20190274 Ver 1_401 Application_20190228

$ PAID
2 0 1 90 2 7 4
Agent Authorization Letter
November 5, 2018
Owner Information
Owner Name: East Brooke Apartments
Mailing Address: 2304 Churchill Dr
City, State, Zip: Burlington, NC, 27215
Property Description
PIN: 8885160959
Project: Morningside Dr
Address: 2045 Morningside Dr Burlington, NC 27215
County: Alamance
as owner/agent of the above referenced
property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCD" to enter the subject property
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com
//-51--/Z-
Date
l_51--/Z-
Date

10/25/2018 Alamance County Tax Record Application - Account Information
/ Select Search:
Real Property Record
Alamance County Government Search
TAX ADMINISTRATION RECORD SEARCH Tax Bill Search
'v c County Homepage
Alamance Homepage
Account Details for EASTBROOKE APARTMENTS LLC r ?) New Search
EASTBROOKE APARTMENTS
LLC
2304 CHURCHILL DRIVE
BURLINGTON, NC 27215
2003 MORNINGSIDE DR
Parcel ID No. 148118
GPIN 8885160959
Legal Desc EASTBROOK
Tax Value $ 474,387
OLD Tax ID 6-46-247
APTS
Owner ID 0653878
Deed Year 2015
Tax Value - Land and all permanent
improvements, if any, effective valuation
Deed Bk/Pg 3431 /0431
date January 1, 2017, date of County's most
Tax District 12 - CITY OF
Plat Bk/Pg /
recent General Reappraisal
BURLINGTON
Assessed 474,387
Land Use Code 401
Value $
Land Use Desc APART: LO
Grantor EASTBROOKE
Exemption Code
APARTMENTS
If Assessed Value does not equal Market
Neighborhood BLC05
LLC
Value, then the parcel may be in a tax
deferment program, be split by the county
line, or be overridden to match an alternative
Sold Date 05/15/2015
valuation approach.
Sold Amount $ $0.00
Parcel ID No Date Sold Name Stamps Book / Page Sale Price
1 05/15/2015 EASTBROOKE APARTMENTS LLC .00 3431/0431 $0.00
2 11/28/2012 DEBOER & GABRIEL PROPERTIES INC 1196.00 3163/0898 $598,000.00
3 10/11/2010 1933 2006 MORNINGSIDE DR HOLDINGS LLC 2100.00 2951/0654 $1,050,000.00
4 04/20/2006 RTS HOLDINGS P21-7 LLC .00 2400/754 $1,300,000.00
5 03/02/2004 EASTBROOKE II APARTMENTS LLC .00 2044/42 $1,300,000.00
® Back to Results
Print This Property Record Card
New Search
Data Disclaimer: All data shown here is from other primary data sources and is public information. Users of this data are
hereby notified that the aforementioned public information sources should be consulted for verification of the information
contained on this website. While efforts have been made to use the most current and accurate data, Alamance County, NC
and Data Providers assume no legal responsibility for the use of the information contained herein.
Please direct any questions or comments about the data displayed here to [e-mail]
This application was developed for Alamance County by NexGen Digital
Document Solutions ustaxdata a,,,,-sE4RICH
www.ustaxdata.com
http://alamance.ustaxdata.com/account.cfm?parcellD=148118 1/1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington DisMct
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.artny.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CouptyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-2514633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Arany Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1929 Morninaside Dr
City, State: Burlington, NC
County: Alamance
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 8885160959
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓A I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
V
W]
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: East Brooke Apartments
Mailing Address: 2304 Churchill Dr
Burlington, NC 27215
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
10/26/2018
Date
ti
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rocess.
; I intend to construct/develop a,project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
aI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
✓❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓a Size of Property or Review Area 6.36 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude:
36.103744
-79.401783
0 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hgp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Repulatory-Permit-
Prop-ram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓� Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs. please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. Ulease complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
a
Vicinity Map
D
Aerial Photograph
IV-/]
USGS Topographic Map
0
Soil Survey Map
FV/1 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
FALandscape Photos (if taken)
0 NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
0 NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
F] Other Assessment Forms
www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re upL� atory/reedocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
a Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/ReeuIatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction isto be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard -copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling (the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
V/ Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
FMust be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
aMust include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
aMust clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
aJurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
0 Jurisdictional non -wetland waters (non -wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW), pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area (using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non-linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non-linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
F%11 Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
✓* Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑✓ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action /D No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

