20190285 Ver 1_401 Application_20190304

WETLANDS
J4 & WATERS, INC
Mr. David Shaeffer
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
NC DWR, 401 Buffer and Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
February 27, 2019
20190285
RE: SAW -2017-01776 NWP Modification Request
Matthews Park Off-site Sanitary Sewer Extension NWP 12 Verification
Matthews, Mecklenburg County, NC
Mr. Shaeffer,
Attached please find a Pre -Construction Notification for a sanitary sewer extension project.
This extension is to be completed by the developer of the Matthews Park development
(associated with SAW -2017-01776) to include additional off-site installation of a gravity sewer
line to serve the on-going development. It will additionally serve potential adjacent, future
developments within the area. Temporary construction activities within wetlands associated
with the sewer line construction are confined to a twenty-five foot construction corridor width
which includes approximately 0.22 acres of total temporary disturbance. These areas are to be
returned to original grades for negligible loss of wetland areas other than manhole structures.
Permanent maintenance activities within the twenty-five foot easement will result in the
conversion of approximately 0.07 acres of currently forested wetlands to emergent wetland
conditions.
Project Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide sanitary sewer utility to the Matthews
mixed-use development and future, adjacent potential developments.
Avoidance and Minimization
Several options were considered for providing access to existing sewer utility services prior to
the selection of the current easement. Those alternatives included the use of sewage pump
stations and alternate gravity alignments. The use of on-site pump station facilities to access
existing sewer at Matthews — Mint Hill road was determined to be impractical due to
operations and maintenance costs, and because pump facilities would ultimately be
abandoned to utilize likely, future gravity lines which would be constructed to serve adjacent
development. The current alignment was determined by constraints from topography,
potential future road alignment of Independence Pointe Parkway, and the existing power

utility easement and tower locations. One practicable, alternate gravity line option to access
sewer to the west of the site would have resulted in temporary stream and wetland impacts
and ultimately more total impact because it does not provide access for future development
of adjacent parcels. The current alignment was assessed to ultimately be the least
environmentally damaging, practicable option.
Compensatory Mitigation
Areas assessed to be considered by the Corps as forested to emergent wetland conversion (0.07
acre) are currently either in the transition to freshwater marsh conditions due to beaver activity on
Mecklenburg County Park property, or are marginal wetlands dominated by sweetgum and loblolly
pine saplings in currently managed pine stand (western area, WL dataform 2). These "forested"
areas are on a natural projection to be non -forested wetlands as evidenced by the attached
photographs. Due to the naturally imperiled "forested" designation and low -diversity condition of
the converted areas, the project developer is proposing the purchase of in -leu fee credit purchase
for 0.1 acre of riparian wetland to compensate for the minimal, lost functions. The resulting,
maintained corridor will continue to function with emergent wetland functions.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Tamp Bandy

