Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190273 Ver 1_401 Application_20190228WETLANDS .i WAW,.0 & WATERS Mr. Ross Sullivan US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Raleigh, NC 27587 $ Pais 20190273 January 30, 2019 NC Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 RE: Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitation Nationwide Permit 3 Verification and Water Quality Certification Request Mr. Sullivan, Attached, please find a Pre -Construction Notification for a Nationwide Permit 3 Verification request and corresponding Water Quality Certification associated with necessary and ongoing work for the Meredith College dam and lake repairs located in Wake County, NC. Impacts associated with this request total 0.269 acres of open water. The purpose of this work is to repair the dam structure as well as an existing retaining wall and bridge headwall, as it experienced damage during the storm event of Hurricane Matthew in the fall of 2016, causing the pond to breach. This work has been ongoing since the conclusion of the event to assess the damage, design the repair, and implement a long-term solution for the continued use and safety of this structure. Attached with this request are drawings that depict the scope of the proposed repairs, which will generally be confined to the footprint of the existing dam structure, emergency spillways, and existing bridge and retaining walls. The major deviation from the existing condition is the addition of an auxiliary spillway and grass -lined emergency spillway to the dam. The primary purpose of these emergency spillways is to provide structural stability to downstream waters in the event of high-flow storm events. As the existing dam has already been breached only a partial drawdown of the lake is necessary in order to begin construction. This will be done utilizing a pump -around which will outlet into the receiving tributary at the outlet of the dam. Additionally, following the drawdown it is planned to remove existing sediment from the lake bed in order to increase the depth of the lake. This sediment will be placed in an adjacent uplands disposal area and allowed to de -water. No impacts to jurisdictional features are associated with the dredging process of the proposed project. Thank you for your consideration, and please don't hesitate to reply if you have any questions about the provided information. Best regards, / 1--�_7 CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. TAMP BANDY 1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 41 08 LB PROPST DRIVE SPARTA, NC 28675 CONOVER, NC 2861 3 336.406.0906 828.302.3437 CHRIS. HUYSMAN@GMAIL.COM JTAMPBANDY@Q GMAIL.COM Perry Isner 704.773.4239 Attachments: Pre -Construction Notification Conceptual Impact Drawings Resource Maps Natural Heritage Program Report Field photographs CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. TAMP BANDY 1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 41 OB LB PROPST DRIVE SPARTA, NO 26675 CONOVER, NO 21361 3 336.406.0906 828.302.3437 CHRIS. HUYSMAN@GMAIL.COM JTAMPBANDY@GMAIL.COM o��F W R T�c9QG Office Use Only: . Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? [j] Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): x❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes 0 No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑x No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑x No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑x No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitation 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh 2d. Subdivision name: n/a 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: n/a 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Meredith College 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 001583, 00678 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Mr. Craig Barfield (Vice President) 3d. Street address: 3800 Hillsborough Street 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607 3f. Telephone no.: 919.760.8516 3g. Fax no.: 919.760.2885 3h. Email address: craigb@meredith.edu Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Perry Isner 5b. Business name (if applicable): Wetlands & Waters, Inc. 5c. Street address: 4108 LB Propst Drive 5d. City, state, zip: Conover, NC 28613 5e. Telephone no.: 704.773.4239 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: perry.isner@gmail.