❑✓ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, 33 CF. R. part 328 and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official.
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action /D No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
7 be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
PV/ include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds).
❑1 include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Momingside Dr City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 11-7-2018
Applicant/Owner: Debour State: NC Sampling Point: A7
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section, Township, Range: Burlington
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex. none): Concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRP Let: 36.103442 :-79.402555 Datum: Nad83
Soil Map Unit Name: HfC- Helena -Urban land complex 6 to 10 % slope Nwl classification: WAM Headwater Fc
Are climatic / h drol x: conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes M No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology= significantly disturbedCD4M "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes= NoF7-1
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No = is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNo = within a Wetland? Yes = No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesF'H No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (131)
_✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (82)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63)
= Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (65)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
r7Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes D
No = Depth (inches): 1 in
Water Table Present? Yes 0
No Q Depth (inches): 2in
Saturation Present? Yes 0
No= Depth (inches): 21n
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes = No Q
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
1W.e Famhim (Pitt aye• 25ft x 25ft
% ('over acs? Statuc
Box elder (Acer negundo)
1. - —
3% NO FACW
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
8% Yes FAC/
3 Sycamore (Platanus Occidental)
5% _YPc FAC11l�
4 Tulip Poplar (Lihodendron tulipifera)
4% Yes FAC
5.
x 5 = 0
6. -
-
2% Yes FAC
20 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
&dina Sratum (Plat size: 25ft x 25ft t
5.
1 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)
1 % NO FACU
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
3% Yes FAC/f�
3 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
3% Yes FAC
4. Sycamore (Platanus Occidental)
4% YES FACW_
10. -
Sampling Pant: A7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 11 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Total % Cover or:
Multiply jm_
OBL species
x 1 = 0
FACW species
x2= 0
FAC species
x 3 = 0
FACU species
x 4 = 0
UPL species
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
6• - Prevalence Index - B/A = NaN
Total Cover My drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 5.5 20% of total cover: 2.2 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0Irruh Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese) 60% Yes FAC 3 - Prevalence Index is :93.0'
2 American Holly (Ilex opera) 5% NO FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3 Fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) 12% NO FACW
4.
-
5."
6."
77 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38.5 20% of total cover: 15.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.. Rush (Juncus spp.)
2% Yes FACIAJI
2 Cinnamon Fem (Osmunda cinnamomea)
2% Yes FAC
3..-
-
4 -
-
5.
-
7.
8..-
10. -
11.-
-
4 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 2
20% of total cover: 0.8
WoodyVines (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Grape (Vitis spp.)
- 15% Yes FAC1tlII
2_ Roundleaf Greenbrier (Smilax rotundafolia)
.2 NO FAC
3. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
15 Yes FAC
4.-
-
5.-
-
32 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 16 20% of total cover. 6.4
US Army Corps of Engineers
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, &]g woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - AN woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YesFv
No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflrr
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc
0-2 10yr 3/2 100
2-10 10yr 3/2 97 10YR4/6 3 C M
10-21 10yr 3/1 95 10YR4/6 5 C M
Sampling Point: A7
Texture Remarks
SL
SCL
SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all ll
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Il (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MCRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
El
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa NoF__1
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Morningside Dr City/County: Alamance Sampling Date: 11/7/2018
Applicant/Owner: Eastbooke Apartments State: NC Sampling Pant: A7
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section, Township, Range: BuUrlington
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRP Lat: 36.103478 Long: -79.40223 Datum: Nad83
Soil Map Una Name: HfC- Helena -Urban land complex 6 to 10 % sloe NWI classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic / h drol x: conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓� No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil I v I or Hydrology = significantly disturbed .✓ Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes a✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes L No I_ I is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNo =r—� within a Wetland? Yes = No Q
Welland Hydrology Present?
Yes No I T I
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Surface Water (A1)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (61)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Murk Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
r7Sphagnurn moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes= No 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
25ft x 25ft Absolute Dominant Indicator
�e f*rahxn (Plrf ale• 1 % Cover egg?
Red Oak (Quercus falcata) _ 6 Yes FACU
2 White Oak (Quercus alba) 8 Yes FACU
3 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) �3 �— FACU
4, -
5. ' -
6. -
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8.5 20% of total cover: 3.4
&Dlina stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft t
1 American Holly (Ilex opaca) 5% Yes FAC
2.
3. - -
4. -
5. -
Sampling Pant: A7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number ot Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
rrevarence moex worKsneer:
Total % Carer of
Multiply jam_
OBL species
x 1 = 0
FACW species
x2= 0
FAC species
x 3 = 0
FACU species
x 4 = 0
UPL species
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
6. " - Prevalence Index - B/A - NaN
5 - Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
,Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese) 5 Yes FAC
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Thus oopallinum
2 - R 5 Yes -Rhu problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3 Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) 5 Yes FACW
4.- -
5." -
6.-
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Wiregrass, Pinelawn Three Awn (Aristida stricta) 5 _ Yes FAC_
2. Carex, Sedge (Carex spp.) 2 Yes FAC -11
-
4.,- -
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1.4
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size.- 25ft x 25ft )
1. Grape (Vitis spp.) _ 2 Yes FACVI�
2, Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) _ 5 Yes FAC
3. Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissuc quinquefolia) 2 Yes FAC
4.-
5.- -
9 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4.5 20% of total cover. 1.8
morphological adaptations below).
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, jn woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - AN woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YesF71 No
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
orc
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast) % Color (mast) % Tvne Loc
0-5 10YR3/3 100
5-16 10YR3/4 100
16-24 10YR 4/3 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked S i
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Soils are disturbed.
Sampling Pant: A7
Texture Remarks
SL
SCL
SCL
Lin
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa NoEl
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecusite: Eastbrook Apt City/County: Burlington /Alamance Sampling Date: 2/6/2019
Applicant/Owner: Debour State: NC Sampling Point: S7
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section, Township, Range: Burlington
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLRP Lt 36.103305 Long: -79.401495 Datum: Nad83
Soil Map Unit Name: HfC- Helena -Urban land corn lex 6 to 10 % sloe NWI classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic / hdrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil I� or Hydrology significantly disturbed�Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes a] No
Are Vegetation Soil= or Hydrology naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? yes= No Q
Welland Hydrology Present? YeSF�9 No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Surface Water (Al) =Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2) [=�Nari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (610)
=Saturation (A3) =Hydrogen Suede Odor (Cl)
=Moss Trim Lines (816)
=Water Marks (61) =Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CO
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84) = Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (B5) =Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
MSphagnurn moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Q No 0 Depth (inches): No
Water Table Present? Yes= No 0 Depth (inches): No
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
The delineation is of top of bank. 8 to 10 ft vertical drop to OHWM. There are no abutting wetlands next to stream
component. Only upland data was obtained for this area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Pant: S7
!4*mhrm Met azP 25ft x 25ft
Absolute
OA Cover
Dominant Indicator
i g�
Dominance Test worksheet:
jape
a u
Number of Dominant Species
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)
1
8
NO FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
25
Yes FAC/
3. Sycamore (Platanus Occidental)
�._
FAC
YPS _ 1�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
q White Oak (Quercus alba) 2 No FACU
5• Tulip Poplar (Lidodendron tulipifera)
15
NO �C :
Percent of Dominant Species NaN
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6. -
6. '
-
-
85 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 42.5
20% of total cover: 17
Total % Cover of MWb-1YlQK_
&Dlina.strstum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft t
OBL species x 1 = 0
1 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
5
Yes FACU
FACW species x2= 0
FAC species x3= 0
FACU species x 4 = 0
2 Sycamore (Platanus Occidental) 5 Yes FACW-
3 Red Oak (Quercus falcate) 3 Yes FACU
UP species x 5 = 0
4
_
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5. -
-
6. '
-
Prevalence Index - B/A = NaN
1-- Total Cover
Hy drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 6.5
20% of total cover: 2.6
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
23ruh Stratum (Plot size: 2511 x 25ft )
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
2
Yes FAC
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2•
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.-
.-4•Indicators
4.-
Indicatorsof hydric sal and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.- -
6.-
-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 1
20% of total cover: 0.4
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
C
1 Sedge Carex, (Carex spp.)
_
Yes
% Y
�— FAC -0
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 _
_
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
q -
-
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
_
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6..-
-
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7 _
_
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, &W woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.--
-
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10. -
-
3 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 1.5
20% of total cover: 0.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Grape (Vitis spp.)
1
Yes FAC1U
2, Roundleaf Greenbrier (Smilax rotundafolia) ,
2
Yes FAC
3. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
2
Yes FAC
4.-
-
5• -
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover. 1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
or
Sampling Pant: S7
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(inches)
Color (mast)
% Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3in
10YR4/3
100%
SCL
3-14in
10YR5/4
100(j
SCL
14-22
10YR7/6
1 001
SCL
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M --Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (M LRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, A T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (M LRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa Nom
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Eastbrook Apts
Date: 2-8-2019
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
There is a total of 0
threatened, endangered,
or candidate species on
this species list.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
aAt, 674-- 2-8-2019

�q

1 L Lex-'
D
w1!_ 01�s
�! �,�i �, at f � l•y�i+�
At,3 7 , w
°�
ANN
l tlx x `QIP' t 7u�
Nk
MW
f
_*._. #fie -ai+�f s, Ea ► !
ILM
r _wo� '_ x
j meq..:_.: '` - y:..�? • • �' .�,ti � x��`� .t,� y r ' a"i'-i �_ 1F {_.qye= %,i:� �-� � 1 `
�a�n�.j'�i� •$ � �"T+! 3i�����y i,,J.f i "M ���iy���`97 If 'x \. 'qc�•�4��� "�,i.-- _ter`
t���,. ,:,,�`�, ! 5�+� 4a`!}/�� 1�Y�jti, /..•! �I��'�'jd+ "�=�Ik'---� , "' ` � �� f � is
_ �.. i � � '�,a } �" � ...y't °'�` 1 3 �� / �� i��.^`l jl ^71�� 1 \ � � `�41�\M.�'• p�\h .�.E
�! ..-../Y�� - ��� ���� � �� 11 - �i � `, +r �` } � 1� - !'I� �- ® �• f. t'r.:��j1, m� �,A - 'ray • :1
.Fzwn Yds•. _ � ' � p.A+.. :---a � � Ny �� kl _s _�� i. � �\BN� `i
�-_ �j •� ' r-.+, �' t. Y _ _ �\ x R �r`It{� ? " I����... �.�' FNI
'"•*? t`�A � � (, 'Y � r �.v// .+ � 4 „1. .,,a i � "f � 'I y �, � 7�,c�+t ��1�1�+��� � �. +,` ����r p t 7 ��
� '*` � �+", ."_. �y4, 1, t 1 t• 1�', �L - � - ! d��t �?A��; I I� � S� C �\.`x'R4.
'., Y j dCr�� ,fir.• ?> �; P� ��y+y,ih E
771

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
se d -Y
TIM BAUMGARTNER,
U mdor
Jason DeBeer
DeBeer and Gabriel Builders
2304 Church Drive
Burlington, NC 27215
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental QuoUty
February 13, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/13/2019
Project: Eastbrook Apartment Complex County: Chatham
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
— (8 -digit HUC)
Cape Fear 03030002 Riparian Wetland 0.48
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: AdamCarter, agent
Sincerely,
Jaeanagement
AsSupervisor
SDE �
North Carolina Depanw-nt of fmicorownial Quatity I Division of Mitigation Services
717 W. ►ones Shtet I M? Mag Service Center I L*194 North Carolina 27699-1652
403078978

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), all applicants must demonstrate compliance
with G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this form signed and dated by the
permit applicant or an authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more details.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not required to
//purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
F1 The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review.
credits were not available at the time theApplication was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Bank
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
Initial here
Signature of Applicant o(Age(J
� •fi,
Dat '
Eel r
Project Name t
Printed Name
47 '. 1 ,
Location'

pur
bmdm
voilcy amexnem. i he policy o2 1 Ny!!, IS M = _ =fi�'i =MM it" z 1�eS.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.wi%amsCDncdenr.Qov.
2. All refund requests are subject to find availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requdsts not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 4/23/2015
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kellv.williams0ncderingov. . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by thirdparties. Review meetings are held on Tuesda rAke! oons.
CONTACT INFORMATIONAPPLICANT'S AGENT APPLICANT
j 1. Business/Company Name
2. Contact Person _
r--
3. Street Address or P O Box
-------
4. City, State, Zip
I 5. Telephone Number
fill Cal__+t r
LP -.BCD( �i 4
i
64-4 2` O -1-71
C S .. �@ l7!` •Li
i
3 C t►.. s • _.___ I
r �- �- `
33 (1 moi/ L _.<045
6. E -Mail Address
i+1• (//�✓�C� 11 / /
M d _ `1 �� I
j
PROJECT INFORMATION
i
7. Project Name
-----
tt
# Si"��c�oL ARCrt��^�1�
+
1
� t '
8. Project Location (nearest town, city) y l
� 9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map �
�� . i �,�y t
g.,
10. County
--L----�
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8 -digit)
(See Note 1) ----- -- f..�• ` L 5)
12. Project Ty -pe- "*indicate owner type and -t Owner Tyr Type: Q Government
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail, =
residential, apartments, road, utilities, military, Project Type:
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
14. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac-)
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm Cool i Cold
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.) Zone 1:
Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake:
Zone 2:
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts y NCDWR:
USACE: r Other: SL&f,crvt
Check L4) below if this request is for a: By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
revision to a current acceptance read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:_
renewal of an expired acceptance
i
extension of unexpired acceptance
I Date:
-T
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit: www.nceep.net or contact DMS
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or kelly-will ornsAncdenr.gov_ or to the front desk at 919-707-8976