O�O4� W AT
I I >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 and 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
E] Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Matthews Park Offsite Sewer (NW12)
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Matthews
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
1100 Matthews Mint Hill, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
32563-296
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ken Walsh
3d. Street address:
1355 Greenwood Cliff, Suite 150
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28204
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
(Consultant) Tamp Bandy
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
4108 LB Propst Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Conover, NC 28613
5e. Telephone no.:
828302-3437
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
21508135
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.1159 Longitude: -80.7055
1 c. Property size:
20.385 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Fourmile Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
j Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is currently being graded for development. General land use in the vicinity is light industrial and single family housing. A proposed minor
thoroughfare runs from North to South through the project site (Independence Pointe).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.21 acre wetlands within off-site ss easement
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Previously authorized impacts of 0.03 acre wetland impact on-site for mixed use development. Off-site temporary sewer impacts are proposed under
NWP12 to provide access/sewer extension to existing sanitary sewer utilities
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Utilized typical earth moving and grading equipment to construct site and install sanitary sewer utility.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
H] Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: SAW-2017-01776
ro'ect (includingall prior phases)in the past?
onsite wetlands under
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
x❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
Name (if known): Tamp Bandy / Perry Isner
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
see attached. Off-site wetlands within the off-site sanitary sewer corridor have not been previously approved, but have been delineated by W&W and
are included in this submittal for verification of temporary impacts under NWP12
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NWP 18 Verification attached (SAW 2017-01776)
This request for verification to include additional off-site easement impacts for sanitary sewer construction access to existing utility.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑x Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The main development parcel is to be constructed in phases with impacts previously verified under SAW-2017-01776. The off-site sewer
construction is to serve all phases of this development as well as potential development on adjacent parcels.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
x❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
temporary construction
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
No
Corps
0.15
W2 T
forest conversion
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.07
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.22
2h. Comments:
New impacts for off-site sewer easement and utility construction total 0.22 for temporary construction. Forested wetland loss from permanent
maintenance and conversion to emergent or non -tidal freshwater marsh is 0.07 acres.
(Note: Previously authorized impacts for on-site fill for development total 0.03 acre)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
-
S4
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
alternatives include pump stations and access to other existing off-site utilities were considered impractical due to topography, future road alignments,
and power utility and tower locations. The current alignment will have the capacity to serve future adjacent development and will ultimately result in
less total impacts to wetlands and streams, and is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
the easement will be returned to original grades and allowed to revert to wetland conditions. anti -seep collars will be utilized to prevent loss of
hydrology. Impacts are located primarily within beaver impounded areas and existing, currently maintained power line ROW.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑x Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑x Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑x Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.1 acre acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Mitigation is offered for forested wetland conversion. Forested wl are low quality or are in process of conversion by beaver to marsh
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yesx❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes x❑ No
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
see attached approval for onsite development
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Matthews / Mecklenburg County
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
0 Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
DYes ❑ No
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑x No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
F1 Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
E] Yes
No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
off-site sanitary sewer easement to tie to existing manhole.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑x No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
n/a
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
GIS
Ken Walsh
(see attached signature page)
2-25-19
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
JU. ( love you uI ICl.Mdu, Vvilh llle U0,FVV3 uul lo:BI l lllly Llluclnyelcu SNet,ies Aci
impacts?
❑ Yes ❑X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
LJ.,hiMY�
Ntip
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
n/a
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Ar, What snurca(s) rim vrni uSa to make tha flnnrinlain d0prminntion?
GIS
�� : �� I �1 L ✓
/Itcant/A
Ziff l
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
entent
pP 9 Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Fav
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Brigman Road
City, State:
Matthews, NC
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 21508113
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Wyatt Dixon
Mailing Address
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1420 E. 7th St, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC
704-560-3000
[e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
F] I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
0
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
sanitary sewer utility easement
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mecklenburg County
Mailing Address: 600 East 4th Street, 11 th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
—5111, 1 —2, k; I a/,
Name
Capacity: ✓ Owner ❑ Authorized AgentsDke
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

MECMNOUEG COUNTY
WNO OEVEIAPMENT ttw�
MNOAEOs
I �
I 1 11
i
1
I 1 11
i
1
1

A
FRESHWATER MARSH IMPACT 0.04 AC
BASED ON FIELD -MEASUREMENTS
FROM WETLANDS &'WATERS, INC.
EXISTIIN6 15- SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
FLAG CLEARING LIMITS,
FORESTED WETLAND.AREA----t
OR 4E 1 ED WEjL NO IMPACT -0.04 AC
41
8 ED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS
o 9M WETLANDS &, WATERS, INC./
WETLAND FTL NO ARE�A
25- OF TRANSMISSION TOWF�RS
DOUBLE ROW'
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (TYP.)
SEE-MCLDS 30.068
FORESTED WETLAND AREA
FORESTEI/VWETILAW IMPACT 9.OZ3 AC
B E UREMENTS
\\ - - - - - - i� � • BASED FIELD EAS
FROM ETLANDK & WATFiRS, INC./,
91 f
SILT FENCE OUTLETS^
SEE MCLDSM 30.06C
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
StE N TE 3
30
30
IREF -PNO;WZTION FENCING
SEE MCUDSM 4&QZ
- — -
- - - - - - -
27.9
FRESHWATER MARSH IMPACT 0.10 AC
30 --!--3
30
BASED ON FIELB MEASUREMENTSWETLANDS --
FROM WETLANDS WATERS INC
CONTRACTOR NO; TO WORK WITHIN_
25- OF TRANSMISSION TOWF�RS
DOUBLE ROW'
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (TYP.)
SEE-MCLDS 30.068
FORESTED WETLAND AREA
FORESTEI/VWETILAW IMPACT 9.OZ3 AC
B E UREMENTS
\\ - - - - - - i� � • BASED FIELD EAS
FROM ETLANDK & WATFiRS, INC./,
91 f