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0794261272 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): ILatitude: 35.79706 Longitude: -78.68566 1 c. Property size: +/-5 acres (project area) 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Southwest Prong Beaverdam Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project area consists of the existing pond and outdoor amphitheater for the school, which includes maintained grounds and some mature trees. The land use in the vicinity of the project is owned by the college, and includes roadways, athletic fields, and school buildings. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 300 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to repair the dam of the Meredith College pond and rehabilitate to entire area for its originally intended use as the location of the commencement ceremonies. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Project includes repair of the existing dam and control structure, sediment removal from the existing lakebed, construction of auxiliary and emergency spillways, and repair/replacement of bridge and retaining walls around existing island. Typical construction/earth-moving equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes Q No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3of10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers 0 Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 - Choose one - - S2 - Choose one - S3 - Choose one - - S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 P Meredith Lake Fill (impoundment repair) Pond 0.23 02 P Meredith Lake Bridge Pond 0.004 03 P Meredith Lake Fill (retaining wall) Pond 0.035 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 0.269 4g. Comments: See page C2.1 of impact drawings for impact area details. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. 5e. Stream Impacts (feet) Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number - Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 - Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5of10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Project has been carefully designed such that impacts are only necessary for impacts to open waters for the purposes of repairs to the impoundment and island bridge/retaining wall. Repairs to the existing dam are only being done on the upstream side such to avoid impacts to the jurisdictional stream at the outlet of the pond. Retaining walls and bridge headwalls are utilizing the minimum footprint necessary for structural integrity. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Project will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan to ensure that materials incidental to construction activities are not transported in downstream receiving waters. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes 0 No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Pro ram 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yesx0 No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ❑x Yes ❑ No 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yesx❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No impervious area will be added as a result of project activities. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW El USMP❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑Yes ❑ No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the Yes No use of public (federal/state) land? 1b. If you answered `yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, Yes No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑Yes Q No 2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. n/a Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act YesX No ❑ impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A query of the NC Natural Heritage Program database was done and is included with this PCN. As there are no known occurrences of federally listed species within a mile of the project area we are deferring to the Corps for notification. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑x No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation M Yes ❑ No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NC SHPO HPOWEB GIS service 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant isprovided.) Page 10 of 10 MEREDITH COLLEGE DAM MEREDITH COLLEGE RALEIGH, NC - WAKE COUNTY DAM AND LAKE REHABILITATION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PLANS OWNER: MEREDITH COLLEGE 3800 HILLSBOROUGH STREET RALEIGH, NC 27607 MS. SHARON CAMPBELL DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES SERVICES MEREDITH COLLEGE 919.796.2856 (CELL) 919.760.8011 (OFFICE) STATE DAM ID: WAKE -235 SIZE OF DAM: SMALL HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: HIGH SHEETINDEX C1.0 COVER SHEET CIA LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS, AND NOTES C1.2 PROJECT MAPS EXISTING SITE SURVEY C2.0 CONCEPTUAL REPAIR PLAN C2.1 WETLAND PERMITTING IMPACTS PLAN C2.2 LAKEBED SEDIMENT REMOVAL PLAN �PJ QQ Oc Vis€ LICENSE NO. 0-2909 --- %, I.v o, 7 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES THE - TORNSI AUDI THE CGATRBGTCR SHALL BE RESETAN— rtnclvNc REnso�NAele e�Foars To oROTE°Ncr Fn u.IiNR.awN WEERNwED—ly uN.NOwNEFA.uNESAREDlsCZEEDIENT To "EtSM S TE I AS .1 T- UNGINECIR OWNER .RoTHE ENGINEER FOR CANAGES I—RIES OR OTHER ACCIDENTS W.