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, #FOLDER NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
D. PROJECT LOCATIONS) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: #FOLDER LOCATION DIRECTIONS#
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Alamance City: Burlington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.103478° Long.: -79.40223°
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Service Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
a licable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
W1
36.103409
-79.402579
0.30 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W2
36.103716
36.103716
0.15 acre
Wetland
Section 404
S1
36.103409
-79.402731
230 if
Non -wetland
Section 10/404
S2
36.103455
-79.40129
208 if
Non -wetland
Section 10/404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJ13 constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action; or in any administrative appeal or in -any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make anofficial determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, Burlington Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS 2018_
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: NC FRIS
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): DigitalGlobe 10/17/2017
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
6t&, (mob 2/17/2019
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD fors. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Feet
I I I I I I
to bl*W -
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
w
= Burlington_Parcel - 3.6 acres
Flood Zones
0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
AE
SourCE - _ _ X
Esri, D,- - - ----, ___.
USGS,eAeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC N
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC w- E
PIN: 161870; GPIN: 8885161870
NV Flood Risk Information System (DFIRM 3710888500) S
3e:
Figure: 6
1 inch = 2,000 feet
25 Oct 2018

M
QBurlington_Parcel - 3.6 acres
0 100 200 300 400 500 FeetBurlington_NWI W
ources Esri. DeLorme. Ni :e:''
1 I I 1 I 1 sri. DigitalGlobe, GeoEye y_ ,
USGS. AeroGRID. IGN. and the GIS"User Community
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name- Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC N Figure: 5
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC w E
PIN: 161870; GPIN: 8885161870 1 inch = 150 feet
USFWS National Wetland Inventory (2018) 5 25 Oct 2018

low
i
r�.
NC OneMap 24K Hydrology Data
Burlington_Parcel — 3.6 acres
Soil Map Units
HfB -complex,Helena-Urban land 2 to 6 percent slopes
0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet HfC - Helena -Urban land complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
I i i i i i
r
,USGS. AeroGRID. IGN, and the GIS User Community
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC N Figure. 4
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC WE
PIN- 161870; GPIN- 8885161870 MY 1 inch= 150 feet
P.O. Box 244 NRCD Web Soil Survey (SSURGO) S 25 Oct 2018
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

� , �`- � .--tis , •. �,,, `� � '� �..,r•
`^~�♦ • L- .,,/''a 't ° ! e( ��` � +� 9+,� .moi' `•
is . 4,. ��` , �� �'�`-'` ,► �►,� ,
`L
R
X IL
A10- r
•
+, s •1x1 t'
• '"• �o to � f t ' r c _ �,.�•...'^.,,/ s � 4 ~`. r
J !
>
N Jam• - _ .t... '+« * -. � .-- + � � '� /' � i,. j .: .,
o
00.r
/01
rM
--
y , _ s..� „y' '' ''` "a`, •' " Burlington_Parcel - 3.6 acres
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet *' - f••
,Copyright:©- 2013 Nati'onall G ographic Society. i -cubed
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC N Figure. 3
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC we
PIN: 161870; GPIN: 8885161870 1 inch = 1,000 feet
P.O. Box 244 USGS 7.5 -Minute Topo: Burlington Quad s 25 Oct 2018
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

U
M
U
EN
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet
I I I I I I
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
I M
Burlington—Parcel - 3.6 acres Delineation Flags
WOUS — 438' length x 10' wide 40 Al -A28
WOUS Area — 0.11 acre 0 B1 -B10 _
Wetlands — 0.45 acre O J1 -J7 (Uplands)
0 S1 -S16
® W1 -W19
SNA
0 Reference Flags
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC
PIN: 161870
GPIN-.8885161870
d the GIS User Community
N Figure:2
WF,
1 inch = 100 feet
S_
13 Feb 2019

1001
87 82 11
kLTAMAHAI o %'4 70 qs
70 10 11
I
t ALAMANCE COUNTY
CD
Sq
I
I
j
409
LAKEVIEW
0
MORGANTOWN
`k
Ly .,
100
.ON COLLEGE
70 N Ci 1
- rC t St
BURLINGTON
62
s Church St 116 16
54
54
10
ALAMANCE
0
BELLEMONT
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles
I I I I I I
t". 1411-,
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
W Ce
Main St
HAW RIVER
SVYEPSONVILLE
0
Project Location
Sources: Esri, Del-orme, NAVTEQ, USGS, NRCAN, MET[, PC, TomTom
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC
PIN: 161870; GPIN- 8885161870
0 1
Figure: 1
1 inch = 1.58 miles
25 Oct 2018

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Express X Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification.-
ertification:0 Yes ❑ No
E9
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
0 Yes ❑ No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes 0 No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Eastbrook Apartments
2b. County:
Alamance
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Burlington
2d. Subdivision name:
Eastbrook Apt
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
EASTBROOK APARTMENTS LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3431/0431
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
DEBOER & GABRIEL PROPERTIES INC
3d. Street address:
2304 Churchill Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Adam Carter
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland Soutions, LLC
5c. Street address:
816 Merry Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Dunn, NC 28334
5e. Telephone no.:
(910)890-27789
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8885160959
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.103744 Longitude: -79.401783
1c. Property size:
6.36 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Service Creek to Haw River to Jordan Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
WS-V;NSW
2c. River basin:
Upper Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing conditions on site consist of open field and mature native forest within an active and growing residential development. Residential
development surrounds 360 degrees of the project area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.45
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 438
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an apartment building to assist with shortage of apartments in the Burlington area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist with constructing a sediment basin outside of the wetlands and grading the project site in preparation of the construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: 1/2019
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary Q Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam Carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions, LLC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD will be issued with NW permit request.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps,
0.24
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
All residual wetlands will be monitored throughout the process of construction and 2 yrs after construction activity for no additional loss of wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 T
Apt Building and Stormwatr
UT to Service Creek
No
3,351.31
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
YeslNo
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
3,351.31
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
We have altered the layout of the apt building to not impact eh stream. We have minimized the impacts to the wetlands to just zone 2 of the stream
buffer. Measures have been taken to move the temporary retention pond out of the wetlands to further lesson the wetland impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
We will utilize silt fence, Wattles, dean gravel/rip-rap, to helps slow down surface water so that no sediment or silt will be transproted off site during the
time of construction. We will maintain BMPs throughout the construction cycle and beyond through maintaining a inspection regiment after each rain
fall event.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
© Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
© DWQ © Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
©Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.48 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
We are using the in -lieu fee program to mitigate for wetland impacts for the lack of there being a private mitigation bank in the HUC of the impact.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
® Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
Stormwater/APT Construction
10,454.4
1.5
15,681.6
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Waiting on Burlington to decide on mitigation decision
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
All surface water will be directed into a retention pond and then slow released back into the down hill
into
❑X Yes ❑ No
slope and the wetlands
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
11.49%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
© Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
More than and acre of disturbance
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
All storm -water BMPs will be utiliezed in order to manage low engery flow across
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Burlington
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject.?
City of Burilington
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes © No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
©HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyH
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes © No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
© Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ©No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes © No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[-]Yes ©No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ Yes ©No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ©No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All waste water will be discharged into city of Brlington sewer treatment system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes pX No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
https://ecosSws.govrparJ
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
httpsJ/www.habitat.noaa.gov/protectiordefVefhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes © No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.nadcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.coMappstwebappviewer/
Samuel Adam Carter`
2_22_2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

S�-"I Of ty ie+�;C+niiait.rt
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: October 25, 2018
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0090
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
Project Name: Morningside Dr
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

10/25/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy� for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
wwwtowerkill.com; and http://www.fws. og v/mi rg atoUbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

