £ RETAIN 100.00'
PB 21 PG 15
50 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I�
MORRIS PHIUP ALLISON -Y7- POT Sta. 11+00.00 W =gym
SARA LYN SZOSTAK WDODED''
DB 7928 PG 2602 f +/g
h PB 21 PG 15 a GLADYS BARRERA 3
I FLO
DB 77a11 PG 1802 Q
/ AHMAD H. HAMZE O a PB 20 PG 59
I
WOODED / ISBKD 7y�C&G I DB 7661 PG 3026
0G90 +1332 -YlC I PS 20 PG 59
PUk I OG30 D 1 I I I ILA
X a I + I DPTCH L S1A55 B RIP
FQE ___6 m l W I5D F L SEE DETAIL GEOE)RILE I
iOOCB ED
- - - - STONE O1 C GRAS _ GRASS I I 6 RETAIN
- - - - - - -T - - - CB - - - CHC92_ - �^z
G-
E-
E—E
CULTIVq TED FIELD E E
-L- PT Sta.
-L- POT Sta. 90+11 I EST 7 SY
43 -Y7- POT Sta. 12+76.74 GEOTEXTIU
Bd T,
DETAIL 9 BURCH CREEK FAR. TIE TO EX/S
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH ROBERT W.DARNELL & LYNN D. THOMPSO, (RT SIDE OA
(NOT TO SCALE) ROBERT ARTHUR DARNELL
NnTuaaL DB 6226 PG 1416
G ND DB -- 6D4 P
G 1190
ENTIP PROJECT U-2581 BA
FROM STA.80+65 TO STA.81+65 A RT -L- POT STA. 91 + 00,00
DETAIL 2 END CONSTRUCTION
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
I— $wle, -L- POT Sta. 9I+80.1
From
Ditch
"
1:17 3', ot• Slope
Ground o'.�7 D F\� �
Min. D=1.5 H.
FROM STA.90+63 TO STA.91+40 -L- LT
FOR —L— PROFILE SEE SHEET /3
[:j17EXISTING SIGNAL TO BE MODIFIED FOR —Y6— & —Y8— PROFILES SEE SHEET 16
HD -14'1

Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS
TYPE ALLOWABLE
ROAD PARALLEL
BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL
CROSSING IMPACT (z) (z) (z)
ft ft ft
ZONE 1
ft
(z)
MITIGABLE
ZONE 2
ft
(z)
TOTAL
ft
(z)
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
ft ft
(z) (z)
1
11+85/12+35 -L- LT
X
1201
1201
2
55+18/56+42 -L- LT
1 @ 10'x8' RCBC
X
4370
1127
5497
2
55+00/56+43 -L- RT
1 @ 10'x8' RCBC
X
7393
3228
10621
3
14+10/15+17 -Y6- LT
X
1635 896
2531
TOTALS*:
2836 1 896 1
3732
1 11763
1 4355 1
16118
0 0
NOTES:
2018 Feb