— CG.R Al I'S W DE,IGRRI.E IR EDDRDD� RDr IMI EDrD EDDRMERT. COMB_ WORK.S,ASED NATE LS. ANDSRE ACCESSBYAITRGR¢EDANOONAUIORIZEDPERSONS. S TE BE AFLAH CLE THE F—HEER 12 T �E CONTRACTOR SHALL C�,—INA TE WITH THE ENGINEER. THE OWNER, AND IPJACENT PIOPERTY OWNERS AS RE -BRED FOR 11RN oUT"GE OF PEElp ER Ty LH N. NEER ZIRS C— C OR S- VE"' ALL DTIE-T.SAND,�, DES ET T.E JOB SITE 11 D11FLIENGES IRE FC -D N-11 ENINECR 11COLATC11 So Tr Q� \�P CONSTRUCTION NOTES I TIE CONTRACTOR FIIONHRLE FOR THC Al— CATION AID NA NTENANLE OF BASE AND ETORN FLOWS N ALL ,REAS OF THE QQ T HE CONSTRUCTION IERIOO �V/ OFrNE=DECTS E.RR.UGROui N CNSigV rp EgIW G��ND.aWONrv�LOEGRW owAE111— 10 �WLoS11 EE 4 ENN 01 N„IT R E WI Rl' All 1—`L AREAS AND FOR � Z e EANDLWALgEGD tOR.REWRENENTS EDFINECONETRDCTWEIrEIN,000RC.CEWTRALLAFELCAELEFEDERALSTAT�ai 1IIIN IIA � ACCORD,NCEWI,SECTIONB„EB OF TEECONS,RDLTIONSEECIECATIONS TIONEtEERALLBEET,BIL EDWlN EGFtAtIDNN �zALL r ° INE ENGINEER ETC SHALL BE R-111 11 TIE CONTRACTOR 11 1IN11RUCT101 CIIIILETIIN 111TES INICTED OTTLETWISE 11 T.0 ENGINEER E RE U. -GRADING DIGITAL 1HOTGGRARN1 A—X-ERr EODEAIENT,ETC, OIT— rwIECONErquciION REWIRENENT INTOCONFIANCE `+ pSiE E3 S REF ECi ALL FIElO,xbIFILAla+5 t0 +EvaovOSED RERA qS ENSiINIIIa TaE.IEICIry IATA.NDUTEOONrNIILNS All i[E a 9 CONFIETE SET OF FINAL RECORD DRAwwcS TO TRE ENG—TH NO LATER THAN -wEEnS AFTER LICENSE NO. C-2909 COMIlETON 01 CON STE r Lu U w w F Q 0 Z a LIJZ<. wag z w O J � x Oin a3 a U=i wu Hw w ro Y Lu a I o 0 a w O w J No 18-11001-1 SHEET C1.1 D 7 Notes: an:/wlm «. —11. ,�nourtl e . a,lyl� Nw�•a..waowefe , oe c�.�o Gn t utdirieeow « !hb mop, ,m w. quwmlw t^al NI unGrgounG uaRlxo an Me,n attu Ny 2)1.dwrr�y wta� a. awwa«w ey Ywcn 19, 1018. m lape- graarla N a of M, arra o! M, funs o` !M1e wrwy J) THIS IS NOT A .ONNDARY SORVEY. 4) M. or°a°.«mlayen.dn lln. Gmei «,inti G..Nxn«N of wpe,o..r,1 of M. Ions o1 oy wI- I- -d rm0n! et wn a daao,W y vtlwn.y, fltl. Nim O Gel. Mown A e w A. mat— .11 xaG olbcln9 M, ..Y b. vo vt ,M1own n,rem. 5) G.eG.tw DaNm -.— .a M. NLCS MS/RM�rele. ,, NAO.J rM.1- (2011) mG NAIO.O(0.od-). 6) N1 -!ansae N+o.n me m. r« nwirmt m vd dstmm �.ess �_ nd. E,bl„q�Cmtau, O«Huaua Yree Wmlhraua Tree -': uutls Hedeeraw atm w tad yalN mi SlormNOran uonxde So+ Bwv Wvoaen coat B,bge Canrou, LNe - Rake County, NoM Ceroltne I, A+,ry w. Elx, cert aupwNaian a yGp6 w hil ane C_.-- c �e � '2 I- Ww to Jala tt5 wtlwaa ! wl, apowapnicjp'an ON, 'f Oea AA en wlkN -yen Me po,f A almGatl, w0lMet !n Ij— Gata«.vp iou, Goy, N NarN, -a M.1 111 ompetea Nm.Ji 1., 201.; a,d al melee mmeNCOS VRS/RTN ..W wG radlrelb, (2011) mtl NI --na m NAIIOM (-121): v G Mmap ol M te Ih. .aWr.-1. 01 me Slbb— o1 —b—n M lard SurnHn, m fh --b (21 NCAL 56.1600) wG Gosa nut —tMe .au em«te er NCOS 47-.10 a. annd«. -- my mivba hn a I—. name,, one ..a lnb �.d doy of Aprd, 201., A.O. .756 `iaoo-a Ent9'Y�':>�z -f..`........e ,V t Topographic Survey For: Meredith College Wake county, North Carolina April 9, 2016 GRAPHIC SCALE (arm) Dr.nty IBOP2tepa.dwy 1Nci. P.YIr SLo�MEN �N x- � my at tl. ss f rw Vol 9O RINI—, ,f 11N., .T- P x�WGf ran <.wn Legend Existing Contour Woods Line Lnrcfsrn sr�luf� Storm Sewer u+fn a — Water Llne Fence Deciduous Tree Coniferous Tree Woods Hedgerow Irrigation Control Votwe V tical Pipe O Strom Drain Manhole 9 Yard inlet ❑ ��._•• 4• weir Soil Bore ® '�•.` Rip Rap ��•••` Wooden Foot Bridge il .;: stom umnd. 121.69 Riser ❑ Inv. 1n: 416.65 Creek Out 116..9 Contour Line P—W, Slmd 90. _ PM %X- ^^^ \ �F, � ��`�,\\�x�\�(n\\\�`,\,, J�ki \, -d InI.f / eetl Rpe poeemir •nalaoeee 1n .: X16.10 a PeDPnsEDTNff PfMD—.nfa 'sem-- NDn�,D�fNGf�,fxiLffL,FN14A6n� D 24 INCH "A GL CT LE RON p PE EARRFL RD PDWD NGo i1nG a,<Dx, NT NfNT nn0 enCKFILL WITI I—PICTED5011. / IMNMUN oP WIDM -i]uF I •� i C 11 TE •\ PDVGE 11 i Pfnn00NIIX In vF1.1T—ELL M lN.GT 5tantlm9 ebtr Exls*n�.n Ncn c�i vxn rr rxnn .ir �� -- s PF n. a.r i.n X QQ`4�Li7 nio L,xf ,Re> -r10-_____.i \ENT111 sxoAflwe 11D,rn1 V W o f I—SED 1 111. 