10/25/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

10/25/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

10/25/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0090
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
Project Name: Morningside Dr
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Proposed Development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/36.10369795184586N79.40202561973169W
Counties: Alamance, NC

10/25/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00198
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 0 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf ofNOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECTAREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:t
Project/Site:I
? d a-7ala-
Latitude: /o 1/0 edi
Evaluator.d"'VI �'ar �PT
County: A la a�cL
Longitude: yp,f/l9
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Z
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other }
e.g. Quad Name: Qctr i i6if>
19 or rennial if> 3(1'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0. 0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1 1.5
1
1 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
02
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
1.5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
010
a
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
003
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see d' scions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = C )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 (T)2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 M
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0. '
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
Ct 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biolodv (Subtotal = & 1,33)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
G �(
v�_
„v c, t. v'
V
_
c.tvALI
+ � : Ira
\t%l -�!
------
wr�Ax-
14µ:�y
�(�
J
5 >

B_ City of
URLINGTON
-i -Water ResAurces
Riparian Buffer Authorization Application
Stormwater Division
1302 Belmont Street
PO Box 1358
Burlington, NC 27216
[phone]
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Project Information
1 a.
Name of project:
Eastbrook Apartment Complex
1 b.
County:
Alamance
1 c.
Nearest municipality:
Burlington
1 d.
Subdivision name:
Eastbrook Apartment Complex
2.
Owner Information
2a.
Name on Recorded Deed:
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created):
2d.
Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
DeBour &Gabriel Builders
2e.
Street address:
2304 Church Dr
2f.
City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
2g.
Telephone no.:
336 516-5048
2h. Fax no.:
2i.
Email address:
[e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different
from owner)
3a.
Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b.
Name:
Adam Carter
3c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland Solutions, LLC
3d.
Street address:
816 Merry Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Dunn, NC 28334
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]

INTERNAL DRAFT- NOT FOR PUBLIC USE
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 2 of 7
4a. Name:
4b. Business name
(if applicable):
4c. Street address:
4d. City, state, zip:
4e. Telephone no.:
4f. Fax no.:
4g. Email address:
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 2 of 7

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 148118
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.103411 Longitude: -79.402599
1c. Property size: Acres: 6.
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Service Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving
water:
WS-V;NSW
2c. River basin:
Upper Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The existing conditions on site consist of open field and mature native forest within an active and growing
residential development. Residential development surrounds 360 degrees of the project area.
3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
438 linear ft
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To construct stormwater and Apt Complex of parcel
3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of building a temporary stormwater retention basin and then grading and building a apt
building. Equipment being utilized will be backhoe, track hoe, motor grader and skid steer.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps, State or City been requested or obtained for this
property/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam Carter
Agency/ Consultant Company:
Wetland Solutions,LLC
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State/City determinations and attach
documentation. Under Review by Corps Rep David Bailey
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain and detail.
3 1 P a g e

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 4 of 7

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
1a. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact
Reason for
Type of impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number—
impact
(exempt, allowable,
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P)
allowable w/
required?
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
or Temporary
mitigation)
61 ®P ❑ T
Grade for
allowable
UT
❑ Yes ❑ No
10,454
Stormwater and
.4
APT Building
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
10,454
.4
1 b. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
We have altered the layout of the apt building to not impact the stream. We have minimized the impacts to the
wetlands to just zone 2 of the stream buffer. Measures have been taken to move the temporary retention pond out
of the wetlands to further lesson the wetland impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
We will utilize silt fence, Wattles, clean gravel/rip-rap, to help slow down surface water so that no sediment or silt
will be transported off site during the time of construction. We will maintain BMPs throughout the construction
cycle and beyond through maintaining an inspection regiment after each rain fall event.
5� Page

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone Reason for impact
Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet s uare feet
Zone 1
3.0
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c. If buffer mitigation is required is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f. Comments:
We are recommending onsite remediation of the zone 2 buffer by revegetating with local native vegetation once
onsite grading is complete.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 6 of 7

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
Environmental Documentation
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
❑ Other BMP
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
❑ Yes ® No
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
of public (federal/state) land?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
1 b.
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use
❑ Yes ® No
of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ® No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H.0500), Isolated Wetland
[]Yes ® No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200) or any City Ordinance?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Samuel Adam Carter
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name 2/17/2019
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Submit this completed form with all items in the checklist to: City of Burlington — Stormwater Division
1302 Belmont Street
Burlington, NC 27216
Attn: Carolyn Buckner/Amy Cameron
Submittal Checklist:
❑ Maps of site location indicating project boundaries using USGS 1:24,000 topo map and NRCS county soil survey
❑Buffer Impact Exhibit(s)
Questions? Please contact the Stormwater Division at 336-222-5091

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Seaelary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Laecior
Jason DeBeer
DeBeer and Gabriel Builders
2304 Church Drive
Burlington, NC 27215
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 13, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/13/2019
Project: Eastbrook Apartment Complex County: Chatham
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8 -digit HUG)
Cape Fear 03030002 Riparian Wetland 0.48
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: AdamCarter, agent
Sincerely, _
Jaeanagement
AsSupervisor
North Carolina Departmrnt of [lrVtrar PJRikdl Quality ; Division of Wigallon Services
717 W. Itmes Shret 116521 fs 9 Service Centrr I i Mwth Caroline 27699-1652
Q19milpitb

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), all applicants must demonstrate compliance
with G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this form signed and dated by the
permit applicant or an authorized agent. Please refer to DFNR's Implementation Policy for more details.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not required to
purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DwR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
E] The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
E] This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time theApplication was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
Abanks regarding credit availability.
�` I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
initial here
Signature of Applicant o(Agetl
�Z // 1 4,2-e) I q
Dat6 '
Project Name t
Printed Name
Location

1. A11 refund requests must be made in wTifina to the DNAS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kellv.williams6_ncdenr.aov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DIMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 4/23/2015
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kzlly williamsca)ncdenr.gov . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or ]at long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by thirdparties. Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons.
CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT'S AGENT ; APPLICANT
1. Business/Company Name !t
2. Contact Person
3. Street Address or P O Box C _ lac oc�4
3 C �{►. s , �. --
t
4. City, State, Zip I
5. TelephoneNumber6416 1
0' ' 1' -1
33G 7-045
6. E -Mail Address i d
Lu�-1����.L���i �1�trY-
PROJECT INFORMATION
7. Project Name
8. Project Location (nearest town, city)
9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map
- - -
I, j 4.
-----_1_—_.—��--2�---------
10. County
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8 -digit)
(see Note 1)
12. Project Type -indicate owner type and
Owner Type: 0
Government -�rivate
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential, apartments, road, utilities, military,
Project Type:
etc.)..
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
Y` e
14. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
I
16. Stream impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm (
Cool i Cold
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.) Fi
{ Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake: =Zone 1: ;Zone 2:
-
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts NCDWR:
�ZOther: ���, gc>>ny„CCAA
USACE: �G\1riC� �lr
Check below if this request is for a: By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
j revision to a current acceptance ;read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
renewal of an expired acceptance G
Ile Lia,
extension of unexpired acceptance
Date:
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit visitwww.nceep.net or contact DMS
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or kelly.williams(d)ncdenr.gov- or to the front desk at 919-707-8976

BCity of
_ URLINGTON
-Water ResAurces
Riparian Buffer Authorization Application
Stormwater Division
1302 Belmont Street
PO Box 1358
Burlington, NC 27216
[phone]
A. Applicant Information
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project:
Eastbrook Apartment Complex
1 b. County:
Alamance
1 c. Nearest municipality:
Burlington
1 d. Subdivision name:
Eastbrook Apartment Complex
2. Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed:
EastBrook Apartments, LLC
2b. Deed Book and Page No.
3431/0431
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created):
2d. Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
DeBour &Gabriel Builders
2e. Street address:
2304 Church Dr
2f. City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
2g. Telephone no.:
336 516-5048
2h. Fax no.:
2i. Email address:
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different
from owner)
3a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b. Name:
Adam Carter
3c. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland Solutions, LLC
3d. Street address:
816 Merry Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Dunn, NC 28334
3f. Telephone no.:
(910)890_2779
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]

INTERNAL DRAFT- NOT FOR PUBLIC USE
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 2 of 7
4a. Name:
4b. Business name
(if applicable):
4c. Street address:
4d. City, state, zip.-
ip:4e.
4e.Telephone no.:
4f. Fax no.:
4g. Email address:
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 2 of 7