NETLAND IMPACT NOTES
OR CONSTRUCTION CORRIDORS IN WETLANDS AND ACROSS STREAM CHANNELS. STUMPS
SHALL BE GRUBBED ONLY AS NEEDED TO INSTALL THE UTILITY AND REMAINING
STUMPS SHALL BE CUT OFF AT GRADE LEVEL. THE STRIPPING OF TOPSOIL WITHIN
WETLANDS ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR IS NOT PERMITTED.
PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS IN WETLANDS AND ACROSS STREAM
CHANNELS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICABLE AND SHALL
NOT EXCEED 20 FEET WIDE EXCEPT AT MANHOLE LOCATIONS. 15 -FOOT BY 15- FOOT
PERPENDICULAR VEHICLE TURNAROUNDS SHALL BE ALLOWED IN ACCESS CORRIDORS
BUT MUST BESPACED AT LEAST 500 FEET APART. EXCEPTIONS TO THIS CONDITION
REQUIRE APPLICATION TO AND WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM DWR.[15A NCAC 02H .0506
(13)(2) AND (C)(2)]
FOR ALL UTILITY LINES CONSTRUCTED WITHIN WETLANDS, AN ANTI -SEEP COLLAR SHALL
BE PLACED AT THE DOWNSTREAM (UTILITY LME GRADIENT) WETLAND BOUNDARY AND
EVERY 150 FEET UP THE GRADIENT UNTIL THE UTILITY EXITS THE WETLAND. ANTI -SEEP
COLLARS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CLASS B CONCRETE, COMPACTED CLAY, PVC
PIPE, OR METAL COLLARS. PERPENDICULAR WETLAND CROSSINGS THAT ARE OPEN CUT
AND LESS THAN 150 FEET LONG DO NOT REQUIRE ANTI -SEEP COLLARS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE WETLAND GRADES. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE
REMOVED TO A HIGH GROUND DISPOSAL AREA. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (B)(2) AND
(C)(2)]. THE MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOILS WITHIN THE WETLANDS ALONG UTILITY
CORRIDORS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. DURING
EXCAVATION, THE SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON FABRIC TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS
WHENEVER POSSIBLE TOPSOIL EXCAVATED FROM UTILITY TRENCHES WILL BE PILED
SEPARATELY FROM SUBSOILS AND WILL BE BACKFILLED INTO THE TRENCH ONLY AFTER
THE SUBSOILS HAVE BEEN PLACED AND COMPACTED.
HEAVY EQUIPMENT WORKING IN WETLANDS SHALL BE PLACED ON MATS OR OTHER
MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO MINIMIZE SOIL DISTURBANCE. [15A NCAC 02H
.0506(8)(3) AND (C)(3)
N N
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEDIMENT FILTER OUTLET SHALL BE 18 INCHES HIGH BUT NO TALLER THAN 18 INCHES.
2. CLASS 1 OR 2 RIP -RAP SHALL BE USED AND COVERED WITH 4 INCHES OF NCDOT /5 OR
/57 WASHED STONE ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE
3. POSTS SHAUL BE NO MORE THAN 4 FEET APART.
4. SITE OUTLETS AT ANY POINT SMALL CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE ANTICIPATED AND AT TME
DIRECTION OF THE INSPECTOR.
5. ONE ACRE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA PER OUTLET.
I -a
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. FILTER OUTLETS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR
HIS AGENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING
PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REPAIRS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
2. THE STONE SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY AFTER ANY EVENT THAT HAS CLOGGED
OR REMOVED IT.
3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH HALF THE HEIGHT
OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT
FENCE OUTLET IS REMOVED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM TO THE EXISTING
GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY SILT FENCE
LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS 0I OUTLET OPTION 1 3o.osc

ROY COOPER
Governrr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Wyatt Dixon
Proffitt Dixon Partners
1.355 Greenwood Cliff Road Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28204
Project: Matthews Park Sewer Extension
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/20/2019
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type —�— Impact Quantity
—-- L. (8 -digit HUG)- __
Catawba 03050103 Riparian Wetland_- 0.06
*DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc.- Tamp Bandy, agent
Sincerely,
i
Jame$ Bi Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
Q Q
: �_�
NWh Carolina Departmrnt of Lnvironmental Quality I Divtswn of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Cmter I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707 8976