1 -TILE sincH srefL Plse�ixn,. /� �' .n num --D. t= snscunaD ?� LICENSE N0. C-2909 w .PossifD aovosLo W \` QO z �'• a Top: .19.00 rn.RDt:.113. n.6]2 I My OUC J W Q V d J n 4 W Oma U W 2 � F Lu `m a. Le W W g U W Q 0z Q im im «0 1e-tto-0t-t —ET C2.0 7 Impact O-3 ting Wall Repairs Gr916 00 IA6J Inv Out 1116 Legend Existing Contour Woods Line Storm Sewer Water Line Fence Deciduous Tree Coniferous Tree Woods Hedgerow Irrigation Control Val - Vertical pipe O Storm Drain Manhole V Yard Inlet ❑ Sall Bore Rip Rap Wooden Foot Bridge Riser ❑ Creek Contour Line Bridge Headwall wE u roAeRoRE In ENEn moH, l ,nE. 1 11 SOT a -- �,ea ❑ 613002) ° J //�� 0 N N g I! ; � � - R MEREDITH COLLEGE DAM DAM AND LAKE REHABILITATION PROJECT RALEIGH, NC - WAKE COUNTY m GRIMES ����� ENGINEERING, PC a F</ K vc LAKEBED SEDIMENT REMOVAL PLAN MARK REVISIONS BY DATE 4a UNC Rex Healthcare Hampton Rd Wt 4y a � C)k e 8°°ne iysonville G6enwood �PP F Project Iral1 as Village b q z Area Arenw P �. ,fit Qi Raleigh a j 'y Artny 3 kir Raleigh National Guard District Dr r " wNrewou� '� CaraWgh y D to S i Pl1/C Le nard St Macedonia Arena Westchase Blvd -0 Ridge aad Grant Ave i Ix Shop /ng �� Q Tr' 'nrrYRa a Cer ter Wade Ave CaStadiiurney 4 i�✓At�E EI:GEWOOD � ayce£ Park °V Mayview Rd 1 Meredith Coil' -7* J Beryl RdVanp pi h l"e e Method roll` Gia a Sel a� W Westover X Cameron Village 4 a .a F 0 Chapel Nil\�`� �, �R Ligon St Ni!l sbo,olr Clark Av° , W f S ?6 Hiltst:r ac3 t'fc1 PJ a ~ t CAMERON PARK V4�EStetil o ugh Or astern Br�� North Carolina State University 54 i �q< Van n StPullenCr p Marcom St Park 1' E'Stern $lyd 2500 feet 500 m Bing Kaplan C}I © 2018 HERE, © OpenStreetMap - WAND8 & 4WAMB. INC. Owner/ Meredith College rojec Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitation ..1. Developer et Figure Fi 1: Site Vicinity Ma g city / Raleigh county: Wake State: NC ax 0794261272 y p Town: PIN s : Coordinates (Lat/Long): 35.79706 / -78.68566 nPRA Scale: graphic Date: 12/06/18 'Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes for preliminary planning use only. Not intended to be relied upon for exact location, dimensions, or orientation. All findings and assessments made by wetland consultants regarding limits of jurisdiction or permitting requirements are subject to verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other appropriate state and local authorities. WETLANDS & Owr .�. WATERS, INC. Dewe `Figure 2: Approximate Depiction of Aquatic Resources lCoordi er/ Meredith College o er Raleigh County: Wake State: NC nates (l at/Long): 35.79706 / -78.68566 AID / nRnn- ;' Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitation graphic 0794261272 12/06/18 -1 WNWETLANDS & YINC. Figure 3: County GIS N 0 1-10 220 440 ft 1 inch = 200 feet Owner/ Meredith College Project t Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitation Developer city / Raleigh County: Wake State: NC Tax 0794261272 Town: PIN s : Coordinates (Laftong): 35.79706 / -78.68566 r)Rnn Scale: graphic Date: 12/06/18 6 Z�tm a! W, - nNaawk6i Mn A a Ad I u Soil Map --Wake County, North Carolina 708960 70M 709020 70905.0 70M 709110 709140 709170 70200 709230 WETLANDS & .�. WATERS, INC. Figure 5: Soil Survey R uwneri Meredith College Name Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitatior Developer city / Raleigh County: Wake State: NC Tax 0794261272 Town: g PIN s ; Coordinates (t_at/�ong): 35.79706 / -78.68566 AID Scale: graphic Date: 12/06/18 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service � /,fit: ��� � - •• ' lot I.Al It } "'►ila' - f 4 i , u. 7F 'fFAw jai •.�, , .. V ' Ridgeyf-d i t�►, � j r ; Shopping �, � x ��• . i , n m . lr a IV " ,fix � 'h.. : 'w�• f � �, e: � � '.� �� Mer�eiith '��+► ;fr � r Ir ' ..�' College Project 4rea ,V L� m r, . • Meth©d *' *'" r $� pt In + • .. !1� !�. - ' R „ National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA fIIIIIIIIIIIIIZI } eviGes 11'E(,)r- R"N'I}l�a�� HI'lCH'lJr IVIIIVIIVIHL�I-L'l'IGLJ of � v "974 E Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEx MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V. 1199 SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth zone AE, AD, Aa, VE. AR HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard zone x Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to OTHER AREAS OF . Levee. See Notes. znne x FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezo— o No scREEn Area of Minimal Flood Hazard znne x (—� Effective LOMRs OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard z—o GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES 1l 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17s Water Surface Elevation _ - - Coastal Transect _,.