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 148118
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.103411 Longitude: -79.402599
1c. Property size: Acres: 6.
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Service Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving
water:
WS-V;NSW
2c. River basin:
Upper Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The existing conditions on site consist of open field and mature native forest within an active and growing
residential development. Residential development surrounds 360 degrees of the project area.
3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
438 linear ft
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To construct stormwater and Apt Complex of parcel
3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of building a temporary stormwater retention basin and then grading and building a apt
building. Equipment being utilized will be backhoe, track hoe, motor grader and skid steer.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps, State or City been requested or obtained for this
property/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam Carter
Agency/ Consultant Company:
Wetland Solutions, LLC
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State/City determinations and attach
documentation. Under Review by Corps Rep David Bailey
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain and detail.
3�Page

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 4 of 7

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
1a. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact
Reason for
Type of impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number—
impact
(exempt, allowable,
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P)
allowable w/
required?
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
or Temporary
mitigation)
B1 ❑ P ® T
Grade for
allowable
UT
❑ Yes ❑ No
3351.3
Stormwater and
1
APT Building
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
3351.3
1
1 b. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
We have altered the layout of the apt building to not impact the stream. We have minimized the impacts to the
wetlands to just zone 2 of the stream buffer. Measures have been taken to move the temporary retention pond out
of the wetlands to further lesson the wetland impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
We will utilize sift fence, Wattles, clean gravel/rip-rap, to help slow down surface water so that no sediment or silt
will be transported off site during the time of construction. We will maintain BMPs throughout the construction
cycle and beyond by maintaining an inspection regiment after each rain fall event.
S�Pa`Te

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact Multiplier
(square feet
Required mitigation
s uare feet
Zone 1
3.0
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c. If buffer mitigation is required is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f. Comments:
We are recommending onsite remediation of the zone 2 buffer by revegetating with local native vegetation once
onsite grading is complete.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 6 of 7

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
Environmental Documentation
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
❑ Other BMP
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
❑ Yes ® No
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
of public (federal/state) land?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
1 b.
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use
❑ Yes ® No
of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ® No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H.0500), Isolated Wetland
[]Yes ® No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200) or any City Ordinance?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Samuel Adam Carter
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name 2_22 201
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Submit this completed form with all items in the checklist to: City of Burlington — Stormwater Division
1302 Belmont Street
Burlington, NC 27216
Attn: Carolyn Buckner/Amy Cameron
Submittal Checklist:
2Maps of site location indicating project boundaries using USGS 1:24,000 topo map and NRCS county soil survey
2Buffer Impact Exhibit(s)
Questions? Please contact the Stormwater Division at 336-222-5091
7�. ,

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Eastbrook Apt Date
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summa
1/18/2019
Adam Carter
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Eastbrook Apt Date of Evaluation 1/18/2019
Applicant/Owner Name Jason DeBour Wetland Site Name Eastbrook Apt
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Adam Carter
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Service Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
County Alamance NCDWR Region Raleigh
C Yes C No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci- degrees) 36.103442 -79.402555
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? C Yes r' No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? . Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area
F nadromous fish
f✓ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
PF NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
f Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
P— Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
P-1 Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
r— Designated NCNHP reference community
(Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, If any? (check all that apply)
r Blackwater
f: Brownwater
r— Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) C` Lunar (" Wind C Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? C Yes r: No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? f" Yes t: No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? t± Yes l" No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
!" A C' A Not severely altered
t: B C: B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch 5 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
r A r A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
(+ B {: B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C` C C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (M•
AA WT
3a. (— A C A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
Co— B (: B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C f C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
(" D C D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. C` A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. C A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
r C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
t-' D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
C E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. C+ A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
r B Soil ribbon Z 1 inch
4c. C A No peat or muck presence
r B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
C A r A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B C B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
r C C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
r— A f7 A F A i 10% impervious surfaces
I— B r— B I— B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
r— C F C r— C R a 20% coverage of pasture
r— D r— D r— D 2:20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
f— E r— r— E 2:20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
r— F f— F r— F a 20% coverage of clear-cut land
P-1 G r— G f— G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and& overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer— assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
t: Yes (- No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
(— A 2 50 feet
r B From 30 to < 50 feet
C: C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
r: 5 15 -feet wide (- > 154eet wide r Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
C: Yes r No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
{. Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
r Exposed — adjacent open water with width i' 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box In each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
r A C A 2100 feet
(— B r B From 80 to < 100 feet
ro C f: C From 50 to < 80 feet
(— D r D From 40 to < 50 feet
C E C E From 30 to < 40 feet
C F (' F From 15 to < 30 feet
r G !- G From 5 to < 15 feet
r H r H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
( A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
i B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
(: C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
r~ A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
r: B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
r C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetlanq type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
(` A r" A (- A Z 500 acres
r' B r B r B From 100 to < 500 acres
r C r C (- C From 50 to < 100 acres
r D r D r D From 25 to < 50 acres
r E r~ E r E From 10 to < 25 acres
r F r F f-' F From 5 to < 10 acres
r G r G f-' G From 1 to < 5 acres
r H r H r` H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
r: I (: I r: I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
r J r~ J (- J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
f ' K r K r~ K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
r A Pocosin is the full extent (i 90%) of its natural landscape size.
C B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
r A C A 2:500 acres
r B r" B From 100 to < 500 acres
(- C r~ C From 50 to < 100 acres
r-' D r D From 10 to < 50 acres
r~ E r- E < 10 acres
r: F r: F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
r" Yes r No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas 2:40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
r` A 0
(: B 1 to 4
(` C 5 to 8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
r-' A Vegetation is dose to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
r+' B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
r-' C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
r-' A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
r: B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
(- C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
(. Yes (` No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
(` A z 25% coverage of vegetation
r B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
Moderate density shrub layer
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (W) separately.
(` C
AA
WT
(' A
Dense herb layer
A
(o—A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
o
( B
C B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
m
v
(' C
(" C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
(` A
(' A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
C: B
(: B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
(' C
(' C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
a (' A (— A Dense shrub layer
2 {: B
L
(: B
Moderate density shrub layer
(' C
(` C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
( A
(' A
Dense herb layer
(" B
{" B
Moderate density herb layer
(: C
(. C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
(` A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
(: B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
t+ A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
r B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
r C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
(' A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
(: B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
(`A (`B CC ('D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely atter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
(. A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
r B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
( C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
(' D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

EASTBROOK APARTMENTS
Alamance County, North Carolina
BUILDING ADDITION
CIVIL SITE PACKAGE
C/O DEBOER & GABRIEL BUILDERS
OCTOBER 2018
REVISED: FEBRUARY, 2019
SHEET INDEX
1. EXISTING SITE SURVEY W/ PROPOSED OVERLAY
Z. CLEARING A GRUBBING EROSION CONTROL PLAN. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
3. GRADING AER0810N CONTROL PLAN
4. UTILITY A 6TORMWATER PLAN
S. WATER, SEWER A STORMWATER DETAILS
8. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
7. LANDSCAPING PLAN
OWNER: GABRIEL 1 D -ER BUILDERS
ADDRESS: 1903 WRNINGSDE DWE
BU11-IDN.. 27D1
Civil l Environmental
Design & Consulting
418 SOUTH SECOND STREET
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
VOICE [phone]
VICINITY MAP
ND SGALE

L — �-. �•�!re ,�o•.r•• �roru_.oe�a.n�� f/�Yi/ ae.l—_----�._—
owr ema � f � — _ - sswN �E aWa°°/°'9 !'•mNwr a lreowwA loaca/ sY fs.•a m.J �� e
50. R. FOOTPRINT RIM3)
P
R
535.]) THLL PRORRM'Y -POB!' RRaY ereRV/ROP.eRBe —YL I i
mw P»y+tr ero. womww ».-Boo, /sP•,r/wu.
I Z — I I- — I mm ro.e eom aBaY.a� .Ree mxo Bvas• aR vBosaan: �
a,euar RR p.ee m.)
I I - �, I L - ` _ - � I � __ _ I ,� I Yoru Hoar sao> mnmovs ae�vr oe: !e•.ae / aerX/arsl • u.,RR
w fvi.Rm•B mm mov" w n
n (� J Two siORY IBPIOV auarnro I�
1,10 50. FT. P.—CKINT , I I — — �Y , - -- I a1 RMCRB eODID In
BR
I I (- I I I _= _I I---10'3tta•cw_ I N I - ---- _�eso)'sa• � U rn
I Z
Z I
00
R _('moi) C M
_
I w T_ _ — h _ — I- 1� N L� b
J]PeRwIN01 $ea5 I I Nab ]..InI I I I ,--- \``�___'' I� I I li i ____________________l j �F
'�->_..-��„ i i 1 I I I 1 I I I I I T r�---•+�" _ �_ �i ,"'-�\�. i��� it I I i I � � N
1 _I —I I I I I I AET
Pegg
me
IN. �'" I I ! I I I I _ 'li'�' �,_�- •'�'----['�---I.- —.{IF
_ — a�_��� I 1 I I I � 1 1 1 1 1—M � — e• ' i \ � \\ i , —�' sNM-�—,_-L--_ ' I:� -
\ '12°"
O Ee BBNO •'
I ! I i 7,, oP —13 EE r j
� bbd. . .-.-. '�\, y 8�}�I�, " �j ; ;• 1' ,'l r \,' NN \,
grydq \
J.
ev
Al
\( 1CIS
I \ C ♦ I i i C \ NN \ J !� 600
)r zu.oft O
mei
--�--"------------ \\ I PSI ♦
V6\ \
/ / r.eRar •wwa
r- .]•' �, -- -- ' \ pawn wr
iww
NN \ AS NOTED
\ \ 25-