nE<D
v
51
OR
oR jf[1R s' - (/LNi 0UGAOE
PO
z
ESIF 7A IT
CHARLOTTE
A�
PEY
FWRLpP ;4
h
51 Bq lQ
O'44YvL' Oy ENP° �N<L IRS RD
LN O
O�
Y
�
_ W
Ny
NpPIpO
0/
zi
y�' OUNt J�
Club View Acres ~+RLLYNOR
z
� FtOF
RD
G� ,�t
OER
Project Location
Z LAUREL FORK DR =
m - 3
0 LN
UpG
NEWP p0.
f fNA E
\(F5 ST eP
o �
EPESS E RD
r
JIdE a0.10G
m N0T
ENNAM LN
PP
(RC(LN
/,
\ Matthews Park
STALLINGS
BR/AR
LP
RIf
RLDGF OR
BR/DtfE°
9 NSN
J011 LN 71 PKDO
g
f
!E
m4
�
Southminister Woods
k
OP. UNION y.
�oJGr
O 3 POP
00
tN
0 ^ 4£M1
p0 f OF'
l
= L Nq
p
Y
NE44
E
Eaa1N
g i O SN
\ tY
30 - 9i
2 ,oN o
EA iR TO,51 OR
hl
iC' 1 Ny
PNE
TRT RO
FORFIRE RDLSS
EOUN
r,N
f4�Nf
/ GS p
¢
F04TF LN DR
R0
MATTHEWS
S�Q JO S/ALEIN
a
T L
PE°
RROVOCN(C LL£ PE
NRD
E POP PEEEy((S
WOR RA4
OP ARRD 'RO
OP
(
o
N
y?4 ElN
3 GPEEN COATSOAT z o
KFRRT '
rs'Q
SaN`
MCNFF RD =
(ATAWBACFA, 3
r^a
E2
�
dI
t
R
2
CAMERON
X44
fNftQ ��pNN` 'P��FOp O
pY 0
g - Dp N'JY
SON OR O
100
NAM0
JETTE RD
PPI z
T LABEWO00 a0
D 00. (>`
,NIt
K
ENLNANTE A`' P0h 'i
w0 0`4 P! � PPT 9'Y9
!
NOR
RO
NR /
` MUp ANOv LN1
AiE
�aNN �_
s
WEE EIP
ALLENW000 ♦v�
TOR
GOi'
Gi
S1 j005
0
yE
JE WALNER0.
+ 0 e1 -
PNO 4'y
W°&` QR x
yT? MLNDEN
DP
O
STRAH,, W
x O C SyNO _
.,,,ETON OE
NAL[EOR
MCLENDON RD DID
� D MpA,R0
�
O
o o
CRO
c
p i
O
PO
o ON PO
2 SN 0
TATTING RO
_
p 1 O� P
� OP OP
?
PO ! NOaN�/Ey
pOS
PPpN
pE0
s
V O
ROBINSDN AVF s W=jWp
<�D4
!
032 oB Q 0(SEPS'
O1L P
�
�
♦ Z� , ``PONL'
ETLICY
0.E Da
s=��
RAIHTRCF OR P
OO !
MOPRIS RD
EOE SNORE OR
Rain F1.1—RD ",L R104Eo 611
Forest �x
FITZNOLNCN
'A'RUW ER0551NG LN LTT ONIN
O
gOUNTT CT// T'
RIANC
IREC'U" RD .. O,p r
EDP 0a
C�"LT.
yNOp
-
W
Prnviflnnrn �
Ff
'
°a
.EP° fl
Project Name:
Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
Owner / Developer:
WETLANDS
Proffitt Dixon Partners
.J(. W AT E R s
city /county:
Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s):
(Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 1 : Vicinity Map
Coordinates:
Scale:
Date:
Lat: 35.1102 Long:
-80.7050
graphic
01/21/19

f- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 '
'
1
1
1
'
'
� 1
,
1
1
\ 1
Wetland
1
t DF -1
t Upland
�
`
r DF -1 -,-�
1
'
Uplands t
, '
\
1
_ I
1 �
'
i
1
'
1
` p
1
1
'
1 Existing
fI t '
1� 200
1 Manhole / f
It
'
1 i
'--------J--1-------------
-------------------------
'Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes
for preliminary planning use only. Not intended to
be relied upon for exact location, dimensions, or
orientation. All findings and assessments made
by wetland consultants regarding limits of
jurisdiction or permitting requirements are subject
to verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers
and other appropriate state and local authorities.
WETLANDS
WATERS
Figure 2: Approximate Depiction
of Waters and Wetlands
�N
Graphic Scale k-200 tt--�
ct Name: Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
Owner/ Developer: Proffitt Dixon Partners
City / County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Coordinates:I Scale:
Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050
Date:
1 inch = 250 feet 1 01/21/19