-.._ Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary -- --- Coastal Transect Baseline OTHER _ Profile Baseline FEATURES Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available N f No Digital Data Available MAP PANELS Unmapped �) The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent dw an authoritative property location. .i „ e` Aer x � • A & Jr� USGS The NeGonal Map Orihimager' . ®at2 Feet 1:6,000 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 -'W1 INW!, WETLANDS 81 .i YWATERS, INC. Figure 7: FEMA Mapping vwnerJ Meredith College HrojecNamet Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitatior Developer city / Raleigh County: Wake State: NC Tax 0794261272 Town: PIN s : Coordinates (L.at/Long): 35.79706 / -78.68566 ARnn AID / Scale: graphic Date: 12/06/18 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps If it Is not void as described below. ^ The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the F - authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map + was exported on 12/3/2018 at 2:40:34 PM and does not �. reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and W time. The NFHL and effective information may change or a become superseded by new data over time. o oThls fr, map Image is void lithe one or more of the following map elements do not appear. basemap Imagery, flood zone labels, hed>Octobe 201 :k legend, scale bar, map creation date, community Identifiers, 35°47'34.70"N FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map Images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. vwnerJ Meredith College HrojecNamet Meredith College Dam and Lake Rehabilitatior Developer city / Raleigh County: Wake State: NC Tax 0794261272 Town: PIN s : Coordinates (L.at/Long): 35.79706 / -78.68566 ARnn AID / Scale: graphic Date: 12/06/18 a; on Roy Couper. Governor Rolm■ NC DEPARTMENT OF MEMONATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES V,Susi Har��lltcn. Secretary �.0 Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship NCNHDE-7687 December 6, 2018 Meagan Jolly Wetlands & Waters, Inc. 529 North Graham Street Charlotte, NC 28202 RE: Meredith P.A. expanded Dear Meagan Jolly: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence: the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our records. The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: httos://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butler,d)ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program (DEPARTMENT /fir 41 OFC Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Meredith P.A. expanded December 6, 2018 NCNHDE-7687 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Group Observation Occurrence Date Rank Butterfly 35199 Erynnis martialis Mottled Duskywing 1933-04-29 X Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -Pre Damselfly Moth 34927 Acronicta albarufa Barrens Dagger Moth 1938 -Pre Vascular Plant 26314 Clematis catesbyana Coastal Virgin's -bower 1890-08-15 Vascular Plant 24010 Trifolium reflexum Buffalo Clover 1936-05-18 No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area H? H H H Managed Area Name : _, Owner NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Triangle Land Conservancy Easement Triangle Land Conservancy City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Wake County Open Space Easement Wake County: multiple local government Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council North Carolina Museum of Art NC DNCR, Division of State Historic Sites 5 -Very --- and Properties Accuracy Federal State Global State Status Status Rank Rank 5 -Very --- Significantly G3 S2 Low Rare 5 -Very --- Significantly G5 S2? Low Rare 5 -Very --- Significantly G3G4 S1S2 Low Rare 5 -Very --- Significantly G4G5 S2 Low Rare Peripheral 3 -Medium --- Threatened G3G4 S1S2 Owner Type State Local Government Private Local Government Local Government Private State Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos //ncnhde natureserve org/content/help. Data query generated on December 6, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q4 Oct 2018. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 3 Fi kyn >mn ':enhvl �naM N' A." , 1 NCNHDE-7687: Meredith P.A. expanded December 6, 2018 ❑ Project Boundary Buffered Project Boundary E] Managed Area (MAREA) Method . ,� Page 3 of 3 1:21,400 0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi 0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km Sources Esri, HERE, G—'Ilh Intermep, increment P Carp., GERCO, USGS, FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, Geoeese, IGN, Kedaster NL. Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan. MLTI, Esn China (Hong Kong), swisstopo. ® OpenStreetMep contributors, and the GIS User Commundy F' r., . _...+ , wade A- ^---------------- �,'. 01:1 > t} I December 6, 2018 ❑ Project Boundary Buffered Project Boundary E] Managed Area (MAREA) Method . ,� Page 3 of 3 1:21,400 0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi 0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km Sources Esri, HERE, G—'Ilh Intermep, increment P Carp., GERCO, USGS, FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, Geoeese, IGN, Kedaster NL. Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan. MLTI, Esn China (Hong Kong), swisstopo. ® OpenStreetMep contributors, and the GIS User Commundy U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT (Authority: AR 335-15, See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: Meredith College City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 03/01/18 Applicant/Owner: Meredith College State: NC Sampling Point: Dfl Investigator(s): C. Huysman Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.79674 Long: -78.68597 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet-Urban NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks (136) —Surface Water (Al) —True Aquatic Plants (B14) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (610) —Saturation (A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) —Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) —Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (63) —Thin Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other (Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) —Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Dfl Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Pinus taeda 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 3. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 No FACU Total Number of Dominant 4. Taxodium distichum 5 No OBL Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 55 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11 OBL species 5 x 1 = 5 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC FAC species 140 x 3 = 420 2. Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC FACU species 20 x 4 = 80 3. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 165 (A) 505 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.06 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% g. 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0' 20 =Total Cover _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Microstegium vimineum 80 Yes FAC 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6. 7. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8, than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 9. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 80 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC 2. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 10 =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 SOIL Sampling Point: Df1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-4 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey 4-10 7.5YR 5/3 80 5YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 10-16 7.5YR 5/3 50 10YR 3/2 50 D M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ? Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) —Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 DTRECTION 35.79736"N ACCURACY 16 ft 250 deg(T) 078.68623'W DATUM WG584 V iA % X& w1k 14 -J Meredith College DIRECTION 219 "' Y 1 35.79752 N 2018-03-01 15:26:18-05:00 ACCURACY 33 ft DATUM WG58.1 W.Tl Tl 711M ra 2018-03-01 15:34:59-05:00 DIRECTION 35.79735°N ACCURACY 16 ft 140 deg(T) 078.68622°W DATUM WG584 W U24 t �i5 7YN Meredith College 2018-03-01 15:26:28-05:00 m Ln M I m M I r-1 N Ln rl J-� Q� r O=3 Ql N r O W L N v N v X 2 3 r-4 N 0) R 0 00 CT 00 n � vi C0 ms DIRECTION 35.79625°N ACCURACY 16 ft 0 171 deg(T) 078.68498°W DATUM WGS84 M I 10 m N I V Y O Q Z W c 41 �A4 L� DIRECTION 283 deg(T) 35.79666°N ACCURACY 16 ft 078.68600°W DATUM WGS84 Meredith College pLnp`2018-03-01 15.59:23--05:00 Y A y "° ��^"''�„ - s `':*rev. ��•q��r1 vim... Meredith College Dispisal 2018-03-01 15:52:46-05:00 DIRECTION 296 deg(T) 35.79668°N 078.68600°W ACCURACY 16 ft DATUM WGS84 Meredith College Dredge 2018-03-01 16:00:41-05:00