TOP SLOPE DDROSION (1YP.) WMER BAL
}10 AS M
SLOPE DRNN
INIAIN L SLOPE RISES BNlE5
INEM M
i0 IN-EDGRADE SURFME EL.
TEMP. SLOPE BOTTOM EL,
CR
Il
IN 1 {gym
+� r
14
l\
•��.�•,� _ — _ _ _ a�>•1 I I I A NP. CON5IRUCTIIW / d y JL \ T\/ \ \\
AC TEMP, DNERSION T�1 _ �'•��_' L II a.l W / B DRCn ro sea ABusn cRouxD cw s r- - . -. _ �"-••-+_ I I'
-MEENSITELY I l � _ y
1 F SKIMMERR BLSIW I I � I \ � tl /✓ I\ Ij_�_ �/ —
B SCW4EMT BASINL I ) / c
SURFACE EL SSt I
1 BOTTOM EL 5A \�
EE
(SSEDIMENT
1.1 NOTES THIS
// STRENDALL BµANDNK BUFFER /. - • _ 1 • ._ I R GO
SLOPE
R.
so
Al
C TDM C. NOERSBox\' \. A / I
ABLIHOELD C11VER
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
OR BRICK
i0. FT. FOOTPRINT
1
IENPoMMy, DNERSIdI DII
r ` ® B S.5T.1'Bli N GRDUw
1 /� — _ = — _ JT'� CWEP Wrtnlu ] ar5
```
b BO
SCGe 1' - 20' -D
0— McRRurn 20'
L—
-J -- 1
1 I I t I1 I DSIU BEDS
b55p IT.BDf'OD1PRIxT 1 I I a l 12.,0 ACRES
11—
B PTE x I I —v _I f 1
—
—
0.
WUINS)STI I
I
'—
� 1
I
I 1 I
ISPACES
I I 31fORN �yu P[Fi- _ _
NI OUT
_ 1 I l
_ _ /-`-Qe�Lfl_.___..�
♦♦'-1 11
I
MKVIGNG
'
12I I I-1_ I
' I
_��\
1�j—I_j __� I �`— �..�
w\
J
]RP sPACEs
1 1
I I rl �1 I I � � I I 1r I �! � l--,=-�:;- �•.•o��l
)'i.�
, WE MD MRIGTK N M A IL _71
TOP SLOPE DDROSION (1YP.) WMER BAL
}10 AS M
SLOPE DRNN
INIAIN L SLOPE RISES BNlE5
INEM M
i0 IN-EDGRADE SURFME EL.
TEMP. SLOPE BOTTOM EL,
CR
Il
IN 1 {gym
+� r
14
l\
•��.�•,� _ — _ _ _ a�>•1 I I I A NP. CON5IRUCTIIW / d y JL \ T\/ \ \\
AC TEMP, DNERSION T�1 _ �'•��_' L II a.l W / B DRCn ro sea ABusn cRouxD cw s r- - . -. _ �"-••-+_ I I'
-MEENSITELY I l � _ y
1 F SKIMMERR BLSIW I I � I \ � tl /✓ I\ Ij_�_ �/ —
B SCW4EMT BASINL I ) / c
SURFACE EL SSt I
1 BOTTOM EL 5A \�
EE
(SSEDIMENT
1.1 NOTES THIS
// STRENDALL BµANDNK BUFFER /. - • _ 1 • ._ I R GO
SLOPE
R.
so
Al
C TDM C. NOERSBox\' \. A / I
ABLIHOELD C11VER
3
L
vat "MFA To
- I.to Ac.
DISTURBED UMRS
2.10 ACRES
S AREA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
.91IRSED M.
2.10 ACRES
FRAM E EXCEPTIONS
20 D 20
b BO
SCGe 1' - 20' -D
0— McRRurn 20'
3
L
vat "MFA To
- I.to Ac.
DISTURBED UMRS
2.10 ACRES
S AREA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
TWE
NUNS
FRAM E EXCEPTIONS
I.I. IBwi s.
♦ 0v. N.lrwn
SEDIIAENT BASIN NOTES
t wIWRNT Rim .� i0 ONLYREMAINA IN PLACE AND CONVERTED TO A
PRFFOMED SCOUR HOLE ONLY AFTER NL DISTURBED OR.AWAGE
MEAS MESE ENTIRE RESULTING DISCHARGE BERM TRUCL BE
IEVEL MD THE ENTIRE SCOUR HOLE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS
SHOWN IN TnE PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL IE ON SHEET 11.
2. TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING
CLEA IxG ANO GRUBBING L BATONS. SEWMEMT BASIN 3 TO
RE MNN iN PLACE UNTIL ALL LONTIBUTNIG DISTURBED DRAINAGE
MEAS ME STABILIZED, SU BUM
PAD / SB-! WNSIRIICII011
SEOIIEMCE ON SHEET 3. CDNSTRUCTION SEQUENCE THE ENTIRE
TENPORMY -N L nD WITHIN THE BUILDING'S STRUCTURAL
FlLL ZONE.
M BASW
SHEET).
z
C WIN
2
0 z2v
W `WF2
�0i
t7<a.00
m Lu d=�
C 0 a III! cc
i i omm
10 0 cc0QLL
,E)0 CW0
N6
yf
a a0v
W
Vp
JW1R
JWWn
JWW �
AS NOTED
10 -01 -la

SITE AREA STABU2ATION RIPTIF
ON SiABILIIATION nMf
DESCPTR
TIIIME nNE EM10N5
\ _ ®E C TEMPORAiry OrvERBWx gTCH L
OR BRICrf r — — _ \ -\ ° SB 2 EDS'MTABLISH GRCOUNO To, S1. UCC SSLOPEODEIRSION (IVP.) E SSW
:0. FT. FOOTPRINT I I /� — — — T �\ COVER WITHIN T DAYS MMNTAIN AS FILL SLOPE RISES e NV. CUT AIM B45.Z� !Jl.JT PM T Oej X4`= v O -G
TS r 1 1I — J -\ g5iUR0E0 TO FINISHED GRACE 8�+ i
— — — -[ — L — — , _ � 3.10 ACRES TEMP. SLOPE M 51[IMMER 4\LN i O;N•gt w Toa.
!B -I B SEDT E T BASIN LES B 1 I N�
L SURE LL. 511 I T M• ,i�"p°a•N,tA.. a
F .513 V) r ,• om �DNw. rr No•n �-
_ _ `fy _ \ l___ _ I/I gym,.• yo -r W
I I _ n wn I.r•
n— J- — — J I 510Lj
iOR` B`ICN
' I 5110 S0. T. OOIPRINT _� .�[^ _ _ n M
I I I D C OTn 6 GPAVEL I I r A l '' b. 'IE' �+'-� Q N
E111
D
NL ALL
I A w. im r..[k.d•. snap n. z e [c u•ry•m
I I L — _ _ ren L s oRM I —9' _I I`1I1 _ K____ i SEaMENT FENCE �� GROUND STABIU ATION �1 O Z
DRAINS) I — �I : `•\ _ / I sroNE our a REQUIREMENTS - VL11 �
— — I I , I 1 1..� _ _ (�� t.•` _ /j I S IM. EIT FENCE /EN V) D I
I �T — — — J / �1 / _ �!(%�'• _ �_��1� -1__11 ; DRN[MDL MFA TO FENC ! = W
d I i___- _ �El-(0
i Is [Ess THAN oao ACRES ~ —
I U i I 0 PO
Ln
MPARN VAGES I i I I II/� I I —�—� j _// $I\\ .._.._�- �; \� •, , ( 1 ['gip QFNERAL GRADING AE RO ION CONTROL NOTES
THF
°, R �N
ARallo GIL 1,
SPACES -_
I I �'WPR DPR[+[: B LL e
I I I I I I wETVJlD MRIGnON MG ' i ® . 1
THI
UN
C _ I I 1 —I —I i' s oR+[ MH A[[P . PIT[�a ANP P,«<R App ,r., :..,W, .xLP. PHP [°, r�P _
�.—� — — � — �>'1 I A MP. CON5IRUCLIbN / ' 9 4i /i I SIMx A%rrA. .[ Dcilo[S o�cwuuzu cNrno r5mwu �
=;.•, L _ — r -1 i I _ _ R.A CE I / I_ ■[\ \I )\\• ! I RrlrN/. oMAsiT.1.� mi¢n[v[; E°o �v)e 5� ;aCo[o :�. [:orNi�or co°�rrs minnx oos � s