J-- Polaris 3G Ma — Mecklenbur County, North Carolina IC
�. erxka
4R
W
t
9�t
1
eckknbure [aanty
'!� Sport s Comgar
DevMapad
ll�l• 9
ti
a,
s map or report is prepared for the inventory o rea property within Mecklenburg County and iscompiled from recorded ee s, plats, tax maps, surveys,
planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources
should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the information contained herein.
Project Name: Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
WETLANDS Owner/ Developer: Proffitt Dixon Partners
.,�(. WATERS City/County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 3: County GIS rLato
rdinates: Scale: Date:
35.1102 Long: -80.7050 graphic 01/21/19

00
r , 5u at
//'. (� � 1 � • -ted
�
r
._
�--
� � f I rsit� •�
,. � � ' \� � � _�� •• Pak
"N
'1 •' �� XX
.�,, .
• �/ ••
� ... • ' [:'� :•s�• yep �,pr @ \
' � �`'
.• l
`'Matthews
� �� •' � � ,,t ,. tl� T {"� -- _ _ r7� `1 c � • �Eastcrn ,/�
• J21 • jl yy
y — 1 / a3}i�l -1
•� M
Sewage
\�
\•\\'� ��• • '1•
�I !
N
N 0 o.s Mi Map provided by MyTopo.com
0 3000 Ft
Project Name: Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
WETLANDS
Owner/ Developer: Proffitt Dixon Partners
I
1, & WATERS
City/County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 4: USGS Topo Quad
Coordinates:
Scale:
Date:
Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050
graphic
01/21/19

526500 526CW 526 -,!Xi 526800 526900 527000 527100 527200 527300
Project Name: Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
W WET LANDS Owner / Developer: Proffitt Dixon Partners
.1, c WATERS City/County: Matthews /Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 5: Soil Survey Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050 graphic 01/21/19

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
Wetlands ❑ Freshwater Emergent Wetland 0 Lake N
Q Estuarine and Marine Deepwater IN Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland E] Other
Estuarine and Marine Wetland ❑ Freshwater Pond B Riverine
Project Name: Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
WETLANDS Owner / Developer:
/ Proffitt Dixon Partners
-i & WATERS city /county: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 6: National Wetland Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Inventory Map Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050 graphic 01/21/19

NC Surface Water
Classification
,.1 .F
s,,r... wnu, a ir<.,—. ,
;PG
nN
/V
Project Name:
Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
WETLANDS
WJ4&
Owner / Developer:
Proffitt Dixon Partners
WATERS
city/county:
Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s).
(Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Figure 7: Stream Classification
Coordinates:
Scale:
Date:
Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050
not to scale
01/21/19

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA
Feet
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
1:6,000
https://p4.msc.fema.gov/arcgislrestldirectories/arcgisjobs/nfhl_printlnfhlprinftoolmaster2_gpserver/j05dafOc69d5e4bc5a8e5972e84abfb97/scratch/F I RMETTE_0476d84f-1 cfa-11 e9-8132-001 b2l b3l e35.pdf
n.—;--+ ni-
W
J4 & ETLANDSS
WATERS
Figure 8: FEMA Floodplain
Matthews Park Sanitary Sewer Utility Extension
Owner / Developer: Proffitt Dixon Partners
City / County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): (Easement through) 21508113 and 21508115
Coordinates: I Scale:
Lat: 35.1102 Long: -80.7050
graphic
Date:
01/21/19

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matthews Park Sewer Extension City/County: Matthews / Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 01/21/19
Applicant/Owner: Town of Matthews State: NC Sampling Point: DF 1
Investigator(s): T. Bandy, C. Huysman Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1104 Long: -80.7048 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland - paried with U series
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
tNta rUKM b115 -4-5U, JUL Mtl Eastern Mountains and Piedmont–Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DF 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
80 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
20 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
100 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
25 Yes
FACU
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Ulmus alata
5 No
FACU
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
3.
FACU species 150 x4= 600
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 170 (A) 660 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.88
30 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum sinense
20 Yes
FACU
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Allium canadense
10 Yes
FACU
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Polystichum acrostichoides
10 Yes
FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
g
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants,
g.
except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DF 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6
7.5YR 5/4
100
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy/Clayey-
6-12
7.5YR 6/3
80
7.5YR 4/3 10 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
10YR 6/2 10 D
M
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
12-20
7.5YR 5/3
40
7.5YR 3/3 40 D
M
Loamy/Clayey
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
7.5YR 6/4 20 C
M
Faint redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matthews Park Sewer Extension City/County: Matthews / Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 01/21/19
Applicant/Owner: Town of Matthews State: NC Sampling Point: DF 2
Investigator(s): T. Bandy, C. Huysman Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1105 Long: -80.7047 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Upland - paried with U series
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
_Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (62)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DF 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
5 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
10 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1.
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2•
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
3.
FACU species 0 x4= 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 10 (A) 30 (B)
6•
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5•
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants,
g,
except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DF 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100
Loamy/Clayey-
3-10 10YR 5/2 60
10YR 5/6 20 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10YR 3/2 18 D M
7.5YR 5/6 2 C PL
Prominent redox concentrations
10-18 10YR 6/1 80
10YR 3/2 15 D M
Loamy/Clayey
7.5YR 4/3 5 C M
Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (1722)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

DIRECTION 35.10854'N ACCURACY 65,1n ;:
96 deg(T) 080.70658°W DATUM WGS84 ,
ito
Am
1
Matthews 2019-01-21
Sewer Extension Upt OF 1 15:48:59-05:00
DIRECTION 35.10840'N ACCURACY 165 1n
75 deg(T) 080.70631 W DATUM WGS84
E—
aq,+3
A. �A
�
11 deg(T)
080.70497"W
r
'
g
•},
,f� rr `�
Matthews
UpL:
Sewer Extension
2319-01-21
OF 1
15:49:15-05:00
DIRECTION
35.11044'N
11 deg(T)
080.70497"W
r
'
g
ACCURACY 30 m
DATUM WGS84
it
�j,,
Matthews WL OF 2. 2019-01-21
Sewer Extension Forested 15:58:32-05:01
DIRECTION 35.10948'N ACCURACY 149 mt
302 deg(T) 080.70539 W DATUM WGS84
^saw.+.fa►�:,,,�(r���_,,�'L,' t .�. J��f.
M
Matthews WL OF 2. 2019-01-21
Sewer Extension Forested 15:58:46-05:00
DIRECTION 35..10900°N ACCURACY 65 m
70 deg(T) 080.70685'W DATUM WGS$4
For.
iA.
r" � f•t 'ltti�Qi
y � \
z m
} 4 . a
Matthews Power Line 2019-01-17
Sewer Ext WLs 1024 09:57:24-05:00

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-01776 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Matthews
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Proffitt Dixon Partners
Wyatt Dixon
Address: 1355 Greenwood Cliff Road, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone Number: 704-817-9126
E-mail: wyatt(a?proffittdixon.com
Size (acres) 35.45 Nearest Town Matthews
Nearest Waterway Fourmile Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.1153
Longitude: -80.7022
Location description: The project is located on the south side of Matthews -Mint Hill Road, 0.4 miles from the intersection of
Matthews -Mint Hill Road and US Highwav 74. PIN: 21508112. Reference project area description shown in the Pre -
Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1 — Vicinity Map" dated 07/26/2017.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the construction of a high-density, mixed-use retail park
which would provide commercial office and retail space, in close proximity to Interstate 485 and East Independence
Expressway/NC Highway 74. Permanent impacts to wetlands would result is a loss of 0.03 acres of wetlands.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 18. Minor Discharges
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 10/4/2017, and the enclosed plans Figures 1-8 dated 7/26/2017. Any violation of
the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration
order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the pennittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact David Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or david.l.shaeffer(a�usace.army.mil.
RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYANXENNETH.1263385574
Corps Regulatory Official: °° ° ° Date: 11/30/2017
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022

SAW -2017-01776 - Proffitt Dixon Partners
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® There are wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Please note, if
work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an approved JD, the appeal must
be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any work in waters of the United States
and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Date. Action ID: AID.
Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 11/30/2017.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Corps Regulatory OffiClal; ^-
David Shaeffer
Date of JD: 11/30/2017
Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW -2017-01776 - Proffitt Dixon Partners
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Wetlands and Waters, Inc.
Tamp Bandy
Address:
4108 LB Propst Drive
Conover, NC 28613
Telephone Number:
828-302-3437
E-mail:
itampbandvn mail.com