V 1
I
J—�L l I i i 9E E p o:wE�o°`'s"
f K:w °w;"
IX
� I 1 I on s [n ro.,cM.oR nnu [T my sMNP H°[cw n
I NL m MITI
ul '�• I M:°•w . [n Nw : 1 t 1 1 i
PHN [.[[LMR. MATING ANP
I ! i A' N'\" t • / � Y' '� � I r ` � \) `\ \ � \I II wMmMrzN sa"P[rzP ro [n•NL�:H P1o�NPPww.
Y
I• I / 1 III • 1 EXCELSIORS-1
ON FALL L
TO -1.
orBRSN)
REAM BMN x�OTC.
ALDr+cs swrtxix
STBUFiCR / I� H TEMP. SLOPE
1 �r s prose -t 1 \ BASIN NOTES o ! B
t. — TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND CONVERTED TDA W
A \\l PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE ONLY AFTER ALL g RBED DRAINAGE
SEDIMENT f
AREAS ME STABUEEO, RESULTING DISCHARGE BERM SHALL BE • �'''
LEVEL AND THE ENTIRE SCOUR HOLE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS
SHryNx IN irtE PREFORMED SCOUR NOLE DETA4 (E DN SHEET 1),
1 �� - ' /•\ \ 1 \ T TFMN1 TIE ee.xMEMT A•W a i0 BE CONSTRUCTED DURING
I •' pp _ / \ \ J 1 \\ CLGRNG AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS. EDPRCNT BASIN J TO
i
REMAIN IN PLACE UTIL ALL CONTIBUTING DISTURBED DRAINAGE
/ _ • • 1 RLL m� 1 m / /// / •(, ✓' y MEAS ME STABILIZED. see "B PAn / �•_3 CM[y±R�••Tv,u • n
" ® 8 XXX '-m2• CON TRUCTION SEOVENCE THE ENTIRE
E
PREFORMED I / TEMPORAMT WIN 5 LOWED WITHIN THE BLAGING's STRUCTURAL J n
nu zoxE. O NN
cc
T1 ^ W
11
i "\. �' I-8inq •S - /\ SEDIMENTBAsIE .4�a lO.i
4 II l ] SEDwENT(EYSEDBIENT 1 Or
w I ! ll �J j \, .\ ONSURFACCELL 511A OTEs T.Is SHEET). O •j W a=Z
___ )
®/ f ='� 1: \ \\ (SEE SEDIMENT BASIN H F
// it p,P \`\ •� \ __ ; ________F'�-\ ;\_ NOTfs THIS sNEn). I _j Y?=
911 DIN PAD / 58- ONcTRU .TION O N. W OBDm
_ l (I
/ \, x \ • THE PERIMETER FILL SLOPES OF THE BULGING PAD OR T BE w(I O
_ _ _ _ _' _ _- _ \ \ \ 1 .1 CONSTpuCTEO PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PAD, AND PRIOR i0 RCMOVING G W C
_ ` \ \•p\ \ SB -3 TO FORM A BERM. O
J
\AL \ • THE BUILDING PAD FILL MEA S—BE FILLED A"D COMPACTED PROM O f m�Y
THE PERIMETER BERM IMYARD TOWW 3. = VJ I� 1L f•
AA
\ I \ 1 AS FILL MFRS INSIOE TIE PERIMETER BERM RISE (ABOVE ELEVATpN O y0C)
!SJ). THE STORM MATER RUN-OFF (ROMNG BACK TOWMD 58-J) 6
l ��� A lA°P \ L• \ I \O� SINLL SHORNBE DIVERTED TO THE NORM AND SOUIH ENDS OF SB -J AS W p
-- "�--� _�-/ I; - - �`` -r-~- ` \ I •\. LATHER PERMIRING (l OR J DATS DRY) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL O
—URBED UMCS / - .���— - \ \ \ \ REMOVE SB -3 AND SK(AAMER, AND COMPLETE THE BUILpNG PAD FILL
_ _ \$ t CONPACnGN OPERAT*.
..; _ I \ �
/ `-' ° _ ' I gITURBEO LINK' \. {L \ • THE BUILDING FOOTINGS, COMPACTED STONE BASE• AND BLIGING
2.10 ACRES �- ��-- _ +_ v{` \ SLAB SINLL BE CONSTRUCTED IMMEONTELY THERGRER. APRT ��
/ �/ 3,l0 ACRES \,\. esMm
QV*' ��' OP oPE RAIN Ox TP.) •\ paw w
pNiyo°. \ jMo 'LOPE GRAIN
Y�iSVS. iffiB:.w WETLWD MRIfiTION MG \ 1 TONT SHED AS GRADELL LOPE RISES \�
TEMPORARY CLGN MATER C 1 \ ` \
°••'• AM.'S DNERSION DrtcN Q L \ J{VWn
ESTAB— GROUND COVER
WITHIN) GAYS TEMPORARY CLGN YIATER \ \
D IDR MATTING LINED DRCn B EXCELSIOR B D ON DIOCH 5 \\ TEMPORMV MVERSIOx OIrCH C E \ AS NOTED
30 0 3o w e0 AS SIgWN B WRING ON a ESTABuSN GRD OVER wR
OIFSRE ORNNAGE MG TD 2:1 CUT SLOPE WRNIN TUMYS \ �Ds5BM1. ESiABUs WOUND" e \
DNERSION - 1,12 AC. EXCELSIOR MATT1.G INED DICH B \ COMER WIMIN T DA's \ 10-01-18
SCRk t' - ro' Exn BNN:E AMA,— DO' OFF'ITE SiYAGWNMG i0 EXCELSIOR MATCNG LINED DITCH B
DNERSION - I.ID AC. As -- e

FRAME ! COIFR
2' DM OPEMNG 115 FOIJIIDRY MODEL 15F669
GRWT OIC EOWL
Y WX.
ADJUSTED
ROJIJ
FDR 27' TXRU 36' 60' DNLIETER 6'
ANDS
RHWAS REmWMFD
1RENCX J
CBc nu
DE t/2- .= JON'
WNKRE FRAYf AND C R SINS KIT EMEND ABOVE FINRWEO
N ORADC TNCS
CONCENTRIC
OR ECC[N
CONE SECTION
PR —
ALL PK CRWOY SEWER I.E.
6' MANHOLE STEPS 16'
ON CENTER (FIRST STEP
PRECAST SE 1T AS
1'-0' FROM TOP Of
CONE SM"t WT
REDD. IDSE .D' SEClIDNS
AS NECESSARY IN UEU
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DETAIL n
STEP 2'-0' NMR. FROM
CONCRETE 11ILL BOTTOM)
OF ADJIISiWG RIK:3 IN
GBTAINNIG TOP ELEV.)
NO _LE -
FILL OPENING AROUND
MONOUTXC
RCP NON NON-SNRWN
GROUT AFTER PIPE
BASE SECTbN
IMS BEEN INSTALLED.
INVERT M PIPE
COMPACTED
SUBGPADE
� 4 MIN GWNUGP
6' MIN.
ITYP)
EWTERNL
UNDER MANANKRE
SOY • 4PRECAST /
COMCRER ORALE INLET
TPAXS. N/24' Al' \ CONGVE DARER —
OPEKNG CWeFRAME t OWE
CONCRETE SLAB USF MODEL 4137-6234
46Y PRECAST - OR APPROVED E.
CONCRETE MH ��
8' MIG( MALLS LONCRCR nLL TOP ELEVATpN AS
ENSH CRAOE ORATE S_ CN PUNS
SLIIDtl
CATCH BASIN TOP OF MH n
NO SCALE pESC
TgMNE FUT 407TDM TRENCH; —FILL JOB EIGVATED
\ WTERNL TD CENTEALRJE OF PVF AT 95R
QSTFNNWDy$PER,O M. ASTM DBRB OR D4253,54
ALL,
WCTIIE IRON WATER UNE, SEWER LINE,
OR RCP CULVERT PWWD
USE- E
��A�ND LESS A6�DW�IEIER ��S,
ixPE SCnunTlnN
\\ tYPFI
FDR 27' TXRU 36' 60' DNLIETER 6'