Action ID Number: SAW -2017-01776 County: Mecklenburg
Permittee: Proffitt Dixon Partners, Wyatt Dixon
Project Name: Matthews Park Mixed -Use Development
Date Verification Issued: 11/30/2017
Project Manager: David Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
Select Field Office Street Address
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/30/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Proffitt Dixon Partners, Wyatt, Dixon, 1355
Greenwood Cliff Road, Suite 150, Charlotte, NC, 28204
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Matthews Park Mixed -Use
Development, SAW -2017-01776
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project is located on the south side of
Matthews -Mint Hill Road, 0.4 miles from the intersection of Matthews -Mint Hill Road and US Highway 74. PIN:
21508112. Reference project area description shown in the Pre -Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1 —
Vicinity Map" dated 07/26/2017.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Matthews
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.1153 Longitude: -80.7022
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Fourmile Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 07/26/2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Wetland
35.11444
-80.70564
0.01 acres
Wetland
404
A100
Wetland
35.114768
-80.70402
0.02 acres
Wetland
404
A200

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a pen -nit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
detennination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Dated 07/26/2017
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 4 Matthews 2":2.000'
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 5 Soil Survey of Mecklenburg
County/City of Matthews
® National wetlands inventorymap(s). Cite name: Figure 6 USFWS NWI Mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 8 FIRM Nos 3710458000K and 3 7 1 045 9000K
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ®Other (Name & Date):Photos P1 through P5 Dated 07/26/2017
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): Figure 2 Approximate Depiction of Waters and Wetlands. Figure 3 Count
and Figure 7 Stream Classification Dated 07/13/2017 and 07/26/2017
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
RO D E N Digitally signed by RODEN
REYN OLDS. B RYA N.KE N N ETH.1263385 5 74
REYNOLDS.BRYANX ou=PKL ouo USA, ccn VRODEN ernment, ou=DoD,
ENNETH.1263385574 Date 020117.112.01109 0
116:03-05'03385574
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
11/30/2017
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

k
plo+°t
•� " fir. k
CIiARLOTTE ani' z
S
ITE
• � � ,. „sly" �v/
C10"Aft—ow
t<uHt 1101 Do + 0 ♦i
AF
t <O4L V `R • `� J ��ttp'
*� IN
A Malllirtrs Park
x 3 STALLINGS
Southminister Woods
} f 41 '<
♦ .I.rwttrd ;� + ♦�i-
rn+ror xa <w on
• ■ p
c.l1 kN � ��l1T^I'll l,wS'<-�..'� <.'„,�F�Y- 4tµ ` p, ♦�\ t"!y
riq+'Cf 44rv,ro ' is 4p4N �tts ayN N yp
d
� ty - °r ♦ ray rfi^ � 3 1r 10 � o, � „+ .4
...tN
.02
av J i°
% \
OR
t• YipJifltW +V+ NC,.rNn(+N Rn O
� ^ c
0
i $ o i
a \
s
aObNt[W All i y `�
'moi a ♦%+
P Y
dr Y,NK;a,v „ N Rain 1 „N,Y++v 1r.oN wit°
t �9
Fon-%l
«It� OST
Project Name: Mint Hill - Matthews
W e t l a n d s Owner / Developer: Proffitt Dixon
W& Waters City / County:
Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 21508112
Figure 1 : Vicinity Map Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat 35.1153 Long: -80.7022 graphic 07/26/17

TN
Waters of tl
Wetland �
0.01 acr
14-- 200 ft
Graphic Scale
Project Boundary
Wetlands
�. Y& Waters
'Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes for preliminary planning use only. Not intended
to be relied upon for exact location. dimensions, or orientation. All findings and assessments made
by wetland consultants regarding limits of jurisdiction or permitting requirements are subject to
verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other appropriate state and local authorities
Project Name:
r / Developer:
City / County:
Tax PIN(s):
Mint Hill - Matthews
Proffitt Dixon
Matthews / Mecklenburg
21508112
Figure 2: Approximate Depiction Coordinates: I Scale: Date:
of Waters and Wetlands Lat: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022 1 inch = 250 feet
07/26/17

•
i
s
•
-T • Su a60
x i
.a,
• r 4.0.4
,
1 G
10 A
f r
JJJ
�{
1
.fit. ti .� '• _ _ i
i� rel n'n I /� , 1 `. j1}' '• • i _
10 e_
vei
s r
JJ Y
�r
M
tthew
a IT
r.
•
".
•• �'21
+ . + .• p. 4
p -
•++:*eerr.+
�,� ++ r ♦ -..{ -
.r t /
^�
s J
—y G
e
;
f '
`1 .• tea ��`\ ..^" � 1 f f t 'x.- Y� - ...—A
t
/
S - k
•
`
v _
t � r
` .ten' � tv \ •a. ^ � r ,�� _ _ ;� �.. • +
- f
e '
r
t wv
I r
�y {
N� a
6 ;
µ
t
N 0.5 0Mi
o z000 .5 Map provided by MyTopo,conn
Ft
Wet I a n d s
Project Name: Mint Hill - Matthews
Owner /Developer: Proffitt Dixon
.�. & Waters
city / County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 21508112
Figure 4: USGS Topo Quad
Coordinates:
Scale: -7Date:
Lat: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022
graphic
07/26/17