PSK D i0 rrs CENIFPLIK INPE
1RENCX J
CBc nu
WNKRE FRAYf AND C R SINS KIT EMEND ABOVE FINRWEO
PIE D IN a INCHES MINIMUM SAND. GRANUTAIC
WTEIINL, M GRAVEL TO DEPTH OF 1/6 K RPE
GRADE. WIHRIu -NT OF TNTC ONT WY BE V6E0 TO C0.ER
ADJUSRNG RINGS K STN MWHO(E HEIDNT PRDNIBIR {AMIE
PR —
ALL PK CRWOY SEWER I.E.
ON( -LACKS MN); SELECT JOB E%GVATCD WTERNL
COYPKTCO TD a LACKS ABOVE lOP Of RPE Ar
r0 BE INSTALLED AT pKTIND GRADE.
RSR STAKMAD PROCTOR. A6TY D6R6 DR D4Y33.54.
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DETAIL n
,.', -..
ALL ER LINE AND Pvc FORCE LWN.
ALL " PNC WATER AT
NO _LE -
►a glow
r
PRESSURE PIPE FITTING RESTRAINT DgT"
NO—
DM .
DRANAOF ARG _ 0.35 K.
t•o.ro. NR•6.�. F—,
O�e•1.56 CFS
SDWRE PREF
SCWR NCR
RIPNP IN BA
SKWM c FOR C
LINER: CGSS B RIPRAP
WRX TYPE 2 FLTER FABRIC
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL
R-
ui
W n
�n
N r M
ONEO
0 Z I
cn11
O
J
SWC
S M
(1) v
00
Sf
ixPE SCnunTlnN
TREtRICnJ
CBc nu
PSK D i0 rrs CENIFPLIK INPE
DRAKNAR INTERN. R INCHES UNDER PIPE;
TED DPANULAR OR 4WD WTERNL TD 4
IRDOI TOP OF RPE AT RSR STANDARD
INCHES ABOVE
PROCTOR, ASTM DO90 OR D4253,54.
PR —
ALL PK CRWOY SEWER I.E.
PIPE EMBEDMENT DETAILS n
W 9GEE
►a glow
r
PRESSURE PIPE FITTING RESTRAINT DgT"
NO—
DM .
DRANAOF ARG _ 0.35 K.
t•o.ro. NR•6.�. F—,
O�e•1.56 CFS
SDWRE PREF
SCWR NCR
RIPNP IN BA
SKWM c FOR C
LINER: CGSS B RIPRAP
WRX TYPE 2 FLTER FABRIC
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL
R-
ui
W n
�n
N r M
ONEO
0 Z I
cn11
O
J
SWC
S M
(1) v
00
Sf

81��' 90 JN "NOl•JN17tl08 d0 AL0
N0I1100r •JNI01NI8 039040Hd
� 1ss—a0C(sr�) rlj b S1N3WlHVdV N00N81SV3 a t c
LLSLZ ON 'O1313H1IWS i = a
1338iS ON003S Hinos SWIM ¢ '
10N1N00 NOISOU3
sY L II t
i
t
a -
$ q o w s s
g Y Y. Y Ji Ll lie V' i
2dd SS i W IH$ pyyyM
R Y¢ 4a EYtls ■S E� p5 W
to3 w�
h HISIF : • J f/1 m
I all al
3 gR jig 114 4t d w
_ ss4 112 511 9gg 11 l33:3
a
a p gg h
-
i y I Ufa �a'¢4R'3#�9 'eqH i i_i R
S w io
< gas r rd r r ;
N1.4
.h F?pig r r'r i t $•'a r 9 aT !mq g
qq RFs"AA'g9 CKs
g,.
dj}d fYf rn
a
g
[ ff 5t
i
�3yn F
till
OWN, �
� �
OR
X CL
I
Rj
$g
3V
a
s

— l PIAME G LECEND —
OOTPRINT I 1 _ _ _ _ - T'`-` R�IMMiNs.xJ � NEM fi1HOPY iRF6 ODERWS SMUM.Rp SNUWRD GK
�
M. 00- M5.37 � 1RUERsroRr JI¢rs "41EUNCHIER MBORFA XR\M:EBFARY
I — I — —�- `• I I ® SCHRUBS RFA NROINICN HENRrs —NET
ALL UND—NG S— CGMPLY VTTH sECTNIN ]x.11": IINDYIYING
OF THE cm GF BUR 40DEVELOPMENT MN—E IATEST
F-
REMSEN.
I 1 1 I N
—�--J ---1 I m sTIA MCI,
FTPmNi 1 � I a — � I _-•_•_--_— __---
1--
_-e0• EXISTING VEOU—N MEETS M EXCEEDS---�__—
�_IANDSCAP1. REWREMENTS IN THIS MFA N I —__-- —
I
_ _
_ _ E5,..NM1L�
°MRXWGIyMCEs yr�n..a so -«t vle,ex,e rn,d ,'•'`i
I
v"GES /II I 1 I 1 IlkI I I I 1 1 / I I� pb�pl) I B Sn? Quo, ., J-` o ui.«: R«w.a (x / ,00•)
Setup. R.Wirce (I] / 100')- 15 R.Rb
wnmlep rn.n a
�I I I .`M� C--
- - 9G alum ant
J J — I I I I 1 RIM 51".N C+ ] O Canox R.4'N neantmY I. R«uN.e (x
i_ — — = L 1 I I I R WV d S]J.NI 11M1M1 F. ®sI,— Repuine (15 / 100')- I" R«O
Ai a '. -- \ `n I sBx•]a•.et
--------------
-------- - _
x.I. I" . 2W E«rA Bro.NW.P.n,„ W
w^
" M
O N o
zVcy)
OZp
NSM
2 W �
D 2 M
N /-v
N
a
(YID
S �W
JWB/
JEAN«
A$ NOTED
10-01-2010
T 7
I
♦
\ \I
H
€
I
I
�f � .�
.
DISTURBED OMITS
♦ x.ID ADRES�
\ \ \
I
E+� i m
Z
I )
\
—
I
knig/
i
I I
i
1
-- ___________J
E%IANDSGPwO RMETS EOUNIEMEMS N tIISE"RFA.
---,-----�----
1
-
EXSTING VECflTIO"N /NEER DR
cI------------
EREOUI'EMEM9IN MIs_____,_-_
I
a I
A. \
\ \ \b
— — —
/
® ®0
®
®
® ® ®
®
----------
___
0 I -C.1
epinere SN. olamine ram rr"I
®
®
®
I—
R I-
\\\
O ®
®tC—
® ® a
® ®O
... (1 / 1. \ \
Un«ntery Tn.« R«uir« (x
®®O
® ® ®
® ® I
®Sana R«ei..e
(15 / IaD�)- a Rp'R
® O ®
a
C.«°y Tr«.
�•
" R«•e
Unp.nbry Tr.« R.RUM« (x / 100')
Staup. -- (11 / 100•)- . R.°'e
,n
x e 0, s M N
x.I. I" . 2W E«rA Bro.NW.P.n,„ W
w^
" M
O N o
zVcy)
OZp
NSM
2 W �
D 2 M
N /-v
N
a
(YID
S �W
JWB/
JEAN«
A$ NOTED
10-01-2010
T 7

®o®:
lTE sssia
s
+/ F J I
I
B
u�
'L�u
/ 1 1
®E
� '�, 1•� _._
X,
—
1 1
I
I
I
.• I
I
Ag \� r'v^
UTILITY PLAN
STORMWATER PLAN
418 SOUTH SECOND STREET
QOII SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
j [phone]
Enrironnrn,nl
lTE sssia
s
+/ F J I
I
B
Ag \� r'v^
UTILITY PLAN
STORMWATER PLAN
418 SOUTH SECOND STREET
QOII SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
j [phone]
Enrironnrn,nl
lTE sssia
+/ F J I
I
1/$
u�
'L�u
/ 1 1
� '�, 1•� _._
m.._ �I �--- — g= I � to
_
_ I
Fj IL
y
I�
uog ��x
, -- •�—_ �F 1
e
4 rI
Ag \� r'v^
UTILITY PLAN
STORMWATER PLAN
418 SOUTH SECOND STREET
QOII SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
j [phone]
Enrironnrn,nl
lTE sssia
� Ry Ste€
•
1/$
'L�u
/ 1 1
Ag \� r'v^
UTILITY PLAN
STORMWATER PLAN
418 SOUTH SECOND STREET
QOII SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
j [phone]
Enrironnrn,nl

71'r
oft's
SOL- ILI' I