Sd'i.Y] :!P'n 4Cr7H] 52CffD Sd i] S'li4l577[IY1 x'131 527200 527M 57i31U
i ._
VV D
N1 B
uB rot,
e
`oma, �_.�►
r
Ur CeB2
EnB CeD2 Ce
Ce02 M eB
MeB
W kE3 ep.
CeB2nB
'k0
Project Name: Mint Hill - Matthews
W e t( a n d S Owner / Developer: Proffitt Dixon
.,t. &Waters city /County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 21508112
Figure 5: Soil Survey Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022 graphic 07/26/17

Am
9 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventor
Rec'vd on LDB on 10OCT2017
SAW -2017-01776
Matthews Mint Hill Road
Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland D Other
Estuarine and Marine Wetland iI Freshwater Pond Rivenne
WWet Iands
.i. & Waters
Project Name: Mint Hill - Matthews
Owner / Developer:
Proffitt Dixon
city / county: Matthews / Mecklenburg
'ax PIN(s): 21508112
Figure 6: National Wetland Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Inventory Map t -at: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022 graphic 07/26/17

NC Surface Water Classification
Surfa:e Water Ciass,fications
1:18,056 N
DWR 2014 IF Overall Cat (Zoom in for faster results)
No Data 0 0.1.'5 0.35 0.7 m1
-- ------- 1-
tmpared (Cat 5) 0 0.175 0.35 0.7 km
4
Wetlands
af Waters
Figure 7: Stream Classification
Project Name:
Owner / Developer:
City / County:
"ax PIN(s):
Coordinates:
t -at: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022
Mint Hill - Matthews
Proffitt Dixon
Matthews / Mecklenburg
21508112
Scale: Date:
graphic
07/26/17

FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (Official)
rNFHLck to expand) 1tive
LOMAS
•
FIRM Panels
0
,Crass .5ecoons
Flood Hazard Boundane�
Limit Lanes
SFHA / Flood Zone
Boundary
t
Other Boundanes
Flood Hazard Zones i
oil
a4Wetlands
& Waters
Figure 8: FEMA Floodplain
0.3nii
Project Name: Mint Hill - Matthews
Owner / Developer: Proffitt Dixon
City / County: Matthews / Mecklenburg
Tax PIN(s): 21508112
Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 35.1153 Long: -80.7022 graphic 07/26/17

�NeU f", C
° s
m a
°? a
A
Storm Water Management Permit
Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services
Project Number: 382804
Name of Development: Matthews Mixed Use
Street Number and Name: Original Tax Parcel #: 21508112
Jurisdiction: MATTHEWS
Zoning Designation: ENT
Total Area of Project: 34.83 acres Total Disturbed Area: 25.20 acres % Built Upon: 31.10
Land Development Fees Paid: Yes [ ] Amendment to Permit #
Type of Development: Large Subdivision Project >= 10 acres denuded
Owner
Name: Wyatt Dixon
Address: 1355 Greenwood Cliff Rd. Suite 1, Charlotte, NC 28204
Phone: [phone] Fax:
Email: [e-mail]
Financial Responsible Party
Name: Wyatt Dixon
Address: 1355 Greenwood Cliff Rd. Suite 1, Charlotte, NC 28204
Phone: [phone] Fax:
Email: [e-mail]
Designer
Name: Jeff Orsborn
Address: 610 E. Morehead Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone: [phone] Fax:
Email: [e-mail]
Watershed District Where Project is Located:
Project Density Based on Drainage Area: High Density
Pollutant Removal Efficiency Required: 85% TSS
Buffers Required: No
Acknowledgement that Volume Control Will Be Provided For The 1 -year, 24 hour storm for post development: Yes
Peak Control Provided: 10 Year, 6 Hour and 25 Year, 6 Hour
Open Space Required: 10%
Sewer: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Water: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Total Phosphorus Mitigation Approved: NA
Development / Redevelopment Mitigation Approved: NA
Open Space Mitigation Approved: NA
W
Reviewed By- ;Ydrod`64" Date: 08/31/2018
Result: [X] Approved as noted
[ ] Approved with Modifications
[ ] Approved with Performance Reservation (Attached)